grepcent / static financial knowledge base

SITE Centers Corp. (SITC)

CIK: 0000894315. SIC: 6798 Real Estate Investment Trusts. Latest 10-K as of: 2026-02-26.

SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > Holding And Other Investment Offices > SIC 6798 Real Estate Investment Trusts

SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=894315. Latest filing source: 0001193125-26-076905.

Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.

Business

Read SITC's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.

Risk Factors

Read SITC's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.

Selected Fundamentals

MetricValueUnitFYFiled
Net income177,861,000USD20252026-02-26
Assets418,737,000USD20252026-02-26

Financials

Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-26. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000894315.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.

Download these verified figures (annual + quarterly, with per-value filing provenance): JSON · CSV

Flow metrics use full-year FY periods from 10-K/10-K/A filings; balance-sheet metrics use FY-end instants. Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures. Missing metrics are omitted rather than fabricated.

Metric2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net income60,012,000-241,685,000114,434,000100,699,00035,721,000124,935,000168,719,000265,703,000531,824,000177,861,000
Diluted EPS0.20-1.480.430.330.080.512.944.859.773.36
Operating cash flow460,663,000410,407,000263,418,000270,154,000190,170,000282,515,000257,262,000238,533,000112,044,00019,613,000
Dividends paid293,905,000305,819,000281,332,000180,698,00098,348,00099,541,000120,016,000120,518,000128,064,000355,741,000
Share buybacks0.000.0036,341,00014,069,0007,500,0000.0042,256,00026,611,0000.000.00
Assets8,197,518,0007,170,073,0004,206,331,0004,093,622,0004,108,284,0003,967,051,0004,045,017,0004,061,350,000933,602,000418,737,000
Liabilities4,951,506,0004,272,635,0002,133,329,0002,112,144,0002,163,461,0001,924,399,0001,952,395,0001,885,807,000416,858,00083,972,000
Stockholders' equity3,237,515,0002,890,932,0002,070,074,0001,978,414,0001,941,508,0002,036,858,0002,086,828,0002,175,543,000516,744,000334,765,000
Cash and cash equivalents30,430,00092,611,00011,087,00016,080,00069,742,00041,807,00020,254,000551,402,00054,595,000119,034,000

Ratios

ROE and ROA use period-end equity/assets. Liabilities / equity uses total liabilities divided by stockholders' equity. Current ratio uses current assets divided by current liabilities when both are reported.

Metric2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Return on equity1.85%-8.36%5.53%5.09%1.84%6.13%8.08%12.21%102.92%53.13%
Return on assets0.73%-3.37%2.72%2.46%0.87%3.15%4.17%6.54%56.96%42.48%
Liabilities / equity1.531.481.031.071.110.940.940.870.810.25

Industry Peer Context

Each number-line places SITC against the min, median, and max of latest reported values among companies in the same SIC industry when at least three peers report that ratio.

ROE peer context

SITC ROE versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 6798; peer count 151.SITC ROE versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 6798; peer count 151.151 SIC peersMin -49.4%Median 5.7%Max 103.0%SITC 53.1%

ROA peer context

SITC ROA versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 6798; peer count 155.SITC ROA versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 6798; peer count 155.155 SIC peersMin -34.4%Median 1.5%Max 42.5%SITC 42.5%

Financial Charts

SITC net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Net incomeLatest point: FY2025 = $177.9MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearNet income$0.0B$375.0M$750.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.

SITC diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Diluted EPSLatest point: FY2025 = $3.36/shareSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDiluted EPS (USD/share)$0.00/share$7.50/share$15.00/shareFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

SITC operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Operating cash flowLatest point: FY2025 = $19.6MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearOperating cash flow$0.0B$250.0M$500.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.

SITC dividends paid, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC dividends paid, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Dividends paidLatest point: FY2025 = $355.7MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDividends paid$0.0B$250.0M$500.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: PaymentsOfDividends. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividends.

SITC share buybacks, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC share buybacks, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Share buybacksLatest point: FY2025 = $0.0BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearShare buybacks$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.

SITC assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC AssetsLatest point: FY2025 = $418.7MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearAssets$0.0B$3.0B$6.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.

SITC liabilities, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC liabilities, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC LiabilitiesLatest point: FY2025 = $84.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearLiabilities$0.0B$1.0B$2.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.

SITC stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Stockholders' equityLatest point: FY2025 = $334.8MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearStockholders' equity$0.0B$2.0B$4.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.

SITC cash and cash equivalents, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC cash and cash equivalents, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SITC Cash and cash equivalentsLatest point: FY2025 = $119.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearCash and cash equivalents$0.0B$375.0M$750.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-076905; filed 2026-02-26. Concept: CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue. Source concepts: us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue.

Quarterly

Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-07. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000894315.json.

Flow metrics use discrete quarter-length periods from 10-Q/10-Q/A filings. Q4 revenue and net income are derived only when annual FY and nine-month YTD facts exist for the same fiscal year; derived Q4 values are labeled. EPS Q4 is not derived.

QuarterEnd DateRevenueNet IncomeDiluted EPSMethod
2022-Q22022-06-300.27reported discrete quarter
2022-Q32022-09-300.30reported discrete quarter
2023-Q12023-03-31138,692,0000.06reported discrete quarter
2023-Q22023-06-30138,158,0005,353,0000.01reported discrete quarter
2023-Q32023-09-30144,759,00048,642,0000.22reported discrete quarter
2023-Q42023-12-31124,666,000196,424,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2024-Q12024-03-31122,091,000-23,552,000-0.13reported discrete quarter
2024-Q22024-06-30115,671,000238,245,0001.11reported discrete quarter
2024-Q32024-09-3090,763,000322,953,0006.07reported discrete quarter
2024-Q42024-12-31-5,822,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2025-Q12025-03-3142,623,0003,085,0000.06reported discrete quarter
2025-Q22025-06-3033,470,00046,504,0000.88reported discrete quarter
2025-Q32025-09-3027,100,000-6,158,000-0.13reported discrete quarter
2025-Q42025-12-3120,456,000134,430,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2026-Q12026-03-3113,016,000938,0000.02reported discrete quarter

Quarterly Charts

SITC quarterly revenue, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC quarterly revenue, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC Quarterly RevenueLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $13.0MSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Revenue$0.0B$125.0M$250.0M2023-Q12023-Q22023-Q32023-Q42024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-211986; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.

SITC quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC Quarterly Net incomeLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $938.0KSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Net income-$250.0M$0.0B$500.0M2023-Q22023-Q32023-Q42024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32024-Q42025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-211986; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: ProfitLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:ProfitLoss.

SITC quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SITC Quarterly Diluted EPSLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $0.02/shareSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Diluted EPS (USD/share)-$0.50/share$0.00/share$8.00/share2022-Q22022-Q32023-Q12023-Q22023-Q32024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-211986; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

Macro Cross-References

Latest quarter (10-Q)

Latest 10-Q source: 0001193125-26-211986.

Extracted structurally from real Item 2 body heading to real Item 3/4 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-05-07. Report date: 2026-03-31.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) provides readers with a perspective from management on the financial condition, results of operations and liquidity of SITE Centers Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company” or “SITE Centers”) and other factors that may affect the Company’s future results. The Company believes it is important to read the MD&A in conjunction with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as well as other publicly available information.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of owning, leasing, redeveloping and managing shopping centers. As of March 31, 2026, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 16 shopping centers (including 10 shopping centers owned through an unconsolidated joint venture). At March 31, 2026, the Company owned approximately 4.4 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) through all its shopping center properties (wholly-owned and joint venture). In addition, the Company owns two adjacent office buildings located in Beachwood, Ohio, totaling approximately 339,000 square feet of GLA, a portion of which currently serves as the Company’s headquarters.

The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see Non-GAAP Financial Measures described later in this section) (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Three Months
Ended March 31,
20262025
Net income$938$3,085
FFO$(1,176)$16,024
Operating FFO$(1,884)$8,282
Earnings per share – Diluted$0.02$0.06

For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the decrease in Net income, as compared to the prior-year period, primarily was the result of impairment charges and a decrease in rental income as a result of property dispositions, offset by the gain on the sale of joint venture interests, increases on gains on the disposition of real estate and interest income and decreases in interest expense, condemnation revenue and depreciation and amortization.

SITE Centers Strategy

The Company continues to pursue the marketing and sale of its remaining wholly-owned properties and the monetization of its investment in the Dividend Trust Portfolio (“DTP”) joint venture. The timing of asset sales may be impacted by general economic conditions, local conditions in the markets in which our remaining properties are situated and other property-specific considerations. The Company’s ability and timing to monetize the value of its investment in the DTP joint venture may be impacted by the degree of cooperation of the joint venture partner and the limited rights afforded the Company under the joint venture agreement (including the requirement that the Company obtain the joint venture partner’s consent to the sale of individual joint venture properties or to the Company’s sale of its interest in the joint venture). For risks related to the Company’s strategy, see Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025.

The Company expects to use proceeds from additional asset sales to pay operating expenses, manage overall liquidity levels, make distributions to shareholders and establish a reserve fund to satisfy projected expenses and known and unknown claims that might arise during the anticipated wind-up of its business. The Company expects to incur significant expenses in connection with the eventual wind-up of its business, including but not limited to the fee applicable to any early termination of the Shared Services Agreement, employee severance costs, discretionary bonuses upon completion of the sales process, costs to terminate office leases, licenses and other operating contracts, professional fees (including fees of accountants and law firms), costs to comply with ongoing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) (until such time as the Company qualifies for relief therefrom), insurance premiums and potential deductibles (including with respect to a “tail” insurance policy for directors and officers), vendor expenses, costs to resolve and streamline the Company’s subsidiaries and corporate structure and any claims arising under sale agreements for completed dispositions.

The majority of the Company’s wholly-owned retail properties are in various stages of contract negotiations or in the process of being marketed for sale, though no assurances can be given that such efforts will result in additional asset sales.

13

The Company expects that rental income and net income will decrease in future periods as compared to corresponding prior year periods as a result of the significant disposition activity and declining property revenues. However, the Company’s general and administrative expenses will remain elevated prior to the termination of the Shared Services Agreement as a result of the contractual obligations and services owing to Curbline thereunder.

Operational Accomplishments

Operational highlights for the Company through March 31, 2026, include the following:


Leased approximately 18,000 square feet of GLA, including one new lease and eight renewals. As of March 31, 2026, the remaining 2026 lease expirations aggregated approximately 0.2 million square feet of GLA.


For the comparable leases executed in the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company generated cash lease spreads on a pro rata basis of 16.7% for new leases and 1.9% for renewals. Leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase of rental rates on new and renewal leases over rental rates on existing leases, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity. The Company’s cash lease spreads calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated, in addition to other factors that limit comparability, and as a result, is a useful benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates;


Total portfolio average annualized base rent per square foot was $20.00 at March 31, 2026, as compared to $22.61 at December 31, 2025 and $19.75 at March 31, 2025, all on a pro rata basis, respectively;


The aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 84.9% at March 31, 2026, as compared to 85.9% at December 31, 2025 and 89.4% at March 31, 2025, all on a pro rata basis; and


For new leases executed in the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $3.53 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $6.26 per rentable square foot for the full year of 2025. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

The comparability of year-over-year operating metrics has been increasingly impacted by the level and composition of the Company’s disposition activities and the reduced size of the Company’s portfolio.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2025, are referred to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.”

Revenues from Operations (in thousands)

Three Months
Ended March 31,
20262025$ Change
Rental income(A)$9,241$31,450$(22,209)
Fee and other income(B)3,77511,173(7,398)
Total revenues$13,016$42,623$(29,607)

(A)
The following table summarizes the key components of Rental income (in thousands):

Three Months
Ended March 31,
Contractual Lease Payments20262025$ Change
Base and percentage rental income(1)$6,802$22,755$(15,953)
Recoveries from tenants(2)2,1308,402(6,272)
Uncollectible revenue(3)36(108)144
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income273401(128)
Total contractual lease payments$9,241$31,450$(22,209)

14

(1)
The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions):

Increase (Decrease)
Comparable Portfolio Properties$(0.1)
Disposition of shopping centers(16.1)
Straight-line rents0.2
Total$(16.0)

The decrease in Comparable Portfolio Properties is due to lower occupancy, partially offset by an increase in annualized base rent per occupied square foot.

At March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company owned six and 22 wholly-owned properties as of each balance sheet date that had an aggregate occupancy rate of 80.3% and 89.2% and an average annualized base rent per occupied square foot of $25.02 and $19.95, respectively. The decrease in occupancy rate and increase in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was due to a combination of transactional activity, the mix of properties sold and overall decreases in occupancy.

(2)
Recoveries from tenants were approximately 43.2% and 70.9% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in the recovery percentage was due to a combination of transactional activity, the mix of properties sold and overall decreases in occupancy.

(3)
The net amount reported was primarily attributable to the impact of tenants on the cash basis of accounting and related reserve adjustments.

(B)
The decrease in Fee and other income primarily resulted from $8.4 million of other property revenue recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2025 in conjunction with the resolution of the condemnation proceedings with the State of Florida relating to business damages and compensation for land taken in 2022 at the Shoppes at Paradise Pointe partially offset by the increase in fees from Curbline Properties. Fee and other income is primarily earned from Curbline Properties and the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures.

Expenses from Operations (in thousands)

Three Months
Ended March 31,
20262025$ Change
Operating and maintenance(A)$3,293$7,132$(3,839)
Real estate taxes(A)1,6424,721(3,079)
Impairment charges(B)17,45017,450
General and administrative8,8999,395(496)
Depreciation and amortization(A)5,01713,252(8,235)
$36,301$34,500$1,801

(A)
The changes were due to the following (in millions):

Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Comparable Portfolio Properties$(0.1)$0.1$(1.0)
Disposition of shopping centers(3.7)(3.2)(7.2)
$(3.8)$(3.1)$(8.2)

(B)
The Company recorded $17.5 million of impairment charges for the three months ended March 31, 2026 triggered by a purchase offer received which is currently under negotiation. Impairment charges are presented in

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Latest 10-K MD&A

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-02-26. Report date: 2025-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of owning, leasing, redeveloping and managing shopping centers. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 19 shopping centers (including 11 shopping centers owned through two unconsolidated joint ventures). At December 31, 2025, the Company owned 5.0 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture). At December 31, 2025, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 85.9% on a pro rata basis, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $22.61 on a pro rata basis. In addition, at December 31, 2025, the Company owns two adjacent office buildings located in Beachwood, Ohio, totaling approximately 339,000 square feet, yielding approximately 227,000 square feet of GLA, of which the Company occupies approximately 60,000 square feet of GLA and approximately 167,000 square feet of GLA is leased or available to be leased to third parties. In January 2026, the Company sold its interest in the RVIP IIIB joint venture (Deer Park Town Center in Deer Park, Illinois).

Curbline Spin-Off

In October 2023, the Company announced a plan to spin off a portfolio of convenience retail assets into a separate, publicly traded company to be named Curbline Properties Corp. (“Curbline” or “Curbline Properties”) in recognition of the distinct characteristics and opportunities within the Company’s unanchored and grocery, lifestyle and power center portfolios. Convenience

27

properties are generally positioned on the curbline of well-trafficked intersections and major vehicular corridors, offering enhanced access and visibility along with dedicated parking and often include drive-thru units. Convenience properties generally consist of a homogeneous row of primarily small-shop units leased to a diversified mixture of national and local service and restaurant tenants that cater to daily convenience trips from the growing suburban population.

As of September 30, 2024, the Curbline portfolio consisted of 79 wholly-owned convenience retail assets consisting of approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA. The separation of Curbline was completed on October 1, 2024.

On October 1, 2024, the Company, Curbline and Curbline Properties LP (the “Operating Partnership”) entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”), which provided for the principal transactions necessary to complete the spin-off, including the allocation among the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership of the Company’s assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods both prior to and following the spin-off. In particular, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provided, among other things, that certain assets relating to Curbline’s business were to be transferred to the Operating Partnership or the applicable Curbline subsidiary, including equity interests of certain Company subsidiaries that held assets and liabilities related to Curbline, interests in real property, certain tangible personal property, cash and cash equivalents held in Curbline accounts (including the transfer to Curbline of unrestricted cash of $800.0 million upon consummation of the spin-off) and other assets primarily used or held primarily for use in Curbline’s business. The Separation and Distribution Agreement also provided that certain liabilities relating to Curbline’s business were to be transferred to the Operating Partnership or the applicable Curbline subsidiary, including liabilities relating to or arising out of the operation of Curbline’s business after the effective time of the spin-off and liabilities expressly allocated to Curbline or one of its subsidiaries by the Separation and Distribution Agreement or certain other agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off.

Additionally, the Separation and Distribution Agreement contains provisions that obligate the Company to complete certain redevelopment projects at properties that are owned by Curbline. As of December 31, 2025, these redevelopment projects were estimated to cost $21.3 million to complete.

On October 1, 2024, the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership also entered into a Shared Services Agreement (the “Shared Services Agreement”), which provides that, subject to the supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors and executives, the Operating Partnership or its affiliates will provide the Company (i) leadership and management services that are of a nature customarily performed by leadership and management overseeing the business and operation of a REIT similarly situated to the Company, including supervising various business functions of the Company necessary for the day-to-day management operations of the Company and its affiliates and (ii) transaction services that are of a nature customarily performed by a dedicated transactions team within an organization similarly situated to the Company, including the provision of personnel at both the leadership and operational levels necessary to ensure effective and efficient preparation, negotiation, execution and implementation of real estate transactions, as well as overseeing post-transaction activities and alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives. The Operating Partnership or its affiliates provides the Company with a Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer but the Company employs its own Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and General Counsel.

The Shared Services Agreement also requires the Company to provide the Operating Partnership and its affiliates the services of its employees and the use or benefit of such other of the Company’s assets and resources as may be necessary or useful to establish and operate various business functions of the Operating Partnership and its affiliates in a manner as would be established and operated for a REIT similarly situated to Curbline. The Operating Partnership has the authority to supervise the employees of the Company and its affiliates and direct and control the day-to-day activities of such employees while such employees are providing services to the Operating Partnership or its affiliates under the Shared Services Agreement.

The Operating Partnership pays the Company a fee in the aggregate amount of 2.0% of Curbline’s Gross Revenue (as defined in the Shared Services Agreement) during the term of the Shared Services Agreement to be paid in monthly installments each month in arrears no later than the tenth calendar day of each month based upon Curbline’s Gross Revenue for the prior month. There is no separate fee paid by the Company in connection with the provision of services by the Operating Partnership or its affiliates under the Shared Services Agreement. Unless terminated earlier, the term of the Shared Services Agreement will expire on October 1, 2027. In the event of certain early terminations of the Shared Services Agreement, the Company will be obligated to pay a termination fee to the Operating Partnership equal to $2.5 million multiplied by the number of whole or partial fiscal quarters remaining in the Shared Services Agreement’s three-year term (or $12.0 million in the event the Company terminates the agreement for convenience on October 1, 2026).

The Company is also obligated to provide Curbline Properties and its affiliates with space at the Company’s offices located in Beachwood, Ohio, New York, New York and Boca Raton, Florida at no additional cost until October 1, 2027 or such earlier date as the Shared Services Agreement is terminated as a result of a change in control of Curbline Properties or a material breach by Curbline Properties and its affiliates under the Shared Services Agreement (a “Sanctioned Termination Event”). Curbline Properties and its affiliates also have an option exercisable on or prior to October 1, 2027 (or such earlier date as the Shared Services Agreement is

28

terminated pursuant to a Sanctioned Termination Event) to enter into a lease agreement for office space at the Company’s corporate headquarters location in Beachwood, Ohio for an initial five-year term at annual base rent of $8.00 per square foot with the right to extend the lease for up to four successive terms of five years each (with 10% increases in annual base rent for each extension).

The Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership also entered into a tax matters agreement (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), which governs the rights, responsibilities and obligations of the parties following the spin-off with respect to various tax matters and provides for the allocation of tax-related assets, liabilities and obligations. In addition, the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership entered into an employee matters agreement (“the Employee Matters Agreement”), which governs the respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the parties following the spin-off with respect to transitioning employees, equity plans and retirement plans, health and welfare benefits, and other employment, compensation, and benefit-related matters.

SITE Centers Strategy

The Company intends to pursue the marketing and sale of its remaining wholly-owned properties and to monetize the value of its investment in the DTP joint venture. The timing of asset sales may be impacted by general economic conditions, local conditions in the markets in which our remaining properties are situated and other property-specific considerations. The Company’s ability and timing to monetize the value of its investment in the DTP joint venture may be impacted by the degree of cooperation of the joint venture partner and the limited rights afforded the Company under the joint venture agreement (including the requirement that the Company obtain the joint venture partner’s consent to the sale of individual joint venture properties and distribution of resulting proceeds). See Item 1A. Risk Factors under the captions “Risks Relating to the Company’s Strategy–The Company May Have Difficulty Selling Its Remaining Real Estate Investments at Attractive Prices or at All” and “–The Company May Have Difficulty Realizing Value from Its Interest in the DTP Joint Venture.”

The Company expects to use proceeds from additional asset sales to pay operating expenses, manage overall liquidity levels, make distributions to shareholders and establish a reserve fund to satisfy projected expenses and known and unknown claims that might arise during the anticipated wind-up of its business. The Company expects to incur significant expenses in connection with the eventual wind-up of its business, including but not limited to the fee applicable to any early termination of the Shared Services Agreement, employee severance costs, discretionary bonuses upon completion of the sales process, costs to terminate office leases, licenses and other operating contracts, professional fees (including fees of accountants and law firms), costs to comply with ongoing reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) (until such time as the Company qualifies for relief therefrom), insurance premiums and potential deductibles (including with respect to a “tail” insurance policy for directors and officers), vendor expenses, costs to resolve and streamline the Company’s subsidiaries and corporate structure and any claims arising under sale agreements for completed dispositions.

The Company is currently in various stages of marketing several wholly-owned assets for sale, though no assurances can be given that such efforts will result in additional asset sales. As of February 26, 2026, the Company had entered into agreements to sell two properties for which the buyers’ general due diligence periods had expired. These transactions are expected to close in the first quarter of 2026. In each case, closing remains subject to customary conditions, including, but not limited to, delivery of estoppel letters from tenants, the accuracy of the Company’s representations in all material respects and the absence of material casualty or condemnation events. The majority of the Company’s other wholly-owned retail properties are in various stages of contract negotiations or in the process of being marketed for sale.

The Company expects that rental income and net income will continue to decrease in future periods as compared to corresponding prior year periods as a result of significant disposition activity and declining property revenues. However, the Company’s general and administrative expenses will remain elevated prior to the termination of the Shared Services Agreement as a result of the contractual obligations and services owing to Curbline thereunder.

Transaction and Investment Highlights

Transaction and investment highlights during 2025, include the following:


Sold 14 wholly-owned shopping centers for an aggregate sales price of $752.5 million, of which a portion of was used to repay approximately $241.3 million of mortgage debt as well as a make-whole premium of approximately $7.0 million in connection with the repayment of the mortgage loan on Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey);


Repaid the remaining $64.0 million balance in December 2025 on the cross-collateralized mortgage facility provided by affiliates of Atlas SP Partners, L.P. and Athene Annuity and Life Company Mortgage Facility in August 2024 (the “Mortgage Facility”) and


Paid special cash dividends of $1.50, $3.25, $1.00 and $1.00 per common share on July 15, 2025, August 29, 2025, November 14, 2025 and December 30, 2025, respectively.

29

Operational Accomplishments

Operating highlights for 2025 included:


Signed new leases and renewals for approximately 0.5 million square feet of GLA on a pro rata basis;


For the comparable leases executed and renewed, achieved blended lease spreads of 1.8% at the Company’s pro rata share;


Total portfolio average annualized base rent per occupied square foot on a pro rata basis increased to $22.61 at December 31, 2025, as compared to $19.64 at December 31, 2024, due to transactional activity and the remaining mix of properties and


Aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 85.9% at December 31, 2025 on a pro rata basis compared to 90.6% at December 31, 2024. The year-over-year decrease primarily was related to the disposition of properties during the year, the remaining mix of properties and increased vacancy at the Maxwell (Chicago, Illinois).

The comparability of year-over-year operating metrics has been increasingly impacted by the level and composition of the Company’s disposition activities and the reduced size of the Company’s portfolio.

Retail Environment

The Company continued to enter into new leases and lease renewals in 2025 with a combination of national and local retailers. Although certain retailers announced bankruptcies and/or store closures in 2025, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continued to expand their store fleets. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects to backfill spaces vacated by bankrupt or non-renewing tenants are generally good, however, in recent years, the Company has often elected not to pursue replacement tenants for vacant space as potential buyers have often expressed a preference for acquiring properties with lease-up opportunities. The Company currently has seven movie theaters in its portfolio. Opportunities to re-tenant any vacant theater spaces that may arise may be more limited and would likely require significant capital expenditures.

Company Fundamentals

The following table lists the Company’s tenants that exceed 1.5% of the Company’s aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenue and the respective Company-owned shopping center GLA as of December 31, 2025, for the following (1) the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture properties combined, (2) the wholly-owned properties and (3) the unconsolidated joint ventures presented at 100%:

At 100%
At SITE Centers’ ShareWholly-Owned PropertiesJoint Venture Properties
Tenant% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA
The Kroger Co.(A)9.7%6.2%15.9%10.8%0.0%0.0%
Burlington Stores, Inc.4.5%3.5%6.9%5.4%0.8%1.1%
Fitness International, LLC(B)4.2%2.2%6.8%3.9%0.0%0.0%
Cinemark Holding, Inc.3.6%5.0%5.9%6.6%0.0%1.3%
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.2.9%2.3%0.0%0.0%9.1%6.2%
Nordstrom, Inc.2.0%1.8%3.3%3.2%0.0%0.0%
Five Below, Inc.2.0%1.9%2.6%2.5%1.5%1.2%
RSG Group USA, Inc.2.0%1.5%3.3%2.6%0.0%0.0%
The Gap, Inc.(C)1.8%2.0%0.5%0.7%3.4%3.0%
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.,(D)1.7%2.4%0.0%0.0%5.4%6.5%
Publix Super Markets, Inc.1.6%2.8%2.2%3.8%0.8%1.5%

(A)
Includes Harris Teeter and Mariano’s

(B)
Includes LA Fitness and Xsport Fitness

(C)
Includes Gap; Old Navy and Banana Republic

(D)
Includes Dick’s Sporting Goods, Going Going Gone and Golf Galaxy

30

The Company leased approximately 1.0 million square feet (0.5 million square feet at the Company’s share) of GLA in 2025 in its wholly-owned and joint venture portfolios, composed of 17 new leases and 64 renewals, for a total of 81 leases executed in 2025. At December 31, 2025, the Company had 65 leases expiring in 2026 (excluding ground leases) with an average base rent per square foot of $22.14 on a pro rata basis. For the comparable leases executed in 2025, at the Company’s interest, the Company generated cash leasing spreads of (17.6)% for three new leases and 2.5% for 64 renewals, or 1.8% on a blended basis. Cash leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase of the tenant’s annual base rent in the first year of the newly executed or renewal lease, over the annual base rent applicable to the final year of the previous lease term, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity and exclude properties in redevelopment. The Company’s cash leasing spread calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated, in addition to other factors that limit comparability, and as a result, is a good benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates.

For new leases executed during 2025, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $6.26 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $6.85 per rentable square foot in 2024. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

Summary—2025 Financial Results

The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” described later in this section) (in thousands except per share amounts):

For the Year Ended
December 31,
20252024
Net income attributable to common shareholders$177,861$516,031
FFO attributable to common shareholders$19,429$79,443
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$25,151$166,724
Earnings per share – Diluted$3.36$9.77

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the decrease in net income attributable to common shareholders, as compared to the prior year, was primarily the result of lower gain on disposition of real estate recognized in 2025, the net impact of property sales, lower interest income and an increase in impairment charges, partially offset by no preferred dividend expense and lower general and administrative costs, debt extinguishment costs and interest expense. The decrease in Funds from Operations (“FFO”) attributable to common shareholders was primarily the result of the impact of net property dispositions and lower interest income, partially offset by no preferred dividend expense and lower general and administrative costs, interest expense and debt extinguishment costs. The decrease in Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders generally was due to the impact of net property dispositions and lower interest income, partially offset by lower general and administrative costs and interest expense.

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in the understanding of the Company’s financial statements and the factors that accounted for changes in certain key items in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting estimates that affected these financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, management has used available information, including the Company’s history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may use different estimates that may affect the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

31

Real Estate and Long-Lived Assets

Impairment Assessment and Measurement of Fair Value

An asset with impairment indicators is considered impaired when the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. If an asset’s carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. Estimated fair value may be based on discounted future cash flows utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, future market rental rates and, in addition to available market information, third-party appraisals, broker selling estimates or sale agreements under negotiation. The Company reviews its individual real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are primarily related to changes in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows; however, other impairment indicators could occur.

If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the alternative courses of action as of the balance sheet date. Undiscounted cash flows relating to assets considered for potential sale include estimated net operating income through potential sale dates and estimates of the assets current fair value based on the best available information, which may include a direct capitalization of such net operating income, letters of intent, broker opinions of value or purchase and sale agreements under negotiation.

Impairment indicators related to significant decreases in cash flows may be caused by declines in occupancy, projected losses on potential future sales, market factors, significant changes in projected development costs or completion dates and sustainability of development projects. For certain assets, this may require us to reevaluate the hold period required to recover the asset’s carrying value based on updated undiscounted cash flow estimates and involves reconsideration of our hold period based of our ability and intent to hold the asset. The determination of anticipated undiscounted cash flows in these situations is inherently more subjective, requiring significant estimates made by management, and considers the most likely expected course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans and intended holding periods.

The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. If the Company’s estimates of the anticipated holding periods, projected future cash flows or market conditions change, its evaluation of the impairment charges may be different, and such differences could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Specifically, plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.

The fair value of real estate investments used in the Company’s impairment calculations is estimated based on the price that would be received for the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date. Real estate assets without a public market are valued based on assumptions made and valuation techniques used by the Company. The availability of observable transaction data and inputs can make it more difficult and/or subjective to determine the fair value of such real estate assets. As a result, amounts ultimately realized by the Company from real estate assets sold may differ from the fair values presented, and the differences could be material.

The valuation of real estate assets for impairment is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including the indicative bid, the income capitalization approach or the discounted cash flow analysis. In general, the Company utilizes a valuation technique that is based on the characteristics of the specific asset when measuring fair value of an investment. However, a single valuation technique is generally used for the Company’s property type. Fair value measurements based upon an indicative bid are developed by third-party sources (including offers and comparable sales values) and are subject to the Company’s corroboration for reasonableness. The significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow technique are discount rates and terminal capitalization rates. The significant assumption used in the income capitalization approach is market capitalization rates. Valuation of real estate assets is calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the measurement date, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.

32

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The spin-off of Curbline Properties in October 2024 represented a strategic shift in the Company’s business and, as such, the Curbline properties are reflected in the financial results as discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the comparison of the Company’s 2025 performance to 2024 presented below, consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2024 are referred to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.” The discussion of the Company’s 2024 performance compared to 2023 performance is set forth in “Results of Operations” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Revenues from Operations (in thousands)

20252024$ Change
Rental income(A)$103,590$269,286$(165,696)
Fee and other income(B)20,0598,18111,878
Total revenues$123,649$277,467$(153,818)

(A)
The following table summarizes the key components of rental income (in thousands):

Contractual Lease Payments20252024$ Change
Base and percentage rental income(1)$75,062$193,561$(118,499)
Recoveries from tenants(2)26,68370,360(43,677)
Uncollectible revenue(3)475702(227)
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income1,3704,663(3,293)
Total contractual lease payments$103,590$269,286$(165,696)

(1)
The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions):

Increase (Decrease)
Acquisition of shopping centers$0.8
Comparable Portfolio Properties(0.6)
Disposition of shopping centers(116.3)
Straight-line rents(2.4)
Total$(118.5)

The decrease in Comparable Portfolio Properties is due to lower occupancy, partially offset by an increase in annualized base rent per occupied square foot.

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company owned eight and 22 wholly-owned properties as of each balance sheet date that had an aggregate occupancy rate of 83.7% and 90.6% and an average annualized base rent per occupied square foot of $25.99 and $19.81, respectively. The decrease in occupancy rate and increase in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was due to a combination of transactional activity and the mix of properties sold and overall decreases in occupancy.

(2)
Recoveries from tenants were approximately 65.8% and 80.4% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in the recovery percentage was due to a combination of transactional activity, the mix of properties sold, overall decreases in occupancy rate and the weighting of the remaining properties that have certain tenant recovery exclusions.

(3)
The net amount reported was primarily attributable to the impact of tenants on the cash basis of accounting and related reserve adjustments.

(B)
For the year ended December 31, 2025, Fee and Other Income included $8.4 million of other property revenues in conjunction with the resolution of the condemnation proceedings with the State of Florida relating to business damages and compensation for land taken in 2022 at the Shoppes at Paradise Pointe. Otherwise, Fee and Other Income was primarily earned from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and Curbline Properties. The components of Fee and Other Income are presented in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Fee and Other Income,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein. Decreases in the number of assets under management will impact the amount of revenue recorded in future periods. The Company or its joint venture partner may also elect to terminate the DTP joint venture in connection with the Company’s strategy to monetize the value of its investment. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

33

Expenses from Operations (in thousands)

20252024$ Change
Operating and maintenance(A)$24,644$47,247$(22,603)
Real estate taxes(A)15,90940,292(24,383)
Impairment charges(B)114,07066,60047,470
General and administrative(C)39,84355,205(15,362)
Depreciation and amortization(A)44,809101,344(56,535)
$239,275$310,688$(71,413)

(A)
The changes were due to the following (in millions):

Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Acquisition of shopping centers$0.5$0.1$0.3
Comparable Portfolio Properties0.30.6(3.3)
Disposition of shopping centers(23.4)(25.1)(53.5)
$(22.6)$(24.4)$(56.5)

The decrease in depreciation for the Comparable Portfolio Properties was primarily due to the impact of certain tenant improvements and intangibles having been fully depreciated in 2024.

(B)
There were $114.1 million and $66.6 million of impairment charges recorded for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, triggered by changes in hold period assumptions. Impairment charges are presented in Note 10, “Impairment Charges,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

(C)
The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to the transition of employment of several former employees to Curbline Properties and its affiliates on October 1, 2024. The Company continues to expense certain internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with leasing and re-leasing of existing space.

Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)

20252024$ Change
Interest expense(A)$(15,310)$(59,463)$44,153
Interest income(B)3,77231,620(27,848)
Debt extinguishment costs(C)(10,315)(42,822)32,507
Gain on debt retirement(D)1,037(1,037)
Loss on equity derivative instruments(E)(4,412)4,412
Transaction costs and other expense(F)(3,877)(2,184)(1,693)
$(25,730)$(76,224)$50,494

(A)
The weighted-average debt outstanding and related weighted-average interest rate are as follows:

For the Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Weighted-average debt outstanding (in billions)$0.2$1.0
Weighted-average interest rate5.4%5.3%

As of December 31, 2025 the Company had no outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s consolidated indebtedness consisted of the Mortgage Facility and a mortgage loan encumbering Nassau Park Pavilion with an aggregate outstanding balance of $306.8 million, a weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates excluding amortization of debt issuance costs) of 6.9% and a weighted-average maturity (prior to exercise of applicable extension options) of 2.4 years. Interest costs capitalized in conjunction with redevelopment projects were $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

(B)
Related to excess cash as a result of sale proceeds maintained in money market accounts.

34

(C)
In 2025, consisted of write-offs of loan costs and payments of debt extinguishment costs due to the release of sold properties from the Mortgage Facility ($3.3 million) and the mortgage loan encumbering Nassau Park Pavilion as well as a make whole premium payment ($7.0 million). In 2024, primarily related to the write-offs of loan costs and commitment fees and payment of debt extinguishment costs due to the termination of a mortgage financing commitment ($21.2 million), a revolving credit facility ($3.9 million), redemption of certain senior unsecured notes ($6.7 million), pay-off of a term loan ($0.9 million) and the release of properties from the Mortgage Facility ($10.1 million).

(D)
Related to the prior year repurchase of senior unsecured notes due in 2025, 2026 and 2027 for total cash consideration, including expenses, of $87.1 million and fair value discount write-off.

(E)
In 2024, derivative mark-to-market impact related to the partial hedge on the potential interest rate impact to yield maintenance premiums on outstanding senior unsecured notes. The hedge was terminated in conjunction with the redemption of certain senior unsecured notes and the Company received a cash payment of $1.3 million in 2024.

(F)
Primarily consists of transaction costs for abandoned deals and the adjustment to reflect the fair value of services provided to Curbline Properties relative to the fees and fair value of services received from Curbline under the Shared Services Agreement. The increase is due to the Shared Services Agreement being in place for a full year in 2025.

Other Items (in thousands)

20252024$ Change
Equity in net (loss) income of joint ventures(A)$(781)$82$(863)
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net(B)2,669(2,669)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(C)319,772633,219(313,447)
Tax benefit (expense) of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes226(761)987
Income from discontinued operations(D)6,060(6,060)

(A)
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had an economic investment in two unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 11 shopping center properties. The termination of joint ventures and joint venture property sales could significantly impact the amount of income or loss recognized in future periods. See Note 2, “Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures,” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

(B)
In 2024, the Company acquired its partner’s 80% interest in one asset previously owned by DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Meadowmont Village, Chapel Hill, North Carolina) for $35.4 million and stepped up its 20% interest due to change in control.

(C)
The Company sold 14 and 40 wholly-owned shopping centers (excluding certain convenience parcels that were retained and later included in the spin-off of Curbline Properties on October 1, 2024) in 2025 and 2024, respectively. In addition, one land parcel was also sold in 2024. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

(D)
2024 results are through the spin-off date and include $30.7 million in transactions costs related to the spin-off of Curbline Properties.

Net Income (in thousands)

20252024$ Change
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$177,861$531,824$(353,963)

The decrease in net income in 2025 attributable to SITE Centers, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to the lower gain on disposition of real estate recognized in 2025, the net impact of property sales, lower interest income and an increase in impairment charges, partially offset by no preferred dividend expense and lower general and administrative costs, debt extinguishment costs and interest expense.

35

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Funds from Operations and Operating Funds from Operations

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company believes that FFO and Operating FFO, both non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of REITs. FFO and Operating FFO are frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs. The Company also believes that FFO and Operating FFO more appropriately measure the core operations of the Company and provide benchmarks to its peer group.

FFO excludes GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions, and many companies use different depreciable lives and methods. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate and gains and losses from property dispositions, it can provide a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and acquisition, disposition and development activities. This provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted to exclude (i) preferred share dividends, (ii) gains and losses from disposition of real estate property and related investments, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) impairment charges on real estate property and related investments, (iv) gains and losses from changes in control and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation and amortization of intangibles, equity income (loss) from joint ventures and equity income (loss) from non-controlling interests and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint ventures and non-controlling interests, determined on a consistent basis. The Company’s calculation of FFO is consistent with the definition of FFO provided by NAREIT.

The Company believes that certain charges, income and gains recorded in its operating results are not comparable or reflective of its core operating performance. Operating FFO is useful to investors as the Company removes non-comparable charges, income and gains to analyze the results of its operations and assess performance of the core operating real estate portfolio. As a result, the Company also computes Operating FFO and discusses it with the users of its financial statements, in addition to other measures such as net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and FFO. Operating FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as FFO excluding certain charges, income and gains/losses that management believes are not comparable and indicative of the results of the Company’s operating real estate portfolio. Such adjustments include write-off of preferred share original issuance costs, condemnation revenue, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, certain transaction fee income, transaction costs and other restructuring type costs, including employee separation costs. The disclosure of these adjustments is regularly requested by users of the Company’s financial statements.

The adjustment for these charges, income and gains may not be comparable to how other REITs or real estate companies calculate their results of operations, and the Company’s calculation of Operating FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO. Additionally, the Company provides no assurances that these charges, income and gains are non-recurring. These charges, income and gains could be reasonably expected to recur in future results of operations.

These measures of performance are used by the Company for several business purposes and by other REITs. The Company uses FFO and/or Operating FFO in part (i) as a disclosure to improve the understanding of the Company’s operating results among the investing public, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset company’s performance, (iii) to influence acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.

For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO and Operating FFO provide the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. They provide recognized measures of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often significant). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO and Operating FFO in a different manner.

Management recognizes the limitations of FFO and Operating FFO when compared to GAAP’s net income. FFO and Operating FFO do not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use FFO or Operating FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO represents cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and neither is necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO should be considered an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. FFO and Operating FFO are simply used as additional indicators of the

36

Company’s operating performance. The Company believes that to further understand its performance, FFO and Operating FFO should be compared with the Company’s reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP, as presented in its consolidated financial statements. Reconciliations of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) have been provided below.

