SLM Corp (SLM)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > SIC Major Group 61 > SIC 6141 Personal Credit Institutions
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1032033. Latest filing source: 0001032033-26-000011.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Business
Read SLM's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.
Risk Factors
Read SLM's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2,627,255,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Net income | 744,847,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Assets | 29,746,295,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-19. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001032033.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,077,246,000 | 1,437,303,000 | 1,935,352,000 | 2,331,032,000 | 2,021,660,000 | 1,776,844,000 | 2,031,580,000 | 2,592,303,000 | 2,619,046,000 | 2,627,255,000 | ||||||
| Net income | 250,327,000 | 288,934,000 | 487,476,000 | 578,276,000 | 880,690,000 | 1,160,513,000 | 469,014,000 | 581,391,000 | 608,325,000 | 744,847,000 | ||||||
| Diluted EPS | 0.53 | 0.62 | 1.07 | 1.30 | 2.25 | 3.61 | 1.76 | 2.41 | 2.68 | 3.46 | ||||||
| Operating cash flow | -199,023,000 | -171,159,000 | -102,741,000 | -15,641,000 | -182,669,000 | -49,522,000 | 4,992,000 | -144,637,000 | -329,395,000 | -398,581,000 | ||||||
| Dividends paid | 264,000,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 51,114,000 | 46,351,000 | 60,462,000 | 112,961,000 | 101,233,000 | 99,172,000 | 107,691,000 | ||||||
| Share buybacks | 600,000,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 167,201,000 | 558,167,000 | 1,530,683,000 | 713,197,000 | 350,264,000 | 247,968,000 | 368,736,000 | ||||||
| Assets | 18,533,003,000 | 21,779,584,000 | 26,638,173,000 | 32,686,479,000 | 30,770,423,000 | 29,221,899,000 | 28,811,029,000 | 29,169,468,000 | 30,072,110,000 | 29,746,295,000 | ||||||
| Liabilities | 16,185,945,000 | 19,305,328,000 | 23,665,517,000 | 29,374,643,000 | 28,207,588,000 | 27,072,188,000 | 27,084,059,000 | 27,288,671,000 | 27,912,190,000 | 27,294,937,000 | ||||||
| Stockholders' equity | 5,278,609,000 | 5,012,000,000 | 5,243,000,000 | 5,060,000,000 | 1,161,471,000 | 1,829,958,000 | 1,726,970,000 | 1,880,797,000 | 2,159,920,000 | 2,451,358,000 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,918,793,000 | 1,534,339,000 | 2,559,106,000 | 5,563,877,000 | 4,455,292,000 | 4,334,603,000 | 4,616,117,000 | 4,149,838,000 | 4,700,366,000 | 4,241,265,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 23.24% | 20.10% | 25.19% | 24.81% | 43.56% | 65.31% | 23.09% | 22.43% | 23.23% | 28.35% | ||||||
| Return on equity | 27.16% | 30.91% | 28.16% | 30.39% | ||||||||||||
| Return on assets | 1.35% | 1.33% | 1.83% | 1.77% | 2.86% | 3.97% | 1.63% | 1.99% | 2.02% | 2.50% | ||||||
| Liabilities / equity | 15.68 | 14.51 | 12.92 | 11.13 |
Industry Peer Context
Net margin peer context
ROE peer context
ROA peer context
Financial Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: InterestAndDividendIncomeOperating. Source concepts: us-gaap:InterestAndDividendIncomeOperating.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001032033-26-000011; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue. Source concepts: us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue.
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-07-23. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001032033.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | 0.29 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | 0.47 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 1.10 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 652,250,000 | 29,365,000 | 0.11 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 668,550,000 | 168,443,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 663,558,000 | 289,931,000 | 1.27 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 641,476,000 | 251,993,000 | 1.11 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 652,639,000 | -45,152,000 | -0.23 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 661,373,000 | 111,553,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 656,090,000 | 304,540,000 | 1.40 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 656,759,000 | 71,272,000 | 0.32 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 657,587,000 | 135,850,000 | 0.63 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 656,819,000 | 233,185,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 649,309,000 | 307,954,000 | 1.54 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2026-Q2 | 2026-06-30 | 602,055,000 | 58,525,000 | 0.29 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001032033-26-000042; filed 2026-07-23. Concept: InterestAndDividendIncomeOperating. Source concepts: us-gaap:InterestAndDividendIncomeOperating.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001032033-26-000042; filed 2026-07-23. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001032033-26-000042; filed 2026-07-23. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0001032033-26-000042.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
The following information should be read in connection with SLM Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 19, 2026) (the “2025 Form 10-K”), and subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Definitions for capitalized terms used in this report not defined herein can be found in the 2025 Form 10-K.
References in this Form 10-Q to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Sallie Mae,” “SLM,” and the “Company” refer to SLM Corporation and its subsidiaries, except as otherwise indicated or unless the context otherwise requires.
This report contains “forward-looking statements” and information based on management’s current expectations as of the date of this report. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs, opinions, expectations, and/or statements that assume or are dependent upon future events, are forward-looking statements. These include, but are not limited to, the strategies, goals, and assumptions of the Company; the Company’s expectation and ability to execute loan sales (including sales under the Company’s strategic partnership) and share repurchases; the Company’s expectation and ability to pay a quarterly cash dividend on the Company’s common stock in the future, subject to approval of the Board of Directors; the Company’s 2026 guidance; the Company’s three-year horizon outlook; the Company’s credit outlook; the impact of acquisitions the Company has made or may make in the future; the Company’s projections regarding originations, net charge-offs, non-interest expenses, earnings, balance sheet position, and other metrics; any estimates related to accounting standard changes; and any estimates related to the impact of changes in credit administration practices, including the results of simulations or other behavioral observations.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the Company’s control, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting the Company will be as anticipated by management. The Company cautions readers that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, implied by, or projected in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks and uncertainties set forth in Item 1A., “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in the Company’s most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC; increases in financing costs; limits on liquidity; increases in costs associated with compliance with laws and regulations; failure to comply with consumer protection, banking, and other laws or regulations; changes in laws, regulations, and supervisory expectations, especially in light of the goals of the current federal administration; the ability to timely develop new products and services and the acceptance of those products and services by potential and existing customers; changes in accounting standards and related changes in significant accounting estimates, including those regarding the measurement of the Company’s allowance for credit losses and the related provision expense; any adverse outcomes in significant litigation to which the Company is a party; credit risk associated with the Company’s exposure to third parties, including counterparties to the Company’s derivative transactions; the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management framework and quantitative models; changes in the terms of education loans and the educational credit marketplace (including changes resulting from new laws and the implementation of existing laws); and changes in the demand for the Company’s deposit products, including changes caused by new or emerging market entrants or technologies. The Company could also be affected by, among other things, changes in funding costs and availability; reductions to credit ratings; cybersecurity incidents, cyberattacks, risks related to artificial intelligence (“AI”), and other failures or breaches of operating systems or infrastructure, including those of third-party vendors; the societal, demographic, business, and legislative/regulatory impacts of pandemics, other public health crises, severe weather events, and/or natural disasters; damage to reputation; risks associated with restructuring initiatives, including failures to successfully implement cost-cutting programs and the adverse effects of such initiatives on the business; changes in the demand for higher education, educational financing, or financing preferences of lenders, educational institutions, students, and their families, including changes to the amount or availability of funding that educational institutions, students, or their families receive from government sources; changes in laws and regulations with respect to the student lending business and financial institutions generally; changes in banking rules and regulations, including increased capital requirements; increased competition from banks and other consumer lenders; changes in customer creditworthiness; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships among relevant money-market instruments and those of earning assets versus funding arrangements; rates of prepayments on loans owned by the Company; and changes in general economic or macroeconomic conditions, including, but not limited to, changes due to inflation, stagflation, recession, shifts in the labor market, and changes to government policies or initiatives, such as tariffs, trade wars, wars, immigration, and student visa policies, which could negatively impact consumer or business sentiment, demand for higher education, demand for student loans, financial and business results and/or modeling, and the ability to successfully effectuate any
51
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, or initiatives. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements also requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions, including estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates or assumptions may prove to be incorrect.
All forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are expressly qualified in their entirety by the factors, risks, and uncertainties set forth in the foregoing cautionary statements, and are made only as of the date of this report. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update, supplement, or revise any forward-looking statements or estimates to conform to actual results or changes in the Company’s expectations, nor to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were made. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements or estimates discussed herein.
Selected Financial Information and Ratios
| (In thousands, except per share data and percentages) | Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | ||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 54,944 | $ | 67,300 | $ | 359,343 | $ | 367,884 | |||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 1.85 | $ | 1.72 | |||||||
| Weighted average shares used to compute diluted earnings per common share | 190,384 | 213,220 | 194,109 | 214,098 | |||||||||||
| Return on Assets(1) | 0.8 | % | 1.0 | % | 2.5 | % | 2.6 | % | |||||||
| Efficiency ratio(2) | 48.6 | % | 41.4 | % | 38.1 | % | 32.7 | % | |||||||
| Other Operating Statistics (Held for Investment) | |||||||||||||||
| Ending Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,531,493 | $ | 21,160,332 | $ | 19,531,493 | $ | 21,160,332 | |||||||
| Average education loans | $ | 21,119,086 | $ | 22,561,636 | $ | 22,226,216 | $ | 22,738,295 | |||||||
| (1) We calculate and report our Return on Assets as the ratio of (a) GAAP net income numerator (annualized) to (b) the GAAP total average assets denominator. | |||||||||||||||
| (2) We calculate and report on our Efficiency ratio as the ratio of (a) GAAP total non-interest expenses to (b) the sum of GAAP net interest income plus GAAP total non-interest income. |
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026.
Strategic Imperatives
To further focus our business and increase stockholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our primary focus is driving innovation to maximize the sustainable growth and profitability of our core private student loan business. Additionally, we aim to accelerate the growth of new lines of business to attract more customers requiring our products and services. We are also focused on building the data infrastructure, technology, and talent required to compete in a digital world. We seek to create a customer-centric brand as an education solutions company that supports students and families through their higher education journey. We are focused on driving greater internal commitment to our mission, brand, and strategy, while we evolve our structure and risk capabilities to support our core private student loan business and emerging new businesses.
Key Financial Measures
Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
A brief summary of our key financial measures (net interest income and net interest margin; loan sales and secured financings; allowance for credit losses; charge-offs and delinquencies; operating expenses; Private Education Loan originations; and funding sources) can be found in Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2025 Form 10-K.
52
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
[[GREPCENT_TABLE]]
[["(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)","","Three Months Ended June 30,","","Increase(Decrease)","","Six Months Ended June 30,","","Increase(Decrease)"],["","2026","","2025","","$","","%","","2026","","2025","","$","","%"],["Interest income:"],["Loans","","$","540","","","$","598","","","$","(58)","","","(10)","%","","$","1,142","","","$","1,196","","","$","(54)","","","(5)","%"],["Investments","","17","","","14","","","3","","","21","","","32","","","28","","","4","","","14"],["Cash and cash equivalents","","45","","","45","","","\u2014","","","\u2014","","","77","","","88","","","(11)","","","(13)"],["Total interest income","","602","","","657","","","(55)","","","(8)","","","1,251","","","1,313","","","(61)","","","(5)"],["Total interest expense","","269","","","280","","","(11)","","","(4)","","","543","","","561","","","(18)","","","(3)"],["Net interest income","","333","","","377","","",
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures and information contained in “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Changes to Federal Student Loan Programs
On July 4, 2025, H.R.1 (“H.R.1”) was enacted into law. H.R.1 implements significant reforms to the federal student loan program, including:
•Limiting Parent PLUS loans to $20,000 per student, per year, with an aggregate, per student limit of $65,000;
•Eliminating Graduate PLUS loans, which previously allowed graduate students to borrow up to the full cost of attendance; and
•Limiting the amount graduate students can borrow to $20,500 per year with a $100,000 lifetime limit, and the amount professional graduate students can borrow to $50,000 per year with a $200,000 lifetime limit through the Unsubsidized Stafford loan program (these amounts are in addition to the amount borrowed for undergraduate education).
All federal student loan program changes are to be effective for new borrowers beginning July 1, 2026, and will not apply to borrowers who begin borrowing prior to that date.
We anticipate that these changes to the federal student loan program will present opportunities for a gradual and positive impact on our overall Private Student Loan originations volume in the coming years.
As we continue the near-term planning, growth, and scaling of our origination expansion initiative and our strategic partnership funding model, we may see trends or uncertainties from increased marketing, technology, infrastructure, and operational costs, which may result in margin and/or expense pressures. These expected investments are necessary to support the execution of these new initiatives, which address anticipated increases in demand for Private Education Loans and related financial products (particularly in light of recent changes to federal higher education funding).
Strategic Imperatives
To further focus our business and increase stockholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our primary focus is driving innovation to maximize the sustainable growth and profitability of our core private student loan business. Additionally, we aim to accelerate the growth of new lines of business to attract more customers requiring our products and services. We are also focused on building the data infrastructure, technology, and talent required to compete in a digital world. We seek to create a customer-centric brand as an education solutions company that supports students and families through their higher education journey. We are focused on driving greater internal commitment to our mission, brand, and strategy, while we evolve our structure and risk capabilities to support our core private student loan business and emerging new businesses.
Key Financial Measures
Set forth below are brief summaries of our key financial measures. Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 47
by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Most of our earnings are generated from the interest income earned on assets in our education loan portfolios, net of the interest expense we pay on the funding for those loans. We report these earnings as net interest income. The majority of our interest income comes from our Private Education Loan portfolio.
We also often refer to the net interest margin, which is the net interest yield earned on our interest-earning assets less the rate paid on our related interest-bearing liabilities. As interest rates change, changes in the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities tend to lag slightly compared to changes in the yields on our interest-earning assets, which could impact our net interest margin in any given period.
Loan Sales and Secured Financings
We may sell loans to third parties through whole loan sales, including loans sold to strategic partners, securitizations, or other similar transactions. We typically retain servicing of loans subsequent to their sale and earn revenue for this servicing at prevailing market rates for such services and also earn fee revenue for program management services for loans sold to strategic partners. Selling loans removes the loan assets from our balance sheet and helps us manage our asset growth, capital, and liquidity needs. Alternatively, we may use loans as collateral in connection with the creation of asset-backed securitizations or secured funding facilities structured as financings. These types of transactions may provide us long-term financing, but they do not remove loan assets from our balance sheet, nor do they generate gains on sales of loans, net. Consequently, our operating results may be significantly affected by whether we choose to sell loans and recognize current gains on sale or continue to hold or finance loans, thereby retaining some or all the net interest income from those loans. In 2025, we recognized $369 million in gains from the sale of approximately $4.95 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $4.53 billion of principal and $422 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third parties.
For additional information regarding these transactions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment” and Note 11, “Borrowings — Unconsolidated Funding Vehicles” in this Form 10-K.
During the fourth quarter of 2025, we transferred $933 million from loans held for investment to loans held for sale as we intended to sell the loans to a leading global investment firm (the “Strategic Partner”). In January 2026, we sold the loans to the Strategic Partner. The transaction qualified for sale treatment and removed the balance of the loans from our balance sheet on the settlement date. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6, “Loans Held for Sale”.
During the third quarter of 2024, we transferred our remaining FFELP Loan portfolio to loans held for sale and subsequently sold the FFELP Loan portfolio to an unaffiliated third party in the fourth quarter of 2024. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment”.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management estimates and maintains an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date. See “ — Critical Accounting Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Item 7. Allowances for credit losses are an important indicator of management’s perspective on the future performance of a loan portfolio. Each quarter, management makes an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses to reflect its most up-to-date estimate of future losses by recording a charge against quarterly revenues known as provision expense. As they occur, actual loan charge-offs and recoveries are then charged or credited, respectively, against the allowance for credit losses rather than against earnings.
The allowance for credit losses and provision expense rise in periods of high loan origination, when future charge-offs are expected to increase, and fall when future charge-offs are expected to decline. We bear the full credit exposure on our Private Education Loans. Losses on our Private Education Loans are affected by risk characteristics such as loan status (in-school, grace, forbearance, repayment, and delinquency), loan seasoning (number of months in active repayment), underwriting criteria (e.g., credit scores), presence of a cosigner, servicing and collections practices, and the current economic environment. See Item 1A “Risk Factors — CREDIT RISK — Defaults on our loans could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows” for additional information. Losses typically emerge once a borrower separates from school and enters full principal and interest repayment after the borrower’s grace
48 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
period (six months, typically) ends. As a larger proportion of our Private Education Loan portfolio enters full principal and interest repayment in the coming years, we would expect the dollar amount of charge-offs to increase.
Prior to the sale of our remaining FFELP Loan portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2024, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense was small because we generally bore a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to the federal guarantee on such loans. We maintained an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses.
Charge-Offs and Delinquencies
Delinquencies are another important indicator of potential future credit performance. Private Education Loans are charged off at the end of the month in which they reach 120 days delinquent or otherwise when the loans are classified as a loss by us or our regulator. Charge-off data provides relevant information with respect to the actual performance of a loan portfolio over time. Management focuses on delinquencies as well as the progression of loans from early to late stage delinquency as a key metric in estimating the allowance for credit losses and tailoring its future collections strategies. We sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off, and use in-house collectors and third-party collectors to collect on retained defaulted loans.
As part of our new strategic partnership funding model, we plan to sell newly originated loans for the first time. This shift to selling younger loans is expected to change the composition of our loans in repayment portfolio (which does not include loans held for sale), as loans sold will be younger at the point of sale than in prior periods. As a result, we expect to see increases to our credit metrics that are calculated as percentages using "loans in repayment" as the denominator, including but not limited to, net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment and delinquencies as a percentage of loans in repayment.
Operating Expenses
The cost of operating our business directly affects our profitability. We strive to manage growth in our business in a prudent fashion by focusing on investments to improve efficiency and while capturing anticipated growth opportunities, including our origination expansion initiative and other initiatives. We monitor and report internally various metrics, including cost to acquire and cost to service our loans (which include both owned and serviced loans), among others. We also monitor and report our efficiency ratio, which is calculated as total non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income plus total non-interest income. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the efficiency ratio was 33.2 percent, 34.7 percent, and 37.9 percent, respectively. The cost to acquire is affected by such variables as technology, personnel, and marketing costs. Servicing expenses primarily include compensation and benefit expenses related to our collections, customer support, and payment processing employees, and technology costs and other expenses associated with facilitating and servicing borrowers. Costs to service can vary period to period based upon seasonality and borrower payment status. The cost to service a delinquent borrower is significantly higher than the cost to service a current or in-school borrower.
Private Education Loan Originations
Private Education Loans are the principal asset on our balance sheet, and the amount of new Private Education Loan originations we generate each year is a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.
Funding Sources
Though we rely primarily on deposits, loan sales, and loan securitizations to fund our loan originations, we also have access to a multi-lender secured borrowing facility (the “Secured Borrowing Facility”) and, from time to time, we access the debt capital markets through unsecured bond issuances. For additional information, see “—Borrowings — Long-term Borrowings” below in this Item 7.
Deposits
We utilize brokered, retail, and other core deposits to meet funding needs and enhance our liquidity position. These deposits can be term or liquid deposits. Our term brokered deposits have original terms from three months to ten years. Retail deposits are sourced through a direct banking platform and serve as an important source of diversified funding. Brokered deposits are sourced through a network of brokers and provide a stable source of funding. In addition, we accept certain deposits considered non-brokered that are held in large accounts structured to allow FDIC insurance to
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 49
flow through to underlying individual depositors. We further diversify our funding sources with deposits from Educational 529 savings plans and Health Savings plans.
Loan Sales
We use proceeds from loan sales to fund Private Education Loan originations, share repurchase programs, and other activities. Historically, we have sold portfolios of Private Education Loans as one-off, seasoned loan sales. As part of our new strategic partnership funding model, we will sell newly originated and not fully-disbursed Private Education Loans to strategic partners, and also plan to continue to execute sales of seasoned Private Education Loans.
Loan Securitizations
Term ABS financing provides long-term funding for our Private Education Loan portfolio at attractive interest rates and at terms that effectively match the average life of the assets. Loans associated with these transactions will remain on our balance sheet if we retain the residual interest in the related trusts.
50 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 vs. 2024 | 2024 vs. 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 2,392 | $ | 2,314 | $ | 2,327 | $ | 78 | 3 | % | $ | (13) | (1) | % | ||||||||||||
| Investments | 59 | 61 | 51 | (2) | (3) | 10 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 176 | 243 | 214 | (67) | (28) | 29 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 2,627 | 2,619 | 2,592 | 9 | — | 26 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 1,125 | 1,138 | 1,030 | (13) | (1) | 108 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 1,502 | 1,481 | 1,562 | 22 | 1 | (82) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: provisions for credit losses | 333 | 409 | 345 | (76) | (19) | 64 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provisions for credit losses | 1,169 | 1,072 | 1,217 | 97 | 9 | (145) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of loans, net | 369 | 255 | 160 | 114 | 45 | 95 | 59 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on securities, net | (10) | — | 3 | (10) | (100) | (3) | (100) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 123 | 113 | 84 | 10 | 9 | 29 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 483 | 368 | 247 | 114 | 31 | 121 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 656 | 637 | 619 | 19 | 3 | 18 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acquired intangible assets impairment and amortization expense | 4 | 5 | 66 | (1) | (20) | (61) | (92) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expenses | 659 | 642 | 685 | 17 | 3 | (43) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 993 | 798 | 778 | 195 | 24 | 20 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 248 | 190 | 197 | 58 | 31 | (7) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 745 | 608 | 581 | 137 | 23 | 27 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 16 | 18 | 18 | (2) | (11) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 729 | $ | 590 | $ | 564 | $ | 139 | 24 | % | $ | 26 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 3.52 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 2.44 | $ | 0.79 | 29 | % | $ | 0.29 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 3.46 | $ | 2.68 | $ | 2.41 | $ | 0.78 | 29 | % | $ | 0.27 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||
| Declared dividends per common share | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.06 | 13 | % | $ | 0.02 | 5 | % |
Note: Due to rounding, amounts in this table may not sum to totals.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 51
GAAP Consolidated Earnings Summary
Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2024
For the year ended December 31, 2025, net income was $745 million, or $3.46 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $608 million, or $2.68 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2024. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to an increase in total net interest income, a decrease in provisions for credit losses, and an increase in gains on sales of loans, net, and other income, which were offset by an increase in total non-interest expense.
The primary contributors to the drivers of change in net income for the current year period compared with the year-ago period are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2025 increased by $22 million compared with the year-ago period primarily due to a $1.5 billion increase in average Private Education Loans outstanding and a 5-basis point increase in our net interest margin. Our net interest margin increased in the current period from the year-ago period primarily because our cost of funds decreased but the yields on our interest-earning assets were unchanged. Our cost of funds decreased primarily due to the decline in the 30-day average SOFR compared to the year-ago period. The yields on our interest-earning assets were unchanged compared to the year-ago period because the yields on our Private Education Loans decreased but the proportion of total interest-earning assets that were Private Education Loans is higher in the current period than the year-ago period.
•Provision for credit losses in 2025 was $333 million, compared with $409 million in the year-ago period. During 2025, the decrease in the provision for credit losses was primarily due to $297 million in negative provisions resulting from the $4.95 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2025 and the $44 million in the reversal of provision in fourth quarter of 2025 due to the transfer of loans held for sale. These drivers were offset by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, and changes in the economic outlook. In the year-ago period, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, and changes in recovery rates, offset by $236 million in negative provisions resulting from the approximately $3.69 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2024, an improved economic outlook, and changes in management overlays.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $369 million in 2025, compared with $255 million in the year-ago period. The increase in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of selling approximately $4.95 billion of Private Education Loans in 2025, compared with the sale of approximately $3.69 billion of Private Education Loans in the year-ago period.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, were $10 million of losses in 2025, compared with less than $1 million in gains in the year-ago period. The change year-over-year was primarily due to an impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2025 on certain non-marketable equity securities, and the change in mark-to-fair value of our trading investments.
•Other income was $123 million in 2025, compared with $113 million in the year-ago period. The increase in other income compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of a $13 million increase in third-party servicing fees from the year-ago period. The increase in third-party servicing fees was primarily due to an additional approximately $4.95 billion of sold loans that we continue to service on behalf of the owners of the loans. The increase in third-party servicing fees was offset by a $3 million decrease in early withdrawal penalty fee income compared to the year-ago period, which was related to a health savings account provider that redeemed its deposits early and paid an early withdrawal penalty in the first quarter of 2024.
•For the year ended December 31, 2025, total operating expenses were $656 million, compared with $637 million in the year-ago period. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily due to increased marketing spend and higher spending on information technology initiatives, offset by reduced FDIC fees and lower personnel costs.
•In 2025, we recorded $4 million in impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared with $5 million in the year-ago period. The decrease was a result of an increase in amortization recorded on our customer relationships in 2024 in accordance with the accelerated amortization method, and the impairment write-down of the Scholly partner relationships intangible asset in the fourth quarter of 2024 which resulted in no amortization on that intangible asset in the current period. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
52 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $248 million, compared with $190 million in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate increased in 2025 to 25.0 percent from 23.8 percent in the year-ago period. The increase in the effective rate for 2025 was primarily attributable to an increase in state income taxes.
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2023
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net income was $608 million, or $2.68 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $581 million, or $2.41 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to an increase in gains on sales of loans, net and other income and a decrease in total non-interest expense, which were offset by a decrease in total net interest income and an increase in provisions for credit losses.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for 2024 compared with 2023 are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2024 decreased by $82 million compared with 2023 primarily due to a 31-basis point decrease in our net interest margin and an $79 million decrease in average Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans outstanding. Our net interest margin decreased in 2024 from 2023 primarily because our cost of funds increased more than the yields on our interest-earning assets. As interest rates change, changes in the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities tend to lag compared to changes in the yields on our interest-earning assets. In a rising interest rate environment, as we experienced in 2022 and the first part of 2023, our variable-rate interest earning assets repriced faster than our cost of funds. As such, we saw an expansion in our net interest margin throughout most of 2023. As interest rates stabilized in the latter half of 2023 and into the first half of 2024, our cost of funds increased faster than our interest-earning assets yields and reduced our net interest margin.
•Provision for credit losses in 2024 was $409 million, compared with $345 million in 2023. During 2024, the increase in the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, and changes in recovery rates. These drivers were offset by $236 million in negative provisions resulting from the approximately $3.69 billion Private Education Loan sales during 2024, an improved economic outlook, and changes in management overlays. In 2023, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, slower prepayment rates, management overlays, and changes in economic outlook, which were partially offset by $205 million in negative provisions recorded as a result of the approximately $3.15 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2023 and an increase in recovery rates (as the result of a 2023 change in our defaulted loan recovery process).
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $255 million in 2024, compared with $160 million in 2023. The increase in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of selling approximately $3.69 billion of Private Education Loans in 2024, compared with the sale of approximately $3.15 billion of Private Education Loans in 2023. Additionally, we received lower sales premiums in 2023 as compared to 2024 due to movement in market interest rates in 2023. We also sold our Credit Card loan portfolio in May 2023 and recorded a $4 million loss on the sale in 2023.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, were less than $1 million in gains in 2024, compared with $3 million in gains in 2023. The decrease from 2023 was due to the change in mark-to-fair value of our trading investments.
•Other income was $113 million in 2024, compared with $84 million in 2023. The increase in other income compared with 2023 was primarily the result of a $21 million increase in third-party servicing fees from 2023. The increase in third-party servicing fees was primarily due to an additional approximately $3.7 billion of sold loans that we continue to service on behalf of the owners of the loans. There was also a $3 million increase in early withdrawal penalty fee income in 2024 compared with 2023, which was related to a health savings account provider that redeemed its deposits early and paid an early withdrawal penalty in the first quarter of 2024.
•For the year ended December 31, 2024, total operating expenses were $637 million, compared with $619 million in 2023. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by higher personnel costs, increased marketing costs, and higher FDIC assessment fees.
•In 2024, we recorded $5 million in impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared with $66 million in 2023. The decrease is a result of the impairment write-down of the Nitro trade name intangible asset taken in the fourth quarter of 2023. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 9, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 53
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $190 million, compared with $197 million in 2023. The effective tax rate decreased in 2024 to 23.8 percent from 25.3 percent in 2023. The decrease in the effective rate for 2024 was primarily attributable to a decrease in state income taxes.
,
Financial Condition
Average Balance Sheets - GAAP
The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 22,654,942 | 10.56 | % | $ | 21,121,545 | 10.81 | % | $ | 21,039,701 | 10.86 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | — | — | 413,338 | 7.45 | 574,218 | 7.19 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | — | — | — | — | 11,096 | 14.02 | |||||||||||||||
| Taxable securities | 1,836,407 | 3.20 | 2,316,848 | 2.65 | 2,543,586 | 2.00 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and other short-term investments | 4,164,094 | 4.25 | 4,700,066 | 5.19 | 4,215,164 | 5.09 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28,655,443 | 9.17 | % | 28,551,797 | 9.17 | % | 28,383,765 | 9.13 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 596,535 | 505,245 | 301,749 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 29,251,978 | $ | 29,057,042 | $ | 28,685,514 | |||||||||||||||
| Average Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokered deposits | $ | 8,546,629 | 4.01 | % | $ | 10,009,221 | 3.89 | % | $ | 9,803,802 | 3.29 | % | |||||||||
| Retail and other deposits | 11,830,694 | 4.13 | 11,142,798 | 4.65 | 11,605,215 | 4.40 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities(1) | 6,362,734 | 4.63 | 5,616,445 | 4.09 | 5,366,365 | 3.66 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 26,740,057 | 4.21 | % | 26,768,464 | 4.25 | % | 26,775,382 | 3.85 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | 141,396 | 149,594 | 83,895 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,370,525 | 2,138,984 | 1,826,237 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 29,251,978 | $ | 29,057,042 | $ | 28,685,514 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 5.24 | % | 5.19 | % | 5.50 | % |
(1) Includes the average balance of our unsecured borrowings, as well as secured borrowings and amortization expense of transaction costs related to our term asset-backed securitizations and our Secured Borrowing Facility.
54 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Rate/Volume Analysis - GAAP
The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Increase (Decrease) | Change Due To(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate | Volume | ||||||||||
| 2025 vs. 2024 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 8,209 | $ | (1,294) | $ | 9,503 | |||||
| Interest expense | (12,833) | (11,626) | (1,207) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 21,042 | $ | 15,652 | $ | 5,390 | |||||
| 2024 vs. 2023 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 26,743 | $ | 11,358 | $ | 15,385 | |||||
| Interest expense | 108,174 | 108,440 | (266) | ||||||||
| Net interest income (loss) | $ | (81,431) | $ | (90,630) | $ | 9,199 |
(1) Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.
Summary of Our Loans Held for Investment Portfolio
Ending Loans Held for Investment Balances, net
| Private Education Loans | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,983,859 | $ | 4,397,127 | |||
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,676,575 | 17,837,881 | |||||
| Total, gross | 21,660,434 | 22,235,008 | |||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 102,008 | 103,070 | |||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,430,318) | (1,435,920) | |||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 20,332,124 | $ | 20,902,158 |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 55
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,997,092 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,997,149 | |||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,028,752 | 537,344 | 17,566,096 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 21,025,844 | 537,401 | 21,563,245 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,554 | 1,330 | 82,884 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,335,105) | (4,667) | (1,339,772) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,659,323 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,659,380 | |||||||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 16,644,365 | 608,993 | 17,253,358 | ||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,303,688 | 609,050 | 20,912,738 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 69,656 | 1,549 | 71,205 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,353,631) | (3,444) | (1,357,075) | ||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
56 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,544,030 | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | 3,544,112 | |||||||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,172,833 | 695,134 | 25,014 | 17,892,981 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,716,863 | 695,216 | 25,014 | 21,437,093 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 1,815 | 222 | 69,525 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,158,977) | (4,077) | (2,281) | (1,165,335) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||||
| % of total | 96 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
Average Loans Held for Investment Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 22,654,942 | 100 | % | $ | 21,121,545 | 98 | % | $ | 21,039,701 | 97 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | — | — | 413,338 | 2 | 574,218 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio | $ | 22,654,942 | 100 | % | $ | 21,534,883 | 100 | % | $ | 21,613,919 | 100 | % |
.
Loans Held for Investment, Net — Activity
| Year Ended December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands) | Total Loans Held for Investment (Private Education Loans), net | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 20,902,158 | |
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||
| Fixed-rate | 6,395,293 | ||
| Variable-rate | 1,066,205 | ||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 7,461,498 | ||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 676,532 | ||
| Sales | (4,553,263) | ||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (976,282) | ||
| Allowance | 5,602 | ||
| Transfer to loans held for sale | (910,760) | ||
| Repayments and other | (2,273,361) | ||
| Ending balance | $ | 20,332,124 |
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 57
| Year Ended December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 | |||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 6,629,205 | — | 6,629,205 | ||||||||
| Variable-rate | 435,025 | — | 435,025 | ||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 7,064,230 | — | 7,064,230 | ||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 602,825 | 16,796 | 619,621 | ||||||||
| Sales | (3,430,920) | — | (3,430,920) | ||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (806,908) | (45,467) | (852,375) | ||||||||
| Allowance | (100,815) | 4,667 | (96,148) | ||||||||
| Transfer to loans held for sale | — | (466,168) | (466,168) | ||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,198,547) | (43,892) | (2,242,439) | ||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 20,902,158 | $ | — | $ | 20,902,158 |
| Year Ended December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 5,760,434 | — | 5,760,434 | ||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 665,987 | — | 665,987 | ||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 6,426,421 | — | 6,426,421 | ||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,480 | 22,584 | 620,064 | ||||||||||
| Sales | (2,938,616) | — | (2,938,616) | ||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (975,889) | (32,855) | (1,008,744) | ||||||||||
| Allowance | 18,526 | (1,223) | 17,303 | ||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,375,342) | (61,597) | (2,436,939) | ||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 |
“Loan consolidations to third parties” and “Repayments and other” are both significantly affected by the volume of loans in our held for investment portfolio in P&I repayment status. Loans in P&I repayment status include loans in full principal and interest repayment status as well as certain loans in short-term interest-only payment programs (such as loans in GRP and loans in a short-term interest only alternative program). The amount of loans in P&I repayment status in our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2025 decreased by 0.1 percent compared with December 31, 2024, and now totals 45 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2025. The balance of loans held for investment in P&I repayment status was affected in 2025 and 2024 by loan sales.
“Loan consolidations to third parties” for the year ended December 31, 2025 total 10.6 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio in P&I repayment status at December 31, 2025, or 4.8 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2025, compared with the year-ago period of 8.7 percent of our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio in P&I repayment status, or 3.9 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio, respectively. The increase in consolidations compared to the year-ago period is primarily attributable to lower interest rates in 2025. Historical experience has shown that loan consolidation activity is heightened in the period when the loan initially enters full principal and interest repayment status and then subsides over time.
58 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
The “Repayments and other” category includes all scheduled repayments, as well as voluntary prepayments, made on loans in repayment and also includes charge-offs. Consequently, this category can be significantly affected by the volume of loans in repayment.
Private Education Loan Originations
The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations. Originations represent loans that were funded or acquired during the period presented.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | % | 2024 | % | 2023 | % | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Option - interest only(1) | $ | 1,469,697 | 20 | % | $ | 1,272,414 | 18 | % | $ | 1,166,442 | 18 | % | |||||||||
| Smart Option - fixed pay(1) | 2,443,689 | 33 | 2,331,055 | 33 | 2,121,112 | 33 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - deferred(1) | 2,785,186 | 38 | 2,786,821 | 40 | 2,584,545 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
| Graduate Loan(2) | 717,751 | 9 | 623,033 | 9 | 511,193 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Parent Loan(3) | — | — | — | — | 38 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan originations | $ | 7,416,323 | 100 | % | $ | 7,013,323 | 100 | % | $ | 6,383,330 | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Percentage of loans with a cosigner | 92.8 | % | 90.0 | % | 87.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Average FICO at approval(4) | 755 | 752 | 748 |
(1) Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See Item 1. “Business - Our Business - Private Education Loans” for a further discussion.
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Graduate Loan originations include $24.7 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Graduate Loan originations include $32.2 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Graduate Loan originations include $29.4 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status.
(3) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date were processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023.
(4) Represents the higher credit score of the cosigner or the borrower.
Private Education Loan Maturities
The following table summarizes the remaining maturities of our Private Education Loan portfolio.
| As of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands) | One year or less | After one year to five years | After five years to 15 years | After 15 years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-rate | $ | 8,802 | $ | 299,669 | $ | 8,298,840 | $ | 8,345,308 | $ | 16,952,619 | |||||||||
| Variable-rate | 19,734 | 436,924 | 2,816,683 | 1,434,474 | 4,707,815 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | $ | 28,536 | $ | 736,593 | $ | 11,115,523 | $ | 9,779,782 | $ | 21,660,434 |
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 59
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses Activity
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Portfolio (Private Education Loans) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,435,920 | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 4,667 | $ | 1,339,772 | |||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 280,244 | 311,787 | — | 311,787 | |||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (399,636) | (376,840) | (380) | (377,220) | |||||||||||||||||
| Write-downs arising from transfer of loans to held for sale(2) | — | — | (8,297) | (8,297) | |||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 53,911 | 44,756 | — | 44,756 | |||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 400,677 | 357,067 | 4,010 | 361,077 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (296,524) | (235,955) | — | (235,955) | |||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred to held for sale | (44,274) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(3) | 59,879 | 121,112 | 4,010 | 125,122 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,430,318 | $ | 1,435,920 | $ | — | $ | 1,435,920 |
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | 1,357,075 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | |||||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 320,237 | — | 320,237 | 344,310 | — | — | 344,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (420,095) | (1,001) | (421,096) | (427,416) | (613) | (3,215) | (431,244) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 46,368 | — | 46,368 | 41,737 | — | 5 | 41,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 240,347 | 2,224 | 242,571 | 410,254 | (20) | 3,301 | 413,535 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (205,383) | — | (205,383) | (174,231) | — | — | (174,231) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred to held for sale | — | — | — | — | — | (2,372) | (2,372) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(3) | 34,964 | 2,224 | 37,188 | 236,023 | (20) | 929 | 236,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 4,667 | $ | 1,339,772 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | — | $ | 1,357,075 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans transferred to held for sale.
(3) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
60 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
| 2021 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | |||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 301,655 | — | — | 301,655 | |||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (229,591) | (321) | (356) | (230,268) | |||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 29,494 | — | 12 | 29,506 | |||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | (233,852) | 20 | 1,124 | (232,708) | |||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (66,460) | — | — | (66,460) | |||||||||||
| Loans transferred from held for sale | 1,887 | — | — | 1,887 | |||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(2) | (298,425) | 20 | 1,124 | (297,281) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
Provision for Credit Losses
Below is a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | 59,879 | $ | 121,112 | $ | 34,964 | $ | 236,023 | $ | (298,425) | |||||||||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 272,808 | 283,393 | 308,275 | 396,521 | 264,324 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | 332,687 | 404,505 | 343,239 | 632,544 | (34,101) | ||||||||||||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| FFELP Loans | — | 4,010 | 2,224 | (20) | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | — | — | — | 929 | 1,124 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | — | 4,010 | 2,224 | 909 | 1,144 | ||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | 332,687 | $ | 408,515 | $ | 345,463 | $ | 633,453 | $ | (32,957) |
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 61
Private Education Loan Allowance for Credit Losses
In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of December 31, 2025, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, in particular, credit quality and delinquency, forbearance, and charge-off trends.
Private Education Loans held for investment in P&I repayment status were 45 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2025, compared with 44 percent at December 31, 2024.
For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loans, see “— Critical Accounting Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment — Certain Collection Tools — Private Education Loans” in this Form 10-K.
62 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
The table below presents our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio delinquency trends. Loans in repayment include loans making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the following table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
| Private Education Loans Held for Investment | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Balance | % | Balance | % | Balance | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1) | $ | 5,332,532 | $ | 5,722,827 | $ | 5,291,991 | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance(2) | 433,075 | 405,430 | 324,039 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment and percentage of each status: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans current | 15,258,723 | 96.0 | % | 15,513,333 | 96.3 | % | 14,809,271 | 96.1 | % | |||||||||
| Loans delinquent 30-59 days(3) | 330,307 | 2.0 | 310,748 | 1.9 | 298,751 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
| Loans delinquent 60-89 days(3) | 154,683 | 1.0 | 140,735 | 0.9 | 151,017 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 days or greater past due(3) | 151,114 | 1.0 | 141,935 | 0.9 | 150,775 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans in repayment | 15,894,827 | 100.0 | % | 16,106,751 | 100.0 | % | 15,409,814 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | 21,660,434 | 22,235,008 | 21,025,844 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 102,008 | 103,070 | 81,554 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans | 21,762,442 | 22,338,078 | 21,107,398 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans allowance for losses | (1,430,318) | (1,435,920) | (1,335,105) | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans, net | $ | 20,332,124 | $ | 20,902,158 | $ | 19,772,293 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in repayment | 73.4 | % | 72.4 | % | 73.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of loans in repayment | 4.0 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in forbearance: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in an extended grace period(4) | 1.7 | % | 1.6 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances(5) | 1.0 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % |
(1)Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans (e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation).
(2)Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors (other than delinquent loans in disaster forbearance), consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.
(3)The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.
(4)We calculate the percentage of loans in an extended grace period as the ratio of (a) Private Education Loans in forbearance in an extended grace period numerator to (b) Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance denominator. An extended grace period aligns with The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency definition of an additional, consecutive, one-time period during which no payment is required for up to six months after the initial grace period. We typically grant this extended grace period to customers who may be having difficulty finding employment before the full principal and interest repayment period starts or once it has begun. Loans in forbearance in an extended grace period were approximately $272 million, $253 million, and $168 million at December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this Item 7 for additional details.
(5)We calculate the percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances as the ratio of (a) Private Education Loans in hardship and other forbearances (excluding loans in an extended grace period and delinquent loans in disaster forbearance) numerator to (b) Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance denominator. If the customer is in financial hardship, we work with the customer and/or cosigner and identify any available alternative arrangements designed to reduce monthly payment obligations, which may include a short-term hardship forbearance. Loans in hardship and other forbearances (excluding loans in an extended grace period and delinquent loans in disaster forbearance) were approximately $161 million, $152 million, and $156 million at December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this Item 7 for additional details.
Delinquencies as a percentage of loans in repayment increased to 4.0 percent at December 31, 2025 from 3.7 percent at December 31, 2024. The increase in the delinquency metric in 2025 compared with 2024 is primarily attributable to changes and refinements to our loss mitigation programs in late 2024 which generally restricted loan modification eligibility to borrowers in later-stage delinquency, as well as a shift in the composition of the loans in repayment portfolio (which does not include loans held for sale) due to $933 million of newly originated loans transferred
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 63
to held for sale status during the fourth quarter of 2025, as we intended to sell the loans to the Strategic Partner in January 2026. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this Item 7 for additional details. The percentage of loans in an extended grace forbearance remained relatively consistent at 1.7 percent and 1.6 percent at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances remained relatively consistent at 1.0 percent and 0.9 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
The decrease in delinquencies at December 31, 2024, compared with 2023, was primarily attributable to the then-new loan modification programs. The increase in the percentage of loans in an extended grace period at December 31, 2024 compared with 2023 was primarily due to borrowers being eligible to receive up to six months of extended grace forbearance in one increment instead of multiple instances of two-month increments, coupled with our continued efforts to better match our available program offerings to the financial needs of our borrowers. The percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances remained relatively consistent at 0.9 percent and 1.0 percent, respectively at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
64 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan (held for investment) losses and the allowance for unfunded loan commitments.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance | $ | 1,435,920 | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | |||||||||
| Transfer from allowance for unfunded loan commitments(1) | 280,244 | 311,787 | 320,237 | 344,310 | 301,655 | ||||||||||||||
| Provisions: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for current period | 400,677 | 357,067 | 240,347 | 410,254 | (233,852) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (296,524) | (235,955) | (205,383) | (174,231) | (66,460) | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held for sale | (44,274) | — | — | — | 1,887 | ||||||||||||||
| Total provisions(2) | 59,879 | 121,112 | 34,964 | 236,023 | (298,425) | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (399,636) | (376,840) | (420,095) | (427,416) | (229,591) | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 53,911 | 44,756 | 46,368 | 41,737 | 29,494 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (345,725) | (332,084) | (373,727) | (385,679) | (200,097) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, ending balance | 1,430,318 | 1,435,920 | 1,335,105 | 1,353,631 | 1,158,977 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded loan commitments, beginning balance (1) | 84,568 | 112,962 | 124,924 | 72,713 | 110,044 | ||||||||||||||
| Provision(2)(3) | 272,808 | 283,393 | 308,275 | 396,521 | 264,324 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer to allowance for loan losses | (280,244) | (311,787) | (320,237) | (344,310) | (301,655) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded loan commitments, ending balance(1) | 77,132 | 84,568 | 112,962 | 124,924 | 72,713 | ||||||||||||||
| Total allowance for credit losses, ending balance | $ | 1,507,450 | $ | 1,520,488 | $ | 1,448,067 | $ | 1,478,555 | $ | 1,231,690 | |||||||||
| Total Allowance Percentage of Private Education Loan Exposure(5)(6) | 6.00 | % | 5.83 | % | 5.89 | % | 6.30 | % | 5.20 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses coverage of net charge-offs | 4.14 | 4.32 | 3.57 | 3.51 | 5.79 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment(4) | 2.15 | % | 2.19 | % | 2.44 | % | 2.55 | % | 1.33 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of ending loans in repayment(4) | 4.00 | % | 3.68 | % | 3.90 | % | 3.77 | % | 3.26 | % | |||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment and forbearance(4) | 2.65 | % | 2.46 | % | 2.06 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.91 | % | |||||||||
| Ending total loans, gross | $ | 21,660,434 | $ | 22,235,008 | $ | 21,025,844 | $ | 20,303,688 | $ | 20,716,863 | |||||||||
| Average loans in repayment(4) | $ | 16,047,085 | $ | 15,139,184 | $ | 15,310,934 | $ | 15,103,123 | $ | 15,019,869 | |||||||||
| Ending loans in repayment(4) | $ | 15,894,827 | $ | 16,106,751 | $ | 15,409,814 | $ | 15,129,550 | $ | 15,511,212 | |||||||||
| Unfunded loan commitments for loans held for investment(6) | $ | 1,913,753 | $ | 2,311,660 | $ | 2,221,077 | $ | 1,995,808 | $ | 1,776,976 | |||||||||
| Total accrued interest receivable | $ | 1,570,069 | $ | 1,549,415 | $ | 1,354,565 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 1,187,123 |
(1) When a new loan commitment is made, we record an allowance to cover lifetime expected credit losses on the unfunded commitments, which is recorded in “Other Liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments.
(2) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
(3) Includes incremental provision for new commitments and changes to provision for existing commitments.
(4) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
(5) The Total Allowance Percentage of Private Education Loan Exposure is the total allowance for credit losses as a percentage of ending total loans plus unfunded loan commitments and total accrued interest receivable on Private Education Loans.
(6) Unfunded loan commitments for loans held for investment and the calculation of the Total Allowance Percentage of Private Education Loan Exposure do not include $523 million of unfunded loan commitments associated with loans classified as held for sale at December 31, 2025. Due to the near-term timing of the loan sale and credit quality of the loans, we believe there is no risk of credit loss and are not recording an allowance for the unfunded loan commitments related to the loans classified as held for sale.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the Total Allowance as Percentage of Private Education Loan Exposure; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 65
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment decreased in the year ended December 31, 2025 compared with the year-ago period primarily due to changes in the loan modification programs implemented in late 2024. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment decreased in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily due to the expanded loan modifications program implemented in late 2023 and throughout the full year 2024.
During 2026, the first wave of loans that were modified under the expanded loss mitigation programs in late 2023 will be exiting existing modifications. Borrowers currently enrolled in these programs have largely exhibited positive payment performance, and longer-term performance is unknown but will become clearer throughout 2026.
Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool
In recent years, we have made significant changes to our credit administration practices, enhancing our loss mitigation programs through both our forbearance and loan modification offerings. We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our borrowers manage their student loan obligations, achieve better student outcomes and increase the collectability of the loans. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment or interest-only alternative.
We continually monitor our credit administration practices and modify them from time to time based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
Forbearance
Forbearance allows a borrower to not make scheduled payments for a specified period of time. Our forbearance policies and practices vary depending upon whether a borrower is current or delinquent at the time forbearance is requested, generally with stricter requirements for delinquent borrowers. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan by the term of forbearance taken. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total principal or interest repayment obligation. While a loan is in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized (added to principal) at the end of the forbearance. Interest will not capitalize at the end of certain types of forbearance, such as disaster forbearance, however.
During the first six months following a borrower’s grace period, the borrower may be eligible for extended grace forbearance, which provides temporary payment relief to give the borrower additional time to be in a position to make regular principal and interest payments. We do not consider borrowers who are eligible for extended grace to be experiencing financial difficulty.
Hardship forbearance may be granted in order to provide temporary payment relief to borrowers who are either current in their payments but demonstrate a need for relief, or who are delinquent in their payments but demonstrate an ability and willingness to repay their obligation. In these circumstances, a borrower’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of the forbearance period for borrowers who were current when they entered forbearance or those who were delinquent but met specific payment requirements curing their delinquency, the borrower will enter repayment status as current. In all instances, the borrowers are expected to begin making scheduled monthly payments at the end of their forbearance periods. This strategy is aimed at assisting borrowers while mitigating the risks of delinquency and default as well as encouraging resolution of delinquent loans.
Disaster forbearance is used to assist borrowers affected by material events, typically federally-declared disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and pandemics. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in one-month increments, up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described below. Disaster forbearance is granted based on areas impacted by federally declared disasters, not because the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. Loans in disaster forbearance are not assessed late or other fees. Due to the nature and limited timeframe of disaster forbearance, delinquent loans granted disaster forbearance are maintained in their pre-grant delinquency status, and as such, are not reflected in our loans in forbearance metrics.
We offer certain other administrative forbearances (e.g., death and disability, bankruptcy, military service, and in school assistance) that are required by law (such as by the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act), are considered separate from our active loss mitigation programs, or do not exceed the significance threshold. We do not consider borrowers eligible for these other administrative forbearances to be experiencing financial difficulty.
66 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Currently, we generally grant forbearance for up to 12 months over the life of the loan, in increments of one to two months at a time, although extended grace forbearance is typically granted in one six-month increment. Disaster forbearance and certain other limited instances do not apply toward the 12-month limit. We also currently require 12 months of positive payment performance by a borrower (meaning the borrower must make payment in a cumulative amount equivalent to 12 monthly required payments under the loan) between successive grants of forbearance and between forbearance grants and certain other repayment alternatives. This required period of positive payment performance is not necessary to receive additional increments of extended grace forbearance or for a borrower to receive a contractual interest rate reduction. In addition, we currently limit the participation of delinquent borrowers in certain short-term extended or interest-only repayment alternatives to once in 12 months and twice in five years. We also now count the number of months a borrower receives a short-term extended repayment alternative toward the 12-month forbearance limit described above.
Modification Programs other than Forbearances
For borrowers experiencing more severe hardship, following evaluation of their ability and willingness to repay, we currently use modification programs tailored to the financial condition of the individual borrower. Pursuant to our modification programs, we may reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to a rate between 2 percent and 8 percent temporarily, and/or in some instances may permanently extend the final maturity of a loan. For borrowers experiencing the most severe financial conditions, we may permanently reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to 2 percent for the remaining life of the loan and also permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. Following modification, borrowers who are delinquent but meet specific payment requirements curing their delinquency will be brought current. We currently limit the granting of a permanent extension of the final maturity date of a loan to once over the life of the loan, and the number of interest rate reductions to twice over the life of the loan.
Modifications under these programs are generally considered loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. See Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Commitments — Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty” in this Form 10-K for disclosures related to these modification programs. However, in some situations, we may offer on a limited basis term extensions or rate reductions or a combination of both to borrowers to reduce consolidation activities, which we do not consider to be modifications of loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
Delinquency Trends by Active Repayment Status
The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio held for investment aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). Active repayment status includes loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. Our experience shows that the percentage of loans in forbearance status generally decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At December 31, 2025, Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance that have been in active repayment status for fewer than 25 months as a percentage of all loans in repayment and forbearance were 2.0 percent. At December 31, 2025, approximately 76 percent of our Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance status have been in active repayment status fewer than 25 months.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 67
| As of December 31, 2025 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,333 | $ | 5,333 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 266 | 63 | 38 | 28 | 38 | — | 433 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,142 | 3,655 | 1,937 | 1,587 | 3,937 | — | 15,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 82 | 51 | 49 | 41 | 107 | — | 330 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 41 | 26 | 21 | 19 | 48 | — | 155 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 43 | 22 | 22 | 17 | 47 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,574 | $ | 3,817 | $ | 2,067 | $ | 1,692 | $ | 4,177 | $ | 5,333 | 21,660 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 102 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,430) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 20,332 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.63 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.23 | % | — | % | 2.65 | % |
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,723 | $ | 5,723 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 247 | 66 | 37 | 23 | 32 | — | 405 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,497 | 3,585 | 2,230 | 1,518 | 3,683 | — | 15,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 78 | 58 | 49 | 36 | 90 | — | 311 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 38 | 25 | 22 | 17 | 39 | — | 141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 39 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 44 | — | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,899 | $ | 3,757 | $ | 2,358 | $ | 1,610 | $ | 3,888 | $ | 5,723 | 22,235 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,436) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 20,902 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.50 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.19 | % | — | % | 2.46 | % |
68 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,292 | $ | 5,292 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 190 | 55 | 31 | 20 | 28 | — | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,129 | 3,529 | 2,183 | 1,472 | 3,496 | — | 14,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 81 | 56 | 45 | 33 | 84 | — | 299 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 40 | 29 | 24 | 17 | 41 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 42 | 28 | 23 | 16 | 42 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,482 | $ | 3,697 | $ | 2,306 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 5,292 | 21,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,335) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.21 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.18 | % | — | % | 2.06 | % |
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 69
Private Education Loans Held for Investment Types
The following table provides information regarding the loans in repayment balance and total loan balance by Private Education Loan held for investment product type for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
| As of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands) | Smart Option | Graduate Loan | Other(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 13,806,666 | $ | 1,765,589 | $ | 322,572 | $ | 15,894,827 | |||||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 18,785,313 | $ | 2,468,471 | $ | 406,650 | $ | 21,660,434 |
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | Smart Option | Graduate Loan | Other(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 14,273,952 | $ | 1,466,915 | $ | 365,884 | $ | 16,106,751 | |||||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 19,710,266 | $ | 2,067,468 | $ | 457,274 | $ | 22,235,008 |
(1) Other includes our Parent Loan and Career training loan products. In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023. In May 2022, we discontinued offering our Career Training loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in September 2023.
(2) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include loans in the “loans in forbearance” metric).
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans 90 days or greater past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The majority of the total accrued interest receivable represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accruing on that loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized to the balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The allowance for credit losses considers both the collectibility of principal and accrued interest. The allowance for uncollectible interest estimates the additional uncollectible interest that is not captured in the allowance for credit losses.
| Private Education Loans | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrued Interest Receivable | |||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Total Interest Receivable | 90 Days or Greater Past Due | Allowance forUncollectibleInterest(1) | ||||||||
| December 31, 2025 | $ | 1,570,069 | $ | 6,548 | $ | 14,511 | |||||
| December 31, 2024 | $ | 1,549,415 | $ | 6,420 | $ | 12,366 | |||||
| December 31, 2023 | $ | 1,354,565 | $ | 8,373 | $ | 9,897 | |||||
| December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 6,609 | $ | 8,121 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 4,937 |
(1) The allowance for uncollectible interest at December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021 represents the expected losses related to the portion of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are in repayment (at December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, and 2021, relates to $164 million, $164 million, $151 million, $240 million, and $240 million, respectively, of accrued interest receivable) that is/was not expected to be capitalized. The accrued interest receivable that is/was expected to be capitalized ($1.4 billion, $1.4 billion, $1.2 billion, $937 million, and $947 million, respectively, at December 31, 2025, 2024, 2023. 2022, and 2021) is/was reserved for in the allowance for credit losses.
70 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary funding and liquidity objective is to support our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress. Our business needs primarily include funding originations of Private Education Loans and meeting any deposits outflows at the Bank. To achieve these objectives, we maintain access to diverse funding sources, such as retail deposits, brokered deposits, asset-backed securitizations, unsecured debt, other financing facilities, and loan sales. We maintained liquidity reserves in the form of unrestricted cash and liquid investments of $5.4 billion and $6.1 billion as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, as noted in the table below.
At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, our sources of liquidity included liquid investments with unrealized losses of $61.2 million and $105.8 million, respectively. It is our policy to manage operations so our liquidity needs are fully satisfied through normal operations to avoid unplanned loan or liquid investment sales under all but the most dire conditions. Our liquidity management is governed by policies approved by our Board of Directors. Oversight of these policies is performed in the Asset and Liability Committee, a management-level committee. These policies take into account the volatility of cash flow forecasts, expected asset and liability maturities, anticipated loan demand, and a variety of other factors to establish minimum liquidity guidelines.
Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and deposit markets at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our performance, competitive pressures, the macroeconomic environment, and the impact they have on the availability of funding sources in the marketplace. We target maintaining sufficient on-balance sheet and contingent sources of liquidity to enable us to meet all contractual and contingent obligations under various stress scenarios, including severe macroeconomic stresses and specific stresses that test the resiliency of our balance sheet. At December 31, 2025, we held a significant liquidity buffer of cash and liquid investments, which we expect to maintain through in the future. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, our liquidity levels will likely vary from quarter to quarter.
Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity
Ending Balances
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 4,421 | $ | 3,745 | $ | 3,224 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,236,844 | 4,696,621 | 4,146,614 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,135,886 | 1,361,431 | 1,988,295 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 5,377,151 | $ | 6,061,797 | $ | 6,138,133 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
Average Balances
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 8,397 | $ | 8,698 | $ | 6,827 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 3,958,618 | 4,504,167 | 4,014,444 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,170,153 | 1,647,113 | 1,975,754 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 5,137,168 | $ | 6,159,978 | $ | 5,997,025 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 71
Deposits
The following table summarizes total deposits.
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits - interest-bearing | $ | 21,059,967 | $ | 21,066,752 | ||||
| Deposits - non-interest-bearing | 184 | 1,816 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 21,060,151 | $ | 21,068,568 |
Our total deposits of $21.1 billion were comprised of $8.8 billion in brokered deposits and $12.3 billion in retail and other deposits at December 31, 2025, compared with total deposits of $21.1 billion, which were comprised of $9.5 billion in brokered deposits and $11.6 billion in retail and other deposits, at December 31, 2024.
Interest-bearing deposits as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity money market deposit accounts (“MMDAs”), and retail and brokered CDs. Interest-bearing deposits also include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and that we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.6 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2025, compared with $7.0 billion at December 31, 2024. The omnibus accounts are structured in such a way that entitles the individual depositor pass-through deposit insurance (subject to FDIC rules and limitations), and the majority of these deposits have contractual minimum balances and maturity terms.
Some of our deposit products are serviced by third-party providers. Placement fees associated with the brokered CDs are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest rate method. We recognized placement fee expense of $8 million, $11 million, and $12 million in the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Fees paid to third-party brokers related to brokered CDs were $8 million, $8 million, and $8 million during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.
Interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized as follows:
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | ||||||||||
| Money market | $ | 10,004,845 | 3.83 | % | $ | 9,582,290 | 4.27 | % | ||||||
| Savings | 1,177,177 | 3.83 | 944,034 | 4.02 | ||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 9,877,945 | 3.87 | 10,540,428 | 4.20 | ||||||||||
| Deposits - interest-bearing | $ | 21,059,967 | $ | 21,066,752 |
(1) Includes the effect of interest rate swaps in effective hedge relationships.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were $1.2 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of deposits exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Accrued interest on deposits was $71 million and $92 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
72 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment, or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us.
Excess cash is generally invested with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRB”) on an overnight basis or in the FRB’s Term Deposit Facility, minimizing counterparty exposure on cash balances.
Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of a small portfolio of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises that are purchased to meet CRA targets. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board-approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.
Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”), or clearinghouses for over-the-counter derivatives. CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by the Bank are covered under CSAs or clearinghouse agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our exposure to the counterparty is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position, less any collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with the counterparty.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act requires all standardized derivatives, including most interest rate swaps, to be submitted for clearing to central counterparties to reduce counterparty risk. Two of the central counterparties we use are the CME and the LCH. All variation margin payments on derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH are accounted for as legal settlement. As of December 31, 2025, $562 million notional of our derivative contracts were cleared on the CME and $11 million were cleared on the LCH. The derivative contracts cleared through the CME and LCH represent 98.0 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively, of our total notional derivative contracts of $573 million at December 31, 2025.
For derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH, the net gain (loss) position includes the variation margin amounts as settlement of the derivative and not collateral against the fair value of the derivative. The amount of variation margin included as settlement as of December 31, 2025 was $(1) million and $(0.1) million for the CME and LCH, respectively. Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are presented as realized gains (losses).
Our exposure to the counterparty is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position less any collateral held and plus any collateral posted. When there is a net negative exposure, we consider our exposure to the counterparty to be zero. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had a net positive exposure (derivative gain/loss positions to us, less collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with counterparties) related to derivatives of $0.1 million and $5 million, respectively.
We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties.
The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2025.
| As of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands) | SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure, net of collateral | $ | 113 | |
| Exposure to counterparties with credit ratings, net of collateral | $ | 113 | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3 | — | % | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3 | — | % |
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 73
Regulatory Capital
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking authorities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position. Under U.S. Basel III and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital standards that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and its classification under the prompt corrective action framework are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings, and other factors.
