grepcent / static financial knowledge base

SMITHFIELD FOODS INC (SFD)

CIK: 0000091388. SIC: 2011 Meat Packing Plants. Latest 10-K as of: 2026-03-24.

SIC breadcrumb: Manufacturing > Food And Kindred Products > SIC 2011 Meat Packing Plants

SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=91388. Latest filing source: 0000091388-26-000014.

Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.

Business

Read SFD's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.

Risk Factors

Read SFD's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.

Selected Fundamentals

MetricValueUnitFYFiled
Revenue15,531,000,000USD20252026-03-24
Net income987,000,000USD20252026-03-24
Assets12,177,000,000USD20252026-03-24

Financials

Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-03-24. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000091388.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.

Download these verified figures (annual + quarterly, with per-value filing provenance): JSON · CSV

Flow metrics use full-year FY periods from 10-K/10-K/A filings; balance-sheet metrics use FY-end instants. Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures. Missing metrics are omitted rather than fabricated.

Metric2009201020112012201320142016202320242025
Revenue14,640,000,00014,142,000,00015,531,000,000
Net income-101,400,000521,000,000361,300,000120,700,000556,100,000452,300,00017,000,000953,000,000987,000,000
Operating income-223,900,00062,800,0001,095,000,000722,600,000338,500,000931,600,000793,800,000-56,000,0001,118,000,0001,292,000,000
Gross profit624,600,000730,100,0001,714,100,0001,549,400,0001,205,000,0001,775,600,0001,755,400,000889,000,0001,897,000,0002,089,000,000
Diluted EPS-1.41-0.653.122.211.260.052.512.51
Operating cash flow269,900,000258,200,000616,400,000570,100,000688,000,000916,000,0001,059,000,000
Capital expenditures353,000,000350,000,000341,000,000
Dividends paid323,000,000288,000,000396,000,000
Assets7,708,900,0007,611,800,0007,422,200,0009,954,800,00010,131,500,0009,894,000,00013,317,000,00011,054,000,00012,177,000,000
Stockholders' equity2,755,600,0003,545,500,0003,387,300,0003,097,000,0007,241,000,0005,834,000,0006,801,000,000
Free cash flow335,000,000566,000,000718,000,000

Ratios

ROE and ROA use period-end equity/assets. Liabilities / equity uses total liabilities divided by stockholders' equity. Current ratio uses current assets divided by current liabilities when both are reported.

Metric2009201020112012201320142016202320242025
Net margin0.12%6.74%6.36%
Operating margin-0.38%7.91%8.32%
Return on equity-3.68%14.69%10.67%3.90%0.23%16.34%14.51%
Return on assets-1.32%6.84%4.87%1.21%5.49%4.57%0.13%8.62%8.11%
Current ratio2.792.722.902.032.012.462.97

Financial Bridges

Waterfall figures reconcile reported SEC companyfacts components. Missing bridges are omitted when required components are not present for the same fiscal year.

Income statement bridge from reported figures

SFD FY2025 income statement bridge from reported figures.SFD FY2025 income statement bridge from reported figures.SFD income bridgeFY2025: revenue to net incomeSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Income statement bridgeReported amount$0.0B$10.0B$20.0B$15.5BRevenue-$13.4BCost$2.1BGross-$797.0MOpEx$1.3BOperating-$305.0MOther/tax$987.0MNet income

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Revenue: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax; source concepts us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax | Gross profit: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept GrossProfit; source concepts us-gaap:GrossProfit | Operating income: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept OperatingIncomeLoss; source concepts us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss | Net income: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept NetIncomeLoss; source concepts us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss

Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures

SFD FY2025 free cash flow bridge from reported figures.SFD FY2025 free cash flow bridge from reported figures.SFD free cash flow bridgeFY2025: operating cash flow less capital expendituresSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Free cash flow bridgeReported amount$0.0B$1.0B$2.0B$1.1BOperating cash flow-$341.0MCapex$718.0MFree cash flow

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Operating cash flow: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations | Capital expenditures: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets; source concepts us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets | Free cash flow: accession 0000091388-26-000014; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations - PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets

Financial Charts

SFD revenue, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD revenue, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD RevenueLatest point: FY2025 = $15.5BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearReported revenue$0.0B$10.0B$20.0B$14.6BFY2023$14.1BFY2024$15.5BFY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax. Source concepts: us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax.

SFD net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Net incomeLatest point: FY2025 = $987.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearNet income$0.0B$500.0M$1.0BFY2014FY2016FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.

SFD operating income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD operating income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Operating incomeLatest point: FY2025 = $1.3BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearOperating income-$250.0M$0.0B$2.0BFY2014FY2016FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: OperatingIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss.

SFD gross profit, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD gross profit, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Gross profitLatest point: FY2025 = $2.1BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearGross profit$0.0B$2.0B$4.0BFY2014FY2016FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: GrossProfit. Source concepts: us-gaap:GrossProfit.

SFD diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Diluted EPSLatest point: FY2025 = $2.51/shareSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDiluted EPS (USD/share)$0.00/share$2.00/share$4.00/shareFY2012FY2013FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

SFD operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Operating cash flowLatest point: FY2025 = $1.1BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearOperating cash flow$0.0B$1.0B$2.0BFY2011FY2012FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations.

SFD capital expenditures, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD capital expenditures, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Capital expendituresLatest point: FY2025 = $341.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearCapital expenditures$0.0B$250.0M$500.0M$353.0MFY2023$350.0MFY2024$341.0MFY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets.

SFD dividends paid, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD dividends paid, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Dividends paidLatest point: FY2025 = $396.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDividends paid$0.0B$250.0M$500.0M$323.0MFY2023$288.0MFY2024$396.0MFY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: PaymentsOfDividends. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividends.

SFD assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD AssetsLatest point: FY2025 = $12.2BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearAssets$0.0B$10.0B$20.0BFY2014FY2016FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.

SFD stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Stockholders' equityLatest point: FY2025 = $6.8BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearStockholders' equity$0.0B$4.0B$8.0BFY2012FY2013FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.

SFD free cash flow, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD free cash flow, last 3 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.SFD Free cash flowLatest point: FY2025 = $718.0MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearFree cash flow$0.0B$375.0M$750.0M$335.0MFY2023$566.0MFY2024$718.0MFY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-28; accession 0000091388-26-000014; filed 2026-03-24. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations - PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivitiesContinuingOperations; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets.

Quarterly

Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-04-28. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000091388.json.

Flow metrics use discrete quarter-length periods from 10-Q/10-Q/A filings. Q4 revenue and net income are derived only when annual FY and nine-month YTD facts exist for the same fiscal year; derived Q4 values are labeled. EPS Q4 is not derived.

QuarterEnd DateRevenueNet IncomeDiluted EPSMethod
2011-Q32011-01-301.21reported discrete quarter
2012-Q12011-07-310.49reported discrete quarter
2012-Q22011-10-300.74reported discrete quarter
2012-Q32012-01-290.49reported discrete quarter
2013-Q12012-07-290.40reported discrete quarter
2013-Q22012-10-280.07reported discrete quarter
2013-Q32013-01-270.58reported discrete quarter
2014-Q12013-07-280.27reported discrete quarter
2015-Q12015-03-2997,000,000reported discrete quarter
2015-Q22015-06-28104,200,000reported discrete quarter
2015-Q32015-09-2783,300,000reported discrete quarter
2015-Q42016-01-03167,800,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2016-Q12016-04-03121,000,000reported discrete quarter
2016-Q22016-07-03137,800,000reported discrete quarter
2016-Q32016-10-02143,800,000reported discrete quarter
2025-Q12025-03-303,771,000,000224,000,0000.57reported discrete quarter
2025-Q22025-06-293,786,000,000188,000,0000.48reported discrete quarter
2025-Q32025-09-283,747,000,000248,000,0000.63reported discrete quarter
2025-Q42025-12-284,227,000,000327,000,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2026-Q12026-03-293,800,000,000246,000,0000.62reported discrete quarter

Quarterly Charts

SFD quarterly revenue, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD quarterly revenue, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD Quarterly RevenueLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $3.8BSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Revenue$0.0B$3.0B$6.0B2025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-29; accession 0000091388-26-000033; filed 2026-04-28. Concept: RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax. Source concepts: us-gaap:RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax.

SFD quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD Quarterly Net incomeLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $246.0MSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Net income$0.0B$250.0M$500.0M2015-Q12015-Q22015-Q32015-Q42016-Q12016-Q22016-Q32025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-29; accession 0000091388-26-000033; filed 2026-04-28. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.

SFD quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.SFD Quarterly Diluted EPSLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $0.62/shareSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Diluted EPS (USD/share)$0.00/share$0.75/share$1.50/share2011-Q32012-Q12012-Q22012-Q32013-Q12013-Q22013-Q32014-Q12025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-29; accession 0000091388-26-000033; filed 2026-04-28. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

Macro Cross-References

Latest quarter (10-Q)

Latest 10-Q source: 0000091388-26-000033.

Extracted structurally from real Item 2 body heading to real Item 3/4 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-04-28. Report date: 2026-03-29.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025. The information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which we believe are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for all periods included. Totals and percentages may be affected by rounding. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Overview

Smithfield Foods, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (“Smithfield,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is an American food company that employs approximately 32,000 people in the United States (“U.S.”) and 2,500 people in Mexico. We boast a portfolio of high-quality, iconic brands, such as Smithfield®, Eckrich® and Nathan’s Famous®, among many others. We are an indirect, majority-owned subsidiary of Hong Kong-based WH Group Limited (“WH Group”).

Our elected fiscal year is the 52-week or 53-week period which ends on the Sunday nearest to December 31. Each of the first quarters of fiscal years 2026 and 2025, which ended on March 29, 2026 and March 30, 2025, respectively, consisted of 13 weeks.

We conduct our operations through three reportable segments: Packaged Meats, Fresh Pork and Hog Production. We also conduct operations through two other operating segments, Mexico and Bioscience, which are aggregated and reported as “Other.”

Packaged Meats Segment

The Packaged Meats segment consists of our U.S. operations that process fresh meat into a wide variety of packaged meats products, including bacon, sausage, hot dogs, deli and lunch meats, dry sausage products (such as pepperoni and genoa salami), ham products, ready-to-eat products and prepared foods (such as pre-cooked entrees, bacon and sausage). Approximately 80% of the Packaged Meats segment’s raw materials are sourced from our Fresh Pork segment. We market our domestic packaged meats products under a strategic set of core brands, which include: Smithfield, Eckrich, Nathan’s Famous, Farmland, Armour, Farmer John, Kretschmar, Krakus, John Morrell, Cook’s, Gwaltney, Carando, Margherita, Curly’s and Smithfield Culinary. We also sell a sizeable portion of our packaged meats products as private label products. The majority of the Packaged Meats segment’s products are sold to retail and foodservice customers in the U.S.

Fresh Pork Segment

The Fresh Pork segment consists of our U.S. operations that process live hogs into a wide variety of primal, sub-primal and offal products, such as bellies, butts, hams, loins, picnics and ribs. The Fresh Pork segment sources approximately 40% of its raw materials from our Hog Production segment, with the remainder from farmers with whom we partner across the U.S. Approximately one-third of our fresh pork products, including the majority of hams, bellies and trimmings, is transferred to our Packaged Meats segment. Externally, we sell our fresh pork products to domestic retail, foodservice and industrial customers, as well as to export markets, including, among others, Mexico, China, Japan, South Korea and Canada.

Hog Production Segment

The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations in the U.S., which produce and raise our hogs on numerous Company-owned farms and farms that are owned and operated by contract farmers. Nearly all of the hogs produced by this segment are processed by our Fresh Pork segment. The Hog Production segment also sells livestock feed and grains and provides transportation and other ancillary services to external customers. In fiscal year 2025 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2026, approximately 60% of the Hog Production segment’s cost of goods sold was from animal feed, which is derived primarily from corn and soybean meal.

28

Key Factors and Recent Developments Affecting Our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Our operating results and financial condition have been and/or may be impacted in the future by several key factors and recent developments.

Growth Strategies

The strategic initiatives we are executing across our segments are complemented and enabled by our strong balance sheet and ongoing operational investments, positioning us for future growth. We have several strategic initiatives to grow our business, reduce costs and enhance our profitability and margins. A comprehensive discussion of our growth strategies is provided in Part II, Item 1. Business—Our Growth Strategies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2025.

Sales Drivers

We are focused on driving profitable growth through our Packaged Meats segment. Within the Packaged Meats segment, the primary factors impacting sales of our brands are household penetration, consumption levels, price point and product offerings. As a result, we have pursued strategies that we believe best align our products with consumer trends and behavior. We have shifted our portfolio towards a higher mix of value-added and margin accretive products while leveraging the breadth of our offerings to further penetrate across dayparts. We look to increase brand awareness and encourage consumer adoption of our products through product and packaging innovation and effective and appealing marketing strategies while maintaining our promise to consumers to offer high-quality products for every budget. We have also expanded to new categories and grown distribution of under-indexed brands in under-penetrated locations. In addition, we seek to increase sales in packaged meats products by driving volumes of our private label and foodservice products, by expanding our customer relationships and by offering quality selections across the value chain.

The U.S. packaged meats market is supported by long-term secular tailwinds, including consumer demand for high-protein diets, high-quality nutrition, product versatility and convenience. We expect these tailwinds to continue to drive increases in overall meat consumption. Nevertheless, changes in market trends and consumer preferences could adversely affect our results of operations.

In our Fresh Pork segment, the primary drivers of external sales are the consistent level of global pork consumption, our ability to maximize the value of each hog and our ability to leverage our different end markets including retail, foodservice, industrial and export channels. Through ongoing product innovation, we seek to appeal to ever-changing consumer preferences, including demand for convenience and smaller portion sizes as well as expanded interests in new and varied flavors. We also seek to increase the value of raw materials through whole-hog utilization and by appealing to differentiated, global tastes and preferences. We leverage multiple sales channels to optimize profitability, including value-added retail, export markets, industrial, pharmaceutical and pet foods.

Cost Factors

Our cost as a percentage of sales varies based on fluctuations of raw material prices, as well as manufacturing, distribution and marketing costs. Raw materials are the largest component of our total cost of goods sold, with feed ingredients and hogs accounting for the majority share. The prices of feed ingredients, hogs and pork fluctuate based on market dynamics which can affect our margins. In addition, our operating costs are affected by fuel prices, which also fluctuate based on market dynamics. We enter into hedging transactions for commodities such as feed ingredients, hogs and fuel when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also reduces the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices.

We continue to optimize the size of our hog production operations and procure a greater mix of hogs from independent suppliers with market-based supply agreements in order to supply our Fresh Pork segment. We have reduced the size of our internal hog production from a peak of 17.6 million head in 2019 to 11.1 million head in 2025, which represents approximately 40% of the hogs processed by our Fresh Pork segment. We continue to explore opportunities to reduce internal production over the medium term.

29

We are pursuing best-in-class manufacturing principles in our plants by employing automation to redeploy labor to higher value tasks, increasing yields and driving efficiency by reducing complexity. In our logistics and distribution network, we actively manage transportation and warehousing costs by evaluating transportation carrier mix, optimizing transportation routes, maximizing utilization of our cold storage and trucking assets, improving supply and demand planning and optimizing inventory levels.

Our results of operations will continue to depend on our ability to (1) manage raw material cost movements through optimizing our hog production operations, hedging, forward purchasing, strategic sourcing negotiations and passing inflationary cost increases to customers, (2) operate our manufacturing and logistics footprint efficiently and competitively and (3) continue to attract and retain customers and consumers through effective sales and marketing spend.

Initial Public Offering

On January 29, 2025, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 26,086,958 shares of common stock, representing 7% of the total outstanding shares, at a price of $20.00 per share. We issued 13,043,479 shares of common stock bringing the total number of outstanding shares to 393,112,711. The remaining 13,043,479 shares of common stock were sold by WH Group, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary SFDS UK Holdings Limited, our only shareholder at the time. We received net proceeds from the IPO of $236 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and fees. As a result of the IPO, our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker “SFD.”

Tariffs

We export our products to over 30 countries, including China. Those exports primarily consist of fresh pork products. For the quarter ended March 29, 2026, our export sales into China accounted for approximately 2% of our total sales. As of March 29, 2026, products we export to China faced tariffs that ranged from 25% to 47%, with most products subject to 47% tariff rates.

Trade relations between the U.S. and China are fluid. China previously had proposed imposing tariff rates on our products ranging from 140% to 172%, but implementation of those increased rates have been repeatedly paused. It is impossible for us to predict whether tariff rates imposed on our products by China will increase, decrease or stay the same, or whether China will ban imports from the U.S. altogether, and we will adjust our sales strategy accordingly.

Geopolitical Conflicts and Market Volatility

Recent hostilities and geopolitical tensions in multiple regions, including the Middle East, Ukraine, and parts of Central and South America, have contributed to increased volatility in global oil, energy, commodity and transportation markets. Ongoing sanctions, export controls, and other governmental actions associated with these conflicts have impacted and may continue to impact the price and availability of oil and other key inputs. Energy prices directly influence freight, logistics and certain raw material costs across our supply chain, which have increased and may continue to increase our operating costs. In addition, these conditions have disrupted trade flows and contributed to broader macroeconomic uncertainty, which could impact demand for our products. The duration and overall impact of these conflicts remain uncertain

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Latest 10-K MD&A

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Published MD&A gate trimmed front/tail over-capture. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-03-24. Report date: 2025-12-28.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis includes the results of operations and financial condition, including year-over-year comparisons, for fiscal years 2025 and 2024. For discussion and analysis of fiscal year 2023, including a year-over-year comparison of fiscal years 2024 and 2023, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2024. The information reflects all normal recurring adjustments which we believe are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for all periods included. Totals and percentages may be affected by rounding. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Overview

We are an American food company that employs approximately 32,000 people in the U.S. and 2,500 people in Mexico. We boast a portfolio of high-quality, iconic brands, such as Smithfield®, Eckrich® and Nathan’s Famous®, among many others. We are an indirect, majority-owned subsidiary of Hong Kong-based WH Group.

We conduct our operations through three reportable segments: Packaged Meats, Fresh Pork, and Hog Production. We also conduct operations through two other operating segments, Mexico and Bioscience, which are aggregated and reported as “Other.”

Our fiscal year is the 52-week or 53-week period which ends on the Sunday nearest to December 31. Fiscal years 2025 and 2024 each consisted of 52 weeks.

For a more comprehensive overview of our company and operations, refer to “Item 1. Business” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Key Factors and Recent Developments Affecting Our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The following are key factors that have influenced our results of operations in the past and/or may influence our results in the future.

Growth Strategies

The strategic initiatives we are executing across our segments are complemented and enabled by our strong balance sheet and ongoing operational investments, positioning us for future growth. We have several strategic initiatives to grow our business, reduce costs and enhance our profitability and margins. For a comprehensive discussion of our growth strategies, refer to “Item 1. Business—Our Growth Strategies in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Sales Drivers

We are focused on driving profitable growth through our Packaged Meats segment. Within the Packaged Meats segment, the primary factors impacting sales of our brands are household penetration, consumption levels, price point and product offerings. As a result, we have pursued strategies that we believe best align our products with consumer trends and behavior. We have shifted our portfolio towards a higher mix of value-added and margin accretive products while leveraging the breadth of our offerings to further penetrate across dayparts. We look to increase brand awareness and encourage consumer adoption of our products through product and packaging innovation and effective and appealing marketing strategies while maintaining our promise to consumers to offer high-quality products for every budget. We have also expanded to new categories and grown distribution of under-indexed brands in under-penetrated locations. In addition, we seek to increase sales in packaged meats products by driving volumes of our private label and foodservice products, by expanding our customer relationships and by offering quality selections across the value chain.

58

The U.S. packaged meats market is supported by long-term secular tailwinds, including consumer demand for high-protein diets, high-quality nutrition, product versatility and convenience. We expect these tailwinds to continue to drive increases in overall meat consumption. Nevertheless, changes in market trends and consumer preferences could adversely affect our results of operations.

In our Fresh Pork segment, the primary drivers of external sales are the consistent level of global pork consumption, our ability to maximize the value of each hog and our ability to leverage our different end markets including retail, foodservice, industrial and export channels. Through ongoing product innovation, we seek to appeal to ever-changing consumer preferences, including demand for convenience and smaller portion sizes as well as expanded interests in new and varied flavors. We also seek to capitalize on export markets as an outlet for increasing the value of raw materials through whole-hog utilization and by appealing to differentiated, global tastes and preferences.

Cost Factors

Our cost as a percentage of sales varies based on fluctuations of raw material prices, as well as manufacturing, distribution and marketing costs. Raw materials are the largest component of our total cost of goods sold, with feed ingredients and hogs accounting for the majority share. The prices of feed ingredients, hogs and pork fluctuate based on market dynamics which can affect our margins. In addition, our distribution costs are affected by fuel prices, which also fluctuate based on market dynamics and may contribute to higher prices for feed ingredients and other inputs. We enter into hedging transactions for commodities such as feed ingredients, hogs and fuel when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also reduces the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices.

We continue to optimize the size of our hog production operations and procure a greater mix of hogs from independent suppliers with market-based supply agreements in order to supply our Fresh Pork segment. We have reduced the size of our internal hog production from a peak of 17.6 million head in 2019 to 11.1 million head in 2025, which represents approximately 40% of the hogs processed by our Fresh Pork segment. We continue to explore opportunities to reduce internal production over the medium term.

We are pursuing best-in-class manufacturing principles in our plants by employing automation to redeploy labor to higher value tasks, increasing yields and driving efficiency by reducing complexity. In our logistics and distribution network, we have reduced transportation and warehousing costs by improving transportation carrier mix, maximizing utilization of our cold storage and trucking assets, improving supply and demand planning and optimizing inventory levels.

Our results of operations will continue to depend on our ability to (1) manage raw material cost movements through optimizing our hog production operations, hedging, forward purchasing, strategic sourcing negotiations and passing inflationary cost increases to customers, (2) operate our manufacturing and logistics footprint efficiently and competitively and (3) continue to attract and retain customers and consumers through effective sales and marketing spend.

Initial Public Offering

On January 29, 2025, we completed our IPO of 26,086,958 shares of common stock, representing 7% of the total outstanding shares, at a price of $20.00 per share. We issued 13,043,479 shares of common stock bringing the total number of outstanding shares to 393,112,711. The remaining 13,043,479 shares of common stock were sold by WH Group, through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary SFDS UK, our only shareholder at the time. We received net proceeds from the IPO of $236 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and fees. As a result of the IPO, our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker “SFD.”

In connection with the IPO, we granted to certain of our directors and employees and certain directors and employees of WH Group: (1) options to purchase 9,822,467 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to the IPO price of $20.00 per share with an aggregate grant date fair value of $30 million and (2) 1,527,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of $31 million. The options and substantially all RSUs vest over a five year period, with 20% vesting each year. We recognized compensation expense totaling $9 million

59

associated with these equity instruments in fiscal year 2025. Unrecognized compensation expense totaled $37 million as of December 28, 2025, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining vesting period of 4.1 years.

Tariffs

We export our products to over 30 countries, including China. Those exports primarily consist of fresh pork offal products. For fiscal year 2025, our export sales into China accounted for approximately 2% of our total sales. As of December 28, 2025, products we export to China faced tariffs that ranged from 25% to 47%, with most products subject to 47% tariff rates.

Trade relations between the U.S. and China are fluid. China previously had proposed imposing tariff rates on our products ranging from 140% to 172%, but implementation of those increased rates have been repeatedly paused. It is impossible for us to predict whether tariff rates imposed on our products by China will increase, decrease or stay the same, or whether China will ban imports from the U.S. altogether, and we will adjust our sales strategy accordingly.

Geopolitical Conflicts and Market Volatility

Recent hostilities and geopolitical tensions in multiple regions, including the Middle East, Ukraine, and parts of Central and South America, have contributed to increased volatility in global oil, energy, commodity and transportation markets. Ongoing sanctions, export controls, and other governmental actions associated with these conflicts have impacted and may continue to impact the price and availability of oil and other key inputs. Because energy prices directly influence freight, logistics and certain raw material costs across our supply chain, sustained volatility or disruptions may increase our operating costs. In addition, these conditions may disrupt trade flows and contribute to broader macroeconomic uncertainty, which could impact demand for our products. The duration and overall impact of these conflicts remain uncertain. We will continue to monitor developments and take measures to minimize the impact on our operations.

Litigation

Like other participants in our industry, we are subject to various laws and regulations administered by federal, state and other government entities, including the EPA and corresponding state agencies, as well as the USDA, the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyard Administration, the FDA, OSHA, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and similar agencies in foreign countries.

We, from time-to-time, receive notices and inquiries from regulatory authorities and others asserting that we are not in compliance with such laws and regulations. In some instances, litigation ensues. In addition, individuals may initiate litigation against us.

As of December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024, we had contingent liabilities totaling $149 million and $141 million, respectively, in accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets related to litigation matters. Charges totaling $80 million were recorded in fiscal year 2025 and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) in the consolidated statements of income. We did not record any significant charges for litigation matters in fiscal year 2024. These matters will not affect our profits or losses in future periods unless our accruals prove to be insufficient or excessive. It is reasonably possible that a change in our estimates may occur in the near term and that our accruals could be insufficient. We are unable to estimate the amount of possible loss in excess of our accruals, which could be material.

Additionally, in the second quarter of 2025, we settled a claim against an insurance carrier and received $29 million in proceeds for the recovery of losses we incurred in connection with past litigation. As a result, we recognized a $29 million gain on the insurance recovery in the second quarter of 2025. The gain was recognized in operating gains in the consolidated statement of income and the proceeds were classified in operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows in the second quarter of 2025.

For further information related to our litigation matters, refer to “Note 19: Regulation and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

60

Employee Retention Tax Credits

In the second quarters of 2025 and 2024, we recognized $10 million and $87 million, respectively, of employee retention tax credits, substantially all of which were classified in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of income. For more information, see “Note 7: Employee Retention Tax Credits” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

One Big Beautiful Bill

On July 4, 2025, the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2025 (commonly known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill” or “OBBB”) was signed into law. This comprehensive legislation made several significant changes to federal tax law, including:

•Permanently reinstating 100% bonus depreciation and adding 100% bonus deprecation for real property placed in service after January 19, 2025 and used in production activity.

•Permanently reinstating the immediate expensing of R&D in the U.S for years 2022 and beyond.

•Permanently restoring the EBITDA-based limitations for interest deduction under the IRS Tax Code.

In the third quarter of 2025, following the enactment of the OBBB, we reclassified approximately $77 million of deferred tax assets related to R&D capitalization to prepaid expenses and other current assets.

Sioux Falls Plant Construction

On February 16, 2026, we announced that we had initiated the approval process to construct a new state-of-the-art combined fresh pork and packaged meats processing facility in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The proposed facility would replace our existing 117-year-old plant currently located in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Our preliminary estimate of the proposed investment is up to $1.3 billion over the next three years. This investment is contingent on approval by the Company’s board of directors as well as permitting and other regulatory approvals. If approved, construction is anticipated to begin in the first half of 2027 with production estimated to commence by the end of 2028. Additionally, if the project moves forward, we plan to accelerate depreciation and may incur other incremental costs related to closing the existing plant, which are currently under evaluation.

Acquisitions

Nathan’s Famous

On January 20, 2026, we entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Nathan’s for $102.00 per share in cash. The acquisition is expected to be funded using cash on hand. Since March 2014, we have held an exclusive license to manufacture, distribute, market and sell “Nathan’s Famous” branded hot dogs, sausages, corned beef and certain other ancillary products through retail outlets in the U.S. and Canada and Sam’s Clubs in Mexico. The license is scheduled to expire in March 2032. The closing of the transaction is expected to occur in the first half of 2026, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions set forth in the merger agreement, including obtaining approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Nathan’s common stock, approval from CFIUS and other customary closing conditions.

Nashville, Tennessee Facility

On July 30, 2024, we acquired a dry sausage production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee from Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation for $38 million. The acquisition is part of our strategy to grow our value-added packaged meats business and serve the growing demand for high-quality pepperoni, salami, charcuterie and other dry sausage products.

61

Restructuring and Optimization

Springfield, Massachusetts Facility

On February 6, 2026, we announced our decision to exit our leased Springfield, Massachusetts dry sausage production facility by the end of August 2026 and consolidate production across our network, including at our recently acquired Nashville, Tennessee facility. The decision to close the Springfield facility is part of the Company’s ongoing efforts to optimize its manufacturing footprint and improve operational and cost efficiencies. The costs to close the facility are estimated to be approximately $10 million and primarily represent asset write-downs.

Elizabeth, New Jersey Facility

On June 30, 2025, we exited our leased Elizabeth, New Jersey facility, a small specialty dry sausage production facility, and consolidated production across our network. Costs associated with closing the plant primarily include equipment that we disposed of prior to the end of the asset’s useful life. The charges associated with the closing were not material.

Altoona, Iowa Facility

On August 30, 2024, we exited our leased Altoona, Iowa ham boning facility and consolidated production volume into other locations to improve manufacturing efficiencies. Charges associated with the closing were not material.

Administrative Process Optimization

In the fourth quarter of 2025, we commenced an initiative to modernize and optimize certain of our administrative and transactional processes. As part of this initiative, we will employ new and advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence and robotic process automation, that will allow us to drive significant improvements in operational efficiency and productivity. As a result of this initiative, we recognized $3 million in employee termination benefit costs in SG&A in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025 and anticipate additional one-time restructuring costs totaling approximately $11 million in fiscal year 2026.

Office Closures

In the second quarter of 2025, we announced a plan to close our satellite offices in Lisle, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri and move work performed at those locations to our headquarters in Smithfield, Virginia. As a result, we estimated and accrued $4 million of employee termination benefit costs in SG&A in the consolidated statement of income in the second quarter of 2025 for personnel who are not expected to relocate.

Workforce Reduction

In the first quarter of 2025, we implemented a reduction in workforce initiative to streamline our operations and reduce operating expenses. We eliminated certain corporate and plant positions and recognized employee termination benefit costs totaling $9 million in the consolidated statement of income in the first quarter of 2025 with $6 million classified in SG&A and $2 million classified in cost of sales.

Hog Production Reform

Beginning in 2023, as part of our Hog Production Reform initiative, we took a number of actions to optimize the size of our Hog Production segment’s operations and improve its cost structure, including ceasing certain farm operations, terminating certain agreements with underperforming contract farmers and reducing the size of our hog production business. We recognized charges totaling $31 million in cost of sales in fiscal year 2024 as a result of this initiative, including a $4 million loss on the sale of certain hog farms in Missouri, from which we received $32 million in proceeds.

Additionally, on December 17, 2024, we sold our hog production assets in Utah, excluding the live animals, for $58 million. The transaction resulted in a gain of $32 million, which was recognized in operating gains in the

62

consolidated statement of income in the fourth quarter of 2024. As part of the agreement, we leased back certain farm and feed properties that we continue to operate.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024, we became a member of a North Carolina-based company, Murphy Family Farms, by contributing $3 million in cash in exchange for a 25% minority interest. We additionally sold approximately 150,000 sows and related inventories located on Company-owned and contract farms in North Carolina to Murphy Family Farms. Subsequent to the end of fiscal year 2024, on December 30, 2024, we sold the commercial hog inventories associated with such sows to Murphy Family Farms. Murphy Family Farms is now a hog supplier to us and supplies approximately 3.2 million hogs annually. We supply animal feed and other supplies and provide certain support services to Murphy Family Farms.

On February 24, 2025, we became a member of a North Carolina-based company, VisionAg, by contributing $450,000 in cash in exchange for a 9% minority interest. We additionally sold approximately 28,000 sows and the associated commercial hog inventories located on certain Company-owned and contract farms in North Carolina to VisionAg. VisionAg is now a hog supplier to us and supplies approximately 600,000 hogs annually. We supply animal feed and provide certain support services to VisionAg.

European Carve-Out

On August 26, 2024, we completed a carve-out and transfer of our European operations to WH Group. As a result, we derecognized the assets and liabilities of our former European operations through equity. No gain or loss was recognized on the transaction. The historical results of operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows of the European operations have been condensed and reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20252024$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Sales$15,531$14,142$1,3899.8%
Cost of sales13,44212,2441,1979.8%
Gross profit2,0891,89719210.1%
Selling, general and administrative expenses84984091.1%
Operating gains(52)(60)8(12.9)%
Operating profit1,2921,11817515.6%
Interest expense, net4166(25)(38.1)%
Non-operating gains(18)(9)(9)103.3%
Income from continuing operations before income taxes1,2701,06120919.7%
Income tax expense283271124.5%
Income from equity method investments(12)(8)(4)51.9%
Net income from continuing operations99879820125.2%
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests1114(3)(21.7)%
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield$987$783$20426.0%

63

Operating Profit (Loss) by Segment

Fiscal Year
20252024$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$1,094$1,168$(74)(6.4)%
Fresh Pork214266(52)(19.7)%
Hog Production176(144)320NM
Other45351029.1%
Corporate expenses(128)(153)2616.8%
Unallocated (1)(109)(55)(55)(99.2)%
Operating profit$1,292$1,118$17515.6%

________________

(1)We do not allocate certain items to our operating segments such as litigation charges, exit and disposal costs, insurance recoveries, gains and losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets, accelerated depreciation, and employee termination benefits, among others.

Results of Operations Analysis

The following discussion provides an analysis of our results of operations for the fiscal year of 2025 compared to the fiscal year of 2024.

Sales

Fiscal Year
20252024$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Sales by segment:
Packaged Meats$8,757$8,319$4385.3%
Fresh Pork8,3447,8734716.0%
Hog Production3,3933,00239113.0%
Other5284715812.2%
Total segment sales21,02319,6651,3586.9%
Inter-segment sales eliminations:
Fresh Pork(3,327)(2,990)(337)11.3%
Hog Production(2,164)(2,533)369(14.6)%
Other(1)(1)(3.6)%
Total inter-segment sales eliminations(5,492)(5,524)32(0.6)%
Consolidated sales$15,531$14,142$1,3899.8%

Packaged Meats. Segment sales increased by $438 million, or 5.3%, primarily as a result of a 5.6% increase in average sales price. The increase in average sales price was primarily due to higher raw material costs, which translated into higher sales prices of our packaged meats products. Volume remained relatively consistent year-over-year.

Fresh Pork. Segment sales increased by $471 million, or 6.0%, primarily attributable to a 5.8% increase in our average sales price. The increase in the average sales price is directionally aligned with the 7.4% increase in the cut-

64

out values reported by the USDA, which averaged $1.03 per pound in 2025, primarily due to lower U.S. pork production coupled with continued strong demand for pork. Volume remained relatively consistent year-over-year.

Hog Production. Segment sales increased by $391 million, or 13.0%, primarily due to the following factors, which more than offset an approximately 3.4 million, or 23.4%, decrease in the number of market hogs sold due to our Hog Production Reform initiative:

•Sales of commercial hog inventories, transportation services and other ancillary goods and services to Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg totaling $363 million in 2025.

•A $411 million increase in grain and feed sales primarily attributable to our livestock feed supply agreements with Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg.

•An 8.9% increase in our average market hog sales price, inclusive of the effects of hedging, driven by an increase in the lean hog price index published by the CME.

Other. Segment sales increased by $58 million, or 12.2%, primarily due to an 11.5% increase in average sales price and a 6.4% increase in volume in our Mexico operations. The increase was partially offset by lower sales in our Bioscience operations.

Inter-segment Eliminations

•Fresh Pork. The increase in inter-segment sales by our Fresh Pork segment was attributable to higher market values for fresh pork components sold to our Packaged Meats segment, partially offset by a 0.6% decrease in sales volume.

•Hog Production. The decrease in inter-segment sales by our Hog Production segment was attributable to our strategic initiative to optimize our hog production operations, which reduced the number of hogs produced by our Hog Production segment, partially offset by an increase in the average sales price.

Cost of Sales

Fiscal Year
20252024$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$7,295$6,759$5367.9%
Fresh Pork7,9657,4195457.3%
Hog Production3,1793,104752.4%
Other4584124711.4%
Unallocated3674(38)(51.1)%
Inter-segment eliminations(5,492)(5,524)32(0.6)%
Cost of sales$13,442$12,244$1,1979.8%

Packaged Meats. Cost of sales in our Packaged Meats segment increased by $536 million, or 7.9%, driven primarily by the following factors, which more than offset lower freight and cold storage costs:

•A $525 million increase in raw material costs primarily attributable to the effect of higher fresh pork market prices.

•A $32 million decrease in employee retention tax credits.

Fresh Pork. Cost of sales in our Fresh Pork segment increased by $545 million, or 7.3%, driven primarily by the following factors, which more than offset lower manufacturing, freight and cold storage costs:

•A $579 million increase in raw material costs primarily attributable to higher market prices for hogs.

65

•A $35 million decrease in employee retention tax credits.

Hog Production. Cost of sales in our Hog Production segment increased by $75 million, or 2.4%, due to:

•A $412 million increase in the cost of grain and feed sales primarily attributable to our livestock feed supply agreements with Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg.

•The sale of commercial hog inventories, transportation services and other ancillary goods and services to Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg, which increased cost of sales by $319 million in fiscal year 2025.

•An $8 million decrease in employee retention tax credits.

These increases were partially offset by a $427 million decrease in raw material costs, a $174 million decrease in operating costs and a $62 million decrease in the cost of breeding stock sales, largely attributable to the reduction in the size of our hog production operations.

Other. Cost of sales in our Other segments increased by $47 million, or 11.4%, driven primarily by a $56 million increase in raw material costs in our Mexico operations. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in raw material costs in our Bioscience operations primarily due to lower sales volume.