Reconciliation Presentation

FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20252024$ Change
FFO attributable to common shareholders$19,429$79,443$(60,014)
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders25,151166,724(141,573)

The decrease in FFO attributable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to the impact of net property dispositions and lower interest income, partially offset by no preferred dividend expense and lower general and administrative costs, interest expense and debt extinguishment costs. The decrease in Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders generally was due to the impact of net property dispositions and lower interest income, partially offset by lower general and administrative costs and interest expense.

The Company’s reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders is as follows (in thousands). The Company provides no assurances that these charges and gains are non-recurring. These charges and gains could reasonably be expected to recur in future results of operations.

For the Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Net income attributable to common shareholders$177,861$516,031
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments40,62297,186
Equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures781(82)
Joint ventures’ FFO(A)5,8676,040
Discontinued operations’ depreciation and amortization of real estate investments29,556
Impairment of real estate114,07066,600
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(2,669)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(319,772)(633,219)
FFO attributable to common shareholders19,42979,443
Separation and other charges2,9221,709
Discontinued operations’ transaction and debt extinguishment costs30,851
Transaction, debt extinguishment and other (at SITE’s share)11,17944,154
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs6,155
Derivative mark-to-market4,412
Condemnation revenue(8,379)
Non-operating items, net5,72287,281
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$25,151$166,724

(A)
At both December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 11 shopping center properties. These joint ventures represent the investments in which the Company recorded its share of equity in net income or loss and, accordingly, FFO and Operating FFO.

Joint ventures’ FFO and Operating FFO are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Net (loss) income attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures$(1,956)$5,611
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments25,50626,948
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(369)(10,354)
FFO$23,181$22,205
FFO at SITE Centers’ ownership interests$5,867$6,040
Operating FFO at SITE Centers’ ownership interests$5,867$6,229

37

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The Company requires capital to fund its operating expenses, redevelopment activities and capital expenditures. The Company’s primary capital sources include cash on hand, cash flow from operations and proceeds from ongoing asset sales. The Company does not maintain a revolving credit facility and therefore plans to closely monitor and conservatively manage its liquidity and cash position as it pursues the sale of its remaining properties and returns capital to shareholders. The Company expects to maintain sufficient cash reserves with proceeds from asset sales in order to satisfy and discharge expenses projected to be incurred, and any unknown or contingency claims or obligations which might arise, during the subsequent wind-up of its operations. The Company also expects to maintain an elevated cash balance pending resolution of the DTP joint venture in order to maximize the Company’s alternatives for monetizing its joint venture investment, including through the possible exercise of the joint venture’s buy/sell provision.

At December 31, 2025, the Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $119.0 million. As of December 31, 2025, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $21.3 million to be incurred to complete redevelopment projects at properties owned by Curbline pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement.

The Company had no consolidated indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2025, as compared to $306.8 million at December 31, 2024. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures had $440.7 million of indebtedness ($106.0 million at SITE’s share).

The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business at this time.

2025 Financing Activities

In August 2024, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries closed and funded the $530.0 million Mortgage Facility provided by affiliates of Atlas SP Partners, L.P. and Athene Annuity and Life Company. The Company used proceeds from the closing together with cash on hand from asset sales to repay all of its outstanding senior unsecured indebtedness and to capitalize Curbline. The Mortgage Facility was originally secured by 23 properties, many of which were sold during 2025, and required mortgage paydowns which were made with proceeds from the sales. In December 2025, the Company fully repaid all remaining amounts outstanding under the Mortgage Facility. While the Mortgage Facility was outstanding during 2025, the Company was in compliance with all covenants set forth in the loan agreement.

In addition, the loan secured by Nassau Park Pavilion was repaid in full when the property was sold in November 2025.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures’ Mortgage Indebtedness – As of December 31, 2025

The outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2025, which would have matured in the subsequent 14-month period (i.e., through February 28, 2027), was $60.1 million or $29.9 million at the Company’s share. In January 2026, the Company sold its interest in the RVIP IIIB joint venture to its partner and no longer maintains any direct or indirect obligations with respect to this unconsolidated indebtedness.

No assurance can be provided that outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s remaining joint venture will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Any future deterioration in property-level revenues may cause the joint venture to be unable to refinance maturing obligations or satisfy applicable covenants, financial tests or debt service requirements or loan maturity extension conditions in the future, thereby allowing the mortgage lender to assume control of property cash flows, limit distributions of cash to joint venture members, declare a default, increase the interest rate or accelerate the loan’s maturity. In addition, rising interest rates or challenged transaction markets may adversely impact the ability of the Company’s remaining joint venture to sell assets at attractive prices in order to repay indebtedness.

Cash Flow Activity

The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20252024
Cash flow provided by operating activities$19,613$112,044
Cash flow provided by investing activities705,3951,843,903
Cash flow used for financing activities(669,859)(2,457,312)

38

Changes in cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the prior year are as follows:

Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $92.4 million primarily due to lower operating income as a result of disposition activity and a decrease in interest income, partially offset by lower transaction costs related to the spin-off of Curbline Properties and lower general and administrative and interest expense.

Investing Activities: Cash from investing activities decreased by $1,138.5 million primarily due to the following:


Decrease in real estate assets acquired, developed and improved of $270.7 million;


Decrease in proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint ventures of $1,408.6 million and


Decrease in distributions and repayment of advances from unconsolidated joint venture of $1.6 million.

Financing Activities: Cash used for financing activities decreased by $1,787.5 million primarily due to the following:


Decreases in repayment of the Company’s term loan, the Mortgage Facility and mortgage debt of $242.1 million;


Decrease in payments of debt issuance costs and Curbline loan costs of $16.9 million;


Increase in dividends paid in 2025 of $227.7 million due to special dividends;


Decrease in proceeds from the Mortgage Facility of $530.0 million;


Decrease in the repayment of certain of the Company’s senior unsecured notes of $1,305.9 million;


Redemption of Class A Preferred Shares in 2024 of $175.0 million and


Contribution of unrestricted cash to Curbline in 2024 of $800.0 million.

Dividend Distribution

The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared special cash dividends of $355.7 million ($6.75 per share) in 2025, as compared to $64.4 million of cash dividends declared in 2024 (in addition to the value of the distribution of Curbline Properties common stock). Because actual distributions were greater than 100% of taxable income, the Company does not expect to incur federal income taxes in 2025.

The decision to declare and pay future dividends on the Company’s common shares, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future dividends, will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company does not currently expect to make regular quarterly dividend payments in the future. The Company expects that the frequency and timing of future dividends will be influenced by operations and sales of its remaining assets, though the Company plans to closely monitor and conservatively manage its cash position in order to maintain sufficient cash reserves to satisfy and discharge expenses projected to be incurred, and any unknown or contingency claims or obligations which might arise, during the subsequent wind-up of its operations. The Company also expects to maintain an elevated cash balance pending resolution of the DTP joint venture in order to maximize the Company’s alternatives for monetizing its joint venture investment, including through the possible exercise of the joint venture’s buy/sell provision.

The Company currently operates in a manner that allows it to qualify as a REIT and generally not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. U.S. federal income tax law generally requires that a REIT distribute annually to holders of its capital stock at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and excluding net capital gains, and that it pay tax at regular corporate rates to the extent that it annually distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income. The Company may elect to surrender its REIT status in connection with the sale of its remaining assets and the anticipated wind-up of its operations in the event the Company determines that the anticipated benefits to the Company and its shareholders of maintaining REIT qualification do not exceed the related compliance costs or if the nature of the Company’s remaining operations makes compliance with REIT requirements impracticable.

SITE Centers’ Equity

In 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 0.5 million of its common shares under this program at an aggregate cost of $26.6 million, or $53.76 per share.

39

SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL

The Company remains committed to maintaining sufficient liquidity in order to fund its operating expenses, capital expenditures and expenses and liabilities to be incurred during the wind-up of its operations. The Company’s primary capital sources include cash on hand, cash flow from operations and proceeds from sales of its remaining wholly-owned properties and monetization of its investment in the DTP joint venture. The Company does not maintain a revolving credit facility and therefore plans to closely monitor and conservatively manage its cash position and expects to maintain an elevated cash balance pending resolution of the DTP joint venture in order to maximize the Company’s alternatives for monetizing its joint venture investment, including through the possible exercise of the joint venture’s buy/sell provision.

Future Sales of Wholly-Owned Properties

The Company intends to pursue the marketing and sale of its remaining wholly-owned properties. The timing of asset sales may be impacted by general economic conditions, local conditions in the markets in which our remaining properties are situated and other property-specific considerations. As of February 26, 2026, the Company had entered into agreements to sell two properties for which the buyers’ general due diligence periods had expired. These transactions are expected to close in the first quarter of 2026. In each case, closing remains subject to customary conditions, including, but not limited to, delivery of estoppel letters from tenants, the accuracy of the Company’s representations in all material respects and the absence of material casualty or condemnation events. The majority of the Company’s other wholly-owned retail properties are in various stages of contract negotiation or in the process of being marketed for sale.

DTP Joint Venture

Since 2018, the Company and certain Chinese institutional investors (collectively, the “Co-Investor” and, together with the Company, the “Limited Partners”) have owned 20% and 80% limited partnership interests, respectively, in Dividend Trust Portfolio JV LP (the “DTP Joint Venture” or the “joint venture”). The joint venture owns all of the outstanding common shares of Dividend Trust REIT Subsidiary, a Maryland REIT (the “REIT Subsidiary”), which as of December 31, 2025, owned ten shopping centers located in the United States, aggregating approximately 3.4 million square feet of GLA. The Company serves as the general partner of the joint venture and is responsible for its day-to-day management subject to the requirement to obtain the Co-Investor’s approval for certain major decisions, including but not limited to property acquisitions and dispositions, new financings, debt repayments, annual budgets, entering into or amending major leases, distributions and calls for additional capital contributions. The joint venture agreement provides the Co-Investor with the ability to remove the Company as general partner and certain indemnification rights in the event the Company breaches certain of its obligations under the joint venture agreement, including the obligation to maintain the qualification of the REIT Subsidiary.

The term of the joint venture expires on April 10, 2029, subject to automatic extension in the event the joint venture’s mortgage loan has not been repaid in full prior to that date, or voluntarily extension by the mutual agreement of both Limited Partners. Available cash from operations is generally distributed to the Limited Partners quarterly based on their limited partner interests, subject to a preferred return to the general partner in the event the Co-Investor has achieved a certain after-tax rate of return. Fees payable by the joint venture to the general partner consist of a corporate services fee and a property management fee aggregating $4.5 million per year, subject to ratable reduction in the event of any property sales (based on the percentage of joint venture net operating income derived from the sold properties). Subject to limited exceptions, no partner may sell or transfer its interest in the joint venture without the consent of the other partners.

Either Limited Partner may cause the sale of the REIT Subsidiary (but not of any individual joint venture properties) subject to first providing the other Limited Partner the right to purchase the REIT Subsidiary at a price proposed by the initiating Limited Partner. In the event the non-initiating Limited Partner does not elect to purchase the REIT Subsidiary at the proposed price, the initiating Limited Partner may engage a broker to market and sell the REIT Subsidiary within 180 days at a cash price of not less than 97% of the price originally proposed by the initiating Limited Partner. Either Limited Partner may also initiate a buy-sell mechanism pursuant to which it provides the non-initiating Limited Partner the option to purchase the initiating Limited Partner’s interest in the joint venture or sell the non-initiating Limited Partner’s interest based on a value for the joint venture set by the initiating Limited Partner.

As of December 31, 2025, the joint venture’s properties were encumbered by a mortgage loan in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $380.6 million which matures on January 11, 2029. The fixed blended interest rate applicable to the loan’s individual tranches is 6.38% per annum, subject to an increase of 5.0% per annum following the occurrence of any default. The loan is structured as an interest-only loan throughout its duration. The principal amount of the loan may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time subject to the joint venture’s payment of a spread maintenance premium equal to the greater of 1% of the amount prepaid and the present value of the monthly interest payments that would have been payable on the prepaid amount through July 2028 assuming an interest rate per annum equal to the difference between the loan’s contractual interest rate and the then applicable yield maintenance

40

treasury rate. So long as no default then exists and subject to other customary release provisions (including delivery of “REMIC” tax and legal opinions and satisfaction of certain rating agency and debt yield requirements), the joint venture may cause the lender to release individual properties from the loan’s collateral pool by prepaying 125% of the initial loan amount allocated to the released properties plus the applicable spread maintenance premium. All rents received from joint venture properties are deposited into a cash management account to which the joint venture has full access absent certain trigger events (including defaults, failure to satisfy certain debt yield requirements and key tenant bankruptcy events).

2025 Transactions Activity

Acquisitions

During 2025, the Company acquired one land parcel from Curbline in Chapel Hill, North Carolina for a gross purchase price of $1.8 million in order to facilitate the future disposition of Meadowmont Market located adjacent thereto.

Dispositions

During 2025, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
June 2025The Promenade at BrentwoodBrentwood, MO338$71,600
June 2025Chapel Hills WestColorado Springs, CO22523,650
July 2025Sandy Plain VillageRoswell, GA17425,000
August 2025Deer Valley Towne CenterPhoenix, AZ15233,725
August 2025Winter Garden VillageWinter Garden, FL629165,000
September 2025Edgewater Towne CenterEdgewater, NJ7653,500
November 2025Parker PavilionsParker, CO518,425
November 2025Nassau Park PavilionPrinceton, NJ759137,550
November 2025Three property portfolio(A)various754126,000
November 2025Paradise Village GatewayPhoenix, AZ21128,500
December 2025Downtown Short PumpRichmond, VA12631,500
December 2025Perimeter PointeAtlanta, GA36048,000
3,855$752,450

(A)
Includes Southmont Plaza (Easton, PA), East Hanover Plaza (East Hanover, NJ) and Stow Community Center (Stow, OH).

2024 Transactions Activity

Acquisitions

During 2024, the Company acquired 14 convenience centers for an aggregate gross purchase price of $219.2 million, all of which were included in the spin-off of Curbline.

In addition, the Company acquired the following shopping centers (in thousands) for the benefit of its consolidated shopping center portfolio:

Date AcquiredProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Purchase Price
April 2024Collection at Brandon Boulevard—Ground Lease(A)Tampa, Florida$1,000
May 2024Meadowmont Crossing(B)Chapel Hill, North Carolina928,932
May 2024Meadowmont Market(B)Chapel Hill, North Carolina458,784
137$18,716

(A)
Acquired the fee interest in a land parcel at this center.

(B)
Acquired from the DDRM Properties Joint Venture.

41

Dispositions

During 2024, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
January 2024Marketplace at Highland VillageHighland Village, Texas207$42,100
January 2024Casselberry Commons (A)Casselberry, Florida23740,300
March 2024Chapel Hills EastColorado Springs, Colorado22537,000
April 2024Cool Springs PointeBrentwood, Tennessee19834,550
April 2024Market Square(A)Douglasville, Georgia11715,600
June 2024Johns Creek Towne CenterSuwanee, Georgia30358,850
June 2024Six property portfolio(A)Various2,368495,000
June 2024Carillon Place(A)Naples, Florida25054,700
June 2024The HubHempstead, New York24941,000
June 2024Cumming Marketplace (Lowe's parcel)Cumming, Georgia13517,200
June 2024Belgate Shopping CenterCharlotte, North Carolina26947,250
July 2024Two property portfolio(A)Cumming, Georgia40667,530
July 2024Midway Plaza (A)Tamarac, Florida21836,425
July 2024Bandera Pointe(A)San Antonio, Texas43858,325
July 2024Lee Vista PromenadeOrlando, Florida31468,500
August 2024Three property portfolio(A)Various894137,500
August 2024Guilford CommonsGuilford, Connecticut12926,500
August 2024Woodfield Village GreenSchaumburg, Illinois39093,200
August 2024Falcon Ridge Town Center (A)Fontana, California25064,700
August 2024Centennial PromenadeCentennial, Colorado44398,100
September 2024White Oak Village(A)Richmond, Virginia39863,503
September 2024Springfield CenterSpringfield, Virginia17749,100
September 2024Hamilton Marketplace(A)Hamilton, New Jersey485116,500
September 2024Whole Foods at Bay PlaceOakland, California5744,400
September 2024The Shops at Midtown Miami(A)Miami, Florida34883,750
September 2024Ridge at Creekside(A)Roseville, California18639,750
September 2024Echelon Village Plaza(A)Voorhees, New Jersey858,500
September 2024Three property portfolio(A)Various960180,500
September 2024University Hills(A)Denver, Colorado21056,500
September 2024Village Square at GolfBoynton Beach, Florida13531,101
September 2024Collection at Brandon BoulevardBrandon, Florida22237,200
11,303$2,245,134

(A)
GLA excludes some square footage relating to convenience parcels retained by the Company at the time of the sale and subsequently included in the spin-off of Curbline Properties.

Joint Venture Dispositions

In May 2024, the Company acquired one asset owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Meadowmont Village, Chapel Hill, North Carolina) for $44.2 million ($8.8 million at the Company’s share) which included a convenience parcel subsequently included in the Curbline Properties spin-off. In June 2024, the DDRM Properties Joint Venture sold one asset (Hilltop Plaza, Richmond, California) for $36.5 million, of which the Company’s share was $7.3 million. There are no remaining assets in this joint venture.

Equity Transactions

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company redeemed all of its Class A Preferred Shares at a redemption price of $500.00 per Class A Preferred Share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $3.6302 per Class A Preferred Share (or $0.1815 per depositary share). The Company recorded a charge of $6.2 million to net income attributable to common shareholders, which represents the difference between the redemption price and the carrying amount immediately prior to redemption, which was recorded to additional paid-in capital upon original issuance.

42

Redevelopment Projects

At December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $2.6 million in construction in progress in various active re-tenanting projects. At December 31, 2025, the estimated cost to complete redevelopment projects at properties owned by Curbline pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement was approximately $21.3 million.

CAPITALIZATION

At December 31, 2025, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $336.8 million of market equity (calculated as common shares outstanding multiplied by $6.42, the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) at December 31, 2025).

We expect that the NYSE would commence the de-listing of the Company’s common shares from the exchange if (i) the average closing price of the Company’s common shares were to fall below $1.00 per share over a 30-consecutive-day trading period, (ii) the Company’s average market capitalization were to fall below $15 million over a 30‑consecutive-day trading period or (iii) the Company were to lose or terminate its REIT qualification (unless the resulting entity qualifies for an original listing as a corporation). The NYSE also has certain discretionary authority to de-list the Company’s common shares on an involuntary basis. The Company expects to voluntarily de-list its common shares from the NYSE as future distributions cause its stock price to approach levels that would trigger involuntary de-listing. If the Company’s common shares are de-listed, shareholders may have difficulty trading their common shares on the secondary market. De-listing would also eliminate the requirement that the Company’s Board of Directors be composed of a majority of independent directors.

In connection with the spin-off of Curbline, the Company used proceeds from the Mortgage Facility together with proceeds from asset sales to repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness and therefore no longer maintains a revolving line of credit or an investment grade rating. The Company may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, and therefore conservatively manages its cash balances and proceeds from asset sales in order to maintain the capital needed to fund its operations.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

Other Guaranties

In conjunction with the redevelopment and re-tenanting of various shopping centers, the Company had entered into commitments with general contractors aggregating approximately $0.6 million for its properties (excluding Curbline redevelopment noted below) as of December 31, 2025. These obligations, composed principally of construction contracts, are generally due within 12 to 24 months, as the related construction costs are incurred, and are expected to be financed through cash on hand, operating cash flows or asset sales. These contracts typically can be changed or terminated without penalty.

Additionally, the Separation and Distribution Agreement contains obligations to complete certain redevelopment projects at properties that are owned by Curbline. As of December 31, 2025, such redevelopment projects were estimated to cost $21.3 million to complete.

The Company routinely enters into contracts for the maintenance of its properties. These contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty. At December 31, 2025, the Company had purchase order obligations, typically payable within one year, aggregating approximately $0.1 million related to the maintenance of its properties and general and administrative expenses.

At December 31, 2025, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $5.0 million. The Company has not recorded any obligations associated with these letters of credit, the majority of which serve as collateral to secure the Company’s obligation to third-party insurers with respect to limited reinsurance provided by the Company’s captive insurance company.

The Company is a party to employment contracts with its Chief Financial Officer and its General Counsel. These contracts generally provide for base salary, bonuses based on factors including the performance of the Company and the executive, participation in the Company’s retirement plans, health and welfare benefits and reimbursement of various qualified business expenses. These employment agreements have indefinite terms subject to termination by either the Company or the executive without cause upon at least 90 days’ notice and the payment of severance and other amounts to the executive under certain circumstances. The Company is not a party to employment contracts with its Chief Executive Officer or Chief Investment Officer whose services are provided to the Company by Curbline Properties pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. The term of the Shared Services Agreement expires on October 1, 2027, subject to earlier termination by the Company or Curbline Properties as provided therein (and the Company’s payment of a termination fee to Curbline Properties under certain circumstances).

43

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The Company continues to experience retailer demand which it believes is attributable to the location of many of the Company’s properties in communities experiencing population growth, limited new construction of competing retail properties and tenants’ continuing use of physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of merchandise distribution.

The Company benefits from a diversified tenant base, where only four tenants’ annualized base rent equals or exceeds 3% of the Company’s annualized base rent plus the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture annualized base rent. Other significant national tenants generally have relatively strong financial positions, have outperformed other retail categories over time and the Company believes remain well-capitalized. Historically, these national tenants have provided a stable revenue base, and the Company believes that they will continue to provide a stable revenue base going forward, given the long-term nature of these leases. The majority of the tenants in the Company’s shopping centers provide day-to-day consumer necessities with a focus on value and convenience, versus discretionary items, which the Company believes will enable many of its tenants to outperform under a variety of economic conditions. The Company has relatively little reliance on overage or percentage rents generated by tenant sales performance.

The threat of increasing inflation, changing interest rates, uncertainty over tariff policy, concerns over consumer confidence and the volatility of global capital markets pose risks to the U.S. economy, retail sales, and the Company’s tenants. In addition to these macroeconomic challenges, the retail sector has been affected by changing consumer behaviors, including the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for the share of the consumer wallet. The Company routinely monitors the credit profiles of its tenants and analyzes the possible impact of any potential tenant credit issues on the financial statements of the Company and its unconsolidated joint ventures. In some cases, changing conditions have resulted in weaker retailers and retail categories losing market share and declaring bankruptcy and/or closing stores. However, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to launch new concepts and expand their store fleets in communities with attractive demographics. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects (and the prospects of purchasers of it properties) to backfill spaces vacated by non-renewing or bankrupt tenants are generally good, though such re-tenanting efforts would likely require additional capital expenditures and the opportunities to lease any vacant theater spaces may be more limited. However, there can be no assurance that vacancy resulting from increasingly uncertain economic conditions will not adversely affect the Company’s operating results or the valuation of its properties. (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including trends that might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations. The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act, both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements relating to future capital expenditures, financing sources, dispositions, the resolution of joint ventures, distributions to shareholders, and the Company’s wind-up strategy and costs and expenses relating thereto. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and that could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements. For additional factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:


The Company may fail to dispose of its remaining properties on favorable terms or at all, especially in areas experiencing deteriorating economic conditions. Real estate investments can be illiquid and buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties obtaining financing;


The Company may have difficulty realizing value from its DTP joint venture on account of its limited control over the joint venture and contractual restrictions set forth in the joint venture agreement;


Changes in interest rates, a downturn in the economy or disruptions in the financial markets could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares, the valuation of its portfolio, its ability to sell properties and the prices realized therefor, as well as its performance and cash flow;

44


The Company may be unable to accurately project costs and expenses relating to its disposition and wind-up strategy and may encounter exposure to unexpected claims, liabilities or costs in connection therewith;


The Company may encounter loss of key personnel or disruptions in its property management or accounting functions in connection with the decreasing size of its operations;


The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues, and any economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of the Company’s tenants, or new tenants, to enter into new leases or the ability of the Company’s existing tenants to renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates;


The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions;


The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the internet and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants, or a general downturn in its tenants’ businesses, which may cause tenants to close stores or default in payment of rent;


The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties, and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants;


The Company may require greater time and financial resources to complete redevelopment projects (including construction obligations owing to Curbline Properties under the Shared Services Agreement) as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, resulting in increased construction costs;


The Company does not maintain a revolving credit facility or investment grade rating and may encounter difficulties in obtaining financing on reasonable terms, or at all, to operate its business;


Inflationary pressures could result in reductions in retailer profitability, consumer discretionary spending and tenant demand to lease space. Inflation could also increase the costs incurred by the Company to operate its properties and finance its operations and could adversely impact the valuation of its properties, all of which could have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common shares;


The Company may be unable to satisfy or comply with complex regulations related to its status as a REIT, including as a result of recent disposition activity and changes to the Company’s asset portfolio;


The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company must borrow funds to make distributions, those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms or at all;


Any de-listing of the Company’s common shares from the NYSE could adversely impact shareholders’ ability to sell shares when desired and the price obtained therefor;


The Company’s decision to dispose of real estate assets could result in material impairment losses and adversely affect the Company’s financial results;


The outcome of pending or future litigation, including litigation with tenants or joint venture partners, may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


Property damage, expenses related thereto and other business and economic consequences (including the potential loss of revenue) resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters in locations where the Company owns properties may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, its financial condition and its ability to dispose of impacted properties;


Sufficiency and timing of any insurance recovery payments related to damages and lost revenues from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


The Company may incur liability for injuries to persons, property or the environment occurring on or near its properties and such losses may be uninsured or exceed policy coverage;


The Company and its tenants could be negatively affected by the impacts of pandemics and other public health crises;


The Company could be subject to potential liabilities, increased costs, reputation harm and other adverse effects on the Company’s business due to stakeholders’, including regulators’, views regarding the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and disclosures or lack thereof, and the impact of factors outside of the Company’s control on such initiatives and disclosures;

45


The Company could incur additional expenses to comply with or respond to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act or otherwise be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations;


The Company’s Board of Directors, which regularly reviews the Company’s business strategy and objectives, may change the Company’s strategic plan based on a variety of factors and conditions, including in response to changing market conditions;


The Company may be negatively impacted by any change in the Company’s relationship with Curbline Properties and the Company may be unable to retain qualified leadership and adequately manage its business in the event the Shared Services Agreement is terminated;


Potential conflicts of interest with Curbline Properties and


The Company and its vendors could sustain a disruption, failure or breach of their respective networks and systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, including those that leverage artificial intelligence, which could disrupt the Company’s business operations, compromise the confidentiality of sensitive information and result in fines or penalties.

MD&A history

Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.

FY 2024 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000950170-25-029989.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2025-02-28. Report date: 2024-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of owning, leasing, acquiring, redeveloping and managing shopping centers. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 33 shopping centers (including 11 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures). At December 31, 2024, the Company owned 8.8 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture). At December 31, 2024, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 90.6% on a pro rata basis, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $19.64 on a pro rata basis. In addition, at December 31, 2024, the Company owns two adjacent office buildings located in Beachwood, Ohio, totaling approximately 339,000 square feet of GLA, a portion of which buildings currently serve as the Company’s headquarters.

26

Curbline Spin-Off

In October 2023, the Company announced a plan to spin off a portfolio of convenience retail assets into a separate, publicly traded company to be named Curbline Properties Corp. (“Curbline” or “Curbline Properties”) in recognition of the distinct characteristics and opportunities within the Company’s unanchored and grocery, lifestyle and power center portfolios. Convenience properties are generally positioned on the curbline of well-trafficked intersections and major vehicular corridors, offering enhanced access and visibility along with dedicated parking and often include drive-thru units. Convenience properties generally consist of a homogeneous row of primarily small-shop units leased to a diversified mixture of national and local service and restaurant tenants that cater to daily convenience trips from the growing suburban population.

As of September 30, 2024, the Curbline portfolio consisted of 79 wholly-owned convenience retail assets consisting of approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA. The separation of Curbline was completed on October 1, 2024.

On October 1, 2024, the Company, Curbline and Curbline Properties LP (the “Operating Partnership”) entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement (the “Separation and Distribution Agreement”), which provided for the principal transactions necessary to consummate the spin-off, including the allocation among the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership of the Company’s assets, liabilities and obligations attributable to periods both prior to and following the spin-off. In particular, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provided, among other things, that certain assets relating to Curbline’s business were to be transferred to the Operating Partnership or the applicable Curbline subsidiary, including equity interests of certain Company subsidiaries that held assets and liabilities related to Curbline, interests in real property, certain tangible personal property, cash and cash equivalents held in Curbline accounts (including the transfer to Curbline of unrestricted cash of $800.0 million upon consummation of the spin-off) and other assets primarily used or held primarily for use in Curbline’s business. The Separation and Distribution Agreement also provided that certain liabilities relating to Curbline’s business were to be transferred to the Operating Partnership or the applicable Curbline subsidiary, including liabilities relating to or arising out of the operation of Curbline’s business after the effective time of the spin-off and liabilities expressly allocated to Curbline or one of its subsidiaries by the Separation and Distribution Agreement or certain other agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off.

Additionally, the Separation and Distribution Agreement contains provisions that obligate the Company to complete certain redevelopment projects at properties that are owned by Curbline. As of December 31, 2024, these redevelopment projects were estimated to cost $32.9 million to complete.

On October 1, 2024, the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership also entered into a Shared Services Agreement (the “Shared Services Agreement”), which provides that, subject to the supervision of the Company’s Board of Directors and executives, the Operating Partnership or its affiliates will provide the Company (i) leadership and management services that are of a nature customarily performed by leadership and management overseeing the business and operation of a REIT similarly situated to the Company, including supervising various business functions of the Company necessary for the day-to-day management operations of the Company and its affiliates and (ii) transaction services that are of a nature customarily performed by a dedicated transactions team within an organization similarly situated to the Company, including the provision of personnel at both the leadership and operational levels necessary to ensure effective and efficient preparation, negotiation, execution and implementation of real estate transactions, as well as overseeing post-transaction activities and alignment with the Company’s strategic objectives. The Operating Partnership or its affiliates provides the Company with a Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer but the Company employs its own Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and General Counsel. The Company also provid Curbline Properties and its affiliates an option to enter into a lease agreement for office space at SITE Centers’ corporate headquarters location in Beachwood, Ohio for an initial five-year term with the right to extend the lease for up to four successive terms of five years each.

The Shared Services Agreement also requires the Company to provide the Operating Partnership and its affiliates the services of its employees and the use or benefit of the Company’s assets, offices and other resources as may be necessary or useful to establish and operate various business functions of the Operating Partnership and its affiliates in a manner as would be established and operated for a REIT similarly situated to Curbline. The Operating Partnership has the authority to supervise the employees of the Company and its affiliates and direct and control the day-to-day activities of such employees while such employees are providing services to the Operating Partnership or its affiliates under the Shared Services Agreement.

The Operating Partnership pays the Company a fee in the aggregate amount of 2.0% of Curbline’s Gross Revenue (as defined in the Shared Services Agreement) during the term of the Shared Services Agreement to be paid in monthly installments each month in arrears no later than the tenth calendar day of each month based upon Curbline’s Gross Revenue for the prior month. There is no separate fee paid by the Company in connection with the provision of services by the Operating Partnership or its affiliates under the Shared Services Agreement. Unless terminated earlier, the term of the Shared Services Agreement will expire on October 1, 2027. In the event of certain early terminations of the Shared Services Agreement, the Company will be obligated to pay a termination fee to the Operating Partnership equal to $2.5 million multiplied by the number of whole or partial fiscal quarters remaining in the Shared

27

Services Agreement’s three-year term (or $12.0 million in the event the Company terminates the agreement for convenience on its second anniversary).

The Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership also entered into a tax matters agreement (the “Tax Matters Agreement”), which governs the rights, responsibilities and obligations of the parties following the spin-off with respect to various tax matters and provides for the allocation of tax-related assets, liabilities and obligations. In addition, the Company, Curbline and the Operating Partnership entered into an employee matters agreement (“the Employee Matters Agreement”), which governs the respective rights, responsibilities, and obligations of the parties following the spin-off with respect to transitioning employees, equity plans and retirement plans, health and welfare benefits, and other employment, compensation, and benefit-related matters.

SITE Centers Strategy

From July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2024, the Company generated approximately $3.1 billion of gross proceeds from sales of properties for the purpose of acquiring additional convenience properties, capitalizing Curbline and, together with proceeds from the closing and funding of the Mortgage Facility (defined below), redeeming and/or repaying all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness and preferred shares. Going forward, the Company intends to realize value through operations and to consider various factors, including market conditions and differences between the public and private valuations of its portfolio, in evaluating whether and when to pursue additional asset sales. The timing of any additional sales may also be impacted by interim leasing, tactical redevelopment activities and other asset management initiatives intended to maximize value. As of February 28, 2025, the Company was in the beginning stages of marketing a select number of assets for sale, though no assurances can be given that such efforts will result in additional asset sales, particularly in light of the dynamic interest rate environment and capital markets conditions. The Company expects to use proceeds from any additional asset sales to repay outstanding indebtedness and make distributions to shareholders.

The Company expects that rental income and net income will decrease in future periods as compared to corresponding prior year periods as a result of the spin-off of Curbline and the significant volume of dispositions completed in 2024. The Company expects that its future dividend policy will be influenced by operations and asset sales, though the Company’s distribution of any sale proceeds to shareholders will be subject to collateral release and repayment requirements set forth in the terms of the Company’s indebtedness and management of liquidity and overall leverage levels in connection with ongoing operations.

Growth opportunities within the Company’s portfolio include rental rate increases, continued lease-up of the portfolio, and rent commencement with respect to recently executed leases.

Transaction and Capital Markets Highlights

Transaction and investment highlights during 2024, in addition to the Curbline spin-off, include the following:


Acquired a fee interest in a land parcel in Florida as well as a joint venture partner’s 80% interest in two properties in North Carolina (Meadowmont Crossing and Meadowmont Market) for $18.7 million;


Sold 40 wholly-owned shopping centers (excluding certain retained convenience parcels), a parcel at a shopping center and two joint venture assets for an aggregate sales price of $2,325.9 million ($2,261.3 million at the Company’s share);


Effected a reverse stock split of its common shares at a ratio of one-for-four and cancelled treasury shares not reserved for compensation plans;


Closed and funded a $530.0 million Mortgage Facility which had an outstanding principal balance of $206.9 million as of December 31, 2024;


Repaid in full the $200.0 million Term Loan (defined below) and terminated the Revolving Credit Facility (defined below) and recorded associated debt extinguishment costs of $0.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively;


Repurchased $88.3 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding senior notes due in 2025, 2026 and 2027 (the “Senior Notes”) for total cash consideration including expenses of $87.1 million and recorded a gain on debt retirement of $1.0 million;


Redeemed all remaining outstanding Senior Notes for total cash consideration including expenses of $1,223.0 million and recorded debt extinguishment costs of $6.7 million;


Repaid a joint venture mortgage loan for DDRM Properties Joint Venture due in 2024 for $40.9 million ($8.2 million at the Company’s share) and

28


Redeemed all outstanding 6.375% Class A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares and the associated depositary shares (the “Class A Preferred Shares”) for total cash consideration including expenses of $175.0 million plus accrued dividends. In connection with the redemption, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $6.2 million to net income attributable to common shareholders in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Operational Accomplishments

The Company believes the strong leased and commencement rates of its portfolio is attributable to national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations and the concentration of the Company’s portfolio in primarily suburban, high household income communities which have witnessed significant population growth, changes in remote work and work-from-home trends, and limited new construction of competing retail properties.

Operating highlights for 2024 included (excluding discontinued operations and properties sold in 2024):


Signed new leases and renewals for approximately 0.7 million square feet of GLA on a pro rata basis;


Achieved blended lease spreads of 7.8% at the Company’s pro rata share;


Total annualized base rent per occupied square foot on a pro rata basis increased to $19.64 at December 31, 2024, as compared to $19.42 at December 31, 2023, primarily due to an increase in occupancy of small shop space and rent increases and


Aggregate occupancy was 90.6% at December 31, 2024 on a pro rata basis compared to 89.5% at December 31, 2023. The year over year increase primarily was related to new tenant openings in excess of closings.

Retail Environment

The Company continued to see strong renewals for its space in 2024 from a combination of both national and local retailers. Although certain retailers announced bankruptcies and/or store closures in 2024 other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to expand their store fleets and launch new concepts. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects to backfill spaces vacated by bankrupt or non-renewing tenants are generally good, though such re-tenanting efforts will likely require additional capital expenditures and opportunities to lease any vacant theater spaces that may arise may be more limited. Many of the Company’s largest tenants, including TJX Companies, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross and Burlington, remain well positioned with access to capital and have outperformed other retail categories on a relative basis.

Company Fundamentals

The following table lists the Company’s tenants that equal or exceed 1.5% of the Company’s aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenue and the respective Company-owned shopping center GLA as of December 31, 2024, for the following (1) the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture properties combined, (2) the wholly-owned properties and (3) the unconsolidated joint ventures presented at 100%:

29

At 100%
At SITE Centers’ ShareWholly-Owned PropertiesJoint Venture Properties
Tenant% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA
TJX Companies(A)4.6%4.9%4.7%4.8%4.6%5.9%
Dick’s Sporting Goods(B)4.4%4.2%4.6%4.2%3.8%4.9%
Burlington4.3%3.8%5.0%4.3%0.8%1.1%
Kroger(C)3.6%2.1%4.3%2.5%0.0%0.0%
PetSmart3.3%3.1%3.6%3.4%1.6%1.4%
LA Fitness Centers3.2%2.3%3.8%2.7%0.0%0.0%
Best Buy2.9%2.8%2.9%2.7%3.4%3.8%
Ross Stores(D)2.4%3.1%2.3%3.0%3.9%4.8%
Michaels1.7%1.9%1.7%1.8%2.1%2.6%
Five Below1.7%1.5%1.7%1.6%1.4%1.2%
Ulta Beauty1.5%0.9%1.5%0.8%1.9%1.5%

(A)
Includes T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, Sierra Trading, HomeSense and Combo Store

(B)
Includes Dick’s Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy

(C)
Includes Kroger, Harris Teeter, King Soopers, Mariano’s and Lucky’s

(D)
Includes Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts

The Company leased approximately 1.3 million square feet (0.7 million square feet at the Company’s share) of GLA in 2024 in its wholly-owned and joint venture portfolios, composed of 19 new leases and 90 renewals, for a total of 109 leases executed in 2024. At December 31, 2024, the Company had 68 leases expiring in 2025 with an average base rent per square foot of $23.46 on a pro rata basis. For the comparable leases executed in 2024, at the Company’s interest, the Company generated positive cash leasing spreads of 14.2% for new leases and 7.4% for renewals, or 7.8% on a blended basis. Cash leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase of the tenant’s annual base rent in the first year of the newly executed or renewal lease, over the annual base rent applicable to the final year of the previous lease term, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity and exclude properties in redevelopment. The Company’s cash leasing spread calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated, in addition to other factors that limit comparability, and as a result, is a good benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates.

For new leases executed during 2024, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $6.85 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $4.74 per rentable square foot in 2023. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

Summary—2024 Financial Results

The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” described later in this section) (in thousands except per share amounts):

For the Year Ended
December 31,
20242023
Net income attributable to common shareholders$516,031$254,547
FFO attributable to common shareholders$79,443$240,199
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$166,724$247,872
Earnings per share – Diluted$9.77$4.85

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the increase in net income attributable to common shareholders, as compared to the prior year, was primarily the result of higher gains on dispositions of real estate and an increase in interest income, partially offset by the impact of net property dispositions, the write-off of fees related to the Mortgage Commitment (defined below), debt

30

extinguishment costs, and impairment charges. The decrease in Funds from Operations (“FFO”) attributable to common shareholders was primarily the result of the impact of net property dispositions and debt extinguishment costs, partially offset by increased interest income. The decrease in Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders generally was due to the impact of net property dispositions, partially offset by increased interest income.

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in the understanding of the Company’s financial statements and the factors that accounted for changes in certain key items in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting estimates that affected these financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, management has used available information, including the Company’s history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may use different estimates that may affect the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Purchase Price Allocations of Property Acquisitions

For the acquisition of real estate assets, the Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company applies various valuation methods, all of which require significant estimates by management, including discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions. Further, the valuation of above- and below-market lease values are significantly impacted by management's estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease. If the Company determines that an event has occurred after the initial allocation of the asset or liability that would change the estimated useful life of the asset, the Company will reassess the depreciation and amortization of the asset. The Company is required to make subjective estimates in connection with these valuations and allocations.

Real Estate and Long-Lived Assets

Impairment Assessment

An asset with impairment indicators is considered impaired when the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. If an asset’s carrying value is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The Company reviews its individual real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles for potential impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators are primarily related to changes in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows; however, other impairment indicators could occur.