Capital Management
The Bank intends to maintain at all times regulatory capital levels that meet both the minimum levels required under U.S. Basel III (including applicable buffers) and the levels necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action framework, in order to support asset growth and operating needs, address unexpected credit risks, and protect the interests of depositors and the DIF administered by the FDIC. The Bank’s Capital Policy requires management to monitor these capital standards and the Bank’s compliance with them. The Board of Directors and management periodically evaluate the quality of assets, the stability of earnings, and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for the Bank. The Company is a source of strength for the Bank and will provide additional capital if necessary.
We believe that current and projected capital levels are appropriate for 2026. As of December 31, 2025, the Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios exceed the required minimum ratios and the applicable buffers under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III standards as well as the “well capitalized” standards under the prompt corrective action framework.
Under U.S. Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain the following minimum regulatory capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. In addition, the Bank is subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5 percent. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in restrictions on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. Including the buffer, the Bank is required to maintain the following capital ratios under U.S. Basel III in order to avoid such restrictions: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 7.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 8.5 percent, and a Total risk-based capital ratio of greater than 10.5 percent.
To qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework for insured depository institutions, the Bank must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
In July 2023, the federal banking agencies proposed a rule to implement significant changes to the U.S. Basel Ill regulatory capital requirements. The proposed changes to the regulatory capital requirements generally would amend or introduce approaches and methodologies that would apply to banking organizations with total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more or to banking organizations with significant trading activity. The proposed rule therefore would not affect the Bank's capital requirements or the calculation of its capital ratios. It is uncertain if and when a final rule will be adopted, and if so, whether and to what extent it will differ from the proposed rule.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopted CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, could elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. On each of January 1, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts were phased in for regulatory capital purposes. As of January 1, 2025, all adjusted transition amounts have been phased in for regulatory capital purposes. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained
74 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
earnings by $953 million. This transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
The Bank’s required and actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios, including applicable capital conservation buffers, under U.S. Basel III are shown in the following table. The following capital amounts and ratios are based upon the Bank’s average assets and risk-weighted assets, as indicated. The Bank has elected to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income related to both available-for-sale investments and swap valuations from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital.
| Actual | U.S. Basel IIIMinimum Requirements Plus Buffer(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2025(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,929,973 | 11.1 | % | $ | 1,849,590 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,929,973 | 11.1 | % | $ | 2,245,930 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,274,883 | 12.4 | % | $ | 2,774,384 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 2,929,973 | 9.9 | % | $ | 1,186,335 | 4.0 | % | |||||
| As of December 31, 2024(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 11.3 | % | $ | 1,827,318 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 11.3 | % | $ | 2,218,886 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,294,663 | 12.6 | % | $ | 2,740,976 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 9.7 | % | $ | 1,213,505 | 4.0 | % |
(1) Reflects the U.S. Basel III minimum required ratio plus the applicable capital conservation buffer.
(2) The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios also exceeded all applicable standards for the Bank to qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework.
(3) For December 31, 2025 and 2024, the actual amounts and the actual ratios include the respective adjusted transition amounts discussed above.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 75
Dividends
The Bank is chartered under the laws of the State of Utah and its deposits are insured by the FDIC. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. The Company relies on dividends from the Bank, as necessary, to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends and other payments and consummate share repurchases, as described herein. The Bank declared $700 million, $570 million, and $550 million in dividends to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively, with the proceeds primarily used to fund share repurchase programs and stock dividends. We expect that the Bank will pay dividends to the Company as may be necessary to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends on its Series B Preferred Stock and common stock and to consummate any common share repurchases by the Company under the share repurchase programs. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors — GENERAL RISKS” for possible limitations on the payments of our dividends.
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings consist of unsecured debt and secured borrowings issued through our term ABS program and our Secured Borrowing Facility. The issuing entities for those secured borrowings are variable interest entities and are consolidated for accounting purposes. The following table summarizes our borrowings at December 31, 2025 and 2024. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt (fixed-rate) | $ | 498,415 | $ | 493,415 | $ | 991,830 | $ | — | $ | 995,420 | $ | 995,420 | |||||||||||
| Total unsecured borrowings | 498,415 | 493,415 | 991,830 | — | 995,420 | 995,420 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | — | 4,174,513 | 4,174,513 | — | 4,617,743 | 4,617,743 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | — | 694,566 | 694,566 | — | 827,182 | 827,182 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan term securitizations | — | 4,869,079 | 4,869,079 | — | 5,444,925 | 5,444,925 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total secured borrowings | — | 4,869,079 | 4,869,079 | — | 5,444,925 | 5,444,925 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 498,415 | $ | 5,362,494 | $ | 5,860,909 | $ | — | $ | 6,440,345 | $ | 6,440,345 |
Short-term Borrowings
Unsecured Borrowings Transactions
On November 1, 2021, we issued $500 million of 3.125 percent unsecured Senior Notes due November 2, 2026, at a price of 99.43 percent. At December 31, 2025, the outstanding carrying value, net of deferred financing fees, was $498 million.
Long-term Borrowings
Unsecured Borrowings Transactions
On January 31, 2025, we issued $500 million of 6.50 percent unsecured Senior Notes due January 31, 2030, at a price of 99.78 percent. At December 31, 2025, the outstanding carrying value, net of deferred financing fees, was $493 million.
76 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Secured Borrowings Transactions
The following summarizes those Private Education Loan Trust term ABS issued in 2024 and 2025 in which we retained 100 percent of the residual class certificates.
| SMB Private Education Loan Trust | Date Closed | Loans Transferred to the Trust(1) | Notes Issued | Gross Proceeds | Weighted Average Cost of Funds(2) | Weighted Average Life of Class A and Class B Notes (in years) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2024-C ABS Transaction | May 15, 2024 | $ | 733,644 | $ | 668,000 | $ | 667,888 | SOFR plus 1.19% | 5.36 | |||||||||
| 2024-E ABS Transaction | August 14, 2024 | 944,645 | 868,000 | 867,743 | SOFR plus 1.42% | 5.17 | ||||||||||||
| 2024-F ABS Transaction | November 06, 2024 | 732,445 | 680,000 | 679,981 | SOFR plus 1.08% | 5.09 | ||||||||||||
| Total 2024 | $ | 2,410,734 | $ | 2,216,000 | $ | 2,215,612 | ||||||||||||
| Loans encumbered at December 31, 2025 related to 2024 term ABS | $ | 2,080,180 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2025-A ABS Transaction | May 07, 2025 | $ | 576,908 | $ | 539,000 | $ | 538,889 | SOFR plus 1.49% | 5.46 | |||||||||
| Total 2025 | $ | 576,908 | $ | 539,000 | $ | 538,889 | ||||||||||||
| Loans encumbered at December 31, 2025 related to 2025 term ABS: | $ | 545,900 |
(1)Represents principal and capitalized interest.
(2)Represents SOFR equivalent cost of funds for variable and fixed-rate bonds, excluding issuance costs.
Pre-2024 Transactions
Prior to 2024, we executed a total of $11.53 billion in ABS transactions that were accounted for as secured borrowings. At December 31, 2025, $3.93 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.81 billion of principal and $116 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered as a result of these transactions.
Secured Borrowing Facility
On June 13, 2025, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to increase the amount that may be borrowed under the facility from $2 billion to $2.5 billion and extended the maturity. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility Trust. The amendment extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until June 12, 2026. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on June 12, 2027 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur). The one-year revolving period plus the one-year amortization period results in a contractual maturity that is two years from the date of inception or renewal. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Secured Borrowing Facility. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
Other Borrowing Sources
We maintain discretionary uncommitted Federal Funds lines of credit with various correspondent banks, which totaled $125 million at December 31, 2025. The interest rate we are charged on these lines of credit is priced at Fed Funds plus a spread at the time of borrowing and is payable daily. We did not utilize these lines of credit in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
We established an account at the FRB to meet eligibility requirements for access to the Primary Credit borrowing facility at the FRB’s Discount Window (the “Window”). The Primary Credit borrowing facility is a lending program available to depository institutions that are in generally sound financial condition. All borrowings at the Window must be fully collateralized. We can pledge asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, as well as Private Education Loans, to the FRB as collateral for borrowings at the Window. Generally, collateral value is assigned based on the estimated fair value
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 77
of the pledged assets. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the value of our pledged collateral at the FRB was $2.5 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. The interest rate charged to us is the discount rate set by the FRB. We did not utilize this facility in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually at the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. At December 31, 2025, we had $2.4 billion of outstanding contractual loan commitments which we expect to fund during the remainder of the 2025/2026 academic year, including $523 million of contractual loan commitments associated with loans classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2025, we had a $77 million reserve recorded in “Other Liabilities” to cover lifetime expected credit losses on unfunded commitments.
Contractual Cash Obligations
In addition to our contractual loan commitments, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. These include contractual principal obligations associated with long-term Bank deposits, secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations. Our material contractual cash obligations relate to Bank deposits. At December 31, 2025, we had $7.5 billion of principal obligations related to Bank deposits due in the next year, and $7.5 billion due thereafter. At December 31, 2025, our contractual cash obligations due in the next year for secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $782 million, $500 million, and $7 million, respectively, and our contractual cash obligations due thereafter for our secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $4.1 billion, $500 million, and $20 million, respectively.
Common Stock
Our governing documents permit the issuance of up to 1.125 billion shares of common stock (par value of $0.20). At December 31, 2025, 199 million shares were issued and outstanding and 31 million shares were unissued but encumbered for outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and dividend equivalent units for employee compensation and remaining authority for stock-based compensation plans. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity” in this Form 10-K for additional details.
78 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Critical Accounting Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies” in this Form 10-K includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates its estimates, particularly those that include the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and are often about matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions relate to the following critical accounting estimates that are discussed in more detail below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date.
In determining the lifetime expected credit losses on our Private Education Loan portfolio loan segments, we use a discounted cash flow method. This method requires us to project future principal and interest cash flows on our loans in those portfolios.
To estimate the future expected cash flows, we use statistical loan-level models that consider life of loan expectations for defaults, prepayments, recoveries, and any other qualitative adjustments deemed necessary, to determine the adequacy of the allowance at each balance sheet date. These cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Management adjusts the effective interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments. The difference between the present value of those cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the underlying loans is the allowance for credit losses. Entities that measure credit losses based on the present value of expected future cash flows are permitted to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense, but may alternatively report the change in present value due to the passage of time as interest income. We have elected to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense.
We estimate future default rates used in our current expected credit losses at a loan level using historical loss experience, current borrower characteristics, current conditions, and economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable period. At the end of the reasonable and supportable forecast period, we immediately revert our forecasted economic factors to long-term historical averages. We estimate future prepayment speeds used in our current expected credit losses at a loan level using historical prepayment experience, current borrower characteristics, current conditions, and economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable period.
The reasonable and supportable forecast period is meant to represent the period in which we believe we can estimate the impact of forecasted economic factors in our expected losses. We use a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, although this period is subject to change as our view evolves on our ability to reasonably forecast economic conditions to estimate future losses.
In estimating future default rates and prepayment speeds in our current expected credit losses, we use a combination of expected economic scenarios coupled with our historical experience and adjust for any qualitative factors (as described below). We also develop an adverse and favorable economic scenario. At each reporting date, we determine the appropriate weighting of these alternate scenarios based upon the current economic conditions and our view of the risks of alternate outcomes. This weighting of expectations is used in calculating our current expected credit losses recorded each period.
We obtain forecasts for our expected loss model from an external economic data provider who provides a range of economic forecasts with various likelihoods of occurrence. Management reviews and weighs the economic forecasts for each of these inputs to calculate our allowance for credit losses. Our forecasting process reflects management’s continuous review of forecasting assumptions and model inputs and is consistent with our internal governance, risk management framework and CECL methodologies. Management continues to review both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses. The most recent adjustment to scenario weightings occurred in the first quarter of 2025.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 79
In estimating recoveries, we use both estimates of what we expect to receive from the sale of defaulted loans as well as historical borrower payment behavior to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
In addition to the above modeling approach, we also take certain other qualitative factors into consideration when calculating the allowance for credit losses, which could result in management overlays (increases or decreases to the allowance for credit losses). These management overlays can encompass a broad array of factors not captured by model inputs, including, but not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards, changes in servicing policies and collection administration practices, including changes we have implemented to our loan modification programs, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, charge-offs, recoveries not already included in the analysis, the effect of other external factors such as shifts in the macroeconomic environment or legal and regulatory requirements that impact the level of estimated current expected credit losses or prepayments, the performance of the model over time versus actual losses, and any other operational or regulatory changes that could materially affect our estimate of future losses.
The evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. If actual future performance in delinquency, charge-offs, and recoveries is significantly different than estimated, or management assumptions or practices were to change, this could materially affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses, the timing of when losses are recognized, and the related provision for credit losses in our consolidated statements of income.
When calculating our allowance for credit losses and liability for unfunded commitments, we incorporate several inputs that are subject to change period to period. These include, but are not limited to, CECL model inputs and any overlays deemed necessary by management. The most impactful CECL model inputs include:
•Economic forecasts;
•Weighting of economic forecasts; and
•Recovery rates.
Of the model inputs outlined above, economic forecasts, weighting of economic forecasts, and recovery rates are subject to estimation uncertainty, and changes in these inputs could have a material impact to our allowance for credit losses and the related provision for credit losses.
In 2023, we experienced slower prepayment rates due to the rising interest rate environment. Historically, when rates rise, loan prepayments generally decline due to a reduction in consolidation activity of our borrowers to third party lenders, and when rates decline, loan prepayments generally rise due to an increase in consolidation activity of our borrowers to third party lenders. During 2023, our estimates of future prepayment speeds reflected the then current interest rate environment and future expectations of increased prepayment speeds in line with market expectations of a decline in interest rates based on the scenarios produced by an external data provider described above. Slower prepayment speeds increase the allowance for credit losses because the loss rates applied in the future periods are applied to higher loan balances.
In the second quarter of 2024, we implemented a loan-level future default rate model that includes current portfolio characteristics and forecasts of real gross domestic product and college graduate unemployment. In the second quarter of 2024, we also implemented a future prepayment speeds model to include forecasts of real gross domestic product, retail sales, SOFR, and the U.S. 10-year treasury rate. These models reduced the reliance on certain qualitative overlays compared to the previous default rate and prepayment speeds models. Prior to these changes, our default rate and prepayment speeds models used forecasts of college graduate unemployment, retail sales, home price index, and median family income. Both the future default rate model and the future prepayment speeds model are used in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses.
80 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
To demonstrate the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses for our Private Education Loan portfolio to a more pessimistic forecast of expected economic outcomes, we considered what our allowance for credit losses would be if we applied a 100 percent probability weighting to the S3 unfavorable (or downside/90th percentile) scenario (with a concurrent 0 percent weighting for both the Baseline and S1 stronger near-term growth scenarios) under the range of scenarios noted above. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2025 of $196 million or 12.9 percent. In addition, we also considered a 100 percent probability weighting to the S4 unfavorable (or downside/96th percentile) scenario (with a concurrent 0 percent weighting for both the Baseline and S1 stronger near-term growth scenarios) under the range of scenarios noted above. Excluding consideration of any qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2025 of $298 million or 19.6 percent. These scenarios do not reflect our current expectations as of December 31, 2025, nor do they capture other qualitative adjustments or all the potential unknown variables that could arise in the forecast periods, but they provide an approximation of possible outcomes under hypothetical pessimistic conditions. The estimated impacts were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable periods, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods are based on longer term averages and only change when we determine there is a fundamental change that will affect the long-term rate.
Estimates are also made on our Private Education Loans regarding when each borrower will separate from school. The cash flow timing of when a borrower will begin making full principal and interest payments is dependent upon when the student either graduates or leaves school. These dates can change based upon many factors. We receive information regarding projected graduation dates from a third-party clearinghouse. The separation from school date is updated quarterly based on updated information received from the clearinghouse.
Additionally, when we have a contractual obligation to fund a loan or a portion of a loan at a later date, we make an estimate regarding the percentage of this obligation that will be funded. This estimate is based on historical experience. For unfunded commitments, we recognize the related life of loan allowance as a liability. Once the loan is funded, that liability transfers to the allowance for Private Education Loan losses. For newly originated loans that will be sold to strategic partners, due to the near-term timing of the loan sale and credit quality of the loans, we believe there is no risk of credit loss and do not record an allowance for the unfunded loan commitments related to the loans classified as held for sale.
Key Credit Quality Indicators - Private Education Loans
We determine the collectability of our Private Education Loan portfolio by evaluating certain risk characteristics. We consider credit score at original approval and periodically refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan’s term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of the creditworthiness of borrowers, and the higher the credit scores the more likely it is the borrowers will be able to make all of their contractual payments. Loan status affects the credit risk because a past due loan is more likely to result in a credit loss than a current loan. Additionally, loans in the deferred payment status have different credit risk profiles compared with those in current pay status. Loan seasoning affects credit risk because a loan with a history of making payments generally has a lower incidence of default than a loan with a history of making infrequent or no payments. The existence of a cosigner lowers the likelihood of default as well. We monitor and update these credit quality indicators in the analysis of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses on a quarterly basis.
In the second quarter of 2023, we changed how we collect on defaulted loans. Previously, we used a mix of in-house collectors and sales to third parties. We continue to sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off but no longer sell retained defaulted loans (that have been subject to internal collection attempts for six months) to third parties and instead continue our collection efforts using in-house collectors and third-party collectors. When we estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans, we no longer include expectations of future sales on retained defaulted loans. We continue to monitor how we collect on defaulted loans and may modify the approach from time to time based on performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
Private Education Loans generally do not require borrowers to begin principal and interest repayment until at least six months after the borrowers have graduated or otherwise separated from school. Consequently, the loss estimates for these loans are generally low while the borrower is in school and then increase upon the end of the grace period after separation from school. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, 25 percent and 26 percent, respectively, of the principal balance of the Private Education Loan portfolio was related to borrowers who were then in an in-school (fully deferred), grace, or other deferment status and not required to make payments.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 81
Our collection policies for Private Education Loans allow for periods of nonpayment (forbearance) for certain borrowers requesting an extended grace period upon leaving school or experiencing temporary difficulty meeting payment obligations.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for Private Education Loans, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most relevant of the metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans plus unfunded loan commitments and total accrued interest receivable; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
We consider a Private Education Loan to be delinquent if the borrower has not made a required payment prior to the 31st day after such payment was contractually due.
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure for Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period that we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. The discounted cash flow approach described above includes expected future contractual disbursements. The portion of the allowance for credit losses related to future disbursements is shown as a liability on the face of the balance sheet, and related provision for credit losses is reflected on the income statement.
Uncollectible Interest
The majority of the total accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loan portfolio represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and on fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accrued on the loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized and increase the unpaid principal balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The discounted cash flow approach and the allowance for credit losses described above consider both the collectability of principal and accrued interest. The allowance for uncollectible interest estimates the additional uncollectible interest that is not captured in the allowance for credit losses. The allowance for uncollectible interest uses historical experience to estimate the uncollectible interest on loans for which payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. This amount is recorded as a reduction of interest income. Accrued interest receivable is separately disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses
During the third quarter of 2024, we transferred our FFELP Loan portfolio to loans held for sale as we planned to sell our FFELP Loan portfolio. At that time, we wrote down this loan portfolio to its estimated fair value through an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses of $8 million. We subsequently sold the FFELP Loan portfolio to a third party in the fourth quarter of 2024.
FFELP Loans are insured as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default, subject to a risk-sharing level based on the date of loan disbursement. These insurance obligations are supported by contractual rights against the United States. For loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006, owners receive 97 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed after October 1, 1993, and before July 1, 2006, owners receive 98 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993, owners receive 100 percent reimbursement. Because owners bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to this federal guarantee, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense were relatively small.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, we used the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for the unguaranteed portion of our FFELP Loans. We maintained an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for FFELP Loan losses used historical experience of customer default behavior. We applied the default rate projections, net of applicable risk sharing, to our FFELP Loans for the relevant period to perform our quantitative calculation. Once the quantitative calculation was performed, we reviewed the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and determined if qualitative adjustments needed to be considered.
82 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Risk Management
Our Approach
Risk is inherent in our business activities and the specialized lending industry we serve. The ability of management to identify, manage, and remediate risk in a timely manner is critical to our continued success. Our risk management framework is designed to assess, manage, and report these risks and escalate as appropriate to the Board of Directors or its designee.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our overall strategic direction, including our risk management capability and effectiveness. The Board of Directors has oversight of key policies as well as the risk management framework developed and administered by the management team. We also have a process that is designed to escalate meaningful departures from our risk appetite statements to the Board. The Board of Directors oversees the continued development of the risk management framework.
The Governance Framework
Our overall objective is to ensure all significant risks inherent in our business can be identified and appropriately mitigated. To this end, we have adopted the “three lines of defense” approach to governance. Specifically, the business units form the “first line of defense” and are the “owners” of risks in their business activities. As the risk owner, the first line of defense is accountable for the day-to-day execution of risk and control policies and procedures (including activities performed by third-party contractors). The “second line of defense” is our Risk Management function, which is independent from the first line of defense. The second line of defense conducts oversight and effective challenge of the risk-taking activities within the first line of defense. Finally, the Internal Audit function comprises the “third line of defense.” The Internal Audit function provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, as reflected in audit reports.
Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard
The Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard are designed to establish a stable risk and control environment across the enterprise. The policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, outlines the framework used to ensure that risk and control issues across the enterprise are identified, assessed, measured, monitored, and reported. The Risk Management Policy, the Risk Appetite Standard, and the related policies and procedures constitute the core of the risk management program.
Sallie Mae leverages risk appetite to outline the level of risk we are willing to accept within each risk category, as described below, in pursuit of our business objectives. Compliance with our risk appetite is monitored using a set of risk metrics, with defined thresholds and limits, for each risk category. The management-level Enterprise Risk Committee provides oversight of the risk appetite standard with escalation to the Board of Directors, as appropriate.
Board of Directors Committee Structure
We have a Board of Directors committee structure as outlined below that facilitates oversight, effective challenge, and escalation of risk and control issues.
•Financial Risk Committee. The Financial Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s major financial risks, including credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk. The Financial Risk Committee, along with the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of the Company’s risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The Financial Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the major non-financial risks, including compliance risks, operational risks, information and cyber security risk, and model risk. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, along with the Financial Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of our risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 83
Operational and Compliance Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and reporting processes, the performance of the Internal Audit function, and the qualifications, hiring, performance, and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
•Nominations and Governance Committee. The Nominations and Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors appropriate standards of corporate governance, and assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with regard to oversight of the operations of the Board of Directors, the qualifications and independence of directors, nominations to the Board of Directors, and compliance with the corporate governance standards.
•Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, our incentive compensation and benefits practices for employees of all levels, and management’s succession planning. Additionally, the Compensation Committee provides oversight of human capital management.
Management-Level Committee Structure
Executive Committee. The EC is authorized by the Board of Directors to assist the CEO in the general supervision of the business of the Company. Specifically, the EC will (i) provide to the CEO advice and counsel, subject matter expertise, and recommendations as requested, and (ii) through its subcommittees, facilitate the evaluation and decision-making on routine cross-functional matters, and assist management in the fulfillment of management’s duties related to specific risks. The EC has established the following sub-committees to assist in fulfilling its duties.
•Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”). The ERC provides independent oversight and monitoring of the risk and control environment. The ERC is jointly accountable to the Financial Risk Committee and the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors and provides for escalation accordingly.
•Credit Committee. The Credit Committee is responsible for credit and counterparty risk, product pricing, and credit and collections operations.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The OCRC is the oversight body for the identification, assessment, remediation, measurement, and reporting of operational and compliance risks.
•Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO is responsible for the strategy, processes, and authorities with which the Bank’s interest rate risk, liquidity, and capital adequacy are managed.
Each of these sub-committees is comprised of subject matter experts from the senior management team and is accountable to the EC. Moreover, these sub-committees may be supported by steering or working groups, as appropriate.
Disclosure Committee. Our Disclosure Committee assists our CEO and Chief Financial Officer in their review of periodic SEC reporting documents, earnings releases, investor materials, and related disclosure policies and procedures.
Internal Audit
Internal Audit provides independent assurance to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as to the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management, control, and governance processes. Internal Audit also assists management by providing objective assurance, credible challenge, and consulting services around matters involving risk management. Internal Audit regularly performs selected reviews of our risk management and compliance functions to assess the effectiveness of the overall risk management framework, identifies areas that may require increased focus and resources, and reports significant control issues and recommendations to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually, Internal Audit performs an independent risk assessment to evaluate the risk of all significant components of the Company and uses the results to develop an annual, risk-based Internal Audit plan to provide the assurance services noted above.
Risk Categories
Risk categories are a foundational element of the risk management framework; they are widely used in risk
identification and provide the basis for risk aggregation and reporting. The Company has identified six major risk categories:
84 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
Strategic Risk. Strategic risk is the risk of: adverse impacts to enterprise value, current or anticipated earnings, capital, or franchise value arising from the Company’s competitive and market position and evolving forces in the industry that can affect that position; lack of responsiveness to these conditions; strategic decisions to change the Company’s scale, market position, or operating model; or failure to appropriately consider implementation risks inherent in the Company’s strategy.
The overall development of the Company’s strategic plan includes extensive engagement with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the Board of Directors provides oversight and effective challenge on performance relative to the strategic plan.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from obligors’ failure, or the increased probability thereof, to meet the terms of a lending, issuer, or counterparty agreement. Credit risk is found in all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.
The credit risk related to Private Education Loans is managed within a credit risk infrastructure that includes: (i) a well-defined underwriting, asset quality, and collection policy framework; (ii) an ongoing monitoring and review process of portfolio composition and trends; (iii) assignment and management of credit authorities and responsibilities; and (iv) establishment of an allowance for credit losses that covers estimated future losses based upon an analysis of portfolio metrics and economic factors.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is managed by reviewing counterparties for credit strength on an ongoing basis and through our credit policies, which place limits on the amount of exposure we may take with any one counterparty and require collateral to secure the position. The credit and counterparty risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with contracts in a gain position to us fail to perform under the terms of the contract.
Credit risk exposure is managed primarily through the Credit Committee, and regular reporting on credit programs and credit metrics is provided to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from fluctuations in market conditions such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and other financial market factors. We are exposed to various types of market risk, in particular the risk of loss resulting from interest rate risk, basis risk, and other risks that arise through the management of our investment, debt, and loan portfolios. Market risk exposures are managed primarily through ALCO. These activities are closely tied to those related to the management of our funding and liquidity risks. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the investment and asset and liability management policies and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO. The Chief Financial Officer provides reports to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors on market risk management.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, reputation, or survival resulting from not being able to meet the Company’s financial obligations when they become due, whether due to a lack of available funding or the inability to liquidate assets in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to: meet our funding needs through market cycles, including periods of financial stress; manage the relative maturities of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet; fund disbursements of Private Education Loans and other loans; and service our indebtedness and bank deposits. Ultimately, our liquidity risk relates to our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates and to maintain deposits and other funding sources through the Bank, as well as our maintenance of a reserve of cash and unencumbered highly liquid investment securities that may be readily converted to cash if needed.
Our liquidity risk activities are centralized within our Corporate Finance department, which is responsible for developing and executing our funding strategy. We analyze and monitor our liquidity risk, maintain excess liquidity, and access diverse funding sources depending on current market conditions. Liquidity risks are overseen and recommendations approved primarily through ALCO. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for periodically reviewing the liquidity positions and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO.
Operational Risk. Operational risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events. Operational risk is pervasive in that it exists in all business lines, functional units, legal entities, and geographic locations.
2025 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 85
Operational risk exposures are managed through a combination of first line of defense and control activities and second line of defense oversight. The OCRC is the management committee responsible for operational risk, and it supports the EC in its oversight duties. The OCRC is responsible for escalation to the EC, as appropriate. Additionally, our key risk indicators include operational risk metrics, thresholds, and limits and are included in the periodic reporting to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Cybersecurity risk is one of our significant operational risks. We provide more detailed information on our cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance in Part I, Item 1C. of this Form 10-K.
Compliance Risk. Compliance risk is the risk of legal or regulatory sanctions, fines, penalties, financial losses, or loss to brand resulting from violations of, or non-conformance with, applicable laws, rules, regulations, and self-regulatory organizations’ standards, as well as the Code of Business Conduct.
Primary ownership and responsibility for compliance risk is placed with the first line of defense to identify and manage. Our Compliance function supports these activities by providing extensive training, monitoring, and testing of the processes, policies, and procedures utilized by the first line of defense, maintaining relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and working in close coordination with our Legal department. Compliance risk metrics and regular reporting on compliance programs are provided to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
86 SLM CORPORATION — 2025 Form 10-K
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-25-006776.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures and information contained in “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Strategic Imperatives
To focus our business and increase shareholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our primary focus remains on maximizing the profitability and growth of our core private student loan business, while harnessing and optimizing the power of our brand and attractive client base. In addition, we continue to seek to better inform the external narrative about student lending and Sallie Mae, and strive to maintain a rigorous and predictable capital allocation and return program to create shareholder value. We are focused on driving a mission-led culture that continues to make Sallie Mae a great place to work, while we continue to strengthen our risk and compliance functions, enhance and build upon our risk management framework, and assess and monitor enterprise-wide risk.
Key Financial Measures
Set forth below are brief summaries of our key financial measures. Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Most of our earnings are generated from the interest income earned on assets in our education loan portfolios, net of the interest expense we pay on the funding for those loans. We report these earnings as net interest income. The majority of our interest income comes from our Private Education Loan portfolio.
We also often refer to the net interest margin, which is the net interest yield earned on our interest-earning assets less the rate paid on our related interest-bearing liabilities. As interest rates change, changes in the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities tend to lag slightly compared to changes in the yields on our interest-earning assets, which could impact our net interest margin in any given period.
Loan Sales and Secured Financings
We may sell loans to third parties through whole loan sales, securitizations, or other similar transactions. We typically retain servicing of loans subsequent to their sale and earn revenue for this servicing at prevailing market rates for such services. Selling loans removes the loan assets from our balance sheet and helps us manage our asset growth, capital, and liquidity needs. Alternatively, we may use loans as collateral in connection with the creation of asset-backed securitizations or secured funding facilities structured as financings. These types of transactions may provide us long-term financing, but they do not remove loan assets from our balance sheet, nor do they generate gains on sales of loans, net. Consequently, our operating results may be significantly affected by whether we choose to sell loans and recognize current gains on sale or continue to hold or finance loans, thereby retaining some or all the net interest income from those loans. In 2024, we recognized $255 million in gains from the sale of approximately $3.69 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.42 billion of principal and $274 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third parties.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 45
For additional information regarding these transactions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment” and Note 10, “Borrowings - Unconsolidated Funding Vehicles” in this Form 10-K.
During the third quarter of 2024, we transferred our remaining FFELP Loan portfolio to loans held for sale and subsequently sold the FFELP Loan portfolio to an unaffiliated third party in the fourth quarter of 2024. We wrote down the FFELP Loan portfolio to its estimated fair value through an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses of $8 million in 2024. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment.”
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management estimates and maintains an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date. See “ — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Item 7. Allowances for credit losses are an important indicator of management’s perspective on the future performance of a loan portfolio. Each quarter, management makes an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses to reflect its most up-to-date estimate of future losses by recording a charge against quarterly revenues known as provision expense. As they occur, actual loan charge-offs and recoveries are then charged or credited, respectively, against the allowance for credit losses rather than against earnings.
The allowance for credit losses and provision expense rise in periods of high loan origination, when future charge-offs are expected to increase, and fall when future charge-offs are expected to decline. We bear the full credit exposure on our Private Education Loans. Losses on our Private Education Loans are affected by risk characteristics such as loan status (in-school, grace, forbearance, repayment, and delinquency), loan seasoning (number of months in active repayment), underwriting criteria (e.g., credit scores), presence of a cosigner, servicing and collections practices, and the current economic environment. See Item 1A “Risk Factors — CREDIT RISK — Defaults on our loans could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows” for additional information. Losses typically emerge once a borrower separates from school and enters full principal and interest repayment after the borrower’s grace period (six months, typically) ends. As a larger proportion of our Private Education Loan portfolio enters full principal and interest repayment in the coming years, we would expect the dollar amount of charge-offs to increase.
Prior to the sale of our remaining FFELP Loan portfolio in the fourth quarter of 2024, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense was small because we generally bore a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to the federal guarantee on such loans. We maintained an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses.
Charge-Offs and Delinquencies
Delinquencies are another important indicator of potential future credit performance. Private Education Loans are charged off at the end of the month in which they reach 120 days delinquent or otherwise when the loans are classified as a loss by us or our regulator. Charge-off data provides relevant information with respect to the actual performance of a loan portfolio over time. Management focuses on delinquencies as well as the progression of loans from early to late stage delinquency as a key metric in estimating the allowance for credit losses and tailoring its future collections strategies. We sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off, and use in-house collectors and third-party collectors to collect on retained defaulted loans.
Operating Expenses
The cost of operating our business directly affects our profitability. We strive to manage growth in our business in a prudent fashion by focusing on investments to improve efficiency. We monitor and report internally various metrics, including cost to acquire and cost to service our loans (which include both owned and serviced loans), among others. The cost to acquire is affected by such variables as technology, personnel, and marketing costs. Servicing expenses primarily include compensation and benefit expenses related to our collections, customer support, and payment processing employees, and technology costs and other expenses associated with facilitating and servicing borrowers. Costs to service can vary period to period based upon seasonality and borrower payment status. The cost to service a delinquent borrower is significantly higher than the cost to service a current or in-school borrower.
Private Education Loan Originations
Private Education Loans are the principal asset on our balance sheet, and the amount of new Private Education Loan originations we generate each year is a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 46
Funding Sources
Though we rely primarily on deposits and loan securitizations to fund our loan originations, we also have access to a multi-lender secured borrowing facility (the “Secured Borrowing Facility”) and, from time to time, we access the debt capital markets through unsecured bond issuances. For additional information, see “—Borrowings — Long-term Borrowings” below in this Item 7.
Deposits
We utilize brokered, retail, and other core deposits to meet funding needs and enhance our liquidity position. These deposits can be term or liquid deposits. Our term brokered deposits have original terms from three months to ten years. Retail deposits are sourced through a direct banking platform and serve as an important source of diversified funding. Brokered deposits are sourced through a network of brokers and provide a stable source of funding. In addition, we accept certain deposits considered non-brokered that are held in large accounts structured to allow FDIC insurance to flow through to underlying individual depositors. We further diversify our funding sources with deposits from Educational 529 savings plans and Health Savings plans.
Loan Securitizations
Term ABS financing provides long-term funding for our Private Education Loan portfolio at attractive interest rates and at terms that effectively match the average life of the assets. Loans associated with these transactions will remain on our balance sheet if we retain the residual interest in the related trusts.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 47
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 2,314 | $ | 2,327 | $ | 1,915 | $ | (13) | (1) | % | $ | 412 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||
| Investments | 61 | 51 | 35 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 243 | 214 | 82 | 29 | 14 | 132 | 161 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 2,619 | 2,592 | 2,032 | 26 | 1 | 560 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 1,138 | 1,030 | 543 | 108 | 10 | 487 | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 1,481 | 1,562 | 1,489 | (82) | (5) | 73 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: provisions for credit losses | 409 | 345 | 633 | 64 | 19 | (288) | (45) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provisions for credit losses | 1,072 | 1,217 | 855 | (145) | (12) | 362 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of loans, net | 255 | 160 | 328 | 95 | 59 | (168) | (51) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on securities, net | — | 3 | (60) | (3) | (100) | 63 | 105 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 113 | 84 | 67 | 29 | 35 | 17 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 368 | 247 | 335 | 121 | 49 | (88) | (26) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 637 | 619 | 551 | 18 | 3 | 68 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acquired intangible assets impairment and amortization expense | 5 | 66 | 8 | (61) | (92) | 58 | 725 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expenses | 642 | 685 | 559 | (43) | (6) | 126 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 798 | 778 | 631 | 20 | 3 | 147 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 190 | 197 | 162 | (7) | (4) | 35 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 608 | 581 | 469 | 27 | 5 | 112 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 18 | 18 | 9 | — | — | 9 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 590 | $ | 564 | $ | 460 | $ | 26 | 5 | % | $ | 104 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 2.73 | $ | 2.44 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 0.29 | 12 | % | $ | 0.66 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.68 | $ | 2.41 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 0.27 | 11 | % | $ | 0.65 | 37 | % | ||||||||||||
| Declared dividends per common share | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.02 | 5 | % | $ | — | — | % |
Note: Due to rounding, amounts in this table may not sum to totals.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 48
GAAP Consolidated Earnings Summary
Year Ended December 31, 2024 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2023
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net income was $608 million, or $2.68 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $581 million, or $2.41 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2023. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to an increase in gains on sales of loans, net and other income and a decrease in total non-interest expense, which were offset by a decrease in total net interest income and an increase in provisions for credit losses.
The primary contributors to the drivers of change in net income for the current year period compared with the year-ago period are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2024 decreased by $82 million compared with the year-ago period primarily due to a 31-basis point decrease in our net interest margin and an $79 million decrease in average Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans outstanding. Our net interest margin decreased in the current period from the year-ago period primarily because our cost of funds increased more than the yields on our interest-earning assets. As interest rates change, changes in the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities tend to lag compared to changes in the yields on our interest-earning assets. In a rising interest rate environment, as we experienced in 2022 and the first part of 2023, our variable-rate interest earning assets repriced faster than our cost of funds. As such, we saw an expansion in our net interest margin throughout most of 2023. As interest rates stabilized in the latter half of 2023 and into the first half of 2024, our cost of funds increased faster than our interest-earning assets yields and reduced our net interest margin.
•Provision for credit losses in 2024 was $409 million, compared with $345 million in the year-ago period. During 2024, the increase in the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, and changes in recovery rates. These drivers were offset by $236 million in negative provisions resulting from the approximately $3.69 billion Private Education Loan sales during 2024, an improved economic outlook, and changes in management overlays. In the year-ago period, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, slower prepayment rates, management overlays, and changes in economic outlook, which were partially offset by $205 million in negative provisions recorded as a result of the approximately $3.15 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2023 and an increase in recovery rates (as the result of a 2023 change in our defaulted loan recovery process).
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $255 million in 2024, compared with $160 million in the year-ago period. The increase in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of selling approximately $3.69 billion of Private Education Loans in 2024, compared with the sale of approximately $3.15 billion of Private Education Loans in the year-ago period. Additionally, we received lower sales premiums in 2023 as compared to 2024 due to movement in market interest rates in 2023. We also sold our Credit Card loan portfolio in May 2023 and recorded a $4 million loss on the sale in 2023.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, were less than $1 million in gains in 2024, compared with $3 million in gains in the year-ago period. The decrease from the year-ago period was due to the change in mark-to-fair value of our trading investments.
•Other income was $113 million in 2024, compared with $84 million in the year-ago period. The increase in other income compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of a $21 million increase in third-party servicing fees from the year-ago period. The increase in third-party servicing fees was primarily due to an additional approximately $3.7 billion of sold loans that we continue to service on behalf of the owners of the loans. There was also a $3 million increase in early withdrawal penalty fee income in 2024 compared with the year-ago period, which was related to a health savings account provider that redeemed its deposits early and paid an early withdrawal penalty in the first quarter of 2024.
•For the year ended December 31, 2024, total operating expenses were $637 million, compared with $619 million in the year-ago period. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by higher personnel costs, increased marketing costs, and higher FDIC assessment fees.
•In 2024, we recorded $5 million in impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared with $66 million in the year-ago period. The decrease is a result of the impairment write-down of the Nitro trade name intangible asset taken in the fourth quarter of 2023. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 49
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $190 million, compared with $197 million in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate decreased in 2024 to 23.8 percent from 25.3 percent in the year-ago period. The decrease in the effective rate for 2024 was primarily attributable to a decrease in state income taxes.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2022
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net income was $581 million, or $2.41 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $469 million, or $1.76 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to less provisions for credit losses and an increase in total net interest income and other income, which were offset by decreases in gains on sales of loans, net, and higher operating expenses.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for 2023 compared with 2022 are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2023 increased by $73 million compared with 2022 primarily due to a $375 million increase in average Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans outstanding and a 19-basis point increase in our net interest margin. Our net interest margin increased in 2023 from 2022 because of the dramatic increase in interest rates in 2023. When interest rates rise, the yield on our interest-earning assets typically increases faster than our cost of funds. As such, as rates increased in 2023, we saw our net interest margin increase.
•Provision for credit losses in 2023 was $345 million, compared with $633 million in 2022. During 2023, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, slower prepayment rates, management overlays, and changes in economic outlook, which were partially offset by $205 million in negative provisions recorded as a result of the approximately $3.15 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2023 and an increase in recovery rates (as the result of a change in our defaulted loan recovery process). In 2022, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments made during the period, slower than expected prepayment rates, and additional management overlays, which were partially offset by negative provisions recorded related to approximately $3.34 billion in Private Education Loans sold in 2022 and the adoption of a new loss model that included a reduction in the long-term estimate of losses after the reasonable and supportable period. Management overlays increased in 2022 due to several factors, including additional provisions for our expectation of higher future loan losses related to the previously announced credit administration practices changes we implemented in 2021, “gap year” loans, a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges we experienced in 2022.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $160 million in 2023, compared with $328 million in 2022. The decrease in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of selling approximately $3.15 billion of Private Education Loans in 2023, compared with the sale of approximately $3.34 billion of Private Education Loans in 2022, and lower sales premiums received in 2023 compared to 2022, which were attributable to higher interest rates in 2023. We also sold our Credit Card loan portfolio in May 2023 and recorded a $4 million loss on the sale in 2023.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, were $3 million in gains in 2023, compared with a net loss of $60 million in 2022. The gains on securities, net, in 2023 were related to the changes in mark-to-fair value of our trading investments. During 2022, we determined that an investment in non-marketable equity securities was impaired. As such, we wrote down the value by $60 million in 2022 based upon an estimate of the value of these securities.
•Other income was $84 million in 2023, compared with $67 million in 2022. The increase in other income compared with 2022 was primarily the result of a $13 million increase in third-party servicing fees from 2022 and a $2 million increase in Private Education Loan late fees compared with 2022.
•For the year ended December 31, 2023, total operating expenses were $619 million, compared with $551 million in 2022. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by higher personnel costs, initiative spending, and higher FDIC assessment fees, which were partially offset by lower Credit Card portfolio expenses as a result of the sale of the portfolio.
•In 2023, we recorded $66 million in impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared with $8 million in 2022. During the fourth quarter of 2023, we recorded an impairment of $56 million as a result of a write-down of the value of the Nitro trade name and trademarks intangible assets. This write-down occurred because we planned to discontinue the use of the Nitro trade name and trademarks in 2024 and transition the related branding to the Sallie and Sallie Mae brands and platforms. In 2023, we recorded $10 million in amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, compared to $8 million in 2022. The increase in amortization expense was related to our acquisition of several key assets of Scholly in the third quarter of 2023. For additional
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 50
information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $197 million, compared with $162 million in 2022. The effective tax rate decreased in 2023 to 25.3 percent from 25.6 percent in 2022. The decrease in the effective rate for 2023 was primarily attributable to an increase in tax credits utilized in the year.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 51
,
Financial Condition
Average Balance Sheets - GAAP
The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 21,121,545 | 10.81 | % | $ | 21,039,701 | 10.86 | % | $ | 20,576,737 | 9.14 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 413,338 | 7.45 | 574,218 | 7.19 | 662,194 | 4.62 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | — | — | 11,096 | 14.02 | 28,547 | 5.10 | |||||||||||||||
| Taxable securities | 2,316,848 | 2.65 | 2,543,586 | 2.00 | 2,509,215 | 1.41 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and other short-term investments | 4,700,066 | 5.19 | 4,215,164 | 5.09 | 4,284,442 | 1.93 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28,551,797 | 9.17 | % | 28,383,765 | 9.13 | % | 28,061,135 | 7.24 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 505,245 | 301,749 | 605,447 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 29,057,042 | $ | 28,685,514 | $ | 28,666,582 | |||||||||||||||
| Average Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokered deposits | $ | 10,009,221 | 3.89 | % | $ | 9,803,802 | 3.29 | % | $ | 9,871,787 | 1.95 | % | |||||||||
| Retail and other deposits | 11,142,798 | 4.65 | 11,605,215 | 4.40 | 11,109,675 | 1.65 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities(1) | 5,616,445 | 4.09 | 5,366,365 | 3.66 | 5,517,489 | 3.03 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 26,768,464 | 4.25 | % | 26,775,382 | 3.85 | % | 26,498,951 | 2.05 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | 149,594 | 83,895 | 107,611 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,138,984 | 1,826,237 | 2,060,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 29,057,042 | $ | 28,685,514 | $ | 28,666,582 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 5.19 | % | 5.50 | % | 5.31 | % |
(1) Includes the average balance of our unsecured borrowings, as well as secured borrowings and amortization expense of transaction costs related to our term asset-backed securitizations and our Secured Borrowing Facility.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 52
Rate/Volume Analysis - GAAP
The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Increase (Decrease) | Change Due To(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate | Volume | ||||||||||
| 2024 vs. 2023 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 26,743 | $ | 11,358 | $ | 15,385 | |||||
| Interest expense | 108,174 | 108,440 | (266) | ||||||||
| Net interest income (loss) | $ | (81,431) | $ | (90,630) | $ | 9,199 | |||||
| 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 560,723 | $ | 537,107 | $ | 23,616 | |||||
| Interest expense | 487,291 | 481,570 | 5,721 | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 73,432 | $ | 56,165 | $ | 17,267 |
(1) Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.
Summary of Our Loans Held for Investment Portfolio
Ending Loans Held for Investment Balances, net
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | Total Loans Held for Investment (Private Education Loans) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,397,127 | |
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,837,881 | ||
| Total, gross | 22,235,008 | ||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 103,070 | ||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,435,920) | ||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 20,902,158 | |
| % of total | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 53
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,997,092 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,997,149 | |||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,028,752 | 537,344 | 17,566,096 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 21,025,844 | 537,401 | 21,563,245 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,554 | 1,330 | 82,884 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,335,105) | (4,667) | (1,339,772) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,659,323 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,659,380 | |||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 16,644,365 | 608,993 | 17,253,358 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,303,688 | 609,050 | 20,912,738 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 69,656 | 1,549 | 71,205 | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,353,631) | (3,444) | (1,357,075) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 54
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,544,030 | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | 3,544,112 | |||||||||
| Repayment and other(2) | 17,172,833 | 695,134 | 25,014 | 17,892,981 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,716,863 | 695,216 | 25,014 | 21,437,093 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 1,815 | 222 | 69,525 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,158,977) | (4,077) | (2,281) | (1,165,335) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,582,394 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | 3,582,475 | |||||||||
| Repayment and other(2)(3) | 16,146,943 | 737,512 | 12,238 | 16,896,693 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 19,729,337 | 737,593 | 12,238 | 20,479,168 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 63,475 | 1,993 | 230 | 65,698 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,355,844) | (4,378) | (1,501) | (1,361,723) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||||
| % of total | 96 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school” category include $254 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, or other reasons, and who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were then not required to make any payments.
(2) At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “grace, repayment and other” category include (a) $147 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a grace or deferred status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020, who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were not then required to make any payments, and (b) $639 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a forbearance or repayment status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period.
(3) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 55
Average Loans Held for Investment Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 21,121,545 | 98 | % | $ | 21,039,701 | 97 | % | $ | 20,576,737 | 97 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 413,338 | 2 | 574,218 | 3 | 662,194 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio | $ | 21,534,883 | 100 | % | $ | 21,613,919 | 100 | % | $ | 21,238,931 | 100 | % |
.
Loans Held for Investment, Net — Activity
| Year Ended December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 | |||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 6,629,205 | — | 6,629,205 | ||||||||
| Variable-rate | 435,025 | — | 435,025 | ||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 7,064,230 | — | 7,064,230 | ||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 602,825 | 16,796 | 619,621 | ||||||||
| Sales | (3,430,920) | — | (3,430,920) | ||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (806,908) | (45,467) | (852,375) | ||||||||
| Allowance | (100,815) | 4,667 | (96,148) | ||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | — | (466,168) | (466,168) | ||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,198,547) | (43,892) | (2,242,439) | ||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 20,902,158 | $ | — | $ | 20,902,158 |
| Year Ended December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 5,760,434 | — | 5,760,434 | ||||||||
| Variable-rate | 665,987 | — | 665,987 | ||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 6,426,421 | — | 6,426,421 | ||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,480 | 22,584 | 620,064 | ||||||||
| Sales | (2,938,616) | — | (2,938,616) | ||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (975,889) | (32,855) | (1,008,744) | ||||||||
| Allowance | 18,526 | (1,223) | 17,303 | ||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,375,342) | (61,597) | (2,436,939) | ||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 56
| Year Ended December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 4,189,269 | — | — | 4,189,269 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 1,809,301 | — | 82,819 | 1,892,120 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,998,570 | — | 82,819 | 6,081,389 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 550,474 | 24,642 | (195) | 574,921 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (3,136,302) | — | — | (3,136,302) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,384,950) | (61,529) | — | (1,446,479) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | (194,654) | 633 | 2,281 | (191,740) | |||||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | — | — | (28,905) | (28,905) | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,438,799) | (49,545) | (78,955) | (2,567,299) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | — | $ | 19,626,868 |
“Loan consolidations to third parties” and “Repayments and other” are both significantly affected by the volume of loans in our held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status. The amount of loans in full principal and interest repayment status in our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2024 increased by 3.7 percent compared with December 31, 2023, and now totals 42 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2024. The balance of loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status was affected in 2024 and 2023 by loan sales.
“Loan consolidations to third parties” for the year ended December 31, 2024 total 9.1 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status at December 31, 2024, or 3.9 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2024, compared with the year-ago period of 11.5 percent of our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status, or 4.9 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio, respectively. While interest rates began to decrease towards the end of 2024, increased interest rates for most of the year led to a decrease in consolidations compared to 2023. Historical experience has shown that loan consolidation activity is heightened in the period when the loan initially enters full principal and interest repayment status and then subsides over time.
The “Repayments and other” category includes all scheduled repayments, as well as voluntary prepayments, made on loans in repayment (including loans in full principal and interest repayment status) and also includes charge-offs. Consequently, this category can be significantly affected by the volume of loans in repayment.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 57
Private Education Loan Originations
The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations. Originations represent loans that were funded or acquired during the period presented.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | % | 2023 | % | 2022 | % | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Option - interest only(1) | $ | 1,272,414 | 18 | % | $ | 1,166,442 | 18 | % | $ | 1,146,365 | 19 | % | |||||||||
| Smart Option - fixed pay(1) | 2,331,055 | 33 | 2,121,112 | 33 | 1,950,048 | 33 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - deferred(1) | 2,786,821 | 40 | 2,584,545 | 41 | 2,330,719 | 39 | |||||||||||||||
| Graduate Loan(2) | 623,033 | 9 | 511,193 | 8 | 516,877 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
| Parent Loan(3) | — | — | 38 | — | 30,515 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan originations | $ | 7,013,323 | 100 | % | $ | 6,383,330 | 100 | % | $ | 5,974,524 | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Percentage of loans with a cosigner | 90.0 | % | 87.5 | % | 86.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Average FICO at approval(4) | 752 | 748 | 747 |
(1) Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See Item 1. “Business - Our Business - Private Education Loans” for a further discussion.
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Graduate Loan originations include $32.2 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Graduate Loan originations include $29.4 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Graduate Loan originations include $1.8 million of Parent Loans and $29.1 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status.
(3) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date were processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023.
(4) Represents the higher credit score of the cosigner or the borrower.
Private Education Loan Maturities
The following table summarizes the remaining maturities of our Private Education Loan portfolio.
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | One year or less | After one year to five years | After five years to 15 years | After 15 years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-rate | $ | 7,782 | $ | 313,875 | $ | 8,191,111 | $ | 8,580,614 | $ | 17,093,382 | |||||||||
| Variable-rate | 20,054 | 506,104 | 3,349,420 | 1,266,048 | 5,141,626 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | $ | 27,836 | $ | 819,979 | $ | 11,540,531 | $ | 9,846,662 | $ | 22,235,008 |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 58
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses Activity
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 4,667 | $ | 1,339,772 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | 1,357,075 | |||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 311,787 | — | 311,787 | 320,237 | — | 320,237 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (376,840) | (380) | (377,220) | (420,095) | (1,001) | (421,096) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Write-downs arising from transfer of loans to held for sale(2) | — | (8,297) | (8,297) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 44,756 | — | 44,756 | 46,368 | — | 46,368 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 357,067 | 4,010 | 361,077 | 240,347 | 2,224 | 242,571 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (235,955) | — | (235,955) | (205,383) | — | (205,383) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(3) | 121,112 | 4,010 | 125,122 | 34,964 | 2,224 | 37,188 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,435,920 | $ | — | $ | 1,435,920 | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 4,667 | $ | 1,339,772 |
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | |||||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 344,310 | — | — | 344,310 | 301,655 | — | — | 301,655 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (427,416) | (613) | (3,215) | (431,244) | (229,591) | (321) | (356) | (230,268) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 41,737 | — | 5 | 41,742 | 29,494 | — | 12 | 29,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 410,254 | (20) | 3,301 | 413,535 | (233,852) | 20 | 1,124 | (232,708) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (174,231) | — | — | (174,231) | (66,460) | — | — | (66,460) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | — | (2,372) | (2,372) | 1,887 | — | — | 1,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(3) | 236,023 | (20) | 929 | 236,932 | (298,425) | 20 | 1,124 | (297,281) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | — | $ | 1,357,075 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans transferred to held for sale.
(3) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 59
| 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 | |||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | 1,060,830 | 2,852 | 79,183 | 188 | 1,143,053 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,435,130 | 4,485 | 145,060 | 290 | 1,584,965 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 320,808 | — | — | — | 320,808 | ||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (205,326) | (519) | (39,079) | (119) | (245,043) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(2) | — | — | (108,534) | — | (108,534) | ||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 24,021 | — | 4,984 | 2 | 29,007 | ||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 148,673 | 412 | 40,485 | 1,328 | 190,898 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (161,793) | — | (42,916) | — | (204,709) | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | (205,669) | — | — | — | (205,669) | ||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for loan losses(3) | (218,789) | 412 | (2,431) | 1,328 | (219,480) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | — | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(3) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
Provision for Credit Losses
Below is a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | 121,112 | $ | 34,964 | $ | 236,023 | $ | (298,425) | $ | (218,789) | |||||||||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 283,393 | 308,275 | 396,521 | 264,324 | 312,613 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | 404,505 | 343,239 | 632,544 | (34,101) | 93,824 | ||||||||||||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Loans | — | — | — | — | (2,431) | ||||||||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 4,010 | 2,224 | (20) | 20 | 412 | ||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | — | — | 929 | 1,124 | 1,328 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | 4,010 | 2,224 | 909 | 1,144 | (691) | ||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | 408,515 | 345,463 | 633,453 | (32,957) | 93,133 |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 60
Private Education Loan Allowance for Credit Losses
In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of December 31, 2024, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, in particular, credit quality and delinquency, forbearance, and charge-off trends.
Private Education Loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status were 42 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2024, compared with 43 percent at December 31, 2023.
For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loans, see “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment — Certain Collection Tools — Private Education Loans” in this Form 10-K.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 61
The table below presents our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio delinquency trends. Loans in repayment include loans making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the following table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| Private Education Loans Held for Investment | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Balance | % | Balance | % | Balance | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1) | $ | 5,722,827 | $ | 5,291,991 | $ | 4,895,053 | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance(2) | 405,430 | 324,039 | 279,085 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment and percentage of each status: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans current | 15,513,333 | 96.3 | % | 14,809,271 | 96.1 | % | 14,559,347 | 96.2 | % | |||||||||
| Loans delinquent 30-59 days(3) | 310,748 | 1.9 | 298,751 | 1.9 | 287,308 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
| Loans delinquent 60-89 days(3) | 140,735 | 0.9 | 151,017 | 1.0 | 147,505 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 days or greater past due(3) | 141,935 | 0.9 | 150,775 | 1.0 | 135,390 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans in repayment | 16,106,751 | 100.0 | % | 15,409,814 | 100.0 | % | 15,129,550 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | 22,235,008 | 21,025,844 | 20,303,688 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 103,070 | 81,554 | 69,656 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans | 22,338,078 | 21,107,398 | 20,373,344 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans allowance for losses | (1,435,920) | (1,335,105) | (1,353,631) | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans, net | $ | 20,902,158 | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 19,019,713 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in repayment | 72.4 | % | 73.3 | % | 74.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of loans in repayment | 3.7 | % | 3.9 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in forbearance: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in an extended grace period(4) | 1.6 | % | 1.1 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances(5) | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % | 1.1 | % |
(1)Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans (e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation).
(2)Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.
(3)The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.
(4)We calculate the percentage of loans in an extended grace period as the ratio of (a) Private Education Loans in forbearance in an extended grace period numerator to (b) Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance denominator. An extended grace period aligns with The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency definition of an additional, consecutive, one-time period during which no payment is required for up to six months after the initial grace period. We typically grant this extended grace period to customers who may be having difficulty finding employment before the full principal and interest repayment period starts or once it has begun. Loans in forbearance in an extended grace period were approximately $253 million, $168 million, and $114 million at December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this Item 7 for additional details.
(5)We calculate the percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances as the ratio of (a) Private Education Loans in hardship and other forbearances (excluding loans in an extended grace period) numerator to (b) Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance denominator. If the customer is in financial hardship, we work with the customer and/or cosigner and identify any available alternative arrangements designed to reduce monthly payment obligations, which may include a short-term hardship forbearance. Loans in hardship and other forbearances (excluding loans in an extended grace period) were approximately $152 million, $156 million, and $165 million at December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this Item 7 for additional details.
Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans (held for investment) in repayment decreased to 3.7 percent at December 31, 2024 from 3.9 percent at December 31, 2023. The decrease in the delinquency metric in 2024 compared with 2023 was primarily attributable to the new loan modification programs. See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool” in this
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 62
Item 7 for additional details. The percentage of loans in an extended grace forbearance increased to 1.6 percent at December 31, 2024 from 1.1 percent at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to borrowers being eligible to receive up to six months of extended grace forbearance in one increment instead of multiple instances of two-month increments, coupled with our continued efforts to better match our available program offerings to the financial needs of our borrowers. The percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances remained relatively consistent at 0.9 percent and 1.0 percent, respectively, at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023.
The increase in delinquencies at December 31, 2023, compared with 2022, was primarily attributable to loan modification programs initiated in the fourth quarter of 2023 that required borrowers to remain in their respective delinquency buckets until three consecutive payments were made under the modified loan terms before being brought current (if re-age eligible). The increase in the percentage of loans in an extended grace period at December 31, 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily due to borrowers being eligible to receive up to six months of extended grace forbearance in one increment instead of multiple instances of two-month increments, beginning in September 2023. The percentage of loans in hardship and other forbearances remained relatively consistent at 1.0 percent and 1.1 percent, respectively at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 63
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan (held for investment) losses and the allowance for unfunded loan commitments.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allowance for loan losses, beginning balance | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | |||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | — | — | 1,060,830 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,335,105 | 1,353,631 | 1,158,977 | 1,355,844 | 1,435,130 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer from allowance for unfunded loan commitments(1) | 311,787 | 320,237 | 344,310 | 301,655 | 320,808 | ||||||||||||||
| Provisions: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for current period | 357,067 | 240,347 | 410,254 | (233,852) | 148,673 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (235,955) | (205,383) | (174,231) | (66,460) | (161,793) | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | — | — | 1,887 | (205,669) | ||||||||||||||
| Total provisions(2) | 121,112 | 34,964 | 236,023 | (298,425) | (218,789) | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (376,840) | (420,095) | (427,416) | (229,591) | (205,326) | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 44,756 | 46,368 | 41,737 | 29,494 | 24,021 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (332,084) | (373,727) | (385,679) | (200,097) | (181,305) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, ending balance | 1,435,920 | 1,335,105 | 1,353,631 | 1,158,977 | 1,355,844 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded loan commitments, beginning balance (1) | 112,962 | 124,924 | 72,713 | 110,044 | 2,481 | ||||||||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | — | — | 115,758 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 112,962 | 124,924 | 72,713 | 110,044 | 118,239 | ||||||||||||||
| Provision(2)(3) | 283,393 | 308,275 | 396,521 | 264,324 | 312,613 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer to allowance for loan losses | (311,787) | (320,237) | (344,310) | (301,655) | (320,808) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded loan commitments, ending balance(1) | 84,568 | 112,962 | 124,924 | 72,713 | 110,044 | ||||||||||||||
| Total allowance for credit losses, ending balance | $ | 1,520,488 | $ | 1,448,067 | $ | 1,478,555 | $ | 1,231,690 | $ | 1,465,888 | |||||||||
| Total allowance for credit losses as a percentage of the ending total loan balance, plus unfunded loan commitments and total accrued interest receivable | 5.83 | % | 5.89 | % | 6.30 | % | 5.20 | % | 6.49 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses coverage of net charge-offs | 4.32 | 3.57 | 3.51 | 5.79 | 7.48 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment(4) | 2.19 | % | 2.44 | % | 2.55 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.17 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of ending loans in repayment(4) | 3.68 | % | 3.90 | % | 3.77 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.84 | % | |||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment and forbearance(4) | 2.46 | % | 2.06 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.91 | % | 4.32 | % | |||||||||
| Ending total loans, gross | $ | 22,235,008 | $ | 21,025,844 | $ | 20,303,688 | $ | 20,716,863 | $ | 19,729,337 | |||||||||
| Average loans in repayment(4) | $ | 15,139,184 | $ | 15,310,934 | $ | 15,103,123 | $ | 15,019,869 | $ | 15,518,851 | |||||||||
| Ending loans in repayment(4) | $ | 16,106,751 | $ | 15,409,814 | $ | 15,129,550 | $ | 15,511,212 | $ | 14,304,821 | |||||||||
| Unfunded loan commitments | $ | 2,311,660 | $ | 2,221,077 | $ | 1,995,808 | $ | 1,776,976 | $ | 1,673,018 | |||||||||
| Total accrued interest receivable | $ | 1,549,415 | $ | 1,354,565 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 1,168,895 |
(1) When a new loan commitment is made, we record an allowance to cover lifetime expected credit losses on the unfunded commitments, which is recorded in “Other Liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheet. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6, “Allowance for Credit Losses and Unfunded Loan Commitments” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments.
