LINCOLN NATIONAL CORP (LNC)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > Insurance Carriers > SIC 6311 Life Insurance
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=59558. Latest filing source: 0000059558-26-000016.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Business
Read LNC's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.
Risk Factors
Read LNC's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.
Peer comparisons including LNC
- Life insurers: peer review · market-risk page
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 18,212,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Net income | 1,177,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
| Assets | 417,204,000,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-19 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-19. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000059558.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 13,330,000,000 | 14,257,000,000 | 16,424,000,000 | 17,258,000,000 | 17,439,000,000 | 17,715,000,000 | 18,810,000,000 | 11,645,000,000 | 18,442,000,000 | 18,212,000,000 | |
| Net income | 1,192,000,000 | 2,079,000,000 | 1,641,000,000 | 886,000,000 | 499,000,000 | 3,778,000,000 | 1,358,000,000 | -752,000,000 | 3,275,000,000 | 1,177,000,000 | |
| Diluted EPS | 5.03 | 9.22 | 7.40 | 4.38 | 2.56 | 19.96 | 7.78 | -4.92 | 18.41 | 5.83 | |
| Operating cash flow | 1,272,000,000 | 788,000,000 | 1,943,000,000 | -2,686,000,000 | 534,000,000 | -217,000,000 | 3,609,000,000 | -2,074,000,000 | -2,007,000,000 | -167,000,000 | |
| Dividends paid | 319,000,000 | 310,000,000 | 305,000,000 | 307,000,000 | 325,000,000 | ||||||
| Share buybacks | 900,000,000 | 879,000,000 | 725,000,000 | 900,000,000 | 550,000,000 | 275,000,000 | 1,105,000,000 | 550,000,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Assets | 261,627,000,000 | 281,763,000,000 | 298,147,000,000 | 334,761,000,000 | 365,948,000,000 | 386,945,000,000 | 334,331,000,000 | 372,413,000,000 | 390,831,000,000 | 417,204,000,000 | |
| Liabilities | 247,149,000,000 | 264,441,000,000 | 283,797,000,000 | 315,072,000,000 | 343,249,000,000 | 366,191,000,000 | 329,229,000,000 | 365,520,000,000 | 382,562,000,000 | 406,298,000,000 | |
| Stockholders' equity | 14,478,000,000 | 17,322,000,000 | 14,350,000,000 | 19,689,000,000 | 22,699,000,000 | 19,915,000,000 | 5,102,000,000 | 6,893,000,000 | 8,269,000,000 | 10,906,000,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 8.94% | 14.58% | 9.99% | 5.13% | 2.86% | 21.33% | 7.22% | -6.46% | 17.76% | 6.46% | |
| Return on equity | 8.23% | 12.00% | 11.44% | 4.50% | 2.20% | 18.97% | 26.62% | -10.91% | 39.61% | 10.79% | |
| Return on assets | 0.46% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 0.26% | 0.14% | 0.98% | 0.41% | -0.20% | 0.84% | 0.28% | |
| Liabilities / equity | 17.07 | 15.27 | 19.78 | 16.00 | 15.12 | 18.39 | 64.53 | 53.03 | 46.26 | 37.25 |
Industry Peer Context
Net margin peer context
ROE peer context
ROA peer context
Financial Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2024 ended 2024-12-31; accession 0000059558-25-000023; filed 2025-02-21. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000059558-26-000016; filed 2026-02-19. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-07. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000059558.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q2 | 2022-06-30 | 1.34 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | -15.17 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | -5.37 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 2,929,000,000 | 511,000,000 | 2.94 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 4,203,000,000 | 853,000,000 | 4.79 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 699,000,000 | -1,235,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 4,116,000,000 | 1,222,000,000 | 6.93 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 5,153,000,000 | 895,000,000 | 5.11 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 4,111,000,000 | -528,000,000 | -3.29 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 5,062,000,000 | 1,687,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 4,691,000,000 | -722,000,000 | -4.41 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 4,044,000,000 | 699,000,000 | 3.80 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 4,555,000,000 | 445,000,000 | 2.12 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 4,922,000,000 | 754,000,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 5,306,000,000 | -172,000,000 | -1.10 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0000059558-26-000035; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0000059558-26-000035; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0000059558-26-000035; filed 2026-05-07. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0000059558-26-000035.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 69 |
| Introduction | 70 |
| Executive Summary | 70 |
| Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates | 71 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 77 |
| Results of Annuities | 78 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 83 |
| Results of Group Protection | 88 |
| Results of Retirement Plan Services | 92 |
| Results of Other Operations | 95 |
| Consolidated Investments | 97 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 113 |
68
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of March 31, 2026, compared with December 31, 2025, and the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared with the corresponding period in 2025 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements presented in “Part I – Item 1. Financial Statements” and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 (“2025 Form 10-K”). For more detailed information on the risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business activities, see the risks described in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2025 Form 10-K.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
•Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account balances, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
•The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business; and our affiliate reinsurance arrangements;
•Changes in tax law or the interpretation of or application of existing tax laws that could impact our tax costs and the products that we sell;
•The impact of regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations that could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and result in additional disclosure and other requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products;
•The impact of existing and emerging rules and regulations relating to privacy, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (“AI”) that may lead to increased compliance costs, reputation risk and/or changes in business practices, and challenges with properly managing the use of AI that could result in reputational harm, competitive harm and legal liability;
•Continued scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance matters that may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
•Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
•Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and demand for our products;
•Increasing or sustained higher interest rates that may negatively affect our profitability, value of our investment portfolio and capital position and may cause policyholders to surrender annuity and life insurance policies, thereby causing realized investment losses;
•The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
•A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefits, including riders on certain of our annuity products and secondary guarantees on certain variable universal life insurance products;
•Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
69
Table of Contents
•A deviation in actual experience regarding future policyholder behavior, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce future earnings;
•Changes in accounting principles that may affect our consolidated financial statements;
•Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
•Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention and profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
•Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
•Interruption in or failure of the telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems of the Company or the third parties on whom we rely or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches in security of such systems;
•The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, including the inability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and potential operating difficulties and unforeseen liabilities relating thereto, as well as the effect of restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
•The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives;
•The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
•Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder claims and adversely affect our businesses and the cost and availability of reinsurance;
•Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
•The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
•The unanticipated loss of key management or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our 2025 Form 10-K. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement products and solutions through our four business segments:
•Annuities
•Life Insurance
•Group Protection
•Retirement Plan Services
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial results for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” in our 2025 Form 10-K for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated net income (loss), we also provide income (loss) from operations because we believe it is a meaningful measure of the profitability of our business segments and Other Operations. Income (loss) from operations is the financial performance measure we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments and Other Operations. Accordingly, we define and report income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 16. Our management believes that income (loss) from operations explains the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in and performance of our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from income (loss) from operations because they are not necessarily indicative of
70
Table
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 42 |
| Introduction | 43 |
| Executive Summary | 43 |
| Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates | 45 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 54 |
| Results of Annuities | 56 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 61 |
| Results of Group Protection | 67 |
| Results of Retirement Plan Services | 71 |
| Results of Other Operations | 76 |
| Consolidated Investments | 78 |
| Reinsurance | 94 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 95 |
41
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of December 31, 2025, compared with December 31, 2024, and the results of operations in 2025 compared to 2024 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions of 2023 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
•Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account balances, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
•The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business; and our affiliate reinsurance arrangements;
•Changes in tax law or the interpretation of or application of existing tax laws that could impact our tax costs and the products that we sell;
•The impact of regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations that could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and result in additional disclosure and other requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products;
•The impact of existing and emerging rules and regulations relating to privacy, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (“AI”) that may lead to increased compliance costs, reputation risk and/or changes in business practices, and challenges with properly managing the use of AI that could result in reputational harm, competitive harm and legal liability;
•Continued scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance matters that may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
•Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
•Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and demand for our products;
•Increasing or sustained higher interest rates that may negatively affect our profitability, value of our investment portfolio and capital position and may cause policyholders to surrender annuity and life insurance policies, thereby causing realized investment losses;
•The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
•A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefits, including riders on certain of our annuity products and secondary guarantees on certain variable universal life insurance products;
•Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
42
Table of Contents
•A deviation in actual experience regarding future policyholder behavior, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce future earnings;
•Changes in accounting principles that may affect our consolidated financial statements;
•Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
•Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention and profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
•Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
•Interruption in or failure of the telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems of the Company or the third parties on whom we rely or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches in security of such systems;
•The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, including the inability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and potential operating difficulties and unforeseen liabilities relating thereto, as well as the effect of restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
•The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives;
•The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
•Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder claims and adversely affect our businesses and the cost and availability of reinsurance;
•Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
•The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
•The unanticipated loss of key management or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement products and solutions through our four business segments:
•Annuities
•Life Insurance
•Group Protection
•Retirement Plan Services
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial results for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated net income (loss), we also provide income (loss) from operations because we believe it is a meaningful measure of the profitability of our business segments and Other Operations. Income (loss) from operations is the financial performance measure we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments and Other Operations. Accordingly, we define and report income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 19. Our management believes that income (loss) from operations explains the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in and performance of our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from income (loss) from operations because they are not necessarily indicative of
43
Table of Contents
current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in most instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments.
We provide information about our business segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items, key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
Below is a discussion of certain trends impacting our business and industry:
Interest Rate Environment
During 2025, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate target range by 75 basis points to a range of 3.50% to 3.75%, stating that the labor market showed signs of softening while acknowledging inflation and economic outlook uncertainty remain somewhat elevated. In addition, effective December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve ended its balance sheet reduction program, thereby adding liquidity into the financial system. The Federal Reserve also released economic projections that reflect a median expectation of one rate cut of 25 basis points in 2026. The Federal Reserve noted that it will continue to monitor economic data and adjust its stance on monetary policy if risks emerge that could negatively impact the attainment of its goal of maximum employment and inflation at 2% over the long term. At the January 2026 meeting, the Federal Reserve decided to maintain the current federal funds target range. We continue to be proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences due to the interest rate environment.
We have provided disclosures around risks related to changes in interest rates in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained higher interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation. Our Bermuda-based reinsurance subsidiary is licensed in Bermuda and is subject to regulations established by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the “BMA”). In addition, our Barbados-based reinsurance subsidiary is regulated by the Barbados Financial Services Commission (“FSC”). Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased regulation and oversight for the industry. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
44
Table of Contents
Significant Operational Matters
Throughout 2025, we executed against our strategic priorities of strengthening and maintaining our balance sheet, improving our operational efficiency, increasing free cash flow and focusing on profitable growth. Notable actions in 2025 include the following:
•During the second quarter of 2025, we closed our stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Bain Capital Prairie, LLC (the “Buyer”), a newly formed subsidiary of Bain Capital, under which we agreed to sell shares representing 9.9% of our outstanding common stock on a post-issuance basis to the Buyer. Under the final terms, Lincoln sold approximately 18.8 million shares of its common stock for aggregate consideration of $825 million. The transaction provided us with capital that we are deploying and expect to continue to deploy toward our strategic priorities, including growing spread-based earnings, advancing our portfolio management efforts and asset sourcing capabilities and optimizing our legacy life portfolio. For additional information on the Bain Capital transaction, see Note 18.
•In the second quarter of 2025, we exercised in full our issuance right under the 10-year facility agreement dated as of August 18, 2020, and issued $500 million of fixed-rate senior notes and used the net proceeds to early extinguish long-term debt pursuant to a tender offer. Additionally in the second quarter of 2025, we entered into a $1.0 billion 30-year facility agreement that increased our access to liquidity by $500 million. In the fourth quarter of 2025, we completed the issuance of $500 million of fixed-rate senior notes and intend to use $400 million of the net proceeds to prefund the repayment of our senior notes due in 2026. For additional information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below and Note 13.
•During 2025, LNL entered into affiliate reinsurance transactions with Lincoln Pinehurst Reinsurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (“LPINE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of LNC that operates as a Bermuda-based life and annuity reinsurance company. For additional information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
•Throughout 2025, LNL issued institutional funding agreements totaling $2.8 billion to support growth in our spread-based earnings. For additional information, see Note 11.
•In the fourth quarter of 2025, we restructured certain captive reinsurance subsidiaries to reduce operating expenses and improve free cash flow within our Life Insurance segment.
We continue to focus on the following actions in 2026:
•Making investments in our businesses and product enhancements to grow revenues, drive margin and reduce costs;
•Leveraging our strategic partnership with Bain Capital to access its investment platform and alternative asset expertise to drive differentiated asset sourcing and accelerate growth across our annuity and life insurance businesses.
•Advancing our Group Protection business with a balanced approach to growth and profitability through executing on our segment and product strategies;
•Maintaining our industry-leading wholesale distribution through Lincoln Financial Distributors, which distributes our annuities and life insurance products as well as our retirement plan products and services through financial institutions and other financial intermediaries;
•Exploring reinsurance and other strategies, including affiliate reinsurance transactions with LPINE, to maximize the value of our businesses;
•Advancing our disciplined approach to capital-efficient growth by prioritizing products with strong risk-adjusted returns; and
•Focusing on expense discipline to drive greater operational efficiency and enhance the operating leverage within our business.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
We have identified the accounting estimates below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition. In applying these critical accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
Investments
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or non-performance risk, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments carried at fair
45
Table of Contents
value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
The following summarizes investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of December 31, 2025:
| Quoted | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | ||||||||||||||
| in Active | ||||||||||||||
| Markets for | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||||
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | |||||||||||
| Priced by third-party pricing services | $ | 1,115 | $ | 79,731 | $ | 97 | $ | 80,943 | ||||||
| Priced by independent broker quotations | – | – | 7,223 | 7,223 | ||||||||||
| Priced by matrices | – | 16,938 | – | 16,938 | ||||||||||
| Priced by other methods (1) | – | – | 799 | 799 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,115 | $ | 96,669 | $ | 8,119 | $ | 105,903 | ||||||
| Percent of total | 1 | % | 91 | % | 8 | % | 100 | % |
(1) Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, see Notes 1 and 14.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2025, we evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion, as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2025, we used broker quotes for 19 securities as our final price source, representing less than 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes. Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data. The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs
46
Table of Contents
used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing source.
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers, future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation” above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans. Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value (“LTV”) reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
47
Table of Contents
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Our additional liabilities for other insurance benefits reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our additional liabilities reserve. These actual to expected adjustments would be reported in benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity risk and credit risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Policyholder Account Balances” below for information on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of hedging and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 5. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives, including sensitivities, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Future contract benefits represent liability reserves that we have established and carry based on estimates of how much we will need to pay for future benefits and claims.
Liability for Future Policy Benefits
Liability for future policy benefits (“LFPB”) represents the reserve amounts associated with non-participating traditional life insurance contracts and limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts that are calculated to meet the various policy and contract obligations as they mature. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to policyholders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions, additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity and policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the actuarial assumptions to best estimate future premium and benefit cash flows (“cash flow assumptions”) and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions as needed (excluding the claims settlement expense assumption that is locked-in at inception) in the calculation of the net premium ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In measuring our LFPB, we establish cohorts, which are groupings of long-duration contracts. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the net premium ratio at the cohort level for actual experience. For all contract cohorts issued after January 1, 2021, interest is accrued on LFPB at the single-A interest rate on the contract cohort inception date. For contract cohorts issued prior to January 1, 2021, interest remains accruing at the original discount rate in effect on the contract cohort inception date due to the modified retrospective transition method. We also remeasure the LFPB using the single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period.
Liability for Future Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term disability and life waiver claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These reserves use actuarial assumptions primarily based on claim termination rates, mortality rates, offsets for other insurance including social security, morbidity, incidence and severity assumptions. Such cash flow assumptions are subject to the comprehensive review process discussed above. We remeasure the liability for future claims using a single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
48
Table of Contents
Additional Liabilities for Other Insurance Benefits
We previously issued UL-type contracts where we provided a secondary guarantee to the policyholder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base policy account balance is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. These guaranteed benefits require an additional liability that is calculated based on the application of a benefit ratio (calculated as the present value of total expected benefit payments over the life of the contract from inception divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the contract). These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the contracts. Cash flow assumptions incorporated in a benefit ratio in measuring these additional liabilities for other insurance benefits include mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals based principally on generally accepted actuarial methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the cash flow assumptions and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions in the calculation of the benefit ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For additional information on future contract benefits, see Note 12.
Market Risk Benefits
Market risk benefits (“MRBs”) are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or circumstance, such as death, annuitization or periodic withdrawal. An MRB can be in either an asset or a liability position. Our MRB assets and MRB liabilities are reported at fair value separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We issue variable and fixed annuity contracts that may include various types of guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) and guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) riders that we have accounted for as MRBs. For contracts that contain multiple riders that qualify as MRBs, the MRBs are valued on a combined basis using an integrated model. We have entered into reinsurance agreements to cede certain GLB and GDB riders where the reinsurance agreements themselves are accounted for as MRBs or contain MRBs. We therefore record ceded MRB assets and ceded MRB liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. We report ceded MRBs associated with these reinsurance agreements in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net amount at risk (“NAR”) represents the amount of GLB or GDB in excess of a policyholder’s account balance at the balance sheet date. Underperforming markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB and GDB riders. A contract with a GDB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the GDB. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 4% and 8%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GDB rider were “in the money.” A contract with a GLB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the present value of GLB payments, assuming no full surrenders. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 14% and 17%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB rider were “in the money.” However, the only way the policyholder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account balance of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account balance is exhausted, the policyholder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account balance can also fluctuate with market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account balance.
Many policyholders have both a GLB and GDB present on the same policy. The total NAR represents the greater of GLB NAR and GDB NAR for each policy as only one benefit can be exercised in practice. Details underlying the NAR, net of reinsurance, primarily related to our Annuities segment, (in millions) were as follows:
| As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
| GLB NAR | $ | 1,505 | $ | 1,522 | ||
| GDB NAR | 455 | 688 | ||||
| Total NAR | 1,927 | 2,129 |
The change in the fair value of MRB assets and liabilities is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), except for the portion attributable to the change in non-performance risk, which is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). The change in the fair value of ceded MRB assets and liabilities, including the changes in our counterparties’ non-performance risks, is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
49
Table of Contents
MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our non-performance risk. Ceded MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our counterparties’ non-performance risk. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant and include assumptions for capital markets, lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin and administrative expenses. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical data and actuarial judgments. The assumption for our own non-performance risk and our counterparties’ non-performance risk for MRBs and ceded MRBs, respectively, are determined at each valuation date and reflect our risk and our counterparties’ risks of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the non-performance risk is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of these MRBs and update these assumptions on a prospective basis as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. For information on fair value inputs, see Note 14. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For illustrative purposes, the following presents hypothetical effects to MRBs attributable to changes to key assumptions / inputs, assuming all other factors remain constant:
| Hypothetical | Hypothetical | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Effect | |||||||
| Assumption / Input | Actual Experience | to MRB Liability | to Net Income | Description of Assumption / Input | ||||
| Equity market return | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Equity market return input represents impact based on movements in equity markets. | ||||
| Interest rate | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Interest rate input represents impact based on movements in interest rates and impact to fixed-income assets. | ||||
| Volatility | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Volatility assumption represents overall volatilities assumed for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a mixture of equity and fixed-income assets. Volatility assumptions vary by fund due to the benchmarking of difference indices. | ||||
| Mortality | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Mortality contracts with only GDB rider | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Lapse | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Lapse assumption represents the estimated probability of a contract surrendering during a year, thereby forgoing any future benefits. | ||||
| Benefit utilization | Higher / Lower | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Benefit utilization assumption of guaranteed withdrawals represents the estimated percentage of policyholders that utilize the guaranteed withdrawal feature. |
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to selected risk caused by changes in equity markets and interest rates associated with GLB and GDB riders that are available in our variable annuity products and accounted for as MRBs. Our hedge program focuses on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. We utilize options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. For additional information on our derivatives, see Note 5.
As part of our hedge program, equity market and interest rate conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not
50
Table of Contents
completely offset changes in the fair value of our GLB and GDB riders caused by movements in these factors due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, policyholder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
The following table presents our after-tax estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets and interest rates (in millions) and excludes the net cost of operating the hedge program. The amounts represent the difference between the change in GLB and GDB riders and the change in the fair value of the underlying hedge instruments. These estimates are based upon the balance as of December 31, 2025, net of reinsurance, and the related hedge instruments in place as of that date. The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes to equity market returns and interest rates occurred.
| In-Force Sensitivities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Market Return | -10% | +10% | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | (850) | $ | 675 | ||
| Interest Rates | -25 bps | +25 bps | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | (375) | 350 |
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the table above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
•The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2025, due to changing market conditions, policyholder activity, hedge positions and other factors;
•The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market changes;
•The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
•Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, may be overly simplistic and not indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
•It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without affecting other capital market sectors; and
•The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB and GDB riders and the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
For additional information on MRBs, see Note 9.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date. This liability includes universal life insurance (“UL”), MoneyGuard®, variable universal life insurance (“VUL”), indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”), and investment-type annuity products (including registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”)), individual and group fixed and fixed portion of variable annuities, fixed indexed deferred annuities and non-life contingent payout fixed annuities) where account balances are equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and policyholder administration charges (collectively known as “policyholder assessments”), as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our fixed indexed annuity and IUL products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives and update assumptions as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the policyholder’s account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the policyholder. Policyholders may elect to rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may
51
Table of Contents
purchase or sell in the future to hedge policyholder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For more information on indexed product derivative results, see Note 20.
For additional information on the liability for policyholder account balances, see Note 11.
Reinsurance Recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables are generally measured and recognized consistent with the assumptions and methodologies used to project the future performance of the underlying direct business as discussed in the “Future Contract Benefits” and “Policyholder Account Balances” sections above. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models and update assumptions as needed. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In addition, we consider the potential impact of counterparty credit risks related to the reinsurance recoverable by estimating an allowance for credit losses using a probability of loss model approach to estimate expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables. For additional information on our allowance for credit losses on reinsurance-related assets, see Note 7.
Annual Assumption Review
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating MRBs, our reserves and embedded derivatives. For more information on our comprehensive review, see Note 1. Details underlying the impact to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | (8) | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
| Life Insurance | (29) | 8 | (156) | |||||||
| Group Protection | 39 | (1) | 24 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | – | – | – | |||||||
| Excluded from income (loss) from operations | (52) | 208 | (36) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (50) | $ | 216 | $ | (167) |
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2025
•For Annuities, the unfavorable impact was driven by model enhancements and updates to policyholder behavior assumptions.
•For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to mortality assumptions for our UL products with secondary guarantees and policyholder behavior assumptions, partially offset by updates to mortality assumptions for our traditional life insurance business and morbidity assumptions.
•For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to the claim termination rate assumption, partially offset by updates to social security and incurred assumptions and other items.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the unfavorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates to policyholder behavior assumptions, model enhancements and other items, partially offset by updates to separate account fee assumptions.
2024
•For Life Insurance, the favorable impact was driven by updates to capital market assumptions on reinsured blocks of MoneyGuard® business and other items, partially offset by unfavorable updates to policyholder behavior assumptions on reinsured blocks of MoneyGuard business.
•For Group Protection, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to disability claim termination rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to life waiver incurred assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the favorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by model enhancements.
52
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax assets and liabilities for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Management exercises judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax assets and liabilities. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Judgment and the use of estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized; and any future prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
As of December 31, 2025, we had an approximate $1.7 billion deferred tax asset related to net unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management concluded that its tax planning strategies, including holding these securities to recovery, were prudent and feasible as these unrealized losses were caused by factors other than credit loss, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to recovery and collect all of the contractual cash flows.
We may experience an increased likelihood of recording a valuation allowance in the future based on the following factors:
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may impact the value of appreciated securities and the sale of certain corporate assets; and
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that may impact the sale of certain corporate assets.
Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, we had a $505 million deferred tax asset related to net operating losses, a $234 million deferred tax asset related to federal income tax credits and a $86 million deferred tax asset related to capital losses generated from the Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude Re”) reinsurance transaction. These deferred tax assets can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes payable in those future periods. The net operating losses do not expire and can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal income tax credits expire in 10 years. The capital losses can be carried back three years and carried forward five years.
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, will be realized.
For risks related to establishing a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Assumptions and Estimates – We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.”
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 22.
53
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Details underlying the consolidated results (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1,198 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,073 | ||||
| Life Insurance | 117 | (63) | (159) | |||||||
| Group Protection | 532 | 425 | 299 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 163 | 163 | 171 | |||||||
| Other Operations | (382) | (370) | (394) | |||||||
| Net annuity product features, pre-tax (1) | 238 | 2,508 | 68 | |||||||
| Net life insurance product features, pre-tax | (42) | (207) | (393) | |||||||
| Credit loss-related adjustments, pre-tax | (134) | (152) | (80) | |||||||
| Investment gains (losses), pre-tax | (319) | (483) | (959) | |||||||
| Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans, pre-tax (2) | (201) | 535 | (802) | |||||||
| Gains (losses) on other non-financial assets, pre-tax (3) | (14) | 582 | – | |||||||
| Other items, pre-tax (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) | (92) | (270) | (55) | |||||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) related to the | ||||||||||
| above pre-tax items | 113 | (553) | 479 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,177 | $ | 3,275 | $ | (752) |
(1) For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, includes changes in MRBs of $341 million, $2,637 million and $2,197 million, respectively; changes in the fair value of the related hedge instruments inclusive of income allocated to support the cost of hedging or future benefits of $(263) million, $(561) million and $(1,894) million, respectively; and changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities and the associated index options for our indexed annuity products of $160 million, $432 million and $(235) million, respectively.
(2) Includes primarily changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction. The coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivative related to the coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). See Note 7 for more information.
(3) For the year ended December 31, 2025, represents impairment of long-lived assets. For the year ended December 31, 2024, relates to the sale of our wealth management business (see Note 1 for additional information).
(4) For the year ended December 31, 2025, includes certain legal accruals of $(9) million and regulatory accruals of $2 million; for the year ended December 31, 2024, includes certain legal accruals of $(129) million, primarily attributable to a first quarter 2024 accrual related to the settlement of cost of insurance litigation, and regulatory accruals of $(12) million related to estimated state guaranty fund assessments net of estimated state premium tax recoveries associated with the Bankers Life Insurance Company and Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company insolvencies (see “State Guaranty Fund Assessments” in Note 17 for more information); and for the year ended December 31, 2023, includes certain legal accruals of $(12) million.
(5) Includes severance expense related to initiatives to realign the workforce of $(24) million, $(74) million and $(7) million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(6) Includes transaction, integration and other costs related to mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and certain other corporate initiatives consisting of $(55) million of transaction costs related to restructuring certain captive reinsurance subsidiaries, $(25) million related to the sale of our wealth management business, $(22) million related to Life Insurance segment persistency optimization and $(21) million primarily related to the Bain Capital transaction for the year ended December 31, 2025; $(40) million primarily related to the sale of our wealth management business for the year ended December 31, 2024; and $(30) million related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction and $(4) million related to the sale of our wealth management business for the year ended December 31, 2023.
(7) Includes deferred compensation mark-to-market adjustment of $(32) million, $(15) million and $(2) million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(8) For the year ended December 31, 2025, includes gains on early extinguishment of debt of $94 million.
54
Table of Contents
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Net income decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower gain in net annuity product features driven by the impact of capital markets.
•Unfavorable changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans in 2025 compared to favorable changes in 2024 driven by the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Gain on other non-financial assets in 2024 due to the sale of our wealth management business.
•Unfavorable impact from our annual assumption review in 2025 compared to favorable impact in 2024.
The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:
•Improvement in income from operations in our Life Insurance segment, favorability in our total loss ratio in our Group Protection segment and growth in average account balances.
•Lower net unfavorable other items driven by settlement of cost of insurance litigation in 2024 and gain on extinguishment of debt in 2025.
•Lower loss in net life insurance product features driven by the change in the fair value of hedges associated with VUL products attributable to the impact of capital markets.
•Lower investment losses driven by favorable changes in the fair value of certain derivatives and lower realized losses on certain investments.
•Higher investment income on alternative investments.
Additional Information
For information on the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, see Note 7.
For information on the sale of our wealth management business in 2024, see Note 1.
For information on the impacts from our annual assumption review, see “Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above.
55
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 103 | $ | 127 | $ | (1,584) | ||||
| Fee income | 2,406 | 2,381 | 2,196 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 1,966 | 1,759 | 1,734 | |||||||
| Other revenues (2) | 515 | 629 | 656 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 4,990 | 4,896 | 3,002 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement (1) | 108 | 145 | (1,504) | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,799 | 1,536 | 1,252 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,668 | 1,827 | 2,041 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,575 | 3,508 | 1,789 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 1,415 | 1,388 | 1,213 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 217 | 228 | 140 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 1,198 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,073 |
(1) Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement. Benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement include primarily changes in income annuity reserves driven by insurance premiums.
(2) Consists primarily of revenues attributable to interest income on deposit reinsurance assets and the net settlement related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited, and broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility and have a comparable offset in commissions and other expenses. During the second quarter of 2024, we closed the sale of our wealth management business. See Note 1 for more information.
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to:
•Higher fee income driven by higher average daily separate account balances.
•Lower federal income tax expense due to unfavorable separate account dividends-received deduction true-ups in 2024.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Higher commissions and other expenses, net of broker-dealer expenses, driven by higher deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) amortization and the impact from our annual assumption review.
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, in certain reinsured portfolios and lower investment income within our surplus portfolio, which more than offset impacts from higher average general account balances and improving portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment. The lower net investment income, net of interest credited, in certain reinsured portfolios had a corresponding increase in other revenues.
The increase in income from operations was also due to higher commissions and other expenses in the first quarter of 2024 related to a balance sheet true-up in preparation for the close of the sale of the wealth management business.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force fixed annuities. Insurance premiums and benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement within the table above in 2023 reflect the
56
Table of Contents
ceding of in-force life-contingent payout fixed annuities that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations.
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account balances. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average gross account balances were 12%, 11% and 9% in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our outflow rate in 2025 and 2024 reflects an increase in full surrenders as a result of the elevated interest rate environment and strong equity markets.
Our fixed annuities and RILA have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained higher interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Mortality, expense and other assessments (1) | $ | 2,347 | $ | 2,315 | $ | 2,143 | ||||
| Surrender charges | 50 | 59 | 45 | |||||||
| DFEL: | ||||||||||
| Deferrals | (16) | (18) | (19) | |||||||
| Amortization | 25 | 25 | 27 | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,406 | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,196 |
(1) Presented net of GLB and GDB hedge allowance.
We charge policyholders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily separate account balances. Average daily separate account balances are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual rate that is applied either to the account balance or the guaranteed amount. We allocate a portion of these fees to support the cost of hedging GLB and GDB riders. For more information, see Note 19. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
57
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,818 | $ | 1,592 | $ | 1,600 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 11 | 4 | 2 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 137 | 154 | 128 | |||||||
| Net investment income pertaining to broker-dealer services | – | 9 | 4 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | 1,966 | 1,759 | 1,734 | |||||||
| Interest Credited | ||||||||||
| Amount provided to policyholders | 1,787 | 1,524 | 1,242 | |||||||
| DSI deferrals | (1) | (2) | (5) | |||||||
| Interest credited before DSI amortization | 1,786 | 1,522 | 1,237 | |||||||
| DSI amortization | 13 | 14 | 15 | |||||||
| Total interest credited | $ | 1,799 | $ | 1,536 | $ | 1,252 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our deferred fixed annuities, the fixed portion of our variable annuities and our RILA contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuities, fixed portion of the variable annuities and RILA contracts and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
58
Table of Contents
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Separate Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Separate account deposits | $ | 6,035 | $ | 4,765 | $ | 2,981 | ||||
| Separate account net flows | (10,490) | (9,308) | (7,196) | |||||||
| Separate account balances | 122,945 | 117,998 | 113,355 | |||||||
| Average daily separate account balances | 119,279 | 117,278 | 108,473 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 6,211 | 5,428 | 4,285 | |||||||
| General Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| General account deposits | $ | 11,148 | $ | 8,983 | $ | 9,839 | ||||
| General account net flows | 5,282 | 2,833 | 5,169 | |||||||
| General account balances (3) | 52,443 | 45,613 | 39,471 | |||||||
| Average general account balances (3) | 48,012 | 42,754 | 39,733 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities and RILA indexed account balances.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our separate account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Net of reinsurance.
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
59
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 605 | $ | 425 | $ | 354 | ||||
| Non-deferrable | 686 | 690 | 617 | |||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 532 | 495 | 471 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | ||||||||||
| and LOC expenses | 23 | 25 | 12 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 31 | 40 | 41 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer | 1,877 | 1,675 | 1,495 | |||||||
| DAC deferrals | (693) | (498) | (411) | |||||||
| Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred, | ||||||||||
| excluding amortization | 1,184 | 1,177 | 1,084 | |||||||
| DAC, VOBA and other amortization: | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 472 | 432 | 433 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 12 | (2) | (2) | |||||||
| Broker-dealer expenses incurred (1) | – | 220 | 526 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,668 | $ | 1,827 | $ | 2,041 |
| DAC Deferrals | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales/deposits | 4.0% | 3.6% | 3.2% |
(1) During the second quarter of 2024, we closed the sale of our wealth management business. See Note 1 for more information.
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
60
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 1,072 | $ | 1,149 | $ | 1,162 | ||||
| Fee income | 2,765 | 2,715 | 3,010 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 2,446 | 2,321 | 2,729 | |||||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) | (4) | (6) | (6) | |||||||
| Other revenues (2) | 163 | 69 | 12 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 6,442 | 6,248 | 6,907 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement | 3,846 | 3,893 | 4,583 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,170 | 1,194 | 1,290 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses (2) | 1,312 | 1,266 | 1,265 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 6,328 | 6,353 | 7,138 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 114 | (105) | (231) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (3) | (42) | (72) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 117 | $ | (63) | $ | (159) |
(1) Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement for changes in reserves. The decrease in insurance premiums in 2025 was driven by the expiration of a 10-year assumed reinsurance treaty in the first quarter of 2025, which has a corresponding offset in benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement.
(2) For information on amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold through reinsurance, see Note 1 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by higher investment income on alternative investments, growth in investments and moderate spread expansion.
•Higher fee income driven by higher deferred front-end loads (“DFEL”) amortization.
•Lower benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement driven by improved mortality due to lower claims incidence, partially offset by the impact from our annual assumption review and aging of the block.
•Lower commissions and other expenses, net of amortization of deferred loss on business sold through reinsurance, driven by expense management and a reduction in expenses associated with reserve financing due to restructuring certain captive reinsurance subsidiaries in the fourth quarter of 2025.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force UL with secondary guarantees and MoneyGuard®. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction.
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained higher interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
61
Table of Contents
Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force. Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account balances and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Cost of insurance assessments | $ | 2,139 | $ | 2,104 | $ | 2,300 | ||||
| Expense assessments | 1,478 | 1,406 | 1,495 | |||||||
| Surrender charges | 39 | 33 | 32 | |||||||
| DFEL: | ||||||||||
| Deferrals | (1,221) | (1,114) | (1,075) | |||||||
| Amortization | 332 | 287 | 258 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (2) | (1) | – | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,765 | $ | 2,715 | $ | 3,010 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Sales by Product | ||||||||||
| IUL/UL | $ | 119 | $ | 100 | $ | 119 | ||||
| MoneyGuard® | 124 | 128 | 98 | |||||||
| VUL | 92 | 85 | 132 | |||||||
| Term | 57 | 66 | 100 | |||||||
| Executive Benefits | 265 | 59 | 93 | |||||||
| Total sales | $ | 657 | $ | 438 | $ | 542 | ||||
| Net Flows | ||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 6,203 | $ | 5,102 | $ | 5,385 | ||||
| Withdrawals and deaths | (2,368) | (1,941) | (1,767) | |||||||
| Net flows | $ | 3,835 | $ | 3,161 | $ | 3,618 | ||||
| Policyholder Assessments | $ | 5,450 | $ | 5,517 | $ | 5,476 |
62
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Account Balances (1) | ||||||||||
| General account | $ | 21,486 | $ | 21,452 | $ | 21,403 | ||||
| Separate account | 28,095 | 23,320 | 20,088 | |||||||
| Total account balances | $ | 49,581 | $ | 44,772 | $ | 41,491 | ||||
| In-Force Face Amount | ||||||||||
| UL and other | $ | 362,312 | $ | 363,950 | $ | 365,938 | ||||
| Term insurance | 702,280 | 714,362 | 722,620 | |||||||
| Total in-force face amount | $ | 1,064,592 | $ | 1,078,312 | $ | 1,088,558 | ||||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Average General Account Balances (1) | $ | 21,343 | $ | 21,400 | $ | 30,606 |
(1) Net of reinsurance ceded.
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our policyholders’ account balances. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account balances.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Sales volumes can fluctuate given large case sizes within Executive Benefits.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
•UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
•MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL) and MoneyGuard Market AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
•Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
•Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.
63
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,849 | $ | 1,848 | $ | 2,346 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 3 | 8 | 6 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 194 | 153 | 153 | |||||||
| Other investments (3) | 400 | 312 | 224 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 2,446 | $ | 2,321 | $ | 2,729 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 1,170 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,290 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.
(3) Includes primarily net investment income earned on our alternative investments portfolio. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to policyholder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account balances because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Investment income partially offsets the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
64
Table of Contents
Benefits and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement
Details underlying benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Benefits and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement | ||||||||||
| Death claims direct and assumed | $ | 5,994 | $ | 5,960 | $ | 5,412 | ||||
| Death claims ceded | (2,617) | (2,734) | (2,097) | |||||||
| Reserves released on death | (812) | (590) | (622) | |||||||
| Net death benefits | 2,565 | 2,636 | 2,693 | |||||||
| Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product | ||||||||||
| reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 370 | 393 | 751 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 165 | 20 | 172 | |||||||
| Change in MoneyGuard® reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 636 | 573 | 524 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (4) | 53 | 37 | |||||||
| Change in traditional product reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 65 | 141 | 202 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (129) | (84) | (11) | |||||||
| Other benefits (1) | 178 | 161 | 215 | |||||||
| Total benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement | $ | 3,846 | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,583 | ||||
| Death claims per $1,000 of in-force | 2.40 | 2.43 | 2.49 |
(1) Includes primarily long-term care claims and life surrender benefits.
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee, linked-benefit and term life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing remeasurements. Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims.