If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the alternative courses of action as of the balance sheet date. Undiscounted cash flows relating to assets considered for potential sale include estimated net operating income through potential sale dates and estimates of the assets current fair value based on the best available information, which may include a direct capitalization of such net operating income, letters of intent, broker opinions of value or purchase and sale agreements under negotiation.

Impairment indicators related to significant decreases in cash flows may be caused by declines in occupancy, projected losses on potential future sales, market factors, significant changes in projected development costs or completion dates and sustainability of development projects. For certain assets, this may require us to reevaluate the hold period required to recover the asset’s carrying value based on updated undiscounted cash flow estimates and involves reconsideration of our hold period based of our ability and intent to hold the asset. The determination of anticipated undiscounted cash flows in these situations is inherently more subjective, requiring significant estimates made by management, and considers the most likely expected course of action at the balance sheet date

31

based on current plans, intended holding periods, estimated down-time, market rent assumptions, terminal capitalization rates and other available market information.

The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. If the Company’s estimates of the anticipated holding periods, projected future cash flows or market conditions change, its evaluation of the impairment charges may be different, and such differences could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Specifically, plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.

Measurement of Fair Value

The fair value of real estate investments used in the Company’s impairment calculations is estimated based on the price that would be received for the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date. Real estate assets without a public market are valued based on assumptions made and valuation techniques used by the Company. The availability of observable transaction data and inputs can make it more difficult and/or subjective to determine the fair value of such real estate assets. As a result, amounts ultimately realized by the Company from real estate assets sold may differ from the fair values presented, and the differences could be material.

The valuation of real estate assets for impairment is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including the income capitalization approach or discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each asset considering prevailing market capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations, bona fide purchase offers received from third parties and/or consideration of the amount that currently would be required to replace the asset, as adjusted for obsolescence. In general, the Company utilizes a valuation technique that is based on the characteristics of the specific asset when measuring fair value of an investment. However, a single valuation technique is generally used for the Company’s property type. The significant assumptions include market rental rates, estimated down-time and capitalization rates used in the income capitalization valuation, as well as the projected property net operating income. Valuation of real estate assets is calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the measurement date, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The spin-off of Curbline Properties in October 2024 represented a strategic shift in the Company’s business and, as such, the Curbline properties are reflected in the financial results as discontinued operations for all periods presented. For the comparison of the Company’s 2024 performance to 2023 and comparison of the Company’s 2023 performance to 2022 presented below, consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2023 and January 1, 2022, respectively, are referred to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.”

Revenues from Operations (in thousands)

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
202420232022$ Change$ Change
Rental income(A)$269,286$444,062$464,252$(174,776)$(20,190)
Fee and other income(B)8,1818,55314,966(372)(6,413)
Total revenues$277,467$452,615$479,218$(175,148)$(26,603)

(A)
The following table summarizes the key components of rental income (in thousands):

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
Contractual Lease Payments202420232022$ Change$ Change
Base and percentage rental income(1)$193,561$325,000$334,842$(131,439)$(9,842)
Recoveries from tenants(2)70,360113,214118,281(42,854)(5,067)
Uncollectible revenue(3)702(1,010)1,5931,712(2,603)
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income4,6636,8589,536(2,195)(2,678)
Total contractual lease payments$269,286$444,062$464,252$(174,776)$(20,190)

32

(1)
The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions):

Increase (Decrease)Increase (Decrease)
2024 vs. 20232023 vs. 2022
Acquisition of shopping centers$1.0$
Comparable Portfolio Properties1.53.1
Disposition of shopping centers(135.5)(13.0)
Straight-line rents1.60.1
Total$(131.4)$(9.8)

The increase within the Comparable Portfolio Properties for 2023 as compared to 2022 includes the write-off of approximately $8.4 million of below-market lease intangibles due to the early termination of tenant leases.

The increase in Comparable Property Portfolio is due to higher occupancy and annualized base rent per occupied square foot. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Comparable Properties consisted of 22 wholly-owned properties as of each balance sheet date that had an aggregate occupancy rate of 90.6% and 89.5% and an average annualized base rent per occupied square foot of $19.81 and $19.63, respectively.

(2)
Recoveries from tenants were approximately 73.5% and 78.7% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The decrease in the recovery percentage primarily was due to a combination of transactional activity and the mix of properties sold.

(3)
The net amount reported was primarily attributable to the impact of tenants on the cash basis of accounting and related reserve adjustments.

(B) Fee and Other Income was primarily earned from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures and Curbline Properties. The decrease primarily relates to lower fee revenue from joint ventures as a result of asset sales. The components of Fee and Other Income are presented in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Fee and Other Income,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein. Decreases in the number of assets under management will impact the amount of revenue recorded in future periods. The Company’s joint venture partners may also elect to terminate their joint venture arrangements with the Company in connection with a change in investment strategy or otherwise. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

Expenses from Operations (in thousands)

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
202420232022$ Change$ Change
Operating and maintenance(A)$55,372$78,306$81,893$(22,934)$(3,587)
Real estate taxes(A)40,29265,50172,716(25,209)(7,215)
Impairment charges(B)66,6002,53666,600(2,536)
General and administrative(C)47,08050,86746,564(3,787)4,303
Depreciation and amortization(A)101,344180,611177,012(79,267)3,599
$310,688$375,285$380,721$(64,597)$(5,436)

33

(A)
The changes were due to the following (in millions):

Comparison of 2024 to 2023
2024 vs. 2023 $ Change
Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Acquisition of shopping centers$0.2$0.2$0.5
Comparable Portfolio Properties(0.1)0.5(2.0)
Disposition of shopping centers(23.0)(25.9)(77.8)
$(22.9)$(25.2)$(79.3)
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
2023 vs. 2022 $ Change
Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Acquisition of shopping centers$$$
Comparable Portfolio Properties(2.2)(0.1)2.9
Disposition of shopping centers(1.4)(7.1)0.7
$(3.6)$(7.2)$3.6

The decrease in depreciation for the Comparable Portfolio Properties in 2024 vs. 2023 was primarily due to the impact of acceleration of depreciation related to terminations and write-off of intangibles in 2023.

(B)
There were $66.6 million of impairment charges recorded for the year ended December 31, 2024, triggered by changes in hold period assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the $2.5 million impairment charge resulted from a tenant exercising a fixed-price purchase option on their building pursuant to the lease agreement. Impairment charges are presented in Note 11, “Impairment Charges,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

(C)
General and administrative expenses for 2023 included costs related to a May 2023 restructuring plan, which included a voluntary retirement offer and other costs to align the Company’s cost structure and technology platform with current and future expected operations and resulted in charges to general and administrative costs of $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The Company continues to expense certain internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with leasing and re-leasing of existing space.

Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
202420232022$ Change$ Change
Interest expense(A)$(59,463)$(80,482)$(76,074)$21,019$(4,408)
Interest income(B)31,6204,34827,2724,348
Debt extinguishment costs(C)(42,822)(50)(581)(42,772)531
Gain on debt retirement(D)1,0371,037
Loss on equity derivative instruments(E)(4,412)2,103(6,515)2,103
Transaction and other expenses(F)(2,184)(836)(1,949)(1,348)1,113
$(76,224)$(74,917)$(78,604)$(1,307)$3,687

(A)
The weighted-average debt outstanding and related weighted-average interest rate are as follows:

For the Year Ended December 31,
202420232022
Weighted-average debt outstanding (in billions)$1.0$1.7$1.8
Weighted-average interest rate5.3%4.5%4.1%

34

In 2024, the Company simplified its debt structure. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s consolidated indebtedness consisted of two outstanding mortgages (the Mortgage Facility and a mortgage loan encumbering Nassau Park Pavilion) with an aggregate outstanding balance of $306.8 million, a weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates excluding amortization of debt issuance costs) of 6.9% and a weighted-average maturity (prior to exercise of applicable extension options) of 2.4 years. The weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates and excluding amortization of debt issuance costs) was 4.3% and 4.1% at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. At December 31, 2023, the weighted-average maturity (without extensions) was 2.5 years. Interest costs capitalized in conjunction with redevelopment projects were $0.6 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

(B)
Related to excess cash as a result of sale proceeds maintained in money market accounts.

(C)
In 2024, related primarily to the write off of loan costs and commitment fees and payment of debt extinguishment costs due to the termination of the Mortgage Commitment ($21.2 million), the Revolving Credit Facility ($3.9 million), redemption of the Senior Notes ($6.7 million), pay-off of the Term Loan ($0.9 million) and the release of properties from the Mortgage Facility ($10.1 million).

(D)
Related to the repurchase of a portion of the Senior Notes for total cash consideration, including expenses, of $87.1 million and the write-off of a fair value discount.

(E)
Derivative mark-to-market impact related to the partial hedge on the potential interest rate impact to yield maintenance premiums on the Senior Notes. The hedge was terminated in conjunction with the redemption of the Senior Notes and the Company received a cash payment of $1.3 million in 2024.

(F)
In 2024, primarily consists of transactions costs for abandoned deals and an adjustment to reflect the fair value of services received and provided to Curbline Properties under the Shared Services Agreement.

Other Items (in thousands)

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
202420232022$ Change$ Change
Equity in net income of joint ventures(A)$82$6,577$27,892$(6,495)$(21,315)
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(B)2,6693,74945,581(1,080)(41,832)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(C)633,219218,65546,644414,564172,011
Tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes(761)(2,045)(816)1,284(1,229)
Income from discontinued operations(D)6,06036,37229,598(30,312)6,774
Income attributable to non-controlling interests, net(18)(73)1855

(A)
The reduction in income is the result of gains recognized in 2023 from joint venture asset sales. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 11, 13 and 18 shopping center properties, respectively. Joint venture property sales could significantly impact the amount of income or loss recognized in future periods. See Note 3, “Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures,” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

(B)
In 2024, the Company acquired its partner’s 80% interest in one asset previously owned by DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Meadowmont Village, Chapel Hill, North Carolina) for $35.4 million and stepped up its 20% interest due to change in control. In 2023, the Company recorded a gain related to additional proceeds received related to an unconsolidated joint venture that sold its sole asset, a parcel of undeveloped land in Richmond Hill, Ontario, which was considered contingent at the time of the sale. In 2022, the Company recorded a $3.3 million gain from the acquisition of its joint venture partner’s 80% equity in an asset (Casselberry Commons) owned by the DDRM Joint Venture, a $16.8 million gain from the sale of its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner and a $25.4 million gain from the sale of its 50% interest in Lennox Town Center to its partner.

(C)
The Company sold 40 and 17 wholly-owned shopping centers (excluding certain convenience parcels that were retained and later included in the spin-off of Curbline Properties) in 2024 and 2023, respectively. In addition, one land parcel was also sold in 2024. Five wholly-owned shopping centers and land parcels were sold in 2022. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

35

(D)
The decrease in 2024 as compared to 2023 is due to the fact that 2024 results are through the spin-off date as compared to a full year in 2023 as well as $30.7 million in transactions costs related to the spin-off of Curbline Properties. The increase in 2023 as compared to 2022 was due to properties acquired during 2023 and 2022 which were included in the spin-off.

Net Income (in thousands)

20242023
vs.vs.
20232022
202420232022$ Change$ Change
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$531,824$265,703$168,719$266,121$96,984

The increase in net income in 2024 attributable to SITE Centers, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to the higher gain on disposition of real estate recognized in 2024 and interest income partially offset by impairment charges, debt extinguishment costs and the net impact of property sales. The increase in net income attributable to SITE Centers in 2023, as compared to the prior-year period was primarily attributable to the higher gain on disposition of real estate recognized in 2023, base rent growth, the write-off of below market lease intangibles and the net impact of property acquisitions, partially offset by lower joint venture management fees, higher interest expense, higher depreciation expense and separation and charges included within general and administrative expenses related to the restructuring plan initiated in May 2023.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Funds from Operations and Operating Funds from Operations

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company believes that FFO and Operating FFO, both non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of REITs. FFO and Operating FFO are frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs. The Company also believes that FFO and Operating FFO more appropriately measure the core operations of the Company and provide benchmarks to its peer group.

FFO excludes GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions, and many companies use different depreciable lives and methods. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate and gains and losses from property dispositions, it can provide a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and acquisition, disposition and development activities. This provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted to exclude (i) preferred share dividends, (ii) gains and losses from disposition of real estate property and related investments, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) impairment charges on real estate property and related investments, (iv) gains and losses from changes in control and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation and amortization of intangibles, equity income (loss) from joint ventures and equity income (loss) from non-controlling interests and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint ventures and non-controlling interests, determined on a consistent basis. The Company’s calculation of FFO is consistent with the definition of FFO provided by NAREIT.

The Company believes that certain charges, income and gains recorded in its operating results are not comparable or reflective of its core operating performance. Operating FFO is useful to investors as the Company removes non-comparable charges, income and gains to analyze the results of its operations and assess performance of the core operating real estate portfolio. As a result, the Company also computes Operating FFO and discusses it with the users of its financial statements, in addition to other measures such as net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and FFO. Operating FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as FFO excluding certain charges, income and gains/losses that management believes are not comparable and indicative of the results of the Company’s operating real estate portfolio. Such adjustments include write-off of preferred share original issuance costs, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, certain transaction fee income, transaction costs and other restructuring type costs, including employee separation costs. The disclosure of these adjustments is regularly requested by users of the Company’s financial statements.

The adjustment for these charges, income and gains may not be comparable to how other REITs or real estate companies calculate their results of operations, and the Company’s calculation of Operating FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO.

36

Additionally, the Company provides no assurances that these charges, income and gains are non-recurring. These charges, income and gains could be reasonably expected to recur in future results of operations.

These measures of performance are used by the Company for several business purposes and by other REITs. The Company uses FFO and/or Operating FFO in part (i) as a disclosure to improve the understanding of the Company’s operating results among the investing public, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset company’s performance, (iii) to influence acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.

For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO and Operating FFO provide the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. They provide recognized measures of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often significant). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO and Operating FFO in a different manner.

Management recognizes the limitations of FFO and Operating FFO when compared to GAAP’s net income. FFO and Operating FFO do not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use FFO or Operating FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO represents cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and neither is necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO should be considered an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. FFO and Operating FFO are simply used as additional indicators of the Company’s operating performance. The Company believes that to further understand its performance, FFO and Operating FFO should be compared with the Company’s reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP, as presented in its consolidated financial statements. Reconciliations of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) have been provided below.

Reconciliation Presentation

FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20242023$ Change
FFO attributable to common shareholders$79,443$240,199$(160,756)
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders166,724247,872(81,148)

The decrease in FFO for the year ended December 31, 2024, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to the impact from net property dispositions, debt extinguishment costs and transaction costs associated with the spin-off of Curbline, which are included in income from discontinued operations, partially offset by increased interest income. The decrease in Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders generally was due to the impact of net property dispositions, partially offset by increased interest income.

37

The Company’s reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders is as follows (in thousands). The Company provides no assurances that these charges and gains are non-recurring. These charges and gains could reasonably be expected to recur in future results of operations.

For the Year Ended December 31,
20242023
Net income attributable to common shareholders$516,031$254,547
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments97,186175,156
Equity in net income of joint ventures(82)(6,577)
Joint ventures’ FFO(A)6,0407,981
Discontinued operations’ FFO adjustments(B)29,55631,478
Non-controlling interests (OP Units)18
Impairment of real estate66,600
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(2,669)(3,749)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(633,219)(218,655)
FFO attributable to common shareholders79,443240,199
Separation and other charges1,7095,752
Discontinued operations’ transaction and debt extinguishment costs30,8512,376
Transaction, debt extinguishment and other (at SITE’s share)44,1541,648
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs6,155
Derivative mark-to-market4,412(2,103)
Non-operating items, net87,2817,673
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$166,724$247,872

(A)
At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 11 and 13 shopping center properties, respectively. These joint ventures represent the investments in which the Company recorded its share of equity in net income or loss and, accordingly, FFO and Operating FFO.

Joint ventures’ FFO and Operating FFO are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20242023
Net income attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures$5,611$21,246
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments26,94832,578
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(10,354)(21,316)
FFO$22,205$32,508
FFO at SITE Centers’ ownership interests$6,040$7,981
Operating FFO at SITE Centers’ ownership interests$6,229$8,742

(B)
Discontinued operations’ FFO adjustments are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20242023
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments$29,556$31,849
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(371)
Discontinued operations’ FFO adjustments$29,556$31,478

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The Company requires capital to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditures. The Company’s primary capital sources include cash flow from operations, debt financings and proceeds from asset sales. The Company remains committed to monitoring the duration of its indebtedness, to maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile while maintaining strategic flexibility and to closely monitoring liquidity and its cash position following the termination of its Revolving Credit Facility in August 2024.

38

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $306.8 million aggregate principal amount of consolidated indebtedness outstanding (as compared to $1.6 billion at December 31, 2023) consisting of the Mortgage Facility having an outstanding principal balance of $206.9 million and a mortgage loan secured by Nassau Park Pavilion having an outstanding principal balance of $99.9 million. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures had $441.8 million of indebtedness ($106.6 million at SITE’s share).

The Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated debt obligations generally require monthly payments of principal and/or interest over the term of the obligation. While the Company currently believes it has several options to obtain capital and fund its business, no assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Any new debt financings may also entail higher rates of interest than the indebtedness being refinanced, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

The Company expects that operating expenses, redevelopment activities and capital expenditures will generally be financed through cash provided from operating activities and asset sales. At December 31, 2024, the Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $54.6 million. As of December 31, 2024, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $32.9 million to be incurred to complete redevelopment projects at properties owned by Curbline pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business at this time.

2024 Financing Activities

The Company repositioned its capital structure during the course of 2024 in order to provide leverage levels and liquidity following the separation of Curbline Properties.

Mortgage Facility

On August 7, 2024, the Company closed and funded a $530.0 million mortgage loan (the “Mortgage Facility”) provided by affiliates of Atlas SP Partners, L.P. and Athene Annuity and Life Company (collectively, the “Lenders”). The Company used proceeds from the closing together with cash on hand from asset sales to repay its outstanding senior unsecured indebtedness as described below and to capitalize Curbline.

In connection with the Mortgage Facility’s closing, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company (collectively, the “Borrowers”) delivered certain promissory notes (collectively, the “Notes”) evidencing their obligation to pay principal, interest and other amounts under the Mortgage Facility. The Notes are secured by, among other things, mortgages encumbering the Borrowers’ respective properties (a total of 23 properties at closing) (collectively, the “Properties”) and related personal property, leases and rents.

The Mortgage Facility will mature on September 6, 2026, subject to two one-year extensions at the Borrowers’ option (subject to satisfaction of certain conditions). The interest rate applicable to the Notes is equal to 30-day term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) (subject to a rate index floor of 3.50%) plus a spread of 2.75% per annum. The Borrowers are required to maintain an interest rate cap with respect to the principal amount of the Notes having a 30-day term SOFR strike rate equal to 6.25%. During the continuance of an event of default, the contract rate of interest on the Notes will increase to the lesser of (i) the maximum rate allowed by law or (ii) 4% above the interest rate then otherwise applicable.

The Mortgage Facility is structured as an interest only loan throughout the initial two-year term and any exercised extension periods. The principal amount outstanding under the Mortgage Facility may be prepaid (in whole or in part) by the Borrowers at any time without penalty, provided that prepayments made prior to the first anniversary of the closing date in excess of 35% of the initial principal amount of the Mortgage Facility will be subject to the Borrowers’ payment of a spread maintenance premium equal to 2.75% per annum based on the number of days remaining prior to the first anniversary of the closing date. So long as no event of default then exists and subject to other customary release conditions, the Borrowers may cause the Lenders to release Properties from the Mortgage Facility in connection with their sale by paying 115% of the initial loan amount allocated to such Property (plus the spread maintenance premium, if applicable) provided that after giving effect to such release the debt yield of the remaining Properties is equal to or greater than (i) the debt yield on the Mortgage Facility’s closing date and (ii) the debt yield in effect immediately prior to such release.

All Property rents are deposited into lockbox accounts in the name of the Borrowers for the benefit of and controlled by the Lenders. So long as no Trigger Period (as defined below) is continuing, Borrowers will have control over all funds in such lockbox accounts. During a Trigger Period, substantially all amounts in the lockbox accounts will be remitted to a cash management account controlled by the Lenders on a daily basis and will be used by the Lenders to fund monthly debt service, real estate taxes, insurance, required reserves, other amounts owing to the Lenders and other property-level operating costs, with all remaining amounts to be held by the Lenders as additional collateral for the Mortgage Facility. A “Trigger Period” commences (i) upon the occurrence of any event of default under the Mortgage Facility (and ends upon the cure or waiver of the event of default); (ii) when the debt yield falls below

39

10.5% (and ends when the debt yield exceeds 10.5% for one calendar quarter); or (iii) upon any bankruptcy action with respect to any Borrower or manager of a Property that has not been discharged within 60 days of filing.

Throughout the term of the Mortgage Facility, the Company is required to maintain (i) a net worth of not less than 15% of the then outstanding principal amount of the loan (but in no event less than $100.0 million) and (ii) minimum liquid assets of not less than 5% of the then outstanding principal amount of the loan (but in no event less than $15.0 million).

The Company is required to comply with certain other covenants under the Mortgage Facility. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2024.

As of December 31, 2024, the Mortgage Facility had an outstanding principal balance of $206.9 million and was secured by 13 Properties.

Termination of Mortgage Commitment

In connection with the Mortgage Facility’s closing, the Company terminated the commitment (the “Mortgage Commitment”) that it had obtained from the a different group of lenders in October 2023 to provide a $1.1 billion financing secured by 40 of the Company’s properties.

Termination of Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan

On August 15, 2024, the Company terminated all of the lenders’ commitments under its unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and paid all related fees and expenses then outstanding. At the time of termination of the lenders’ commitments, there were no loans outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility.

On August 15, 2024, the Company also repaid in full all outstanding amounts under its unsecured term loan with a syndicate of financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the “Term Loan”). At the time of the repayment, the principal amount of the Term Loan was approximately $200.0 million.

Repayment of Other Senior Unsecured Indebtedness

On August 21, 2024, the Company redeemed the entire outstanding principal amount of its 4.700% Notes due 2027 ($448.3 million). On August 23, 2024, the Company redeemed the entire outstanding principal amount of its 3.625% Notes due 2025 ($400.4 million) and 4.250% Notes due 2026 ($370.1 million).

Redemption of Series A Preferred Shares

On November 26, 2024, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding Class A Preferred Shares for a total cash consideration of $175.0 million plus accrued dividends.

Consolidated Indebtedness – As of December 31, 2024

In addition to amounts outstanding under the Mortgage Facility, the Company had outstanding consolidated indebtedness at December 31, 2024 of $99.9 million, which consisted of a mortgage loan encumbering one property (Nassau Park Pavilion, Princeton, New Jersey), maturing in November 2028. No assurance can be provided that the Company’s debt obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures’ Mortgage Indebtedness – As of December 31, 2024

The outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2024, which matures in the subsequent 14-month period (i.e., through February 28, 2026), is $61.2 million or $30.4 million at the Company’s share which is expected to be extended in accordance with the loan documents.

No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Any future deterioration in property-level revenues may cause one or more of these joint ventures to be unable to refinance maturing obligations or satisfy applicable covenants, financial tests or debt service requirements or loan maturity extension conditions in the future, thereby allowing the mortgage lender to assume control of property cash flows, limit distributions of cash to joint venture members, declare a default, increase the interest rate or accelerate the loan’s maturity. In addition, rising interest rates or challenged transaction markets may adversely impact the ability of the Company’s joint ventures to sell assets at attractive prices in order to repay indebtedness.

40

Cash Flow Activity

The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20242023
Cash flow provided by operating activities$112,044$238,533
Cash flow provided by investing activities1,843,903559,899
Cash flow used for financing activities(2,457,312)(250,615)

Changes in cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year are as follows:

Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $126.5 million primarily due to lower rental income as a result of disposition activity and transaction costs related to the spin-off of Curbline Properties partially offset by an increase in interest income.

Investing Activities: Cash from investing activities increased by $1.3 billion primarily due to the following:


Increase in real estate assets acquired, developed and improved of $12.1 million;


Increase in proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint ventures of $1.3 billion and


Decrease in distributions from unconsolidated joint venture of $8.0 million.

Financing Activities: Cash used for financing activities increased by $2.2 billion primarily due to the following:


Increase in the repayment of the Senior Notes of $1.2 billion;


Increase in repayment of Term Loan and Mortgage Facility debt of $520.4 million partially offset by increase in proceeds from mortgage debt of $430.0 million;


Redemption of Class A Preferred Shares of $175.0 million;


Contribution of unrestricted cash to Curbline of $800.0 million;


Increase in dividends paid in 2024 of $7.5 million due to a special dividend paid in January 2024 and


Repurchases of common shares in 2023 of $26.6 million.

Dividend Distribution

The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared common and preferred share cash dividends of $64.4 million in 2024 (in addition to the value of the distribution of Curbline Properties common stock), as compared to $154.1 million of cash dividends declared in 2023. In order to maximize the capitalization of Curbline and preserve funds for operations, the Company did not declare a dividend on its common shares with respect to the third and fourth quarter of 2024. Because actual distributions were greater than 100% of taxable income, the Company does not expect to incur federal income taxes in 2024.

The Company declared aggregate cash dividends of $1.04 per common share in 2024 (adjusted to reflect the one-for-four reverse stock split of the Company’s common shares in August 2024). The decision to declare and pay future dividends on the Company’s common shares, as well as the timing, amount and composition of any such future dividends, will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company does not currently expect to make regular quarterly dividend payments in the future. Instead, the Company intends to pursue a dividend policy of retaining sufficient free cash flow to support the Company’s capital needs while still adhering to REIT payout requirements and minimizing federal income taxes. The Company expects that the frequency and timing of future dividends will be influenced by operations and asset sales, though the Company’s distribution of any sale proceeds to shareholders will be subject to collateral release and repayment requirements set forth in the terms of the Company’s indebtedness and prudent management of liquidity and overall leverage levels in connection with ongoing operations. The Company is required by the Code to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income; however, there can be no assurances as to the timing and amounts of future dividends.

SITE Centers’ Equity

In 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 0.5 million of its common shares under this program at an aggregate cost of $26.6 million, or $53.76 per share (as adjusted to give effect to the one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s common shares in August 2024).

In May 2024, the Company terminated its $250.0 million “at the market” continuous equity program.

41

Prior to the commencement of trading on August 19, 2024, in anticipation of the spin-off of Curbline Properties, the Company effected a reverse stock split of its common shares, at a ratio of one-for-four and cancelled all outstanding treasury shares not specifically reserved to satisfy the Company’s compensation plans.

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company redeemed all of its Class A Preferred Shares at a redemption price of $500.00 per Class A Preferred Share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $3.6302 per Class A Preferred Share (or $0.1815 per depositary share). The Company recorded a charge of $6.2 million to net income attributable to common shareholders, which represents the difference between the redemption price and the carrying amount immediately prior to redemption, which was recorded to additional paid-in capital upon original issuance.

SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL

The Company remains committed to maintaining sufficient liquidity, managing debt duration and maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile while maintaining strategic flexibility. Debt financings, asset sales and cash flow from operations continue to represent potential sources of proceeds to be used to achieve these objectives.

Curbline Separation

On October 1, 2024, the Company completed the spin-off of Curbline. For additional information on the Curbline spin-off, see the “Executive Summary—Curbline Spin-Off” section of this MD&A.

Prior to the spin-off of Curbline, the Company used proceeds from the closing and funding of the Mortgage Facility and asset sales to redeem and/or repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness. Going forward, the Company intends to realize value through operations and to consider various factors, including market conditions and differences between the public and private valuations of its portfolio, in evaluating whether and when to pursue additional asset sales. The timing of any additional sales may also be impacted by interim leasing, tactical redevelopment activities and other asset management initiatives intended to maximize value. As of February 28, 2025, the Company was in the beginning stages of marketing a select number of assets for sale, though no assurances can be given that such efforts will result in additional asset sales, particularly in light of the dynamic interest rate environment and capital markets conditions. The Company expects to use proceeds from any additional asset sales to repay outstanding indebtedness (including the Mortgage Facility) and make distributions to shareholders. Following the termination of the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility in August 2024, the Company also plans to conservatively manage its cash position in order to provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operations.

2024 Transactions Activity

Acquisitions

During 2024, the Company acquired 14 convenience centers for an aggregate gross purchase price of $219.2 million, all of which were included in the spin-off of Curbline.

In addition, the Company acquired the following shopping centers (in thousands) for the benefit of its consolidated shopping center portfolio:

Date AcquiredProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Purchase Price
April 2024Collection at Brandon Boulevard—Ground Lease(A)Tampa, Florida$1,000
May 2024Meadowmont Crossing(B)Chapel Hill, North Carolina928,932
May 2024Meadowmont Market(B)Chapel Hill, North Carolina458,784
137$18,716

(A)
Acquired the fee interest in a land parcel at this center.

(B)
Acquired from the DDRM Properties Joint Venture.

42

Dispositions

During 2024, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
January 2024Marketplace at Highland VillageHighland Village, Texas207$42,100
January 2024Casselberry Commons (A)Casselberry, Florida23740,300
March 2024Chapel Hills EastColorado Springs, Colorado22537,000
April 2024Cool Springs PointeBrentwood, Tennessee19834,550
April 2024Market Square(A)Douglasville, Georgia11715,600
June 2024Johns Creek Towne CenterSuwanee, Georgia30358,850
June 2024Six property portfolio(A)Various2,368495,000
June 2024Carillon Place(A)Naples, Florida25054,700
June 2024The HubHempstead, New York24941,000
June 2024Cumming Marketplace (Lowe's parcel)Cumming, Georgia13517,200
June 2024Belgate Shopping CenterCharlotte, North Carolina26947,250
July 2024Two property portfolio(A)Cumming, Georgia40667,530
July 2024Midway Plaza (A)Tamarac, Florida21836,425
July 2024Bandera Pointe(A)San Antonio, Texas43858,325
July 2024Lee Vista PromenadeOrlando, Florida31468,500
August 2024Three property portfolio(A)Various894137,500
August 2024Guilford CommonsGuilford, Connecticut12926,500
August 2024Woodfield Village GreenSchaumburg, Illinois39093,200
August 2024Falcon Ridge Town Center (A)Fontana, California25064,700
August 2024Centennial PromenadeCentennial, Colorado44398,100
September 2024White Oak Village(A)Richmond, Virginia39863,503
September 2024Springfield CenterSpringfield, Virginia17749,100
September 2024Hamilton Marketplace(A)Hamilton, New Jersey485116,500
September 2024Whole Foods at Bay PlaceOakland, California5744,400
September 2024The Shops at Midtown Miami(A)Miami, Florida34883,750
September 2024Ridge at Creekside(A)Roseville, California18639,750
September 2024Echelon Village Plaza(A)Voorhees, New Jersey858,500
September 2024Three property portfolio(A)Various960180,500
September 2024University Hills(A)Denver, Colorado21056,500
September 2024Village Square at GolfBoynton Beach, Florida13531,101
September 2024Collection at Brandon BoulevardBrandon, Florida22237,200
11,303$2,245,134

(A)
GLA excludes some square footage relating to convenience parcels retained by the Company at the time of the sale and subsequently included in the spin-off of Curbline Properties.

Joint Venture Dispositions

In May 2024, the Company acquired one asset owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Meadowmont Village, Chapel Hill, North Carolina) for $44.2 million ($8.8 million at the Company’s share) which included a convenience parcel subsequently included in the Curbline Properties spin-off. In June 2024, the DDRM Properties Joint Venture sold one asset (Hilltop Plaza, Richmond, California) for $36.5 million, of which the Company’s share was $7.3 million. There are no remaining assets in this joint venture.

Equity Transactions

In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company redeemed all of its Class A Preferred Shares at a redemption price of $500.00 per Class A Preferred Share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $3.6302 per Class A Preferred Share (or $0.1815 per depositary share). The Company recorded a charge of $6.2 million to net income attributable to common shareholders, which represents the difference between the redemption price and the carrying amount immediately prior to redemption, which was recorded to additional paid-in capital upon original issuance.

43

Redevelopment Projects

The Company evaluates additional tactical redevelopment potential within the portfolio, particularly as it relates to the efficient use of the underlying real estate, which includes expanding, improving and re-tenanting various properties. The Company generally expects to commence construction on redevelopment projects only after substantial tenant leasing has occurred. At December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $2.7 million in construction in progress in various active re-tenanting projects. At December 31, 2024, the estimated cost to complete redevelopment projects at properties owned by Curbline pursuant to the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement was approximately $32.9 million.

2023 Transactions Activity

Acquisitions

During 2023, the Company acquired 12 convenience centers for an aggregate gross purchase price of $165.1 million, all of which were included in the spin-off of Curbline.

Dispositions

During 2023, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
August 2023Sharon GreenCumming, Georgia98$17,450
August 2023Terrell PlazaSan Antonio, Texas10825,106
August 2023Windsor CourtWindsor, Connecticut7919,000
September 2023Larkin's CornerBoothwyn, Pennsylvania22526,000
September 2023Waterstone CenterMason, Ohio16230,718
October 2023Boston Portfolio(A)Boston, Massachusetts1,354319,000
October 2023Cotswold VillageCharlotte, North Carolina263110,400
October 2023Tampa Portfolio(B)Tampa, Florida44197,900
November 2023Midtowne ParkAnderson, South Carolina16717,675
November 2023West Bay PlazaWestlake, Ohio14741,750
November 2023Wando CrossingMt. Pleasant, South Carolina21446,750
November 20231000 Van NessSan Francisco, California12228,000
December 2023Melbourne ShoppingMelbourne, Florida21121,750
December 2023Buena Park PlaceBuena Park, California21353,000
3,804$854,499

(A)
GLA excludes some square footage relating to convenience parcels retained by the Company at the time of the sale and subsequently included in the spin-off of Curbline Properties.

(B)
Includes Lake Brandon Plaza, North Pointe Plaza and The Shoppes at New Tampa.

During 2023, unconsolidated shopping centers sold by the DDRM Joint Venture generated proceeds totaling $112.2 million of which the Company’s share was $22.4 million.

Equity Transactions

In the first quarter of 2023, the Company repurchased 0.4 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $20.0 million, or $53.73 per share (adjusted to give effect to the one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s common shares in August 2024) with the remaining proceeds from the sale of wholly-owned properties in the fourth quarter of 2022 and proceeds from the sale of joint venture properties.

In the second quarter of 2023, the Company repurchased 35,158 operating partnership units (“OP Units”) in a privately negotiated transaction at an aggregate cost of $1.7 million, or $49.36 per share (adjusted to give effect to the one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s common shares in August 2024). Following the repurchase, the Company has no outstanding OP Units.

Redevelopment Projects

The Company invested approximately $82 million in various consolidated active redevelopment and other projects during 2023.

44

2022 Transactions Activity

Acquisitions

During 2022, the Company acquired 15 convenience centers for an aggregate gross purchase price of $306.8 million, all of which were included in the spin-off of Curbline. In addition, the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s 80% equity interest from the DDRM Joint Venture for one asset which included a convenience center component. The purchase price was $44.5 million at 100% (or $35.6 million at 80%).

Dispositions of Assets and Joint Venture Investments

During 2022, the Company sold five wholly-owned shopping centers and land parcels at wholly-owned shopping centers in addition to three unconsolidated shopping centers generating proceeds totaling $265.2 million, of which the Company’s share was $223.9 million. In addition, the DDRM Joint Venture sold 13 shopping centers for an aggregate sales price of $387.6 million ($77.5 million at the Company’s share) with the related mortgage debt of $225.0 million repaid upon closing.

In 2022, the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s 80% equity interest in one asset owned by the DDRM Joint Venture for $35.6 million (including the portion included in the Curbline Properties spin-off) and stepped up the previous 20% interest due to change in control. The transaction resulted in Gain on change in control of interests of $3.3 million.

The Company sold its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%). In addition, the Company sold its 50% interest in Lennox Town Center to its partner based on a gross asset value of $77.0 million (at 100%). These transactions resulted in a Gain on sale and change in control of interests of $42.2 million.

Equity Transactions

In the first and second quarters of 2022, the Company settled 0.6 million common shares which were offered and sold on a forward basis under its $250 million continuous equity program, resulting in gross proceeds of $38.3 million, or $63.16 per share. In the third and fourth quarters of 2022, the Company repurchased 0.9 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $48.9 million, or $52.37 per share. The per share amounts have been adjusted to give effect to the one-for-four reverse split of the Company’s common shares in August 2024.

Redevelopment Projects

The Company invested approximately $75 million in various consolidated active redevelopment and other projects during 2022.

CAPITALIZATION

At December 31, 2024, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $306.8 million of debt and $801.7 million of market equity (calculated as common shares outstanding multiplied by $15.29, the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2024).

In July 2024, the Company announced a one-for-four reverse stock split of its common shares. Split-adjusted trading began on the New York Stock Exchange at the opening of trading on August 19, 2024.

Management seeks to maintain access to the capital resources necessary to manage the Company’s balance sheet and to repay upcoming maturities. Accordingly, the Company may seek to obtain funds through additional debt or asset sales. In connection with the spin-off of Curbline, the Company used proceeds from the Mortgage Facility together with proceeds from asset sales to repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness and therefore no longer maintains a revolving line of credit or an investment grade rating. The Company may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all.

The Mortgage Facility contains certain operating and financial covenants, including net worth and liquidity requirements, and includes provisions that could restrict the Company’s access and use of rent collections from mortgaged properties in the event the debt yield falls below a certain threshold or an event of default occurs. Although the Company intends to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities. In addition, the Mortgage Facility permits the acceleration of maturity and foreclosure in the event of breaches of affirmative or negative covenants. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

45

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

The Company has addressed all of its consolidated debt maturing in 2025. The Company expects to fund repayment of future maturities from cash on hand, proceeds from asset sales and other investments, cash flow from operations and/or additional debt financings. No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be repaid as currently anticipated or refinanced.

Other Guaranties

In conjunction with the redevelopment of shopping centers, the Company had entered into commitments with general contractors aggregating approximately $0.4 million for its properties (excluding Curbline redevelopment noted below) as of December 31, 2024. These obligations, composed principally of construction contracts, are generally due within 12 to 24 months, as the related construction costs are incurred, and are expected to be financed through cash on hand, operating cash flows or asset sales. These contracts typically can be changed or terminated without penalty.

Additionally, the Separation and Distribution Agreement contains obligations to complete certain redevelopment projects at properties that are owned by Curbline. As of December 31, 2024, such redevelopment projects were estimated to cost $32.9 million to complete.

In connection with the sale of two properties in 2024, the Company guaranteed additional construction costs to complete re-tenanting work at the properties and deferred maintenance, all of which were recorded as a liability. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had a liability of approximately $7.2 million. The amount is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company routinely enters into contracts for the maintenance of its properties. These contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty. At December 31, 2024, the Company had purchase order obligations, typically payable within one year, aggregating approximately $0.3 million related to the maintenance of its properties and general and administrative expenses.

At December 31, 2024, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $9.2 million. The Company has not recorded any obligations associated with these letters of credit, the majority of which serve as collateral to secure the Company’s obligation to third-party insurers with respect to limited reinsurance provided by the Company’s captive insurance company.

The Company is a party to employment contracts with its Chief Financial Officer and its General Counsel. These contracts generally provide for base salary, bonuses based on factors including the performance of the Company and the executive, participation in the Company’s retirement plans, health and welfare benefits and reimbursement of various qualified business expenses. These employment agreements have indefinite terms subject to termination by either the Company or the executive without cause upon at least 90 days’ notice and the payment of severance and other amounts to the executive under certain circumstances. The Company is not a party to employment contracts with its Chief Executive Officer or Chief Investment Officer whose services are provided to the Company by Curbline Properties pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. The term of the Shared Services Agreement expires on October 1, 2027, subject to earlier termination by the Company or Curbline Properties as provided therein (and the Company’s payment of a termination fee to Curbline Properties under certain circumstances).

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The Company continues to experience steady retailer demand which it believes is attributable to the concentration of the Company’s portfolio in primarily suburban, high household income communities experiencing population growth, positive changes in remote and work-from-home trends, limited new construction of competing retail properties and tenants’ increasing use of physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of merchandise distribution.

The Company benefits from a diversified tenant base, where only six tenants’ annualized rental revenue equals or exceeds 3% of the Company’s annualized consolidated revenues plus the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture revenues. Other significant national tenants generally have relatively strong financial positions, have outperformed other retail categories over time and the Company believes remain well-capitalized. Historically, these national tenants have provided a stable revenue base, and the Company believes that they will continue to provide a stable revenue base going forward, given the long-term nature of these leases. The majority of the tenants in the Company’s shopping centers provide day-to-day consumer necessities with a focus on value and convenience, versus discretionary items, which the Company believes will enable many of its tenants to outperform under a variety of economic conditions. The Company has relatively little reliance on overage or percentage rents generated by tenant sales performance.