(2) See “—Financial Condition — Allowance for Credit Losses — Provision for Credit Losses” in this Item 7 for a reconciliation of the provisions for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income.
(3) Includes incremental provision for new commitments and changes to provision for existing commitments.
(4) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of the metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans plus unfunded loan commitments and total accrued interest receivable; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 64
Charge-offs decreased in the year ended December 31, 2024 compared with the year-ago period primarily due to the new loan modification programs implemented throughout the full year 2024. Charge-offs decreased in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared with the year ended December 31, 2022 because of a combination of factors, including improved staffing levels and the impact of the new loan modification programs begun in the fourth quarter of 2023. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we charged off $13 million of delinquent loans that had received certain grants of forbearance under previous credit administration practices (which have been discontinued) and which were classified as a loss and charged off prior to their reaching 120 days delinquent.
Use of Forbearance and Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool
Over the course of the last few years, we have made significant changes to our credit administration practices, enhancing our loss mitigation programs through both our forbearance and loan modification offerings. We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our borrowers manage their student loan obligations and achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loans. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment or interest-only alternative.
Forbearance allows a borrower to not make scheduled payments for a specified period of time. Our forbearance policies and practices vary depending upon whether a borrower is current or delinquent at the time forbearance is requested, generally with stricter requirements for delinquent borrowers. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan by the term of forbearance taken. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total principal or interest repayment obligation. While a loan is in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized (added to principal) at the end of the forbearance. Interest will not capitalize at the end of certain types of forbearance, such as disaster forbearance, however.
During the first six months following a borrower’s grace period, the borrower may be eligible for extended grace forbearance, which provides temporary payment relief to give the borrower additional time to be in a position to make regular principal and interest payments.
Hardship forbearance may be granted in order to provide temporary payment relief to borrowers who are either current in their payments but demonstrate a need for relief, or who are delinquent in their payments but demonstrate an ability and willingness to repay their obligation. In these circumstances, a borrower’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of the forbearance period, for borrowers who were current when they entered forbearance, or those who were delinquent but met specific payment requirements curing their delinquency, the borrower will enter repayment status as current. In all instances, the borrowers are expected to begin making scheduled monthly payments at the end of their forbearance periods. This strategy is aimed at assisting borrowers while mitigating the risks of delinquency and default as well as encouraging resolution of delinquent loans.
Disaster forbearance is used to assist borrowers affected by material events, typically federally-declared disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and pandemics. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described below.
Currently, we generally grant forbearance in increments of one to two months at a time, for up to 12 months over the life of the loan, although extended grace forbearance is typically granted in one six-month increment and disaster forbearance and certain other limited instances do not apply toward the 12-month limit. We also currently require 12 months of positive payment performance by a borrower (meaning the borrower must make payment in a cumulative amount equivalent to 12 monthly required payments under the loan) between successive grants of forbearance and between forbearance grants and certain other repayment alternatives. This required period of positive payment performance does not apply, however, to extended grace forbearances and is not required for a borrower to receive a contractual interest rate reduction. In addition, we currently limit the participation of delinquent borrowers in certain short-term extended or interest-only repayment alternatives to once in 12 months and twice in five years. We also now count the number of months a borrower receives a short-term extended repayment alternative toward the 12-month forbearance limit described above.
For borrowers experiencing more severe hardship, following evaluation of their ability and willingness to repay, we currently use modification programs tailored to the financial condition of the individual borrower. Pursuant to our modification programs, we may reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to a rate between 2 percent and 8 percent
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 65
for a temporary period of two to four years, and in some instances may also permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. For borrowers experiencing the most severe financial conditions, we may permanently reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to 2 percent for the remaining life of the loan and also permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. Following modification, borrowers who are delinquent but meet specific payment requirements curing their delinquency will be brought current. We currently limit the granting of a permanent extension of the final maturity date of a loan to once over the life of the loan, and the number of interest rate reductions to twice over the life of the loan.
We continually monitor our credit administration practices and may modify them further from time to time based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
Delinquency Trends by Active Repayment Status
The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio held for investment aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). Active repayment status includes loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. Our experience shows that the percentage of loans in forbearance status generally decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At December 31, 2024, for Private Education Loans (held for investment) that have been in active repayment status for fewer than 25 months, loans in forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance were 1.9 percent. Approximately 77 percent of our Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance status have been in active repayment status fewer than 25 months.
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,723 | $ | 5,723 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 247 | 66 | 37 | 23 | 32 | — | 405 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,497 | 3,585 | 2,230 | 1,518 | 3,683 | — | 15,513 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 78 | 58 | 49 | 36 | 90 | — | 311 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 38 | 25 | 22 | 17 | 39 | — | 141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 39 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 44 | — | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,899 | $ | 3,757 | $ | 2,358 | $ | 1,610 | $ | 3,888 | $ | 5,723 | 22,235 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,436) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 20,902 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.50 | % | 0.40 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.19 | % | — | % | 2.46 | % |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 66
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,292 | $ | 5,292 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 190 | 55 | 31 | 20 | 28 | — | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,129 | 3,529 | 2,183 | 1,472 | 3,496 | — | 14,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 81 | 56 | 45 | 33 | 84 | — | 299 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 40 | 29 | 24 | 17 | 41 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 42 | 28 | 23 | 16 | 42 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,482 | $ | 3,697 | $ | 2,306 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 5,292 | 21,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,335) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.21 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.18 | % | — | % | 2.06 | % |
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,895 | $ | 4,895 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 165 | 43 | 26 | 19 | 26 | — | 279 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,131 | 3,393 | 2,129 | 1,603 | 3,303 | — | 14,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 80 | 58 | 44 | 31 | 74 | — | 287 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 43 | 30 | 20 | 17 | 38 | — | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 41 | 27 | 20 | 14 | 34 | — | 136 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,460 | $ | 3,551 | $ | 2,239 | $ | 1,684 | $ | 3,475 | $ | 4,895 | 20,304 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (1,354) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.07 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.17 | % | — | % | 1.81 | % |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 67
Private Education Loans Held for Investment Types
The following table provides information regarding the loans in repayment balance and total loan balance by Private Education Loan held for investment product type for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | Smart Option | Graduate Loan | Other(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 14,273,952 | $ | 1,466,915 | $ | 365,884 | $ | 16,106,751 | |||||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 19,710,266 | $ | 2,067,468 | $ | 457,274 | $ | 22,235,008 |
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | Smart Option | Graduate Loan | Other(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 13,747,153 | $ | 1,243,129 | $ | 419,532 | $ | 15,409,814 | |||||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 18,764,200 | $ | 1,750,814 | $ | 510,830 | $ | 21,025,844 |
(1) Other includes our Parent Loan and Career training loan products. In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023. In May 2022, we discontinued offering our Career Training loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in September 2023.
(2) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans 90 days or greater past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The majority of the total accrued interest receivable represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accruing on that loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized to the balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The allowance for credit losses considers both the collectibility of principal and accrued interest. The allowance for uncollectible interest estimates the additional uncollectible interest that is not captured in the allowance for credit losses.
| Private Education Loans | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrued Interest Receivable | |||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Total Interest Receivable | 90 Days or Greater Past Due | Allowance forUncollectibleInterest(1) | ||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | $ | 1,549,415 | $ | 6,420 | $ | 12,366 | |||||
| December 31, 2023 | $ | 1,354,565 | $ | 8,373 | $ | 9,897 | |||||
| December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 6,609 | $ | 8,121 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 4,937 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,168,895 | $ | 4,354 | $ | 4,467 |
(1) The allowance for uncollectible interest at December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020 represents the expected losses related to the portion of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are in repayment (at December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, relates to $164 million, $151 million, $240 million, $240 million, and $196 million, respectively, of accrued interest receivable) that is/was not expected to be capitalized. The accrued interest receivable that is/was expected to be capitalized ($1.4 billion, $1.2 billion, $937 million, $947 million, and $973 million, respectively, at December 31, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020) is/was reserved for in the allowance for credit losses.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 68
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to fund our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress, our ongoing ability to fund originations of Private Education Loans, and our ability to meet any outflows of our Bank deposits. To achieve these objectives, we analyze and monitor our liquidity needs, and maintain excess liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, such as deposits at the Bank, issuance of secured debt primarily through asset-backed securitizations, other financing facilities, and loan sales.
At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, our sources of liquidity included liquid investments with unrealized losses of $105.8 million and $128.9 million, respectively. It is our policy to manage operations so liquidity needs are fully satisfied through normal operations to avoid unplanned loan or liquid investment sales under all but the most dire emergency conditions. Our liquidity management is governed by policies approved by our Board of Directors. Oversight of these policies is performed in the Asset and Liability Committee, a management-level committee. These policies take into account the volatility of cash flow forecasts, expected asset and liability maturities, anticipated loan demand, and a variety of other factors to establish minimum liquidity guidelines.
Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and the markets for bank deposits at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our performance, competitive pressures, the macroeconomic environment, and the impact they have on the availability of funding sources in the marketplace. We target maintaining sufficient on-balance sheet and contingent sources of liquidity to enable us to meet all contractual and contingent obligations under various stress scenarios, including severe macroeconomic stresses as well as specific stresses that test the resiliency of our balance sheet. We hold a significant liquidity buffer of cash and securities, which we expect to maintain through 2025. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, our liquidity levels will likely vary from quarter to quarter.
Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity
Ending Balances
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 3,745 | $ | 3,224 | $ | — | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,696,621 | 4,146,614 | 4,617,533 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,361,431 | 1,988,295 | 2,012,901 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,061,797 | $ | 6,138,133 | $ | 6,630,434 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
Average Balances
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 8,698 | $ | 6,827 | $ | 7,954 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,504,167 | 4,014,444 | 4,080,312 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,647,113 | 1,975,754 | 2,230,118 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,159,978 | $ | 5,997,025 | $ | 6,318,384 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 69
Deposits
The following table summarizes total deposits.
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits - interest-bearing | $ | 21,066,752 | $ | 21,651,657 | ||||
| Deposits - non-interest-bearing | 1,816 | 1,531 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 21,068,568 | $ | 21,653,188 |
Our total deposits of $21.1 billion were comprised of $9.5 billion in brokered deposits and $11.6 billion in retail and other deposits at December 31, 2024, compared with total deposits of $21.7 billion, which were comprised of $10.3 billion in brokered deposits and $11.4 billion in retail and other deposits, at December 31, 2023.
Interest-bearing deposits as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity money market deposit accounts (“MMDAs”), and retail and brokered CDs. Interest-bearing deposits also include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and that we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.0 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2024, compared with $7.6 billion at December 31, 2023. The omnibus accounts are structured in such a way that entitles the individual depositor pass-through deposit insurance (subject to FDIC rules and limitations), and the majority of these deposits have contractual minimum balances and maturity terms.
Some of our deposit products are serviced by third-party providers. Placement fees associated with the brokered CDs are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest rate method. We recognized placement fee expense of $11 million, $12 million, and $13 million in the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. Fees paid to third-party brokers related to brokered CDs were $8 million, $8 million, and $13 million during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
Interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2024 and 2023 are summarized as follows:
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | ||||||||||
| Money market | $ | 9,582,290 | 4.27 | % | $ | 10,258,292 | 4.85 | % | ||||||
| Savings | 944,034 | 4.02 | 945,000 | 4.35 | ||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 10,540,428 | 4.20 | 10,448,365 | 3.69 | ||||||||||
| Deposits - interest-bearing | $ | 21,066,752 | $ | 21,651,657 |
(1) Includes the effect of interest rate swaps in effective hedge relationships.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were $567 million and $478 million, respectively, of deposits exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Accrued interest on deposits was $92 million and $91 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 70
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment, or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us.
Excess cash is generally invested with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRB”) on an overnight basis or in the FRB’s Term Deposit Facility, minimizing counterparty exposure on cash balances.
Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of a small portfolio of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises that are purchased to meet CRA targets. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board-approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.
Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”), or clearinghouses for over-the-counter derivatives. CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by the Bank are covered under CSAs or clearinghouse agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our exposure to the counterparty is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position, less any collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with the counterparty.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act requires all standardized derivatives, including most interest rate swaps, to be submitted for clearing to central counterparties to reduce counterparty risk. Two of the central counterparties we use are the CME and the LCH. All variation margin payments on derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH are accounted for as legal settlement. As of December 31, 2024, $850 million notional of our derivative contracts were cleared on the CME and $71 million were cleared on the LCH. The derivative contracts cleared through the CME and LCH represent 92.3 percent and 7.7 percent, respectively, of our total notional derivative contracts of $921 million at December 31, 2024.
For derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH, the net gain (loss) position includes the variation margin amounts as settlement of the derivative and not collateral against the fair value of the derivative. The amount of variation margin included as settlement as of December 31, 2024 was $(22) million and $(1) million for the CME and LCH, respectively. Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are presented as realized gains (losses).
Our exposure to the counterparty is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position less any collateral held and plus any collateral posted. When there is a net negative exposure, we consider our exposure to the counterparty to be zero. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had a net positive exposure (derivative gain/loss positions to us, less collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with counterparties) related to derivatives of $5 million and $9 million, respectively.
We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties.
The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2024.
| As of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands) | SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure, net of collateral | $ | 4,839 | |
| Exposure to counterparties with credit ratings, net of collateral | $ | 4,839 | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3 | — | % | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3 | — | % |
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 71
Regulatory Capital
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking authorities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position. Under U.S. Basel III and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital standards that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and its classification under the prompt corrective action framework are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings, and other factors.
Capital Management
The Bank intends to maintain at all times regulatory capital levels that meet both the minimum levels required under U.S. Basel III (including applicable buffers) and the levels necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action framework, in order to support asset growth and operating needs, address unexpected credit risks, and protect the interests of depositors and the DIF administered by the FDIC. The Bank’s Capital Policy requires management to monitor these capital standards and the Bank’s compliance with them. The Board of Directors and management periodically evaluate the quality of assets, the stability of earnings, and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for the Bank. The Company is a source of strength for the Bank and will provide additional capital if necessary.
We believe that current and projected capital levels are appropriate for 2025. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios exceed the required minimum ratios and the applicable buffers under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III standards as well as the “well capitalized” standards under the prompt corrective action framework.
Under U.S. Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain the following minimum regulatory capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. In addition, the Bank is subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5 percent. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in restrictions on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. Including the buffer, the Bank is required to maintain the following capital ratios under U.S. Basel III in order to avoid such restrictions: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 7.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 8.5 percent, and a Total risk-based capital ratio of greater than 10.5 percent.
To qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework for insured depository institutions, the Bank must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
In July 2023, the federal banking agencies proposed a rule to implement significant changes to the U.S. Basel Ill regulatory capital requirements. The proposed changes to the regulatory capital requirements generally would amend or introduce approaches and methodologies that would apply to banking organizations with total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more or to banking organizations with significant trading activity. The proposed rule therefore would not affect the Bank's capital requirements or the calculation of its capital ratios.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopted CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, could elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. On each of January 1, 2022, 2023, and 2024, 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts was phased in for regulatory capital purposes. On January 1, 2025, the remaining 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts was phased in for regulatory capital purposes, with the phased-in amounts included in regulatory capital at the beginning of the year. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $953 million. This
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 72
transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
At December 31, 2024, the adjusted transition amounts that were deferred and are being phased in for regulatory capital purposes are as follows:
| Adjusted Transition Amounts | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Remaining Adjusted Transition Amounts to be Phased-In | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | $ | 836,351 | $ | (209,088) | $ | (209,088) | $ | (209,088) | $ | 209,087 | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | 1,038,145 | (259,536) | (259,536) | (259,536) | 259,537 | ||||||||||||||
| Liability for unfunded commitments | 104,377 | (26,094) | (26,094) | (26,095) | 26,094 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 306,171 | (76,542) | (76,542) | (76,543) | 76,544 |
The Bank’s required and actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios, including applicable capital conservation buffers, under U.S. Basel III are shown in the following table. The following capital amounts and ratios are based upon the Bank’s average assets and risk-weighted assets, as indicated. The Bank has elected to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income related to both available-for-sale investments and swap valuations from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments included in other comprehensive income totaled $83 million and $115 million, net of tax of $27 million and $37 million, respectively. The capital ratios would remain above the well capitalized thresholds, including applicable capital conservation buffers, if the unrealized loss became fully recognized into capital.
| Actual | U.S. Basel IIIMinimum Requirements Plus Buffer(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2024(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 11.3 | % | $ | 1,827,318 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 11.3 | % | $ | 2,218,886 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,294,663 | 12.6 | % | $ | 2,740,976 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 2,957,067 | 9.7 | % | $ | 1,213,505 | 4.0 | % | |||||
| As of December 31, 2023(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 12.3 | % | $ | 1,719,621 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 12.3 | % | $ | 2,088,111 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,334,140 | 13.6 | % | $ | 2,579,432 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 10.2 | % | $ | 1,184,213 | 4.0 | % |
(1) Reflects the U.S. Basel III minimum required ratio plus the applicable capital conservation buffer.
(2) The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios also exceeded all applicable standards for the Bank to qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework.
(3) For December 31, 2024 and 2023, the actual amounts and the actual ratios include the respective adjusted transition amounts discussed above that were phased in at the beginning of 2024 and 2023.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 73
Dividends
The Bank is chartered under the laws of the State of Utah and its deposits are insured by the FDIC. The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. The Company relies on dividends from the Bank, as necessary, to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends and other payments and consummate share repurchases, as described herein. The Bank declared $570 million, $550 million, and $700 million in dividends to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, with the proceeds primarily used to fund share repurchase programs and stock dividends. We expect that the Bank will pay dividends to the Company as may be necessary to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends on its Series B Preferred Stock and common stock and to consummate any common share repurchases by the Company under the share repurchase programs. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors — GENERAL RISKS” for possible limitations on the payments of our dividends.
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings consist of unsecured debt and secured borrowings issued through our term ABS program and our Secured Borrowing Facility. The issuing entities for those secured borrowings are variable interest entities and are consolidated for accounting purposes. The following table summarizes our secured borrowings at December 31, 2024 and 2023. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt (fixed-rate) | $ | — | $ | 995,420 | $ | 995,420 | $ | — | $ | 992,200 | $ | 992,200 | |||||||||||
| Total unsecured borrowings | — | 995,420 | 995,420 | — | 992,200 | 992,200 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | — | 4,617,743 | 4,617,743 | — | 3,585,254 | 3,585,254 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | — | 827,182 | 827,182 | — | 650,058 | 650,058 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan term securitizations | — | 5,444,925 | 5,444,925 | — | 4,235,312 | 4,235,312 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total secured borrowings | — | 5,444,925 | 5,444,925 | — | 4,235,312 | 4,235,312 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 6,440,345 | $ | 6,440,345 | $ | — | $ | 5,227,512 | $ | 5,227,512 |
Short-term Borrowings
Secured Financings
On June 14, 2024, we amended our $2 billion maximum financing Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. The amendment extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until June 13, 2025. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on June 13, 2026 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur). The one-year revolving period plus the one-year amortization period results in a contractual maturity that is two years from the date of inception or renewal; however, we classify advances under our Secured Borrowing Facility as short-term borrowings because it is our intention to repay those advances within one year. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no outstanding short-term borrowings under the Secured Borrowing Facility. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 74
Long-term Borrowings
Unsecured Financing Transactions
On October 29, 2020, we issued at par $500 million of 4.20 percent unsecured Senior Notes due October 29, 2025. This unsecured borrowing remained classified as long-term as of December 31, 2024 in accordance with our ability and intent to refinance the debt on a long-term basis. At December 31, 2024, the outstanding balance was $499 million. On February 18, 2025, we redeemed these Senior Notes. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 23, “Subsequent Events” in this Form 10-K for additional information.
On November 1, 2021, we issued $500 million of 3.125 percent unsecured Senior Notes due November 2, 2026, at a price of 99.43 percent. At December 31, 2024, the outstanding balance was $496 million.
On January 31, 2025, we issued $500 million of 6.50 percent unsecured Senior Notes due January 31, 2030. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 23, “Subsequent Events” in this Form 10-K.
Secured Financing Transactions
The following summarizes those Private Education Loan Trust term ABS issued in 2023 and 2024 in which we retained 100 percent of the residual class certificates.
| SMB Private Education Loan Trust | Date Closed | Loans Transferred to the Trust(1) | Notes Issued | Gross Proceeds | Weighted Average Cost of Funds(2) | Weighted Average Life (in years) of Class A and Class B Notes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2023-A ABS Transaction | March 15, 2023 | $ | 644,573 | $ | 579,000 | $ | 571,910 | SOFR plus 1.53% | 5.06 | |||||||||
| 2023-C ABS Transaction | August 16, 2023 | 647,934 | 568,000 | 567,881 | SOFR plus 1.69% | 4.93 | ||||||||||||
| Total 2023 | $ | 1,292,507 | $ | 1,147,000 | $ | 1,139,791 | ||||||||||||
| 2024-C ABS Transaction | May 15, 2024 | $ | 733,644 | $ | 668,000 | $ | 667,888 | SOFR plus 1.19% | 5.36 | |||||||||
| 2024-E ABS Transaction | August 14, 2024 | 944,645 | 868,000 | 867,743 | SOFR plus 1.42% | 5.17 | ||||||||||||
| 2024-F ABS Transaction | November 6, 2024 | 732,445 | 680,000 | 679,981 | SOFR plus 1.08% | 5.09 | ||||||||||||
| Total 2024 | $ | 2,410,734 | $ | 2,216,000 | $ | 2,215,612 |
(1)The transfer of such loans did not qualify for sale treatment and thus remain on our consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2024, the following Private Education Loan amounts remain encumbered related to these transactions:
| SMB Private Education Loan Trust | Loan Principal | Capitalized Interest | Total Loans | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| 2023-A ABS Transaction | $ | 484,551 | $ | 32,856 | $ | 517,407 | |||||
| 2023-C ABS Transaction | 516,507 | 35,287 | 551,794 | ||||||||
| Total 2023 | $ | 1,001,058 | $ | 68,143 | $ | 1,069,201 | |||||
| 2024-C ABS Transaction | $ | 646,550 | 52,968 | $ | 699,518 | ||||||
| 2024-E ABS Transaction | 841,355 | 69,238 | 910,593 | ||||||||
| 2024-F ABS Transaction | 662,361 | 55,131 | 717,492 | ||||||||
| Total 2024 | $ | 2,150,266 | 177,337 | $ | 2,327,603 |
(2)Represents SOFR equivalent cost of funds for variable and fixed-rate bonds, excluding issuance costs.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 75
Pre-2023 Transactions
Prior to 2023, we executed a total of $10.38 billion in ABS transactions that were accounted for as secured financings. At December 31, 2024, $3.74 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.63 billion of principal and $107 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered as a result of these transactions.
Other Borrowing Sources
We maintain discretionary uncommitted Federal Funds lines of credit with various correspondent banks, which totaled $125 million at December 31, 2024. The interest rate we are charged on these lines of credit is priced at Fed Funds plus a spread at the time of borrowing, and is payable daily. We did not utilize these lines of credit in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
We established an account at the FRB to meet eligibility requirements for access to the Primary Credit borrowing facility at the FRB’s Discount Window (the “Window”). The Primary Credit borrowing facility is a lending program available to depository institutions that are in generally sound financial condition. All borrowings at the Window must be fully collateralized. We can pledge asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, as well as Private Education Loans, to the FRB as collateral for borrowings at the Window. Generally, collateral value is assigned based on the estimated fair value of the pledged assets. At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the value of our pledged collateral at the FRB was $2.2 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The interest rate charged to us is the discount rate set by the FRB. We did not utilize this facility in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually at the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. At December 31, 2024, we had $2.3 billion of outstanding contractual loan commitments which we expect to fund during the remainder of the 2024/2025 academic year. At December 31, 2024, we had an $85 million reserve recorded in “Other Liabilities” to cover lifetime expected credit losses on the unfunded commitments.
Contractual Cash Obligations
In addition to our contractual loan commitments, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. These include contractual principal obligations associated with long-term Bank deposits, secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations. Our material contractual cash obligations relate to Bank deposits. At December 31, 2024, we had $7.8 billion of principal obligations related to Bank deposits due in the next year, and $7.7 billion due thereafter. At December 31, 2024, our contractual cash obligations due in the next year for secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $824 million, $500 million, and $7 million, respectively, and our contractual cash obligations due thereafter for our secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $4.6 billion, $500 million, and $27 million, respectively.
Common Stock
Our shareholders have authorized the issuance of 1.125 billion shares of common stock (par value of $0.20). At December 31, 2024, 210 million shares were issued and outstanding and 33 million shares were unissued but encumbered for outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and dividend equivalent units for employee compensation and remaining authority for stock-based compensation plans. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” in this Form 10-K for additional details.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 76
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies” in this Form 10-K includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates its estimates, particularly those that include the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and are often about matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions relate to the following critical accounting policies that are discussed in more detail below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date.
In determining the lifetime expected credit losses on our Private Education Loan portfolio loan segments, we use a discounted cash flow method. This method requires us to project future principal and interest cash flows on our loans in those portfolios.
To estimate the future expected cash flows, we use statistical loan-level models that consider life of loan expectations for defaults, prepayments, recoveries, and any other qualitative adjustments deemed necessary, to determine the adequacy of the allowance at each balance sheet date. These cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Management adjusts the effective interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments. The difference between the present value of those cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the underlying loans is the allowance for credit losses. Entities that measure credit losses based on the present value of expected future cash flows are permitted to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense, but may alternatively report the change in present value due to the passage of time as interest income. We have elected to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense.
We estimate future default rates used in our current expected credit losses at a loan level using historical loss experience, current borrower characteristics, current conditions, and economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable period. At the end of the reasonable and supportable forecast period, we immediately revert our forecasted economic factors to long-term historical averages. We estimate future prepayment speeds used in our current expected credit losses at a loan level using historical prepayment experience, current borrower characteristics, current conditions, and economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable period.
The reasonable and supportable forecast period is meant to represent the period in which we believe we can estimate the impact of forecasted economic factors in our expected losses. We use a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, although this period is subject to change as our view evolves on our ability to reasonably forecast economic conditions to estimate future losses.
In estimating future default rates and prepayment speeds in our current expected credit losses, we use a combination of expected economic scenarios coupled with our historical experience and adjust for any qualitative factors (as described below). We also develop an adverse and favorable economic scenario. At each reporting date, we determine the appropriate weighting of these alternate scenarios based upon the current economic conditions and our view of the risks of alternate outcomes. This weighting of expectations is used in calculating our current expected credit losses recorded each period.
We obtain forecasts for these inputs from Moody’s Analytics. Moody’s Analytics provides a range of forecasts for each of these inputs with various likelihoods of occurrence. We determine which forecasts we will include in our estimation of allowance for credit losses and the associated weightings for each of these inputs. At December 31, 2024, December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, we used the Baseline (50th percentile likelihood of occurring)/S1 (stronger near-term growth scenario - 10 percent likelihood of occurring)/S3 (unfavorable (or downside) scenario - 10 percent likelihood of occurring) scenarios and weighted them 40 percent, 30 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. Management reviews both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses.
In estimating recoveries, we use both estimates of what we expect to receive from the sale of defaulted loans as well as historical borrower payment behavior to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 77
In addition to the above modeling approach, we also take certain other qualitative factors into consideration when calculating the allowance for credit losses, which could result in management overlays (increases or decreases to the allowance for credit losses). These management overlays can encompass a broad array of factors not captured by model inputs, including, but not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards, changes in servicing policies and collection administration practices, including the loan modification program changes implemented in the fourth quarter of 2023, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, charge-offs, recoveries not already included in the analysis, the effect of other external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated current expected credit losses, the performance of the model over time versus actual losses, and any other operational or regulatory changes that could affect our estimate of future losses.
The evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. If actual future performance in delinquency, charge-offs, and recoveries is significantly different than estimated, or management assumptions or practices were to change, this could materially affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses, the timing of when losses are recognized, and the related provision for credit losses in our consolidated statements of income.
When calculating our allowance for credit losses and liability for unfunded commitments, we incorporate several inputs that are subject to change period to period. These include, but are not limited to, CECL model inputs and any overlays deemed necessary by management. The most impactful CECL model inputs include:
•Economic forecasts;
•Weighting of economic forecasts; and
•Recovery rates.
Of the model inputs outlined above, economic forecasts, weighting of economic forecasts, and recovery rates are subject to estimation uncertainty, and changes in these inputs could have a material impact to our allowance for credit losses and the related provision for credit losses.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, we changed our loss model to include forecasts of college graduate unemployment, retail sales, and median family income in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Prior to this change, we included forecasts of college graduate unemployment and the Consumer Price Index in our loss forecasting models.
In 2023, we experienced slower prepayment rates due to the rising interest rate environment. Historically, when rates rise, loan prepayments decline due to a reduction in consolidation activity of our borrowers to third party lenders, and when rates decline, loan prepayments rise due to an increase in consolidation activity of our borrowers to third party lenders. During 2023, our estimates of future prepayment speeds reflected the then current interest rate environment and future expectations of increased prepayment speeds in line with market expectations of a decline in interest rates based on the scenarios produced by Moody's Analytics described above. Slower prepayment speeds increase the allowance for credit losses because the loss rates applied in the future periods are applied to higher loan balances.
In the second quarter of 2024, we implemented a loan-level future default rate model that includes current portfolio characteristics and forecasts of real gross domestic product and college graduate unemployment. In the second quarter of 2024, we also implemented a future prepayment speeds model to include forecasts of real gross domestic product, retail sales, SOFR, and the U.S. 10-year treasury rate. These models reduce the reliance on certain qualitative overlays compared to the previous default rate and prepayment speeds models. Prior to these changes, our default rate and prepayment speeds models used forecasts of college graduate unemployment, retail sales, home price index, and median family income. Both the future default rate model and the future prepayment speeds model are used in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. The combined impact upon implementation of these model enhancements and the changes in the related qualitative overlays did not have a material impact on the overall level of our allowance for credit losses.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 78
To demonstrate the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses for our Private Education Loan portfolio to a more pessimistic forecast of expected economic outcomes, we considered what our allowance for credit losses would be if we applied a 100 percent probability weighting to the S3 unfavorable (or downside/90th percentile) scenario (with a concurrent 0 percent weighting for both the Baseline and S1 stronger near-term growth scenarios) under the range of scenarios noted above. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 of $177 million or 11.6 percent. In addition, we also considered a 100 percent probability weighting to the S4 unfavorable (or downside/96th percentile) scenario (with a concomitant 0 percent weighting for both the Baseline and S1 stronger near-term growth scenarios) under the range of scenarios noted above. Excluding consideration of qualitative adjustments, this sensitivity analysis would result in a hypothetical increase in our allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 of $274 million or 18.0 percent. These scenarios do not reflect our current expectations as of December 31, 2024, nor do they capture other qualitative adjustments or all the potential unknown variables that could arise in the forecast periods, but they provide an approximation of possible outcomes under hypothetical pessimistic conditions. The estimated impacts were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable periods, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods are based on longer term averages and only change when we determine there is a fundamental change that will affect the long-term rate.
Below we describe in further detail our policies and procedures for the allowance for credit losses as they relate to our Private Education Loan portfolio. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we sold our remaining FFELP Loan portfolio to an unaffiliated third party. During the third quarter of 2022, we reclassified our Credit Card loan portfolio to loans held-for-sale and subsequently sold the Credit Card portfolio to a third party in May 2023.
Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses
In addition to the key assumptions/estimates described above, some estimates are unique to our Private Education Loan portfolio. Estimates are made on our Private Education Loans regarding when each borrower will separate from school. The cash flow timing of when a borrower will begin making full principal and interest payments is dependent upon when the student either graduates or leaves school. These dates can change based upon many factors. We receive information regarding projected graduation dates from a third-party clearinghouse. The separation from school date is updated quarterly based on updated information received from the clearinghouse.
Additionally, when we have a contractual obligation to fund a loan or a portion of a loan at a later date, we make an estimate regarding the percentage of this obligation that will be funded. This estimate is based on historical experience. For unfunded commitments, we recognize the related life of loan allowance as a liability. Once the loan is funded, that liability transfers to the allowance for Private Education Loan losses.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 79
Key Credit Quality Indicators - Private Education Loans
We determine the collectability of our Private Education Loan portfolio by evaluating certain risk characteristics. We consider credit score at original approval and periodically refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan’s term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of the creditworthiness of borrowers, and the higher the credit scores the more likely it is the borrowers will be able to make all of their contractual payments. Loan status affects the credit risk because a past due loan is more likely to result in a credit loss than a current loan. Additionally, loans in the deferred payment status have different credit risk profiles compared with those in current pay status. Loan seasoning affects credit risk because a loan with a history of making payments generally has a lower incidence of default than a loan with a history of making infrequent or no payments. The existence of a cosigner lowers the likelihood of default as well. We monitor and update these credit quality indicators in the analysis of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses on a quarterly basis.
In the second quarter of 2023, we changed how we collect on defaulted loans. Previously, we used a mix of in-house collectors and sales to third parties. We continue to sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off but no longer sell retained defaulted loans (that have been subject to internal collection attempts for six months) to third parties and instead continue our collection efforts using in-house collectors and third-party collectors. This improved our estimate of recovery rates for the year ended December 31, 2023. When we estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans, we no longer include expectations of future sales on retained defaulted loans. We continue to monitor how we collect on defaulted loans and may modify the approach from time to time based on performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
For December 31, 2022, we used both an estimate of recovery rates from in-house collections as well as expectations of future sales of defaulted loans to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
Private Education Loans generally do not require borrowers to begin principal and interest repayment until at least six months after the borrowers have graduated or otherwise separated from school. Consequently, the loss estimates for these loans are generally low while the borrower is in school and then increase upon the end of the grace period after separation from school. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, 26 percent and 25 percent, respectively, of the principal balance of the Private Education Loan portfolio was related to borrowers who were then in an in-school (fully deferred), grace, or other deferment status and not required to make payments.
Our collection policies for Private Education Loans allow for periods of nonpayment (forbearance) for certain borrowers requesting an extended grace period upon leaving school or experiencing temporary difficulty meeting payment obligations.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for Private Education Loans, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most relevant of the metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans plus unfunded loan commitments and total accrued interest receivable; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
We consider a Private Education Loan to be delinquent if the borrower has not made a required payment prior to the 31st day after such payment was contractually due.
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure for Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. The discounted cash flow approach described above includes expected future contractual disbursements. The portion of the allowance for credit losses related to future disbursements is shown as a liability on the face of the balance sheet, and related provision for credit losses is reflected on the income statement.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 80
Uncollectible Interest
The majority of the total accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loan portfolio represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and on fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accrued on the loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized and increase the unpaid principal balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The discounted cash flow approach and the allowance for credit losses described above consider both the collectability of principal and accrued interest. The allowance for uncollectible interest estimates the additional uncollectible interest that is not captured in the allowance for credit losses. The allowance for uncollectible interest uses historical experience to estimate the uncollectible interest on loans for which payment in full of principal or interest is not expected. This amount is recorded as a reduction of interest income. Accrued interest receivable is separately disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses
During the third quarter of 2024, we transferred our FFELP Loan portfolio to loans held for sale as we planned to sell our FFELP Loan portfolio. At that time, we wrote down this loan portfolio to its estimated fair value through an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses of $8 million. We subsequently sold the FFELP Loan portfolio to a third party in the fourth quarter of 2024.
FFELP Loans are insured as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default, subject to a risk-sharing level based on the date of loan disbursement. These insurance obligations are supported by contractual rights against the United States. For loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006, owners receive 97 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed after October 1, 1993, and before July 1, 2006, owners receive 98 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993, owners receive 100 percent reimbursement. Because owners bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to this federal guarantee, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense were relatively small.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we used the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for the unguaranteed portion of our FFELP Loans. We maintained an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for FFELP Loan losses used historical experience of customer default behavior. We applied the default rate projections, net of applicable risk sharing, to our FFELP Loans for the relevant period to perform our quantitative calculation. Once the quantitative calculation was performed, we reviewed the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and determined if qualitative adjustments needed to be considered.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 81
Risk Management
Our Approach
Risk is inherent in our business activities and the specialized lending industry we serve. The ability of management to identify, manage, and remediate risk in a timely manner is critical to our continued success. Our risk management framework is designed to assess, manage, and report these risks and escalate as appropriate to the Board of Directors or its designee.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our overall strategic direction, including our risk management capability and effectiveness. The Board of Directors has oversight of key policies as well as the risk management framework developed and administered by the management team. We also have a process that is designed to escalate meaningful departures from our risk appetite statements to the Board. The Board of Directors oversees the continued development of the risk management framework.
The Governance Framework
Our overall objective is to ensure all significant risks inherent in our business can be identified and appropriately mitigated. To this end, we have adopted the “three lines of defense” approach to governance. Specifically, the business units form the “first line of defense” and are the “owners” of risks in their business activities. As the risk owner, the first line of defense is accountable for the day-to-day execution of risk and control policies and procedures (including activities performed by third-party contractors). The “second line of defense” is our Risk Management function, which is independent from the first line of defense. The second line of defense conducts oversight and effective challenge of the risk-taking activities within the first line of defense. Finally, the Internal Audit function comprises the “third line of defense.” The Internal Audit function provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, as reflected in audit reports.
Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard
The Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard are designed to establish a stable risk and control environment across the enterprise. The policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, outlines the framework used to ensure that risk and control issues across the enterprise are identified, assessed, measured, monitored, and reported. The Risk Management Policy, the Risk Appetite Standard, and the related policies and procedures constitute the core of the risk management program.
Sallie Mae leverages risk appetite to outline the level of risk we are willing to accept within each risk category, as described below, in pursuit of our business objectives. Compliance with our risk appetite is monitored using a set of risk metrics, with defined thresholds and limits, for each risk category. The management-level Enterprise Risk Committee provides oversight of the risk appetite standard with escalation to the Board of Directors, as appropriate.
Board of Directors Committee Structure
We have a Board of Directors committee structure as outlined below that facilitates oversight, effective challenge, and escalation of risk and control issues.
•Financial Risk Committee. The Financial Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s major financial risks, including credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk. The Financial Risk Committee, along with the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of the Company’s risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The Financial Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the major non-financial risks, including compliance risks, operational risks, information and cyber security risk, and model risk. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, along with the Financial Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of our risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 82
management culture. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and reporting processes, the performance of the Internal Audit function, and the qualifications, hiring, performance, and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
•Nominations and Governance Committee. The Nominations and Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors appropriate standards of corporate governance, and assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with regard to oversight of the operations of the Board of Directors, the qualifications and independence of directors, nominations to the Board of Directors, and compliance with the corporate governance standards.
•Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, our incentive compensation and benefits practices for employees of all levels, and management’s succession planning. Additionally, the Compensation Committee provides oversight of human capital management.
•Preferred Stock Committee. The Preferred Stock Committee monitors and evaluates proposed actions that may impact the rights of holders of our preferred stock.
Management-Level Committee Structure
Executive Committee. The EC is authorized by the Board of Directors to assist the CEO in the general supervision of the business of the Company. Specifically, the EC will (i) provide to the CEO advice and counsel, subject matter expertise, and recommendations as requested, and (ii) through its subcommittees, facilitate the evaluation and decision-making on routine cross-functional matters, and assist management in the fulfillment of management’s duties related to specific risks. The EC has established the following sub-committees to assist in fulfilling its duties.
•Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”). The ERC provides independent oversight and monitoring of the risk and control environment. The ERC is jointly accountable to the Financial Risk Committee and the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors and provides for escalation accordingly.
•Credit Committee. The Credit Committee is responsible for credit and counterparty risk, product pricing, and credit and collections operations.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The OCRC is the oversight body for the identification, assessment, remediation, measurement, and reporting of operational and compliance risks.
•Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO is responsible for the strategy, processes, and authorities with which the Bank’s interest rate risk, liquidity, and capital adequacy are managed.
•Policy Management Committee (“PMC”) The PMC is responsible for the effective and efficient administration of the Company’s policies, standards, and procedures.
Each of these sub-committees is comprised of subject matter experts from the senior management team and is accountable to the EC. Moreover, these sub-committees may be supported by steering or working groups, as appropriate.
Disclosure Committee. Our Disclosure Committee assists our CEO and Chief Financial Officer in their review of periodic SEC reporting documents, earnings releases, investor materials, and related disclosure policies and procedures.
Internal Audit
Internal Audit provides independent assurance to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as to the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management, control, and governance processes. Internal Audit also assists management by providing objective assurance, credible challenge, and consulting services around matters involving risk management. Internal Audit regularly performs selected reviews of our risk management and compliance functions to assess the effectiveness of the overall risk management framework, identifies areas that may require increased focus and resources, and reports significant control issues and recommendations to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually, Internal Audit performs an
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 83
independent risk assessment to evaluate the risk of all significant components of the Company and uses the results to develop an annual, risk-based Internal Audit plan to provide the assurance services noted above.
Risk Categories
Risk categories are a foundational element of the risk management framework; they are widely used in risk
identification and provide the basis for risk aggregation and reporting. The Company has identified six major risk categories:
Strategic Risk. Strategic risk is the risk of: adverse impacts to enterprise value, current or anticipated earnings, capital, or franchise value arising from the Company’s competitive and market position and evolving forces in the industry that can affect that position; lack of responsiveness to these conditions; strategic decisions to change the Company’s scale, market position, or operating model; or failure to appropriately consider implementation risks inherent in the Company’s strategy.
The overall development of the Company’s strategic plan includes extensive engagement with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the Board of Directors provides oversight and effective challenge on performance relative to the strategic plan.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from obligors’ failure, or the increased probability thereof, to meet the terms of a lending, issuer, or counterparty agreement. Credit risk is found in all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.
The credit risk related to Private Education Loans is managed within a credit risk infrastructure that includes: (i) a well-defined underwriting, asset quality, and collection policy framework; (ii) an ongoing monitoring and review process of portfolio composition and trends; (iii) assignment and management of credit authorities and responsibilities; and (iv) establishment of an allowance for credit losses that covers estimated future losses based upon an analysis of portfolio metrics and economic factors.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is managed by reviewing counterparties for credit strength on an ongoing basis and through our credit policies, which place limits on the amount of exposure we may take with any one counterparty and require collateral to secure the position. The credit and counterparty risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with contracts in a gain position to us fail to perform under the terms of the contract.
Credit risk exposure is managed primarily through the Credit Committee, and regular reporting on credit programs and credit metrics is provided to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from fluctuations in market conditions such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and other financial market factors. We are exposed to various types of market risk, in particular the risk of loss resulting from interest rate risk, basis risk, and other risks that arise through the management of our investment, debt, and loan portfolios. Market risk exposures are managed primarily through ALCO. These activities are closely tied to those related to the management of our funding and liquidity risks. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the investment and asset and liability management policies and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO. The Chief Financial Officer provides reports to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors on market risk management.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, reputation, or survival resulting from not being able to meet the Company’s financial obligations when they become due, whether due to a lack of available funding or the inability to liquidate assets in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to: meet our funding needs through market cycles, including periods of financial stress; manage the relative maturities of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet; fund disbursements of Private Education Loans and other loans; and service our indebtedness and bank deposits. Ultimately, our liquidity risk relates to our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates and to maintain deposits and other funding sources through the Bank, as well as our maintenance of a reserve of cash and unencumbered highly liquid investment securities that may be readily converted to cash if needed.
Our liquidity risk activities are centralized within our Corporate Finance department, which is responsible for developing and executing our funding strategy. We analyze and monitor our liquidity risk, maintain excess liquidity, and access diverse funding sources depending on current market conditions. Liquidity risks are overseen and recommendations approved primarily through ALCO. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors is
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 84
responsible for periodically reviewing the liquidity positions and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO.
Operational Risk. Operational risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events. Operational risk is pervasive in that it exists in all business lines, functional units, legal entities, and geographic locations.
Operational risk exposures are managed through a combination of first line of defense and control activities and second line of defense oversight. The OCRC is the management committee responsible for operational risk, and it supports the EC in its oversight duties. The OCRC is responsible for escalation to the EC, as appropriate. Additionally, our key risk indicators include operational risk metrics, thresholds, and limits and are included in the periodic reporting to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Cybersecurity risk is one of our significant operational risks. We provide more detailed information on our cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance in Part I, Item 1C. of this Form 10-K.
Compliance Risk. Compliance risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from violations of, or non-conformance with, the Code of Business Conduct and with laws, rules, regulations, and self regulatory organizations’ standards.
Primary ownership and responsibility for compliance risk is placed with the first line of defense to identify and manage. Our Compliance function supports these activities by providing extensive training, monitoring, and testing of the processes, policies, and procedures utilized by the first line of defense, maintaining relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and working in close coordination with our Legal department. Compliance risk metrics and regular reporting on compliance programs are provided to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
2024 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 85
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-24-006382.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures and information contained in “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae
The COVID-19 crisis was unprecedented and has had a significant impact on the economic environment globally and in the U.S. On April 10, 2023, President Biden signed into law a joint resolution that immediately terminated the COVID-19 national emergency. On June 3, 2023, President Biden signed into law the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, and as a result, the U.S. Department of Education announced the end of its COVID-19 student loan forbearance program. Beginning on September 1, 2023, interest accrual on federal student loans resumed and in October 2023, payments by federal student loan borrowers resumed. There still remains some uncertainty as to the length and breadth of the COVID-19 impact to the U.S. economy and, consequently, on us.
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Key Financial Measures
Set forth below are brief summaries of our key financial measures. Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
Net Interest Income
Most of our earnings are generated from the interest income earned on assets in our education loan portfolios, net of the interest expense we pay on the funding for those loans. We report these earnings as net interest income. We also often refer to the net interest margin, which is the net interest yield earned on our interest-earning assets less the rate paid on our related interest-bearing liabilities. The majority of our interest income comes from our Private Education Loan portfolio. FFELP Loans have a lower net interest yield and carry lower risk than Private Education Loans, as a result of the federal government guarantee supporting FFELP Loans.
Loan Sales and Secured Financings
We may sell loans to third parties through whole loan sales, securitizations, or other similar transactions. We typically retain servicing of loans subsequent to their sale and earn revenue for this servicing at prevailing market rates for such services. Selling loans removes the loan assets from our balance sheet and helps us manage our asset growth, capital, and liquidity needs. Alternatively, we may use loans as collateral in connection with the creation of asset-backed securitizations or secured funding facilities structured as financings. These types of transactions may provide us long-term financing, but they do not remove loan assets from our balance sheet, nor do they generate gains on sales of loans, net. Consequently, our operating results may be significantly affected by whether we choose to sell loans and recognize current gains on sale or continue to hold or finance loans, thereby retaining some or all the net interest income from those loans. In 2023, we recognized $164 million in gains from the sale of approximately $3.15 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $2.93 billion of principal and $226 million in capitalized interest, to an unaffiliated third party. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment.”
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 47
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management estimates and maintains an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date. See “ — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses.” Allowances for credit losses are an important indicator of management’s perspective on the future performance of a loan portfolio. Each quarter, management makes an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses to reflect its most up-to-date estimate of future losses by recording a charge against quarterly revenues known as provision expense. As they occur, actual loan charge-offs and recoveries are then charged or credited, respectively, against the allowance for credit losses rather than against earnings.
The allowance for credit losses and provision expense rise in periods of high loan origination, when future charge-offs are expected to increase, and fall when future charge-offs are expected to decline. We bear the full credit exposure on our Private Education Loans. Losses on our Private Education Loans are affected by risk characteristics such as loan status (in-school, grace, forbearance, repayment, and delinquency), loan seasoning (number of months in active repayment), underwriting criteria (e.g., credit scores), presence of a cosigner, servicing and collections practices, and the current economic environment. See “CREDIT RISK - Defaults on our loans, particularly Private Education Loans, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows.” in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for additional information. Losses typically emerge once a borrower separates from school and enters full principal and interest repayment after the borrower’s grace period (six months, typically) ends. As a larger proportion of our Private Education Loan portfolio enters full principal and interest repayment in the coming years, we would expect the amount of charge-offs to increase.
Our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are small because we generally bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to the federal guarantee on such loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses.
Charge-Offs and Delinquencies
Delinquencies are another important indicator of potential future credit performance. Private Education Loans are charged off at the end of the month in which they reach 120 days delinquent or otherwise when the loans are classified as a loss by us or our regulator. Charge-off data provides relevant information with respect to the actual performance of a loan portfolio over time. Management focuses on delinquencies as well as the progression of loans from early to late stage delinquency as a key metric in estimating the allowance for credit losses and tailoring its future collections strategies. We sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off, and use in-house collectors and third-party collectors to collect on retained defaulted loans.
Operating Expenses
The cost of operating our business directly affects our profitability. We strive to manage growth in our business in a prudent fashion by focusing on investments to improve efficiency. We monitor and report internally various metrics, including cost to acquire and cost to service our loans (which include both owned and serviced loans), among others. The cost to acquire is affected by such variables as technology, personnel, and marketing costs. Servicing expenses primarily include compensation and benefit expenses related to our collections, customer support, and payment processing employees, and technology costs and other expenses associated with facilitating and servicing borrowers. Costs to service can vary period to period based upon seasonality and borrower payment status. The cost to service a delinquent borrower is significantly higher than the cost to service a current or in-school borrower.
Private Education Loan Originations
Private Education Loans are the principal asset on our balance sheet, and the amount of new Private Education Loan originations we generate each year is a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.
Funding Sources
Deposits
We utilize brokered, retail, and other core deposits to meet funding needs and enhance our liquidity position. These deposits can be term or liquid deposits. Our term brokered deposits have terms from three months to ten years. Retail deposits are sourced through a direct banking platform and serve as an important source of diversified funding. Brokered deposits are sourced through a network of brokers and provide a stable source of funding. In addition, we accept certain
48 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
deposits considered non-brokered that are held in large accounts structured to allow FDIC insurance to flow through to underlying individual depositors. We diversify our funding sources with deposits from Educational 529 savings plans and Health Savings plans. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.6 billion of our deposit totals as of December 31, 2023.
Loan Securitizations
We have diversified our funding sources by issuing term ABS and by entering into the Secured Borrowing Facility. Term ABS financing provides long-term funding for our Private Education Loan portfolio at attractive interest rates and at terms that effectively match the average life of the assets. Loans associated with these transactions will remain on our balance sheet if we retain the residual interest in the related trusts. The Secured Borrowing Facility provides an extremely flexible source of funds that can be drawn upon on short notice to meet funding needs within the Bank. Borrowings under our Secured Borrowing Facility are accounted for as secured financings.
LIBOR Transition
Following announcements by the UKFCA, which regulates LIBOR, and ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, publication of 1-week and 2-month USD LIBOR and all tenors for other currencies ceased after December 31, 2021. Publication of the remaining USD settings ceased after June 30, 2023 (the “LIBOR Cessation Date”).
In 2020, we launched a formal cross-functional replacement project with the goal of ensuring a smooth transition to a replacement index for our LIBOR-based assets and obligations with minimal negative impact on our customers, investors, and the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations. In 2020, we began accepting certain deposits based on SOFR. In the second quarter of 2021, we began issuing variable-rate Private Education Loans that are indexed to SOFR. In May 2022, we renewed the Secured Borrowing Facility with an index based on SOFR and, in the third quarter of 2022, we began issuing ABS that are indexed to SOFR. In the second quarter of 2023, our derivatives were transitioned by the CME and LCH into instruments on which the LIBOR coupon remained in effect until the first repricing date after the LIBOR Cessation Date.
In the third quarter of 2023, all our remaining assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items referencing LIBOR transitioned to reference SOFR plus the applicable spread adjustment on their respective first repricing dates after the LIBOR Cessation Date. These items were comprised of Private Education Loans originated before April 2021, deposits, variable-rate ABS, derivatives, as well as our Series B Preferred Stock.
Approximately $76 million of our variable-rate ABS (those issued before November 2017) did not have fallback provisions for an alternative reference rate and we relied upon the safe harbors provided by federal legislation to transition these ABS rates from LIBOR to SOFR.
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors - INTEREST RATE RISK” in this Form 10-K for additional discussion regarding the risks associated with the transition from LIBOR.
Strategic Imperatives
To further focus our business and increase shareholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our focus remains on maximizing the profitability and growth of our core private student loan business, while harnessing and optimizing the power of our brand and attractive client base. In addition, we continue to seek to better inform the external narrative about student lending and Sallie Mae. We also strive to maintain a rigorous and predictable capital allocation and return program to create shareholder value. We are focused on driving a mission-led culture that continues to make Sallie Mae a great place to work. We also continue to strengthen our risk and compliance functions, enhance and build upon our risk management framework, and assess and monitor enterprise-wide risk.
During 2023, we made the following progress on the above corporate strategic imperatives.
Acquisition of Scholly
On July 21, 2023, we completed the previously announced acquisition of several key assets of Scholly, which is engaged in the business of operating as a scholarship publishing and servicing platform, comprised of websites and mobile application search products that offer custom recommendations for post-secondary scholarships for students, their families, and others as well as related services for scholarship providers. The addition of Scholly assets will support our mission of providing students with the confidence needed to successfully navigate the higher education journey. For additional information on this transaction, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies — Business Combinations,” and Note 10, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 49
2023-A Securitization
On March 15, 2023, we executed our $579 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2023-A term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $579 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $572 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 5.06 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.53 percent.
2023-C Securitization
On August 16, 2023, we executed our $568 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2023-C term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $568 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $568 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.93 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.69 percent.
2023 Loan Sales and 2023-B and 2023-D Transactions
In 2023, we recognized $164 million in gains from the sale of approximately $3.15 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $2.93 billion of principal and $226 million in capitalized interest, to an unaffliated third party. The transactions qualified for sale treatment and removed the balance of the loans from our balance sheet on the respective settlement dates. We remained the servicer of these loans pursuant to applicable servicing agreements executed in connection with the sales. For additional information regarding these transactions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment” and Note 12, “Borrowings - Unconsolidated VIEs” in this Form 10-K.
Secured Borrowing Facility
On May 16, 2023, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity of the facility. The amount that can be borrowed under the facility is $2 billion. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. Under the Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until May 15, 2024. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 15, 2025 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur).
Sale of Credit Card Loan Portfolio
In May 2023, we sold our Credit Card loan portfolio to a third party. This transaction qualified for sale treatment and removed the balance of the loans from our balance sheet on the settlement date. We recorded a loss of $4 million related to the sale in the second quarter of 2023.
Share Repurchases under our Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased 22 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $349 million under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans authorized under our share repurchase programs.
See “Item 1. Business — Human Capital Resources and Talent Development” for a discussion regarding our mission-led culture.
50 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 vs. 2022 | 2022 vs. 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 2,327 | $ | 1,915 | $ | 1,757 | $ | 412 | 22 | % | $ | 158 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Investments | 51 | 35 | 14 | 16 | 46 | 21 | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 214 | 82 | 6 | 132 | 161 | 76 | 1,267 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 2,592 | 2,032 | 1,777 | 560 | 28 | 255 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 1,030 | 543 | 382 | 487 | 90 | 161 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 1,562 | 1,489 | 1,395 | 73 | 5 | 94 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: provisions for credit losses | 345 | 633 | (33) | (288) | (45) | 666 | 2,018 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provisions for credit losses | 1,217 | 855 | 1,428 | 362 | 42 | (573) | (40) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of loans, net | 160 | 328 | 548 | (168) | (51) | (220) | (40) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on securities, net | 3 | (60) | 39 | 63 | 105 | (99) | (254) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 84 | 67 | 45 | 17 | 25 | 22 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 247 | 335 | 632 | (88) | (26) | (297) | (47) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 619 | 551 | 519 | 68 | 12 | 32 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acquired intangible assets impairment and amortization expense | 66 | 8 | — | 58 | 725 | 8 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring expenses | — | — | 1 | — | — | (1) | (100) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expenses | 685 | 559 | 520 | 126 | 23 | 39 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 778 | 631 | 1,540 | 147 | 23 | (909) | (59) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 197 | 162 | 380 | 35 | 22 | (218) | (57) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 581 | 469 | 1,160 | 112 | 24 | (691) | (60) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 18 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 100 | 5 | 125 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 564 | $ | 460 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 104 | 23 | % | $ | (696) | (60) | % | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 2.44 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 3.67 | $ | 0.66 | 37 | % | $ | (1.89) | (51) | % | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.41 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.61 | $ | 0.65 | 37 | % | $ | (1.85) | (51) | % | ||||||||||||
| Declared dividends per common share | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.20 | $ | — | — | % | $ | 0.24 | 120 | % |
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 51
GAAP Consolidated Earnings Summary
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2022
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net income was $581 million, or $2.41 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $469 million, or $1.76 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to less provisions for credit losses and an increase in total net interest income and other income, which were offset by decreases in gains on sales of loans, net, and higher operating expenses.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for the current year period compared with the year-ago period are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2023 increased by $73 million compared with the year-ago period primarily due to a $375 million increase in average Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans outstanding and a 19-basis point increase in our net interest margin. Our net interest margin increased in the current period from the year-ago period because of the dramatic increase in interest rates over the past year. When interest rates rise, the yield on our interest-earning assets typically increases faster than our cost of funds. As such, as rates increased in 2023, we saw our net interest margin increase.
•Provision for credit losses in 2023 was $345 million, compared with $633 million in the year-ago period. During 2023, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments, net of expired commitments, slower prepayment rates, management overlays, and changes in economic outlook, which were partially offset by $205 million in negative provisions recorded as a result of the approximately $3.15 billion in Private Education Loan sales during 2023 and an increase in recovery rates (as a result of the change in our defaulted loan recovery process). In the year-ago period, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments made during the period, slower than expected prepayment rates, and additional management overlays, which were partially offset by negative provisions recorded related to $3.34 billion in Private Education Loans sold in 2022 and the adoption of a new loss model that included a reduction in the long-term estimate of losses after the reasonable and supportable period. Management overlays increased in 2022 due to several factors, including additional provisions for our expectation of higher future loan losses related to the previously announced credit administration practices changes we implemented in 2021, “gap year” loans, a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges we experienced in 2022.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $160 million in 2023, compared with $328 million in the year-ago period. The decrease in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of selling approximately $3.15 billion of Private Education Loans in 2023, compared with the sale of approximately $3.34 billion of Private Education Loans in the year-ago period, and lower sales premiums received in 2023 compared to the year-ago period, which were attributable to higher interest rates in 2023. We also sold our Credit Card loan portfolio in May 2023 and recorded a $4 million loss on the sale in 2023.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, were $3 million in gains in 2023, compared with a net loss of $60 million in the year-ago period. The gains on securities, net, in 2023 were related to the changes in mark-to-fair value of our trading investments. During 2022, we determined that an investment in non-marketable equity securities was impaired. As such, we wrote down the value by $60 million in 2022 based upon an estimate of the value of these securities.
•Other income was $84 million in 2023, compared with $67 million in the year-ago period. The increase in other income compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of a $13 million increase in third-party servicing fees from the year-ago period and a $2 million increase in Private Education Loan late fees compared with the year-ago period.
•For the year ended December 31, 2023, total operating expenses were $619 million, compared with $551 million in the year-ago period. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by higher personnel costs, initiative spending, and higher FDIC assessment fees, which were partially offset by lower Credit Card portfolio expenses as a result of the sale of the portfolio.
•In 2023, we recorded $66 million in impairment and amortization of acquired intangible assets, compared with $8 million in the year-ago period. During the fourth quarter of 2023, we recorded an impairment of $56 million as a result of a write-down of the value of the Nitro trade name and trademarks intangible assets. This write-down occurred because we plan to discontinue the use of the Nitro trade name and trademarks in 2024 and transition the related branding to the Sallie and Sallie Mae brands and platforms. In 2023, we recorded $10 million in amortization expense of acquired intangible assets, compared to $8 million in the year-ago period. The increase
52 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
in amortization expense is related to our acquisition of several key assets of Scholly in the third quarter of 2023. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $197 million, compared with $162 million in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate decreased in 2023 to 25.3 percent from 25.6 percent in the year-ago period. The decrease in the effective rate for 2023 was primarily attributable to an increase in tax credits utilized in the year.
Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2021
For the year ended December 31, 2022, net income was $469 million, or $1.76 diluted earnings per common share,
compared with net income of $1.16 billion, or $3.61 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31,
2021. The year-over-year decrease was primarily attributable to higher provisions for credit losses, decreases in gains on
sales of loans, net, and other income, and higher operating expenses, which were offset by an increase in total net
interest income.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for 2022 compared with 2021 are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2022 increased by $94 million compared with 2021 primarily due to a 50-basis point increase in our net interest margin, which more than offset a $922 million reduction in average interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin increased in 2022 from 2021 because of a combination of factors, including an $855 million reduction in low-yielding average cash and other short-term investments, and a $367 million increase in average taxable securities. Historically, the yields on interest-earnings assets reprice more quickly than our cost of funds. As such, as rates increased in 2022, the yields on our interest-earning assets increased 111 basis points, while the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities only increased 63 basis points, compared with 2021. The higher level of cash and other short-term investments in 2021 was primarily the result of $4.2 billion in Private Education Loan sales that occurred in 2021.