65
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 474 | $ | 461 | $ | 571 | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 541 | 563 | 617 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | 95 | 96 | 102 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 144 | 135 | 150 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,254 | 1,255 | 1,440 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA deferrals | (553) | (543) | (671) | |||||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 701 | 712 | 769 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization: | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 509 | 503 | 492 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 2 | – | – | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred loss on business sold | ||||||||||
| through reinsurance (1) | 96 | 47 | – | |||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,312 | $ | 1,266 | $ | 1,265 |
| DAC and VOBA Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales | 84.2 | % | 124.0 | % | 123.9 | % |
(1) The amortization of deferred loss on business sold through reinsurance pertains to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction. See Note 7 for additional information.
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable. For our interest-sensitive and traditional products, DAC and value of business acquired (“VOBA”) are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances.
66
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums | $ | 5,490 | $ | 5,145 | $ | 5,014 | ||||
| Net investment income | 376 | 348 | 339 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 236 | 224 | 210 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 6,102 | 5,717 | 5,563 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement | 3,814 | 3,692 | 3,732 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 2 | 6 | 5 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,613 | 1,481 | 1,447 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 5,429 | 5,179 | 5,184 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 673 | 538 | 379 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 141 | 113 | 80 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 532 | $ | 425 | $ | 299 |
(1) Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 160 | $ | 110 | $ | 70 | ||||
| Disability | 381 | 323 | 237 | |||||||
| Dental | (9) | (8) | (8) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 532 | $ | 425 | $ | 299 |
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force and persistency.
•Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by growth in business in force.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Higher commissions and other expenses due to incentive compensation as a result of production performance and higher other costs pertaining to business operations.
•Higher benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement driven by less favorable claims experience than expected in our disability business and growth in business in force, partially offset by the impact of our annual assumption review and lower incidence in our life business.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
Additional Information
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently volatile. For every one percent increase in the total loss ratio,
67
Table of Contents
we would expect an estimated annual decrease to income from operations of $41 million to $46 million. The effects are symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Insurance Premiums by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 2,158 | $ | 2,001 | $ | 1,938 | ||||
| Disability | 3,142 | 2,962 | 2,892 | |||||||
| Dental | 190 | 182 | 184 | |||||||
| Total insurance premiums | $ | 5,490 | $ | 5,145 | $ | 5,014 | ||||
| Sales by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 390 | $ | 392 | $ | 333 | ||||
| Disability | 397 | 414 | 311 | |||||||
| Dental | 64 | 50 | 49 | |||||||
| Total sales | $ | 851 | $ | 856 | $ | 693 |
Premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.
Sales relate to new policyholders and new coverages sold to existing policyholders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products. Generally, we have higher sales during the fourth quarter of the year.
68
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 294 | $ | 269 | $ | 268 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 80 | 77 | 70 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 376 | $ | 348 | $ | 339 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
Benefits and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement
Details underlying benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Benefits and Policyholder Liability | ||||||||||
| Remeasurement by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,457 | $ | 1,424 | $ | 1,434 | ||||
| Disability | 2,211 | 2,134 | 2,163 | |||||||
| Dental | 148 | 140 | 140 | |||||||
| Total benefits and policyholder liability | ||||||||||
| remeasurement by product line | $ | 3,816 | $ | 3,698 | $ | 3,737 |
| Loss Ratios by Product Line | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life | 67.5 | % | 71.1 | % | 74.0 | % | ||
| Disability | 70.4 | % | 72.1 | % | 74.8 | % | ||
| Dental | 78.0 | % | 77.0 | % | 76.1 | % | ||
| Total | 69.5 | % | 71.9 | % | 74.5 | % |
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. For additional information on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
69
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 541 | $ | 462 | $ | 446 | ||
| General and administrative expenses | 915 | 870 | 846 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 140 | 138 | 133 | |||||
| Other | 4 | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,600 | 1,473 | 1,428 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (142) | (135) | (113) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 1,458 | 1,338 | 1,315 | |||||
| DAC and other intangible amortization | 155 | 143 | 132 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,481 | $ | 1,447 |
| DAC Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of insurance premiums | 2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.3 | % |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
70
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Fee income | $ | 301 | $ | 292 | $ | 262 | ||||
| Net investment income | 1,022 | 997 | 1,012 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 30 | 32 | 36 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 1,353 | 1,321 | 1,310 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Interest credited | 692 | 675 | 665 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 473 | 460 | 444 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,165 | 1,135 | 1,109 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 188 | 186 | 201 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 25 | 23 | 30 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 163 | $ | 163 | $ | 171 |
(1) Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Income from operations for this segment remained flat due primarily to the following:
•Higher fee income driven by higher average daily separate account balances.
•Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by higher average general account balances, impacts to portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment and higher investment income on prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, partially offset by an increase in crediting rates.
•Higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher trail commissions resulting from higher average daily separate account balances.
•Lower other revenues in 2025 due to a plan termination during the fourth quarter of 2024.
Additional Information
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year. New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account balances were 17%, 14% and 12% for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in the outflow rate for the year ended December 31, 2025, was attributable primarily to a large plan termination during the first quarter of 2025.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account balances was 11%, 13% and 15% for 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain
71
Table of Contents
statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained higher interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Annuity expense assessments | $ | 218 | $ | 214 | $ | 191 | ||||
| Mutual fund fees | 78 | 75 | 69 | |||||||
| Total expense assessments | 296 | 289 | 260 | |||||||
| Surrender charges | 5 | 3 | 2 | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 301 | $ | 292 | $ | 262 |
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance, administrative, recordkeeping and other services and mutual fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account balances, both general and separate, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account balance-related items such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
72
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 939 | $ | 917 | $ | 935 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | ||||||||||
| bond make-whole premiums (1) | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 79 | 78 | 76 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 1,022 | $ | 997 | $ | 1,012 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 692 | $ | 675 | $ | 665 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
73
Table of Contents
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Separate Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Separate account deposits | $ | 2,305 | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,268 | ||||
| Separate account net flows | (1,403) | (1,129) | (240) | |||||||
| Separate account balances | 23,136 | 21,489 | 19,668 | |||||||
| Average daily separate account balances | 22,046 | 21,003 | 18,183 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 6,211 | 5,428 | 4,285 | |||||||
| General Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| General account deposits | $ | 4,065 | $ | 3,407 | $ | 2,776 | ||||
| General account net flows | (1,006) | (1,088) | (1,718) | |||||||
| General account balances | 23,843 | 23,619 | 23,784 | |||||||
| Average general account balances | 23,665 | 23,603 | 24,502 | |||||||
| Mutual Fund Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| Mutual fund deposits | $ | 10,286 | $ | 9,106 | $ | 6,734 | ||||
| Mutual fund net flows | (603) | 2,329 | 2,090 | |||||||
| Mutual fund account balances (3) | 77,061 | 67,473 | 57,533 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our separate account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Flows By Market | ||||||||||
| Small market | $ | 96 | $ | (11) | $ | 382 | ||||
| Mid – large market | (1,309) | 1,944 | 1,279 | |||||||
| Multi-Fund® and other | (1,799) | (1,821) | (1,529) | |||||||
| Total net flows | $ | (3,012) | $ | 112 | $ | 132 |
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
74
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 6 | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||
| Non-deferrable | 109 | 99 | 83 | |||||
| General and administrative expenses | 342 | 340 | 341 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 18 | 19 | 19 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 475 | 462 | 447 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (20) | (21) | (21) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 455 | 441 | 426 | |||||
| DAC amortization | 18 | 19 | 18 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 473 | $ | 460 | $ | 444 |
| DAC Deferrals | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred.
75
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | (921) | ||||
| Net investment income (2) | 147 | 111 | 151 | |||||||
| Other revenues (3) | 49 | 45 | 15 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 198 | 160 | (755) | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement | 19 | 12 | (866) | |||||||
| Interest credited | 80 | 32 | 36 | |||||||
| Other expenses | 259 | 246 | 250 | |||||||
| Interest and debt expense | 321 | 336 | 331 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 679 | 626 | (249) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (481) | (466) | (506) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (99) | (96) | (112) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (382) | $ | (370) | $ | (394) |
(1) Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement for changes in reserves.
(2) Includes our institutional pension business, which has a corresponding offset in insurance premiums and benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement for changes in reserves, and funding agreement activity beginning in 2025, which has a partial offset in interest credited. For information on funding agreements, see Note 11.
(3) Includes certain third-party advisory fees, which has a partial offset in other expenses.
Comparison of 2025 to 2024
Loss from operations for Other Operations increased due primarily to the following:
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, related to lower portfolio yields.
•Higher other expenses associated with costs pertaining to business operations.
The increase in loss from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Higher other revenues due to the effect of market fluctuations on assets held as part of certain compensation plans.
•Lower interest and debt expense driven by a decline in average outstanding debt and interest rates.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force institutional pension business. Insurance premiums and benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force institutional pension business that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.
76
Table of Contents
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business. Policyholder liability remeasurement gains (losses) result from updates in cash flow assumptions and actual variance from expected experience used in the net
premium ratio or benefit ratio calculation for future policy benefits associated with institutional pension products.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| General and administrative expenses: | ||||||||||
| Legal | $ | 4 | $ | 6 | $ | (4) | ||||
| Branding | 42 | 42 | 42 | |||||||
| Other (1) | 208 | 208 | 220 | |||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | 254 | 256 | 258 | |||||||
| DAC deferrals | (6) | – | – | |||||||
| Other (2) | 11 | (10) | (8) | |||||||
| Total other expenses | $ | 259 | $ | 246 | $ | 250 |
(1) Includes expenses that are corporate in nature and not allocated to our business segments.
(2) Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its access to a financing facility and issuance of letters of credit (“LOCs”) and taxes, licenses and fees.
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
77
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Details underlying consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
| Percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investments | |||||||||||||
| As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||
| Investments | |||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 93,448 | $ | 87,111 | 67.3 | % | 67.1 | % | |||||
| Trading securities | 1,676 | 2,025 | 1.2 | % | 1.6 | % | |||||||
| Equity securities | 636 | 294 | 0.4 | % | 0.2 | % | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 22,472 | 21,083 | 16.2 | % | 16.2 | % | |||||||
| Policy loans | 2,626 | 2,476 | 1.9 | % | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| Derivative investments | 9,945 | 9,677 | 7.2 | % | 7.4 | % | |||||||
| Other investments: | |||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 4,182 | 3,836 | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | |||||||
| Alternative investments – reinsurance-related (1) | 1,438 | 1,464 | 1.0 | % | 1.1 | % | |||||||
| Company-owned life insurance | 1,190 | 664 | 0.9 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||
| Other | 1,295 | 1,288 | 0.9 | % | 1.0 | % | |||||||
| Total investments | $ | 138,908 | $ | 129,918 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
(1) Represents alternative investments that support reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. For more information, see Note 7.
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
78
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 3; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 3.
| As of December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 14,577 | $ | 155 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 13,713 | 14.6 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 3,180 | 51 | 324 | 2,907 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 6,270 | 78 | 596 | 5,752 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,328 | 54 | 376 | 3,006 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,765 | 61 | 467 | 5,359 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 14,952 | 154 | 2,043 | 13,063 | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 2,974 | 38 | 266 | 2,746 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 5,064 | 27 | 537 | 4,554 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,552 | 41 | 315 | 3,278 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,596 | 18 | 412 | 2,202 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 12,721 | 132 | 1,492 | 11,361 | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,286 | 25 | 207 | 1,104 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,156 | 4 | 120 | 1,040 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 400 | 29 | 3 | 426 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 675 | 12 | 31 | 656 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 2,586 | 15 | 99 | 2,502 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (“ABS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 8,619 | 6 | 126 | 8,499 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 7,743 | 131 | 91 | 7,783 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 2,479 | 18 | 383 | 2,114 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 35 | – | 2 | 33 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 892 | 9 | 32 | 869 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 261 | 16 | 51 | 226 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 241 | 21 | 7 | 255 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 101,352 | 1,095 | 8,999 | 93,448 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (3) | 1,756 | 44 | 124 | 1,676 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 632 | 15 | 11 | 636 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 103,740 | $ | 1,154 | $ | 9,134 | $ | 95,760 |
79
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 14,276 | $ | 97 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 12,977 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 3,395 | 40 | 381 | 3,054 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 6,223 | 51 | 745 | 5,529 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,242 | 49 | 437 | 2,854 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,899 | 38 | 593 | 5,344 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 15,042 | 115 | 2,356 | 12,801 | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 3,000 | 27 | 341 | 2,686 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 4,708 | 19 | 620 | 4,107 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,451 | 28 | 370 | 3,109 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,450 | 7 | 445 | 2,012 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 12,494 | 76 | 1,750 | 10,820 | 12.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,362 | 16 | 221 | 1,157 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMOs: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,202 | 3 | 168 | 1,037 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 328 | 21 | 4 | 345 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| MPTS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 529 | – | 48 | 481 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMBS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,817 | 4 | 156 | 1,665 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| ABS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| CLOs | 8,307 | 21 | 277 | 8,051 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 5,895 | 78 | 144 | 5,829 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 2,765 | 18 | 443 | 2,340 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 33 | – | 2 | 31 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 429 | 3 | 41 | 391 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 282 | 11 | 56 | 237 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 240 | 25 | 11 | 254 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 97,369 | 747 | 11,005 | 87,111 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (3) | 2,168 | 35 | 178 | 2,025 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 310 | 6 | 22 | 294 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 99,847 | $ | 788 | $ | 11,205 | $ | 89,430 |
(1) Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2) Includes securities collateralized by consumer loans, equipment loans and other asset types.
(3) Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
80
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to future contract benefits, policyholder account balances and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). For instance, deferred income tax balances are adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2025 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Agency | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAIC | Equivalent | Amortized | Fair | % of | Amortized | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| Designation (1) | Designation (1) | Cost | Value | Total | Cost | Value | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AAA / AA / A | $ | 61,616 | $ | 56,349 | 60.3 | % | $ | 58,103 | $ | 51,596 | 59.2 | % | |||||||||||
| 2 | BBB | 36,551 | 33,995 | 36.4 | % | 36,224 | 32,583 | 37.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total investment grade securities | 98,167 | 90,344 | 96.7 | % | 94,327 | 84,179 | 96.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Below Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | BB | 1,025 | 955 | 1.0 | % | 960 | 910 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | B | 1,970 | 1,966 | 2.1 | % | 1,857 | 1,826 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | CCC and lower | 108 | 106 | 0.1 | % | 138 | 124 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | In or near default | 82 | 77 | 0.1 | % | 87 | 72 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total below investment grade securities | 3,185 | 3,104 | 3.3 | % | 3,042 | 2,932 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 101,352 | $ | 93,448 | 100.0 | % | $ | 97,369 | $ | 87,111 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total securities below investment grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as a percentage of total fixed maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFS securities | 3.1 | % | 3.3 | % | 3.1 | % | 3.4 | % |
(1) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the “NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings. The average credit quality of our total fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio was A- as of December 31, 2025.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current risk-based capital (“RBC”) rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 97% of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. See Note 3 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2025, decreased by $2.0 billion since December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized $278 million of gross losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, which were primarily related to portfolio rebalancing and sales that support our reinsurance funds withheld agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $257 million of gross losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, which were primarily
81
Table of Contents
related to portfolio rebalancing and sales that support our reinsurance funds withheld agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers.
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We do not believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2025, required an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
•The current economic environment and market conditions;
•Our business strategy and current business plans;
•The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
•Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;
•The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of annuity contracts and life insurance policies;
•The capital risk limits approved by management; and
•Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(89) million and $(42) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
•Historical and implied volatility of the security;
•The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
•Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
•Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
•Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For information on credit loss impairment on fixed maturity AFS securities, see Notes 1, 3 and 20.
As reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $148.4 billion of investments and cash and invested cash, which exceeded the liabilities for our future obligations under insurance policies and contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers and amounts on deposit with reinsurers, which totaled $120.6 billion as of December 31, 2025. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of $33.8 billion as of December 31, 2025, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business. For additional information, see “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $23.2 billion and $20.9 billion, respectively, representing 17% and 16% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income (loss) as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 7 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the
82
Table of Contents
securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of $2.4 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively, and a net unrealized gain (loss) of $(80) million and $(178) million, respectively.
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $170 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2025. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $168 million, or 99%, and trading securities represented $2 million, or 1%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2025. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2025:
| Agency | Non-Agency | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 400 | $ | 426 | $ | 2,231 | $ | 2,122 | ||||||||||
| ABS home equity | – | – | 165 | 202 | 165 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (1)(2) | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 565 | $ | 628 | $ | 2,396 | $ | 2,324 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 453 | $ | 509 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 2,205 | ||||||||||
| 2 | – | – | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | 12 | 19 | 12 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,831 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 565 | $ | 628 | $ | 2,396 | $ | 2,324 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.4 | % | 2.5 | % | |
| Total non-agency backed as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % |
83
Table of Contents
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $68 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $68 million in trading securities consisted of $30 million agency and $38 million non-agency.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $62 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $62 million in trading securities consisted of $29 million agency and $33 million non-agency.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $179 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2024. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $172 million, or 96%, and trading securities represented $7 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2024. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| Agency | Non-Agency | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 328 | $ | 345 | $ | 2,059 | $ | 1,863 | ||||||||||
| ABS home equity | – | – | 159 | 189 | 159 | 189 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (1)(2) | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 487 | $ | 534 | $ | 2,218 | $ | 2,052 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 460 | $ | 502 | $ | 2,191 | $ | 2,020 | ||||||||||
| 2 | – | – | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | 9 | 15 | 9 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 487 | $ | 534 | $ | 2,218 | $ | 2,052 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.3 | % | 2.4 | % | |
| Total non-agency backed as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $64 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $64 million in trading securities consisted of $15 million agency and $49 million non-agency.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $54 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $54 million in trading securities consisted of $14 million agency and $40 million non-agency.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
None of these investments as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
84
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2025:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 2,270 | $ | 2,189 | $ | 316 | $ | 313 | $ | 2,586 | $ | 2,502 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 2,204 | $ | 2,124 | $ | 316 | $ | 313 | $ | 2,520 | $ | 2,437 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 66 | 65 | – | – | 66 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 2,270 | $ | 2,189 | $ | 316 | $ | 313 | $ | 2,586 | $ | 2,502 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.6 | % | 2.7 | % |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $113 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $113 million in trading securities consisted of $64 million of multiple property CMBS and $49 million of single property CMBS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $100 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $100 million in trading securities consisted of $58 million of multiple property CMBS and $42 million of single property CMBS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 1,672 | $ | 1,526 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,665 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 1,667 | $ | 1,522 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,812 | $ | 1,661 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 5 | 4 | – | – | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,672 | $ | 1,526 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,665 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 1.9 | % | 1.9 | % |
85
Table of Contents
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $126 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $126 million in trading securities consisted of $77 million of multiple property CMBS and $49 million of single property CMBS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $109 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $109 million in trading securities consisted of $68 million of multiple property CMBS and $41 million of single property CMBS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
The following summarizes our investments in ABS within fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions) as of December 31, 2025:
| CLOs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABS (1)(2) | $ | 8,619 | $ | 8,499 | $ | 7,743 | $ | 7,783 | $ | 16,362 | $ | 16,282 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 7,708 | $ | 7,589 | $ | 5,905 | $ | 5,960 | $ | 13,613 | $ | 13,549 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 911 | 910 | 1,715 | 1,700 | 2,626 | 2,610 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | 6 | 14 | 6 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | 79 | 71 | 79 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 8,619 | $ | 8,499 | $ | 7,743 | $ | 7,783 | $ | 16,362 | $ | 16,282 |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $274 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $274 million in trading securities consisted of $138 million of CLOs and $136 million of Other ABS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $271 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $271 million in trading securities consisted of $137 million of CLOs and $134 million of Other ABS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
86
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our investments in ABS within fixed maturity AFS securities (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| CLOs | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABS (1)(2) | $ | 8,307 | $ | 8,051 | $ | 5,895 | $ | 5,829 | $ | 14,202 | $ | 13,880 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 8,106 | $ | 7,848 | $ | 4,453 | $ | 4,425 | $ | 12,559 | $ | 12,273 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 201 | 203 | 1,354 | 1,325 | 1,555 | 1,528 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | 6 | 13 | 6 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | 82 | 66 | 82 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 8,307 | $ | 8,051 | $ | 5,895 | $ | 5,829 | $ | 14,202 | $ | 13,880 |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $378 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $378 million in trading securities consisted of $240 million of CLOs and $138 million of Other ABS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $369 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $369 million in trading securities consisted of $240 million of CLOs and $129 million of Other ABS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
87
Table of Contents
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings. The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2025, was as follows:
| Net Amortized Cost | % Net Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | % Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | % Fair Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | $ | 5,546 | 8.1 | % | $ | 1,151 | 12.8 | % | $ | 4,395 | 7.4 | % | |||||
| Electric | 6,472 | 9.4 | % | 1,018 | 11.3 | % | 5,454 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||
| Technology | 3,643 | 5.3 | % | 537 | 6.0 | % | 3,106 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 3,387 | 4.9 | % | 474 | 5.3 | % | 2,913 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 1,973 | 2.9 | % | 420 | 4.7 | % | 1,553 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 2,001 | 2.9 | % | 392 | 4.4 | % | 1,609 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 2,056 | 3.0 | % | 273 | 3.0 | % | 1,783 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
| Diversified manufacturing | 2,027 | 3.0 | % | 261 | 2.9 | % | 1,766 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
| Banking | 3,660 | 5.3 | % | 253 | 2.8 | % | 3,407 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 1,466 | 2.1 | % | 241 | 2.7 | % | 1,225 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Retail | 1,414 | 2.1 | % | 219 | 2.4 | % | 1,195 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| ABS | 6,658 | 9.7 | % | 214 | 2.4 | % | 6,444 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||
| Chemicals | 1,602 | 2.3 | % | 214 | 2.4 | % | 1,388 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 1,219 | 1.8 | % | 183 | 2.0 | % | 1,036 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 1,418 | 2.1 | % | 183 | 2.0 | % | 1,235 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Life insurance | 1,207 | 1.8 | % | 178 | 2.0 | % | 1,029 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 1,752 | 2.5 | % | 169 | 1.9 | % | 1,583 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 1,139 | 1.7 | % | 168 | 1.9 | % | 971 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
| Utility – other | 945 | 1.4 | % | 166 | 1.8 | % | 779 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
| Government-sponsored | 443 | 0.6 | % | 150 | 1.7 | % | 293 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||
| Railroads | 808 | 1.2 | % | 143 | 1.6 | % | 665 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
| Wirelines | 844 | 1.2 | % | 142 | 1.5 | % | 702 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
| Midstream | 1,195 | 1.7 | % | 128 | 1.4 | % | 1,067 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
| Consumer products | 754 | 1.1 | % | 112 | 1.2 | % | 642 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
| Wireless | 742 | 1.1 | % | 107 | 1.2 | % | 635 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
| Integrated | 542 | 0.8 | % | 105 | 1.2 | % | 437 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||
| Non-agency CMBS | 1,619 | 2.4 | % | 98 | 1.1 | % | 1,521 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | |||||||||||||||||
| less than $100 million | 12,135 | 17.6 | % | 1,300 | 14.4 | % | 10,835 | 18.2 | % | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 68,667 | 100.0 | % | $ | 8,999 | 100.0 | % | $ | 59,668 | 100.0 | % |
| Total by industry as a percentage of | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 67.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 63.9 | % |
88
Table of Contents
The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2024, was as follows:
| Net Amortized Cost | % Net Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | % Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | % Fair Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | $ | 5,802 | 7.5 | % | $ | 1,255 | 11.3 | % | $ | 4,547 | 6.8 | % | |||||
| Electric | 7,301 | 9.4 | % | 1,187 | 10.8 | % | 6,114 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||
| Technology | 3,988 | 5.1 | % | 621 | 5.6 | % | 3,367 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 3,603 | 4.6 | % | 556 | 5.1 | % | 3,047 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 2,086 | 2.7 | % | 451 | 4.1 | % | 1,635 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 2,306 | 3.0 | % | 451 | 4.1 | % | 1,855 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
| Banking | 5,015 | 6.5 | % | 419 | 3.8 | % | 4,596 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||
| ABS | 6,807 | 8.8 | % | 406 | 3.7 | % | 6,401 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 2,267 | 2.9 | % | 335 | 3.0 | % | 1,932 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
| Diversified manufacturing | 2,262 | 2.9 | % | 323 | 2.9 | % | 1,939 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 1,634 | 2.1 | % | 285 | 2.6 | % | 1,349 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Retail | 1,565 | 2.0 | % | 261 | 2.4 | % | 1,304 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Chemicals | 1,893 | 2.4 | % | 248 | 2.3 | % | 1,645 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 1,658 | 2.1 | % | 239 | 2.2 | % | 1,419 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 1,376 | 1.8 | % | 216 | 2.0 | % | 1,160 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 1,922 | 2.5 | % | 215 | 2.0 | % | 1,707 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
| Life insurance | 1,274 | 1.7 | % | 213 | 1.9 | % | 1,061 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 1,357 | 1.8 | % | 212 | 1.9 | % | 1,145 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Utility – other | 1,164 | 1.5 | % | 192 | 1.7 | % | 972 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
| Consumer products | 1,071 | 1.4 | % | 173 | 1.6 | % | 898 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
| Midstream | 1,383 | 1.8 | % | 163 | 1.5 | % | 1,220 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
| Non-agency CMBS | 1,503 | 1.9 | % | 155 | 1.4 | % | 1,348 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Wirelines | 857 | 1.1 | % | 154 | 1.4 | % | 703 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
| Railroads | 846 | 1.1 | % | 149 | 1.4 | % | 697 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
| Government-sponsored | 459 | 0.6 | % | 144 | 1.3 | % | 315 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||
| Integrated | 682 | 0.9 | % | 125 | 1.1 | % | 557 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
| Automotive | 1,463 | 1.9 | % | 123 | 1.1 | % | 1,340 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Wireless | 712 | 0.9 | % | 120 | 1.1 | % | 592 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | |||||||||||||||||
| less than $100 million | 13,260 | 17.1 | % | 1,614 | 14.7 | % | 11,646 | 17.5 | % | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 77,516 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,005 | 100.0 | % | $ | 66,511 | 100.0 | % |
| Total by industry as a percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 79.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 76.4 | % | 0.764 |
89
Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
| As of December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,611 | $ | 4,864 | $ | 22,475 | 99.2 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | 29 | 60 | 89 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure | – | 90 | 90 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,640 | 5,014 | 22,654 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (113) | (69) | (182) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,527 | $ | 4,945 | $ | 22,472 |
| As of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,546 | $ | 3,572 | $ | 21,118 | 99.4 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | 25 | 33 | 58 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure | – | 59 | 59 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,571 | 3,664 | 21,235 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (99) | (53) | (152) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,472 | $ | 3,611 | $ | 21,083 |
(1) Includes certain mortgage loans on real estate that support our modified coinsurance agreements, where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the fair value of such commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were in delinquent status was $20 million and $21 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2025, there were specifically identified impaired commercial and residential mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $67 million and $85 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate. As of December 31, 2024, there were specifically identified impaired commercial and residential mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $36 million and $58 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, was $40 million and $34 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate. The total outstanding principal and interest on residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, was $58 million and $32 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment and Other Operations (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2025 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | ||||||
| Annuities | $ | 10,181 | $ | 8,783 | ||
| Life Insurance | 3,327 | 3,527 | ||||
| Group Protection | 1,650 | 1,608 | ||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 5,332 | 5,380 | ||||
| Other Operations | 1,982 | 1,785 | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 22,472 | $ | 21,083 |
90
Table of Contents
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
| As of December 31, 2025 | As of December 31, 2025 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Value | % | Carrying Value | % | |||||||||||
| Property Type | State | |||||||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,362 | 30.6 | % | CA | $ | 4,828 | 27.5 | % | |||||
| Industrial | 5,202 | 29.7 | % | TX | 1,785 | 10.2 | % | |||||||
| Office building | 3,017 | 17.2 | % | FL | 924 | 5.3 | % | |||||||
| Retail | 2,828 | 16.1 | % | PA | 879 | 5.0 | % | |||||||
| Other commercial | 853 | 4.9 | % | AZ | 865 | 4.9 | % | |||||||
| Mixed use | 162 | 0.9 | % | NY | 852 | 4.9 | % | |||||||
| Hotel/motel | 103 | 0.6 | % | WA | 658 | 3.9 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,527 | 100.0 | % | MD | 643 | 3.7 | % | ||||||
| Geographic Region | GA | 632 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Pacific | 5,798 | 33.1 | % | NC | 571 | 3.3 | % | |||||||
| South Atlantic | 3,631 | 20.6 | % | TN | 517 | 2.9 | % | |||||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,152 | 12.3 | % | UT | 439 | 2.5 | % | |||||||
| West South Central | 1,925 | 11.0 | % | NJ | 421 | 2.4 | % | |||||||
| Mountain | 1,591 | 9.1 | % | VA | 385 | 2.2 | % | |||||||
| East North Central | 1,053 | 6.0 | % | OH | 316 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| East South Central | 615 | 3.5 | % | OR | 312 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| West North Central | 414 | 2.4 | % | IL | 301 | 1.7 | % | |||||||
| New England | 348 | 2.0 | % | All other states | 2,199 | 12.4 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,527 | 100.0 | % | Total | $ | 17,527 | 100.0 | % |
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below as of December 31, 2024:
| Carrying Value | % | Carrying Value | % | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property Type | State | |||||||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,551 | 31.8 | % | CA | $ | 4,707 | 26.9 | % | |||||
| Industrial | 5,033 | 28.8 | % | TX | 1,693 | 9.7 | % | |||||||
| Office building | 3,077 | 17.6 | % | FL | 1,011 | 5.8 | % | |||||||
| Retail | 2,754 | 15.8 | % | AZ | 906 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
| Other commercial | 803 | 4.6 | % | PA | 899 | 5.1 | % | |||||||
| Mixed use | 145 | 0.8 | % | NY | 895 | 5.1 | % | |||||||
| Hotel/motel | 109 | 0.6 | % | WA | 673 | 4.0 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % | MD | 671 | 3.8 | % | ||||||
| Geographic Region | GA | 639 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||
| Pacific | 5,683 | 32.5 | % | TN | 533 | 3.1 | % | |||||||
| South Atlantic | 3,683 | 21.1 | % | NC | 471 | 2.7 | % | |||||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,199 | 12.6 | % | VA | 420 | 2.4 | % | |||||||
| West South Central | 1,829 | 10.5 | % | NJ | 405 | 2.3 | % | |||||||
| Mountain | 1,525 | 8.7 | % | IL | 339 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| East North Central | 1,139 | 6.5 | % | WI | 328 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| East South Central | 646 | 3.7 | % | OH | 323 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| West North Central | 448 | 2.6 | % | UT | 322 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| New England | 320 | 1.8 | % | All other states | 2,237 | 12.8 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % | Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % |
91
Table of Contents
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
| As of December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Principal Repayment Year | ||||||||||||||
| 2026 | $ | 1,414 | $ | 702 | $ | 2,116 | 9.4 | % | ||||||
| 2027 | 1,813 | 162 | 1,975 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||
| 2028 | 2,274 | 58 | 2,332 | 10.3 | % | |||||||||
| 2029 | 1,842 | 59 | 1,901 | 8.5 | % | |||||||||
| 2030 | 1,886 | 66 | 1,952 | 8.6 | % | |||||||||
| 2031 and thereafter | 8,448 | 3,852 | 12,300 | 54.5 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 17,677 | $ | 4,899 | $ | 22,576 | 100.0 | % |
See Note 3 for information regarding our LTV and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment and Other Operations (in millions) was as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 11 | $ | 12 | $ | 16 | ||||
| Life Insurance | 373 | 294 | 207 | |||||||
| Group Protection | 8 | 5 | 9 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 9 | 6 | 10 | |||||||
| Other Operations | – | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| Total (1) | $ | 401 | $ | 319 | $ | 243 |
(1) Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses, not including alternative investments that support reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, alternative investments included investments in 384 and 371 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 3% of total investments. These amounts do not include alternative investments that support funds withheld and modified coinsurance reinsurance agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing was $74 million and $14 million, respectively.
92
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 4,294 | $ | 4,222 | $ | 4,819 | ||||
| Trading securities | 97 | 118 | 161 | |||||||
| Equity securities | 16 | 21 | 13 | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 1,039 | 887 | 755 | |||||||
| Policy loans | 104 | 95 | 103 | |||||||
| Cash and invested cash | 287 | 194 | 129 | |||||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment | ||||||||||
| and bond make-whole premiums (1) | 23 | 15 | 10 | |||||||
| Other investments (2) | 522 | 308 | 234 | |||||||
| Investment income | 6,382 | 5,860 | 6,224 | |||||||
| Investment expense | (307) | (316) | (324) | |||||||
| Net investment income | $ | 6,075 | $ | 5,544 | $ | 5,900 |
(1) See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Includes primarily investment income on alternative investments. See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Interest Rate Yield | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on | ||||||||
| real estate and other, net of investment expenses | 4.16 | % | 4.04 | % | 4.04 | % | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | ||||||||
| bond make-whole premiums | 0.02 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.01 | % | ||
| Other investments | 0.39 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.17 | % | ||
| Net investment income yield on invested assets | 4.57 | % | 4.30 | % | 4.22 | % |
We earn investment income on our general account investments supporting our liabilities associated with investment-type annuities (including RILA, individual and group fixed and fixed portion of variable annuities, fixed indexed deferred annuities and non-life contingent payout fixed annuities), UL, MoneyGuard(R), VUL, IUL and funding agreement products. The profitability of our products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the policyholder account balance. The net investment income and the interest rate yield tables above each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
93
Table of Contents
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek annuity and life reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. For more information about the impacts of reinsurance on our consolidated financial statements, see Notes 1 and 7. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an AM Best rating of A or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
As a result of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld agreements, we reported deposit assets, net of allowances for credit losses of $33.7 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025. For additional information, see Note 7.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2025, 84%, or $23.5 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $22.0 billion was held by reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), $1.4 billion was held in our funds withheld portfolios and $142 million was secured by LOCs for which we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement. We reported funds withheld reinsurance liabilities of $17.9 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.4 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2025. LNL must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held $848 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2025. LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least 160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by which we established $530 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2025, LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of these
94
Table of Contents
arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 7 and 17 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance and other subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the subsidiaries’ capital position, as discussed further below. Based on the sources of liquidity available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs.
Capital
Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may materially affect our business operations and results of operations and may adversely affect our subsidiaries’ capital position, which may cause them to retain more capital. This in turn may pressure our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. We believe we have appropriate capital to operate our business in accordance with our strategy. For more information, see “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, issuance of debt or other types of securities and policyholder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed below. Our primary uses are to pay obligations under insurance policies and contracts, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our common and preferred stockholders, to repurchase our common stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $(167) million, $(2.0) billion and $(2.1) billion in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities will fluctuate based on the timing of insurance premiums received and benefit payments to policyholders, as well as other business activities including cash payments on certain derivatives used to hedge exposure to product-related risks.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends, return of capital and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common and preferred stock dividends, common stock repurchases, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
95
Table of Contents
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Cash Dividends and Return of Capital from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| LNL | $ | 685 | $ | 505 | $ | 495 | ||||
| First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company | 10 | – | 15 | |||||||
| Lincoln Investment Management Company | 25 | 40 | 25 | |||||||
| Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited | 50 | 50 | 150 | |||||||
| Lincoln Pinehurst Reinsurance Company (Bermuda) Limited | 75 | – | – | |||||||
| Total cash dividends and return of capital from subsidiaries | $ | 845 | $ | 595 | $ | 685 | ||||
| Interest from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| Interest on inter-company notes | $ | 138 | $ | 154 | $ | 147 |
The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, issuance of preferred stock or common stock, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
During 2024, LNL made a $929 million extraordinary dividend in the form of investments to LNC for the purpose of the initial capitalization of LPINE. See “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below for more information about LPINE.
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend, along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits. LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains. Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
Our Bermuda-based reinsurance subsidiary, LPINE, and our Barbados-based reinsurance subsidiary, Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited (“LNBAR”), are regulated by the BMA and the Barbados FSC, respectively. Similar to our domestic insurance subsidiaries, our reinsurance subsidiaries in Barbados and Bermuda are subject to regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends imposed by the jurisdictions in which they are domiciled. These requirements may include satisfying certain earnings, reserve or solvency thresholds in order to pay a dividend or obtaining regulatory approval for payment of any dividend in excess of such thresholds.
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $805 million in 2026 without prior approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
96
Table of Contents
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.”
Subsidiaries’ Capital
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus will affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying capacity. For additional information on RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our insurance subsidiaries’ regulatory capital levels are affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. For instance, our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees subject to the NAIC RBC framework require reserves calculated pursuant to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) and Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”), respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to reinsurance captives or reinsurance subsidiaries. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs, debt financing, excess of loss structures with third-party reinsurers, as well as other financing strategies to finance certain reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2025, was $5 million of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance agreements for term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see Note 13. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.2 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves associated with our term and UL products with secondary guarantees as of December 31, 2025; of this amount, $2.6 billion involve exposure to variable interest entities. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 4. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders and guaranteed benefits on VUL policies, as well as certain components of the NAIC RBC calculation that are impacted by such guaranteed benefits, are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates, and such statutory reserves and our RBC levels are also affected by the level of account balances relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Our insurance subsidiaries cede a portion of the variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders to LNBAR through a modified coinsurance agreement. Our variable annuity hedge program mitigates the risk to LNBAR from guaranteed benefit riders and continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. LNL also uses a partial hedge and a third-party reinsurance agreement to mitigate potential capital volatility from guaranteed benefits on VUL policies. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and supporting derivatives.
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital among our insurance subsidiaries, as well as our captive reinsurance or reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and VUL separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also increases, all else equal. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also decreases, all else equal, which will affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
LNC made $967 million in capital contributions in cash to subsidiaries in 2025, including $800 million to LNL in the second quarter of 2025 using proceeds from the Bain Capital transaction. For more information on the Bain Capital transaction, see “Issuance of Common Stock” below and Note 18.
97
Table of Contents
During 2024, LNC contributed $929 million of investments and $22 million in cash to LPINE, a wholly owned subsidiary of LNC and a licensed Bermuda-based life and annuity reinsurance company, in support of an inter-company reinsurance agreement with LNL. LNC made $5 million and $7 million in capital contributions in cash to other subsidiaries in 2024 and 2023, respectively.