The Company believes that its shopping center portfolio is well positioned, as evidenced by its recent leasing activity, historical property income growth and consistent growth in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot. The Company executed new

46

leases and renewals aggregating approximately 0.7 million square feet of space on a pro rata basis for the year ended December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the shopping center portfolio occupancy, on a pro rata basis, was 90.6% and 89.5%, respectively, and the total portfolio average annualized base rent, on a pro rata basis, was $19.64 and $19.42, respectively. Historical occupancy has generally ranged from 89% to 94% over the last 10 years. The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated to be incurred over the expected lease term for new leases executed during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, on a pro rata basis, was $6.85 and $4.74 per rentable square foot, respectively. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals. The comparability of period-over-period operating metrics has been increasingly impacted by the level and composition of the Company’s disposition activities.

Inflation, higher interest rates and concerns over consumer spending, along with the volatility of global capital markets, continue to pose risks to the U.S. economy, retail sales, and the Company’s tenants. In addition to these macroeconomic challenges, the retail sector has been affected by changing consumer behaviors, including the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for the share of the consumer wallet. The Company routinely monitors the credit profiles of its tenants and analyzes the possible impact of any potential tenant credit issues on the financial statements of the Company and its unconsolidated joint ventures. In some cases, changing conditions have resulted in weaker retailers and retail categories losing market share and declaring bankruptcy and/or closing stores. However, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to launch new concepts and expand their store fleets within the suburban, high household income communities in which many of the Company’s properties are located. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects to backfill vacant spaces or non-renewing tenants are generally good, though such re-tenanting efforts would likely require additional capital expenditures and the opportunities to lease any vacant theater spaces may be more limited. However, there can be no assurance that vacancy resulting from increasingly uncertain economic conditions will not adversely affect the Company’s operating results or the valuation of its properties (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including trends that might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations. The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, dispositions and other business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of environmental and other regulations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and that could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements. For additional factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:


The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues, and any economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of the Company’s tenants, or new tenants, to enter into new leases or the ability of the Company’s existing tenants to renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates;


The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions;


The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the internet and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants, or a general downturn in its tenants’ businesses, which may cause tenants to close stores or default in payment of rent;


The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties, and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants;

47


The Company leases the majority of its square footage to large tenants, which makes it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for its space by, such tenants;


The Company may fail to dispose of properties on favorable terms, especially in regions experiencing deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, real estate investments can be illiquid, particularly as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties obtaining financing due to local or global conditions, and could limit the Company’s ability to promptly make changes to its portfolio to respond to economic and other conditions;


The Company may be subject to potential exposure to unexpected claims, liabilities or costs under the Company's agreements with Curbline and the Operating Partnership or otherwise in connection with the spin-off;


The Company may abandon a redevelopment opportunity after expending resources if it determines that the opportunity is not feasible due to a variety of factors, including a lack of availability of construction financing on reasonable terms, the impact of the economic environment on prospective tenants’ ability to enter into new leases, or pay contractual rent, or the inability of the Company to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations;


The Company may not complete redevelopment projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as weather, labor conditions, governmental approvals, material shortages or general economic downturn, resulting in limited availability of capital, increased debt service expense and construction costs and decreases in revenue;


The Company’s financial condition may be affected by required debt service payments, the risk of default, restrictions on its ability to incur additional debt or to enter into certain transactions under its debt obligations. In addition, the Company may encounter difficulties in obtaining permanent financing or refinancing existing debt;


Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares, its ability to sell properties and prices realized, as well as its performance, interest expense levels and cash flow;


Financing necessary for the Company to operate its business may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms;


Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company, the valuation of its properties and the market price of the Company’s common shares;


Inflationary pressures could result in reductions in retailer profitability, consumer discretionary spending and tenant demand to lease space. Inflation could also increase the costs incurred by the Company to operate its properties and finance its operations and could adversely impact the valuation of its properties, all of which could have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common shares;


The Company is subject to complex regulations related to its status as a REIT, the compliance with which has become more complex as a result of changes to the Company’s asset portfolio, and would be adversely affected if it failed to qualify as a REIT for any reason;


The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company must borrow funds to make distributions, those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms or at all;


Joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer may become bankrupt, may at any time have interests or goals different from those of the Company and may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture or may seek to terminate the joint venture, resulting in a loss to the Company of property revenues and management fees. The partner could cause a default under the joint venture loan for reasons outside the Company’s control. Furthermore, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized;


The Company’s decision to dispose of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, would change the holding period assumption in the undiscounted cash flow impairment analyses, which could result in material impairment losses and adversely affect the Company’s financial results;


The outcome of pending or future litigation, including litigation with tenants or joint venture partners, may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;

48


Property damage, expenses related thereto and other business and economic consequences (including the potential loss of revenue) resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters in locations where the Company owns properties may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


Sufficiency and timing of any insurance recovery payments related to damages and lost revenues from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


The Company and its tenants could be negatively affected by the impacts of pandemics and other public health crises;


The Company is subject to potential environmental liabilities;


The Company may incur losses that are uninsured or exceed policy coverage due to its liability for certain injuries to persons, property or the environment occurring on its properties;


The Company could be subject to potential liabilities, increased costs, reputation harm and other adverse effects on the Company’s business due to stakeholders’, including regulators’, views regarding the Company’s environmental, social and governance initiatives and disclosures, and the impact of factors outside of the Company’s control on such initiatives and disclosures;


The Company could incur additional expenses to comply with or respond to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act or otherwise be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations;


The Company’s Board of Directors, which regularly reviews the Company’s business strategy and objectives, may change the Company’s strategic plan based on a variety of factors and conditions, including in response to changing market conditions;


A change in the Company’s relationship with Curbline Properties and the Company’s ability to retain qualified personnel and adequately manage the Company in the event the Shared Services Agreement is terminated;


Potential conflicts of interest with Curbline Properties and


The Company and its vendors could sustain a disruption, failure or breach of their respective networks and systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, which could disrupt the Company’s business operations, compromise the confidentiality of sensitive information and result in fines or penalties.

FY 2023 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000950170-24-019352.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2024-02-23. Report date: 2023-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of owning, leasing, acquiring, redeveloping, developing and managing shopping centers. As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 114 shopping centers (including 13 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures). At December 31, 2023, the Company owned 22.6 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture). At December 31, 2023, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 92.0% on a pro rata basis, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $20.35 on a pro rata basis.

Current Strategy

The overall investment, operating and financing policies of the Company, which govern a variety of activities, such as capital allocations, dividends and status as a REIT, are determined by management and the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may amend or revise the Company’s policies from time to time without a vote of the Company’s shareholders.

The Company’s mission is to own and manage open-air shopping centers located in suburban, high household income communities. The Company strives to deliver total shareholder returns through earnings and cash flow growth, a sustainable dividend and a strong balance sheet that is well positioned through various economic cycles.

In October 2023, the Company announced a plan to spin off its convenience assets into a separate, publicly traded REIT to be named Curbline Properties Corp. (“Curbline”) in recognition of the distinct characteristics and opportunities within the Company’s unanchored and grocery and power center portfolios. Convenience properties are positioned on the curbline of well-trafficked intersections, offering enhanced access and visibility relative to other retail property types. The properties generally consist of a ubiquitous row of primarily small-shop units along with dedicated parking leased to a diversified mixture of national and local service and restaurant tenants that cater to daily convenience trips from the growing suburban population. The property type’s site plan and depth of leasing prospects generally reduce operating capital expenditures and provide significant tenant diversification.

In addition, the Company has obtained a financing commitment for a $1.1 billion mortgage facility (the “Mortgage Facility”) which is expected to close prior to the consummation of the spin-off with loan and additional asset sale proceeds expected to be used to repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had a portfolio of 65 wholly-owned convenience assets that are expected to be included in the Curbline portfolio, including properties separated or in the process of being separated from existing Company properties. The median property size within the Curbline portfolio as of December 31, 2023 was approximately 20,000 square feet with 92% of base rent generated by units less than 10,000 square feet. The Company intends to acquire additional convenience properties prior to the spin-off that will be included in the Curbline portfolio, funded through additional Company dispositions, retained cash flow and cash on hand.

Curbline is expected to be in a net cash position at the time of its separation from the Company with cash on hand, a preferred investment in the Company, and an unsecured, undrawn line of credit. Curbline is not expected to have any debt outstanding at the time of its separation from the Company and therefore Curbline is expected to have significant capacity to utilize sources of debt capital in order to fund asset growth.

The Company currently expects to complete the separation of Curbline on or around October 1, 2024. Following the separation of Curbline, the Company intends to realize value through operations and, depending on market conditions, the sale of additional assets. The timing of certain sales may be impacted by interim leasing, tactical redevelopment activities, and other asset management initiatives intended to maximize values.

Growth opportunities within the Company’s portfolio include rental rate increases, continued lease-up of the portfolio, rent commencement with respect to recently executed leases and the adaptation of existing site plans and square footage to generate higher blended rental rates and operating cash flows.

Transaction and Capital Markets Highlights

Transaction and investment highlights during 2023 include the following:


Acquired 12 convenience centers in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas and Virginia for an aggregate purchase price of $165.1 million;

30

Table of Contents


Sold 17 wholly-owned shopping centers for an aggregate gross sales price of $854.5 million;


Sold five joint venture shopping centers for an aggregate gross sales price of $112.2 million ($22.4 million at the Company’s share);


Closed on a five-year, $100.0 million mortgage financing for Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey);


Closed on five-year, $380.6 million ($76.1 million at the Company’s share) mortgage secured by the 10-property Dividend Trust Portfolio joint venture portfolio;


Repurchased 1.5 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $20.0 million, or $13.43 per share (including fees);


Repurchased 140,633 Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”) in a privately negotiated transaction at an aggregate cost of $1.7 million, or $12.34 per share and


Declared aggregate quarterly cash dividends of $0.52 per common share in addition to a special dividend on account of significant disposition activity of $0.16 per common share paid in January 2024.

Operational Accomplishments

The Company believes the strong leasing volumes are attributable to the concentration of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities and to national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations.

Operating highlights for 2023 included:


Signed new leases and renewals for approximately 3.3 million square feet of GLA, which included 0.6 million square feet of new leasing volume, both on a pro rata basis;


Achieved new cash lease spreads of 29.5% and renewal spreads of 6.5% at the Company’s pro rata share;


Increased annualized base rent per occupied square foot on a pro rata basis to $20.35 at December 31, 2023, as compared to $19.52 at December 31, 2022, primarily due to asset sales and was also favorably impacted by property acquisitions and leasing results and


Aggregate occupancy was 92.0% at December 31, 2023 on a pro rata basis compared to 92.4% at December 31, 2022. The year over year decline primarily was related to the recapture of units previously leased by Bed, Bath & Beyond and the sale of properties with an average occupancy rate of 97.2%, partially offset by new leasing activity.

Retail Environment

The Company continued to see demand from a broad range of tenants for its space in 2023, particularly as large national retailers launched new brand concepts and further incorporated omni-channel strategies leveraging brick and mortar infrastructure to fulfill online purchases and drive incremental business. Although certain retailers announced bankruptcies and/or store closures in 2023, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to expand their store fleets and launch new concepts. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects to backfill spaces vacated by bankrupt or non-renewing tenants are generally good, though such re-tenanting efforts will likely require additional capital expenditures and opportunities to lease any vacant theater spaces may be more limited. Many of the Company’s largest tenants, including TJX Companies, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross and Burlington, remain well positioned with access to capital and have outperformed other retail categories on a relative basis.

31

Table of Contents

Company Fundamentals

The following table lists the Company’s tenants that equal or exceed 1.5% of the Company’s aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenue and the respective Company-owned shopping center GLA as of December 31, 2023, for the following (1) the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture properties combined, (2) the wholly-owned properties and (3) the unconsolidated joint ventures presented at 100%:

At 100%
At SITE Centers' ShareWholly-Owned PropertiesJoint Venture Properties
Tenant% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA
TJX Companies(A)5.2%7.1%5.3%7.2%3.9%4.9%
Dick's Sporting Goods(B)2.5%2.7%2.5%2.7%3.5%4.4%
Ross Stores(C)2.2%3.1%2.2%3.0%4.6%5.6%
Burlington2.1%2.5%2.2%2.6%0.8%1.0%
PetSmart2.1%2.2%2.1%2.3%1.5%1.3%
Nordstrom Rack1.6%1.5%1.7%1.6%
Michaels1.6%2.3%1.6%2.3%2.0%2.3%
Gap(D)1.6%1.5%1.5%1.4%2.8%2.7%
Kroger(E)1.5%1.6%1.5%1.7%1.1%1.1%
Ulta1.5%1.1%1.5%1.1%1.4%1.0%
Best Buy1.5%1.7%1.4%1.7%3.2%3.4%

(A)
Includes T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, Sierra Trading, HomeSense and Combo Store

(B)
Includes Dick’s Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy

(C)
Includes Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts

(D)
Includes Gap, Old Navy and Banana Republic

(E)
Includes Kroger, Harris Teeter, King Soopers, Mariano’s and Lucky’s

The Company leased approximately 3.6 million square feet (3.3 million square feet at the Company’s share) of GLA in 2023 in its wholly-owned and joint venture portfolios, composed of 112 new leases and 327 renewals, for a total of 439 leases executed in 2023. At December 31, 2023, the Company had 205 leases expiring in 2024 with an average base rent per square foot of $18.35 on a pro rata basis. For the comparable leases executed in 2023, at the Company’s interest, the Company generated positive cash leasing spreads of 29.5% for new leases and 6.5% for renewals, or 9.0% on a blended basis. Cash leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase of the tenant’s annual base rent in the first year of the newly executed or renewal lease, over the annual base rent applicable to the final year of the previous lease term, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity and exclude properties in redevelopment. The Company’s cash leasing spread calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated, in addition to other factors that limit comparability, and as a result, is a good benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates.

For new leases executed during 2023, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $4.90 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $7.42 per rentable square foot in 2022. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

32

Table of Contents

Summary—2023 Financial Results

The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” described later in this section) (in thousands except per share amounts):

For the Year Ended
December 31,
20232022
Net income attributable to common shareholders$254,547$157,563
FFO attributable to common shareholders$240,199$250,991
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$247,872$253,346
Earnings per share – Diluted$1.21$0.73

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the increase in net income attributable to common shareholders, as compared to the prior year, primarily was attributable to higher gain on asset sales. The decrease in FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders generally was due to the impact of property sales and lower management fees from joint ventures partially offset by property Net Operating Income (“NOI”) growth and the impact of property acquisitions.

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in the understanding of the Company’s financial statements and the factors that accounted for changes in certain key items in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting estimates that affected these financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, management has used available information, including the Company’s history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may use different estimates that may affect the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Purchase Price Allocations of Property Acquisitions

For the acquisition of real estate assets, the Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company applies various valuation methods, all of which require significant estimates by management, including discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions. Further, the valuation of above- and below-market lease values are significantly impacted by management's estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease. If the Company determines that an event has occurred after the initial allocation of the asset or liability that would change the estimated useful life of the asset, the Company will reassess the depreciation and amortization of the asset. The Company is required to make subjective estimates in connection with these valuations and allocations.

Real Estate and Long-Lived Assets

Impairment Assessment

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles may be impaired. Impairment indicators are primarily related to a change in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows; however, other impairment indicators could occur. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. The determination of undiscounted cash flows may require significant estimates by management. In management’s estimate of projected cash flows, it considers factors such as hold period, expected future operating income (loss), trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the

33

Table of Contents

alternative courses of action. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated actions could affect the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could have a material impact on the Company’s net income. To the extent an impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the estimated fair value of the property.

The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. If the Company’s estimates of the anticipated holding periods, projected future cash flows or market conditions change, its evaluation of the impairment charges may be different, and such differences could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Specifically, plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.

Measurement of Fair Value

The Company is required to periodically assess for impairment the value of its consolidated real estate assets. The fair value of real estate investments used in the Company’s impairment calculations is estimated based on the price that would be received for the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date. Real estate assets without a public market are valued based on assumptions made and valuation techniques used by the Company. The availability of observable transaction data and inputs can make it more difficult and/or subjective to determine the fair value of such real estate assets. As a result, amounts ultimately realized by the Company from real estate assets sold may differ from the fair values presented, and the differences could be material.

The valuation of real estate assets for impairment is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including the income capitalization approach or discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each asset considering prevailing market capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations, bona fide purchase offers received from third parties and/or consideration of the amount that currently would be required to replace the asset, as adjusted for obsolescence. In general, the Company utilizes a valuation technique that is based on the characteristics of the specific asset when measuring fair value of an investment. However, a single valuation technique is generally used for the Company’s property type. The significant assumptions include the capitalization rate used in the income capitalization valuation, as well as the projected property net operating income. Valuation of real estate assets is calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the measurement date, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the comparison of the Company’s 2023 performance to 2022 presented below, consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2022, are referred to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.” The discussion of the Company’s 2022 performance compared to 2021 performance is set forth in “—Comparison of 2022 and 2021 Results of Operations” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.

Revenues from Operations (in thousands)

20232022$ Change
Rental income(A)$537,066$537,106$(40)
Fee and other income(B)9,20915,247(6,038)
Total revenues$546,275$552,353$(6,078)

(A)
The following table summarizes the key components of rental income (in thousands):

Contractual Lease Payments20232022$ Change
Base and percentage rental income(1)$396,353$391,883$4,470
Recoveries from tenants(2)134,816133,5741,242
Uncollectible revenue(3)(1,417)1,388(2,805)
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income7,31410,261(2,947)
Total contractual lease payments$537,066$537,106$(40)

34

Table of Contents

(1)
The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions):

Increase (Decrease)
Acquisition of shopping centers$11.5
Comparable Portfolio Properties15.9
Disposition of shopping centers(22.9)
Straight-line rents
Total$4.5

The increase within the Comparable Portfolio Properties includes the write-off of approximately $8.4 million of below-market lease intangibles due to the early termination of tenant leases.

At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company owned 101 wholly-owned properties as of each balance sheet date that had an aggregate occupancy rate of 92.1% and 92.6%, respectively, and an average annualized base rent per occupied square foot of $20.46 and $19.61, respectively.

(2)
Recoveries from tenants were approximately 81.4% and 78.6% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase in the recovery percentage primarily was due to a combination of transactional activity and a decrease in non-recoverable landlord expenses.

(3)
The net amount reported was primarily attributable to the impact of tenants on the cash basis of accounting and related reserve adjustments.

(B) Fee and Other Income was primarily earned from the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures. The decrease primarily relates to lower fee revenue from joint ventures as a result of asset sales. The components of Fee and Other Income are presented in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Fee and Other Income,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein. Decreases in the number of assets under management will impact the amount of revenue recorded in future periods. The Company’s joint venture partners may also elect to terminate their joint venture arrangements with the Company in connection with a change in investment strategy or otherwise. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

Expenses from Operations (in thousands)

20232022$ Change
Operating and maintenance(A)$88,959$89,278$(319)
Real estate taxes(A)76,76280,706(3,944)
Impairment charges(B)2,536(2,536)
General and administrative(C)50,86746,5644,303
Depreciation and amortization(A)212,460203,5468,914
$429,048$422,630$6,418

(A)
The changes were due to the following (in millions):

Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Acquisition of shopping centers$2.9$2.9$7.5
Comparable Portfolio Properties0.7(0.4)1.9
Disposition of shopping centers(3.9)(6.4)(0.5)
$(0.3)$(3.9)$8.9

The increase in depreciation for the Comparable Portfolio Properties was primarily due to the acceleration of depreciation related to terminations and write-off of intangibles.

(B)
There were no impairment charges recorded for the year ended December 31, 2023. Changes in (i) an asset’s expected future undiscounted cash flows due to changes in market or leasing conditions, (ii) various courses of action that may occur or (iii) estimated holding periods could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges. Impairment charges are presented in Note 12, “Impairment Charges,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

35

Table of Contents

(C)
General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, were approximately 7.9% and 6.8% of total revenues (excluding uncollectible revenue), respectively, including total revenues of unconsolidated joint ventures and managed properties for the comparable periods. The increase is primarily attributable to a May 2023 restructuring plan, which included a voluntary retirement offer and other costs to align the Company’s cost structure and technology platform with current and future expected operations and resulted in charges to general and administrative costs of $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2023, general and administrative expenses of $50.9 million, less the separation charges and other costs of $5.0 million, were approximately 7.2% of total revenues. The Company continues to expense certain internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with leasing and re-leasing of existing space.

Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)

20232022$ Change
Interest expense(A)$(82,002)$(77,692)$(4,310)
Other income (expense), net(B)3,189(2,540)5,729
$(78,813)$(80,232)$1,419

(A)
The weighted-average debt outstanding and related weighted-average interest rate are as follows:

For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Weighted-average debt outstanding (in billions)$1.8$1.8
Weighted-average interest rate4.5%4.1%

The Company’s overall balance sheet strategy is to continue to maintain substantial liquidity and prudent leverage levels. The weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates and excluding fair market value of adjustments and debt issuance costs) was 4.3% and 4.1% at December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. At December 31, 2023, the weighted-average maturity (without extensions) was 2.5 years. Interest costs capitalized in conjunction with redevelopment projects were $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

(B)
In 2023, includes interest income, net of fees, of $4.4 million, derivative mark-to-market impact of $2.1 million related to the partial hedge on the potential interest rate impact to yield maintenance premiums on outstanding unsecured notes, partially offset by transaction costs and debt extinguishment costs totaling $3.3 million.

Other Items (in thousands)

20232022$ Change
Equity in net income of joint ventures(A)$6,577$27,892$(21,315)
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(B)3,74945,581(41,832)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(C)219,02646,644172,382
Tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes(2,045)(816)(1,229)
Income attributable to non-controlling interests, net(18)(73)55

(A)
The 2023 results include gains recorded on the sale of assets offset by the reduction of income as a result of asset sales closed in 2023 and 2022. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 13 and 18 shopping center properties, respectively. Joint venture property sales could significantly impact the amount of income or loss recognized in future periods. See Note 3, “Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures,” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

(B)
In 2023, the Company recorded a gain related to additional proceeds received related to an unconsolidated joint venture that sold its sole asset, a parcel of undeveloped land in Richmond Hill, Ontario, which was considered contingent at the time of the sale. In 2022, the Company recorded a $3.3 million gain from the acquisition of its joint venture partner’s 80% equity interest in an asset (Casselberry Commons) owned by the DDRM Joint Venture, a $16.8 million gain from the sale of its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner and a $25.4 million gain from the sale of its 50% interest in Lennox Town Center to its partner.

(C)
The Company sold 17 wholly-owned shopping centers in 2023 and five wholly-owned shopping centers and land parcels in 2022. See “— Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

36

Table of Contents

Net Income (in thousands)

20232022$ Change
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$265,703$168,719$96,984

The increase in net income attributable to SITE Centers, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to the gain recorded from wholly-owned asset sales. Additionally, the 2023 results were also impacted by lower joint venture management fees, higher interest expense, higher depreciation expense and separation and charges included within general and administrative expenses, relating to the restructuring plan initiated in May 2023, partially offset by base rent growth, the write-off of below-market lease intangibles and the net impact of property acquisitions.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Funds from Operations and Operating Funds from Operations

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company believes that Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Operating FFO, both non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of REITs. FFO and Operating FFO are frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs. The Company also believes that FFO and Operating FFO more appropriately measure the core operations of the Company and provide benchmarks to its peer group.

FFO excludes GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions, and many companies use different depreciable lives and methods. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate and gains and losses from property dispositions, it can provide a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and acquisition, disposition and development activities. This provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted to exclude (i) preferred share dividends, (ii) gains and losses from disposition of real estate property and related investments, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) impairment charges on real estate property and related investments, (iv) gains and losses from changes in control and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation and amortization of intangibles, equity income (loss) from joint ventures and equity income (loss) from non-controlling interests and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint ventures and non-controlling interests, determined on a consistent basis. The Company’s calculation of FFO is consistent with the definition of FFO provided by NAREIT.

The Company believes that certain charges, income and gains recorded in its operating results are not comparable or reflective of its core operating performance. Operating FFO is useful to investors as the Company removes non-comparable charges, income and gains to analyze the results of its operations and assess performance of the core operating real estate portfolio. As a result, the Company also computes Operating FFO and discusses it with the users of its financial statements, in addition to other measures such as net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and FFO. Operating FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as FFO excluding certain charges, income and gains that management believes are not comparable and indicative of the results of the Company’s operating real estate portfolio. Such adjustments include write-off of preferred share original issuance costs, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, certain transaction fee income, transaction costs and other restructuring type costs, including employee separation costs. The disclosure of these adjustments is regularly requested by users of the Company’s financial statements.

The adjustment for these charges, income and gains may not be comparable to how other REITs or real estate companies calculate their results of operations, and the Company’s calculation of Operating FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO. Additionally, the Company provides no assurances that these charges, income and gains are non-recurring. These charges, income and gains could be reasonably expected to recur in future results of operations.

These measures of performance are used by the Company for several business purposes and by other REITs. The Company uses FFO and/or Operating FFO in part (i) as a disclosure to improve the understanding of the Company’s operating results among the investing public, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset company’s performance, (iii) to influence acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.

37

Table of Contents

For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO and Operating FFO provide the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. They provide recognized measures of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often significant). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO and Operating FFO in a different manner.

Management recognizes the limitations of FFO and Operating FFO when compared to GAAP’s net income. FFO and Operating FFO do not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use FFO or Operating FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO represents cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and neither is necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. Neither FFO nor Operating FFO should be considered an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. FFO and Operating FFO are simply used as additional indicators of the Company’s operating performance. The Company believes that to further understand its performance, FFO and Operating FFO should be compared with the Company’s reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP, as presented in its consolidated financial statements. Reconciliations of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) have been provided below.

Reconciliation Presentation

FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022$ Change
FFO attributable to common shareholders$240,199$250,991$(10,792)
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders247,872253,346(5,474)

The decrease in FFO for the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to lower management fees and income from joint ventures and higher interest and general and administrative expenses, partially offset by base rent growth, the write-off of below-market lease intangibles and the net impact of property acquisitions. The change in Operating FFO primarily was due to the same drivers impacting FFO but excludes the impact of the separation and other charges, included within general and administrative expenses, relating to the restructuring plan initiated in May 2023, transaction costs related to the spin-off of Curbline and derivative fair value adjustments.

The Company’s reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders is as follows (in thousands). The Company provides no assurances that these charges and gains are non-recurring. These charges and gains could reasonably be expected to recur in future results of operations.

For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Net income attributable to common shareholders$254,547$157,563
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments207,005198,662
Equity in net income of joint ventures(6,577)(27,892)
Joint ventures' FFO(A)7,98112,274
Non-controlling interests (OP Units)1873
Impairment of real estate2,536
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(3,749)(45,581)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(219,026)(46,644)
FFO attributable to common shareholders240,199250,991
Separation and other charges5,752
Transaction, debt extinguishment and other (at SITE's share)4,0242,740
Derivative mark-to-market(2,103)
RVI disposition fees(385)
Non-operating items, net7,6732,355
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$247,872$253,346

(A)
At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 13 and 18 shopping center properties, respectively. These joint ventures represent the investments in which the Company recorded its share of equity in net income or loss and, accordingly, FFO and Operating FFO.

38

Table of Contents

Joint ventures’ FFO and Operating FFO are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Net income attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures$21,246$106,846
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments32,57846,518
Impairment of real estate17,550
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(21,316)(120,097)
FFO$32,508$50,817
FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests$7,981$12,274
Operating FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests$8,742$13,128

Net Operating Income and Same Store Net Operating Income

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company uses NOI, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as a supplemental performance measure. NOI is calculated as property revenues less property-related expenses. The Company believes NOI provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and, when compared across periods, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis.

The Company also presents NOI information on a same store basis, or Same Store Net Operating Income (“SSNOI”). The Company defines SSNOI as property revenues less property-related expenses, which exclude straight-line rental income (including reimbursements) and expenses, lease termination income, management fee expense, fair market value of leases and expense recovery adjustments. SSNOI includes assets owned in comparable periods (15 months for prior period comparisons). In addition, SSNOI is presented including activity associated with redevelopment. SSNOI excludes all non-property and corporate level revenue and expenses. Other real estate companies may calculate NOI and SSNOI in a different manner. The Company believes SSNOI at its effective ownership interest provides investors with additional information regarding the operating performance of comparable assets because it excludes certain non-cash and non-comparable items as noted above. SSNOI is frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs.

SSNOI is not, and is not intended to be, a presentation in accordance with GAAP. SSNOI information has its limitations as it excludes any capital expenditures associated with the re-leasing of tenant space or as needed to operate the assets. SSNOI does not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use SSNOI as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities. SSNOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. SSNOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. A reconciliation of NOI and SSNOI to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) is provided below.

39

Table of Contents

Reconciliation Presentation

The Company’s reconciliation of net income computed in accordance with GAAP to NOI and SSNOI for the Company at 100% and at its effective ownership interest of the assets is as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31, 2023
2023202220232022
At 100%At the Company's Interest
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$265,703$168,719$265,703$168,719
Fee income(6,817)(11,546)(6,817)(11,546)
Interest expense82,00277,69282,00277,692
Depreciation and amortization212,460203,546212,460203,546
General and administrative50,86746,56450,86746,564
Other (income) expense, net(3,189)2,540(3,189)2,540
Impairment charges2,5362,536
Equity in net income of joint ventures(6,577)(27,892)(6,577)(27,892)
Tax expense2,0458162,045816
Gain on sale and change in control of interests(3,749)(45,581)(3,749)(45,581)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(219,026)(46,644)(219,026)(46,644)
Income from non-controlling interests18731873
Consolidated NOI$373,737$370,823$373,737$370,823
Less: Non-Same Store NOI adjustments(69,445)(74,177)
Total Consolidated SSNOI$304,292$296,646
Consolidated SSNOI % Change2.6%
Net income from unconsolidated joint ventures$21,246$106,846$4,625$22,248
Interest expense25,60134,0555,8407,664
Depreciation and amortization32,57846,5187,65610,457
Impairment charges17,5503,510
Other (income) expense, net10,46712,3032,3452,766
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(21,316)(120,097)(4,265)(23,965)
Unconsolidated NOI$68,576$97,175$16,201$22,680
Less: Non-Same Store NOI adjustments(1,280)(7,800)
Total Unconsolidated SSNOI at SITE share$14,921$14,880
Unconsolidated SSNOI % Change0.3%
SSNOI % Change at SITE Share2.5%

The SSNOI increase for the full year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the prior-year period, was primarily attributable to minimum rent increases related to rent steps, favorable net recoveries, percentage, overage and ancillary rents offset by increases in uncollectible revenues.

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The Company periodically evaluates opportunities to issue and sell additional debt or equity securities, obtain credit facilities from lenders or repurchase or refinance long-term debt as part of its overall strategy to further strengthen its financial position. The Company remains committed to monitoring liquidity and the duration of its indebtedness and to maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile.

The Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated debt obligations generally require monthly or semi-annual payments of principal and/or interest over the term of the obligation. While the Company currently believes it has several viable sources to obtain capital and fund its business, including capacity under its Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below), no assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Any new debt financings may also entail higher rates of interest than the indebtedness being refinanced, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

The Company has historically accessed capital sources through both the public and private markets. Acquisitions and redevelopments are generally financed through cash provided from operating activities, the Revolving Credit Facility, mortgages

40

Table of Contents

assumed, secured debt, unsecured debt, common and preferred equity offerings, joint venture capital and asset sales. Total consolidated debt outstanding was $1.6 billion at December 31, 2023, as compared to $1.7 billion at December 31, 2022.

At December 31, 2023, the Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $552.0 million and a restricted cash balance of $17.1 million primarily related to asset sale proceeds available to fund future qualifying acquisitions as part of a forward like-kind exchange transaction. The Company has availability under its Revolving Credit Facility of $950.0 million (subject to satisfaction of applicable borrowing conditions). The Company has addressed all of its consolidated debt maturing in 2024. In 2025, the Company has $457.1 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes and $25.7 million of consolidated mortgage debt maturing. The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures have $39.1 million of mortgage debt at the Company’s share maturing in 2024. As of December 31, 2023, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $9 million to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects. The Company declared aggregate common share dividends of $0.68 per share in 2023, including a special cash dividend of $0.16 per share paid in January 2024, and declared a dividend of $0.13 per share in the first quarter of 2024 payable in April 2024. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business at this time. At December 31, 2023, the Company had no borrowings outstanding on the Revolving Credit Facility. In May 2023, the Company repaid $87.2 million of senior notes due 2023 and in November 2023, the Company repaid $65.6 million of senior notes due 2024.

Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan

The Company maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) that provides for borrowings of up to $950 million, which limit may be increased to $1.45 billion provided that existing or new lenders agree to provide incremental commitments and subject to other conditions precedent. The Revolving Credit Facility matures in June 2026 subject to two six-month options to extend the maturity to June 2027 at the Company’s option (subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions). The Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at variable rates at the Company’s election, based on either (i) the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate plus a 10-basis point credit spread adjustment plus an applicable margin (0.85% at December 31, 2023), or (ii) the alternative base rate plus an applicable margin (0.0% at December 31, 2023). The Revolving Credit Facility also provides for an annual facility fee, which was 20 basis points on the entire facility at December 31, 2023. The applicable margins and facility fee vary depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) and Fitch Investor Services Inc. (“Fitch”) (or their respective successors). The Revolving Credit Facility also features a sustainability-linked pricing component whereby the applicable interest rate margin can be adjusted by one or two basis points if the Company meets certain sustainability performance targets.

The Company also maintains a $200 million unsecured term loan with a syndicate of financial institutions and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the “Term Loan”), that bears interest at variable rates, based on the Company's long-term senior unsecured debt ratings, equal to (i) the SOFR rate plus a 10-basis point credit spread adjustment plus an applicable margin (0.95% at December 31, 2023) or (ii) the alternative base rate plus an applicable margin (0.0% at December 31, 2023). The applicable margins vary depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s, S&P and Fitch (or their respective successors). In August 2022, the Company swapped the portion of the Term Loan's interest rate calculated by reference to the variable SOFR rate to a fixed rate of 2.75% per annum. The Term Loan matures in June 2027. The Company may increase the principal amount of the Term Loan in the future to up to $800 million in the aggregate provided that existing or new lenders are identified to provide additional loan commitments subject to other customary conditions precedent. The Term Loan also features a sustainability-linked pricing component whereby the applicable interest rate margin can be adjusted by one to two basis points if the Company meets certain sustainability performance targets. The covenants governing the Term Loan are substantially identical to those governing the Revolving Credit Facility.

The Revolving Credit Facility, the Term Loan and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness is, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants including, among other things, leverage ratios and debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and engage in certain mergers and acquisitions. The Revolving Credit Facility, the Term Loan and the indentures also contain customary default provisions including the failure to make timely payments of principal and interest payable thereunder, the failure to comply with the financial and operating covenants and the failure of the Company or its majority-owned subsidiaries (i.e., entities in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest) to pay, when due, certain indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds beyond applicable grace and cure periods. In the event the Company’s lenders or note holders declare a default, as defined in the applicable agreements governing the debt, the Company may be unable to obtain further funding, and/or an acceleration of any outstanding borrowings may occur. As of December 31, 2023, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants in the agreements governing its debt. Although the Company believes it will continue to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities.

41

Table of Contents

Mortgage Financing Commitment

In October 2023, in preparation for the expected spin-off of the Company’s convenience properties, the Company obtained a commitment (the “Commitment”) from affiliates of Apollo, including Atlas SP Partners, L.P., to provide a $1.1 billion mortgage facility to be secured by approximately 40 of the Company’s retail properties (the “Mortgage Facility”). The Company may proceed to close and draw all or a portion of the Mortgage Facility on any date prior to October 25, 2024, subject to the satisfaction of various closing conditions set forth in the Commitment, including debt yield and loan-to-value thresholds, the lender’s receipt of acceptable third party reports and satisfaction of other customary closing requirements. To the extent that any of the collateral properties are sold prior to the closing of the Mortgage Facility, the amount available under the Commitment will be reduced. The Company currently expects to close and draw on the Mortgage Facility prior to the spin-off of Curbline, and to use loan and additional asset sale proceeds to redeem and/or repay all of its outstanding unsecured indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.

As set forth in the Commitment, the Mortgage Facility will mature on the second anniversary of the closing date subject to a one-year extension option at the Company’s election and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions at the time of the extension. Following closing, the Company will be able to effectuate the release of properties serving as collateral for the Mortgage Facility by making a principal prepayment based on the amount of the loan allocated to such property.

The Company paid upfront commitment and structuring fees to the lender and its affiliates and will also pay the lender fees during the unfunded commitment period based on the committed loan amount (as such amount may be reduced from time to time by the Company) and a closing fee based on the amount of the loan funded at closing. The Company is not obligated to close or draw on the Mortgage Facility and no assurances can be given that the Company will satisfy the conditions to close the Mortgage Facility or that the Mortgage Facility will close on the terms set forth in the Commitment or at all.

Consolidated Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2023

As discussed above, the Company is committed to maintaining prudent leverage levels and may utilize proceeds from financings or the sale of properties or other investments to repay debt. These sources of funds could be affected by various risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be provided that the Company’s debt obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. See Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company continually evaluates its debt maturities and, based on management’s assessment, believes it has viable financing and refinancing alternatives (including the Mortgage Facility). The Company has sought to manage its debt maturities, increase liquidity, maintain prudent leverage levels and improve the Company’s credit profile with a focus of lowering the Company’s balance sheet risk and cost of capital.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures’ Mortgage Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2023

The outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2023, which matures in the subsequent 14-month period (i.e., through February 28, 2025), is as follows (in millions):

Outstanding at December 31, 2023At SITE Centers' Share
DDRM Joint Venture(A)$40.9$8.2
RVIP IIIB(B)62.230.9
Total$103.1$39.1

(A) The joint venture expects to repay indebtedness with proceeds from future asset sales.

(B) Expected to be extended in accordance with the loan documents.

No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated. Any future deterioration in property-level revenues may cause one or more of these joint ventures to be unable to refinance maturing obligations or satisfy applicable covenants, financial tests or debt service requirements or loan maturity extension conditions in the future, thereby allowing the mortgage lender to assume control of property cash flows, limit distributions of cash to joint venture members, declare a default, increase the interest rate or accelerate the loan’s maturity. In addition, rising interest rates or challenged transaction markets may adversely impact the ability of the Company’s joint ventures to sell assets at attractive prices in order to repay indebtedness.

42

Table of Contents

Cash Flow Activity

The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Cash flow provided by operating activities$238,533$257,262
Cash flow provided by (used for) investing activities559,899(167,559)
Cash flow used for financing activities(250,615)(111,741)

Changes in cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the prior year are as follows:

Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities decreased by $18.7 million primarily due to changes in cash flow from dispositions, higher interest rates, higher general and administrative expenses attributable to the May 2023 restructuring plan and changes in working capital.

Investing Activities: Cash from investing activities increased by $727.5 million primarily due to the following:


Increase in proceeds from disposition of real estate of $619.9 million;


Decrease in real estate assets acquired, developed and improved of $177.1 million;


Decrease in distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures of $30.6 million;


Decrease in proceeds from disposition of joint venture interests of $35.8 million and


Payment of swaption agreement fees of $3.4 million.

Financing Activities: Cash used for financing activities increased by $138.9 million primarily due to the following:


Increase of $110.1 million of outstanding debt;


Decrease in proceeds of issuance of common shares of $36.7 million;


Decrease in repurchases of common shares of $15.6 million;


Payment of loan commitment fees of $13.5 million and


Decrease in debt issuance costs of $5.9 million.

Dividend Distribution

The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared common and preferred share cash dividends of $154.1 million in 2023, as compared to $122.3 million of cash dividends paid in 2022. Because actual distributions were greater than 100% of taxable income, federal income taxes were not incurred by the Company in 2023.

The Company declared aggregate cash dividends of $0.68 per common share in 2023, which includes a special cash dividend attributable to significant dispositions activity consummated in 2023 of $0.16 per common share, paid on January 12, 2024, to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 27, 2023. In February 2024, the Company declared its first quarter 2024 dividend of $0.13 per common share payable on April 5, 2024, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2024.

The Board of Directors of the Company intends to monitor the Company’s dividend policy in order to maintain sufficient liquidity for operations and in order to maximize the Company’s free cash flow while still adhering to REIT payout requirements and minimizing federal income taxes (excluding federal income taxes applicable to its taxable REIT subsidiary activities). The Company’s future dividend policy may also be influenced by future asset sales, though the Company’s ability to distribute sale proceeds to shareholders will be subject to restrictions set forth in the terms of the Company’s indebtedness and preferred stock financings.