•Provision for credit losses in 2022 was $633 million, compared with a negative provision of $33 million in 2021. During 2022, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments made during the period, slower prepayment rates, and additional management overlays, which were partially offset by negative provisions recorded related to $3.34 billion in Private Education Loans sold in 2022, and the adoption of a new loss model that included a reduction in the long-term estimate of losses after the reasonable and supportable period. Management overlays increased in 2022 due to several factors, including additional provisions for our expectation of higher future loan losses related to the previously announced credit administration practices changes we implemented in 2021, “gap year” loans, a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges we experienced in 2022. “Gap year” loans refer to loans to borrowers who took a “gap year” during the COVID-19 pandemic and entered full principal and interest repayment status starting in late 2021 and early 2022. Losses on these “gap year” loans were higher than expected and contributed to the higher provision expense recorded in 2022 to cover the higher-than-expected losses. In 2021, the provision for credit losses was favorably affected by improved economic forecasts in 2021 and faster prepayments speeds. In addition, during the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. The faster estimated prepayment speeds reflected the significant improvement in economic forecasts as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model in the first quarter of 2021.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $328 million in 2022, compared with $548 million in 2021. Higher interest rates in 2022 compared with 2021 resulted in the amount the buyers were willing to pay on our loans in 2022 to decrease compared with 2021. The decrease in gains on sales of loans, net, also was the result of $90 million less in Private Education Loan sales in 2022 when compared with 2021.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net, was a loss of $60 million in 2022, compared with a gain of $39 million in 2021. During 2022, we determined that an investment in non-marketable equity securities was impaired. As such, we wrote down the value based upon an estimate of the value of these securities. The gain recorded in 2021 was primarily the result of a $35 million increase in the valuation of the same non-marketable securities.
•Other income was $67 million in 2022, compared with $45 million in 2021. Other income in 2021 was negatively affected by a $5 million reduction in the tax indemnification receivable related to uncertain tax positions and by a $3 million loss from fees related to the redemption of $200 million of our 5.125 percent unsecured senior notes
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 53
due in April 2022. Also, in the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a $10 million increase in third-party servicing fees and a $4 million increase in Private Education Loan late fees versus 2021.
•For the year ended December 31, 2022, total operating expenses were $551 million, compared with $519 million in 2021. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by transaction costs related to our acquisition of Nitro, higher personnel costs, and initiative spending.
•In 2022, we recorded $8 million in amortization of acquired intangible assets related to our acquisition of Nitro in the first quarter of 2022. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets” in this Form 10-K.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $162 million, compared with $380 million in 2021. The effective tax rate increased in 2022 to 25.6 percent from 24.7 percent in 2021. The increase in the effective rate for 2022 was primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance against future tax benefits, and lower-than-expected tax credits in 2022.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings”
We prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, we also produce and report our after-tax earnings on a separate basis that we refer to as non-GAAP “Core Earnings.” The difference between our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” and GAAP results for periods presented generally is driven by the unrealized, mark-to-fair value gains (losses) on derivative contracts recognized in GAAP, but not in non-GAAP “Core Earnings.”
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” recognizes the difference in accounting treatment based upon whether a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. We enter into derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate and cash flow risk associated with our portfolio. We believe that our derivatives are effective economic hedges and, as such, are a critical element of our interest rate risk management strategy. Those derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment have their related cash flows recorded in interest income or interest expense along with the hedged item. Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and the stand-alone derivative must be marked-to-fair value in the income statement with no consideration for the corresponding change in fair value of the hedged item. These gains and losses, recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net,” are primarily caused by interest rate volatility and changing credit spreads during the period as well as the volume and term of derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment. Cash flows on derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are not recorded in interest income and interest expense; they are recorded in non-interest income: “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net.”
The adjustments required to reconcile from our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” results to our GAAP results of operations, net of tax, relate to differing treatments for those derivative instruments used to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The amount recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” includes (i) the accrual of the current payment on the interest rate swaps that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and (ii) the change in fair values related to future expected cash flows for derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. For purposes of non-GAAP “Core Earnings,” we include in GAAP earnings the current period accrual amounts (interest reclassification) on the swaps and exclude the change in fair values for those derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” is meant to represent what earnings would have been had these derivatives qualified for hedge accounting and there was no ineffectiveness.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” are not a substitute for reported results under GAAP. We provide a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation because (i) earnings per share computed on a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis is one of several measures we utilize to evaluate management performance and allocate corporate resources, and (ii) we believe it better reflects the financial results for derivatives that are economic hedges of interest rate risk, but which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
GAAP provides a uniform, comprehensive basis of accounting. Our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation differs from GAAP in the way it treats derivatives as described above.
The following table shows the amount in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” that relates to the interest reclassification on the derivative contracts. There were no gains (losses) on derivative and hedging activities in the year ended December 31, 2023.
54 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealized gains (losses) on instruments not in a hedging relationship | $ | — | $ | (248) | $ | (23,216) | |||||
| Interest reclassification | — | 243 | 23,360 | ||||||||
| Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net | $ | — | $ | (5) | $ | 144 |
The following table reflects adjustments associated with our derivative activities.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP: | |||||||||||
| GAAP net income | $ | 581,391 | $ | 469,014 | $ | 1,160,513 | |||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 17,705 | 9,029 | 4,736 | ||||||||
| GAAP net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 563,686 | $ | 459,985 | $ | 1,155,777 | |||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||
| Net impact of derivative accounting(1) | — | 248 | 23,216 | ||||||||
| Net tax expense(2) | — | 60 | 5,615 | ||||||||
| Total non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP | — | 188 | 17,601 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 563,686 | $ | 460,173 | $ | 1,173,378 | |||||
| GAAP diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.41 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.61 | |||||
| Derivative adjustments, net of tax | — | — | 0.06 | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” diluted earnings per common share | $ | 2.41 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.67 |
(1) Derivative Accounting: Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” exclude periodic unrealized gains and losses caused by the mark-to-fair value valuations on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP, but include current period accruals on the derivative instruments. Under GAAP, for our derivatives held to maturity, the cumulative net unrealized gain or loss over the life of the contract will equal $0.
(2) Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” tax rate is based on the effective tax rate at the Bank, where the derivative instruments are held.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 55
Financial Condition
Average Balance Sheets - GAAP
The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 21,039,701 | 10.86 | % | $ | 20,576,737 | 9.14 | % | $ | 20,968,061 | 8.25 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 574,218 | 7.19 | 662,194 | 4.62 | 718,186 | 3.43 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | 11,096 | 14.02 | 28,547 | 5.10 | 14,982 | 4.67 | |||||||||||||||
| Taxable securities | 2,543,586 | 2.00 | 2,509,215 | 1.41 | 2,142,025 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and other short-term investments | 4,215,164 | 5.09 | 4,284,442 | 1.93 | 5,139,731 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28,383,765 | 9.13 | % | 28,061,135 | 7.24 | % | 28,982,985 | 6.13 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 301,749 | 605,447 | 636,691 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 28,685,514 | $ | 28,666,582 | $ | 29,619,676 | |||||||||||||||
| Average Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokered deposits | $ | 9,803,802 | 3.29 | % | $ | 9,871,787 | 1.95 | % | $ | 11,015,170 | 1.35 | % | |||||||||
| Retail and other deposits | 11,605,215 | 4.40 | 11,109,675 | 1.65 | 10,540,170 | 0.70 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities(1) | 5,366,365 | 3.66 | 5,517,489 | 3.03 | 5,390,098 | 2.94 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 26,775,382 | 3.85 | % | 26,498,951 | 2.05 | % | 26,945,438 | 1.42 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | 83,895 | 107,611 | 279,344 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 1,826,237 | 2,060,020 | 2,394,894 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 28,685,514 | $ | 28,666,582 | $ | 29,619,676 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 5.50 | % | 5.31 | % | 4.81 | % |
(1) Includes the average balance of our unsecured borrowings, as well as secured borrowings and amortization expense of transaction costs related to our term asset-backed securitizations and our Secured Borrowing Facility.
56 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Rate/Volume Analysis - GAAP
The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Increase (Decrease) | Change Due To(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate | Volume | ||||||||||
| 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 560,723 | $ | 537,107 | $ | 23,616 | |||||
| Interest expense | 487,291 | 481,570 | 5,721 | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 73,432 | $ | 56,165 | $ | 17,267 | |||||
| 2022 vs. 2021 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 254,736 | $ | 312,781 | $ | (58,045) | |||||
| Interest expense | 160,721 | 167,154 | (6,433) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 94,015 | $ | 139,455 | $ | (45,440) |
(1) Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.
Summary of Our Loans Held for Investment Portfolio
Ending Loans Held for Investment Balances, net
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,997,092 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,997,149 | |||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 17,028,752 | 537,344 | 17,566,096 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 21,025,844 | 537,401 | 21,563,245 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,554 | 1,330 | 82,884 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,335,105) | (4,667) | (1,339,772) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 57
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,659,323 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,659,380 | |||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 16,644,365 | 608,993 | 17,253,358 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,303,688 | 609,050 | 20,912,738 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 69,656 | 1,549 | 71,205 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,353,631) | (3,444) | (1,357,075) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,544,030 | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | 3,544,112 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 17,172,833 | 695,134 | 25,014 | 17,892,981 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,716,863 | 695,216 | 25,014 | 21,437,093 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 1,815 | 222 | 69,525 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,158,977) | (4,077) | (2,281) | (1,165,335) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
58 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,582,394 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | 3,582,475 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2)(3) | 16,146,943 | 737,512 | 12,238 | 16,896,693 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 19,729,337 | 737,593 | 12,238 | 20,479,168 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 63,475 | 1,993 | 230 | 65,698 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,355,844) | (4,378) | (1,501) | (1,361,723) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||||
| % of total | 96 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school” category include $254 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic, or other reasons, and who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were then not required to make any payments. For further discussion, see “— Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool .”
(2) At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “grace, repayment and other” category include (a) $147 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a grace or deferred status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020, who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were not then required to make any payments, and (b) $639 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a forbearance or repayment status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. For further discussion, see “— Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool .”
(3) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| As of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,288,239 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,288,320 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 18,901,352 | 783,225 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 20,737,468 | ||||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 23,189,591 | 783,306 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 25,025,788 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,224 | 2,143 | 513 | 36 | 83,916 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (374,300) | (1,633) | (65,877) | (102) | (441,912) | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 | |||||||||
| % of total | 93 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 59
Average Loans Held for Investment Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 21,039,701 | 97 | % | $ | 20,576,737 | 97 | % | $ | 20,968,061 | 97 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 574,218 | 3 | 662,194 | 3 | 718,186 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards(1) | — | — | — | — | 14,982 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio | $ | 21,613,919 | 100 | % | $ | 21,238,931 | 100 | % | $ | 21,701,229 | 100 | % |
(1) Credit Card loans were transferred to loans held-for-sale at September 30, 2022 and subsequently sold in May 2023.
Loans Held for Investment, Net — Activity
| Year Ended December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 5,760,434 | — | 5,760,434 | ||||||||
| Variable-rate | 665,987 | — | 665,987 | ||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 6,426,421 | — | 6,426,421 | ||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,480 | 22,584 | 620,064 | ||||||||
| Sales | (2,938,616) | — | (2,938,616) | ||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (975,889) | (32,855) | (1,008,744) | ||||||||
| Allowance | 18,526 | (1,223) | 17,303 | ||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,375,342) | (61,597) | (2,436,939) | ||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 534,064 | $ | 20,306,357 |
| Year Ended December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 4,189,269 | — | — | 4,189,269 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 1,809,301 | — | 82,819 | 1,892,120 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,998,570 | — | 82,819 | 6,081,389 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 550,474 | 24,642 | (195) | 574,921 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (3,136,302) | — | — | (3,136,302) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,384,950) | (61,529) | — | (1,446,479) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | (194,654) | 633 | 2,281 | (191,740) | |||||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | — | — | (28,905) | (28,905) | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,438,799) | (49,545) | (78,955) | (2,567,299) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | — | $ | 19,626,868 |
60 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 3,027,440 | — | — | 3,027,440 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 2,421,082 | — | 63,323 | 2,484,405 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,448,522 | — | 63,323 | 5,511,845 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,416 | 27,252 | (323) | 624,345 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (1,138,726) | — | — | (1,138,726) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,583,691) | (27,031) | — | (1,610,722) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | 196,868 | 300 | (780) | 196,388 | |||||||||||
| Transfer from loans held-for-sale | 25,040 | — | — | 25,040 | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,357,023) | (42,775) | (50,232) | (2,450,030) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 |
“Loan consolidations to third parties” and “Repayments and other” are both significantly affected by the volume of loans in our held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status. The amount of loans in full principal and interest repayment status in our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2023 decreased by 0.6 percent compared with December 31, 2022, and now totals 43 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2023. The balance of loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status was affected in 2023 and 2022 by loan sales.
“Loan consolidations to third parties” for the year ended December 31, 2023 total 11.5 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status at December 31, 2023, or 4.9 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2023, compared with the year-ago period of 16.2 percent of our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status, or 7.3 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio, respectively. The
decrease in consolidations is attributable to higher interest rates in 2023 that made it less competitive for consolidators.
Historical experience has shown that loan consolidation activity is heightened in the period when the loan initially enters full principal and interest repayment status and then subsides over time.
The “Repayments and other” category includes all scheduled repayments, as well as voluntary prepayments, made on loans in repayment (including loans in full principal and interest repayment status) and also includes charge-offs. Consequently, this category can be significantly affected by the volume of loans in repayment.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 61
Private Education Loan Originations
The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations. Originations represent loans that were funded or acquired during the period presented.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | % | 2022 | % | 2021 | % | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Option - interest only(1) | $ | 1,166,442 | 18 | % | $ | 1,146,365 | 19 | % | $ | 1,128,176 | 21 | % | |||||||||
| Smart Option - fixed pay(1) | 2,121,112 | 33 | 1,950,048 | 33 | 1,685,519 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - deferred(1) | 2,584,545 | 41 | 2,330,719 | 39 | 1,996,461 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
| Graduate Loan(2) | 511,193 | 8 | 516,877 | 8 | 525,050 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| Parent Loan(3) | 38 | — | 30,515 | 1 | 87,325 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan originations | $ | 6,383,330 | 100 | % | $ | 5,974,524 | 100 | % | $ | 5,422,531 | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Percentage of loans with a cosigner | 87.5 | % | 86.0 | % | 86.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Average FICO at approval(4) | 748 | 747 | 750 |
(1) Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See Item 1. “Business - Our Business - Private Education Loans” for a further discussion.
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Graduate Loan originations include $29.4 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Graduate Loan originations include $1.8 million of Parent Loans and $29.1 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Graduate Loan originations include $5.8 million of Parent Loans and $24.4 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status.
(3) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date were processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023.
(4) Represents the higher credit score of the cosigner or the borrower.
Private Education Loan Maturities
The following table summarizes the remaining maturities of our Private Education Loan portfolio.
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | One year or less | After one year to five years | After five years to 15 years | After 15 years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-rate | $ | 7,781 | $ | 332,489 | $ | 7,197,507 | $ | 6,448,014 | $ | 13,985,791 | |||||||||
| Variable-rate | 23,535 | 620,602 | 4,602,806 | 1,793,110 | 7,040,053 | ||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | $ | 31,316 | $ | 953,091 | $ | 11,800,313 | $ | 8,241,124 | $ | 21,025,844 |
62 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses Activity
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | 1,357,075 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | |||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 320,237 | — | 320,237 | 344,310 | — | — | 344,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (420,095) | (1,001) | (421,096) | (427,416) | (613) | (3,215) | (431,244) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 46,368 | — | 46,368 | 41,737 | — | 5 | 41,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 240,347 | 2,224 | 242,571 | 410,254 | (20) | 3,301 | 413,535 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (205,383) | — | (205,383) | (174,231) | — | — | (174,231) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | — | — | — | — | (2,372) | (2,372) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses(2) | 34,964 | 2,224 | 37,188 | 236,023 | (20) | 929 | 236,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 4,667 | $ | 1,339,772 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | — | $ | 1,357,075 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, below is a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. When a new loan commitment is made, we record the CECL allowance as a liability for unfunded commitments by recording a provision for credit losses. When the loan is funded, we transfer that liability to the allowance for credit losses.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | 34,964 | $ | 236,023 | |||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 308,275 | 396,521 | |||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | 343,239 | 632,544 | |||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| FFELP Loans | 2,224 | (20) | |||||
| Credit Cards | — | 929 | |||||
| Total | 2,224 | 909 | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | 345,463 | $ | 633,453 |
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 63
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | — | — | 1,060,830 | 2,852 | 79,183 | 188 | 1,143,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,355,844 | 4,378 | 1,501 | 1,361,723 | 1,435,130 | 4,485 | 145,060 | 290 | 1,584,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 301,655 | — | — | 301,655 | 320,808 | — | — | — | 320,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (229,591) | (321) | (356) | (230,268) | (205,326) | (519) | (39,079) | (119) | (245,043) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (108,534) | — | (108,534) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 29,494 | — | 12 | 29,506 | 24,021 | — | 4,984 | 2 | 29,007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | (233,852) | 20 | 1,124 | (232,708) | 148,673 | 412 | 40,485 | 1,328 | 190,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (66,460) | — | — | (66,460) | (161,793) | — | (42,916) | — | (204,709) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | 1,887 | — | — | 1,887 | (205,669) | — | — | — | (205,669) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses(3) | (298,425) | 20 | 1,124 | (297,281) | (218,789) | 412 | (2,431) | 1,328 | (219,480) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | — | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(3) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, below is a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. When a new loan commitment is made, we record the CECL allowance as a liability for unfunded commitments by recording a provision for credit losses. When the loan is funded, we transfer that liability to the allowance for credit losses.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | (298,425) | $ | (218,789) | |||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 264,324 | 312,613 | |||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | (34,101) | 93,824 | |||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Personal Loans | — | (2,431) | |||||
| FFELP Loans | 20 | 412 | |||||
| Credit Cards | 1,124 | 1,328 | |||||
| Total | 1,144 | (691) | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | (32,957) | 93,133 |
64 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
| 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 277,943 | $ | 977 | $ | 62,201 | $ | — | $ | 341,121 | |||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (208,978) | (822) | (74,313) | (1) | (284,114) | ||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 25,765 | — | 5,206 | — | 30,971 | ||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses | 279,570 | 1,478 | 72,783 | 103 | 353,934 | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 |
Private Education Loan Allowance for Credit Losses
In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of December 31, 2023, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, in particular, credit quality and delinquency, forbearance, and charge-off trends.
Private Education Loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status were 43 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2023, compared with 45 percent at December 31, 2022.
For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loans, see “—Allowance for Credit Losses,” “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses,” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment — Certain Collection Tools - Private Education Loans” in this Form 10-K.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 65
The table below presents our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio delinquency trends. Loans in repayment include loans making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the following table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| Private Education Loans Held for Investment | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Balance | % | Balance | % | Balance | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1) | $ | 5,291,991 | $ | 4,895,053 | $ | 4,904,414 | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance(2) | 324,039 | 279,085 | 301,237 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment and percentage of each status: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans current | 14,809,271 | 96.1 | % | 14,559,347 | 96.2 | % | 15,005,773 | 96.7 | % | |||||||||
| Loans delinquent 30-59 days(3) | 298,751 | 1.9 | 287,308 | 1.9 | 308,559 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
| Loans delinquent 60-89 days(3) | 151,017 | 1.0 | 147,505 | 1.0 | 116,947 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 days or greater past due(3) | 150,775 | 1.0 | 135,390 | 0.9 | 79,933 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans in repayment | 15,409,814 | 100.0 | % | 15,129,550 | 100.0 | % | 15,511,212 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | 21,025,844 | 20,303,688 | 20,716,863 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,554 | 69,656 | 67,488 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans | 21,107,398 | 20,373,344 | 20,784,351 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans allowance for losses | (1,335,105) | (1,353,631) | (1,158,977) | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,772,293 | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 19,625,374 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 73.3 | % | 74.5 | % | 74.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 3.9 | % | 3.8 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 2.1 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.9 | % |
(1)Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans (e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation).
(2)Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.
(3)The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.
Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans (held for investment) in repayment increased to 3.9 percent at December 31, 2023 from 3.8 percent at December 31, 2022, and the forbearance rate increased to 2.1 percent at December 31, 2023 from 1.8 percent at December 31, 2022. The increase in delinquencies in 2023 compared with 2022 was primarily attributable to new loan modification programs initiated in the fourth quarter of 2023 that require borrowers to remain in their respective delinquency buckets until three consecutive payments are made under the modified loan terms before being brought current. The increase in delinquencies and reduction in forbearance at December 31, 2022, compared with 2021, were due to a combination of factors, including our new credit administration practices changes that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, operational challenges in 2022, including a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and the cessation of the use of disaster forbearance related to COVID-19. We stopped providing COVID-19 related disaster forbearances in June 2021. See additional discussion in “— Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool.”
66 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan (held for investment) losses.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 277,943 | |||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | — | 1,060,830 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,353,631 | 1,158,977 | 1,355,844 | 1,435,130 | 277,943 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 320,237 | 344,310 | 301,655 | 320,808 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 240,347 | 410,254 | (233,852) | 148,673 | 279,570 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (205,383) | (174,231) | (66,460) | (161,793) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | — | 1,887 | (205,669) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total provision | 34,964 | 236,023 | (298,425) | (218,789) | 279,570 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (420,095) | (427,416) | (229,591) | (205,326) | (208,978) | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 46,368 | 41,737 | 29,494 | 24,021 | 25,765 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (373,727) | (385,679) | (200,097) | (181,305) | (183,213) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending Balance | $ | 1,335,105 | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance and accrued interest to be capitalized(2) | 6.01 | % | 6.37 | % | 5.35 | % | 6.55 | % | — | % | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment(2)(3)(4) | 8.43 | % | 8.76 | % | 7.32 | % | 9.28 | % | — | % | |||||||||
| Allowance coverage of net charge-offs | 3.57 | 3.51 | 5.79 | 7.48 | 2.04 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment(3) | 2.44 | % | 2.55 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.17 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of ending loans in repayment(3) | 3.90 | % | 3.77 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.81 | % | |||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment and forbearance(3) | 2.06 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.91 | % | 4.32 | % | 4.08 | % | |||||||||
| Ending total loans, gross | $ | 21,025,844 | $ | 20,303,688 | $ | 20,716,863 | $ | 19,729,337 | $ | 23,189,591 | |||||||||
| Average loans in repayment(3) | $ | 15,310,934 | $ | 15,103,123 | $ | 15,019,869 | $ | 15,518,851 | $ | 15,605,927 | |||||||||
| Ending loans in repayment(3) | $ | 15,409,814 | $ | 15,129,550 | $ | 15,511,212 | $ | 14,304,821 | $ | 16,787,670 | |||||||||
| Accrued interest to be capitalized(2) | $ | 1,203,357 | $ | 936,837 | $ | 947,391 | $ | 973,201 | $ | — | |||||||||
| Accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment(2)(4) | $ | 435,807 | $ | 324,384 | $ | 312,537 | $ | 308,655 | $ | — |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Related metrics and ending balances for the year ended December 31, 2019 are not available, as CECL had not yet been adopted, and the allowance for credit losses only covered expected losses over the next twelve months.
(3) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
(4) Accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment includes interest on loans that are in repayment but have not yet entered into full principal and interest payment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, does not include interest on those loans while they are in forbearance).
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans and accrued interest to be capitalized and of ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
Charge-offs decreased in the year ending December 31, 2023 compared with the year-ago period because of a combination of factors, including improved staffing levels and new loan modification programs. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we charged off $13 million of delinquent loans that had received certain grants of forbearance under previous credit administration practices (which have been discontinued) and which were classified as a loss and charged off prior to their reaching 120 days delinquent. Also contributing to the increase in the full-year 2022 charge-offs compared with 2021 were $59 million in losses on loans whose borrowers took a “gap year” during the pandemic. “Gap year” loans refer to loans to
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 67
borrowers who took a “gap year” during the COVID-19 pandemic and entered full principal and interest repayment status starting in late 2021 and early 2022. Losses on these “gap year” loans were higher than expected and contributed to the higher charge-offs in 2022.
Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations and achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loans. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. Forbearance is granted prospectively for borrowers who are current in their payments and may be granted retroactively for certain delinquent borrowers.
Forbearance allows a borrower to not make scheduled payments for a specified period of time. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan by the term of forbearance taken. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total principal or interest repayment obligation. While a loan is in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized (added to principal) at the end of the forbearance. Interest will not capitalize at the end of certain types of forbearance, such as disaster forbearance, however.
We grant forbearance through our servicing centers to borrowers who are current in their payments and through our collections centers to certain borrowers who are delinquent. Our forbearance policies and practices vary depending upon whether a borrower is current or delinquent at the time forbearance is requested, generally with stricter payment requirements for delinquent borrowers. We view the population of borrowers that use forbearance positively because the borrowers are either proactively reaching out to us to obtain assistance in managing their obligations or are working with our collections center to bring their loans current.
Forbearance may be granted through our servicing centers to customers who are exiting their grace period, and to other customers who are current in their payments, to provide temporary payment relief. In these circumstances, a customer’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of the forbearance period, the customer will enter repayment status as current and is expected to begin making scheduled monthly payments.
Forbearance may also be granted through our collections centers to customers who are delinquent in their payments. If specific payment requirements are met, the forbearance can cure the delinquency and the customer is returned to a current repayment status. Forbearance as a collection tool is used most effectively when applying historical experience and our judgment to a customer’s unique situation. We leverage updated customer information and other decision support tools to best determine who will be granted forbearance based on our expectations as to a customer’s ability and willingness to repay their obligation. This strategy is aimed at assisting customers while mitigating the risks of delinquency and default as well as encouraging resolution of delinquent loans. In most instances, we require one payment, as an indication of a customer’s willingness and ability to repay, before granting forbearance to delinquent borrowers.
Historically, we have utilized disaster forbearance to assist borrowers affected by material events, typically federally-declared disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described below.
Management continually monitors our credit administration practices and may periodically modify these practices based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback. In light of these considerations, we previously announced certain changes to our credit administration practices, including the imposition of limits on the number of forbearance months granted consecutively and the number of times certain extended or reduced repayment alternatives may be granted.
Currently, we generally grant forbearance in increments of one to two months at a time, for up to 12 months over the life of the loan, although disaster forbearance and certain assistance we grant to borrowers who are still in school do not apply toward the 12-month limit. We also currently require 12 months of positive payment performance by a borrower (meaning the borrower must make payment in a cumulative amount equivalent to 12 monthly required payments under the loan) between successive grants of forbearance and between forbearance grants and certain other repayment alternatives. This required period of positive payment performance does not apply, however, to forbearances granted during the first six months following a borrower’s grace period and is not required for a borrower to receive a contractual interest rate reduction. In addition, we currently limit the participation of delinquent borrowers in certain short-term extended or interest-only repayment alternatives to once in 12 months and twice in five years. We also now count the
68 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
number of months a borrower receives a short-term extended repayment alternative toward the 12-month forbearance limit described above.
We also offer rate and term modifications to customers experiencing more severe hardship. In the fourth quarter of 2023, we developed additional modification programs tailored to the financial condition of individual borrowers. Pursuant to these additional modification programs, for our borrowers experiencing the most severe financial conditions, we currently may reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to as low as 2.0 percent for the remaining life of the loan and also permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. Other borrowers experiencing severe hardship may not require as much assistance, however, given their circumstances. In those instances, we may reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to a rate greater than 2.0 percent, and up to 8.0 percent, for a temporary period of two to four years, and in some instances may also permanently extend the final maturity of the loan.
When we give a borrower facing financial difficulty an interest rate reduction under our programs, we evaluate their ability to pay and provide customized repayment terms based upon their financial condition. As part of demonstrating the ability and willingness to pay, the customer must make three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment to qualify for the program. We believe by tailoring the modification programs to the borrower’s current financial condition and not having a one size fits all approach, we increase the likelihood the borrower will be able to make the modified payments and avoid default. This approach of giving different interest rate reductions to different borrowers experiencing more severe hardship also helps us better manage the overall assistance we provide to borrowers. We currently limit the granting of a permanent extension of the final maturity date of a loan under our loan modification programs to one time over the life of the loan. We also currently permit two consecutive rate reductions so long as the borrower qualifies and makes three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment in connection with each rate reduction. We also now limit the number of interest rate reductions to twice over the life of the loan.
While there are limitations to our estimate of the future impact of the various credit administration practices changes we have implemented, we expect that the credit administration practices described above, including the changes we implemented in 2021, will accelerate periodic defaults and will increase periodic defaults in our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio. For 2021, we increased our allowance for credit losses as a result of the new credit administration practices. In 2022, we further increased our allowance for credit losses to reflect higher expected future periodic defaults in both the near term (reasonable and supportable period) and long term. This change reflected our estimate that the elevated default rates experienced in the latter half of 2022 that continued into 2023 would eventually decline over time. Among the measures that we have implemented and may modify further and expect may partly offset or moderate any acceleration of or increase in defaults will be greater focus on the risk assessment process to ensure borrowers are mapped to the appropriate program, better utilization of existing loss mitigation programs (e.g., GRP and rate modifications), the use of a program offering short-term payment reductions (permitting interest-only payments for up to six months) for certain early-stage delinquencies, and implementation of potential new risk mitigation and collection strategies.
We expect to learn more about how our borrowers are reacting to changes in our credit administration practices and, as we analyze such reactions, we will continue to refine our estimates of the impact of those changes on our allowance for credit losses.
As discussed above, we will continue to monitor our credit administration practices and may modify them further from time to time based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
Delinquency Trends by Active Repayment Status
The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio held for investment aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). Active repayment status includes loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. Our experience shows that the percentage of loans in forbearance status generally decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At December 31, 2023, for Private Education Loans (held for investment) that have been in active repayment status for fewer than 25 months, loans in forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance were 1.6 percent. Approximately 76 percent of our Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance status have been in active repayment status fewer than 25 months.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 69
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,292 | $ | 5,292 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 190 | 55 | 31 | 20 | 28 | — | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,129 | 3,529 | 2,183 | 1,472 | 3,496 | — | 14,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 81 | 56 | 45 | 33 | 84 | — | 299 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 40 | 29 | 24 | 17 | 41 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 42 | 28 | 23 | 16 | 42 | — | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,482 | $ | 3,697 | $ | 2,306 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 3,691 | $ | 5,292 | 21,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,335) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.21 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.18 | % | — | % | 2.06 | % |
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,895 | $ | 4,895 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 165 | 43 | 26 | 19 | 26 | — | 279 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,131 | 3,393 | 2,129 | 1,603 | 3,303 | — | 14,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 80 | 58 | 44 | 31 | 74 | — | 287 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 43 | 30 | 20 | 17 | 38 | — | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 41 | 27 | 20 | 14 | 34 | — | 136 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,460 | $ | 3,551 | $ | 2,239 | $ | 1,684 | $ | 3,475 | $ | 4,895 | 20,304 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,354) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.07 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.17 | % | — | % | 1.81 | % |
70 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,904 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 180 | 44 | 30 | 21 | 26 | — | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,234 | 3,405 | 2,424 | 1,671 | 3,272 | — | 15,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 125 | 54 | 41 | 29 | 60 | — | 309 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 38 | 25 | 17 | 13 | 24 | — | 117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 26 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 15 | — | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,603 | $ | 3,546 | $ | 2,524 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 3,397 | $ | 4,904 | 20,717 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,159) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.14 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.16 | % | — | % | 1.91 | % |
Private Education Loans Held for Investment Types
The following table provides information regarding the loans in repayment balance and total loan balance by Private Education Loan held for investment product type for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | CareerTraining(2) | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(3) | $ | 211,123 | $ | 206,343 | $ | 13,747,153 | $ | 2,066 | $ | 1,243,129 | $ | 15,409,814 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 301,265 | $ | 207,448 | $ | 18,764,200 | $ | 2,117 | $ | 1,750,814 | $ | 21,025,844 |
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | CareerTraining(2) | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(3) | $ | 216,513 | $ | 261,316 | $ | 13,599,750 | $ | 4,565 | $ | 1,047,406 | $ | 15,129,550 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 308,884 | $ | 262,602 | $ | 18,218,925 | $ | 4,602 | $ | 1,508,675 | $ | 20,303,688 |
(1) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in February 2023.
(2) In May 2022, we discontinued offering our Career Training loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, and final disbursements under those loans occurred in September 2023.
(3) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 71
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans held for investment. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans 90 days or greater past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The majority of the total accrued interest receivable represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accruing on that loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized to the balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school, and the current expected credit losses on accrued interest that will be capitalized is included in our allowance for credit losses.
| Private Education Loans | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrued Interest Receivable | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Total Interest Receivable | 90 Days or Greater Past Due | Allowance forUncollectibleInterest(1) | ||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | $ | 1,354,565 | $ | 8,373 | $ | 9,897 | |||||
| December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 6,609 | $ | 8,121 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 4,937 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,168,895 | $ | 4,354 | $ | 4,467 | |||||
| December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,366,158 | $ | 2,390 | $ | 5,309 |
(1) The allowance for uncollectible interest at December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020 represents the expected losses related to the portion of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are in repayment (at December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, relates to $151 million, $240 million, $240 million, and $196 million, respectively, of accrued interest receivable) that is/was not expected to be capitalized. The accrued interest receivable that is/was expected to be capitalized ($1.2 billion, $937 million, $947 million, and $973 million, respectively, at December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020) is/was reserved for in the allowance for credit losses. Related ending balances for the year ended December 31, 2019 are not available, as CECL had not yet been adopted, and the allowance for uncollectible losses only covered expected losses over the next twelve months.
72 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to fund our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress, our ongoing ability to fund originations of Private Education Loans, and our ability to meet any outflows of our Bank deposits. To achieve these objectives, we analyze and monitor our liquidity needs, and maintain excess liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, such as deposits at the Bank, issuance of secured debt primarily through asset-backed securitizations, other financing facilities, and loan sales.
Interest-bearing deposits as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity money market deposit accounts (“MMDAs”), and retail and brokered CDs. Interest-bearing deposits also include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and that we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.6 billion and $8.0 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The omnibus accounts are structured in such a way that entitles the individual depositor pass-through deposit insurance (subject to FDIC rules and limitations), and the majority of these deposits have contractual minimum balances and maturity terms.
At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, our sources of liquidity included liquid investments with unrealized losses of $128.9 million and $184.5 million, respectively. It is our policy to manage operations so liquidity needs are fully satisfied through normal operations to avoid unplanned loan or liquid investment sales under all but the most dire emergency conditions. Our liquidity management is governed by policies approved by our Board of Directors. Oversight of these policies is performed in the Asset and Liability Committee, a management-level committee.
These policies take into account the volatility of cash flow forecasts, expected asset and liability maturities, anticipated loan demand, and a variety of other factors to establish minimum liquidity guidelines.
Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and the markets for bank deposits at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our performance, competitive pressures, the macroeconomic environment, and the impact they have on the availability of funding sources in the marketplace. We target maintaining sufficient on-balance sheet and contingent sources of liquidity to enable us to meet all contractual and contingent obligations under various stress scenarios, including severe macroeconomic stresses as well as specific stresses that test the resiliency of our balance sheet. As the Bank has grown, we have improved our liquidity stress testing practices to align more closely with the industry, which resulted in our adopting increased liquidity requirements. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019, we began to increase our liquidity levels by increasing cash and marketable investments held as part of our ongoing efforts to enhance our ability to maintain a strong risk management position. By early 2020 and continuing through 2023, we held a significant liquidity buffer of cash and securities, which we expect to maintain through 2024. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, our liquidity levels will likely vary from quarter to quarter.
Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity
Ending Balances
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 3,224 | $ | — | $ | 2,588 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,146,614 | 4,617,533 | 4,332,015 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,988,295 | 2,012,901 | 2,325,711 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,138,133 | $ | 6,630,434 | $ | 6,660,314 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 73
Average Balances
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 6,827 | $ | 7,954 | $ | 3,739 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,014,444 | 4,080,312 | 4,934,506 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,975,754 | 2,230,118 | 1,953,154 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 5,997,025 | $ | 6,318,384 | $ | 6,891,399 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
Deposits
The following table summarizes total deposits.
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 21,651,657 | $ | 21,446,647 | ||||
| Deposits - non-interest bearing | 1,531 | 1,424 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 21,653,188 | $ | 21,448,071 |
Our total deposits of $21.7 billion were comprised of $10.3 billion in brokered deposits and $11.4 billion in retail and other deposits at December 31, 2023, compared with total deposits of $21.4 billion, which were comprised of $9.9 billion in brokered deposits and $11.5 billion in retail and other deposits, at December 31, 2022.
Interest bearing deposits as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity MMDAs, and retail and brokered CDs. Interest bearing deposits also include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and that we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.6 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2023, compared with $8.0 billion at December 31, 2022.
Some of our deposit products are serviced by third-party providers. Placement fees associated with the brokered CDs are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest rate method. We recognized placement fee expense of $12 million, $13 million, and $16 million in the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. Fees paid to third-party brokers related to brokered CDs were $8 million, $13 million, and $13 million during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively.
Interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2023 and 2022 are summarized as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | ||||||||||
| Money market | $ | 10,258,292 | 4.85 | % | $ | 10,977,242 | 3.75 | % | ||||||
| Savings | 945,000 | 4.35 | 982,586 | 3.15 | ||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 10,448,365 | 3.69 | 9,486,819 | 2.57 | ||||||||||
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 21,651,657 | $ | 21,446,647 |
(1) Includes the effect of interest rate swaps in effective hedge relationships.
74 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were $478 million and $615 million, respectively, of deposits exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Accrued interest on deposits was $91 million and $59 million at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment, or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us.
Excess cash is generally invested with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRB”) on an overnight basis or in the FRB’s Term Deposit Facility, minimizing counterparty exposure on cash balances.
Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of a small portfolio of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises that are purchased to meet CRA targets. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board-approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.
Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”), or clearinghouses for over-the-counter derivatives. CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by the Bank are covered under CSAs or clearinghouse agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position, less any collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with the counterparty.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act requires all standardized derivatives, including most interest rate swaps, to be submitted for clearing to central counterparties to reduce counterparty risk. Two of the central counterparties we use are the CME and the LCH. All variation margin payments on derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH are accounted for as legal settlement. As of December 31, 2023, $1.8 billion notional of our derivative contracts were cleared on the CME and $0.1 billion were cleared on the LCH. The derivative contracts cleared through the CME and LCH represent 92.6 percent and 7.4 percent, respectively, of our total notional derivative contracts of $1.9 billion at December 31, 2023.
For derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH, the net gain (loss) position includes the variation margin amounts as settlement of the derivative and not collateral against the fair value of the derivative. The amount of variation margin included as settlement as of December 31, 2023 was $(40) million and $(4) million for the CME and LCH, respectively. Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are presented as realized gains (losses).
Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position less any collateral held and plus any collateral posted. When there is a net negative exposure, we consider our exposure to the counterparty to be zero. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had a net positive exposure (derivative gain positions to us, less collateral held by us, and plus collateral posted with counterparties) related to derivatives of $9 million and $12 million, respectively.
We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties.
The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2023.
| As of December 31, 2023 (dollars in thousands) | SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure, net of collateral | $ | 8,858 | |
| Exposure to counterparties with credit ratings, net of collateral | $ | 8,858 | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3 | — | % | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3 | — | % |
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 75
Regulatory Capital
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking authorities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position. Under U.S. Basel III and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital standards that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and its classification under the prompt corrective action framework are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings, and other factors.
Capital Management
The Bank intends to maintain at all times regulatory capital levels that meet both the minimum levels required under U.S. Basel III (including applicable buffers) and the levels necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action framework, in order to support asset growth and operating needs, address unexpected credit risks, and protect the interests of depositors and the DIF administered by the FDIC. The Bank’s Capital Policy requires management to monitor these capital standards and the Bank’s compliance with them. The Board of Directors and management periodically evaluate the quality of assets, the stability of earnings, and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for the Bank. The Company is a source of strength for the Bank and will provide additional capital if necessary.
We believe that current and projected capital levels are appropriate for 2024. As of December 31, 2023, the Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios exceed the required minimum ratios and the applicable buffers under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III standards as well as the “well capitalized” standards under the prompt corrective action framework.
Under U.S. Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain the following minimum regulatory capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. In addition, the Bank is subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5 percent. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in restrictions on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. Including the buffer, the Bank is required to maintain the following capital ratios under U.S. Basel III in order to avoid such restrictions: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 7.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 8.5 percent, and a Total risk-based capital ratio of greater than 10.5 percent.
To qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework for insured depository institutions, the Bank must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
In July 2023, the federal banking agencies proposed a rule to implement significant changes to the U.S. Basel III regulatory capital requirements. The proposed changes to the regulatory capital requirements generally would amend or introduce approaches and methodologies that would apply to banking organizations with total consolidated assets of $100 billion or more or to banking organizations with significant trading activity. The proposed rule therefore would not affect the Bank’s capital requirements or the calculation of its capital ratios.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopted CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, could elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. On January 1 of 2023 and 2022, 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts were phased in for regulatory capital purposes. On January 1, 2024, an additional 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts was phased in for regulatory capital purposes. On January 1, 2025, the remaining 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts will be phased in for regulatory capital purposes, with the phased-in amounts included in regulatory capital at the beginning of the year. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our
76 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $953 million. This transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
At December 31, 2023, the adjusted transition amounts that were deferred and are being phased in for regulatory capital purposes are as follows:
| Adjusted Transition Amounts | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Remaining Adjusted Transition Amounts to be Phased-In | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||
| Retained earnings | $ | 836,351 | $ | (209,088) | $ | (209,088) | $ | 418,175 | |||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | 1,038,145 | (259,536) | (259,536) | 519,073 | |||||||||||
| Liability for unfunded commitments | 104,377 | (26,094) | (26,094) | 52,189 | |||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 306,171 | (76,542) | (76,542) | 153,087 |
The Bank’s required and actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under U.S. Basel III are shown in the following table. The following capital amounts and ratios are based upon the Bank’s average assets and risk-weighted assets, as indicated. The Bank has elected to exclude accumulated other comprehensive income related to both available-for-sale investments and swap valuations from Common Equity Tier 1 Capital. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments included in other comprehensive income totaled $115 million and $160 million, net of tax of $37 million and $52 million, respectively. The capital ratios would remain above the U.S. Basel III well capitalized thresholds if the unrealized loss became fully recognized into capital.
| Actual | U.S. Basel IIIMinimum Requirements Plus Buffer(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2023(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 12.3 | % | $ | 1,719,621 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 12.3 | % | $ | 2,088,111 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,334,140 | 13.6 | % | $ | 2,579,432 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,019,973 | 10.2 | % | $ | 1,184,213 | 4.0 | % | |||||
| As of December 31, 2022(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 12.9 | % | $ | 1,645,807 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 12.9 | % | $ | 1,998,480 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,338,645 | 14.2 | % | $ | 2,468,711 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 10.3 | % | $ | 1,185,280 | 4.0 | % |
(1) Reflects the U.S. Basel III minimum required ratio plus the applicable capital conservation buffer.
(2) The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios also exceeded all applicable standards for the Bank to qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework.
(3) For December 31, 2023 and 2022, the actual amounts and the actual ratios include the respective adjusted transition amounts discussed above that were phased in at the beginning of 2023 and 2022.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 77
Dividends
The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. The Company relies on dividends from the Bank, as necessary, to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends and other payments and consummate share repurchases, as described herein. The Bank declared $550 million, $700 million, and $1.4 billion in dividends to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively, with the proceeds primarily used to fund share repurchase programs and stock dividends. See Part I, Item 1. “Business — Supervision and Regulation — Regulation of Sallie Mae Bank — Dividends and Share Repurchase Programs,” regarding the expectation that the Bank will pay dividends to the Company as may be necessary to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends on its Series B Preferred Stock and common stock and to consummate any common share repurchases by the Company under the share repurchase programs. See also Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — General Risks” for possible limitations on the payments of our dividends.
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings consist of unsecured debt and secured borrowings issued through our term ABS program and our Secured Borrowing Facility. The issuing entities for those secured borrowings are variable interest entities and are consolidated for accounting purposes. The following table summarizes our secured borrowings at December 31, 2023 and 2022. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt (fixed-rate) | $ | — | $ | 992,200 | $ | 992,200 | $ | — | $ | 988,986 | $ | 988,986 | |||||||||||
| Total unsecured borrowings | — | 992,200 | 992,200 | — | 988,986 | 988,986 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | — | 3,585,254 | 3,585,254 | — | 3,462,363 | 3,462,363 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | — | 650,058 | 650,058 | — | 783,765 | 783,765 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan term securitizations | — | 4,235,312 | 4,235,312 | — | 4,246,128 | 4,246,128 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total secured borrowings | — | 4,235,312 | 4,235,312 | — | 4,246,128 | 4,246,128 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 5,227,512 | $ | 5,227,512 | $ | — | $ | 5,235,114 | $ | 5,235,114 |
Short-term Borrowings
Secured Financings
On May 16, 2023, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity of the facility. The amount that can be borrowed under the facility is $2 billion. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. Under the Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until May 15, 2024. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 15, 2025 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur). At both December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there were no secured borrowings outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, “Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
78 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Short-term borrowings have a remaining term to maturity of one year or less. The Secured Borrowing Facility’s contractual maturity is two years from the date of inception or renewal (one-year revolving period plus a one-year amortization period); however, we classify advances under our Secured Borrowing Facility as short-term borrowings because it is our intention to repay those advances within one year.
Long-term Borrowings
Unsecured Debt
On October 29, 2020, we issued at par an unsecured debt offering of $500 million of 4.20 percent Senior Notes due October 29, 2025. At December 31, 2023, the outstanding balance was $497 million.
On November 1, 2021, we issued an unsecured debt offering of $500 million, 3.125 percent Senior Notes due November 2, 2026, at a price of 99.43 percent. At December 31, 2023, the outstanding balance was $495 million.
Secured Financings
2023 Transactions
On March 15, 2023, we executed our $579 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2023-A term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $579 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $572 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 5.06 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.53 percent. On December 31, 2023, $591 million of our Private Education Loans, including $551 million of principal and $40 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On August 16, 2023, we executed our $568 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2023-C term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $568 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $568 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.93 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.69 percent. On December 31, 2023, $620 million of our Private Education Loans, including $579 million of principal and $41 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
2022 Transactions
On August 9, 2022, we executed our $575 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2022-C term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $575 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $575 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.69 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.76 percent. At December 31, 2023, $543 million of our Private Education Loans, including $513 million of principal and $30 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
Pre-2022 Transactions
Prior to 2022, we executed a total of $9.81 billion in ABS transactions that were accounted for as secured financings. At December 31, 2023, $4.02 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.90 billion of principal and $128 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered as a result of these transactions.
Other Borrowing Sources
We maintain discretionary uncommitted Federal Funds lines of credit with various correspondent banks, which totaled $125 million at December 31, 2023. The interest rate we are charged on these lines of credit is priced at Fed Funds plus a spread at the time of borrowing, and is payable daily. We did not utilize these lines of credit in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
We established an account at the FRB to meet eligibility requirements for access to the Primary Credit borrowing facility at the FRB’s Discount Window (the “Window”). The Primary Credit borrowing facility is a lending program available to depository institutions that are in generally sound financial condition. All borrowings at the Window must be fully collateralized. We can pledge asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, as well as FFELP Loans and Private Education Loans, to the FRB as collateral for borrowings at the Window. Generally, collateral value is assigned based on the estimated fair value of the pledged assets. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the value of our pledged collateral at the FRB was $1.6 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. The interest rate charged to us is the discount rate set by the FRB. We did not utilize this facility in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 79
Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually at the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). At December 31, 2023, we had $2.2 billion of outstanding contractual loan commitments which we expect to fund during the remainder of the 2023/2024 academic year. At December 31, 2023, we had a $113 million reserve recorded in “Other Liabilities” to cover expected losses that may occur during the one-year loss emergence period on these unfunded commitments.
Contractual Cash Obligations
In addition to our contractual loan commitments, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. This includes contractual principal obligations associated with long-term Bank deposits, secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations. Our material contractual cash obligations relate to Bank deposits. At December 31, 2023, we had $5.1 billion of principal obligations related to Bank deposits due in the next year, and $11.0 billion thereafter. At December 31, 2023, our contractual cash obligations due in the next year for secured borrowings and lease obligations were $724 million and $7 million, respectively, and our contractual cash obligations due thereafter for our secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $3.5 billion, $1.0 billion, and $31 million, respectively.
Common Stock
Our shareholders have authorized the issuance of 1.125 billion shares of common stock (par value of $0.20). At December 31, 2023, 220 million shares were issued and outstanding and 36 million shares were unissued but encumbered for outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and dividend equivalent units for employee compensation and remaining authority for stock-based compensation plans. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” in this Form 10-K for additional details.
Arrangements with Navient Corporation
In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into the Separation and Distribution Agreement. We also entered into various other ancillary agreements with Navient to effect the Spin-Off and provide a framework for our relationship with Navient thereafter, such as a transition services agreement, a tax sharing agreement, an employee matters agreement, a loan servicing and administration agreement, a joint marketing agreement, a key services agreement, a data sharing agreement, and a master sublease agreement. The majority of these agreements were transitional in nature with most having terms that have expired. In the case of the loan servicing and administration agreement for those FFELP Loans that we hold and Navient services for us, the agreement is scheduled to expire or be renewed by the end of 2026.
We continue to have exposure to risks related to Navient’s creditworthiness. If we are unable to obtain indemnification payments from Navient, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
We briefly summarize below some of the most significant agreements and relationships we continue to have with Navient. For additional information regarding the Separation and Distribution Agreement and the other ancillary agreements, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2014.
Separation and Distribution Agreement
The Separation and Distribution Agreement addresses, among other things, the following activities:
•the obligation of each party to indemnify the other against liabilities retained or assumed by that party pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement and in connection with claims of third parties;
•the allocation among the parties of rights and obligations under insurance policies; and
•the creation of a governance structure by which matters related to the separation and other transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement are to be managed.
80 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides specific processes and procedures pursuant to which we may submit claims for indemnification to Navient. If for any reason Navient is unable or unwilling to pay claims made against it, our costs, operating expenses, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected over time.
Indemnification Obligations
Pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, and as contemplated by the structure of the Spin-Off, Navient is legally obligated to indemnify the Bank against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses that may arise from the conduct of all activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM occurring prior to the Spin-Off, except for certain liabilities related to the conduct of the pre-Spin-Off consumer banking business that were specifically assumed by the Bank (and as to which the Bank is obligated to indemnify Navient). Some significant examples of the types of indemnification obligations Navient has under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and related ancillary agreements include:
•Navient is required to indemnify the Company and the Bank for any liabilities, costs, or expenses they may incur arising from any action or threatened action related to the servicing, operations, and collections activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM and its subsidiaries with respect to Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans that were assets of the Bank or Navient at the time of the Spin-Off; provided that written notice was provided to Navient on or prior to April 30, 2017, the third anniversary date of the Spin-Off. Navient is not required to indemnify for changes in law or changes in prior existing interpretations of law that occur on or after April 30, 2014.
•In connection with the Spin-Off, we recorded a liability related to uncertain tax positions of $27 million for which we are indemnified by Navient. As of December 31, 2023, the remaining balance of the indemnification receivable related to those uncertain tax positions was zero.
Long-Term Arrangements
The loan servicing and administration agreement governs the terms by which Navient provides servicing, administration, and collection services for the Bank’s portfolio of FFELP Loans, as well as servicing history information with respect to Private Education Loans previously serviced by Navient and access to certain promissory notes in Navient’s possession. The term of the loan servicing and administration agreement has been extended to December 31, 2026.
The tax sharing agreement governs the respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations of us and Navient after the Spin-Off relating to taxes, including with respect to the payment of taxes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, and the conduct of tax contests. Under this agreement, each party is generally liable for taxes attributable to its business. The agreement also addresses the allocation of tax liabilities that are incurred as a result of the Spin-Off and related transactions.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 81
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies” in this Form 10-K includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates its estimates, particularly those that include the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and are often about matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions relate to the following critical accounting policies that are discussed in more detail below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date.
In determining the lifetime expected credit losses on our Private Education Loan portfolio loan segments, we use a discounted cash flow method. This method requires us to project future principal and interest cash flows on our loans in those portfolios.
To estimate the future expected cash flows, we use a vintage-based model that considers life of loan loss expectations, prepayments, defaults, recoveries, and any other adjustments deemed necessary, to determine the adequacy of the allowance at each balance sheet date. These cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Management adjusts the effective interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments. The difference between the present value of those cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the underlying loans is the allowance for credit losses. Entities that measure credit losses based on the present value of expected future cash flows are permitted to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense, but may alternatively report the change in present value due to the passage of time as interest income. We have elected to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense.
In determining the loss rates used for the vintage-based approach, we start with our historical loss rates, stratify the loans within each vintage, and then adjust the loss rates based upon economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. The reasonable and supportable forecast period is meant to represent the period in which we believe we can estimate the impact of forecasted economic factors in our expected losses. At the end of the reasonable and supportable forecast period, we immediately revert our forecasted economic factors to long-term historical loss conditions. We use a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, although this period is subject to change as our view evolves on our ability to reasonably forecast economic conditions to estimate future losses.
In estimating our current expected credit losses, we use a combination of expected economic scenarios coupled with our historical experience to derive a base case adjusted for any qualitative factors (as described below). We also develop an adverse and favorable economic scenario. At each reporting date, we determine the appropriate weighting of these alternate scenarios based upon the current economic conditions and our view of the risks of alternate outcomes. This weighting of expectations is used in calculating our current expected credit losses recorded each period.
In estimating recoveries, we use both estimates of what we would receive from the sale of defaulted loans as well as historical borrower payment behavior to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
We use historical experience and economic forecasts to estimate future prepayment speeds. At the end of the two-year reasonable and supportable forecast for prepayments, we immediately revert to our historical long-term prepayment rates.
In addition to the above modeling approach, we also take certain other qualitative factors into consideration when calculating the allowance for credit losses, which could result in management overlays (increases or decreases to the allowance for credit losses). These qualitative factors include, but are not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards, changes in servicing policies and collection administration practices, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, charge-offs, recoveries not already included in the analysis, the effect of other external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated current expected credit losses, the performance of the model over time versus actual losses, and any other operational or regulatory changes that could affect our estimate of future losses.
82 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
The evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. If actual future performance in delinquency, charge-offs, and recoveries is significantly different than estimated, or management assumptions or practices were to change, this could materially affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses, the timing of when losses are recognized, and the related provision for credit losses on our consolidated statements of income.
When calculating our allowance for credit losses and liability for unfunded commitments, we incorporate several inputs that are subject to change period to period. These include, but are not limited to, CECL model inputs and any overlays deemed necessary by management. The most impactful CECL model inputs include:
•Economic forecasts;
•Weighting of economic forecasts;
•Prepayment speeds; and
•Recovery rates.
Management overlays can encompass a broad array of factors not captured by model inputs, including but not limited to, changes in servicing policies, collection administration practices, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, and observed differences between forecasted and actual results. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we further increased our allowance for credit losses to reflect higher expected future periodic defaults in both the near term (reasonable and supportable period) and long term. This change reflected our estimate that the elevated default rates experienced in the latter half of 2022 would continue into 2023 and then decline over time. This estimate of future losses, like other aspects of our estimate of current expected credit losses, is susceptible to significant changes.
Of the model inputs outlined above, economic forecasts, weighting of economic forecasts, prepayments speeds, and recovery rates are subject to estimation uncertainty, and changes in these inputs could have a material impact to our allowance for credit losses and the related provision for credit losses.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, we changed our loss model to include forecasts of college graduate unemployment, retail sales, and median family income in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Prior to this change, we included forecasts of college graduate unemployment and the Consumer Price Index in our loss forecasting models. We obtain forecasts for these inputs from Moody’s Analytics. Moody’s Analytics provides a range of forecasts for each of these inputs with various likelihoods of occurrence. We determine which forecasts we will include in our estimation of allowance for credit losses and the associated weightings for each of these inputs. At December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023, we used the Base (50th percentile likelihood of occurring)/S1 (stronger near-term growth scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring)/S3 (downside scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring) scenarios and weighted them 40 percent, 30 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. Management reviews both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses.
In 2023, we experienced slower prepayment rates due to the rising interest rate environment. Historically, when rates rise loan prepayments and consolidation activity by third parties decline, and when rates decline loan prepayments and consolidation activity increase. During 2023, our estimates of future prepayment speeds reflect the current interest rate environment and future expectations of increased prepayment speeds in line with market expectations of a decline in interest rates based on the scenarios produced by Moody's Analytics described above. Slower prepayment speeds increase the allowance for credit losses because the loss rates applied in the future periods are applied to higher loan balances. We experienced higher prepayments during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unemployment rates were elevated, than we would have expected based upon our experience during past financial crises. As a result, during 2021 we increased our estimate of prepayment speeds to reflect higher short-term and long-term prepayment experience, which had a beneficial impact on the allowance for credit losses at that time.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 83
A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the following inputs to the CECL loss model is estimated to change the allowance as follows:
| Estimated Increase (Decrease) to the Allowance for Credit Losses(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | +100 Basis Points | -100 Basis Points | |||||
| College graduate unemployment rate(2) | $ | 62,135 | $ | (85,010) | |||
| Prepayment speeds(2) | (16,453) | 16,528 | |||||
| Recovery rates(3) | (17,402) | 17,402 |
(1) Based on our Private Education Loan Portfolio at December 31, 2023.
(2)The estimated impacts of changes were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable period, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods will not change.
(3)The estimated change in the recovery rate is based on long-term assumptions.
A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the retail sales or median family income does not result in material changes to our allowance for credit losses. Increases in the weighting of economic forecasts resulting in greater weight given to more severe economic forecasts would result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses.
The estimated impacts of changes in the above table were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable period, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods are based on longer term averages and only change when we determine there is a fundamental change that will affect long-term rates.
Below we describe in further detail our policies and procedures for the allowance for credit losses as they relate to our Private Education Loan and FFELP Loan portfolios. During the third quarter of 2022, we reclassified our Credit Card loan portfolio to loans held-for-sale and subsequently sold the Credit Card portfolio to a third party in May 2023.
Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses
In addition to the key assumptions/estimates described above, some estimates are unique to our Private Education Loan portfolio. Estimates are made on our Private Education Loans regarding when each borrower will separate from school. The cash flow timing of when a borrower will begin making full principal and interest payments is dependent upon when the student either graduates or leaves school. These dates can change based upon many factors. We receive information regarding projected graduation dates from a third-party clearinghouse. The separation from school date is updated quarterly based on updated information received from the clearinghouse.
Additionally, when we have a contractual obligation to fund a loan or a portion of a loan at a later date, we make an estimate regarding the percentage of this obligation that will be funded. This estimate is based on historical experience. For unfunded commitments, we recognize the related life of loan allowance as a liability. Once the loan is funded, that liability transfers to the allowance for Private Education Loan losses.
Key Credit Quality Indicators - Private Education Loans
We determine the collectability of our Private Education Loan portfolio by evaluating certain risk characteristics. We consider credit score at original approval and periodically refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan’s term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of the creditworthiness of borrowers, and the higher the credit scores the more likely it is the borrowers will be able to make all of their contractual payments. Loan status affects the credit risk because a past due loan is more likely to result in a credit loss than a current loan. Additionally, loans in the deferred payment status have different credit risk profiles compared with those in current pay status. Loan seasoning affects credit risk because a loan with a history of making payments generally has a lower incidence of default than a loan with a history of making infrequent or no payments. The
84 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
existence of a cosigner lowers the likelihood of default as well. We monitor and update these credit quality indicators in the analysis of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses on a quarterly basis.
In the second quarter of 2023, we changed how we collect on defaulted loans. Previously, we used a mix of in-house collectors and sales to third parties. We will continue to sell a segment of defaulted loans immediately after charge-off but will no longer sell retained defaulted loans (that have been subject to internal collection attempts for six months) to third parties and instead will continue our collection efforts using in-house collectors and third-party collectors. This improved our estimate of recovery rates for the year ended December 31, 2023. When we estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans, we no longer include expectations of future sales on retained defaulted loans. We continue to monitor how we collect on defaulted loans and may modify the approach from time to time based on performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
For December 31, 2022, we used both an estimate of recovery rates from in-house collections as well as expectations of future sales of defaulted loans to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
Private Education Loans generally do not require borrowers to begin principal and interest repayment until at least six months after the borrowers have graduated or otherwise separated from school. Consequently, the loss estimates for these loans are generally low while the borrower is in school and then increase upon the end of the grace period after separation from school. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, 25 percent and 24 percent, respectively, of the principal balance of the Private Education Loan portfolio was related to borrowers who were then in an in-school (fully deferred), grace, or other deferment status and not required to make payments.
Our collection policies for Private Education Loans allow for periods of nonpayment (forbearance) for certain borrowers requesting an extended grace period upon leaving school or experiencing temporary difficulty meeting payment obligations.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for Private Education Loans, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most relevant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans and accrued interest to be capitalized and of ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
We consider a Private Education Loan to be delinquent if the borrower has not made a required payment prior to the 31st day after such payment was contractually due.
Adoption of ASU No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures”
On March 31, 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” (“ASU No. 2022-02”), which eliminated the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The enhanced disclosures are required to be provided for modifications made starting in the period of adoption. Information about modifications in periods before adoption is not required to be provided.
ASU No. 2022-02 also requires that entities disclose current-period gross charge-offs by year of origination. For entities that have adopted the amendments in CECL, the amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption of the amendments in ASU No. 2022-02 was permitted if an entity has adopted CECL. The amendments should be applied prospectively. For the transition method related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs, an entity has the option to apply a modified retrospective transition method. We elected to early adopt all aspects of ASU No. 2022-02 prospectively for the period beginning January 1, 2022. The adoption was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the allowance for our TDR portfolio was included in our overall allowance for Private Education Loans. In estimating the expected defaults for our Private Education Loans that were considered TDRs, we followed the same discounted cash flow process described above but used the historical loss rates related to past TDR loans. The appropriate gross loss rates were determined for each individual loan by evaluating loan maturity, risk characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions. Our TDR portfolio was comprised mostly of loans with interest rate reductions and loans with forbearance usage greater than three months, as further described below.
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations and achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loans. These
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 85
changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction, a temporary or permanent interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. Forbearance is granted prospectively for borrowers who are current in their payments and may be granted retroactively for certain delinquent borrowers.