On May 6, 2024, we closed the sale of all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that comprised the Company’s wealth management business operated through LFN to Osaic Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation. We received $723 million in cash that was primarily used to increase LNL’s RBC ratio. We also used a portion of the proceeds to reduce our leverage ratio. For more information on the sale of our wealth management business, see Note 1.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2025, were as follows:
| Beginning Balance | Issuances | Maturities, Repayments and Refinancing | Change in Fair Value Hedges | Other Changes (1) | Ending Balance | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt (2) | $ | 300 | $ | – | $ | (300) | $ | – | $ | 400 | $ | 400 | ||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior notes (3) | $ | 4,498 | $ | 1,000 | $ | (299) | $ | 34 | $ | (505) | $ | 4,728 | ||||||||||
| Term loans | 150 | – | – | – | – | 150 | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes (4) | 995 | – | (194) | – | – | 801 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital securities (5) | 213 | – | (26) | – | – | 187 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 5,856 | $ | 1,000 | $ | (519) | $ | 34 | $ | (505) | $ | 5,866 |
(1) Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, premium (discount) associated with debt issuances, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2) We repaid our 3.35% Senior Notes that matured on March 9, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, consisted of $400 million principal amount of our 3.625% Senior Notes due December 12, 2026.
(3) In May 2025, we repurchased $34 million of our 3.05% Senior Notes due 2030, $129 million of our 4.35% Senior Notes due 2048 and $136 million of our 4.375% Senior Notes due 2050.
(4) In May 2025, we repurchased $97 million of our Subordinated Notes due 2066 and $97 million of our Subordinated Notes due 2067.
(5) In May 2025, we repurchased $21 million of our Capital Securities due 2066 and $5 million of our Capital Securities due 2067.
On November 10, 2025, we completed the issuance and sale of $500 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.350% Senior Notes due 2035. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering to fund the repayment of the Company’s 3.625% Senior Notes due 2026, of which $400 million aggregate principal amount was outstanding as of December 31, 2025, on or prior to their maturity. We intend to use the remainder of the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of other debt on or prior to its maturity. On May 15, 2025, we issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of our 2.330% Senior Notes due 2030. See “Alternative Sources of Liquidity – Facility Agreements for Senior Notes Issuances” below for more information.
LNC made interest payments to service debt to third parties of $309 million, $308 million and $311 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facility, see Note 13.
98
Table of Contents
Preferred Stock
Details underlying preferred stock dividends paid (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Series C preferred stock dividends | $ | 46 | $ | 46 | $ | 36 | ||||
| Series D preferred stock dividends | 45 | 45 | 46 | |||||||
| Total preferred stock dividends | $ | 91 | $ | 91 | $ | 82 |
For additional information on preferred stock, see Note 18.
Issuance of Common Stock
On June 5, 2025, we closed our stock sale transaction pursuant to the Purchase Agreement with Bain Capital Prairie, LLC, a newly formed subsidiary of Bain Capital, under which we agreed to sell shares representing 9.9% of our outstanding common stock on a post-issuance basis to the Buyer. Under the final terms, Lincoln sold approximately 18.8 million shares of its common stock for aggregate consideration of $825 million. The transaction provided us with capital that we are deploying and expect to continue to deploy toward our strategic priorities, including growing spread-based earnings, advancing our portfolio management efforts and asset sourcing capabilities and optimizing our legacy life portfolio. For additional information on the Bain Capital transaction, see Note 18.
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchases depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of dividends from our subsidiaries and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II – Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||
| Dividends to common stockholders | $ | 324 | $ | 306 | $ | 305 | ||||
| Repurchase of common stock | – | – | – | |||||||
| Total cash returned to common stockholders | $ | 324 | $ | 306 | $ | 305 |
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
To meet short-term liquidity needs that arise in the ordinary course of business, we utilize an inter-company cash management program between LNC and participating subsidiaries whereby participating subsidiaries can borrow cash from or lend cash to LNC. Loans under the inter-company cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC. As of December 31, 2025, LNC had $157 million of outstanding borrowings from the cash management program related primarily to liquidity management and had no outstanding lending into the cash management program. Holding company borrowing activity is reported in loans from and accrued interest due to subsidiaries on the holding company’s balance sheet. Holding company lending activity is reported in loans to and accrued interest due from subsidiaries on the holding company’s balance sheet. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company balance sheet.
99
Table of Contents
Facility Agreements for Senior Notes Issuance
On May 13, 2025, LNC exercised in full its issuance right under the 10-year facility agreement, dated as of August 18, 2020 (the “Trust I Facility Agreement”) with Belrose Funding Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust I”) and on May 15, 2025, LNC issued $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.330% Senior Notes due 2030 (the “2.330% Senior Notes”) to Trust I in exchange for the principal and interest strips of U.S. Treasury securities held by Trust I (the “Trust I Eligible Assets”), which had a fair value of $418 million when the 2.330% Senior Notes were issued. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2.330% Senior Notes and subsequent sale of the Trust I Eligible Assets were subsequently used to early extinguish long-term debt during the second quarter of 2025 pursuant to a tender offer. For more information on the early extinguishment of debt, see “Debt” above and Note 13.
On May 20, 2025, LNC entered into a 30-year facility agreement (the “Trust II Facility Agreement”) with Belrose Funding Trust II, a Delaware statutory trust (“Trust II”), in connection with Trust II’s sale of $1.0 billion of its Pre-Capitalized Trust Securities Redeemable May 15, 2055 (the “2055 P-Caps”) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Trust II invested the proceeds from the sale of the 2055 P-Caps in a portfolio of principal and interest strips of U.S. Treasury securities (the “Trust II Eligible Assets”). The Trust II Facility Agreement provides LNC the right to issue to Trust II, and to require Trust II to purchase from LNC, on one or more occasions, up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time of $1.0 billion of LNC’s 6.792% Senior Notes due 2055 (the “6.792% senior notes”) in exchange for a corresponding amount of the Trust II Eligible Assets. LNC may direct Trust II to grant all or a portion of the issuance right to one or more assignees (who are LNC’s consolidated subsidiaries or persons to whom LNC or any such consolidated subsidiary has an obligation or liability) (each, an “Issuance Right Assignee”) who may cause a corresponding portion of the 6.792% senior notes to be issued to Trust II and receive the corresponding Trust II Eligible Assets that would otherwise have been delivered to LNC pursuant to the exercise of the issuance right. The 6.792% senior notes will not be issued unless and until the issuance right is exercised. In return, LNC pays Trust II a semi-annual facility fee at a rate of 1.888% per year (applied to the unexercised portion of the issuance right) and reimburses Trust II for its expenses.
For additional information on the facility agreements for senior notes issuances, see Note 13.
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans as an alternative source of liquidity, and to issue funding agreements, both of which are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of December 31, 2025, LNL had a Board-approved maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility with outstanding funding agreements of $1.5 billion. Liquidity borrowings are reported within payables for collateral on investments and funding agreements are reported within policyholder account balances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with a Board-approved maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31, 2025, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information on borrowings under this facility, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 3. For additional information on funding agreements issued to FHLBI, see Note 11.
Repurchase Agreements and Securities Lending Programs
Our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to $2.6 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which none was utilized as of December 31, 2025. Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can also access liquidity through securities lending programs and uncommitted repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2025, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $145 million, and none pledged under uncommitted repurchase agreements. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 3.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures hedged. As of December 31, 2025, we were in a net collateral payable position of $7.8 billion. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to return, post or pledge collateral to counterparties. If we do not have sufficient high quality securities or cash to provide as collateral to counterparties, we have alternative sources of liquidity. In addition to the liquidity from repurchase agreements and FHLB facilities discussed above, we also have a five-year revolving credit facility discussed in Note 13. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 5.
100
Table of Contents
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2025, were as follows:
| Less Than 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | More Than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policyholder account balances, future contract benefits | ||||||||||||||||||
| and MRBs (1) | $ | 32,760 | $ | 63,383 | $ | 55,982 | $ | 388,854 | $ | 540,979 | ||||||||
| Funding agreements (2) | 1,450 | 500 | 1,800 | – | 3,750 | |||||||||||||
| Short-term and long-term debt (3) | 400 | 650 | 966 | 4,246 | 6,262 | |||||||||||||
| Investment commitments (4) | 1,838 | 566 | 444 | 1,820 | 4,668 | |||||||||||||
| Certain financing arrangements (5) | 229 | 161 | 29 | 10 | 429 | |||||||||||||
| Retirement and other plans (6) | 99 | 191 | 187 | 413 | 890 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 36,776 | $ | 65,451 | $ | 59,408 | $ | 395,343 | $ | 556,978 |
(1) Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years, not discounted for the time value of money and gross of any reinsurance recoverable. New business issued or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2) See Note 11 for additional information.
(3) Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 13 for additional information.
(4) See Note 3 for additional information.
(5) Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See Note 17 for additional information.
(6) Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2035 and known payments under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined benefit plans. See Note 15 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Our credit ratings assigned by AM Best, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P are on outlook stable.
As of February 12, 2026, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “aaa to c” | “AAA to D” | “Aaa to C” | “AAA to D” | |||
| bbb+ | BBB+ | Baa2 | BBB+ | |||
| (8th of 22) | (8th of 23) | (9th of 21) | (8th of 22) |
101
Table of Contents
As of February 12, 2026, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “AMB-1+ to AMB-4” | “F1+ to D” | “P-1 to NP” | “A-1+ to D” | |||
| AMB-2 | F2 | P-2 | A-2 | |||
| (3rd of 6) | (3rd of 8) | (2nd of 4) | (3rd of 7) |
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements and/or certain repurchase agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event if the long-term credit ratings of LNC drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s) or if the financial strength ratings of LNL drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). For certain repurchase agreements, there is a termination event if the long-term credit ratings of LNC drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s) or if the financial strength ratings of LNL drop below BBB+/Baa1 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000059558-25-000023.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 41 |
| Introduction | 42 |
| Executive Summary | 42 |
| Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates | 44 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 55 |
| Results of Annuities | 57 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 62 |
| Results of Group Protection | 68 |
| Results of Retirement Plan Services | 72 |
| Results of Other Operations | 76 |
| Consolidated Investments | 78 |
| Reinsurance | 90 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 91 |
40
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, and the results of operations in 2024 and 2023 compared with the immediately preceding year of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
•Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account balances, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
•The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business; our affiliate reinsurance arrangements; and restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and 12b-1 distribution fees;
•Changes in tax law or the interpretation of or application of existing tax laws that could impact our tax costs and the products that we sell;
•The impact of regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations that could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and result in additional disclosure and other requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products;
•The impact of new and emerging rules, laws and regulations relating to privacy, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence that may lead to increased compliance costs, reputation risk and/or changes in business practices;
•Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters that may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
•Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
•Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and demand for our products;
•Rapidly increasing or sustained high interest rates that may negatively affect our profitability, value of our investment portfolio and capital position and may cause policyholders to surrender annuity and life insurance policies, thereby causing realized investment losses;
•The impact of the implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions;
•The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
•A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefit riders, which are accounted for as market risk benefits (“MRBs”), of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;
•Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
41
Table of Contents
•A deviation in actual experience regarding future policyholder behavior, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce future earnings;
•Changes in accounting principles that may affect our consolidated financial statements;
•Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
•Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
•Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
•Interruption in or failure of the telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems of the Company or the third parties on whom we rely or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches in security of such systems;
•The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, including the inability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and potential operating difficulties and unforeseen liabilities relating thereto, as well as the effect of restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
•The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives;
•The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
•Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder claims, affect our businesses and increase the cost and availability of reinsurance;
•Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
•The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
•The unanticipated loss of key management or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement income products and solutions through our four business segments:
•Annuities;
•Life Insurance;
•Group Protection; and
•Retirement Plan Services
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial results for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated net income (loss), we also provide income (loss) from operations because we believe it is a meaningful measure of the profitability of our business segments and Other Operations. Income (loss) from operations is the financial performance measure we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments and Other Operations. Accordingly, we define and report income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 19. Our management believes that income (loss) from operations explains the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in and performance of our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from income (loss) from operations because they are unpredictable and not necessarily
42
Table of Contents
indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments.
We provide information about our business segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items, key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
Below is a discussion of certain trends impacting our business and industry:
Interest Rate Environment
During 2024, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate target range by 100 basis points to a range of 4.25% to 4.50%, stating that it had gained greater confidence that inflation was moving sustainably towards its target level of 2%. At the January 2025 meeting, the Federal Reserve decided to maintain the current federal funds target range.
While the federal funds rate target range decreased during 2024, we continue to experience an elevated interest rate environment. We continue to be proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this interest rate environment. As a result of the elevated interest rate environment, sales of fixed annuities, fixed-indexed annuities and registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”) products increased across the industry. With the elevated interest rate environment expected to persist into 2025, these industry sales trends may continue in 2025.
We have provided disclosures around risks related to changes in interest rates in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained high interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders,” “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review – Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity” below and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation. Our Bermuda-based reinsurance subsidiary is licensed in Bermuda and is subject to regulations established by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”). In addition, our Barbados-based reinsurance subsidiary is regulated by the Barbados Financial Services Commission. Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased regulation and oversight for the industry. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
43
Table of Contents
Significant Operational Matters
Throughout 2024, we executed against our strategic priorities of strengthening our balance sheet, improving our operational efficiency, increasing free cash flow and focusing on profitable growth. Notable actions in 2024 include the following:
•In the first quarter of 2024, we completed the issuance of $350 million of fixed-rate senior notes and used the net proceeds to pre-fund the repayment of our senior notes due in 2025. Also, we refinanced our term loan in the third quarter of 2024, extending the maturity date to 2027.
•We continued to focus on expense management, and, in the first quarter of 2024, we reduced our workforce by approximately 5% to streamline our organizational structure, improve operational efficiency and reduce expenses.
•We received $723 million in cash in 2024 with the close of the sale of all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that comprised the Company’s wealth management business operated through Lincoln Financial Network (“LFN”) to Osaic Holdings, Inc. (“Osaic”). The proceeds were primarily used to increase The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company’s (“LNL”) risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio above the Company’s target of 400%, and we used a portion of the proceeds to reduce our leverage ratio. For additional information, see “Results of Annuities” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Subsidiaries’ Capital” below and Note 1.
•We continued to focus on improving free cash flow through increasing our affiliate reinsurance capacity with the execution of affiliate reinsurance transactions during 2024 with Lincoln Pinehurst Reinsurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (“LPINE”), a wholly owned subsidiary of LNC that operates as a Bermuda-based life and annuity reinsurance company. For additional information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
•In the fourth quarter of 2024, LNL established a funding agreement-backed notes program pursuant to which LNL may issue funding agreements to a special purpose statutory trust for spread lending purposes. In January 2025, LNL issued a $500 million funding agreement with an annual fixed interest rate of 5.3%, maturing January 2030.
We continue to focus on the following actions in 2025:
•Growing our industry-leading wholesale distribution through Lincoln Financial Distributors, which distributes our annuities and life insurance products as well as our retirement plan products and services through financial institutions and other financial intermediaries;
•Making investments in our businesses and product enhancements to grow revenues, drive margin and reduce costs;
•Shifting our new business to a more capital-efficient mix with higher risk-adjusted returns;
•Improving the profitability of our Group Protection business through strategic pricing actions and repositioning our business through targeted segment strategies as part of our longer-term margin expansion initiatives;
•Exploring reinsurance and other strategies to maximize the value of our businesses; and
•Focusing on expense discipline to drive greater operational efficiency and enhance the operating leverage within our business.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
We have identified the accounting estimates below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition. In applying these critical accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
Investments
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or non-performance risk, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
44
Table of Contents
The following summarizes investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| Quoted | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | ||||||||||||||
| in Active | ||||||||||||||
| Markets for | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||||
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | |||||||||||
| Priced by third-party pricing services | $ | 419 | $ | 76,909 | $ | 162 | $ | 77,490 | ||||||
| Priced by independent broker quotations | – | – | – | 5,084 | – | 5,084 | ||||||||
| Priced by matrices | – | – | 16,743 | – | 16,743 | |||||||||
| Priced by other methods (1) | – | – | – | 229 | – | 229 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 419 | $ | 93,652 | $ | 5,475 | $ | 99,546 | ||||||
| Percent of total | 0% | 95% | 5% | 100% |
(1) Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity AFS securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, see Notes 1 and 14.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2024, we evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion, as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2024, we used broker quotes for 18 securities as our final price source, representing less than 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes. Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data. The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing
45
Table of Contents
service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing source.
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers, future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation” above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans. Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value (“LTV”) reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk
46
Table of Contents
characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Our additional liabilities for other insurance benefits reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our additional liabilities reserve. These actual to expected adjustments would be reported in benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity risk and credit risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Policyholder Account Balances” below for information on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of hedging and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 5. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives, including sensitivities, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Future contract benefits represent liability reserves that we have established and carry based on estimates of how much we will need to pay for future benefits and claims.
Liability for Future Policy Benefits
Liability for future policy benefits (“LFPB”) represents the reserve amounts associated with non-participating traditional life insurance contracts and limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts that are calculated to meet the various policy and contract obligations as they mature. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to policyholders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions, additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity and policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the actuarial assumptions to best estimate future premium and benefit cash flows (“cash flow assumptions”) and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions as needed (excluding the claims settlement expense assumption that is locked-in at inception) in the calculation of the net premium ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In measuring our LFPB, we establish cohorts, which are groupings of long-duration contracts. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the net premium ratio at the cohort level for actual experience. For all contract cohorts issued after January 1, 2021, interest is accrued on LFPB at the single-A interest rate on the contract cohort inception date. For contract cohorts issued prior to January 1, 2021, interest remains accruing at the original discount rate in effect on the contract cohort inception date due to the modified retrospective transition method. We also remeasure the LFPB using the single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period.
Liability for Future Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term life and disability claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These reserves use actuarial assumptions primarily based on claim termination rates, offsets for other insurance including social security and long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions. Such cash flow assumptions are subject to the comprehensive review process discussed above. We remeasure the liability for future claims using a single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
47
Table of Contents
Additional Liabilities for Other Insurance Benefits
We previously issued UL-type contracts where we provided a secondary guarantee to the policyholder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base policy account balance is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. These guaranteed benefits require an additional liability that is calculated based on the application of a benefit ratio (calculated as the present value of total expected benefit payments over the life of the contract from inception divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the contract). These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the contracts. Cash flow assumptions incorporated in a benefit ratio in measuring these additional liabilities for other insurance benefits include mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals based principally on generally accepted actuarial methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the cash flow assumptions and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions in the calculation of the benefit ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For additional information on future contract benefits, see Note 12.
Market Risk Benefits
MRBs are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or circumstance, such as death, annuitization or periodic withdrawal. An MRB can be in either an asset or a liability position. Our MRB assets and MRB liabilities are reported at fair value separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We issue variable and fixed annuity contracts that may include various types of guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) and guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) riders that we have accounted for as MRBs. For contracts that contain multiple riders that qualify as MRBs, the MRBs are valued on a combined basis using an integrated model. We have entered into reinsurance agreements to cede certain GLB and GDB riders where the reinsurance agreements themselves are accounted for as MRBs or contain MRBs. We therefore record ceded MRB assets and ceded MRB liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. We report ceded MRBs associated with these reinsurance agreements in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net amount at risk (“NAR”) represents the amount of GLB or GDB in excess of a policyholder’s account balance at the balance sheet date. Underperforming markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB and GDB riders. A contract with a GDB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the GDB. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, 8% and 15%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GDB rider were “in the money.” A contract with a GLB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the present value of GLB payments, assuming no full surrenders. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, 17% and 21%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB rider were “in the money.” However, the only way the policyholder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account balance of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account balance is exhausted, the policyholder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account balance can also fluctuate with market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account balance.
Many policyholders have both a GLB and GDB present on the same policy. The total NAR represents the greater of GLB NAR and GDB NAR for each policy as only one benefit can be exercised in practice. Details underlying the NAR, net of reinsurance, (in millions) were as follows:
| Annuities | Retirement Plan Services | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||
| GLB NAR | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,805 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||
| GDB NAR | 686 | 1,491 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Total NAR | 2,126 | 3,143 | 3 | 4 |
The change in the fair value of MRB assets and liabilities is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), except for the portion attributable to the change in non-performance risk, which is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). The change in the fair value of ceded MRB assets and liabilities, including the changes in our counterparties’ non-performance risks, is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
48
Table of Contents
MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our non-performance risk. Ceded MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our counterparties’ non-performance risk. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant and include assumptions for capital markets, lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin and administrative expenses. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical data and actuarial judgments. The assumption for our own non-performance risk and our counterparties’ non-performance risk for MRBs and ceded MRBs, respectively, are determined at each valuation date and reflect our risk and our counterparties’ risks of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the non-performance risk is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of these MRBs and update these assumptions on a prospective basis as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. For information on fair value inputs, see Note 14. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
49
Table of Contents
For illustrative purposes, the following presents hypothetical effects to MRBs attributable to changes to key assumptions / inputs, assuming all other factors remain constant:
| Hypothetical | Hypothetical | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Effect | |||||||
| Assumption / Input | Actual Experience | to MRB Liability | to Net Income | Description of Assumption / Input | ||||
| Equity market return | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Equity market return input represents impact based on movements in equity markets. | ||||
| Interest rate | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Interest rate input represents impact based on movements in interest rates and impact to fixed-income assets. | ||||
| Volatility | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Volatility assumption represents overall volatilities assumed for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a mixture of equity and fixed-income assets. Volatility assumptions vary by fund due to the benchmarking of difference indices. | ||||
| Mortality | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Mortality contracts with only GDB rider | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Lapse | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Lapse assumption represents the estimated probability of a contract surrendering during a year, thereby forgoing any future benefits. | ||||
| Benefit utilization | Higher / Lower | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Benefit utilization assumption of guaranteed withdrawals represents the estimated percentage of policyholders that utilize the guaranteed withdrawal feature. |
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to selected risk caused by changes in equity markets and interest rates associated with GLB and GDB riders that are available in our variable annuity products and accounted for as MRBs. Our hedge program focuses on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. We utilize options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. For additional information on our derivatives, see Note 5.
As part of our hedge program, equity market and interest rate conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not completely offset changes in the fair value of our GLB and GDB riders caused by movements in these factors due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, policyholder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
50
Table of Contents
The following table presents our after-tax estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets and interest rates (in millions) and excludes the net cost of operating the hedge program. The amounts represent the difference between the change in GLB and GDB riders and the change in the fair value of the underlying hedge instruments. These estimates are based upon the balance as of December 31, 2024, net of reinsurance, and the related hedge instruments in place as of that date. The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes to equity market returns and interest rates occurred.
| In-Force Sensitivities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Market Return | -10% | +10% | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | (850) | $ | 725 | ||
| Interest Rates | -25 bps | +25 bps | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | (350) | 325 |
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the table above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
•The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2024, due to changing market conditions, policyholder activity, hedge positions and other factors;
•The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market changes;
•The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
•Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, may be overly simplistic and not indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
•It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without affecting other capital market sectors; and
•The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB and GDB riders and the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
For additional information on MRBs, see Note 9.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date. This liability includes universal life insurance (“UL”) and variable universal life insurance (“VUL”) and investment-type annuity products where account balances are equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and policyholder administration charges (collectively known as “policyholder assessments”), as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”) and indexed annuity products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives and update assumptions as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the policyholder’s account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the policyholder. Policyholders may elect to rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge policyholder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For more information on indexed product derivative results, see Note 20.
For additional information on the liability for policyholder account balances, see Note 11.
51
Table of Contents
Reinsurance Recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables are generally measured and recognized consistent with the assumptions and methodologies used to project the future performance of the underlying direct business as discussed in the “Future Contract Benefits” and “Policyholder Account Balances” sections above. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models and update assumptions as needed. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In addition, we consider the potential impact of counterparty credit risks related to the reinsurance recoverable by estimating an allowance for credit losses using a probability of loss model approach to estimate expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables. For additional information on our allowance for credit losses on reinsurance-related assets, see Note 7.
Annual Assumption Review
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating MRBs, our reserves and embedded derivatives. For more information on our comprehensive review, see Note 1. Details underlying the effect to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||
| Life Insurance | 8 | (156) | (2,107) | |||||||
| Group Protection | (1) | 24 | (12) | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | – | – | – | |||||||
| Excluded from income (loss) from operations | 208 | (36) | 74 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 216 | $ | (167) | $ | (2,044) |
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2024
•For Life Insurance, the favorable impact was driven by updates to capital market assumptions on reinsured blocks of MoneyGuard® business and other items, partially offset by unfavorable updates to policyholder behavior assumptions on reinsured blocks of MoneyGuard business.
•For Group Protection, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to disability claim termination rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to life waiver incurred assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the favorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by model enhancements.
2023
•For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior and mortality assumptions, partially offset by the favorable impact of a 50-basis-point increase in our long-term new money investment yield assumption.
•For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability and life waiver claim termination rate assumptions, partially offset by the unfavorable impact due to updates to long-term disability social security offset assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the unfavorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates to mortality and policyholder lapse behavior assumptions and other items, partially offset by a favorable impact from updates to volatility and policyholder GLB utilization behavior assumptions.
2022
•For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees in the amount of $1.9 billion, after-tax, as well as updates to mortality and morbidity assumptions and other items.
•For Group Protection, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions, partially offset by the favorable impact of updates to life waiver termination assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the favorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates to policyholder benefit utilization behavior and fund mapping and volatility assumptions, partially offset by an unfavorable impact from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees that impacted ceded reserves.
52
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangibles that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired and written down to the reporting unit’s fair value. The results of one test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of another reporting unit.
For the purposes of the evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, our reporting units correspond with our business segments.
The fair values of our reporting units are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the value of new business. Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we expect to issue in the future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the values of in-force and new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected, weighted-average rate of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each reporting unit.
We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Factors that can influence the value of goodwill include the capital markets, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, consumer confidence and any items that can directly or indirectly affect new business future cash flows. Factors that could affect production levels and profitability of new business include mix of new business, pricing changes, customer acceptance of our products and distribution strength. Spread compression and related effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments.
Examples of unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Lower expectations for future sales levels or future sales profitability;
•Higher discount rates on new business assumptions;
•Weakened expectations for the ability to execute future reserve financing transactions for life insurance business over the long-term or expectations for significant increases in the associated costs;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products, the required amount of reserves and/or surplus, or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including changes to statutory reserve requirements or changes to RBC requirements; and
•Valuations of significant mergers or acquisitions of companies or blocks of business that would provide relevant market-based inputs for our impairment assessment that could support less favorable conclusions regarding the estimated fair value of our reporting units.
As of October 1, 2024 and 2023, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our reporting units (Annuities, Group Protection and Retirement Plan Services), and, as of each such date, the fair value was in excess of the carrying value for each such reporting unit.
In the third quarter of 2022, as a result of the capital market environment, including (i) declining equity markets and (ii) the impact of rising interest rates on our discount rate assumption, we accelerated our quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Life Insurance reporting unit as we concluded that there were indicators of impairment. Based on this quantitative test, which included updating our best estimate assumptions therein, we incurred an impairment during the third quarter of 2022 of the Life Insurance reporting unit goodwill of $634 million, which represented the write-off of the entire balance of goodwill for the reporting unit.
As of October 1, 2022, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for the remaining reporting units, and, as of October 1, 2022, the fair value was in excess of each such other reporting unit’s carrying value.
For more information on goodwill and specifically identifiable intangible assets by segment, see Notes 1 and 8.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax assets and liabilities for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Management exercises judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax assets and liabilities. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative
53
Table of Contents
changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. While we have determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative minimum tax for 2023 or 2024, we will continue to evaluate the potential impact of this new alternative minimum tax on our business, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Judgment and the use of estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized; and any future prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
As of December 31, 2024, we had an approximate $2.2 billion deferred tax asset related to net unrealized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management concluded that its tax planning strategies, including holding these securities to recovery, was prudent and feasible as these unrealized losses were caused by factors other than credit loss, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to recovery and collect all of the contractual cash flows.
We may experience an increased likelihood of recording a valuation allowance in the future based on the following factors:
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may impact the value of appreciated securities and the sale of certain corporate assets; and
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that may impact the sale of certain corporate assets.
Additionally, as of December 31, 2024, we had a $478 million deferred tax asset related to net operating losses, a $169 million deferred tax asset related to federal income tax credits and a $56 million deferred tax asset related to capital losses generated from the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. These deferred tax assets can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes payable in those future periods. The net operating losses do not expire and can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal income tax credits expire in 10 years. The capital losses can be carried back three years and carried forward five years.
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, will be realized.
For risks related to establishing a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Assumptions and Estimates – We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.”
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 22.
54
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Details underlying the consolidated results (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 (1) | 2022 (1) | ||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,161 | ||||
| Life Insurance | (63) | (159) | (2,094) | |||||||
| Group Protection | 425 | 299 | 41 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 163 | 171 | 211 | |||||||
| Other Operations | (370) | (394) | (401) | |||||||
| Net annuity product features, pre-tax | 2,508 | 68 | 4,133 | |||||||
| Net life insurance product features, pre-tax | (207) | (393) | 26 | |||||||
| Credit loss-related adjustments, pre-tax | (152) | (80) | (130) | |||||||
| Investment gains (losses), pre-tax | (483) | (959) | 20 | |||||||
| Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans, pre-tax (2) | 535 | (802) | (52) | |||||||
| Impairment of intangibles (3) | – | – | (634) | |||||||
| Gains (losses) on other non-financial assets – sale of | ||||||||||
| subsidiaries/businesses, pre-tax (4) | 582 | – | – | |||||||
| Other items, pre-tax (5) (6) (7) (8) | (270) | (55) | (109) | |||||||
| Income tax benefit (expense) related to the | ||||||||||
| above pre-tax items | (553) | 479 | (814) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 3,275 | $ | (752) | $ | 1,358 |
(1) The prior period presentation was recast to conform to the revised definition of income (loss) from operations. See Note 19 for additional information.
(2) Includes primarily changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction. The coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivative related to the coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). See Note 7 for more information.
(3) See Note 8 for more information.
(4) For information on the sale of our wealth management business, see Note 1.
(5) For the year ended December 31, 2024, includes certain legal accruals of $(129) million, primarily attributable to a first quarter 2024 accrual related to the settlement of cost of insurance litigation, and regulatory accruals of $(12) million related to estimated state guaranty fund assessments net of estimated state premium tax recoveries associated with the Bankers Life Insurance Company and Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Company insolvencies (see “State Guaranty Fund Assessments” in Note 17 for more information). For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, includes certain legal accruals of $(12) million and $(147) million, respectively.
(6) Includes severance expense related to initiatives to realign the workforce of $(74) million and $(7) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(7) Includes transaction and integration costs related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures of $(40) million and $(34) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(8) Includes deferred compensation mark-to-market adjustment of $(15) million, $(2) million and $38 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
55
Table of Contents
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Net income increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher gain in net annuity product features driven by improvement in the fair value of GLB hedge instruments attributable to the effect of capital markets and higher gain in MRB-related impacts due to higher interest rates, partially offset by less favorable changes in equity markets.
•Favorable changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans in 2024 compared to unfavorable changes in 2023 driven primarily by the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Gain on other non-financial assets due to the sale of our wealth management business in 2024.
•Favorable impact from our annual assumption review in 2024 compared to unfavorable impact in 2023.
•Lower investment losses driven by losses in 2023 on fixed maturity AFS securities as part of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Growth in average account balances and improvement in our total loss ratio in our Group Protection segment.
•Lower loss in net life insurance product features driven by mark-to-market changes on hedges associated with VUL products.
The increase in net income was partially offset by the following:
•Higher expenses in other items.
•Higher credit loss-related adjustments on our mortgage loans on real estate.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Net income decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower gain in net annuity product features driven by unfavorable changes in the fair value of GLB and GDB hedge instruments in 2023 compared to favorable changes in 2022 attributable to the effect of capital markets and lower gain in MRB-related impacts due to the effect of capital markets.
•Investment losses in 2023 compared to gains in 2022 driven by losses in 2023 on fixed maturity AFS securities as part of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Higher unfavorable changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans driven by the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Loss in net life insurance product features in 2023 compared to gain in 2022 driven by mark-to-market losses on hedges associated with VUL products.
•Higher compensation-related expenses, partially offset by lower expenses in other items.
The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:
•Less unfavorable impact from our annual assumption review.
•Goodwill impairment in 2022 in our Life Insurance segment.
•Lower total loss ratio in our Group Protection segment.
•Higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
Additional Information
For information on the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, see Notes 3 and 7.
For information on the sale of our wealth management business in 2024, see “Results of Annuities” below and Note 1.
For information on the impacts from our annual assumption review, see “Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above.
For a discussion of the 2022 goodwill impairment, see “Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” above.
56
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 127 | $ | (1,584) | $ | 165 | ||||
| Fee income | 2,381 | 2,196 | 2,347 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 1,759 | 1,734 | 1,463 | |||||||
| Other revenues (2) | 629 | 656 | 507 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 4,896 | 3,002 | 4,482 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits (1) | 143 | (1,506) | 251 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,536 | 1,252 | 894 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,827 | 2,041 | 1,989 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,508 | 1,789 | 3,136 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 1,388 | 1,213 | 1,346 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 228 | 140 | 185 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,161 |
(1) Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include primarily changes in income annuity reserves driven by insurance premiums.
(2) Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility and have a comparable offset in commissions and other expenses; and the net settlement related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited. On May 6, 2024, we closed the sale of our wealth management business. See Note 1 for more information.
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to higher fee income driven by higher average daily separate account balances.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, which more than offset impacts from higher average general account balances, improving portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment and higher investment income within our surplus portfolio. The lower net investment income, net of interest credited, was experienced in certain reinsured portfolios that have a corresponding increase in other revenues and decrease in benefits.
•Higher commissions and other expenses, net of broker-dealer expenses, driven by higher trail commissions resulting from higher average daily separate account balances. In addition, we incurred higher broker-dealer expenses in the first quarter of 2024 as a result of a balance sheet true-up in preparation for the close of the sale of the wealth management business.
•Higher federal income tax expense due to unfavorable separate account dividends-received deduction true-ups in 2024 compared to favorable true-ups in 2023.
57
Table of Contents
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower fee income driven by lower average daily separate account balances.
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, reflecting lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, which more than offset impacts from higher average general account balances and improving portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment. The lower net investment income, net of interest credited, was experienced in certain reinsured portfolios that have a corresponding increase in other revenues.
•Higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense due to a more favorable tax return true-up driven by the separate account dividends-received deduction.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude Re”) to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force fixed annuities. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force life-contingent payout fixed annuities that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations.
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account balances. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average gross account balances were 11%, 9% and 7% in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our outflow rate increase in 2024 was due primarily to an increase in full surrenders as a result of the elevated interest rate environment and strong equity markets.
Our fixed annuities and RILA have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained high interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
58
Table of Contents
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Mortality, expense and other assessments (1) | $ | 2,315 | $ | 2,143 | $ | 2,318 | ||||
| Surrender charges | 59 | 45 | 24 | |||||||
| DFEL: | ||||||||||
| Deferrals | (18) | (19) | (23) | |||||||
| Amortization | 25 | 27 | 28 | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,196 | $ | 2,347 |
(1) Presented net of GLB and GDB hedge allowance.
We charge policyholders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily separate account balances. Average daily separate account balances are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual rate that is applied either to the account balance or the guaranteed amount. We allocate a portion of these fees to support the cost of hedging GLB and GDB riders. For more information, see Note 19. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,592 | $ | 1,600 | $ | 1,305 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 4 | 2 | 31 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 154 | 128 | 127 | |||||||
| Net investment income pertaining to broker-dealer services | 9 | 4 | – | |||||||
| Total net investment income | 1,759 | 1,734 | 1,463 | |||||||
| Interest Credited | ||||||||||
| Amount provided to policyholders | 1,524 | 1,242 | 880 | |||||||
| DSI deferrals | (2) | (5) | (2) | |||||||
| Interest credited before DSI amortization | 1,522 | 1,237 | 878 | |||||||
| DSI amortization | 14 | 15 | 16 | |||||||
| Total interest credited | $ | 1,536 | $ | 1,252 | $ | 894 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our deferred fixed annuities, the fixed portion of our variable annuities and our RILA contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuities, fixed portion of the variable annuities and RILA contracts and what we credit to our
59
Table of Contents
policyholders’ accounts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Separate Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Separate account deposits | $ | 4,765 | $ | 2,981 | $ | 3,370 | ||||
| Separate account net flows | (9,308) | (7,196) | (5,867) | |||||||
| Separate account balances | 117,998 | 113,355 | 105,573 | |||||||
| Average daily separate account balances | 117,278 | 108,473 | 114,838 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 5,428 | 4,285 | 4,100 | |||||||
| General Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| General account deposits | $ | 8,983 | $ | 9,839 | $ | 8,462 | ||||
| General account net flows | 2,833 | 5,169 | 5,530 | |||||||
| General account balances (3) | 45,613 | 39,471 | 37,165 | |||||||
| Average general account balances (3) | 42,754 | 39,733 | 34,754 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities and RILA indexed account balances.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our separate account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Net of reinsurance.
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
60
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 425 | $ | 354 | $ | 390 | ||||
| Non-deferrable | 690 | 617 | 628 | |||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 495 | 471 | 408 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | ||||||||||
| and LOC expenses | 25 | 12 | 4 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 40 | 41 | 43 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer | 1,675 | 1,495 | 1,473 | |||||||
| DAC deferrals | (498) | (411) | (449) | |||||||
| Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred, | ||||||||||
| excluding amortization | 1,177 | 1,084 | 1,024 | |||||||
| DAC, VOBA and other amortization: | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 432 | 433 | 430 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (2) | (2) | (1) | |||||||
| Broker-dealer expenses incurred | 220 | 526 | 536 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,827 | $ | 2,041 | $ | 1,989 |
| DAC Deferrals | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales/deposits | 3.6 | % | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues.