Unallocated. Unallocated cost of sales decreased by $38 million, or 51.1%, primarily due to lower exit and disposal costs associated with Hog Production Reform.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Fiscal Year
20252024$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$367$394$(27)(6.8)%
Fresh Pork166188(22)(11.7)%
Hog Production3842(4)(8.7)%
Other25242.0%
Corporate expenses128154(26)(16.8)%
Unallocated1253887227.9%
Selling, general and administrative expenses$849$840$91.1%

SG&A increased by $9 million, or 1.1%, in fiscal year 2025, primarily due to the following factors, which more than offset various broad-based expense savings, including those attributable to our workforce reduction initiative:

•A $75 million increase in litigation charges in fiscal year 2025, which were not allocated to our operating segments.

•Accruals for employee termination benefits totaling $14 million in fiscal year 2025 related to our workforce reduction initiative and the decision to close our satellite offices in Lisle, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri. These charges were not allocated to our operating segments.

66

Operating Gains

The following table provides details of operating gains.

Fiscal Year
20252024
(in millions)
Insurance recoveries (1)$(37)$(9)
Gain on disposal of assets (2)(7)(43)
Other operating gains(8)(8)
Operating gains$(52)$(60)

________________

(1)Consists of gains recognized in connection with settlements of insurance claims associated with past litigation and property damage.

(2)     Fiscal year 2024 includes a $32 million gain on the sale of hog farms in Utah and a $6 million gain on the sale of assets to Murphy Family Farms in the fourth quarter of 2024.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net decreased by $25 million, or 38.1%, due to higher levels of cash and cash equivalents earning interest in the current year, which more than offset the impact of earning lower interest rates.

Non-Operating Gains

The following table provides details of non-operating (gains) losses.

Fiscal Year
20252024
(in millions)
Gain on assets held in rabbi trusts (1)$(34)$(16)
Net pension and postretirement benefits cost (2)1710
Other non-operating gains(1)(2)
Non-operating gains$(18)$(9)

________________

(1)Consists of assets held in rabbi trusts used to fund nonqualified defined benefit pension plans and deferred compensation plans. Fiscal year 2025 includes a $17 million gain recognized in the third quarter of 2025 for a one-time benefit on company-owned life insurance policies.

(2)Includes the components of net pension and postretirement benefits cost other than service cost, which is included in operating profit. These components consist of interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of actuarial gains/losses and prior service costs/credits, and curtailment gains.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense increased by $12 million, or 4.5%, in fiscal year 2025, primarily due to higher earnings year-over-year. Our effective tax rate attributable to continuing operations decreased to 22.3% in fiscal year 2025 compared to 25.5% in fiscal year 2024 primarily due to the conclusion of certain U.S. federal income tax matters in fiscal year 2024 and by a non-taxable gain recognized in fiscal year 2025 for a one-time benefit on company-owned life insurance policies. The decrease was partially offset by limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents on hand together with availability under our committed revolving credit facilities. As of December 28, 2025, we had $3,837 million of available liquidity consisting of $1,539 million in cash and cash equivalents and $2,298 million of availability under our committed credit facilities. Availability under our committed credit facilities is reduced by the principal amount of any outstanding commercial

67

paper. We believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations and commitments for at least the next twelve months.

Credit Facilities

December 28, 2025
FacilityCapacityBorrowing Base AdjustmentOutstanding BorrowingsCommercial Paper BorrowingsOutstanding Letters of CreditAmount Available
(in millions)
Senior Revolving Credit Facility$2,100$$$$$2,100
Securitization Facility225(27)198
Total credit facilities$2,325$$$$(27)$2,298

Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

In February 2025, we refinanced our $2,100 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Senior Revolving Credit Facility”), extending the maturity date from May 21, 2027 to February 12, 2030 with the option to extend the maturity date for up to two one-year periods, subject to obtaining the lenders’ consent and satisfaction of certain other conditions. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility capacity remains at $2,100 million. As part of the new agreement, there are no longer any subsidiary guarantors under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility which also released the subsidiary guarantors from our Senior Unsecured Notes. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at the Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.50% per annum, or, at our election, at a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50% per annum, in each case depending on our senior unsecured debt ratings. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility also contains financial maintenance covenants requiring us to maintain a maximum total consolidated leverage ratio (ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated capitalization, each as defined in the Senior Revolving Credit Facility) of 0.50 to 1.00 (which we may elect to increase to 0.55 to 1.00 with respect to any fiscal quarter in which a material acquisition is consummated and the immediately following three consecutive fiscal quarters, subject to certain restrictions) and a minimum interest coverage ratio (ratio of EBITDA to consolidated interest expense, each as defined in the Senior Revolving Credit Facility) of 3.50 to 1.00.

Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability and that of our subsidiaries to merge and consolidate with other companies, incur indebtedness, grant liens or security interests on assets subject to their security interest, or enter into transactions with affiliates, each subject to certain exceptions as set forth therein. We are currently in compliance with the covenants under our Senior Revolving Credit Facility.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility

We maintain a $225 million accounts receivable securitization facility (“Securitization Facility”), which matures in November 2027. As part of the Securitization Facility, certain accounts receivable of our major domestic meat processing subsidiaries are sold to a wholly-owned “bankruptcy remote” special purpose vehicle (“SPV”). The SPV pledges all such accounts receivable not otherwise sold pursuant to the Monetization Facility (as defined below) as security for loans made, and letters of credit issued, by participating lenders under the Securitization Facility. The SPV is included in our consolidated financial statements and therefore the accounts receivable owned by it are included in our consolidated balance sheets. However, the accounts receivable owned by the SPV are separate and distinct from our other assets and are not available to our other creditors should we become insolvent. As of December 28, 2025, the SPV held $654 million of accounts receivable. We must maintain certain ratios related to the collection of our receivables as a condition of the Securitization Facility agreement. As of December 28, 2025, we had $27 million in letters of credit issued under the Securitization Facility. None of the letters of credit were drawn upon.

68

Monetization Facility

On July 22, 2025, we terminated an uncommitted $250 million accounts receivable monetization facility (“Monetization Facility”) and paid $232 million to participating banks to reacquire the outstanding balance of accounts receivable previously sold under the facility. The Monetization Facility was originally established to provide us with additional liquidity and working capital flexibility. In light of our liquidity position and internal capital resources as of July 22, 2025, we determined that the Monetization Facility was no longer cost-effective or necessary. There were no early termination penalties or other material exit costs incurred in connection with the termination of the Monetization Facility.

Cash Flows From Operating Activities of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20252024
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$998$970
Less: Net income from discontinued operations(172)
Net income from continuing operations$998$798
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization332339
Deferred income tax expense9491
Stock compensation expense9
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets12(21)
Income from equity method investments(12)(8)
Gain on assets held in rabbi trusts(34)(16)
Change in accounts receivable(470)(6)
Change in inventories118138
Change in prepaid expenses and other current assets(6)(88)
Change in accounts payable65(19)
Change in accrued expenses and other current liabilities(63)(261)
Other17(32)
Net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations$1,059$916

The increase in net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations year-over-year was primarily driven by higher earnings, partially offset by changes in working capital. The following describes the significant changes in working capital:

•Accounts receivable. Accounts receivable increased in fiscal year 2025 primarily driven by the termination of our Monetization Facility in July 2025 and the sale of commercial hog inventories and feed to Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg.

•Inventories. Inventories decreased in fiscal year 2025 primarily driven by lower hog inventory volumes, reflecting the sale of commercial hog inventories to Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg, partially offset by higher meat inventories primarily driven by higher market prices. Inventories decreased in fiscal year 2024 primarily due to lower commodity prices for feed grains and lower inventory volumes attributable to Hog Production Reform decisions.

•Prepaid expenses and other current assets. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased in fiscal year 2024 largely due to an increase in income taxes receivable, which was primarily driven by a tax

69

benefit recognized in connection with the carve-out of our European operations, and an increase in prepaid deposits for grain in Mexico.

•Accounts payable. Accounts payable increased in fiscal year 2025 primarily due to purchases of commercial hog inventories from Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg.

•Accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased in fiscal year 2025 largely due to lower accrued payroll expenses resulting from recent reductions in workforce and a change in our policies for paid time off. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased in fiscal year 2024 largely due to payments related to litigation settlements and our Hog Production Reform activities.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20252024
(in millions)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures$(341)$(350)
Net expenditures from breeding stock transactions(14)(43)
Investments in partnerships and other assets(12)(13)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets1499
Cash receipts on notes receivable25
Other189
Net cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations$(309)$(298)

The following items explain the significant investing activities:

•Capital expenditures. Capital expenditures for both periods consisted primarily of various plant automation and improvement projects. Fiscal year 2024 also includes $33 million for the purchase of a dry sausage production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee.

•Investments in partnerships and other assets. We made capital contributions totaling $7 million and $5 million to a biogas joint venture in fiscal years 2025 and 2024, respectively. Also, in fiscal year 2024, we became a member of, and contributed $3 million to, Murphy Family Farms.

•Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets. In fiscal year 2025, we received $7 million for the sale of hog farms in Missouri. In fiscal year 2024, we received $58 million and $32 million for the sale of hog farms in Utah and Missouri, respectively.

•Cash receipts on notes receivable. Cash receipts on notes receivable primarily consists of payments from Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg related to sales of breeding stock and related assets, which we financed through interest-bearing notes.

70

Cash Flows From Financing Activities of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20252024
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of dividends$(396)$(288)
Principal payments on long-term debt and finance lease obligations(3)(24)
Payment of deferred purchase consideration for acquisition(2)(2)
Repayments to Securitization Facility(14)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility14
Net repayments to revolving credit facilities(8)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock236
Other11
Net cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations$(164)$(321)

The following items explain the significant financing activities:

•Payment of dividends. In both periods, $1 million of dividends was paid to the noncontrolling interest (“NCI”) holder of our consolidated subsidiary, Altosano, and the remainder was paid to our shareholders.

•Net proceeds from issuance of common stock. In the first quarter of 2025, we received $236 million in net proceeds from our IPO after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and fees.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our cash requirements for long-term contractual obligations and commitments as of December 28, 2025 are presented in the following table:

Due Date by Period
202620272028202920302031 & thereafterTotal
(in millions)
Debt principal payments (1)$$600$$400$500$500$2,000
Debt interest payments74514933259242
Guaranteed royalty payments (2)15161616171797
Lease obligations (3)9280684128197506
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations (4)26204
Commitments to investees (5)198
Purchase commitments:
Hog procurement (6)2,9941,8251,3831,1777927928,964
Contract hog growers (7)267144130672989727
Grain procurement (8)9999
Other7218161616198335
Other long-term liabilities (9)174
Total$3,640$2,734$1,662$1,751$1,408$1,802$13,546

________________

(1)In the event of default on a payment, acceleration of principal payments could occur.

(2)Represents guaranteed royalty payments to license the Nathan’s Famous brand. These payments would cease if the acquisition of Nathan’s is successfully completed.

71

(3)Amounts presented for lease obligations represent the undiscounted contractual lease payments for our operating and finance lease obligations. For more information on leases, see “Note 12: Lease Obligations, Commitments and Guarantees” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(4)We historically provided the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. Funding requirements for our pension plans are determined based on the funded status measured at the end of each year. The values of our pension obligation and related assets may fluctuate significantly, which may in turn lead to a larger underfunded status in our pension plans and a higher funding requirement. The funding requirement for our qualified pension plans in fiscal year 2026 is expected to be $5 million. We also expect to contribute $22 million to our non-qualified pension plans to cover expected benefit payments. We are unable to reliably estimate the amount and timing of the remaining payments beyond fiscal year 2026, therefore we have only the estimated funding for fiscal year 2026 and the total liability as of December 28, 2025 in the table above. For more information, see “Note 14: Pension and Other Retirement Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(5)In 2019, we announced that we planned to contribute up to $250 million to our joint venture, Align RNG, LLC (“Align”) through 2028 to fund various projects as approved by Align’s board from time to time. As of December 28, 2025, we had contributed $121 million in capital toward these planned contributions. Should the board, of which we have 50% of the voting power, choose not to approve additional projects, the remaining contributions would not be required. Additionally, we have committed to contribute up to $25 million to the TPG Rise Climate investment fund through July 2027. As of December 28, 2025, we had contributed $21 million in capital toward this commitment. Lastly, we have capital support agreements with Murphy Family Farms and VisionAg whereby we are committed to advance up to $50 million and $15 million, respectively, to cover operating costs if certain conditions are met. No such advances have been made. We are unable to reliably estimate if or when any of these commitments will be drawn upon.

(6)Through the Fresh Pork segment, we have purchase agreements with certain independent suppliers. Some of these arrangements obligate us to purchase all of the hogs produced by these suppliers. Other arrangements obligate us to purchase a fixed amount of hogs. Due to the uncertainty of the number of hogs that we are obligated to purchase and the uncertainty of market prices at the time of hog purchases, we have estimated our obligations under these arrangements. Future payments were estimated using current live hog market prices, available futures contract prices and internal projections adjusted for historical quality premiums.

(7)Through the Hog Production segment, we use contract farmers and their facilities to raise hogs produced from our breeding stock. Under multi-year contracts, the farmers provide the initial facility investment, labor and front-line management in exchange for a performance-based service fee payable upon delivery. We are obligated to pay this service fee for all hogs delivered. We have estimated our obligation based on expected hogs delivered from these farmers.

(8)Includes fixed-price forward grain purchase contracts totaling $67 million. Also includes unpriced forward grain purchase contracts which, if valued using market prices as of December 28, 2025, would be $33 million. These forward grain contracts are accounted for as normal purchases. As a result, they are not recorded in the balance sheet.

(9)Other long-term liabilities consist of long-term casualty insurance reserves, deferred compensation and unrecognized tax benefits, among others. We are unable to estimate reliably the timing of settlement of these liabilities.

Other Anticipated or Potential Cash Requirements

Capital Expenditures

The Company remains in a strong financial position due to its robust cash flows, liquidity, and solid balance sheet. We plan to continue to support the business in 2026 through capital expenditures in the range of $350 million to $450 million, inclusive of profit improvement projects, such as packaged meats capacity expansion and automation, as well as repairs and maintenance.

If approved by our board of directors and completed on the expected schedule, we estimate that our investment in a new fresh pork and packaged meats processing facility in Sioux Falls, South Dakota will be up to $1.3 billion over the next three years.

Nathan’s Famous

We expect to pay approximately $450 to $500 million for our pending acquisition of Nathan’s, including transaction costs and the payoff of assumed debt. The transaction is expected to close during the first half of 2026, subject to obtaining regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.

Dividends

Returning cash to shareholders in the form of dividends is also a top priority for the Company. In fiscal year 2025, we paid dividends of $1.00 per share. On March 23, 2026, our Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.3125

72

per share of common stock, which is payable on April 21, 2026, to shareholders of record on April 7, 2026. We anticipate the remaining quarterly dividends in fiscal year 2026 will be $0.3125 per share, resulting in an annual dividend rate in fiscal year 2026 of $1.25 per share. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board and depends on various factors, including our net income, financial condition, cash requirements, business prospects, and other factors that our Board deems relevant to its analysis and decision making.

Monarch Sale Notice

On January 16, 2025, TPG Rise Climate (“TPG”), one of the other two equal joint venture partners in Monarch Bio Energy, LLC (“Monarch”), delivered a sale notice under the joint venture agreement, which required Monarch to pursue a sale of the joint venture. A sale has not yet occurred and as a result, TPG may require that Monarch purchase TPG’s ownership interest in Monarch.

Altosano Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

The NCI holder in Altosano currently has the right to exercise a put option that would obligate us to redeem 40% of their interest. After December 31, 2027 the NCI holder in Altosano has the right to exercise a put option for the remainder of their interest. The redemption value for the NCI is fair value. As of December 28, 2025, the value of the NCI on our consolidated balance sheet was $264 million.

Contingent Losses

The consolidated financial statements reflect accruals for contingent losses associated with various claims. Legal expenses incurred in our and our subsidiaries’ defense of these claims and any payments made to plaintiffs through unfavorable verdicts or otherwise could negatively impact our cash flows and our liquidity position. For more information on contingencies, refer to “Note 19: Regulation and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Risk Management Activities

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and “Note 8: Derivative Financial Instruments” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decreases, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers and counterparties to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increases, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. Over the past three years, the maximum amount of margin deposits held by our brokers and counterparties at any given time was $121 million.

The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities historically have tended to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

Guarantees

In the second quarter of 2025, Monarch refinanced its debt, repaying a debt facility of up to $61 million that Smithfield and certain other joint ventures partners in Monarch had joint and severally guaranteed. Smithfield was released from the guaranty and no longer provides a guaranty of Monarch’s debt.

73

Non-GAAP Measures

In arriving at our presentation of non-GAAP financial measures, we exclude items that have an impact on our income statement that, in the judgment of our management, are items that, either as a result of their nature or size, could, were they not identified, potentially cause investors to extrapolate future performance from an improper base. While not all inclusive, examples of these items include:

•loss contingencies, due to the difficulty in predicting future events, their timing and size;

•transactions or events that are not part of our core business activities or are unusual in their nature (whether gains or losses); and

•the tax effects of the foregoing items.

Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to Smithfield and Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations per Common Share Attributable to Smithfield

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield to adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield. Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield and adjusted net income from continuing operations per common share attributable to Smithfield are non-GAAP measures. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful for investors because they exclude the effects of items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. Although we believe these non-GAAP measures provide a better comparison of our year-over-year performance and are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools. As such, adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield and adjusted net income from continuing operations per common share attributable to Smithfield are not intended to be alternatives to net income from continuing operations, net income from continuing operations per common share or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

74

Fiscal YearAffected income statementaccount
20252024
(in millions, except per share data)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield$987$783
Litigation charges73SG&A
Reduction in workforce (1)9SG&A
Reduction in workforce (1)2Cost of sales
Office closures (2)4SG&A
Hog Production Reform (3)531Cost of sales
Hog Production Reform (4)(4)(38)Operating gains
Plant closure2Cost of sales
Incremental costs from destruction of property4Cost of sales
Employee retention tax credits (5)(10)(86)Cost of sales
Employee retention tax credits (5)(1)SG&A
Insurance recoveries (6)(36)(4)Operating gains
Company-owned life insurance gain (7)(17)Non-operating gains
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (8)(11)24Income tax expense
Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield$1,002$714
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield per diluted common share$2.51$2.06
Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield per diluted common share$2.55$1.88

________________

(1)Consists of severance costs associated with workforce reduction initiatives. Total severance costs round up to $12 million.

(2)Consists of severance costs associated with the planned closure of our satellite offices in Lisle, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri.

(3)Consists of contract termination costs, loss on asset disposals, employee termination benefits, accelerated depreciation charges and other exit costs associated with our Hog Production Reform initiative.

(4)    Fiscal year 2025 includes a $3 million gain on the sale of certain of our hog farms in Missouri. Fiscal year 2024 includes a $32 million gain on the sale of hog farms in Utah and a $6 million gain on the sale of assets to Murphy Family Farms.

(5)    Represents the recognition of employee retention tax credits received under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.

(6)    Consists of gains recognized in connection with settlements of insurance claims associated with past litigation and property damage.

(7)    Consists of a gain recognized in the third quarter of 2025 for a one-time benefit on company-owned life insurance policies.

(8)    Represents the tax effects of the non-GAAP adjustments based on a statutory tax rate of 25.7%.

EBITDA from Continuing Operations, Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations to EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. EBITDA from continuing operations, adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations are non-GAAP measures. We believe EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure to our stakeholders because it excludes the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating interest and depreciation costs to provide a comparable year-over-year analysis. We believe adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure as it excludes the effect of discontinued operations, non-operating gains and losses, and other items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. We believe adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations is a useful measure as it evaluates overall operating performance, ability to pursue and service possible debt opportunities and possible future investment opportunities.

75

We believe these non-GAAP measures provide a more comparable year-over-year analysis. Although these non-GAAP measures are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools. As such, EBITDA from continuing operations, adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations are not intended to be alternatives to net income from continuing operations or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

Fiscal YearAffected Income Statement Account
20252024
(in millions, except percentages)
Net income from continuing operations$998$798
Interest expense, net4166
Income tax expense283271
Depreciation and amortization332339
EBITDA from continuing operations$1,654$1,474
Litigation charges73SG&A
Reduction in workforce (1)9SG&A
Reduction in workforce (1)2Cost of sales
Office closures (2)4SG&A
Hog Production Reform (3)329Cost of sales
Hog Production Reform (4)(4)(38)Operating gains
Plant closure (5)1Cost of sales
Incremental costs from destruction of property4Cost of sales
Employee retention tax credits (6)(10)(86)Cost of sales
Employee retention tax credits (6)(1)SG&A
Insurance recoveries (7)(36)(4)Operating gains
Company-owned life insurance gain (8)(17)Non-operating gains
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations$1,677$1,379
Net income margin from continuing operations6.4%5.6%
Adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations10.8%9.7%

________________

(1)Consists of severance costs associated with workforce reduction initiatives. Total severance costs round up to $12 million.

(2)Consists of severance costs associated with the planned closure of our satellite offices in Lisle, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri.

(3)Consists of contract termination costs, loss on asset disposals, employee termination benefits and other exit costs associated with our Hog Production Reform initiative. Excludes accelerated depreciation charges as such amounts are included in the depreciation and amortization line in this table.

(4)Fiscal year 2025 includes a $3 million gain on the sale of certain of our hog farms in Missouri. Fiscal year 2024 includes a $32 million gain on the sale of hog farms in Utah and a $6 million gain on the sale of assets to Murphy Family Farms.

(5)Excludes accelerated depreciation charges as such amounts are included in the depreciation and amortization line in this table.

(6)Represents the recognition of employee retention tax credits received under the CARES Act.

(7)Consists of gains recognized in connection with settlements of insurance claims associated with past litigation and property damage.

(8)Consists of a gain recognized in the third quarter of 2025 for a one-time benefit on company-owned life insurance policies.

76

Net Debt and Ratio of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations

The following table provides a reconciliation of total debt and finance lease obligations to net debt, the ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income from continuing operations, and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. Net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are non-GAAP measures. We believe net debt is a useful measure as it helps to give investors a clear understanding of our financial position. Net debt is also used to calculate certain leverage ratios. We believe the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure as it monitors the sustainability of our debt levels and our ability to take on additional debt against adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations, which is used as an operating performance measure. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide a more comparable year-over-year analysis. Although net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, these non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools. As such, net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are not intended to be alternatives to total debt and finance lease obligations and the ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income from continuing operations or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

Fiscal Year Ended
December 28, 2025December 29, 2024
(in millions, except ratios)
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease$3$3
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations2,0001,999
Total debt and finance lease obligations$2,003$2,002
Cash and cash equivalents(1,539)(943)
Net debt$464$1,059
Net income from continuing operations$998$798
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations$1,677$1,379
Ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income from continuing operations2.0x2.5x
Ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations0.3x0.8x

Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted Operating Profit Margin

The following table provides a reconciliation of operating profit to adjusted operating profit. Adjusted operating profit and adjusted operating profit margin are non-GAAP measures. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful to investors because they provide a better understanding of underlying operating results and trends of established, ongoing operations of our segments, excluding the impact of items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. These non-GAAP measures are not intended to be alternatives to operating profit, operating profit margin or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

77

Fiscal Year 2025Packaged MeatsFresh PorkHog ProductionOther (1)Corporate (2)Unallocated (3)Consolidated
(in millions, except percentages)
Operating profit (loss)$1,094$214$176$45$(128)$(109)$1,292
Litigation charges7373
Reduction in workforce (4)1212
Office closures (5)44
Plant closure22
Hog Production Reform11
Employee retention tax credits (6)(5)(5)(10)
Insurance recoveries (7)(36)(36)
Adjusted operating profit (loss)$1,089$209$176$45$(128)$(55)$1,336
Operating profit margin12.5%2.6%5.2%8.6%NMNM8.3%
Adjusted operating profit margin12.4%2.5%5.2%8.6%NMNM8.6%
Fiscal Year 2024Packaged MeatsFresh PorkHog ProductionOther (1)Corporate (2)Unallocated (3)Consolidated
(in millions, except percentages)
Operating profit (loss)$1,168$266$(144)$35$(153)$(55)$1,118
Incremental costs from destruction of property44
Insurance recoveries (7)(4)(4)
Hog Production Reform (8)(7)(7)
Employee retention tax credits (6)(38)(41)(8)(87)
Adjusted operating profit (loss)$1,130$225$(152)$35$(153)$(61)$1,024
Operating profit (loss) margin14.0%3.4%(4.8)%7.4%NMNM7.9%
Adjusted operating profit (loss) margin13.6%2.9%(5.0)%7.4%NMNM7.2%

________________

(1)Includes our Mexico and Bioscience operations.

(2)Represents general corporate expenses for management and administration of the business.

(3)We do not allocate certain items to our operating segments such as litigation charges, exit and disposal costs, insurance recoveries, gains and losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets, accelerated depreciation, and employee termination benefits, among others.

(4)Consists of severance costs associated with workforce reduction initiatives.

(5)Consists of severance costs associated with the planned closure of our satellite offices in Lisle, Illinois and Kansas City, Missouri.

(6)Represents the recognition of employee retention tax credits received under the CARES Act.

(7)Consists of gains recognized in connection with settlements of insurance claims associated with past litigation and property damage.

(8)Consists of a $32 million gain on the sale of our Utah hog farms and a $6 million gain on the sale of breeding stock to Murphy Family Farms, partially offset by contract termination costs, loss on asset disposals, employee termination benefits, accelerated depreciation charges and other exit costs associated with our Hog Production Reform initiative.

78

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on our judgment, experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of our accounting estimates are considered critical as they are both important to the representation of our financial condition and results of operations and require significant or complex judgment on the part of management. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates that we consider to be critical. Our accounting policies are more fully discussed in “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue (sales) is primarily derived from contracts with customers for the purchase of our products. Revenue is recognized at a point in time when our performance obligation has been satisfied and control of the promised goods is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon shipment or delivery to a customer based on the terms of the sale. The primary performance obligation in our contracts with customers is to provide meat products. Shipping and handling activities are considered part of the fulfillment of our promise to provide meat products and not a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are reported as a component of cost of sales.

Revenue is recorded at the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing goods to customers. The transaction price may include estimates of variable consideration, including a variety of customer sales incentive programs, such as rebates, product returns and coupons redeemed by consumers. Our estimates of variable consideration are based on a number of factors including history with the respective customer, current performance and future projections. We sufficiently constrain estimates of variable consideration based on the likelihood and magnitude of a potential revenue reversal when the uncertainties associated with the variable consideration are subsequently resolved.

We review and update estimates of variable consideration regularly. We have not experienced any material reversals of revenue recognized in the past three fiscal years resulting from overestimation of variable consideration nor do we expect there will be a material change in our estimates of variable consideration that would result in a material reversal of revenue recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The effect of any reversal of revenue would be recognized in the period in which an adjustment to our estimate is identified.

Contingent Liabilities

We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to the operation of our farms and facilities, labor, livestock procurement, securities, the environment, our products, taxes and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of loss. A determination of the amount of accruals and disclosures required, if any, are made after considerable analysis of each individual issue or claim.

We accrue for contingent liabilities, including future defense costs, when an assessment of the risk of loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We disclose contingent liabilities when the risk of loss is reasonably possible or probable.

Our contingent liabilities contain uncertainties because the eventual outcome will result from future events. Our determination of accruals requires estimates and judgments related to the possible outcomes, differing interpretations of the law, assessments of the amounts of potential damages, settlements or defense costs, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.

The consolidated financial statements reflect accruals for estimated contingent losses associated with various claims. These matters will not affect our profits or losses in future periods unless our accruals prove to be insufficient or excessive. However, legal expenses incurred in our defense of legal matters and any payments made to plaintiffs through unfavorable verdicts or otherwise will negatively impact our cash flows and our liquidity position.

79

If actual results are not consistent with the estimates or assumptions used to develop our accruals for contingent losses, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could have a material effect on our future results of operations and cash flows.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually on the first day of the fourth quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. In the evaluation of goodwill for impairment, we may perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is not, no further analysis is required. If it is, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any.

To identify if an impairment exists, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated by applying valuation multiples of earnings and/or estimating future discounted cash flows. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

For our other non-amortizable intangible assets, if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The selection of earnings multiples is dependent upon assumptions regarding future levels of operating performance as well as business trends and prospects, and industry, market and economic conditions. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. When estimating future discounted cash flows, we consider the assumptions that hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount rate is used, based on an industry-wide average cost of capital or location-specific economic factors. We consider all these factors to be level 3 inputs, as defined in “Note 17: Fair Value Measurements” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The fair values of our trademarks have been estimated using a royalty rate method. Assumptions about royalty rates are based on the rates at which similar brands and trademarks are licensed in the marketplace.

Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.

As of December 28, 2025, we had $1,623 million of goodwill and $1,216 million of non-amortizable trademarks. Our goodwill is included in the following reporting units:

•Packaged Meats: $1,503 million

•Mexico: $79 million

•Fresh Pork: $34 million

•Hog Production: $4 million

•Bioscience: $4 million

We have not recognized an impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets in the past three fiscal years. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units would not result in an impairment. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our intangible assets also would not result in an impairment.

Income Taxes

We estimate total income tax expense based on statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in various jurisdictions in which we earn income.

80

Federal income taxes include an estimate for taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be remitted to the U.S. and be taxable, but not for earnings considered indefinitely invested in the foreign subsidiary. We account for the global intangible low-taxed income inclusion from foreign subsidiaries in the period in which it is incurred.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.

We record liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits based on our analysis of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We record these liabilities using a two-step process in which (1) we evaluate whether we believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority. The difference between the tax benefit claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return and the amount recognized for financial reporting purposes is recorded as a liability.

The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. Changes in current tax laws and rates could affect recorded tax assets and liabilities in the future. In addition, changes in projected future earnings could affect the recorded valuation allowances in the future.

Our analysis of unrecognized tax benefits requires considerable judgment about the likelihood and amount of benefit that would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.

Due to the complexity and inherent uncertainties surrounding income tax positions, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our recorded liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would require use of cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

Over the past three fiscal years, we have recognized $66 million of income tax expense in years subsequent to the initial recognition and measurement of an unrecognized tax benefit. No payments were made to tax authorities in fiscal year 2025 upon the ultimate resolution of unrecognized tax benefits taken in prior years.

See “Note 13: Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pension Accounting

We historically provided the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. In the second quarter of 2021, we amended our qualified pension plans to freeze the benefit accrual for all non-union participants as of June 30, 2021.

We recognize the funded status of our pension plans in our consolidated balance sheets and recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost.

We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of our pension obligation and related costs. The measurement of our pension obligations and related costs is dependent on the use of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions include discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, salary growth rates and mortality rates. Changes in assumptions and future investment returns could potentially have a material impact on our expenses and related funding requirements.

81

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our benefit obligation and net benefit cost for fiscal year 2025:

•5.78% – Discount rate to determine net benefit cost;

•5.69% – Discount rate to determine pension benefit obligation; and

•7.25% – Expected return on plan assets.

If actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. The effects of actual results differing from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in such future periods.

A 0.50% decrease in the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation would have further reduced the funded status by $100 million as of December 28, 2025, and would have resulted in an additional $3 million in net pension cost in fiscal year 2025.

A 0.50% decrease in expected return on plan assets would have resulted in an additional $8 million in net pension cost in fiscal year 2025.

In addition to higher net pension cost, a significant decrease in the funded status of our pension plans caused by either a devaluation of plan assets or a decline in the discount rate would result in higher pension funding requirements.

See “Note 14: Pension and Other Retirement Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information about our accounting for pension and retirement plans.

Derivative Accounting

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices. Our objective is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with fluctuations in commodity prices.

We record all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet, with the exception of contracts that qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale scope exception, which are expected to result in physical delivery. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it qualifies and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method).

We apply hedge accounting when the change in the market value of derivative contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. If it is determined that the derivative instruments are no longer effective at offsetting changes in the price of the hedged items, then the mark-to-market method must be applied to account for the derivative instruments prospectively, which could increase volatility in our results of operations. We recognized $8 million, $(25) million and $18 million in gains (losses) on derivatives accounted for under the mark-to-market method in fiscal years 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively.

For additional information on derivatives, refer to “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 8: Derivative Financial Instruments” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which includes detailed discussions of our accounting for and use of derivative instruments.

82

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a description of recently issued accounting pronouncements, refer to “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

MD&A history

Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.

FY 2024 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000091388-25-000017.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2025-03-25. Report date: 2024-12-29.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis includes the results of operations and financial conditions, including year-over-year comparisons, for fiscal years 2024 and 2023. For discussion and analysis of fiscal year 2022, including a year-over-year comparison of fiscal years 2023 and 2022, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our final prospectus, dated January 27, 2025, for our IPO, filed with the SEC under Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act on January 29, 2025. The information reflects all normal recurring adjustments which we believe are necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for all periods included. Totals and percentages may be affected by rounding. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Overview

We are an American food company that employs approximately 34,000 people in the U.S. and 2,500 people in Mexico. We boast a portfolio of high-quality, iconic brands, such as Smithfield®, Eckrich® and Nathan’s Famous®, among many others. We are a majority owned subsidiary of Hong Kong-based WH Group.

We conduct our operations through three reportable segments: Packaged Meats, Fresh Pork, and Hog Production. We also conduct operations that do not constitute reportable segments, which include our Mexico and Bioscience operations.

Our fiscal year is the 52-week or 53-week period which ends on the Sunday nearest to December 31. Fiscal years 2024 and 2023 each consisted of 52-weeks.

For a more comprehensive overview of our company and operations, refer to “Item 1. Business” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Growth Strategies

The strategic initiatives we are executing across our segments are complemented and enabled by our strong balance sheet and ongoing operational investments, positioning us for future growth. We have several strategic initiatives to grow our business, reduce costs and enhance our profitability and margins. These include:

•driving growth in our Packaged Meats segment;

•further enhancing the profitability of our Fresh Pork segment;

•continuing to invest in innovation;

•optimizing operational and supply chain efficiencies; and

•executing synergistic and complementary mergers and acquisitions.

For a more comprehensive discussion of our growth strategies, refer to “Item 1. Business—Our Growth Strategies” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The following are key factors that have influenced our results of operations in the past and may influence our results in the future.

Sales Drivers

We are focused on driving profitable growth through our Packaged Meats segment. Within the Packaged Meats segment, the primary factors impacting sales of our brands are household penetration, consumption levels, price

60

point and product offerings. As a result, we have pursued strategies that we believe best align our products with consumer trends and behavior. We have shifted our portfolio towards a higher mix of value-added and margin accretive products while leveraging the breadth of our offerings to further penetrate across dayparts. We look to increase brand awareness and encourage consumer adoption of our products through product and packaging innovation and effective and appealing marketing strategies while maintaining our promise to consumers to offer high-quality products for every budget. We have also expanded to new categories and grown distribution of under-indexed brands in under-penetrated locations. In addition to the prior initiatives, we also seek to increase sales in packaged meats products by driving volumes of our private label and foodservice products, by expanding our customer relationships and by offering quality selections across the value chain.

The U.S. packaged meats market is supported by long-term secular tailwinds, including consumer demand for high-protein diets, high-quality nutrition, product versatility and convenience. We expect these tailwinds to continue to drive increases in overall meat consumption. Nevertheless, changes in market trends and consumer preferences could adversely affect our results of operations.

In our Fresh Pork segment, the primary drivers of external sales are the consistent level of global pork consumption, our ability to maximize the value of each hog and our ability to leverage our different end markets including retail, foodservice, industrial and export channels. Through ongoing product innovation, we seek to appeal to ever-changing consumer preferences, including demand for convenience and smaller portion sizes as well as expanded interests in new and varied flavors. We also seek to capitalize on export markets as an outlet for increasing the value of raw materials through whole-hog utilization and by appealing to differentiated, global tastes and preferences.

Cost Factors

Our cost as a percentage of sales varies based on fluctuations of raw materials prices, as well as manufacturing, distribution and marketing costs. Raw materials are the largest component of our total cost of goods sold, with feed ingredients and hogs accounting for the majority share. Approximately 80% of the raw materials used in the Packaged Meats segment is sourced internally from our Fresh Pork segment, and about half of the hogs used in the Fresh Pork segment are supplied by our Hog Production segment. In the Hog Production segment, in fiscal year 2024, approximately 60% of cost of goods sold was from animal feed, which is derived primarily from corn and soybean meal. The price of feed ingredients, hogs and pork fluctuates based on market dynamics which can affect our margins. We enter into hedging transactions for these commodities when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also reduces the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices.

We continue to optimize the size of our hog production operations and procure a greater mix of hogs from independent suppliers with market-based supply agreements in order to supply our Fresh Pork segment. We have reduced the size of our internal hog production from a peak of 17.6 million head in 2019 to 14.6 million head in 2024, and we continue to explore opportunities for reduced internal production. We expect to produce approximately 11.5 million head in 2025, which would represent approximately 40% of the hogs processed by our Fresh Pork segment.

We are pursuing best-in-class manufacturing principles in our plants by employing automation to redeploy labor to higher value tasks, increasing yields and driving efficiency by reducing complexity. In our logistics and distribution network, we have reduced transportation and warehousing costs by improving transportation carrier mix, maximizing utilization of our cold storage and trucking assets, improving supply and demand planning and optimizing inventory levels.

Our results of operations will continue to depend on our ability to (1) manage raw material cost movements through optimizing our hog production operations, hedging, forward purchasing, strategic sourcing negotiations and passing inflationary cost increases to customers, (2) operate our manufacturing and logistics footprint efficiently and competitively and (3) continue to attract and retain customers and consumers through effective sales and marketing spend.

61

Tariffs

We export our products to over 30 countries, including China, Mexico and Canada, and we are engaged in a joint venture in Mexico. For the year ended December 29, 2024, U.S. export sales accounted for 13% of our total sales.

Because of the growing market share of U.S. pork products in the international markets, U.S. exporters are increasingly being affected by measures taken by importing countries to protect local producers. Our international sales and operations are subject to various risks related to economic or political uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks posed by the imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other trade protection measures that may be taken by various countries.