Prior to January 1, 2022, we classified a loan as a TDR due to forbearance using a two-step process. The first step was to identify a loan that was in full principal and interest repayment status and received more than three months of forbearance in a 24-month period; however, during the first nine months after a loan had entered full principal and interest repayment status, we did not count up to the first six months of forbearance received during that period against the three-month policy limit. The second step was to evaluate the creditworthiness of the loan by examining its most recent refreshed FICO score. Loans that met the criteria in the first test and had a FICO score above a certain threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) were not classified as TDRs. Loans that met the criteria in the first test and had a FICO score under the threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) were classified as TDRs.
A loan also became a TDR when it was modified to reduce the interest rate on the loan (regardless of when such modification occurred and/or whether such interest rate reduction was temporary). Once a loan qualified for TDR status, it remained a TDR for allowance purposes for the remainder of its life. About half our loans that were considered TDRs involved a temporary forbearance of payments and did not change the contractual interest rate of the loan.
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure for Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. The discounted cash flow approach described above includes expected future contractual disbursements. The portion of the allowance for credit losses related to future disbursements is shown as a liability on the face of the balance sheet, and related provision for credit losses is reflected on the income statement.
Uncollectible Interest
The majority of the total accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loan portfolio represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and on fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accrued on the loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized and increase the unpaid principal balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The discounted cash flow approach described above considers both the collectability of principal as well as this portion of accrued interest that is expected to capitalize to the balance of the loan. Therefore, the allowance for this portion of accrued interest balance is included in our allowance for credit losses. The discounted cash flow approach does not consider interest accrued on loans that are in a full principal and interest repayment status or in interest-only repayment status. We separately capture the amount of expected uncollectible interest associated with these loans using historical experience to estimate the uncollectible interest for the next four months at each period-end date. This amount is recorded as a reduction of interest income. Accrued interest receivable is separately disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses
FFELP Loans are insured as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default, subject to a risk-sharing level based on the date of loan disbursement. These insurance obligations are supported by contractual rights against the United States. For loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006, we receive 97 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed after October 1, 1993, and before July 1, 2006, we receive 98 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993, we receive 100 percent reimbursement. Because we bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to this federal guarantee, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are relatively small.
We use the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for the unguaranteed portion of our FFELP Loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for FFELP Loan losses uses historical experience of customer default behavior. We apply the default rate projections, net of applicable risk sharing, to our FFELP Loans for the current period to perform our quantitative calculation. Once the quantitative calculation is performed, we review the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and determine if qualitative adjustments need to be considered.
86 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Risk Management
Our Approach
Risk is inherent in our business activities and the specialized lending industry we serve. The ability of management to identify, manage, and remediate risk in a timely manner is critical to our continued success. Our risk management framework is designed to assess, manage, and report these risks and escalate as appropriate to the Board of Directors or its designee.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our overall strategic direction, including our risk management capability and effectiveness. The Board of Directors has oversight of key policies as well as the risk management framework developed and administered by the management team. We have a robust process to escalate meaningful departures from our risk appetite statements to the Board. The Board of Directors oversees the continued development of the risk management framework.
The Governance Framework
Our overall objective is to ensure all significant risks inherent in our business can be identified and appropriately mitigated. To this end, we have adopted the “three lines of defense” approach to governance. Specifically, the business units form the “first line of defense” and are the “owners” of risks in their business activities. As the risk owner, the first line of defense is accountable for the day-to-day execution of risk and control policies and procedures (including activities performed by third-party contractors). The “second line of defense” is our Risk Management function, which is independent from the first line of defense. The second line of defense conducts oversight and effective challenge of the risk-taking activities within the first line of defense. Finally, the Internal Audit function comprises the “third line of defense.” The Internal Audit function provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, as reflected in audit reports.
Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard
The Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Standard are designed to establish a stable risk and control environment across the enterprise. The policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, outlines the framework used to ensure that risk and control issues across the enterprise are identified, assessed, measured, monitored, and reported. The Risk Management Policy, the Risk Appetite Standard, and the related policies and procedures constitute the core of the risk management program.
Sallie Mae leverages risk appetite to outline the level of risk we are willing to accept within each risk category, as described below, in pursuit of our business objectives. Compliance with our risk appetite is monitored using a set of risk metrics, with defined thresholds and limits, for each risk category. The Enterprise Risk Committee provides oversight of the risk appetite standard with escalation to the Board of Directors, as appropriate.
Board of Directors Committee Structure
We have a robust Board of Directors committee structure as outlined below that facilitates oversight, effective challenge, and escalation of risk and control issues.
•Financial Risk Committee. The Financial Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s major financial risks, including credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk. The Financial Risk Committee, along with the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of the Company’s risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The Financial Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the major non-financial risks, including compliance risks, operational risks, information and cyber security risk, and model risk. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, along with the Financial Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of our risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statements, metrics, and associated limits and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 87
Operational and Compliance Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and reporting processes, the performance of the Internal Audit function, and the qualifications, hiring, performance, and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
•Nominations and Governance Committee. The Nominations and Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Directors appropriate standards of corporate governance, and assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with regard to oversight of the operations of the Board of Directors, the qualifications and independence of directors, nominations to the Board of Directors, and compliance with the corporate governance standards. The Nominations and Governance Committee also provides oversight of the ESG matters of the Company.
•Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, our incentive compensation and benefits practices for employees of all levels, and management’s succession planning. Additionally, the Compensation Committee provides oversight of human capital management, including in the areas of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
•Preferred Stock Committee. The Preferred Stock Committee monitors and evaluates proposed actions that may impact the rights of holders of our preferred stock.
Management-Level Committee Structure
Executive Committee. The EC is authorized by the Board of Directors to assist the CEO in the general supervision of the business of the Company. Specifically, the EC will (i) provide to the CEO advice and counsel, subject matter expertise, and recommendations as requested, and (ii) through its subcommittees, facilitate the evaluation and decision-making on routine cross-functional matters, and assist management in the fulfillment of management’s duties related to specific risks. The EC has established the following sub-committees to assist in fulfilling its duties.
•Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”). The ERC provides independent oversight and monitoring of the risk and control environment. The ERC is jointly accountable to the Financial Risk Committee and the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors and provides for escalation accordingly.
•Credit Committee. The Credit Committee is responsible for credit and counterparty risk, product pricing, and credit and collections operations.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The OCRC is the oversight body for the identification, assessment, remediation, measurement, and reporting of operational and compliance risks.
•Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO is responsible for the strategy, processes, and authorities with which the Bank’s interest rate risk, liquidity, and capital adequacy are managed.
•Policy Management Committee (“PMC”) The PMC is responsible for the effective and efficient administration of the Company’s policies, standards, and procedures.
Each of these sub-committees is comprised of subject matter experts from the senior management team and is accountable to the EC. Moreover, these sub-committees may be supported by steering or working groups, as appropriate.
Disclosure Committee. Our Disclosure Committee assists our CEO and Chief Financial Officer in their review of periodic SEC reporting documents, earnings releases, investor materials, and related disclosure policies and procedures.
Internal Audit
Internal Audit provides independent assurance to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as to the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management, control, and governance processes. Internal Audit also assists management by providing objective assurance, credible challenge, and consulting services around matters involving risk management. Internal Audit regularly performs selected reviews of our risk management and compliance functions to assess the effectiveness of the overall risk management framework, identifies areas that may require increased focus and resources, and reports significant control issues and recommendations to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually, Internal Audit performs an independent risk assessment to evaluate the risk of all significant components of the Company and uses the results to develop an annual, risk-based Internal Audit plan to provide the assurance services noted above.
88 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
Risk Categories
Risk categories are a foundational element of the risk management framework; they are widely used in risk
identification and provide the basis for risk aggregation and reporting. The Company has identified six major risk categories:
Strategic Risk. Strategic risk is the risk of: adverse impacts to enterprise value, current or anticipated earnings, capital, or franchise value arising from the Company’s competitive and market position and evolving forces in the industry that can affect that position; lack of responsiveness to these conditions; strategic decisions to change the Company’s scale, market position, or operating model; or failure to appropriately consider implementation risks inherent in the Company’s strategy.
The overall development of the Company’s strategic plan includes extensive engagement with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the Board of Directors provides oversight and effective challenge on performance relative to the strategic plan.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from obligors’ failure, or the increased probability thereof, to meet the terms of a lending, issuer, or counterparty agreement. Credit risk is found in all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.
The credit risk related to Private Education Loans is managed within a credit risk infrastructure that includes: (i) a well-defined underwriting, asset quality, and collection policy framework; (ii) an ongoing monitoring and review process of portfolio composition and trends; (iii) assignment and management of credit authorities and responsibilities; and (iv) establishment of an allowance for credit losses that covers estimated future losses based upon an analysis of portfolio metrics and economic factors.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is managed by reviewing counterparties for credit strength on an ongoing basis and through our credit policies, which place limits on the amount of exposure we may take with any one counterparty and require collateral to secure the position. The credit and counterparty risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with contracts in a gain position to us fail to perform under the terms of the contract.
Credit risk exposure is managed primarily through the Credit Committee, and regular reporting on credit programs and credit metrics is provided to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from fluctuations in market conditions such as changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and other financial market factors. We are exposed to various types of market risk, in particular the risk of loss resulting from interest rate risk, basis risk, and other risks that arise through the management of our investment, debt, and loan portfolios. Market risk exposures are managed primarily through ALCO. These activities are closely tied to those related to the management of our funding and liquidity risks. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the investment and asset and liability management policies and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO. The Chief Financial Officer provides reports to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors on market risk management.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, reputation, or survival resulting from not being able to meet the Company’s financial obligations when they become due, whether due to a lack of available funding or the inability to liquidate assets in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to: meet our funding needs through market cycles, including periods of financial stress; manage the relative maturities of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet; fund disbursements of Private Education Loans and other loans; and service our indebtedness and bank deposits. Ultimately, our liquidity risk relates to our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates and to maintain deposits and other funding sources through the Bank, as well as our maintenance of a reserve of cash and unencumbered highly liquid investment securities that may be readily converted to cash if needed.
2023 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 89
Our liquidity risk activities are centralized within our Corporate Finance department, which is responsible for developing and executing our funding strategy. We analyze and monitor our liquidity risk, maintain excess liquidity, and access diverse funding sources depending on current market conditions. Liquidity risks are overseen and recommendations approved primarily through ALCO. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for periodically reviewing the liquidity positions and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO.
Operational Risk. Operational risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events. Operational risk is pervasive in that it exists in all business lines, functional units, legal entities, and geographic locations.
Operational risk exposures are managed through a combination of first line of defense and control activities and second line of defense oversight. The OCRC is the management committee responsible for operational risk, and it supports the EC in its oversight duties. The OCRC is responsible for escalation to the EC, as appropriate. Additionally, our key risk indicators include operational risk metrics, thresholds, and limits and are included in the periodic reporting to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Cybersecurity risk is one of our significant operational risks. We provide more detailed information on our cybersecurity risk management, strategy, and governance in Part I, Item 1C. of this Form 10-K.
Compliance Risk. Compliance risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from violations of, or non-conformance with, the Code of Business Conduct and with laws, rules, regulations, and self regulatory organizations’ standards.
Primary ownership and responsibility for compliance risk is placed with the first line of defense to identify and manage. Our Compliance function supports these activities by providing extensive training, monitoring, and testing of the processes, policies, and procedures utilized by the first line of defense, maintaining relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and working in close coordination with our Legal department. Compliance risk metrics and regular reporting on compliance programs are provided to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
90 SLM CORPORATION — 2023 Form 10-K
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-23-004893.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures and information contained in “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae
During the first quarter of 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 began to spread worldwide and has caused significant disruptions to the U.S. and world economies.
The impact of COVID-19 has been felt by our colleagues, our customers, and our communities. In response to COVID-19, we implemented efforts to safeguard our team members and enabled a remote work environment. In addition, we took steps to help our customers during the crisis. Further, The Sallie Mae Fund, our charitable arm, made contributions to assist in our hometown communities.
The COVID-19 crisis was unprecedented and had a significant impact on the economic environment globally and in the U.S. While we have highlighted below how we responded to the pandemic in 2020 and 2021, the pandemic continued to have lingering impacts on our financial results in 2022. As COVID-19 mutates into newer strains, there is a significant amount of uncertainty as to the length and breadth of the impact to the U.S. economy and, consequently, on us. The information below should be read in conjunction with our COVID-19 pandemic risk factor, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors - Pandemic Risk ” in this annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, see the forward-looking and cautionary statements discussion in this annual report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Financial Results
We continued to see an impact to our financial results as a direct result of COVID-19 in 2022. The economic upheaval that occurred in 2022 (e.g., higher inflation, higher interest rates, and lower stock market) as the country began to recover from the initial effects of the pandemic and the resulting government stimulus programs also affected our financial results and operations through increased loan yields and deposit costs, increased losses on loans and increased allowance for credit losses, increased employee compensation costs, and reduced staffing. Difficulty in hiring and retaining servicing and collections staff contributed to the higher charge-off rates in 2022, as did losses from the “gap year” program we implemented in 2020 to help our borrowers. During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans, and in the fourth quarter of 2021 we increased them again for the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflected the significant improvement in economic forecasts at the time, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. We experienced higher prepayments during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unemployment rates were elevated, than we would have expected based upon our experience during past financial crises. In 2022, as interest rates rose from the low levels experienced during the pandemic, we saw prepayments slow down, which resulted in an increase in our allowance for credit losses.
Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance as a percentage of held for investment Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance was 1.8 percent at December 31, 2022, compared to 1.9 percent at December 31, 2021. The forbearance rate on December 31, 2022 was lower than on December 31, 2021 due to our ending disaster forbearance related to COVID-19 in June 2021 and our adoption of the previously announced planned credit administration practices changes. Delinquencies at December 31, 2022, as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment, increased to 3.8 percent from 3.3 percent at December 31, 2021. The increase in delinquencies was primarily due to the ending of the disaster forbearance program related to COVID-19, the adoption of new credit administration practices changes in the latter part of 2021, and operational challenges we experienced during 2022.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 51
For the start of the 2021-2022 academic year, the majority of colleges, universities, and trade schools returned to in-person classes while offering full residential options. For the start of the 2022-2023 academic year, we continued to see colleges, universities, and trade schools returning to in-person classes and full residential options. While these schools moved away from an emphasis on hybrid and online classes, some colleges maintained the option for online classes as a safety precaution.
For some students, going back to school in the fall of 2020 was not an option because of the pandemic or for other reasons. Therefore, some students took a “gap year” before returning to school. In 2020, for those students that had unexpectedly separated from school, we had provided an extension of time, until the fall of 2021, to re-enroll before beginning their grace period that occurs upon separation from school and prior to entering full principal and interest repayment status. At December 31, 2020, $1.0 billion of Private Education Loans had been granted this extended period of time. Beginning September 30, 2021, we no longer granted this “gap year” extension. Losses on these “gap year” loans, which totaled $59 million, were higher than expected and contributed to the higher charge-offs in 2022.
On March 27, 2020, then President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which, among other things, allows us to (i) elect to suspend the requirements under GAAP for loan modifications related to COVID-19 that would otherwise be categorized as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), and (ii) suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the effects of COVID-19 as being a TDR, including impairment for accounting purposes. Furthermore, on December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (“CAA”) was signed into law. The CAA provides for additional COVID-19 focused relief and extends certain provisions of the CARES Act.
We elected to suspend TDR accounting for modifications of loans that occurred as a result of COVID-19 for the applicable period of the CARES Act and CAA relief. The relief from TDR guidance applied to modifications of loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019, and that occurred during the period beginning on March 1, 2020, and ending on the earlier of (i) 60 days after the date on which the national emergency related to the COVID-19 outbreak is terminated, or (ii) January 1, 2022. We continued to apply TDR accounting to those loans that were more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019 and were subsequently modified through December 31, 2021. Effective January 1, 2022, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” (“ASU No. 2022-02”), which eliminated the accounting guidance for TDRs while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. See “Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses —Adoption of ASU No. 2022-02 ‘Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures’ ” for additional details about the adoption of the new accounting guidance.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopt CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, could elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. On January 1, 2022, 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts were phased in for regulatory capital purposes. On January 1 of each year from 2023 to 2025, the adjusted transition amounts will continue to be phased in for regulatory capital purposes at a rate of 25 percent per year, with the phased-in amounts included in regulatory capital at the beginning of each year. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $953 million. This transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
52 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
At December 31, 2022, the adjusted transition amounts that were deferred and are being phased in for regulatory capital purposes are as follows:
| Transition Amounts | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Remaining Adjusted Transition Amounts to be Phased-In | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | January 1, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | $ | 952,639 | $ | (57,859) | $ | (58,429) | $ | (209,088) | $ | 627,263 | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | 1,143,053 | (55,811) | (49,097) | (259,536) | 778,609 | ||||||||||||||
| Liability for unfunded commitments | 115,758 | (2,048) | (9,333) | (26,094) | 78,283 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 306,171 | — | — | (76,542) | 229,629 |
Customers and Credit Performance
COVID-19 had a far reaching, negative impact on individuals and businesses. Specifically, COVID-19 materially disrupted business operations throughout the country, resulting in supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures. As a result, we expected many of our individual customers to experience financial hardship, creating a challenge to meet credit standards for new loan originations and making it difficult, if not impossible, to fulfill their payment obligations to us without temporary assistance. We monitored key metrics as early warning indicators of financial hardship, including changes in weekly unemployment claims, enrollment in auto-debit payments, requests for new forbearances, enrollment in hardship payment plans, and early delinquency metrics.
As a result of the negative impact on employment from COVID-19, our customers experienced higher levels of financial hardship, which initially led to elevated levels of forbearance, as we provided disaster forbearance to borrowers who requested it. We saw higher levels of delinquencies and defaults as borrowers who had received disaster forbearance from us re-entered repayment status. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we considered the multiple economic forecasts in estimating our allowance for credit losses. We could experience significant changes in our allowance for credit losses if there are significant changes in the rate of occurrence and the severity of infections from COVID-19 increases. The process for determining our allowance contemplates material external factors that may require management adjustments. We used Moody’s Analytics economic forecasts in estimating the losses on our loan portfolio.
Historically, we have utilized disaster forbearance to assist borrowers affected by material events, typically federally-declared disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described later in this Form 10-K. In accordance with regulatory guidance that encouraged lenders to work constructively with customers who were affected by COVID-19, we invoked this same disaster forbearance program to assist our customers through COVID-19 and offered this program across our operations. During 2021, we ended all COVID-19 disaster forbearances and at December 31, 2022, there were no loans under a disaster forbearance program related to COVID-19.
We continue to adapt and evolve our customer care and collections practices to meet the needs of our customers, while operating in a safe and sound manner. See also “— Financial Results” in this section for further discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students returning to college campuses.
Our Team Members
Our team members have been affected by COVID-19 in many ways, including sickness, disruptions due to unexpected school and day-care closings, family underemployment or unemployment, and learning how to work remotely with, in some cases, new tools and technology to learn and support that work. Our goal has been to support our team members during the present uncertainty while meeting the needs of our customers and providing business continuity. In April 2022, we returned to our offices, with most team members working under a hybrid model of some days in the office and other days working from home.
Operations
We have robust pandemic and business continuity plans that include our business units and technology environments. When COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, we activated our pandemic response plan. Sallie Mae’s response was initiated by the Incident Management Office (“IMO”), a group of key stakeholders representing members of senior and executive management. The IMO directed the activities of the operational response group to address the
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 53
health and safety of our workforce, assist customers, sustain business operations, and address the management of other ongoing pandemic activities.
In response to a growing infected population across the United States in 2020, we executed plans for social-distancing and mask wearing in our facilities, implemented work-from-home contingencies and instituted a voluntary vaccination incentive program for our team members. As the impact of the virus progressed, we expanded remote-working capabilities for our teams and consulted with regulators about our plans. We closely monitored directives and guidance from both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local health departments to ensure compliance with any requirements. We also completed a series of additional steps to appropriately ensure data security through compliance with our telecommuting policy. The policy is designed to create a secure at-home work environment that protects our customers’ information and transactions while also providing the necessary technology capabilities to enable effective remote-working for our team members.
In addition, we enhanced the functionality of our chatbot, IVR, mobile app, and website features to help our customers manage their accounts.
Most team members currently are working on a hybrid model of some days in the office and the other days working from home.
Liquidity and Capital
Over the course of 2019, we significantly increased our overall liquidity position for risk management purposes and enhanced our liquidity stress testing regime. As a result of these efforts, we currently believe our liquidity position is stable and we expect to be able to fund our business operations. Because of the disruptions in the capital markets that occurred at the onset of the pandemic, in the first quarter of 2020 we implemented our Contingency Funding Plan, which entailed monitoring and reporting to management our liquidity position and the health of deposit and asset-backed securities markets. In times of financial distress, we often see a flight to quality, where investors seek safer places to invest their money, such as insured bank deposits and in securities such as U.S. Treasuries and government- sponsored debt and mortgage-backed securities. We saw similar trends in the marketplace during this crisis and expect that as a well-capitalized insured depository institution, we will have ample access to deposit markets. As pandemic-related capital market disruptions abated, we de-activated the Contingency Funding Plan in October 2020, but have continued to remain watchful for signs of renewed market stress as the pandemic evolves. Maintaining our focus on earnings quality as well as prudent liquidity management, we actively managed the cost of our retail deposits downward in response to the rapid downturn in short-term interest rates in 2020. As the economy recovered and inflation increased in 2022, we saw deposit rates increase as market rates began to rise. In addition, we were able to access the brokered deposit, asset-backed security, and unsecured debt markets throughout 2021 and 2022. We manage our capital position through a rigorous capital stress testing regime. As a result, we believe that, given the quality of our Private Education Loan portfolio, we have sufficient capital to withstand our current estimate in the event of a downturn. If circumstances surrounding COVID-19 change in a significantly more adverse way, however, it is possible our liquidity and regulatory capital position could be materially and adversely affected, which could materially and adversely impact our business operations and our overall financial condition. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Borrowings” in Item 7 for additional discussion of our capital and funding activities.
Regulatory agencies have also provided regulatory capital relief to financial institutions as a result of the crisis. See “ — Financial Results” for additional discussion regarding the regulatory relief.
Regulatory
We are regulated by the FDIC, the UDFI, and the CFPB. These agencies have encouraged regulated entities to work constructively with customers affected by COVID-19 and have provided guidance regarding loan modifications.
The federal banking regulators have stated that working with customers who are current on existing loans, either individually or as part of a program for creditworthy customers who are experiencing short-term financial or operational problems as a result COVID-19, generally would not be considered TDRs (as hereinafter defined). For modification programs, such as forbearance, designed to provide short-term relief for current customers affected by COVID-19, we may presume that customers who are current on payments are not experiencing financial difficulties at the time of the modification for purposes of determining TDR status, and thus no further TDR analysis was required for each loan modification in the program.
In addition, the federal banking regulators have indicated their examiners will exercise judgment in reviewing loan modifications, including TDRs, and will not automatically adversely risk-rate credits that are affected by COVID-19, including those considered TDRs. Regardless of whether modifications result in loans being considered TDRs or adversely classified, the federal banking regulators have indicated their examiners will not criticize prudent efforts to modify the terms of existing loans to affected customers.
54 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Key Financial Measures
Set forth below are brief summaries of our key financial measures. Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
Net Interest Income
Most of our earnings are generated from the interest income earned on assets in our education loan portfolios, net of the interest expense we pay on the funding for those loans. We report these earnings as net interest income. We also often refer to the net interest margin, which is the net interest yield earned on our interest-earning assets less the rate paid on our related interest-bearing liabilities. The majority of our interest income comes from our Private Education Loan portfolio. FFELP Loans have a lower net interest yield and carry lower risk than Private Education Loans, as a result of the federal government guarantee supporting FFELP Loans.
Loan Sales and Secured Financings
We may sell loans to third-parties through whole loan sales, securitizations, or other similar transactions. We typically retain servicing of loans subsequent to their sale and earn revenue for this servicing at prevailing market rates for such services. Selling loans removes the loan assets from our balance sheet and helps us manage our asset growth, capital, and liquidity needs. Alternatively, we may use loans as collateral in connection with the creation of asset-backed securitizations or secured funding facilities structured as financings. These types of transactions may provide us long-term financing, but they do not remove loan assets from our balance sheet, nor do they generate gains on sales of loans, net. Consequently, our operating results may be significantly affected by whether we choose to sell loans and recognize current gains on sale or continue to hold or finance loans, thereby retaining some or all the net interest income from those loans. In 2022, we recognized $328 million in gains from the sale of approximately $3.34 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.13 billion of principal and $217 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third-parties. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment.”
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management estimates and maintains an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses.” Allowances for credit losses are an important indicator of management’s perspective on the future performance of a loan portfolio. Each quarter, management makes an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses to reflect its most up-to-date estimate of future losses by recording a charge against quarterly revenues known as provision expense. As they occur, actual loan charge-offs and recoveries are then charged or credited, respectively, against the allowance for credit losses rather than against earnings.
The allowance for credit losses and provision expense rise in periods of high loan origination, when future charge-offs are expected to increase, and fall when future charge-offs are expected to decline. We bear the full credit exposure on our Private Education Loans and Credit Cards. Losses on our Private Education Loans are affected by risk characteristics such as loan status (in-school, grace, forbearance, repayment, and delinquency), loan seasoning (number of months in active repayment), underwriting criteria (e.g., credit scores), presence of a cosigner, servicing and collections practices, and the current economic environment. See “CREDIT RISK - Defaults on our loans, particularly Private Education Loans, could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for additional information. Losses typically emerge once a borrower separates from school and enters full principal and interest repayment after the borrower’s grace period (six months, typically) ends. As a larger proportion of our Private Education Loan portfolio enters full principal and interest repayment in the coming years, we would expect the amount of charge-offs to increase.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 55
Our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are small because we generally bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to the federal guarantee on such loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses.
Charge-Offs and Delinquencies
Delinquencies are another important indicator of potential future credit performance. Private Education Loans are charged off at the end of the month in which they reach 120 days delinquent or otherwise when the loans are classified as a loss by us or our regulator. Charge-off data provides relevant information with respect to the actual performance of a loan portfolio over time. Management focuses on delinquencies as well as the progression of loans from early to late stage delinquency as a key metric in estimating the allowance for credit losses and tailoring its future collections strategies. We manage our charged-off loans through a mix of in-house collectors, third-party collectors, and sales to third-parties.
Operating Expenses
The cost of operating our business directly affects our profitability. We strive to manage growth in our business in a prudent fashion by focusing on investments to improve efficiency. We monitor and report internally various metrics, including cost to acquire and cost to service our loans (which include both owned and serviced loans), among others. The cost to acquire is affected by such variables as technology, personnel, and marketing costs. Servicing expenses primarily include compensation and benefit expenses related to our collections, customer support, and payment processing employees, and technology costs and other expenses associated with facilitating and servicing borrowers. Costs to service can vary period to period based upon seasonality and borrower payment status. The cost to service a delinquent borrower is significantly higher than the cost to service a current or in-school borrower.
Private Education Loan Originations
Private Education Loans are the principal asset on our balance sheet, and the amount of new Private Education Loan originations we generate each year is a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.
Funding Sources
Deposits
We utilize brokered, retail, and other core deposits to meet funding needs and enhance our liquidity position. These deposits can be term or liquid deposits. Our term brokered deposits have terms as long as seven years. Interest rates on a portion of our long-term deposits are swapped into one-month LIBOR. This structure has the effect of transforming the interest rate characteristics of these deposits to match the index on which the majority of our assets reset, thereby minimizing our exposure to interest rate risk. Retail deposits are sourced through a direct banking platform and serve as an important source of diversified funding. Brokered deposits are sourced through a network of brokers and provide a stable source of funding. In addition, we accept certain deposits considered non-brokered that are held in large accounts structured to allow FDIC insurance to flow through to underlying individual depositors. We diversify our funding sources with deposits from Educational 529 savings plan and Health Savings plans. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $8.0 billion of our deposit totals as of December 31, 2022.
Loan Securitizations
We have diversified our funding sources by issuing term ABS and by entering into the Secured Borrowing Facility. Term ABS financing provides long-term funding for our Private Education Loan portfolio at attractive interest rates and at terms that effectively match the average life of the assets. Loans associated with these transactions will remain on our balance sheet if we retain the residual interest in the related trusts. The Secured Borrowing Facility provides an extremely flexible source of funds that can be drawn upon on short notice to meet funding needs within the Bank. Borrowings under our Secured Borrowing Facility are accounted for as secured financings.
56 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
LIBOR Transition
Following announcements by the UKFCA, which regulates LIBOR, and ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, publication of 1-week and 2-month USD LIBOR and all tenors for other currencies ceased after December 31, 2021. While publication of the remaining USD settings is expected to cease after June 30, 2023, U.S. banking and other global financial services regulators directed regulated institutions to cease entering into new LIBOR-based contracts as soon as practicable and in any event by the end of 2021.
In 2020, we launched a formal cross-functional replacement project with the goal of ensuring a smooth transition to a replacement index for our LIBOR-based assets and obligations with minimal negative impact on our customers, investors, and the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The Chief Financial Officer and the project team monitor developments, assess impacts, propose plans and, with the approval of an executive committee, implement changes. The Chief Financial Officer and/or project team reports status regularly to our Board of Directors. In 2020, we began accepting certain deposits based on SOFR. In the second quarter of 2021, we began issuing variable-rate Private Education Loans that are indexed to SOFR. In May 2022, we renewed the Secured Borrowing Facility with an index based on SOFR and, in the third quarter of 2022, we began issuing ABS that are indexed to SOFR.
Substantially all our assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items referencing LIBOR are comprised of Private Education Loans originated before April 2021, deposits, variable-rate ABS issued before 2022, and derivatives. In addition, our Series B Preferred Stock is indexed to LIBOR. We plan to transition these exposures to LIBOR by changing them to an alternative reference rate, either through modification or replacement, by June 30, 2023. Approximately $192 million of our variable-rate ABS (those issued before November 2017) do not have fallback provisions for an alternative reference rate and we intend to rely upon the safe harbors provided by recently passed federal legislation to transition these ABS to an alternative reference rate. Generally, the safe harbors will shield parties from liability and damages for transitioning certain USD LIBOR-indexed contracts (generally, those that do not have provisions for an alternative reference rate) to a benchmark replacement rate based on SOFR and selected by the Federal Reserve Board. We have evaluated the potential basis risk associated with a mismatch in variable-rate assets and liabilities, including any mismatches related to (i) legacy assets and liabilities that remain indexed to LIBOR up to June 2023 and newly issued assets and liabilities that are, or will be, indexed to SOFR and (ii) term SOFR-indexed assets and liabilities and average SOFR assets and liabilities. In all such cases, we have determined the basis risk is immaterial on an aggregate basis.
The chart below depicts our current LIBOR exposure at December 31, 2022.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 57
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | LIBOR Exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 6,501,635 | |
| FFELP Loans | 513,839 | ||
| Available-for-sale investments | 48,637 | ||
| Total Assets | $ | 7,064,111 | |
| Deposits | $ | 1,872,647 | |
| Private Education Loan term securitizations - no contractual fallback | 192,366 | ||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations - alternative reference rate fallback | 524,123 | ||
| Total Liabilities | 2,589,136 | ||
| Total Equity (preferred stock) | 251,070 | ||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 2,840,206 | |
| Off-Balance Sheet: | |||
| Pay LIBOR derivative notional | $ | 1,528,186 | |
| Receive LIBOR derivative notional | 1,314,660 | ||
| Total derivative notional | 2,842,846 | ||
| Total Off-Balance Sheet | $ | 2,842,846 |
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K for additional discussion regarding the risks associated with the transition from LIBOR.
Strategic Imperatives
To further focus our business and increase shareholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our focus remains on maximizing the profitability and growth of our core private student loan business, while harnessing and optimizing the power of our brand and attractive client base. In addition, we continue to seek to better inform the external narrative about student lending and Sallie Mae. We also strive to maintain a rigorous and predictable capital allocation and return program to create shareholder value. We are focused on driving a mission-led culture that continues to make Sallie Mae a great place to work. We also continue to strengthen our risk and compliance function, enhance and build upon our risk management framework, and assess and monitor enterprise-wide risk.
During 2022, we made the following progress on the above corporate strategic imperatives.
Acquisition of Nitro College
On March 4, 2022, we completed the acquisition of Nitro, which provides resources that help students and families evaluate how to responsibly pay for college and manage their financial responsibilities after graduation. The addition of Nitro brought innovative products, tools, and resources to help students and families confidently navigate their higher education journey.
The acquisition of Nitro enhances future strategic growth opportunities for Sallie Mae and expands our digital marketing capabilities, reduces the cost to acquire customer accounts, and accelerates our progress to become a broader education solutions provider helping students to, through, and immediately after college. For additional information on this transaction, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies — Business Combination,” and Note 10, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets.”
2022 Loan Sales and 2022-A, 2022-B, and 2022-D Transactions
During 2022, we sold $3.34 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.13 billion of principal and $217 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third parties. The transactions qualified for sale treatment and removed
58 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
the balance of the loans from our balance sheet on the respective settlement dates. We remained the servicer of these loans pursuant to applicable servicing agreements executed in connection with the sales. These sales resulted in our recognizing a gain of $328 million during the year ended December 31, 2022. For additional information regarding these transactions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment” and Note 12, “Borrowings - Unconsolidated VIEs.”
2022-C Securitization
On August 9, 2022, we executed our $575 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2022-C term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $575 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $575 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.69 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.76 percent.
Secured Borrowing Facility
On May 17, 2022, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity of the facility. The amount that can be borrowed under the facility is $2 billion. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. Under the Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until May 16, 2023. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 16, 2024 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur).
Disposition of Credit Card Business
We plan to exit and sell our credit card business to focus resources on our core business strategies. We processed completed credit card applications received through the end of December 2022. At December 31, 2022, we had $29 million in Credit Card receivables in loans held for sale.
Share Repurchases under our Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased 40 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $708 million under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans authorized under our share repurchase programs.
See “Item 1. Business — Human Capital Resources and Talent Development” for a discussion regarding our mission-led culture.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 59
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 vs. 2021 | 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 1,915 | $ | 1,757 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 158 | 9 | % | $ | (232) | (12) | % | ||||||||||||
| Investments | 35 | 14 | 12 | 21 | 150 | 2 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 82 | 6 | 21 | 76 | 1,267 | (15) | (71) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 2,032 | 1,777 | 2,022 | 255 | 14 | (245) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 543 | 382 | 542 | 161 | 42 | (160) | (30) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 1,489 | 1,395 | 1,480 | 94 | 7 | (85) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: provisions for credit losses | 633 | (33) | 93 | 666 | 2,018 | (126) | (135) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provisions for credit losses | 855 | 1,428 | 1,387 | (573) | (40) | 41 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of loans, net | 328 | 548 | 238 | (220) | (40) | 310 | 130 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains (losses) on securities, net | (60) | 39 | 4 | (99) | (254) | 35 | 875 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net | — | — | 50 | — | — | (50) | (100) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 67 | 45 | 39 | 22 | 49 | 6 | (15) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 335 | 632 | 331 | (297) | (47) | 301 | 91 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 551 | 519 | 538 | 32 | 6 | (19) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acquired intangible assets amortization expense | 8 | — | — | 8 | 100 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring expenses | — | 1 | 26 | (1) | (100) | (25) | (96) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expenses | 559 | 520 | 564 | 39 | 8 | (44) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 631 | 1,540 | 1,154 | (909) | (59) | 386 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 162 | 380 | 273 | (218) | (57) | 107 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 469 | 1,160 | 881 | (691) | (60) | 279 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 9 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 125 | (6) | (60) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 460 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 871 | $ | (696) | (60) | % | $ | 285 | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 1.78 | $ | 3.67 | $ | 2.27 | $ | (1.89) | (51) | % | $ | 1.40 | 62 | % | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.61 | $ | 2.25 | $ | (1.85) | (51) | % | $ | 1.36 | 60 | % | ||||||||||||
| Declared dividends per common share | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.24 | 120 | % | $ | 0.08 | 67 | % |
60 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
GAAP Consolidated Earnings Summary
Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2021
For the year ended December 31, 2022, net income was $469 million, or $1.76 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $1.16 billion, or $3.61 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2021. The year-over-year decrease was primarily attributable to higher provisions for credit losses, decreases in gains on sales of loans, net, and other income, and higher operating expenses, which were offset by an increase in total net interest income.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for the current year period compared with the year-ago period are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2022 increased by $94 million compared with the year-ago period primarily due to a 50-basis point increase in our net interest margin, which more than offset a $922 million reduction in average interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin increased in the current period from the year-ago period because of a combination of factors, including an $855 million reduction in low-yielding average cash and other short-term investments, and a $367 million increase in average taxable securities. Historically, the yields on interest-earnings assets reprice more quickly than our cost of funds. As such, as rates increased in 2022, the yields on our interest-earning assets increased 111 basis points, while the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities only increased 63 basis points, compared with 2021. The higher level of cash and other short-term investments in 2021 was primarily the result of the $4.2 billion Private Education Loan sale that occurred in 2021.
•Provision for credit losses in 2022 was $633 million, compared with a negative provision of $33 million in the year-ago period. During 2022, the provision for credit losses was primarily affected by new loan commitments made during the period, slower prepayment rates, and additional management overlays, which were partially offset by negative provisions recorded related to $3.34 billion in Private Education Loans sold in 2022, and the adoption of a new loss model that included a reduction in the long-term estimate of losses after the reasonable and supportable period. Management overlays increased in 2022 due to several factors, including additional provisions for our expectation of higher future loan losses related to the previously announced credit administration practices changes we implemented in 2021, “gap year” loans, a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges we experienced in 2022. We expect the lack of tenured collections staff and operational challenges to persist into 2023 and, to a lesser extent, 2024. “Gap year” loans refer to loans to borrowers who took a “gap year” during the COVID-19 pandemic and entered full principal and interest repayment status starting in late 2021 and early 2022. Losses on these “gap year” loans were higher than expected and contributed to the higher provision expense recorded in 2022 to cover the higher-than-expected losses. In the year-ago period, the provision for credit losses was favorably affected by improved economic forecasts in 2021 and faster prepayments speeds. In addition, during the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. The faster estimated prepayment speeds reflected the significant improvement in economic forecasts as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model in the first quarter of 2021.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $328 million in 2022, compared with $548 million in the year-ago period. Higher interest rates in 2022 compared with 2021 resulted in the amount the buyers were willing to pay on our loans in 2022 to decrease compared with the year-ago period. The decrease in gains on sales of loans, net, also was the result of $90 million less in Private Education Loan sales in 2022 when compared with the year-ago period.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net was a loss of $60 million in 2022, compared with a gain of $39 million in the year ago period. During 2022, we determined that an investment in non-marketable equity securities was impaired. As such, we wrote down the value based upon an estimate of the value of these securities. The gain recorded in 2021 was primarily the result of a $35 million increase in the valuation of the same non-marketable securities.
•Other income was $67 million in 2022, compared with $45 million in the year-ago period. Other income in 2021 was negatively affected by a $5 million reduction in the tax indemnification receivable related to uncertain tax positions and by a $3 million loss from fees related to the redemption of $200 million of our 5.125 percent unsecured senior notes due in April 2022. Also, in the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a $10 million increase in third-party servicing fees and a $4 million increase in Private Education Loan late fees versus the year-ago period.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 61
•For the year ended December 31, 2022, total operating expenses were $551 million, compared with $519 million in the year-ago period. The increase in total operating expenses was primarily driven by transaction costs related to our acquisition of Nitro, higher personnel costs, and initiative spending.
•In 2022, we recorded $8 million in amortization of acquired intangible assets related to our acquisition of Nitro in the first quarter of 2022. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 10, “Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets.”
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $162 million, compared with $380 million in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate increased in 2022 to 25.6 percent from 24.7 percent in the year-ago period. The increase in the effective rate for 2022 was primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowance against future tax benefits, and lower-than-expected tax credits in 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2020
For the year ended December 31, 2021, net income was $1.16 billion, or $3.61 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $881 million, or $2.25 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2020. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to increases in gains on sales of loans, net, other income, lower provisions for credit losses, and lower operating expenses, which were offset by a decline in total net interest income.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for 2021 compared with 2020 are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2021 decreased by $85 million compared with 2020 primarily due to a $2.1 billion reduction in average loans outstanding. The decline in average loans outstanding was due to the sale of our Personal Loan portfolio that occurred in the third quarter of 2020 and the sale of $4.2 billion of Private Education Loans in 2021. Net interest margin in 2021 was unchanged from 2020 as the lower yield on our interest earning assets was offset by lower cost of funds.
•Provisions for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased by $126 million compared with 2020. This decrease of $126 million in 2021 compared with 2020 was primarily the result of improving economic forecasts in 2021 and faster prepayment speeds. During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflect the significant improvement in economic forecasts, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we increased our long-term estimate of prepayment speeds to reflected higher long-term prepayment experience. Partially offsetting these benefits were additional provisions to reflect the adoption of our credit administration practices changes and other management overlays.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $548 million in 2021, compared with $238 million in 2020. The increase in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of $1.14 billion in additional Private Education Loan sales in 2021 when compared with 2020 and improved pricing on the sale of those loans in 2021 compared with 2020.
•Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net, decreased $50 million in 2021 compared with 2020. The year ended December 31, 2020 was favorably impacted by a significant decrease in interest rates caused by the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, which made our receive fixed/pay variable interest rate swaps that are not designated as accounting hedges, but are economic hedges, to increase in value.
•Gains (losses) on securities, net was a gain of $39 million in 2021, compared with a gain of $4 million in 2020. The gain recorded in 2021 was primarily the result of a $35 million increase in the valuation of our investment in non-marketable securities.
•Other income increased $6 million in 2021 from 2020. The increase in other income compared with 2020 was primarily the result of a $26 million increase in third-party servicing fees, offset by an $11 million gain from the sale of our former Upromise subsidiary recognized in 2020 and $6 million in lower revenue related to our former Upromise subsidiary. In addition, other income during the year ended December 31, 2021 was negatively affected by a $3 million loss from fees related to the redemption of $200 million of our 5.125 percent unsecured senior notes due in April 2022. Third-party servicing fees increased in 2021 because we sold $4.24 billion in loans in 2021 where we retained servicing rights.
62 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
•For the year ended December 31, 2021, total operating expenses were $519 million, compared with $538 million in 2020. The decrease in total operating expenses was primarily driven by lower personnel costs as a result of the corporate reorganization that occurred in the second half of 2020, the divestiture of our former Upromise subsidiary in 2020, the sale of the Personal Loan portfolio in 2020, and lower initiative spending and improved servicing efficiencies in 2021.
•In the third quarter of 2020, we implemented a restructuring plan that resulted in our recording a $26 million restructuring charge in the year ended December 31, 2020. These expenses were primarily related to involuntary termination benefit arrangements, as well as certain other costs, such as legal and consulting fees, that were incremental and incurred as a direct result of our 2020 restructuring plan. There were de minimis restructuring expenses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $380 million, compared with $273 million in 2020. The effective tax rate increased in 2021 to 24.7 percent from 23.7 percent in 2020. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by higher state income tax expense related to an increase in our uncertain tax positions.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings”
We prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, we also produce and report our after-tax earnings on a separate basis that we refer to as non-GAAP “Core Earnings.” The difference between our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” and GAAP results for periods presented generally is driven by the unrealized, mark-to-fair value gains (losses) on derivative contracts recognized in GAAP, but not in non-GAAP “Core Earnings.”
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” recognizes the difference in accounting treatment based upon whether a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. We enter into derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate and cash flow risk associated with our portfolio. We believe that our derivatives are effective economic hedges and, as such, are a critical element of our interest rate risk management strategy. Those derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment have their related cash flows recorded in interest income or interest expense along with the hedged item. Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and the stand-alone derivative must be marked-to-fair value in the income statement with no consideration for the corresponding change in fair value of the hedged item. These gains and losses, recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net,” are primarily caused by interest rate volatility and changing credit spreads during the period as well as the volume and term of derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment. Cash flows on derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are not recorded in interest income and interest expense; they are recorded in non-interest income: “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net.”
The adjustments required to reconcile from our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” results to our GAAP results of operations, net of tax, relate to differing treatments for those derivative instruments used to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The amount recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” includes (i) the accrual of the current payment on the interest rate swaps that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and (ii) the change in fair values related to future expected cash flows for derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. For purposes of non-GAAP “Core Earnings,” we include in GAAP earnings the current period accrual amounts (interest reclassification) on the swaps and exclude the change in fair values for those derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” is meant to represent what earnings would have been had these derivatives qualified for hedge accounting and there was no ineffectiveness.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” are not a substitute for reported results under GAAP. We provide a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation because (i) earnings per share computed on a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis is one of several measures we utilize in establishing management incentive compensation, and (ii) we believe it better reflects the financial results for derivatives that are economic hedges of interest rate risk, but which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
GAAP provides a uniform, comprehensive basis of accounting. Our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation differs from GAAP in the way it treats derivatives as described above.
The following table shows the amount in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” that relates to the interest reclassification on the derivative contracts.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 63
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealized gains (losses) on instruments not in a hedging relationship | $ | (248) | $ | (23,216) | $ | 10,164 | |||||
| Interest reclassification | 243 | 23,360 | 39,380 | ||||||||
| Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net | $ | (5) | $ | 144 | $ | 49,544 |
The following table reflects adjustments associated with our derivative activities.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP: | |||||||||||
| GAAP net income | $ | 469,014 | $ | 1,160,513 | $ | 880,690 | |||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 9,029 | 4,736 | 9,734 | ||||||||
| GAAP net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 459,985 | $ | 1,155,777 | $ | 870,956 | |||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||
| Net impact of derivative accounting(1) | 248 | 23,216 | (10,164) | ||||||||
| Net tax expense (benefit)(2) | 60 | 5,615 | (2,481) | ||||||||
| Total non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP | 188 | 17,601 | (7,683) | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 460,173 | $ | 1,173,378 | $ | 863,273 | |||||
| GAAP diluted earnings per common share | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.61 | $ | 2.25 | |||||
| Derivative adjustments, net of tax | — | 0.06 | (0.02) | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” diluted earnings per common share | $ | 1.76 | $ | 3.67 | $ | 2.23 |
(1) Derivative Accounting: Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” exclude periodic unrealized gains and losses caused by the mark-to-fair value valuations on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP, but include current period accruals on the derivative instruments. Under GAAP, for our derivatives held to maturity, the cumulative net unrealized gain or loss over the life of the contract will equal $0.
(2) Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” tax rate is based on the effective tax rate at the Bank, where the derivative instruments are held.
The following table reflects our provisions for credit losses and total portfolio net charge-offs:
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisions for credit losses | $ | 633,453 | $ | (32,957) | $ | 93,133 | |||||
| Total portfolio net charge-offs | (389,502) | (200,762) | (216,036) |
64 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Financial Condition
Average Balance Sheets - GAAP
The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 20,576,737 | 9.14 | % | $ | 20,968,061 | 8.25 | % | $ | 22,426,216 | 8.42 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 662,194 | 4.62 | 718,186 | 3.43 | 757,953 | 3.76 | |||||||||||||||
| Personal Loans | — | — | — | — | 582,552 | 12.43 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | 28,547 | 5.10 | 14,982 | 4.67 | 9,390 | (6.04) | |||||||||||||||
| Taxable securities | 2,509,215 | 1.41 | 2,142,025 | 0.65 | 1,547,837 | 0.73 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and other short-term investments | 4,284,442 | 1.93 | 5,139,731 | 0.14 | 5,447,844 | 0.41 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28,061,135 | 7.24 | % | 28,982,985 | 6.13 | % | 30,771,792 | 6.57 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 605,447 | 636,691 | 236,536 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 28,666,582 | $ | 29,619,676 | $ | 31,008,328 | |||||||||||||||
| Average Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokered deposits | $ | 9,871,787 | 1.95 | % | $ | 11,015,170 | 1.35 | % | $ | 12,777,874 | 1.84 | % | |||||||||
| Retail and other deposits | 11,109,675 | 1.65 | 10,540,170 | 0.70 | 10,772,161 | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities(1) | 5,517,489 | 3.03 | 5,390,098 | 2.94 | 4,982,771 | 2.98 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 26,498,951 | 2.05 | % | 26,945,438 | 1.42 | % | 28,532,806 | 1.90 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | 107,611 | 279,344 | 234,798 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,060,020 | 2,394,894 | 2,240,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 28,666,582 | $ | 29,619,676 | $ | 31,008,328 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 5.31 | % | 4.81 | % | 4.81 | % |
(1) Includes the average balance of our unsecured borrowings, as well as secured borrowings and amortization expense of transaction costs related to our term asset-backed securitizations and our Secured Borrowing Facility.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 65
Rate/Volume Analysis - GAAP
The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Increase (Decrease) | Change Due To(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate | Volume | ||||||||||
| 2022 vs. 2021 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 254,736 | $ | 312,781 | $ | (58,045) | |||||
| Interest expense | 160,721 | 167,154 | (6,433) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 94,015 | $ | 139,455 | $ | (45,440) | |||||
| 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | (244,816) | $ | (130,949) | $ | (113,867) | |||||
| Interest expense | (159,589) | (130,830) | (28,759) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | (85,227) | $ | 857 | $ | (86,084) |
(1) Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.
Summary of Our Loans Held for Investment Portfolio
Ending Loans Held for Investment Balances, net
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,659,323 | $ | 57 | $ | 3,659,380 | |||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 16,644,365 | 608,993 | 17,253,358 | ||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,303,688 | 609,050 | 20,912,738 | ||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 69,656 | 1,549 | 71,205 | ||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,353,631) | (3,444) | (1,357,075) | ||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | 19,626,868 | |||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
66 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,544,030 | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | 3,544,112 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 17,172,833 | 695,134 | 25,014 | 17,892,981 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,716,863 | 695,216 | 25,014 | 21,437,093 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 1,815 | 222 | 69,525 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,158,977) | (4,077) | (2,281) | (1,165,335) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,582,394 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | 3,582,475 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2)(3) | 16,146,943 | 737,512 | 12,238 | 16,896,693 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 19,729,337 | 737,593 | 12,238 | 20,479,168 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 63,475 | 1,993 | 230 | 65,698 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,355,844) | (4,378) | (1,501) | (1,361,723) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||||
| % of total | 96 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school” category include $254 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the pandemic, or other reasons, and who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were then not required to make any payments. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(2)At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “grace, repayment and other” category include (a) $147 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a grace or deferred status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020, who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were not then required to make any payments, and (b) $639 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a forbearance or repayment status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(3)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 67
| As of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,288,239 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,288,320 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 18,901,352 | 783,225 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 20,737,468 | ||||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 23,189,591 | 783,306 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 25,025,788 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,224 | 2,143 | 513 | 36 | 83,916 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (374,300) | (1,633) | (65,877) | (102) | (441,912) | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 | |||||||||
| % of total | 93 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
| As of December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,037,125 | $ | 163 | $ | — | $ | 4,037,288 | |||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 16,467,340 | 846,324 | 1,190,091 | 18,503,755 | |||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,504,465 | 846,487 | 1,190,091 | 22,541,043 | |||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 68,321 | 2,379 | 297 | 70,997 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (277,943) | (977) | (62,201) | (341,121) | |||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 20,294,843 | $ | 847,889 | $ | 1,128,187 | $ | 22,270,919 | |||||||
| % of total | 91 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
68 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Average Loans Held for Investment Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 20,576,737 | 97 | % | $ | 20,968,061 | 97 | % | $ | 22,426,216 | 94 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 662,194 | 3 | 718,186 | 3 | 757,953 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Personal Loans | — | — | — | — | 582,552 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | — | — | 14,982 | — | 9,390 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio | $ | 21,238,931 | 100 | % | $ | 21,701,229 | 100 | % | $ | 23,776,111 | 100 | % |
Loans Held for Investment, Net — Activity
| Year Ended December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 4,189,269 | — | — | 4,189,269 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 1,809,301 | — | 82,819 | 1,892,120 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,998,570 | — | 82,819 | 6,081,389 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 550,474 | 24,642 | (195) | 574,921 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (3,136,302) | — | — | (3,136,302) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,384,950) | (61,529) | — | (1,446,479) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | (194,654) | 633 | 2,281 | (191,740) | |||||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | — | — | (28,905) | (28,905) | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,438,799) | (49,545) | (78,955) | (2,567,299) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 607,155 | $ | — | $ | 19,626,868 |
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 3,027,440 | — | — | 3,027,440 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 2,421,082 | — | 63,323 | 2,484,405 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,448,522 | — | 63,323 | 5,511,845 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,416 | 27,252 | (323) | 624,345 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (1,138,726) | — | — | (1,138,726) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,583,691) | (27,031) | — | (1,610,722) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | 196,868 | 300 | (780) | 196,388 | |||||||||||
| Transfer from loans held-for-sale | 25,040 | — | — | 25,040 | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,357,023) | (42,775) | (50,232) | (2,450,030) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 |
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 69
| Year Ended December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 | |||||||||
| Day 1 CECL adjustment to allowance | (1,060,830) | (2,852) | (79,183) | (188) | (1,143,053) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 21,835,685 | 780,964 | 904,460 | 3,630 | 23,524,739 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 2,903,258 | — | 41 | — | 2,903,299 | ||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 2,439,029 | — | — | 35,955 | 2,474,984 | ||||||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,342,287 | — | 41 | 35,955 | 5,378,283 | ||||||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 616,115 | 27,558 | (253) | (819) | 642,601 | ||||||||||||||
| Sales | (2,925,478) | — | (588,285) | — | (3,513,763) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third parties | (1,332,802) | (21,243) | — | — | (1,354,045) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance | 79,285 | 107 | 36,526 | (1,211) | 114,707 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | (2,885,640) | — | — | — | (2,885,640) | ||||||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,292,484) | (52,178) | (352,489) | (26,588) | (2,723,739) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | — | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 |
“Loan consolidations to third parties” and “Repayments and other” are both significantly affected by the volume of loans in our held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status. The amount of loans in full principal and interest repayment status in our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2022 decreased by 2 percent compared with December 31, 2021, and now totals 45 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2022. The balance of loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status was affected in 2022 and 2021 by loan sales.
“Loan consolidations to third parties” for the year ended December 31, 2022 total 16.2 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status at December 31, 2022, or 7.3 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2022, compared with the year-ago period of 18.1 percent of our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status, or 8.1 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio, respectively. The decrease in consolidations is attributable to higher interest rates in 2022 that made it less competitive for consolidators. Historical experience has shown that loan consolidation activity is heightened in the period when the loan initially enters full principal and interest repayment status and then subsides over time.
The “Repayments and other” category includes all scheduled repayments and returns, as well as voluntary prepayments, made on loans in repayment (including loans in full principal and interest repayment status) and also includes charge-offs. Consequently, this category can be significantly affected by the volume of loans in repayment.
Historically, voluntary prepayments and loan consolidations decrease when unemployment increases as borrowers and lenders look to conserve liquidity. While we saw a decrease in voluntary prepayments in the second quarter of 2020 (as compared to the first quarter of 2020) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the decrease was not as significant as we expected based upon historical experience during higher unemployment periods and increased to closer to pre-pandemic levels in 2021.
70 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Private Education Loan Originations
The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations. Originations represent loans that were funded or acquired during the period presented.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | % | 2021 | % | 2020 | % | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Option - interest only(1) | $ | 1,146,365 | 19 | % | $ | 1,128,176 | 21 | % | $ | 1,228,603 | 23 | % | |||||||||
| Smart Option - fixed pay(1) | 1,950,048 | 33 | 1,685,519 | 31 | 1,503,948 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - deferred(1) | 2,330,719 | 39 | 1,996,461 | 36 | 1,910,712 | 36 | |||||||||||||||
| Graduate Loan(2) | 516,877 | 8 | 525,050 | 10 | 579,451 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Parent Loan(3) | 30,515 | 1 | 87,325 | 2 | 98,023 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan originations | $ | 5,974,524 | 100 | % | $ | 5,422,531 | 100 | % | $ | 5,320,737 | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Percentage of loans with a cosigner | 86.0 | % | 86.2 | % | 86.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Average FICO at approval(4) | 747 | 750 | 749 |
(1) Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See Item 1. “Business - Our Business - Private Education Loans” for a further discussion.
(2) For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Graduate Loan originations include $1.8 million of Parent Loans and $29.1 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Graduate Loan originations include $5.8 million of Parent Loans and $24.4 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Graduate Loan originations include $6.6 million of Parent Loans and $21.0 million of Smart Option Loans where the student was in a graduate status.
(3) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date were processed, with final disbursements under those loans occurring in mid-December 2022.
(4) Represents the higher credit score of the cosigner or the borrower.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 71
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses Activity
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | |||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 344,310 | — | — | 344,310 | 301,655 | — | — | 301,655 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (427,416) | (613) | (3,215) | (431,244) | (229,591) | (321) | (356) | (230,268) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sales | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 41,737 | — | 5 | 41,742 | 29,494 | — | 12 | 29,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 410,254 | (20) | 3,301 | 413,535 | (233,852) | 20 | 1,124 | (232,708) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (174,231) | — | — | (174,231) | (66,460) | — | — | (66,460) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | — | (2,372) | (2,372) | 1,887 | — | — | 1,887 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses(2) | 236,023 | (20) | 929 | 236,932 | (298,425) | 20 | 1,124 | (297,281) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 3,444 | $ | — | $ | 1,357,075 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, below is a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. When a new loan commitment is made, we record the CECL allowance as a liability for unfunded commitments by recording a provision for credit losses. When the loan is funded, we transfer that liability to the allowance for credit losses.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | 236,023 | $ | (298,425) | |||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 396,521 | 264,324 | |||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | 632,544 | (34,101) | |||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| FFELP Loans | (20) | 20 | |||||
| Credit Cards | 929 | 1,124 | |||||
| Total | 909 | 1,144 | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | 633,453 | $ | (32,957) |
72 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
| 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 | $ | 277,943 | $ | 977 | $ | 62,201 | $ | — | $ | 341,121 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | 1,060,830 | 2,852 | 79,183 | 188 | 1,143,053 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,435,130 | 4,485 | 145,060 | 290 | 1,584,965 | 277,943 | 977 | 62,201 | — | 341,121 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 320,808 | — | — | — | 320,808 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (205,326) | (519) | (39,079) | (119) | (245,043) | (208,978) | (822) | (74,313) | (1) | (284,114) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(2) | — | — | (108,534) | — | (108,534) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 24,021 | — | 4,984 | 2 | 29,007 | 25,765 | — | 5,206 | — | 30,971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 148,673 | 412 | 40,485 | 1,328 | 190,898 | 279,570 | 1,478 | 72,783 | 103 | 353,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (161,793) | — | (42,916) | — | (204,709) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred to held-for-sale | (205,669) | — | — | — | (205,669) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses(3) | (218,789) | 412 | (2,431) | 1,328 | (219,480) | 279,570 | 1,478 | 72,783 | 103 | 353,934 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | — | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(3) For the year ended December 31, 2020, below is a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. When a new loan commitment is made, we record the CECL allowance as a liability for unfunded commitments by recording a provision for credit losses. When the loan is funded, we transfer that liability to the allowance for credit losses.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2020 | ||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | (218,789) | |
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 312,613 | ||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | 93,824 | ||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||
| Personal Loans | (2,431) | ||
| FFELP Loans | 412 | ||
| Credit Cards | 1,328 | ||
| Total | (691) | ||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | 93,133 |
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 73
| 2018 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 243,715 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 6,628 | $ | 251,475 | |||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (154,701) | (1,135) | (19,690) | (175,526) | |||||||||||
| Loan sales(1) | (1,216) | — | — | (1,216) | |||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 20,858 | — | 946 | 21,804 | |||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | 169,287 | 980 | 74,317 | 244,584 | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 277,943 | $ | 977 | $ | 62,201 | $ | 341,121 |
(1) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
Private Education Loan Allowance for Credit Losses
In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of December 31, 2022, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, in particular, credit quality and delinquency, forbearance, and charge-off trends.
Private Education Loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status were 45 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at both December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021.
For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loans, see “—Allowance for Credit Losses,” “— Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses,” and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment — Certain Collection Tools - Private Education Loans” in this Form 10-K.
74 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
The table below presents our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio delinquency trends. Loans in repayment include loans making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the following table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
| Private Education Loans Held for Investment | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Balance | % | Balance | % | Balance | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1)(2) | $ | 4,895,053 | $ | 4,904,414 | $ | 4,779,040 | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance(1)(3) | 279,085 | 301,237 | 645,476 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment and percentage of each status(1): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans current | 14,559,347 | 96.2 | % | 15,005,773 | 96.7 | % | 13,898,948 | 97.2 | % | |||||||||
| Loans delinquent 30-59 days(4) | 287,308 | 1.9 | 308,559 | 2.0 | 205,528 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
| Loans delinquent 60-89 days(4) | 147,505 | 1.0 | 116,947 | 0.8 | 119,643 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 days or greater past due(4) | 135,390 | 0.9 | 79,933 | 0.5 | 80,702 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans in repayment | 15,129,550 | 100.0 | % | 15,511,212 | 100.0 | % | 14,304,821 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | 20,303,688 | 20,716,863 | 19,729,337 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 69,656 | 67,488 | 63,475 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans | 20,373,344 | 20,784,351 | 19,792,812 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans allowance for losses | (1,353,631) | (1,158,977) | (1,355,844) | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,019,713 | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 18,436,968 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 74.5 | % | 74.9 | % | 72.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 3.8 | % | 3.3 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 4.3 | % |
(1)At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school/grace/deferment” category above include $401 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the pandemic, or for other reasons, and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in forbearance” category above include $30 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in repayment” category above include $609 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. This program ended in September 2021. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(2)Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans (e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation).
(3)Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.
(4)The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.
Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans (held for investment) in repayment increased to 3.8 percent at December 31, 2022 from 3.3 percent at December 31, 2021, and the forbearance rate decreased to 1.8 percent at December 31, 2022 from 1.9 percent at December 31, 2021. The increase in delinquencies and the reduction in forbearance at December 31, 2022, compared with the prior year, were due to a combination of factors, including our new credit administration practices changes that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, operational challenges in 2022, including a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and the cessation of the use of disaster forbearance related to COVID-19. We stopped providing COVID-19 related disaster forbearances in June 2021. See additional discussion in “ — Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Customers and Credit Performance” and “— Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool.”
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 75
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan (held for investment) losses.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 277,943 | $ | 243,715 | |||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | 1,060,830 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,158,977 | 1,355,844 | 1,435,130 | 277,943 | 243,715 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 344,310 | 301,655 | 320,808 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | 410,254 | (233,852) | 148,673 | 279,570 | 169,287 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (174,231) | (66,460) | (161,793) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred (to) from held-for-sale | — | 1,887 | (205,669) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total provision | 236,023 | (298,425) | (218,789) | 279,570 | 169,287 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (427,416) | (229,591) | (205,326) | (208,978) | (154,701) | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 41,737 | 29,494 | 24,021 | 25,765 | 20,858 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (385,679) | (200,097) | (181,305) | (183,213) | (133,843) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(2) | — | — | — | — | (1,216) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending Balance | $ | 1,353,631 | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 277,943 | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance and accrued interest to be capitalized(3) | 6.37 | % | 5.35 | % | 6.55 | % | — | % | — | % | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment(3)(4) | 8.76 | % | 7.32 | % | 9.28 | % | — | % | — | % | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance | 6.67 | % | 5.59 | % | 6.87 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.36 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment(4) | 8.95 | % | 7.47 | % | 9.48 | % | 2.23 | % | 1.90 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance coverage of net charge-offs | 3.51 | 5.79 | 7.48 | 2.04 | 2.08 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment(4) | 2.55 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of ending loans in repayment(4) | 3.77 | % | 3.26 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.81 | % | 2.57 | % | |||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment and forbearance(4) | 1.81 | % | 1.91 | % | 4.32 | % | 4.08 | % | 3.79 | % | |||||||||
| Ending total loans, gross | $ | 20,303,688 | $ | 20,716,863 | $ | 19,729,337 | $ | 23,189,591 | $ | 20,504,465 | |||||||||
| Average loans in repayment(4) | $ | 15,103,123 | $ | 15,019,869 | $ | 15,518,851 | $ | 15,605,927 | $ | 13,303,801 | |||||||||
| Ending loans in repayment(4) | $ | 15,129,550 | $ | 15,511,212 | $ | 14,304,821 | $ | 16,787,670 | $ | 14,666,856 | |||||||||
| Accrued interest to be capitalized(3) | $ | 936,837 | $ | 947,391 | $ | 973,201 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment(3)(5) | $ | 324,384 | $ | 312,537 | $ | 308,655 | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(3) Related metrics and ending balances for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, are not available, as CECL had not yet been adopted, and the allowance for credit losses only covered expected losses over the next twelve months.
(4) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
(5) Accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment includes interest on loans that are in repayment but have not yet entered into full principal and interest payment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance).
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans and accrued interest to be capitalized and of ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
76 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Charge-offs increased in the year ending December 31, 2022 compared with the year-ago period because of a combination of factors, including the previously announced credit administration practices changes the Company implemented in 2021 that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, as well as a shortage and lack of tenured collections staff, and other operational challenges during much of 2022. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we charged off $13 million of delinquent loans that had received certain grants of forbearance under previous credit administration practices (which have been discontinued) and which were classified as a loss and charged off prior to their reaching 120 days delinquent. Also contributing to the increase in the full-year 2022 charge-offs compared with the prior year were $59 million in losses on loans whose borrowers took a “gap year” during the pandemic. “Gap year” loans refer to loans to borrowers who took a “gap year” during the COVID pandemic and entered full principal and interest repayment status starting in late 2021 and early 2022. Losses on these “gap year” loans were higher than expected and contributed to the higher charge-offs in 2022.
Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations and achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loan. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary interest rate reduction, a temporary interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. Forbearance is granted prospectively for borrowers who are current in their payments and may be granted retroactively for certain delinquent borrowers.
Forbearance allows a borrower to not make scheduled payments for a specified period of time. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan by the term of forbearance taken. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total principal or interest repayment obligation. While a loan is in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized (added to principal) at the end of the forbearance. Interest will not capitalize at the end of certain types of forbearance, such as disaster forbearance, however.
We grant forbearance through our servicing centers to borrowers who are current in their payments and through our collections centers to certain borrowers who are delinquent. Our forbearance policies and practices vary depending upon whether a borrower is current or delinquent at the time forbearance is requested, generally with stricter payment requirements for delinquent borrowers. We view the population of borrowers that use forbearance positively because the borrowers are either proactively reaching out to us to obtain assistance in managing their obligations or are working with our collections center to bring their loans current.
Forbearance may be granted through our servicing centers to customers who are exiting their grace period, and to other customers who are current in their payments, to provide temporary payment relief. In these circumstances, a customer’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of the forbearance period, the customer will enter repayment status as current and is expected to begin making scheduled monthly payments.
Forbearance may also be granted through our collections centers to customers who are delinquent in their payments. If specific payment requirements are met, the forbearance can cure the delinquency and the customer is returned to a current repayment status. Forbearance as a collection tool is used most effectively when applying historical experience and our judgment to a customer’s unique situation. We leverage updated customer information and other decision support tools to best determine who will be granted forbearance based on our expectations as to a customer’s ability and willingness to repay their obligation. This strategy is aimed at assisting customers while mitigating the risks of delinquency and default as well as encouraging resolution of delinquent loans. In most instances, we require one payment, as an indication of a customer’s willingness and ability to repay, before granting forbearance to delinquent borrowers.
Historically, we have utilized disaster forbearance to assist borrowers affected by material events, typically federally-declared disasters, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described below.
During COVID-19, our customers experienced higher levels of financial hardship, which initially led to higher levels of forbearance. We expect for some customers financial hardship may lead to higher levels of delinquencies and defaults in the future, as borrowers who had received disaster forbearance from us re-enter repayment status. Beginning in June 2021, we stopped granting disaster forbearance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As borrowers in the various delinquency buckets exit disaster forbearance and begin to enter repayment, we expect elevated levels of losses on this
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 77
segment of our customers. We expect that, left unabated, this deterioration in delinquency and default rates may persist until economic conditions return to pre-pandemic levels.
Management continually monitors our credit administration practices and may periodically modify these practices based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback. In light of these considerations, we previously announced certain planned changes to our credit administration practices, including the imposition of limits on the number of forbearance months granted consecutively and the number of times certain extended or reduced repayment alternatives may be granted. Prior to implementation of the previously announced changes, borrowers could receive consecutive forbearance grants without intervening payments of principal and interest, if they satisfied all eligibility requirements.
We commenced testing in October 2019 for some of the previously announced planned changes on a very small percentage of our total portfolio and in March 2020 we began to expand the number of borrowers who would be subject to the new credit administration practices. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in April 2020 we postponed our efforts so that we could be more flexible in dealing with our customers’ financial hardship. In October 2020, we re-initiated a multi-phased deployment of certain previously announced credit administration practices changes. In October 2021, we announced additional planned changes to our credit administration practices, which we implemented in December 2021.
Currently, we generally grant forbearance in increments of one to two months at a time, for up to 12 months over the life of the loan, although disaster forbearance and certain assistance we grant to borrowers who are still in school do not apply toward the 12-month limit. We also currently require 12 months of positive payment performance by a borrower (meaning the borrower must make payment in a cumulative amount equivalent to 12 monthly required payments under the loan) between successive grants of forbearance and between forbearance grants and certain other repayment alternatives. This required period of positive payment performance does not apply, however, to forbearances granted during the first six months following a borrower’s grace period and is not required for a borrower to receive a contractual interest rate reduction. In addition, we currently limit the participation of delinquent borrowers in certain short-term extended or interest-only repayment alternatives to once in 12 months and twice in five years. We also now count the number of months a borrower receives a short-term extended repayment alternative toward the 12-month forbearance limit described above.
We also offer rate and term modifications to customers experiencing more severe hardship. Currently, we temporarily reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to 4.0 percent for a two-year period and, in the vast majority of cases, permanently extend the final maturity date of the loan. As part of demonstrating the ability and willingness to pay, the customer must make three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment to qualify for the program. The combination of the rate reduction and maturity extension helps reduce the monthly payment due from the borrower and increases the likelihood the borrower will remain current during the interest rate modification period as well as when the loan returns to its original contractual interest rate. We currently limit the granting of a permanent extension of the final maturity date of the loan under our loan modification program to one time over the life of the loan. We also currently permit two consecutive rate reductions to 4.0 percent so long as the borrower qualifies and makes three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment in connection with each rate reduction. We currently require 12 months of positive payment performance after the interest rate adjusts upward to its previous rate (at the end of the rate reduction periods) before the borrower may be eligible for a forbearance or certain other repayment alternatives, however. We also now limit the number of interest rate reductions to twice over the life of the loan.
Although we are not regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, we have reviewed their student lending guidelines when considering and assessing our practices in certain areas. Now that we have implemented the previously announced credit administration practices changes, we believe our current collection and servicing practices generally align with the guidelines for student lending published by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
While there are limitations to our estimate of the future impact of the various credit administration practices changes we have implemented, we expect that the credit administration practices described above, including the changes we implemented in 2021, will accelerate periodic defaults and will increase periodic defaults in our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio. For 2021, we increased our allowance for credit losses as a result of the new credit administration practices. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we further increased our allowance for credit losses to reflect higher expected future periodic defaults in both the near term (reasonable and supportable period) and long term. This change reflects our estimate that the elevated default rates experienced in the latter half of 2022 will continue into 2023 and then decline over time. Among the measures that we have implemented and may modify further and expect may partly offset or moderate any acceleration of or increase in defaults will be greater focus on the risk assessment process to ensure borrowers are mapped to the appropriate program, better utilization of existing loss mitigation programs (e.g., GRP and rate modifications), the use of a program offering short-term payment reductions (permitting interest-only payments for up to six months) for certain early-stage delinquencies, and implementation of potential new risk mitigation and collection strategies.
78 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
The full impact of these changes to our collections practices described above will only be realized over the long term. When we calculated the allowance for credit losses under CECL at December 31, 2022, our loan loss reserves were significantly affected because we expect the life of loan defaults on our overall Private Education Loan portfolio to increase, in part as a result of the changes to our credit administration practices described above. We expect to learn more about how our borrowers are reacting to these changes to credit administration practices and, as we analyze such reactions, we will continue to refine our estimates of the impact of those changes on our allowance for credit losses.
As discussed above, we will continue to monitor our credit administration practices and may modify them further from time to time based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
Delinquency Trends by Active Repayment Status
The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio held for investment aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). Active repayment status includes loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. Our experience shows that the percentage of loans in forbearance status generally decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At December 31, 2022, for Private Education Loans (held for investment) that have been in active repayment status for fewer than 25 months, loans in forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance were 1 percent. Approximately 75 percent of our Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance status have been in active repayment status fewer than 25 months.
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,895 | $ | 4,895 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 165 | 43 | 26 | 19 | 26 | — | 279 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,131 | 3,393 | 2,129 | 1,603 | 3,303 | — | 14,559 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 80 | 58 | 44 | 31 | 74 | — | 287 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 43 | 30 | 20 | 17 | 38 | — | 148 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 41 | 27 | 20 | 14 | 34 | — | 136 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,460 | $ | 3,551 | $ | 2,239 | $ | 1,684 | $ | 3,475 | $ | 4,895 | 20,304 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,354) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.07 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.17 | % | — | % | 1.81 | % |
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 79
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,904 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 180 | 44 | 30 | 21 | 26 | — | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,234 | 3,405 | 2,424 | 1,671 | 3,272 | — | 15,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 125 | 54 | 41 | 29 | 60 | — | 309 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 38 | 25 | 17 | 13 | 24 | — | 117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 26 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 15 | — | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,603 | $ | 3,546 | $ | 2,524 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 3,397 | $ | 4,904 | 20,717 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,159) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.14 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.16 | % | — | % | 1.91 | % |
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Aged by Number of Months in Active Repayment Status | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,779 | $ | 4,779 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 353 | 91 | 71 | 54 | 76 | — | 645 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 3,987 | 3,181 | 2,215 | 1,624 | 2,892 | — | 13,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 76 | 39 | 30 | 22 | 38 | — | 205 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 49 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 21 | — | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 33 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 13 | — | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,498 | $ | 3,347 | $ | 2,345 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 4,779 | 19,729 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,356) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 18,437 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 2.36 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.51 | % | — | % | 4.32 | % |
80 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Private Education Loans Held for Investment Types
The following table provides information regarding the loans in repayment balance and total loan balance by Private Education Loan held for investment product type for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | CareerTraining(2) | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(3) | $ | 216,513 | $ | 261,316 | $ | 13,599,750 | $ | 4,565 | $ | 1,047,406 | $ | 15,129,550 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 308,884 | $ | 262,602 | $ | 18,218,925 | $ | 4,602 | $ | 1,508,675 | $ | 20,303,688 |
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | CareerTraining(2) | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(3) | $ | 221,637 | $ | 301,422 | $ | 14,097,819 | $ | 9,354 | $ | 880,980 | $ | 15,511,212 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 318,055 | $ | 302,764 | $ | 18,789,771 | $ | 9,402 | $ | 1,296,871 | $ | 20,716,863 |
(1) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date continued to be processed, with final disbursements under those loans occurring until mid–December 2022.
(2) In May 2022, we discontinued offering our Career Training loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date will continue to be processed, with final disbursements under those loans to occur until May 2023.
(3) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans held for investment. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans 90 days or greater past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The majority of the total accrued interest receivable represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accruing on that loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized to the balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school, and the current expected credit losses on accrued interest that will be capitalized is included in our allowance for credit losses. The allowance for uncollectible interest shown below represents the expected losses related to the portion of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are in repayment but have not yet entered into full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. The allowance for this portion of interest is included in our allowance for credit losses. The allowance for uncollectible interest exceeds the amount of accrued interest on our 90 days past due portfolio for all periods presented.
| Private Education Loans | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrued Interest Receivable | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Total Interest Receivable | 90 Days or Greater Past Due | Allowance forUncollectibleInterest(1) | ||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | $ | 1,177,562 | $ | 6,609 | $ | 8,121 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 4,937 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,168,895 | $ | 4,354 | $ | 4,467 | |||||
| December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,366,158 | $ | 2,390 | $ | 5,309 | |||||
| December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,168,823 | $ | 1,920 | $ | 6,322 |
(1) The allowance for uncollectible interest at December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020 represents the expected losses related to the portion of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are in repayment (at December 31, 2022 relates to $240 million of accrued interest receivable on those loans that are not expected to be capitalized). The accrued interest receivable that is expected to be capitalized ($937 million at December 31, 2022) is reserved in the allowance for credit losses.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 81
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to fund our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress, our ongoing ability to fund originations of Private Education Loans, and our ability to meet any outflows of our Bank deposits. To achieve these objectives, we analyze and monitor our liquidity needs, maintain excess liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, such as deposits at the Bank, issuance of secured debt primarily through asset-backed securitizations, other financing facilities, and loan sales. It is our policy to manage operations so liquidity needs are fully satisfied through normal operations to avoid unplanned loan sales under all but the most dire emergency conditions. Our liquidity management is governed by policies approved by our Board of Directors. Oversight of these policies is performed in the Asset and Liability Committee, a management-level committee.
These policies take into account the volatility of cash flow forecasts, expected asset and liability maturities, anticipated loan demand, and a variety of other factors to establish minimum liquidity guidelines.
Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and the markets for bank deposits at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our performance, competitive pressures, the macroeconomic environment, and the impact they have on the availability of funding sources in the marketplace. We target maintaining sufficient on-balance sheet and contingent sources of liquidity to enable us to meet all contractual and contingent obligations under various stress scenarios, including severe macroeconomic stresses as well as specific stresses that test the resiliency of our balance sheet. As the Bank has grown, we have improved our liquidity stress testing practices to align more closely with the industry, which resulted in our adopting increased liquidity requirements. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019, we began to increase our liquidity levels by increasing cash and marketable investments held as part of our ongoing efforts to enhance our ability to maintain a strong risk management position. By early 2020 and continuing through 2022, we held a significant liquidity buffer of cash and securities, which we expect to maintain through 2023. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, our liquidity levels will likely vary from quarter to quarter.
Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity
Ending Balances
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | — | $ | 2,588 | $ | 1,117 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,617,533 | 4,332,015 | 4,454,175 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 2,012,901 | 2,325,711 | 1,927,726 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,630,434 | $ | 6,660,314 | $ | 6,383,018 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
82 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Average Balances
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 7,954 | $ | 3,739 | $ | 20,307 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,080,312 | 4,934,506 | 5,202,302 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 2,230,118 | 1,953,154 | 1,495,155 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,318,384 | $ | 6,891,399 | $ | 6,717,764 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
Deposits
The following table summarizes total deposits.
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 21,446,647 | $ | 20,826,692 | ||||
| Deposits - non-interest bearing | 1,424 | 1,432 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 21,448,071 | $ | 20,828,124 |
Our total deposits of $21.4 billion were comprised of $9.9 billion in brokered deposits and $11.5 billion in retail and other deposits at December 31, 2022, compared with total deposits of $20.8 billion, which were comprised of $10.1 billion in brokered deposits and $10.7 billion in retail and other deposits, at December 31, 2021.
Interest bearing deposits as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity money market deposit accounts (“MMDAs”), and retail and brokered CDs. Interest bearing deposits include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and add deposits we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $8.0 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2022, compared with $7.3 billion at December 31, 2021.
Some of our deposit products are serviced by third-party providers. Placement fees associated with the brokered CDs are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest rate method. We recognized placement fee expense of $13 million, $16 million, and $19 million in the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. Fees paid to third-party brokers related to brokered CDs were $13 million, $13 million, and $5 million during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2022 and 2021 are summarized as follows:
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | ||||||||||
| Money market | $ | 10,977,242 | 3.75 | % | $ | 10,473,569 | 0.69 | % | ||||||
| Savings | 982,586 | 3.15 | 959,122 | 0.43 | ||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 9,486,819 | 2.57 | 9,394,001 | 1.20 | ||||||||||
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 21,446,647 | $ | 20,826,692 |
(1) Includes the effect of interest rate swaps in effective hedge relationships.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 83
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were $615 million and $743 million, respectively, of deposits exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Accrued interest on deposits was $59 million and $35 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment, or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us.
Excess cash is generally invested with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (the “FRB”) on an overnight basis or in the FRB’s Term Deposit Facility, minimizing counterparty exposure on cash balances.
Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of a small portfolio of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises that are purchased to meet CRA targets. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board-approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.
Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”), or clearinghouses for over-the-counter derivatives. CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by the Bank are covered under CSAs or clearinghouse agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position, less any collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with the counterparty.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act requires all standardized derivatives, including most interest rate swaps, to be submitted for clearing to central counterparties to reduce counterparty risk. Two of the central counterparties we use are the CME and the LCH. All variation margin payments on derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH are accounted for as legal settlement. As of December 31, 2022, $2.6 billion notional of our derivative contracts were cleared on the CME and $0.2 billion were cleared on the LCH. The derivative contracts cleared through the CME and LCH represent 92.2 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively, of our total notional derivative contracts of $2.8 billion at December 31, 2022.
For derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH, the net gain (loss) position includes the variation margin amounts as settlement of the derivative and not collateral against the fair value of the derivative. The amount of variation margin included as settlement as of December 31, 2022 was $(58) million and $(7) million for the CME and LCH, respectively. Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are presented as realized gains (losses).
Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position less any collateral held and plus any collateral posted. When there is a net negative exposure, we consider our exposure to the counterparty to be zero. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had a net positive exposure (derivative gain positions to us, less collateral held by us, and plus collateral posted with counterparties) related to derivatives of $12 million and $9 million, respectively.
We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties.
The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2022.
| As of December 31, 2022 (dollars in thousands) | SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure, net of collateral | $ | 11,566 | |
| Exposure to counterparties with credit ratings, net of collateral | $ | 11,566 | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3 | — | % | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3 | — | % |
84 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Regulatory Capital
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking authorities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial position. Under U.S. Basel III and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital standards that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and its classification under the prompt corrective action framework are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings, and other factors.
Capital Management
The Bank intends to maintain at all times regulatory capital levels that meet both the minimum levels required under U.S. Basel III (including applicable buffers) and the levels necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action framework, in order to support asset growth and operating needs, address unexpected credit risks, and protect the interests of depositors and the DIF administered by the FDIC. The Bank’s Capital Policy requires management to monitor these capital standards and the Bank’s compliance with them. The Board of Directors and management periodically evaluate the quality of assets, the stability of earnings, and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for the Bank. The Company is a source of strength for the Bank and will provide additional capital if necessary.
We believe that current and projected capital levels are appropriate for 2023. As of December 31, 2022, the Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios exceed the required minimum ratios and the applicable buffers under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III standards as well as the “well capitalized” standards under the prompt corrective action framework.
Under U.S. Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain the following minimum regulatory capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. In addition, the Bank is subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5 percent. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in restrictions on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. Including the buffer, the Bank is required to maintain the following capital ratios under U.S. Basel III in order to avoid such restrictions: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 7.0 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of greater than 8.5 percent, and a Total risk-based capital ratio of greater than 10.5 percent.
To qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework for insured depository institutions, the Bank must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 5.0 percent.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopted CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, could elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. On January 1, 2022, 25 percent of the adjusted transition amounts were phased in for regulatory capital purposes. On January 1 of each year from 2023 to 2025, the adjusted transition amounts will continue to be phased in for regulatory capital purposes at a rate of 25 percent per year, with the phased-in amounts included in regulatory capital at the beginning of each year. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $953 million. This transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 85
At December 31, 2022, the adjusted transition amounts that were deferred and are being phased in for regulatory capital purposes are as follows:
| Transition Amounts | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Phase-In Amounts for the Year Ended | Remaining Adjusted Transition Amounts to be Phased-In | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | January 1, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | $ | 952,639 | $ | (57,859) | $ | (58,429) | $ | (209,088) | $ | 627,263 | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | 1,143,053 | (55,811) | (49,097) | (259,536) | 778,609 | ||||||||||||||
| Liability for unfunded commitments | 115,758 | (2,048) | (9,333) | (26,094) | 78,283 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 306,171 | — | — | (76,542) | 229,629 |
The Bank’s required and actual regulatory capital amounts and ratios under U.S. Basel III are shown in the following table. The following capital amounts and ratios are based upon the Bank’s average assets and risk-weighted assets, as indicated.
| Actual | U.S. Basel IIIMinimum Requirements Plus Buffer(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2022(3): | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 12.9 | % | $ | 1,645,807 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 12.9 | % | $ | 1,998,480 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,338,645 | 14.2 | % | $ | 2,468,711 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,040,662 | 10.3 | % | $ | 1,185,280 | 4.0 | % | |||||
| As of December 31, 2021: | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 14.1 | % | $ | 1,643,132 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 14.1 | % | $ | 1,995,232 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,410,183 | 14.5 | % | $ | 2,464,699 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 11.1 | % | $ | 1,198,808 | 4.0 | % |
(1) Reflects the U.S. Basel III minimum required ratio plus the applicable capital conservation buffer.
(2) The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios also exceeded all applicable standards for the Bank to qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework.
(3) For December 31, 2022, the actual amounts and the actual ratios include the adjusted transition amounts discussed above that were phased in at the beginning of 2022.
86 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Dividends
The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. The Bank declared $700 million, $1.4 billion, and $579 million in dividends to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, with the proceeds primarily used to fund the 2022, 2021, and 2020 Share Repurchase Programs and stock dividends. See Part I, Item 1. “Business — Supervision and Regulation — Regulation of Sallie Mae Bank — Dividends and Share Repurchase Programs,” regarding the expectation that the Bank will pay dividends to the Company as may be necessary to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends on its Series B Preferred Stock and common stock and to consummate any common share repurchases by the Company under the share repurchase programs. See also Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — General Risks” for possible limitations on the payments of our dividends.
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings consist of unsecured debt and secured borrowings issued through our term ABS program and our Secured Borrowing Facility. The issuing entities for those secured borrowings are variable interest entities and are consolidated for accounting purposes. The following table summarizes our secured borrowings at December 31, 2022 and 2021. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, “Borrowings.”
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt (fixed-rate) | $ | — | $ | 988,986 | $ | 988,986 | $ | — | $ | 986,138 | $ | 986,138 | |||||||||||
| Total unsecured borrowings | — | 988,986 | 988,986 | — | 986,138 | 986,138 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | — | 3,462,363 | 3,462,363 | — | 3,897,996 | 3,897,996 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | — | 783,765 | 783,765 | — | 1,046,856 | 1,046,856 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan term securitizations | — | 4,246,128 | 4,246,128 | — | 4,944,852 | 4,944,852 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total secured borrowings | — | 4,246,128 | 4,246,128 | — | 4,944,852 | 4,944,852 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 5,235,114 | $ | 5,235,114 | $ | — | $ | 5,930,990 | $ | 5,930,990 |
Short-term Borrowings
Unsecured Debt
On November 15, 2021, we redeemed our $200 million, 5.125 percent Senior Notes due April 5, 2022. The Senior Notes were redeemed at 101.39 percent of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date. As a result of the redemption, we recognized a $3 million loss on the transaction. At December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, there were no borrowings outstanding classified as short-term.
Secured Financings
On May 17, 2022, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity of the facility. The amount that can be borrowed under the facility is $2 billion. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. Under the Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until May 16, 2023. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 87
outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 16, 2024 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur). At both December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, there were no secured borrowings outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12, “Borrowings.”
Short-term borrowings have a remaining term to maturity of one year or less. The Secured Borrowing Facility’s contractual maturity is two years from the date of inception or renewal (one-year revolving period plus a one-year amortization period); however, we classify advances under our Secured Borrowing Facility as short-term borrowings because it is our intention to repay those advances within one year.
Long-term Borrowings
Unsecured Debt
On October 29, 2020, we issued at par an unsecured debt offering of $500 million of 4.20 percent Senior Notes due October 29, 2025. At December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance was $496 million.
On November 1, 2021, we issued an unsecured debt offering of $500 million, 3.125 percent Senior Notes due November 2, 2026, at a price of 99.43 percent. At December 31, 2022, the outstanding balance was $493 million.
Secured Financings
2022 Transactions
On August 9, 2022, we executed our $575 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2022-C term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $575 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $575 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.69 years and priced at a weighted average SOFR equivalent cost of SOFR plus 1.76 percent. At December 31, 2022, $635 million of our Private Education Loans, including $597 million of principal and $38 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
2021 Transactions
On May 19, 2021, we executed our $531 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-B term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $531 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $529 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.26 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.77 percent. At December 31, 2022, $410 million of our Private Education Loans, including $389 million of principal and $21 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On August 18, 2021, we executed our $527 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-D term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $527 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $525 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.22 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent. At December 31, 2022, $425 million of our Private Education Loans, including $403 million of principal and $22 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On November 9, 2021, we executed our $534 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-E term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $534 million of notes to third parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $532 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.15 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent. At December 31, 2022, $439 million of our Private Education Loans, including $416 million of principal and $23 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
Pre-2021 Transactions
Prior to 2021, we executed a total of $8.21 billion in ABS transactions that were accounted for as secured financings. At December 31, 2022, $3.75 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.63 billion of principal and $120 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered as a result of these transactions.
88 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Other Borrowing Sources
We maintain discretionary uncommitted Federal Funds lines of credit with various correspondent banks, which totaled $125 million at December 31, 2022. The interest rate we are charged on these lines of credit is priced at Fed Funds plus a spread at the time of borrowing, and is payable daily. We did not utilize these lines of credit in the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
We established an account at the FRB to meet eligibility requirements for access to the Primary Credit borrowing facility at the FRB’s Discount Window (the “Window”). The Primary Credit borrowing facility is a lending program available to depository institutions that are in generally sound financial condition. All borrowings at the Window must be fully collateralized. We can pledge asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, as well as FFELP Loans and Private Education Loans, to the FRB as collateral for borrowings at the Window. Generally, collateral value is assigned based on the estimated fair value of the pledged assets. At December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the value of our pledged collateral at the FRB was $2.2 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively. The interest rate charged to us is the discount rate set by the FRB. We did not utilize this facility in the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.
Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually at the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). At December 31, 2022, we had $2.0 billion of outstanding contractual loan commitments which we expect to fund during the remainder of the 2022/2023 academic year. At December 31, 2022, we had a $125 million reserve recorded in “Other Liabilities” to cover expected losses that may occur during the one-year loss emergence period on these unfunded commitments.
Contractual Cash Obligations
In addition to our contractual loan commitments, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. This includes contractual principal obligations associated with long-term Bank deposits, secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations. Our material contractual cash obligations relate to Bank deposits. At December 31, 2022, we had $3.9 billion of principal obligations related to Bank deposits due in the next year, and $11.6 billion thereafter. At December 31, 2022, our contractual cash obligations due in the next year for secured borrowings and lease obligations were $729 million and $7 million, respectively, and our contractual cash obligations due thereafter for our secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $3.5 billion, $1.0 billion, and $38 million, respectively.
Common Stock
Our shareholders have authorized the issuance of 1.125 billion shares of common stock (par value of $0.20). At December 31, 2022, 241 million shares were issued and outstanding and 38 million shares were unissued but encumbered for outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and dividend equivalent units for employee compensation and remaining authority for stock-based compensation plans. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” for additional details.
Arrangements with Navient Corporation
In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement. We also entered into various other ancillary agreements with Navient to effect the Spin-Off and provide a framework for our relationship with Navient thereafter, such as a transition services agreement, a tax sharing agreement, an employee matters agreement, a loan servicing and administration agreement, a joint marketing agreement, a key services agreement, a data sharing agreement, and a master sublease agreement. The majority of these agreements were transitional in nature with most having terms that have expired. In the case of the loan servicing and administration agreement for those FFELP Loans that we hold and Navient services for us, the agreement is scheduled to expire or be renewed by the end of 2026.
We continue to have exposure to risks related to Navient’s creditworthiness. If we are unable to obtain indemnification payments from Navient, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 89
Pursuant to the terms of the Spin-Off and applicable law, Navient is responsible for all liabilities (whether accrued, contingent, or otherwise and whether known or unknown) arising out of or resulting from the conduct of pre-Spin-Off SLM and its subsidiaries’ businesses prior to the Spin-Off, other than certain specifically identified liabilities relating to the conduct of our consumer banking business for which the Bank is responsible. Nonetheless, given the prior usage of the Sallie Mae and SLM names by entities now owned by Navient, we and our subsidiaries may from time to time be improperly named as defendants in legal proceedings where the allegations at issue are the legal responsibility of Navient. Most of these legal proceedings involve matters that arose in whole or in part in the ordinary course of business of pre-Spin-Off SLM. Likewise, as the period of time since the Spin-Off increases, so does the likelihood any allegations that may be made may be in part for our own actions in a post-Spin-Off time period and in part for Navient’s conduct in a pre-Spin-Off time period. We will not be providing information on these proceedings unless there are material issues of fact or disagreement with Navient as to the bases of the proceedings or responsibility therefor that we believe could have a material, adverse impact on our business, assets, financial condition, liquidity, or outlook if not resolved in our favor.
We briefly summarize below some of the most significant agreements and relationships we continue to have with Navient. For additional information regarding the Separation and Distribution Agreement and the other ancillary agreements, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2014.
Separation and Distribution Agreement
The Separation and Distribution Agreement addresses, among other things, the following activities:
•the obligation of each party to indemnify the other against liabilities retained or assumed by that party pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement and in connection with claims of third parties;
•the allocation among the parties of rights and obligations under insurance policies; and
•the creation of a governance structure by which matters related to the separation and other transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement are to be managed.
The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides specific processes and procedures pursuant to which we may submit claims for indemnification to Navient. If for any reason Navient is unable or unwilling to pay claims made against it, our costs, operating expenses, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected over time.
Indemnification Obligations
Pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, and as contemplated by the structure of the Spin-Off, Navient is legally obligated to indemnify the Bank against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses that may arise from the conduct of all activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM occurring prior to the Spin-Off, except for certain liabilities related to the conduct of the pre-Spin-Off consumer banking business that were specifically assumed by the Bank (and as to which the Bank is obligated to indemnify Navient). Some significant examples of the types of indemnification obligations Navient has under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and related ancillary agreements include:
•Navient is required to indemnify the Company and the Bank for any liabilities, costs, or expenses they may incur arising from any action or threatened action related to the servicing, operations, and collections activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM and its subsidiaries with respect to Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans that were assets of the Bank or Navient at the time of the Spin-Off; provided that written notice was provided to Navient on or prior to April 30, 2017, the third anniversary date of the Spin-Off. Navient is not required to indemnify for changes in law or changes in prior existing interpretations of law that occur on or after April 30, 2014.
•In connection with the Spin-Off, we recorded a liability related to uncertain tax positions of $27 million for which we are indemnified by Navient. As of December 31, 2022, the remaining balance of the indemnification receivable related to those uncertain tax positions was $3 million.
Long-Term Arrangements
The loan servicing and administration agreement governs the terms by which Navient provides servicing, administration, and collection services for the Bank’s portfolio of FFELP Loans, as well as servicing history information
90 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
with respect to Private Education Loans previously serviced by Navient and access to certain promissory notes in Navient’s possession. The term of the loan servicing and administration agreement has been extended to December 31, 2026.
The tax sharing agreement governs the respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations of us and Navient after the Spin-Off relating to taxes, including with respect to the payment of taxes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, and the conduct of tax contests. Under this agreement, each party is generally liable for taxes attributable to its business. The agreement also addresses the allocation of tax liabilities that are incurred as a result of the Spin-Off and related transactions.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 91
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies” includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates its estimates, particularly those that include the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and are often about matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions relate to the following critical accounting policies that are discussed in more detail below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Adoption of CECL
On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU No. 2016-13 (“CECL”) using the modified retrospective method and it had a material impact on how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations and on regulatory capital. The following table illustrates the impact of the cumulative effect adjustment made upon adoption of CECL:
| January 1, 2020 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | As reported under CECL | Pre-CECL Adoption | Impact of CECL Adoption | ||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses: | |||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 1,435,130 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,060,830 | |||||
| FFELP Loans | 4,485 | 1,633 | 2,852 | ||||||||
| Personal Loans | 145,060 | 65,877 | 79,183 | ||||||||
| Credit Cards | 290 | 102 | 188 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,584,965 | $ | 441,912 | $ | 1,143,053 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset | $ | 415,540 | $ | 109,369 | $ | 306,171 | |||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses: | |||||||||||
| Off-balance sheet exposures | $ | 118,239 | $ | 2,481 | $ | 115,758 | |||||
| Equity: | |||||||||||
| Retained Earnings | $ | 897,873 | $ | 1,850,512 | $ | (952,639) |
This transition adjustment is inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
Under CECL, for all loans carried at amortized cost, upon loan origination we are required to measure our allowance for credit losses based on our estimate of all current expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term of the assets. Updates to that estimate each period are recorded through provision expense. The estimate of credit losses must be based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. CECL does not mandate the use of any specific method for estimating credit loss, permitting companies to use judgment in selecting the approach that is most appropriate in their circumstances.
92 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date.
In determining the lifetime expected credit losses on our Private Education Loan portfolio loan segments, we use a discounted cash flow method. This method requires us to project future principal and interest cash flows on our loans in those portfolios.
To estimate the future expected cash flows, we use a vintage-based model that considers life of loan loss expectations, prepayments, defaults, recoveries, and any other adjustments deemed necessary, to determine the adequacy of the allowance at each balance sheet date. These cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Management adjusts the effective interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments. The difference between the present value of those cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the underlying loans is the allowance for credit losses. Entities that measure credit losses based on the present value of expected future cash flows are permitted to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense, but may alternatively report the change in present value due to the passage of time as interest income. We have elected to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense.
In determining the loss rates used for the vintage-based approach, we start with our historical loss rates, stratify the loans within each vintage, and then adjust the loss rates based upon economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. The reasonable and supportable forecast period is meant to represent the period in which we believe we can estimate the impact of forecasted economic factors in our expected losses. At the end of the reasonable and supportable forecast period, we immediately revert our forecast of expected losses to our historical averages. We use a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, although this period is subject to change as our view evolves on our ability to reasonably forecast economic conditions to estimate future losses.
In estimating our current expected credit losses, we use a combination of expected economic scenarios coupled with our historical experience to derive a base case adjusted for any qualitative factors (as described below). We also develop an adverse and favorable economic scenario. At each reporting date, we determine the appropriate weighting of these alternate scenarios based upon the current economic conditions and our view of the risks of alternate outcomes. This weighting of expectations is used in calculating our current expected credit losses recorded each period.
In estimating recoveries, we use both estimates of what we would receive from the sale of defaulted loans as well as historical borrower payment behavior to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
We use historical experience and economic forecasts to estimate future prepayment speeds. As with our loss forecasts, at the end of the two-year reasonable and supportable forecast for prepayments, we immediately revert to our historical long-term prepayment rates.
In addition to the above modeling approach, we also take certain other qualitative factors into consideration when calculating the allowance for credit losses, which could result in management overlays (increases or decreases to the allowance for credit losses). These qualitative factors include, but are not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off and recovery practices not already included in the analysis, and the effect of other external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated current expected credit losses.
The evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. If actual future performance in delinquency, charge-offs, and recoveries is significantly different than estimated, or management assumptions or practices were to change, this could materially affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses, the timing of when losses are recognized, and the related provision for credit losses on our consolidated statements of income.
When calculating our allowance for credit losses and liability for unfunded commitments, we incorporate several inputs that are subject to change period to period. These include, but are not limited to, CECL model inputs and any overlays deemed necessary by management. The most impactful CECL model inputs include:
•Economic forecasts;
•Weighting of economic forecasts;
•Prepayment speeds; and
•Recovery rates.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 93
Management overlays can encompass a broad array of factors not captured by model inputs, including but not limited to, changes in servicing policies, collection administration practices, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, and observed differences between forecasted and actual results. In the fourth quarter of 2022, we further increased our allowance for credit losses to reflect higher expected future periodic defaults in both the near term (reasonable and supportable period) and long term. This change reflects our estimate that the elevated default rates experienced in the latter half of 2022 will continue into 2023 and then decline over time. This estimate of future losses, like other aspects of our estimate of current expected credit losses, is susceptible to significant changes.
Of the model inputs outlined above, economic forecasts, weighting of economic forecasts, prepayments speeds, and recovery rates are subject to estimation uncertainty, and changes in these inputs could have a material impact to our allowance for credit losses and the related provision for credit losses.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, we changed our loss model to include forecasts of college graduate unemployment, the home price index, and median family income in determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Prior to this change, we included forecasts of college graduate unemployment and the Consumer Price Index in our loss forecasting models. We obtain forecasts for these inputs from Moody’s Analytics. Moody’s Analytics provides a range of forecasts for each of these inputs with various likelihoods of occurrence. We determine which forecasts we will include in our estimation of allowance for credit losses and the associated weightings for each of these inputs. At December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2022, we used the Base (50th percentile likelihood of occurring)/S1 (stronger near-term growth scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring)/S3 (downside scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring) scenarios and weighted them 40 percent, 30 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. Management reviews both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses.
During 2022, we experienced slower prepayment rates due to the rising interest rate environment. Historically, when rates rise loan prepayments and consolidation activity by third parties decline, and when rates decline loan prepayments and consolidation activity increase. During 2022, we reduced our estimates of future prepayment speeds to reflect the impact of the rising rate environment. Slower prepayment speeds increase the allowance for credit losses because the loss rates applied in the future periods are applied to higher loan balances. We experienced higher prepayments during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unemployment rates were elevated, than we would have expected based upon our experience during past financial crises. As a result, during 2021 we increased our estimate of prepayment speeds to reflect higher short-term and long-term prepayment experience, which had a beneficial impact on the allowance for credit losses at that time.
A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the following inputs to the CECL loss model is estimated to change the allowance as follows:
| Estimated Increase (Decrease) to the Allowance for Credit Losses(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in millions) | +100 Basis Points | -100 Basis Points | |||||
| College graduate unemployment rate(2) | $ | 46,587 | $ | (63,157) | |||
| Prepayment speeds(2) | (15,659) | 15,760 | |||||
| Recovery rates(3) | (14,637) | 14,637 |
(1) Based on our Private Education Loan Portfolio at December 31, 2022.
(2)The estimated impacts of changes were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable period, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods will not change.
(3)The estimated change in the recovery rate is based on long-term assumptions.
A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the home price index or median family income does not result in material changes to our allowance for credit losses. Increases in the weighting of economic forecasts resulting in greater weight given to more severe economic forecasts would result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses.
The estimated impacts of changes in the above table were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable period, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for
94 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
the remaining periods are based on longer term averages and only change when we determine there is a fundamental change that will affect long-term rates.
Below we describe in further detail our policies and procedures for the allowance for credit losses as they relate to our Private Education Loan and FFELP Loan portfolios. During the third quarter of 2022, we reclassified our Credit Card loan portfolio to loans held-for-sale, as we plan to exit and sell our credit card business. During the third quarter of 2020, we sold our entire Personal Loan portfolio.
Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses
In addition to the key assumptions/estimates described above, some estimates are unique to our Private Education Loan portfolio. Estimates are made on our Private Education Loans regarding when each borrower will separate from school. The cash flow timing of when a borrower will begin making full principal and interest payments is dependent upon when the student either graduates or leaves school. These dates can change based upon many factors. We receive information regarding projected graduation dates from a third-party clearinghouse. The separation from school date is updated quarterly based on updated information received from the clearinghouse.
Additionally, when we have a contractual obligation to fund a loan or a portion of a loan at a later date, we make an estimate regarding the percentage of this obligation that will be funded. This estimate is based on historical experience. For unfunded commitments, we recognize the related life of loan allowance as a liability. Once the loan is funded, that liability transfers to the allowance for Private Education Loan losses.
Key Credit Quality Indicators - Private Education Loans
We determine the collectability of our Private Education Loan portfolio by evaluating certain risk characteristics. We consider credit score at original approval and periodically refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan’s term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of the creditworthiness of borrowers, and the higher the credit scores the more likely it is the borrowers will be able to make all of their contractual payments. Loan status affects the credit risk because a past due loan is more likely to result in a credit loss than a current loan. Additionally, loans in the deferred payment status have different credit risk profiles compared with those in current pay status. Loan seasoning affects credit risk because a loan with a history of making payments generally has a lower incidence of default than a loan with a history of making infrequent or no payments. The existence of a cosigner lowers the likelihood of default as well. We monitor and update these credit quality indicators in the analysis of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses on a quarterly basis.
We collect on defaulted loans through a mix of in-house collectors, third-party collectors, and sales to third-parties. For December 31, 2022 and 2021, we used both an estimate of recovery rates from in-house collections as well as expectations of future sales of defaulted loans to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
Private Education Loans generally do not require borrowers to begin principal and interest repayment until at least six months after the borrowers have graduated or otherwise separated from school. Consequently, the loss estimates for these loans are generally low while the borrower is in school and then increase upon the end of the grace period after separation from school. At both December 31, 2022 and 2021, 24 percent of the principal balance of the Private Education Loan portfolio was related to borrowers who were then in an in-school (fully deferred), grace, or other deferment status and not required to make payments.
Our collection policies for Private Education Loans allow for periods of nonpayment for certain borrowers requesting an extended grace period upon leaving school or experiencing temporary difficulty meeting payment obligations. This is referred to as forbearance and is considered in estimating the allowance for credit losses.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for Private Education Loans, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most relevant of these metrics considered are the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans and accrued interest to be capitalized and of ending loans in repayment and accrued interest to be capitalized on loans in repayment, delinquency percentages, and forbearance percentages.
We consider a Private Education Loan to be delinquent if the borrower has not made a required payment prior to the 31st day after such payment was contractually due.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 95
Adoption of ASU No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures”
On March 31, 2022, the FASB issued ASU No. 2022-02, “Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures” (“ASU No. 2022-02”), which eliminates the accounting guidance for TDRs while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancings and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The enhanced disclosures are required to be provided for modifications made starting in the period of adoption. Information about modifications in periods before adoption is not required to be provided.
ASU No. 2022-02 also requires that entities disclose current-period gross charge-offs by year of origination. For entities that have adopted the amendments in CECL, the amendment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years.
Early adoption of the amendments in ASU No. 2022-02 is permitted if an entity has adopted CECL. The amendments should be applied prospectively. For the transition method related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs, an entity has the option to apply a modified retrospective transition method. We have elected to early adopt all aspects of ASU No. 2022-02 prospectively for the period beginning January 1, 2022. The adoption was immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.
Troubled Debt Restructurings
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the allowance for our TDR portfolio was included in our overall allowance for Private Education Loans. In estimating the expected defaults for our Private Education Loans that were considered TDRs, we followed the same discounted cash flow process described above but used the historical loss rates related to past TDR loans. The appropriate gross loss rates were determined for each individual loan by evaluating loan maturity, risk characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions. Our TDR portfolio was comprised mostly of loans with interest rate reductions and loans with forbearance usage greater than three months, as further described below.
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations, achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loans. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary interest rate reduction, a temporary interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. When we give a borrower facing financial difficulty an interest rate reduction, we temporarily reduce the rate (currently to 4.0 percent) for a two-year period and, in the vast majority of cases, permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. The combination of these two loan term changes helps reduce the monthly payment due from the borrower and increases the likelihood the borrower will remain current during the interest rate modification period as well as when the loan returns to its original contractual interest rate.
Prior to January 1, 2022, we classified a loan as a TDR due to forbearance using a two-step process. The first step was to identify a loan that was in full principal and interest repayment status and received more than three months of forbearance in a 24-month period; however, during the first nine months after a loan had entered full principal and interest repayment status, we did not count up to the first six months of forbearance received during that period against the three-month policy limit. The second step was to evaluate the creditworthiness of the loan by examining its most recent refreshed FICO score. Loans that met the criteria in the first test and had a FICO score above a certain threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) were not classified as TDRs. Loans that met the criteria in the first test and had a FICO score under the threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) were classified as TDRs.
A loan also became a TDR when it was modified to reduce the interest rate on the loan (regardless of when such modification occurred and/or whether such interest rate reduction was temporary). Once a loan qualified for TDR status, it remained a TDR for allowance purposes for the remainder of its life. About half our loans that were considered TDRs involved a temporary forbearance of payments and did not change the contractual interest rate of the loan.
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure for Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. The discounted cash flow approach described above includes expected future contractual disbursements. The portion of the allowance for credit losses related to future disbursements is shown as a liability on the face of the balance sheet, and related provision for credit losses is reflected on the income statement.
96 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Uncollectible Interest
The majority of the total accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loan portfolio represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and on fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accrued on the loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized and increase the unpaid principal balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The discounted cash flow approach described above considers both the collectability of principal as well as this portion of accrued interest that is expected to capitalize to the balance of the loan. Therefore, the allowance for this portion of accrued interest balance is included in our allowance for credit losses. The discounted cash flow approach does not consider interest accrued on loans that are in a full principal and interest repayment status or in interest-only repayment status. We separately capture the amount of expected uncollectible interest associated with these loans using historical experience to estimate the uncollectible interest for the next four months at each period-end date. This amount is recorded as a reduction of interest income. Accrued interest receivable is separately disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses
FFELP Loans are insured as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default, subject to a risk-sharing level based on the date of loan disbursement. These insurance obligations are supported by contractual rights against the United States. For loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006, we receive 97 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed after October 1, 1993, and before July 1, 2006, we receive 98 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993, we receive 100 percent reimbursement. Because we bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to this federal guarantee, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are relatively small.
We use the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for the unguaranteed portion of our FFELP Loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for FFELP Loan losses uses historical experience of customer default behavior. We apply the default rate projections, net of applicable risk sharing, to our FFELP Loans for the current period to perform our quantitative calculation. Once the quantitative calculation is performed, we review the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and determine if qualitative adjustments need to be considered.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 97
Risk Management
Our Approach
Risk is inherent in our business activities and the specialized lending industry we serve. The ability of management to identify, manage, and remediate risk in a timely manner is critical to our continued success. Our risk management framework is designed to assess, manage, and report these risks and escalate as appropriate to the Board of Directors or its designee.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our overall strategic direction, including our risk management capability and effectiveness. The Board of Directors has oversight of key policies as well as the risk management framework developed and administered by the management team. We have a robust process to escalate meaningful departures from our risk appetite statements to the Board. The Board of Directors oversees the continued development of the risk management framework.
The Governance Framework
Our overall objective is to ensure all significant risks inherent in our business can be identified and appropriately mitigated. To this end, we have adopted the “three lines of defense” approach to governance. Specifically, the business units form the “first line of defense” and are the “owners” of risks in their business activities. As the risk owner, the first line of defense is accountable for the day-to-day execution of risk and control policies and procedures (including activities performed by third-party contractors). The “second line of defense” is our Risk Management function, which is independent from the first line of defense. The second line of defense conducts oversight and effective challenge of the risk-taking activities within the first line of defense. Finally, the Internal Audit function comprises the “third line of defense.” The Internal Audit function provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, as reflected in audit reports.
Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Framework
The Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Framework are designed to establish a stable risk and control environment across the enterprise. The policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, outlines the framework used to ensure that risk and control issues across the enterprise are identified, assessed, measured, monitored, and reported. The Risk Management Policy, the Risk Appetite Framework, and the related policies and procedures constitute the core of the risk management program.
Sallie Mae leverages risk appetite to outline the level of risk we are willing to accept within each risk category, as described below, in pursuit of our business objectives. Compliance with our risk appetite is monitored using a set of risk metrics, with defined thresholds and limits, for each risk type. The Enterprise Risk Committee (the “ERC”) provides oversight of the risk appetite framework with escalation to the Board of Directors, as appropriate.
Board of Directors Committee Structure
We have a robust Board of Directors committee structure as outlined below that facilitates oversight, effective challenge, and escalation of risk and control issues.
•Financial Risk Committee. The Financial Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities with regard to the Company’s major financial risks, including credit risk, market risk, and liquidity risk. The Financial Risk Committee, along with the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of the Company’s risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statement and thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The Financial Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to the major non-financial risks, including compliance risks, operational risks, information security risk, and model risk. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, along with the Financial Risk Committee, provides oversight of the development, maintenance, and monitoring of our risk management framework, risk governance structure, and risk appetite statement and
98 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
thresholds, and the promotion of our risk management culture. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
•Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial statements, accounting and reporting processes, the performance of the internal audit function, and the qualifications, hiring, performance, and independence of our independent registered accounting firm.
•Nominations and Governance Committee. The Nominations and Governance Committee recommends to the Board appropriate standards of corporate governance, and assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations with regard to oversight of the operations of the Board, the qualifications and independence of directors, nominations to the Board of Directors, and compliance with the corporate governance standards. The Nominations and Governance Committee also provides oversight of the ESG matters of the Company.
•Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, our incentive compensation and benefits practices for employees of all levels, and management’s succession planning. Additionally, the Compensation Committee provides oversight of human capital management, including in the areas of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
•Preferred Stock Committee. The Preferred Stock Committee monitors and evaluates proposed actions that may impact the rights of holders of our preferred stock.
Management-Level Committee Structure
Executive Committee (“EC”). The EC is authorized by the Board of Directors to assist the CEO in the general supervision of the business of the Company. Specifically, the EC will (i) provide to the CEO advice and counsel, subject matter expertise, and recommendations as requested, and (ii) through its subcommittees, facilitate the evaluation and decision-making on routine cross-functional matters, and assist management in the fulfillment of management’s duties related to specific risks. The EC has established the following sub-committees to assist in fulfilling its duties.
•Enterprise Risk Committee (“ERC”). The ERC provides independent oversight and monitoring of the risk and control environment. The ERC is jointly accountable to the Financial Risk Committee and the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors and provides for escalation accordingly.
•Credit Committee. The Credit Committee is responsible for credit and counterparty risk, product pricing, and credit and collections operations.
•Operational Risk Committee (“ORC”). The ORC is the oversight body for risk related to inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. It also reviews information technology risk and regulatory and legal risks.
•Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO is responsible for the strategy, processes, and authorities with which the Bank’s interest rate risk, liquidity, and capital adequacy are managed.
Each of these sub-committees is comprised of subject matter experts from the senior management team and is accountable to the EC. Moreover, these sub-committees may be supported by steering or working groups, as appropriate.
Disclosure Committee. Our Disclosure Committee assists our CEO and Chief Financial Officer in their review of periodic SEC reporting documents, earnings releases, investor materials, and related disclosure policies and procedures.
Internal Audit
Internal Audit provides independent assurance to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and management as to the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management, control, and governance processes, and assists management by providing objective assurance, advisory, and consulting services designed to add value and improve operations. Internal Audit regularly monitors and performs selected reviews of our risk management and compliance functions, to assess the effectiveness of the overall risk management framework, identifies areas that may require increased focus and resources, and reports significant control issues and recommendations to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually, Internal Audit performs an independent risk assessment to evaluate the risk of all significant components of the Company and uses the results to develop their annual Internal Audit plan. The Internal Audit function provides challenge to the first and second lines of defense and also provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 99
Risk Categories
Risk categories are a foundational element of the Risk Management Framework; they are widely used in risk
identification and provide the basis for risk aggregation and reporting. The Company has identified six major risk categories:
Strategic Risk. Strategic risk is the risk of opportunity costs or of adverse impacts to the value of future business from external threats or from internal constraints and/or failings. The overall development of the strategic plan includes extensive engagement with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the Board of Directors provides oversight and effective challenge on performance relative to the strategic plan.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from obligors’ failure, or the increased probability thereof, to meet the terms of a lending, issuer, or counterparty agreement. Credit risk is found in all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.
The credit risk related to Private Education Loans is managed within a credit risk infrastructure that includes: (i) a well-defined underwriting, asset quality, and collection policy framework; (ii) an ongoing monitoring and review process of portfolio composition and trends; (iii) assignment and management of credit authorities and responsibilities; and (iv) establishment of an allowance for credit losses that covers estimated future losses based upon an analysis of portfolio metrics and economic factors.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is managed by reviewing counterparties for credit strength on an ongoing basis and through our credit policies, which place limits on the amount of exposure we may take with any one counterparty and require collateral to secure the position. The credit and counterparty risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with contracts in a gain position to us fail to perform under the terms of the contract.
Credit risk exposure is managed primarily through the Credit Committee, and regular reporting on credit programs and credit metrics is provided to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from changes in market conditions and prices. We are exposed to various types of market risk, in particular the risk of loss resulting from interest rate risk, basis risk, and other risks that arise through the management of our investment, debt, and loan portfolios. Market risk exposures are managed primarily through ALCO. These activities are closely tied to those related to the management of our funding and liquidity risks. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the investment and asset and liability management policies and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO. The Chief Financial Officer provides reports to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors on market risk management.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, reputation, or survival resulting from not being able to meet the Company’s financial obligations when they become due.
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to: meet our funding needs through market cycles, including periods of financial stress; manage the relative maturities of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet; fund disbursements of Private Education Loans and other loans; and service our indebtedness and bank deposits. Ultimately, our liquidity risk relates to our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates and to maintain deposits and other funding sources through the Bank, as well as our maintenance of a reserve of cash and unencumbered highly liquid investment securities that may be readily converted to cash if needed.
Our liquidity risk activities are centralized within our Corporate Finance department, which is responsible for developing and executing our funding strategy. We analyze and monitor our liquidity risk, maintain excess liquidity, and access diverse funding sources depending on current market conditions. Liquidity risks are overseen and recommendations approved primarily through ALCO. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for periodically reviewing the liquidity positions and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO.
100 SLM CORPORATION — 2022 Form 10-K
Operational Risk. Operational risk is the risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events that are not directly attributable to
other risk categories. Operational risk is pervasive in that it exists in all business lines, functional units, legal entities, and geographic locations.
Operational risk exposures are managed through a combination of first line of defense and control activities and second line of defense oversight. The ORC is the management committee responsible for operational risk, and it supports the EC in its oversight duties. The ORC is responsible for escalation to the EC, as appropriate. Additionally, our key risk indicators include operational risk metrics, thresholds, and limits and are included in the periodic reporting to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Compliance Risk. The risk of adverse impacts to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from violations of, or non-conformance with, the Code of Business Conduct and with laws, rules, regulations, and self regulatory organizations’ standards.
Primary ownership and responsibility for compliance risk is placed with the first line of defense to identify and manage. Compliance supports these activities by providing extensive training, monitoring, and testing of the processes, policies, and procedures utilized by the first line of defense, maintaining relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and working in close coordination with our Legal department. Compliance risk metrics and regular reporting on compliance programs are provided to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
2022 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 101
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-22-003839.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures and information contained in “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Through this discussion and analysis, we intend to provide the reader with some narrative context for how our management views our consolidated financial statements, additional context within which to assess our operating results, and information on the quality and variability of our earnings, liquidity, and cash flows.
Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae
During the first quarter of 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 began to spread worldwide and has caused significant disruptions to the U.S. and world economies. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a pandemic. On March 13, 2020, then President Trump declared a national emergency, which made federal funds available to respond to the crisis. Beginning on March 15, 2020, many businesses closed or reduced hours throughout the U.S. to combat the spread of COVID-19. Throughout 2020, all 50 states reported cases of COVID-19 and each implemented various containment efforts, including lockdowns on non-essential businesses and work from home regimes. As a result of these measures, in early 2020 the unemployment rate increased dramatically. In response, we offered disaster forbearance to those customers who contacted us and were negatively affected by COVID-19. The second half of 2020 saw improvements in economic and consumer trends, but continued waves of new cases of COVID-19 created continued uncertainty in the economic environment. However, at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020 and into the first quarter of 2021, the rollout of new vaccines and the ratification of two additional stimulus laws resulted in lower infection rates and significant improvement in the outlook of the economy. The improved outlook in the economy has contributed to faster prepayment rates. We have continued to see improved trends in unemployment rates in 2021 despite the increase in COVID-19 infections from the Delta and Omicron variants that occurred in the latter half of 2021.
The impact of COVID-19 is felt by our colleagues, our customers, and our communities. In response to COVID-19, we implemented efforts to safeguard our team members and enabled a remote work environment. In addition, we have taken steps to help our customers in this time of crisis. Further, The Sallie Mae Fund, our charitable arm, has made contributions to assist in our hometown communities. The following discussion highlights how we are responding and the expected impacts of COVID-19 on our business.
The COVID-19 crisis is unprecedented and has had a significant impact on the economic environment globally and in the U.S. While we have highlighted below how we have responded to the pandemic and described its financial impact, there is a significant amount of uncertainty as to the length and breadth of the impact to the U.S. economy and, consequently, on us. Economists expect the impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. economy to continue to be significant into 2022 and beyond. Accordingly, the information below should be read in conjunction with our COVID-19 pandemic risk factor, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors - Pandemic Risk ” in this annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, see the forward-looking and cautionary statements discussion in this annual report on Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks and uncertainties set forth in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Customers and Credit Performance
COVID-19 is having far reaching, negative impacts on individuals and businesses. Specifically, COVID-19 has materially disrupted business operations throughout the country, resulting in supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures. As a result, we expect many of our individual customers will experience financial hardship, creating a challenge to meet credit standards for new loan originations and making it difficult, if not impossible, to fulfill their payment obligations to us without temporary assistance. We are monitoring key metrics as early warning indicators of financial hardship, including changes in weekly unemployment claims, enrollment in auto-debit payments, requests for new forbearances, enrollment in hardship payment plans, and early delinquency metrics.
As a result of the negative impact on employment from COVID-19, our customers are experiencing higher levels of financial hardship, which initially led to elevated levels of forbearance, as we provided disaster forbearance to borrowers who requested it. We are seeing higher levels of delinquencies and defaults and expect that to continue into the future, as borrowers who had received disaster forbearance from us re-enter repayment status. We expect that, left unabated, this
48 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
deterioration in forbearance, delinquency, and default rates will persist until such time as the economy and employment return to relatively normal levels. This past year has shown us that there is a lot of uncertainty regarding COVID-19 as two new variants caused a significant increase in infections. We maintain an allowance for credit losses that incorporates multiple economic scenarios. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we considered the current economic forecasts as well as how the significant uncertainty may affect future unemployment rates and the economy in estimating our allowance for credit losses. We could experience significant changes in our allowance for credit losses as the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic becomes clearer. The process for determining our allowance contemplates material external factors that may require management adjustments. We used Moody’s Analytics economic forecasts in estimating the losses on our loan portfolio.
Historically, we have utilized disaster forbearance to assist borrowers affected by material events, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described later in this Form 10-K. In accordance with regulatory guidance that encourages lenders to work constructively with customers who have been impacted by COVID-19, we invoked this same disaster forbearance program to assist our customers through COVID-19 and offered this program across our operations, including through mobile and self-service channels such as chat and IVR to address initial high volumes at the onset of the pandemic. During 2021, we ended all COVID-19 disaster forbearances and at December 31, 2021, there were no loans under a disaster forbearance program related to COVID-19.
To make it as easy as possible to access the assistance our customers need, we have communicated to them multiple times and in multiple ways. At the start of the pandemic, we sent all our customers an email explaining their self-serve options and how to contact us if they need assistance. We continue to send e-mails to those customers who enrolled for COVID-19 disaster forbearance and we regularly update our website at www.SallieMae.com/coronavirus with the latest information on how our customers can access their account and get assistance or payment relief, if needed. We expect that, as the economic impact of COVID-19 evolves, we will continue to evaluate the measures we have put in place to assist our customers during this unprecedented time. We continue to adapt and evolve our customer care and collections practices to meet the needs of our customers, while operating in a safe and sound manner. See also “— Financial Results” in this section for further discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students returning to college campuses.