61
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 1,149 | $ | 1,162 | $ | 1,146 | ||||
| Fee income | 2,715 | 3,010 | 2,995 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 2,303 | 2,712 | 2,587 | |||||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) | (6) | (6) | (7) | |||||||
| Other revenues | 87 | 29 | 26 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 6,248 | 6,907 | 6,747 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | 3,730 | 4,436 | 4,071 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,194 | 1,290 | 1,310 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | 163 | 147 | 2,854 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,266 | 1,265 | 1,193 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 6,353 | 7,138 | 9,428 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (105) | (231) | (2,681) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (42) | (72) | (587) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (63) | $ | (159) | $ | (2,094) |
(1) Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Loss from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement loss driven by the run-rate impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction and the impact from our annual assumption review, partially offset by unfavorable mortality due to higher severity related to elevated large claims.
•Higher other revenues driven by the run-rate impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by the run-rate impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, partially offset by higher investment income on alternative investments.
•Lower fee income driven by the run-rate impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Higher commissions and other expenses driven by the impact of the amortization of deferred loss recognized as part of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, partially offset by expense management.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement loss driven by less unfavorable impacts from the annual assumption review and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, respectively, partially offset by higher benefits due to growth in reserves.
•Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Higher fee income driven by growth in business in force, partially offset by the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
62
Table of Contents
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses due to higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
For more information on the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, see “Additional Information” below.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force UL with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”) and MoneyGuard®. Due to the timing of when the reinsurance agreements were finalized in mid-November, income (loss) from operations for the fourth quarter of 2023 was unfavorably impacted by approximately $15 million. We expect an ongoing unfavorable impact to operating results in future quarters of approximately $25 million to $30 million per quarter as a result of this reinsurance transaction. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained high interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force. Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account balances and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Cost of insurance assessments | $ | 2,104 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 2,258 | ||||
| Expense assessments | 1,406 | 1,495 | 1,539 | |||||||
| Surrender charges | 33 | 32 | 30 | |||||||
| DFEL: | ||||||||||
| Deferrals | (1,114) | (1,075) | (1,061) | |||||||
| Amortization | 287 | 258 | 233 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (1) | – | (4) | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,715 | $ | 3,010 | $ | 2,995 |
63
Table of Contents
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Sales by Product | ||||||||||
| IUL/UL | $ | 100 | $ | 119 | $ | 135 | ||||
| MoneyGuard® | 128 | 98 | 94 | |||||||
| VUL | 85 | 132 | 163 | |||||||
| Term | 66 | 100 | 177 | |||||||
| Executive Benefits | 59 | 93 | 136 | |||||||
| Total sales | $ | 438 | $ | 542 | $ | 705 | ||||
| Net Flows | ||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 5,102 | $ | 5,385 | $ | 5,821 | ||||
| Withdrawals and deaths | (1,941) | (1,767) | (1,698) | |||||||
| Net flows | $ | 3,161 | $ | 3,618 | $ | 4,123 | ||||
| Policyholder Assessments | $ | 5,517 | $ | 5,476 | $ | 5,434 |
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Account Balances (1) | ||||||||||
| General account | $ | 21,452 | $ | 21,403 | $ | 32,136 | ||||
| Separate account | 23,320 | 20,088 | 16,499 | |||||||
| Total account balances | $ | 44,772 | $ | 41,491 | $ | 48,635 | ||||
| In-Force Face Amount | ||||||||||
| UL and other | $ | 363,950 | $ | 365,938 | $ | 363,884 | ||||
| Term insurance | 714,362 | 722,620 | 707,747 | |||||||
| Total in-force face amount | $ | 1,078,312 | $ | 1,088,558 | $ | 1,071,631 | ||||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Average General Account Balances (1) | $ | 21,400 | $ | 30,606 | $ | 32,284 |
(1) Net of reinsurance ceded.
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our policyholders’ account balances. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account balances.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the year with the fourth quarter being our strongest.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
•UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
•MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL), 15% of total expected premium deposits, and MoneyGuard Market AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
•Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
•Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
64
Table of Contents
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,848 | $ | 2,346 | $ | 2,366 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 8 | 6 | 37 | |||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 294 | 207 | 48 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (3) | 153 | 153 | 136 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 2,303 | $ | 2,712 | $ | 2,587 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,290 | $ | 1,310 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.
(3) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to policyholder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account balances because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Investment income partially offsets the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
65
Table of Contents
Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits and policyholder remeasurement (gain) loss (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain) Loss | ||||||||||
| Death claims direct and assumed | $ | 5,960 | $ | 5,412 | $ | 5,440 | ||||
| Death claims ceded | (2,734) | (2,097) | (2,110) | |||||||
| Reserves released on death | (590) | (622) | (609) | |||||||
| Net death benefits | 2,636 | 2,693 | 2,721 | |||||||
| Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product | ||||||||||
| reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 393 | 751 | 688 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 20 | 172 | 2,438 | |||||||
| Change in MoneyGuard® reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 573 | 524 | 456 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 53 | 37 | 167 | |||||||
| Change in traditional product reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 141 | 202 | 205 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (84) | (11) | 62 | |||||||
| Other benefits (1) | 161 | 215 | 188 | |||||||
| Total benefits and policyholder remeasurement | ||||||||||
| (gain) loss | $ | 3,893 | $ | 4,583 | $ | 6,925 | ||||
| Death claims per $1,000 of in-force | 2.43 | 2.49 | 2.66 |
(1) Includes primarily long-term care claims and life surrender benefits.
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee, linked-benefit and term life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing remeasurements. Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims.
66
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 461 | $ | 571 | $ | 698 | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 563 | 617 | 554 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | 96 | 102 | 105 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 135 | 150 | 159 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,255 | 1,440 | 1,516 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA deferrals | (543) | (671) | (805) | |||||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 712 | 769 | 711 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization: | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 503 | 492 | 482 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | – | – | (4) | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred loss on business sold | ||||||||||
| through reinsurance (1) | 47 | – | – | |||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,266 | $ | 1,265 | $ | 1,193 |
| DAC and VOBA Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales | 124.0 | % | 123.9 | % | 114.2 | % |
(1) The amortization of deferred loss on business sold through reinsurance pertains to the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction. See Notes 1 and 7 for additional information.
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable. For our interest-sensitive and traditional products, deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value of business acquired (“VOBA”) are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances.
67
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums | $ | 5,145 | $ | 5,014 | $ | 4,768 | ||||
| Net investment income | 348 | 339 | 334 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 224 | 210 | 202 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 5,717 | 5,563 | 5,304 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | 4,039 | 4,020 | 4,034 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 6 | 5 | 5 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | (347) | (288) | (103) | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,481 | 1,447 | 1,316 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 5,179 | 5,184 | 5,252 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 538 | 379 | 52 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 113 | 80 | 11 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 425 | $ | 299 | $ | 41 |
(1) Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 110 | $ | 70 | $ | 15 | ||||
| Disability | 323 | 237 | 27 | |||||||
| Dental | (8) | (8) | (1) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 425 | $ | 299 | $ | 41 |
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force.
•Lower benefits, net of policyholder liability remeasurement gain, driven by more favorable reported incidence and claim terminations than assumed in our disability business and lower incidence in our life business.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses due to incentive compensation as a result of production performance.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force.
•Lower benefits, net of policyholder liability remeasurement gain, driven by more favorable discount rate impacts on new claims, lower incidence in our disability and life businesses and the impact from our annual assumption review.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations and higher commissions due to growth in business in force.
68
Table of Contents
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on our reserve adjustments.
Additional Information
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently volatile. For every one percent increase in the total loss ratio, we would expect an estimated annual decrease to income from operations of $41 million to $45 million. The effects are symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Insurance Premiums by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 2,001 | $ | 1,938 | $ | 1,808 | ||||
| Disability | 2,962 | 2,892 | 2,763 | |||||||
| Dental | 182 | 184 | 197 | |||||||
| Total insurance premiums | $ | 5,145 | $ | 5,014 | $ | 4,768 | ||||
| Sales by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | 392 | 333 | 299 | |||||||
| Disability | 414 | 311 | 337 | |||||||
| Dental | 50 | 49 | 40 | |||||||
| Total sales | $ | 856 | $ | 693 | $ | 676 |
Premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.
Sales relate to new policyholders and new coverages sold to existing policyholders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products. Generally, we have higher sales during the fourth quarter of the year.
69
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 269 | $ | 268 | $ | 254 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 77 | 70 | 74 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 348 | $ | 339 | $ | 334 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits, interest credited, policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder | ||||||||||
| Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss by | ||||||||||
| Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,424 | $ | 1,434 | $ | 1,437 | ||||
| Disability | 2,134 | 2,163 | 2,354 | |||||||
| Dental | 140 | 140 | 145 | |||||||
| Total benefits, interest credited and policyholder | ||||||||||
| liability remeasurement (gain) loss | $ | 3,698 | $ | 3,737 | $ | 3,936 |
| Loss Ratios by Product Line | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life | 71.1 | % | 74.0 | % | 79.5 | % | ||
| Disability | 72.1 | % | 74.8 | % | 85.2 | % | ||
| Dental | 77.0 | % | 76.1 | % | 73.5 | % | ||
| Total | 71.9 | % | 74.5 | % | 82.5 | % |
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. For additional information on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
70
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 462 | $ | 446 | $ | 394 | ||
| General and administrative expenses | 870 | 846 | 766 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 138 | 133 | 123 | |||||
| Other | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,473 | 1,428 | 1,285 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (135) | (113) | (99) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 1,338 | 1,315 | 1,186 | |||||
| DAC amortization | 111 | 100 | 97 | |||||
| Other intangible amortization | 32 | 32 | 33 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,481 | $ | 1,447 | $ | 1,316 |
| DAC Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of insurance premiums | 2.6 | % | 2.3 | % | 2.1 | % |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
71
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Fee income | $ | 292 | $ | 262 | $ | 261 | ||||
| Net investment income | 997 | 1,012 | 976 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 32 | 36 | 37 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 1,321 | 1,310 | 1,274 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Interest credited | 675 | 665 | 629 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 460 | 444 | 398 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,135 | 1,109 | 1,027 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 186 | 201 | 247 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 23 | 30 | 36 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 163 | $ | 171 | $ | 211 |
(1) Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by lower average general account balances and crediting rate increases.
•Higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher trail commissions resulting from higher average daily separate account balances.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by higher fee income driven by higher average daily separate account balances.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to higher commissions and other expenses driven by compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
Additional Information
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year. New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account balances were 14%, 12% and 11% for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account balances was 13%, 15% and 17% for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our
72
Table of Contents
fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates and sustained high interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals and surrenders” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Annuity expense assessments | $ | 214 | $ | 191 | $ | 192 | ||||
| Mutual fund fees | 75 | 69 | 68 | |||||||
| Total expense assessments | 289 | 260 | 260 | |||||||
| Surrender charges | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 292 | $ | 262 | $ | 261 |
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance and administrative expenses, and mutual fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account balances, both general and separate, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account balance-related items such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 917 | $ | 935 | $ | 883 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 2 | 1 | 23 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 78 | 76 | 70 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 997 | $ | 1,012 | $ | 976 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 675 | $ | 665 | $ | 629 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
73
Table of Contents
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Separate Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Separate account deposits | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,268 | $ | 2,348 | ||||
| Separate account net flows | (1,129) | (240) | 11 | |||||||
| Separate account balances | 21,489 | 19,668 | 16,885 | |||||||
| Average daily separate account balances | 21,003 | 18,183 | 17,946 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 5,428 | 4,285 | 4,100 | |||||||
| General Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| General account deposits | $ | 3,407 | $ | 2,776 | $ | 4,012 | ||||
| General account net flows | (1,088) | (1,718) | 433 | |||||||
| General account balances | 23,619 | 23,784 | 25,138 | |||||||
| Average general account balances | 23,603 | 24,502 | 24,558 | |||||||
| Mutual Fund Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| Mutual fund deposits | $ | 9,106 | $ | 6,734 | $ | 6,542 | ||||
| Mutual fund net flows | 2,329 | 2,090 | 2,252 | |||||||
| Mutual fund account balances (3) | 67,473 | 57,533 | 46,707 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our separate account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Flows By Market | ||||||||||
| Small market | $ | (11) | $ | 382 | $ | 295 | ||||
| Mid – large market | 1,944 | 1,279 | 3,601 | |||||||
| Multi-Fund® and other | (1,821) | (1,529) | (1,200) | |||||||
| Total net flows | $ | 112 | $ | 132 | $ | 2,696 |
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
74
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||
| Non-deferrable | 99 | 83 | 75 | |||||
| General and administrative expenses | 340 | 341 | 303 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 19 | 19 | 17 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 462 | 447 | 399 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (21) | (21) | (21) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 441 | 426 | 378 | |||||
| DAC amortization | 19 | 18 | 20 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 460 | $ | 444 | $ | 398 |
| DAC Deferrals | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred.
75
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 (1) | 2022 (1) | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (2) | $ | 4 | $ | (921) | $ | 8 | ||||
| Net investment income (3) | 110 | 148 | 155 | |||||||
| Other revenues (4) | 46 | 18 | (7) | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 160 | (755) | 156 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | 12 | (863) | 63 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 32 | 36 | 39 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | – | (3) | 3 | |||||||
| Other expenses | 246 | 250 | 262 | |||||||
| Interest and debt expense | 336 | 331 | 283 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 626 | (249) | 650 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (466) | (506) | (494) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (96) | (112) | (93) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (370) | $ | (394) | $ | (401) |
(1) The prior period presentation was recast to conform to the revised definition of income (loss) from operations. See Note 19 for additional information.
(2) Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
(3) Includes our Institutional Pension business, which has a corresponding offset in premiums and benefits for changes in reserves.
(4) Includes certain third-party advisory fees, which has a partial offset in other expenses.
Comparison of 2024 to 2023
Loss from operations for Other Operations decreased due primarily to lower expenses associated with strategic initiatives, partially offset by higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in average interest rates.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for Other Operations decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower other expenses associated with strategic initiatives and lower legal expenses, partially offset by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
•Higher other revenues due to the effect of market fluctuations on assets held as part of certain compensation plans, which increased during 2023 compared to a decrease during 2022.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in average interest rates.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force institutional pension business. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force institutional pension business that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 7 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
76
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 (1) | 2022 (1) | ||||||||
| General and administrative expenses: | ||||||||||
| Legal | $ | 6 | $ | (4) | $ | 9 | ||||
| Branding | 42 | 42 | 43 | |||||||
| Other (2) | 208 | 220 | 215 | |||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | 256 | 258 | 267 | |||||||
| Other (3) | (10) | (8) | (5) | |||||||
| Total other expenses | $ | 246 | $ | 250 | $ | 262 |
(1) The prior period presentation was recast to conform to the revised definition of income (loss) from operations. See Note 19 for additional information.
(2) Includes expenses that are corporate in nature and not allocated to our business segments.
(3) Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its access to a financing facility and issuance of letters of credit (“LOCs”).
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
77
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
| Percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investments | |||||||||||||
| As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||
| Investments | |||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 87,111 | $ | 88,738 | 67.4 | % | 71.4 | % | |||||
| Trading securities | 2,025 | 2,359 | 1.6 | % | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| Equity securities | 294 | 306 | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 21,083 | 18,963 | 16.3 | % | 15.3 | % | |||||||
| Policy loans | 2,476 | 2,476 | 1.9 | % | 2.0 | % | |||||||
| Derivative investments | 9,677 | 6,474 | 7.5 | % | 5.2 | % | |||||||
| Alternative investments | 3,836 | 3,377 | 3.0 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||
| Other investments | 2,752 | 1,638 | 2.1 | % | 1.3 | % | |||||||
| Total investments | $ | 129,254 | $ | 124,331 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
78
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 3; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 3.
| As of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 14,276 | $ | 97 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 12,977 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 3,395 | 40 | 381 | 3,054 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 6,223 | 51 | 745 | 5,529 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,242 | 49 | 437 | 2,854 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,899 | 38 | 593 | 5,344 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 15,042 | 115 | 2,356 | 12,801 | 14.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 3,000 | 27 | 341 | 2,686 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 4,708 | 19 | 620 | 4,107 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,451 | 28 | 370 | 3,109 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,450 | 7 | 445 | 2,012 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 12,494 | 76 | 1,750 | 10,820 | 12.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,362 | 16 | 221 | 1,157 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,202 | 3 | 168 | 1,037 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 328 | 21 | 4 | 345 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 529 | – | 48 | 481 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,817 | 4 | 156 | 1,665 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (“ABS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 8,307 | 21 | 277 | 8,051 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Credit card | 122 | 6 | 1 | 127 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Home equity | 159 | 30 | – | 189 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other | 5,614 | 42 | 143 | 5,513 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 2,765 | 18 | 443 | 2,340 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 33 | – | 2 | 31 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 429 | 3 | 41 | 391 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 282 | 11 | 56 | 237 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 240 | 25 | 11 | 254 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 97,369 | 747 | 11,005 | 87,111 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 2,168 | 35 | 178 | 2,025 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 310 | 6 | 22 | 294 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 99,847 | $ | 788 | $ | 11,205 | $ | 89,430 |
79
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 14,767 | $ | 133 | $ | 1,412 | $ | 13,488 | 15.2 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 3,426 | 58 | 325 | 3,159 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 6,143 | 83 | 591 | 5,635 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,509 | 63 | 375 | 3,197 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,660 | 60 | 495 | 5,225 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 15,356 | 196 | 1,908 | 13,644 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 3,331 | 38 | 309 | 3,060 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 4,994 | 32 | 500 | 4,526 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,487 | 35 | 317 | 3,205 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,296 | 7 | 370 | 1,933 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 12,683 | 121 | 1,484 | 11,320 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,425 | 26 | 186 | 1,265 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMOs: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,245 | 8 | 149 | 1,104 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 332 | 19 | 10 | 341 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| MPTS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 365 | 1 | 38 | 328 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMBS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 2 | – | – | 2 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,620 | 5 | 203 | 1,422 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| ABS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| CLOs | 8,452 | 9 | 389 | 8,072 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Credit card | 113 | 7 | 1 | 119 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Home equity | 175 | 28 | 2 | 201 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other | 3,954 | 18 | 193 | 3,779 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 3,072 | 100 | 415 | 2,757 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 34 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 416 | 6 | 29 | 393 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 314 | 16 | 47 | 283 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 243 | 21 | 17 | 247 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 97,414 | 1,091 | 9,767 | 88,738 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 2,515 | 55 | 211 | 2,359 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 340 | 8 | 42 | 306 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 100,269 | $ | 1,154 | $ | 10,020 | $ | 91,403 |
(1) Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2) Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
80
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to future contract benefits, policyholder account balances and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). For instance, deferred income tax balances are adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2024 | As of December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Agency | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAIC | Equivalent | Amortized | Fair | % of | Amortized | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| Designation (1) | Designation (1) | Cost | Value | Total | Cost | Value | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AAA / AA / A | $ | 58,103 | $ | 51,596 | 59.2 | % | $ | 56,557 | $ | 51,234 | 57.7 | % | |||||||||||
| 2 | BBB | 36,224 | 32,583 | 37.4 | % | 37,832 | 34,614 | 39.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total investment grade securities | 94,327 | 84,179 | 96.6 | % | 94,389 | 85,848 | 96.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Below Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | BB | 960 | 910 | 1.0 | % | 1,176 | 1,090 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | B | 1,857 | 1,826 | 2.1 | % | 1,760 | 1,719 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | CCC and lower | 138 | 124 | 0.2 | % | 86 | 78 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | In or near default | 87 | 72 | 0.1 | % | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total below investment grade securities | 3,042 | 2,932 | 3.4 | % | 3,025 | 2,890 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 97,369 | $ | 87,111 | 100.0 | % | $ | 97,414 | $ | 88,738 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total securities below investment grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as a percentage of total fixed maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFS securities | 3.1 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 3.3 | % |
(1) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, 97% of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. See Note 3 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2024, increased by $1.2 billion since December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we recognized $257 million of gross losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, which were primarily related to portfolio rebalancing and sales that support our reinsurance funds withheld agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized $408 million of gross losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, which were primarily related to the transfer of assets as part of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction and by sales driven by the regional banking crisis.
81
Table of Contents
For further information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We do not believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2024, required an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
•The current economic environment and market conditions;
•Our business strategy and current business plans;
•The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
•Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;
•The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of annuity contracts and life insurance policies;
•The capital risk limits approved by management; and
•Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(42) million and $(22) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
•Historical and implied volatility of the security;
•The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
•Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
•Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
•Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For information on credit loss impairment on fixed maturity AFS securities, see Notes 1, 3 and 20.
As reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $135.1 billion of investments and cash and invested cash, which exceeded the liabilities for our future obligations under insurance policies and contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers and amounts on deposit with reinsurers, which totaled $109.4 billion as of December 31, 2024. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of $20.6 billion as of December 31, 2024, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business. For additional information, see “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $20.9 billion and $20.6 billion, respectively, representing 16% and 17% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 7 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the
82
Table of Contents
securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of $2.1 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, and a net unrealized gain (loss) of $(178) million and $(155) million, respectively.
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $179 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2024. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $172 million, or 96%, and trading securities represented $7 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2024. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| Agency | Non-Agency | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 328 | $ | 345 | $ | 2,059 | $ | 1,863 | ||||||||||
| ABS home equity | – | – | 159 | 189 | 159 | 189 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (1)(2) | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 487 | $ | 534 | $ | 2,218 | $ | 2,052 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 460 | $ | 502 | $ | 2,191 | $ | 2,020 | ||||||||||
| 2 | – | – | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | 9 | 15 | 9 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,731 | $ | 1,518 | $ | 487 | $ | 534 | $ | 2,218 | $ | 2,052 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.3 | % | 2.4 | % | |
| Total non-agency backed as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % |
83
Table of Contents
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $64 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $64 million in trading securities consisted of $15 million agency and $49 million non-agency.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $54 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $54 million in trading securities consisted of $14 million agency and $40 million non-agency.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2024:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 1,672 | $ | 1,526 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,665 | ||||||||||
| NAIC Designation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | $ | 1,667 | $ | 1,522 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,812 | $ | 1,661 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 5 | 4 | – | – | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by NAIC designation (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,672 | $ | 1,526 | $ | 145 | $ | 139 | $ | 1,817 | $ | 1,665 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 1.9 | % | 1.9 | % |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $126 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $126 million in trading securities consisted of $77 million of multiple property CMBS and $49 million of single property CMBS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $109 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $109 million in trading securities consisted of $68 million of multiple property CMBS and $41 million of single property CMBS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the NAIC.
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings. The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2024, was as follows:
84
Table of Contents
| Net Amortized Cost | % Net Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | % Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | % Fair Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | $ | 5,802 | 7.5 | % | $ | 1,255 | 11.3 | % | $ | 4,547 | 6.8 | % | |||||
| Electric | 7,301 | 9.4 | % | 1,187 | 10.8 | % | 6,114 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||
| Technology | 3,988 | 5.1 | % | 621 | 5.6 | % | 3,367 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 3,603 | 4.6 | % | 556 | 5.1 | % | 3,047 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 2,086 | 2.7 | % | 451 | 4.1 | % | 1,635 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 2,306 | 3.0 | % | 451 | 4.1 | % | 1,855 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
| Banking | 5,015 | 6.5 | % | 419 | 3.8 | % | 4,596 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||
| ABS | 6,807 | 8.8 | % | 406 | 3.7 | % | 6,401 | 9.6 | % | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 2,267 | 2.9 | % | 335 | 3.0 | % | 1,932 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
| Diversified manufacturing | 2,262 | 2.9 | % | 323 | 2.9 | % | 1,939 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 1,634 | 2.1 | % | 285 | 2.6 | % | 1,349 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Retail | 1,565 | 2.0 | % | 261 | 2.4 | % | 1,304 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Chemicals | 1,893 | 2.4 | % | 248 | 2.3 | % | 1,645 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 1,658 | 2.1 | % | 239 | 2.2 | % | 1,419 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 1,376 | 1.8 | % | 216 | 2.0 | % | 1,160 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 1,922 | 2.5 | % | 215 | 2.0 | % | 1,707 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
| Life insurance | 1,274 | 1.7 | % | 213 | 1.9 | % | 1,061 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 1,357 | 1.8 | % | 212 | 1.9 | % | 1,145 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Utility – other | 1,164 | 1.5 | % | 192 | 1.7 | % | 972 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
| Consumer products | 1,071 | 1.4 | % | 173 | 1.6 | % | 898 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
| Midstream | 1,383 | 1.8 | % | 163 | 1.5 | % | 1,220 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
| Non-agency CMBS | 1,503 | 1.9 | % | 155 | 1.4 | % | 1,348 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Wirelines | 857 | 1.1 | % | 154 | 1.4 | % | 703 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
| Railroads | 846 | 1.1 | % | 149 | 1.4 | % | 697 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
| Government-sponsored | 459 | 0.6 | % | 144 | 1.3 | % | 315 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||
| Integrated | 682 | 0.9 | % | 125 | 1.1 | % | 557 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
| Automotive | 1,463 | 1.9 | % | 123 | 1.1 | % | 1,340 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Wireless | 712 | 0.9 | % | 120 | 1.1 | % | 592 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | |||||||||||||||||
| less than $100 million | 13,260 | 17.1 | % | 1,614 | 14.7 | % | 11,646 | 17.5 | % | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 77,516 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,005 | 100.0 | % | $ | 66,511 | 100.0 | % |
| Total by industry as a percentage of | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 79.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 76.4 | % |
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
| As of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,546 | $ | 3,572 | $ | 21,118 | 99.4 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | 25 | 33 | 58 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure | – | 59 | 59 | 0.3 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,571 | 3,664 | 21,235 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (99) | (53) | (152) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,472 | $ | 3,611 | $ | 21,083 |
85
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,273 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 19,015 | 99.7 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | – | 21 | 21 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure | – | 41 | 41 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,273 | 1,804 | 19,077 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (86) | (28) | (114) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,187 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 18,963 |
(1) Includes certain mortgage loans on real estate that support our modified coinsurance agreements where the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of such commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were in delinquent status was $21 million. As of December 31, 2023, there were no such mortgage loans in delinquent status.
As of December 31, 2024, there were specifically identified impaired commercial and residential mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $36 million and $58 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate. As of December 31, 2023, there were specifically identified impaired commercial and residential mortgage loans with an aggregate carrying value of $2 million and $47 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $34 million and less than $1 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate. The total outstanding principal and interest on residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $32 million and $20 million, respectively, or less than 1% of total mortgage loans on real estate.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment and Other Operations (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2024 | As of December 31, 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | ||||||
| Annuities | $ | 8,783 | $ | 7,362 | ||
| Life Insurance | 3,527 | 3,675 | ||||
| Group Protection | 1,608 | 1,550 | ||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 5,380 | 4,813 | ||||
| Other Operations | 1,785 | 1,563 | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 21,083 | $ | 18,963 |
86
Table of Contents
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
| As of December 31, 2024 | As of December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Value | % | Carrying Value | % | |||||||||||
| Property Type | State | |||||||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,551 | 31.8 | % | CA | $ | 4,707 | 26.9 | % | |||||
| Industrial | 5,033 | 28.8 | % | TX | 1,693 | 9.7 | % | |||||||
| Office building | 3,077 | 17.6 | % | FL | 1,011 | 5.8 | % | |||||||
| Retail | 2,754 | 15.8 | % | AZ | 906 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
| Other commercial | 803 | 4.6 | % | PA | 899 | 5.1 | % | |||||||
| Mixed use | 145 | 0.8 | % | NY | 895 | 5.1 | % | |||||||
| Hotel/motel | 109 | 0.6 | % | WA | 673 | 4.0 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % | MD | 671 | 3.8 | % | ||||||
| Geographic Region | GA | 639 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||
| Pacific | 5,683 | 32.5 | % | TN | 533 | 3.1 | % | |||||||
| South Atlantic | 3,683 | 21.1 | % | NC | 471 | 2.7 | % | |||||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,199 | 12.6 | % | VA | 420 | 2.4 | % | |||||||
| West South Central | 1,829 | 10.5 | % | NJ | 405 | 2.3 | % | |||||||
| Mountain | 1,525 | 8.7 | % | IL | 339 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| East North Central | 1,139 | 6.5 | % | WI | 328 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| East South Central | 646 | 3.7 | % | OH | 323 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| West North Central | 448 | 2.6 | % | UT | 322 | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| New England | 320 | 1.8 | % | All other states | 2,237 | 12.8 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % | Total | $ | 17,472 | 100.0 | % |
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
| As of December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Principal Repayment Year | ||||||||||||||
| 2025 | $ | 1,028 | $ | 432 | $ | 1,460 | 6.9 | % | ||||||
| 2026 | 1,391 | 110 | 1,501 | 7.1 | % | |||||||||
| 2027 | 1,850 | 41 | 1,891 | 8.9 | % | |||||||||
| 2028 | 2,192 | 43 | 2,235 | 10.5 | % | |||||||||
| 2029 | 1,881 | 46 | 1,927 | 9.1 | % | |||||||||
| 2030 and thereafter | 9,266 | 2,909 | 12,175 | 57.5 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 17,608 | $ | 3,581 | $ | 21,189 | 100.0 | % |
See Note 3 for information regarding our LTV and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
87
Table of Contents
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment and Other Operations (in millions) was as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 12 | $ | 16 | $ | 8 | ||||
| Life Insurance | 294 | 207 | 47 | |||||||
| Group Protection | 5 | 9 | 5 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 6 | 10 | 4 | |||||||
| Other Operations | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Total (1) | $ | 319 | $ | 243 | $ | 66 |
(1) Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, alternative investments included investments in 371 and 352 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 3% of total investments. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing was $14 million and $79 million, respectively.
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 4,222 | $ | 4,819 | $ | 4,469 | ||||
| Trading securities | 118 | 161 | 182 | |||||||
| Equity securities | 21 | 13 | 11 | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 887 | 755 | 689 | |||||||
| Policy loans | 95 | 103 | 101 | |||||||
| Cash and invested cash | 194 | 129 | 13 | |||||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment | ||||||||||
| and bond make-whole premiums (1) | 15 | 10 | 105 | |||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 319 | 243 | 66 | |||||||
| Consent fees | – | 3 | 8 | |||||||
| Other investments | (30) | (33) | 79 | |||||||
| Investment income | 5,841 | 6,203 | 5,723 | |||||||
| Investment expense | (316) | (324) | (208) | |||||||
| Net investment income | $ | 5,525 | $ | 5,879 | $ | 5,515 |
(1) See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
88
Table of Contents
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Interest Rate Yield | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on | ||||||||
| real estate and other, net of investment expenses | 4.04 | % | 4.04 | % | 3.87 | % | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | ||||||||
| bond make-whole premiums | 0.01 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.08 | % | ||
| Alternative investments | 0.25 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.05 | % | ||
| Net investment income yield on invested assets | 4.30 | % | 4.22 | % | 4.00 | % |
We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the policyholder on our average general account balances, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
89
Table of Contents
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek annuity and life reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. The consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” reflect insurance premiums, insurance fees, benefits and DAC amortization net of insurance ceded. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements. For information regarding reserve financing and LOC expenses from inter-company reinsurance agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Material Cash Outflows” below.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an AM Best rating of A or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
As a result of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld agreements, we reported deposit assets, net of allowances for credit losses of $30.8 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024. For additional information, see Note 7.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2024, 86%, or $24.6 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $22.9 billion was held by reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), $1.6 billion was held in our funds withheld portfolios and $171 million was secured by LOCs for which we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement. We reported funds withheld reinsurance liabilities of $16.9 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2024.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.5 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2024. LNL must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held $913 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2024. LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least 160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by which we established $551 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2024, LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at
90
Table of Contents
least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of these arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 7 and 17 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital –Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance and other subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the subsidiaries’ capital position, as discussed further below. Based on the sources of liquidity available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs.
Capital
Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may materially affect our business operations and results of operations and may adversely affect our subsidiaries’ capital position that may cause them to retain more capital, which may pressure their ability to pay dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. We believe we have appropriate capital to operate our business in accordance with our strategy. For more information, see “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, issuance of debt or other types of securities and policyholder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed below. Our primary uses are to pay policy claims and benefits, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our common and preferred stockholders, to repurchase our common stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $(2.0) billion, $(2.1) billion and $3.6 billion in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The use of cash flows from operating activities for 2024 was attributable primarily to cash payments on certain derivatives used to hedge exposure to product-related risks. The use of cash flows from operating activities for 2023 was attributable primarily to net operating cash payments related to closing the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction and cash payments on certain derivatives used to hedge exposure to product-related risks.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends, return of capital and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources
91
Table of Contents
support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common and preferred stock dividends, common stock repurchases, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Cash Dividends and Return of Capital from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| LNL | $ | 505 | $ | 495 | $ | 645 | ||||
| First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company | – | 15 | 22 | |||||||
| Lincoln Investment Management Company | 40 | 25 | 38 | |||||||
| Lincoln National Management Corporation | – | – | 7 | |||||||
| Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited | 50 | 150 | 85 | |||||||
| Total cash dividends and return of capital from subsidiaries | $ | 595 | $ | 685 | $ | 797 | ||||
| Interest from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| Interest on inter-company notes | $ | 154 | $ | 147 | $ | 118 |
The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, issuance of preferred stock, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
During the second quarter of 2024, LNL made a $929 million extraordinary dividend in the form of investments to LNC for the purpose of the initial capitalization of LPINE. See “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below for more information about LPINE.
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend, along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits. LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains. Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
Our Bermuda-based reinsurance subsidiary, LPINE, and our Barbados-based reinsurance subsidiary, Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited (“LNBAR”), are regulated by the BMA and the Barbados Financial Services Commission, respectively. Similar to our domestic insurance subsidiaries, our reinsurance subsidiaries in Barbados and Bermuda are subject to regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends imposed by the jurisdictions in which they are domiciled. These requirements may include satisfying certain earnings, reserve or solvency thresholds in order to pay a dividend or obtaining regulatory approval for payment of any dividend in excess of such thresholds.
92
Table of Contents
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $730 million in 2025 without prior approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.”
Subsidiaries’ Capital
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus will affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying capacity. For additional information on RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our insurance subsidiaries’ regulatory capital levels are affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. For instance, our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees subject to the NAIC RBC framework require reserves calculated pursuant to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) and Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”), respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to reinsurance captives or reinsurance subsidiaries. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2024, was $1.8 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance agreements for term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 13. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.7 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves associated with our term and UL products with secondary guarantees as of December 31, 2024; of this amount, $3.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 4. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders and guaranteed benefits on VUL policies, as well as certain components of the NAIC RBC calculation that are impacted by such guaranteed benefits, are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates, and such statutory reserves and our RBC levels are also affected by the level of account balances relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Our insurance subsidiaries’ cede a portion of the variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders to LNBAR through a modified coinsurance agreement. Our variable annuity hedge program mitigates the risk to LNBAR from guaranteed benefit riders and continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. LNL also uses a partial hedge that mitigates potential capital volatility from guaranteed benefits on VUL policies. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and supporting derivatives. In December 2022, LNC issued a long-term note to a non-affiliated variable interest entity in exchange for notes of like principal and duration classified as AFS securities. LNC contributed the securities to LNBAR to address asset value volatility based on market conditions. Under the current terms of the note facility, the maximum permissible principal amount of the note is $1.5 billion, the full amount of which was outstanding as of December 31, 2024. There are no impacts to the LNC Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the set-off right provided in the note facility. For more information, see Note 4.
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital among our insurance subsidiaries, as well as our captive reinsurance or reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and VUL separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also increases, all else equal. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also decreases, all else equal, which will affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
93
Table of Contents
During the second quarter of 2024, LNC contributed $929 million of investments and $22 million in cash to LPINE, a wholly owned subsidiary of LNC and a licensed Bermuda-based life and annuity reinsurance company, in support of an inter-company reinsurance agreement with LNL.
LNC made capital contributions in cash to other subsidiaries of $5 million, $7 million, and $925 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
On May 6, 2024, we closed the sale of all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that comprised the Company’s wealth management business operated through LFN to Osaic. We received $723 million in cash that was primarily used to increase LNL’s RBC ratio. We also used a portion of the proceeds to reduce our leverage ratio. For more information on the sale of our wealth management business, see Note 1.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2024, were as follows:
| Beginning Balance | Issuance | Maturities, Repayments and Refinancing | Change in Fair Value Hedges | Other Changes (1) | Ending Balance | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt (2) | $ | 250 | $ | – | $ | (100) | $ | – | $ | 150 | $ | 300 | ||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 4,491 | $ | 350 | $ | – | $ | (27) | $ | (316) | $ | 4,498 | ||||||||||
| Term loans | – | – | – | – | 150 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes (3) | 995 | – | – | – | – | 995 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital securities (3) | 213 | – | – | – | – | 213 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 5,699 | $ | 350 | $ | – | $ | (27) | $ | (166) | $ | 5,856 |
(1) Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2) As of December 31, 2024, consisted of $300 million principal amount of our 3.35% Senior Notes due March 9, 2025.
(3) We use interest rate swaps to partially hedge the variability in rates.
On March 14, 2024, we completed the issuance and sale of $350 million aggregate principal amount of our 5.852% Senior Notes due 2034. We used a portion of the net proceeds to fund the repayments of $47 million of our term loan due December 3, 2024. We intend to use the remaining net proceeds from the offering to fund the repayment of the Company’s 3.35% Senior Notes due 2025 on or prior to their maturity, and possible repurchases of other of our outstanding debt securities, as well as to pay fees and expenses in respect of the foregoing.
During June 2024, we repaid $53 million of our term loan originally due December 3, 2024, using available cash to deleverage the balance sheet. On July 18, 2024, we refinanced this term loan into a $150 million term loan due July 16, 2027.
LNC made interest payments to service debt to third parties of $308 million, $311 million and $278 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities, see Note 13.
94
Table of Contents
Preferred Stock
Details underlying preferred stock dividends paid (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Series C preferred stock dividends | $ | 46 | $ | 36 | $ | – | ||||
| Series D preferred stock dividends | 45 | 46 | – | |||||||
| Total preferred stock dividends | $ | 91 | $ | 82 | $ | – |
For additional information on preferred stock, see Note 18.