In February 2025, the current U.S. administration issued executive orders announcing a 10% tariff on most imported goods from China and 25% tariffs on most imported goods from Mexico and Canada. The China tariff went into effect on February 4, 2025 and the tariffs on Mexico and Canada went into effect on March 4, 2025. The China tariff was increased by an additional 10% effective March 4, 2025. However, on March 6, 2025, President Trump announced that the proposed tariffs on imported goods from Canada and Mexico that are covered by the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement will be suspended until April 2, 2025.

China responded by imposing an additional 15% tariff on U.S. chicken, wheat, corn and cotton products and an additional 10% tariff on pork, among other products, increasing the tariff rate on pork from 37% to 47%. Officials from Mexico and Canada have announced that they anticipate imposing retaliatory tariffs.

Our primary raw materials, including hogs, feed grains and meat, are sourced primarily in the U.S. Tariffs imposed on U.S. exports of these items could increase U.S. supplies of these items and therefore, reduce our raw material costs. On the other hand, the U.S. pork industry depends on free and open export markets to support growth. China, Mexico and Canada are three of our largest export markets. Tariffs imposed on U.S. pork exports could increase U.S. pork supplies, which would also affect the price of pork in the U.S. We could also experience a decrease in demand or lose customers due to anti-American sentiment. Any of the above could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Recent Developments

The following events and transactions have had, and/or will have, an impact on our results of operations and/or financial condition:

Initial Public Offering. On January 29, 2025, we completed our IPO of 26,086,958 shares of common stock, which represents 7% of the total outstanding shares, at a price of $20.00 per share. We issued 13,043,479 shares of common stock bringing the total number of outstanding shares to 393,112,711. The remaining 13,043,479 shares of common stock were sold by our existing shareholder. Our existing shareholder granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,913,042 additional shares of our common stock. On February 20, 2025, the underwriters partially exercised such option and purchased 2,506,936 additional shares of common stock from our existing shareholder. We received net proceeds from the IPO of approximately $236 million after deducting underwriting discounts, commissions and fees. As a result of the IPO, our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker “SFD.”

In connection with the IPO, we granted to our directors and certain of our employees and certain directors and employees of WH Group:

•options to purchase 9,822,467 shares with an exercise price equal to the IPO price and an aggregate grant date fair value of $30 million; and

•1,527,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with an aggregate grant date fair value of $31 million.

Both the options and RSUs vest over a five year period, with 20% vesting each year. We expect to recognize an aggregate of $49 million in compensation expense over the five-year vesting period of these awards, of which we estimate that the amount recognized in 2025 will be $9 million.

62

Altoona, Iowa Facility Closure. On August 30, 2024, we closed our Altoona, Iowa ham boning facility and consolidated production volume into other locations to improve manufacturing efficiencies. Costs associated with closing the plant primarily include operating lease assets and equipment that we disposed of prior to the expiration of the lease term or end of the asset’s useful life. The charges associated with the closing were not material. Altoona was accounted for in the Fresh Pork segment.

European Carve-Out. On August 26, 2024, we completed a carve-out and transfer of our European operations to WH Group. As a result, we derecognized the assets and liabilities of our former European operations through equity. No gain or loss was recognized on the transaction. The historical results of operations, assets and liabilities, and cash flows of the European operations have been condensed and reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.

Dry Sausage Facility Acquisition. On July 30, 2024, we acquired a dry sausage production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee from Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation for $38 million. The acquisition is part of our strategy to grow our value-added packaged meats business and serve the growing demand for high-quality pepperoni, salami, charcuterie and other dry sausage products.

Employee Retention Tax Credit. In the second quarter of 2024, we recognized $86 million and $1 million of employee retention credits in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”), respectively, in the consolidated statement of income. For more information, see “Note 7: Employee Retention Tax Credits” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

American Skin. On December 28, 2023, we acquired the remaining 15% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC for $15 million.

West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform. We have undertaken a number of steps to exit our operations in California where high taxes, high utility costs and a challenging regulatory environment negatively impact our ability to operate efficiently and profitably. We also undertook a number of other actions in furtherance of our efforts to optimize the size of our Hog Production segment’s operations and improve its cost structure:

•West Coast Exit. In May 2022, we announced a decision to close our Vernon, California processing facility, exit farm operations in Arizona and California and reduce our sow herd in Utah. Additionally, in December 2023, we made a decision to terminate a number of agreements with contract farmers and closed several company-owned nursery farms in Utah as a result of the Vernon, California facility closure in early fiscal year 2023.

•Hog Production Reform. We have taken the following actions to further restructure and optimize the size of our hog production operations, including:

•In May 2023, we made a decision to cease operations on a number of sow farms in Missouri. The decision was driven by persistent livestock disease issues, underperforming operations and shifting industry supply and demand dynamics.

•In fiscal years 2023 and 2024, we terminated certain agreements with underperforming contract farmers and closed certain farms in the eastern U.S.

•On December 27, 2024, we became a member of a North Carolina-based company, Murphy Family Farms, by contributing $3 million in cash in exchange for a 25% minority interest. We additionally sold approximately 150,000 sows and related inventories located on company-owned and contract farms in North Carolina to Murphy Family Farms and recorded a gain of $6 million on the sale. Subsequent to the end of fiscal year 2024, on December 30, 2024, we sold the commercial hog inventories associated with such sows to Murphy Family Farms. Murphy Family Farms is now a hog supplier to us and will supply approximately 3.2 million hogs annually. We will supply animal feed and other supplies and provide certain support services to Murphy Family Farms.

63

•On February 24, 2025, we became a member of a North Carolina-based company, VisionAg, by contributing $450,000 in cash in exchange for a 9% minority interest. We additionally sold approximately 28,000 sows and the associated commercial hog inventories located on certain company-owned and contract farms in North Carolina to VisionAg. VisionAg is now a hog supplier to us and will supply approximately 600,000 hogs annually. In addition, we will supply animal feed and provide certain support services to VisionAg.

As a result of these decisions, we incurred various exit costs and disposal charges. We recognized charges totaling $31 million and $195 million in cost of sales in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. Included in the $31 million of charges recognized in fiscal year 2024 was a $4 million loss on the sale of certain hog farms in Missouri from which we received $32 million in proceeds.

Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2023, certain biogas assets owned by our joint venture, Align, were impaired as a result of our decision in December 2023 to terminate hog grower contracts and close farms in Utah. As a result, we recognized our share of the impairment totaling $35 million in (income) loss from equity method investments in the consolidated income statement. Also in the fourth quarter of 2023, we incurred $14 million in costs associated with biogas assets owned by our joint venture, Monarch, in connection with the farms in Missouri that were closed in fiscal year 2023. These costs were recognized in (income) loss from equity method investments in the consolidated statement of income.

In the second quarter of 2023, we sold our Vernon, California facility for $205 million and recognized a gain of $86 million in operating gains in the consolidated statement of income.

On December 17, 2024, we sold our hog production assets in Utah, excluding the live animals, for $58 million. The transaction resulted in a gain of $32 million, which was recognized in operating gains in the consolidated statement of income in the fourth quarter of 2024. As part of the agreement, we leased back certain farm and feed properties that we continue to operate.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Results of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20242023$ Change
(in millions)
Sales$14,142$14,640$(498)
Cost of sales12,24413,751(1,507)
Gross profit1,8978891,008
Selling, general and administrative expenses8401,050(211)
Operating gains(60)(105)45
Operating profit (loss)1,118(56)1,174
Interest expense, net6676(10)
Non-operating gains(9)(3)(6)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes1,061(129)1,189
Income tax expense (benefit)271(41)312
(Income) loss from equity method investments(8)46(53)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations798(133)930
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests1459
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield$783$(138)$921

64

Operating Profit (Loss) by Segment

Fiscal Year
20242023$ Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$1,168$1,066$102
Fresh Pork266117150
Hog Production(144)(756)612
Other35(4)39
Corporate expenses(153)(107)(46)
Unallocated(55)(371)316
Operating profit (loss)$1,118$(56)$1,174

We recently removed income from equity method investments from the measure of segment profit reviewed by our Chief Operating Decision Maker. Accordingly, the historical segment results presented herein have been retrospectively adjusted to remove income from equity method investments.

Results of Operations Analysis

The following discussion provides an analysis of our results of operations for fiscal year 2024 compared to fiscal year 2023.

Sales

Fiscal Year
20242023$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Sales by segment:
Packaged Meats$8,319$8,280$390.5%
Fresh Pork7,8737,832420.5%
Hog Production3,0023,317(315)(9.5)%
Other471559(88)(15.7)%
Total segment sales19,66519,988(323)(1.6)%
Inter-segment sales eliminations:
Fresh Pork(2,990)(2,694)(296)11.0%
Hog Production(2,533)(2,646)114(4.3)%
Other(1)(7)6(90.0)%
Total inter-segment sales eliminations(5,524)(5,348)(176)3.3%
Consolidated Sales$14,142$14,640$(498)(3.4)%

Packaged Meats. Segment sales increased by $39 million, or 0.5%, as a 3.1% increase in average sales price more than offset a 2.5% decrease in sales volume. The increase in average sales price was primarily due to higher raw material costs, which translated into higher sales prices of our packaged meats products, as well as an improvement in product mix. The decrease in volume was mainly due to lower bacon sales associated with the group housing legislation in California and Massachusetts, which requires pork producers nationwide to comply with certain production standards in order to sell pork products into these states, and lower holiday ham sales.

Fresh Pork. Segment sales increased by $42 million, or 0.5%, as a 5.4% increase in our average sales price more than offset a 4.7% decrease in volume. The increase in our average sales price reflects strong demand for U.S. pork, which was supported by higher relative prices for competing proteins and strength in export markets. In fiscal year

65

2024, fresh pork cut-out values reported by the USDA averaged $0.96 per pound, up 6.5% from fiscal 2023. The decrease in Fresh Pork volume was largely due to a strategic plan to optimize production levels.

Hog Production. Segment sales decreased by $315 million, or 9.5%, largely due to an 7.8% decrease in the number of hogs sold and a $171 million decrease in grain sales, partially offset by a 6.2% increase in our average hog sales price, including the effects of hedging. The decrease in the number of hogs sold by the segment was largely attributable to Hog Production Reform activities aimed at reducing the number of hogs we produce.

Other. Segment sales decreased by $88 million, or 15.7%, predominantly attributable to our Mexico operations due in part to an 8.3% decline in volume.

Inter-segment Eliminations

•Fresh Pork. The increase in inter-segment sales by our Fresh Pork segment was attributable to higher market values for fresh pork components sold to our Packaged Meats segment.

•Hog Production. The decrease in inter-segment sales by our Hog Production segment was attributable to our Hog Production Reform activities, which reduced the number of hogs sold to our Fresh Pork segment, partially offset by an increase in the average sales price.

Cost of Sales

Fiscal Year
20242023$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$6,759$6,792$(33)(0.5)%
Fresh Pork7,4197,525(105)(1.4)%
Hog Production3,1044,024(920)(22.9)%
Other412536(125)(23.3)%
Unallocated74222(148)(66.6)%
Inter-segment eliminations(5,524)(5,348)(176)3.3%
Cost of sales$12,244$13,751$(1,507)(11.0)%

Packaged Meats. Cost of sales in our Packaged Meats segment decreased by $33 million, or 0.5%, driven by the following factors, which more than offset a $75 million increase in raw material costs attributable to the net effect of higher meat prices and lower sales volume:

•A $71 million decrease in manufacturing and distribution costs primarily due to cost improvement initiatives and lower sales volume.

•The recognition of $38 million in employee retention tax credits in the second quarter of 2024.

Fresh Pork. Cost of sales in our Fresh Pork segment decreased by $105 million, or 1.4%, due to the following factors, which more than offset a $111 million increase in raw material costs driven by the net effect of higher market hog prices and lower sales volume:

•A $175 million decrease in manufacturing and distribution costs largely due to cost improvement initiatives and lower sales volume.

•The recognition of $41 million in employee retention tax credits in the second quarter of 2024.

Hog Production. Cost of sales in our Hog Production segment decreased by $920 million, or 22.9%, primarily due to the following factors:

•A $717 million decrease in raw material costs largely due to lower prices for feed ingredients, a reduction in the number of hogs produced and lower external grain sales.

66

•A $195 million decrease in operating costs largely attributable to the effects of our Hog Production Reform activities on both volume and cost improvements, as well as lower external grain sales.

•The recognition of $8 million in employee retention tax credits in the second quarter of 2024.

Other. Cost of sales in our Other segments decreased by $125 million, or 23.3%, which was primarily attributable to lower raw material costs in our Mexico operations driven by lower market prices for feed ingredients and lower sales volume.

Unallocated. The unallocated costs primarily represent costs associated with our West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform activities.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Fiscal Year
20242023$ Change% Change
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$394$422$(28)(6.7)%
Fresh Pork188190(3)(1.5)%
Hog Production4250(8)(15.9)%
Other2426(2)(8.2)%
Unallocated38254(215)(84.9)%
Corporate expenses1541084642.8%
Selling, general, and administrative expenses$840$1,050$(211)(20.1)%

SG&A decreased by $211 million, or 20.1%, primarily driven by the following factors, which more than offset a $44 million increase in variable compensation expenses attributable to the improvement in our results of operations (reflected primarily in corporate expenses):

•A $211 million decrease in accruals for litigation matters described in “Note 18: Regulation and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8. of this Annual Report. This decrease is reflected in unallocated expenses in the table above.

•A $27 million decrease in marketing and advertising expenses due to an increased focus on the effectiveness of our spending, largely attributable to our Packaged Meats and Fresh Pork segments.

•The impact of foreign exchange transactions, which decreased SG&A by $14 million. Gains and losses on foreign exchange transactions are included in unallocated expenses in the table above.

67

Operating Gains

Operating gains consists of the following items:

Fiscal Year
20242023
(in millions)
Packaged Meats$(2)$
Unallocated:
Gain on disposal of assets (1)(43)(88)
Insurance recoveries(9)(5)
Other operating gains(5)(12)
Total operating gains$(60)$(105)

________________

(1)Fiscal year 2024 includes a $32 million gain on the sale of hog farms in Utah and a $6 million gain on the sale of assets to Murphy Family Farms. Fiscal year 2023 includes an $86 million gain on the sale of our Vernon, California plant.

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net decreased by $10 million to $66 million from $76 million, or 13.1%, due to higher levels of cash and cash equivalents earning interest at higher rates in fiscal year 2024 as compared to fiscal year 2023, while interest rates on borrowings were largely fixed.

Non-operating Gains

Non-operating gains consists of the following items:

Fiscal Year
20242023
(in millions)
Gain on nonqualified retirement plan assets$(17)$(15)
Net pension and postretirement benefits cost (1)1010
Other(2)1
Non operating gains$(9)$(3)

________________

(1)Includes the components of net pension and postretirement benefits cost other than service cost, which is included in operating profit. These components consist of interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of actuarial gains/losses and prior service costs/credits, and curtailment gains.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Income tax expense (benefit) increased to an expense of $271 million in fiscal year 2024 from a benefit of $41 million in fiscal year 2023 primarily due to the significant pre-tax income recognized in fiscal year 2024, compared to a loss recognized in fiscal year 2023. The effective tax rate was 25.5% in fiscal year 2024 compared to 32.2% in fiscal year 2023. The impact of the reconciling items between the federal statutory rate and our effective tax rate were more pronounced in fiscal year 2023 largely due to the pre-tax loss of $129 million in fiscal year 2023 compared to pre-tax income of $1,061 million in fiscal year 2024. See “Note 13: Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, for further information.

(Income) Loss from Equity Method Investments

(Income) loss from equity method investments increased to income of $8 million in fiscal year 2024 from a loss of $46 million in fiscal year 2023. Fiscal year 2023 included $49 million in impairments and other costs associated with our biogas joint ventures as a result of our West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform actions.

68

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our sources of liquidity include cash and cash equivalents on hand together with availability under our committed revolving credit facilities. As of December 29, 2024, we had $3,245 million of available liquidity consisting of $943 million in cash and cash equivalents and $2,303 million of availability under our committed credit facilities. Availability under our committed credit facilities is reduced by the principal amount of our outstanding commercial paper. We believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations and commitments for at least the next twelve months.

Credit Facilities

December 29, 2024
FacilityCapacityBorrowing Base AdjustmentOutstandingBorrowingsCommercial Paper BorrowingsOutstanding Letters of CreditAmount Available
(in millions)
Senior Revolving Credit Facility$2,100$$$$$2,100
Securitization Facility225(22)203
Total credit facilities$2,325$$$$(22)$2,303

Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

In February 2025, we refinanced our $2,100 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility (“Senior Revolving Credit Facility”) extending the maturity date from May 21, 2027 to February 12, 2030. As part of the new agreement, there are no longer any subsidiary guarantors under the Senior Revolving Credit Facility which also released the subsidiary guarantors from our senior unsecured notes. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility bears interest at the SOFR plus a margin ranging from 0.875% to 1.50% per annum, or, at our election, at a base rate plus a margin ranging from 0.00% to 0.50% per annum, in each case depending on our senior unsecured debt ratings. The Senior Revolving Credit Facility also contains financial maintenance covenants requiring us to maintain a maximum total consolidated leverage ratio (ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated capitalization, each as defined in the Senior Revolving Credit Facility) of 0.50 to 1.00 (which we may elect to increase to 0.55 to 1.00 with respect to any fiscal quarter in which a material acquisition is consummated and the immediately following three consecutive fiscal quarters, subject to certain restrictions) and a minimum interest coverage ratio (ratio of EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense, each as defined in the Senior Revolving Credit Facility) of 3.50 to 1.00.

Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability and that of our subsidiaries to merge and consolidate with other companies, incur indebtedness, grant liens or security interests on assets subject to their security interest, make acquisitions, loans, advances or investments, pay dividends, sell or otherwise transfer assets, optionally prepay or modify terms of any junior indebtedness or enter into transactions with affiliates, each subject to certain exceptions as set forth therein. We are currently in compliance with the covenants under our Senior Revolving Credit Facility.

We have a commercial paper program, which is supported by the Senior Revolving Credit Facility, that provides access to a low-cost source of borrowing to fund general corporate purposes, including working capital. The maximum issuance capacity under our commercial paper program is $1,750 million. The maturity of commercial paper issued under the program varies but does not exceed 397 days from the date of issuance. Our ability to access the commercial paper market in the future is dependent on maintaining investment grade credit ratings and market conditions.

Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility

In November 2024, we refinanced our accounts receivable securitization facility (the “Securitization Facility”), which extended the maturity date to November 22, 2027, and reduced the borrowing capacity to $225 million. As part of the Securitization Facility, certain accounts receivable of our major domestic meat processing subsidiaries are

69

sold to a wholly owned “bankruptcy remote” special purpose vehicle (“SPV”). The SPV pledges all such accounts receivable not otherwise sold pursuant to the Monetization Facility (as defined below) as security for loans made, and letters of credit issued, by participating lenders under the Securitization Facility. The SPV is included in our consolidated financial statements and therefore the accounts receivable owned by it are included in our consolidated balance sheets. However, the accounts receivable owned by the SPV are separate and distinct from our other assets and are not available to our other creditors should we become insolvent. As of December 29, 2024, the SPV held $374 million of accounts receivable. We must maintain certain ratios related to the collection of our receivables as a condition of the Securitization Facility agreement. As of December 29, 2024, we had $22 million in letters of credit issued under the Securitization Facility. None of the letters of credit were drawn upon.

Under the Securitization Facility, we and the SPV, as applicable, are subject to certain customary covenants, including, but not limited to, restrictions on our ability to sell, assign or otherwise dispose of any collateral or assign any right to receive income with respect thereto, use proceeds for any purpose other than those set forth in the Securitization Facility, make certain payments on junior indebtedness, incur debt or merge or consolidate, subject to certain exceptions set forth therein. The SPV is also prohibited from issuing any LCR Security (as defined in the Securitization Facility agreement). We are currently in compliance with the covenants under the Securitization Facility.

Monetization Facility

In addition to the Securitization Facility, we maintain an uncommitted $250 million accounts receivable monetization facility (the “Monetization Facility”). At Smithfield’s election and subject to the purchasing banks’ approval, certain accounts receivable may be sold by the SPV to purchasing banks, so long as the uncollected outstanding amount of accounts receivable sold pursuant to the Monetization Facility does not exceed $250 million in the aggregate at any time, among other limitations. In the event of a sale, the purchasing banks assume all credit risk related to the receivables while we maintain risk associated with customer disputes. We account for the sale of receivables to a purchasing bank by derecognizing the receivables from our consolidated balance sheet upon transfer of control to the purchasing bank, and recognizing a discount on the sale in SG&A in the consolidated statement of income. The proceeds from the sale of receivables are included in net cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. On behalf of the purchasing banks, we continue to service all receivables sold under the Monetization Facility. As of December 29, 2024, the uncollected balance of receivables that had been sold to purchasing banks was $230 million. We had no servicing asset or liability outstanding as of December 29, 2024.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, we sold $227 million of accounts receivable at a discount and received proceeds totaling $225 million. Subsequently, we reinvested $4,094 million and $3,431 million of cash collections from customers in the revolving sale of accounts receivable to purchasing banks in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. We recognized charges totaling $15 million and $12 million in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively, attributable to the discount on the sale of accounts receivable in SG&A in the consolidated statement of income.

Cash Flows

Cash Flows From Operating Activities of Continuing Operations

70

Fiscal Year
20242023
(in millions)
Net income$970$23
Less: Net income from discontinued operations(172)(155)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$798$(133)
Adjustments to reconcile net income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations:
Depreciation and amortization339427
Deferred income taxes91(130)
Impairment of assets11
(Income) loss from equity method investments(8)46
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets1511
(Gain) loss on sale of property, plant and equipment(35)(85)
Change in accounts receivable(6)157
Change in inventories138469
Change in prepaid expenses and other current assets(88)57
Change in accounts payable(19)(215)
Change in accrued expenses and other current liabilities(261)80
Other(49)2
Net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations$916$688

Net cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations increased by $228 million to $916 million in fiscal year 2024 from $688 million in fiscal year 2023. This increase was primarily driven by higher earnings and changes on deferred income taxes, partially offset by changes in working capital. The following describes the significant changes in working capital:

•Accounts receivable. Accounts receivable decreased in fiscal year 2023 primarily due to the monetization of receivables under the Monetization Facility.

•Inventories and accounts payable. Inventories and accounts payable decreased in fiscal year 2024 primarily due to lower commodity prices for feed grains and lower inventory volumes attributable to Hog Production reform decisions. Inventories and accounts payable decreased in fiscal year 2023 primarily due to lower inventory volumes largely attributable to the West Coast exit and Hog Production reform decisions as well as lower commodity prices for meat and feed grains.

•Prepaid expenses and other current assets. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased in fiscal year 2024 largely due to an increase in income taxes receivable, which was primarily driven by a tax benefit recognized in connection with the carve-out of our European operations, and an increase in prepaid deposits for grain in Mexico. Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased in fiscal year 2023 largely due to a decrease in an escrow balance related to a litigation settlement.

•Accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased in fiscal year 2024 largely due to payments related to litigation settlements and our West Coast exit and Hog Production reform activities. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities increased in fiscal year 2023 largely due to accruals for litigation and our West Coast exit and Hog Production reform activities, partially offset by litigation settlements.

71

Cash Flows From Investing Activities of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20242023
(in millions)
Capital expenditures$(350)$(353)
Net expenditures from breeding stock transactions(43)(48)
Investments in partnerships and other assets(13)(27)
Business dispositions13
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets99219
Other93
Net cash flows used in investing activities of continuing operations$(298)$(194)

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations increased by $104 million to $298 million in fiscal year 2024 from $194 million in fiscal year 2023. The following items explain this increase and the significant cash flows from investing activities:

•Capital expenditures. Fiscal year 2024 includes $33 million for the purchase of a dry sausage production facility located in Nashville, Tennessee. The remaining capital expenditures for both fiscal years 2024 and 2023 consisted primarily of various plant expansion, automation and improvement projects.

•Investments in partnerships and other assets. We made capital contributions totaling $5 million and $21 million to our biogas joint ventures in fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively. Also, in fiscal year 2024, we became a member of, and contributed $3 million to, Murphy Family Farms.

•Business dispositions. In fiscal year 2023, we received a $7 million final settlement for the sale of a business in fiscal year 2022, $4 million for the sale of a retail business and a $2 million final settlement for the sale of hog farms in California.

•Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment and other assets. In fiscal year 2024, we received $58 million and $32 million for the sale of hog farms in Utah and Missouri, respectively. In fiscal year 2023, we received $205 million in proceeds for the sale of our Vernon, California facility.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities of Continuing Operations

Fiscal Year
20242023
(in millions)
Payment of dividends$(288)$(323)
Repayments to Securitization Facility(14)(226)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility14226
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest(15)
Net repayments to revolving credit facilities(8)(7)
Principal payments on long-term debt and finance lease obligations(24)(4)
Payment of deferred purchase consideration for acquisition(2)(2)
Other1(2)
Net cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations$(321)$(353)

72

Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations decreased by $32 million to $321 million in fiscal year 2024 from $353 million in fiscal year 2023. The following items explain certain significant cash flows from financing activities during the periods presented:

•Dividends. Dividends in fiscal year 2023 included a $100 million special dividend from the proceeds from the sale of our Vernon, California facility.

•Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest. In fiscal year 2023, we paid $15 million for the remaining 15% interest in American Skin.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Our cash requirements for long-term contractual obligations and commitments as of December 29, 2024 are presented in the following table:

Due Date by Period
202520262027202820292030 & thereafterTotal
(in millions)
Debt principal payments (1)$$$600$$400$1,000$2,000
Debt interest payments747451493334317
Guaranteed royalty payments (2)151516161634112
Lease obligations (3)7359473627217460
Pension and other postretirement benefit obligations (4)29312
Commitments to investees (5)195
Purchase commitments:
Hog procurement (6)2,5991,7041,2399139135847,953
Contract hog growers (7)14178695537108488
Grain procurement (8)179179
Other8319171516209359
Other long-term liabilities (9)197
Total$3,194$1,951$2,039$1,085$1,443$2,185$12,571

________________

(1)In the event of default on a payment, acceleration of principal payments could occur.

(2)Represents guaranteed royalty payments to license the Nathan’s Famous brand.

(3)Amounts presented for lease obligations represent the undiscounted contractual lease payments for our operating and finance lease obligations. For more information on leases, see “Note 12: Lease Obligations, Commitments and Guarantees” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(4)We historically provided the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. Funding requirements for our pension plans are determined based on the funded status measured at the end of each year. The values of our pension obligation and related assets may fluctuate significantly, which may in turn lead to a larger underfunded status in our pension plans and a higher funding requirement. The funding requirement for our qualified pension plans in fiscal year 2025 is expected to be $6 million. We also expect to contribute $23 million to our non-qualified pension plans to cover expected benefit payments. We are unable to reliably estimate the amount and timing of the remaining payments beyond fiscal year 2025, therefore we have only the estimated funding for fiscal year 2025 and the total liability as of December 29, 2024 in the table above. For more information, see “Note 14: Pension and Other Retirement Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(5)In 2019, we announced that we planned to contribute up to $250 million to Align through 2028 to fund various projects as approved by Align’s board from time to time. As of December 29, 2024, we had contributed $114 million in capital toward these planned contributions. Should the board, of which we have 50% of the voting power, choose not to approve additional projects, the remaining contributions would not be required. Additionally, we have committed to contribute up to $25 million to the TPG Rise Climate investment fund through July 2027. As of December 29, 2024, we had contributed $17 million in capital toward this commitment. Lastly, we have a capital support agreement with Murphy Family Farms whereby we are committed to advance up to $50 million to cover operating costs of Murphy Family Farms if certain conditions are

73

met. No such advances have been made. We are unable to reliably estimate if or when any of these commitments will be drawn upon.

(6)Through the Fresh Pork segment, we have purchase agreements with certain independent suppliers. Some of these arrangements obligate us to purchase all of the hogs produced by these suppliers. Other arrangements obligate us to purchase a fixed amount of hogs. Due to the uncertainty of the number of hogs that we are obligated to purchase and the uncertainty of market prices at the time of hog purchases, we have estimated our obligations under these arrangements. Future payments were estimated using current live hog market prices, available futures contract prices and internal projections adjusted for historical quality premiums.

(7)Through the Hog Production segment, we use contract farmers and their facilities to raise hogs produced from our breeding stock. Under multi-year contracts, the farmers provide the initial facility investment, labor and front-line management in exchange for a performance-based service fee payable upon delivery. We are obligated to pay this service fee for all hogs delivered. We have estimated our obligation based on expected hogs delivered from these farmers.

(8)Includes fixed-price forward grain purchase contracts totaling $76 million. Also includes unpriced forward grain purchase contracts which, if valued using market prices as of December 29, 2024, would be $102 million. These forward grain contracts are accounted for as normal purchases. As a result, they are not recorded in the balance sheet.

(9)Other long-term liabilities consist of long-term casualty insurance reserves, deferred compensation, contingent liabilities, and asset retirement obligations, among others. We are unable to estimate reliably the timing of settlement of these liabilities.

Other Anticipated or Potential Cash Requirements

Capital Expenditures

The Company remains in a strong financial position due to its robust cash flows, liquidity, and solid balance sheet. We plan to continue to support the business in 2025 through capital expenditures in the range of $400 million to $500 million, inclusive of profit improvement projects, such as packaged meats capacity expansion and automation, as well as repairs and maintenance.

Dividends

Returning cash to shareholders in the form of dividends is also a top priority for the Company. On March 24, 2025, our Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share of common stock, which is payable on April 22, 2025, to shareholders of record on April 10, 2025. We anticipate the remaining quarterly dividends in fiscal 2025 will be $0.25 per share, resulting in an annual dividend rate in fiscal 2025 of $1.00 per share. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board and depends on various factors, including our net income, financial condition, cash requirements, business prospects, and other factors that our Board deems relevant to its analysis and decision making.

Monarch Sale Notice

On January 16, 2025, TPG Rise Climate, one of the other two equal joint venture partners in Monarch, delivered a sale notice under the joint venture agreement, pursuant to which Monarch must pursue a sale of the joint venture. In the event that a sale of Monarch is not consummated before January 17, 2026, TPG Rise Climate may require that Monarch purchase TPG Rise Climate’s ownership interests in Monarch.

Altosano Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest

After December 31, 2024, our noncontrolling interest (“NCI”) holders in Altosano have the right to exercise a put option that would obligate us to redeem 40% of their interest. After December 31, 2027 the NCI holders in Altosano have the right to exercise a put option for the remainder of their interest. The redemption value for the NCI is fair value. As of December 29, 2024, the value of the NCI on our consolidated balance sheet was $225 million.

Contingent Losses

Like other participants in our industry, we are subject to various laws and regulations administered by federal, state and other government entities, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and corresponding state agencies, as well as the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyard Administration, the USDA, the OSHA, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and similar agencies in foreign countries. We, from time to time, receive

74

notices and inquiries from regulatory authorities and others asserting that we are not in compliance with such laws and regulations. In some instances, litigation ensues. In addition, individuals may initiate litigation against us.

The consolidated financial statements reflect accruals for contingent losses associated with various claims. These matters will not affect our profits or losses in future periods unless our accruals prove to be insufficient or excessive. It is reasonably possible that a change in our estimates may occur in the near term and that our accruals could be insufficient. We are unable to estimate the amount of possible loss in excess of our accruals, which could be material. Additionally, legal expenses incurred in our and our subsidiaries’ defense of these claims and any payments made to plaintiffs through unfavorable verdicts or otherwise could negatively impact our cash flows and our liquidity position. For more information on contingencies, refer to “Note 18: Regulation and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Risk Management Activities

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described in “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” and “Note 8: Derivative Financial Instruments” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report. See these sections for more information on the effects of derivative instruments on our consolidated statements of income.

Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decreases, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers and counterparties to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increases, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. Over the past two fiscal years, the maximum amount of margin deposits held by our brokers and counterparties at any given time was $97 million.

The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities historically have tended to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

Guarantees

We and certain other joint venture partners in Monarch joint and severally guarantee Monarch’s debt, interest and fees. As of December 29, 2024, the maximum amount of loans that could be outstanding under Monarch’s debt agreements was $61 million and the loans mature in June 2025. Monarch’s outstanding debt was $43 million as of the end of fiscal year 2024.

The guarantee involves elements of performance and credit risk and is not included in the consolidated balance sheets. We could become liable in connection with Monarch’s obligation depending on the ability of Monarch to perform on its obligation. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for the obligation, we would record the liability on our consolidated balance sheet.

Non-GAAP Measures

In arriving at our presentation of non-GAAP financial measures, we exclude items that have an impact on our income statement that, in the judgment of our management, are items that, either as a result of their nature or size, could, were they not identified, potentially cause investors to extrapolate future performance from an improper base. While not all inclusive, examples of these items include:

•loss contingencies, due to the difficulty in predicting future events, their timing and size;

•transactions or events that are not part of our core business activities or are unusual in their nature (whether gains or losses); and

75

•the tax effects of the foregoing items.

Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to Smithfield and Adjusted Net Income from Continuing Operations per Common Share Attributable to Smithfield

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations to adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield. Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield and adjusted net income from continuing operations per common share attributable to Smithfield are non-GAAP measures. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful for investors because they exclude the effects of items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. Although we believe these non-GAAP measures provide a better comparison of our year-over-year performance and are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools. As such, adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield and adjusted net income from continuing operations per common share attributable to Smithfield are not intended to be alternatives to net income from continuing operations, net income from continuing operations per common share or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

Fiscal Year
20242023Affected income statementaccount
(in millions, except per share data)
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield783(138)
Employee Retention Tax Credits (1)(86)Cost of sales
Employee Retention Tax Credits (1)(1)SG&A
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform (2)(38)Operating gains
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform (3)31195Cost of sales
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform (4)49(Income) loss from equity method investments
Insurance recoveries(4)(5)Operating gains
Litigation charges (5)208SG&A
Gain on sale of Vernon, California facility(86)Operating gains
Incremental costs from destruction of property43Cost of sales
Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustments (6)24(94)Income tax expense (benefit)
Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield$714$132
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield per common share (basic and diluted)$2.06$(0.36)
Adjusted net income from continuing operations attributable to Smithfield per common share (basic and diluted)$1.88$0.35

________________

(1)In the second quarter of 2024, we recognized $86 million and $1 million of employee retention tax credits in cost of sales and SG&A, respectively. For more information about the employee retention tax credits, see “Note 7: Employee Retention Tax Credits” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(2)Includes a $32 million gain on sale of our Utah hog farms and a $6 million gain on the sale of breeding stock to Murphy Family Farms.

(3)Consists of costs related to the closure of our Vernon, California processing facility, the closure and/or reduction of certain farms in Arizona, California, Missouri and Utah and certain residual operating and restructuring expenses, including the termination of a number of agreements with contract farmers, workforce reduction, and accelerated depreciation of

76

machinery equipment with no future alternative use, due to discontinuation of operations in the West Coast and efforts to improve the cost structure of our Hog Production segment.

(4)Includes an impairment of certain biogas assets recognized by our joint venture, Align, and costs incurred in connection with the closure of certain farms in Missouri that impacted assets owned by our joint venture, Monarch.

(5)Consists of accruals for the antitrust price-fixing and antitrust wage-fixing litigation matters that are described in “Note 18: Regulation and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

(6)Represents the tax effects of the non-GAAP adjustments based on a statutory tax rate of 25.7%.

EBITDA from Continuing Operations, Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations and Adjusted EBITDA Margin from Continuing Operations

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations to EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. EBITDA from continuing operations, adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations are non-GAAP measures. We believe EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure to our stakeholders because it excludes the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating interest and depreciation costs to provide a comparable year-over-year analysis. We believe adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure as it excludes the effect of discontinued operations, non-operating gains and losses, and other items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. We believe adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations is a useful measure as it evaluates overall operating performance, ability to pursue and service possible debt opportunities and possible future investment opportunities. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide a more comparable year-over-year analysis. Although these non-GAAP measures are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools. As such, EBITDA from continuing operations, adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations and adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations are not intended to be alternatives to net income from continuing operations or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

77

Fiscal Year
20242023Affected Income StatementAccount
(in millions, except percentages)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$798$(133)
Interest expense, net6676
Income tax expense (benefit)271(41)
Depreciation and amortization339427
EBITDA from continuing operations$1,474$329
Employee Retention Tax Credits(86)Cost of sales
Employee Retention Tax Credits(1)SG&A
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform(38)Operating gains
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform (1)29110Cost of sales
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform49(Income) loss from equity method investments
Insurance recoveries(4)(5)Operating gains
Incremental costs from destruction of property43Cost of sales
Litigation charges208SG&A
Gain on sale of Vernon, California facility(86)Operating gains
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations$1,379$610
Net income (loss) margin from continuing operations5.6%(0.9)%
Adjusted EBITDA margin from continuing operations9.7%4.2%

(1)Excludes accelerated depreciation and amortization charges of $2 million and $85 million for fiscal years 2024 and 2023, respectively, as such charges are included in the depreciation and amortization line in this table.