SITE Centers’ Equity

In December 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program. Under the terms of the program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares. In 2023, the Company repurchased 1.5 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $20.0 million, or $13.43 per share. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had repurchased an aggregate of 2.0 million of its common shares under this program at an aggregate cost of $26.6 million.

The Company has a $250.0 million continuous equity program. At February 15, 2024, the Company had approximately $211.7 million available for the future offering of common shares under this program.

43

Table of Contents

SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL

The Company remains committed to maintaining sufficient liquidity, managing debt duration and maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile while maintaining strategic flexibility. Equity offerings, debt financings (including the Mortgage Facility), asset sales and cash flow from operations continue to represent potential sources of proceeds to be used to achieve these objectives.

Curbline Separation

In October 2023, the Company announced a plan to separate its convenience assets into a separate, publicly traded REIT through the spin-off of Curbline. Prior to the spin-off of Curbline, the Company expects to use proceeds from the closing of the Mortgage Facility and additional asset sales to redeem and/or repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness. Curbline is expected to be in a net cash position at the time of its separation from the Company with cash on hand, a preferred investment in the Company, and an unsecured, undrawn line of credit. Curbline is not expected to have any debt outstanding at the time of its separation from the Company and therefore Curbline is expected to have significant access to sources of debt capital in order to fund significant asset growth. The Company expects to acquire additional convenience properties prior to the spin-off that will be included in the Curbline portfolio, funded through additional Company dispositions, retained cash flow and cash on hand. Following the separation of Curbline, depending on market conditions, the Company intends to sell additional assets and use the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness, redeem Curbline’s preferred investment in the Company and make distributions to shareholders. The timing of certain sales may be impacted by interim leasing, tactical redevelopment activities, and other asset management initiatives intended to maximize values.

2024 Strategic Activity

Acquisitions

Through February 22, 2024, the Company acquired The Grove at Harpers Preserve in Conroe, Texas for $10.7 million. In addition, the DDRM Joint Venture acquired outparcels at its Meadowmont Village property for a purchase price of $8.1 million ($1.6 million at the Company’s share).

Dispositions

Through February 22, 2024, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
January 2024The Marketplace at Highland VillageHighland Village, Texas207$42,100
January 2024Casselberry Commons(A)Casselberry, Florida23740,300
444$82,400

(A)
Excludes 7,929 square feet retained by the Company (Shops at Casselberry).

Changes in investment and financings strategies for assets may impact the Company’s hold-period assumptions for those properties. Decisions to market or sell properties could result in changes in intended hold periods and trigger potential impairments or losses in future periods. The Company evaluates all potential sale opportunities to maximize shareholder value taking into account the growth prospects of the assets, the use of proceeds and the impact to the Company’s balance sheet, in addition to the impact on operating results.

44

Table of Contents

2023 Strategic Activity

Acquisitions

During 2023, the Company acquired the following convenience centers (in thousands):

Date AcquiredProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Purchase Price
January 2023Foxtail CenterTimonium, Maryland30$15,075
January 2023Parker KeystoneDenver, Colorado1711,000
April 2023Barrett CornersKennesaw, Georgia1915,600
May 2023Alpha Soda CenterAlpharetta, Georgia159,400
May 2023Briarcroft CenterHouston, Texas3323,500
July 2023Towne Crossing ShopsMidlothian, Virginia74,200
August 2023Oaks at SlaughterAustin, Texas2614,100
September 2023Marketplace at 249Houston, Texas179,800
October 2023Point at UniversityCharlotte, North Carolina148,900
October 2023Estero CrossingEstero, Florida3417,122
November 2023Presidential Plaza NorthSnellville, Georgia117,420
December 2023Shops at Lake PleasantPeoria, Arizona4729,000
270$165,117

Dispositions

During 2023, the Company sold the following wholly-owned shopping centers (in thousands):

Date SoldProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Sales Price
August 2023Sharon GreenCumming, Georgia98$17,450
August 2023Terrell PlazaSan Antonio, Texas10825,106
August 2023Windsor CourtWindsor, Connecticut7919,000
September 2023Larkin's CornerBoothwyn, Pennsylvania22526,000
September 2023Waterstone CenterMason, Ohio16230,718
October 2023Boston Portfolio(A)Boston, Massachusetts1,354319,000
October 2023Cotswold VillageCharlotte, North Carolina263110,400
October 2023Tampa Portfolio(B)Tampa, Florida44197,900
November 2023Midtowne ParkAnderson, South Carolina16717,675
November 2023West Bay PlazaWestlake, Ohio14741,750
November 2023Wando CrossingMt. Pleasant, South Carolina21446,750
November 20231000 Van NessSan Francisco, California12228,000
December 2023Melbourne ShoppingMelbourne, Florida21121,750
December 2023Buena Park PlaceBuena Park, California21353,000
3,804$854,499

(A)
Includes Shoppers World and Gateway Center. Excludes 19,017 square feet retained by the Company (Shops at Framingham).

(B)
Includes Lake Brandon Plaza, North Pointe Plaza and The Shoppes at New Tampa.

During 2023, unconsolidated shopping centers sold by the DDRM Joint Venture generated proceeds totaling $112.2 million of which the Company’s share was $22.4 million.

Equity Transactions

In the first quarter of 2023, the Company repurchased 1.5 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $20.0 million, or $13.43 per share with the remaining proceeds from the sale of wholly-owned properties in the fourth quarter of 2022 and proceeds from the sale of joint venture properties.

In the second quarter of 2023, the Company repurchased 140,633 OP units in a privately negotiated transaction at an aggregate cost of $1.7 million, or $12.34 per share. Following the repurchase, the Company has no outstanding OP units.

45

Table of Contents

Redevelopment Pipeline

The Company evaluates additional tactical redevelopment potential within the portfolio, particularly as it relates to the efficient use of the underlying real estate, which includes expanding, improving and re-tenanting various properties. The Company generally expects to commence construction on redevelopment projects only after substantial tenant leasing has occurred. At December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $51 million in construction in progress in various active consolidated redevelopments and other projects and anticipates that it has approximately $9 million yet to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects. At December 31, 2023, the Company’s shopping center expansions, outparcel developments, construction of first-generation space and repurposing projects, were as follows (in thousands):

LocationEstimated Stabilized QuarterEstimated CostCost Incurred at December 31, 2023
Nassau Park Pavilion (Trenton, New Jersey)1Q24$7,635$6,096
University Hills (Denver, Colorado)3Q246,7185,736
Shops at Framingham (Boston, Massachusetts)2Q242,4142,174
Tanasbourne Town Center (Portland, Oregon)1Q2613,7697,251
Perimeter Pointe (Atlanta, Georgia)TBD1,417
Total$30,536$22,674

2022 Transaction Activity

Acquisitions

During 2022, the Company acquired the following shopping centers (in thousands)

Date AcquiredProperty NameCity, StateTotal Owned GLAGross Purchase Price
January 2022Artesia VillageScottsdale, Arizona21$14,500
February 2022Casselberry Commons(A)Casselberry, Florida24535,600
March 2022Shops at Boca CenterBoca Raton, Florida11790,000
April 2022Shoppes of CrabappleAlpharetta, Georgia84,350
May 2022La Fiesta SquareLafayette, California5360,798
May 2022Lafayette MercantileLafayette, California2243,000
June 2022Shops at TanglewoodHouston, Texas2622,150
June 2022Boulevard at MarketplaceFairfax, Virginia1910,448
June 2022Fairfax MarketplaceFairfax, Virginia1916,038
June 2022Fairfax PointeFairfax, Virginia108,394
July 2022Parkwood ShopsAtlanta, Georgia208,400
August 2022Chandler CenterChandler, Arizona75,250
August 2022Shops at Power and BaselineMesa, Arizona44,600
August 2022Northsight PlazaScottsdale, Arizona106,150
August 2022Broadway CenterTempe, Arizona117,000
November 2022Shops on MontviewDenver, Colorado95,762
601$342,440

(A)
Acquired its joint venture partner's 80% equity interest from the DDRM Joint Venture. This asset included a convenience center component. The purchase price was $44.5 million at 100% (or $35.6 million at 80%).

Dispositions of Assets and Joint Venture Investments

During 2022, the Company sold five wholly-owned shopping centers and land parcels at wholly-owned shopping centers in addition to three unconsolidated shopping centers generating proceeds totaling $265.2 million, of which the Company’s share was $223.9 million. In addition, the DDRM Joint Venture sold 13 shopping centers for an aggregate sales price of $387.6 million ($77.5 million at the Company’s share) with the related mortgage debt of $225.0 million repaid upon closing.

The Company sold its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%). In addition, the Company sold its 50% interest in Lennox Town Center to its partner based on a gross asset value of $77.0 million (at 100%). These transactions resulted in a Gain on Sale of Interests of $42.2 million.

46

Table of Contents

Equity Transactions

In the first and second quarters of 2022, the Company settled 2.4 million common shares which were offered and sold on a forward basis under its $250 million continuous equity program, resulting in gross proceeds of $38.3 million, or $15.79 per share. In the third and fourth quarters of 2022, the Company repurchased 3.7 million of its common shares in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of $48.9 million, or $13.09 per share.

Redevelopment Projects

The Company invested approximately $75 million in various consolidated active redevelopment and other projects during 2022.

CAPITALIZATION

At December 31, 2023, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $1.6 billion of debt, $175.0 million of preferred shares and $2.9 billion of market equity (calculated as common shares outstanding multiplied by $13.63, the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 29, 2023, the last trading day of 2023). At December 31, 2023, after giving effect to the swap of the variable-rate component of the Term Loan’s interest rate to a fixed rate, the Company’s total debt consisted entirely of fixed-rate debt.

Management seeks to maintain access to the capital resources necessary to manage the Company’s balance sheet and to repay upcoming maturities. Accordingly, the Company may seek to obtain funds through additional debt or equity financings and/or joint venture capital in a manner consistent with its intention to operate with a prudent debt capitalization policy and to reduce the Company’s cost of capital by maintaining an investment grade rating with Moody’s, S&P and Fitch. In the event the Company closes the Mortgage Facility in connection with the spin-off of Curbline, the Company expects to use loan proceeds together with proceeds from additional asset sales to repay all of the Company’s outstanding unsecured indebtedness in which case it would no longer maintain an investment grade rating. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, as it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The Company may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, which may negatively affect future ratings.

The Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness is, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, engage in certain mergers and acquisitions and make distribution to its shareholders. Although the Company intends to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities. In addition, the Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan and the Company’s indentures permit the acceleration of maturity in the event certain other debt of the Company is in default or has been accelerated. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

The Company has addressed all of its consolidated debt maturing in 2024. The Company expects to fund future maturities from utilization of its Revolving Credit Facility, proceeds from asset sales and other investments, cash flow from operations and/or additional debt or equity financings including the Mortgage Facility. No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be repaid as currently anticipated or refinanced.

Other Guaranties

In conjunction with the redevelopment of shopping centers, the Company had entered into commitments with general contractors aggregating approximately $6.7 million for its consolidated properties as of December 31, 2023, which includes the assets in the redevelopment pipeline. These obligations, composed principally of construction contracts, are generally due within 12 to 24 months, as the related construction costs are incurred, and are expected to be financed through operating cash flow, asset sales or borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. These contracts typically can be changed or terminated without penalty.

In connection with the sale of two properties, the Company guaranteed additional construction costs to complete re-tenanting work at the properties and deferred maintenance, both of which were recorded as a liability and reduction of gain on sale of real estate of $5.4 million at December 31, 2023. The amount is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

47

Table of Contents

The Company routinely enters into contracts for the maintenance of its properties. These contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty. At December 31, 2023, the Company had purchase order obligations, typically payable within one year, aggregating approximately $3.4 million related to the maintenance of its properties and general and administrative expenses.

At December 31, 2023, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $12.9 million. The Company has not recorded any obligations associated with these letters of credit, the majority of which serve as collateral to secure the Company’s obligation to third-party insurers with respect to limited reinsurance provided by the Company’s captive insurance company.

The Company has entered into employment contracts with all four of its executive officers. These contracts generally provide for base salary, bonuses based on factors including the financial performance of the Company and personal performance, participation in the Company’s equity plans and retirement plans, health and welfare benefits and reimbursement of various qualified business expenses. These employment agreements also provide for certain perquisites (e.g., health insurance coverage, car service, reimbursement of life and disability insurance premiums, etc.) and severance payments and benefits for various departure scenarios. The employment agreement for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer extends through September 2024. The employment agreements for the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Investment Officer extend through September 2026. The employment agreement for the Company’s Chief Accounting Officer extends through September 2024. All of the agreements are subject to termination by either the Company or the executive without cause upon at least 90 days’ notice subject to the payment of severance and other amounts to the executive under certain circumstances.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

Despite current economic uncertainty, the Company continues to experience retailer demand for quality real estate locations within well-positioned shopping centers. During 2023, the Company executed new leases and renewals aggregating approximately 3.3 million square feet of space on a pro rata basis. The Company believes these strong leasing results and tenant demand are attributable to the concentration of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities, pandemic-induced migration and work-from-home trends, limited new construction and tenants’ increasing use of physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of merchandise distribution.

The Company benefits from a diversified tenant base, with only one tenant whose annualized rental revenue equals or exceeds 3% of the Company’s annualized consolidated revenues plus the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture revenues (TJX Companies at 5.2%). Other significant national tenants generally have relatively strong financial positions, have outperformed other retail categories over time and the Company believes remain well-capitalized. Historically, these national tenants have provided a stable revenue base, and the Company believes that they will continue to provide a stable revenue base going forward, given the long-term nature of these leases. The majority of the tenants in the Company’s shopping centers provide day-to-day consumer necessities with a focus on value and convenience, versus discretionary items, which the Company believes will enable many of its tenants to outperform under a variety of economic conditions. The Company has relatively little reliance on overage or percentage rents generated by tenant sales performance.

The Company believes that its shopping center portfolio is well positioned, as evidenced by its recent leasing activity, historical property income growth and consistent growth in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot. Historical occupancy has generally ranged from 89% to 94% over the last 10 years. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the shopping center portfolio occupancy, on a pro rata basis, was 92.0% and 92.4%, respectively, and the total portfolio average annualized base rent per occupied square foot, on a pro rata basis, was $20.35 and $19.52, respectively. The Company’s portfolio was impacted by tenant bankruptcies in 2023 and the Company expects to expend capital in coming periods in connection with leases executed to backfill these and other closures. Although the per square foot cost of leasing capital expenditures has been predominantly consistent with the Company’s historical trends, the high volume of the Company’s leasing activity in recent years will cause aggregate leasing capital expenditure levels to remain elevated. The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated to be incurred over the expected lease term for new leases executed during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, on a pro rata basis, was $4.90 and $7.42 per rentable square foot, respectively. The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

Although disruptions to the Company’s business stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic have subsided, inflation, higher interest rates, concerns over consumer spending along with the volatility of global capital markets continue to pose risks to the U.S. economy, the consumer and the Company’s tenants. In addition to these macroeconomic challenges, the retail sector has been affected by changing consumer behaviors following the COVID-19 pandemic, including the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for share of the consumer wallet. The Company routinely monitors the credit profiles of its tenants and analyzes the possible impact of any potential tenant credit issues on the financial statements of the Company and its unconsolidated joint ventures. In some cases, changing conditions have resulted in weaker retailers and retail categories losing market share and declaring bankruptcy and/or closing stores. However, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to

48

Table of Contents

express interest in launching new concepts and expanding their store fleets within the suburban, high household income communities in which the Company’s properties are located. As a result, the Company believes that its prospects to backfill spaces vacated by bankrupt or non-renewing tenants are generally good, though such re-tenanting efforts would likely require additional capital expenditures and the opportunities to lease any vacant theater spaces may be more limited. However, there can be no assurance that vacancy resulting from increasingly uncertain economic conditions will not adversely affect the Company’s operating results (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

Inflation, rising interest rates and the availability of commercial real estate financing have also impacted, at certain times, real estate owners’ ability to acquire and sell assets and raise equity and debt financing. Although the Company has no consolidated indebtedness maturing in 2024, debt capital markets liquidity could adversely impact the Company’s business plan and ability to refinance future maturities, if needed, and the interest rates applicable thereto. Following the separation of Curbline, depending on market conditions, the Company intends to sell additional assets and use the proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness, redeem Curbline’s preferred investment in the Company and make distributions to shareholders. The timing of certain sales may be impacted by interim leasing, tactical redevelopment activities, and other asset management initiatives intended to maximize values. Unfavorable changes in interest rates or the capital markets could adversely impact the Company’s ability to sell additional assets on favorable terms.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including trends that might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations. The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements related to acquisitions (including any related pro forma financial information) and other business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of environmental and other regulations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and that could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements. For additional factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).

Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:


The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues, and any economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of the Company’s tenants, or new tenants, to enter into new leases or the ability of the Company’s existing tenants to renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates;


The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions;


The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the internet and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants, or a general downturn in its tenants’ businesses, which may cause tenants to close stores or default in payment of rent;


The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties, and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants;


The Company leases the majority of its square footage to large tenants, which makes it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for its space by, such tenants;

49

Table of Contents


The Company may not realize the intended benefits of acquisition or merger transactions. The acquired assets may not perform as well as the Company anticipated, or the Company may not successfully integrate the assets and realize improvements in occupancy and operating results. The acquisition of certain assets may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities;


The Company may fail to identify, acquire, construct or develop additional properties that produce a desired yield on invested capital, or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties. In addition, the Company may be limited in its acquisition opportunities due to competition, the inability to obtain financing on reasonable terms or any financing at all and other factors;


The Company may fail to dispose of properties on favorable terms, especially in regions experiencing deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, real estate investments can be illiquid, particularly as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties obtaining financing due to local or global conditions, and could limit the Company’s ability to promptly make changes to its portfolio to respond to economic and other conditions;


The Company may fail to complete its previously announced spin-off of its convenience properties, or the closing of the related Mortgage Facility, which could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares;


The Company may abandon a redevelopment opportunity after expending resources if it determines that the opportunity is not feasible due to a variety of factors, including a lack of availability of construction financing on reasonable terms, the impact of the economic environment on prospective tenants’ ability to enter into new leases, or pay contractual rent, or the inability of the Company to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations;


The Company may not complete redevelopment projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as weather, labor conditions, governmental approvals, material shortages or general economic downturn, resulting in limited availability of capital, increased debt service expense and construction costs and decreases in revenue;


The Company’s financial condition may be affected by required debt service payments, the risk of default, restrictions on its ability to incur additional debt or to enter into certain transactions under its Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan and other documents governing its debt obligations and the risk of downgrades from debt rating services. In addition, the Company may encounter difficulties in obtaining permanent financing or refinancing existing debt. Borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility are subject to certain representations and warranties and no default or event of default existing thereunder;


Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares, its ability to sell properties and prices realized, as well as its performance, interest expense levels and cash flow;


Financing necessary for the Company to execute its strategies and operate its business may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms;


Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company and the market price of the Company’s common shares;


Inflationary pressures could result in reductions in retailer profitability, consumer discretionary spending and tenant demand to lease space. Inflation could also increase the costs incurred by the Company to operate its properties and finance its operations and could adversely impact the valuation of its properties, all of which could have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common shares;


The Company is subject to complex regulations related to its status as a REIT and would be adversely affected if it failed to qualify as a REIT;


The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company must borrow funds to make distributions, those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms or at all;


Joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer may become bankrupt, may at any time have interests or goals different from those of the Company and may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture or may seek to

50

Table of Contents

terminate the joint venture, resulting in a loss to the Company of property revenues and management fees. The partner could cause a default under the joint venture loan for reasons outside the Company’s control. Furthermore, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized;


The Company’s decision to dispose of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, would change the holding period assumption in the undiscounted cash flow impairment analyses, which could result in material impairment losses and adversely affect the Company’s financial results;


The outcome of pending or future litigation, including litigation with tenants or joint venture partners, may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


Property damage, expenses related thereto and other business and economic consequences (including the potential loss of revenue) resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters in locations where the Company owns properties may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


Sufficiency and timing of any insurance recovery payments related to damages and lost revenues from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;


The Company and its tenants could be negatively affected by the impacts of pandemics and other public health crises;


The Company is subject to potential environmental liabilities;


The Company may incur losses that are uninsured or exceed policy coverage due to its liability for certain injuries to persons, property or the environment occurring on its properties;


The Company could be subject to potential liabilities, increased costs, reputation harm and other adverse effects on the Company’s business due to stakeholders’, including regulators’, views regarding the Company’s ESG goals and initiatives, and the impact of factors outside of the Company’s control on such goals and initiatives;


The Company could incur additional expenses to comply with or respond to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act or otherwise be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations;


The Company’s Board of Directors, which regularly reviews the Company’s business strategy and objectives, may change the Company’s strategic plan based on a variety of factors and conditions, including in response to changing market conditions and


The Company and its vendors could sustain a disruption, failure or breach of their respective networks and systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, which could disrupt the Company’s business operations, compromise the confidentiality of sensitive information and result in fines or penalties.

FY 2022 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000950170-23-003924.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Published MD&A gate trimmed front/tail over-capture. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2023-02-23. Report date: 2022-12-31.

Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Company Fundamentals.”

Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust

As of December 31, 2022, the Company met the qualification requirements of a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, the Company, with the exception of its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it meets certain requirements of the Code.

Human Capital Management

As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s workforce was composed of 267 full-time equivalent employees compared to 293 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2021. At the end of 2022, the Company’s workforce was approximately 37% male and 63% female, and women represented approximately 46% of the Company’s managers (defined by reference to the EEO-1 job class categories to include executive/senior-level officials and managers and first/mid-level officials and managers). The ethnicity of the Company’s workforce at the end of 2022 was approximately 77% White, 14% Black, 4% Hispanic, 2% Asian and 3% other (based on EEO categories). Of the Company’s employees, 71% of employees were assigned to work in the corporate headquarters in Beachwood, Ohio, with the rest working in regional offices or remotely. Many of the Company’s employees have a long tenure with the Company, with approximately 79% of the Company’s employees having been with the Company for over 5 years and 53% for over 10 years.

The Company’s primary human capital management objective is to attract, develop, engage and retain the highest quality talent. To support this objective, the Company offers competitive pay and benefit programs, a broad focus on wellness and flexible work arrangements designed to allow employees to meet personal and family needs. The Company also takes steps to measure and improve upon its level of employee engagement and to create a diverse and inclusive workplace. The Company’s employees are expected to exhibit honest, ethical and respectful conduct in the workplace. At least once every two years the Company requires its employees to complete training modules on sexual harassment and discrimination and to acknowledge and certify their compliance with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Senior members of its accounting, finance and capital markets and asset management departments are also required to acknowledge and agree to the Company’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers on an annual basis. The Company’s culture is also underpinned by its employees’ commitment to the Company’s core values of being Fearless, Authentic, Curious and Thoughtful (the Company’s "Matters of FACT") in the conduct of their responsibilities.

Employees returned to the Company's offices on a hybrid schedule in September 2022. The hybrid approach has allowed the Company to provide employees with flexibility for work/life balance while continuing to cultivate relationships and learning, which are key elements of the Company’s culture.

Information Technology and Cybersecurity

The Company depends on the proper functioning, availability and security of its information systems, including financial, data processing, communications and operating systems, as well as proprietary software programs that are important to the efficient operation of the business. The Company also utilizes certain software applications provided by third parties, grants access to certain of the Company’s systems to third parties who provide outsourced functions or other services and increasingly stores and transmits data by means of connected information technology or “cloud” systems. Any significant failures or other disruption of the Company’s critical information systems, including as a result of ransomware attacks or other cyber incidents, that impact the availability or other proper functioning of these systems or that result in the compromise of sensitive or confidential information, including information of tenants, employees and others, could result in liability to third parties and have a significant impact on the Company’s operations and reputation.

The frequency and sophistication of global cybersecurity threats have increased in recent years, primarily through phishing and ransomware campaigns. The Company’s objective for managing increasing cybersecurity risk is to avoid or minimize the impacts of external threat events or other efforts to breach the Company’s systems. The Company works to achieve this objective by hardening its networks and systems against attack. The Company has a formal process in place for incident response and business continuity, which the Company refers to as its Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan, which encompasses tactics related to cybersecurity, systems and facilities availability and information privacy. The Company has established an internal Security and Privacy Governance Committee comprised of members of management to help review and discuss cybersecurity matters on a periodic basis. The role of the committee is to oversee the development and implementation of the Company’s Cybersecurity Incident Response Plan, to discuss the implementation of various security measures and to receive reports on the Company’s cybersecurity training and awareness program and engagement of third parties to conduct periodic external security testing. The Company’s audit services and technology teams conduct third-party risk assessments during the procurement of solutions and services and annually on agreement renewal. As a complement to these measures, the Company also conducts annual cybersecurity awareness training for all employees, new-hire

5

Table of Contents

cybersecurity training, periodic simulated phishing tests and additional training for employees who travel outside the United States. The Company’s Audit Committee is briefed on information security matters, including current data security and recovery initiatives and external security testing results, at least once each year by senior members of the Company’s information technology and audit services teams.

The Company’s information technology systems are protected through physical and software safeguards, as well as backup systems the Company considers to be appropriate. However, such safeguards may ultimately prove to be insufficient to protect against all incidents the Company experiences. Furthermore, these systems are vulnerable to interruption from events beyond the Company’s control. To mitigate the potential for such occurrences at the Company’s primary data center, the Company has implemented various systems, including redundant telecommunication facilities, replication of critical data and backups to multiple off-site locations, a fire suppression system to protect the Company’s on-site data center and electrical power protection and generation facilities. The Company also has a catastrophic disaster recovery plan and alternate processing capability available for its critical data processes in the event of a catastrophe that renders the primary data center unusable.

The Company has not experienced any cyber-incidents that have materially obstructed the availability of its information systems and data. The Company has experienced incidents involving malware, email phishing and other events intended to disrupt information systems, wrongfully obtain valuable information or cause other types of malicious events that could have resulted in harm to the business, but to the Company’s knowledge, the various protections the Company has employed have been effective in identifying these types of events at a point when the impacts on the business could be minimized.

The Company also maintains cybersecurity insurance; however, there is no assurance that the insurance the Company maintains will cover all cybersecurity breaches or that policy limits will be sufficient to cover all related losses.

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

Detailed information regarding the Company’s approach to sustainability can be found on the Company's website in its Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report. This report is based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standard, which summarizes environmental and social performance, and includes disclosures with respect to certain Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Task Force on Climate-Related Disclosures (TCFD) standards. The content of the Company’s sustainability report is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other report or document filed with the SEC, unless expressly noted.

Information About the Company’s Executive Officers

The section below provides information regarding the Company’s executive officers as of February 15, 2023:

David R. Lukes, age 53, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SITE Centers and has been a member of SITE Centers’ Board of Directors since March 2017. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Lukes served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Equity One, Inc., an owner, developer and operator of shopping centers, from June 2014 until March 2017 and served as its Executive Vice President from May 2014 to June 2014. Mr. Lukes also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears Holding Corporation affiliate Seritage Realty Trust, a REIT primarily engaged in the re-leasing of shopping centers, from 2012 through April 2014 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of Olshan Properties, a privately-owned real estate firm specializing in commercial real estate, from 2010 through 2012. From 2002 to 2010, Mr. Lukes served in various senior management positions at Kimco Realty Corporation, including serving as its Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Lukes has also served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of RVI since April 2018 and as an Independent Director of Citycon Oyj, an owner and manager of shopping centers in the Nordic region listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki stock exchange, since 2017. Mr. Lukes also serves as a member of the Advisory Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"). Mr. Lukes holds a Bachelor of Environmental Design from Miami University, a Master of Architecture from the University of Pennsylvania and a Master of Science in real estate development from Columbia University.

Conor M. Fennerty, age 37, has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of SITE Centers since November 2019. From April 2017 to November 2019, Mr. Fennerty served as SITE Centers’ Senior Vice President of Capital Markets. Mr. Fennerty has also served as Executive Vice President of RVI since November 2020 and Director of RVI since July 2022. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Fennerty served as a Vice President and Senior Analyst at BlackRock, Inc., a global funds manager, from July 2014 to April 2017, an Analyst at Cohen & Steers Capital Management, a specialist asset manager focused on real assets, from May 2012 to July 2014, and prior to that, a member of the global investment research division of Goldman Sachs from May 2010 to May 2012. Mr. Fennerty earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration with a major in finance from Georgetown University.

6

Table of Contents

Christa A. Vesy, age 52, is Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of SITE Centers, a position she assumed in March 2012. From July 2016 to March 2017, Ms. Vesy also served as SITE Centers’ Interim Chief Financial Officer. In these roles, Ms. Vesy has overseen the property and corporate accounting, tax and financial reporting functions for SITE Centers. Previously, Ms. Vesy served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of SITE Centers since November 2006. Ms. Vesy has also served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of RVI since November 2019, as its Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since February 2018 and as a Director since May 2021. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Ms. Vesy worked for The Lubrizol Corporation, where she served as manager of external financial reporting and then as controller for the lubricant additives business segment. Prior to joining Lubrizol, from 1993 to September 2004, Ms. Vesy held various positions with the Assurance and Business Advisory Services group of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, a registered public accounting firm, including Senior Manager from 1999 to September 2004. Ms. Vesy graduated with a Bachelor of Science in business administration from Miami University. Ms. Vesy is a certified public accountant (CPA) and member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

John M. Cattonar, age 41, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer of SITE Centers since May 2021. Previously, Mr. Cattonar served as Senior Vice President of Investments of SITE Centers from April 2017 to May 2021. Prior to joining SITE Centers, Mr. Cattonar served as Vice President of Asset Management for Equity One from August 2015 to March 2017 and at Sears Holding Corporation affiliate Seritage Realty Trust from July 2012 to July 2015. Mr. Cattonar earned a Master of Science in Real Estate Development from Columbia University and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Corporate Headquarters

The Company is an Ohio corporation incorporated in 1992. The Company’s executive offices are located at 3300 Enterprise Parkway, Beachwood, Ohio 44122, and its telephone number is (216) 755-5500. The Company’s website is www.sitecenters.com. The Company uses the Investors Relations section of its website as a channel for routine distribution of important information, including press releases, analyst presentations and financial information. The information the Company posts to its website may be deemed to be material, and investors and others interested in the Company are encouraged to routinely monitor and review the information that the Company posts on its website in addition to following the Company’s press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The Company posts filings made with the SEC to its website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, including the Company’s annual, quarterly and current reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, respectively, the Company’s proxy statements and any amendments to those reports or statements. All such postings and filings are available on the Company’s website free of charge. In addition, this website allows investors and other interested persons to sign up to automatically receive e-mail alerts when the Company posts news releases and financial information on its website. The SEC also maintains a website (https://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The content on, or accessible through, any website referred to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, is not incorporated by reference into, and shall not be deemed part of, this Form 10-K unless expressly noted.

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Summary of Risk Factors

The following is a summary of material risks that could affect the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows. The risks summarized below are discussed in greater detail in the risk factors that follow and are not the only risks the Company faces. The Company’s business operations could also be affected by additional factors that are not presently known to it or that the Company currently considers to be immaterial to its operations. Investors should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the following risks actually occur, the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.

Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Properties and Strategies


The economic performance and value of the Company’s shopping centers depend on many factors, including the macro-economic climate and local conditions, each of which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s cash flows and operating results.


E-commerce may continue to have an adverse impact on the Company’s tenants and business.


The Company leases a substantial portion of its square footage to large national tenants, making it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for, its space by such tenants.


The Company’s dependence on rental income may adversely affect its ability to meet its debt obligations and make distributions to shareholders.


Inflationary pressures could adversely impact operating results.

7

Table of Contents


The Company’s expenses may remain constant or increase even if income from the Company’s properties decreases.


Property ownership through partnerships and joint ventures could limit the Company’s control of those investments and reduce its expected return.


The Company’s real estate assets may be subject to impairment charges.


The Company’s acquisition activities may not produce the cash flows that it expects and may be limited by competitive pressures or other factors.


Real estate property investments are illiquid; therefore, the Company may not be able to dispose of properties when desired or on favorable terms.


The Company’s development, redevelopment and construction activities could affect its operating results.


The Company’s real estate investments may contain environmental risks that could adversely affect its results of operations.


Expectations relating to environmental, social and governance considerations expose the Company to potential liabilities, increased costs, reputational harm and other adverse effects on the Company’s business.


Health pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a significant impact on the Company and its tenants’ businesses.


The Company’s properties could be subject to damage from natural disasters and weather-related factors; an uninsured loss on the Company’s properties or a loss that exceeds the limits of the Company’s insurance policies could subject the Company to lost capital or revenue on those properties.


Violent crime, including terrorism and mass shootings, or civil unrest may affect the markets in which the Company operates its business and its profitability.


A disruption, failure or breach of the Company’s networks or systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, could harm its business.

Risks Relating to the Company’s Indebtedness and Capital Structure


The Company depends on external sources of capital. Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company and the market price of the Company’s common shares.


Changes in the Company’s credit ratings or the debt markets, as well as market conditions in the credit markets, could adversely affect the Company’s publicly traded debt and credit facilities.


The Company’s ability to increase its debt could adversely affect its cash flows.


The Company’s cash flows and operating results could be adversely affected by required payments of debt or related interest and other risks of its debt financing.


The Company’s financial condition could be adversely affected by financial covenants.


The Company may incur significant debt prepayment costs as a result of repaying indebtedness prior to its stated maturity.


The Company has variable-rate debt and interest rate risk.

Risks Related to the Company’s Taxation as a REIT


If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to U.S. federal income tax as a regular corporation and could have significant tax liability.


Compliance with REIT requirements may negatively affect the Company’s operating decisions.


The Company may be forced to borrow funds to maintain its REIT status, and the unavailability of such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, may cause the Company to curtail its investment activities and/or to dispose of assets at inopportune times, which could materially and adversely affect the Company.


Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.


Certain foreign shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain recognized on a disposition of the Company’s common shares if the Company does not qualify as a “domestically controlled” REIT.


Legislative or other actions affecting REITs could have a negative effect on the Company.

Risks Related to the Company’s Organization, Structure and Ownership


Provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, even if that change may be considered beneficial by some of the Company’s shareholders.


The Company has significant shareholders who may exert influence on the Company as a result of their considerable beneficial ownership of the Company’s common shares, and their interests may differ from the interests of other shareholders.

8

Table of Contents


The Company’s Board of Directors may change significant corporate policies without shareholder approval.

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Shares


Changes in market conditions could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities.


The Company may issue additional securities without shareholder approval.

General Risks Relating to Investments in the Company’s Securities


The Company may be unable to retain and attract key management personnel.


The Company is subject to litigation that could adversely affect its results of operations.


Changes in accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") or other standard-setting bodies may adversely affect the Company’s business.

The risks summarized above are discussed in greater detail below.

Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Properties and Strategies

The Economic Performance and Value of the Company’s Shopping Centers Depend on Many Factors, Including the Macro-Economic Climate and Local Conditions, Each of Which Could Have an Adverse Impact on the Company’s Cash Flows and Operating Results

The economic performance and value of the Company’s real estate holdings can be affected by many factors, including the following:


Changes in the national, regional, local and international economic climate, including as a result of pandemics;


Local conditions, such as an oversupply of space or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area and population, demographic and employment trends;


The attractiveness of the properties to tenants;


The increase in consumer purchases through the internet;


The Company’s ability to provide adequate management services and to maintain its properties;


Increased operating costs if these costs cannot be passed through to tenants and


The expense of periodically renovating, repairing and re-letting spaces.

Because the Company’s properties consist of retail shopping centers, the Company’s performance is linked to general economic conditions in the retail market, including conditions that affect consumers’ purchasing behaviors and disposable income. The market for retail space historically has been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by weakness in the national, regional and local economies, the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies, the ongoing consolidation in the retail sector, increases in consumer internet purchases and the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets. The Company’s performance is affected by its tenants’ results of operations, which are impacted by macroeconomic factors that affect consumers’ ability to purchase goods and services. If the price of the goods and services offered by its tenants materially increases, including as a result of inflationary pressures or increases in taxes or tariffs resulting from, among other things, potential changes in the Code, the operating results and the financial condition of the Company's tenants and demand for retail space could be adversely affected. To the extent that any of these conditions occur, they are likely to affect market rents for retail space. In addition, the Company may face challenges in the management and maintenance of its properties or incur increased operating costs, such as real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, that may make its properties unattractive to tenants.

In addition, the Company’s properties compete with numerous shopping venues, including regional malls, outlet centers, other shopping centers and e-commerce, in attracting and retaining retailers. As of December 31, 2022, leases at the Company’s properties (including the proportionate share of unconsolidated properties) were scheduled to expire on a total of approximately 5.0% of leased GLA during 2023. For those leases that renew, rental rates upon renewal may be lower than current rates. For those leases that do not renew, the Company may not be able to promptly re-lease the space on favorable terms or with reasonable capital investments. In these situations, the Company’s financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be adversely impacted.

9

Table of Contents

E-Commerce May Continue to Have an Adverse Impact on the Company’s Tenants and Business

E-commerce has been broadly embraced by the public, including at an increased rate throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and growth in the e‑commerce share of overall consumer sales is likely to continue in the future. Some of the Company’s tenants have been negatively impacted by increasing competition from internet retailers, and this trend could affect the way current and future tenants lease space. For example, the migration toward e-commerce has led some omni-channel retailers to reduce the number and size of their traditional “brick and mortar” locations, use such locations for curbside pickup of items ordered online and increasingly rely on e-commerce and alternative distribution channels. The Company cannot predict with certainty how continuing growth in e-commerce will impact the demand for space at its properties or how much revenue will be generated at traditional store locations in the future. If the Company is unable to anticipate and respond promptly to trends in retailer and consumer behavior, or if demand for traditional retail space significantly decreases, the Company’s occupancy levels and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

The Company Leases a Substantial Portion of Its Square Footage to Large National Tenants, Making It Vulnerable to Changes in the Business and Financial Condition of, or Demand for, Its Space by Such Tenants

As of December 31, 2022, the annualized base rental revenues of the Company’s tenants that are equal to or exceed 1.5% of the Company’s aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenues, including its proportionate share of joint venture aggregate annualized shopping center base rental revenues, are as follows:

Tenant% of Annualized Base Rental Revenues
TJX Companies, Inc.5.9%
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.2.7%
PetSmart, Inc.2.4%
Michaels Companies, Inc.2.2%
Ross Stores, Inc.2.1%
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.1.9%
Nordstrom, Inc.1.8%
Gap Inc.1.8%
Best Buy Co., Inc.1.8%
Burlington Stores, Inc.1.7%
Ulta Beauty, Inc.1.7%
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.1.6%
The Kroger Co.1.6%
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.1.6%

The retail shopping sector has been affected by economic conditions, including changing consumer behaviors following the COVID-19 pandemic, increases in consumer internet purchases and the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for market share. In some cases, these shifts have resulted in weaker retailers losing market share and declaring bankruptcy, closing stores and/or taking advantage of early termination provisions in their leases. Over the past decade, bankruptcies, store closures and reduced expansion plans by conventional department stores and national chains have resulted in a smaller overall number of tenants requiring large store formats. In addition, movie theater operators have struggled to regain profitability following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and prospects for releasing any theater vacancies arising in the Company's portfolio may be limited absent the investment of significant capital to repurpose the space.

As information becomes available regarding the status of the Company’s leases with tenants in financial distress or as the future plans for their spaces change, the Company may be required to write off and/or accelerate depreciation and amortization expense associated with a significant portion of the tenant-related deferred charges in future periods. The Company’s income and ability to meet its financial obligations could also be adversely affected in the event of the bankruptcy, insolvency or significant downturn in the business of one of these tenants or any of the Company’s other major tenants. In addition, the Company’s results could be adversely affected if any of these tenants do not renew their leases as they expire on terms favorable to the Company or at all.

The Company’s Dependence on Rental Income May Adversely Affect Its Ability to Meet Its Debt Obligations and Make Distributions to Shareholders

Substantially all of the Company’s income is derived from rental income from real property. As a result, the Company’s performance depends on its ability to collect rent from tenants. The Company’s income and funds available for repayment of

10

Table of Contents

indebtedness and distribution to shareholders would be negatively affected if a significant number of its tenants, or any of its major tenants, were to do the following:


Experience a downturn in their business that significantly weakens their ability to meet their obligations to the Company;


Delay lease commencements;


Decline to extend or renew leases upon expiration;


Fail to make rental payments when due or


Close stores or declare bankruptcy.

Any of these actions could result in the termination of tenants’ leases and the loss of rental income attributable to the terminated leases. Lease terminations by an anchor tenant or a failure by that anchor tenant to occupy the premises may also permit other tenants in the same shopping centers to terminate their leases or reduce the amount of rent they pay under the terms of their leases. In addition, the Company cannot be certain that any tenant whose lease expires will renew that lease or that the Company will be able to re-lease space on economically advantageous terms. The loss of rental revenues from a number of the Company’s major tenants and its inability to replace such tenants may adversely affect the Company’s profitability and its ability to meet debt and other financial obligations and make distributions to shareholders.