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchases depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of dividends from our subsidiaries and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our buyback program during 2024. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II – Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Dividends to common stockholders | $ | 306 | $ | 305 | $ | 310 | ||||
| Repurchase of common stock | – | – | 550 | |||||||
| Total cash returned to common stockholders | $ | 306 | $ | 305 | $ | 860 | ||||
| Number of shares repurchased | – | – | 8.7 |
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
To meet short-term liquidity needs that arise in the ordinary course of business, we utilize an inter-company cash management program between LNC and participating subsidiaries whereby participating subsidiaries can borrow cash from or lend cash to LNC. Loans under the inter-company cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC. As of December 31, 2024, LNC had $83 million of outstanding borrowings from the cash management program related primarily to collateral posting requirements on derivatives. Holding company borrowing activity is reported in loans from and accrued interest due to subsidiaries on the holding company’s balance sheet. Holding company lending activity is reported in loans to and accrued interest due from subsidiaries on the holding company’s balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, LNC did not have outstanding lending into the cash management program. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company balance sheet.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
LNC entered into a facility agreement in 2020 with a Delaware trust that gives LNC the right over a 10-year period to issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of 2.330% senior notes to the trust in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by the trust. By agreeing to purchase the 2.330% senior notes in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities upon exercise of the issuance right, the trust will provide a source of liquid assets for the Company. The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure to make certain payments to the trust, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving LNC. We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below a minimum threshold (which was $2.75 billion as of December 31, 2024, and is subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases) and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement. For additional information, see Note 13.
95
Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of December 31, 2024, LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility and maximum available borrowing based on qualifying assets of $4.9 billion. As of December 31, 2024, LNL had outstanding borrowings of $2.7 billion under this facility reported within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31, 2024, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 3.
Repurchase Agreements and Securities Lending Programs
Our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to $2.6 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which none was utilized as of December 31, 2024. Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can also access liquidity through securities lending programs. As of December 31, 2024, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $157 million. The cash received in our securities lending programs is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 3.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures hedged. As of December 31, 2024, we were in a net collateral payable position of $7.1 billion compared to $5.0 billion as of December 31, 2023. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to return, post or pledge collateral to counterparties. If we do not have sufficient high quality securities or cash to provide as collateral to counterparties, we have alternative sources of liquidity. In addition to the liquidity from repurchase agreements and FHLB facilities discussed above, we also have a five-year revolving credit facility discussed in Note 13. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 5.
96
Table of Contents
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2024, were as follows:
| Less Than 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | More than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future contract benefits and policyholder account balances (1) | $ | 24,071 | $ | 51,554 | $ | 48,683 | $ | 357,193 | $ | 481,501 | ||||||||
| Short-term and long-term debt (2) | 300 | 550 | 500 | 4,731 | 6,081 | |||||||||||||
| Reserve financing and LOC expenses (3) | 67 | 129 | 111 | 189 | 496 | |||||||||||||
| Payables for collateral on investments (4) | 2,807 | – | – | – | 2,807 | |||||||||||||
| Investment commitments (5) | 1,244 | 829 | 480 | 1,740 | 4,293 | |||||||||||||
| Operating leases (6) | 29 | 50 | 27 | 2 | 108 | |||||||||||||
| Certain financing arrangements (7) | 174 | 356 | 33 | 8 | 571 | |||||||||||||
| Retirement and other plans (8) | 98 | 192 | 186 | 422 | 898 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 28,790 | $ | 53,660 | $ | 50,020 | $ | 364,285 | $ | 496,755 |
(1) Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years and are not discounted for the time value of money. New business issued or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2) Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 13 for additional information.
(3) Estimates are based on the level of capacity we expect to utilize during the life of the LOCs and other reserve financing arrangements. See Note 13 for additional information.
(4) Excludes collateral payable held for derivative investments. See Note 3 for additional information.
(5) See Note 3 for additional information.
(6) See Note 17 for additional information.
(7) Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See Note 17 for additional information.
(8) Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2034 and known payments under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined benefit plans. See Note 15 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Our credit ratings assigned by AM Best, Fitch, Moody’s and S&P are on outlook stable.
As of February 13, 2025, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “aaa to c” | “AAA to D” | “Aaa to C” | “AAA to D” | |||
| bbb+ | BBB+ | Baa2 | BBB+ | |||
| (8th of 22) | (8th of 23) | (9th of 21) | (8th of 22) |
97
Table of Contents
As of February 13, 2025, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “AMB-1+ to AMB-4” | “F1+ to D” | “P-1 to NP” | “A-1+ to D” | |||
| AMB-2 | F2 | P-2 | A-2 | |||
| (3rd of 6) | (3rd of 8) | (2nd of 4) | (3rd of 7) |
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements and/or certain repurchase agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event if the long-term credit ratings of LNC drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s) or if the financial strength ratings of LNL drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). For certain repurchase agreements, there is a termination event if the long-term credit ratings of LNC drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s) or if the financial strength ratings of LNL drop below BBB+/Baa1 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000059558-24-000013.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 40 |
| Introduction | 41 |
| Executive Summary | 41 |
| Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates | 43 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 54 |
| Results of Annuities | 55 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 60 |
| Results of Group Protection | 66 |
| Results of Retirement Plan Services | 69 |
| Results of Other Operations | 73 |
| Consolidated Investments | 75 |
| Reinsurance | 87 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 88 |
39
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of December 31, 2023, compared with December 31, 2022, and the results of operations in 2023 compared to 2022 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions of 2021 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2022, as updated by our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 22, 2023. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
On January 1, 2023, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-12, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts and related amendments (“ASU 2018-12”) with a transition date of January 1, 2021. ASU 2018-12 updated accounting and reporting requirements for long-duration contracts and certain investment contracts issued by insurance entities. We adopted ASU 2018-12 under the modified retrospective approach, except for market risk benefits (“MRBs”) for which we applied the full retrospective approach. Our consolidated financial statements are presented under the new guidance for reporting periods beginning January 1, 2021. For more information, see Note 3.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
•Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account balances, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
•The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business and our captive reinsurance arrangements as well as restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and 12b-1 distribution fees;
•The impact of U.S. federal tax reform legislation on our business, earnings and capital;
•The impact of regulations adopted by the SEC, the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations that could adversely affect our distribution model and sales of our products and result in additional disclosure and other requirements related to the sale and delivery of our products;
•The impact of new and emerging rules, laws and regulations relating to privacy, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence that may lead to increased compliance costs, reputation risk and/or changes in business practices;
•Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters that may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
•Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
•Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and demand for our products;
•Rapidly increasing or sustained high interest rates that may negatively affect our profitability, value of our investment portfolio and capital position and may cause policyholders to surrender annuity and life insurance policies, thereby causing realized investment losses;
•The impact of the implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions;
40
Table of Contents
•The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
•A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefit riders, which are accounted for as MRBs, of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;
•Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
•A deviation in actual experience regarding future policyholder behavior, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce future earnings;
•Changes in accounting principles that may affect our consolidated financial statements;
•Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
•Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
•Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
•Interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches of our data security systems;
•The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, including the inability to realize the anticipated benefits of acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and potential operating difficulties and unforeseen liabilities relating thereto, as well as the effect of restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
•The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives, including the Spark Initiative;
•The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
•Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder claims, affect our businesses and increase the cost and availability of reinsurance;
•Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
•The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
•The unanticipated loss of key management, financial planners or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth accumulation, wealth protection, group protection and retirement income products and solutions through our four business segments:
•Annuities;
•Life Insurance;
•Group Protection; and
•Retirement Plan Services
41
Table of Contents
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated revenues and net income (loss), we also provide segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations because we believe they are meaningful measures of revenues and the profitability of our operating segments. Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are the financial performance measures we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Accordingly, we define and report operating revenues and income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 20. Our management believes that operating revenues and income (loss) from operations explain the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from operating revenue and income (loss) from operations because they are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments. In addition, we believe that our definitions of operating revenues and income (loss) from operations will provide investors with a more valuable measure of our performance because it better reveals trends in our businesses.
We provide information about our segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items, key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
We continue to be influenced by a variety of trends that affect the industry.
Interest Rate Environment
Throughout 2023, the Federal Reserve continued to reiterate its commitment to implement and maintain policy as needed to achieve a return to its target level inflation over the longer run. To support this goal, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate target range by 100 basis points during 2023. In January 2024, the Federal Reserve announced it would maintain the current federal funds target range of 5.25% to 5.50% for the time-being and stated that while the policy rate is likely at its peak for this tightening cycle, it does not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the federal funds target range until it has greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2.0%. As interest rates were rising, which improves the yield on our new money and floating rate investments, we continued to be proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this interest rate environment. As a result of the higher interest rate environment, sales of fixed annuities, fixed-indexed annuities and registered index-linked annuities (“RILA”) products increased across the industry. Due to inflationary concerns and the higher interest rate environment, life insurance industry sales slowed in 2023. If the higher interest rate environment persists into 2024, these industry sales trends may continue in 2024.
We have provided disclosures around risks related to changes in interest rates in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals,” “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review – Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity” below and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation. Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the life insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased regulation and oversight for the industry. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
42
Table of Contents
Significant Operational Matters
Throughout 2023, we executed against our strategic priorities of strengthening our balance sheet, improving free cash flow and focusing on profitable growth. Notable actions in 2023 include the following:
•In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Reinsurance Company Ltd. (“Fortitude Re”), with an effective date of October 1, 2023;
•In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through Lincoln Financial Network (“LFN”), which is expected to close in the first half of 2024. We anticipate that the capital benefit from this transaction will be used to improve our statutory capital position and reduce our leverage ratio; and
•We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our buyback program during 2023.
For additional information on the Fortitude Re reinsurance agreements, see Notes 4 and 8. For additional information on the planned sale of our wealth management business, see “Results of Annuities” below and Note 1. For information on risks related to capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position.” For information on the risks related to acquisitions and dispositions, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – Acquisitions and dispositions of businesses may not produce anticipated benefits and could result in operating difficulties, unforeseen liabilities or asset impairments, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.”
We continue to focus on the following actions in 2024:
•Growing our industry-leading wholesale distribution through Lincoln Financial Distributors, which distributes our annuities and life insurance products as well as our retirement plan products and services through financial professionals, broker-dealers and other financial services intermediaries;
•Making investments in our businesses and product enhancements to grow revenues, drive margin and reduce costs;
•Shifting our new business to a more capital-efficient mix with higher risk-adjusted returns;
•Exploring reinsurance and other strategies to maximize the value of our businesses;
•Improving the profitability of our Group Protection business through strategic pricing actions and repositioning our business through new market segment strategies as part of our longer-term margin expansion initiatives; and
•Focusing on expense discipline and managing our expenses aggressively. In February 2024, we reduced our workforce by approximately 5% to streamline our organizational structure, improve operational efficiency and reduce expenses. While we expect that this action will ultimately create expense efficiencies, we will incur workforce reduction expenses during the first half of 2024 that will be reported within Other Operations.
Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates
We have identified the accounting estimates below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition. In applying these critical accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
Investments
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or non-performance risk, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
43
Table of Contents
The following summarizes investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of December 31, 2023:
| Quoted | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | ||||||||||||||
| in Active | ||||||||||||||
| Markets for | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||||
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | |||||||||||
| Priced by third-party pricing services | $ | 421 | $ | 75,660 | $ | 147 | $ | 76,228 | ||||||
| Priced by independent broker quotations | – | – | – | 4,335 | – | 4,335 | ||||||||
| Priced by matrices | – | – | 17,256 | – | 17,256 | |||||||||
| Priced by other methods (1) | – | – | – | 223 | – | 223 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 421 | $ | 92,916 | $ | 4,705 | $ | 98,042 | ||||||
| Percent of total | 0% | 95% | 5% | 100% |
(1) Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity AFS securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, see Notes 1 and 15.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2023, we evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion, as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2023, we used broker quotes for 14 securities as our final price source, representing less than 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes. Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data. The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing
44
Table of Contents
service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing source.
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers, future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation” above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans. Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk
45
Table of Contents
characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Our additional liabilities for other insurance benefits reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our additional liabilities reserve. These actual to expected adjustments would be reported in benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, equity market risk, basis risk, commodity risk and credit risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Policyholder Account Balances” below for information on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of hedging and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 6. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives, including sensitivities, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Future contract benefits represent liability reserves that we have established and carry based on estimates of how much we will need to pay for future benefits and claims.
Liability for Future Policy Benefits
Liability for future policy benefits (“LFPB”) represents the reserve amounts associated with non-participating traditional life insurance contracts and limited payment life-contingent annuity contracts that are calculated to meet the various policy and contract obligations as they mature. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to policyholders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions, additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity and policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the actuarial assumptions to best estimate future premium and benefit cash flows (“cash flow assumptions”) and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions as needed (excluding the claims settlement expense assumption that is locked-in at inception) in the calculation of the net premium ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In measuring our LFPB, we establish cohorts, which are groupings of long-duration contracts. On a quarterly basis, we retrospectively update the net premium ratio at the cohort level for actual experience. For all contract cohorts issued after January 1, 2021, interest is accrued on LFPB at the single-A interest rate on the contract cohort inception date. For contract cohorts issued prior to January 1, 2021, interest remains accruing at the original discount rate in effect on the contract cohort inception date due to the modified retrospective transition method. We also remeasure the LFPB using the single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period.
Liability for Future Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term life and disability claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These reserves use actuarial assumptions primarily based on claim termination rates, offsets for other insurance including social security and long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions. Such cash flow assumptions are subject to the comprehensive review process discussed above. We remeasure the liability for future claims using a single-A interest rate as of the end of each reporting period. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
46
Table of Contents
Universal Life Insurance Products with Secondary Guarantees
We issue UL-type contracts where we provide a secondary guarantee to the policyholder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base policy account balance is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. These guaranteed benefits require an additional liability that is calculated based on the application of a benefit ratio (calculated as the present value of total expected benefit payments over the life of the contract from inception divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the contract). These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the contracts. Cash flow assumptions incorporated in a benefit ratio in measuring these additional liabilities for other insurance benefits include mortality rates, morbidity, policyholder behavior (e.g., persistency) and withdrawals based principally on generally accepted actuarial methods and assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the cash flow assumptions and projection models used in estimating these liabilities and update these assumptions in the calculation of the benefit ratio. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
For additional information on future contract benefits, see Note 13.
Market Risk Benefits
MRBs are contracts or contract features that provide protection to the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and expose us to other-than-nominal capital market risk upon the occurrence of a specific event or circumstance, such as death, annuitization or periodic withdrawal. An MRB can be in either an asset or a liability position. Our MRB assets and MRB liabilities are reported at fair value separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
We issue variable and fixed annuity contracts that may include various types of guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) and guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) riders that we have accounted for as MRBs. For contracts that contain multiple riders that qualify as MRBs, the MRBs are valued on a combined basis using an integrated model. We have entered into reinsurance agreements to cede certain GLB and GDB riders where the reinsurance agreements themselves are accounted for as MRBs or contain MRBs. We therefore record ceded MRB assets and ceded MRB liabilities associated with these reinsurance agreements. We report ceded MRBs associated with these reinsurance agreements in other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net amount at risk (“NAR”) represents the amount of GLB or GDB in excess of a policyholder’s account balance at the balance sheet date. Underperforming markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB and GDB riders. A contract with a GDB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the GDB. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 15% and 26%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GDB rider were “in the money.” A contract with a GLB rider is “in the money” if the policyholder’s account balance falls below the present value of GLB payments, assuming no full surrenders. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 21% and 37%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB rider were “in the money.” However, the only way the policyholder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account balance of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account balance is exhausted, the policyholder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account balance can also fluctuate with market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account balance.
Many policyholders have both a GLB and GDB present on the same policy. The total NAR represents the greater of GLB NAR and GDB NAR for each policy as only one benefit can be exercised in practice. Details underlying the NAR, net of reinsurance, (in millions) were as follows:
| Annuities | Retirement Plan Services | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||
| GLB NAR | $ | 1,805 | $ | 3,261 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | ||||||
| GDB NAR | 1,491 | 5,077 | 3 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Total NAR | 3,143 | 7,975 | 4 | 15 |
Change in the fair value of MRB assets and liabilities is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), except for the portion attributable to the change in non-performance risk, which is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). Change in the fair value of ceded MRB assets and liabilities, including the changes in our counterparties’ non-performance risks, is reported in market risk benefit gain (loss) in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
47
Table of Contents
MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our non-performance risk. Ceded MRBs are valued based on a stochastic projection of risk-neutral scenarios that incorporate a spread reflecting our counterparties’ non-performance risk. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant and include assumptions for capital markets, lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin and administrative expenses. These assumptions are based on a combination of historical data and actuarial judgments. The assumption for our own non-performance risk and our counterparties’ non-performance risk for MRBs and ceded MRBs, respectively, are determined at each valuation date and reflect our risk and our counterparties’ risks of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the non-performance risk is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of these MRBs and update these assumptions on a prospective basis as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. For information on fair value inputs, see Note 15. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
48
Table of Contents
For illustrative purposes, the following presents hypothetical effects to MRBs attributable to changes to key assumptions / inputs, assuming all other factors remain constant:
| Hypothetical | Hypothetical | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | Effect | |||||||
| Assumption / Input | Actual Experience | to MRB Liability | to Net Income | Description of Assumption / Input | ||||
| Equity market return | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Equity market return input represents impact based on movements in equity markets. | ||||
| Interest rate | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Interest rate input represents impact based on movements in interest rates and impact to fixed-income assets. | ||||
| Volatility | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Volatility assumption represents overall volatilities assumed for the underlying variable annuity funds, which include a mixture of equity and fixed-income assets. Volatility assumptions vary by fund due to the benchmarking of difference indices. | ||||
| Mortality | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Mortality contracts with only GDB rider | Increase / (Decrease) | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Mortality represents the estimated probability of when an individual belonging to a particular group, categorized according to age or some other factor such as gender, will die. | ||||
| Lapse | Higher / Lower | (Decrease) / Increase | Increase / (Decrease) | Lapse assumption represents the estimated probability of a contract surrendering during a year, thereby forgoing any future benefits. | ||||
| Benefit utilization | Higher / Lower | Increase / (Decrease) | (Decrease) / Increase | Benefit utilization assumption of guaranteed withdrawals represents the estimated percentage of policyholders that utilize the guaranteed withdrawal feature. |
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to selected risk caused by changes in equity markets and interest rates associated with GLB and GDB riders that are available in our variable annuity products and accounted for as MRBs. Effective January 1, 2023, we revised our hedge program, which continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. We utilize options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. For additional information on our derivatives, see Note 6.
As part of our hedge program, equity market and interest rate conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not completely offset changes in the fair value of our GLB and GDB riders caused by movements in these factors due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, policyholder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
The following table presents our after-tax estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets and interest rates (in millions) and excludes the net cost of operating the hedge program. The amounts represent the difference between the change in GLB and GDB riders and the change in the fair value of the underlying hedge instruments. These estimates are based upon the balance as of December 31, 2023, net of reinsurance, and the related hedge instruments in place as of that date.
49
Table of Contents
The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes to equity market returns and interest rates occurred.
| In-Force Sensitivities | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Market Return | -10% | +10% | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | (775) | $ | 600 | ||
| Interest Rates | -25 bps | +25 bps | ||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | (500) | 450 |
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the table above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
•The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2023, due to changing market conditions, policyholder activity, hedge positions and other factors;
•The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market changes;
•The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
•Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rates, may be overly simplistic and not indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
•It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without affecting other capital market sectors; and
•The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB and GDB riders and the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
For additional information on MRBs, see Note 10.
Policyholder Account Balances
Policyholder account balances include the contract value that has accrued to the benefit of the policyholder as of the balance sheet date. This liability includes UL and VUL and investment-type annuity products where account balances are equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and policyholder administration charges (collectively known as “policyholder assessments”), as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our IUL and indexed annuity products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives and update assumptions as needed. We may also update these assumptions in other quarters as we become aware of information that is indicative of the need for such an update. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the policyholder’s account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the policyholder. Policyholders may elect to rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our policyholders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge policyholder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For more information on indexed product net derivative results, see Note 21.
For additional information on the liability for policyholder account balances, see Note 12.
Reinsurance Recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables are generally measured and recognized consistent with the assumptions and methodologies used to project the future performance of the underlying direct business as discussed in the “Future Contract Benefits” and “Policyholder Account Balances” sections above. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models
50
Table of Contents
and update assumptions as needed. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. In addition, we consider the potential impact of counterparty credit risks related to the reinsurance recoverable by estimating an allowance for credit losses using a probability of loss model approach to estimate expected credit losses for reinsurance recoverables. For additional information on our allowance for credit losses on reinsurance-related assets, see Note 8.
Annual Assumption Review
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating MRBs, our reserves and embedded derivatives. For more information on our comprehensive review, see Note 1. Details underlying the effect to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | (1) | ||||
| Life Insurance | (156) | (2,107) | 127 | |||||||
| Group Protection | 24 | (12) | 24 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | – | – | – | |||||||
| Excluded from income (loss) from operations | (36) | 74 | (241) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (167) | $ | (2,044) | $ | (91) |
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2023
•For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior and mortality assumptions, partially offset by the favorable impact of a 50-basis-point increase in our long-term new money investment yield assumption.
•For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability and life waiver claim termination rate assumptions, partially offset by the unfavorable impact due to updates to long-term disability social security offset assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the unfavorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates to mortality and policyholder lapse behavior assumptions and other items, partially offset by a favorable impact from updates to volatility and policyholder GLB utilization behavior assumptions.
2022
•For Life Insurance, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees in the amount of $1.9 billion, after-tax, as well as updates to mortality and morbidity assumptions and other items.
•For Group Protection, the unfavorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions, partially offset by the favorable impact of updates to life waiver termination assumptions.
•For excluded from income (loss) from operations, the favorable impact, related to net annuity product features, was driven by updates to policyholder benefit utilization behavior and fund mapping and volatility assumptions, partially offset by an unfavorable impact from updates to policyholder lapse behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees that impacted ceded reserves.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangibles that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired and written down to the reporting unit’s fair value. The results of one test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of another reporting unit.
For the purposes of the evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, our reporting units correspond with our reporting segments.
The fair values of our reporting units are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the value of new business. Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we expect to issue in the future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the values of in-force and
51
Table of Contents
new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected, weighted-average rate of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each reporting unit.
We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Factors that can influence the value of goodwill include the capital markets, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, consumer confidence and any items that can directly or indirectly affect new business future cash flows. Factors that could affect production levels and profitability of new business include mix of new business, pricing changes, customer acceptance of our products and distribution strength. Spread compression and related effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments.
Examples of unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:
•Lower expectations for future sales levels or future sales profitability;
•Higher discount rates on new business assumptions;
•Weakened expectations for the ability to execute future reserve financing transactions for life insurance business over the long-term or expectations for significant increases in the associated costs;
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products, the required amount of reserves and/or surplus, or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including changes to statutory reserve requirements or changes to RBC requirements; and
•Valuations of significant mergers or acquisitions of companies or blocks of business that would provide relevant market-based inputs for our impairment assessment that could support less favorable conclusions regarding the estimated fair value of our reporting units.
As of October 1, 2023, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our reporting units (Annuities, Group Protection and Retirement Plan Services), and, as of such date, the fair value was in excess of the carrying value for each such reporting unit.
In the third quarter of 2022, as a result of the capital market environment, including (i) declining equity markets and (ii) the impact of rising interest rates on our discount rate assumption, we accelerated our quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Life Insurance reporting unit as we concluded that there were indicators of impairment. Based on this quantitative test, which included updating our best estimate assumptions therein, we incurred an impairment during the third quarter of 2022 of the Life Insurance reporting unit goodwill of $634 million, which represented the write-off of the entire balance of goodwill for the reporting unit.
As of October 1, 2022, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for the remaining reporting units, and, as of October 1, 2022, the fair value was in excess of each such other reporting unit’s carrying value.
For more information on goodwill and specifically identifiable intangible assets by segment, see Notes 1 and 9.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax assets and liabilities for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Management exercises judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax assets and liabilities. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. Both provisions became effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. We determined that we were not within the scope of the corporate alternative minimum tax for 2023.
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Judgment and the use of estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities;
52
Table of Contents
taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized; and any future prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.
As of December 31, 2023, we had an approximate $1.4 billion deferred tax asset related to net unrealized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management concluded that its tax planning strategy to hold these securities to recovery was prudent and feasible as these unrealized losses were caused by factors other than credit loss, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to recovery and collect all of the contractual cash flows. As of December 31, 2023, we had an approximate $441 million deferred tax asset related to the portfolio of investments sold in the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. See Notes 4 and 8 for additional information. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management considered future tax planning strategies, including sales of certain appreciated fixed maturity securities, sales of certain corporate assets and other investment management strategies. Such tax planning strategies are viewed by management as prudent and feasible, and one or a combination of these strategies may be implemented if necessary to realize the deferred tax asset.
We may experience an increased likelihood of recording a valuation allowance in the future based on the following factors:
•Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may impact the value of appreciated securities and the sale of certain corporate assets; and
•Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that may impact the sale of certain corporate assets.
Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, we had a $87 million deferred tax asset related to net operating losses, a $131 million deferred tax asset related to federal income tax credits and a $93 million deferred tax asset related to capital losses generated from the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. These deferred tax assets can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes payable in those future periods. The net operating losses do not expire and can be carried forward indefinitely. The federal income tax credits expire in 10 years. The capital losses can be carried back three years and carried forward five years.
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, will be realized.
For risks related to establishing a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, see “Part I – Item1A. Risk Factors – Assumptions and Estimates – We may be required to recognize an impairment of our goodwill or to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets.”
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 23.
53
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Details underlying the consolidated results (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | ||||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 1,337 | ||||
| Life Insurance | (159) | (2,094) | 487 | |||||||
| Group Protection | 299 | 41 | (164) | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 171 | 211 | 248 | |||||||
| Other Operations | (411) | (486) | (371) | |||||||
| Net annuity product features, after-tax | 52 | 3,266 | 1,600 | |||||||
| Net life insurance product features, after-tax | (310) | 21 | (1) | |||||||
| Credit loss-related adjustments, after-tax | (63) | (103) | 87 | |||||||
| Investment gains (losses), after-tax | (744) | 16 | 519 | |||||||
| Changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans, after-tax (1) | (633) | (41) | 53 | |||||||
| Impairment of intangibles | – | (634) | – | |||||||
| Transaction and integration costs related to mergers, | ||||||||||
| acquisitions and divestitures, after-tax | (27) | – | (11) | |||||||
| Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment | ||||||||||
| of debt, after-tax | – | – | (6) | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (752) | $ | 1,358 | $ | 3,778 |
(1) The coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivative related to the coinsurance with funds withheld investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). See Note 8 for more information.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Net income decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower gain in net annuity product features driven by unfavorable changes in the fair value of GLB and GDB hedge instruments in 2023 compared to favorable changes in 2022 attributable to the impact of capital markets and lower gain in MRB-related impacts due to the impact of capital markets.
•Higher investment losses driven by losses on fixed maturity AFS securities as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction.
•Higher unfavorable changes in the fair value of reinsurance-related embedded derivatives, trading securities and certain mortgage loans driven by the fair value of the embedded derivative related to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction.
•Loss in net life insurance product features in 2023 compared to gain in 2022 driven by mark-to-market losses on hedges associated with VUL products.
•Higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
•Transaction costs pertaining to the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction and the planned sale of our wealth management business.
The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:
•Less unfavorable impact from our annual assumption review.
•Goodwill impairment in 2022 in our Life Insurance segment.
•Lower total loss ratio in our Group Protection segment.
•Higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
54
Table of Contents
Additional Information
In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re, with an effective date of October 1, 2023. For more information on the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction, see Notes 4 and 8.
In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through LFN. For additional information, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Protect and Rebuild Statutory Capital” above, “Results of Annuities” below and Note 1.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
For a discussion of the 2022 goodwill impairment, see “Introduction – Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Goodwill” above.
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | (1,584) | $ | 165 | $ | 116 | ||||
| Fee income | 2,196 | 2,347 | 2,622 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 1,734 | 1,463 | 1,400 | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold | ||||||||||
| through reinsurance | 31 | 25 | 26 | |||||||
| Other revenues (2) | 625 | 482 | 527 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 3,002 | 4,482 | 4,691 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits (1) | (1,506) | 251 | 203 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,252 | 894 | 809 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | 2 | 2 | (3) | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 2,041 | 1,989 | 2,090 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,789 | 3,136 | 3,099 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 1,213 | 1,346 | 1,592 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 140 | 185 | 255 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 1,073 | $ | 1,161 | $ | 1,337 |
(1) Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include primarily changes in income annuity reserves driven by insurance premiums.
(2) Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility, and the net settlement related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower fee income driven by lower average daily variable account balances.
•Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, reflecting lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, which more than offset impacts from higher average fixed account balances and improving portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment. The lower net investment income, net of interest credited, was experienced in certain reinsured portfolios that have a corresponding increase in other revenues.
•Higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
55
Table of Contents
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by lower federal income tax expense due to a more favorable tax return true-up driven by the separate account dividends-received deduction.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force fixed annuities. We expect an ongoing reduction in income (loss) from operations in future quarters of approximately zero to $5 million per quarter as a result of this reinsurance transaction. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force life-contingent payout fixed annuities that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
On December 14, 2023, we announced that we had entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Osaic, pursuant to which Osaic agreed to acquire all of the ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Company that comprise the Company’s wealth management business operated through LFN. The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2024, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations.
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account balances. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average gross account balances were 9%, 7% and 8% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our outflow rate increase in 2023 was due primarily to an increase in full surrenders as a result of the increased interest rate environment.
Our fixed annuities and RILA have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Mortality, expense and other assessments (1) | $ | 2,143 | $ | 2,318 | $ | 2,609 | ||||
| Surrender charges | 45 | 24 | 11 | |||||||
| DFEL: | ||||||||||
| Deferrals | (19) | (23) | (27) | |||||||
| Amortization | 27 | 28 | 29 | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,196 | $ | 2,347 | $ | 2,622 |
(1) Presented net of GLB and GDB hedge allowance.
We charge policyholders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily variable account balances. Average daily variable account balances are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual rate that is applied either to the account balance or the guaranteed amount. We allocate a portion of these fees to support the cost of hedging GLB and GDB riders. For more information, see Note 20. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
56
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,600 | $ | 1,305 | $ | 1,155 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 2 | 31 | 70 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 128 | 127 | 175 | |||||||
| Net investment income pertaining to | ||||||||||
| broker-dealer services | 4 | – | – | |||||||
| Total net investment income | 1,734 | 1,463 | 1,400 | |||||||
| Interest Credited | ||||||||||
| Amount provided to policyholders | 1,242 | 880 | 794 | |||||||
| DSI deferrals | (5) | (2) | (3) | |||||||
| Interest credited before DSI amortization | 1,237 | 878 | 791 | |||||||
| DSI amortization | 15 | 16 | 18 | |||||||
| Total interest credited | $ | 1,252 | $ | 894 | $ | 809 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our deferred fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity policyholders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
57
Table of Contents
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Variable Annuity Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits | $ | 2,981 | $ | 3,370 | $ | 5,220 | ||||
| Variable annuity net flows | (7,196) | (5,867) | (6,278) | |||||||
| Variable annuity account balances | 113,355 | 105,573 | 136,665 | |||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account balances | 108,473 | 114,838 | 133,833 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 4,285 | 4,100 | 4,269 | |||||||
| Fixed Annuity Account Balance Information (3) | ||||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits | $ | 9,839 | $ | 8,462 | $ | 6,519 | ||||
| Fixed annuity net flows | 5,169 | 5,530 | 3,827 | |||||||
| Fixed annuity account balances (4) | 39,471 | 37,165 | 33,833 | |||||||
| Average fixed annuity account balances (4) | 39,733 | 34,754 | 30,610 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Includes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(4) Net of reinsurance.
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
58
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 354 | $ | 390 | $ | 450 | ||||
| Non-deferrable | 617 | 628 | 688 | |||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 471 | 408 | 439 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | ||||||||||
| and LOC expenses | 12 | 4 | 2 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 41 | 43 | 53 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer | 1,495 | 1,473 | 1,632 | |||||||
| DAC deferrals | (411) | (449) | (515) | |||||||
| Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred, | ||||||||||
| excluding amortization | 1,084 | 1,024 | 1,117 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization: | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 433 | 430 | 402 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (2) | (1) | 1 | |||||||
| Broker-dealer expenses incurred | 526 | 536 | 570 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 2,041 | $ | 1,989 | $ | 2,090 |
| DAC Deferrals | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales/deposits | 3.2 | % | 3.8% | 4.4% |
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues.
59
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 1,162 | $ | 1,146 | $ | 1,033 | ||||
| Fee income | 3,010 | 2,995 | 3,121 | |||||||
| Net investment income | 2,712 | 2,587 | 3,207 | |||||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) | (6) | (7) | (7) | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold | ||||||||||
| through reinsurance | 5 | 18 | 12 | |||||||
| Other revenues | 24 | 8 | 21 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 6,907 | 6,747 | 7,387 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | 4,436 | 4,071 | 4,136 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 1,290 | 1,310 | 1,457 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | 147 | 2,854 | (17) | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,265 | 1,193 | 1,214 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 7,138 | 9,428 | 6,790 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (231) | (2,681) | 597 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (72) | (587) | 110 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (159) | $ | (2,094) | $ | 487 |
(1) Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss and benefits driven by less unfavorable impacts from the annual assumption review and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, respectively, partially offset by higher benefits due to growth in reserves.
•Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by higher investment income on alternative investments, partially offset by lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums and the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
•Higher fee income driven by growth in business in force, partially offset by the impact of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by the following:
•Higher commissions and other expenses due to higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
•Lower amortization of deferred gain (loss) on business sold through reinsurance driven by the deferred loss recognized as part of the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on the impacts from our annual assumption review.
For more information on the fourth quarter 2023 reinsurance transaction, see “Additional Information” below.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force UL with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”) and MoneyGuard®. Due to the timing of when the reinsurance agreements were finalized
60
Table of Contents
in mid-November, income (loss) from operations for the fourth quarter of 2023 was unfavorably impacted by approximately $15 million. We expect an ongoing reduction in income (loss) from operations in future quarters of approximately $25 million to $30 million per quarter as a result of this reinsurance transaction. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force. Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account balances and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Fee Income | |||||||||||
| Cost of insurance assessments | $ | 2,300 | $ | 2,258 | $ | 2,362 | |||||
| Expense assessments | 1,495 | 1,539 | 1,525 | ||||||||
| Surrender charges | 32 | 30 | 31 | ||||||||
| DFEL: | |||||||||||
| Deferrals | (1,075) | (1,061) | (989) | ||||||||
| Amortization | 258 | 233 | 191 | ||||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | – | (4) | 1 | ||||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 3,010 | $ | 2,995 | $ | 3,121 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Sales by Product | |||||||||||
| IUL/UL | $ | 119 | $ | 135 | $ | 104 | |||||
| MoneyGuard® | 98 | 94 | 101 | ||||||||
| VUL | 132 | 163 | 181 | ||||||||
| Term | 100 | 177 | 152 | ||||||||
| Executive Benefits | 93 | 136 | 122 | ||||||||
| Total sales | $ | 542 | $ | 705 | $ | 660 | |||||
| Net Flows | |||||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 5,385 | $ | 5,821 | $ | 5,728 | |||||
| Withdrawals and deaths | (1,767) | (1,698) | (1,651) | ||||||||
| Net flows | $ | 3,618 | $ | 4,123 | $ | 4,077 | |||||
| Policyholder Assessments | $ | 5,476 | $ | 5,434 | $ | 5,322 |
61
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Account Balances (1) | ||||||||||
| General account | $ | 21,403 | $ | 32,136 | $ | 32,618 | ||||
| Separate account | 20,088 | 16,499 | 19,192 | |||||||
| Total account balances | $ | 41,491 | $ | 48,635 | $ | 51,810 | ||||
| In-Force Face Amount | ||||||||||
| UL and other | $ | 365,938 | $ | 363,884 | $ | 362,106 | ||||
| Term insurance | 722,620 | 707,747 | 611,854 | |||||||
| Total in-force face amount | $ | 1,088,558 | $ | 1,071,631 | $ | 973,960 | ||||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Average General Account Balances (1) | $ | 30,606 | $ | 32,284 | $ | 36,223 |
(1) Net of reinsurance ceded.
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our policyholders’ account balances. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account balances.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the year with the fourth quarter being our strongest.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
•UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
•MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL), 15% of total expected premium deposits, and MoneyGuard Market AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
•Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
•Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.
62
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 2,346 | $ | 2,366 | $ | 2,512 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 6 | 37 | 46 | |||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 207 | 48 | 522 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (3) | 153 | 136 | 127 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 2,712 | $ | 2,587 | $ | 3,207 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 1,290 | $ | 1,310 | $ | 1,457 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.
(3) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to policyholder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account balances because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our policyholders’ accounts. Investment income partially offsets the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
63
Table of Contents
Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits and policyholder remeasurement (gain) loss (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Benefits and Policyholder Remeasurement (Gain) Loss | ||||||||||
| Death claims direct and assumed | $ | 5,412 | $ | 5,440 | $ | 5,866 | ||||
| Death claims ceded | (2,097) | (2,110) | (2,325) | |||||||
| Reserves released on death | (622) | (609) | (708) | |||||||
| Net death benefits | 2,693 | 2,721 | 2,833 | |||||||
| Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product | ||||||||||
| reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 751 | 688 | 688 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 172 | 2,438 | (176) | |||||||
| Change in MoneyGuard® reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 524 | 456 | 476 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | 37 | 167 | 17 | |||||||
| Change in traditional product reserves: | ||||||||||
| Change in reserves | 202 | 205 | 106 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | (11) | 62 | (3) | |||||||
| Other benefits (1) | 215 | 188 | 178 | |||||||
| Total benefits and policyholder remeasurement | ||||||||||
| (gain) loss | $ | 4,583 | $ | 6,925 | $ | 4,119 | ||||
| Death claims per $1,000 of in-force | 2.49 | 2.66 | 3.05 |
(1) Includes primarily long-term care claims and life surrender benefits.
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee, linked-benefit and term life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing remeasurements. Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends.
64
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 571 | $ | 698 | $ | 639 | ||||
| General and administrative expenses | 617 | 554 | 575 | |||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | 102 | 105 | 100 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 150 | 159 | 165 | |||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,440 | 1,516 | 1,479 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA deferrals | (671) | (805) | (745) | |||||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 769 | 711 | 734 | |||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization | ||||||||||
| Amortization | 492 | 482 | 473 | |||||||
| Impact from annual assumption review | – | (4) | 3 | |||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,265 | $ | 1,193 | $ | 1,214 |
| DAC and VOBA Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of sales | 123.9 | % | 114.2 | % | 112.9 | % |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable. For our interest-sensitive and traditional products, DAC and VOBA are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances.