Net Debt and Ratio of Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA from Continuing Operations

The following table provides a reconciliation of total debt and finance lease obligations to net debt, the ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income from continuing operations, and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations. Net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are non-GAAP measures. We believe net debt is a useful measure as it helps to give investors a clear understanding of our financial position. Net debt is also used to calculate certain leverage ratios. We believe the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is a useful measure as it monitors the sustainability of our debt levels and our ability to take on additional debt against adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations, which is used as an operating performance measure. We believe these non-GAAP measures provide a more comparable year-over-year analysis. Although net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are frequently used by investors and securities analysts in their evaluations of companies, these non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools. As such, net debt and the ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations are not intended to be alternatives to total debt and finance lease obligations and the ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income from continuing operations or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

78

Fiscal Year Ended
December 29, 2024December 31, 2023
(in millions, except ratios)
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease$3$27
Long-term debt and finance lease obligations1,9992,006
Total debt and finance lease obligations2,0022,033
Cash and cash equivalents(943)(687)
Net debt$1,059$1,345
Net income (loss) from continuing operations$798$(133)
Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations$1,379$610
Ratio of total debt and finance lease obligations to net income (loss) from continuing operations2.5x(15.3x)
Ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations0.8x2.2x

Adjusted Operating Profit and Adjusted Operating Profit Margin

The following table provides a reconciliation of operating profit to adjusted operating profit. Adjusted operating profit and adjusted operating profit margin are non-GAAP measures. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful to investors because they provide a better understanding of underlying operating results and trends of established, ongoing operations of our segments, excluding the impact of items that are unusual in nature, infrequent in occurrence or otherwise stem from strategic decisions to restructure our operations. These non-GAAP measures are not intended to be alternatives to operating profit, operating profit margin or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements in isolation for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

79

Fiscal Year 2024Packaged MeatsFresh PorkHog ProductionOther (1)Corporate (2)Unallocated (3)Consolidated
(in millions, except percentages)
Operating profit (loss)$1,168$266$(144)$35$(153)$(55)$1,118
Employee retention tax credits(38)(41)(8)(87)
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform(7)(7)
Insurance recoveries(4)(4)
Incremental costs from destruction of property44
Adjusted operating profit (loss)$1,130$225$(152)$35$(153)$(61)$1,024
Operating profit (loss) margin14.0%3.4%(4.8)%7.4%NMNM7.9%
Adjusted operating profit (loss) margin13.6%2.9%(5.0)%7.4%NMNM7.2%
Fiscal Year 2023Packaged MeatsFresh PorkHog ProductionOther (1)Corporate (2)Unallocated (3)Consolidated
(in millions, except percentages)
Operating profit (loss)$1,066$117$(756)$(4)$(107)$(371)$(56)
Litigation charges208208
West Coast Exit and Hog Production Reform195195
Gain on sale of Vernon, California facility(86)(86)
Insurance recoveries(5)(5)
Incremental costs from destruction of property33
Adjusted operating profit (loss)$1,066$117$(756)$(4)$(107)$(56)$258
Operating profit (loss) margin12.9%1.5%(22.8)%(0.8)%NMNM(0.4)%
Adjusted operating profit (loss) margin12.9%1.5%(22.8)%(0.8)%NMNM1.8%

________________

(1)Includes our Mexico and Bioscience operations.

(2)Represents general corporate expenses for management and administration of the business.

(3)Includes certain costs of sales, SG&A and operating gains that we do not allocate to our segments.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on our judgment, experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain of our accounting estimates are considered critical as they are both important to the representation of our financial condition and results of operations and require significant or complex judgment on the part of management. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates that we consider to be critical. Our accounting policies are more fully discussed in “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

80

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue (sales) is primarily derived from contracts with customers for the purchase of our products. Revenue is recognized at a point in time when our performance obligation has been satisfied and control of the promised goods is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon shipment or delivery to a customer based on the terms of the sale. The primary performance obligation in our contracts with customers is to provide meat products. Shipping and handling activities are considered part of the fulfillment of our promise to provide meat products and not a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are reported as a component of cost of sales.

Revenue is recorded at the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing goods to customers. The transaction price may include estimates of variable consideration, including a variety of customer sales incentive programs, such as rebates, product returns and coupons redeemed by consumers. Our estimates of variable consideration are based on a number of factors including history with the respective customer, current performance and future projections. We sufficiently constrain estimates of variable consideration based on the likelihood and magnitude of a potential revenue reversal when the uncertainties associated with the variable consideration are subsequently resolved.

We review and update estimates of variable consideration regularly. We have not experienced any material reversals of revenue recognized in the past three fiscal years resulting from overestimation of variable consideration nor do we expect there will be a material change in our estimates of variable consideration that would result in a material reversal of revenue recognized in the consolidated statements of income. The effect of any reversal of revenue would be recognized in the period in which an adjustment to our estimate is identified.

Contingent Liabilities

We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to the operation of our farms and facilities, labor, livestock procurement, securities, the environment, our products, taxes and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of loss. A determination of the amount of accruals and disclosures required, if any, are made after considerable analysis of each individual issue or claim.

We accrue for contingent liabilities, including future defense costs, when an assessment of the risk of loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We disclose contingent liabilities when the risk of loss is reasonably possible or probable.

Our contingent liabilities contain uncertainties because the eventual outcome will result from future events. Our determination of accruals requires estimates and judgments related to the possible outcomes, differing interpretations of the law, assessments of the amounts of potential damages, settlements or defense costs, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.

The consolidated financial statements reflect accruals for estimated contingent losses associated with various claims. These matters will not affect our profits or losses in future periods unless our accruals prove to be insufficient or excessive. However, legal expenses incurred in our defense of legal matters and any payments made to plaintiffs through unfavorable verdicts or otherwise will negatively impact our cash flows and our liquidity position.

If actual results are not consistent with the estimates or assumptions used to develop our accruals for contingent losses, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could have a material effect on our future results of operations and cash flows.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. In the evaluation of goodwill for impairment, we may perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is not, no further analysis is required. If it is, a quantitative goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any.

81

To identify if an impairment exists, we compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of a reporting unit is estimated by applying valuation multiples of earnings and/or estimating future discounted cash flows. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

For our other non-amortizable intangible assets, if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The selection of earnings multiples is dependent upon assumptions regarding future levels of operating performance as well as business trends and prospects, and industry, market and economic conditions. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. When estimating future discounted cash flows, we consider the assumptions that hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount rate is used, based on an industry-wide average cost of capital or location-specific economic factors. We consider all these factors to be level 3 inputs, as defined in “Note 16: Fair Value Measurements” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

The fair values of our trademarks have been estimated using a royalty rate method. Assumptions about royalty rates are based on the rates at which similar brands and trademarks are licensed in the marketplace.

Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.

As of December 29, 2024, we had $1,613 million of goodwill and $1,216 million of non-amortizable trademarks. Our goodwill is included in the following reporting units:

•Packaged Meats: $1,503 million;

•Mexico: $69 million;

•Fresh Pork: $34 million;

•Hog Production:$4 million; and

•Bioscience: $4 million.

We have not recognized an impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets in the past three fiscal years. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of any of our reporting units would not result in an impairment. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our intangible assets also would not result in an impairment.

Income Taxes

We estimate total income tax expense based on statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in various jurisdictions in which we earn income.

Federal income taxes include an estimate for taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be remitted to the U.S. and be taxable, but not for earnings considered indefinitely invested in the foreign subsidiary. We account for the global intangible low-taxed income inclusion from foreign subsidiaries in the period in which it is incurred.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.

82

We record liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on our analysis of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. We record these liabilities using a two-step process in which (1) we evaluate whether we believe it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority.

The determination of our provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. Changes in current tax laws and rates could affect recorded tax assets and liabilities in the future. In addition, changes in projected future earnings could affect the recorded valuation allowances in the future.

Our analysis of uncertain tax positions requires considerable judgment about the likelihood and amount of benefit that would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.

Due to the complexity and inherent uncertainties surrounding income tax positions, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our recorded liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement would require use of cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

Over the past three fiscal years, we have recognized $76 million of income tax expense in years subsequent to the initial recognition and measurement of an uncertain tax position and we paid $17 million to tax authorities in fiscal year 2024 upon the ultimate resolution of uncertain tax positions taken in prior years.

See “Note 13: Income Taxes” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

Pension Accounting

We historically provided the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. In the second quarter of 2021, we amended our qualified pension plans to freeze the benefit accrual for all non-union participants as of June 30, 2021.

We recognize the funded status of our pension plans in our consolidated balance sheets and recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost.

We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of our pension obligation and related costs. The measurement of our pension obligations and related costs is dependent on the use of assumptions and estimates. These assumptions include discount rates, expected returns on plan assets, salary growth rates and mortality rates. Changes in assumptions and future investment returns could potentially have a material impact on our expenses and related funding requirements.

The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our benefit obligation and net benefit cost for fiscal year 2024:

•5.57% – Discount rate to determine net benefit cost;

•5.78% – Discount rate to determine pension benefit obligation; and

•7.05% – Expected return on plan assets.

If actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. The effects of actual results differing from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in such future periods.

83

An additional 0.50% decrease in the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation would have further reduced the funded status by $103 million as of December 29, 2024, and would have resulted in an additional $3 million in net pension cost in fiscal year 2024.

A 0.50% decrease in expected return on plan assets would have resulted in an additional $7 million in net pension cost in fiscal year 2024.

In addition to higher net pension cost, a significant decrease in the funded status of our pension plans caused by either a devaluation of plan assets or a decline in the discount rate would result in higher pension funding requirements.

See “Note 14: Pension and Other Retirement Plans” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for further information about our accounting for pension and retirement plans.

Derivative Accounting

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices. Our objective is to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with fluctuations in commodity prices.

We record all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet, with the exception of contracts that qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale scope exception, which are expected to result in physical delivery. Accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it qualifies and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method).

We apply hedge accounting when the change in the market value of derivative contracts has historically been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. If it is determined that the derivative instruments are no longer effective at offsetting changes in the price of the hedged items, then the mark-to-market method must be applied to account for the derivative instruments prospectively, which could increase volatility in our results of operations. We recognized $(25) million, $18 million and $(10) million in gains (losses) on derivatives accounted for under the mark-to-market method in fiscal years 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

For additional information on derivatives, refer to “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 8: Derivative Financial Instruments” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report, which includes detailed discussions of our accounting for and use of derivative instruments.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

For a description of recently issued accounting pronouncements, refer to “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

84

FY 2016 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000091388-16-000064.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2016-03-29. Report date: 2016-01-03.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following information in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We are the largest hog producer and pork processor in the world. In the United States, we are also the leader in numerous packaged meats categories with popular brands including Smithfield®, Eckrich®, Farmland®, Armour® and John Morrell®. We are committed to providing good food in a responsible way and maintaining robust animal care, community involvement, employee safety, environmental, and food safety and quality programs.

We produce and market a wide variety of fresh meat and packaged meats products both domestically and internationally. We operate in a cyclical industry and our results are significantly affected by fluctuations in commodity prices for livestock (primarily hogs) and grains. Some of the factors that we believe are critical to the success of our business are our ability to:

Column 1Column 2
maintain and expand market share, particularly in packaged meats,
Column 1Column 2
develop and maintain strong customer relationships,
Column 1Column 2
continually innovate and differentiate our products,
Column 1Column 2
manage risk in volatile commodities markets, and
Column 1Column 2
maintain our position as a low cost producer of live hogs, fresh pork and packaged meats.

We conduct our operations through five reportable segments: Fresh Pork, Packaged Meats, Hog Production, International and Corporate. The Fresh Pork segment consists of our U.S. fresh pork operations. The Packaged Meats segment consists of our U.S. packaged meats operations. The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations located in the U.S. The International segment is comprised mainly of our meat processing and distribution operations in Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom, our interests in meat processing operations in Mexico, our hog production operations located in Poland and Romania, our interests in hog production operations in Mexico, and our former investment in Campofrío Food Group (CFG). The Corporate segment provides management and administrative services to support our other segments.

In February 2015, we announced an organizational realignment and key senior management appointments that unify all of our independent operating companies, brands, marketing and employees under one corporate umbrella. Moving to a more centralized structure allows for a more efficient and effective approach to customers, best utilizes management talent, maximizes the manufacturing platform and plant efficiency and optimizes marketing, innovation and brand management.

WH Group Merger

On September 26, 2013 (the Merger Date), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 28, 2013 (the Merger Agreement) with WH Group Limited, formerly Shuanghui International Holdings Limited, a corporation formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands and hereinafter referred to as WH Group, the Company merged with Sun Merger Sub, Inc., a Virginia corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of WH Group (Merger Sub), in a transaction hereinafter referred to as the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Company survived as a wholly owned subsidiary of WH Group.

WH Group is the majority shareholder of Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development Co., which is China's largest meat processing enterprise and China's largest publicly traded meat products company as measured by market capitalization. WH Group is a pioneer in the Chinese meat processing industry with over 30 years of history. WH Group's businesses include hog production, meat processing, fresh meat and packaged meats production and distribution. The merging of WH Group's distribution network with our strong management team, leading brands and vertically integrated model is allowing us to provide high-quality, competitively-priced and safe U.S. meat products to consumers in markets around the world. As part of WH Group's international platform, we expect our best practices in large-scale farming, food safety standards, environmental stewardship and animal welfare to set the global industry standard.

29

This transaction enabled Smithfield to continue to execute on its strategic priorities while maintaining brand excellence and commitment to environmental stewardship and animal welfare. We believe we have established Smithfield as the world's leading vertically integrated pork processor and hog producer with best-in-class operations and outstanding food safety practices. Operationally, we have become part of an enterprise that shares our belief in global opportunities and our commitment to the highest standards of product safety and quality. With our shared expertise and leadership, we continue to work on accelerating a global expansion strategy as part of WH Group.

The Merger was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. WH Groups's cost of acquiring the Company has been pushed-down to establish a new accounting basis for the Company. The difference in the cost basis of the Company before and after the Merger impacts the comparability of results.

Change in Fiscal Year

On January 16, 2014, the Company elected to change its fiscal year from the 52 or 53 week period which previously ended on the Sunday nearest to April 30 to the 52 or 53 week period which ends on the Sunday nearest to December 31. The change became effective at the end of the period ended December 29, 2013. Unless otherwise noted, all references to "2015" and "2014" in this report are to the 53 week period ended January 3, 2016 and the 52 week period ended December 28, 2014, respectively.

2015 Summary

Net income was $452.3 million in 2015, compared to net income of $556.1 million in 2014. The following summarizes the operating results of each of our reportable segments for 2015 compared to 2014:

Column 1Column 2
Fresh Pork operating profit increased $80.6 million primarily as the impact of lower meat values was more than offset by lower hog prices.
Column 1Column 2
Packaged Meats operating profit increased $213.5 million to a record $673.3 million primarily as a result of lower raw material costs and higher sales volume, partially offset by lower average selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Hog Production operating profit decreased $324.5 million primarily as a result of lower live hog market prices driven by higher hog supplies, partially offset by favorable hedging results and lower feed costs.
Column 1Column 2
International operating profit decreased $89.7 million due to lower pork market prices in Europe and Mexico and the impact of foreign currency translation due to a stronger U.S. dollar.
Column 1Column 2
Corporate expenses increased by $17.7 million primarily due to higher stock-based compensation expense and charitable contributions.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for all periods presented. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP measures. We believe EBITDA is a useful measure to our investors because it excludes the effects of financing and investing activities by eliminating interest and depreciation costs. We also believe adjusted EBITDA is a useful measure as it excludes the effect of non-operating activities. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not intended to be substitutes for our comparable GAAP measures and should not be used by investors or other users of our financial statements as the sole basis for formulating decisions as they exclude a number of important cash and non-cash charges.

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Net income$452.3$556.1
Interest expense133.8159.4
Income tax expense195.6217.0
Depreciation and amortization expense234.1230.8
EBITDA$1,015.8$1,163.3
Non-operating (gain) loss12.1(0.9)
Adjusted EBITDA$1,027.9$1,162.4

30

Animal Health

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) identified Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDv) in the United States for the first time in 2013. During 2014, the U.S. pork market was significantly impacted by the spreading of PEDv, a disease that only infects pigs, not humans or other livestock, which has been an industry-wide issue and continues to have a presence in U.S. swine. Our herds in several regions in which we operate were affected in 2014 as PEDv spread throughout the U.S. There were confirmed cases of PEDv in the U.S. in 2015; however, there were very few cases compared to the outbreak that occurred in 2014. The USDA and the industry continue to monitor the situation. During 2015, herds in several of our geographic regions were also impacted by outbreaks of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSv). While PRRSv is not new to the swine industry, the impact of these outbreaks was more severe than observed in recent years. We are subject to risks related to our ability to maintain animal health and control PEDv and PRRSv. We are unable to predict the extent these diseases will impact our operations or market prices in the future.

In 2014, the spread of PEDv in the U.S. reduced hog supplies and lead to higher hog and meat prices. In 2015, the hog herds recovered and the supply increase yielded lower market prices.

Renewable Fuel Standard

The federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program requires that bio-fuels be blended into transportation fuels at ever-increasing volumes up to 36 billion gallons in 2030.  In October 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted a “partial waiver” to a statutory bar under the Clean Air Act prohibiting fuel manufacturers from introducing fuel additives that are not “substantially similar” to those already approved and in use for vehicles of model year (MY) 1975 or later.  Prior to the EPA's decision, the ethanol content of gasoline in the United States was limited to 10 percent (E10), which created a barrier, commonly referred to as the “blendwall,” to the expansion of blended bio-fuels as prescribed by the RFS.  The EPA's decision allows fuel manufacturers to increase the ethanol content of gasoline to 15 percent (E15) for use in MY 2007 and newer light-duty motor vehicles, including passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles. In January 2011, the EPA granted another partial waiver authorizing E15 use in MY 2001-2006 light-duty motor vehicles. Judicial challenges to these rulemakings by a coalition of industry groups were dismissed.

In 2013, the EPA issued a proposed rule that would have reduced the volume of renewable fuels mandated by statute and reflected the EPA’s estimate of what would actually be produced in 2014. In April 2015, the EPA entered into a proposed consent decree which would have them propose the 2015 RFS by June 1, 2015 and to finalize the 2014 and 2015 RFS targets by November 30, 2015. On May 29, 2015, the EPA proposed to establish the annual percentage standards for cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel and total renewable fuels that apply to all gasoline and diesel produced or imported in years 2014, 2015 and 2016 as well as the volume of biomass-based diesel for 2017. The proposed volumes are below statutory levels, but above historical output of renewable fuels. On November 30, 2015, the EPA finalized RFS standards for 2014, 2015 and 2016 at higher levels than the proposed volumes, but below statutory targets. The 2016 standard is set at 18.11 billion gallons of renewable fuels, or 10.10% of the motor fuel pool.

Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) has re-introduced legislation in the 114th Congress that would eliminate the conventional (corn starch) ethanol mandate, cap the blendwall at E10, and require the EPA to set cellulosic standards at production levels. Additionally, Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Pat Toomey (R-PA) have introduced similar legislation which would eliminate the conventional ethanol mandate. Although the long-term impact of the RFS is currently unknown, studies have shown that expanded corn-based ethanol production has driven up the price of livestock feed and led to commodity-price volatility. We cannot presently assess the full economic impact of the RFS program on the meat processing industry or on our operations.

Country of Origin Labeling

Following a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel ruling on a complaint by Canada and Mexico that existing U.S. country- of-origin labeling (COOL) requirements violated the United States’ WTO obligations, the USDA published a new rule effective May 23, 2013, Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Pork, Lamb, Chicken, Goat Meat, Wild and Farm-Raised Fish and Shellfish, Perishable Agricultural Commodities, Peanuts, Pecans, Ginseng, and Macadamia Nuts. 78 Fed. Reg. 31367 (May 24, 2013) (the 2013 Rule). The 2013 Rule requires, in part, that labels on covered meat products must list separately, in sequence, the specific country where the animal was "born," the country where it was "raised," and the country where it was "slaughtered." The rule also prohibits combining or commingling of meats with different "Born, Raised, and Slaughtered" combinations in the same package at retail.

31

On March 28, 2014 and on July 29, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a judicial challenge to these rulemakings by a coalition of industry groups. As of February 9, 2015, industry opponents dropped their lawsuit against the USDA. The Canadian and Mexican governments challenged the 2013 Rule before the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the WTO. On October 20, 2014, the DSB issued panel reports finding in favor of Canada and Mexico and against the United States' 2013 Rule. An appeal of the DSB's ruling brought by the U.S. was rejected. Canada and Mexico are seeking a combined $3.2 billion in retaliatory tariffs against a range of U.S. agricultural and manufactured product exports, including frozen and chilled pork products. In December 2015, a WTO Arbitration Panel report set retaliatory tariffs against the United States at just over $1 billion.

In December 2015, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Fiscal Year 2016 omnibus spending legislation which included legislative language to repeal the WTO-noncompliant components of the COOL statute. Although Canada and Mexico still have the right to initiate retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. under WTO rules, there is no indication that they intend to do so and the revocation of mandatory COOL for meat has essentially settled the dispute.

Outlook

The commodity markets affecting our business fluctuate on a daily basis. In this operating environment, it is difficult to forecast industry trends and conditions. The outlook statements that follow must be viewed in this context.

Our most exciting growth prospect is the ongoing development of our packaged meats business. Although we have experienced meaningful and consistent improvement in packaged meats margins, we believe significant growth potential remains. We will continue to strengthen our consumer-focused marketing programs and promote innovation to improve our product mix toward branded, value-added products. We expect these actions to result in continued broad-based gains in packaged meats sales, volume, market share, distribution and margins.

With our organizational realignment, we are taking steps to build on our record results in 2014 as we continue to solidify Smithfield's position as a global leader in branded packaged meats. There is a plethora of benefits to moving to a centralized structure and unifying all our resources and brands together as “One Smithfield,” which should position us to take advantage of growth opportunities in the following ways:

Column 1Column 2
Leveraging Smithfield's size and scope in pork industry;
Column 1Column 2
Maximizing our manufacturing platform and distribution system;
Column 1Column 2
Approaching the market more efficiently and effectively;
Column 1Column 2
Best utilizing management talent across company;
Column 1Column 2
Aligning our operations to provide better customer service;
Column 1Column 2
Optimizing operations in areas like brand management, manufacturing, sales, and marketing; and
Column 1Column 2
Strengthening marketing, brand building and innovation across all brands.

We will continue to sharpen our strategic focus and drive operational improvements across our entire platform, including our fresh pork, hog production and international divisions. We are focused on growth and believe that Smithfield is in an ideal position to continue to achieve strong results into 2016.

32

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations

Sale of Label Printing Plant

In 2015, we sold our product label printing business in Kansas City for $1.65 million cash plus contingent consideration, which we valued at $11.9 million, and recognized a gain of $12.0 million in SG&A, reflected in the Packaged Meats segment.

Sale of CFG

In June 2015, we completed the sale of our entire equity interest in CFG to Alfa for $354.0 million in cash. As of the date of the sale, the book value of our investment in CFG was $298.7 million. Additionally, we had $54.6 million of unrealized currency translation losses on our balance sheet related to our investment in CFG.

Tender Offer

In January 2015, we commenced a cash tender offer for our 7.75% senior unsecured notes due July 2017, 5.25% senior unsecured notes due August 2018, 5.875% senior unsecured notes due August 2021 and 6.625% senior unsecured notes due August 2022, subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price up to $275.0 million (2015 Tender Offer). As a result of the 2015 Tender Offer, we paid $275.0 million to repurchase $258.1 million of principal and recognized losses on debt extinguishment of $12.8 million in non-operating (gain) loss in the consolidated condensed income statement, including the write-off of related unamortized premiums and debt issuance costs.

WH Group Merger

In connection with the Merger, we incurred $23.9 million and $18.0 million of professional fees during the three months ended December 29, 2013 and five months ended September 26, 2013, respectively. These fees are recognized in merger related costs on the consolidated statements of income and reflected in the results of our Corporate segment. In addition, Merger Sub deferred $17.3 million of debt issuance costs for a financing arrangement. We recognized these deferred costs in interest expense during the three months ended December 29, 2013 upon termination of the financing arrangement following the Merger.

WH Group's cost of acquiring the Company has been pushed-down to establish a new accounting basis for the Company. The allocation of consideration to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed by WH Group in the Merger reflects fair value estimates based on management analysis, including work performed by third-party valuation specialists. This work was finalized during the third quarter of 2014 with no material adjustments. Our pre-tax earnings for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 were negatively impacted by $37.7 million as a result of the fair value adjustments to our assets and liabilities, including a $45.4 million increase in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventories.

Acquisition of Kansas City Sausage, LLC

In May 2013, we acquired a 50% interest in Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS), for $36.0 million in cash. KCS operates in Des Moines, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri. In Des Moines, KCS produces premium raw materials for sausage, as well as value-added products, including boneless hams and hides. The Kansas City plant is a modern sausage processing facility and is designed for optimum efficiency to provide retail and foodservice customers with high quality products. With our strong ongoing focus on building our packaged meats business, and with 15% of the U.S. sow population, this joint venture is a logical fit for the Company. It is expected to provide a growth platform in two key packaged meats categories — breakfast sausage and dinner sausage — and to allow us to expand our product offerings to our customers. These categories represent over $4.0 billion in industry retail and foodservice sales annually.

KCS is managed by its Board of Directors, which makes decisions that most significantly impact the economic performance of KCS. We have the right to nominate and elect the majority of the members of the Board of Directors of KCS, and based on the associated voting rights, we have determined that we have a controlling financial interest in KCS. As a result, the acquisition of our interest in KCS was accounted for in the Fresh Pork and Packaged Meats segments using the acquisition method of accounting. In 2015, KCS generated over $275 million in sales.

33

Missouri Litigation

During the twelve months ended April 29, 2012, we engaged in global settlement negotiations and recognized $22.2 million in net charges associated with the expected settlement of the Missouri Litigation. The charges were recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Hog Production segment. During the twelve months ended April 28, 2013, the parties to the litigation reached an agreement and consummated the global settlement.

CFG Consolidation Plan

In December 2011, the board of Campofrío Food Group (CFG) approved a multi-year plan to consolidate and streamline its manufacturing operations to improve operating efficiencies and increase utilization (the CFG Consolidation Plan). The CFG Consolidation Plan included the disposal of certain assets, employee redundancy costs and the contribution of CFG's French cooked ham business into a newly formed joint venture. As a result, we recorded our share of CFG's charges totaling $38.7 million in equity in (income) loss of affiliates within the International segment in the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.

34

Consolidated Results of Operations

The tables presented below compare our results of operations for the periods indicated.

The Transition Period reflects the combined results of predecessor and successor periods. This combined information does not purport to represent what our consolidated results of operations would have been if the Merger had taken place on April 29, 2013, nor have we made any attempt to either include or exclude expenses or income that would have resulted had the Merger actually occurred on April 29, 2013.

As used in the tables below, "NM" means "not meaningful."

Twelve Months Ended January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014% Change
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Sales$14,438.4$15,031.3(4)%
Cost of sales12,683.013,255.7(4)
Gross profit1,755.41,775.6(1)
Selling, general and administrative expenses973.3902.28
Income from equity method investments(11.7)(58.2)(80)
Operating profit793.8931.6(15)
Interest expense133.8159.4(16)
Non-operating (gain) loss12.1(0.9)NM
Income before income taxes647.9773.1(16)
Income tax expense195.6217.0(10)
Net income$452.3$556.1(19)%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales decreased primarily as a result of lower market prices across all of our segments and the impact of foreign currency translation as a result of a stronger U.S. dollar.
Column 1Column 2
Gross profit decreased primarily as a result of lower sales, partially offset by lower pork processing raw material costs and lower feed costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Column 1Column 2
The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to higher marketing and advertising costs as we focus on growing our brands through consumer-focused marketing programs as well as higher stock-based compensation expense.

Income from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
Equity income decreased primarily as a result of lower hog prices in Mexico. Additionally, equity income decreased due to a significant tax benefit recognized through our former investment in CFG in 2014.

Interest Expense

Column 1Column 2
The decrease in interest expense is primarily due to lower debt balances in the current year as a result of various debt repayment activities.

Non-operating (gain) loss

Column 1Column 2
During 2015, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $12.8 million.

35

Income Tax Expense

Column 1Column 2
For 2015, the effective tax rate was impacted by income relative to permanent items, the lower mix of earnings from foreign operations, which are taxed at lower rates, and foreign restructuring. For 2014, taxable income relative to permanent items, the mix of income between jurisdictions and foreign restructuring impacted the effective rate.

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013

Twelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013% Change
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Sales$15,031.3$13,896.18%
Cost of sales13,255.712,691.14
Gross profit1,775.61,205.047
Selling, general and administrative expenses902.2830.19
Merger related costs41.9(100)
Income from equity method investments(58.2)(5.5)958
Operating profit931.6338.5175
Interest expense159.4180.5(12)
Non-operating (gain) loss(0.9)1.7(153)
Income before income taxes773.1156.3395
Income tax expense217.035.6510
Net income$556.1$120.7361%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased primarily as a result of higher domestic pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Gross profit increased primarily as a result of higher average selling prices and lower hog raising costs, which more than offset the increase in pork processing raw material costs. As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations--WH Group Merger," the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 included an additional $45.4 million in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventory.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Column 1Column 2
The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to higher variable compensation expenses stemming from higher year-over-year operating results, partially offset by lower pension expense.

Merger Related Costs

Column 1Column 2
We incurred an aggregate of $41.9 million of professional fees in the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 as a result of the Merger.

Income from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
The increase in profitability in the current year is primarily driven by higher hog prices in Mexico. Additionally, favorable changes to income tax rates positively impacted equity income from CFG.

Interest Expense

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 included $17.3 million of debt issuance costs originally deferred by Merger Sub.

36

Income Tax Expense

Column 1Column 2
For the twelve months ended December 28, 2014, taxable income relative to permanent items, the mix of income between jurisdictions and foreign restructurings impacted the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 was also impacted by income relative to permanent items for the period, the mix of income between jurisdictions and state income tax credits.

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012

SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales$3,894.2$5,679.5$9,573.7$8,898.78%
Cost of sales3,543.15,190.18,733.27,943.510
Gross profit351.1489.4840.5955.2(12)
Selling, general and administrative expenses213.4341.7555.1540.53
Merger related costs23.918.041.9NM
Loss (income) from equity method investments2.60.53.1(6.5)(148)
Operating profit111.2129.2240.4421.2(43)
Interest expense59.064.6123.6111.811
Loss on debt extinguishment1.71.7120.7(99)
Income before income taxes50.564.6115.1188.7(39)
Income tax expense15.812.728.558.7(51)
Net income$34.7$51.9$86.6$130.0(33)%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased primarily as a result of higher average selling prices in the Fresh Pork, Packaged Meats and Hog Production segments and an 18% increase in volume in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
Gross profit decreased primarily as the result of an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices. As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations--WH Group Merger," the eight months ended December 29, 2013 included an additional $45.4 million in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventory.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Column 1Column 2
Advertising costs during the eight months ended December 29, 2013 were approximately $20.0 million higher than during the eight months ended December 30, 2012 as we continued our investment in marketing and advertising programs focused on building brand equity and growing sales.

Merger Related Costs

Column 1Column 2
As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations," we incurred an aggregate of $41.9 million of professional fees during the eight months ended December 29, 2013 as a result of the Merger.

Loss (Income) from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
The decline in profitability was primarily driven by lower selling prices in the meat processing operations of our Mexican joint ventures. Also, tax law changes in Mexico negatively impacted our joint ventures. during the eight months ended December 29, 2013.

Interest Expense and Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Column 1Column 2
As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations," interest expense for the eight months ended December 29, 2013 includes $17.3 million of debt issuance costs originally deferred by Merger Sub.

37

Column 1Column 2
In the eight months ended December 30, 2012, we recognized losses of $120.7 million on the repurchase of $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.

Income Tax Expense

Column 1Column 2
The effective tax rate was impacted in all periods presented by income relative to permanent items, the mix of income between jurisdictions and state income tax credits.

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales$13,221.1$13,094.31%
Cost of sales11,901.411,544.93
Gross profit1,319.71,549.4(15)
Selling, general and administrative expenses815.4816.9
(Income) loss from equity method investments(15.0)9.9(252)
Operating profit519.3722.6(28)
Interest expense168.7176.7(5)
Loss on debt extinguishment120.712.2889
Income before income taxes229.9533.7(57)
Income tax expense46.1172.4(73)
Net income$183.8$361.3(49)%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased slightly as higher volumes across all segments were largely offset by lower domestic fresh meat and hog market prices and the effects of foreign currency translation.
Column 1Column 2
The decline in gross profit margin was primarily caused by higher hog feed costs and lower pork prices in the U.S.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $6.4 million in professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses increased $26.4 million.

(Income) Loss from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
CFG's results for twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Results from our Mexican joint ventures declined due to higher feed costs, lower hog prices and lower meat sales volumes.

Interest Expense

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense decreased due to lower average interest rates resulting from the refinancing of our 10% senior secured notes due July 2014 (2014 Notes) and our 7.75% senior unsecured notes due May 2013 (2013 Notes) as described under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.

38

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $120.7 million on the repurchase of $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $11.0 million on the repurchase of $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million in the first quarter associated with the refinancing of our working capital facilities in June 2011.

Income Tax Expense

The following items explain the significant changes in the effective tax rate from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 to twelve months ended April 28, 2013:

Column 1Column 2
Tax credits increased due in part to the passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 that retroactively reinstated the Research and Development, Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work tax credits.
Column 1Column 2
We released $11.1 million in deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013, primarily related to the utilization of tax losses in foreign jurisdictions.
Column 1Column 2
The mix of earnings from foreign operations, which are taxed at lower rates, was higher in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013.

39

Segment Results

The following information reflects the comparative results from each respective segment:

Twelve Months Ended January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014% Change
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$5,089.9$5,780.0(12)%
Packaged Meats7,089.17,173.0(1)%
Hog Production3,069.73,384.6(9)%
International1,422.81,654(14)%
Total segment sales16,671.517,991.6(7)%
Intersegment sales(2,233.1)(2,960.3)(25)%
Consolidated sales$14,438.4$15,031.3(4)%
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$177.3$96.783%
Packaged Meats673.3459.846%
Hog Production19.7344.2(94)%
International66.1155.8(58)%
Corporate(142.6)(124.9)(14)%
Consolidated operating profit$793.8$931.6(15)%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Sales decreased 12% due to a 21% decrease in average selling prices, partially offset by a 12% increase in volume.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit per head increased to $6 from $4 due to lower raw material costs, which more than offset the impact of lower fresh pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
We processed 30.5 million hogs during 2015, an increase of 13% from the prior year.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales decreased 1% due to an 8% decrease in average selling prices, partially offset by a 7% increase in volume. Current year sales volume totaled 3.0 billion pounds.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit increased to $0.22 per pound from $0.16 per pound due primarily to lower raw material costs. Current year results included a gain of $12.0 million on the sale of our product label printing business in Kansas City.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Sales decreased 9% due to lower domestic live hog market prices which were partially offset by favorable hedging results. Head sold during the year amounted to 15.9 million hogs, an increase of 8% from the prior year. These changes in sales volumes and market prices are driven largely by the effects of PEDv in the prior year. See "Executive Overview--Animal Health" for additional discussion about PEDv.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit decreased to $1 per head from $23 per head due to lower selling prices, partially offset by favorable hedging results and lower feed costs.

40

International

Column 1Column 2
Sales decreased due primarily to changes in foreign exchange rates, which negatively impacted sales by $260.5 million, or 16%. On a constant currency basis, sales increased 2% due to a 9% increase in volume to 1.5 billion pounds driven largely by a 9% increase in hogs processed and an 11% increase in poultry processed in Europe, partially offset by a 7% decrease in average selling prices. We processed 4.6 million hogs during 2015.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit was negatively impacted by lower pork market prices in Europe along with lower equity income from our Mexican joint ventures. Foreign currency translation also negatively impacted operating profit by approximately $12.6 million due to a stronger U.S. Dollar.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
The decrease in operating results is primarily attributable to higher stock-based compensation expense and charitable contributions.

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013

Twelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013% Change
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$5,780.0$5,155.612%
Packaged Meats7,173.06,522.610%
Hog Production3,384.63,420.6(1)%
International1,654.01,556.76%
Total segment sales17,991.616,655.58%
Intersegment sales(2,960.3)(2,759.4)7%
Consolidated sales$15,031.3$13,896.18%
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$96.7$76.027%
Packaged Meats459.8378.022%
Hog Production344.2(21.9)1,672%
International155.860.5158%
Corporate(124.9)(154.1)19%
Consolidated operating profit$931.6$338.5175%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales increased 12% due to a 15% increase in average selling prices partially offset by a 3% decrease in volume.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit increased 27%. Operating profit per head increased from $2.61 to $3.47 due to higher fresh pork market prices, which more than offset higher raw material costs.
Column 1Column 2
We processed 27.9 million hogs during 2014, a decrease of 4%, largely attributable to PEDv. However, average hog weights were up 2%, which helped to offset the overall decline in volume.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales increased 10% due to a 10% increase in average selling prices. Current year sales volume totaled 2.8 billion pounds, which remained relatively unchanged from the twelve months ended December 29, 2013.

41

Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit increased to $0.16 per pound from $0.13 per pound due to higher average selling prices. Additionally, the prior year included $38.7 million, or $0.01 per pound, of non-cash costs related to the fair value step-up of inventories due to the Merger. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales decreased due to lower sales volume, partially offset by higher domestic live hog market prices. Head sold during the year amounted to 14.7 million hogs, a decrease of 10% from the twelve months ended December 29, 2013. PEDv was a significant factor in the volume decline and favorably impacted market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit benefited from a 20% increase in domestic live hog market prices and lower feed costs.

International

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales were positively impacted by an 18% increase in volume of 1.5 billion pounds, driven largely by a 13% increase in hogs processed in Europe, and partially offset by an 11% decrease in average selling prices. We processed 4.3 million hogs during 2014. The effects of foreign currency translation also positively impacted sales by approximately $18 million.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit was positively impacted by higher sales and lower feed costs in Europe along with higher equity income from our Mexican joint ventures. Additionally, favorable changes to income tax rates positively impacted equity income from CFG.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
Operating results in the Corporate segment were improved from last year due to the impact of $41.9 million of merger related costs in the prior year, partially offset by higher variable compensation expense in the current year driven by improved operating results.