Our Team Members
Our team members have been affected by COVID-19 in many ways, including disruptions due to unexpected school and day-care closings, family underemployment or unemployment, and learning how to work remotely with, in some cases, new tools and technology to learn and support that work. Our goal has been to support our team members during the present uncertainty while meeting the needs of our customers and providing business continuity. Early in the crisis, we provided our team members with information about best practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other viruses or illnesses. We enabled substantially all of our workforce to work remotely. In addition, we have limited in-person meetings, non-employee visits to our locations, and non-essential business travel.
In the second quarter of 2021, we communicated our return to office plans to our team members. Based on the national and local guidelines, we developed a phased-in approach for returning to the office. Under this phased-in approach, we opened our offices in early July 2021 for employees who wanted to voluntarily come to the office. We had planned for a more substantial return to our campuses in early October; however, with the increase in new cases due to the COVID-19 Delta and Omicron variants, we postponed a more fulsome return to our offices until April 2022. The return to our offices will include enhanced safety protocols and processes to provide the best working environment for our team members and we will implement limited flexible work-from-home schedules for employees.
Operations
We have robust pandemic and business continuity plans that include our business units and technology environments. When COVID-19 advanced to a pandemic, we activated our business continuity plan. As an element of the plan, we activated our Executive Crisis Management Team (“ECMT”), a group of the most senior managers across the enterprise. The ECMT directed a series of activities to address the health and safety of our workforce, to assist customers, to sustain business operations, and to address our management of other ongoing pandemic activities.
In response to a growing infected population across the United States in 2020, we executed plans for social-distancing in our facilities and implemented work-from-home contingencies. As the virus spread, we created remote-working capabilities for our teams and consulted with regulators about our plans. We also completed a series of additional steps to appropriately ensure compliance with our telecommuting policy. The policy is designed to create a secure at-home work environment that protects our customers’ information and transactions while also providing the necessary technology capabilities to enable effective remote-working for our team members.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 49
Table of Contents
In addition, we enhanced the functionality of our chatbot, IVR, mobile app, and website features to help our customers manage their accounts.
Most teams continue to work remotely at this time; however, we continue to see productivity and customer satisfaction survey result at pre-pandemic levels. Our technology infrastructure is sufficient to maintain a remote-working environment for the vast majority of our workforce for the foreseeable future.
Liquidity and Capital
Over the course of 2019, we significantly increased our overall liquidity position for risk management purposes and enhanced our liquidity stress testing regime. As a result of these efforts and the activities that occurred in 2020, described below, we currently believe our liquidity position is stable and we expect to be able to fund our business operations through 2022. Because of the disruptions in the capital markets that occurred at the onset of the pandemic, in the first quarter of 2020 we implemented our Contingency Funding Plan, which entailed monitoring and reporting to management our liquidity position and the health of deposit and asset-backed securities markets. In times of financial distress, we often see a flight to quality, where investors seek safer places to invest their money, such as insured bank deposits and in securities such as U.S. Treasuries and government- sponsored debt and mortgage-backed securities. We saw similar trends in the marketplace during this crisis and expect that as a well-capitalized insured depository institution, we will have ample access to deposit markets. As pandemic-related capital market disruptions abated, we de-activated the Contingency Funding Plan in October 2020, but have continued to remain watchful for signs of renewed market stress as the pandemic evolves. Maintaining our focus on earnings quality as well as prudent liquidity management, we actively managed the cost of our retail deposits downward in response to the rapid downturn in short-term interest rates in the first nine months of 2020. Rates were further managed downward in early 2021, and were increased slightly in the second half of the year as market rates began to rise. Despite the lower deposit rates, we have experienced only moderate retail deposit outflows, primarily in term CDs, that are within the outflow targets our Asset and Liability Committee approved. In addition, we were able to access the brokered deposit, asset-backed security, and unsecured debt markets throughout 2020 and 2021. We manage our capital position through a rigorous capital stress testing regime. As a result, we believe that, given the high quality of our Private Education Loan portfolio, we have sufficient capital to withstand our current estimate in the event of a downturn. If circumstances surrounding COVID-19 change in a significantly more adverse way, however, it is possible our liquidity and regulatory capital position could be materially and adversely affected, which could materially and adversely impact our business operations and our overall financial condition. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Borrowings” for additional discussion on our capital and funding activities.
Regulatory agencies have also provided regulatory capital relief to financial institutions as a result of the crisis. See “ — Financial Results” for additional discussion regarding the regulatory relief.
Regulatory
We are regulated by the FDIC, the UDFI, and the CFPB. These agencies have encouraged regulated entities to work constructively with customers affected by COVID-19 and have provided guidance regarding loan modifications.
The federal banking regulators have stated that working with customers who are current on existing loans, either individually or as part of a program for creditworthy customers who are experiencing short-term financial or operational problems as a result COVID-19, generally would not be considered TDRs (as hereinafter defined). For modification programs, such as forbearance, designed to provide short-term relief for current customers affected by COVID-19, we may presume that customers who are current on payments are not experiencing financial difficulties at the time of the modification for purposes of determining TDR status, and thus no further TDR analysis is required for each loan modification in the program.
In addition, the federal banking regulators have indicated their examiners will exercise judgment in reviewing loan modifications, including TDRs, and will not automatically adversely risk-rate credits that are affected by COVID-19, including those considered TDRs. Regardless of whether modifications result in loans being considered TDRs or adversely classified, the federal banking regulators have indicated their examiners will not criticize prudent efforts to modify the terms of existing loans to affected customers.
Community
In response to the exceptional needs in our communities, during 2021, our team members volunteered more than 1,100 hours and donated nearly $50,000 through our matching gift program to charitable organizations. Additionally, through a combination of individual and team led fundraising and "Adopt-A-Family"/"Adopt-A-School" programs, team members also donated clothes to needy families, 20 boxes of school supplies, totaling 14,305 items to local middle and elementary schools, and raised nearly $7,000 to help children and families facing serious illnesses and challenging
50 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
financial situations because of required medical care. We view these efforts as extensions of our core mission. Strong communities become the launching pads for students’ academic endeavors.
Financial Results
For the year ended December 31, 2021, we considered the current economic forecasts as well as the how the significant uncertainty surrounding COVID-19 may affect future unemployment rates and the economy in estimating our allowance for credit losses. During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans, and in the fourth quarter of 2021 we increased them again for the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflect the significant improvement in economic forecasts, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. We experienced higher prepayments during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unemployment rates were elevated, than we would have expected based upon our experience during past financial crises.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we include forecasts of college graduate unemployment and the Consumer Price Index in our loss forecasting models. We obtain forecasts for these two inputs from Moody’s Analytics. Moody’s Analytics provides a range of forecasts for each of these inputs with various likelihoods of occurring. We determine which forecasts we will include in our estimation of allowance for credit losses and the associated weightings for each of these inputs. At January 1, 2020 (the initial adoption date of CECL), December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021, we used the Base (50th percentile likelihood of occurring)/S1 (stronger near-term growth scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring)/S3 (downside scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring) scenarios and weighted them 40 percent, 30 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. Management reviews both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses.
Provisions for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased by $126 million compared with the year-ago period. This decrease of $126 million in 2021 compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of improving economic forecasts in 2021 and faster prepayment speeds. During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflect the significant improvement in economic forecasts, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we increased our long-term estimate of prepayment speeds to reflect higher long-term prepayment experience. Partially offsetting these benefits were additional provisions to reflect the adoption of our credit administration practices changes and other management overlays. As COVID-19 continues to impact the economy, the Company could continue to experience significant changes in its allowance for credit losses in 2022.
Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance as a percentage of held for investment Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance was 1.9 percent at December 31, 2021, compared to 4.3 percent at December 31, 2020. The forbearance rate on December 31, 2021 was lower than on December 31, 2020 due to our ending disaster forbearance related to COVID-19 in June 2021 and our adoption of the previously announced planned credit administration practices changes. Delinquencies at December 31, 2021, as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment, increased to 3.3 percent from 2.8 percent at December 31, 2020. The increase in delinquencies was primarily due to the ending of the disaster forbearance program related to COVID-19 and the adoption of the new credit administration practices changes.
For the start of the 2021-2022 academic year, the majority of colleges, universities, and trade schools returned to in-person classes while offering full residential options. While these schools moved away from an emphasis on hybrid and online policies, some regional reports indicate an increase in colleges maintaining online classes as a safety precaution, due to the recent uptick in COVID-19 variant infections.
For some students, going back to school in the fall of 2020 was not an option because of the pandemic or for other reasons. Therefore, some students took a “gap year” before returning to school. In 2020, for those students that had unexpectedly separated from school, we had provided an extension of time, until the fall of 2021, to re-enroll before beginning their grace period that occurs upon separation from school and prior to entering full principal and interest repayment status. At December 31, 2020, $1.0 billion of Private Education Loans had been granted during this extended period of time. Beginning September 30, 2021, we no longer granted this “gap year” extension.
On March 27, 2020, then President Trump signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which, among other things, allows us to (i) elect to suspend the requirements under GAAP for loan modifications related to COVID-19 that would otherwise be categorized as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”), and (ii) suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the effects of COVID-19 as being a TDR, including impairment
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 51
Table of Contents
for accounting purposes. Furthermore, on December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (“CAA”) was signed into law. The CAA provides for additional COVID-19 focused relief and extends certain provisions of the CARES Act.
We have elected to suspend TDR accounting for modifications of loans that occur as a result of COVID-19 for the applicable period of the CARES Act and CAA relief. The relief from TDR guidance applies to modifications of loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019, and that occur during the period beginning on March 1, 2020, and ending on the earlier of (i) sixty days after the date on which the national emergency related to the COVID-19 outbreak is terminated, or (ii) January 1, 2022. We are continuing to apply TDR accounting to those loans that were more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019 and were subsequently modified.
Under regulations issued by the FDIC and other federal banking agencies, banking organizations that adopt CECL during the 2020 calendar year, including the Bank, may elect to delay for two years, and then phase in over the following three years, the effects on regulatory capital of CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The Bank has elected to use this option. Therefore, the regulatory capital impact of the Bank’s transition adjustments recorded on January 1, 2020 from the adoption of CECL, and 25 percent of the ongoing impact of CECL on the Bank’s allowance for credit losses, retained earnings, and average total consolidated assets, each as reported for regulatory capital purposes (collectively, the “adjusted transition amounts”), were deferred for the two-year period ending January 1, 2022. From January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2025, the adjusted transition amounts will be phased in for regulatory capital purposes at a rate of 25 percent per year, with the phased-in amounts included in regulatory capital at the beginning of each year. The Bank’s January 1, 2020 CECL transition amounts increased our allowance for credit losses by $1.1 billion, increased the liability representing our off-balance sheet exposure for unfunded commitments by $116 million, and increased our deferred tax asset by $306 million, resulting in a cumulative effect adjustment that reduced retained earnings by $953 million. This transition adjustment was inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
At December 31, 2021, the adjusted transition amounts, reflecting changes over the two-year phase-in period, that will be deferred for regulatory capital purposes are as follows:
| Transition Amounts | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Adjustments for the Year Ended | Adjusted Transition Amounts | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | January 1, 2020 | December 31, 2020 | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||
| Retained earnings | $ | 952,639 | $ | (57,859) | $ | (58,429) | $ | 836,351 | |||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | 1,143,053 | (55,811) | (49,097) | 1,038,145 | |||||||||||
| Liability for unfunded commitments | 115,758 | (2,048) | (9,333) | 104,377 | |||||||||||
| Deferred tax asset | 306,171 | — | — | 306,171 |
52 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Overview
The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our business and operations as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Key Financial Measures
Set forth below are brief summaries of our key financial measures. Our operating results are primarily driven by net interest income from our Private Education Loan portfolio, gains and losses on loan sales, provision expense for credit losses, and operating expenses. The growth of our business and the strength of our financial condition are primarily driven by our ability to achieve our annual Private Education Loan origination goals while sustaining credit quality and maintaining cost-efficient funding sources to support our originations.
Net Interest Income
Most of our earnings are generated from the interest income earned on assets in our education loan portfolios and on Credit Cards, net of the interest expense we pay on the funding for those loans. We report these earnings as net interest income. We also often refer to the net interest margin, which is the net interest yield earned on our interest-earning assets less the rate paid on our related interest-bearing liabilities. The majority of our interest income comes from our Private Education Loan portfolio. FFELP Loans have a lower net interest yield and carry lower risk than Private Education Loans, as a result of the federal government guarantee supporting FFELP Loans.
Loan Sales and Secured Financings
We may sell loans to third-parties through whole loan sales, securitizations, or other similar transactions. We typically retain servicing of loans subsequent to their sale and earn revenue for this servicing at prevailing market rates for such services. Selling loans removes the loan assets from our balance sheet and helps us manage our asset growth, capital, and liquidity needs. Alternatively, we may use loans as collateral in connection with the creation of asset-backed securitizations or secured funding facilities structured as financings. These types of transactions may provide us long-term financing, but they do not remove loan assets from our balance sheet, nor do they generate gains on sales of loans, net. Consequently, our operating results may be significantly affected by whether we choose to sell loans and recognize current gains on sale or continue to hold or finance loans, thereby retaining some or all the net interest income from those loans. In 2021, we recognized $548 million in gains from the sale of approximately $4.24 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.98 billion of principal and $264 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third parties. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment.”
Allowance for Credit Losses
Management estimates and maintains an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date. See Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Credit Losses.” Allowances for credit losses are an important indicator of management’s perspective on the future performance of a loan portfolio. Each quarter, management makes an adjustment to the allowance for credit losses to reflect its most up-to-date estimate of future losses by recording a charge against quarterly revenues known as provision expense. As they occur, actual loan charge-offs and recoveries are then charged or credited, respectively, against the allowance for credit losses rather than against earnings.
The allowance for credit losses and provision expense rise in periods of high loan origination, when future charge-offs are expected to increase, and fall when future charge-offs are expected to decline. We bear the full credit exposure on our Private Education Loans and Credit Cards. Losses on our Private Education Loans are affected by risk characteristics such as loan status (in-school, grace, forbearance, repayment, and delinquency), loan seasoning (number of months in active repayment), underwriting criteria (e.g., credit scores), presence of a cosigner, and the current economic environment. See “CREDIT RISK - Defaults on our loans, particularly Private Education Loans, could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.” in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for additional information. Losses typically emerge once a borrower separates from school and enters full principal and interest repayment after the borrower’s grace period (six months, typically) ends. As a larger proportion of our Private Education Loan portfolio enters full principal and interest repayment in the coming years, we would expect the amount of TDRs, and charge-offs, to increase.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 53
Table of Contents
Our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are small because we generally bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to the federal guarantee on such loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses.
We maintain an allowance for Credit Card losses at an amount sufficient to absorb losses estimated to cover lifetime expected credit losses. Because our Credit Card portfolio is relatively new and we do not have sufficient historical loss experience, we use estimated loss rates reported by other financial institutions to estimate our allowance for credit losses for Credit Cards, net of expected recoveries. In addition, we use a model that utilizes purchased credit card information with risk characteristics similar to those of our own portfolio as a challenger model. We then consider any qualitative factors that may change our future expectations of losses. As all of our Credit Card loans are unconditionally cancelable by us, the issuer, we do not record any estimate of credit losses for unused portions of our Credit Card commitments.
Charge-Offs and Delinquencies
Delinquencies are another important indicator of potential future credit performance. When a Private Education Loan reaches 120 days delinquent, it is charged against the allowance for credit losses. We charge off Credit Cards when they are 180 days delinquent. Charge-off data provides relevant information with respect to the actual performance of a loan portfolio over time. Management focuses on delinquencies as well as the progression of loans from early to late stage delinquency as a key metric in estimating the allowance for credit losses and tailoring its future collections strategies. We manage our charged-off loans through a mix of in-house collectors, third-party collectors, and sales to third-parties.
Operating Expenses
The cost of operating our business directly affects our profitability. We strive to manage growth in our business in a prudent fashion by focusing on investments to improve efficiency throughout the Company. We monitor and report internally various metrics, including cost to acquire and cost to service our loans (which include both owned and serviced loans), among others. The cost to acquire is affected by such variables as technology, personnel, and marketing costs. Servicing expenses primarily include compensation and benefit expenses related to our collections, customer support, and payment processing employees, and technology costs and other expenses associated with facilitating and servicing borrowers. Costs to service can vary period to period based upon seasonality and borrower payment status. The cost to service a delinquent borrower is significantly higher than the cost to service a current or in-school borrower.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings”
We prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, we also produce and report our after-tax earnings on a separate basis that we refer to as non-GAAP “Core Earnings.” The difference between our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” and GAAP results for periods presented generally is driven by the unrealized, mark-to-fair value gains (losses) on derivative contracts recognized in GAAP, but not in non-GAAP “Core Earnings.”
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” recognizes the difference in accounting treatment based upon whether a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment. We enter into derivative instruments to economically hedge interest rate and cash flow risk associated with our portfolio. We believe that our derivatives are effective economic hedges and, as such, are a critical element of our interest rate risk management strategy. Those derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment have their related cash flows recorded in interest income or interest expense along with the hedged item. Some of our derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and the stand-alone derivative must be marked-to-fair value in the income statement with no consideration for the corresponding change in fair value of the hedged item. These gains and losses, recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net,” are primarily caused by interest rate volatility and changing credit spreads during the period as well as the volume and term of derivatives not receiving hedge accounting treatment. Cash flows on derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are not recorded in interest income and interest expense; they are recorded in non-interest income: “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net.”
The adjustments required to reconcile from our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” results to our GAAP results of operations, net of tax, relate to differing treatments for those derivative instruments used to hedge our economic risks that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The amount recorded in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” includes (i) the accrual of the current payment on the interest rate swaps that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and (ii) the change in fair values related to future expected cash flows for derivatives that
54 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. For purposes of non-GAAP “Core Earnings,” we include in GAAP earnings the current period accrual amounts (interest reclassification) on the swaps and exclude the change in fair values for those derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” is meant to represent what earnings would have been had these derivatives qualified for hedge accounting and there was no ineffectiveness.
Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” are not a substitute for reported results under GAAP. We provide a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation because (i) earnings per share computed on a non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis is one of several measures we utilize in establishing management incentive compensation, and (ii) we believe it better reflects the financial results for derivatives that are economic hedges of interest rate risk, but which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
GAAP provides a uniform, comprehensive basis of accounting. Our non-GAAP “Core Earnings” basis of presentation differs from GAAP in the way it treats derivatives as described above.
The following table shows the amount in “Gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities, net” that relates to the interest reclassification on the derivative contracts.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealized gains (losses) on instruments not in a hedging relationship | $ | (23,216) | $ | 10,164 | $ | 19,469 | |||||
| Interest reclassification | 23,360 | 39,380 | (1,644) | ||||||||
| Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net | $ | 144 | $ | 49,544 | $ | 17,825 |
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 55
Table of Contents
The following table reflects adjustments associated with our derivative activities.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP: | |||||||||||
| GAAP net income | $ | 1,160,513 | $ | 880,690 | $ | 578,276 | |||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 4,736 | 9,734 | 16,837 | ||||||||
| GAAP net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 1,155,777 | $ | 870,956 | $ | 561,439 | |||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||
| Net impact of derivative accounting(1) | 23,216 | (10,164) | (19,469) | ||||||||
| Net tax expense (benefit)(2) | 5,615 | (2,481) | (4,758) | ||||||||
| Total non-GAAP “Core Earnings” adjustments to GAAP | 17,601 | (7,683) | (14,711) | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 1,173,378 | $ | 863,273 | $ | 546,728 | |||||
| GAAP diluted earnings per common share | $ | 3.61 | $ | 2.25 | $ | 1.30 | |||||
| Derivative adjustments, net of tax | 0.06 | (0.02) | (0.03) | ||||||||
| Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” diluted earnings per common share | $ | 3.67 | $ | 2.23 | $ | 1.27 |
(1) Derivative Accounting: Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” exclude periodic unrealized gains and losses caused by the mark-to-fair value valuations on derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under GAAP, but include current period accruals on the derivative instruments. Under GAAP, for our derivatives held to maturity, the cumulative net unrealized gain or loss over the life of the contract will equal $0.
(2) Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” tax rate is based on the effective tax rate at the Bank, where the derivative instruments are held.
The following table reflects our provisions for credit losses and total portfolio net charge-offs:
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provisions for credit losses | $ | (32,957) | $ | 93,133 | $ | 354,249 | |||||
| Total portfolio net charge-offs | (200,762) | (216,036) | (253,143) |
Beginning in 2020, we began to evaluate management’s performance internally using a measure that starts with Non-GAAP “Core Earnings” net income as disclosed above for a period, and further adjusting it by increasing it by the impact of GAAP provisions for credit losses, and decreasing it by the total portfolio net charge-offs recorded in that period, net of the tax impact of these adjustments.
56 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Private Education Loan Originations
Private Education Loans are the principal asset on our balance sheet, and the amount of new Private Education Loan originations we generate each year is a key indicator of the trajectory of our business, including our future earnings and asset growth.
Funding Sources
Deposits
We utilize brokered, retail, and other core deposits to meet funding needs and enhance our liquidity position. These deposits can be term or liquid deposits. Our term brokered deposits have terms as long as seven years. Interest rates on a portion of our long-term deposits are swapped into one-month LIBOR. This structure has the effect of transforming the interest rate characteristics of these deposits to match the index on which the majority of our assets reset, thereby minimizing our exposure to interest rate risk. Retail deposits are sourced through a direct banking platform and serve as an important source of diversified funding. Brokered deposits are sourced through a network of brokers and provide a stable source of funding. In addition, we accept certain deposits considered non-brokered that are held in large accounts structured to allow FDIC insurance to flow through to underlying individual depositors. We diversify our funding sources with deposits from Educational 529 savings plan and Health Savings plans. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.3 billion of our deposit totals as of December 31, 2021.
Loan Securitizations
We have diversified our funding sources by issuing term ABS and by entering into the Secured Borrowing Facility. Term ABS financing provides long-term funding for our Private Education Loan portfolio at attractive interest rates and at terms that effectively match the average life of the assets. Loans associated with these transactions will remain on our balance sheet if we retain the residual interest in the related trusts. The Secured Borrowing Facility provides an extremely flexible source of funds that can be drawn upon on short notice to meet funding needs within the Bank. Borrowings under our Secured Borrowing Facility are accounted for as secured financings.
LIBOR Transition
Following announcements by the UKFCA, which regulates LIBOR, and ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of LIBOR, publication of 1-week and 2-month USD LIBOR and all tenors for other currencies ceased after December 31, 2021. While publication of the remaining USD settings is expected to cease after June 30, 2023, U.S. banking and other global financial services regulators have directed regulated institutions to cease entering into new LIBOR-based contracts as soon as practicable and in any event by the end of 2021.
In 2020, we launched a formal cross-functional replacement project with the goal of ensuring a smooth transition to a replacement index for our LIBOR-based assets and obligations with minimal negative impact on our customers, investors, and the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The project team monitors developments, assesses impacts, proposes plans and, with the approval of an executive committee, implements changes. The Chief Financial Officer and/or project team reports status regularly to our Board of Directors. In 2020, we began accepting certain deposits based on SOFR. In the second quarter of 2021, we began issuing variable-rate Private Education Loans that are indexed to SOFR. In 2022, subject to market conditions and investor demand, we expect to begin issuing ABS that are indexed to SOFR and to renew the Secured Borrowing Facility with an index based on SOFR.
Substantially all our assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet items referencing LIBOR are comprised of Private Education Loans originated before April 2021, deposits, variable-rate ABS, and derivatives. In addition, our Series B Preferred Stock is indexed to LIBOR. We plan to transition these exposures to LIBOR by changing them to an alternative reference rate, either through modification or replacement, by June 30, 2023, although we may accelerate the transition of our legacy Private Education Loans depending upon a number of considerations, including regulatory guidance. Approximately $339 million of our variable-rate ABS (those issued before November 2017) do not have fallback provisions for an alternative reference rate and we intend to rely upon the safe harbors provided by proposed federal legislation, which is currently drafted to supersede state legislation, and/or current New York legislation to transition these ABS to an alternative reference rate. Generally, the safe harbors will shield parties from liability for transitioning certain USD LIBOR-indexed contracts (generally, those that do not have provisions for an alternative
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 57
Table of Contents
reference rate) to SOFR and will render nonactionable any claims brought by parties to such contracts that allege breach of contract based on another party’s use of SOFR. We have evaluated the potential basis risk associated with a mismatch in variable-rate assets and liabilities, including any mismatches related to (i) legacy assets and liabilities that remain indexed to LIBOR up to June 2023 and newly issued assets and liabilities that are, or will be, indexed to SOFR and (ii) term SOFR-indexed assets and liabilities and average SOFR assets and liabilities. In all such cases, we have determined the basis risk is immaterial on an aggregate basis.
The chart below depicts our current LIBOR exposure at December 31, 2021.
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | LIBOR Exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 9,680,263 | |
| FFELP Loans | 590,660 | ||
| Available-for-sale investments | 70,087 | ||
| Total Assets | $ | 10,341,010 | |
| Deposits | $ | 4,202,554 | |
| Private Education Loan term securitizations - no contractual fallback | 339,348 | ||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations - alternative reference rate fallback | 709,631 | ||
| Total Liabilities | 5,251,533 | ||
| Total Equity (preferred stock) | 251,070 | ||
| Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 5,502,603 | |
| Off-Balance Sheet: | |||
| Pay LIBOR derivative notional | $ | 3,915,999 | |
| Receive LIBOR derivative notional | 1,438,144 | ||
| Total derivative notional | 5,354,143 | ||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | 2,000,000 | ||
| Total Off-Balance Sheet | $ | 7,354,143 |
See Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K for additional discussion regarding the risks associated with the transition from LIBOR.
58 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Strategic Imperatives
To further focus our business and increase shareholder value, we continue to advance our strategic imperatives. Our focus remains on maximizing the profitability and growth of our core private student loan business, while harnessing and optimizing the power of our brand and attractive client base. In addition, we continue to seek to better inform the external narrative about student lending and Sallie Mae’s role in helping students and families responsibly plan and pay for college. We also strive to maintain a rigorous and predictable capital allocation and return program to create shareholder value. Our internal focus is to drive a mission-led culture that continues to make Sallie Mae a great place to work. Finally, we continue to strengthen our risk and compliance efforts, to enhance and build upon our risk management framework, and to keep focused and aligned on assessing and monitoring enterprise-wide risk.
During 2021, we made the following progress on the above corporate strategic imperatives.
New Servicing Call Center Platform and Rebranded Online Resource Tools
In late March 2021, we migrated our servicing call center to a new integrated platform that will further our goal to deliver exceptional customer experiences. This new platform allows us to streamline our processes and provide efficiencies, thereby creating more customer-centric capabilities for our team members. We also relaunched our online resource to provide a centralized and simplified site that provides information on tools and resources for school counselors as they assist students and families plan and pay for college. We are also creating a suite of confidence inspiring tools and resources as well as new, innovative partnerships that will provide significant value to our customers.
Introduced new www.SallieMakesSense.com website
We launched www.SallieMakesSense.com to help educate and inform policymakers, influencers, media, and others about who Sallie Mae is today and illustrate the important role we continue to play in helping students and families plan and pay for college. In addition to providing key statistics and information about the success of our customers, and the important role of private student lenders, the site also highlights the various tools and resources we provide families to make an informed decision about higher education. It also features content on the higher education landscape and our work in helping students complete their education.
2021 Loan Sales and 2021-A and 2021-C Transactions
During 2021, we sold $4.24 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.98 billion in principal and $264 million in capitalized interest, to unaffiliated third parties. The transactions qualified for sale treatment and removed the balance of the loans from our balance sheet on the respective settlement dates. We remained the servicer of these loans pursuant to applicable servicing agreements executed in connection with the sales. These sales resulted in our recognizing a gain of $548 million during 2021. For additional information regarding these transactions, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment” and Note 11, “Borrowings - Unconsolidated VIEs.”
2021-B Securitization
On May 19, 2021, we executed our $531 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-B term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $531 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $529 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.26 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.77 percent.
2021-D Securitization
On August 18, 2021, we executed our $527 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-D term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $527 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $525 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.22 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent.
2021-E Securitization
On November 9, 2021, we executed our $534 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-E term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $534 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $532 million of gross
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 59
Table of Contents
proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.15 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent.
Final Settlement of ASR
On January 26, 2021, we completed our ASR with a third-party financial institution and we received an additional 13 million shares. In total, we repurchased 58 million shares under the ASR at an average price per share of $9.01. For additional information regarding this ASR, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity.”
Common Stock Tender Offer
On February 2, 2021, we announced the commencement of the Tender Offer to purchase up to $1 billion in aggregate purchase price of our outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.20 per share. Pursuant to the Tender Offer, we repurchased 28.5 million shares at a price of $16.50 per share. The purchase of shares settled on March 16, 2021, for an aggregate cost of approximately $472 million, including fees and expenses related to the Tender Offer. We cancelled the 28.5 million shares purchased in connection with the Tender Offer.
Share Repurchases under our Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we repurchased 57 million shares of our common stock at a total cost of $1.1 billion under Rule 10b5-1 trading plans authorized under our share repurchase programs.
Common Stock Dividends
We paid quarterly cash dividends on our common stock of $0.03 per share for the first, second, and third quarters of 2021. In the fourth quarter of 2021 we increased our dividend per share on our common stock to $0.11 per share, which was paid on December 15, 2021 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 3, 2021.
Secured Borrowing Facility
On July 30, 2021, we amended and extended the maturity of the Secured Borrowing Facility, discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, “Borrowings.” The Secured Borrowing Facility is a $2 billion secured borrowing facility, under which the full $2 billion is available for us to draw. Under the amended Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay, and reborrow funds, until May 17, 2022. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 17, 2023 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur).
See “Item 1. Business — Human Capital Resources and Talent Development” for a discussion regarding our mission-led culture.
60 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
We present the results of operations below on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
GAAP Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 1,757 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 2,249 | $ | (232) | (12) | % | $ | (260) | (12) | % | ||||||||||||
| Investments | 14 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 6 | 21 | 74 | (15) | (71) | (53) | (72) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income | 1,777 | 2,022 | 2,331 | (245) | (12) | (309) | (13) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | 382 | 542 | 708 | (160) | (30) | (166) | (23) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | 1,395 | 1,480 | 1,623 | (85) | (6) | (143) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Less: provisions for credit losses | (33) | 93 | 354 | (126) | (135) | (261) | (74) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provisions for credit losses | 1,428 | 1,387 | 1,269 | 41 | 3 | 118 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on sales of loans, net | 548 | 238 | — | 310 | 130 | 238 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net | — | 50 | 18 | (50) | (100) | 32 | 178 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 84 | 43 | 31 | 41 | 95 | 12 | (39) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 632 | 331 | 49 | 301 | 91 | 282 | 576 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 519 | 538 | 574 | (19) | (4) | (36) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring expenses | 1 | 26 | — | (25) | (96) | 26 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total non-interest expenses | 520 | 564 | 574 | (44) | (8) | (10) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 1,540 | 1,154 | 744 | 386 | 33 | 410 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 380 | 273 | 165 | 107 | 39 | 108 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 1,160 | 881 | 578 | 279 | 32 | 302 | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock dividends | 4 | 10 | 17 | (6) | (60) | (7) | (41) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to SLM Corporation common stock | $ | 1,156 | $ | 871 | $ | 561 | $ | 285 | 33 | % | $ | 310 | 55 | % | ||||||||||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 3.67 | $ | 2.27 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.40 | 62 | % | $ | 0.96 | 73 | % | ||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 3.61 | $ | 2.25 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 1.36 | 60 | % | $ | 0.95 | 73 | % | ||||||||||||
| Declared dividends per common share | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.08 | 67 | % | $ | — | — | % |
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 61
Table of Contents
GAAP Consolidated Earnings Summary
Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2020
For the year ended December 31, 2021, net income was $1.16 billion, or $3.61 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $881 million, or $2.25 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2020. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to increases in gains on sales of loans, net, other income, lower provisions for credit losses, and lower operating expenses, which were offset by a decline in total net interest income.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for the current year period compared with the year-ago period are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2021 decreased by $85 million compared with the year-ago period primarily due to a $2.1 billion reduction in average loans outstanding. The decline in average loans outstanding was due to the sale of our Personal Loan portfolio that occurred in the third quarter of 2020 and the sale of $4.2 billion of Private Education Loans in 2021. Net interest margin in 2021 was unchanged from the prior year as the lower yield on our interest earning assets was offset by lower cost of funds.
•Provisions for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2021 decreased by $126 million compared with the year-ago period. This decrease of $126 million in 2021 compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of improving economic forecasts in 2021 and faster prepayment speeds. During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflect the significant improvement in economic forecasts, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we increased our long-term estimate of prepayment speeds to reflect higher long-term prepayment experience. Partially offsetting these benefits were additional provisions to reflect the adoption of our credit administration practices changes and other management overlays.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $548 million in 2021, compared with $238 million in the year-ago period. The increase in gains on sales of loans was primarily the result of $1.14 billion in additional Private Education Loan sales in 2021 when compared with the year-ago period and improved pricing on the sale of those loans in 2021 compared with the year-ago period.
•Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net, decreased $50 million in 2021 compared with the year-ago period. The year-ago period was favorably impacted by a significant decrease in interest rates caused by the economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic, which made our receive fixed/pay variable interest rate swaps that are not designated as accounting hedges, but are economic hedges, to increase in value.
•Other income increased $41 million in 2021 from the year-ago period. The increase in other income compared with the year-ago period was primarily the result of a $35 million gain related to changes in the valuation of certain non-marketable securities, and a $26 million increase in third-party servicing fees, offset by an $11 million gain from the sale of our former Upromise subsidiary recognized in the year-ago period and $6 million in lower revenue related to our former Upromise subsidiary. In addition, other income during the year ended December 31, 2021 was negatively affected by a $3 million loss from fees related to the redemption of $200 million of our 5.125 percent unsecured senior notes due in April 2022. Third-party servicing fees increased in 2021 because we sold $4.24 billion in loans in 2021 where we retained servicing rights.
•For the year ended December 31, 2021, total operating expenses were $519 million, compared with $538 million in the year-ago period. The decrease in total operating expenses was primarily driven by lower personnel costs as a result of the corporate reorganization that occurred in the second half of 2020, the divestiture of our former Upromise subsidiary in 2020, the sale of the Personal Loan portfolio in 2020, and lower initiative spending and improved servicing efficiencies in 2021.
•In the third quarter of 2020, we implemented a restructuring plan that resulted in our recording a $26 million restructuring charge in the year ended December 31, 2020. These expenses were primarily related to involuntary termination benefit arrangements, as well as certain other costs, such as legal and consulting fees, that were incremental and incurred as a direct result of our 2020 restructuring plan. There were de minimis restructuring expenses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $380 million, compared with $273 million in the year-ago period. The effective tax rate increased in 2021 to 24.7 percent from 23.7 percent in the year-ago period.
62 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by higher state income tax expense related to an increase in our uncertain tax positions.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared with Year Ended December 31, 2019
For the year ended December 31, 2020, net income was $881 million, or $2.25 diluted earnings per common share, compared with net income of $578 million, or $1.30 diluted earnings per common share, for the year ended December 31, 2019. The year-over-year increase was primarily attributable to increases in gains on sales of loans, net, lower provisions for credit losses, and lower operating expenses, which were offset by a decline in total net interest income.
The primary contributors to each of the identified drivers of change in net income for 2020 compared with 2019 are as follows:
•Net interest income in 2020 decreased by $143 million compared with 2019 primarily due to a 95 basis point decrease in net interest margin. Net interest margin decreased primarily due to (i) rates on our cash and short-term investments portfolio decreasing faster than our deposits repriced as interest rates fell as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as (ii) the sale of our higher yielding Personal Loan portfolio.
•Provisions for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased by $261 million compared with 2019. The allowance in 2019 was determined using an incurred loss model which, for the most part, based its allowance on expected losses over the next 12 months. On January 1, 2020, we adopted CECL, which required a life-of-loan loss allowance, and recorded an increase to the allowance for on balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loan commitments of $1.3 billion with an offsetting entry of a $953 million reduction in retained earnings and a $306 million increase in our deferred tax asset. After January 1, 2020, all future changes in the allowance were recorded through the provisions for credit losses. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our provisions for credit losses were $93 million. This was primarily the result of $290 million in additional provision for credit losses related to new commitments made in 2020, an additional $129 million due to deteriorating economic conditions during the year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and $99 million caused by lower recovery rates and various overlays and other adjustments applied during the year. Offsetting these was a $206 million reduction in the provisions for credit losses as a result of $2.9 billion of loans transferred to held-for-sale from held for investment in the fourth quarter of 2020, the sale of $3.1 billion of Private Education Loans in the first quarter of 2020, which resulted in a reduction to our provisions for credit losses of $162 million, a benefit of $121 million from faster prepayment speeds, and the sale of our entire Personal Loan portfolio, which resulted in a reduction to our provisions for credit losses of $43 million. The benefit from faster prepayment speeds was to reflect actual loan prepayment speeds being higher than what our models were predicting due to the significant amount of COVID-19 related government stimulus.
•Gains on sales of loans, net, were $238 million in 2020, primarily as a result of the sale of $3.1 billion of Private Education Loans to unaffiliated third-parties in the first quarter of 2020. There were no loan sales in 2019.
•Gains on derivatives and hedging activities, net, increased $32 million in 2020 compared with 2019. The increase was driven by a significant decrease in interest rates during 2020 as a result of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused our receive-fixed/pay-variable interest rate swaps that are not designated as accounting hedges, but are economic hedges, to increase in value.
•Other income increased $12 million in 2020 from 2019 primarily due to an $11 million gain from the sale of our former Upromise subsidiary in the second quarter of 2020, and an increase of $17 million in third-party servicing fees, offset by $13 million in lower revenue from our divested Upromise business, and an $8 million gain we recorded in 2019 related to changes in the valuation of certain non-marketable securities. Third-party servicing fees increased primarily as a result of the sale of $3.1 billion of Private Education loans in the first quarter of 2020 (where we continued to service the loans after they were sold).
•For the year ended December 31, 2020, total operating expenses were $538 million, compared with $574 million in 2019. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily driven by reduced personnel and marketing costs as a result of the suspension of Personal Loan originations and the subsequent sale of our Personal Loan portfolio, the sale of our former Upromise subsidiary, lower FDIC fees, and lower employee compensation costs as a result of the restructuring, which were offset by increased costs from growth in the serviced and owned loan portfolio, CEO transition costs, and costs related to other initiatives.
•Restructuring expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $26 million, related to the restructuring plan we implemented in the third quarter of 2020. These expenses were primarily related to involuntary termination
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 63
Table of Contents
benefit arrangements, as well as certain other costs, such as legal and consulting fees that were incremental and incurred as a direct result of our restructuring plan. There were no restructuring expenses recorded in 2019.
•Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 was $273 million, compared with $165 million in 2019. The effective tax rate increased in 2020 to 23.7 percent from 22.2 percent in 2019. The increase in the effective tax rate was primarily driven by $14 million in tax credits recorded in 2019.
64 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Financial Condition
Average Balance Sheets - GAAP
The following table reflects the rates earned on interest-earning assets and paid on interest-bearing liabilities and reflects our net interest margin on a consolidated basis.
| Years ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | Balance | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 20,968,061 | 8.25 | % | $ | 22,426,216 | 8.42 | % | $ | 22,225,473 | 9.32 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 718,186 | 3.43 | 757,953 | 3.76 | 814,198 | 4.79 | |||||||||||||||
| Personal Loans | — | — | 582,552 | 12.43 | 1,141,503 | 12.09 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | 14,982 | 4.67 | 9,390 | (6.04) | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Taxable securities | 2,142,025 | 0.65 | 1,547,837 | 0.73 | 324,849 | 2.35 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and other short-term investments | 5,139,731 | 0.14 | 5,447,844 | 0.41 | 3,693,245 | 2.01 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 28,982,985 | 6.13 | % | 30,771,792 | 6.57 | % | 28,199,268 | 8.27 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 636,691 | 236,536 | 1,318,290 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 29,619,676 | $ | 31,008,328 | $ | 29,517,558 | |||||||||||||||
| Average Liabilities and Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Brokered deposits | $ | 11,015,170 | 1.35 | % | $ | 12,777,874 | 1.84 | % | $ | 11,760,646 | 2.66 | % | |||||||||
| Retail and other deposits | 10,540,170 | 0.70 | 10,772,161 | 1.47 | 9,588,747 | 2.44 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities(1) | 5,390,098 | 2.94 | 4,982,771 | 2.98 | 4,658,075 | 3.43 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 26,945,438 | 1.42 | % | 28,532,806 | 1.90 | % | 26,007,468 | 2.72 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing liabilities | 279,344 | 234,798 | 392,173 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 2,394,894 | 2,240,724 | 3,117,917 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 29,619,676 | $ | 31,008,328 | $ | 29,517,558 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 4.81 | % | 4.81 | % | 5.76 | % |
(1) Includes the average balance of our unsecured borrowings, as well as secured borrowings and amortization expense of transaction costs related to our term asset-backed securitizations and our Secured Borrowing Facility.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 65
Table of Contents
Rate/Volume Analysis - GAAP
The following rate/volume analysis shows the relative contribution of changes in interest rates and asset volumes.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Increase (Decrease) | Change Due To(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate | Volume | ||||||||||
| 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | (244,816) | $ | (130,949) | $ | (113,867) | |||||
| Interest expense | (159,589) | (130,830) | (28,759) | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | (85,227) | $ | 857 | $ | (86,084) | |||||
| 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | (309,372) | $ | (508,217) | $ | 198,845 | |||||
| Interest expense | (166,050) | (229,719) | 63,669 | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | (143,322) | $ | (282,344) | $ | 139,022 |
(1) Changes in income and expense due to both rate and volume have been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. The changes in income and expense are calculated independently for each line in the table. The totals for the rate and volume columns are not the sum of the individual lines.
Summary of Our Loans Held for Investment Portfolio
Ending Loans Held for Investment Balances, net
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,544,030 | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | 3,544,112 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 17,172,833 | 695,134 | 25,014 | 17,892,981 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,716,863 | 695,216 | 25,014 | 21,437,093 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 1,815 | 222 | 69,525 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,158,977) | (4,077) | (2,281) | (1,165,335) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 | |||||||||
| -2281 | |||||||||||||||||
| % of total | 97 | % | 3 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1) Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2) Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
66 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,582,394 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | 3,582,475 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2)(3) | 16,146,943 | 737,512 | 12,238 | 16,896,693 | |||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 19,729,337 | 737,593 | 12,238 | 20,479,168 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 63,475 | 1,993 | 230 | 65,698 | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,355,844) | (4,378) | (1,501) | (1,361,723) | |||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||||
| % of total | 96 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school” category include $254 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the pandemic, or other reasons, and who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were then not required to make any payments. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(2)At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “grace, repayment and other” category include (a) $147 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a grace or deferred status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020, who received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period and, therefore, were not then required to make any payments, and (b) $639 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers were in a forbearance or repayment status and who did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(3)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 67
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands) | PrivateEducationLoans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,288,239 | $ | 81 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,288,320 | |||||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 18,901,352 | 783,225 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 20,737,468 | ||||||||||||||
| Total, gross | 23,189,591 | 783,306 | 1,049,007 | 3,884 | 25,025,788 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81,224 | 2,143 | 513 | 36 | 83,916 | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (374,300) | (1,633) | (65,877) | (102) | (441,912) | ||||||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 | |||||||||
| % of total | 93 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | — | % | 100 | % |
| As of December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 4,037,125 | $ | 163 | $ | — | $ | 4,037,288 | |||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 16,467,340 | 846,324 | 1,190,091 | 18,503,755 | |||||||||||
| Total, gross | 20,504,465 | 846,487 | 1,190,091 | 22,541,043 | |||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 68,321 | 2,379 | 297 | 70,997 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (277,943) | (977) | (62,201) | (341,121) | |||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 20,294,843 | $ | 847,889 | $ | 1,128,187 | $ | 22,270,919 | |||||||
| % of total | 91 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | 100 | % |
| As of December 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Loans Held for Investment | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total loan portfolio: | |||||||||||||||
| In-school(1) | $ | 3,740,237 | $ | 257 | $ | — | $ | 3,740,494 | |||||||
| Grace, repayment and other(2) | 13,691,930 | 927,403 | 400,280 | 15,019,613 | |||||||||||
| Total, gross | 17,432,167 | 927,660 | 400,280 | 18,760,107 | |||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 56,378 | 2,631 | — | 59,009 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (243,715) | (1,132) | (6,628) | (251,475) | |||||||||||
| Total loans held for investment portfolio, net | $ | 17,244,830 | $ | 929,159 | $ | 393,652 | $ | 18,567,641 | |||||||
| % of total | 93 | % | 5 | % | 2 | % | 100 | % |
(1)Loans for customers still attending school and who are not yet required to make payments on the loans.
(2)Includes loans in deferment or forbearance. Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
68 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Average Loans Held for Investment Balances (net of unamortized premium/discount)
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | $ | 20,968,061 | 97 | % | $ | 22,426,216 | 94 | % | $ | 22,225,473 | 92 | % | |||||||||
| FFELP Loans | 718,186 | 3 | 757,953 | 3 | 814,198 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Personal Loans | — | — | 582,552 | 3 | 1,141,503 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit Cards | 14,982 | — | 9,390 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total portfolio | $ | 21,701,229 | 100 | % | $ | 23,776,111 | 100 | % | $ | 24,181,174 | 100 | % |
Loans Held for Investment, Net — Activity
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 | |||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 3,027,440 | — | — | 3,027,440 | |||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 2,421,082 | — | 63,323 | 2,484,405 | |||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,448,522 | — | 63,323 | 5,511,845 | |||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 597,416 | 27,252 | (323) | 624,345 | |||||||||||
| Sales | (1,138,726) | — | — | (1,138,726) | |||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third-parties | (1,583,691) | (27,031) | — | (1,610,722) | |||||||||||
| Allowance | 196,868 | 300 | (780) | 196,388 | |||||||||||
| Transfer from loans held-for-sale | 25,040 | — | — | 25,040 | |||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,357,023) | (42,775) | (50,232) | (2,450,030) | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 692,954 | $ | 22,955 | $ | 20,341,283 |
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 69
Table of Contents
| Year Ended December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 | |||||||||
| Day 1 CECL adjustment to allowance | (1,060,830) | (2,852) | (79,183) | (188) | (1,143,053) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 21,835,685 | 780,964 | 904,460 | 3,630 | 23,524,739 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 2,903,258 | — | 41 | — | 2,903,299 | ||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 2,439,029 | — | — | 35,955 | 2,474,984 | ||||||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,342,287 | — | 41 | 35,955 | 5,378,283 | ||||||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 616,115 | 27,558 | (253) | (819) | 642,601 | ||||||||||||||
| Sales | (2,925,478) | — | (588,285) | — | (3,513,763) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third-parties | (1,332,802) | (21,243) | — | — | (1,354,045) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance | 79,285 | 107 | 36,526 | (1,211) | 114,707 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer to loans held-for-sale | (2,885,640) | — | — | — | (2,885,640) | ||||||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,292,484) | (52,178) | (352,489) | (26,588) | (2,723,739) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 735,208 | $ | — | $ | 10,967 | $ | 19,183,143 |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Loans Held for Investment, net | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 20,294,843 | $ | 847,889 | $ | 1,128,187 | $ | — | $ | 22,270,919 | |||||||||
| Acquisitions and originations: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | 3,784,860 | — | 480,398 | — | 4,265,258 | ||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | 1,866,914 | — | — | 5,933 | 1,872,847 | ||||||||||||||
| Total acquisitions and originations | 5,651,774 | — | 480,398 | 5,933 | 6,138,105 | ||||||||||||||
| Capitalized interest and deferred origination cost premium amortization | 722,153 | 28,258 | (323) | — | 750,088 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan consolidations to third-parties | (1,512,279) | (27,461) | — | — | (1,539,740) | ||||||||||||||
| Allowance | (96,357) | (656) | (3,676) | (102) | (100,791) | ||||||||||||||
| Repayments and other | (2,163,619) | (64,214) | (620,943) | (2,013) | (2,850,789) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 22,896,515 | $ | 783,816 | $ | 983,643 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 24,667,792 |
“Loan consolidations to third-parties” and “Repayments and other” are both significantly affected by the volume of loans in our held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status. Loans in full principal and interest repayment status in our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2021 decreased by 3 percent compared with December 31, 2020, and now total 44.7 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2021. The balance of loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status was affected in 2021 and 2020 by loan sales, and the transfer of loans from held for investment to held-for-sale in 2020.
“Loan consolidations to third-parties” for the year ended December 31, 2021 total 18.1 percent of our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status at December 31, 2021, or 8.1 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2021, compared with the year-ago period of 14.7 percent of our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio in full principal and interest repayment status, or 7.2 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio, respectively. The increase in consolidations is attributable to consolidators having ready access to funding in spite of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the economy. Historical experience has shown that loan consolidation activity is heightened in the period when the loan initially enters full principal and interest repayment status and then subsides over time.
70 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
The “Repayments and other” category includes all scheduled repayments and returns, as well as voluntary prepayments, made on loans in repayment (including loans in full principal and interest repayment status) and also includes charge-offs. Consequently, this category can be significantly affected by the volume of loans in repayment.
Historically, voluntary prepayments and loan consolidations decrease when unemployment increases as borrowers and lenders look to conserve liquidity. While we saw a decrease in voluntary prepayments in the second quarter of 2020 (as compared to the first quarter of 2020) as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the decrease was not as significant as we expected based upon historical experience during higher unemployment periods and has increased to closer to pre-pandemic levels in 2021.
Private Education Loan Originations
The following table summarizes our Private Education Loan originations. Originations represent loans that were funded or acquired during the period presented.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | % | 2020 | % | 2019 | % | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Option - interest only(1) | $ | 1,123,624 | 21 | % | $ | 1,222,148 | 23 | % | $ | 1,234,246 | 22 | % | |||||||||
| Smart Option - fixed pay(1) | 1,680,947 | 31 | 1,498,578 | 28 | 1,560,496 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - deferred(1) | 1,994,483 | 36 | 1,912,978 | 36 | 2,082,147 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
| Smart Option - principal and interest | 11,102 | — | 9,559 | — | 9,806 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Graduate Loan | 525,050 | 10 | 579,451 | 11 | 622,181 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Parent Loan(2) | 87,325 | 2 | 98,023 | 2 | 115,910 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan originations | $ | 5,422,531 | 100 | % | $ | 5,320,737 | 100 | % | $ | 5,624,786 | 100 | % | |||||||||
| Percentage of loans with a cosigner | 86.2 | % | 86.0 | % | 86.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Average FICO at approval(3) | 750 | 749 | 746 |
(1) Interest only, fixed pay and deferred describe the payment option while in school or in grace period. See Item 1. “Business - Our Business - Private Education Loans” for further discussion.
(2) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date will continue to be processed, with final disbursements under those loans to occur until mid–December 2022.
(3) Represents the higher credit score of the cosigner or the borrower.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 71
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses
Allowance for Credit Losses Activity
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | — | — | — | 1,060,830 | 2,852 | 79,183 | 188 | 1,143,053 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,355,844 | 4,378 | 1,501 | 1,361,723 | 1,435,130 | 4,485 | 145,060 | 290 | 1,584,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 301,655 | — | — | 301,655 | 320,808 | — | — | — | 320,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (229,591) | (321) | (356) | (230,268) | (205,326) | (519) | (39,079) | (119) | (245,043) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sales | — | — | — | — | — | — | (108,534) | — | (108,534) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 29,494 | — | 12 | 29,506 | 24,021 | — | 4,984 | 2 | 29,007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | (233,852) | 20 | 1,124 | (232,708) | 148,673 | 412 | 40,485 | 1,328 | 190,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (66,460) | — | — | (66,460) | (161,793) | — | (42,916) | — | (204,709) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred to held-for-sale | 1,887 | — | — | 1,887 | (205,669) | — | — | — | (205,669) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total provisions for credit losses(2) | (298,425) | 20 | 1,124 | (297,281) | (218,789) | 412 | (2,431) | 1,328 | (219,480) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,281 | $ | 1,165,335 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 4,378 | $ | — | $ | 1,501 | $ | 1,361,723 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Troubled debt restructurings(3) | $ | 1,057,665 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,057,665 | $ | 1,274,590 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,274,590 |
(1) See Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, below is a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses reported in the consolidated statements of income. When a new loan commitment is made, we record the CECL allowance as a liability for unfunded commitments by recording a provision for credit losses. When the loan is funded, we transfer that liability to the allowance for credit losses.
| Consolidated Statements of Income Provisions for Credit Losses Reconciliation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | $ | (298,425) | $ | (218,789) | |||
| Provisions for unfunded loan commitments | 264,324 | 312,613 | |||||
| Total Private Education Loan provisions for credit losses | (34,101) | 93,824 | |||||
| Other impacts to the provisions for credit losses: | |||||||
| Personal Loans | — | (2,431) | |||||
| FFELP Loans | 20 | 412 | |||||
| Credit Cards | 1,124 | 1,328 | |||||
| Total | 1,144 | (691) | |||||
| Provisions for credit losses reported in consolidated statements of income | $ | (32,957) | $ | 93,133 |
(3) Represents the unpaid principal balance of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings.
72 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
| 2019 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Credit Cards | Total Portfolio | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 277,943 | $ | 977 | $ | 62,201 | $ | — | $ | 341,121 | $ | 243,715 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 6,628 | $ | 251,475 | |||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (208,978) | (822) | (74,313) | (1) | (284,114) | (154,701) | (1,135) | (19,690) | (175,526) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(1) | — | — | — | — | — | (1,216) | — | — | (1,216) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 25,765 | — | 5,206 | — | 30,971 | 20,858 | — | 946 | 21,804 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | 279,570 | 1,478 | 72,783 | 103 | 353,934 | 169,287 | 980 | 74,317 | 244,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,633 | $ | 65,877 | $ | 102 | $ | 441,912 | $ | 277,943 | $ | 977 | $ | 62,201 | $ | 341,121 | |||||||||||||||||
| Troubled debt restructurings(2) | $ | 1,581,966 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,581,966 | $ | 1,257,856 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,257,856 |
| 2017 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Private Education Loans | FFELP Loans | Personal Loans | Total Portfolio | |||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 182,472 | $ | 2,171 | $ | 58 | $ | 184,701 | |||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (130,063) | (954) | (579) | (131,596) | |||||||||||
| Loan sales(1) | (4,871) | — | — | (4,871) | |||||||||||
| Plus: | |||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 17,635 | — | 11 | 17,646 | |||||||||||
| Provisions for loan losses | 178,542 | (85) | 7,138 | 185,595 | |||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 243,715 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 6,628 | $ | 251,475 | |||||||
| Troubled debt restructurings(2) | $ | 990,351 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 990,351 |
(1) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(2) Represents the unpaid principal balance of loans classified as troubled debt restructurings.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 73
Table of Contents
Private Education Loan Allowance for Credit Losses
In establishing the allowance for Private Education Loan losses as of December 31, 2021, we considered several factors with respect to our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio, in particular, credit quality and delinquency, forbearance, and charge-off trends.
Private Education Loans held for investment in full principal and interest repayment status were 45 percent of our total Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio at December 31, 2021, compared with 49 percent at December 31, 2020.
For a more detailed discussion of our policy for determining the collectability of Private Education Loans and maintaining our allowance for Private Education Loans, see “—Allowance for Credit Losses” and Note 5, “Loans Held for Investment — Certain Collection Tools - Private Education Loans” in this Form 10-K.
74 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
The table below presents our Private Education Loans held for investment portfolio delinquency trends. Loans in repayment include loans making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period (but, for purposes of the following table, do not include those loans while they are in forbearance). For the periods presented below, we updated our delinquency bucket periods from what we reported in our 2020 Form 10-K to conform with the delinquency bucket periods defined by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”).
| Private Education Loans Held for Investment | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Balance | % | Balance | % | Balance | % | ||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment(1)(2) | $ | 4,904,414 | $ | 4,779,040 | $ | 5,687,405 | ||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance(1)(3) | 301,237 | 645,476 | 714,516 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment and percentage of each status(1): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans current | 15,005,773 | 96.7 | % | 13,898,948 | 97.2 | % | 16,315,651 | 97.2 | % | |||||||||
| Loans delinquent 30-59 days(4) | 308,559 | 2.0 | 205,528 | 1.4 | 288,051 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
| Loans delinquent 60-89 days(4) | 116,947 | 0.8 | 119,643 | 0.8 | 121,302 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 days or greater past due(4) | 79,933 | 0.5 | 80,702 | 0.6 | 62,666 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans in repayment | 15,511,212 | 100.0 | % | 14,304,821 | 100.0 | % | 16,787,670 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, gross | 20,716,863 | 19,729,337 | 23,189,591 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67,488 | 63,475 | 81,224 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans | 20,784,351 | 19,792,812 | 23,270,815 | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans allowance for losses | (1,158,977) | (1,355,844) | (374,300) | |||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,625,374 | $ | 18,436,968 | $ | 22,896,515 | ||||||||||||
| Percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 74.9 % | 72.5 | % | 72.4 | % | |||||||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment | 3.3 % | 2.8 | % | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.9 % | 4.3 | % | 4.1 | % |
(1)At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in-school/grace/deferment” category above include $401 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 because of the pandemic, or for other reasons, and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in forbearance” category above include $30 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. At December 31, 2020, the loans in the “in repayment” category above include $609 million of Private Education Loans whose borrowers did not return to school in the fall of 2020 and who then received an extension of time from us to re-enroll before beginning their grace period. This program ended in September 2021. For further discussion, see “— Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Financial Results.”
(2)Deferment includes customers who have returned to school or are engaged in other permitted educational activities and are not yet required to make payments on the loans (e.g., residency periods for medical students or a grace period for bar exam preparation).
(3)Loans for customers who have requested extension of grace period generally during employment transition or who have temporarily ceased making full payments due to hardship or other factors, consistent with established loan program servicing policies and procedures.
(4)The period of delinquency is based on the number of days scheduled payments are contractually past due.
Delinquencies as a percentage of Private Education Loans (held for investment) in repayment increased to 3.3 percent at December 31, 2021 from 2.8 percent at December 31, 2020, and the forbearance rate decreased to
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 75
Table of Contents
1.9 percent at December 31, 2021 from 4.3 percent at December 31, 2020. The increase in delinquencies and the reduction in forbearance at December 31, 2021, compared with the prior year, were due to a combination of factors, including our new credit administration practices changes that imposed additional requirements for those borrowers requesting forbearance, and the cessation of the use of disaster forbearance related to COVID-19. We stopped providing COVID-19 related disaster forbearances in June 2021. See additional discussion in “ — Impact of COVID-19 on Sallie Mae — Customers and Credit Performance” and “— Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool.”
The following table summarizes changes in the allowance for Private Education Loan (held for investment) losses.
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beginning balance | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 277,943 | $ | 243,715 | $ | 182,472 | |||||||||
| Day 1 adjustment for adoption of CECL | — | 1,060,830 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at January 1 | 1,355,844 | 1,435,130 | 277,943 | 243,715 | 182,472 | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer from unfunded commitment liability(1) | 301,655 | 320,808 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Provision, current period | (233,852) | 148,673 | 279,570 | 169,287 | 178,542 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sale reduction to provision | (66,460) | (161,793) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Loans transferred to held-for-sale | 1,887 | (205,669) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total provision | (298,425) | (218,789) | 279,570 | 169,287 | 178,542 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs: | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (229,591) | (205,326) | (208,978) | (154,701) | (130,063) | ||||||||||||||
| Recoveries | 29,494 | 24,021 | 25,765 | 20,858 | 17,635 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (200,097) | (181,305) | (183,213) | (133,843) | (112,428) | ||||||||||||||
| Loan sales(2) | — | — | — | (1,216) | (4,871) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending Balance | $ | 1,158,977 | $ | 1,355,844 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 277,943 | $ | 243,715 | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending total loan balance | 5.59 | % | 6.87 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.40 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance as a percentage of the ending loans in repayment(3) | 7.47 | % | 9.48 | % | 2.23 | % | 1.90 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance coverage of net charge-offs | 5.79 | 7.48 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 2.17 | ||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans in repayment(3) | 1.33 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.01 | % | 1.03 | % | |||||||||
| Delinquencies as a percentage of ending loans in repayment(3) | 3.26 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.81 | % | 2.57 | % | 2.42 | % | |||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of ending loans in repayment and forbearance(3) | 1.91 | % | 4.32 | % | 4.08 | % | 3.79 | % | 3.70 | % | |||||||||
| Ending total loans, gross | $ | 20,716,863 | $ | 19,729,337 | $ | 23,189,591 | $ | 20,504,465 | $ | 17,432,167 | |||||||||
| Average loans in repayment(3) | $ | 15,019,869 | $ | 15,518,851 | $ | 15,605,927 | $ | 13,303,801 | $ | 10,881,058 | |||||||||
| Ending loans in repayment(3) | $ | 15,511,212 | $ | 14,304,821 | $ | 16,787,670 | $ | 14,666,856 | $ | 12,206,033 |
(1) See Note 8, “Unfunded Loan Commitments,” in this Form 10-K for a summary of the activity in the allowance for and balance of unfunded loan commitments, respectively.
(2) Represents fair value adjustments on loans sold.
(3) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most significant of these metrics considered are the allowance coverage of net charge-offs ratio; the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans and of ending loans in repayment; and delinquency and forbearance percentages.
76 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Use of Forbearance and Rate Modifications as a Private Education Loan Collection Tool
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations and achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loan. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary interest rate reduction, a temporary interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. Forbearance is granted prospectively for borrowers who are current in their payments and may be granted retroactively for certain delinquent borrowers.
Forbearance allows a borrower to not make scheduled payments for a specified period of time. Using forbearance extends the original term of the loan by the term of forbearance taken. Forbearance does not grant any reduction in the total principal or interest repayment obligation. While a loan is in forbearance status, interest continues to accrue and is capitalized (added to principal) at the end of the forbearance. Interest will not capitalize at the end of certain types of forbearance, such as disaster forbearance, however.