Inflationary Pressures Could Adversely Impact Operating Results

Inflationary pressures pose risks to the Company’s business, tenants and the U.S. economy. Inflationary pressures and rising interest rates could result in reductions in retailer profitability and consumer discretionary spending which could impact tenant demand for new and existing store locations and the Company’s ability to grow rents. Regardless of inflation levels, base rent under most of the Company’s long-term anchor leases will remain constant (subject to tenants’ exercise of renewal options at pre-negotiated rent increases) until the expiration of their lease terms. Inflation may result in increases in certain shopping center operating expenses including common area maintenance and other operating expenses. Although most of the Company’s leases require tenants to pay their share of these property operating expenses, some tenants may be unable to absorb large expense increases caused by inflation and such increased expenses may limit tenants’ ability to pay higher base rents upon renewal, or renew leases at all. Inflation may also impact other aspects of the Company’s operating costs, including insurance, employee retention costs, the cost to complete redevelopments and build-outs of recently leased vacancies and interest rate costs relating to variable-rate loans and refinancing of fixed-rate indebtedness. Increasing interest rates or capital availability constraints may also adversely impact the transaction market, including the availability of financing asset values and the Company's ability to buy or sell properties. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s Expenses May Remain Constant or Increase Even if Income from the Company’s Properties Decreases

Costs associated with the Company’s business, such as common area expenses, utilities, insurance, real estate taxes, mortgage payments and corporate expenses, are relatively inflexible and generally do not decrease in the event that a property is not fully occupied, rental rates decrease, a tenant fails to pay rent or other circumstances cause the Company’s revenues to decrease. In addition, inflation could result in higher operating costs. If the Company is unable to lower its operating costs when revenues decline and/or is unable to pass along cost increases to tenants, the Company’s cash flows, profitability and ability to make distributions to shareholders could be adversely impacted.

Property Ownership Through Partnerships and Joint Ventures Could Limit the Company’s Control of Those Investments and Reduce Its Expected Return

Partnership or joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that the Company’s partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt, that its partner or co-venturer might at any time have different interests or goals than the Company and that its partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, the Company’s partner or co-venturer could have different investment criteria that would impact the assets held by the joint venture or its interest in the joint venture, which may also reduce the carrying value of its equity investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized. These situations could have an impact on the Company’s revenues from its joint ventures. Other risks of joint venture investments include impasse on decisions, such as the decision to sell or finance a property or leasing decisions with anchor tenants, because neither the Company’s partner or co-venturer nor the Company would have full control over the partnership or joint venture. Joint venture platforms typically contain customary buy-sell provisions, which could result in either the sale of the Company’s interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire the Company’s partner’s interest at

11

Table of Contents

inopportune times, as well as the termination of applicable management contracts and fees. In addition, the Company is obligated to maintain the REIT status of the Dividend Trust Portfolio joint venture’s REIT subsidiary and may be obligated to maintain the REIT status of future joint venture platforms and the Company’s failure to do so could result in substantial liability to its partner. These factors could limit the return that the Company receives from such investments, cause its cash flows to be lower than its estimates or lead to business conflicts or litigation. There is no limitation under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, or its Code of Regulations, as to the amount of funds that the Company may invest in partnerships or joint ventures. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture. Furthermore, if credit conditions in the capital markets deteriorate, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity method investments if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized or considered an other than temporary decline. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had $44.6 million of investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures holding 18 shopping centers.

The Company’s Real Estate Assets May Be Subject to Impairment Charges

On a periodic basis, the Company assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of its real estate assets and other investments may be impaired. A property’s value is impaired only if the estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. In the Company’s estimate of projected cash flows, it considers factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors. If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows considerations include the most likely course of action at the balance sheet date based on current plans, intended holding periods and available market information. The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate assets and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will not take additional charges in the future related to the impairment of its assets. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in the period in which the charge is taken.

The Company’s Acquisition Activities May Not Produce the Cash Flows That It Expects and May Be Limited by Competitive Pressures or Other Factors

The Company intends to acquire retail properties to the extent that suitable acquisitions can be made at appropriate returns. Acquisitions of commercial properties entail risks such as the following:


The Company may be unable to identify, or may have difficulty identifying, acquisition opportunities that fit its investment strategy and cost of capital;


The Company’s estimates on expected occupancy and rental rates may differ from actual conditions;


The Company’s estimates of the costs of any redevelopment or repositioning of acquired properties may prove to be inaccurate;


The Company may be unable to operate successfully in new markets where acquired properties are located due to a lack of market knowledge or understanding of local economies;


The properties may become subject to environmental liabilities that the Company was unaware of at the time the Company acquired the property or


The Company may be unable to successfully integrate new properties into its existing operations.

In addition, the Company may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions at appropriate returns due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment, some of which may have greater financial resources or a lower cost of capital than the Company.

Real Estate Property Investments Are Illiquid; Therefore, the Company May Not Be Able to Dispose of Properties When Desired or on Favorable Terms

Real estate investments generally cannot be disposed of quickly. In addition, the Code imposes restrictions, which are not applicable to other types of real estate companies, on the ability of a REIT to dispose of properties. Therefore, the Company may not be able to diversify or alter its portfolio in response to economic conditions or trends in retailer or consumer behavior promptly or on favorable terms. The Company’s inability to quickly respond to such changes or dispose of properties could adversely affect the value of the Company’s portfolio and its ability to repay indebtedness and make distributions to shareholders.

12

Table of Contents

The Company’s Development, Redevelopment and Construction Activities Could Affect Its Operating Results

The Company intends to continue the selective development and redevelopment of retail properties as opportunities arise. The Company’s development and redevelopment activities include the following risks:


Construction costs of a project may exceed the Company’s original estimates;


Occupancy rates and rents at a newly completed property may not be sufficient to make the property profitable;


Rental rates per square foot could be less than projected;


The Company may not complete construction and lease-up on schedule, resulting in increased construction costs;


The Company may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations and


The Company may abandon development or redevelopment opportunities after expending resources to determine feasibility.

Additionally, the time frame required for development and redevelopment and lease-up of these properties means that the Company may wait several years for a significant cash return. If any of the above events occur, the development and redevelopment of properties may hinder the Company’s growth and have an adverse effect on its results of operations and cash flows. In addition, new development activities, regardless of whether they are ultimately successful, typically require substantial time and attention from management.

The Company’s Real Estate Investments May Contain Environmental Risks That Could Adversely Affect Its Results of Operations

The acquisition and ownership of properties may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities. The Company’s operating expenses could be higher than anticipated due to the cost of complying with existing or future environmental laws and regulations. In addition, under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the Company may be considered an owner or operator of real property or to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances. As a result, the Company may become liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances released on or in its properties. The Company may also be liable for other potential costs that could relate to hazardous or toxic substances (including governmental fines and injuries to persons and property). The Company may incur such liability whether or not it knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Such liability could be of substantial magnitude and divert management’s attention from other aspects of the Company’s business and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition, as well as its ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Expectations Relating to Environmental, Social and Governance Considerations Expose the Company to Potential Liabilities, Increased Costs, Reputational Harm and Other Adverse Effects on the Company’s Business

Many governments, regulators, investors, employees, customers and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on environmental, social and governance considerations relating to businesses, including climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, human capital and diversity, equity and inclusion. The Company makes statements about its environmental, social and governance goals and initiatives through information provided on its website, press releases and other communications, including through its Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability Report. Responding to these environmental, social and governance considerations and implementation of these goals and initiatives involves risks and uncertainties, including those described under “Forward-Looking Statements” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations in Part II of this Report on Form 10-K, requires investments and are impacted by factors that may be outside the Company’s control. In addition, some stakeholders may disagree with the Company’s goals and initiatives and the focus of stakeholders may change and evolve over time. Stakeholders also may have very different views on where environmental, social and governance focus should be placed, including differing views of regulators in various jurisdictions in which we operate. Any failure, or perceived failure, by the Company to achieve its goals, further its initiatives, adhere to its public statements, comply with federal or state environmental, social and governance laws and regulations, or meet evolving and varied stakeholder expectations and standards could result in legal and regulatory proceedings against the Company and materially adversely affect the Company’s business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

13

Table of Contents

Health Pandemics, Including the COVID-19 Pandemic, Could Have a Significant Impact on the Company and Its Tenants’ Businesses

The Company’s business and the businesses of its tenants could be significantly impacted by health pandemics and the public perception of and reaction to the related risks. Beginning in March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the closure of many tenant businesses and substantially reduced foot traffic at open tenant businesses as a result of social distancing restrictions. As a result, a significant number of tenants failed to pay some or all of their monthly rent obligations, and the Company and its joint ventures ultimately agreed to defer a significant portion of these unpaid tenant rent obligations until 2021 and beyond. As of December 31, 2022, the COVID-19-related deferred amounts for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis have been repaid and the level and pace of tenant collections has largely reverted to pre-pandemic norms.

However, if additional surges in COVID-19 contagion were to occur, or if new pandemics were to emerge, tenant operations could be restricted or adversely impacted and such developments could lead to nonpayment of rents, tenant requests for rent relief and tenant closures and bankruptcies. Certain tenant categories are especially vulnerable to the impacts of pandemics, including movie theaters, fitness centers and restaurants that rely on in-person dining, activities and entertainment.

In addition to the impacts and uncertainties listed above, the occurrence of a pandemic may significantly limit the ability of the Company’s employees to access the Company’s offices and properties, which could adversely impact the Company’s ability to manage its properties and complete other operating and administrative functions that are important to its business. Efforts by the Company’s employees to work remotely could also expose the Company to additional risks, such as increased cybersecurity risk. Furthermore, pandemics could negatively affect global capital markets, which, in turn, could negatively affect the Company’s ability to obtain necessary financing, including property-level refinancing for its joint ventures, on favorable terms, or at all. Reduced rent collections from tenants could also impact the ability of the Company and its joint ventures to satisfy covenants and debt service obligations applicable to their financing arrangements, particularly with respect to mortgage loan indebtedness, and result in the recognition of impairment charges with respect to certain of the Company’s properties. Reduced rent collections from tenants may also have the effect of decreasing management fees collected from the Company’s joint ventures, which are often based on property cash receipts, and may also impact decisions by the Company’s Board of Directors with respect to future dividend policy. The Company’s periodic assessment of tenants’ ability to pay outstanding obligations may also result in reductions to rental revenue on account of previously accrued rents for which collection is no longer considered probable. Any of the foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company’s Properties Could Be Subject to Damage from Natural Disasters and Weather-Related Factors; An Uninsured Loss on the Company’s Properties or a Loss That Exceeds the Limits of the Company’s Insurance Policies Could Subject the Company to Lost Capital or Revenue on Those Properties

The Company’s properties are generally open-air shopping centers. Extreme weather conditions may impact the profitability of the Company’s tenants by decreasing traffic at or hindering access to the Company’s properties, which may decrease the amount of rent the Company collects. Furthermore, a number of the Company’s properties are located in areas that are subject to natural disasters, including Florida and California. Such properties could therefore be affected by rising sea levels, hurricanes, tropical storms, earthquakes and wildfires, whether caused by global climate changes or other factors. In addition, the Company’s insurance premiums have increased in recent years, and the potential increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, extreme weather-related events and climate change in the future may limit the types of coverage and the coverage limits the Company is able to obtain on commercially reasonable terms.

The Company currently maintains all-risk property insurance with limits of $150 million per occurrence and in the aggregate and general liability insurance with limits of $100 million per occurrence and in the aggregate, in each case subject to various conditions, exclusions, deductibles and sub-limits for certain perils such as flood and earthquake. Coverage for a named windstorm for the Company’s continental U.S. properties is generally subject to a deductible of up to 5% of the total insured value of each property. The amount of any insurance coverage for losses due to damage or business interruption may prove to be insufficient. Should a loss occur that is uninsured or is in an amount exceeding the aggregate limits for the applicable insurance policy, or in the event of a loss that is subject to a substantial deductible under an insurance policy, the Company could lose all or part of its capital invested in, and anticipated revenue from, one or more of the properties, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operating results and financial condition, as well as its ability to make distributions to shareholders.

Violent Crime, Including Terrorism and Mass Shootings, or Civil Unrest May Affect the Markets in Which the Company Operates Its Business and Its Profitability

Certain of the Company’s properties are located in or near major metropolitan areas or other areas that have experienced, and remain susceptible to, violent crime, including terrorist attacks and mass shootings and civil unrest. Any kind of violent criminal acts, including terrorist acts against public institutions or buildings or modes of public transportation (including airlines, trains or buses), or

14

Table of Contents

civil unrest could alter shopping habits, deter customers from visiting the Company’s shopping centers or result in damage to its properties, which would have a negative effect on the Company’s business, the operations of its tenants and the value of its properties.

A Disruption, Failure or Breach of the Company’s Networks or Systems, Including as a Result of Cyber-Attacks, Could Harm Its Business

The Company relies extensively on computer systems to manage its business. While the Company maintains some of its own critical information technology systems, it also depends on third parties to provide important information technology services relating to several key business functions, such as payroll, human resources, electronic communications and certain finance functions. These systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, facility damage, computer or telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches, vandalism, natural disasters, catastrophic events, human error and potential cyber threats, including phishing attacks, ransomware and other sophisticated cyber-attacks. Although the Company and such third parties employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate cyber threats, including password protection, firewalls, backup servers, threat monitoring and periodic penetration testing, the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful. Should they occur, these threats could compromise the confidential information of the Company’s tenants, employees and third-party vendors; disrupt the Company’s business operations and the availability and integrity of data in the Company’s systems; and result in litigation, violation of applicable privacy and other laws, investigations, actions, fines or penalties. In the event of damage or disruption to the Company’s business due to these occurrences, the Company may not be able to successfully and quickly recover all of its critical business functions, assets and data. Furthermore, while the Company maintains insurance, the coverage may not sufficiently cover all types of losses, claims or fines that may arise. For additional information see Item 1 “Business—Information Technology and Cybersecurity” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risks Relating to the Company’s Indebtedness and Capital Structure

The Company Depends on External Sources of Capital. Disruptions in the Financial Markets Could Affect the Company’s Ability to Obtain Financing on Reasonable Terms and Have Other Adverse Effects on the Company and the Market Price of the Company’s Common Shares

To qualify as a REIT, the Company must, among other things, distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding any net capital gains) to its stockholders each year. Because of these distribution requirements, the Company has relied on third-party sources of capital, including debt and preferred equity financings, to fund growth opportunities and capital needs. The U.S. and global equity and credit markets have experienced significant price volatility, dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the past, which have caused market prices of many stocks to fluctuate substantially and the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances materially affected liquidity in the financial markets, making terms for certain financings less attractive and, in certain cases, resulting in the unavailability of financing for businesses and assets similar to those operated by the Company. Uncertainty in the equity and credit markets may negatively affect the Company’s ability to access additional financing at reasonable terms or at all, which may negatively affect the Company’s ability to refinance its debt, obtain new financing or make acquisitions. These circumstances may also adversely affect the Company’s tenants, including their ability to enter into new leases, pay their rents when due and renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates.

A prolonged downturn in the equity or credit markets may cause the Company to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may require it to adjust its business plan accordingly. In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for the Company to sell properties or may adversely affect the price it receives for properties that it does sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties in obtaining financing. These events in the equity and credit markets may make it more difficult or costly for the Company to raise capital through the issuance of its equity or debt securities. These disruptions in the financial markets also may have a material adverse effect on the market value of the Company’s common shares and other adverse effects on the Company or the economy in general. There can be no assurances that government responses to the disruptions in the financial markets will restore consumer confidence, stabilize the markets or increase liquidity and the availability of equity or credit financing.

Changes in the Company’s Credit Ratings or the Debt Markets, as Well as Market Conditions in the Credit Markets, Could Adversely Affect the Company’s Publicly Traded Debt and Credit Facilities

The market value for the Company’s publicly traded debt depends on many factors, including the following:


The Company’s credit ratings with major credit rating agencies;


The prevailing interest rates being paid by, or the market price for publicly traded debt issued by, other companies similar to the Company;

15

Table of Contents


The Company’s financial condition, liquidity, leverage, financial performance and prospects and


The overall condition of the financial markets.

The condition of the financial markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future. The U.S. credit markets have experienced severe dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the past. Furthermore, uncertain market conditions can be exacerbated by leverage. The occurrence of these circumstances in the credit markets and/or additional fluctuations in the financial markets and prevailing interest rates could have an adverse effect on the Company’s ability to access capital and its cost of capital.

In addition, credit rating agencies continually review their ratings for the companies they follow, including the Company. For example, credit rating agencies may review and change their credit ratings for the Company as a result of disruptions to retail tenants and property-level revenues caused by macroeconomic trends or other developments such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The credit rating agencies also evaluate the real estate industry as a whole and may change their credit rating for the Company based on their overall view of the industry. Any rating organization that rates the Company’s publicly traded debt may lower the rating or decide, at its sole discretion, not to rate the Company’s publicly traded debt. The ratings of the Company’s publicly traded debt are based primarily on the rating organization’s assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of interest when due and the payment of principal on the maturity date. A negative change in the Company’s rating could have an adverse effect on the Company’s credit facilities and market price of the Company’s publicly traded debt, as well as the Company’s ability to access capital and its cost of capital.

The Company’s Ability to Increase Its Debt Could Adversely Affect Its Cash Flows

At December 31, 2022, the Company had outstanding debt of $1.7 billion (excluding its proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture mortgage debt aggregating $110.6 million as of December 31, 2022). The Company intends to maintain prudent leverage levels. The Company is subject to limitations under its credit facilities and indentures relating to its ability to incur additional debt; however, the Company’s organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness it may incur. If the Company were to become more highly leveraged, its cash needs to fund debt service would increase accordingly. Under such circumstances, the Company’s risk of decreases in cash flow due to fluctuations in the real estate market, reliance on its major tenants, acquisition and development costs and the other factors discussed in these risk factors could subject the Company to an even greater adverse impact on its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk of default on the Company’s debt obligations, which could further reduce its cash available for distribution and adversely affect its ability to dispose of its portfolio on favorable terms, which could cause the Company to incur losses and reduce its cash flows.

The Company’s Cash Flows and Operating Results Could Be Adversely Affected by Required Payments of Debt or Related Interest and Other Risks of Its Debt Financing

The Company is generally subject to the risks associated with debt financing. These risks include the following:


The Company’s cash flows may not satisfy required payments of principal and interest;


The Company may not be able to refinance existing indebtedness on its properties as necessary, or the interest rate and other terms of the refinancing may be less favorable to the Company than the interest rate and terms applicable to the existing debt;


Required debt payments are not reduced if the economic performance of any property declines;


Debt service obligations could reduce funds available for distribution to the Company’s shareholders and funds available for development, redevelopment and acquisitions;


Any default on the Company’s indebtedness could result in acceleration of those obligations, which could result in the acceleration of other debt obligations and possible loss of property to foreclosure and


The Company may not be able to finance necessary capital expenditures for purposes such as re-leasing space on favorable terms or at all.

If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and the Company cannot or does not make the mortgage payments, it may have to surrender the property to the lender with a consequent loss of any prospective income and equity value from such property, which may also adversely affect the Company’s credit ratings. Any of these risks can place strains on the Company’s cash flows, reduce its ability to grow and adversely affect its results of operations.

16

Table of Contents

The Company’s Financial Condition Could Be Adversely Affected by Financial Covenants

The Company’s credit facilities and the indenture under which its senior unsecured indebtedness is, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, leverage ratios and certain coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of its assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions. These credit facilities and indenture also contain customary default provisions including, but not limited to, the failure to pay principal and interest issued thereunder in a timely manner, the failure to comply with the Company’s financial and operating covenants and the failure of the Company or its majority-owned subsidiaries (i.e., entities in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest) to pay when due certain indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds beyond applicable grace and cure periods. These covenants could limit the Company’s ability to obtain additional funds needed to address cash shortfalls or pursue growth opportunities or transactions that would provide substantial return to its shareholders. In addition, a breach of these covenants could cause a default or accelerate some or all of the Company’s indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.

The Company May Incur Significant Debt Prepayment Costs as a Result of Repaying Indebtedness Prior to Its Stated Maturity

In prudently managing its capital structure and refinancing risk in the past, the Company has chosen to retire debt prior to its stated maturity date, and in doing so, has incurred prepayment or defeasance premiums in accordance with the relevant loan agreements. If the Company chooses to retire debt prior to its stated maturity date in the future, it may incur significant debt prepayment costs or defeasance premiums, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s cash flows and results of operations.

The Company Has Variable-Rate Debt and Interest Rate Risk

The Company has indebtedness with interest rates that vary depending upon the market index. In addition, the Company has a revolving credit facility that bears interest at a variable rate on any amounts drawn on the facility. The Company may incur additional variable-rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates on variable-rate debt would increase the Company’s interest expense, which would negatively affect net earnings and cash available for payment of its debt obligations and distributions to its shareholders.

Risks Related to the Company’s Taxation as a REIT

If the Company Fails to Qualify as a REIT in Any Taxable Year, It Will Be Subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax as a Regular Corporation and Could Have Significant Tax Liability

The Company intends to operate in a manner that allows it to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, REIT qualification requires that the Company satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual or quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex provisions of the Code, for which there are a limited number of judicial or administrative interpretations. The Company’s status as a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that are not entirely within its control. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to qualify and remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes is not certain. Even a technical or inadvertent violation of the REIT requirements could jeopardize the Company’s REIT qualification. Furthermore, Congress or the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) might change the tax laws or regulations and the courts could issue new rulings, in each case potentially having a retroactive effect that could make it more difficult or impossible for the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, the following will result:


The Company would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, which, among other things, means that it would be unable to deduct distributions to its shareholders in computing its taxable income and would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates;


Any resulting tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to shareholders and could force the Company to liquidate assets or take other actions that could have a detrimental effect on its operating results and


Unless the Company were entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions, it would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the Company lost its qualification, and its cash available for debt service obligations and distribution to its shareholders, therefore, would be reduced for each of the years in which the Company does not qualify as a REIT.

Even if the Company remains qualified as a REIT, it may face other tax liabilities that reduce its cash flow. The Company’s TRS is subject to taxation, and any changes in the laws affecting the Company’s TRS may increase the Company’s tax expenses. The Company may also be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and property either directly or at the level of its

17

Table of Contents

subsidiaries. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for debt service obligations and distribution to the Company’s shareholders.

Compliance with REIT Requirements May Negatively Affect the Company’s Operating Decisions

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company must meet certain requirements on an ongoing basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts the Company distributes to its shareholders and the ownership of its shares. The Company may also be required to make distributions to its shareholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when the Company’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or debt service obligations.

As a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its annual net taxable income (excluding net capital gains) to its shareholders. To the extent that the Company satisfies this distribution requirement, but distributes less than 100% of its net taxable income, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, the Company will be subject to a 4% non-deductible excise tax if the actual amount paid to its shareholders in a calendar year is less than the minimum amount specified under U.S. federal tax laws. From time to time, the Company may generate taxable income greater than its income for financial reporting purposes, or its net taxable income may be greater than its cash flows available for distribution to its shareholders. If the Company does not have other funds available in these situations, it could be required to borrow funds, sell its securities or a portion of its properties at unfavorable prices or find other sources of funds in order to meet the REIT distribution requirements and avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax.

In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code impose a 100% tax on income from “prohibited transactions.” Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets, other than foreclosure property, that constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. This 100% tax could affect the Company’s decisions to sell property if it believes such sales could be treated as a prohibited transaction. However, the Company would not be subject to this tax if it were to sell assets through its TRS. The Company will also be subject to a 100% tax on certain amounts if the economic arrangements between the Company and its TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.

The Company May Be Forced to Borrow Funds to Maintain Its REIT Status, and the Unavailability of Such Capital on Favorable Terms at the Desired Times, or at All, May Cause the Company to Curtail Its Investment Activities and/or to Dispose of Assets at Inopportune Times, Which Could Materially and Adversely Affect the Company

To qualify as a REIT, the Company generally must distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income each year, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and excluding any net capital gains, and the Company will be subject to regular corporate income taxes on its undistributed taxable income to the extent that the Company distributes less than 100% of its REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and including any net capital gains, each year. In addition, the Company will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions paid by the Company in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of the Company’s ordinary income, 95% of its capital gain net income and 100% of its undistributed income from prior years. The Company could have a potential distribution shortfall as a result of, among other things, differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and recognition of income for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. In order to maintain REIT status and avoid the payment of income and excise taxes, the Company may need to borrow funds to meet the REIT distribution requirements. The Company may not be able to borrow funds on favorable terms or at all, and the Company’s ability to borrow may be restricted by the terms of the instruments governing the Company’s existing indebtedness. The Company’s access to third-party sources of capital depends on a number of factors, including the market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential, current debt levels, the market price of common shares and current and potential future earnings. The Company cannot assure shareholders that it will have access to such capital on favorable terms at the desired times, or at all, which may cause the Company to curtail its investment activities and/or to dispose of assets at inopportune times and could materially and adversely affect the Company. The Company may make taxable in-kind distributions of common shares, which may cause shareholders to be required to pay income taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of any cash received, or the Company may be required to withhold taxes with respect to such distributions in excess of any cash shareholders receive.

Dividends Paid by REITs Generally Do Not Qualify for Reduced Tax Rates

In general, the maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends paid to individual U.S. shareholders is 20%. Due to its REIT status, the Company’s distributions to individual shareholders generally are not eligible for the reduced rates. However, U.S. shareholders that are individuals, trusts or estates generally may deduct up to 20% of the ordinary dividends (e.g., REIT dividends that are not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) received from a REIT for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. Although this deduction reduces the effective tax rate applicable to certain dividends paid by REITs (generally to 29.6%, assuming the shareholder is subject to the 37% maximum rate), such tax rate is still higher than

18

Table of Contents

the tax rate applicable to corporate dividends that constitute qualified dividend income. Accordingly, investors who are individuals, trusts or estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could materially and adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of the Company’s common shares.

Certain Foreign Shareholders May Be Subject to U.S. Federal Income Tax on Gain Recognized on a Disposition of the Company’s Common Shares if the Company Does Not Qualify as a “Domestically Controlled” REIT

A foreign person disposing of a U.S. real property interest, including shares of a U.S. corporation whose assets consist principally of U.S. real property interests, is generally subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain recognized on the disposition. This tax does not apply, however, to the disposition of stock in a REIT if the REIT is “domestically controlled.” In general, the Company will be a domestically controlled REIT if at all times during the five-year period ending on the applicable stockholder’s disposition of the Company’s stock, less than 50% in value of the stock was held directly or indirectly by non-U.S. persons. If the Company were to fail to qualify as a domestically controlled REIT, gain recognized by a foreign stockholder on a disposition of the Company’s common shares would be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the common shares were traded on an established securities market and the foreign stockholder did not at any time during a specific testing period directly or indirectly own more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs Could Have a Negative Effect on the Company

The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, could materially and adversely affect the Company or its shareholders. The Company cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect shareholders or the Company. New legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly and negatively affect the Company’s ability to qualify as a REIT, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of such qualification or the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in the Company. In addition, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, could change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT. Furthermore, potential amendments and technical corrections, as well as interpretations and implementation of regulations by the Treasury and IRS, may have or may in the future occur or be enacted, and, in each case, they could lessen or increase the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “TCJA”). In addition, states and localities, which often use federal taxable income as a starting point for computing state and local tax liabilities, continue to react to the TCJA, and these may exacerbate its negative, or diminish its positive, effects on the Company. It is impossible to predict the nature or extent of any new tax legislation, regulation or administrative interpretations, but such items could adversely affect the Company’s operating results, financial condition and/or future business planning.

Risks Related to the Company’s Organization, Structure and Ownership

Provisions of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations Could Have the Effect of Delaying, Deferring or Preventing a Change in Control, Even if That Change May Be Considered Beneficial by Some of the Company’s Shareholders

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by the Company’s Board of Directors. Among other things, the Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations include these provisions:


Prohibiting any person, except for certain shareholders (including the family of Mr. Alexander Otto) as set forth in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, from owning more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common shares in order to maintain the Company’s status as a REIT;


Authorizing “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval and may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to the Company’s common shares;


Providing that any vacancy on the Board of Directors may be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office;


Providing that no shareholder may cumulate the shareholder’s voting power in the election of directors;


Providing that shareholders may not act by written consent unless such written consent is unanimous and

19

Table of Contents


Requiring advance notice of shareholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of the Company’s shareholders and for nominations of candidates for election to the Board of Directors.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in the Company’s management. The Company believes these provisions protect its shareholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics and are not intended to make the Company immune from takeovers. However, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some shareholders and could delay, defer or prevent an acquisition that the Board of Directors determines is not in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, which under certain circumstances could reduce the market price of its common shares.

The Company Has Significant Shareholders Who May Exert Influence on the Company as a Result of Their Considerable Beneficial Ownership of the Company’s Common Shares, and Their Interests May Differ from the Interests of Other Shareholders

The Company has shareholders, including Mr. Alexander Otto, who is a member of the Board of Directors, who, because of their considerable beneficial ownership of the Company’s common shares, are in a position to exert significant influence over the Company. These shareholders may exert influence with respect to matters that are brought to a vote of the Company’s Board of Directors and/or the holders of the Company’s common shares. Among others, these matters include the election of the Company’s Board of Directors, corporate finance transactions and joint venture activity, merger, acquisition and disposition activity, and amendments to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Code of Regulations. In the context of major corporate events, the interests of the Company’s significant shareholders may differ from the interests of other shareholders. For example, if a significant shareholder does not support a merger, tender offer, sale of assets or other business combination because the shareholder judges it to be inconsistent with the shareholder’s investment strategy, the Company may be unable to enter into or consummate a transaction that would enable other shareholders to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market prices for common shares. Furthermore, significant shareholders of the Company have sold in the past, and may sell in the future, substantial amounts of the Company’s common shares in the public market to enhance the shareholders’ liquidity positions, fund alternative investments or for other reasons. This has caused in the past, and may cause in the future, the trading price of the Company’s common shares to decline significantly, resulting in other shareholders being unable to sell their common shares at favorable prices. The Company cannot predict or control how the Company’s significant shareholders may use the influence they have as a result of their common share holdings.

The Company’s Board of Directors May Change Significant Corporate Policies Without Shareholder Approval

The Company’s strategies and investment, financing and dividend policies will be determined by its Board of Directors. These strategies and policies may be amended or revised at any time at the discretion of the Board of Directors without a vote of the Company’s shareholders. A change in any of these strategies and policies could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, operating results and cash flow and on its ability to pay dividends to shareholders.

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Shares

Changes in Market Conditions Could Adversely Affect the Market Price of the Company’s Publicly Traded Securities

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities depends on various market conditions, which may change from time to time. Among the market conditions that may affect the market price of the Company’s publicly traded securities are the following:


The extent of institutional investor interest in the Company and the properties it owns;


The reputation of REITs generally and the reputation of REITs with similar portfolios;


The attractiveness of the securities of REITs in comparison to securities issued by other entities (including securities issued by other real estate companies or sovereign governments), bank deposits or other investments;


The Company’s financial condition and performance;


The market’s perception of the Company’s growth potential and future cash dividends;


An increase in market interest rates, which may lead prospective investors to demand a higher distribution rate in relation to the price paid for the Company’s shares and


General economic and financial market conditions.

20

Table of Contents

The Company May Issue Additional Securities Without Shareholder Approval

The Company can issue preferred shares and common shares without shareholder approval subject to certain limitations in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. Holders of preferred shares have priority over holders of common shares, and the issuance of additional shares reduces the ownership interest of existing holders in the Company.

General Risks Relating to Investments in the Company’s Securities

The Company May Be Unable to Retain and Attract Key Management Personnel

The Company may be unable to retain and attract talented executives. In the event of the loss of key management personnel to competitors, or upon unexpected death, disability or retirement, the Company may not be able to find replacements with comparable skill, ability and industry expertise. The Company’s operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected until suitable replacements are identified and retained, if at all.

The Company Is Subject to Litigation That Could Adversely Affect Its Results of Operations

The Company is a defendant from time to time in lawsuits and regulatory proceedings relating to its business. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, the Company cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation or proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. Any such litigation could also lead to increased volatility of the trading price of the Company’s common shares. For a further discussion of litigation risks, see “Legal Matters” in Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Changes in Accounting Standards Issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or Other Standard-Setting Bodies May Adversely Affect the Company’s Business

The Company’s financial statements are subject to the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which are periodically revised and/or expanded. From time to time, the Company is required to adopt new or revised accounting standards issued by recognized authoritative bodies, including the FASB and the SEC. It is possible that accounting standards the Company is required to adopt may require changes to the current accounting treatment that it applies to its consolidated financial statements and may require it to make significant changes to its systems. Changes in accounting standards could result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2022, the Portfolio Properties included 119 shopping centers (including 18 centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures). At December 31, 2022, the Portfolio Properties aggregated 27.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA located in 20 states. These centers are principally located in suburban, higher household income communities with the highest concentration of centers located in the Southeast, including Florida, Georgia and North Carolina.

At December 31, 2022, on a pro rata basis, the average annualized base rent per square foot was $19.52. The average annualized base rent of the Company’s 101 wholly-owned shopping centers was $19.61 per square foot, and the average annualized base rent for the 18 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures was $16.20 per square foot. The Company’s average annualized base rent per square foot does not consider tenant expense reimbursements.

The majority of the Company’s shopping centers are anchored by national tenant anchors and are designed to provide a highly compelling shopping experience and merchandise mix for retail partners and consumers. The tenants of the shopping centers typically cater to the consumer’s desire for value, service and convenience and offer day-to-day necessities rather than luxury items. The properties often include discounters, specialty grocers, pet supply stores, fitness centers, quick-service restaurants and beauty supply retailers as additional anchors or tenants. In recent years, the Company has also acquired a number of smaller format, convenience retail properties which do not include a traditional anchor tenant. The Company has established close relationships with a large number of major national and regional tenants, many of which occupy space in its shopping centers.

Information as to the Company’s 10 largest tenants based on total annualized rental revenues and Company-owned GLA at December 31, 2022, is set forth in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the caption “Executive Summary – Retail Environment and Company Fundamentals” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For

21

Table of Contents

additional details related to property encumbrances for the Company’s wholly-owned assets, see “Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation” (Schedule III) herein. At December 31, 2022, the Company owned an investment in 18 properties through unconsolidated joint ventures, which properties served as collateral for joint venture mortgage debt aggregating approximately $535.1 million (of which the Company’s proportionate share is $110.6 million) and is not reflected in the Company's consolidated indebtedness. The Company’s properties range in size from approximately 2,000 square feet to approximately 1,100,000 square feet of total GLA (with 46 properties exceeding 300,000 square feet of total GLA). On a pro rata basis, the Company’s properties were 92.4% occupied as of December 31, 2022.

Tenant Lease Expirations and Renewals

The following table shows the impact of tenant lease expirations through 2032 at the Company’s 101 wholly-owned shopping centers, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options:

Expiration YearNo. of Leases ExpiringApproximate GLA in Square Feet (Thousands)Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (Thousands)Average Base Rent per Square Foot Under Expiring LeasesPercentage of Total GLA Represented by Expiring LeasesPercentage of Total Base Rental Revenues Represented by Expiring Leases
2023165955$20,462$21.424.9%5.9%
20243302,75150,08018.2114.1%14.4%
20252872,59150,85219.6313.2%14.6%
20262382,08037,77718.1710.6%10.9%
20272832,76753,97819.5114.1%15.5%
20282062,29141,54018.1311.7%11.9%
202910189919,72021.934.6%5.7%
203010583016,93320.414.2%4.9%
20318078013,48317.284.0%3.9%
203214997120,69021.325.0%5.9%
Total1,94416,915$325,515$19.2486.4%93.6%

The following table shows the impact of tenant lease expirations through 2032 at the Company’s 18 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures, assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options:

Expiration YearNo. of Leases ExpiringApproximate GLA in Square Feet (Thousands)Annualized Base Rent Under Expiring Leases (Thousands)Average Base Rent per Square Foot Under Expiring LeasesPercentage of Total GLA Represented by Expiring LeasesPercentage of Total Base Rental Revenues Represented by Expiring Leases
202341276$5,515$19.945.9%8.0%
2024616599,01713.6914.0%13.2%
2025524937,69015.5910.5%11.2%
2026586529,50614.5813.9%13.9%
20275763010,75817.0813.4%15.7%
2028425908,99915.2612.5%13.1%
2029212093,37616.154.4%4.9%
203012651,22218.931.4%1.8%
2031162804,90617.516.0%7.2%
2032252213,81717.264.7%5.6%
Total3854,075$64,806$15.9086.7%94.6%

The rental payments under certain of these leases will remain constant until the expiration of their base terms, regardless of inflationary increases. There can be no assurance that any of these leases will be renewed or that any replacement tenants will be obtained if not renewed.

22

Table of Contents

SITE Centers Corp.

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2022

LocationCenterYear Developed/ RedevelopedYear AcquiredSITE Ownership InterestOwned GLA (000's)Total Annualized Base Rent (000's)Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1)Key Tenants
Arizona
1Chandler, AZChandler Center20162022100%7$294$42.45
2Mesa, AZShops at Power and Baseline20162022100%4$214$56.22
3Phoenix, AZAhwatukee Foothills Towne Center2013199820%691$12,142$18.14AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Big Lots, Burlington, HomeGoods, JOANN, Lina Home Furnishing, Marshalls, Michaels, OfficeMax, Ross Dress for Less, Sprouts Farmers Market
4Phoenix, AZArrowhead Crossing19951996100%353$5,574$16.32Burlington, DSW, Golf Galaxy, Hobby Lobby, HomeGoods, Nordstrom Rack, Staples, T.J. Maxx
5Phoenix, AZDeer Valley Towne Center19961999100%190$3,792$20.55Michaels, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less
6Phoenix, AZParadise Village Gateway20042003100%295$4,543$25.38PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Sun & Ski Sports
7Scottsdale, AZArtesia Village20072022100%21$850$39.81
8Scottsdale, AZNorthsight Plaza20042022100%10$325$33.65
9Tempe, AZBroadway Center20152022100%11$379$35.45
California
10Buena Park, CABuena Park Place20092004100%213$3,652$17.58Aldi, Kohl's, Michaels
11Fontana, CAFalcon Ridge Town Center20052013100%277$6,500$23.6624 Hour Fitness, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Stater Bros Markets
12Lafayette, CALa Fiesta Square19932022100%53$2,451$52.21
13Lafayette, CALafayette Mercantile20062022100%22$1,063$58.64
14Long Beach, CAThe Pike Outlets(2)2015DEV100%389$5,517$23.67Cinemark, H & M, Nike, Restoration Hardware
15Oakland, CAWhole Foods at Bay Place20062013100%57$2,919$51.02Whole Foods
16Richmond, CAHilltop Plaza2000200220%246$3,758$17.3199 Cents Only, Century Theatre, City Sports Club, dd's Discounts, Ross Dress for Less
17Roseville, CACreekside Plaza20072014100%32$1,258$40.17
18Roseville, CARidge at Creekside20072014100%243$4,845$20.04Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy BABY, Cost Plus World Market, Macy's Furniture Gallery, REI
19San Francisco, CA1000 Van Ness19982002100%122$2,919$37.66CGV Cinemas
Colorado
20Centennial, COCentennial Promenade20021997100%443$6,941$21.29Conn's, Golf Galaxy, HomeGoods, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Stickley Furniture, Total Wine & More
21Colorado Springs, COChapel Hills20002011100%450$5,418$13.39Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, Burlington, DSW, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Pep Boys, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Urban Air Adventure Park, Whole Foods
22Denver, COShops on Montview20202022100%9$260$38.68
23Denver, COUniversity Hills19972003100%236$4,529$20.37King Soopers, Marshalls, Michaels
24Parker, COFlatAcres MarketCenter/ Parker Pavilions(2)20032003100%232$4,340$19.3624 Hour Fitness, Bed Bath & Beyond, Michaels, Office Depot
Connecticut
25Guilford, CTGuilford Commons2015DEV100%129$2,146$18.32Bed Bath & Beyond, The Fresh Market
26Plainville, CTConnecticut Commons2013DEV20%561$7,003$13.69AMC Theatres, Dick's Sporting Goods, DSW, Kohl's, Lowe's, Marshalls, Old Navy, PetSmart
27Windsor, CTWindsor Court19932007100%79$1,513$19.89Stop & Shop

23

Table of Contents

SITE Centers Corp.