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012

SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$1,347.3$2,240.3$3,587.6$3,356.17%
Packaged Meats1,968.92,541.74,510.64,140.09
Hog Production889.21,439.12,328.32,042.814
International428.2643.61,071.8983.69
Total segment sales4,633.66,864.711,498.310,522.59
Intersegment sales(739.4)(1,185.2)(1,924.6)(1,623.8)(19)
Consolidated sales$3,894.2$5,679.5$9,573.7$8,898.78%
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$96.0$(50.7)$45.3$131.0(65)%
Packaged Meats81.7149.2230.9322.7(28)
Hog Production(40.6)81.440.8(56.4)172
International25.415.941.389.0(54)
Corporate(51.3)(66.6)(117.9)(65.1)(81)
Consolidated operating profit$111.2$129.2$240.4$421.2(43)%

42

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased during the Transition Period as a result of a 6% increase in average selling prices and a 1% increase in volume.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit decreased despite the increase in average selling prices primarily as a result of an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased during the Transition Period as a result of a 9% increase in average selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit in the current year decreased as the increase in selling prices was more than offset by higher raw material costs. Additionally, operating profit in the Transition Period included $38.7 million of additional non-cash costs related to the fair value step-up of our inventories. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Transition Period sales benefited from an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices and a 3% increase in head sold.
Column 1Column 2
Hog Production operating profit improved by $97.2 million mainly due to higher live hog market prices.

International

Column 1Column 2
As a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, International segment sales and operating profit in the Transition Period were both positively impacted by approximately 3%.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in the transition period were positively impacted by an 18% increase in volume which was partially offset by a 10% decrease in average selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Transition Period operating profit was also negatively impacted by 8% and 6% increases in raising costs in both Poland and Romania, respectively, along with significantly lower equity income from our Mexican joint ventures.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
The Transition Period includes fees related to the Merger. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

43

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$4,924.1$5,089.4(3)%
Packaged Meats6,152.06,003.62
Hog Production3,135.13,052.63
International1,468.51,466.7
Total segment sales15,679.715,612.3
Intersegment sales(2,458.6)(2,518.0)2
Consolidated sales$13,221.1$13,094.31
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$161.6$222.0(27)%
Packaged Meats470.0401.717
Hog Production(119.1)166.1(172)
International108.242.8153
Corporate(101.4)(110.0)8
Consolidated operating profit$519.3$722.6(28)%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Sales declined 3% due to a 6% decrease in average selling prices, partially offset by a 3% increase in volume as a result of higher slaughter levels and hog weights.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit decreased to $6 per head from $8 per head due to lower fresh pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
We processed 28.5 million hogs, an increase of 3% from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased 2% due to a 4% increase in volume partially offset by a 1% decrease in average selling prices. Sales volume totaled 2.8 billion pounds and 2.7 billion pounds for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012, respectively.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit increased to $0.17 per pound from $0.15 per pound due to lower raw material costs.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased due to higher volumes, which more than offset the impact of lower market hog prices. Head sold during the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 amounted to 16.0 million hogs, an increase of 1% from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit was negatively impacted by higher hog supplies, resulting in a 6% decrease in live hog prices, and increased domestic raising costs, including the effects of grain derivative contracts designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes, primarily as a result of higher priced feed.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 included gains of $91.2 million compared to $58.6 million for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 on lean hog derivative contracts and grain derivative contracts that are not designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation as well as accelerated depreciation charges of $8.2 million as a result of our decision to permanently idle certain farm assets in Missouri.

44

International

Column 1Column 2
Fluctuation in foreign exchange rates and their effect on foreign currency translation decreased sales by 8% and decreased operating profit by $11.5 million.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 benefited from significantly higher volumes in our Polish operations due to a 19% increase in the number of hogs processed. Unit sales prices in our Polish operations increased in several key product categories; however, higher volumes of lower value by-products that resulted from more processed hogs effectively diminished the overall average unit selling price compared to twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in our Romanian operations improved on significantly higher average unit selling prices and sales volumes, which benefited from the approval to export pork products to European Union member countries beginning in the fourth quarter of the twelve months ended April 29, 2012. Sales and hog slaughter volumes benefited from an expansion in our hog production operations in the second quarter of the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Equity income from our Mexican joint ventures decreased by $4.1 million due to higher feed costs and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $6.4 million of professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.

45

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Summary

Our cash requirements consist primarily of the purchase of raw materials used in our hog production and pork processing operations, long-term debt obligations and related interest, lease payments for real estate, machinery, vehicles and other equipment, and expenditures for capital assets, other investments and other general business purposes. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell, as well as our credit facilities.

We believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations for at least the next twelve months. As of January 3, 2016, our liquidity position was $2.3 billion, comprised of $1.4 billion in availability under our credit facilities, $704.9 million in cash and cash equivalents and $160.0 million in unutilized loans. Our liquidity position was enhanced by cash held for payments deferred by livestock suppliers to 2016 as well as cash held for the $125.0 million voluntary contribution to fund our qualified pension plans made in the first quarter of 2016.

Sources of Liquidity

We have available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external. These sources provide funds required for current operations, acquisitions, integration costs, debt retirement and other capital requirements.

Accounts Receivable and Inventories

The meat processing industry is characterized by high sales volume and rapid turnover of inventories and accounts receivable. Because of the rapid turnover rate, we consider our meat inventories and accounts receivable highly liquid and readily convertible into cash. The Hog Production segment also has rapid turnover of accounts receivable. Although inventory turnover in the Hog Production segment is slower, mature hogs are readily convertible into cash. Borrowings under our credit facilities are used, in part, to finance increases in the levels of inventories and accounts receivable resulting from seasonal and other market-related fluctuations in raw material costs.

Credit Facilities

January 3, 2016
FacilityCapacityBorrowing Base AdjustmentOutstanding Letters of CreditOutstanding BorrowingsAmount Available
(in millions)
Inventory Revolver$1,025.0$(1.3)$$$1,023.7
Securitization Facility325.0(87.9)237.1
International facilities167.2(2.7)(0.1)(38.8)125.6
Total credit facilities$1,517.2$(4.0)$(88.0)$(38.8)$1,386.4

In April 2015, we entered into a new $1.025 billion asset-based revolving credit facility agreement (the Inventory Revolver Credit Agreement) which replaced the Inventory Revolver which would have matured in June 2016. See "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 7—"Debt" for additional information regarding our working capital facilities and Rabobank Term Loan.

Rabobank Term Loan

In May 2015, we refinanced our $200.0 million Rabobank Term Loan and extended its maturity date from May 1, 2018 to May 1, 2020. See "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 7—"Debt" for additional information regarding our working capital facilities and Rabobank Term Loan.

46

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$797.8$813.1

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended January 3, 2016 vs. Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014

Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers decreased due to lower domestic live hog prices.
Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we received $152.5 million for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements compared to $179.6 million paid in the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Net tax payments decreased approximately $25.4 million
Column 1Column 2
Cash interest payments decreased approximately $24.5 million.
Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we received a cash dividend of $14.3 million from one our of Mexican joint ventures.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers decreased due to lower average meat selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we contributed $200.0 million to our qualified pension plans.
Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$813.1$358.2

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 vs. Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers increased due to higher average meat selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment decreased approximately $656.6 million from the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers increased due to a 20% increase in average domestic live hog prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside meat suppliers increased due to higher fresh meat market prices, particularly pork and beef.
Column 1Column 2
The current year included net tax payments of $178.8 million for income taxes as compared to net

refunds of $16.5 million in the prior year.

Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we paid $179.6 million for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements compared to $37.1 million in the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash interest payments increased approximately $23.2 million.

47

SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$459.3$(25.8)$433.5$248.0

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 vs. Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers increased due to a 6% and 9% increase in average selling prices in the Fresh Pork and Packaged Meats segments, respectively, and an 18% increase in sales volume in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment decreased approximately $65.4 million despite a significant increase in total pounds purchased.
Column 1Column 2
In the prior year eight month period, we paid cash to settle the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
In the eight months ended December 29, 2013, we paid $53.8 million for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements compared to $91.0 million received in prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers increased due to an 8% increase in domestic live hog market prices.
Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$172.7$570.1

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 vs. Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment increased approximately $372 million.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received for the settlement of commodity derivative contracts and for margin requirements decreased $103.4 million in fiscal 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers decreased primarily as a result of lower domestic selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
We paid cash to settle the Missouri litigation in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Expenditures for advertising increased as part of our strategy to build brand equity and grow sales.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers was lower due to a 6% decrease in average domestic live hog market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Income tax payments decreased $222.0 million as a result of significant tax refunds during the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and lower domestic taxable income.
Column 1Column 2
We contributed $17.7 million to our qualified and non-qualified pension plans in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 compared to $142.8 million in the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.

48

Investing Activities

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Capital expenditures$(375.2)$(301.4)
Proceeds from sale of equity interest in CFG354.0
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(11.0)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions(53.2)13.3
Construction of distribution center pending sale-leaseback(43.5)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of distribution center42.5
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment6.43.8
Other(6.0)3.6
Net cash flows from investing activities$(75.0)$(291.7)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
In June 2015, we sold our entire equity interest in CFG for $354.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
In April 2014, Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS) bought a meat processing business for $11.0 million.
Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc.$$(4,896.6)
Capital expenditures(301.4)(311.0)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(11.0)(33.7)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions13.3(6.2)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment3.86.1
Advance note and other3.6(10.4)
Net cash flows from investing activities$(291.7)$(5,251.8)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
In April 2014, Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS) bought a meat processing business for $11.0 million.

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
WH Group paid $4.9 billion in connection with the Merger to acquire all of our common stock and settle all vested and unvested stock-based compensation awards.
Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.

49

Column 1Column 2
We paid $33.7 million, net of cash acquired, for a 50% interest in KCS. Also, we advanced $10.0 million to the seller of KCS in exchange for a promissory note, which is secured by the remaining membership interests in KCS held by the seller.
SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc.$(4,896.6)$$(4,896.6)$
Capital expenditures(69.9)(139.8)(209.7)(176.7)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(32.8)(32.8)(23.1)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions5.1(5.3)(0.2)(12.4)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment2.31.74.014.8
Advance note and other(10.0)(10.0)0.1
Net cash flows from investing activities$(4,959.1)$(186.2)$(5,145.3)$(197.3)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013

Column 1Column 2
WH Group paid $4.9 billion in connection with the Merger to acquire all of our common stock and settle all vested and unvested stock-based compensation awards.
Column 1Column 2
In May 2013, we paid $32.8 million, net of cash acquired, for a 50% interest in KCS. Also, we advanced $10.0 million to the seller of KCS in exchange for a promissory note, which is secured by the remaining membership interest in KCS held by the seller.
Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.

Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures during the prior year primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
In October 2012, we paid $23.1 million, net of cash acquired, for a 70% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC.
Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Capital expenditures$(278.0)$(290.7)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(24.0)
Net expenditures from breeding stock transactions(18.4)(2.3)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment16.96.4
Other(0.2)
Net cash flows from investing activities$(303.7)$(286.6)

50

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $45.9 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $24.0 million, net of cash acquired, for a 70% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $32.8 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project and $30.9 million related to the Cost Savings Initiative. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects.

Financing Activities

Twelve Months Ended
January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and capital leases$$13.0
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(410.1)(34.5)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility290.0255.0
Payments on Securitization Facility(290.0)(360.0)
Payment of dividends(30.0)
Net repayments on revolving credit facilities and notes payables(6.4)(159.6)
Other(0.2)
Net cash flows from financing activities$(446.5)$(286.3)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we repurchased $258.1 million of our senior unsecured notes in connection with the 2015 Tender Offer. Additionally, we repaid $150.0 million on our Rabobank term loan.
Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we paid a $30.0 million dividend to our parent company.

Financing Activities

Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Net proceeds from equity contributions$$4,162.1
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and capital leases13.01,100.3
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(34.5)(680.5)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility255.0440.0
Payments on Securitization Facility(360.0)(335.0)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables(159.6)93.5
Debt issuance costs and other(0.2)(18.2)
Net cash flows from financing activities$(286.3)$4,762.2

51

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
As part of the Merger, WH Group purchased all of our common stock as of the Merger Date. The amount paid by WH Group, net of certain transaction costs is deemed to be an equity contribution by WH Group to the Company.
Column 1Column 2
Merger Sub issued the Merger Sub Notes as part of the financing for the Merger. Also, Merger Sub incurred $20.4 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the Merger Sub Notes, which are being amortized over the life of the Merger Sub Notes. As a result of the Merger and the transactions entered into in connection therewith, we have assumed the liabilities and obligations of Merger Sub, including Merger Sub's obligations under the Merger Sub Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We made an early repayment of our $200.0 million floating rate unsecured term loan due in February 2014 and we repaid the outstanding principal balance on our 4% senior unsecured convertible notes totaling $400.0 million, and we repaid the outstanding principal amount on our 7.75% senior unsecured notes totaling $55.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
We drew $145.0 million, net of repayments, on our Inventory Revolver and $105.0 million, net of repayments, on our Securitization Facility, to repay other long-term debt, as noted above.
SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Net proceeds from equity contributions$4,162.1$$4,162.1$
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and capital leases900.3900.31,019.2
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(218.7)(458.7)(677.4)(713.4)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility240.0170.0410.0
Payments on Securitization Facility(255.0)(50.0)(305.0)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables(367.9)490.3122.442.8
Repurchase of common stock(386.4)
Debt issuance costs and other(20.4)0.1(20.3)(16.5)
Net cash flows from financing activities$4,440.4$151.7$4,592.1$(54.3)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013

Column 1Column 2
As part of the Merger, WH Group purchased all of our common stock as of the Merger Date. The amount paid by WH Group, net of certain transaction costs is deemed to be an equity contribution by WH Group to the Company.
Column 1Column 2
Merger Sub issued the Merger Sub Notes as part of the financing for the Merger. Also, Merger Sub incurred $20.4 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the Merger Sub Notes, which are being amortized over the life of the Merger Sub Notes. As a result of the Merger and the transactions entered into in connection therewith, we have assumed the liabilities and obligations of Merger Sub, including Merger Sub's obligations under the Merger Sub Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We made an early repayment of our $200.0 million floating rate unsecured term loan due in February 2014, repaid the outstanding principal balance on our 4% senior unsecured convertible notes totaling $400.0 million, and repaid the outstanding principal amount on our 7.75% senior unsecured notes totaling $55.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
We drew $145.0 million on our Inventory Revolver and $105.0 million on our Securitization Facility, net of repayments, to repay other long-term debt, as noted above.

52

Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
In August 2012, we issued $1.0 billion of our 2022 Notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 19,068,079 shares of our common stock for $386.4 million as part of a previously approved share repurchase program.
Column 1Column 2
We incurred $18.0 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, which are being amortized over their ten-year life.
Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt$1,219.2$
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(716.5)(152.7)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables13.9(0.3)
Repurchase of common stock(386.4)(189.5)
Change in cash collateral23.9
Debt issuance costs and other(14.5)(9.8)
Net cash flows from financing activities$115.7$(328.4)

The following items explain the significant financing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
In August 2012, we issued $1.0 billion of our 2022 Notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $589.4 million of our 2014 Notes and $105.0 million of our 2013 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 19,068,079 shares of our common stock for $386.4 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We incurred $18.0 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, which were being amortized over their ten-year life and subsequently written off in connection with the Merger.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
We redeemed the remaining $77.8 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011 and repurchased $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 9,176,704 shares of our common stock for $189.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We received $20.0 million of cash previously held in a deposit account to serve as collateral for overdrafts on certain of our bank accounts and $3.9 million of cash from the counterparty of our interest rate swap contract which expired in August 2011.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $11.0 million of debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of the ABL Credit Facility.

53

Capitalization

January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
6.625% senior unsecured notes, due August 2022, including unamortized premiums of $15.6 million and $19.7 million$900.2$1,014.3
7.75% senior unsecured notes, due July 2017, including unamortized premiums of $20.6 million and $38.1 million446.8519.3
5.25% senior unsecured notes, due August 2018, net of debt issuance costs of $5.4 million and $8.3 million446.4491.7
5.875% senior unsecured notes, due August 2021, net of debt issuance costs of $5.7 million and $7.6 million349.3392.4
Floating rate senior unsecured term loan, due May 202050.0200.0
Various, interest rates from 2.45% to 2.76%, due February 2016 through March 201971.084.0
Total debt2,263.72,701.7
Current portion(29.1)(46.9)
Total long-term debt$2,234.6$2,654.8
Total shareholder's equity$4,820.5$4,539.5

Guarantees

As part of our business, we are party to various financial guarantees and other commitments as described below. These arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk that are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. We could become liable in connection with these obligations depending on the performance of the guaranteed party or the occurrence of future events that we are unable to predict. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for an obligation, we will record the liability in our consolidated balance sheet.

As of January 3, 2016, we continued to guarantee $6.7 million of leases that were transferred to JBS S.A. in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef, Inc which closed in October 2008. This guaranty may remain in place until the leases expire through February 2022.

Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity

Capital Projects

We anticipate capital expenditures of approximately $350.0 million for 2016 to upgrade facilities with new machinery and equipment in order to improve our competitive cost structure and achieve least cost/best in class operations. These expenditures are expected to be funded with cash flows from operations and/or borrowings under credit facilities.

Group Pens

In January 2007, we announced a voluntary, ten-year program to phase out individual gestation stalls at our company-owned sow farms and replace the gestation stalls with group pens. We currently estimate the total cost of our transition to group pens to be approximately $360.0 million, including associated maintenance and repairs. This program represents a significant financial commitment and reflects our desire to be more animal friendly, as well as to address the concerns and needs of our customers. As of the end of 2015, we had completed conversions to group housing for 82% of our sows on company-owned farms. We remain on track to finish conversion to group housing for all sows on company-owned farms by the end of 2017. Worldwide, we have pledged to convert all company sow farms by 2022. Our hog production operations in Poland and Romania completed their conversions to group housing facilities a number of years ago, and our joint ventures in Mexico are currently working toward the 2022 goal.

In January 2014, we announced the recommendation that all of our contract sow growers join with us in converting their facilities to group housing systems for pregnant sows. We asked contract sow growers to convert by 2022 and offered a sliding scale of incentives to accelerate that timetable through the receipt of contract extensions upon completion of the conversion.

54

Risk Management Activities

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described under “Derivative Financial Instruments” below. Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the underlying value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decrease, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increase, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. During 2015, margin deposits posted by us ranged from $(15.4) million to $80.7 million (negative amounts representing margin deposits we have received from our brokers). The average daily amount we held on deposit with our brokers during 2015 was $40.7 million. As of January 3, 2016, the net amount on deposit with our brokers was $47.9 million.

The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities tend to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

Pension Plan Funding

Funding requirements for our pension plans are determined based on the funded status measured at the end of each year. The values of our pension obligation and related assets may fluctuate significantly, which may in turn lead to a larger underfunded status in our pension plans and a higher funding requirement. We contributed $200.0 million to our qualified pension plans in 2015.  In January 2016, we contributed an additional $125.0 million to our qualified pension plans.

55

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides information about our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of January 3, 2016:

Payments Due By Period
Total1 Year1-3 Years3-5 Years5 Years
(in millions)
Long-term debt, excluding premiums and debt issuance costs$2,238.7$29.1$911.6$58.3$1,239.7
Interest686.2139.8245.4162.8138.2
Capital lease obligations, including interest25.01.42.11.919.6
Operating leases260.049.079.153.178.8
Capital expenditure commitments57.957.9
Purchase obligations:
Hog procurement (1)5,970.71,628.62,422.11,365.7554.3
Contract hog growers (2)1,142.5377.7316.7210.4237.7
Grain procurement (3)210.5210.5
Other (4)406.2167.527.830.0180.9
Total$10,997.7$2,661.5$4,004.8$1,882.2$2,449.2

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Through the Fresh Pork and International segments, we have purchase agreements with certain hog producers. Some of these arrangements obligate us to purchase all of the hogs produced by these producers. Other arrangements obligate us to purchase a fixed amount of hogs. Due to the uncertainty of the number of hogs that we are obligated to purchase and the uncertainty of market prices at the time of hog purchases, we have estimated our obligations under these arrangements. Future payments were estimated using current live hog market prices, available futures contract prices and internal projections adjusted for historical quality premiums.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Through the Hog Production segment, we use independent farmers and their facilities to raise hogs produced from our breeding stock. Under multi-year contracts, the farmers provide the initial facility investment, labor and front line management in exchange for a performance-based service fee payable upon delivery. We are obligated to pay this service fee for all hogs delivered. We have estimated our obligation based on expected hogs delivered from these farmers.
Column 1Column 2
(3)Includes fixed price forward grain purchase contracts totaling $11.9 million. Also includes unpriced forward grain purchase contracts which, if valued as of January 3, 2016 market prices, would be $198.6 million. These forward grain contracts are accounted for as normal purchases. As a result, they are not recorded in the balance sheet.
Column 1Column 2
(4)Includes guaranteed royalty payments totaling $229.5 million to Nathan's Famous Inc. (Nathan's) over an 18 year contractual term commencing in March 2014. In December 2012, John Morrell signed an agreement with Nathan's to become Nathan's exclusive licensee to manufacture and sell branded hot dog, sausage and corn beef products in the retail market. Under the terms of the agreement, guaranteed minimum royalty payments were $10.0 million for the first year and increase at a compounded average annual rate of 3.2% over the contract term.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect, or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect, on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, as well as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates.

56

Derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities at fair value. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as cash flow or fair value hedges for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method). Under this guidance, we may elect either method of accounting for our derivative portfolio, assuming all the necessary requirements are met. We have in the past availed ourselves of either acceptable method and expect to do so in the future. We believe all of our derivative instruments represent economic hedges against changes in prices and rates, regardless of their designation for accounting purposes.

When available, we use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of our derivative instruments. This may include exchange prices, quotes obtained from brokers, or independent valuations from external sources, such as banks. In some cases where market prices are not available, we make use of observable market based inputs to calculate fair value.

The size and mix of our derivative portfolio varies from time to time based upon our analysis of current and future market conditions. The following table presents the fair values of our open derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets (1):

January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Grains$(28.0)$(27.4)
Livestock18.858.0
Energy(15.7)(10.1)
Interest rate contracts(0.2)(0.1)
Foreign currency(1.1)0.4

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Negative amounts represent net liabilities

Sensitivity Analysis

The following table presents the sensitivity of the fair value of our open derivative contracts to a hypothetical 10% change in market prices or foreign exchange rates, as of January 3, 2016 and December 28, 2014:

January 3, 2016December 28, 2014
(in millions)
Grains$18.9$24.2
Livestock1.476.3
Energy3.35.9
Foreign currency7.44.3

Commodities Risk

Our meat processing and hog production operations use various raw materials, primarily live hogs, corn, soybean meal and wheat, which are actively traded on commodity exchanges. We hedge these commodities when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also tends to reduce the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices. Commodities underlying our derivative instruments are subject to significant price fluctuations. Any requirement to mark-to-market the positions that have not been designated or do not qualify for hedge accounting could result in volatility in our results of operations. We attempt to closely match the hedging instrument terms with the hedged item’s terms. Gains and losses resulting from our commodity derivative contracts are recorded in cost of sales except for lean hog contracts that are designated in cash flow hedging relationships, which are recorded in sales, and are offset by increases and decreases in cash prices in our core business (with such increases and decreases reflected in the same income statement line items). For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. However, under the “mark-to-market” method described above, these offsetting changes do not always occur in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

57

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We periodically enter into interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates on certain financial instruments and to manage the overall mix of fixed rate and floating rate debt instruments. We also periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency rates on foreign denominated assets and liabilities as well as forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies.

See "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 4—Derivative Financial Instruments" for the effects of pre-tax gains and losses on derivative instruments on our consolidated financial statements.

58

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on our experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates we consider critical. Our accounting policies are more fully discussed in Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Contingent liabilities
We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to the operation of our farms, labor, livestock procurement, securities, environmental, product, taxing authorities and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses and fees. A determination of the amount of reserves and disclosures required, if any, for these contingencies are made after considerable analysis of each individual issue. We accrue for contingent liabilities when an assessment of the risk of loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We disclose contingent liabilities when the risk of loss is reasonably possible or probable.Our contingent liabilities contain uncertainties because the eventual outcome will result from future events, and determination of current reserves requires estimates and judgments related to future changes in facts and circumstances, differing interpretations of the law and assessments of the amount of damages or fees, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our contingent liabilities during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our contingent liabilities.

59

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Marketing and advertising costs
We incur advertising, customer incentive and consumer incentive costs to promote products through marketing programs. These programs include cooperative advertising, volume discounts, in-store display incentives, coupons and other programs. Advertising costs are charged in the period incurred except for certain production costs, which are expensed upon the first airing of the advertisement. We accrue customer and consumer incentive costs based on the estimated performance, historical utilization and redemption of each program. Except for certain amounts related to cooperative advertising arrangements, cash consideration given to customers is considered a reduction in the price of our products, thus recorded as a reduction to sales. The remainder of marketing and advertising costs is recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense.Recognition of the costs related to these programs contains uncertainties due to judgment required in estimating the potential performance and redemption of each program.These estimates are based on many factors, including experience of similar promotional programs.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our marketing accruals during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our marketing accruals. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.
Impairment Considerations of Equity Method Investments
Each quarter, we review the carrying value of our investments and consider whether indicators of impairment exist. Examples of impairment indicators include a history or expectation of future operating losses and declines in a quoted share price, among other factors. If an impairment indicator exists, we must evaluate the fair value of our investment to determine if a loss in value, which is other than temporary, has occurred. If we consider any such decline to be other than temporary (based on various factors, including historical financial results, product development activities and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), then a write-down of the investment to its estimated fair value would be recorded.In assessing the fair value of an investment, we consider a variety of information, including the history of our investment's cash flows, expectations about future cash flows and market multiples for comparable businesses.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of equity method investments during the periods presented in this Form 10-K.

60

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Accrued self insurance
We are self insured for certain losses related to health and welfare, workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability claims. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of certain of our self-insurance liabilities. We and the actuary consider a number of factors when estimating our self-insurance liability, including claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. We periodically review our estimates and assumptions with our third-party actuary to assist us in determining the adequacy of our self-insurance liability.Our self-insurance liabilities contain uncertainties due to assumptions required and judgment used. Costs to settle our obligations, including legal and healthcare costs, could increase or decrease causing estimates of our self-insurance liabilities to change. Incident rates, including frequency and severity, could increase or decrease causing estimates in our self-insurance liabilities to change.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our self-insurance liabilities during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our self-insurance liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. A 10% increase in the estimates as of January 3, 2016, would result in an increase in the amount we recorded for our insurance liabilities of approximately $10.6 million.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples include a current expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use a long-lived asset or a change in its physical condition. When evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Impairment is recorded if the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. The impairment is the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived asset.We had no significant impairments of long-lived assets during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to judgment in assumptions and estimates surrounding undiscounted future cash flows of the long-lived asset, including forecasting useful lives of assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate the impairment of long-lived assets during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate impairments of long- lived assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used to calculate estimated future cash flows, we may be exposed to future impairment losses that could be material.

61

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment of goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. In the evaluation of goodwill for impairment, we may perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is not, no further analysis is required. If it is, a prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test is performed to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any. The first step in the two-step impairment test is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.We estimate the fair value of our reporting units by applying valuation multiples and/or estimating future discounted cash flows. The selection of multiples and cash flows is dependent upon assumptions regarding future levels of operating performance as well as business trends and prospects, and industry, market and economic conditions. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. When estimating future discounted cash flows, we consider the assumptions that hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount rate is used, based on our cost of capital or location-specific economic factors. The fair values of trademarks have been calculated using a royalty rate method. Assumptions about royalty rates are based on the rates at which similar brands and trademarks are licensed in the marketplace. Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. As of January 3, 2016, we had $1.6 billion of goodwill and $1.3 billion of indefinite-lived intangible assets, consisting mainly of trademarks. Our goodwill is included in the following segments: Fresh Pork - $32.2 millionPackaged Meats - $1,518.3 millionInternational - $65.1 millionHog Production - $3.9 millionAs a result of the first step of our 2015 goodwill impairment analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, the second step was not necessary. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our reporting units would not result in an impairment.Our 2015 indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis did not result in an impairment charge. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our intangible assets would not result in an impairment.

62

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all the assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit). For our other non-amortizable intangible assets, if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We have elected to make the first day of the fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for goodwill and other intangible assets. However, we could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, divestiture of a significant component of the business or a decline in market capitalization.

63

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Income taxes
We estimate total income tax expense based on statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in various jurisdictions in which we earn income. Federal income taxes include an estimate for taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be remitted to the United States and be taxable, but not for earnings considered indefinitely invested in the foreign subsidiary. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded when it is likely a tax benefit will not be realized for a deferred tax asset. We record unrecognized tax benefit liabilities for known or anticipated tax issues based on our analysis of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. This analysis is performed in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.Changes in tax laws and rates could affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Changes in projected future earnings could affect the recorded valuation allowances in the future. Our calculations related to income taxes contain uncertainties due to judgment used to calculate tax liabilities in the application of complex tax regulations across the tax jurisdictions where we operate. Our analysis of unrecognized tax benefits contain uncertainties based on judgment used to apply the more likely than not recognition and measurement thresholds.We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the tax related balances or valuation allowances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our recorded liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement may require use of our cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement could be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

64

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Pension Accounting
We provide the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. We account for our pension plans in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, which requires us to recognize the funded status of our pension plans in our consolidated balance sheets and to recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period, but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of our pension obligation and related costs. We generally contribute the minimum amount required under government regulations to our qualified pension plans. We funded $200.0 million, $167.1 million, $18.8 million, and $17.7 million to our qualified pension plans during the twelve months ended January 3, 2016, the twelve months ended December 28, 2014, the eight months ended December 29, 2013 and the twelve months ended April 28, 2013, respectively. We expect to fund $125.0 million in 2016 for our qualified pension plans.The measurement of our pension obligation and costs is dependent on a variety of assumptions regarding future events. The key assumptions we use include discount rates, salary growth, retirement ages/mortality rates and the expected return on plan assets. These assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions. The discount rate assumption is based on investment yields available at year-end on corporate bonds rated AA and above with a maturity to match our expected benefit payment stream. The salary growth assumption reflects our long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. Retirement rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. Mortality rates were previously based on mandated mortality tables. During 2014, we used a new mortality table that has flexibility to consider industry specific groups, such as blue collar or white collar. The expected return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, investment strategy and historical returns of the asset categories. The effects of actual results differing from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in such future periods. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our benefit obligation and net benefit cost for 2015: • 4.55% – Discount rate to determine net benefit cost • 4.70% – Discount rate to determine pension benefit obligation • 7.50% – Expected return on plan assets • 4.00% – Salary growthIf actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. An additional 0.50% decrease in the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation would have further reduced the funded status by $123.5 million as of January 3, 2016, and would have resulted in an additional $15.3 million in net pension cost for the twelve months ended January 3, 2016. A 0.50% decrease in expected return on plan assets would have resulted in an additional $7.0 million in net pension cost for the twelve months ended January 3, 2016. In addition to higher net pension cost, a significant decrease in the funded status of our pension plans caused by either a devaluation of plan assets or a decline in the discount rate would result in higher pension funding requirements.
Derivatives Accounting
See “Derivative Financial Instruments” above for a discussion of our derivative accounting policy.

65

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information about recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted by us, including their potential effects on our financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking statements include statements concerning our outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Our forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the availability and prices of live hogs, feed ingredients (including corn), raw materials, fuel and supplies, food safety, livestock disease, live hog production costs, product pricing, the competitive environment and related market conditions, risks associated with our indebtedness, including cost increases due to rising interest rates or changes in debt ratings or outlook, hedging risk, adverse weather conditions, operating efficiencies, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, access to capital, the cost of compliance with and changes to regulations and laws, including changes in accounting standards, tax laws, environmental laws, agricultural laws and occupational, health and safety laws, adverse results from litigation, actions of domestic and foreign governments, labor relations issues, credit exposure to large customers, the ability to realize the anticipated strategic benefits of the acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc. by WH Group, the ability to make effective acquisitions and successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into existing operations and other risks and uncertainties described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because actual results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. Any forward-looking statement that we make speaks only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

FY 2014 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000091388-15-000015.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2015-03-25. Report date: 2014-12-28.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following information in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We are the largest hog producer and pork processor in the world. In the United States, we are also the leader in numerous packaged meats categories with popular brands including Smithfield®, Eckrich®, Farmland®, Armour® and John Morrell®. We are committed to providing good food in a responsible way and maintaining robust animal care, community involvement, employee safety, environmental, and food safety and quality programs.

We produce and market a wide variety of fresh meat and packaged meats products both domestically and internationally. We operate in a cyclical industry and our results are significantly affected by fluctuations in commodity prices for livestock (primarily hogs) and grains. Some of the factors that we believe are critical to the success of our business are our ability to:

Column 1Column 2
maintain and expand market share, particularly in packaged meats,
Column 1Column 2
develop and maintain strong customer relationships,
Column 1Column 2
continually innovate and differentiate our products,
Column 1Column 2
manage risk in volatile commodities markets, and
Column 1Column 2
maintain our position as a low cost producer of live hogs, fresh pork and packaged meats.

We conduct our operations through five reportable segments: Fresh Pork, Packaged Meats, Hog Production, International and Corporate. The Fresh Pork segment consists of our U.S. fresh pork operations. The Packaged Meats segment consists of our U.S. packaged meats operations. The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations located in the U.S. The International segment is comprised mainly of our meat processing and distribution operations in Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom, our interests in meat processing operations, mainly in Western Europe and Mexico, our hog production operations located in Poland and Romania and our interests in hog production operations in Mexico. The Corporate segment provides management and administrative services to support our other segments. See "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Note 15—Reportable Segments" for additional information about changes to our reportable segments during the current year.

In February 2015, we announced an organizational realignment and key senior management appointments that unify all of our independent operating companies, brands, marketing and employees under one corporate umbrella. Moving to a more centralized structure allows for a more efficient and effective approach to customers, best utilizes management talent, maximizes the manufacturing platform and plant efficiency and optimizes marketing, innovation and brand management.

WH Group Merger

On September 26, 2013 (the Merger Date), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated May 28, 2013 (the Merger Agreement) with WH Group Limited, formerly Shuanghui International Holdings Limited, a corporation formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands and hereinafter referred to as WH Group, the Company merged with Sun Merger Sub, Inc., a Virginia corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of WH Group (Merger Sub), in a transaction hereinafter referred to as the Merger. As a result of the Merger, the Company survived as a wholly owned subsidiary of WH Group.

WH Group is the majority shareholder of Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development Co., which is China's largest meat processing enterprise and China's largest publicly traded meat products company as measured by market capitalization. WH Group is a pioneer in the Chinese meat processing industry with over 30 years of history. WH Group's businesses include hog production, meat processing, fresh meat and packaged meats production and distribution. The merging of WH Group's distribution network with our strong management team, leading brands and vertically integrated model is allowing us to provide high-quality, competitively-priced and safe U.S. meat products to consumers in markets around the world. As part of WH Group's international platform, we expect our best practices in large-scale farming, food safety standards, environmental stewardship and animal welfare to set the global industry standard.

28

This transaction enabled Smithfield to continue to execute on its strategic priorities while maintaining brand excellence and commitment to environmental stewardship and animal welfare. We have established Smithfield as the world's leading vertically integrated pork processor and hog producer with best-in-class operations and outstanding food safety practices. Operationally, we have become part of an enterprise that shares our belief in global opportunities and our commitment to the highest standards of product safety and quality. With our shared expertise and leadership, we continue to work on accelerating a global expansion strategy as part of WH Group.

The Merger was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. WH Groups's cost of acquiring the Company has been pushed-down to establish a new accounting basis for the Company. The difference in the cost basis of the Company before and after the Merger impacts the comparability of results.

Change in Fiscal Year

On January 16, 2014, the Company elected to change its fiscal year end from the 52 or 53 week period which previously ended on the Sunday nearest to April 30 to the 52 or 53 week period which ends on the Sunday nearest to December 31. The change became effective at the end of the period ended December 29, 2013. Unless otherwise noted, all references to 2014 in this report are to the twelve months ended December 28, 2014. The comparable financial data for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 is unaudited.

2014 Summary

Net income was $556.1 million in 2014, compared to net income of $120.7 million for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013. The following summarizes the operating results of each of our reportable segments and other significant items impacting pre-tax income for 2014 compared to the twelve months ended December 29, 2013:

Column 1Column 2
Fresh Pork operating profit increased $20.7 million primarily as a result of higher fresh pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Packaged Meats operating profit increased $81.8 million as a result of higher average selling prices and the unfavorable impact of the fair value step-up of inventories in the prior year due to the Merger.
Column 1Column 2
Hog Production operating profit increased $366.1 million as a result of significantly higher live hog market prices and lower feed costs.
Column 1Column 2
International operating profit increased $95.3 million due to higher sales volume and lower raw material costs in our European operations as well as an increase in equity income from our joint ventures in Mexico.
Column 1Column 2
Corporate results improved by $29.2 million due to the impact of merger related costs incurred in the prior year, partially offset by higher variable compensation cost in the current year. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" below for further discussion.

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDv)

The USDA identified PEDv in the United States for the first time in 2013. During 2014, the U.S. pork market was significantly impacted by the spreading of PEDv, a disease that only infects pigs, not humans or other livestock, which has been an industry-wide issue and continues to have a presence in U.S. swine. Our herds in several regions in which we operate were affected in 2014 as PEDv spread throughout the U.S. There are confirmed cases of PEDv in the U.S. in 2015; however, the outbreak currently appears to be less severe than in 2014. The USDA and the industry continue to monitor the situation. We are subject to risks related to our ability to maintain animal health and control PEDv. We are unable to predict the extent the disease will impact our operations or market prices in the future.