65
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums | $ | 5,014 | $ | 4,768 | $ | 4,450 | ||||
| Net investment income | 339 | 334 | 365 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 210 | 202 | 180 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 5,563 | 5,304 | 4,995 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | 4,020 | 4,034 | 4,069 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 5 | 5 | 6 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | (288) | (103) | (163) | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,447 | 1,316 | 1,291 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 5,184 | 5,252 | 5,203 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 379 | 52 | (208) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 80 | 11 | (44) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 299 | $ | 41 | $ | (164) |
(1) Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 70 | $ | 15 | $ | (256) | ||||
| Disability | 237 | 27 | 98 | |||||||
| Dental | (8) | (1) | (6) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 299 | $ | 41 | $ | (164) |
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
•Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force.
•Lower total benefits and policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss driven by more favorable discount rate impacts on new claims, lower incidence in our disability and life businesses and the impact from our annual assumption review.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses driven by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations and higher commissions due to growth in business in force.
See “Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on our reserve adjustments.
Additional Information
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently uncertain. For every one percent increase in the total loss ratio, we would expect an annual decrease to income from operations of approximately $38 million to $42 million. The effects are symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
66
Table of Contents
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Insurance Premiums by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,938 | $ | 1,808 | $ | 1,653 | ||||
| Disability | 2,892 | 2,763 | 2,569 | |||||||
| Dental | 184 | 197 | 228 | |||||||
| Total insurance premiums | $ | 5,014 | $ | 4,768 | $ | 4,450 | ||||
| Sales by Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | 333 | 299 | 264 | |||||||
| Disability | 311 | 337 | 284 | |||||||
| Dental | 49 | 40 | 38 | |||||||
| Total sales | $ | 693 | $ | 676 | $ | 586 |
Our cost of insurance and policy administration charges are embedded in the premiums charged to our customers. The premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.
Sales relate to new policyholders and new coverages sold to existing policyholders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products.
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 268 | $ | 254 | $ | 236 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 1 | 6 | 16 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 70 | 74 | 113 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 339 | $ | 334 | $ | 365 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
67
Table of Contents
Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss
Details underlying benefits, interest credited, policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Benefits, Interest Credited and Policyholder | ||||||||||
| Liability Remeasurement (Gain) Loss by | ||||||||||
| Product Line | ||||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,434 | $ | 1,437 | $ | 1,630 | ||||
| Disability | 2,163 | 2,354 | 2,108 | |||||||
| Dental | 140 | 145 | 174 | |||||||
| Total benefits, interest credited and policyholder | ||||||||||
| liability remeasurement (gain) loss | $ | 3,737 | $ | 3,936 | $ | 3,912 |
| Loss Ratios by Product Line | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life | 74.0 | % | 79.5 | % | 98.6 | % | ||
| Disability | 74.8 | % | 85.2 | % | 82.0 | % | ||
| Dental | 76.1 | % | 73.5 | % | 76.3 | % | ||
| Total | 74.5 | % | 82.5 | % | 87.9 | % |
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends. For additional information on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 446 | $ | 394 | $ | 361 | ||
| General and administrative expenses | 849 | 768 | 731 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 133 | 123 | 120 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,428 | 1,285 | 1,212 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (113) | (99) | (91) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 1,315 | 1,186 | 1,121 | |||||
| DAC amortization | 100 | 97 | 138 | |||||
| Other intangible amortization | 32 | 33 | 32 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,447 | $ | 1,316 | $ | 1,291 |
| DAC Deferrals | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of insurance premiums | 2.3 | % | 2.1 | % | 2.0 | % |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized.
68
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Fee income | $ | 262 | $ | 261 | $ | 295 | ||||
| Net investment income | 1,012 | 976 | 991 | |||||||
| Other revenues (1) | 36 | 37 | 36 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | 1,310 | 1,274 | 1,322 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Interest credited | 665 | 629 | 616 | |||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 444 | 398 | 406 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,109 | 1,027 | 1,022 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 201 | 247 | 300 | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 30 | 36 | 52 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 171 | $ | 211 | $ | 248 |
(1) Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to higher commissions and other expenses driven by compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
Additional Information
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account balances caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account balances were 12%, 11% and 12% for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account balances was 15%, 17% and 18% for 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time crediting rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
69
Table of Contents
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||||
| Annuity expense assessments | $ | 191 | $ | 192 | $ | 218 | ||||
| Mutual fund fees | 69 | 68 | 77 | |||||||
| Total expense assessments | 260 | 260 | 295 | |||||||
| Surrender charges | 2 | 1 | – | |||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 262 | $ | 261 | $ | 295 |
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance and administrative expenses, and mutual fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account balances, both fixed and variable, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account balance-related items such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity policyholders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real | ||||||||||
| estate and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 935 | $ | 883 | $ | 828 | ||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 1 | 23 | 58 | |||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 76 | 70 | 105 | |||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 1,012 | $ | 976 | $ | 991 | ||||
| Interest Credited | $ | 665 | $ | 629 | $ | 616 |
(1) See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the policyholders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity policyholders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
70
Table of Contents
Account Balances
Details underlying account balances (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of or For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Variable Account Balance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits | $ | 2,268 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 2,218 | ||||
| Variable annuity net flows | (240) | 11 | (731) | |||||||
| Variable annuity account balances | 19,668 | 16,885 | 20,947 | |||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account balances | 18,183 | 17,946 | 20,147 | |||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 4,285 | 4,100 | 4,269 | |||||||
| Fixed Account Balance Information (3) | ||||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits | $ | 2,776 | $ | 4,012 | $ | 3,121 | ||||
| Fixed annuity net flows | (1,718) | 433 | (353) | |||||||
| Fixed annuity account balances | 23,784 | 25,138 | 23,579 | |||||||
| Average fixed account balances | 24,502 | 24,558 | 23,143 | |||||||
| Mutual Fund Account Balance Information | ||||||||||
| Mutual fund deposits | $ | 6,734 | $ | 6,542 | $ | 6,296 | ||||
| Mutual fund net flows | 2,090 | 2,252 | 1,323 | |||||||
| Mutual fund account balances (4) | 57,533 | 46,707 | 54,518 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(2) We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account balances. The account balances of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance.
(3) Includes the fixed portion of variable annuities.
(4) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Flows By Market | ||||||||||
| Small market | $ | 382 | $ | 295 | $ | 133 | ||||
| Mid – large market | 1,279 | 3,601 | 1,573 | |||||||
| Multi-Fund® and other | (1,529) | (1,200) | (1,467) | |||||||
| Total net flows | $ | 132 | $ | 2,696 | $ | 239 |
For more information on account balances, see Notes 10 and 11.
71
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | ||||||||
| Commissions: | ||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | ||
| Non-deferrable | 83 | 75 | 79 | |||||
| General and administrative expenses | 341 | 303 | 308 | |||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 19 | 17 | 17 | |||||
| Total expenses incurred | 447 | 399 | 409 | |||||
| DAC deferrals | (21) | (21) | (22) | |||||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 426 | 378 | 387 | |||||
| DAC amortization | 18 | 20 | 19 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 444 | $ | 398 | $ | 406 |
| DAC Deferrals | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
Commissions and other expenses that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized on a constant level basis over the expected term of the related contracts using the groupings and actuarial assumptions consistent with those used for calculating the related policyholder liability balances. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account balances, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred.
72
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | (921) | $ | 8 | $ | 18 | ||||
| Net investment income | 148 | 155 | 148 | |||||||
| Amortization of deferred gain (loss) on | ||||||||||
| business sold through reinsurance | 1 | — | — | |||||||
| Other revenues | 17 | (7) | 15 | |||||||
| Total operating revenues | (755) | 156 | 181 | |||||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||||
| Benefits | (863) | 63 | 76 | |||||||
| Interest credited | 36 | 39 | 42 | |||||||
| Policyholder liability remeasurement (gain) loss | (3) | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| Other expenses | 117 | 203 | 189 | |||||||
| Interest and debt expense | 331 | 283 | 262 | |||||||
| Spark program expense | 153 | 167 | 87 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | (229) | 758 | 657 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (526) | (602) | (476) | |||||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (115) | (116) | (105) | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (411) | $ | (486) | $ | (371) |
(1) Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2023 to 2022
Loss from operations for Other Operations decreased due primarily to the following:
•Lower other expenses primarily driven by lower legal expenses compared to 2022, which included a one-time item, partially offset by higher compensation-related expenses and other costs pertaining to business operations.
•Higher other revenues due to the effect of market fluctuations on assets held as part of certain compensation plans, which increased during 2023 compared to a decrease during 2022.
•Lower Spark program expense as part of our Spark Initiative.
The decrease in loss from operations was partially offset by higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in average interest rates.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2023, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Fortitude Re to reinsure liabilities under certain blocks of in-force institutional pension business. Insurance premiums and benefits within the table above in 2023 reflect the ceding of in-force institutional pension business that had no income (loss) from operations impact. See Note 8 for more information on the transaction, which improved our capital position and is expected to be accretive to ongoing free cash flow.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.
73
Table of Contents
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| General and administrative expenses: | ||||||||||
| Legal | $ | – | $ | 156 | $ | 94 | ||||
| Branding | 42 | 43 | 45 | |||||||
| Other (1) | 73 | 10 | 61 | |||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | 115 | 209 | 200 | |||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees (2) | 5 | (3) | (9) | |||||||
| Other (3) | (3) | (3) | (2) | |||||||
| Total other expenses | $ | 117 | $ | 203 | $ | 189 |
(1) Includes the portion of our deferred compensation plan expense attributable to participants’ selection of LNC stock as the measure for their investment return, expenses that are corporate in nature including charitable contributions and other expenses not allocated to our business segments.
(2) Includes state guaranty funds assessments to cover losses to policyholders of insolvent or rehabilitated insurance companies. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states.
(3) Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its access to a financing facility and issuance of letters of credit.
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash, the availability of funds from our inter-company cash management program and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
74
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
| Percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investments | |||||||||||||
| As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 2022 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||
| Investments | |||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 88,738 | $ | 99,736 | 71.4 | % | 75.8 | % | |||||
| Trading securities | 2,359 | 3,498 | 1.9 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||
| Equity securities | 306 | 427 | 0.2 | % | 0.3 | % | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 18,963 | 18,301 | 15.3 | % | 13.9 | % | |||||||
| Policy loans | 2,476 | 2,359 | 2.0 | % | 1.8 | % | |||||||
| Derivative investments | 6,474 | 3,594 | 5.2 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||
| Alternative investments | 3,377 | 3,021 | 2.7 | % | 2.3 | % | |||||||
| Other investments | 1,638 | 718 | 1.3 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||
| Total investments | $ | 124,331 | $ | 131,654 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly-owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
75
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 4; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 4.
| As of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 14,767 | $ | 133 | $ | 1,412 | $ | 13,488 | 15.2 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 3,426 | 58 | 325 | 3,159 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 6,143 | 83 | 591 | 5,635 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 3,509 | 63 | 375 | 3,197 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,660 | 60 | 495 | 5,225 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 15,356 | 196 | 1,908 | 13,644 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 3,331 | 38 | 309 | 3,060 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 4,994 | 32 | 500 | 4,526 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,487 | 35 | 317 | 3,205 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,296 | 7 | 370 | 1,933 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 12,683 | 121 | 1,484 | 11,320 | 12.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,425 | 26 | 186 | 1,265 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,245 | 8 | 149 | 1,104 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 332 | 19 | 10 | 341 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 365 | 1 | 38 | 328 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 2 | – | – | 2 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,620 | 5 | 203 | 1,422 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (“ABS”): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 8,452 | 9 | 389 | 8,072 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Credit card | 113 | 7 | 1 | 119 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Home equity | 175 | 28 | 2 | 201 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other | 3,954 | 18 | 193 | 3,779 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 3,072 | 100 | 415 | 2,757 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 34 | 1 | 2 | 33 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 416 | 6 | 29 | 393 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 314 | 16 | 47 | 283 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 243 | 21 | 17 | 247 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 97,414 | 1,091 | 9,767 | 88,738 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 2,515 | 55 | 211 | 2,359 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 340 | 8 | 42 | 306 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 100,269 | $ | 1,154 | $ | 10,020 | $ | 91,403 |
76
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 17,762 | $ | 133 | $ | 1,998 | $ | 15,897 | 15.9 | % | ||||||||
| Basic industry | 4,352 | 45 | 478 | 3,919 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Capital goods | 7,374 | 63 | 884 | 6,553 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Communications | 4,239 | 72 | 519 | 3,792 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 6,056 | 40 | 698 | 5,398 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 17,080 | 184 | 2,395 | 14,869 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Energy | 4,776 | 53 | 485 | 4,344 | 4.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Technology | 5,581 | 27 | 675 | 4,933 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Transportation | 3,666 | 19 | 421 | 3,264 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,330 | 3 | 416 | 1,917 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Utilities | 14,204 | 111 | 1,822 | 12,493 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,820 | 37 | 213 | 1,644 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMOs: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,451 | 3 | 166 | 1,288 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 364 | 18 | 14 | 368 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| MPTS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 394 | 1 | 42 | 353 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| CMBS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 15 | – | – | 15 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,902 | 3 | 246 | 1,659 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| ABS: | ||||||||||||||||||
| CLOs | 8,497 | 1 | 671 | 7,827 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Credit card | 85 | 6 | 1 | 90 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Home equity | 196 | 27 | 4 | 219 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Other | 3,014 | 4 | 250 | 2,768 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Municipals: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable | 5,319 | 171 | 506 | 4,984 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 91 | 1 | 6 | 86 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Government: | ||||||||||||||||||
| United States | 405 | 5 | 31 | 379 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Foreign | 348 | 17 | 47 | 318 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 364 | 25 | 30 | 359 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 111,685 | 1,069 | 13,018 | 99,736 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 3,833 | 44 | 379 | 3,498 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity Securities | 383 | 104 | 60 | 427 | ||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 115,901 | $ | 1,217 | $ | 13,457 | $ | 103,661 |
(1) Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2) Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
77
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to future contract benefits, policyholder account balances and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to AOCI. For instance, deferred income tax balances are adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2023 | As of December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Agency | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NAIC | Equivalent | Amortized | Fair | % of | Amortized | Fair | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| Designation (1) | Designation (1) | Cost | Value | Total | Cost | Value | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AAA / AA / A | $ | 56,557 | $ | 51,234 | 57.7 | % | $ | 63,741 | $ | 56,892 | 57.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 2 | BBB | 37,832 | 34,614 | 39.0 | % | 44,103 | 39,230 | 39.4 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total investment grade securities | 94,389 | 85,848 | 96.7 | % | 107,844 | 96,122 | 96.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Below Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | BB | 1,176 | 1,090 | 1.2 | % | 2,101 | 1,938 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | B | 1,760 | 1,719 | 2.0 | % | 1,679 | 1,620 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | CCC and lower | 86 | 78 | 0.1 | % | 59 | 53 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | In or near default | 3 | 3 | 0.0 | % | 2 | 3 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total below investment grade securities | 3,025 | 2,890 | 3.3 | % | 3,841 | 3,614 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 97,414 | $ | 88,738 | 100.0 | % | $ | 111,685 | $ | 99,736 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total securities below investment grade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as a percentage of total fixed maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AFS securities | 3.1 | % | 3.3 | % | 3.4 | % | 3.6 | % |
(1) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, 97% of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. See Note 4 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2023, decreased by $3.3 billion since December 31, 2022, which was driven by declining interest rates during the fourth quarter of 2023 and the transfer of assets as part of the Fortitude Re reinsurance transaction. For further information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.
78
Table of Contents
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2023, did not require an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
•The current economic environment and market conditions;
•Our business strategy and current business plans;
•The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
•Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;
•The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of annuity contracts and life insurance policies;
•The capital risk limits approved by management; and
•Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(22) million and $(15) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
•Historical and implied volatility of the security;
•The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
•Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
•Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
•Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For information on credit loss impairment on fixed maturity AFS securities, see Notes 1, 4 and 21.
As reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $134.5 billion of liabilities for future obligations under insurance policies and contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers, which exceeded investments and cash and invested cash, which totaled $127.7 billion as of December 31, 2023. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of $26.8 billion as of December 31, 2023, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business. For additional discussion, see “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $20.6 billion and $19.0 billion, respectively, representing 17% and 14% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 8 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages
79
Table of Contents
backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of $2.0 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, and a net unrealized gain (loss) of $(155) million and $(195) million, respectively.
80
Table of Contents
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $176 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2023. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $169 million, or 96%, and trading securities represented $7 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2023. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2023:
| Agency | Prime | Alt-A | Subprime/ Option ARM (1) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,609 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 182 | $ | 178 | $ | 56 | $ | 61 | $ | 95 | $ | 103 | $ | 1,942 | $ | 1,773 | ||||||||||||||||||
| ABS home equity | – | – | 17 | 17 | 13 | 20 | 145 | 164 | 175 | 201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (2)(3) | $ | 1,609 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 199 | $ | 195 | $ | 69 | $ | 81 | $ | 240 | $ | 267 | $ | 2,117 | $ | 1,974 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,324 | $ | 1,185 | $ | 79 | $ | 77 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 1,403 | $ | 1,262 | ||||||||||||||||||
| AA | 285 | 246 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 307 | 268 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A | – | – | 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BBB | – | – | 25 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 39 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BB and below | – | – | 72 | 74 | 63 | 75 | 221 | 247 | 356 | 396 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total by rating (2)(3)(4) | $ | 1,609 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 199 | $ | 195 | $ | 69 | $ | 81 | $ | 240 | $ | 267 | $ | 2,117 | $ | 1,974 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Origination Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 and prior | $ | 337 | $ | 326 | $ | 75 | $ | 77 | $ | 69 | $ | 81 | $ | 240 | $ | 267 | $ | 721 | $ | 751 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 50 | 46 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 50 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 130 | 116 | 15 | 15 | – | – | – | – | 145 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 383 | 322 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 383 | 322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 157 | 137 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 157 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 148 | 138 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 148 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 153 | 126 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 153 | 126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 63 | 52 | 3 | 3 | – | – | – | – | 66 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 115 | 97 | 26 | 22 | – | – | – | – | 141 | 119 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 46 | 44 | 62 | 60 | – | – | – | – | 108 | 104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 27 | 27 | 18 | 18 | – | – | – | – | 45 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total by origination year (2)(3) | $ | 1,609 | $ | 1,431 | $ | 199 | $ | 195 | $ | 69 | $ | 81 | $ | 240 | $ | 267 | $ | 2,117 | $ | 1,974 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.2 | % | 2.2 | % | |
| Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.5 | % | 0.6 | % |
(1) Includes the net amortized cost and fair value of option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”) within RMBS, totaling $91 million and
$98 million, respectively.
(2) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $62 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $62 million in trading securities consisted of $53 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $8 million subprime.
(3) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $52 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $52 million in trading securities consisted of $44 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $7 million subprime.
(4) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
81
Table of Contents
None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2023:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Net Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 1,558 | $ | 1,371 | $ | 64 | $ | 53 | $ | 1,622 | $ | 1,424 | ||||||||||
| Rating | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,077 | $ | 981 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 996 | ||||||||||
| AA | 477 | 387 | 45 | 36 | 522 | 423 | ||||||||||||||||
| A | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by rating (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,558 | $ | 1,371 | $ | 64 | $ | 53 | $ | 1,622 | $ | 1,424 | ||||||||||
| Origination Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 and prior | $ | 11 | $ | 10 | $ | 7 | $ | 6 | $ | 18 | $ | 16 | ||||||||||
| 2014 | 15 | 14 | – | – | 15 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 27 | 25 | – | – | 27 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 72 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 198 | 185 | – | – | 198 | 185 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 140 | 133 | – | – | 140 | 133 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 323 | 289 | – | – | 323 | 289 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 251 | 203 | 3 | 2 | 254 | 205 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 246 | 189 | 36 | 28 | 282 | 217 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 158 | 140 | 13 | 12 | 171 | 152 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | 117 | 117 | 4 | 4 | 121 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total by origination year (1)(2) | $ | 1,558 | $ | 1,371 | $ | 64 | $ | 53 | $ | 1,622 | $ | 1,424 |
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 1.7 | % | 1.6 | % |
(1) Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $125 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $125 million in trading securities consisted of $85 million of multiple property CMBS and $40 million of single property CMBS.
(2) Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $104 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $104 million in trading securities consisted of $70 million of multiple property CMBS and $34 million of single property CMBS.
(3) Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings.
82
Table of Contents
The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2023, was as follows:
| Net Amortized Cost | % Net Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Losses | % Gross Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | % Fair Value | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | $ | 4,833 | 6.8 | % | $ | 1,053 | 10.8 | % | $ | 3,780 | 6.1 | % | |||||
| Electric | 6,183 | 8.6 | % | 1,009 | 10.3 | % | 5,174 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||
| ABS | 9,368 | 13.1 | % | 569 | 5.8 | % | 8,799 | 14.2 | % | ||||||||
| Technology | 3,610 | 5.0 | % | 500 | 5.1 | % | 3,110 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||
| Banking | 4,804 | 6.7 | % | 491 | 5.1 | % | 4,313 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 3,018 | 4.2 | % | 453 | 4.6 | % | 2,565 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 1,673 | 2.3 | % | 423 | 4.3 | % | 1,250 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 1,875 | 2.6 | % | 376 | 3.8 | % | 1,499 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||
| Diversified manufacturing | 1,910 | 2.7 | % | 255 | 2.6 | % | 1,655 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 1,434 | 2.0 | % | 238 | 2.4 | % | 1,196 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 1,602 | 2.2 | % | 236 | 2.4 | % | 1,366 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 1,809 | 2.5 | % | 235 | 2.4 | % | 1,574 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
| Chemicals | 1,515 | 2.1 | % | 211 | 2.2 | % | 1,304 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||
| Retail | 1,429 | 2.0 | % | 205 | 2.1 | % | 1,224 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 2,029 | 2.8 | % | 203 | 2.1 | % | 1,826 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
| Non-agency CMBS | 1,364 | 1.9 | % | 202 | 2.1 | % | 1,162 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||
| Life insurance | 961 | 1.4 | % | 187 | 1.9 | % | 774 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 1,244 | 1.7 | % | 187 | 1.9 | % | 1,057 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Utility – other | 1,032 | 1.4 | % | 155 | 1.6 | % | 877 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 1,119 | 1.6 | % | 151 | 1.6 | % | 968 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
| Midstream | 1,257 | 1.8 | % | 142 | 1.5 | % | 1,115 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
| Consumer products | 927 | 1.3 | % | 135 | 1.4 | % | 792 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||
| Government-sponsored | 484 | 0.7 | % | 122 | 1.2 | % | 362 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
| Wirelines | 670 | 0.9 | % | 117 | 1.2 | % | 553 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Automotive | 1,195 | 1.7 | % | 114 | 1.2 | % | 1,081 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
| Railroads | 663 | 0.9 | % | 107 | 1.1 | % | 556 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Wireless | 645 | 0.9 | % | 101 | 1.0 | % | 544 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
| Integrated | 512 | 0.7 | % | 93 | 1.0 | % | 419 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | |||||||||||||||||
| less than $100 million | 12,537 | 17.5 | % | 1,497 | 15.3 | % | 11,040 | 17.8 | % | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 71,702 | 100.0 | % | $ | 9,767 | 100.0 | % | $ | 61,935 | 100.0 | % |
| Total by industry as a percentage of | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 73.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 69.8 | % |
83
Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
| As of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,273 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 19,015 | 99.7 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | – | 21 | 21 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | – | 41 | 41 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,273 | 1,804 | 19,077 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (86) | (28) | (114) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,187 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 18,963 |
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||||||
| Current | $ | 16,987 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 18,366 | 99.8 | % | ||||||
| Delinquent (1) | – | 13 | 13 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | – | 21 | 21 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 16,987 | 1,413 | 18,400 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (84) | (15) | (99) | |||||||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 16,903 | $ | 1,398 | $ | 18,301 |
(1) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 34 and 24 residential mortgage loans, respectively, were delinquent.
(2) As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 82 and 49 residential mortgage loans, respectively, were in foreclosure.
As of December 31, 2023, there were 3 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $2 million and 99 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $47 million. As of December 31, 2022, there were 2 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of less than $1 million and 37 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $16 million.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, was less than $1 million. The total outstanding principal and interest on residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, was $20 million and $13 million, respectively.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2023 | As of December 31, 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment | ||||||
| Annuities | $ | 7,362 | $ | 7,008 | ||
| Life Insurance | 3,675 | 3,536 | ||||
| Group Protection | 1,550 | 1,417 | ||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 4,813 | 4,253 | ||||
| Other Operations | 1,563 | 2,087 | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 18,963 | $ | 18,301 |
84
Table of Contents
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
| As of December 31, 2023 | As of December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Value | % | Carrying Value | % | |||||||||||
| Property Type | State | |||||||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,602 | 32.6 | % | CA | $ | 4,613 | 26.8 | % | |||||
| Industrial | 4,487 | 26.1 | % | TX | 1,612 | 9.4 | % | |||||||
| Office building | 3,359 | 19.5 | % | FL | 952 | 5.5 | % | |||||||
| Retail | 2,674 | 15.6 | % | NY | 886 | 5.2 | % | |||||||
| Other commercial | 765 | 4.5 | % | AZ | 830 | 4.8 | % | |||||||
| Hotel/motel | 163 | 0.9 | % | PA | 783 | 4.6 | % | |||||||
| Mixed use | 137 | 0.8 | % | WA | 692 | 4.0 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,187 | 100.0 | % | GA | 676 | 3.9 | % | ||||||
| Geographic Region | MD | 663 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||
| Pacific | 5,629 | 32.8 | % | TN | 553 | 3.2 | % | |||||||
| South Atlantic | 3,627 | 21.1 | % | NC | 448 | 2.6 | % | |||||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,046 | 11.9 | % | OH | 384 | 2.2 | % | |||||||
| West South Central | 1,753 | 10.2 | % | VA | 381 | 2.2 | % | |||||||
| Mountain | 1,441 | 8.4 | % | NJ | 378 | 2.2 | % | |||||||
| East North Central | 1,172 | 6.8 | % | WI | 355 | 2.1 | % | |||||||
| East South Central | 678 | 3.9 | % | OR | 325 | 1.9 | % | |||||||
| West North Central | 456 | 2.6 | % | SC | 299 | 1.7 | % | |||||||
| New England | 357 | 2.1 | % | Non U.S. | 28 | 0.2 | % | |||||||
| Non U.S. | 28 | 0.2 | % | All other states | 2,329 | 13.6 | % | |||||||
| Total | $ | 17,187 | 100.0 | % | Total | $ | 17,187 | 100.0 | % |
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
| As of December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||||||
| Principal Repayment Year | ||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 922 | $ | 25 | $ | 947 | 5.0 | % | ||||||
| 2025 | 1,029 | 25 | 1,054 | 5.5 | % | |||||||||
| 2026 | 1,401 | 26 | 1,427 | 7.5 | % | |||||||||
| 2027 | 1,737 | 27 | 1,764 | 9.2 | % | |||||||||
| 2028 | 2,151 | 28 | 2,179 | 11.4 | % | |||||||||
| 2029 and thereafter | 10,077 | 1,631 | 11,708 | 61.4 | % | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 17,317 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 19,079 | 100.0 | % |
See Note 4 for information regarding our loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
85
Table of Contents
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 16 | $ | 8 | $ | 63 | ||||
| Life Insurance | 207 | 47 | 522 | |||||||
| Group Protection | 9 | 5 | 41 | |||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 10 | 4 | 38 | |||||||
| Other Operations | 1 | 2 | 15 | |||||||
| Total (1) | $ | 243 | $ | 66 | $ | 679 |
(1) Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, alternative investments included investments in 352 and 337 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 3% and 2% of total investments, respectively. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing was $79 million and $11 million, respectively.
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 4,819 | $ | 4,469 | $ | 4,351 | ||||
| Trading securities | 161 | 182 | 167 | |||||||
| Equity securities | 13 | 11 | 3 | |||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 755 | 689 | 680 | |||||||
| Policy loans | 103 | 101 | 115 | |||||||
| Cash and invested cash | 129 | 13 | – | |||||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment | ||||||||||
| and bond make-whole premiums (1) | 10 | 105 | 199 | |||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 243 | 66 | 679 | |||||||
| Consent fees | 3 | 8 | 10 | |||||||
| Other investments | (33) | 79 | 64 | |||||||
| Investment income | 6,203 | 5,723 | 6,268 | |||||||
| Investment expense | (324) | (208) | (157) | |||||||
| Net investment income | $ | 5,879 | $ | 5,515 | $ | 6,111 |
(1) See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2) See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
86
Table of Contents
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Interest Rate Yield | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on | ||||||||
| real estate and other, net of investment expenses | 4.04 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.92 | % | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | ||||||||
| bond make-whole premiums | 0.01 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.15 | % | ||
| Alternative investments | 0.17 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.51 | % | ||
| Net investment income yield on invested assets | 4.22 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.58 | % |
We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the contract holder on our average fixed account balances, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek annuity and life reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. The consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” reflect insurance premiums, insurance fees, benefits and DAC amortization net of insurance ceded. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements. For information regarding reserve financing and LOC expenses from inter-company reinsurance agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Material Cash Outflows” below.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an AM Best rating of A+ or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
As a result of our modified coinsurance and coinsurance with funds withheld agreements, we reported deposit assets, net of allowances for credit losses of $28.8 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023. For additional information, see Note 8.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2023, 86%, or $25.6 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $24.7 billion was held by
87
Table of Contents
reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), $121 million was held in our funds withheld portfolios and $813 million was secured by LOCs for which we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement. We reported funds withheld reinsurance liabilities of $17.6 billion on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2023. The excess funds withheld represent funds above the reinsurance recoverable from our reinsurers.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.6 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2023. LNL must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $1.0 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2023. LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least 160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by which we established $585 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2023, LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of these arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 8 and 18 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital –Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and statutory earnings performance. Based on the sources of liquidity available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs.
Capital
Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below. Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may materially affect our business operations and results of operations and may adversely affect our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC.
88
Table of Contents
Reductions to our subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC may cause them to retain more capital, which may pressure their ability to pay dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. We believe we have adequate capital to operate our business as we replenish statutory capital back to our targeted levels. For more information, see “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, issuance of debt or other types of securities and policyholder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed below. Our primary uses are to pay policy claims and benefits, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our common and preferred stockholders, to repurchase our common stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $(2.1) billion, $3.6 billion and $(217) million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common and preferred stock dividends, common stock repurchases, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Dividends from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| LNL | $ | 495 | $ | 645 | $ | 1,910 | ||||
| First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company | 15 | 22 | 45 | |||||||
| Lincoln Investment Management Company | 25 | 38 | 20 | |||||||
| Lincoln National Management Corporation | – | 7 | 10 | |||||||
| Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited | 150 | 85 | 75 | |||||||
| Total dividends from subsidiaries | $ | 685 | $ | 797 | $ | 2,060 | ||||
| Interest from Subsidiaries | ||||||||||
| Interest on inter-company notes | $ | 147 | $ | 118 | $ | 111 |
See Note 24 for information on the increase in dividends from LNL in 2021. The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, issuance of preferred stock, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend, along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the
89
Table of Contents
Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits. LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains.
Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $790 million in 2024 without prior approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.”
Subsidiaries’ Capital
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus will affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying capacity. For a discussion of the actions management is taking to rebuild statutory capital, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Protect and Rebuild Statutory Capital.” For additional information on RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our insurance subsidiaries’ regulatory capital levels are affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. For instance, our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves calculated pursuant to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (“XXX”) and Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”), respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to reinsurance captives. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2023, was $1.9 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance agreements for UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 14. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.8 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves associated with our term and UL products with secondary guarantees as of December 31, 2023; of this amount, $3.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 5. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves established for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates and are affected by the level of account balances relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Our insurance subsidiaries’ cede a portion of the guaranteed benefit riders to Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited (“LNBAR”) through a modified coinsurance agreement. Our variable annuity hedge program mitigates the risk to LNBAR from guaranteed benefit riders and continues to focus on generating sufficient income to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and supporting derivatives. In December 2022, LNC issued a long-term note to a non-affiliated variable interest entity in exchange for notes of like principal and duration classified as AFS securities. LNC contributed the securities to LNBAR to address asset value volatility based on market conditions. Under the current terms of the note facility, the maximum permissible
90
Table of Contents
principal amount of the note is $1.25 billion, the full amount of which was outstanding as of December 31, 2023. There are no impacts to the LNC Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the set-off right provided in the note facility. For more information, see Note 5.
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital among our insurance subsidiaries, including our captive reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and variable universal life insurance separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also increases. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries may also decrease, which will affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
We continue to analyze the use of our existing captive reinsurance structures, as well as additional third-party reinsurance arrangements, and our hedging strategies relative to managing the effects of equity markets and interest rates on the statutory reserves, statutory capital and the dividend capacity of our life insurance subsidiaries.
In November 2023, we closed our reinsurance agreements with Fortitude Re, with an effective date of October 1, 2023, which improved our statutory capital position. For more information, see Notes 4 and 8.
In December 2023, we announced we had entered into an agreement to sell our wealth management business operated through LFN, which is expected to close in the first half of 2024. We anticipate that the capital benefit from this transaction will be used to improve our statutory capital position and reduce our leverage ratio. For more information, see “Results of Annuities” above and Note 1.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2023, were as follows:
| Beginning Balance | Issuance | Maturities, Repayments and Refinancing | Change in Fair Value Hedges | Other Changes (1) | Ending Balance | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt (2) | $ | 500 | $ | – | $ | (500) | $ | – | $ | 250 | $ | 250 | ||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 4,497 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 5 | $ | (11) | $ | 4,491 | ||||||||||
| Term loans | 250 | – | – | – | (250) | – | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes (3) | 995 | – | – | – | – | 995 | ||||||||||||||||
| Capital securities (3) | 213 | – | – | – | – | 213 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 5,955 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 5 | $ | (261) | $ | 5,699 |
(1) Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2) As of December 31, 2023, consisted of $250 million principal amount of our term loan due December 3, 2024.
(3) To hedge the variability in rates, we purchased interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining terms of the subordinated notes and capital securities.
LNC made interest payments to service debt to third parties of $311 million, $278 million and $269 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities, see Note 14.
Preferred Stock
In November 2022, we raised approximately $1 billion through the issuance of preferred stock, $780 million of which was contributed to LNL in the fourth quarter of 2022 to strengthen LNL’s statutory capital. We used the remaining proceeds to fund part of the repayment upon maturity of our 4.00% Senior Notes due September 1, 2023. For additional information, see Note 19.
91
Table of Contents
Details underlying preferred stock dividends paid (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Series C preferred stock dividends | $ | 36 | $ | – | $ | – | ||||
| Series D preferred stock dividends | 46 | – | – | |||||||
| Total preferred stock dividends | $ | 82 | $ | – | $ | – |
Capital Contributions to Subsidiaries
LNC made capital contributions to subsidiaries of $7 million, $925 million and $65 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchases depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of dividends from our subsidiaries and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock under our buyback program during 2023. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II – Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||
| Dividends to common stockholders | $ | 305 | $ | 310 | $ | 319 | ||||
| Repurchase of common stock | – | 550 | 1,105 | |||||||
| Total cash returned to common stockholders | $ | 305 | $ | 860 | $ | 1,424 | ||||
| Number of shares repurchased | – | 8.7 | 16.2 |
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
To promote effective short-term cash management strategies, we utilize an inter-company cash management program between LNC and participating subsidiaries under which each entity can lend to or borrow from the holding company to meet short-term borrowing needs. As of December 31, 2023, the holding company had a net receivable of $258 million due from certain subsidiaries in the inter-company cash management program. Loans under the cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
LNC entered into a facility agreement in 2020 with a Delaware trust that gives LNC the right over a 10-year period to issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of 2.330% senior notes to the trust in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by the trust. By agreeing to purchase the 2.330% senior notes in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities upon exercise of the issuance right, the trust will provide a source of liquid assets for the Company. The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure to make certain payments to the trust, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving LNC. We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below a minimum threshold (which was $2.75 billion as of December 31, 2023, and is subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases) and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement. For additional information, see Note 14.
92
Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of December 31, 2023, LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility and maximum available borrowing based on qualifying assets of $5.1 billion. As of December 31, 2023, LNL had outstanding borrowings of $2.7 billion under this facility reported within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31, 2023, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Securities Lending Programs and Repurchase Agreements
Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can access liquidity through securities lending programs and repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2023, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $205 million. In addition, our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to $2.25 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which $25 million was utilized as of December 31, 2023. The cash received in our securities lending programs and repurchase agreements is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures hedged. As of December 31, 2023, we were in a net collateral payable position of $5.0 billion compared to $3.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to post collateral with a counterparty. If we do not have sufficient high-quality securities or cash and invested cash to provide as collateral, we have committed liquidity sources through facilities that can provide up to $1.25 billion of additional liquidity to help meet collateral needs. Access to such facilities is contingent upon interest rates having achieved certain threshold levels. In addition to these facilities, we have the facility agreement for senior notes issuance, the FHLB facilities and the repurchase agreements discussed above as well as the five-year revolving credit facility discussed in Note 14 to leverage that would be eligible for collateral posting. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 6.
93
Table of Contents
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2023, were as follows:
| Less Than 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 3 - 5 Years | More than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future contract benefits and policyholder account balances (1) | $ | 22,361 | $ | 46,149 | $ | 46,824 | $ | 389,433 | $ | 504,767 | ||||||||
| Short-term and long-term debt (2) | 250 | 700 | 500 | 4,381 | 5,831 | |||||||||||||
| Reserve financing and LOC expenses (3) | 67 | 128 | 120 | 231 | 546 | |||||||||||||
| Payables for collateral on investments (4) | 2,855 | – | – | – | 2,855 | |||||||||||||
| Investment commitments (5) | 890 | 1,013 | 1,135 | 50 | 3,088 | |||||||||||||
| Operating leases (6) | 43 | 66 | 44 | 9 | 162 | |||||||||||||
| Finance leases (6) | 18 | 11 | – | – | 29 | |||||||||||||
| Certain financing arrangements (7) | 152 | 396 | 137 | 6 | 691 | |||||||||||||
| Retirement and other plans (8) | 100 | 196 | 189 | 440 | 925 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 26,736 | $ | 48,659 | $ | 48,949 | $ | 394,550 | $ | 518,894 |
(1) Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years and are not discounted for the time value of money. New business issued or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2) Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 14 for additional information.