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2022

LocationCenterYear Developed/ RedevelopedYear AcquiredSITE Ownership InterestOwned GLA (000's)Total Annualized Base Rent (000's)Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1)Key Tenants
Florida
28Boca Raton, FLShops at Boca Center19862022100%117$4,090$41.00Total Wine & More
29Boynton Beach, FLVillage Square at Golf20022007100%135$1,780$22.16
30Brandon, FLLake Brandon Plaza20142009100%178$2,518$14.51JOANN, Nordstrom Rack, Publix, Total Wine & More
31Brandon, FLLake Brandon Village20042003100%114$1,478$15.64buybuy BABY, PetSmart, Sprouts Farmers Market
32Brandon, FLThe Collection at Brandon Boulevard(2)2021DEV100%222$3,053$13.73Bealls Outlet, Chuck E. Cheese's, Crunch Fitness, Kane Furniture
33Casselberry, FLCasselberry Commons20102007100%246$3,232$15.75Burlington, Publix, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
34Delray Beach, FLShoppes at Addison Place20002021100%56$2,280$46.33
35Fort Walton Beach, FLShoppes at Paradise Pointe20002007100%84$875$12.71Publix
36Jupiter, FLConcourse Village20042015100%134$2,309$17.86Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
37Melbourne, FLMelbourne Shopping Center19992007100%211$1,409$9.08Big Lots, Club 4 Fitness, Publix
38Miami, FLThe Shops at Midtown Miami2006DEV100%467$9,872$21.83Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Marshalls, Nordstrom Rack, Ross Dress for Less, Target, west elm
39Naples, FLCarillon Place19941995100%265$3,888$15.79Bealls Outlet, DSW, OfficeMax, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Walmart Neighborhood Market
40Orlando, FLLee Vista Promenade2016DEV100%314$5,276$17.42Academy Sports, Bealls Outlet, Epic Theatres, HomeGoods, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less
41Orlando, FLMillenia Crossing20092015100%100$2,164$25.41Nordstrom Rack
42Palm Harbor, FLThe Shoppes of Boot Ranch19901995100%52$1,390$28.07
43Plantation, FLThe Fountains20102007100%430$6,876$16.79Dick's Sporting Goods, JOANN, Kohl's, Marshalls/HomeGoods, Total Wine & More, Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park
44Tamarac, FLMidway Plaza19852007100%228$2,792$14.53Publix, Ross Dress for Less
45Tampa, FLNorth Pointe Plaza1990IPO100%108$1,654$15.32Publix
46Tampa, FLSouthtown Center20052019100%44$1,265$35.92
47Wesley Chapel, FLThe Shoppes at New Tampa20022007100%155$1,956$15.77Publix, Ross Dress for Less
48Winter Garden, FLWinter Garden Village20072013100%759$15,945$21.57Bealls, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Burlington, Forever 21, Havertys, JOANN, LA Fitness, Marshalls, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Staples
Georgia
49Alpharetta, GAShoppes of Crabapple20062022100%8$242$28.93
50Atlanta, GAHammond Springs20082021100%69$1,978$30.19
51Atlanta, GAParkwood Shops19962022100%20$518$25.39
52Atlanta, GAPerimeter Pointe20021995100%360$4,504$19.32Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, LA Fitness, Regal Cinemas
53Cumming, GACumming Marketplace19992003100%310$4,315$14.04Lowe's, Marshalls, Michaels, OfficeMax
54Cumming, GACumming Town Center20072013100%311$5,095$16.36Ashley Furniture HomeStore, Best Buy, Burlington, Dick's Sporting Goods, T.J. Maxx/HomeGoods
55Cumming, GASharon Greens20012007100%98$1,169$12.82Kroger
56Decatur, GAHairston Crossing2002200720%58$535$9.65Goodwill
57Douglasville, GAMarket Square19902007100%125$1,516$12.71Aaron's

24

Table of Contents

SITE Centers Corp.

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2022

LocationCenterYear Developed/ RedevelopedYear AcquiredSITE Ownership InterestOwned GLA (000's)Total Annualized Base Rent (000's)Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1)Key Tenants
58Marietta, GATowne Center Prado2002199520%287$3,627$13.46Going Going Gone, Publix, Ross Dress for Less
59Roswell, GASandy Plains Village20132007100%174$2,210$13.98Movie Tavern, Painted Tree Marketplace
60Snellville, GAPresidential Commons20002007100%274$4,175$15.24Burlington, buybuy BABY, JOANN, Kroger
61Suwanee, GAJohns Creek Town Center20042003100%303$4,249$16.09Kohl's, Market By Macy's, Michaels, PetSmart, Sprouts Farmers Market, Staples
Illinois
62Chicago, IL3030 North Broadway20162017100%132$4,538$34.45Mariano's, XSport Fitness
63Chicago, ILThe Maxwell20142014100%240$5,616$27.18Burlington, Dick's Sporting Goods, Nordstrom Rack, T.J. Maxx
64Deer Park, ILDeer Park Town Center2004DEV50%357$8,696$32.77Century Theatre, Crate & Barrel, Gap
65Schaumburg, ILWoodfield Village Green20151995100%390$7,726$22.75Bloomingdale's The Outlet Store, Container Store, HomeGoods, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Sierra Trading Post, Trader Joe's
66Tinley Park, ILBrookside Marketplace2013201220%317$4,592$15.68Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Michaels, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx
Indiana
67Highland, INHighland Grove Shopping Center2001200720%312$4,402$15.61Burlington, Kohl's, Michaels
Massachusetts
68Everett, MAGateway Center2001DEV100%640$6,098$17.23Costco, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, Michaels, Old Navy, Target, Total Wine & More
69Framingham, MAShoppers World19941995100%781$17,844$25.47AMC Theatres, Barnes & Noble, Best Buy, DSW, Golf Galaxy, Hobby Lobby, HomeSense, Kohl's, Macy's Furniture Gallery, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Public Lands, Sierra Trading Post, T.J. Maxx
Missouri
70Brentwood, MOThe Promenade at Brentwood19981998100%338$5,305$15.71Burlington, Micro Center, PetSmart, Target, Trader Joe's
71Independence, MOIndependence Commons1999199520%386$5,713$15.51AMC Theatres, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, Kohl's, Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less
New Jersey
72East Hanover, NJEast Hanover Plaza19942007100%98$2,069$21.11HomeGoods, HomeSense
73Edgewater, NJEdgewater Towne Center20002007100%76$1,618$29.60Whole Foods
74Freehold, NJFreehold Marketplace2005DEV100%21$768$37.18
75Hamilton, NJHamilton Marketplace20042003100%550$10,292$20.23Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Kohl's, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, ShopRite, Staples
76Princeton, NJNassau Park Pavilion20211997100%750$11,393$15.64At Home, Best Buy, Burlington, Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, HomeSense, Michaels, PetSmart, Raymour & Flanigan, T.J. Maxx, Wegmans
77Union, NJRoute 22 Retail Center1997200720%112$1,562$15.90Big Lots, Dick's Sporting Goods
78Voorhees, NJEchelon Village Plaza20022015100%89$792$12.58The Edge Fitness Clubs
79Woodland Park, NJWest Falls Plaza1995200720%91$1,786$21.45andThat!, Cost Plus World Market

25

Table of Contents

SITE Centers Corp.

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2022

LocationCenterYear Developed/ RedevelopedYear AcquiredSITE Ownership InterestOwned GLA (000's)Total Annualized Base Rent (000's)Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1)Key Tenants
New York
80Hempstead, NYThe Hub20012015100%249$3,277$13.27Home Depot, Stop & Shop
North Carolina
81Chapel Hill, NCMeadowmont Village2002200720%185$2,297$22.60Harris Teeter
82Charlotte, NCBelgate Shopping Center2017DEV100%289$4,771$16.79Burlington, Cost Plus World Market, Hobby Lobby, Marshalls, Old Navy, PetSmart, T.J. Maxx
83Charlotte, NCCarolina Pavilion19972012100%701$9,735$14.10AMC Theatres, American Freight Outlet Stores, AutoZone, Bed Bath & Beyond, Big Lots, Burlington, buybuy BABY, Conn's, Floor & Decor, Frontgate Outlet Store, JOANN, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Ross Dress for Less, Value City Furniture
84Charlotte, NCCotswold Village20132011100%263$6,157$25.19Harris Teeter, Marshalls, PetSmart
85Cornelius, NCThe Shops at The Fresh Market20012007100%132$1,400$18.73The Fresh Market
86Raleigh, NCPoyner Place2012201220%252$3,966$16.45Cost Plus World Market, Marshalls, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Target, Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park
87Wilmington, NCUniversity Centre2001IPO20%418$4,441$11.33Bed Bath & Beyond, Lowe's, Old Navy, Ollie's Bargain Outlet, Ross Dress for Less
88Winston Salem, NCShoppes at Oliver's Crossing2003200720%77$1,064$14.71Lowes Foods
Ohio
89Cincinnati, OHKenwood Square20172013100%427$7,118$18.87Dick's Sporting Goods, Macy's Furniture Gallery, Marshalls/HomeGoods, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, The Fresh Market
90Columbus, OHEaston Market20131998100%502$7,670$15.28Bed Bath & Beyond, buybuy BABY, DSW, HomeGoods, Marshalls, Michaels, Nordstrom Rack, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, Sierra Trading Post, T.J. Maxx, Value City Furniture
91Columbus, OHPolaris Towne Center19992011100%459$7,056$16.88Best Buy, Big Lots, JOANN, Kroger, OfficeMax, T.J. Maxx
92Mason, OHWaterstone Center19982014100%162$2,774$17.15Best Buy, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less
93Stow, OHStow Community Center2008DEV100%406$4,855$12.30Giant Eagle, Hobby Lobby, HomeGoods, Kohl's, T.J. Maxx
94Toledo, OHSpringfield Commons1999DEV20%272$2,433$11.72Burlington, Kohl's, Planet Fitness
95Westlake, OHWest Bay Plaza2022IPO100%147$3,204$23.14Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, HomeSense
Oregon
96Hillsboro, ORTanasbourne Town Center20011996100%285$5,211$21.56Bed Bath & Beyond, Marshalls, Michaels, Ross Dress for Less, Sierra Trading Post
97Portland, ORThe Blocks20012019100%97$2,678$35.71
Pennsylvania
98Boothwyn, PALarkin's Corner19942015100%225$2,136$9.70ACME, Walmart
99Easton, PASouthmont Plaza20042015100%251$3,916$16.11Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, Michaels, Staples

26

Table of Contents

SITE Centers Corp.

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2022

LocationCenterYear Developed/ RedevelopedYear AcquiredSITE Ownership InterestOwned GLA (000's)Total Annualized Base Rent (000's)Average Base Rent (Per SF)(1)Key Tenants
South Carolina
100Anderson, SCMidtowne Park20082014100%167$1,655$9.89Dick's Sporting Goods, HomeGoods, Kohl's
101Charleston, SCAshley Crossing2011200320%208$2,215$11.17Food Lion, JOANN, Kohl's, Marshalls
102Mount Pleasant, SCWando Crossing20001995100%214$3,222$15.61Ashley Furniture HomeStore, Marshalls, Michaels, T.J. Maxx, Total Wine & More
Tennessee
103Brentwood, TNCool Springs Pointe20042000100%198$3,158$15.94Best Buy, Restoration Hardware, Ross Dress for Less
Texas
104Highland Village, TXThe Marketplace at Highland Village20072013100%207$3,680$18.72DSW, LA Fitness, T.J. Maxx/HomeGoods
105Houston, TXShops at Tanglewood20192022100%26$1,187$46.45
106Round Rock, TXVintage Plaza20032019100%41$835$27.70
107San Antonio, TXBandera Pointe2002DEV100%490$5,921$12.58Barnes & Noble, Gold's Gym, JOANN, Lowe's, Old Navy, PetSmart, Ross Dress for Less, T.J. Maxx, Urban Air Trampoline & Adventure Park
108San Antonio, TXTerrell Plaza20122007100%108$2,083$20.15Ross Dress for Less
109San Antonio, TXVillage at Stone Oak2007DEV100%442$6,412$18.75Alamo Drafthouse Cinema, Hobby Lobby, HomeGoods, Ross Dress for Less
Virginia
110Charlottesville, VAEmmet Street North20202021100%2$200$86.32
111Charlottesville, VAEmmet Street Station20182021100%11$488$51.82
112Fairfax, VABoulevard Marketplace20122022100%19$788$40.79
113Fairfax, VAFairfax Marketplace20082022100%19$913$55.14
114Fairfax, VAFairfax Pointe20102022100%10$518$49.39
115Fairfax, VAFairfax Towne Center19941995100%253$5,058$20.46Bed Bath & Beyond, JOANN, Regal Cinemas, Safeway, T.J. Maxx
116Midlothian, VACommonwealth Center2002200720%166$1,965$17.94Michaels, The Fresh Market
117Richmond, VADowntown Short Pump20002007100%126$2,972$23.59Barnes & Noble, Regal Cinemas
118Richmond, VAWhite Oak Village20082014100%432$6,408$15.81JCPenney, K&G Fashion Superstore, Michaels, PetSmart, Publix
119Springfield, VASpringfield Center19992007100%177$4,199$23.76Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond, DSW, Marshalls, Michaels, The Tile Shop

(1)
Calculated as total annualized base rentals divided by Company-owned rent commenced GLA as of December 31, 2022.

(2)
Indicates the asset or a portion of the asset is subject to a ground lease. All other assets are owned fee simple.

27

Table of Contents

FY 2021 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0001564590-22-006507.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2022-02-24. Report date: 2021-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Company is a self-administered and self-managed Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) in the business of acquiring, owning, developing, redeveloping, leasing and managing shopping centers.  As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s portfolio consisted of 136 shopping centers (including 47 shopping centers owned through unconsolidated joint ventures).  At December 31, 2021, the Company owned approximately 32.0 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) (42.2 million square feet of total GLA) through all its properties (wholly-owned and joint venture) and managed approximately 0.6 million total square feet of GLA owned by Retail Value Inc. (“RVI”), an owner and operator of one shopping center listed on the New York Stock Exchange.  As of December 31, 2021, the Company owned approximately 60 acres of developable land.  At December 31, 2021, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s operating shopping center portfolio was 90.0%, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $18.33, both on a pro rata basis.

COVID-19 Pandemic

In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic, and it continues to spread throughout the United States and other countries across the world.  Beginning in mid-March 2020, federal, state and local governments took various actions to limit the spread of COVID-19, including ordering the temporary closure of non-essential businesses (which included many of the Company’s tenants) and imposing significant social distancing guidelines and restrictions on the continued operations of essential businesses and the subsequent reopening of non-essential businesses.  In order to safeguard the health of its employees and their families, the Company closed all of its offices in March 2020 and successfully transitioned to working remotely.  The Company reopened its Corporate Headquarters in Cleveland, Ohio, and select regional offices on a voluntary basis in October 2020 and in September 2021, the Company began to require that all employees report to the office at least two times each week.  The Company continues to closely monitor local levels of infection associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and has taken additional steps as needed in order to protect the health and safety of its workforce, including a relaxation of office attendance requirements in late 2021 as a result of the Omicron variant and rising infection levels.  To date, the Company’s leasing and administrative operations have not been adversely impacted by the pandemic, as the Company’s significant investments in its information technology infrastructure and systems in prior years facilitated the transition to remote and hybrid working environments.

The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the collection of rents from April 2020 through December 2020.  During the second half of 2020 and early 2021, the Company worked with tenants to maximize the collection of unpaid 2020 rents by offering rent deferment on a case-by-case basis often in exchange for concessions in the form of tenant extensions of lease terms, the relaxation of leasing restrictions and co-tenancy provisions and, in some cases, alterations of control areas allowing for future redevelopment of the shopping center.

During the course of 2021, the Company’s rental collections normalized close to pre-pandemic levels.  As of December 31, 2021, a substantial majority of tenants, including tenants previously on the cash basis of accounting, were paying their monthly rent and any deferred rents relating to prior periods.  Included in 2021 results was $13.8 million of net revenue, at SITE Centers’ share, primarily related to contractual rents paid from cash-basis tenants that were contractually due in 2020.  The majority of the deferral arrangements relating to 2020 revenue were repaid during 2021, and therefore, the impact of 2020 rent collections is expected to be minimal in future periods.  At December 31, 2021, $0.2 million remained outstanding under deferral arrangements for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis.

As of February 10, 2022, the Omicron variant has not had a material impact on the Company’s rent collections or leasing activity though some tenants have experienced challenges in maintaining regular operating hours as a result of related labor shortages.  Future rent collections may be negatively impacted by additional surges in COVID-19 contagion, the emergence of new COVID-19 variants that are more infectious or resistant to existing vaccines, decreases in the effectiveness of existing vaccines, and any implementation of additional restrictions on tenant businesses as a result thereof.  For a further discussion of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, see “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financing Activities” and “Economic Conditions” included in this section and Item 1A. Risk Factors in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Current Strategy

The growth opportunities within the Company’s core property operations include rental rate increases, continued lease-up of the portfolio and the adaptation of existing site plans and square footage to generate higher blended rental rates and operating cash flows.  Additional growth opportunities include external acquisitions and tactical redevelopment.  Management intends to use retained cash flow, proceeds from the sale of lower growth assets and proceeds from equity offerings and debt financings to fund capital expenditures relating to new leasing activity, acquisitions, including opportunistic investments, and tactical redevelopment activity.

33

The Company believes the following serve as cornerstones for the execution of its strategy:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Maximization of recurring cash flows through strong leasing and core property operations;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Growth in Company cash flows through capital recycling, especially the redeployment of capital from mature, slower growing assets into acquisitions that offer operational and tactical redevelopment potential;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Enhancement of property cash flows through creative, proactive tactical redevelopment efforts that result in the profitable adaptation of site plans to better suit tenant and community demands;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Risk mitigation through continuous focus on maintaining prudent leverage levels and lengthy average debt maturities, as well as access to a diverse selection of capital sources, including the secured and unsecured debt markets, unsecured lines of credit, common equity and capital from a wide range of joint venture partners and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Sustainability of growth through a constant focus on relationships with investor, tenant, employee, community and environmental constituencies.

Transaction and Capital Markets Highlights

Transaction and investment highlights for the Company during 2021 include the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Acquired partner Madison International’s 80% interest in six assets for $107.2 million ($134.0 million at 100%) with the mortgage debt related to the properties repaid at closing;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Acquired its partner’s 33% interest in a consolidated joint venture that owned one shopping center, Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), for $15.1 million ($45.8 million at 100%) with the mortgage debt related to the property repaid at closing. The partner’s 33% ownership was previously reflected as non-controlling interest on the Company’s balance sheet;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Acquired four shopping centers (one each in Delray Beach, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia and two in Charlottesville, Virginia), one income producing parcel adjacent to Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey) and one land parcel adjacent to Belgate Shopping Center (Charlotte, North Carolina) for an aggregate purchase price of $100.5 million;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Sold six unconsolidated shopping centers, several wholly-owned land parcels and the Hobby Lobby parcel of a shopping center for an aggregate sales price of $166.6 million, or $96.5 million at the Company’s share;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
One of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario. The Company’s share of net proceeds totaled $22.1 million after accounting for customary closing costs and foreign currency translation but before income taxes;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Agreed to sell its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner, State of Utah, based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%). The transaction is expected to close by June 2022;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares. In December 2021, RVI repurchased all of the outstanding RVI Preferred Shares from the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $1.00. As a result, the Company no longer maintains an investment in RVI and will not receive any further distributions on account of the RVI Preferred Shares;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Sold 2,225,698 common shares on a forward basis under its continuous equity offering program at a weighted average price of $15.77 per share before issuance costs, generating expected gross proceeds before issuance costs of $35.1 million with no shares settled to date;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
In March 2021, issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
In April 2021, redeemed all of its 6.250% Class K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares (the “Class K Preferred Shares”) having an aggregate liquidation preference of $150.0 million and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Declared aggregate cash dividends of $0.47 per common share.

34

Operational Accomplishments

The COVID‑19 pandemic caused a slow-down in leasing activity in 2020; however, leasing volume rebounded in late 2020, and the Company’s 2021 leasing activity exceeded 2020 levels.  Although there may be some additional disruption among existing tenants due to the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on supply chains and labor markets, the Company believes that recent strong leasing volumes are attributable to the location of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities (which have been impacted less by the pandemic on a relative basis) and to national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of fulfillment of online purchases.

Operating highlights for 2021 included:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Signed new leases and renewals for approximately 3.5 million square feet of GLA, which included 0.9 million square feet of new leasing volume, both on a pro rata share;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Achieved new lease spreads of 13.1% and renewal spreads of 2.2% at the Company’s pro rata share;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Annualized base rent per occupied square foot on a pro rata basis decreased to $18.33 at December 31, 2021, as compared to $18.50 at December 31, 2020, primarily due to the 2021 joint venture acquisitions and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Continued to maintain strong aggregate occupancy on a pro rata basis of 90.0% at December 31, 2021, as compared to 89.0% at December 31, 2020.

Retail Environment

The Company continues to see demand from a broad range of tenants for its space, particularly as larger national retailers launch new brand concepts and incorporate omni-channel strategies that leverage brick and mortar infrastructure to drive incremental business.  Value-oriented retailers continue to take market share from conventional and national chain department stores.  As a result, while certain of those conventional and national department stores have announced bankruptcies, store closures and/or reduced expansion plans, other retailers, specifically those in the value and convenience category, continue to expand their store fleets and launch new concepts.  Many of the Company’s largest tenants, including TJX Companies, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross, Burlington and Five Below, have remained well positioned with access to capital while outperforming other retail categories on a relative basis despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

Company Fundamentals

The following table lists the Company’s 10 largest tenants at its wholly-owned properties and its proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture properties combined as of December 31, 2021:

At SITE Centers' Share
Tenant% of Total Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA
1.TJX Companies(A)5.8%6.4%
2.Dick's Sporting Goods(B)2.7%2.8%
3.PetSmart2.6%2.3%
4.Michaels2.3%2.3%
5.Ross Stores(C)1.9%2.5%
6.Bed, Bath & Beyond(D)1.9%2.4%
7.Ulta1.9%1.2%
8.Gap(E)1.9%1.5%
9.Nordstrom Rack1.8%1.5%
10.Best Buy1.8%1.8%

35

The following table lists the Company’s 10 largest tenants at 100% as of December 31, 2021:

At 100%
Wholly-Owned PropertiesJoint Venture Properties
Tenant% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA% of Shopping Center Base Rental Revenues% of Company- Owned Shopping Center GLA
TJX Companies(A)6.0%4.8%3.4%3.4%
Dick's Sporting Goods(B)2.8%2.1%1.7%1.7%
PetSmart2.7%1.8%1.2%0.9%
Michaels2.3%1.7%1.9%1.8%
Bed, Bath & Beyond(D)2.0%1.9%0.5%0.6%
Nordstrom Rack2.0%1.1%0.0%0.0%
Ulta2.0%0.9%1.3%0.7%
Best Buy1.9%1.3%1.6%1.3%
Ross Stores(C)1.9%1.7%3.1%3.8%
Gap(E)1.8%1.1%2.2%1.4%
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(A)Includes T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, Sierra Trading Post, HomeSense and Combo Store
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(B)Includes Dick’s Sporting Goods and Golf Galaxy
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(C)Includes Ross Dress for Less and dd’s Discounts
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(D)Includes Bed Bath & Beyond and buybuy BABY
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(E)Includes Gap, Old Navy, Banana Republic and Athleta

The Company leased approximately 5.0 million square feet (3.5 million square feet at the Company’s share) of GLA in 2021 in its wholly-owned and joint venture portfolios, comprised of 240 new leases and 363 renewals, for a total of 603 leases executed in 2021.  At December 31, 2021, the Company had 339 leases expiring in 2022 with an average base rent per square foot of $20.31 on a pro rata basis.  For the comparable leases executed in 2021, at the Company’s interest, the Company generated positive leasing spreads of 13.1% for new leases and 2.2% for renewals, or 3.7% on a blended basis.  Leasing spreads are a key metric in real estate, representing the percentage increase over rental rates on existing leases versus rental rates on new and renewal leases, though leasing spreads exclude consideration of the amount of capital expended in connection with new leasing activity and exclude properties in redevelopment.  The Company’s leasing spread calculation includes only those deals that were executed within one year of the date the prior tenant vacated and, as a result, is a good benchmark to compare the average annualized base rent of expiring leases with the comparable executed market rental rates.

For new leases executed during 2021, the Company expended a weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated at $8.34 per rentable square foot, on a pro rata basis, over the lease term, as compared to $6.81 per rentable square foot in 2020.  The increase in the weighted-average cost of tenant improvements was due to the higher percentage of anchor leases executed in 2021.  The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

Summary—2021 Financial Results

The following provides an overview of the Company’s key financial metrics (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”) (in thousands except per share amounts):

For the Year Ended
December 31,
20212020
Net income attributable to common shareholders$106,123$15,190
FFO attributable to common shareholders$242,774$176,562
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$245,687$192,824
Earnings per share – Diluted$0.51$0.08

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the increase in net income attributable to common shareholders, as compared to the prior year, was primarily attributable to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year, higher gains associated with the sale of joint venture assets and the valuation allowance reversal

36

recognized in 2020 related to the Company’s preferred investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, partially offset by lower gain on sale of joint venture interests and lower interest income resulting from the termination of the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in the fourth quarter of 2020.

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in the understanding of the Company’s financial statements and the factors that accounted for changes in certain key items in the financial statements, as well as critical accounting estimates that affected these financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and all subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes.  In preparing these financial statements, management has used available information, including the Company’s history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality.  It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize.  Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.  In addition, other companies may use different estimates that may affect the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

Rental income has been reduced for the elimination of unpaid contractual lease payments for tenants that are on the cash basis of accounting due to collectability concerns.  When a tenant comes off the cash basis, there could be a reinstatement of the straight-line rent receivable, which would result in additional recognition of straight-line income.

The Company makes estimates of the collectability of its accounts receivable related to base rents, including straight-line rentals, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income.  The Company analyzes tenant credit worthiness, as well as both current economic and tenant-specific sector trends, when evaluating the probability of collection of accounts receivable.  In evaluating tenant credit worthiness, the Company’s assessment may include a review of payment history, tenant sales performance and financial position.  For larger national tenants, the Company also evaluates projected liquidity, as well as the tenant’s access to capital and the overall health of the particular sector.  In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the probability of collection of the related receivable.  The time to resolve these claims may exceed one year.  These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings because once the amount is considered not probable of being collected, earnings are reduced by a corresponding amount until the receivable is collected.

Real Estate and Long-Lived Assets

On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, and intangibles may be impaired.  Impairment indicators are primarily related to change in estimated hold periods and significant, prolonged decreases in projected cash flows; however, other impairment indicators could occur.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property.  The determination of undiscounted cash flows may require significant estimates by management.  In management’s estimate of projected cash flows, it considers factors such as hold period, expected future operating income (loss), trends and prospects, the effects of demand, competition and other factors.  If the Company is evaluating the potential sale of an asset or development alternatives, the undiscounted future cash flows analysis is probability-weighted based upon management’s best estimate of the likelihood of the alternative courses of action.  Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated actions could affect the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could have a material impact on the Company’s net income.  To the extent an impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the estimated fair value of the property.

The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments.  These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because recording an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income.  If the Company’s estimates of the anticipated holding periods, projected future cash flows, or market conditions change, its evaluation of the impairment charges may be different, and such differences could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  Specifically, plans to hold properties over longer periods decrease the likelihood of recording impairment losses.

37

For the acquisition of real estate assets, the Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition.  The Company applies various valuation methods, all of which require significant estimates by management, including discount rates, exit capitalization rates, estimated land values (per square foot), capitalization rates and certain market leasing assumptions.  Further, the valuation of above- and below-market lease values are significantly impacted by management's estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease. If the Company determines that an event has occurred after the initial allocation of the asset or liability that would change the estimated useful life of the asset, the Company will reassess the depreciation and amortization of the asset.  The Company is required to make subjective estimates in connection with these valuations and allocations.

Measurement of Fair Value—Real Estate and Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company is required to assess for impairment the value of certain consolidated and unconsolidated joint venture investments, as well as the underlying collateral for other investments.  The fair value of real estate investments used in the Company’s impairment calculations is estimated based on the price that would be received for the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between marketplace participants at the measurement date.  Investments without a public market are valued based on assumptions made and valuation techniques used by the Company.  The availability of observable transaction data and inputs can make it more difficult and/or subjective to determine the fair value of such investments.  As a result, amounts ultimately realized by the Company from investments sold may differ from the fair values presented, and the differences could be material.

The valuation of real estate assets, investments and real estate collateral for impairment is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including the income capitalization approach or discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each asset considering prevailing market capitalization rates, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations, bona fide purchase offers received from third parties and/or consideration of the amount that currently would be required to replace the asset, as adjusted for obsolescence.  In general, the Company utilizes a valuation technique that is based on the characteristics of the specific asset when measuring fair value of an investment.  However, a single valuation technique is generally used for the Company’s property type.

For operational real estate assets, the significant assumptions include the capitalization rate used in the income capitalization valuation, as well as the projected property net operating income.  For investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company also considers the valuation of any underlying joint venture debt.  Valuation of real estate assets is calculated based on market conditions and assumptions made by management at the measurement date, which may differ materially from actual results if market conditions or the underlying assumptions change.

Deferred Tax Assets and Tax Liabilities—Valuation Allowance

The Company accounts for income taxes related to its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements.  The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent it believes it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized.  In making such determinations, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including forecasts of future taxable income, the reversal of other existing temporary differences, available net operating loss carryforwards, tax planning strategies and recent results of operations.  Several of these considerations require assumptions and significant judgment about the forecasts of future taxable income that are consistent with the plans and estimates that the Company is utilizing to manage its business.  Based on this assessment, management must evaluate the need for, and amount of, valuation allowances against the Company’s deferred tax assets.  The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets if and when it has determined that an uncertainty exists regarding their realization, which would increase the provision for income taxes.  To the extent facts and circumstances change in the future, adjustments to the valuation allowances may be required.  In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize the deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would adjust the valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.  The Company makes certain estimates in the determination of the use of valuation reserves recorded for deferred tax assets.  These estimates could have a direct impact on the Company’s earnings, as a difference in the tax provision would impact the Company’s earnings.

The Company has made estimates in assessing the impact of the uncertainty of income taxes.  Accounting standards prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute criteria for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.  The standards also provide guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.  These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because higher tax expense will result in reduced earnings.

COMPARISON OF 2021 AND 2020 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the comparison of the Company’s 2021 performance to 2020 presented below, consolidated shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2020, but excluding properties under redevelopment and those subsequently sold by the Company, are referred

38

to herein as the “Comparable Portfolio Properties.”  The discussion of the Company’s 2020 performance compared to 2019 performance is set forth in — “Comparison of 2020 and 2019 Results of Operations” included in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Revenues from Operations (in thousands)

20212020$ Change
Rental income(A)$490,799$414,864$75,935
Fee and other income(B)42,06545,469(3,404)
Total revenues$532,864$460,333$72,531
Column 1Column 2
(A)The following table summarizes the key components of the 2021 rental income as compared to 2020 (in thousands):
Contractual Lease Payments20212020$ Change
Base and percentage rental income(1)$353,067$329,165$23,902
Recoveries from tenants(2)120,530107,13213,398
Uncollectible revenue(3)9,383(31,908)41,291
Lease termination fees, ancillary and other rental income7,81910,475(2,656)
Total contractual lease payments$490,799$414,864$75,935
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(1)The changes in base and percentage rental income were due to the following (in millions):
Increase (Decrease)
Acquisition of shopping centers$22.8
Comparable Portfolio Properties(3.3)
Redevelopment properties1.8
Straight-line rents2.6
Total$23.9

The decrease in base and percentage rental income for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is due to the timing of tenant bankruptcies and store closures in 2020 resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by rent commencements in 2021 of the vacated space.

The following tables present the statistics for the Company’s assets affecting base and percentage rental income summarized by the following portfolios: pro rata combined shopping center portfolio, wholly-owned shopping center portfolio and joint venture shopping center portfolio:

Pro Rata Combined Shopping Center Portfolio December 31,
20212020
Centers owned (at 100%)136138
Aggregate occupancy rate90.0%89.0%
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot$18.33$18.50
Wholly-Owned Shopping Centers December 31,
20212020
Centers owned8978
Aggregate occupancy rate90.0%89.2%
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot$18.52$18.75
Joint Venture Shopping Centers December 31,
20212020
Centers owned4760
Aggregate occupancy rate89.4%87.3%
Average annualized base rent per occupied square foot$15.15$15.36

39

At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the wholly-owned Comparable Portfolio Properties’ aggregate occupancy rate was 91.4% and 90.7%, respectively, and the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $18.60 and $18.92, respectively.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
(2)Recoveries from tenants for the Comparable Portfolio Properties were approximately 80.0% and 81.9% of reimbursable operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in the recovery rate is a result of increased operating expenses, primarily management fee expense (on increased prior-year cash receipts) and property insurance expense, which generally have lower recovery percentages based upon individual tenant leases as well as higher real estate tax expense.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(3)Primarily relates to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rent collections, including the impact of lease modification accounting and the initial establishment of reserves in 2020 for tenants placed on the cash basis of accounting due to collectability concerns. In 2021, the net amount reported as income was primarily attributable to rental income paid in 2021 from tenants on the cash basis of accounting, which related to amounts (including deferred rents) contractually owed in 2020.
Column 1Column 2
(B)Increased disposition fees from RVI asset sales (primarily due to the sale of RVI’s Puerto Rico portfolio and a portfolio of five RVI U.S. assets in August 2021 and October 2021, respectively) aggregating $5.9 million were offset by lower asset management fees, property management fees and leasing commissions earned due to a decrease in the number of assets under management because of asset sales by both RVI and the Company’s joint ventures, as well as the termination of several joint ventures in 2021 and 2020 (including the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in the fourth quarter of 2020). The components of Fee and Other Income are presented in Note 2, “Revenue Recognition,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

In 2022, the Company expects to record less fee income due to the continued decrease in assets under management as compared to prior years related to both RVI and joint ventures.  RVI owned one asset as of December 31, 2021 (as compared to the initial portfolio of 48 properties at the time of its spin-off from the Company in July 2018).  As a result, the Company entered into a new management agreement with RVI that went into effect in January 2022 and includes a property management fee for RVI’s remaining property and a reduced asset management fee to effectuate a wind-up of its operations.  In addition, the Company agreed to sell its 20% interest in the 11 assets owned by the SAU Joint Venture to its joint venture partner.  This transaction is expected to close by June 2022.  Fee income from the SAU Joint Venture totaled $1.0 million in 2021.  The Company also purchased six properties from the DDRM Properties Joint Venture in the fourth quarter of 2021 and expects that this joint venture may sell additional assets in 2022.  Changes in the number of assets under management or the fee structures applicable to such arrangements will adversely impact the amount of revenue recorded in future periods.  The Company’s other joint venture partners may also elect to terminate their joint venture arrangements with the Company in connection with a change in investment strategy or otherwise.  See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.

Expenses from Operations (in thousands)

20212020$ Change
Operating and maintenance(A)$76,716$68,801$7,915
Real estate taxes(A)76,07169,6016,470
Impairment charges(B)7,2705,2002,070
General and administrative(C)55,05252,8812,171
Depreciation and amortization(A)185,768170,66915,099
$400,877$367,152$33,725
Column 1Column 2
(A)The changes were due to the following (in millions):
Operating and MaintenanceReal Estate TaxesDepreciation and Amortization
Acquisition of shopping centers$4.9$6.3$15.6
Comparable Portfolio Properties2.91.1(3.6)
Redevelopment properties0.1(0.9)3.1
$7.9$6.5$15.1

The change in operating and maintenance for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is primarily a result of higher insurance expense as well as higher maintenance expenses.  The change in depreciation and amortization for the Comparable Portfolio Properties is primarily a result of decreases attributable to fewer tenant write-offs and intangibles that became fully amortized in

40

2021, partially offset by accelerated depreciation on a redevelopment project and increased depreciation on building improvements.

Column 1Column 2
(B)For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recorded impairment charges that were triggered by a change in hold period assumptions. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded impairment charges related to an outlot and undeveloped land marketed for sale, both triggered by indicative bids received.

Changes in (i) an asset’s expected future undiscounted cash flows due to changes in market or leasing conditions, (ii) various courses of action that may occur or (iii) holding periods could result in the recognition of additional impairment charges.  Impairment charges are presented in Note 14, “Impairment Charges and Reserves,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

Column 1Column 2
(C)General and administrative expenses (including mark-to-market activity for the PRSUs) for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, were approximately 6.7% and 5.5% of total revenues (excluding uncollectible revenue), respectively, including total revenues of unconsolidated joint ventures and managed properties for the comparable periods. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded $5.6 million of expense and $0.7 million of income, respectively, related to the mark-to-market adjustment for certain PRSUs that were granted in 2018 and settled in 2021. Excluding this mark-to-market activity, general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, were 6.0% and 5.6%, respectively, of total revenues. In 2020, the Company recorded a separation charge of $1.7 million related to the elimination of the Chief Operating Officer executive position. The Company continues to expense certain internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with leasing and re-leasing of existing space.

Other Income and Expenses (in thousands)

20212020$ Change
Interest income(A)$$11,888$(11,888)
Interest expense(B)(76,383)(77,604)1,221
Other expense, net(C)(1,185)(18,400)17,215
$(77,568)$(84,116)$6,548
Column 1Column 2
(A)In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company terminated its preferred equity investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures and, accordingly, interest income was no longer recorded (see “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein).
Column 1Column 2
(B)The weighted-average debt outstanding and related weighted-average interest rate are as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Weighted-average debt outstanding (in billions)$1.8$2.0
Weighted-average interest rate4.1%3.8%

The Company’s overall balance sheet strategy is to continue to maintain liquidity, prudent leverage levels and lengthy average debt maturities.  The weighted-average interest rate (based on contractual rates and excluding fair market value of adjustments and debt issuance costs) was 4.0% and 3.7% at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Interest costs capitalized in conjunction with redevelopment projects were $0.6 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.  The decrease in the amount of interest costs capitalized is a result of lower redevelopment activity in 2021, partly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Column 1Column 2
(C)In 2020, the Company recorded debt extinguishment costs of $16.6 million related to its Senior Notes due 2022.

Other Items (in thousands)

20212020$ Change
Equity in net income of joint ventures(A)$47,297$1,516$45,781
Reserve of preferred equity interests, net(B)(19,393)19,393
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net(C)19,18545,464(26,279)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(D)6,0651,0694,996
Tax expense of taxable REIT subsidiaries and state franchise and income taxes(1,550)(1,131)(419)
Income attributable to non-controlling interests, net(E)(481)(869)388

41

Column 1Column 2
(A)The increase primarily was the result of increased gain on sale of joint venture assets in 2021 as compared to 2020 plus the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including rental income paid to joint ventures in 2021 from tenants on the cash basis of accounting that related to amounts (including deferred rents) contractually owed in 2020. See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein. Joint venture property sales could significantly impact the amount of income or loss recognized in future periods. See Note 3, “Investments in and Advances to Joint Ventures,” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.
Column 1Column 2
(B)In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company terminated its preferred equity investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures.
Column 1Column 2
(C)The net gain reported in 2021 relates primarily to two transactions. In December 2021, the Company acquired the equity interest in six assets owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture, which resulted in a Gain on Change in Control of Interests of $7.2 million. In addition, in February 2021, one of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario and recorded a net gain of $12.1 million primarily related to the Company’s promoted interest on the investment disposition, as well as the write-off of the accumulated foreign currency translation. In 2020, the Company sold its 15% interest in the DDRTC Joint Venture to its partner, which resulted in a Gain on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $45.6 million, and terminated the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, which resulted in a Loss on Sale of Joint Venture Interests of $0.2 million. See “Sources and Uses of Capital” included elsewhere herein.
Column 1Column 2
(D)The Company sold several land parcels in 2021 and 2020.
Column 1Column 2
(E)In December 2021, the Company acquired its partner’s 33% non-controlling ownership interest in Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), which represents the entire amount of the non-controlling interest recorded by the Company.

Net Income (in thousands)

20212020$ Change
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$124,935$35,721$89,214

The increase in net income attributable to SITE Centers was primarily a result of the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) that was collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year, gains recorded from unconsolidated joint venture asset sales, higher RVI disposition fees, lower debt extinguishment costs and the valuation allowance reversal recognized in 2020 related to the Company’s preferred investments in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures, partially offset by lower gain on sale of joint venture interests and lower interest income resulting from the termination of the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in 2020.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

Funds from Operations and Operating Funds from Operations

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company believes that Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Operating FFO, both non-GAAP financial measures, provide additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of REITs.  FFO and Operating FFO are frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs.  The Company also believes that FFO and Operating FFO more appropriately measure the core operations of the Company and provide benchmarks to its peer group.