29

Renewable Fuel Standard

The federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program requires that bio-fuels be blended into transportation fuels at ever-increasing volumes up to 36 billion gallons in 2030.  In October 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) granted a “partial waiver” to a statutory bar under the Clean Air Act prohibiting fuel manufacturers from introducing fuel additives that are not “substantially similar” to those already approved and in use for vehicles of model year (MY) 1975 or later.  Prior to EPA's decision, the ethanol content of gasoline in the United States was limited to 10 percent (E10), which created a barrier, commonly referred to as the “blendwall,” to the expansion of blended bio-fuels as prescribed by the RFS.  The EPA's decision allows fuel manufacturers to increase the ethanol content of gasoline to 15 percent (E15) for use in MY 2007 and newer light-duty motor vehicles, including passenger cars, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles. In January 2011, the EPA granted another partial waiver authorizing E15 use in MY 2001-2006 light-duty motor vehicles. Judicial challenges to these rulemakings by a coalition of industry groups were dismissed.

In 2013, the EPA issued a proposed rule that would have reduced the volume of renewable fuels mandated by statute and reflected the EPA’s estimate of what would actually be produced in 2014. However, the EPA has not yet issued the final rule for 2014 production volumes, nor has it issued a proposed rule for 2015 production volumes. Representative Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) has re-introduced legislation in the 114th Congress that would eliminate the corn ethanol mandate, cap the blendwall at E10, and require the EPA to set cellulosic standards at production levels. Although the long-term impact of the RFS is currently unknown, studies have shown that expanded corn-based ethanol production has driven up the price of livestock feed and led to commodity-price volatility. We cannot presently assess the full economic impact of the RFS program on the meat processing industry or on our operations.

Country of Origin Labeling

Following a World Trade Organization (WTO) panel ruling on a complaint by Canada and Mexico that existing U.S. country- of-origin labeling (COOL) requirements violated the United States’ WTO obligations, USDA published a new rule effective May 23, 2013, Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Pork, Lamb, Chicken, Goat Meat, Wild and Farm-Raised Fish and Shellfish, Perishable Agricultural Commodities, Peanuts, Pecans, Ginseng, and Macadamia Nuts. 78 Fed. Reg. 31367 (May 24, 2013) (the 2013 Rule). The 2013 Rule requires, in part, that labels on covered meat products must list separately, in sequence, the specific country where the animal was "born," the country where it was "raised," and the country where it was "slaughtered." The rule also prohibits combining or commingling of meats with different "Born, Raised, and Slaughtered" combinations in the same package at retail.

On March 28, 2014 and on July 29, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected a judicial challenge to these rulemakings by a coalition of industry groups. As of February 9, 2015, industry opponents dropped their lawsuit against the Department of Agriculture. The Canadian and Mexican governments challenged the 2013 Rule before the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) of the WTO. On October 20, 2014, the DSB issued panel reports finding in favor of Canada and Mexico and against the United States' 2013 Rule. The U.S. Trade Representative has appealed the WTO determination and the appeal decision is expected in late spring. If the Canadian and Mexican WTO challenge is ultimately successful, then USDA will be faced with the choice of re-formulating another country of origin regulation, seeking amendments to the underlying statute from Congress, or subjecting U.S. industries to substantial retaliatory tariffs that could begin as early as summer 2015. Although the long-term impact of COOL is currently unknown, industry groups have indicated that the rules impose additional costs on the industry including costs associated with segregation of livestock, record-keeping and new packaging and labeling along with potential retaliatory trade measures under WTO rules. We cannot presently assess the full economic impact of COOL on the meat processing industry or on our operations.

Outlook

The commodity markets affecting our business fluctuate on a daily basis. In this operating environment, it is difficult to forecast industry trends and conditions. The outlook statements that follow must be viewed in this context.

With the launch of our recently announced organizational realignment, we are taking steps to build on our positive results in 2014 as we continue to solidify Smithfield’s position as a global leader in branded packaged meats. Our organizational realignment is about growth and harmonization and we currently expect to further evolve the company without closing any locations or reducing our workforce.

30

There are a plethora of benefits to moving to a centralized structure and unifying all our resources and brands together as ‘One Smithfield,’ which should position us to take advantage of growth opportunities with the following goals:

Column 1Column 2
Leveraging Smithfield’s size and scope in pork industry;
Column 1Column 2
Approaching the market more efficiently and effectively;
Column 1Column 2
Best utilizing management talent across company;
Column 1Column 2
Aligning with the way in which our customers operate;
Column 1Column 2
Maximizing our manufacturing platform and plant efficiency;
Column 1Column 2
Optimizing operations in areas like brand management, manufacturing, sales, and marketing; and
Column 1Column 2
Strengthening marketing, brand building and innovation across all brands.

PEDv has not been a major issue for us this past fall, but the virus does remain a potential uncertainty going forward. We expect U.S. market hog supplies to rebound in 2015, although lower prices and reduced energy costs should generate additional demand in the export markets, as well as domestically. Lower pork prices should also allow us to leverage additional synergistic opportunities with WH Group.

We are sharply focused on growth and believe that Smithfield is in an ideal position to continue to achieve strong results in 2015.

31

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations

WH Group Merger

In connection with the Merger, we incurred $23.9 million and $18.0 million of professional fees during the three months ended December 29, 2013 and five months ended September 26, 2013, respectively. These fees are recognized in merger related costs on the consolidated statements of income and reflected in the results of our Corporate segment. In addition, Merger Sub deferred $17.3 million of debt issuance costs for a financing arrangement. We recognized these deferred costs in interest expense during the three months ended December 29, 2013 upon termination of the financing arrangement following the Merger.

WH Group's cost of acquiring the Company has been pushed-down to establish a new accounting basis for the Company. The allocation of consideration to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed by WH Group in the Merger reflects fair value estimates based on management analysis, including work performed by third-party valuation specialists. This work was finalized during the third quarter of 2014 with no material adjustments. Our pre-tax earnings for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 were negatively impacted by $37.7 million as a result of the fair value adjustments to our assets and liabilities, including a $45.4 million increase in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventories.

Acquisition of Kansas City Sausage, LLC

In May 2013, we acquired a 50% interest in Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS), for $36.0 million in cash. KCS operates in Des Moines, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri. In Des Moines, KCS produces premium raw materials for sausage, as well as value-added products, including boneless hams and hides. The Kansas City plant is a modern sausage processing facility and is designed for optimum efficiency to provide retail and foodservice customers with high quality products. With our strong ongoing focus on building our packaged meats business, and with 15% of the U.S. sow population, this joint venture is a logical fit for the Company. It is expected to provide a growth platform in two key packaged meats categories — breakfast sausage and dinner sausage — and to allow us to expand our product offerings to our customers. These categories represent over $4.0 billion in industry retail and foodservice sales annually.

KCS is managed by its Board of Directors, which makes decisions that most significantly impact the economic performance of KCS. We have the right to nominate and elect the majority of the members of the Board of Directors of KCS, and based on the associated voting rights, we have determined that we have a controlling financial interest in KCS. As a result, the acquisition of our interest in KCS was accounted for in the Fresh Pork and Packaged Meats segments using the acquisition method of accounting. In 2014, KCS generated over $300 million in sales.

Missouri Litigation

During the twelve months ended April 29, 2012, we engaged in global settlement negotiations and recognized $22.2 million in net charges associated with the expected settlement of the Missouri Litigation. The charges were recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Hog Production segment. During the twelve months ended April 28, 2013, the parties to the litigation reached an agreement and consummated the global settlement.

CFG Consolidation Plan

In December 2011, the board of Campofrío Food Group (CFG) approved a multi-year plan to consolidate and streamline its manufacturing operations to improve operating efficiencies and increase utilization (the CFG Consolidation Plan). The CFG Consolidation Plan included the disposal of certain assets, employee redundancy costs and the contribution of CFG's French cooked ham business into a newly formed joint venture. As a result, we recorded our share of CFG's charges totaling $38.7 million in equity in (income) loss of affiliates within the International segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

32

Consolidated Results of Operations

The tables presented below compare our results of operations for the twelve months ended December 28, 2014, December 29, 2013, April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012.

The twelve months ended December 29, 2013 reflects the combined results of predecessor and successor periods. This combined information does not purport to represent what our consolidated results of operations would have been if the Merger had taken place on December 31, 2012, nor have we made any attempt to either include or exclude expenses or income that would have resulted had the Merger actually occurred on December 31, 2012.

The Transition Period reflects the combined results of predecessor and successor periods. This combined information does not purport to represent what our consolidated results of operations would have been if the Merger had taken place on April 29, 2013, nor have we made any attempt to either include or exclude expenses or income that would have resulted had the Merger actually occurred on April 29, 2013.

As used in the tables below, "NM" means "not meaningful."

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013

Twelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013% Change
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Sales$15,031.3$13,896.18%
Cost of sales13,255.712,691.14
Gross profit1,775.61,205.047
Selling, general and administrative expenses902.2830.19
Merger related costs41.9(100)
Income from equity method investments(58.2)(5.5)958
Operating profit931.6338.5175
Interest expense159.4180.5(12)
Non-operating (gain) loss(0.9)1.7(153)
Income before income taxes773.1156.3395
Income tax expense217.035.6510
Net income$556.1$120.7361%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased primarily as a result of higher domestic pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Gross profit increased primarily as a result of higher average selling prices and lower hog raising costs, which more than offset the increase in pork processing raw material costs. As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations--WH Group Merger," the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 included an additional $45.4 million in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventory.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Column 1Column 2
The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to higher variable compensation expenses stemming from higher year-over-year operating results, partially offset by lower pension expense.

Merger Related Costs

Column 1Column 2
We incurred an aggregate of $41.9 million of professional fees in the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 as a result of the Merger.

Income from Equity Method Investments

33

Column 1Column 2
The increase in profitability in the current year is primarily driven by higher hog prices in Mexico. Additionally, favorable changes to income tax rates positively impacted equity income from CFG.

Interest Expense

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 included $17.3 million of debt issuance costs originally deferred by Merger Sub.

Income Tax Expense

Column 1Column 2
For the twelve months ended December 28, 2014, taxable income relative to permanent items, the mix of income between jurisdictions and foreign restructurings impacted the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the twelve months ended December 29, 2013 was also impacted by income relative to permanent items for the period, the mix of income between jurisdictions and state income tax credits.

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012

SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales$3,894.2$5,679.5$9,573.7$8,898.78%
Cost of sales3,543.15,190.18,733.27,943.510
Gross profit351.1489.4840.5955.2(12)
Selling, general and administrative expenses213.4341.7555.1540.53
Merger related costs23.918.041.9NM
Loss (income) from equity method investments2.60.53.1(6.5)(148)
Operating profit111.2129.2240.4421.2(43)
Interest expense59.064.6123.6111.811
Loss on debt extinguishment1.71.7120.7(99)
Income before income taxes50.564.6115.1188.7(39)
Income tax expense15.812.728.558.7(51)
Net income$34.7$51.9$86.6$130.0(33)%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased primarily as a result of higher average selling prices in the Fresh Pork, Packaged Meats and Hog Production segments and an 18% increase in volume in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
Gross profit decreased primarily as the result of an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices. As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations--WH Group Merger," the eight months ended December 29, 2013 included an additional $45.4 million in cost of sales as a result of the fair value step-up of our inventory.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Column 1Column 2
Advertising costs during the eight months ended December 29, 2013 were approximately $20.0 million higher than during the eight months ended December 30, 2012 as we continued our investment in marketing and advertising programs focused on building brand equity and growing sales.

Merger Related Costs

Column 1Column 2
As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations," we incurred an aggregate of $41.9 million of professional fees during the eight months ended December 29, 2013 as a result of the Merger.

34

Loss (Income) from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
The decline in profitability was primarily driven by lower selling prices in the meat processing operations of our Mexican joint ventures. Also, tax law changes in Mexico negatively impacted our joint ventures. during the eight months ended December 29, 2013.

Interest Expense and Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Column 1Column 2
As noted in "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations," interest expense for the eight months ended December 29, 2013 includes $17.3 million of debt issuance costs originally deferred by Merger Sub.
Column 1Column 2
In the eight months ended December 30, 2012, we recognized losses of $120.7 million on the repurchase of $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.

Income Tax Expense

Column 1Column 2
The effective tax rate was impacted in all periods presented by income relative to permanent items, the mix of income between jurisdictions and state income tax credits.

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales$13,221.1$13,094.31%
Cost of sales11,901.411,544.93
Gross profit1,319.71,549.4(15)
Selling, general and administrative expenses815.4816.9
(Income) loss from equity method investments(15.0)9.9(252)
Operating profit519.3722.6(28)
Interest expense168.7176.7(5)
Loss on debt extinguishment120.712.2889
Income before income taxes229.9533.7(57)
Income tax expense46.1172.4(73)
Net income$183.8$361.3(49)%

Sales and Gross Profit

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased slightly as higher volumes across all segments were largely offset by lower domestic fresh meat and hog market prices and the effects of foreign currency translation.
Column 1Column 2
The decline in gross profit margin was primarily caused by higher hog feed costs and lower pork prices in the U.S.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $6.4 million in professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses increased $26.4 million.

(Income) Loss from Equity Method Investments

Column 1Column 2
CFG's results for twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.

35

Column 1Column 2
Results from our Mexican joint ventures declined due to higher feed costs, lower hog prices and lower meat sales volumes.

Interest Expense

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense decreased due to lower average interest rates resulting from the refinancing of our 10% senior secured notes due July 2014 (2014 Notes) and our 7.75% senior unsecured notes due May 2013 (2013 Notes) as described under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $120.7 million on the repurchase of $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $11.0 million on the repurchase of $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million in the first quarter associated with the refinancing of our working capital facilities in June 2011.

Income Tax Expense

The following items explain the significant changes in the effective tax rate from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 to twelve months ended April 28, 2013:

Column 1Column 2
Tax credits increased due in part to the passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 that retroactively reinstated the Research and Development, Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work tax credits.
Column 1Column 2
We released $11.1 million in deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013, primarily related to the utilization of tax losses in foreign jurisdictions.
Column 1Column 2
The mix of earnings from foreign operations, which are taxed at lower rates, was higher in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013.

36

Segment Results

The following information reflects the comparative results from each respective segment:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013

Twelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013% Change
(unaudited)
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$5,780.0$5,155.612%
Packaged Meats7,173.06,522.610%
Hog Production3,384.63,420.6(1)%
International1,654.01,556.76%
Total segment sales17,991.616,655.58%
Intersegment sales(2,960.3)(2,759.4)7%
Consolidated sales$15,031.3$13,896.18%
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$96.7$76.027%
Packaged Meats459.8378.022%
Hog Production344.2(21.9)1,672%
International155.860.5158%
Corporate(124.9)(154.1)19%
Consolidated operating profit$931.6$338.5175%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales increased 12% due to a 15% increase in average selling prices partially offset by a 3% decrease in volume.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit increased 27%. Operating profit per head increased from $2.61 to $3.47 due to higher fresh pork market prices, which more than offset higher raw material costs.
Column 1Column 2
We processed 27.9 million hogs during 2014, a decrease of 4%, largely attributable to PEDv. However, average hog weights were up 2%, which helped to offset the overall decline in volume.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales increased 10% due to a 10% increase in average selling prices. Current year sales volume totaled 2.8 billion pounds, which remained relatively unchanged from the twelve months ended December 29, 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit increased to $0.16 per pound from $0.13 per pound due to higher average selling prices. Additionally, the prior year included $38.7 million, or $0.01 per pound, of non-cash costs related to the fair value step-up of inventories due to the Merger. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales decreased due to lower sales volume, partially offset by higher domestic live hog market prices. Head sold during the year amounted to 14.7 million hogs, a decrease of 10% from the twelve months ended December 29, 2013. PEDv was a significant factor in the volume decline and favorably impacted market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit benefited from a 20% increase in domestic live hog market prices and lower feed costs.

37

International

Column 1Column 2
Current year sales were positively impacted by an 18% increase in volume of 1.5 billion pounds, driven largely by a 13% increase in hogs processed in Europe, and partially offset by an 11% decrease in average selling prices. We processed 4.3 million hogs during 2014. The effects of foreign currency translation also positively impacted sales by approximately $18 million.
Column 1Column 2
Current year operating profit was positively impacted by higher sales and lower feed costs in Europe along with higher equity income from our Mexican joint ventures. Additionally, favorable changes to income tax rates positively impacted equity income from CFG.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
Operating results in the Corporate segment were improved from last year due to the impact of $41.9 million of merger related costs in the prior year, partially offset by higher variable compensation expense in the current year driven by improved operating results.

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 and December 30, 2012

SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$1,347.3$2,240.3$3,587.6$3,356.17%
Packaged Meats1,968.92,541.74,510.64,140.09
Hog Production889.21,439.12,328.32,042.814
International428.2643.61,071.8983.69
Total segment sales4,633.66,864.711,498.310,522.59
Intersegment sales(739.4)(1,185.2)(1,924.6)(1,623.8)(19)
Consolidated sales$3,894.2$5,679.5$9,573.7$8,898.78%
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$96.0$(50.7)$45.3$131.0(65)%
Packaged Meats81.7149.2230.9322.7(28)
Hog Production(40.6)81.440.8(56.4)172
International25.415.941.389.0(54)
Corporate(51.3)(66.6)(117.9)(65.1)(81)
Consolidated operating profit$111.2$129.2$240.4$421.2(43)%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased during the Transition Period as a result of a 6% increase in average selling prices and a 1% increase in volume.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit decreased despite the increase in average selling prices primarily as a result of an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices.

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased during the Transition Period as a result of a 9% increase in average selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit in the current year decreased as the increase in selling prices was more than offset by higher raw material costs. Additionally, operating profit in the Transition Period included $38.7 million of additional non-

38

cash costs related to the fair value step-up of our inventories. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Transition Period sales benefited from an 8% increase in domestic live hog prices and a 3% increase in head sold.
Column 1Column 2
Hog Production operating profit improved by $97.2 million mainly due to higher live hog market prices.

International

Column 1Column 2
As a result of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, International segment sales and operating profit in the Transition Period were both positively impacted by approximately 3%.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in the transition period were positively impacted by an 18% increase in volume which was partially offset by a 10% decrease in average selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Transition Period operating profit was also negatively impacted by 8% and 6% increases in raising costs in both Poland and Romania, respectively, along with significantly lower equity income from our Mexican joint ventures.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
The Transition Period includes fees related to the Merger. See "Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations" for further discussion.

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012% Change
(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh Pork$4,924.1$5,089.4(3)%
Packaged Meats6,152.06,003.62
Hog Production3,135.13,052.63
International1,468.51,466.7
Total segment sales15,679.715,612.3
Intersegment sales(2,458.6)(2,518)2
Consolidated sales$13,221.1$13,094.31
Operating profit (loss):
Fresh Pork$161.6$222.0(27)%
Packaged Meats470.0401.717
Hog Production(119.1)166.1(172)
International108.242.8153
Corporate(101.4)(110.0)8
Consolidated operating profit$519.3$722.6(28)%

Fresh Pork

Column 1Column 2
Sales declined 3% due to a 6% decrease in average selling prices, partially offset by a 3% increase in volume as a result of higher slaughter levels and hog weights.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit decreased to $6 per head from $8 per head due to lower fresh pork market prices.
Column 1Column 2
We processed 28.5 million hogs, an increase of 3% from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.

39

Packaged Meats

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased 2% due to a 4% increase in volume partially offset by a 1% decrease in average selling prices. Sales volume totaled 2.8 billion pounds and 2.7 billion pounds for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012, respectively.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit increased to $0.17 per pound from $0.15 per pound due to lower raw material costs.

Hog Production

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased due to higher volumes, which more than offset the impact of lower market hog prices. Head sold during the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 amounted to 16.0 million hogs, an increase of 1% from the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit was negatively impacted by higher hog supplies, resulting in a 6% decrease in live hog prices, and increased domestic raising costs, including the effects of grain derivative contracts designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes, primarily as a result of higher priced feed.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 included gains of $91.2 million compared to $58.6 million for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 on lean hog derivative contracts and grain derivative contracts that are not designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation as well as accelerated depreciation charges of $8.2 million as a result of our decision to permanently idle certain farm assets in Missouri.

International

Column 1Column 2
Fluctuation in foreign exchange rates and their effect on foreign currency translation decreased sales by 8% and decreased operating profit by $11.5 million.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit for the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 benefited from significantly higher volumes in our Polish operations due to a 19% increase in the number of hogs processed. Unit sales prices in our Polish operations increased in several key product categories; however, higher volumes of lower value by-products that resulted from more processed hogs effectively diminished the overall average unit selling price compared to twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in our Romanian operations improved on significantly higher average unit selling prices and sales volumes, which benefited from the approval to export pork products to European Union member countries beginning in the fourth quarter of the twelve months ended April 29, 2012. Sales and hog slaughter volumes benefited from an expansion in our hog production operations in the second quarter of the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for the twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Equity income from our Mexican joint ventures decreased by $4.1 million due to higher feed costs and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

Corporate

Column 1Column 2
The twelve months ended April 29, 2012 included $6.4 million of professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.

40

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Summary

Our cash requirements consist primarily of the purchase of raw materials used in our hog production and pork processing operations, long-term debt obligations and related interest, lease payments for real estate, machinery, vehicles and other equipment, and expenditures for capital assets, other investments and other general business purposes. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell, as well as our credit facilities.

We believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations for at least the next twelve months. As of December 28, 2014, our liquidity position was $1.8 billion, comprised of $1.3 billion in availability under our credit facilities and $433.5 million in cash and cash equivalents.

Sources of Liquidity

We have available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external. These sources provide funds required for current operations, acquisitions, integration costs, debt retirement and other capital requirements.

Accounts Receivable and Inventories

The meat processing industry is characterized by high sales volume and rapid turnover of inventories and accounts receivable. Because of the rapid turnover rate, we consider our meat inventories and accounts receivable highly liquid and readily convertible into cash. The Hog Production segment also has rapid turnover of accounts receivable. Although inventory turnover in the Hog Production segment is slower, mature hogs are readily convertible into cash. Borrowings under our credit facilities are used, in part, to finance increases in the levels of inventories and accounts receivable resulting from seasonal and other market-related fluctuations in raw material costs.

Credit Facilities

December 28, 2014
FacilityCapacityBorrowing Base AdjustmentOutstanding Letters of CreditOutstanding BorrowingsAmount Available
(in millions)
Inventory Revolver$1,025.0$$$$1,025.0
Securitization Facility325.0(92.7)232.3
International facilities122.0(50.1)71.9
Total credit facilities$1,472.0$$(92.7)$(50.1)$1,329.2

41

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$813.1$358.2

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014 vs. Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers increased due to higher average meat selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment decreased approximately $656.6 million from the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers increased due to a 20% increase in average domestic live hog prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside meat suppliers increased due to higher fresh meat market prices, particularly pork and beef.
Column 1Column 2
The current year included net tax payments of $178.8 million for income taxes as compared to net

refunds of $16.5 million in the prior year.

Column 1Column 2
In the current year, we paid $179.6 million for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements compared to $37.1 million in the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash interest payments increased approximately $23.2 million.
SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$459.3$(25.8)$433.5$248.0

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013 vs. Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers increased due to a 6% and 9% increase in average selling prices in the Fresh Pork and Packaged Meats segments, respectively, and an 18% increase in sales volume in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment decreased approximately $65.4 million despite a significant increase in total pounds purchased.
Column 1Column 2
In the prior year eight month period, we paid cash to settle the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
In the eight months ended December 29, 2013, we paid $53.8 million for the settlement of derivative contracts and for margin requirements compared to $91.0 million received in prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers increased due to an 8% increase in domestic live hog market prices.

42

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$172.7$570.1

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013 vs. Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment increased approximately $372 million.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received for the settlement of commodity derivative contracts and for margin requirements decreased $103.4 million in fiscal 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers decreased primarily as a result of lower domestic selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
We paid cash to settle the Missouri litigation in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Expenditures for advertising increased as part of our strategy to build brand equity and grow sales.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers was lower due to a 6% decrease in average domestic live hog market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Income tax payments decreased $222.0 million as a result of significant tax refunds during the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and lower domestic taxable income.
Column 1Column 2
We contributed $17.7 million to our qualified and non-qualified pension plans in the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 compared to $142.8 million in the twelve months ended April 29, 2012.

Investing Activities

Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc.$$(4,896.6)
Capital expenditures(301.4)(311.0)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(11.0)(33.7)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions13.3(6.2)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment3.86.1
Advance note and other3.6(10.4)
Net cash flows from investing activities$(291.7)$(5,251.8)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2014

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
In April 2014, Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS) bought a meat processing business for $11.0 million.

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
WH Group paid $4.9 billion in connection with the Merger to acquire all of our common stock and settle all vested and unvested stock-based compensation awards.
Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.

43

Column 1Column 2
We paid $33.7 million, net of cash acquired, for a 50% interest in KCS. Also, we advanced $10.0 million to the seller of KCS in exchange for a promissory note, which is secured by the remaining membership interests in KCS held by the seller.
SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc.$(4,896.6)$$(4,896.6)$
Capital expenditures(69.9)(139.8)(209.7)(176.7)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(32.8)(32.8)(23.1)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions5.1(5.3)(0.2)(12.4)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment2.31.74.014.8
Advance note and other(10.0)(10.0)0.1
Net cash flows from investing activities$(4,959.1)$(186.2)$(5,145.3)$(197.3)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013

Column 1Column 2
WH Group paid $4.9 billion in connection with the Merger to acquire all of our common stock and settle all vested and unvested stock-based compensation awards.
Column 1Column 2
In May 2013, we paid $32.8 million, net of cash acquired, for a 50% interest in KCS. Also, we advanced $10.0 million to the seller of KCS in exchange for a promissory note, which is secured by the remaining membership interest in KCS held by the seller.
Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.

Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures during the prior year primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
In October 2012, we paid $23.1 million, net of cash acquired, for a 70% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC.

44

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Capital expenditures$(278.0)$(290.7)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(24.0)
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions(18.4)(2.3)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment16.96.4
Other(0.2)
Net cash flows from investing activities$(303.7)$(286.6)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $45.9 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $24.0 million, net of cash acquired, for a 70% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $32.8 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project and $30.9 million related to the Cost Savings Initiative. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects.

Financing Activities

Twelve Months Ended
(unaudited)
December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Net proceeds from equity contributions$$4,162.1
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and capital leases13.01,100.3
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(34.5)(680.5)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility255.0440.0
Payments on Securitization Facility(360.0)(335.0)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables(159.6)93.5
Debt issuance costs and other(0.2)(18.2)
Net cash flows from financing activities$(286.3)$4,762.2

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended December 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
As part of the Merger, WH Group purchased all of our common stock as of the Merger Date. The amount paid by WH Group, net of certain transaction costs is deemed to be an equity contribution by WH Group to the Company.
Column 1Column 2
Merger Sub issued the Merger Sub Notes as part of the financing for the Merger. Also, Merger Sub incurred $20.4 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the Merger Sub Notes, which are being amortized over the life of the Merger Sub Notes. As a result of the Merger and the transactions entered into in connection therewith, we have assumed the liabilities and obligations of Merger Sub, including Merger Sub's obligations under the Merger Sub Notes.

45

Column 1Column 2
We made an early repayment of our $200.0 million floating rate unsecured term loan due in February 2014 and we repaid the outstanding principal balance on our 4% senior unsecured convertible notes totaling $400.0 million, and we repaid the outstanding principal amount on our 7.75% senior unsecured notes totaling $55.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
We drew $145.0 million, net of repayments, on our Inventory Revolver and $105.0 million, net of repayments, on our Securitization Facility, to repay other long-term debt, as noted above.
SuccessorPredecessorThe Transition PeriodPredecessor
Eight Months Ended
(unaudited)
September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013December 29, 2013December 30, 2012
(in millions)
Net proceeds from equity contributions$4,162.1$$4,162.1$
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and capital leases900.3900.31,019.2
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(218.7)(458.7)(677.4)(713.4)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility240.0170.0410.0
Payments on Securitization Facility(255.0)(50.0)(305.0)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables(367.9)490.3122.442.8
Repurchase of common stock(386.4)
Debt issuance costs and other(20.4)0.1(20.3)(16.5)
Net cash flows from financing activities$4,440.4$151.7$4,592.1$(54.3)

The following items explain the significant investing activities for the periods presented:

Eight Months Ended December 29, 2013

Column 1Column 2
As part of the Merger, WH Group purchased all of our common stock as of the Merger Date. The amount paid by WH Group, net of certain transaction costs is deemed to be an equity contribution by WH Group to the Company.
Column 1Column 2
Merger Sub issued the Merger Sub Notes as part of the financing for the Merger. Also, Merger Sub incurred $20.4 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the Merger Sub Notes, which are being amortized over the life of the Merger Sub Notes. As a result of the Merger and the transactions entered into in connection therewith, we have assumed the liabilities and obligations of Merger Sub, including Merger Sub's obligations under the Merger Sub Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We made an early repayment of our $200.0 million floating rate unsecured term loan due in February 2014, repaid the outstanding principal balance on our 4% senior unsecured convertible notes totaling $400.0 million, and repaid the outstanding principal amount on our 7.75% senior unsecured notes totaling $55.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
We drew $145.0 million on our Inventory Revolver and $105.0 million on our Securitization Facility, net of repayments, to repay other long-term debt, as noted above.

Eight Months Ended December 30, 2012

Column 1Column 2
In August 2012, we issued $1.0 billion of our 2022 Notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $694.4 million of our outstanding senior notes due in May 2013 and July 2014.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 19,068,079 shares of our common stock for $386.4 million as part of a previously approved share repurchase program.
Column 1Column 2
We incurred $18.0 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, which are being amortized over their ten-year life.

46

Predecessor
Twelve Months Ended
April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt$1,219.2$
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(716.5)(152.7)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables13.9(0.3)
Repurchase of common stock(386.4)(189.5)
Change in cash collateral23.9
Debt issuance costs and other(14.5)(9.8)
Net cash flows from financing activities$115.7$(328.4)

The following items explain the significant financing activities for the periods presented:

Twelve Months Ended April 28, 2013

Column 1Column 2
In August 2012, we issued $1.0 billion of our 2022 Notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $589.4 million of our 2014 Notes and $105.0 million of our 2013 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 19,068,079 shares of our common stock for $386.4 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We incurred $18.0 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, which are being amortized over their ten-year life.

Twelve Months Ended April 29, 2012

Column 1Column 2
We redeemed the remaining $77.8 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011 and repurchased $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 9,176,704 shares of our common stock for $189.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We received $20.0 million of cash previously held in a deposit account to serve as collateral for overdrafts on certain of our bank accounts and $3.9 million of cash from the counterparty of our interest rate swap contract which expired in August 2011.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $11.0 million of debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of the ABL Credit Facility.

47

Capitalization

December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
6.625% senior unsecured notes, due August 2022, including unamortized premiums of $19.7 million and $21.7 million$1,014.3$1,021.3
7.75% senior unsecured notes, due July 2017, including unamortized premiums of $38.1 million and $54.0 million519.3538.4
5.25% senior unsecured notes, due August 2018500.0500.0
5.875% senior unsecured notes, due August 2021400.0400.0
Floating rate senior unsecured term loan, due May 2018200.0200.0
Inventory Revolver, LIBOR plus 2.75%145.0
Securitization Facility, the lender's cost of funds of 0.30% plus 1.05%105.0
Various, interest rates from 0.0% to 3.13%, due January 2015 through March 201984.2110.4
Total debt2,717.83,020.1
Current portion(46.9)(47.3)
Total long-term debt$2,670.9$2,972.8
Total shareholder's equity$4,539.5$4,231.1

Interest Rate Spread

As of December 28, 2014, the interest rates on borrowings under the Inventory Revolver and the Securitization Facility were LIBOR plus 2.75% and 0.30% plus 1.05%, respectively. The interest rate spread for the Inventory Revolver is based on a pricing-level grid in the agreement and is determined by our Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 9, 2011, among the Company, specified subsidiaries of the Company, Rabobank Nederland, New York Branch, as Administrative Agent, specified lenders, and other specified agents and arrangers, as amended).

Guarantees

As part of our business, we are party to various financial guarantees and other commitments as described below. These arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk that are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. We could become liable in connection with these obligations depending on the performance of the guaranteed party or the occurrence of future events that we are unable to predict. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for an obligation, we will record the liability in our consolidated balance sheet.

As of December 28, 2014, we continued to guarantee $7.7 million of leases that were transferred to JBS S.A. in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef, Inc which closed in October 2008. This guaranty may remain in place until the leases expire through February 2022.

48

Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity

Capital Projects

We anticipate annual capital expenditures in the range of $325 million to $380 million over the next several years to upgrade facilities with new machinery and equipment in order to improve our competitive cost structure and achieve least cost/best in class operations. These expenditures are expected to be funded with cash flows from operations and/or borrowings under credit facilities.

Group Pens

In January 2007, we announced a voluntary, ten-year program to phase out individual gestation stalls at our company-owned sow farms and replace the gestation stalls with group pens. We currently estimate the total cost of our transition to group pens to be approximately $360.0 million, including associated maintenance and repairs. This program represents a significant financial commitment and reflects our desire to be more animal friendly, as well as to address the concerns and needs of our customers. As of the end of 2014, we had completed conversions to group housing for over 71% of our sows on company-owned farms. We remain on track to finish conversion to group housing for all sows on company-owned farms by the end of 2017. Our hog production operations in Poland and Romania completed their conversions to group housing facilities a number of years ago.

In January 2014, we announced the recommendation that all of our contract sow growers join with us in converting their facilities to group housing systems for pregnant sows. We asked contract sow growers to convert by 2022 and offered a sliding scale of incentives to accelerate that timetable through the receipt of contract extensions upon completion of the conversion.

Risk Management Activities

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described under “Derivative Financial Instruments” below. Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the underlying value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decrease, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increase, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. During 2014, margin deposits posted by us ranged from $7.1 million to $382.0 million. The average daily amount we held on deposit with our brokers during 2014 was $170.2 million. As of December 28, 2014, the net amount on deposit with our brokers was $20.0 million.

The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities tend to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

Pension Plan Funding

Funding requirements for our pension plans are determined based on the funded status measured at the end of each year. The values of our pension obligation and related assets may fluctuate significantly, which may in turn lead to a larger underfunded status in our pension plans and a higher funding requirement. We contributed $167.1 million to our qualified pension plans in 2014. We do not expect to have a funding requirement in 2015.

2015 Tender Offer

In January 2015, we commenced a cash tender offer for our 2017, 2018, 2021 and 2022 Notes, subject to a maximum aggregate purchase price of up to $275 million (2015 Tender Offer). The 2015 Tender Offer expired in February 2015. As a result of the 2015 Tender Offer, we paid $275 million to repurchase $258 million of principal. As a result of these repurchases, we will recognize losses on debt extinguishment of approximately $12.1 million in the first quarter of 2015, including the write-off of related unamortized premiums and debt issuance costs.

49

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides information about our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 28, 2014:

Payments Due By Period
Total1 Year1-3 Years3-5 Years5 Years
(in millions)
Long-term debt, excluding premiums$2,660.1$46.9$534.0$684.4$1,394.8
Interest944.6164.5326.0208.4245.7
Capital lease obligations, including interest25.21.32.01.520.4
Operating leases184.542.560.140.141.8
Capital expenditure commitments40.240.2
Purchase obligations:
Hog procurement (1)5,638.31,136.01,981.01,622.7898.6
Contract hog growers (2)1,304.8388.3354.6266.9295.0
Grain procurement (3)269.6269.6
Other (4)358.387.134.627.8208.8
Total$11,425.6$2,176.4$3,292.3$2,851.8$3,105.1

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Through the Fresh Pork and International segments, we have purchase agreements with certain hog producers. Some of these arrangements obligate us to purchase all of the hogs produced by these producers. Other arrangements obligate us to purchase a fixed amount of hogs. Due to the uncertainty of the number of hogs that we are obligated to purchase and the uncertainty of market prices at the time of hog purchases, we have estimated our obligations under these arrangements. Future payments were estimated using current live hog market prices, available futures contract prices and internal projections adjusted for historical quality premiums.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Through the Hog Production segment, we use independent farmers and their facilities to raise hogs produced from our breeding stock. Under multi-year contracts, the farmers provide the initial facility investment, labor and front line management in exchange for a performance-based service fee payable upon delivery. We are obligated to pay this service fee for all hogs delivered. We have estimated our obligation based on expected hogs delivered from these farmers.
Column 1Column 2
(3)Includes fixed price forward grain purchase contracts totaling $15.4 million. Also includes unpriced forward grain purchase contracts which, if valued as of December 28, 2014 market prices, would be $254.2 million. These forward grain contracts are accounted for as normal purchases. As a result, they are not recorded in the balance sheet.
Column 1Column 2
(4)Includes guaranteed royalty payments totaling $250.0 million to Nathan's Famous Inc. (Nathan's) over an 18 year contractual term commencing in March 2014. In December 2012, John Morrell signed an agreement with Nathan's to become Nathan's exclusive licensee to manufacture and sell branded hot dog, sausage and corn beef products in the retail market. Under the terms of the agreement, guaranteed minimum royalty payments are $10.0 million for the first year and increase at a compounded average annual rate of 3.2% over the contract term.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect, or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect, on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, as well as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates.

Derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities at fair value. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as cash flow or fair value hedges for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method). Under this guidance, we may elect either method of accounting for our derivative portfolio, assuming all the necessary requirements are met. We have in the past availed ourselves of either acceptable method and expect to do so in the future. We believe all of our derivative instruments represent economic hedges against changes in prices and rates, regardless of their designation for accounting purposes.

50

When available, we use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of our derivative instruments. This may include exchange prices, quotes obtained from brokers, or independent valuations from external sources, such as banks. In some cases where market prices are not available, we make use of observable market based inputs to calculate fair value.