We grant forbearance through our servicing centers to borrowers who are current in their payments and through our collections centers to certain borrowers who are delinquent. Our forbearance policies and practices vary depending upon whether a borrower is current or delinquent at the time forbearance is requested, generally with stricter payment requirements for delinquent borrowers. We view the population of borrowers that use forbearance positively because the borrowers are either proactively reaching out to us to obtain assistance in managing their obligations or are working with our collections center to bring their loans current.
Forbearance may be granted through our servicing centers to customers who are exiting their grace period, and to other customers who are current in their payments, to provide temporary payment relief. In these circumstances, a customer’s loan is placed into a forbearance status in limited monthly increments and is reflected in the forbearance status at month-end during this time. At the end of the forbearance period, the customer will enter repayment status as current and is expected to begin making scheduled monthly payments.
Forbearance may also be granted through our collections centers to customers who are delinquent in their payments. If specific payment requirements are met, the forbearance can cure the delinquency and the customer is returned to a current repayment status. Forbearance as a collection tool is used most effectively when applying historical experience and our judgment to a customer’s unique situation. We leverage updated customer information and other decision support tools to best determine who will be granted forbearance based on our expectations as to a customer’s ability and willingness to repay their obligation. This strategy is aimed at assisting customers while mitigating the risks of delinquency and default as well as encouraging resolution of delinquent loans. In most instances, we require one payment, as an indication of a customer’s willingness and ability to repay, before granting forbearance to delinquent borrowers.
Historically, we have utilized disaster forbearance to assist borrowers affected by material events, including hurricanes, wildfires, floods, and the COVID-19 pandemic. We typically grant disaster forbearance to affected borrowers in increments of up to three months at a time, but the disaster forbearance granted generally does not apply toward the 12-month forbearance limit described below.
During COVID-19, our customers experienced higher levels of financial hardship, which initially led to higher levels of forbearance. We expect for some customers financial hardship may lead to higher levels of delinquencies and defaults in the future, as borrowers who had received disaster forbearance from us re-enter repayment status. Beginning in June 2021, we stopped granting disaster forbearance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As borrowers in the various delinquency buckets exit disaster forbearance and begin to enter repayment, we expect elevated levels of losses on this segment of our customers. We expect that, left unabated, this deterioration in delinquency and default rates may persist until economic conditions return to pre-pandemic levels.
Management continually monitors our credit administration practices and may periodically modify these practices based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback. In light of these considerations, we previously announced certain planned changes to our credit administration practices, including the imposition of limits on the number of forbearance months granted consecutively and the number of times certain extended or reduced repayment alternatives may be granted. Prior to implementation of the previously announced changes, borrowers could receive consecutive forbearance grants without intervening payments of principal and interest, if they satisfied all eligibility requirements.
We commenced testing in October 2019 for some of the previously announced planned changes on a very small percentage of our total portfolio and in March 2020 we began to expand the number of borrowers who would be subject to
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 77
Table of Contents
the new credit administration practices. However, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in April 2020 we postponed our efforts so that we could be more flexible in dealing with our customers’ financial hardship. In October 2020, we re-initiated a multi-phased deployment of certain previously announced credit administration practices changes. In October 2021, we announced additional planned changes to our credit administration practices, which we implemented in December 2021.
Currently, we generally grant forbearance in increments of one to two months at a time, for up to 12 months over the life of the loan, although disaster forbearance and certain assistance we grant to borrowers who are still in school do not apply toward the 12-month limit. We also currently require 12 months of positive payment performance by a borrower (meaning the borrower must make payment in a cumulative amount equivalent to 12 monthly required payments under the loan) between successive grants of forbearance and between forbearance grants and certain other repayment alternatives. This required period of positive payment performance does not apply, however, to forbearances granted during the first six months following a borrower’s grace period and is not required for a borrower to receive a contractual interest rate reduction. In addition, we currently limit the participation of delinquent borrowers in certain short-term extended or interest-only repayment alternatives to once in 12 months and twice in five years. We also now count the number of months a borrower receives a short-term extended repayment alternative toward the 12-month forbearance limit described above.
We also offer rate and term modifications to customers experiencing more severe hardship. Currently, we temporarily reduce the contractual interest rate on a loan to 4.0 percent for a two-year period and, in the vast majority of cases, permanently extend the final maturity date of the loan. As part of demonstrating the ability and willingness to pay, the customer must make three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment to qualify for the program. The combination of the rate reduction and maturity extension helps reduce the monthly payment due from the borrower and increases the likelihood the borrower will remain current during the interest rate modification period as well as when the loan returns to its original contractual interest rate. We currently limit the granting of a permanent extension of the final maturity date of the loan under our loan modification program to one time over the life of the loan. We also currently permit two consecutive rate reductions to 4.0 percent so long as the borrower qualifies and makes three consecutive monthly payments at the reduced payment in connection with each rate reduction. We currently require 12 months of positive payment performance after the interest rate adjusts upward to its previous rate (at the end of the rate reduction periods) before the borrower may be eligible for a forbearance or certain other repayment alternatives, however. We also now limit the number of interest rate reductions to twice over the life of the loan. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, 7.2 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively, of our loans then currently in full principal and interest repayment status were subject to interest rate reductions made under our rate modification program.
Although we are not regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, we have reviewed their student lending guidelines when considering and assessing our practices in certain areas. Now that we have implemented the previously announced credit administration practices changes, we believe our current collection and servicing practices generally align with the guidelines for student lending published by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
While there are limitations to our estimate of the future impact of the various credit administration practices changes we have implemented, absent the effect of any mitigating measures, we expect that the credit administration practices described above, including the changes we implemented in 2021, will accelerate periodic defaults and could increase periodic defaults in our Private Education Loan held for investment portfolio by approximately 10.1 percent to 16.6 percent. Among the measures that we have implemented and may modify further and expect may partly offset or moderate any acceleration of or increase in defaults will be greater focus on the risk assessment process to ensure borrowers are mapped to the appropriate program, better utilization of existing loss mitigation programs (e.g., GRP and rate modifications), and the use of a program offering short-term payment reductions (permitting interest-only payments for up to six months) for certain early-stage delinquencies.
The full impact of these changes to our collections practices described above will only be realized over the long term. When we calculated the allowance for credit losses under CECL at December 31, 2021, our loan loss reserves were significantly impacted because we expect the life of loan defaults on our overall Private Education Loan portfolio to increase, in part as a result of the changes to our credit administration practices described above. We expect to learn more about how our borrowers are reacting to these changes to credit administration practices and, as we analyze such reactions, we will continue to refine our estimates of the impact of those changes on our allowance for credit losses.
As discussed above, we will continue to monitor our credit administration practices and may modify them further from time to time based upon performance, industry conventions, and/or regulatory feedback.
The tables below show the composition and status of the Private Education Loan portfolio held for investment aged by number of months in active repayment status (months for which a scheduled monthly payment was due). Active repayment status includes loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period. Our experience shows that the
78 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
percentage of loans in forbearance status generally decreases the longer the loans have been in active repayment status. At December 31, 2021, for Private Education Loans (held for investment) that have been in active repayment status for fewer than 25 months, loans in forbearance status as a percentage of loans in repayment and forbearance were 2.7 percent. Approximately 74 percent of our Private Education Loans (held for investment) in forbearance status have been in active repayment status fewer than 25 months. For the periods presented below, we updated our delinquency bucket periods from what we reported in our 2020 Form 10-K to conform with the delinquency bucket periods defined by the FFIEC.
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Monthly Scheduled Payments Due | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,904 | $ | 4,904 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 180 | 44 | 30 | 21 | 26 | — | 301 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,234 | 3,405 | 2,424 | 1,671 | 3,272 | — | 15,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 125 | 54 | 41 | 29 | 60 | — | 309 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 38 | 25 | 17 | 13 | 24 | — | 117 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 26 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 15 | — | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,603 | $ | 3,546 | $ | 2,524 | $ | 1,743 | $ | 3,397 | $ | 4,904 | 20,717 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,159) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 19,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 1.14 | % | 0.28 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.16 | % | — | % | 1.91 | % |
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 79
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Monthly Scheduled Payments Due | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,779 | $ | 4,779 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 353 | 91 | 71 | 54 | 76 | — | 645 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 3,987 | 3,181 | 2,215 | 1,624 | 2,892 | — | 13,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 76 | 39 | 30 | 22 | 38 | — | 205 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 49 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 21 | — | 120 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 33 | 15 | 12 | 8 | 13 | — | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 4,498 | $ | 3,347 | $ | 2,345 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 4,779 | 19,729 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (1,356) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 18,437 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 2.36 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.51 | % | — | % | 4.32 | % |
| As of December 31, 2019 (dollars in millions) | Private Education Loans Held for Investment Monthly Scheduled Payments Due | Not Yet in Repayment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 12 | 13 to 24 | 25 to 36 | 37 to 48 | More than 48 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in-school/grace/deferment | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,687 | $ | 5,687 | |||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance | 402 | 97 | 79 | 65 | 72 | — | 715 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - current | 4,769 | 3,817 | 2,752 | 2,093 | 2,885 | — | 16,316 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 30-59 days | 108 | 53 | 45 | 35 | 47 | — | 288 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - delinquent 60-89 days | 48 | 24 | 18 | 14 | 17 | — | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in repayment - 90 days or greater past due | 25 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 9 | — | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 5,352 | $ | 4,004 | $ | 2,903 | $ | 2,214 | $ | 3,030 | $ | 5,687 | 23,190 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred origination costs and unamortized premium/(discount) | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (374) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loans, net | $ | 22,897 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans in forbearance as a percentage of total Private Education Loans in repayment and forbearance | 2.30 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.37 | % | 0.41 | % | — | % | 4.08 | % |
80 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Private Education Loans Held for Investment Types
The following table provides information regarding the loans in repayment balance and total loan balance by Private Education Loan held for investment product type for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | Career Training | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 221,637 | $ | 301,422 | $ | 14,097,819 | $ | 9,354 | $ | 880,980 | $ | 15,511,212 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 318,055 | $ | 302,764 | $ | 18,789,771 | $ | 9,402 | $ | 1,296,871 | $ | 20,716,863 |
| As of December 31, 2020 (dollars in thousands) | Signature and Other | Parent Loan(1) | Smart Option | Career Training | Graduate Loan | Total | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ in repayment(2) | $ | 215,439 | $ | 285,323 | $ | 13,130,229 | $ | 12,250 | $ | 661,580 | $ | 14,304,821 | |||||||||||
| $ in total | $ | 330,979 | $ | 289,572 | $ | 18,067,491 | $ | 12,797 | $ | 1,028,498 | $ | 19,729,337 |
(1) In December 2021, we discontinued offering our Parent Loan product. Applications for those loans received before the offering termination date will continue to be processed, with final disbursements under those loans to occur until mid–December 2022.
(2) Loans in repayment include loans on which borrowers are making interest only or fixed payments, as well as loans that have entered full principal and interest repayment status after any applicable grace period.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 81
Table of Contents
Accrued Interest Receivable
The following table provides information regarding accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loans held for investment. The table also discloses the amount of accrued interest on loans 90 days and greater past due as compared to our allowance for uncollectible interest. The majority of the total accrued interest receivable represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accruing on that loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized against the balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period upon separation from school. The allowance for uncollectible interest exceeds the amount of accrued interest on our 90 days past due portfolio for all periods presented.
| Private Education Loans | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accrued Interest Receivable | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Total Interest Receivable | 90 Days and Greater Past Due | Allowance for Uncollectible Interest | ||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,187,123 | $ | 3,635 | $ | 4,937 | |||||
| December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,168,895 | $ | 4,354 | $ | 4,467 | |||||
| December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,366,158 | $ | 2,390 | $ | 5,309 | |||||
| December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,168,823 | $ | 1,920 | $ | 6,322 | |||||
| December 31, 2017 | $ | 951,138 | $ | 1,372 | $ | 4,664 |
82 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Funding and Liquidity Risk Management
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to fund our businesses throughout market cycles, including during periods of financial stress, our ongoing ability to fund originations of Private Education Loans and other loans, and our ability to meet any outflows of our Bank deposits. To achieve these objectives, we analyze and monitor our liquidity needs, maintain excess liquidity and access to diverse funding sources, such as deposits at the Bank, issuance of secured debt primarily through asset-backed securitizations, and other financing facilities, and loan sales. It is our policy to manage operations so liquidity needs are fully satisfied through normal operations to avoid unplanned loan sales under all but the most dire emergency conditions. Our liquidity management is governed by policies approved by our Board of Directors. Oversight of these policies is performed in the Asset and Liability Committee, a management-level committee.
These policies take into account the volatility of cash flow forecasts, expected asset and liability maturities, anticipated loan demand, and a variety of other factors to establish minimum liquidity guidelines.
Key risks associated with our liquidity relate to our ability to access the capital markets and the markets for bank deposits at reasonable rates. This ability may be affected by our performance, competitive pressures, the macroeconomic environment, and the impact they have on the availability of funding sources in the marketplace. We target maintaining sufficient on-balance sheet and contingent sources of liquidity to enable us to meet all contractual and contingent obligations under various stress scenarios, including severe macroeconomic stresses as well as specific stresses that test the resiliency of our balance sheet. As the Bank has grown, we have improved our liquidity stress testing practices to align more closely with the industry, which resulted in our adopting increased liquidity requirements. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019, we began to increase our liquidity levels by increasing cash and marketable investments held as part of our ongoing efforts to enhance our ability to maintain a strong risk management position. By early 2020 and continuing through 2021, we held a significant liquidity buffer of cash and securities, which we expect to maintain through 2022. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, our liquidity levels will likely vary from quarter to quarter.
Sources of Liquidity and Available Capacity
Ending Balances
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 2,588 | $ | 1,117 | $ | 29,620 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,332,015 | 4,454,175 | 5,534,257 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 2,325,711 | 1,927,726 | 487,669 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,660,314 | $ | 6,383,018 | $ | 6,051,546 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 83
Table of Contents
Average Balances
| Years Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources of primary liquidity: | |||||||||||
| Unrestricted cash and liquid investments: | |||||||||||
| Holding Company and other non-bank subsidiaries | $ | 3,739 | $ | 20,307 | $ | 38,705 | |||||
| Sallie Mae Bank(1) | 4,934,506 | 5,202,302 | 3,455,216 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale investments | 1,953,154 | 1,495,155 | 323,930 | ||||||||
| Total unrestricted cash and liquid investments | $ | 6,891,399 | $ | 6,717,764 | $ | 3,817,851 |
(1) This amount will be used primarily to originate Private Education Loans at the Bank.
Deposits
The following table summarizes total deposits.
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 20,826,692 | $ | 22,664,899 | ||||
| Deposits - non-interest bearing | 1,432 | 1,140 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 20,828,124 | $ | 22,666,039 |
Our total deposits of $20.8 billion were comprised of $10.1 billion in brokered deposits and $10.7 billion in retail and other deposits at December 31, 2021, compared with total deposits of $22.7 billion, which were comprised of $11.9 billion in brokered deposits and $10.8 billion in retail and other deposits, at December 31, 2020.
Interest bearing deposits as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 consisted of retail and brokered non-maturity savings deposits, retail and brokered non-maturity money market deposit accounts (“MMDAs”) and retail and brokered CDs. Interest bearing deposits include deposits from Educational 529 and Health Savings plans that diversify our funding sources and add deposits we consider to be core. These and other large omnibus accounts, aggregating the deposits of many individual depositors, represented $7.3 billion of our deposit total as of December 31, 2021, compared with $7.1 billion at December 31, 2020.
Some of our deposit products are serviced by third-party providers. Placement fees associated with the brokered CDs are amortized into interest expense using the effective interest rate method. We recognized placement fee expense of $16 million, $19 million, and $18 million in the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Fees paid to third-party brokers related to brokered CDs were $13 million, $5 million, and $28 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively.
84 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Interest bearing deposits at December 31, 2021 and 2020 are summarized as follows:
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | Amount | Year-End Weighted Average Stated Rate(1) | ||||||||||
| Money market | $ | 10,473,569 | 0.69 | % | $ | 10,159,657 | 0.83 | % | ||||||
| Savings | 959,122 | 0.43 | 907,976 | 0.55 | ||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 9,394,001 | 1.20 | 11,597,266 | 1.34 | ||||||||||
| Deposits - interest bearing | $ | 20,826,692 | $ | 22,664,899 |
(1) Includes the effect of interest rate swaps in effective hedge relationships.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were $743 million and $571 million, respectively, of deposits exceeding FDIC insurance limits. Accrued interest on deposits was $35 million and $50 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Counterparty Exposure
Counterparty exposure related to financial instruments arises from the risk that a lending, investment, or derivative counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to us.
Excess cash is generally invested with the FRB on an overnight basis or in the FRB’s Term Deposit Facility, minimizing counterparty exposure on cash balances.
Our investment portfolio is primarily comprised of a small portfolio of mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies and government-sponsored enterprises that are purchased to meet CRA targets. Additionally, our investing activity is governed by Board-approved limits on the amount that is allowed to be invested with any one issuer based on the credit rating of the issuer, further minimizing our counterparty exposure. Counterparty credit risk is considered when valuing investments and considering impairment.
Related to derivative transactions, protection against counterparty risk is generally provided by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Credit Support Annexes (“CSAs”), or clearinghouses for over-the-counter derivatives. CSAs require a counterparty to post collateral if a potential default would expose the other party to a loss. All derivative contracts entered into by the Bank are covered under CSAs or clearinghouse agreements and require collateral to be exchanged based on the net fair value of derivatives with each counterparty. Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position, less any collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with the counterparty.
Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act requires all standardized derivatives, including most interest rate swaps, to be submitted for clearing to central counterparties to reduce counterparty risk. Two of the central counterparties we use are the CME and the LCH. All variation margin payments on derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH are accounted for as legal settlement. As of December 31, 2021, $5.2 billion notional of our derivative contracts were cleared on the CME and $0.3 billion were cleared on the LCH. The derivative contracts cleared through the CME and LCH represent 94.4 percent and 5.6 percent, respectively, of our total notional derivative contracts of $5.5 billion at December 31, 2021.
For derivatives cleared through the CME and LCH, the net gain (loss) position includes the variation margin amounts as settlement of the derivative and not collateral against the fair value of the derivative. The amount of variation margin included as settlement as of December 31, 2021 was $(72) million and $8 million for the CME and LCH, respectively. Changes in fair value for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are presented as realized gains (losses).
Our exposure is limited to the value of the derivative contracts in a gain position less any collateral held and plus any collateral posted. When there is a net negative exposure, we consider our exposure to the counterparty to be zero. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had a net positive exposure (derivative gain positions to us, less collateral held by us and plus collateral posted with counterparties) related to derivatives of $9 million and $43 million, respectively.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 85
Table of Contents
We have liquidity exposure related to collateral movements between us and our derivative counterparties. Movements in the value of the derivatives, which are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, may require us to return cash collateral held or may require us to access primary liquidity to post collateral to counterparties.
The table below highlights exposure related to our derivative counterparties as of December 31, 2021.
| As of December 31, 2021 (dollars in thousands) | SLM Corporation and Sallie Mae Bank Contracts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total exposure, net of collateral | $ | 9,408 | |
| Exposure to counterparties with credit ratings, net of collateral | $ | 9,408 | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P AA- or Moody’s Aa3 | — | % | |
| Percent of exposure to counterparties with credit ratings below S&P A- or Moody’s A3 | — | % |
Regulatory Capital
The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking authorities. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Under U.S. Basel III and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital standards that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and its classification under the prompt corrective action framework are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components of capital, risk weightings, and other factors. The following capital amounts and ratios are based upon the Bank’s average assets and risk-weighted assets, as indicated.
| Actual | U.S. Basel IIIMinimum Requirements Plus Buffer(1)(2) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||
| As of December 31, 2021: | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 14.1 | % | $ | 1,643,132 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 14.1 | % | $ | 1,995,232 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,410,183 | 14.5 | % | $ | 2,464,699 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,314,657 | 11.1 | % | $ | 1,198,808 | 4.0 | % | |||||
| As of December 31, 2020: | |||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,579,005 | 14.0 | % | $ | 1,794,780 | 7.0 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,579,005 | 14.0 | % | $ | 2,179,375 | 8.5 | % | |||||
| Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) | $ | 3,849,820 | 15.0 | % | $ | 2,692,169 | 10.5 | % | |||||
| Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) | $ | 3,579,005 | 11.3 | % | $ | 1,264,424 | 4.0 | % |
(1) Reflects the U.S. Basel III minimum required ratio plus the applicable capital conservation buffer.
(2) The Bank’s regulatory capital ratios also exceeded all applicable standards for the Bank to qualify as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework.
86 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Capital Management
The Bank intends to maintain at all times regulatory capital levels that meet both the minimum levels required under U.S. Basel III (including applicable buffers) and the levels necessary to be considered “well capitalized” under the FDIC’s prompt corrective action framework, in order to support asset growth and operating needs, address unexpected credit risks, and protect the interests of depositors and the DIF administered by the FDIC. The Bank’s Capital Policy requires management to monitor these capital standards and the Bank’s compliance with them. The Board of Directors and management periodically evaluate the quality of assets, the stability of earnings, and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for the Bank. The Company is a source of strength for the Bank and will provide additional capital if necessary.
We believe that current and projected capital levels are appropriate for 2022. As of December 31, 2021, the Bank’s risk-based and leverage capital ratios exceed the required minimum ratios and the applicable buffers under the fully phased-in U.S. Basel III standards as well as the “well capitalized” standards under the prompt corrective action framework.
Under U.S. Basel III, the Bank is required to maintain the following minimum regulatory capital ratios: a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.5 percent, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0 percent, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0 percent. In addition, the Bank is subject to a Common Equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5 percent. Failure to maintain the buffer will result in restrictions on the Bank’s ability to make capital distributions, including the payment of dividends, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers.
As of December 31, 2021, the Bank had a Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 14.1 percent, a Total risk-based capital ratio of 14.5 percent and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 11.1 percent, which exceed the capital levels required under U.S. Basel III and the “well capitalized” standard.
Dividends
The Bank’s ability to pay dividends is subject to the laws of Utah and the regulations of the FDIC. Generally, under Utah’s industrial bank laws and regulations as well as FDIC regulations, the Bank may pay dividends to the Company from its net profits without regulatory approval if, following the payment of the dividend, the Bank’s capital and surplus would not be impaired. The Bank declared $1.4 billion, $579 million, and $254 million in dividends to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, with the proceeds primarily used to fund the 2021, 2020, and 2019 Share Repurchase Programs, respectively, and stock dividends. See Part I, Item 1. “Business — Supervision and Regulation — Regulation of Sallie Mae Bank — Dividends and Share Repurchase Programs,” regarding the expectation that the Bank will pay dividends to the Company as may be necessary to enable the Company to pay any declared dividends on its Series B Preferred Stock and common stock and to consummate any common share repurchases by the Company under the share repurchase programs. See also Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors — General Risks” for possible limitations on the payments of our dividends.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 87
Table of Contents
Borrowings
Outstanding borrowings consist of unsecured debt and secured borrowings issued through our term ABS program and our Secured Borrowing Facility. The issuing entities for those secured borrowings are variable interest entities and are consolidated for accounting purposes. The following table summarizes our secured borrowings at December 31, 2021 and 2020. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, “Borrowings.”
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, (dollars in thousands) | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | Short-Term | Long-Term | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt (fixed-rate) | $ | — | $ | 986,138 | $ | 986,138 | $ | — | $ | 692,879 | $ | 692,879 | |||||||||||
| Total unsecured borrowings | — | 986,138 | 986,138 | — | 692,879 | 692,879 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Private Education Loan term securitizations: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed-rate | — | 3,897,996 | 3,897,996 | — | 3,261,233 | 3,261,233 | |||||||||||||||||
| Variable-rate | — | 1,046,856 | 1,046,856 | — | 1,235,105 | 1,235,105 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Private Education Loan term securitizations | — | 4,944,852 | 4,944,852 | — | 4,496,338 | 4,496,338 | |||||||||||||||||
| Secured Borrowing Facility | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total secured borrowings | — | 4,944,852 | 4,944,852 | — | 4,496,338 | 4,496,338 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | — | $ | 5,930,990 | $ | 5,930,990 | $ | — | $ | 5,189,217 | $ | 5,189,217 |
Short-term borrowings
On July 30, 2021, we amended our Secured Borrowing Facility to extend the maturity of the facility. The amount that can be borrowed under the facility is $2 billion. We hold 100 percent of the residual interest in the Secured Borrowing Facility trust. Under the Secured Borrowing Facility, we incur financing costs on unused borrowing capacity and on outstanding advances. The amended Secured Borrowing Facility extended the revolving period, during which we may borrow, repay. and reborrow funds, until May 17, 2022. The scheduled amortization period, during which amounts outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility must be repaid, ends on May 17, 2023 (or earlier, if certain material adverse events occur). At December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, there were no secured borrowings outstanding under the Secured Borrowing Facility. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 11, “Borrowings.”
Short-term borrowings have a remaining term to maturity of one year or less. The Secured Borrowing Facility’s contractual maturity is two years from the date of inception or renewal (one-year revolving period plus a one-year amortization period); however, we classify advances under our Secured Borrowing Facility as short-term borrowings because it is our intention to repay those advances within one year.
Long-term borrowings
Unsecured Debt
On November 15, 2021, we redeemed $200 million, 5.125 percent Senior Notes due April 5, 2022. The Senior Notes were redeemed at 101.39 percent of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date. As a result of the redemption, we recognized a $3 million loss on the transaction.
On October 29, 2020, we issued at par an unsecured debt offering of $500 million of 4.20 percent Senior Notes due October 29, 2025. At December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance was $495 million.
On November 1, 2021, we issued an unsecured debt offering of $500 million, 3.125 percent Senior Notes due November 2, 2026, at a price of 99.43 percent. At December 31, 2021, the outstanding balance was $491 million.
88 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Secured Financings
2021 Transactions
On May 19, 2021, we executed our $531 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-B term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $531 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $529 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.26 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.77 percent. At December 31, 2021, $496 million of our Private Education Loans, including $467 million of principal and $29 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On August 18, 2021, we executed our $527 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-D term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $527 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $525 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.22 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent. At December 31, 2021, $515 million of our Private Education Loans, including $485 million of principal and $30 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On November 9, 2021, we executed our $534 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2021-E term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $534 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $532 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.15 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.69 percent. At December 31, 2021, $533 million of our Private Education Loans, including $502 million of principal and $31 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
2020 Transactions
On February 12, 2020, we executed our $636 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2020-A term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $636 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $634 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.18 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 0.88 percent. At December 31, 2021, $496 million of our Private Education Loans, including $469 million of principal and $27 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
On August 12, 2020, we executed our $707 million SMB Private Education Loan Trust 2020-B term ABS transaction, which was accounted for as a secured financing. We sold $707 million of notes to third-parties and retained a 100 percent interest in the residual certificates issued in the securitization, raising approximately $705 million of gross proceeds. The Class A and Class B notes had a weighted average life of 4.14 years and priced at a weighted average LIBOR equivalent cost of 1-month LIBOR plus 1.30 percent. At December 31, 2021, $615 million of our Private Education Loans, including $581 million of principal and $34 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered because of this transaction.
Pre-2020 Transactions
Prior to 2020, we executed a total of $6.9 billion in ABS transactions that were accounted for as secured financings. At December 31, 2021, $3.6 billion of our Private Education Loans, including $3.5 billion of principal and $141 million in capitalized interest, were encumbered as a result of these transactions.
Other Borrowing Sources
We maintain discretionary uncommitted Federal Funds lines of credit with various correspondent banks, which totaled $125 million at December 31, 2021. The interest rate we are charged on these lines of credit is priced at Fed Funds plus a spread at the time of borrowing, and is payable daily. We did not utilize these lines of credit in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
We established an account at the FRB to meet eligibility requirements for access to the Primary Credit borrowing facility at the FRB’s Discount Window (the “Window”). The Primary Credit borrowing facility is a lending program available to depository institutions that are in generally sound financial condition. All borrowings at the Window must be fully collateralized. We can pledge asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, as well as FFELP Loans and Private Education Loans, to the FRB as collateral for borrowings at the Window. Generally, collateral value is assigned based on the estimated fair value of the pledged assets. At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the value of our pledged
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 89
Table of Contents
collateral at the FRB was $3.3 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively. The interest rate charged to us is the discount rate set by the FRB. We did not utilize this facility in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually at the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). At December 31, 2021, we had $1.8 billion of outstanding contractual loan commitments which we expect to fund during the remainder of the 2021/2022 academic year. At December 31, 2021, we had a $73 million reserve recorded in “Other Liabilities” to cover expected losses that may occur during the one-year loss emergence period on these unfunded commitments.
Contractual Cash Obligations
In addition to our contractual loan commitments, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. This includes contractual principal obligations associated with long-term Bank deposits, secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations. Our material contractual cash obligations relate to bank deposits. At December 31, 2021, we had $5.7 billion of principal obligations related to bank deposits due in the next year, and $8.4 billion thereafter. At December 31, 2021, our contractual cash obligations due in the next year for secured borrowings, and lease obligations were $718 million and $6 million, respectively, and our contractual cash obligations due thereafter for our secured borrowings, unsecured debt, and lease obligations were $4.4 billion, $1.0 billion and $45 million, respectively.
Other Cash Obligations
Beginning in 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 eliminates the option to deduct research and development expenditures immediately in the year incurred and requires taxpayers to amortize such expenditures over five years. If these provisions are not deferred, modified, or repealed by Congress with retroactive effect to January 1, 2022, they will decrease our cash from operations beginning in 2022. We currently estimate an approximately $18 million impact to 2022 cash from operations based on the provisions currently in effect. The actual impact on 2022 cash from operations will depend on if and when these provisions are deferred, modified, or repealed by Congress, including if retroactively, and the amount of research and development expenses paid or incurred in 2022, among other factors. In addition, recent proposals to increase the U.S. corporate income tax rate would require us to increase our net deferred tax assets upon enactment of new tax legislation, with a corresponding material, one-time, non-cash decrease in income tax expense, but our income tax expense and payments would likely be materially increased in subsequent years.
Common Stock
Our shareholders have authorized the issuance of 1.125 billion shares of common stock (par value of $0.20). At December 31, 2021, 279 million shares were issued and outstanding and 41 million shares were unissued but encumbered for outstanding stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock units, and dividend equivalent units for employee compensation and remaining authority for stock-based compensation plans. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity” for additional details.
Arrangements with Navient Corporation
In connection with the Spin-Off, we entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement. We also entered into various other ancillary agreements with Navient to effect the Spin-Off and provide a framework for our relationship with Navient thereafter, such as a transition services agreement, a tax sharing agreement, an employee matters agreement, a loan servicing and administration agreement, a joint marketing agreement, a key services agreement, a data sharing agreement, and a master sublease agreement. The majority of these agreements were transitional in nature with most having terms that have expired or will expire within the next year.
We continue to have exposure to risks related to Navient’s creditworthiness. If we are unable to obtain indemnification payments from Navient, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
90 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the terms of the Spin-Off and applicable law, Navient is responsible for all liabilities (whether accrued, contingent, or otherwise and whether known or unknown) arising out of or resulting from the conduct of pre-Spin-Off SLM and its subsidiaries’ businesses prior to the Spin-Off, other than certain specifically identified liabilities relating to the conduct of our consumer banking business for which the Bank is responsible. Nonetheless, given the prior usage of the Sallie Mae and SLM names by entities now owned by Navient, we and our subsidiaries may from time to time be improperly named as defendants in legal proceedings where the allegations at issue are the legal responsibility of Navient. Most of these legal proceedings involve matters that arose in whole or in part in the ordinary course of business of pre-Spin-Off SLM. Likewise, as the period of time since the Spin-Off increases, so does the likelihood any allegations that may be made may be in part for our own actions in a post-Spin-Off time period and in part for Navient’s conduct in a pre-Spin-Off time period. We will not be providing information on these proceedings unless there are material issues of fact or disagreement with Navient as to the bases of the proceedings or responsibility therefor that we believe could have a material, adverse impact on our business, assets, financial condition, liquidity, or outlook if not resolved in our favor.
We briefly summarize below some of the most significant agreements and relationships we continue to have with Navient. For additional information regarding the Separation and Distribution Agreement and the other ancillary agreements, see our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2014.
Separation and Distribution Agreement
The Separation and Distribution Agreement addresses, among other things, the following activities:
•the obligation of each party to indemnify the other against liabilities retained or assumed by that party pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement and in connection with claims of third-parties;
•the allocation among the parties of rights and obligations under insurance policies; and
•the creation of a governance structure by which matters related to the separation and other transactions contemplated by the Separation and Distribution Agreement are to be managed.
The Separation and Distribution Agreement provides specific processes and procedures pursuant to which we may submit claims for indemnification to Navient. If for any reason Navient is unable or unwilling to pay claims made against it, our costs, operating expenses, cash flows, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected over time.
Indemnification Obligations
Pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement, and as contemplated by the structure of the Spin-Off, Navient is legally obligated to indemnify the Bank against all claims, actions, damages, losses, or expenses that may arise from the conduct of all activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM occurring prior to the Spin-Off, except for certain liabilities related to the conduct of the pre-Spin-Off consumer banking business that were specifically assumed by the Bank (and as to which the Bank is obligated to indemnify Navient). Some significant examples of the types of indemnification obligations Navient has under the Separation and Distribution Agreement and related ancillary agreements include:
•Navient is required to indemnify the Company and the Bank for any liabilities, costs, or expenses they may incur arising from any action or threatened action related to the servicing, operations, and collections activities of pre-Spin-Off SLM and its subsidiaries with respect to Private Education Loans and FFELP Loans that were assets of the Bank or Navient at the time of the Spin-Off; provided that written notice was provided to Navient on or prior to April 30, 2017, the third anniversary date of the Spin-Off. Navient is not required to indemnify for changes in law or changes in prior existing interpretations of law that occur on or after April 30, 2014.
•In connection with the Spin-Off, we recorded a liability related to uncertain tax positions of $27 million for which we are indemnified by Navient. As of December 31, 2021, the remaining balance of the indemnification receivable related to those uncertain tax positions was $5 million.
Long-Term Arrangements
The loan servicing and administration agreement governs the terms by which Navient provides servicing, administration, and collection services for the Bank’s portfolio of FFELP Loans, as well as servicing history information
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 91
Table of Contents
with respect to Private Education Loans previously serviced by Navient and access to certain promissory notes in Navient’s possession. The term of the loan servicing and administration agreement has been extended to April 30, 2022.
The data sharing agreement provided us the right to obtain from Navient certain post-Spin-Off performance data relating to Private Education Loans owned or serviced by Navient to support and facilitate ongoing underwriting, originations, forecasting, performance, and reserve analyses. The term of the data sharing agreement expired on April 29, 2019, however.
The tax sharing agreement governs the respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations of us and Navient, after the Spin-Off relating to taxes, including with respect to the payment of taxes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, and the conduct of tax contests. Under this agreement, each party is generally liable for taxes attributable to its business. The agreement also addresses the allocation of tax liabilities that are incurred as a result of the Spin-Off and related transactions.
92 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 2, “Significant Accounting Policies” includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under varying assumptions or conditions. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates its estimates, particularly those that include the most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments and are often about matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions relate to the following critical accounting policies that are discussed in more detail below.
Allowance for Credit Losses
Adoption of CECL
On January 1, 2020, we adopted ASU No. 2016-13 (“CECL”) using the modified retrospective method and it had a material impact on how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations and on regulatory capital. The following table illustrates the impact of the cumulative effect adjustment made upon adoption of CECL:
| January 1, 2020 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | As reported under CECL | Pre-CECL Adoption | Impact of CECL Adoption | ||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses: | |||||||||||
| Private Education Loans | $ | 1,435,130 | $ | 374,300 | $ | 1,060,830 | |||||
| FFELP Loans | 4,485 | 1,633 | 2,852 | ||||||||
| Personal Loans | 145,060 | 65,877 | 79,183 | ||||||||
| Credit Cards | 290 | 102 | 188 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,584,965 | $ | 441,912 | $ | 1,143,053 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset | $ | 415,540 | $ | 109,369 | $ | 306,171 | |||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses: | |||||||||||
| Off-balance sheet exposures | $ | 118,239 | $ | 2,481 | $ | 115,758 | |||||
| Equity: | |||||||||||
| Retained Earnings | $ | 897,873 | $ | 1,850,512 | $ | (952,639) |
This transition adjustment is inclusive of qualitative adjustments incorporated into our CECL allowance as necessary, to address any limitations in the models used.
Under CECL, for all loans carried at amortized cost, upon loan origination we are required to measure our allowance for credit losses based on our estimate of all current expected credit losses over the remaining contractual term of the assets. Updates to that estimate each period are recorded through provision expense. The estimate of credit losses must be based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. CECL does not mandate the use of any specific method for estimating credit loss, permitting companies to use judgment in selecting the approach that is most appropriate in their circumstances.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 93
Table of Contents
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses for the lifetime expected credit losses on loans in our portfolios, as well as for future loan commitments, at the reporting date.
In determining the lifetime expected credit losses on our Private Education Loan portfolio loan segments, we use a discounted cash flow model. This method requires us to project future principal and interest cash flows on our loans in those portfolios.
To estimate the future expected cash flows, we use a vintage-based model that considers life of loan loss expectations, prepayments (both voluntary and involuntary), defaults, recoveries, and any other adjustments deemed necessary, to determine the adequacy of the allowance at each balance sheet date. These cash flows are discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate to calculate the present value of those cash flows. Management adjusts the effective interest rate used to discount expected cash flows to incorporate expected prepayments. The difference between the present value of those cash flows and the amortized cost basis of the underlying loans is the allowance for credit losses. Entities that measure credit losses based on the present value of expected future cash flows are permitted to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense, but may alternatively report the change in present value due to the passage of time as interest income. We have elected to report the entire change in present value as credit loss expense.
In determining the loss rates used for the vintage-based approach, we start with our historical loss rates, stratify the loans within each vintage, and then adjust the loss rates based upon economic factors forecasted over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. The reasonable and supportable forecast period is meant to represent the period in which we believe we can estimate the impact of forecasted economic factors in our expected losses. At the end of the reasonable and supportable forecast period, we immediately revert our forecast of expected losses to our historical averages. We use a two-year reasonable and supportable forecast period, although this period is subject to change as our view evolves on our ability to reasonably forecast economic conditions to estimate future losses.
In estimating our current expected credit losses, we use a combination of expected economic scenarios coupled with our historical experience to derive a base case adjusted for any qualitative factors (as described below). We also develop an adverse and favorable economic scenario. At each reporting date, we determine the appropriate weighting of these alternate scenarios based upon the current economic conditions and our view of the risks of alternate outcomes. This weighting of expectations is used in calculating our current expected credit losses recorded each period.
In estimating recoveries, we use both estimates of what we would receive from the sale of defaulted loans as well as historical borrower payment behavior to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
We use historical experience and economic forecasts to estimate future prepayment speeds. As with our loss forecasts, at the end of the two-year reasonable and supportable forecast for prepayments, we immediately revert to our historical long-term prepayment rates.
In addition to the above modeling approach, we also take certain other qualitative factors into consideration when calculating the allowance for credit losses. These qualitative factors include, but are not limited to, changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off and recovery practices not already included in the analysis, and the effect of other external factors such as legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated current expected credit losses.
The evaluation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant changes. If actual future performance in delinquency, charge-offs, and recoveries is significantly different than estimated, or management assumptions or practices were to change, this could materially affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses, the timing of when losses are recognized, and the related provision for credit losses on our consolidated statements of income.
When calculating our allowance for credit losses and liability for unfunded commitments, we incorporate several inputs that are subject to change period to period. These include, but are not limited to, CECL model inputs and any overlays deemed necessary by management. The most impactful CECL model inputs include:
•Economic forecasts;
•Weighting of economic forecasts;
•Prepayment speeds; and
•Recovery rates.
94 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Management overlays can encompass a broad array of factors not captured by model inputs, including but not limited to, changes in servicing policies, collection administration practices, state law changes that could impact servicing and collection practices, and observed differences between forecasted and actual results.
Of the model inputs outlined above, economic forecasts, weighting of economic forecasts, prepayments speeds, and recovery rates are subject to estimation uncertainty, and changes in these inputs could have a material impact to our allowance for credit losses and the related provision for credit losses.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, we include forecasts of college graduate unemployment and the Consumer Price Index in our loss forecasting models. We obtain forecasts for these two inputs from Moody’s Analytics. Moody’s Analytics provides a range of forecasts for each of these inputs with various likelihoods of occurrence. We determine which forecasts we will include in our estimation of allowance for credit losses and the associated weightings for each of these inputs. At January 1, 2020 (the initial adoption date of CECL), December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021, we used the Base (50th percentile likelihood of occurring)/S1 (stronger near-term growth scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring)/S3 (downside scenario with 10 percent likelihood of occurring) scenarios and weighted them 40 percent, 30 percent, and 30 percent, respectively. Management reviews both the scenarios and their respective weightings each quarter in determining the allowance for credit losses.
During the first quarter of 2021, we increased our estimates of future prepayment speeds during both the two-year reasonable and supportable period as well as the remaining term of the underlying loans. These faster estimated prepayment speeds during the two-year reasonable and supportable period reflected the significant improvement in economic forecasts, as well as the implementation of an updated prepayment speed model. We experienced higher prepayments during the COVID-19 pandemic, when unemployment rates were elevated, than we would have expected based upon our experience during past financial crises. In the fourth quarter of 2021, we increased our long-term estimate of prepayment speeds to reflect higher long-term prepayment experience.
A one-percent increase in the college graduate unemployment rate is estimated to increase our allowance for credit losses by $16.9 million and a one-percent decrease in the college graduate unemployment rate is estimated to decrease our allowance for credit losses by $16.2 million. Increases in the weighting of economic forecasts resulting in greater weight given to more severe economic forecasts would result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses. A one-percent increase in prepayment speeds is estimated to decrease our allowance for credit losses by $20.4 million and a one-percent decrease in prepayment speeds is estimated to increase our allowance for credit losses by $20.5 million. The estimated impacts of changes in prepayment speeds and the college graduate unemployment rates on the allowance for credit losses were calculated for the two-year reasonable and supportable period, but were not calculated for the remaining periods since long-term assumptions used to calculate the allowance for the remaining periods will not change. A one-percent change in recovery rates is estimated to change the allowance for credit losses by $14.2 million. The estimated change in the recovery rate is based on long-term assumptions.
Below we describe in further detail our policies and procedures for the allowance for credit losses as they relate to our Private Education Loan, Credit Card, and FFELP Loan portfolios. During the third quarter of 2020, we sold our entire Personal Loan portfolio.
Allowance for Private Education Loan Losses
In addition to the key assumptions/estimates described above, some estimates are unique to our Private Education Loan portfolio. Estimates are made on our Private Education Loans regarding when each borrower will separate from school. The cash flow timing of when a borrower will begin making full principal and interest payments is dependent upon when the student either graduates or leaves school. These dates can change based upon many factors. We receive information regarding projected graduation dates from a third-party clearinghouse. The separation from school date is updated quarterly based on updated information received from the clearinghouse.
Additionally, when we have a contractual obligation to fund a loan or a portion of a loan at a later date, we make an estimate regarding the percentage of this obligation that will be funded. This estimate is based on historical experience. For unfunded commitments, we recognize the related life of loan allowance as a liability. Once the loan is funded, that liability transfers to the allowance for Private Education Loan losses.
Key Credit Quality Indicators - Private Education Loans
We determine the collectability of our Private Education Loan portfolio by evaluating certain risk characteristics. We consider credit score at original approval and periodically refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan’s term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 95
Table of Contents
the creditworthiness of borrowers and the higher the credit scores the more likely it is the borrowers will be able to make all of their contractual payments. Loan status affects the credit risk because a past due loan is more likely to result in a credit loss than a current loan. Additionally, loans in the deferred payment status have different credit risk profiles compared with those in current pay status. Loan seasoning affects credit risk because a loan with a history of making payments generally has a lower incidence of default than a loan with a history of making infrequent or no payments. The existence of a cosigner lowers the likelihood of default as well. We monitor and update these credit quality indicators in the analysis of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses on a quarterly basis.
We collect on defaulted loans through a mix of in-house collectors, third-party collectors, and sales to third-parties. For December 31, 2021 and 2020, we used both an estimate of recovery rates from in-house collections as well as expectations of future sales of defaulted loans to estimate the timing and amount of future recoveries on charged-off loans.
Private Education Loans generally do not require borrowers to begin principal and interest repayment until at least six months after the borrowers have graduated or otherwise separated from school. Consequently, the loss estimates for these loans are generally low while the borrower is in school and then increase upon the end of the grace period after separation from school. At both December 31, 2021 and 2020, 24 percent of the principal balance of the Private Education Loan portfolio was related to borrowers who were then in an in-school (fully deferred), grace, or other deferment status and not required to make payments.
Our collection policies for Private Education Loans allow for periods of nonpayment for certain borrowers requesting an extended grace period upon leaving school or experiencing temporary difficulty meeting payment obligations. This is referred to as forbearance and is considered in estimating the allowance for credit losses.
As part of concluding on the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses for Private Education Loans, we review key allowance and loan metrics. The most relevant of these metrics considered are the allowance as a percentage of ending total loans, delinquency percentages, and forbearance percentages.
We consider a Private Education Loan to be delinquent if the borrower has not made a required payment prior to the 31st day after such payment was contractually due.
Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”)
In estimating the expected defaults for our Private Education Loans that are considered TDRs, we follow the same discounted cash flow process described above but use the historical loss rates related to past TDR loans. The appropriate gross loss rates are determined for each individual loan by evaluating loan maturity, risk characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions.
The allowance for our TDR portfolio is included in our overall allowance for Private Education Loans. Our TDR portfolio is comprised mostly of loans with interest rate reductions and loans with forbearance usage greater than three months, as further described below.
We adjust the terms of loans for certain borrowers when we believe such changes will help our customers manage their student loan obligations, achieve better student outcomes, and increase the collectability of the loans. These changes generally take the form of a temporary forbearance of payments, a temporary interest rate reduction, a temporary interest rate reduction with a permanent extension of the loan term, and/or a short-term extended repayment alternative. When we give a borrower facing financial difficulty an interest rate reduction, we temporarily reduce the rate (currently to 4.0 percent) for a two-year period and, in the vast majority of cases, permanently extend the final maturity of the loan. The combination of these two loan term changes helps reduce the monthly payment due from the borrower and increases the likelihood the borrower will remain current during the interest rate modification period as well as when the loan returns to its original contractual interest rate.
We classify a loan as a TDR due to forbearance using a two-step process. The first step is to identify a loan that was in full principal and interest repayment status and received more than three months of forbearance in a 24-month period; however, during the first nine months after a loan had entered full principal and interest repayment status, we do not count up to the first six months of forbearance received during that period against the three-month policy limit. The second step is to evaluate the creditworthiness of the loan by examining its most recent refreshed FICO score. Loans that have met the criteria in the first test and have a FICO score above a certain threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) will not be classified as TDRs. Loans that have met the criteria in the first test and have a FICO score under the threshold (based on the most recent quarterly FICO score refresh) will be classified as TDRs.
A loan also becomes a TDR when it is modified to reduce the interest rate on the loan (regardless of when such modification occurs and/or whether such interest rate reduction is temporary). Once a loan qualifies for TDR status, it
96 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
remains a TDR for allowance purposes for the remainder of its life. About half our loans that are considered TDRs involve a temporary forbearance of payments and do not change the contractual interest rate of the loan. As of both December 31, 2021 and 2020, approximately 47 percent, respectively, of TDRs were classified as such due to their forbearance status. For additional information, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7, “Allowance for Credit Losses.”
On March 27, 2020, then President Trump signed into law the CARES Act, which, among other things, allows us to (i) elect to suspend the requirements under GAAP for loan modifications related to COVID-19 that would otherwise be categorized as TDRs, and (ii) suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of the effects of COVID-19 as being a TDR, including impairment for accounting purposes. Furthermore, on December 27, 2020, the CAA was signed into law. The CAA provides for additional COVID-19 focused relief and extends certain provisions of the CARES Act.
We have elected to suspend TDR accounting for both forbearance and interest rate modifications of loans that occur as a result of COVID-19 for the applicable period of the CARES Act and CAA relief. The relief from TDR guidance applies to modifications of loans that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019, and that occur during the period beginning on March 1, 2020, and ending on the earlier of (i) sixty days after the date on which the national emergency related to the COVID-19 outbreak is terminated, or (ii) January 1, 2022. We are continuing to apply TDR accounting to those loans that were more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019 and were subsequently modified.
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure for Contractual Loan Commitments
When we approve a Private Education Loan at the beginning of an academic year, that approval may cover the borrowing for the entire academic year. As such, we do not always disburse the full amount of the loan at the time of such approval, but instead have a commitment to fund a portion of the loan at a later date (usually the start of the second semester or subsequent trimesters). We estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by us. The discounted cash flow approach described above includes expected future contractual disbursements. The portion of the allowance for credit losses related to future disbursements is shown as a liability on the face of the balance sheet, and related provision for credit losses is reflected on the income statement.
Uncollectible Interest
The majority of the total accrued interest receivable on our Private Education Loan portfolio represents accrued interest on deferred loans where no payments are due while the borrower is in school and on fixed-pay loans where the borrower makes a $25 monthly payment that is smaller than the interest accrued on the loan in that month. The accrued interest on these loans will be capitalized and increase the unpaid principal balance of the loans when the borrower exits the grace period after separation from school. The discounted cash flow approach described above considers both the collectability of principal as well as this portion of accrued interest that is expected to capitalize to the balance of the loan. Therefore, the allowance for this portion of accrued interest balance is included in our allowance for credit losses. The discounted cash flow approach does not consider interest accrued on loans that are in a full principal and interest repayment status or in interest-only repayment status. We separately capture the amount of expected uncollectible interest associated with these loans using historical experience to estimate the uncollectible interest for the next four months at each period-end date. This amount is recorded as a reduction of interest income. Accrued interest receivable is separately disclosed on the face of the balance sheet.
Allowance for Credit Card Loans
We use the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for our Credit Card portfolio. Because our Credit Card portfolio is new and we do not have sufficient historical loss experience, we use estimated loss rates reported by other financial institutions to estimate our allowance for credit losses for Credit Cards, net of expected recoveries. In addition, we use a model that utilizes purchased credit card information with risk characteristics similar to those of our own portfolio as a challenger model. We then consider any qualitative factors that may change our future expectations of losses.
As all of our Credit Card loans are unconditionally cancelable by us, the issuer, we do not record any estimate of credit losses for unused portions of our Credit Card commitments.
Allowance for FFELP Loan Losses
FFELP Loans are insured as to their principal and accrued interest in the event of default, subject to a risk-sharing level based on the date of loan disbursement. These insurance obligations are supported by contractual rights against the United States. For loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2006, we receive 97 percent reimbursement on all qualifying claims. For loans disbursed after October 1, 1993, and before July 1, 2006, we receive 98 percent reimbursement on all qualifying
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 97
Table of Contents
claims. For loans disbursed prior to October 1, 1993, we receive 100 percent reimbursement. Because we bear a maximum of three percent loss exposure due to this federal guarantee, our allowance for credit losses for FFELP Loans and related periodic provision expense are relatively small.
We use the gross loss approach when estimating the allowance for credit losses for the unguaranteed portion of our FFELP Loans. We maintain an allowance for credit losses for our FFELP Loans at a level sufficient to cover lifetime expected credit losses. The allowance for FFELP Loan losses uses historical experience of customer default behavior. We apply the default rate projections, net of applicable risk sharing, to our FFELP Loans for the current period to perform our quantitative calculation. Once the quantitative calculation is performed, we review the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and determine if qualitative adjustments need to be considered.
98 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Risk Management
Our Approach
Risk is inherent in our business activities and the specialized lending industry we serve. The ability of management to anticipate, identify, and remediate risk in a timely manner is critical to our continued success. Our risk management framework is designed to identify, remediate, control, and report these risks and escalate as appropriate to the Board of Directors or its designee.
Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our overall strategic direction, including our risk management capability and effectiveness. The Board of Directors has oversight of key policies as well as the risk management framework developed and administered by the management team. We have a robust process to escalate to the Board meaningful departures from our risk appetite statements. The Board of Directors oversees the continued development of the risk management program.
The Governance Framework
Our overall objective is to ensure all significant risks inherent in our business can be identified, remediated where appropriate, managed, monitored, and reported. To this end, we have adopted the “three lines of defense” approach to governance. Specifically, the business units form the “first line of defense” and are the “owners” of risks in their business activities. As the risk owner, the first line of defense is accountable for the day-to-day execution of risk and control policies and procedures (including activities performed by third-party contractors). Our Independent Risk Function constitutes the “second line of defense” and conducts oversight and effective challenge of the risk and control activities within the first line of defense. Rather than focusing on execution, the second line of defense is accountable for the related policy and standards executed upon by the first line of defense. Finally, the Internal Audit function comprises the “third line of defense.” The Internal Audit function provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense, as reflected in audit reports.
Risk Management Policy and Risk Appetite Framework
The risk management policy and risk appetite framework are designed to establish a stable risk and control environment across the enterprise. The policy, which is approved by the Board of Directors, outlines the framework used to ensure that risk and control issues across the enterprise are identified, assessed, measured, remediated, managed, monitored, and reported. The risk management policy, the risk appetite framework, and the related policies and procedures constitute the core of the Independent Risk governance program.
The risk appetite statements are at the heart of the governance framework and establish the level of risk we are willing to accept within each risk category, as described below, in pursuit of our business objectives. Compliance with our risk appetite is monitored using a set of risk metrics, with thresholds and limits, for each risk type. The Enterprise Risk Committee (the “ERC”) provides oversight of the risk appetite framework with escalation to the Board of Directors, as appropriate. Our Board of Directors approves the risk appetite framework annually and requires that management provide ongoing updates on adherence to the risk appetites.
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 99
Table of Contents
Board of Directors Committee Structure
We have a robust Board of Directors committee structure that facilitates oversight, effective challenge, and escalation of risk and control issues.
Financial Risk Committee. The Financial Risk Committee was established to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities with regard to financial risks. Annually, the Financial Risk Committee, along with the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, recommends the risk management policy and the risk appetite framework to the Board of Directors for approval. The Financial Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
Operational and Compliance Risk Committee. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling their oversight responsibilities relating to the major non-financial risks, including compliance risks, operational risks, information security risk and model risk. Annually, the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee, along with the Financial Risk Committee, recommends the risk management policy and the risk appetite framework to the Board of Directors for approval. The Operational and Compliance Risk Committee receives periodic updates on compliance with the framework from the Chief Risk Officer.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the Internal Audit function. Additionally, the Audit Committee oversees the quality and integrity of our financial reporting process and financial statements; the qualifications, hiring, performance, and independence of our independent registered accounting firm; and our system of internal financial controls.
Nominations and Governance Committee. The Nominations and Governance Committee, among other things: (i) implements good governance policies for us and our Board of Directors; (ii) reviews related party transactions; (iii) conducts assessments of the performance of our Board of Directors and its committees; and (iv) recommends nominees for election to our Board of Directors.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities including those related to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our incentive compensation practices for employees of all levels, and management’s succession planning.
Preferred Stock Committee. The Preferred Stock Committee monitors and evaluates proposed actions that may impact the rights of holders of our preferred stock.
Management-Level Committee Structure
Executive Committee (“EC”). The EC is authorized by the Board of Directors to assist the CEO in the general supervision of the business of the Company. Specifically, the EC will (i) provide to the CEO advice and counsel, subject matter expertise, and recommendations as requested, and (ii) through its subcommittees, facilitate the evaluation and decision-making on routine cross-functional matters, and assist management in the fulfillment of management’s duties related to specific risks. The EC has established the following sub-committees to assist in fulfilling its duties.
•Enterprise Risk Committee. The ERC provides independent oversight and effective challenge to risk and control activities across the enterprise. Additionally, through reports from the Chief Risk Officer the ERC informs the Financial Risk Committee and the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors, including escalation of instances of non-compliance with the framework.
•Credit Committee. The Credit Committee is responsible for credit and counterparty risk, product pricing, and credit and collections operations.
•Operational Risk Committee (“ORC”). The ORC is the oversight body for risk related to inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems or from external events. It also reviews information technology risk and regulatory and legal risks.
•Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). ALCO is responsible for the strategy, processes, and authorities with which the Bank’s interest rate risk, liquidity, and capital adequacy are managed.
•Disclosure Committee. Our Disclosure Committee assists our CEO and Chief Financial Officer in their review of periodic SEC reporting documents, earnings releases, investor materials, and related disclosure policies and procedures.
Each of these sub-committees is comprised of subject matter experts from the senior management team and is accountable to the EC. Moreover, these sub-committees may be supported by steering or working groups, as appropriate.
100 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents
Internal Audit
Internal Audit regularly monitors our various risk management and compliance efforts, identifies areas that may require increased focus and resources, and reports significant control issues and recommendations to executive management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually, Internal Audit performs an independent risk assessment to evaluate the risk of all significant components of the Company and uses the results to develop their annual Internal Audit plan. Additionally, Internal Audit performs selected reviews of both risk management and compliance functions, including key controls, processes, and systems, to assess the effectiveness of the overall risk management framework. The Internal Audit function provides challenge to the first and second lines of defense and also provides opinions to the Board of Directors on the effectiveness of the first and second lines of defense.
Risk Categories
Our ERM framework is designed to address the following risk categories:
Strategic Risk. Strategic risk is the risk to shareholder value and growth trajectory from incorrect assumptions about external and internal factors, inappropriate business plans, ineffective business strategy execution, or failure to respond in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory, macroeconomic, or competitive environments. Management must be able to develop and implement business strategies that leverage the organization’s core competencies and are appropriately structured, resourced, and executed. The overall development of the strategic plan includes extensive engagement with the Board of Directors. Similarly, the Board of Directors provides oversight and effective challenge on performance relative to the strategic plan.
Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from an obligor’s failure to repay their contractual obligations to Sallie Mae or otherwise to perform as agreed. Credit risk is found in all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.
The credit risk related to Private Education Loans is managed within a credit risk infrastructure that includes: (i) a well-defined underwriting, asset quality, and collection policy framework; (ii) an ongoing monitoring and review process of portfolio composition and trends; (iii) assignment and management of credit authorities and responsibilities; and (iv) establishment of an allowance for credit losses that covers estimated future losses based upon an analysis of portfolio metrics and economic factors.
Credit risk related to derivative contracts is managed by reviewing counterparties for credit strength on an ongoing basis and through our credit policies, which place limits on the amount of exposure we may take with any one counterparty and require collateral to secure the position. The credit and counterparty risk associated with derivatives is measured based on the replacement cost should the counterparty with contracts in a gain position to us fail to perform under the terms of the contract.
Market Risk. Market risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from changes in market conditions, such as interest rates, credit spreads, or other volatilities. We are exposed to various types of market risk, in particular the risk of loss resulting from interest rate risk, basis risk, and other risks that arise through the management of our investment, debt, and loan portfolios. Market risk exposures are managed primarily through ALCO. These activities are closely tied to those related to the management of our funding and liquidity risks. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the investment and asset and liability management policies and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO. The Chief Financial Officer provides reports to the Financial Risk Committee of the Board of Directors on market risk management.
Liquidity Risk. Liquidity risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or reputation from an inability to meet financial obligations when they come due without incurring unacceptable losses, such as the inability to fund liability maturities and deposit withdrawals or invest in future asset growth and business operations at reasonable market rates, as well as the inability to fund Private Education Loan and other loan originations.
Our primary liquidity needs include our ongoing ability to: meet our funding needs through market cycles, including periods of financial stress; manage the relative maturities of assets and liabilities on our balance sheet; fund disbursements of Private Education Loans and other loans; and service our indebtedness and bank deposits. Ultimately, our liquidity risk relates to our ability to access the capital markets at reasonable rates and to maintain deposits and other
2021 Form 10-K — SLM CORPORATION 101
Table of Contents
funding sources through the Bank, as well as our maintenance of a reserve of cash and unencumbered highly liquid investment securities that may be readily converted to cash if needed.
Our liquidity risk activities are centralized within our Corporate Finance department, which is responsible for developing and executing our funding strategy. We analyze and monitor our liquidity risk, maintain excess liquidity, and access diverse funding sources depending on current market conditions. Liquidity risks are overseen and recommendations approved primarily through ALCO. The Financial Risk Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for periodically reviewing the liquidity positions and contingency funding plan developed and administered by ALCO.
Operational Risk. Operational risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or reputation resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems and third-party vendors, or from external events. Operational risk is pervasive in that it exists in all business lines, functional units, legal entities, and geographic locations, and it includes information technology risk, physical security risk on tangible assets, as well as model, regulatory, and legal risk.
Operational risk exposures are managed through a combination of first line of defense and control activities and second line of defense oversight. The ORC is the management committee responsible for operational risk, and it supports the EC in its oversight duties. The ORC is responsible for escalation to the EC, as appropriate. Additionally, our key risk indicators include operational risk metrics, thresholds, and limits and are included in the periodic reporting to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.
Primary ownership and responsibility for legal risk is placed with the first lines of defense, working with their legal colleagues, to identify and manage. Compliance supports these activities by providing extensive training, monitoring, and testing of the processes, policies, and procedures utilized by the first lines of defense, maintaining relevant legal and regulatory requirements, and working in close coordination with our Legal department. The General Counsel provides periodic reports, as appropriate, to the Operational and Compliance Risk Committee and other committees of the Board of Directors.
Compliance Risk. The risk to earnings, capital, or reputation arising from violations of, or non-conformance with, laws, regulations, related self-regulatory organizations’ standards, and Code of Business Conduct.
Our Code of Business Conduct and the on-going training our employees receive in many compliance areas provide a framework for our employees to conduct themselves with the highest integrity. We instill a risk-conscious culture through communications, training, policies, and procedures.
102 SLM CORPORATION — 2021 Form 10-K
Table of Contents