FFO excludes GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assume that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time.  Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions, and many companies use different depreciable lives and methods.  Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate and gains and losses from property dispositions, it can provide a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and acquisition, disposition and development activities.  This provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), adjusted to exclude (i) preferred share dividends, (ii) gains and losses from disposition of real estate property and related investments, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) impairment charges on real estate property and related investments, including reserve adjustments of preferred equity interests, (iv) gains and losses from changes in control and (v) certain non-cash items.  These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation and amortization of intangibles, equity income (loss) from joint ventures and equity income (loss) from non-controlling interests and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint

42

ventures and non-controlling interests, determined on a consistent basis.  The Company’s calculation of FFO is consistent with the definition of FFO provided by NAREIT.

The Company believes that certain charges, income and gains recorded in its operating results are not comparable or reflective of its core operating performance.  Operating FFO is useful to investors as the Company removes non-comparable charges, income and gains to analyze the results of its operations and assess performance of the core operating real estate portfolio.  As a result, the Company also computes Operating FFO and discusses it with the users of its financial statements, in addition to other measures such as net income (loss) determined in accordance with GAAP and FFO.  Operating FFO is generally defined and calculated by the Company as FFO excluding certain charges, income and gains that management believes are not comparable and indicative of the results of the Company’s operating real estate portfolio.  Such adjustments include gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt, certain transaction fee income, transaction costs and other restructuring type costs.  The disclosure of these adjustments is regularly requested by users of the Company’s financial statements.

The adjustment for these charges, income and gains may not be comparable to how other REITs or real estate companies calculate their results of operations, and the Company’s calculation of Operating FFO differs from NAREIT’s definition of FFO.  Additionally, the Company provides no assurances that these charges, income and gains are non-recurring.  These charges, income and gains could be reasonably expected to recur in future results of operations.

These measures of performance are used by the Company for several business purposes and by other REITs.  The Company uses FFO and/or Operating FFO in part (i) as a disclosure to improve the understanding of the Company’s operating results among the investing public, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset company’s performance, (iii) to influence acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.

For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO and Operating FFO provide the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance.  They provide recognized measures of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often significant).  Other real estate companies may calculate FFO and Operating FFO in a different manner.

Management recognizes the limitations of FFO and Operating FFO when compared to GAAP’s net income.  FFO and Operating FFO do not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties.  Management does not use FFO or Operating FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities.  Neither FFO nor Operating FFO represents cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, and neither is necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.  Neither FFO nor Operating FFO should be considered an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.  FFO and Operating FFO are simply used as additional indicators of the Company’s operating performance.  The Company believes that to further understand its performance, FFO and Operating FFO should be compared with the Company’s reported net income (loss) and considered in addition to cash flows determined in accordance with GAAP, as presented in its consolidated financial statements.  Reconciliations of these measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) have been provided below.

Reconciliation Presentation

FFO and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders were as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20212020$ Change
FFO attributable to common shareholders$242,774$176,562$66,212
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders245,687192,82452,863

The increase in FFO primarily was attributable to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rent) collected from cash-basis tenants in the current year and lower debt extinguishment costs partially offset by the write-off of preferred share original issuance costs and lower interest income and the higher mark-to-market expense on the PRSUs.  The increase in Operating FFO primarily was due to the impact of net revenue relating to prior periods (including deferred rents) collected from cash‑basis tenants in the current year, partially offset by lower interest income.

The Company’s reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders computed in accordance with GAAP to FFO attributable to common shareholders and Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders is as follows (in thousands).  The

43

Company provides no assurances that these charges and gains are non-recurring.  These charges and gains could reasonably be expected to recur in future results of operations.

For the Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Net income attributable to common shareholders$106,123$15,190
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments180,158165,122
Equity in net income of joint ventures(47,297)(1,516)
Joint ventures' FFO(A)21,70319,671
Non-controlling interests (OP Units)6735
Impairment of real estate7,2705,200
Reserve of preferred equity interests19,393
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net(19,185)(45,464)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(6,065)(1,069)
FFO attributable to common shareholders242,774176,562
RVI disposition fees(9,016)(3,142)
Mark-to-market adjustment (PRSUs)5,589(688)
Executive separation charge1,650
Debt extinguishment and other, net1,04718,400
Joint ventures – debt extinguishment and other, net13742
Write-off of preferred share original issuance costs5,156
Non-operating items, net2,91316,262
Operating FFO attributable to common shareholders$245,687$192,824
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(A)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had an economic investment in unconsolidated joint ventures which owned 47 and 59 shopping center properties, respectively. These joint ventures represent the investments in which the Company recorded its share of equity in net income or loss and, accordingly, FFO and Operating FFO.

Joint ventures’ FFO and Operating FFO are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Net income (loss) attributable to unconsolidated joint ventures$110,032$(37,370)
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments66,61899,779
Impairment of real estate33,240
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(89,935)(9,257)
FFO$86,715$86,392
FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests$21,703$19,671
Operating FFO at SITE Centers' ownership interests$21,840$19,713

Net Operating Income and Same Store Net Operating Income

Definition and Basis of Presentation

The Company uses Net Operating Income (“NOI”), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, as a supplemental performance measure.  NOI is calculated as property revenues less property-related expenses.  The Company believes NOI provides useful information to investors regarding the Company’s financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and, when compared across periods, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition and disposition activity on an unleveraged basis.

The Company also presents NOI information on a same store basis, or Same Store Net Operating Income (“SSNOI”).  The Company defines SSNOI as property revenues less property-related expenses, which exclude straight-line rental income (including reimbursements) and expenses, lease termination income, management fee expense, fair market value of leases and expense recovery adjustments.  SSNOI includes assets owned in comparable periods (12 months for year-end comparisons).  In addition, SSNOI is presented both including and excluding activity associated with development and major redevelopment.  In addition, SSNOI excludes all non-property and corporate level revenue and expenses.  Other real estate companies may calculate NOI and SSNOI in a different

44

manner.  The Company believes SSNOI at its effective ownership interest provides investors with additional information regarding the operating performances of comparable assets because it excludes certain non-cash and non-comparable items as noted above.  SSNOI is frequently used by the real estate industry, as well as securities analysts, investors and other interested parties, to evaluate the performance of REITs.

SSNOI is not, and is not intended to be, a presentation in accordance with GAAP.  SSNOI information has its limitations as it excludes any capital expenditures associated with the re-leasing of tenant space or as needed to operate the assets.  SSNOI does not represent amounts available for dividends, capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations or other commitments and uncertainties.  Management does not use SSNOI as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirements for future commitments, acquisitions or development activities.  SSNOI does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs.  SSNOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.  A reconciliation of NOI and SSNOI to their most directly comparable GAAP measure of net income (loss) is provided below.

Reconciliation Presentation

The Company’s reconciliation of net income computed in accordance with GAAP to NOI and SSNOI for the Company at 100% and at its effective ownership interest of the assets is as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
2021202020212020
At 100%At the Company's Interest
Net income attributable to SITE Centers$124,935$35,721$124,935$35,721
Fee income(40,521)(43,574)(40,521)(43,574)
Interest income(11,888)(11,888)
Interest expense76,38377,60476,38377,604
Depreciation and amortization185,768170,669185,768170,669
General and administrative55,05252,88155,05252,881
Other expense, net1,18518,4001,18518,400
Impairment charges7,2705,2007,2705,200
Equity in net income of joint ventures(47,297)(1,516)(47,297)(1,516)
Reserve of preferred equity interests19,39319,393
Tax expense1,5501,1311,5501,131
Gain on sale and change in control of interests, net(19,185)(45,464)(19,185)(45,464)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(6,065)(1,069)(6,065)(1,069)
Income from non-controlling interests481869481869
Consolidated NOI$339,556$278,357$339,556$278,357
SITE Centers' consolidated joint venture(1,286)(1,652)
Consolidated NOI, net of non-controlling interests$339,556$278,357$338,270$276,705
Net income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures$110,032$(37,370)$49,459$892
Interest expense43,37960,01010,55712,068
Depreciation and amortization66,61899,77915,10718,251
Impairment charges33,2401,890
Preferred share expense15,708785
Other expense, net12,07413,7962,9512,946
Gain on disposition of real estate, net(89,935)(9,257)(42,897)(1,784)
Unconsolidated NOI$142,168$175,906$35,177$35,048
Total Consolidated + Unconsolidated NOI$373,447$311,753
Less: Non-Same Store NOI adjustments3,06115,452
Total SSNOI including redevelopment$376,508$327,205
Less: Redevelopment Same Store NOI adjustments(14,945)(9,655)
Total SSNOI excluding redevelopment$361,563$317,550
SSNOI % Change including redevelopment15.1%
SSNOI % Change excluding redevelopment13.9%

45

The increase in SSNOI at the Company’s effective ownership interest for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to 2020, primarily was attributable to rental income paid in 2021 by cash-basis tenants that related to amounts (including deferred rent) contractually owed in 2020 in connection with disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and redevelopment stabilization.

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

The Company periodically evaluates opportunities to issue and sell additional debt or equity securities, obtain credit facilities from lenders or repurchase or refinance long-term debt as part of its overall strategy to further strengthen its financial position.  The Company remains committed to monitoring liquidity and debt duration in addition to maintaining low leverage in an effort to manage its overall risk profile.

The Company’s consolidated and unconsolidated debt obligations generally require monthly or semi-annual payments of principal and/or interest over the term of the obligation.  While the Company currently believes it has several viable sources to obtain capital and fund its business, including capacity under its credit facilities described below, no assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated.

The Company has historically accessed capital sources through both the public and private markets.  Acquisitions and redevelopments are generally financed through cash provided from operating activities, Revolving Credit Facilities (as defined below), mortgages assumed, secured debt, unsecured debt, common and preferred equity offerings, joint venture capital and asset sales.  Total consolidated debt outstanding was $1.7 billion at December 31, 2021, compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2020.

The Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $41.8 million at December 31, 2021, no outstanding balance on its Revolving Credit Facilities and, accordingly, availability under the Revolving Credit Facilities of $970.0 million (subject to satisfaction of applicable borrowing conditions).  The Company has $34.3 million of consolidated mortgage debt maturing in 2022 and $87.2 million of senior notes, $100.0 million outstanding on an unsecured term loan and $35.8 million of consolidated mortgage debt maturing in 2023. The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures have $74.3 million of mortgage debt at the Company’s share maturing in 2022 and no further maturities until April 2024. The Company’s consolidated debt outstanding at December 31, 2021 included $100.0 million of variable rate debt (maturing in January 2023) having an interest rate determined by reference to LIBOR; additionally, the Company currently has the ability to elect that borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities bear interest based on either LIBOR or the Alternative Base Rate, though the LIBOR-based option is expected to be replaced in the future by an alternative benchmark rate of interest to be agreed upon by the Company and the applicable lenders as a result of the cessation of LIBOR’s publication expected to occur in June 2023.  As of December 31, 2021, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $35 million to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects.  The Company declared dividends of $0.47 per share in 2021 and declared a dividend of $0.13 per share in the first quarter of 2022.  The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to operate its business at this time.

Revolving Credit Facilities

The Company maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, arranged by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., RBC Capital Markets and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”).  The Unsecured Credit Facility provides for borrowings of up to $950 million (which may be increased to $1.45 billion provided that the new lenders agree to existing terms of the facility or existing lenders increase their incremental commitments) and a maturity date of January 2024, with two six-month options to extend the maturity to January 2025 upon the Company’s request (subject to satisfaction of certain conditions).  The Company also maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with PNC Bank, National Association, which provides for borrowings of up to $20 million (the “PNC Facility,” and together with the Unsecured Credit Facility, the “Revolving Credit Facilities”), and has terms substantially the same as those contained in the Unsecured Credit Facility.  The Company’s borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities bear interest at variable rates at the Company’s election, based on either LIBOR plus a specified spread (0.9% at December 31, 2021), or the Alternate Base Rate, as defined in the respective facility, plus a specified spread (0% at December 31, 2021).  The credit agreements governing the Revolving Credit Facilities provide that the Company’s ability to request LIBOR-based loans may be suspended in the future in connection with the cessation of LIBOR’s publication, in which case the Company and the applicable lenders will agree on an alternative rate of interest to LIBOR which gives due consideration to prevailing market conventions for similar credit facilities.  Should market conventions for similar credit facilities fail to standardize, legal risks could arise.  See Item 1A., “Risk Factors—The Company May Be Adversely Affected by the Potential Discontinuation of LIBOR” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The Company also pays an annual facility fee of 20 basis points on the aggregate commitments applicable to each Revolving Credit Facility.  The specified spreads and commitment fees vary depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt ratings from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”), Fitch Investor Services Inc. (“Fitch”) and their successors.

The Revolving Credit Facilities and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness are, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants including, among other things, leverage ratios and debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions.  These credit

46

facilities and indentures also contain customary default provisions including the failure to make timely payments of principal and interest payable thereunder, the failure to comply with the Company’s financial and operating covenants and the failure of the Company or its majority-owned subsidiaries (i.e., entities in which the Company has a greater than 50% interest) to pay, when due, certain indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds beyond applicable grace and cure periods.  In the event the Company’s lenders or note holders declare a default, as defined in the applicable agreements governing the debt, the Company may be unable to obtain further funding, and/or an acceleration of any outstanding borrowings may occur.  As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants in the agreements governing its debt.  Although the Company believes it will continue to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities.

Consolidated Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2021

As discussed above, the Company is committed to maintaining low leverage and may utilize proceeds from equity offerings or the sale of properties or other investments to repay additional debt.  These sources of funds could be affected by various risks and uncertainties.  No assurance can be provided that the Company’s debt obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated.  See Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company continually evaluates its debt maturities and, based on management’s assessment, believes it has viable financing and refinancing alternatives.  The Company has sought to manage its debt maturities through executing a strategy to extend debt duration, increase liquidity, maintain low leverage and improve the Company’s credit profile with a focus of lowering the Company's balance sheet risk and cost of capital.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures’ Mortgage Indebtedness – as of December 31, 2021

The Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures had aggregate outstanding indebtedness to third parties of $0.9 billion and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.  Such mortgages are generally non-recourse to the Company and its partners; however, certain mortgages may have recourse to the Company and its partners in certain limited situations, such as misappropriation of funds, impermissible transfer, environmental contamination and material misrepresentation.  The outstanding indebtedness of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures at December 31, 2021, which matures in the subsequent 14-month period (i.e., through February 28, 2023), is as follows (in millions):

Outstanding at December 31, 2021At SITE Centers' Share
DDR – Domestic Retail Fund I(A)$355.1$71.0
DDR SAU Retail Fund LLC(B)16.53.3
Total debt maturities through February 2023$371.6$74.3
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(A)Expected to be extended at the joint venture’s option in accordance with the loan agreement.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
(B)The Company agreed to sell its interest to its joint venture partner which is expected to close by June 2022.

It is expected that the joint ventures will generally fund these obligations from refinancing opportunities, including extension options, or possible asset sales.  No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be refinanced or repaid as currently anticipated.  Similar to SITE Centers, the Company’s joint ventures experienced a reduction in rent collections, beginning in the second quarter of 2020, as a result of the impact of the COVID‑19 pandemic.  Though rent collections at the Company’s joint ventures have improved during 2021, any future deterioration in rent collections may cause one or more of these joint ventures to be unable to refinance maturing obligations or satisfy applicable covenants, financial tests or debt service requirements or loan maturity extension conditions in the future, thereby allowing the mortgage lender to assume control of property cash flows, limit distributions of cash to joint venture members, declare a default, increase the interest rate or accelerate the loan’s maturity.

Cash Flow Activity

The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

For the Year Ended December 31,
20212020
Cash flow provided by operating activities$282,515$190,170
Cash flow provided by investing activities74,451102,478
Cash flow used for financing activities(388,127)(237,363)

47

Changes in cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to the prior year are as follows:

Operating Activities:  Cash provided by operating activities increased $92.3 million primarily due to the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Increase in cash collected from tenants and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Reduction in interest income received from preferred investments.

Investing Activities:  Cash provided by investing activities decreased $28.0 million primarily due to the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Increase in real estate assets acquired and developed of $143.3 million;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Decrease in proceeds from disposition of real estate and joint venture interests of $112.3 million;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Increase in distributions from joint ventures of $47.7 million and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Proceeds from the distribution by RVI of $190.0 million on account of the Company’s preferred investment in RVI.

Financing Activities:  Cash used for financing activities increased $150.8 million primarily due to the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Increase in net debt repayments, including Revolving Credit Facilities, of $221.8 million;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Redemption of the Class K Preferred Shares of $150.0 million and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Increase in proceeds from issuance of common shares, net of offering expenses, of $225.0 million.

RVI Preferred Shares

In 2018, RVI issued to the Company 1,000 shares of its series A preferred stock (the “RVI Preferred Shares”), which were noncumulative and had no mandatory dividend rate or maturity date.  The RVI Preferred Shares ranked, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of RVI, senior in preference and priority to RVI’s common shares and any other class or series of RVI capital stock.  Subject to the requirement that RVI distribute to its common shareholders the minimum amount required to be distributed with respect to any taxable year in order for RVI to maintain its status as a REIT and to avoid U.S. federal income taxes, the RVI Preferred Shares were entitled to a dividend preference for all dividends declared on RVI’s capital stock at any time up to a “preference amount” equal to $190.0 million in the aggregate which amount could have increased by up to an additional $10 million if the aggregate gross proceeds of RVI asset sales subsequent to July 1, 2018 exceeded $2.06 billion.  In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares.  In December 2021, in recognition of the advanced stage of RVI’s dispositions and the aggregate value of sales relative to the $2.06 billion threshold, RVI repurchased all of the outstanding RVI Preferred Shares from the Company for an aggregate purchase price of $1.00.  As a result, the Company no longer maintains an investment in RVI and will not receive any further distributions on account of the RVI Preferred Shares.

Dividend Distribution

The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared common and preferred share cash dividends of $113.0 million in 2021, as compared to $69.2 million of cash dividends paid in 2020.  Because actual distributions were greater than 100% of taxable income, federal income taxes were not incurred by the Company in 2021.

The Company declared cash dividends of $0.47 per common share in 2021.  In February 2022, the Company declared its first quarter 2022 dividend of $0.13 per common share payable on April 7, 2022, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 2022.  The Board of Directors of the Company intends to monitor the Company’s dividend policy in order to maintain sufficient liquidity for operating and in order to maximize the Company’s free cash flow while still adhering to REIT payout requirements.

SITE Centers’ Equity

In 2021, the Company offered and sold 2,225,698 of its common shares on a forward basis under its $250 million continuous equity offering program at a weighted-average forward price of $15.77 per share before issuance costs, generating expected gross proceeds before issuance costs of $35.1 million, with no shares settled to date.  The 2021 transactions may be settled at any time before the applicable settlement date at various dates through December 8, 2022.  At February 10, 2022, the Company had approximately $214.9 million available for the future offering of common shares under this program.

In March 2021, the Company issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million.

In April 2021, the Company redeemed all $150.0 million aggregate liquidation preference of its 6.250% Class K Preferred Shares at a redemption price of $500 per Class K Preferred Share (or $25.00 per depositary share) plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $7.2049 per Class K Preferred Share (or $0.3602 per depositary share).  The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $5.1 million to net income attributable to common shareholders in 2021, which represents the difference between the redemption price and the carrying amount immediately prior to redemption, which was recorded to additional paid-in capital upon original issuance.

48

In November 2018, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a common share repurchase program.  Under the terms of the program, the Company may purchase up to a maximum value of $100 million of its common shares.  Through February 10, 2022, the Company had repurchased 5.1 million of its common shares under this program in open market transactions at an aggregate cost of approximately $57.9 million, or $11.33 per share.  As of February 10, 2022, the Company had not repurchased any shares under the program during 2021 or 2022.

SOURCES AND USES OF CAPITAL

The Company remains committed to maintaining sufficient liquidity, managing debt duration and maintaining prudent leverage levels in an effort to manage its overall risk profile.  Equity offerings, debt financings, asset sales and cash flow from operations continue to represent a potential source of proceeds to be used to achieve these objectives.

2022 Transaction Activity

Acquisitions

In the first quarter of 2022, the Company acquired Artesia Village (Scottsdale, Arizona) for $14.5 million.  The Company also acquired its partner’s 80% interest in Casselberry Commons (Casselberry, Florida) owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture for $35.6 million ($44.5 million at 100%).

Joint Venture Investments

The Company agreed to sell its 20% interest in the SAU Joint Venture to its partner, the State of Utah, based on a gross asset value of $155.7 million (at 100%).  The transaction is expected to close by June 2022.  Fee income from the SAU Joint Venture totaled $1.0 million in 2021.

2021 Strategic Transaction Activity

Equity Transactions

In 2021, the Company issued and sold 17.25 million common shares resulting in net proceeds of $225.3 million.

Acquisitions

During 2021, the Company purchased four shopping centers (one each in Delray Beach, Florida and Atlanta, Georgia and two in Charlottesville, Virginia), one income producing parcel adjacent to Nassau Park Pavilion (Princeton, New Jersey) and one land parcel adjacent to Belgate Shopping Center (Charlotte, North Carolina) for an aggregate purchase price of $100.5 million. The Company also acquired its partner’s 33% interest in a consolidated joint venture that owned Paradise Village Gateway (Phoenix, Arizona), for $15.1 million ($45.8 million at 100%) with the $27.6 million mortgage debt repaid at closing.

In December 2021, the Company acquired the equity interest in six assets owned by the DDRM Properties Joint Venture (Village Square at Golf, Boynton Beach, Florida; Shoppes at Paradise Point, Fort Walton Beach, Florida; Midway Plaza, Tamarac, Florida; North Point Plaza, Tampa, Florida; The Shoppes at New Tampa, Wesley Chapel, Florida and Paradise Shoppes of Ellenwood, Ellenwood, Georgia) for $107.2 million ($134.0 million at 100%) with $73.9 million of mortgage debt related to the properties repaid at closing.  The transaction resulted in a Gain on Change in Control of Interests of $7.2 million.

The Company remains committed to taking advantage of its financial position and elevated cash resources to prudently grow its portfolio of assets in wealthy suburban communities.

Proceeds from Transactional Activity

In 2021, one of the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold its sole asset, which was a parcel of undeveloped land (approximating 70 acres) in Richmond Hill, Ontario.  The Company’s share of net proceeds totaled $22.1 million, after accounting for customary closing costs and foreign currency translation but before income tax.  The net proceeds include $6.1 million that are held in escrow, of which $2.1 million is expected to be released to the Company in 2022 after the receipt of certain tax clearance certificates from the Canadian taxing authorities, and the remaining $4.0 million is considered contingent and should be released upon final dissolution of the partnership.  The Company recorded an aggregate gain on the transaction of $14.9 million, which included its $2.8 million share of the gain reported by the joint venture, as well as $12.1 million related to the Company’s promoted interest on the disposition of the investment net of the write-off of the accumulated foreign currency translation and contingent estimated income taxes.  Subsequent to the transaction, the Company has no other investments outside the United States.

49

During 2021, the Company sold six unconsolidated shopping centers, aggregating 1.0 million square feet, several wholly owned land parcels, and the Hobby Lobby parcel of a shopping center.  These sales collectively generated proceeds totaling $166.6 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share of the proceeds was $96.5 million.  The Company’s pro rata share of proceeds is before giving effect to the repayment of indebtedness and transaction costs.

In October 2021, the Company received a cash distribution of $190.0 million on the RVI Preferred Shares, which represents the full amount to be paid by RVI on account of the Company’s preferred investment.

Changes in investment strategies for assets may impact the Company’s hold-period assumptions for those properties.  The disposition of certain assets could result in a loss or impairment recorded in future periods.  The Company evaluates all potential sale opportunities taking into account the long-term growth prospects of the assets, the use of proceeds and the impact to the Company’s balance sheet, in addition to the impact on operating results.

Redevelopment Opportunities

One key component of the Company’s long-term strategic plan will be the evaluation of additional tactical redevelopment potential within the portfolio, particularly as it relates to the efficient use of the underlying real estate.  The Company will generally commence construction on redevelopment projects only after substantial tenant leasing has occurred.  At December 31, 2021, the Company anticipates that it has approximately $35 million to be incurred on its pipeline of identified redevelopment projects.

Redevelopment Projects

As part of its strategy to expand, improve and re-tenant various properties, at December 31, 2021, the Company had approximately $47 million in construction in progress in various active consolidated redevelopment and other projects on a net basis.  The Company’s major redevelopment projects are typically substantially complete within two years of the construction commencement date.  At December 31, 2021, the Company’s large-scale shopping center expansion and repurposing projects were as follows (in thousands):

LocationEstimated Stabilized QuarterEstimated Gross CostCost Incurred at December 31, 2021
West Bay Plaza - Phase II (Cleveland, Ohio)2Q23$9,102$5,360
Perimeter Pointe (Atlanta, Georgia)TBDN/A1,271
Total$9,102$6,631

At December 31, 2021, the Company’s tactical redevelopment projects, including outparcels, first generation space and small-scale shopping center expansions and other capital improvements, were as follows (in thousands):

LocationEstimated Stabilized QuarterEstimated Gross CostCost Incurred at December 31, 2021
Tanasbourne Town Center (Portland, Oregon)2Q24$11,540$850
Nassau Park Pavilion (Trenton, New Jersey)3Q237,635937
Shoppers World (Boston, Massachusetts)4Q236,672316
University Hills (Denver, Colorado)4Q234,589716
Hamilton Marketplace (Trenton, New Jersey)4Q223,8432,913
Carolina Pavilion (Charlotte, North Carolina)4Q232,339252
West Bay Plaza (Cleveland, Ohio)1Q22335100
Other Tactical ProjectsN/A9,0608,411
Total$46,013$14,495

No major redevelopment projects were completed in 2021.  For tactical redevelopment and larger retenanting projects completed in 2021, the assets placed in service were completed at a cost of approximately $106 per square foot.

50

2020 Strategic Transaction Activity

Acquisitions

In the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company transferred and redeemed its preferred equity interests in the BRE DDR Joint Ventures in exchange for the acquisition of certain of the underlying assets of the joint ventures as follows:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
On October 15, 2020, an affiliate of Blackstone transferred its common equity interest in BRE DDR IV to the Company for consideration of $1.00 and the Company’s preferred investment in the BRE DDR IV joint venture was redeemed, thereby leaving the Company as the sole owner of (i) the properties previously owned by BRE DDR IV, including Ashbridge Square, The Hub, Southmont Plaza, Millenia Crossing, Concourse Village and two properties, Echelon Village Plaza and Larkin’s Corner, in which the Company did not previously have a material economic interest, and (ii) $5.4 million in net cash.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
On November 20, 2020, the Company transferred its common and preferred equity interests in BRE DDR III to an affiliate of Blackstone in exchange for BRE DDR III’s interests in the single-purpose subsidiaries which owned White Oak Village and Midtowne Park and $4.9 million in net cash.

Proceeds from Transactional Activity

In 2020, the Company sold its 15% interest in the DDRTC Joint Venture to its partner, an affiliate of TIAA-CREF, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $140.4 million.

In 2020, the Company consummated the sale of certain land parcels and the Company’s unconsolidated joint ventures sold two shopping center assets, aggregating 0.2 million square feet.  These sales collectively generated proceeds totaling $28.7 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share of the proceeds was $6.6 million.  The Company’s pro rata share of proceeds is before giving effect to the repayment of indebtedness and transaction costs.  The Company also received $7.5 million related to the repayment of a third-party loan investment.

Redevelopment Projects

The Company invested approximately $42 million in various consolidated active redevelopment and other projects during 2020.

CAPITALIZATION

At December 31, 2021, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $1.7 billion of debt, $175.0 million of preferred shares and $3.3 billion of market equity (market equity is defined as common shares and OP Units outstanding multiplied by $15.83, the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2021), resulting in a debt to total market capitalization ratio of 0.32 to 1.0, as compared to the ratio of 0.46 to 1.0 at December 31, 2020.  The closing price of the Company’s common shares on the New York Stock Exchange was $10.12 at December 31, 2020.  At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s total debt consisted of $1.6 billion (for both periods) of fixed-rate debt and $0.1 billion and $0.3 billion of variable-rate debt, respectively.

Management’s strategy is to maintain access to the capital resources necessary to manage the Company’s balance sheet and to repay upcoming maturities.  Accordingly, the Company may seek to obtain funds through additional debt or equity financings and/or joint venture capital in a manner consistent with its intention to operate with a conservative debt capitalization policy and to reduce the Company’s cost of capital by maintaining an investment grade rating with Moody’s, S&P and Fitch.  A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, as it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.  Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.  The Company may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, or at all, which may negatively affect future ratings.

The Company’s credit facilities and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness are, or may be, issued contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, engage in mergers and certain acquisitions and make distribution to its shareholders.  Although the Company intends to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate these covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees or accelerated maturities.  In addition, certain of the Company’s credit facilities and indentures permit the acceleration of maturity in the event certain other debt of the Company is in default or has been accelerated.  Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

51

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

The Company has no consolidated debt maturing until September 2022.  The Company expects to fund future maturities from utilization of its Revolving Credit Facilities, proceeds from asset sales and other investments, cash flow from operations and /or additional debt or equity financings.  No assurance can be provided that these obligations will be repaid as currently anticipated or refinanced.

Other Guarantees

In conjunction with the redevelopment of shopping centers, the Company had entered into commitments with general contractors aggregating approximately $16.9 million for its consolidated properties at December 31, 2021.  These obligations, composed principally of construction contracts, are generally due within 12 to 24 months, as the related construction costs are incurred, and are expected to be financed through operating cash flow, asset sales or borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facilities.  These contracts typically can be changed or terminated without penalty.  In addition, the Company routinely enters into contracts for the maintenance of its properties.  These contracts typically can be canceled upon 30 to 60 days’ notice without penalty and are typically payable within one year.

At December 31, 2021, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of $13.2 million.  The Company has not recorded any obligations associated with these letters of credit, the majority of which are collateral for insurance obligations as the Company is self-insured up to certain limits on several policies.

The Company has entered into employment contracts with its four executive officers.  These contracts generally provide for base salary, bonuses based on factors including the financial performance of the Company and personal performance, participation in the Company’s equity plans and retirement plans, health and welfare benefits and reimbursement of various qualified business expenses.  These employment agreements also provide for certain perquisites (e.g., health insurance coverage, car service, reimbursement of life and disability insurance premiums, etc.) and severance payments and benefits for various departure scenarios.  The employment agreement for the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer extends through September 2024.  The employment agreements for the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Accounting Officer extend through February 2024, May 2024 and September 2024, respectively.  All of the agreements are subject to termination by either the Company or the executive without cause upon at least 90 days’ notice subject to the payment of severance and other amounts to the executive under certain circumstances.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

Despite an increase in retailer bankruptcies in 2020 stemming from the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company experienced strong momentum in new lease discussions and renewal negotiations with tenants in the second half of 2020, which continued through 2021.  Ultimately, the Company executed new leases and renewals aggregating approximately 3.5 million square feet of space during the year ended December 31, 2021, on a pro rata basis, which exceeded 2020 leasing levels.  Although there may be some additional disruption among existing tenants due to the continuing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related supply chain and labor shortages, the Company believes that recent strong leasing volumes are attributable to the location of the Company’s portfolio in suburban, high household income communities (which have been impacted less by the pandemic on a relative basis) and to its national tenants’ strong financial positions and increasing emphasis and reliance on physical store locations to improve the speed and efficiency of fulfillment of online purchases.

The Company benefits from a diversified tenant base, with only one tenant whose annualized rental revenue equals or exceeds 3% of the Company’s annualized consolidated revenues plus the Company’s proportionate share of unconsolidated joint venture revenues (TJX Companies at 5.8%).  Other significant tenants include Dick’s Sporting Goods, Ross Stores, Burlington and Five Below, all of which have relatively strong financial positions, have outperformed other retail categories over time and the Company believes remain well-capitalized.  Historically, these tenants have provided a stable revenue base, and the Company believes that they will continue to provide a stable revenue base going forward, given the long-term nature of these leases.  The majority of the tenants in the Company’s shopping centers provide day-to-day consumer necessities with a focus on value and convenience, versus discretionary items, which the Company believes will enable many of its tenants to outperform under a variety of economic conditions.  The Company recognizes the risks posed by current economic conditions but believes that the position of its portfolio and the general diversity and credit quality of its tenant base should enable it to successfully navigate through a potentially challenging economic environment.  The Company has relatively little reliance on overage or percentage rents generated by tenant sales performance.

The Company believes that its shopping center portfolio is well positioned, as evidenced by its historical property income growth and consistent growth in average annualized base rent per occupied square foot.  Historical occupancy has generally ranged from 89% to 96% since the Company’s initial public offering in 1993.  At December 31, 2021 and 2020, the shopping center portfolio occupancy, on a pro rata basis, was 90.0% and 89.0%, respectively, and the total portfolio average annualized base rent per occupied

52

square foot, on a pro rata basis, was $18.33 and $18.50, respectively.  The decrease in the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot primarily is due to the 2021 joint venture acquisitions.  The Company’s portfolio has been impacted by tenant bankruptcies and lease expirations in recent years (which increased in number and pace in 2020 following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic), and the Company expects to expend significant amounts of capital in coming periods in connection with recently executed anchor leases and in order to re-lease remaining anchor vacancies.  Although the per square foot cost of leasing capital expenditures has been predominantly consistent with the Company’s historical trends, the high volume of the Company’s recent anchor leasing activity will cause aggregate leasing capital expenditure levels to remain elevated.  The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and lease commissions estimated to be incurred over the expected lease term for new leases executed during 2021 and 2020, on a pro rata basis, was $8.34 and $6.81 per rentable square foot, respectively.  The increase in the weighted-average cost of tenant improvements was due to the higher percentage of anchor leases in 2021.  The Company generally does not expend a significant amount of capital on lease renewals.

Beginning in March 2020, the retail sector was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.  Though the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tenant operations has varied by tenant category, local conditions and applicable government mandates, a significant number of the Company’s tenants experienced a reduction in sales and foot traffic, and many tenants were forced to limit their operations or close their businesses for a period of time.  The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the collection of rents from April 2020 through December 2020.  During the second half of 2020 and early 2021, the Company worked with tenants to maximize the collection of unpaid 2020 rents by offering rent deferment on a case-by-case basis often in exchange for concessions in the form of tenant extensions of lease terms, the relaxation of leasing restrictions and co-tenancy provisions and, in some cases, alterations of control areas allowing for future redevelopment of the shopping center.  During the course of 2021, the Company’s rent collections normalized close to pre-pandemic levels.  As of December 31, 2021, a substantial majority of tenants, including tenants previously on the cash basis of accounting, were paying their monthly rent and any deferred rents relating to prior periods.  Included in 2021 results was $13.8 million, at SITE Centers’ share, of net revenue primarily related to contractual rents paid from cash-basis tenants that was contractually due in 2020.  The majority of the deferral arrangements relating to 2020 revenue were repaid during 2021, and therefore, the impact of 2020 rent collections is expected to be minimal in future periods.  At December 31, 2021, $0.2 million remained outstanding under deferral arrangements for tenants that are not accounted for on the cash basis.  As of February 10, 2022, the Omicron variant had not had a material impact on the Company’s rent collections or leasing activity, though some tenants have experienced challenges in maintaining regular operating hours as a result of related labor shortages.

The Company is unable to forecast the duration of the disruption to tenant and Company operations caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, or the ultimate level of collections of rents and other unpaid amounts owed by tenants that were deferred or unpaid during 2020. However, the level and pace of collections of such deferred rents and other unresolved amounts exceeded management’s expectations during 2021, especially with respect to collections from tenants previously placed on the cash basis of accounting.  If new surges in contagion were to occur, or if new COVID-19 variants in addition to Omicron were to emerge that are more resistant to vaccines, or if there are decreases in the effectiveness of such vaccines, the Company’s recent success in leasing space and the collection of deferred rents and unresolved amounts could be adversely impacted and such developments could lead to new restrictions on tenant operations, nonpayment of contractual and previously deferred rents, additional tenant requests for rent relief and additional tenant closures and bankruptcies, all of which could adversely impact the Company’s results of operations in the future.  Certain tenant categories remain especially vulnerable to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, including movie theaters, fitness centers and local restaurants.  For additional risks relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

New Accounting Standards are more fully described in Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included herein.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.  Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including trends that might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations.  The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods.  Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements related to acquisitions (including any related pro forma financial information) and other business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of environmental and other regulations.  Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved.  For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements.  Without limiting the foregoing, the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.  Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements because such statements

53

involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements and that could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements.  For additional factors that could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements (see Item 1A. Risk Factors).  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic may also exacerbate the risks discussed therein and herein, any of which could have a material effect on the Company.

Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues, and any economic downturn may adversely affect the ability of the Company’s tenants, or new tenants, to enter into new leases or the ability of the Company’s existing tenants to renew their leases at rates at least as favorable as their current rates;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the internet and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants, or a general downturn in its tenants’ businesses, which may cause tenants to close stores or default in payment of rent;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties, and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company relies on major tenants, which makes it vulnerable to changes in the business and financial condition of, or demand for its space by, such tenants;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may not realize the intended benefits of acquisition or merger transactions. The acquired assets may not perform as well as the Company anticipated, or the Company may not successfully integrate the assets and realize improvements in occupancy and operating results. The acquisition of certain assets may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may fail to identify, acquire, construct or develop additional properties that produce a desired yield on invested capital, or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties. In addition, the Company may be limited in its acquisition opportunities due to competition, the inability to obtain financing on reasonable terms or any financing at all and other factors;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may fail to dispose of properties on favorable terms, especially in regions experiencing deteriorating economic conditions. In addition, real estate investments can be illiquid, particularly as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of financing or difficulties obtaining financing due to local or global conditions, and could limit the Company’s ability to promptly make changes to its portfolio to respond to economic and other conditions;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may abandon a development or redevelopment opportunity after expending resources if it determines that the opportunity is not feasible due to a variety of factors, including a lack of availability of construction financing on reasonable terms, the impact of the economic environment on prospective tenants’ ability to enter into new leases or pay contractual rent or the inability of the Company to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may not complete development or redevelopment projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as weather, labor conditions, governmental approvals, material shortages or general economic downturn, resulting in limited availability of capital, increased debt service expense and construction costs and decreases in revenue;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company’s financial condition may be affected by required debt service payments, the risk of default, restrictions on its ability to incur additional debt or to enter into certain transactions under its credit facilities and other documents governing its debt obligations and the risk of downgrades from debt rating services. In addition, the Company may encounter difficulties in obtaining permanent financing or refinancing existing debt. Borrowings under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facilities are subject to certain representations and warranties and customary events of default, including

54

Column 1Column 2Column 3
any event that has had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial condition;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market price of the Company’s common shares, as well as its performance and cash flow;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Debt and/or equity financing necessary for the Company to continue to grow and operate its business may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Disruptions in the financial markets could affect the Company’s ability to obtain financing on reasonable terms and have other adverse effects on the Company and the market price of the Company’s common shares;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company is subject to complex regulations related to its status as a REIT and would be adversely affected if it failed to qualify as a REIT;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company must borrow funds to make distributions, those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms or at all;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that a partner or co-venturer may become bankrupt, may at any time have interests or goals different from those of the Company and may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. In addition, a partner or co-venturer may not have access to sufficient capital to satisfy its funding obligations to the joint venture or may seek to terminate the joint venture resulting in a loss to the Company of property revenues and management fees. The partner could cause a default under the joint venture loan for reasons outside the Company’s control. Furthermore, the Company could be required to reduce the carrying value of its equity investments, including preferred investments, if a loss in the carrying value of the investment is realized;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company’s decision to dispose of real estate assets, including undeveloped land and construction in progress, would change the holding period assumption in the undiscounted cash flow impairment analyses, which could result in material impairment losses and adversely affect the Company’s financial results;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The outcome of pending or future litigation, including litigation with tenants or joint venture partners, may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Property damage, expenses related thereto, and other business and economic consequences (including the potential loss of revenue) resulting from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters in locations where the Company owns properties may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Sufficiency and timing of any insurance recovery payments related to damages and lost revenues from extreme weather conditions or natural disasters may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company and its tenants could be negatively affected by the impacts of pandemics and other public health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company is subject to potential environmental liabilities;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company may incur losses that are uninsured or exceed policy coverage due to its liability for certain injuries to persons, property or the environment occurring on its properties;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company could incur additional expenses to comply with or respond to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act or otherwise be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Changes in accounting standards or other standards may adversely affect the Company’s business;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company’s Board of Directors, which regularly reviews the Company’s business strategy and objectives, may change the Company’s strategic plan based on a variety of factors and conditions, including in response to changing market conditions and

55

Column 1Column 2Column 3
The Company and its vendors could sustain a disruption, failure or breach of their respective networks and systems, including as a result of cyber-attacks, which could disrupt the Company’s business operations, compromise the confidentiality of sensitive information and result in fines or penalties.