The size and mix of our derivative portfolio varies from time to time based upon our analysis of current and future market conditions. The following table presents the fair values of our open derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets (1):

December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Grains$(27.4)$(11.2)
Livestock58.0(7.1)
Energy(10.1)2.9
Interest rate contracts(0.1)
Foreign currency0.41.0

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Negative amounts represent net liabilities

Sensitivity Analysis

The following table presents the sensitivity of the fair value of our open derivative contracts to a hypothetical 10% change in market prices or foreign exchange rates, as of December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013:

December 28, 2014December 29, 2013
(in millions)
Grains$24.2$29.9
Livestock76.327.9
Energy5.95.2
Foreign currency4.35.8

Commodities Risk

Our meat processing and hog production operations use various raw materials, primarily live hogs, corn, soybean meal and wheat, which are actively traded on commodity exchanges. We hedge these commodities when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also tends to reduce the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices. Commodities underlying our derivative instruments are subject to significant price fluctuations. Any requirement to mark-to-market the positions that have not been designated or do not qualify for hedge accounting could result in volatility in our results of operations. We attempt to closely match the hedging instrument terms with the hedged item’s terms. Gains and losses resulting from our commodity derivative contracts are recorded in cost of sales except for lean hog contracts that are designated in cash flow hedging relationships, which are recorded in sales, and are offset by increases and decreases in cash prices in our core business (with such increases and decreases reflected in the same income statement line items). For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. However, under the “mark-to-market” method described above, these offsetting changes do not always occur in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

51

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We periodically enter into interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates on certain financial instruments and to manage the overall mix of fixed rate and floating rate debt instruments. We also periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency rates on foreign denominated assets and liabilities as well as forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies.

The following tables present the effects on our consolidated financial statements of pre-tax gains and losses on derivative instruments designated in cash flow hedging relationships:

Cash Flow Hedges
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Earnings (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
SuccessorSuccessorSuccessor
Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013
(in millions)(in millions)(in millions)
Commodity contracts:
Grain contracts$(28.9)$(8.9)$1.7$(0.9)$(3.8)$(3.7)
Lean hog contracts(137.0)3.1(218.7)3.0(6.4)
Interest rate contracts(0.1)
Foreign exchange contracts(0.3)3.52.90.3
Total$(166.3)$(2.3)$(214.1)$2.4$(10.2)$(3.7)
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Income) Loss into Earnings (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
PredecessorPredecessorPredecessor
Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)(in millions)(in millions)
Commodity contracts:
Grain contracts$3.1$39.1$5.5$23.6$108.4$75.1$1.3$$(0.2)
Lean hog contracts(29.3)13.6102.85.954.932.3(0.8)0.4(0.5)
Interest rate contracts(2.4)
Foreign exchange contracts(0.4)0.4(2.5)(0.3)2.1(4.1)
Total$(26.6)$53.1$105.8$29.2$165.4$100.9$0.5$0.4$(0.7)

52

Fair Value Hedges
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivative
SuccessorPredecessor
Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Commodity contracts$2.4$$0.5$(12.8)$21.9
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Related Hedged Item
SuccessorPredecessor
Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Commodity contracts$(2.0)$0.1$(0.5)$5.0$(16.7)
Mark-to-Market Method
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Related Hedged Item
SuccessorPredecessor
Twelve Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
December 28, 2014September 27 - December 29, 2013April 29 - September 26, 2013April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Commodity contracts$2.4$(5.9)$8.5$42.6$6.4
Foreign exchange contracts0.51.2(0.2)3.77.7
Total$2.9$(4.7)$8.3$46.3$14.1

53

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on our experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates we consider critical. Our accounting policies are more fully discussed in Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Contingent liabilities
We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to the operation of our farms, labor, livestock procurement, securities, environmental, product, taxing authorities and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses and fees. A determination of the amount of reserves and disclosures required, if any, for these contingencies are made after considerable analysis of each individual issue. We accrue for contingent liabilities when an assessment of the risk of loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We disclose contingent liabilities when the risk of loss is reasonably possible or probable.Our contingent liabilities contain uncertainties because the eventual outcome will result from future events, and determination of current reserves requires estimates and judgments related to future changes in facts and circumstances, differing interpretations of the law and assessments of the amount of damages or fees, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our contingent liabilities during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our contingent liabilities.

54

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Marketing and advertising costs
We incur advertising, customer incentive and consumer incentive costs to promote products through marketing programs. These programs include cooperative advertising, volume discounts, in-store display incentives, coupons and other programs. Advertising costs are charged in the period incurred except for certain production costs, which are expensed upon the first airing of the advertisement. We accrue customer and consumer incentive costs based on the estimated performance, historical utilization and redemption of each program. Except for certain amounts related to cooperative advertising arrangements, cash consideration given to customers is considered a reduction in the price of our products, thus recorded as a reduction to sales. The remainder of marketing and advertising costs is recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense.Recognition of the costs related to these programs contains uncertainties due to judgment required in estimating the potential performance and redemption of each program.These estimates are based on many factors, including experience of similar promotional programs.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our marketing accruals during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our marketing accruals. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.

55

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment Considerations of Equity Method Investments
Each quarter, we review the carrying value of our investments and consider whether indicators of impairment exist. Examples of impairment indicators include a history or expectation of future operating losses and declines in a quoted share price, among other factors. If an impairment indicator exists, we must evaluate the fair value of our investment to determine if a loss in value, which is other than temporary, has occurred. If we consider any such decline to be other than temporary (based on various factors, including historical financial results, product development activities and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), then a write-down of the investment to its estimated fair value would be recorded.In assessing the fair value of an investment, we consider a variety of information, including, when available, independent third party valuation reports, which incorporate generally accepted valuation techniques, and quoted market prices for our investment adjusted for any influence premium that should be applied to the market price based on our ability to exert significant influence over the operational and strategic decisions of the company. We also consider the history of our investment's cash flows, expectations about future cash flows and market multiples for comparable businesses.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of equity method investments during the periods presented in this Form 10-K.
Accrued self insurance
We are self insured for certain losses related to health and welfare, workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability claims. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of certain of our self-insurance liabilities. We and the actuary consider a number of factors when estimating our self-insurance liability, including claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. We periodically review our estimates and assumptions with our third-party actuary to assist us in determining the adequacy of our self-insurance liability.Our self-insurance liabilities contain uncertainties due to assumptions required and judgment used. Costs to settle our obligations, including legal and healthcare costs, could increase or decrease causing estimates of our self-insurance liabilities to change. Incident rates, including frequency and severity, could increase or decrease causing estimates in our self-insurance liabilities to change.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our self-insurance liabilities during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our self-insurance liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. A 10% increase in the estimates as of December 28, 2014, would result in an increase in the amount we recorded for our insurance liabilities of approximately $10.2 million.

56

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples include a current expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use a long-lived asset or a change in its physical condition. When evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Impairment is recorded if the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. The impairment is the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived asset.During 2014, the three months ended December 29, 2013, the five months ended September 26, 2013, the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and the twelve months ended April 29, 2012, we had no significant impairments of long-lived assets. Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to judgment in assumptions and estimates surrounding undiscounted future cash flows of the long-lived asset, including forecasting useful lives of assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate the impairment of long-lived assets during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate impairments of long- lived assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used to calculate estimated future cash flows, we may be exposed to future impairment losses that could be material.

57

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment of goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. In the evaluation of goodwill for impairment, we may perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is not, no further analysis is required. If it is, a prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test is performed to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any. The first step in the two-step impairment test is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.We estimate the fair value of our reporting units by applying valuation multiples and/or estimating future discounted cash flows. The selection of multiples and cash flows is dependent upon assumptions regarding future levels of operating performance as well as business trends and prospects, and industry, market and economic conditions. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. When estimating future discounted cash flows, we consider the assumptions that hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount rate is used, based on our cost of capital or location-specific economic factors. The fair values of trademarks have been calculated using a royalty rate method. Assumptions about royalty rates are based on the rates at which similar brands and trademarks are licensed in the marketplace. Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets during the periods presented in this Form 10-K. As of December 28, 2014, we had $1.6 billion of goodwill and $1.3 billion of other non-amortizable intangible assets, consisting mainly of trademarks. Our goodwill is included in the following segments: Fresh Pork - $32.2 millionPackaged Meats - $1,518.3 millionInternational - $71.8 millionHog Production - $3.9 millionAs a result of the first step of our 2014 goodwill impairment analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, the second step was not necessary. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our reporting units would not result in a material impairment.Our 2014 other non-amortizable intangible asset impairment analysis did not result in an impairment charge. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our intangible assets would not result in a material impairment.

58

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all the assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit). For our other non-amortizable intangible assets, if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We have elected to make the first day of the fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for goodwill and other intangible assets. However, we could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, divestiture of a significant component of the business or a decline in market capitalization.

59

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Income taxes
We estimate total income tax expense based on statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in various jurisdictions in which we earn income. Federal income taxes include an estimate for taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be remitted to the United States and be taxable, but not for earnings considered indefinitely invested in the foreign subsidiary. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded when it is likely a tax benefit will not be realized for a deferred tax asset. We record unrecognized tax benefit liabilities for known or anticipated tax issues based on our analysis of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. This analysis is performed in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.Changes in tax laws and rates could affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Changes in projected future earnings could affect the recorded valuation allowances in the future. Our calculations related to income taxes contain uncertainties due to judgment used to calculate tax liabilities in the application of complex tax regulations across the tax jurisdictions where we operate. Our analysis of unrecognized tax benefits contain uncertainties based on judgment used to apply the more likely than not recognition and measurement thresholds.We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the tax related balances or valuation allowances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our recorded liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement may require use of our cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement could be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

60

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Pension Accounting
We provide the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. We account for our pension plans in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, which requires us to recognize the funded status of our pension plans in our consolidated balance sheets and to recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period, but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of our pension obligation and related costs. We generally contribute the minimum amount required under government regulations to our qualified pension plans. We funded $167.1 million, $18.8 million, $17.7 million, and $142.8 million to our qualified pension plans during the twelve months ended December 28, 2014, the eight months ended December 29, 2013, the twelve months ended April 28, 2013 and the twelve months ended April 28, 2012, respectively. We do not expect to have a funding requirement in 2015 for our qualified pension plans.The measurement of our pension obligation and costs is dependent on a variety of assumptions regarding future events. The key assumptions we use include discount rates, salary growth, retirement ages/mortality rates and the expected return on plan assets. These assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions. The discount rate assumption is based on investment yields available at year-end on corporate bonds rated AA and above with a maturity to match our expected benefit payment stream. The salary growth assumption reflects our long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. Retirement rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. Mortality rates were previously based on mandated mortality tables. During 2014, we used a new mortality table based on the Mercer Industry Longevity Experience Study (MILES). Both tables have flexibility to consider industry specific groups, such as blue collar or white collar. The expected return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, investment strategy and historical returns of the asset categories. The effects of actual results differing from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in such future periods. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our benefit obligation and net benefit cost for 2014: • 5.25% – Discount rate to determine net benefit cost • 4.30% – Discount rate to determine pension benefit obligation • 7.50% – Expected return on plan assets • 4.00% – Salary growthIf actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. An additional 0.50% decrease in the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation would have further reduced the funded status by $112.5 million as of December 28, 2014, and would have resulted in an additional $2.2 million in net pension cost for the twelve months ended December 28, 2014. A 0.50% decrease in expected return on plan assets would have resulted in an additional $5.6 million in net pension cost for the twelve months ended December 28, 2014. In addition to higher net pension cost, a significant decrease in the funded status of our pension plans caused by either a devaluation of plan assets or a decline in the discount rate would result in higher pension funding requirements.
Derivatives Accounting
See “Derivative Financial Instruments” above for a discussion of our derivative accounting policy.

61

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information about recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted by us, including their potential effects on our financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking statements include statements concerning our outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Our forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the availability and prices of live hogs, feed ingredients (including corn), raw materials, fuel and supplies, food safety, livestock disease, live hog production costs, product pricing, the competitive environment and related market conditions, risks associated with our indebtedness, including cost increases due to rising interest rates or changes in debt ratings or outlook, hedging risk, adverse weather conditions, operating efficiencies, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, access to capital, the cost of compliance with and changes to regulations and laws, including changes in accounting standards, tax laws, environmental laws, agricultural laws and occupational, health and safety laws, adverse results from litigation, actions of domestic and foreign governments, labor relations issues, credit exposure to large customers, the ability to realize the anticipated strategic benefits of the acquisition of Smithfield Foods, Inc. by WH Group, the ability to make effective acquisitions and successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into existing operations and other risks and uncertainties described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because actual results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. Any forward-looking statement that we make speaks only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.

FY 2013 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0000091388-13-000040.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2013-06-18. Report date: 2013-04-28.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following information in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks and ends on the Sunday nearest April 30. All fiscal years presented in this discussion consisted of 52 weeks. Unless otherwise stated, the amounts presented in the following discussion are based on continuing operations for all fiscal periods included.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

We are the largest hog producer and pork processor in the world. In the United States, we are also the leader in numerous packaged meats categories with popular brands including Farmland®, Smithfield®, Eckrich®, Armour® and John Morrell®. We are committed to providing good food in a responsible way and maintaining robust animal care, community involvement, employee safety, environmental, and food safety and quality programs.

We produce and market a wide variety of fresh meat and packaged meats products both domestically and internationally. We operate in a cyclical industry and our results are significantly affected by fluctuations in commodity prices for livestock (primarily hogs) and grains. Some of the factors that we believe are critical to the success of our business are our ability to:

Column 1Column 2
maintain and expand market share, particularly in packaged meats,
Column 1Column 2
develop and maintain strong customer relationships,
Column 1Column 2
continually innovate and differentiate our products,
Column 1Column 2
manage risk in volatile commodities markets, and
Column 1Column 2
maintain our position as a low cost producer of live hogs, fresh pork and packaged meats.

We conduct our operations through four reportable segments: Pork, Hog Production, International and Corporate, each of which is comprised of a number of subsidiaries, joint ventures and other investments. A fifth reportable segment, the Other segment, contains the results of our former turkey production operations and our previous 49% interest in Butterball, LLC (Butterball), which were sold in December 2010 (fiscal 2011). The Pork segment consists mainly of our three wholly-owned U.S. fresh pork and packaged meats subsidiaries: The Smithfield Packing Company, Inc. (Smithfield Packing), Farmland Foods, Inc. and John Morrell Food Group (John Morrell). The Hog Production segment consists of our hog production operations located in the U.S. The International segment is comprised mainly of our meat processing and distribution operations in Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom, our interests in meat processing operations, mainly in Western Europe and Mexico, our hog production operations located in Poland and Romania and our interests in hog production operations in Mexico. The Corporate segment provides management and administrative services to support our other segments.

Fiscal 2013 Summary

Net income was $183.8 million, or $1.26 per diluted share, in fiscal 2013, compared to net income of $361.3 million, or $2.21 per diluted share, in fiscal 2012. The following summarizes the operating results of each of our reportable segments and other significant items impacting pre-tax income for fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012:

Column 1Column 2
Pork segment operating profit increased $7.9 million as improvements in packaged meats profitability were largely offset by lower fresh pork profitability both being driven inversely by lower fresh meat market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Hog Production segment operating profit decreased $285.2 million primarily as a result of lower hog prices and higher feed costs.
Column 1Column 2
International segment operating profit increased $65.4 million. The prior year included certain charges recognized by CFG, of which our share was $38.7 million. Profitability improved significantly in our Eastern European operations.
Column 1Column 2
Corporate segment results improved by $8.6 million. The prior year included $6.4 million of professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Losses on debt extinguishment were $120.7 million in the current year compared to $12.2 million in the prior year.

30

Definitive Merger Agreement

As discussed in "Part I—Item 1. Business—Merger Agreement," on May 28, 2013 (fiscal 2014), we entered into the Merger Agreement with Shuanghui International Holdings Limited (Shuanghui). Shuanghui is the majority shareholder of Henan Shuanghui Investment & Development Co., which is China's largest meat processing enterprise and China's largest publicly traded meat products company as measured by market capitalization.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which has been unanimously approved by the boards of directors of both companies, Shuanghui will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Smithfield for $34.00 per share in cash. Upon completion of the Merger, all then-outstanding stock-based compensation awards, whether vested or unvested, will be converted into the right to receive cash of $34.00 per share (without interest), less the exercise price of such awards, if any.

The Merger will provide us with the opportunity to expand our offering of products to China through Shuanghui's distribution network.  Shuanghui will gain access to high-quality, competitively-priced and safe U.S. products, as well as our best practices and operational expertise. We do not anticipate any changes in how we do business operationally in the U.S. and throughout the world. The Merger would provide our shareholders with significant and immediate cash value for their investment, and would ensure that we continue to execute on our strategic priorities while maintaining our brand excellence, community involvement, and our commitment to environmental stewardship and animal welfare.

The Merger will be financed through a combination of cash provided by Shuanghui, rollover of certain existing Company debt, as well as debt financing which has been committed by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. and a syndicate of banks. The Merger Agreement does not contain a financing condition.

The closing of the Merger is subject to certain conditions, including, among others, approval by our shareholders, the receipt of approval under applicable U.S. and specified foreign antitrust and anti-competition laws, and if review by CFIUS has concluded, the absence of any action by the President of the United States to block or prevent the consummation of the Merger and other customary closing conditions.

The Merger is expected to close in the second half of calendar 2013.

Debt Refinancing

In August 2012 (fiscal 2013), we issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of ten year, 6.625% senior unsecured notes (2022 Notes) at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used the net proceeds to repurchase $694.4 million of outstanding senior notes coming due in May 2013 and July 2014. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized losses on debt extinguishment of $120.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. We also extended the maturity date of our $200.0 million Rabobank Term Loan from June 2016 (fiscal 2017) to May 2018 (fiscal 2019). These activities have significantly improved our debt maturity profile, removed the early maturity trigger on our inventory-based revolving credit facility (the Inventory Revolver), and released the encumbrances on our real estate and fixed assets.

Share Repurchase Program

In June 2012 (fiscal 2013), we announced that our board of directors had approved a new share repurchase program authorizing us to buy up to $250.0 million of our common stock over the subsequent 24 months in addition to the $250.0 million authorized during fiscal 2012 (the Share Repurchase Program). In July 2012 (fiscal 2013), our board of directors approved an increase of $100.0 million to the authorized amount under the Share Repurchase Program. Share repurchases may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The number of shares repurchased, and the timing of any buybacks, will depend on our corporate cash balances, business and economic conditions, and other factors, including investment opportunities. The program may be discontinued at any time. The Merger Agreement generally prohibits the Company from repurchasing any of its shares prior to the completion of the Merger

Since the inception of the Share Repurchase Program in June 2011 (fiscal 2012) and through April 28, 2013, we have repurchased 28,244,783 shares of our common stock for $575.9 million, including related commissions, at an average price of $20.38 per share. As of April 28, 2013, we had $24.5 million available for future repurchases under the Share Repurchase Program.

31

Strategy for Growth

We are focused on top and bottom line growth and transforming the Company into a more value-added consumer packaged meats company. Our strategy includes growing our base business, further improving our cost structure and targeting branded and value-added acquisitions.

The fundamental tenets of our organic growth plan include:

Column 1Column 2
Increased capital investment to upgrade facilities with new machinery and equipment to improve our competitive cost structure and achieve least cost and best in class operations. We expect $300 million to $350 million in annual capital expenditures over the next several years to fund this investment in our business.
Column 1Column 2
Continued higher investment in marketing and advertising programs to build brand equity and grow sales. Our plan is to increase our annual marketing and advertising expenditures by double digits for the foreseeable future. Currently, marketing and advertising expense represents approximately 1% of packaged meats sales.
Column 1Column 2
Establish a culture of innovation to build a strong product pipeline to drive packaged meats volume and margins. Our innovation initiative will be focused in five strategic areas: packaging, health and wellness, convenience, taste and pork consumer solutions. These platforms have a strong focus on product differentiation highlighting quality and convenience, better-for-you foods, including lower sodium, lean protein, and natural ingredients, and new taste experiences.
Column 1Column 2
Emphasize our hog production assets as a strategic point of difference. We believe that our vertically integrated platform is a competitive advantage for the Company as it allows us to meet customer specifications. Both domestic and export customers are asking for differentiated products, from gestation pen pork to ractopamine-free meat, and we are uniquely positioned to fill this demand. As of April 28, 2013, our facilities in Clinton, North Carolina and Bladen County, North Carolina were 100% ractopamine-free. Our facility in Milan, Missouri is expected to be 100% ractopamine-free by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

In addition to our organic growth strategy, we intend to apply a disciplined approach in acquiring branded and value-added companies while maintaining a conservative balance sheet. Our strategy is to target modest-sized companies that can be easily integrated into our existing business. We would expect to finance such acquisitions with a combination of cash generated from our existing businesses and debt.

For example, in May 2013 (fiscal 2014), we acquired a 50% interest in Kansas City Sausage Company, LLC (KCS), for $35.0 million in cash, subject to a customary post-closing adjustment for differences between working capital at closing and an agreed-upon target. KCS is a leading U.S. sausage producer and sow processor. We intend to merge KCS's low-cost, efficient operations and high-quality products with our strong brands and sales and marketing team to continue to grow our packaged meats business.

The venture operates in Des Moines, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri. In Des Moines, the venture produces premium raw materials for sausage, as well as value-added products, including boneless hams and hides. The Kansas City plant is a modern sausage processing facility and is designed for optimum efficiency to provide retail and foodservice customers with high quality products. With our strong ongoing focus on building our packaged meats business, and with 15% of the U.S. sow population, this joint venture is a logical fit for the Company. It provides a growth platform in two key packaged meats categories — breakfast sausage and dinner sausage — and will allow us to expand our product offerings to our customers. These categories represent over $4.0 billion in retail and foodservice sales annually.

We expect the acquired stake in KCS to be immediately accretive to earnings.

Outlook

The commodity markets affecting our business fluctuate on a daily basis. In this operating environment, it is difficult to forecast industry trends and conditions. The outlook statements that follow must be viewed in this context.

Looking ahead to fiscal 2014, we will continue to execute our strategic growth plan to improve earnings and migrate the Company more towards a value-added consumer packaged meats company. We believe this plan will produce broad-based gains in volume, market share and distribution across our core brands and key product categories. The combination of those gains, an improving product mix toward differentiated, branded and value-added products, as well as loosening export market restrictions in our fresh pork business and higher contributions from our international meat processing business, should provide significant long-term growth potential for Smithfield.

32

Near-term, fresh pork margins continue to be weak, but we expect operating profit on a per head basis to average in the mid-single digits in fiscal 2014. We expect our packaged meats business to continue to post strong results in fiscal 2014 with operating margins averaging in the low to middle part of our newly established normalized range of $.15 to $.20 per pound. Lower raising costs and improved efficiencies and productivity in our Hog Production segment should result in improved operating margins in the mid-single digits on a per head basis for fiscal 2014. In our International segment, we anticipate some weakness in the first quarter of fiscal 2014 before results strengthen later in the year.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Significant Events Affecting Results of Operations

Missouri Litigation

During fiscal 2011, we reached a settlement with one of our insurance carriers regarding the reimbursement of certain past and future defense costs associated with the Missouri Litigation. Related to this matter, we recognized a net benefit of $19.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Hog Production segment in fiscal 2011.

During fiscal 2012, we engaged in global settlement negotiations and recognized $22.2 million in net charges associated with the expected settlement. The charges were recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Hog Production segment. During fiscal 2013, the parties to the litigation reached an agreement and consummated the global settlement.

CFG Consolidation Plan

In December 2011 (fiscal 2012), the board of CFG approved a multi-year plan to consolidate and streamline its manufacturing operations to improve operating efficiencies and increase utilization (the CFG Consolidation Plan). The CFG Consolidation Plan included the disposal of certain assets, employee redundancy costs and the contribution of CFG's French cooked ham business into a newly formed joint venture. As a result, we recorded our share of CFG's charges totaling $38.7 million in equity in loss (income) of affiliates within the International segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

Fire Insurance Settlement

In July 2009 (fiscal 2010), a fire occurred at the primary manufacturing facility of our subsidiary, Patrick Cudahy, Inc. (Patrick Cudahy), in Cudahy, Wisconsin. The fire damaged a portion of the facility’s production space and required the temporary cessation of operations, but did not consume the entire facility. Shortly after the fire, we resumed production activities in undamaged portions of the plant, including the distribution center, and took steps to address the supply needs for Patrick Cudahy products by shifting production to other Company and third-party facilities.

We maintain comprehensive general liability and property insurance, including business interruption insurance. In December 2010 (fiscal 2011), we reached an agreement with our insurance carriers to settle the claim for a total of $208.0 million, of which $70.0 million had been advanced to us in fiscal 2010. We allocated these proceeds to first recover the book value of the property lost, out-of-pocket expenses incurred and business interruption losses that resulted from the fire. The remaining proceeds were recognized as an involuntary conversion gain of $120.6 million in the Corporate segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The involuntary conversion gain was classified in a separate line item on the consolidated statement of income. We also recognized $15.8 million of the insurance proceeds in fiscal 2011 in cost of sales in our Pork segment to offset business interruption losses incurred.

Hog Production Cost Savings Initiative

In fiscal 2010, we announced the Cost Savings Initiative. The plan included a number of undertakings designed to improve operating efficiencies and productivity. These consisted of farm reconfigurations and conversions, termination of certain high cost, third party hog grower contracts and breeding stock sourcing contracts, as well as a number of other cost reduction activities. The Cost Savings Initiative was completed in fiscal 2013. We incurred charges related to these activities totaling $3.1 million and $28.0 million in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. No significant charges were incurred during fiscal 2013. All charges have been recorded in cost of sales in the Hog Production segment.

33

Impairment and Disposal of Long-lived Assets

Portsmouth, Virginia Plant

In November 2011 (fiscal 2012), we announced that we would shift the production of hot dogs and lunchmeat from Smithfield Packing's Portsmouth, Virginia plant to our Kinston, North Carolina plant and permanently close the Portsmouth facility. The Kinston facility will be expanded to handle the additional production and will incorporate state of the art technology and equipment, which is expected to produce significant production efficiencies and cost reductions. The Kinston expansion will require an estimated $85 million in capital expenditures, substantially all of which had been incurred by the end of fiscal 2013. The expansion of the Kinston facility and the closure of the Portsmouth facility are expected to be completed in the first half of fiscal 2014.

As a result of this decision, we performed an impairment analysis of the related assets at the Portsmouth facility in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and determined that the net cash flows expected to be generated over the anticipated remaining useful life of the plant were sufficient to recover its book value. As such, no impairment existed. However, we revised depreciation estimates to reflect the use of the related assets at the Portsmouth facility over their shortened useful lives. As a result, we recognized accelerated depreciation charges of $4.4 million and $3.3 million in cost of sales during fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. Also, in connection with this decision, we wrote-down inventory by $0.8 million in cost of sales and accrued $0.6 million for employee severance in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. All of these charges are reflected in the Pork segment.

Hog Farms

Texas

In January 2011 (fiscal 2011), we sold a portion of our Dalhart, Texas hog production assets to a crop farmer for net proceeds of $9.1 million and recognized a loss on the sale of $1.8 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Hog Production segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. In April 2011 (fiscal 2011), we completed the sale of the remaining assets of our Dalhart, Texas operation and received net proceeds of $32.5 million. As a result of the sale, we recognized a gain of $13.6 million, after allocating $8.5 million in goodwill to the asset group, in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Hog Production segment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.

Oklahoma and Iowa

In January 2011 (fiscal 2011), we completed the sale of certain hog production assets located in Oklahoma and Iowa. As a result of these sales, we received total net proceeds of $70.4 million and recognized gains totaling $6.9 million, after allocating $17.0 million of goodwill to these asset groups. The gains were recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses in our Hog Production segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

Missouri

In the first half of fiscal 2011, we began reducing the hog population on certain hog farms in Missouri in order to comply with an amended consent decree. The amended consent decree allows us to return the farms to full capacity upon the installation of an approved "next generation" technology that would reduce the level of odor produced by the farms. The reduced hog raising capacity at these farms was replaced with third party contract farmers in Iowa. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, in connection with the anticipated reduction in finishing capacity, we performed an impairment analysis of these hog farms and determined that the book value of the assets was recoverable and thus, no impairment existed.

Based on the favorable hog raising performance experienced with these third party contract farmers and the amount of capital required to install "next generation" technology at our Missouri farms, we made the decision in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to permanently idle certain of the assets on these farms. Depreciation estimates were revised to reflect the shortened useful lives of the assets. As a result, we recognized accelerated depreciation charges of $8.2 million in fiscal 2012. These charges are reflected in the Hog Production segment.

34

Butterball, LLC (Butterball)

In June 2010 (fiscal 2011), we announced that we had made an offer to purchase our joint venture partner’s 51% ownership interest in Butterball and our partner’s related turkey production assets. In accordance with Butterball’s operating agreement, our partner had to either accept the offer to sell or be required to purchase our 49% interest and our related turkey production assets.

In September 2010 (fiscal 2011), we were notified of our joint venture partner’s decision to purchase our 49% interest in Butterball and our related turkey production assets. In December 2010 (fiscal 2011), we completed the sale of these assets for $167.0 million and recognized a gain of $0.2 million.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The tables presented below compare our results of operations for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011. As used in the tables, "NM" means "not meaningful."

Sales and Cost of Sales

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Sales$13,221.1$13,094.31%$13,094.3$12,202.77%
Cost of sales11,901.411,544.9311,544.910,488.610
Gross profit$1,319.7$1,549.4(15)$1,549.4$1,714.1(10)
Gross profit margin10%12%12%14%

The following items explain the significant changes in sales and gross profit:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Sales in the current year were slightly higher than the prior year as higher volumes across all segments were largely offset by lower domestic fresh meat and hog market prices and the effects of foreign currency translation.
Column 1Column 2
The decline in gross profit margin was primarily caused by higher hog feed costs and lower pork prices in the U.S.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
The increase in consolidated sales was primarily driven by higher sales prices and volumes in the Pork segment. These increases were attributable to higher market prices for fresh pork, supported by export demand, and an improved sales mix in packaged meats to higher margin core brands.
Column 1Column 2
Gross margin declined from fiscal 2011 levels as a result of significantly higher raw material costs in all segments. Domestic live hog market prices increased approximately 15% to $65 per hundredweight from $57 per hundredweight, and domestic raising costs increased 18% to $64 per hundredweight from $54 per hundredweight as a result of higher feed prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cost of sales in fiscal 2011 included $28.0 million of charges associated with the Cost Savings Initiative compared to $3.1 million in fiscal 2012. Also, cost of sales in fiscal 2012 included $8.2 million and $4.7 million of accelerated depreciation and other charges related to the idling of certain of our Missouri hog farm assets and the planned closure of our Portsmouth, Virginia meat processing plant, respectively.

35

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Selling, general and administrative expenses$815.4$816.9%$816.9$789.83%

The following items explain the significant changes in SG&A:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $6.4 million in professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011 (fiscal 2012), we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses increased $26.4 million.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation compared to a $19.1 million net benefit in fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2011 included a net gain of $18.7 million on the sale of hog farms in Texas, Oklahoma and Iowa.
Column 1Column 2
Losses on foreign currency denominated transactions increased $7.0 million.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $6.4 million in professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011 (fiscal 2012), we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Variable compensation expense was $29.9 million lower due primarily to lower profitability levels in fiscal 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Expense for pension and other postretirement benefits decreased $19.6 million.

(Income) Loss from Equity Method Investments

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
CFG$(4.8)$25.0119%$25.0$(17.0)(247)%
Mexican joint ventures(9.3)(13.4)(31)(13.4)(29.6)(55)
All other equity method investments(0.9)(1.7)(47)(1.7)(3.5)(51)
(Income) loss from equity method investments$(15.0)$9.9252$9.9$(50.1)(120)

The following items explain the significant changes in loss (income) from equity method investments:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
CFG's results for fiscal 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Results from our Mexican joint ventures declined due to higher feed costs, lower hog prices and lower meat sales volumes.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
CFG's results for fiscal 2012 included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Results from our Mexican joint ventures were negatively impacted by higher feed costs and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

36

Interest Expense

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Interest expense$168.7$176.7(5)%$176.7$245.4(28)%

The following items explain the significant changes in loss (income) from equity method investments:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense decreased due to lower average interest rates resulting from the refinancing of our 10% senior secured notes due July 2014 (2014 Notes) and our 7.75% senior unsecured notes due May 2013 (2013 Notes) as described under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Interest expense decreased in fiscal 2012 as a result of our Project 100 initiative, under which we redeemed more than $1 billion of debt since the first quarter of fiscal 2011, including $600 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011, $260.6 million of our 2014 Notes and $190 million of our 2013 Notes.

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Loss on debt extinguishment$120.7$12.2889%$12.2$92.5(87)%

The following items explain the losses on debt extinguishment for the fiscal years presented:

Fiscal 2013

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $120.7 million during fiscal 2013 on the repurchase of $589.4 million of our 2014 Notes and $105.0 million of our 2013 Notes.

Fiscal 2012

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $11.0 million during fiscal 2012 on the repurchase of $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $1.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 associated with the refinancing of our working capital facilities in June 2011 (fiscal 2012).

Fiscal 2011

Column 1Column 2
We recognized losses of $92.5 million during fiscal 2011 on the repurchase of $522.2 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011, $200.9 million of our 2014 Notes and $190.0 million of our 2013 Notes.

Income Tax Expense

Fiscal Years
201320122011
Income tax expense (in millions)$46.1$172.4$236.1
Effective tax rate20%32%31%

The following items explain the significant changes in the effective tax rate from fiscal 2012 to fiscal 2013:

Column 1Column 2
Tax credits increased due in part to the passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 that retroactively reinstated the Research and Development, Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work tax credits.

37

Column 1Column 2
We released $11.1 million in deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the current year, primarily related to the utilization of tax losses in foreign jurisdictions.
Column 1Column 2
The mix of earnings from foreign operations, which are taxed at lower rates, was higher in the current year.

Segment Results

The following information reflects the results from each respective segment prior to eliminations of inter-segment sales.

Pork Segment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Sales:
Fresh pork (1)$4,924.1$5,089.4(3)%$5,089.4$4,542.712%
Packaged meats6,152.06,003.626,003.65,721.25
Total$11,076.1$11,093.0$11,093.0$10,263.98
Operating profit: (2)
Fresh pork (1)$161.6$222.0(27)%$222.0$406.5(45)%
Packaged meats470.0401.717401.7346.916
Total$631.6$623.71$623.7$753.4(17)
Sales volume:
Fresh pork3%4%
Packaged meats4
Total42
Average unit selling price:
Fresh pork(6)%8%
Packaged meats(1)5
Total(4)6
Hogs processed3%1%
Average domestic live hog prices (per hundredweight) (3)$60.86$65.05(6)%$65.05$56.5715%

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Includes by-products and rendering.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Fresh pork and packaged meats operating profits represent management's estimated allocation of total Pork segment operating profit.
Column 1Column 2
(3)Represents the average live hog market price as quoted by the Iowa-Southern Minnesota hog market.

In addition to information provided in the table above, the following items explain the significant changes in Pork segment sales and operating profit:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Pork segment sales declined slightly as high pork supplies contributed to lower average fresh pork sales prices.
Column 1Column 2
Fresh pork sales volumes increased as a result of higher slaughter levels and hog weights.

38

Column 1Column 2
Packaged meats sales volumes increased across all trade channels. Lower average unit selling prices of private label products were largely offset by higher sales prices in our core brands.
Column 1Column 2
Fresh pork operating profit decreased to $6 per head from $8 per head due primarily to lower sales prices.
Column 1Column 2
Packaged meats operating profit increased to $.17 per pound from $.15 per pound, benefitting from lower raw material costs.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit were positively impacted by higher average unit selling prices for both fresh pork and packaged meats driven by strong export demand, an improved mix in packaged meats to more core brand product sales, and strong pricing discipline.
Column 1Column 2
Fresh pork volumes increased primarily as a result of stronger export demand.
Column 1Column 2
Fresh pork operating profit decreased to $8 per head from a record $15 per head as live hog prices increased significantly more than fresh meat prices.
Column 1Column 2
Packaged meats operating profit increased to $.15 per pound from $.13 per pound as a result of strong pricing discipline, an improved product mix to more high margin core brands and lower variable compensation and pension related expenses, which more than offset the impact of higher raw material costs.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit for packaged meats in fiscal 2012 included $4.7 million in charges associated with the anticipated closure of our Portsmouth plant.

Hog Production Segment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Sales$3,135.1$3,052.63%$3,052.6$2,705.113%
Operating (loss) profit(119.1)166.1(172)166.1224.4(26)
Head sold15.9715.771%15.7716.43(4)%
Average domestic live hog prices (per hundredweight) (1)$60.86$65.05(6)%$65.05$56.5715%
Raising costs (per hundredweight) (2)$67.82$63.936%$63.93$54.1418%

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Represents the average live hog market price as quoted by the Iowa-Southern Minnesota hog market. These prices do not reflect premiums we receive or the impact of hedging on our actual sales price.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Includes the effects of grain derivative contracts designated in hedging relationships.

In addition to the information provided in the table above, the following items explain the significant changes in Hog Production segment sales and operating profit:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Sales increased due to higher volumes, which more than offset the impact of lower market hog prices.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2013 operating profit was negatively impacted by higher hog supplies, resulting in a 6% decrease in live hog prices, and increased raising costs, primarily as a result of higher priced feed.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2013 operating profit included gains of $91.2 million compared to $58.6 million in fiscal 2012 on derivative contracts that are not reflected in the average live hog prices and raising costs presented in the table above; these are primarily lean hog derivative contracts, and grain derivative contracts that are not designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes.

39

Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included accelerated depreciation charges of $8.2 million as a result of our decision to permanently idle certain farm assets in Missouri.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit were positively impacted by significantly higher live hog market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Volume declined due to temporary disruptions from the Cost Savings Initiative and the sale of our Oklahoma hog farms at the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Raising costs increased primarily as a result of higher feed costs.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included $22.2 million in net charges associated with the Missouri litigation compared to a $19.1 million net benefit in fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit in fiscal 2011 included a net gain of $18.7 million on the sale of hog farms in Oklahoma, Iowa and Texas.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included accelerated depreciation charges of $8.2 million as a result of our decision to permanently idle certain farm assets in Missouri.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included $3.1 million in charges associated with the Cost Savings Initiative compared to $28.0 million in fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included gains of $58.6 million compared to $22.2 million in fiscal 2011 on derivative contracts that are not reflected in the average live hog prices and raising costs presented in the table above; these are primarily lean hog derivative contracts, and grain derivative contracts that are not designated in hedging relationships for accounting purposes.