(3) Estimates are based on the level of capacity we expect to utilize during the life of the LOCs and other reserve financing arrangements. See Note 14 for additional information.
(4) Excludes collateral payable held for derivative investments. See Note 4 for additional information.
(5) See Note 4 for additional information.
(6) See Note 18 for additional information.
(7) Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See Note 18 for additional information.
(8) Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2033 and known payments under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined benefit plans. See Note 16 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Our credit ratings assigned by Moody’s and S&P are on outlook stable, and our credit ratings assigned by AM Best and Fitch are on outlook negative
As of February 16, 2024, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “aaa to c” | “AAA to D” | “Aaa to C” | “AAA to D” | |||
| bbb+ | BBB+ | Baa2 | BBB+ | |||
| (8th of 22) | (8th of 23) | (9th of 21) | (8th of 22) |
94
Table of Contents
As of February 16, 2024, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “AMB-1+ to AMB-4” | “F1+ to D” | “P-1 to NP” | “A-1+ to D” | |||
| AMB-2 | F2 | P-2 | A-2 | |||
| (3rd of 6) | (3rd of 8) | (2nd of 4) | (3rd of 7) |
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event with respect to LNC if its long-term senior debt ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s); or with respect to LNL if its financial strength ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000059558-23-000009.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 36 |
| Introduction | 37 |
| Executive Summary | 37 |
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | 41 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 53 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 54 |
| Results of AnnuitiesResults of Group Protection Results of Retirement Plan Services | 596366 |
| Results of Other Operations | 70 |
| Realized Gain (Loss) | 72 |
| Consolidated Investments | 75 |
| Reinsurance | 87 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 88 |
35
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of December 31, 2022, compared with December 31, 2021, and the results of operations in 2022 compared to 2021 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions of 2020 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2021 Form 10-K. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
Weak general economic and business conditions that may affect demand for our products, account values, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business and our captive reinsurance arrangements as well as restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and 12b-1 distribution fees;
The impact of U.S. federal tax reform legislation on our business, earnings and capital;
The impact of regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations relating to the standard of care owed by investment advisers and/or broker-dealers that could affect our distribution model;
The impact of new and emerging privacy regulations that may lead to increased compliance costs and reputation risk;
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations and regulations regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters that may adversely affect our reputation and our investment portfolio;
Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
Declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses and demand for our products;
Rapidly increasing interest rates causing contract holders to surrender life insurance and annuity policies, thereby causing realized investment losses;
The impact of the implementation of the provisions of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions;
The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefit riders of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;
Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including our various hedging strategies;
A deviation in actual experience regarding future persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products and in establishing related insurance reserves, which may reduce future earnings;
36
Table of Contents
Changes in accounting principles that may affect our financial statements;
Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches of our data security systems;
The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives, including the Spark Initiative;
The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
Pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely impact liabilities for policyholder claims, affect our businesses and increase the cost and availability of reinsurance;
Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
The unanticipated loss of key management, financial planners or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth protection, accumulation, group protection and retirement income products and solutions through our four business segments:
Life Insurance;
Annuities;
Group Protection; and
Retirement Plan Services
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated revenues and net income (loss), we also provide segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations because we believe they are meaningful measures of revenues and the profitability of our operating segments. Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are the financial performance measures we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Accordingly, we define and report operating revenues and income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 21. Our management believes that operating revenues and income (loss) from operations explain the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from operating revenue and income (loss) from operations because they are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments. In addition, we believe that our definitions of operating revenues and income (loss) from operations will provide investors with a more valuable measure of our performance because it better reveals trends in our businesses.
37
Table of Contents
We provide information about our segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items and realized gain (loss), key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
We continue to be influenced by a variety of trends that affect the industry.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The health, economic and business conditions precipitated by the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in 2020 continued to adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition during 2022. While various treatments and vaccines are now available, COVID-19 variants continue to emerge, which could prolong or lead to increased hospitalization and death rates. We continue to monitor U.S. CDC reports related to COVID-19 and the potential continuing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Life Insurance and Group Protection segments. See “Results of Life Insurance” and “Results of Group Protection” below for impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Interest Rate Environment
Throughout 2022, the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate target range to combat inflation. In February 2023, the Federal Reserve announced an additional 25 basis points increase, when it set the range at 4.50% to 4.75% and reiterated its commitment to implement and maintain policy as needed to bring inflation down. Additionally, the Federal Reserve has continued reducing its balance sheet, which started in June 2022, by not reinvesting Treasury securities, agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities. As interest rates rise, which improves the yield on our new money and floating rate investments, we continue to be proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this interest rate environment.
We have provided disclosures around risks related to increases in interest rate risk in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals,” “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review – Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity” below and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation. Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the life insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased regulation and oversight for the industry. In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. For more information on income taxes, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Income Taxes” below. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
Significant Operational Matters
Rebuild Risk-Based Capital Ratio
To rebuild our statutory capital to our risk-based capital (“RBC”) ratio target of 400%, we have taken or intend to take the following actions:
In the fourth quarter, we paused shares repurchases, and we expect the pause to continue through the end of 2023;
We executed a partial hedge on our in-force variable universal life insurance (“VUL”) products with secondary guarantees to mitigate potential capital volatility;
In November 2022, we raised approximately $1 billion through the issuance of preferred stock, $780 million of which was contributed to The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“LNL”) in the fourth quarter; and
Beginning in the first quarter of 2023, we intend to reduce the amount of capital supporting new business and focus on maximizing our return on this capital, which we expect will allow us to deliver more distributable earnings.
For additional information on the issuance of the preferred stock, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Note 14. For information on risks related to capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position.”
38
Table of Contents
Spark Initiative
In 2021, we formally communicated our new expense savings initiative, the Spark Initiative, focused on driving efficiencies throughout all aspects of our business, from leveraging automation to simplifying and improving process efficiency. In addition, the Spark Initiative targets benefits beyond cost savings including improving the way we work by focusing on reskilling and upskilling our valuable employee base.
During 2022, we recognized benefits of $22 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax, net of investments, as a result of these initiatives. In 2023, we expect to realize benefits of approximately $60 million to $100 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax, net of investments. We ultimately expect to realize annual benefits of approximately $260 million to $300 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax, net of investments, by the end of 2024.
For risks related to the Spark Initiative, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We may not realize or sustain all of the benefits we expect from the Spark Initiative, our investments associated with the initiative could be greater than expected, and our efforts with respect to the initiative may result in disruption of our businesses or distraction of our management and employees, which could have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations” above.
Variable Annuity Hedge Program
We offer variable annuity products with living and death benefit guarantees. We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to selected risk and income statement volatility caused by changes in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities associated with guaranteed benefit riders available in our variable annuity products. The hedge program in effect through December 31, 2022, was highly effective and focused on generating sufficient assets to fund future claims with a goal of minimizing the volatility of net income under United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In September 2022, we announced enhancements to our variable annuity hedge program that continues to focus on generating sufficient assets to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. The revised variable annuity hedge program, effective January 1, 2023, aligns with our increased strategic focus on maximizing the economic value as measured by distributable earnings, which is achieved by managing risks to statutory capital generation due to market volatility. For risks related to our variable annuity hedge program, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Our hedging strategies may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the carrying value of the guarantees on certain of our products, which could result in volatility in our results of operations and financial condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries.”
Targeted Annual Operating Earnings Per Share Growth
Growth in operating earnings per share (“EPS”) is a key driver of our long-term performance. We believe that the key drivers to growing our operating EPS over time include:
Generating capital-efficient new business and positive net flows through our product development and distribution;
Capital markets performing in-line with our expectations;
Ongoing expense discipline as well as our Spark Initiative driving improvement in operating margins; and
Capital generation and active capital deployment, consisting of returning capital to common stockholders.
39
Table of Contents
Sources of Earnings
We monitor our sources of earnings as a factor in managing our businesses. We continue to focus on achieving our long-term goal of increasing mortality and morbidity margins. Growth in this source of earnings component could be driven by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, pricing actions on our life and group products and acquiring blocks of mortality/morbidity business. The following table presents the sources of earnings components of income (loss) from operations, before income taxes, excluding Other Operations:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Investment spread (1) | -89.5% | 27.1% | 16.6% | |||||
| Mortality/morbidity (2) | -210.7% | 8.6% | 1.4% | |||||
| Fees on AUM (3) | 166.9% | 62.0% | 88.8% | |||||
| VA riders (4) | 33.3% | 2.3% | -6.8% | |||||
| Total (5) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
(1)Investment spread earnings consist primarily of net investment income, net of interest credited, earned on the underlying general account investments supporting our fixed products less related expenses.
(2)Mortality/morbidity earnings result from mortality margins, morbidity margins, and certain expense assessments and related fees that are a function of the rates priced into the product and level of business in force.
(3)Fees on assets under management (“AUM”) earnings consist primarily of asset-based fees charged on variable account values less associated benefits and related expenses.
(4)Variable annuity (“VA”) riders’ earnings consist of fees charged to the contract holder related to guaranteed benefit riders, less the net valuation premium and associated change in benefit reserves and related expenses.
(5)The sources of earnings components include the results from our annual assumption review, which for 2022 and 2020 were significantly unfavorable. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
See Note 21 for additional information on income (loss) from operations by segment.
Outlook
Management expects to continue focusing on the following in 2023:
Continuing to rebuild RBC ratio and improving our ongoing capital generation;
Exploring reinsurance and other strategies to maximize the value of our in-force business;
Maximizing distributable earnings and protecting capital with our updated variable annuity hedge program;
Further optimizing new business capital allocation;
Continuing to enhance profitability of our Group Protection business;
Continuing to execute on strategic objectives enabled by our experienced and highly talented senior leadership team;
Making investments in our businesses, product innovation and distribution to grow revenues, drive margin expansion and reduce costs;
Continuing to improve profitability through focusing on expense discipline and managing our expenses aggressively, including executing on the Spark Initiative to drive efficiencies throughout all aspects of our business;
Closely monitoring our capital and liquidity positions taking into account changing economic conditions, ongoing regulatory activities and our capital deployment strategy;
Closely monitoring ongoing activities in the legal and regulatory environment and taking an active role in the legislative and/or regulatory process; and
Maintaining risk management and the flexibility to adjust our hedge program in response to regulatory and other changes.
40
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition. In applying these critical accounting policies in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of other significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
The processes, judgments and estimates described herein relate to the accounting standards in effect through December 31, 2022. On January 1, 2023, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2018-12, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts, that significantly changed how we account for our long-duration contracts both in-force and new business, including updating assumptions used to measure the liability for future policy benefits for traditional and limited-payment contracts, measuring of market risk benefits and changing the amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and DAC-like intangibles. For more information, see Note 2.
The hedge program discussed below relates to the variable annuity hedge program design in effect through December 31, 2022. On January 1, 2023, we modified our variable annuity hedge program that continues to focus on generating sufficient assets to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. For additional information on our variable annuity hedge program, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Variable Annuity Hedge Program.” above. For risks related to our variable annuity hedge program, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Our hedging strategies may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the carrying value of the guarantees on certain of our products, which could result in volatility in our results of operations and financial condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries.”
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
Deferrals
Qualifying deferrable acquisition expenses are recorded as an asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as DAC for products we sold during a period or VOBA for books of business we acquired during a period. In addition, we defer costs associated with DSI and revenues associated with DFEL. DSI is an asset included within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and when amortized, increases interest credited on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). DFEL is a liability included within other contract holder funds on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and when amortized, increases fee income on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We incur certain costs that can be capitalized in the acquisition of insurance contracts. Only those costs incurred that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts may be capitalized as deferrable acquisition costs. This determination of deferability must be made on a contract-level basis. Some examples of acquisition costs that are subject to deferral include the following:
Employee, agent or broker commissions;
Wholesaler production bonuses;
Renewal commissions and bonuses to agents or brokers;
Medical and inspection fees;
Premium-related taxes and assessments; and
A portion of the salaries and benefits of certain employees involved in the underwriting, contract issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales force contract selling functions.
All other acquisition-related costs, including costs incurred by the insurer for soliciting potential customers, market research, training, administration, management of distribution and underwriting functions, unsuccessful acquisition or renewal efforts and product development, are considered non-deferrable acquisition costs and must be expensed in the period incurred.
41
Table of Contents
In addition, the following indirect costs are considered non-deferrable acquisition costs and must be charged to expense in the period incurred:
Administrative costs;
Rent;
Depreciation;
Occupancy costs;
Equipment costs (including data processing equipment dedicated to acquiring insurance contracts);
Trail commissions; and
Other general overhead.
Our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL balances (in millions) by business segment as of December 31, 2022, were as follows:
| Retirement | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life | Group | Plan | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance | Annuities | Protection | Services | Total | |||||||||||||
| DAC and VOBA | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 6,591 | $ | 4,297 | $ | 164 | $ | 224 | $ | 11,276 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | 1,828 | 407 | - | 77 | 2,312 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 8,419 | $ | 4,704 | $ | 164 | $ | 301 | $ | 13,588 | |||||||
| DSI | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 32 | $ | 154 | $ | - | $ | 16 | $ | 202 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | - | 13 | - | - | 13 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 32 | $ | 167 | $ | - | $ | 16 | $ | 215 | |||||||
| DFEL | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 3,450 | $ | 308 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 3,758 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | 1,910 | 1 | - | - | 1,911 | ||||||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 5,360 | $ | 309 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 5,669 |
Fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities and certain derivatives are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), net of associated DAC, VOBA, DSI, future contract benefits, other contract holder funds and deferred income taxes. The unrealized balances in the table above represent the DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL balances for these effects of unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity AFS securities and certain derivatives.
Amortization
For our traditional life insurance and group protection products, we amortize deferrable acquisition costs either on a straight-line basis or as a level percent of premium of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. DAC for variable annuity and deferred fixed annuity contracts and universal life insurance (“UL”) and VUL policies is amortized over the expected lives of the contracts in relation to the incidence of EGPs derived from the contracts.
EGPs vary based on a number of factors, including assumptions about policy persistency, mortality, fee income, investment margins, expense margins and realized gains and losses on investments. When actual gross profits are higher in the period than EGPs, we recognize more amortization than planned. When actual gross profits are lower in the period than EGPs, we recognize less amortization than planned. In a calendar year where the gross profits for a certain group of policies, or “cohorts,” are negative, our actuarial process limits, or floors, the amortization expense offset to zero. For a discussion of the periods over which we amortize our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL see “DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” in Note 1.
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used for our EGPs underlying the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL that may result in unlocking of assumptions. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Reversion to the Mean
Because returns within the variable sub-accounts (“variable funds”) have a significant effect on the value of variable annuity and VUL products and the fees earned on these accounts, EGPs could increase or decrease with movements in variable fund returns. Significant
42
Table of Contents
and sustained changes in variable funds have had and could in the future have an effect on DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization primarily within our Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments, as well as, to a lesser extent, our Life Insurance segment.
As variable fund returns do not move in a systematic manner, we reset the baseline of account values from which EGPs are projected, which we refer to as our reversion to the mean (“RTM”) process. Under our RTM process, future EGPs are projected using stochastic modeling of a large number of market scenarios in conjunction with best estimates of lapse rates, interest rate spreads and mortality rates to develop a statistical distribution of the present value of future EGPs for our variable annuity products. Because variable fund returns are unpredictable, the underlying premise of this process is that best estimate projections of future EGPs need not be affected by random short-term and insignificant deviations from expectations in variable fund returns. However, long-term or significant deviations from expected variable fund returns require a change to best estimate projections of EGPs and unlocking of DAC, VOBA, DSI, DFEL and changes in future contract benefits. The statistical distribution is designed to identify when the deviations from expected returns have become significant enough to warrant a change of the future variable fund growth rate assumption.
As discussed above, stochastic modeling is used to develop a range of reasonably possible future EGPs. We compare the range of the present value of the future EGPs from the stochastic modeling to that used in our amortization model. A set of intervals around the mean of these scenarios is utilized to calculate two separate statistical ranges of reasonably possible EGPs. These intervals are then compared to the present value of the EGPs used in the amortization model. If the present value of EGPs utilized for amortization were to exceed the reasonable range of statistically calculated EGPs, a revision of the EGPs used to calculate amortization would be considered. If a revision is deemed necessary, future EGPs would be re-projected using the current account values at the end of the period during which the revision occurred along with a long-term variable fund growth rate assumption such that the re-projected EGPs would be our best estimate of EGPs.
Our practice is not necessarily to unlock immediately after exceeding the first of the two statistical ranges, but, rather, if we stay between the first and second statistical range for several quarters, we would likely unlock. Additionally, if we exceed the ranges as a result of a short-term market reaction, we would not necessarily unlock. However, if the second statistical range is exceeded for more than one quarter, it is likely that we would unlock. While this approach reduces adjustments to DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL due to short-term fluctuations, significant changes in variable fund returns that extend beyond one or two quarters could result in a significant favorable or unfavorable unlocking. Notwithstanding these intervals, if a severe decline or increase in variable fund values were to occur or should other circumstances suggest that the present value of future EGPs no longer represents our best estimate, we could determine that a revision of the EGPs is necessary.
Our long-term variable fund growth rate assumption, which is used in the determination of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization for the variable component of our variable annuity and VUL products, is an immediate increase of approximately 2% followed by growth going forward of 6.5% to 8.25% depending on the block of business and reflecting differences in contract holder fund allocations between fixed-income and equity-type investments. If we had unlocked our RTM assumption as of December 31, 2022, we would have recorded unfavorable unlocking of approximately $90 million, pre-tax, primarily within our Annuities segment.
Investments
Investments are an integral part of our operations, and we invest in fixed maturity securities that are primarily classified as AFS and carried at fair value with the difference from amortized cost due to factors other than credit loss included in stockholders’ equity as a component of AOCI. The difference between amortized cost and fair value due to credit loss impairment is recognized in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). We also invest in equity securities that are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in realized gain (loss). See “Consolidated Investments” below for more information.
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or NPR, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
43
Table of Contents
The following summarizes investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of December 31, 2022:
| Quoted | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | |||||||||||||||
| in Active | |||||||||||||||
| Markets for | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||||||
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| Priced by third-party pricing services | $ | 400 | $ | 86,156 | $ | 162 | $ | 86,718 | |||||||
| Priced by independent broker quotations | - | - | 4,297 | 4,297 | |||||||||||
| Priced by matrices | - | 16,506 | - | 16,506 | |||||||||||
| Priced by other methods (1) | - | - | 261 | 261 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 400 | $ | 102,662 | $ | 4,720 | $ | 107,782 | |||||||
| Percent of total | 0% | 95% | 5% | 100% |
(1)Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity AFS securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, see Notes 1 and 20.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2022, we evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion, as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2022, we used broker quotes for 47 securities as our final price source, representing less than 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes. Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data. The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing source.
44
Table of Contents
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers, future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation” above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans. Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization and changes in other contract holder funds within realized losses reflecting the incremental effect of actual
45
Table of Contents
versus expected credit-related investment losses. These actual to expected amortization adjustments could create volatility in net realized gains and losses.
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk, basis risk, equity market risk, credit risk and foreign currency exchange risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Future Contract Benefits” and “Other Contract Holder Funds” below for information on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of these hedging programs and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 5. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives, including sensitivities, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Reserves
Reserves are the amounts that, with the additional premiums to be received and interest thereon compounded annually at certain assumed rates, are calculated to be sufficient to meet the various policy and contract obligations as they mature. Generally, the reserves in excess of account value are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to contract holders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions, additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity, policy persistency and interest rates. We periodically review our experience and update our policy reserves for new issues and reserve for all claims incurred, as we believe appropriate.
GLB
We have certain GLB variable annuity products with GWB and GIB features that are embedded derivatives. Certain features of these guarantees have elements of both insurance benefits accounted for under the Financial Services – Insurance – Claim Costs and Liabilities for Future Policy Benefits Subtopic of the FASB ASC (“benefit reserves”) and embedded derivative reserves. We calculate the value of the embedded derivative reserve and the benefit reserve based on the specific characteristics of each GLB feature. Through our hybrid accounting approach, for reserve calculation purposes we assign product cash flows to the embedded derivative or insurance portion of the reserves based on the life-contingent nature of the benefits. We report the insurance portion of the reserves in future contract benefits with the embedded derivative reported in either other assets or other liabilities. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. These embedded derivatives are valued based on a stochastic projection of scenarios of the embedded derivative cash flows. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant and include assumptions for capital markets, actuarial lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin, administrative expenses and a margin for profit. In addition, an NPR component is determined at each valuation date that reflects our risk of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the NPR is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. These embedded derivatives are carried at fair value and are all classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. It is possible that different valuation techniques and assumptions could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. Changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives result primarily from changes in market conditions. For more information, see Notes 1 and 20.
We have a dynamic hedging strategy designed to mitigate selected risk and income statement volatility caused by changes in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities associated with GWB and GIB features that are available in our variable annuity products. In addition to mitigating selected risk and income statement volatility, the hedge program is also focused on a long-term goal of accumulating assets that could be used to pay claims under these benefits.
46
Table of Contents
Changes in the value of the hedge contracts hedge the income statement effect of changes in GLB embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves. This dynamic hedging strategy utilizes options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. The notional amounts of the underlying hedge instruments are such that the magnitude of the change in the value of the hedge instruments due to changes in equity markets, interest rates and implied volatilities is designed to offset the magnitude of the change in the GLB embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves caused by changes in equity markets, as well as the change in GLB embedded derivative reserves caused by changes in interest rates and implied volatilities. See “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below for information on how we determine our NPR, including the sensitivity of the NPR factor.
As part of our hedging program, equity market, interest rate and market-implied volatility conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not completely offset changes in the fair value of embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves caused by movements in these factors due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, contract holder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
Within our annuity business, we have certain products that contain GLB features. The proportion of our variable annuity account values that contained GLB features to our total annuity account values, net of reinsurance, was 45% and 50% as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Underperforming equity markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB features. A contract with a GLB feature is “in the money” if the contract holder’s account value falls below the present value of guaranteed withdrawal or income benefits, assuming no lapses. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, 37% and 7%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB feature were “in the money,” and our exposure, after reinsurance, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $3.1 billion and $453 million, respectively. However, the only way the contract holder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account value of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account value is exhausted, the contract holder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account value can also fluctuate with equity market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account value.
As a result of these factors, the ultimate amount to be paid by us related to GLB guarantees is uncertain and could be significantly more or less than $3.1 billion, net of reinsurance. Our fair value estimates of the GLB embedded derivatives, which are based on detailed models of future cash flows under a wide range of market-consistent scenarios, reflect a more comprehensive view of the related factors and represent our best estimate of the present value of these potential liabilities. The market-consistent scenarios used in the determination of the fair value of the GLB embedded derivatives are similar to those used by an investment bank to value derivatives for which the pricing is not transparent and the aftermarket is nonexistent or illiquid. We use risk-neutral Monte Carlo simulations in our calculation to value the entire block of guarantees, which involve 100 unique scenarios per policy or approximately 44 million scenarios. The market-consistent scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant. The market-consistent inputs include, but are not limited to, assumptions for capital markets (e.g., implied volatilities, correlation among indices, risk-free swap curve, etc.), contract holder behavior (e.g., policy lapse, rider utilization, etc.), mortality, risk margins, maintenance expenses and a margin for profit. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. It is possible that different valuation techniques and assumptions could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. For information on our variable annuity hedge program performance, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below.
47
Table of Contents
The following table presents our estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets, interest rates and implied market volatilities (in millions) at the levels indicated in the table and excludes the net cost of operating the hedging program. The amounts represent the estimated difference between the change in the portion of GLB reserves that is calculated on a fair value basis and the change in the value of the underlying hedge instruments after the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and taxes. These effects do not include any estimate of unlocking that could occur, nor do they estimate any change in the NPR component of the GLB reserve or any estimate of effects to our GLB benefit ratio unlocking. These estimates are based upon the recorded reserves as of December 31, 2022, and the related hedge instruments in place as of that date. The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes to equity market returns, interest rates and implied volatilities occurred.
| In-Force Sensitivities | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Market Return | -20% | -10% | -5% | 5% | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | 864 | $ | 427 | $ | 205 | $ | (194 | ) | |||
| Interest Rates | -50 bps | -25 bps | +25 bps | +50 bps | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | 21 | $ | 12 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | ||
| Implied Volatilities | 4% | 2% | -2% | -4% | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | 25 | $ | 13 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | (28 | ) |
The following table shows the effect (dollars in millions) of indicated changes in instantaneous shifts in equity market returns, interest rate scenarios and market-implied volatilities:
| Assumptions of Changes In | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | Interest | Market | |||||||||
| Market | Rate | Implied | Net | ||||||||
| Return | Yields | Volatilities | Income | ||||||||
| Scenario 1 | -5% | -12.5 bps | +1% | $ | 210 | ||||||
| Scenario 2 | -10% | -25.0 bps | +2% | 421 | |||||||
| Scenario 3 | -20% | -50.0 bps | +4% | 790 |
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the two tables above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2022, due to changing market conditions, contract holder activity, hedge positions and other factors;
The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market changes;
The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rate and implied volatility term structures, may be overly simplistic and not indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without affecting other capital market sectors; and
The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB reserves and the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
GDB
The reserves related to the GDB features available in our variable annuity products are based on the application of a “benefit ratio” (the present value of total expected benefit payments over the life of the contract divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the contract) to total variable annuity assessments received in the period. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the variable annuity. These reserves are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the change reported in benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The change in the liability for a period is the benefit ratio multiplied by the assessments recorded for the period less GDB claims paid in the period plus interest. As experience or assumption changes result in a change in expected benefit payments or assessments, the benefit ratio is unlocked or, in other words, recalculated using the updated expected benefit payments and assessments over the life of the contract since inception. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating these reserves and unlock assumptions similar to the DAC discussion above. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants
48
Table of Contents
updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
We utilize a delta hedging strategy for variable annuity products with a GDB feature, which uses futures and total return swaps on equity market indices to hedge against movements in equity markets. The hedging strategy is designed to hedge our exposure to earnings volatility that results from equity market driven changes in the reserve for GDB contracts. Because the GDB reserves are based upon projected long-term equity market return assumptions, and because the value of the hedging contracts will reflect current capital market conditions, the quarterly changes in values for the GDB reserves and the hedging contracts may not exactly offset each other. For information on our variable annuity hedge program performance, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivative Results” below.
UL Products with Secondary Guarantees
We issue UL-type contracts where we provide a secondary guarantee to the contract holder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base policy account value is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. The reserves related to UL products with secondary guarantees are based on the application of a benefit ratio the same as our GDB features, which are discussed above. These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the contracts. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating these reserves and unlock assumptions similar to the DAC discussion above. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Liability for Unpaid Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term life and disability claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These reserves are based on assumptions as to interest, claim resolution rates and offsets for other insurance including social security. Claim resolution rate assumptions and social security offsets are based on our actual experience. The interest rate assumption used for discounting long-term claim reserves is an important part of the reserving process due to the long benefit period for these claims. The interest rate assumptions used for discounting claim reserves are based on projected portfolio yield rates, after consideration for defaults and investment expenses, for assets supporting the liabilities. Our long-term disability reserves are discounted using rates ranging from 2.5% to 5.0% and vary by year of claim incurral. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and reserving models used in calculating these reserves. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Other Contract Holder Funds
Other contract holder funds includes account values on UL and VUL insurance and investment-type annuity products where account values are equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and contract administration charges, as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our IUL and indexed annuity products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the contract holder’s account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the contract holder. Contract holders may elect to rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For information on our index benefits hedging results, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
49
Table of Contents
Annual Assumption Review
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used for our EGPs underlying the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL as well as our reserves and embedded derivatives. For more information on our comprehensive review, see Note 1. Details underlying the effect to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | |||||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | (2,197 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (440 | ) |
| Annuities | 217 | (5 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||
| Group Protection | 1 | 16 | (3 | ) | |||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 6 | - | (3 | ) | |||||
| Excluded realized gain (loss) | (86 | ) | 6 | 58 | |||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (2,059 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (489 | ) |
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2022
For Life Insurance, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior assumptions related to UL products with secondary guarantees in the amount of $1.8 billion, after-tax, as well as updates to mortality, morbidity and reinsurance assumptions and other items.
For Annuities, favorable unlocking was driven by increases to interest rate assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable updates to other items.
For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to life waiver assumptions and increases to interest rate assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable updates to long-term disability incidence and severity assumptions.
For Retirement Plan Services, favorable unlocking was driven by increases to interest rate assumptions and other items.
For excluded realized gain (loss), unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior assumptions that impacted ceded reserves, partially offset by favorable updates to expense and capital market assumptions.
2021
For Life Insurance, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior and interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to investment allocation assumptions.
For Annuities, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior and interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to expense assumptions.
For Group Protection, the favorable impact was driven by updates to long-term disability termination rate assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable updates to interest rate assumptions.
For excluded realized gain (loss), favorable unlocking was driven by updates to expense assumptions and other items, partially offset by unfavorable updates to policyholder behavior assumptions.
Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity
New money rates have increased but underlying interest rate volatility remains high. As a result, new money rates require careful analysis when forecasting the future direction of changes in rates. If we change our view of future new money rates and lower our current long-term new money investment yield assumption, then, assuming that all other assumptions remain constant, we estimate the impact of lowering this assumption by 50 basis points would be approximately $(225) million to income (loss) from operations due primarily to unlocking our DAC and VOBA assets. This impact would be most pronounced in our Life Insurance segment. The actual impact of a 50 basis point decline in the yield would be based upon a number of factors existing at the time of the assumption update, and, therefore, the actual amount of the loss may differ from our current estimate. In addition, lower investment margins may also impact the recoverability of intangible assets such as goodwill, require the establishment of additional liabilities or trigger loss recognition events on certain policyholder liabilities. For more information on our interest rate risk, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
50
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangibles that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired and written down to the reporting unit’s fair value. The results of one test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of another reporting unit. For the purposes of the evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, our reporting units (Life Insurance, Annuities, Group Protection and Retirement Plan Services) correspond with our reporting segments.
The fair values of our reporting units are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the value of new business. Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we expect to issue in the future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the values of in-force and new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected, weighted-average rate of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each reporting unit.
We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Factors that can influence the value of goodwill include the capital markets, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, consumer confidence and any items that can directly or indirectly affect new business future cash flows. Factors that could affect production levels and profitability of new business include mix of new business, pricing changes, customer acceptance of our products and distribution strength. Spread compression and related effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments. Examples of unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:
Lower expectations for future sales levels or future sales profitability;
Higher discount rates on new business assumptions;
Weakened expectations for the ability to execute future reserve financing transactions for life insurance business over the long-term or expectations for significant increases in the associated costs;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products, the required amount of reserves and/or surplus, or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including changes to statutory reserve requirements or changes to RBC requirements; and
Valuations of significant mergers or acquisitions of companies or blocks of business that would provide relevant market-based inputs for our impairment assessment that could support less favorable conclusions regarding the estimated fair value of our reporting units.
As a result of the capital market environment during the third quarter of 2022, including (i) declining equity markets and (ii) the impact of rising interest rates on our discount rate assumption, we accelerated our quantitative goodwill impairment test for our Life Insurance reporting unit as we concluded that there were indicators of impairment. Based on this quantitative test, which included updating our best estimate assumptions therein, we incurred an impairment during the third quarter of 2022 of the Life Insurance reporting unit goodwill of $634 million, which represented a write-off of the entire balance of goodwill for the reporting unit. As of October 1, 2022, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for the remaining reporting units, and, as of October 1, 2022, the fair value was in excess of each such other reporting unit’s carrying value.
Refer to Note 9 for goodwill and specifically identifiable intangible assets by segment.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax liabilities and assets for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Management exercises considerable judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax liabilities and assets. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 established a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax for corporations whose average adjusted net income for any consecutive three-year period beginning after December 31, 2022, exceeds $1.0 billion. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 also established a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by publicly traded corporations. Both provisions are effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. We are currently evaluating the impact of the corporate alternative minimum tax on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
51
Table of Contents
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Considerable judgment and the use of estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized; and any tax planning strategies we would employ to avoid a tax benefit from expiring unused.
As of December 31, 2022, we had an approximate $2.2 billion deferred tax asset related to net unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities. In the assessment of the future realizability of this deferred tax asset, management considered tax planning strategy and concluded that unrealized losses were caused by factors other than credit loss, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities to recovery and collect all of the contractual cash flows. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, we had a $278 million deferred tax asset related to net operating loss carryforwards that can be used to offset taxable income in future periods and reduce our income taxes payable in those future periods. The net operating loss carryforwards do not expire and can be carried forward indefinitely. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss deferred tax asset, will be realized. For additional information on income taxes, see Note 6.
52
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Details underlying the consolidated results, deposits, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | |||||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | (1,941 | ) | $ | 535 | $ | (34 | ) | |
| Annuities | 1,245 | 1,283 | 983 | ||||||
| Group Protection | 102 | (127 | ) | 43 | |||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 209 | 235 | 168 | ||||||
| Other Operations | (495 | ) | (375 | ) | (295 | ) | |||
| Excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax | 107 | (325 | ) | (570 | ) | ||||
| Benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax | (820 | ) | 196 | 194 | |||||
| Impairment of intangibles | (634 | ) | - | - | |||||
| Net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | - | - | 37 | ||||||
| Transaction and integration costs related to mergers, | |||||||||
| acquisitions and divestitures, after-tax | - | (11 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
| Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment | |||||||||
| of debt, after-tax | - | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (2,227 | ) | $ | 1,405 | $ | 499 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Deposits | |||||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | 5,735 | $ | 5,693 | $ | 5,890 | |||
| Annuities | 11,879 | 11,740 | 11,260 | ||||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 11,886 | 10,840 | 10,017 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 29,500 | $ | 28,273 | $ | 27,167 | |||
| Net Flows | |||||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | 3,998 | $ | 3,982 | $ | 4,137 | |||
| Annuities | (415 | ) | (2,569 | ) | (341 | ) | |||
| Retirement Plan Services | 2,905 | 464 | 166 | ||||||
| Total net flows | $ | 6,488 | $ | 1,877 | $ | 3,962 |
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Account Values | ||||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | 48,634 | $ | 51,846 | $ | 57,605 | ||
| Annuities | 144,966 | 172,725 | 157,518 | |||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 88,735 | 99,114 | 88,307 | |||||
| Total account values | $ | 282,335 | $ | 323,685 | $ | 303,430 |
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Net income decreased due primarily to the following:
The effect of our annual assumption review.
Goodwill impairment in our Life Insurance segment.
Lower investment income on alternative investments and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
Lower fee income driven by lower average daily variable account values.
Unfavorable variable annuity net derivative results.
53
Table of Contents
The decrease in net income was partially offset by the following:
Lower mortality claims in our Life Insurance and Group Protection segments.
Lower expenses driven by lower compensation-related expenses, partially offset by higher Spark program and legal expenses.
Growth in business in force.
For a discussion of the goodwill impairment, see “Introduction – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” above.
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Operating Revenues | |||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 1,146 | $ | 1,033 | $ | 950 | |||
| Fee income | 3,374 | 3,863 | 3,727 | ||||||
| Net investment income | 2,585 | 3,209 | 2,823 | ||||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) (2) | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
| Amortization of deferred gain on | |||||||||
| business sold through reinsurance | 49 | 20 | 12 | ||||||
| Other revenues | 8 | 21 | 10 | ||||||
| Total operating revenues | 7,156 | 8,137 | 7,516 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||
| Interest credited | 1,307 | 1,439 | 1,491 | ||||||
| Benefits | 7,020 | 4,275 | 4,586 | ||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,316 | 1,766 | 1,506 | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 9,643 | 7,480 | 7,583 | ||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (2,487 | ) | 657 | (67 | ) | ||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (546 | ) | 122 | (33 | ) | ||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (1,941 | ) | $ | 535 | $ | (34 | ) |
(1)Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
(2)See “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
Higher benefits due to the effect of unlocking and growth in business in force, partially offset by lower mortality claims.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by negative performance on alternative investments in 2022 compared to investment income in 2021, and the impact of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement.
Lower fee income due to the effect of unlocking and the impact of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement, partially offset by growth in business in force.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
Lower commissions and other expenses due to the effect of unlocking and lower incentive compensation as a result of production performance.
Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force.
Higher amortization of deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance as a result of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
54
Table of Contents
Additional Information
We expect an ongoing reduction in income from operations in future quarters of approximately $45 million per quarter as a result of the significantly unfavorable impact of the third quarter 2022 annual assumption review.
For information on our fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement, see Note 8.
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force. Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account values and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Fee Income | |||||||||
| Cost of insurance assessments | $ | 2,258 | $ | 2,362 | $ | 2,377 | |||
| Expense assessments | 1,540 | 1,507 | 1,502 | ||||||
| Surrender charges | 30 | 31 | 33 | ||||||
| DFEL: | |||||||||
| Deferrals | (1,061 | ) | (989 | ) | (972 | ) | |||
| Amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 558 | 560 | 514 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 49 | 392 | 273 | ||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 3,374 | $ | 3,863 | $ | 3,727 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Sales by Product | |||||||||
| IUL/UL | $ | 135 | $ | 104 | $ | 111 | |||
| MoneyGuard® | 94 | 101 | 127 | ||||||
| VUL | 163 | 181 | 188 | ||||||
| Term | 177 | 152 | 132 | ||||||
| Executive Benefits | 136 | 122 | 72 | ||||||
| Total sales | $ | 705 | $ | 660 | $ | 630 | |||
| Net Flows | |||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 5,735 | $ | 5,693 | $ | 5,890 | |||
| Withdrawals and deaths | (1,737 | ) | (1,711 | ) | (1,753 | ) | |||
| Net flows | $ | 3,998 | $ | 3,982 | $ | 4,137 | |||
| Contract Holder Assessments | $ | 5,361 | $ | 5,201 | $ | 5,154 |
55
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Account Values (1) | ||||||||
| General account | $ | 32,158 | $ | 32,532 | $ | 37,496 | ||
| Separate account | 16,476 | 19,314 | 20,109 | |||||
| Total account values | $ | 48,634 | $ | 51,846 | $ | 57,605 | ||
| In-Force Face Amount | ||||||||
| UL and other | $ | 363,884 | $ | 362,106 | $ | 358,554 | ||
| Term insurance | 707,747 | 611,854 | 535,387 | |||||
| Total in-force face amount | $ | 1,071,631 | $ | 973,960 | $ | 893,941 | ||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Average General Account Values (1) | $ | 32,701 | $ | 36,560 | $ | 37,791 |
(1) Net of reinsurance ceded.