40

International Segment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Sales:
Poland$1,180.7$1,186.3%$1,186.3$1,096.98%
Romania252.3245.83245.8199.123
United Kingdom87.492.6(6)92.6101.6(9)
Eliminations(51.9)(58.0)(11)(58.0)(56.9)2
Total$1,468.5$1,466.7$1,466.7$1,340.79
Operating profit (loss):
Poland$60.3$49.721%$49.7$64.0(22)%
Romania41.47.94247.99.2(14)
Other (1)6.5(14.8)144(14.8)42.7(135)
Total$108.2$42.8153$42.8$115.9(63)
Poland: (2)
Sales volume (pounds)11%(4)%
Average unit selling price (3)(4)13
Hogs processed19(6)
Raising costs (per hundredweight)816
Romania: (2)
Sales volume (pounds)3%10%
Average unit selling price (3)137
Hogs processed98
Raising costs (per hundredweight)(1)11

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Includes the results from our equity method investments in Mexico and our investment in CFG.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Percentages computed based on local currency amounts.
Column 1Column 2
(3)Excludes the sale of live hogs.

In addition to the information provided in the table above, the following items explain the significant changes in International segment sales and operating profit:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Fluctuation in foreign exchange rates and their effect on foreign currency translation decreased sales by $116.1 million, or 7.9%.
Column 1Column 2
Fluctuation in foreign exchange rates and their effect on foreign currency translation decreased operating profit by $11.5 million.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit benefited from significantly higher volumes in our Polish operations due to a 19% increase in the number of hogs processed. Unit sales prices in our Polish operations increased in several key product categories; however, higher volumes of lower value by-products that resulted from more processed hogs effectively diminished the overall average unit selling price compared to the prior year.

41

Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in our Romanian operations improved on significantly higher average unit selling prices and sales volumes, which benefitted from the approval to export pork products to European Union member countries beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. Sales and hog slaughter volumes benefited from an expansion in our hog production operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. Operating profit also improved as a result of a $5.4 million reduction in foreign exchange transaction losses and a $3.9 million increase in government farm subsidies received.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Equity income from our Mexican joint ventures decreased by $4.1 million due to higher feed costs and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in Poland were positively impacted by higher average unit selling prices primarily due to a shift in product mix to more packaged meats and our ability to pass along higher raw material costs, particularly in the second half of fiscal 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Operating profit in Poland declined primarily as a result of higher raw material costs in our meat processing operations. Improvements in Polish hog production fundamentals partially offset the decline in profit.
Column 1Column 2
Sales and operating profit in our Romania fresh pork operation were positively impacted by our approval to export pork products out of Romania to European Union member countries beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. As a result, average unit selling prices increased 7%.
Column 1Column 2
Our Romanian fresh pork and hog production operations both saw improvements in operating results. However, these improvements were more than offset by increased losses in our distribution operations and an unfavorable $8.4 million impact from foreign currency exposure.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 operating profit included $38.7 million of charges related to the CFG Consolidation Plan.
Column 1Column 2
Equity income from our Mexican joint ventures decreased $16.2 million, primarily due to higher feed costs and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates.

Other Segment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Sales$$NM$$74.7(100)%
Operating lossNM(2.4)(100)

The change in sales and operating loss reflects the sale of our turkey operations, including our investment in Butterball, in December 2010 (fiscal 2011).

42

Corporate Segment

Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
20132012% Change20122011% Change
(in millions)(in millions)
Operating (loss) profit$(101.4)$(110.0)8%$(110.0)$3.7NM

The following items explain the significant changes in Corporate segment operating profit (loss):

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $6.4 million of professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2011 included a gain of $120.6 million on the final settlement with our insurance carriers of our claim related to the fire that occurred at our Cudahy, Wisconsin facility in fiscal 2010.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included $6.4 million of professional fees related to the potential acquisition of a controlling interest in CFG. In June 2011, we terminated negotiations to purchase the additional interest.
Column 1Column 2
Variable compensation cost declined $9.0 million due to lower consolidated profit levels in fiscal 2012.
Column 1Column 2
Expense for pension and other post-retirement benefits decreased $4.1 million.

43

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Summary

Our cash requirements consist primarily of the purchase of raw materials used in our hog production and pork processing operations, long-term debt obligations and related interest, lease payments for real estate, machinery, vehicles and other equipment, and expenditures for capital assets, other investments and other general business purposes. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell, as well as our credit facilities.

We believe that our current liquidity position is strong and that our cash flows from operations and availability under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs and financial obligations for at least the next twelve months. As of April 28, 2013, our liquidity position was $1.6 billion, comprised of $1.3 billion in availability under our credit facilities and $310.6 million in cash and cash equivalents.

In August 2012 (fiscal 2013), we issued $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of ten year, 6.625% senior unsecured notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $589.4 million of our 2014 Notes and $105.0 million of our 2013 Notes. As a result of these repurchases, we recognized losses on debt extinguishment of $120.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2013, including the write-off of related unamortized discounts, premiums, and debt issuance costs. We also extended the maturity date of our $200.0 million Rabobank Term Loan from June 2016 (fiscal 2017) to May 2018 (fiscal 2019). These activities significantly improved our debt maturity profile, removed the early maturity trigger on the Inventory Revolver, and released the encumbrances on our real estate and fixed assets.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we partially exercised the accordion feature of our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and increased the borrowing capacity of the Inventory Revolver from a total of $925.0 million to a total of $1.025 billion. All other terms and conditions of the Inventory Revolver remain unchanged, including the limitation on the actual amount of credit that is available from time to time under the Inventory Revolver as a result of borrowing base valuations of our inventory, accounts receivable and certain cash balances. We also executed a new $200.0 million term loan with a scheduled maturity date of February 4, 2014 (the Bank of America Term Loan). The Bank of America Term Loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum or, at our election, a base rate plus 2.25% per annum. These two financing activities increased our liquidity and provided capital funding at a lower interest rate, which will assist us in retiring upcoming debt maturities in the first quarter of fiscal 2014.

Sources of Liquidity

We have available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external. These sources provide funds required for current operations, acquisitions, integration costs, debt retirement and other capital requirements.

Accounts Receivable and Inventories

The meat processing industry is characterized by high sales volume and rapid turnover of inventories and accounts receivable. Because of the rapid turnover rate, we consider our meat inventories and accounts receivable highly liquid and readily convertible into cash. The Hog Production segment also has rapid turnover of accounts receivable. Although inventory turnover in the Hog Production segment is slower, mature hogs are readily convertible into cash. Borrowings under our credit facilities are used, in part, to finance increases in the levels of inventories and accounts receivable resulting from seasonal and other market-related fluctuations in raw material costs.

Credit Facilities

April 28, 2013
FacilityCapacityBorrowing Base AdjustmentOutstanding Letters of CreditOutstanding BorrowingsAmount Available
(in millions)
Inventory Revolver$1,025.0$$$$1,025.0
Securitization Facility275.0(82.3)192.7
International facilities143.1(82.3)60.8
Total credit facilities$1,443.1$$(82.3)$(82.3)$1,278.5

44

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

Fiscal Years
201320122011
(in millions)
Net cash flows from operating activities$172.7$570.1$616.4

The following items explain the significant changes in cash flows from operating activities over the past three fiscal years:

2013 vs. 2012

Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment increased approximately $372 million.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received for the settlement of commodity derivative contracts and for margin requirements decreased $103.4 million in fiscal 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers decreased primarily as a result of lower domestic selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
We paid cash to settle the Missouri litigation in fiscal 2013.
Column 1Column 2
Expenditures for advertising increased as part of our strategy to build brand equity and grow sales.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers was lower due to a 6% decrease in average domestic live hog market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Income tax payments decreased $222.0 million as a result of significant tax refunds during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and lower domestic taxable income.
Column 1Column 2
We contributed $17.7 million to our qualified and non-qualified pension plans in fiscal 2013 compared to $142.8 million in fiscal 2012.

2012 vs. 2011

Column 1Column 2
Cash paid to outside hog suppliers was higher due to a 15% increase in average live hog market prices.
Column 1Column 2
Fiscal 2012 included net tax payments of $225.7 million compared to net refunds of $34.8 million in the prior year.
Column 1Column 2
Cash paid for grain and other feed ingredients purchased by the Hog Production segment increased approximately $262 million.
Column 1Column 2
Variable compensation paid in fiscal 2012 related to the prior year's performance was higher than the corresponding amount paid in fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
We contributed $142.8 million to our qualified and non-qualified pension plans in fiscal 2012 compared to $128.5 million in fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received from customers increased primarily as a result of higher selling prices.
Column 1Column 2
Cash received for the settlement of commodity derivative contracts and for margin requirements increased $82.0 million.

45

Investing Activities

Fiscal Years
201320122011
(in millions)
Capital expenditures$(278.0)$(290.7)$(176.8)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired(24.0)
Dispositions261.5
Insurance proceeds120.6
Net (expenditures) proceeds from breeding stock transactions(18.4)(2.3)26.2
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment16.96.422.8
Other(0.2)
Net cash flows from investing activities$(303.7)$(286.6)$254.3

The following items explain the significant investing activities for each of the past three fiscal years:

2013

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $45.9 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including the replacement of gestation stalls with group pens, which is more fully explained under "Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity" below.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $24.0 million, net of cash acquired, for a 70% interest in American Skin Food Group, LLC.

2012

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures included $32.8 million related to our Kinston, North Carolina plant expansion project and $30.9 million related to the Cost Savings Initiative. The remaining capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects.

2011

Column 1Column 2
Capital expenditures primarily related to plant and hog farm improvement projects, including approximately $44.0 million related to the Cost Savings Initiative.
Column 1Column 2
Dispositions included proceeds from the sale of our investment in Butterball, LLC and our related turkey production assets and proceeds from the sale of hog operations in Texas, Oklahoma and Iowa.
Column 1Column 2
The insurance proceeds represent the gain on involuntary conversion of property, plant and equipment due to the Patrick Cudahy fire upon the final settlement of claims with our insurance carriers in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.
Column 1Column 2
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment includes $9.1 million from the sale of farm land in Texas.

46

Financing Activities

Fiscal Years
201320122011
(in millions)
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt$1,219.2$$
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations(716.5)(152.7)(944.5)
Net borrowings (repayments) on revolving credit facilities and notes payables13.9(0.3)21.6
Repurchase of common stock(386.4)(189.5)
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock and stock option exercises3.11.31.2
Change in cash collateral23.9(23.9)
Debt issuance costs and other(17.6)(11.1)
Net cash flows from financing activities$115.7$(328.4)$(945.6)

The following items explain the significant financing activities for each of the past three fiscal years:

2013

Column 1Column 2
In August 2012, we issued $1.0 billion of our 2022 Notes at a price equal to 99.5% of their face value. We used $804.9 million of the $981.2 million in net proceeds from the debt offering to repurchase the remaining $589.4 million of our 2014 Notes and $105.0 million of our 2013 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 19,068,079 shares of our common stock for $386.4 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We incurred $18.0 million in transaction fees in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Notes, which are being amortized over their ten-year life.

2012

Column 1Column 2
We redeemed the remaining $77.8 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011 and repurchased $59.7 million of our 2014 Notes.
Column 1Column 2
We repurchased 9,176,704 shares of our common stock for $189.5 million as part of the Share Repurchase Program.
Column 1Column 2
We received $20.0 million of cash previously held in a deposit account to serve as collateral for overdrafts on certain of our bank accounts and $3.9 million of cash from the counterparty of our interest rate swap contract which expired in August 2011.
Column 1Column 2
We paid $11.0 million of debt issuance costs in connection with the refinancing of the ABL Credit Facility.

2011

Column 1Column 2
We repurchased $522.2 million of our 7% senior unsecured notes due August 2011 through open market purchases as well as a tender offer. Also, we repurchased $190.0 million and $200.9 million of our 2013 Notes and our 2014 Notes, respectively, as a result of a tender offer that expired on February 9, 2011.
Column 1Column 2
We repaid $16.2 million in outstanding notes payable and received $40.4 million from draws on credit facilities in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
We repaid $30.1 million on outstanding loans in the International segment.
Column 1Column 2
We transferred $20.0 million of cash into a deposit account to serve as collateral for overdrafts on certain of our bank accounts in place of letters of credit previously used under our banking agreement and $3.9 million of cash to the counterparty of our interest rate swap contract to serve as collateral and replace letters of credit previously provided under the contract.

47

Capitalization

April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
6.625% senior unsecured notes, due August 2022, including unamortized discounts of $4.7 million995.3
10% senior secured notes, due July 2014, including unamortized discounts of $7.0 million357.4
10% senior secured notes, due July 2014, including unamortized premiums of $4.4 million229.4
7.75% senior unsecured notes, due July 2017500.0500.0
4% senior unsecured Convertible Notes, due June 2013, including unamortized discounts of $4.1 million and $26.8 million395.9373.2
7.75% senior unsecured notes, due May 201355.0160.0
Floating rate senior unsecured term loan, due May 2018200.0200.0
Floating rate senior unsecured term loan, due February 2014200.0
Various, interest rates from 0.0% to 7.22%, due May 2013 through June 2017132.9117.3
Total debt2,479.11,937.3
Current portion(675.1)(62.5)
Total long-term debt1,804.01,874.8
Total shareholders’ equity3,097.03,387.3

Interest Rate Spread

Although we had no borrowings on the Inventory Revolver or the Securitization Facility as of April 28, 2013, the applicable interest rates would have been LIBOR plus 3% and 0.2% plus 1.75%, respectively. Interest rates for both the Inventory Revolver and the Securitization Facility are based on pricing-level grids in the respective agreements and determined by our Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement).

Guarantees

As part of our business, we are party to various financial guarantees and other commitments as described below. These arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk that are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. We could become liable in connection with these obligations depending on the performance of the guaranteed party or the occurrence of future events that we are unable to predict. If we consider it probable that we will become responsible for an obligation, we will record the liability in our consolidated balance sheet.

As of April 28, 2013, we continue to guarantee $10.2 million of leases that were transferred to JBS S.A. in connection with the sale of Smithfield Beef, Inc. Some of these lease guarantees may be released in the near future and others may remain in place until the leases expire through February 2022.

Additional Matters Affecting Liquidity

Capital Projects

We anticipate annual capital expenditures in the range of $300 million to $350 million over the next several years to upgrade facilities with new machinery and equipment in order to improve our competitive cost structure and achieve least cost/best in class operations. These expenditures are expected to be funded with cash flows from operations and/or borrowings under credit facilities.

48

Group Pens

In January 2007 (fiscal 2007), we announced a voluntary, ten-year program to phase out individual gestation stalls at our company-owned sow farms and replace the gestation stalls with group pens. We currently estimate the total cost of our transition to group pens to be approximately $360.0 million, including associated maintenance and repairs. This program represents a significant financial commitment and reflects our desire to be more animal friendly, as well as to address the concerns and needs of our customers. As of the end of calendar year 2012, we had completed conversions to group housing for over 38% of our sows on company-owned farms. We will continue the conversion as planned with the objective of completing conversions for all sows on company-owned farms by the end of 2017.

Definitive Merger Agreement

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for the Company and Shuanghui. Upon termination of the Merger Agreement under specified customary circumstances, the Company will be required to pay Shuanghui a termination fee. If the Merger Agreement is terminated in connection with the Company entering into an alternative acquisition agreement in respect of a superior proposal or making a change of recommendation, or in certain other customary circumstances, the termination fee payable by the Company to Shuanghui will be $175 million. Under specified circumstances, if the Company enters into a definitive agreement with a Qualified Pre-Existing Bidder with respect to an alternative acquisition proposal on or before June 27, 2013, the amount of the termination fee will instead be reduced to $75 million. The Merger Agreement also provides that Shuanghui will be required to pay the Company a reverse termination fee of $275 million (which is not exclusive in the case of a willful breach by Shuanghui) if the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a willful breach by Shuanghui, termination primarily caused by the failure to obtain required U.S. or foreign antitrust or other regulatory approvals (other than CFIUS), or termination as a result of the failure by Shuanghui to receive the proceeds of its committed debt financing and consummate the Merger.

Share Repurchase Program

In June 2012 (fiscal 2013), we announced that our board of directors had approved a new share repurchase program authorizing us to buy up to $250.0 million of our common stock over the next 24 months in addition to the $250.0 million authorized during fiscal 2012 (Share Repurchase Program). In July 2012 (fiscal 2013), our board of directors approved an increase of $100.0 million to the authorized amount under the Share Repurchase Program. Share repurchases may be made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The number of shares repurchased, and the timing of any buybacks, depend on corporate cash balances, business and economic conditions, and other factors, including investment opportunities. The program may be discontinued at any time. The Merger Agreement generally prohibits the Company from repurchasing any of its shares prior to the completion of the Merger

Since the inception of the Share Repurchase Program in June 2011 (fiscal 2012) and through April 28, 2013, we have repurchased 28,244,783 shares of our common stock for $575.9 million, including related commissions, at an average price of $20.38 per share. As of April 28, 2013, we had $24.5 million available for future repurchases under the Share Repurchase Program.

Risk Management Activities

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, and to a lesser degree, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates, as more fully described under “Derivative Financial Instruments” below. Our liquidity position may be positively or negatively affected by changes in the underlying value of our derivative portfolio. When the value of our open derivative contracts decrease, we may be required to post margin deposits with our brokers to cover a portion of the decrease. Conversely, when the value of our open derivative contracts increase, our brokers may be required to deliver margin deposits to us for a portion of the increase. During fiscal 2013, margin deposits posted by us ranged from $(67.9) million to $77.5 million (negative amounts representing margin deposits we received from our brokers). The average daily amount we held on deposit from our brokers during fiscal 2013 was $3.1 million. As of April 28, 2013, the net amount on deposit with our brokers was $71.4 million.

The effects, positive or negative, on liquidity resulting from our risk management activities tend to be mitigated by offsetting changes in cash prices in our core business. For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. These offsetting changes do not always occur, however, in the same amounts or in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

49

Pension Plan Funding

Funding requirements for our pension plans are determined based on the funded status measured at the end of each year. The values of our pension obligation and related assets may fluctuate significantly, which may in turn lead to a larger underfunded status in our pension plans and a higher funding requirement. We contributed $17.7 million to our qualified pension plans in fiscal 2013. Our expected minimum funding requirement in fiscal 2014 is $51.6 million.

Missouri Litigation

During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the parties to certain nuisance litigation in Missouri reached an agreement and consummated a global settlement that resolved substantially all of the litigation. The global settlement was not materially different than the accrual we maintained for the settled litigation and, therefore, did not materially affect our profits or losses in the second quarter of fiscal 2013. Payments made by us under the global settlement and payments we received from the insurance carriers are included in our cash flows from operations for fiscal 2013.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides information about our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of April 28, 2013.

Payments Due By Period
Total1 Year1-3 Years3-5 Years5 Years
(in millions)
Long-term debt$2,479.1$675.1$111.1$522.5$1,170.4
Interest871.8134.2230.7208.1298.8
Capital lease obligations, including interest26.61.02.21.521.9
Operating leases166.641.954.832.437.5
Capital expenditure commitments53.953.9
Purchase obligations:
Hog procurement (1)6,191.31,449.02,115.91,658.9967.5
Contract hog growers (2)1,044.0380.0291.6181.9190.5
Grain procurement (3)480.3480.3
Other (4)290.515.426.227.8221.1
Total$11,604.1$3,230.8$2,832.5$2,633.1$2,907.7

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Through the Pork and International segments, we have purchase agreements with certain hog producers. Some of these arrangements obligate us to purchase all of the hogs produced by these producers. Other arrangements obligate us to purchase a fixed amount of hogs. Due to the uncertainty of the number of hogs that we are obligated to purchase and the uncertainty of market prices at the time of hog purchases, we have estimated our obligations under these arrangements. Future payments were estimated using current live hog market prices, available futures contract prices and internal projections adjusted for historical quality premiums.
Column 1Column 2
(2)Through the Hog Production segment, we use independent farmers and their facilities to raise hogs produced from our breeding stock. Under multi-year contracts, the farmers provide the initial facility investment, labor and front line management in exchange for a performance-based service fee payable upon delivery. We are obligated to pay this service fee for all hogs delivered. We have estimated our obligation based on expected hogs delivered from these farmers.
Column 1Column 2
(3)Includes fixed price forward grain purchase contracts totaling $192.9 million. Also includes unpriced forward grain purchase contracts which, if valued as of April 28, 2013 market prices, would be $287.4 million. These forward grain contracts are accounted for as normal purchases. As a result, they are not recorded in the balance sheet.
Column 1Column 2
(4)Includes guaranteed royalty payments totaling $250.0 million to Nathan's Famous Inc. (Nathan's) over an 18 year contractual term commencing in March 2014 (fiscal 2014). In December 2012 (fiscal 2013), John Morrell signed an agreement with Nathan's to become Nathan's exclusive licensee to manufacture and sell branded hot dog, sausage and corn beef products in the retail market. Under the terms of the agreement, guaranteed minimum royalty payments are $10.0 million for the first year and increase at a compounded average annual rate of 3.2% over the contract term.

50

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have a material current effect, or that are reasonably likely to have a material future effect, on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

We are exposed to market risks primarily from changes in commodity prices, as well as interest rates and foreign exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we utilize derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to changing prices and rates.

Derivative instruments are recorded in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities at fair value. For derivatives that qualify and have been designated as cash flow or fair value hedges for accounting purposes, changes in fair value have no net impact on earnings, to the extent the derivative is considered perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows attributable to the risk being hedged, until the hedged item is recognized in earnings (commonly referred to as the “hedge accounting” method). For derivatives that do not qualify or are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings (commonly referred to as the “mark-to-market” method). Under this guidance, we may elect either method of accounting for our derivative portfolio, assuming all the necessary requirements are met. We have in the past availed ourselves of either acceptable method and expect to do so in the future. We believe all of our derivative instruments represent economic hedges against changes in prices and rates, regardless of their designation for accounting purposes.

When available, we use quoted market prices to determine the fair value of our derivative instruments. This may include exchange prices, quotes obtained from brokers, or independent valuations from external sources, such as banks. In some cases where market prices are not available, we make use of observable market based inputs to calculate fair value.

The size and mix of our derivative portfolio varies from time to time based upon our analysis of current and future market conditions. The following table presents the fair values of our open derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets (1).

April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Grains$(78.0)$33.8
Livestock14.723.1
Energy2.5(12.2)
Foreign currency0.43.6

——————————————

Column 1Column 2
(1)Negative amounts represent net liabilities

Sensitivity Analysis

The following table presents the sensitivity of the fair value of our open derivative contracts to a hypothetical 10% change in market prices or foreign exchange rates, as of April 28, 2013 and April 29, 2012.

April 28, 2013April 29, 2012
(in millions)
Grains$38.1$49.4
Livestock12.718.0
Energy5.43.3
Foreign currency5.011.9

51

Commodities Risk

Our meat processing and hog production operations use various raw materials, mainly corn, lean hogs, live cattle, pork bellies, soybeans and wheat, which are actively traded on commodity exchanges. We hedge these commodities when we determine conditions are appropriate to mitigate the inherent price risks. While this hedging may limit our ability to participate in gains from favorable commodity fluctuations, it also tends to reduce the risk of loss from adverse changes in raw material prices. Commodities underlying our derivative instruments are subject to significant price fluctuations. Any requirement to mark-to-market the positions that have not been designated or do not qualify for hedge accounting could result in volatility in our results of operations. We attempt to closely match the hedging instrument terms with the hedged item’s terms. Gains and losses resulting from our commodity derivative contracts are recorded in cost of sales except for lean hog contracts that are designated in cash flow hedging relationships, which are recorded in sales, and are offset by increases and decreases in cash prices in our core business (with such increases and decreases reflected in the same income statement line items). For example, in a period of rising grain prices, gains resulting from long grain derivative positions would generally be offset by higher cash prices paid to farmers and other suppliers in spot markets. However, under the “mark-to-market” method described above, these offsetting changes do not always occur in the same period, with lag times of as much as twelve months.

Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

We periodically enter into interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates on certain financial instruments and to manage the overall mix of fixed rate and floating rate debt instruments. We also periodically enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency rates on foreign denominated assets and liabilities as well as forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies.

The following tables present the effects on our consolidated financial statements from our derivative instruments and related hedged items:

Cash Flow Hedges
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on Derivative (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into Earnings (Effective Portion)Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
201320122011201320122011201320122011
(in millions)(in millions)(in millions)
Commodity contracts:
Grain contracts$39.1$5.5$232.9$108.4$75.1$80.7$$(0.2)$1.9
Lean hog contracts13.6102.8(82.8)54.932.3(44.5)0.4(0.5)(1.0)
Interest rate contracts(1.2)(2.4)(7.0)
Foreign exchange contracts0.4(2.5)(4.1)2.1(4.1)(2.6)
Total$53.1$105.8$144.8$165.4$100.9$26.6$0.4$(0.7)$0.9
Fair Value Hedges
Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on DerivativeGain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings on Related Hedged Item
201320122011201320122011
(in millions)(in millions)
Commodity contracts$(12.8)$21.9$(4.2)$5.0$(16.7)$5.4
Mark-to-Market Method
Fiscal Years
201320122011
(in millions)
Commodity contracts$42.6$6.4$63.4
Foreign exchange contracts3.77.7(9.0)
Total$46.3$14.1$54.4

52

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions are based on our experience and our understanding of the current facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates we consider critical. Our accounting policies are more fully discussed in Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Contingent liabilities
We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to the operation of our farms, labor, livestock procurement, securities, environmental, product, taxing authorities and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses and fees. A determination of the amount of reserves and disclosures required, if any, for these contingencies are made after considerable analysis of each individual issue. We accrue for contingent liabilities when an assessment of the risk of loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. We disclose contingent liabilities when the risk of loss is reasonably possible or probable.Our contingent liabilities contain uncertainties because the eventual outcome will result from future events, and determination of current reserves requires estimates and judgments related to future changes in facts and circumstances, differing interpretations of the law and assessments of the amount of damages or fees, and the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our contingent liabilities during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our contingent liabilities.

53

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results Differ From Assumptions
Marketing and advertising costs
We incur advertising, customer incentive and consumer incentive costs to promote products through marketing programs. These programs include cooperative advertising, volume discounts, in-store display incentives, coupons and other programs. Advertising costs are charged in the period incurred except for certain production costs, which are expensed upon the first airing of the advertisement. We accrue customer and consumer incentive costs based on the estimated performance, historical utilization and redemption of each program. Except for certain amounts related to cooperative advertising arrangements, cash consideration given to customers is considered a reduction in the price of our products, thus recorded as a reduction to sales. The remainder of marketing and advertising costs is recorded as a selling, general and administrative expense.Recognition of the costs related to these programs contains uncertainties due to judgment required in estimating the potential performance and redemption of each program.These estimates are based on many factors, including experience of similar promotional programs.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our marketing accruals during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our marketing accruals. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.

54

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment Considerations of Equity Method Investments
Each quarter, we review the carrying value of our investments and consider whether indicators of impairment exist. Examples of impairment indicators include a history or expectation of future operating losses and declines in a quoted share price, among other factors. If an impairment indicator exists, we must evaluate the fair value of our investment to determine if a loss in value, which is other than temporary, has occurred. If we consider any such decline to be other than temporary (based on various factors, including historical financial results, product development activities and the overall health of the affiliate’s industry), then a write-down of the investment to its estimated fair value would be recorded.In assessing the fair value of an investment, we consider a variety of information, including, when available, independent third party valuation reports, which incorporate generally accepted valuation techniques, and quoted market prices for our investment adjusted for any influence premium that should be applied to the market price based on our ability to exert significant influence over the operational and strategic decisions of the company. We also consider the history of our investment's cash flows, expectations about future cash flows and market multiples for comparable businesses.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of equity method investments during the last three years. As of April 28, 2013, the carrying value of our investment in CFG exceeded the quoted market price on the Bolsa de Madrid Exchange (Madrid Exchange), indicating a possible impairment of our investment. However, CFG's share price is just one of several factors we consider in evaluating the fair value of our investment in CFG. Based on our evaluation, we concluded the fair value of our investment in CFG as of April 28, 2013, exceeded its carrying amount. However, our estimate of fair value has declined over the last 24 months, significantly eroding the gap between fair value and carrying value. The fair value decline is primarily attributable to persistent recessionary conditions in Western Europe, which have dampened CFG's current operating performance. In addition, rising interest rates associated with European sovereign debt crises have forced discount rates higher, diminishing the values calculated using our discounted cash flow techniques. Finally, CFG's share price on the Madrid Exchange has declined and, notwithstanding our reservations about the Madrid Exchange price, we nonetheless utilize it as a component of our valuation work and believe such declines must be considered as part of our fair value estimate.

55

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
While we do not believe our investment is impaired as of April 28, 2013, the confluence of these and other factors has decreased our estimate of CFG's fair value and increased the risk of impairment. If the trends contributing to our lower estimate of CFG's fair value continue, the investment would become impaired. Specifically, if the most sensitive factors affecting our fair value calculations (i.e., estimates of future cash flows, interest rates and share price) continue to deteriorate, it is reasonably possible that our estimate of fair value could fall below carrying value. If that occurs, and we determine that the decline is other than temporary, we would record a charge to income for the difference between the estimate of fair value and the carrying amount of our investment.
Accrued self insurance
We are self insured for certain losses related to health and welfare, workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability claims. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of certain of our self-insurance liabilities. We and the actuary consider a number of factors when estimating our self-insurance liability, including claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. We periodically review our estimates and assumptions with our third-party actuary to assist us in determining the adequacy of our self-insurance liability.Our self-insurance liabilities contain uncertainties due to assumptions required and judgment used. Costs to settle our obligations, including legal and healthcare costs, could increase or decrease causing estimates of our self-insurance liabilities to change. Incident rates, including frequency and severity, could increase or decrease causing estimates in our self-insurance liabilities to change.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our self-insurance liabilities during the past three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate our self-insurance liabilities. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. A 10% increase in the estimates as of April 28, 2013, would result in an increase in the amount we recorded for our insurance liabilities of approximately $9.9 million.

56

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples include a current expectation that a long-lived asset will be disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use a long-lived asset or a change in its physical condition. When evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. Impairment is recorded if the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. The impairment is the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived asset. We recorded impairment charges related to long-lived assets of $4.2 million, $2.9 and $9.2 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to judgment in assumptions and estimates surrounding undiscounted future cash flows of the long-lived asset, including forecasting useful lives of assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate the impairment of long-lived assets during the last three years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate impairments of long- lived assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used to calculate estimated future cash flows, we may be exposed to future impairment losses that could be material.

57

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Impairment of goodwill and other non-amortized intangible assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or sooner if impairment indicators arise. In the evaluation of goodwill for impairment, we may perform a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If it is not, no further analysis is required. If it is, a prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test is performed to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit, if any. The first step in the two-step impairment test is to identify if a potential impairment exists by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to have a potential impairment and the second step of the impairment test is not necessary. However, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired and to measure the amount of impairment loss to recognize, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired. However, if the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.We estimate the fair value of our reporting units by applying valuation multiples and/or estimating future discounted cash flows. The selection of multiples and cash flows is dependent upon assumptions regarding future levels of operating performance as well as business trends and prospects, and industry, market and economic conditions. A discounted cash flow analysis requires us to make various judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates and discount rates. When estimating future discounted cash flows, we consider the assumptions that hypothetical marketplace participants would use in estimating future cash flows. In addition, where applicable, an appropriate discount rate is used, based on our cost of capital or location-specific economic factors. The fair values of trademarks have been calculated using a royalty rate method. Assumptions about royalty rates are based on the rates at which similar brands and trademarks are licensed in the marketplace. Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties due to uncontrollable events that could positively or negatively impact the anticipated future economic and operating conditions.We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to evaluate impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets during the last three years. As of April 28, 2013, we had $782.4 million of goodwill and $345.7 million of other non-amortized intangible assets. Our goodwill is included in the following segments: • $231.8 million – Pork • $130.6 million – International • $420.0 million – Hog Production As a result of the first step of our 2013 goodwill impairment analysis, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, the second step was not necessary. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our reporting units would not result in an impairment. Our fiscal 2013 other non-amortized intangible asset impairment analysis did not result in an impairment charge. A hypothetical 10% decrease in the estimated fair value of our intangible assets would not result in a material impairment.

58

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all the assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit). For our other non-amortized intangible assets, if the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We have elected to make the first day of the fourth quarter the annual impairment assessment date for goodwill and other intangible assets. However, we could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets prior to the required annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, divestiture of a significant component of the business or a decline in market capitalization.

59

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Income taxes
We estimate total income tax expense based on statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to us in various jurisdictions in which we earn income. Federal income taxes include an estimate for taxes on earnings of foreign subsidiaries expected to be remitted to the United States and be taxable, but not for earnings considered indefinitely invested in the foreign subsidiary. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are recorded when it is likely a tax benefit will not be realized for a deferred tax asset. We record unrecognized tax benefit liabilities for known or anticipated tax issues based on our analysis of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. This analysis is performed in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.Changes in tax laws and rates could affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Changes in projected future earnings could affect the recorded valuation allowances in the future. Our calculations related to income taxes contain uncertainties due to judgment used to calculate tax liabilities in the application of complex tax regulations across the tax jurisdictions where we operate. Our analysis of unrecognized tax benefits contain uncertainties based on judgment used to apply the more likely than not recognition and measurement thresholds.We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the tax related balances or valuation allowances. However, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our recorded liabilities, our effective tax rate in a given financial statement period could be materially affected. An unfavorable tax settlement may require use of our cash and result in an increase in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution. A favorable tax settlement could be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of resolution.

60

DescriptionJudgments and UncertaintiesEffect if Actual Results DifferFrom Assumptions
Pension Accounting
We provide the majority of our U.S. employees with pension benefits. We account for our pension plans in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance, which requires us to recognize the funded status of our pension plans in our consolidated balance sheets and to recognize, as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period, but are not recognized in net periodic benefit cost. We use an independent third-party actuary to assist in the determination of our pension obligation and related costs. We generally contribute the minimum amount required under government regulations to our qualified pension plans. We funded $17.7 million, $142.8 million and $95.1 million to our qualified pension plans during fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We expect to fund at least $51.6 million in fiscal 2014.The measurement of our pension obligation and costs is dependent on a variety of assumptions regarding future events. The key assumptions we use include discount rates, salary growth, retirement ages/mortality rates and the expected return on plan assets. These assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions. The discount rate assumption is based on investment yields available at year-end on corporate bonds rated AA and above with a maturity to match our expected benefit payment stream. The salary growth assumption reflects our long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. Retirement rates are based primarily on actual plan experience. Mortality rates are based on mandated mortality tables, which have flexibility to consider industry specific groups, such as blue collar or white collar. The expected return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, investment strategy and historical returns of the asset categories. The effects of actual results differing from these assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in such future periods. The following weighted average assumptions were used to determine our benefit obligation and net benefit cost for fiscal 2013: • 4.75% – Discount rate to determine net benefit cost • 4.45% – Discount rate to determine pension benefit obligation • 7.75% – Expected return on plan assets • 4.00% – Salary growthIf actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. For example, the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation decreased from 4.75% as of April 29, 2012 to 4.45% as of April 28, 2013, which is the primary cause for a $115.5 million decline in funded status and an expected increase in net pension cost of $11.9 million in fiscal 2014. An additional 0.50% decrease in the discount rate used to measure our projected benefit obligation would have further reduced the funded status by $136.8 million as of April 28, 2013, and would have resulted in an additional $16.8 million in net pension cost for fiscal 2013. A 0.50% decrease in expected return on plan assets would have resulted in an additional $5.5 million in net pension cost for fiscal 2013. In addition to higher net pension cost, a significant decrease in the funded status of our pension plans caused by either a devaluation of plan assets or a decline in the discount rate would result in higher pension funding requirements.
Derivatives Accounting
See “Derivative Financial Instruments” above for a discussion of our derivative accounting policy.

61

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information about recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted by us, including their potential effects on our financial statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking statements include statements concerning our outlook for the future, as well as other statements of beliefs, future plans and strategies or anticipated events, and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Our forward-looking information and statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. These risks and uncertainties include the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement, the failure to receive, on a timely basis or otherwise, the required approvals by the Company's shareholders or government or regulatory agencies with regard to the merger, the failure of one or more conditions to the closing of the Merger Agreement to be satisfied, the failure of Shuanghui to obtain the necessary financing in connection with the Merger Agreement, the amount of costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the Merger Agreement or the merger, risks arising from the merger's diversion of management's attention from our ongoing business operations, risks that our stock price may decline significantly if the merger is not completed, the ability of the Company to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with customers, suppliers and other business partners pending the consummation of the proposed merger, the availability and prices of live hogs, feed ingredients (including corn), raw materials, fuel and supplies, food safety, livestock disease, live hog production costs, product pricing, the competitive environment and related market conditions, risks associated with our indebtedness, including cost increases due to rising interest rates or changes in debt ratings or outlook, hedging risk, adverse weather conditions, operating efficiencies, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, access to capital, the cost of compliance with and changes to regulations and laws, including changes in accounting standards, tax laws, environmental laws, agricultural laws and occupational, health and safety laws, adverse results from litigation, actions of domestic and foreign governments, labor relations issues, credit exposure to large customers, the ability to make effective acquisitions and successfully integrate newly acquired businesses into existing operations and other risks and uncertainties described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because actual results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the statements. Any forward-looking statement that we make speaks only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not intended to express any future trends or indications of future performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed as historical data.