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our contract holders’ account values. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account values.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the year with the fourth quarter being our strongest. For more information on sales, see “Additional Information” above.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL), 15% of total expected premium deposits, and MoneyGuard Market AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.
56
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 2,366 | $ | 2,512 | $ | 2,531 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 37 | 46 | 24 | |||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 48 | 522 | 140 | |||||
| Surplus investments (3) | 134 | 129 | 128 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 2,585 | $ | 3,209 | $ | 2,823 | ||
| Interest Credited | $ | 1,307 | $ | 1,439 | $ | 1,491 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.
(3)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to contract holder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account values because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our contract holders’ accounts. We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves for traditional products. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Benefits
Details underlying benefits (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Benefits | |||||||||
| Death claims direct and assumed | $ | 5,440 | $ | 5,866 | $ | 5,521 | |||
| Death claims ceded | (2,110 | ) | (2,325 | ) | (2,019 | ) | |||
| Reserves released on death | (609 | ) | (708 | ) | (738 | ) | |||
| Net death benefits | 2,721 | 2,833 | 2,764 | ||||||
| Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product | |||||||||
| reserves: | |||||||||
| Change in reserves, excluding unlocking | 627 | 703 | 644 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 2,533 | (190 | ) | 112 | |||||
| Change in MoneyGuard® reserves: | |||||||||
| Change in reserves, excluding unlocking | 588 | 548 | 482 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 157 | 33 | 272 | ||||||
| Other benefits (1) | 394 | 348 | 312 | ||||||
| Total benefits | $ | 7,020 | $ | 4,275 | $ | 4,586 | |||
| Death claims per $1,000 of in-force | 2.66 | 3.05 | 3.21 |
(1)Includes primarily changes in reserves and dividends on traditional and other products.
57
Table of Contents
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee and linked-benefit life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing unlocking adjustments to these liabilities similar to DAC, VOBA and DFEL. Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 698 | $ | 639 | $ | 687 | |||
| General and administrative expenses | 554 | 576 | 557 | ||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | 105 | 100 | 99 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 159 | 162 | 163 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,516 | 1,477 | 1,506 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA deferrals | (805 | ) | (745 | ) | (788 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 711 | 732 | 718 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 458 | 450 | 339 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 143 | 580 | 445 | ||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,316 | $ | 1,766 | $ | 1,506 | |||
| DAC and VOBA Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of sales | 114.2% | 112.9% | 125.1% |
Commissions and costs that result directly from and are essential to successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and for our interest-sensitive products are generally amortized over the life of the contracts in relation to EGPs. For our traditional products, DAC and VOBA are amortized on either a straight-line basis or as a level percent of premium of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. When comparing DAC and VOBA deferrals as a percentage of sales for 2022 and 2021, the fluctuations were primarily a result of changes in sales mix to products with different commission rates. For more information, see “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
58
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 165 | $ | 116 | $ | 121 | ||
| Fee income | 2,434 | 2,724 | 2,394 | |||||
| Net investment income | 1,461 | 1,401 | 1,272 | |||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) (2) | 207 | 208 | 214 | |||||
| Amortization of deferred gain on | ||||||||
| business sold through reinsurance | 25 | 26 | 29 | |||||
| Other revenues (3) | 482 | 527 | 425 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 4,774 | 5,002 | 4,455 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 894 | 811 | 773 | |||||
| Benefits (1) | 468 | 548 | 696 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,960 | 2,119 | 1,854 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,322 | 3,478 | 3,323 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 1,452 | 1,524 | 1,132 | |||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 207 | 241 | 149 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 1,245 | $ | 1,283 | $ | 983 |
(1)Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums.
(2)See “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
(3)Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility, and the net settlement related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited.
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
Lower fee income driven by lower average daily variable account values.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by lower investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, partially offset by higher average fixed account values and impacts to portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
Lower commissions and other expenses driven by lower trail commissions resulting from lower average daily variable account values, lower incentive compensation as a result of production performance and lower amortization expense as a result of lower actual gross profits.
Lower benefits, net of changes in income annuity reserves, due to the effect of unlocking, partially offset by an increase in the growth of GLB and GDB benefit reserves due to market performance.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
Additional Information
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations.
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account values. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average gross account values were 7%, 8% and 7% in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
59
Table of Contents
Our fixed and indexed variable annuities have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, account values and net flows (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Fee Income | |||||||||
| Mortality, expense and other assessments | $ | 2,411 | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,381 | |||
| Surrender charges | 23 | 11 | 16 | ||||||
| DFEL: | |||||||||
| Deferrals | (22 | ) | (27 | ) | (31 | ) | |||
| Amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 23 | 32 | 26 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | 2 | ||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,434 | $ | 2,724 | $ | 2,394 |
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Variable Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits (1) | $ | 3,370 | $ | 5,220 | $ | 3,978 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | (5,871 | ) | (6,283 | ) | (5,262 | ) | |||
| Change in market value (1) | (23,205 | ) | 16,997 | 16,106 | |||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (2,604 | ) | (2,838 | ) | (2,554 | ) | |||
| Transfers to the variable portion of variable annuity | |||||||||
| products from the fixed portion of variable | |||||||||
| annuity products | 492 | 588 | 831 | ||||||
| Variable annuity account values (1) | 105,613 | 136,721 | 128,175 | ||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account values (1) | 114,882 | 133,888 | 116,117 | ||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 4,100 | 4,269 | 3,218 |
(1)Excludes the fixed portion of variable.
(2)We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account values. The account values of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance. See Note 10 for additional information.
We charge contract holders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily variable account values. Average daily variable account values are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual rate that is applied either to the account value or the guaranteed amount. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity contract holders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals. Fee income includes charges on both our variable and fixed annuity products, but excludes the attributed fees on our GLB riders; see “Realized Gain (Loss) – Operating Realized Gain (Loss)” below for discussion of these attributed fees.
60
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income, interest credited and fixed account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net Investment Income | |||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | |||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,305 | $ | 1,155 | $ | 1,122 | |||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | |||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 31 | 70 | 23 | ||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 125 | 176 | 127 | ||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 1,461 | $ | 1,401 | $ | 1,272 | |||
| Interest Credited | |||||||||
| Amount provided to contract holders | $ | 880 | $ | 794 | $ | 755 | |||
| DSI deferrals | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | |||
| Interest credited before DSI amortization | 878 | 791 | 751 | ||||||
| DSI amortization: | |||||||||
| Amortization, excluding unlocking | 17 | 21 | 21 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 1 | ||||
| Total interest credited | $ | 894 | $ | 811 | $ | 773 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Fixed Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits (1) | $ | 8,509 | $ | 6,520 | $ | 7,282 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | 5,456 | 3,714 | 4,921 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (52 | ) | (86 | ) | (66 | ) | |||
| Transfers from the fixed portion of variable annuity | |||||||||
| products to the variable portion of variable | |||||||||
| annuity products | (492 | ) | (588 | ) | (831 | ) | |||
| Reinvested interest credited (1)(3) | (1,048 | ) | 3,286 | 1,686 | |||||
| Fixed annuity account values (1)(2) | 39,353 | 36,004 | 29,343 | ||||||
| Average fixed account values (1)(2) | 36,914 | 32,803 | 25,804 |
(1)Includes the fixed portion of variable.
(2)Net of reinsurance ceded.
(3)The decrease in reinvested interest credited was driven by the change in embedded derivatives related to our indexed annuity products.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our deferred fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
61
Table of Contents
Benefits
Details underlying benefits (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Benefits | ||||||||
| Net death and other benefits, excluding unlocking | $ | 736 | $ | 540 | $ | 553 | ||
| Unlocking | (268 | ) | 8 | 143 | ||||
| Total benefits | $ | 468 | $ | 548 | $ | 696 |
Benefits for this segment include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums, changes in benefit reserves and costs associated with the hedging of our benefit ratio unlocking on benefit reserves associated with our variable annuity GDB and GLB riders. For a corresponding offset of changes in income annuity reserves, see footnote 1 of “Income (Loss) from Operations” above.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions: | |||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 388 | $ | 450 | $ | 480 | |||
| Non-deferrable | 632 | 686 | 581 | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 408 | 439 | 427 | ||||||
| Inter-segment reimbursement associated with reserve | |||||||||
| financing and LOC expenses (1) | 4 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 45 | 45 | 31 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer | 1,477 | 1,622 | 1,522 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (449 | ) | (515 | ) | (548 | ) | |||
| Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred, | |||||||||
| excluding amortization, net of interest | 1,028 | 1,107 | 974 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 403 | 449 | 401 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (7 | ) | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | |||
| Broker-dealer expenses incurred | 536 | 570 | 493 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,960 | $ | 2,119 | $ | 1,854 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of sales/deposits | 3.8% | 4.4% | 4.9% |
(1)Includes reimbursements to Annuities from the Life Insurance segment for reserve financing, net of expenses incurred by Annuities for its use of letters of credit (“LOCs”). The inter-segment amounts are not reported on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
62
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Insurance premiums | $ | 4,768 | $ | 4,450 | $ | 4,280 | ||
| Net investment income | 333 | 366 | 330 | |||||
| Other revenues (1) | 202 | 180 | 183 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 5,303 | 4,996 | 4,793 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 5 | 6 | 5 | |||||
| Benefits | 3,844 | 3,890 | 3,500 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,325 | 1,260 | 1,234 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 5,174 | 5,156 | 4,739 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 129 | (160 | ) | 54 | ||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 27 | (33 | ) | 11 | ||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 102 | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 43 |
(1)Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line | |||||||||
| Life | $ | 12 | $ | (243 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | |
| Disability | 91 | 122 | 126 | ||||||
| Dental | (1 | ) | (6 | ) | 12 | ||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 102 | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 43 |
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
Higher insurance premiums due to growth in business in force and favorable persistency.
Lower benefits driven by lower COVID-19-related incidence in our life business and lower incidence in our disability business, partially offset by less favorable reserve adjustments.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
Higher commissions and other expenses driven by investments in claims management to help improve ongoing operations and higher sales volumes.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by lower investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on our reserve adjustments.
Additional Information
The total loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2022, decreased as compared to the prior year, due primarily to lower COVID-19-related incidence and favorable reserve adjustments in our life business and lower incidence in our disability business, partially offset by unfavorable reserve adjustments in our disability business in 2022 compared to favorable reserve adjustments in 2021. For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – COVID-19 Pandemic” above.
63
Table of Contents
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently uncertain. For every one percent increase in the total loss ratio, we would expect an annual decrease to income from operations of approximately $37 million to $41 million. The effects are symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Insurance Premiums by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,808 | $ | 1,653 | $ | 1,613 | ||
| Disability | 2,763 | 2,569 | 2,401 | |||||
| Dental | 197 | 228 | 266 | |||||
| Total insurance premiums | $ | 4,768 | $ | 4,450 | $ | 4,280 | ||
| Sales by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | 299 | 264 | 265 | |||||
| Disability | 337 | 284 | 397 | |||||
| Dental | 40 | 38 | 44 | |||||
| Total sales | $ | 676 | $ | 586 | $ | 706 |
Our cost of insurance and policy administration charges are embedded in the premiums charged to our customers. The premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.
Sales relate to new contract holders and new programs sold to existing contract holders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products.
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 253 | $ | 237 | $ | 240 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 6 | 16 | 9 | |||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 74 | 113 | 81 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 333 | $ | 366 | $ | 330 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
64
Table of Contents
Benefits and Interest Credited
Details underlying benefits and interest credited (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Benefits and Interest Credited by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,434 | $ | 1,630 | $ | 1,399 | ||
| Disability | 2,270 | 2,092 | 1,938 | |||||
| Dental | 145 | 174 | 168 | |||||
| Total benefits and interest credited | $ | 3,849 | $ | 3,896 | $ | 3,505 | ||
| Loss Ratios by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | 79.4% | 98.6% | 86.7% | |||||
| Disability | 82.2% | 81.4% | 80.5% | |||||
| Dental | 73.5% | 76.3% | 63.1% | |||||
| Total | 80.7% | 87.5% | 81.8% |
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. We expect COVID-19-related mortality to continue to follow U.S. death trends. For additional information on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 394 | $ | 361 | $ | 359 | |||
| General and administrative expenses | 768 | 731 | 697 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 124 | 120 | 122 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,286 | 1,212 | 1,178 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (99 | ) | (91 | ) | (92 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 1,187 | 1,121 | 1,086 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest | 106 | 107 | 115 | ||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 32 | 32 | 33 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,325 | $ | 1,260 | $ | 1,234 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of insurance premiums | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized as a level percent of insurance premiums of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
65
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Fee income | $ | 261 | $ | 296 | $ | 253 | ||
| Net investment income | 975 | 992 | 933 | |||||
| Other revenues (1) | 37 | 36 | 27 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 1,273 | 1,324 | 1,213 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 630 | 617 | 615 | |||||
| Benefits | 3 | 3 | 2 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 396 | 420 | 404 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,029 | 1,040 | 1,021 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 244 | 284 | 192 | |||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 35 | 49 | 24 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 209 | $ | 235 | $ | 168 |
(1)Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
Lower fee income driven by lower average daily account values.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by lower investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio and lower prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, partially offset by higher average fixed account values and impacts to portfolio yields from the current interest rate environment.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by lower commissions and other expenses driven by amortization as a result of lower actual gross profits, the effect of unlocking, incentive compensation as a result of production performance and trail commissions resulting from lower average account values.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
Additional Information
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account values were 10%, 11% and 13% for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account values was 17%, 18% and 19% for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low
66
Table of Contents
interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements,” “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Increases in interest rates may negatively affect our profitability, capital position and the value of our investment portfolio and may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.” For information on the current interest rate environment, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Industry Trends – Interest Rate Environment” above.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||
| Annuity expense assessments | $ | 192 | $ | 219 | $ | 184 | ||
| Mutual fund fees | 68 | 77 | 68 | |||||
| Total expense assessments | 260 | 296 | 252 | |||||
| Surrender charges | 1 | - | 1 | |||||
| Total fee income | $ | 261 | $ | 296 | $ | 253 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net Flows By Market | |||||||||
| Small market | $ | 295 | $ | 133 | $ | 350 | |||
| Mid – large market | 3,811 | 1,800 | 792 | ||||||
| Multi-Fund® and other | (1,201 | ) | (1,469 | ) | (976 | ) | |||
| Total net flows | $ | 2,905 | $ | 464 | $ | 166 |
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Variable Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits (1) | $ | 2,348 | $ | 2,218 | $ | 1,843 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | 10 | (733 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||
| Change in market value (1) | (3,713 | ) | 3,247 | 2,731 | |||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (164 | ) | (185 | ) | (156 | ) | |||
| Variable annuity account values (1) | 16,891 | 20,957 | 18,755 | ||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account values (1) | 17,946 | 20,147 | 16,426 | ||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index | 4,100 | 4,269 | 3,218 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable.
| As of or For the Years Ended | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Mutual Fund Account Value Information | ||||||||
| Mutual fund deposits | $ | 6,542 | $ | 6,297 | $ | 5,449 | ||
| Mutual fund net flows | 2,251 | 1,323 | 100 | |||||
| Mutual fund account values (1) | 46,707 | 54,518 | 46,636 |
(1) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance and administrative expenses, and mutual fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account values, both fixed and variable, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account value-related items such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity contract holders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
67
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income, interest credited and fixed account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 883 | $ | 828 | $ | 834 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 23 | 58 | 23 | |||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 69 | 106 | 76 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 975 | $ | 992 | $ | 933 | ||
| Interest Credited | $ | 630 | $ | 617 | $ | 615 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Fixed Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits (1) | $ | 2,996 | $ | 2,325 | $ | 2,725 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | 644 | (126 | ) | 399 | |||||
| Reinvested interest credited (1) | 629 | 616 | 613 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (13 | ) | (14 | ) | (13 | ) | |||
| Fixed annuity account values (1) | 25,137 | 23,639 | 22,916 | ||||||
| Average fixed account values (1) | 24,571 | 23,147 | 21,696 |
(1)Includes the fixed portion of variable.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Benefits
Benefits for this segment include changes in annuity benefit reserves.
68
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions: | |||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | |||
| Non-deferrable | 75 | 79 | 71 | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 303 | 309 | 304 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 17 | 17 | 16 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 399 | 410 | 396 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (21 | ) | (22 | ) | (21 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 378 | 388 | 375 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 25 | 32 | 25 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (7 | ) | - | 4 | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 396 | $ | 420 | $ | 404 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.5% |
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
69
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Operating Revenues | |||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 8 | $ | 19 | $ | 21 | |||
| Net investment income | 157 | 147 | 152 | ||||||
| Other revenues | (6 | ) | 14 | 12 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 159 | 180 | 185 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||
| Interest credited | 39 | 42 | 39 | ||||||
| Benefits | 79 | 81 | 117 | ||||||
| Other expenses | 203 | 189 | 69 | ||||||
| Interest and debt expense | 283 | 262 | 269 | ||||||
| Spark program expense | 167 | 87 | 68 | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 771 | 661 | 562 | ||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (612 | ) | (481 | ) | (377 | ) | |||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (117 | ) | (106 | ) | (82 | ) | |||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (495 | ) | $ | (375 | ) | $ | (295 | ) |
(1)Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
Loss from operations for Other Operations increased due primarily to the following:
Higher Spark program expense.
Higher interest and debt expense driven by an increase in average interest rates.
Lower other revenues due to the effect of market fluctuations on assets held as part of certain compensation plans, which decreased during 2022 compared to an increase during 2021.
Higher other expenses related to higher legal expenses, partially offset by the effect of changes in our stock price on our deferred compensation plans, as our stock price decreased during 2022, compared to an increase during 2021.
The increase in loss from operations was partially offset by higher net investment income, net of interest credited, related to higher allocated investments driven by an increase in excess capital retained by Other Operations.
Additional Information
We expect to continue making investments as part of our Spark Initiative. For more information, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Spark Initiative.”
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
70
Table of Contents
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in the consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| General and administrative expenses: | |||||||||
| Legal | $ | 156 | $ | 94 | $ | - | |||
| Branding | 43 | 45 | 43 | ||||||
| Other (1) | 10 | 61 | 46 | ||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | 209 | 200 | 89 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees (2) | (3 | ) | (9 | ) | (11 | ) | |||
| Other (3) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | |||
| Total other expenses | $ | 203 | $ | 189 | $ | 69 |
(1)Includes the portion of our deferred compensation plan expense attributable to participants’ selection of LNC stock as the measure for their investment return, expenses that are corporate in nature including charitable contributions and other expenses not allocated to our business segments.
(2)Includes state guaranty funds assessments to cover losses to contract holders of insolvent or rehabilitated insurance companies. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states.
(3)Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its access to a financing facility and issuance of LOCs.
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash, the availability of funds from our inter-company cash management program and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
71
Table of Contents
REALIZED GAIN (LOSS)
Details underlying realized gain (loss), after-DAC (1) (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Components of Realized Gain (Loss), Pre-Tax | |||||||||
| Total operating realized gain (loss) | $ | 201 | $ | 199 | $ | 208 | |||
| Total excluded realized gain (loss) | 135 | (411 | ) | (721 | ) | ||||
| Total realized gain (loss), pre-tax | $ | 336 | $ | (212 | ) | $ | (513 | ) | |
| Components of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss), | |||||||||
| After-Tax | |||||||||
| Credit loss benefit (expense) on mortgage loans on | |||||||||
| real estate | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 79 | $ | (85 | ) | |
| Credit loss benefit (expense) on reinsurance-related assets | (99 | ) | 1 | - | |||||
| Credit loss benefit (expense) on other financial assets | (12 | ) | (9 | ) | (20 | ) | |||
| Realized gain (loss) related to certain financial assets | (67 | ) | (14 | ) | (35 | ) | |||
| Realized gain (loss) on equity securities | 13 | 32 | 4 | ||||||
| Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on | |||||||||
| certain instruments (2) | 48 | 60 | 33 | ||||||
| Total realized gain (loss) related to financial instruments | |||||||||
| and reinsurance-related assets | (124 | ) | 149 | (103 | ) | ||||
| Variable annuity net derivative results: | |||||||||
| Hedge program performance, including unlocking | |||||||||
| for GLB reserves hedged and benefit ratio unlocking | (588 | ) | (109 | ) | (564 | ) | |||
| GLB NPR component | 17 | (195 | ) | 293 | |||||
| Total variable annuity net derivative results | (571 | ) | (304 | ) | (271 | ) | |||
| Indexed annuity forward-starting option | 4 | 26 | (2 | ) | |||||
| Excluded realized gain (loss), including benefit | |||||||||
| ratio unlocking | (691 | ) | (129 | ) | (376 | ) | |||
| Less: benefit ratio unlocking on GDB | |||||||||
| and GLB riders | (798 | ) | 196 | 194 | |||||
| Total excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax | $ | 107 | $ | (325 | ) | $ | (570 | ) |
(1)DAC refers to the associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds and funds withheld reinsurance assets and liabilities.
(2)The modified coinsurance investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivatives related to the modified coinsurance investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). See Note 8 for more information.
Comparison of 2022 to 2021
We had higher realized losses due primarily to the following:
Unfavorable variable annuity net derivative results driven by unfavorable hedge program performance due to more volatile capital markets, partially offset by a favorable GLB NPR component due to credit spreads widening and our associated reserves increasing.
Losses related to an increase in the credit loss allowance for reinsurance-related assets in 2022 due to updates to policyholder behavior assumptions that impacted ceded reserves.
Losses related to an increase in the credit loss allowance for mortgage loans on real estate in 2022 compared to a decrease in 2021 due to changes in economic projections.
Lower gains related to the indexed annuity forward-starting option driven primarily by an increase of option costs and other items, partially offset by the effect of unlocking.
Lower gains on equity securities due to unfavorable equity market performance in 2022 compared to favorable equity market performance in 2021.
Lower gains on the mark-to-market on certain instruments driven by declines in trading securities due to increases in interest rates, partially offset by gains on certain derivatives.
72
Table of Contents
The above components of excluded realized gain (loss) are described including benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
Operating Realized Gain (Loss)
Operating realized gain (loss) includes indexed annuity and IUL net derivative results representing the net difference between the change in the fair value of the options that we hold and a portion of the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL products. The portion of the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities reported in operating realized gain (loss) represents the amount that is credited to the indexed annuity and IUL contracts.
Our GWB, GIB and 4LATER® features have elements of both benefit reserves and embedded derivative reserves. We calculate the value of the benefit reserves and the embedded derivative reserves based on the specific characteristics of each GLB feature. For our GLBs that meet the definition of an embedded derivative under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC, we record them at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair value recorded in realized gain (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). In bifurcating the embedded derivative, we attribute to the embedded derivative the portion of total fees collected from the contract holder that relates to the GLB riders (the “attributed fees”). These attributed fees represent the present value of future claims expected to be paid for the GLB at the inception of the contract (the “net valuation premium”) plus a margin that a theoretical market participant would include for risk/profit (the “risk/profit margin”).
We also include the risk/profit margin portion of the GLB attributed rider fees in operating realized gain (loss) and include the net valuation premium of the GLB attributed rider fees in excluded realized gain (loss). For our Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments, the excess of total fees collected from the contract holders over the GLB attributed rider fees is reported in fee income.
Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Financial Instruments and Reinsurance-Related Assets
For information on realized gain (loss) related to financial instruments and reinsurance-related assets, see Note 15.
Gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments, including those associated with our consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) represents changes in the fair values of certain derivative investments (not including those associated with our variable annuity net derivative results), reinsurance-related embedded derivatives and trading securities.
See Note 3 for information about our consolidated VIEs.
We also recognize the mark-to-market on certain mortgage loans on real estate for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 20 for additional information.
Variable Annuity Net Derivative Results
Our variable annuity net derivative results include the net valuation premium, the change in the GLB embedded derivative reserves and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge them, including the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments. In addition, these results include the changes in reserves not accounted for at fair value and results from benefit ratio unlocking on our GDB and GLB riders and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge the benefit ratio unlocking on our GDB and GLB riders.
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to the risks and earnings volatility that result from changes in the GLB embedded derivative reserves. The change in fair value of these derivative instruments is designed to generally offset the change in embedded derivative reserves. Our variable annuity net derivative results can be volatile, especially when sudden and significant changes in equity markets and/or interest rates occur. We do not attempt to hedge the change in the NPR component of the liability. The NPR factors affect the discount rate used in the calculation of the GLB embedded derivative reserve. Our methodology for calculating the NPR component of the embedded derivative reserve utilizes an extrapolated 30-year NPR spread curve applied to a series of expected cash flows over the expected life of the embedded derivative. Our cash flows consist of both expected fees to be received from contract holders and benefits to be paid, and these cash flows are different on a pre- and post-NPR basis. We utilize a model based on our holding company’s credit default swap (“CDS”) spread adjusted to reflect the credit quality of our insurance subsidiary as the issuing entity. Because the guaranteed benefit liabilities are contained within our insurance subsidiaries, we apply items, such as the effect of our insurance subsidiaries’ claims-paying ratings compared to holding company credit risk and the over-collateralization of insurance liabilities, in order to determine factors that are representative of a theoretical market participant’s view of the NPR of the specific liability within our insurance subsidiaries.
73
Table of Contents
Details underlying our variable annuity hedging program (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of | As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Variable annuity hedge program assets (liabilities) | $ | 1,928 | $ | 1,952 | $ | 1,623 | $ | 625 | $ | 721 | ||||||||||
| Variable annuity reserves – asset (liability): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Embedded derivative reserves, pre-NPR (1) | $ | 1,513 | $ | 1,180 | $ | 1,136 | $ | 1,699 | $ | 1,818 | ||||||||||
| NPR | 40 | 145 | 164 | 46 | 17 | |||||||||||||||
| Embedded derivative reserves | 1,553 | 1,325 | 1,300 | 1,745 | 1,835 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance benefit reserves | (2,468 | ) | (2,668 | ) | (2,349 | ) | (1,547 | ) | (1,231 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total variable annuity reserves – asset (liability) | $ | (915 | ) | $ | (1,343 | ) | $ | (1,049 | ) | $ | 198 | $ | 604 | |||||||
| 10-year CDS spread | 2.31% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 1.15% | |||||||||||||||
| NPR factor related to 10-year CDS spread | 1.58% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 0.99% | 0.70% |
(1)Embedded derivative reserves in an asset (liability) position indicate we estimate the present value of future benefits to be less (greater) than the present value of future net valuation premiums.
The following shows the hypothetical effect (in millions) to net income (loss) for changes in the NPR factor along all points on the spread curve as of December 31, 2022:
| Hypothetical | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | ||||
| NPR factor: | ||||
| Down 158 basis points to zero | $ | (180 | ) | |
| Up 20 basis points | 9 |
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Future Contract Benefits – GLB” above for additional information about our guaranteed benefits.
Indexed Annuity Forward-Starting Option
The liability for the forward-starting option reflects changes in the fair value of embedded derivative liabilities related to index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products accounted for under the Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indications of volatility and interest rates, which can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and therefore can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
74
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
| Percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investments | |||||||||||||
| As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Investments | |||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 99,736 | $ | 118,746 | 75.7% | 77.3% | |||||||
| Trading securities | 3,498 | 4,482 | 2.7% | 2.9% | |||||||||
| Equity securities | 427 | 318 | 0.3% | 0.2% | |||||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 18,301 | 17,991 | 13.9% | 11.7% | |||||||||
| Policy loans | 2,359 | 2,364 | 1.8% | 1.5% | |||||||||
| Derivative investments | 3,736 | 5,437 | 2.8% | 3.6% | |||||||||
| Alternative investments | 3,021 | 2,666 | 2.3% | 1.7% | |||||||||
| Other investments | 718 | 1,626 | 0.5% | 1.1% | |||||||||
| Total investments | $ | 131,796 | $ | 153,630 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly-owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
75
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 4; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 4.
| As of December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | ||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | ||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | |||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | |||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 17,762 | $ | 133 | $ | 1,998 | $ | 15,897 | 15.9% | ||||
| Basic industry | 4,352 | 45 | 478 | 3,919 | 3.9% | ||||||||
| Capital goods | 7,374 | 63 | 884 | 6,553 | 6.6% | ||||||||
| Communications | 4,239 | 72 | 519 | 3,792 | 3.8% | ||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 6,056 | 40 | 698 | 5,398 | 5.4% | ||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 17,080 | 184 | 2,395 | 14,869 | 14.9% | ||||||||
| Energy | 4,776 | 53 | 485 | 4,344 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| Technology | 5,581 | 27 | 675 | 4,933 | 4.9% | ||||||||
| Transportation | 3,666 | 19 | 421 | 3,264 | 3.3% | ||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,330 | 3 | 416 | 1,917 | 1.9% | ||||||||
| Utilities | 14,204 | 111 | 1,822 | 12,493 | 12.5% | ||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,820 | 37 | 213 | 1,644 | 1.6% | ||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,451 | 3 | 166 | 1,288 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 364 | 18 | 14 | 368 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 394 | 1 | 42 | 353 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 15 | - | - | 15 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,902 | 3 | 246 | 1,659 | 1.7% | ||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (“ABS”): | |||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 8,497 | 1 | 671 | 7,827 | 7.8% | ||||||||
| Credit card | 85 | 6 | 1 | 90 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Home equity | 196 | 27 | 4 | 219 | 0.2% | ||||||||
| Other | 3,014 | 4 | 250 | 2,768 | 2.8% | ||||||||
| Municipals: | |||||||||||||
| Taxable | 5,319 | 171 | 506 | 4,984 | 5.0% | ||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 91 | 1 | 6 | 86 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Government: | |||||||||||||
| United States | 405 | 5 | 31 | 379 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Foreign | 348 | 17 | 47 | 318 | 0.3% | ||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 364 | 25 | 30 | 359 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 111,685 | 1,069 | 13,018 | 99,736 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 3,833 | 44 | 379 | 3,498 | |||||||||
| Equity Securities | 383 | 104 | 60 | 427 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 115,901 | $ | 1,217 | $ | 13,457 | $ | 103,661 |
76
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | ||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | ||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | |||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | |||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 16,438 | $ | 1,981 | $ | 81 | $ | 18,338 | 15.4% | ||||
| Basic industry | 4,436 | 741 | 11 | 5,166 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| Capital goods | 7,316 | 1,040 | 31 | 8,325 | 7.0% | ||||||||
| Communications | 4,124 | 734 | 7 | 4,851 | 4.1% | ||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,811 | 616 | 22 | 6,405 | 5.4% | ||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 16,905 | 2,565 | 83 | 19,387 | 16.3% | ||||||||
| Energy | 4,932 | 728 | 13 | 5,647 | 4.8% | ||||||||
| Technology | 5,173 | 546 | 34 | 5,685 | 4.8% | ||||||||
| Transportation | 3,414 | 423 | 11 | 3,826 | 3.2% | ||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,159 | 174 | 11 | 2,322 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Utilities | 13,785 | 2,250 | 38 | 15,997 | 13.5% | ||||||||
| Government-related entities | 1,863 | 315 | 7 | 2,171 | 1.8% | ||||||||
| CMOs: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,544 | 123 | 1 | 1,666 | 1.4% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 360 | 52 | 1 | 411 | 0.3% | ||||||||
| MPTS: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 429 | 21 | 2 | 448 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| CMBS: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 20 | - | - | 20 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,532 | 61 | 14 | 1,579 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| ABS: | |||||||||||||
| CLOs | 6,356 | 11 | 49 | 6,318 | 5.3% | ||||||||
| Credit card | 82 | 24 | 1 | 105 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Home equity | 236 | 54 | - | 290 | 0.2% | ||||||||
| Other | 1,765 | 38 | 4 | 1,799 | 1.5% | ||||||||
| Municipals: | |||||||||||||
| Taxable | 5,250 | 1,290 | 12 | 6,528 | 5.5% | ||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 72 | 21 | - | 93 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Government: | |||||||||||||
| United States | 375 | 60 | 2 | 433 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Foreign | 373 | 64 | 5 | 432 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 408 | 107 | 11 | 504 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 105,158 | 14,039 | 451 | 118,746 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 4,170 | 343 | 31 | 4,482 | |||||||||
| Equity Securities | 285 | 55 | 22 | 318 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 109,613 | $ | 14,437 | $ | 504 | $ | 123,546 |
(1)Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2)Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
77
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to the balances of DAC, VOBA, DFEL, future contract benefits, other contract holder funds and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to AOCI. For instance, DAC is adjusted upon the recognition of unrealized gains or losses because the amortization of DAC is based upon an assumed emergence of gross profits on certain insurance business. Deferred income tax balances are also adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2022 | As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Agency | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||
| NAIC | Equivalent | Amortized | Fair | % of | Amortized | Fair | % of | |||||||||||
| Designation (1) | Designation (1) | Cost | Value | Total | Cost | Value | Total | |||||||||||
| Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AAA / AA / A | $ | 63,741 | $ | 56,892 | 57.0% | $ | 58,542 | $ | 66,571 | 56.1% | |||||||
| 2 | BBB | 44,103 | 39,230 | 39.4% | 42,797 | 48,130 | 40.5% | |||||||||||
| Total investment grade securities | 107,844 | 96,122 | 96.4% | 101,339 | 114,701 | 96.6% | ||||||||||||
| Below Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | BB | 2,101 | 1,938 | 1.9% | 2,278 | 2,492 | 2.1% | |||||||||||
| 4 | B | 1,679 | 1,620 | 1.6% | 1,424 | 1,441 | 1.2% | |||||||||||
| 5 | CCC and lower | 59 | 53 | 0.1% | 51 | 53 | 0.0% | |||||||||||
| 6 | In or near default | 2 | 3 | 0.0% | 66 | 59 | 0.1% | |||||||||||
| Total below investment grade securities | 3,841 | 3,614 | 3.6% | 3,819 | 4,045 | 3.4% | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 111,685 | $ | 99,736 | 100.0% | $ | 105,158 | $ | 118,746 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Total securities below investment | ||||||||||||||||||
| grade as a percentage of total | ||||||||||||||||||
| fixed maturity AFS securities | 3.4% | 3.6% | 3.6% | 3.4% |
(1)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, 97% and 94%, respectively, of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. See Note 4 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2022, increased by $12.6 billion since December 31, 2021. For further information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.
78
Table of Contents
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2022, did not require an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
The current economic environment and market conditions;
Our business strategy and current business plans;
The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;
The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts;
The capital risk limits approved by management; and
Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(15) million and $(11) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
Historical and implied volatility of the security;
The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
For information on credit loss impairment on fixed maturity AFS securities, see Notes 1, 4 and 15.
As reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $143.1 billion of liabilities for future obligations under insurance policies and
contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers, which exceeded investments and cash and invested cash, which totaled $135.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of $16.6 billion as of December 31, 2022, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business. For additional discussion, see “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $19.0 billion and $20.7 billion, respectively, representing 14% and 13% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 8 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages
79
Table of Contents
backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of $2.3 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, and a net unrealized gain (loss) of $(195) million and $245 million, respectively.
80
Table of Contents
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $191 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $183 million, or 96%, and trading securities represented $8 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2022. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2022:
| Subprime/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency | Prime | Alt-A | Option ARM (1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,641 | $ | 190 | $ | 182 | $ | 65 | $ | 70 | $ | 109 | $ | 116 | $ | 2,209 | $ | 2,009 | |||||||||
| ABS home equity | 1 | - | 18 | 19 | 18 | 26 | 159 | 174 | 196 | 219 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (2)(3) | $ | 1,846 | $ | 1,641 | $ | 208 | $ | 201 | $ | 83 | $ | 96 | $ | 268 | $ | 290 | $ | 2,405 | $ | 2,228 | |||||||||
| Rating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,495 | $ | 1,333 | $ | 104 | $ | 100 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | $ | 1,605 | $ | 1,439 | |||||||||
| AA | 345 | 302 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 362 | 319 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | - | - | 8 | 8 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BBB | - | - | 31 | 27 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 42 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BB and below | - | - | 64 | 65 | 73 | 86 | 244 | 266 | 381 | 417 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by rating (2)(3)(4) | $ | 1,846 | $ | 1,641 | $ | 208 | $ | 201 | $ | 83 | $ | 96 | $ | 268 | $ | 290 | $ | 2,405 | $ | 2,228 | |||||||||
| Origination Year | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 and prior | $ | 341 | $ | 338 | $ | 84 | $ | 85 | $ | 83 | $ | 96 | $ | 268 | $ | 290 | $ | 776 | $ | 809 | |||||||||
| 2013 | 112 | 101 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 112 | 101 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 49 | 45 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 50 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 145 | 128 | 15 | 14 | - | - | - | - | 160 | 142 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 459 | 387 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 459 | 387 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 220 | 194 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 220 | 194 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 180 | 166 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 180 | 166 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 158 | 131 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 158 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 67 | 55 | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 70 | 58 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 89 | 72 | 33 | 28 | - | - | - | - | 122 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 26 | 24 | 72 | 70 | - | - | - | - | 98 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by origination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| year (2)(3) | $ | 1,846 | $ | 1,641 | $ | 208 | $ | 201 | $ | 83 | $ | 96 | $ | 268 | $ | 290 | $ | 2,405 | $ | 2,228 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.2% | 2.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.5% | 0.6% |
(1)Includes the net amortized cost and fair value of option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”) within RMBS, totaling $101 million and $107 million, respectively.
(2)Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $120 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $120 million in trading securities consisted of $110 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $9 million subprime.
(3)Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $102 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $102 million in trading securities consisted of $93 million prime, $1 million Alt-A and $8 million subprime.
(4)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
81
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2022:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||
| Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | ||||||||||||
| Type | |||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 1,844 | $ | 1,614 | $ | 73 | $ | 60 | $ | 1,917 | $ | 1,674 | |||||
| Rating | |||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,354 | $ | 1,218 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 1,370 | $ | 1,233 | |||||
| AA | 490 | 396 | 53 | 41 | 543 | 437 | |||||||||||
| A | - | - | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Total by rating (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,844 | $ | 1,614 | $ | 73 | $ | 60 | $ | 1,917 | $ | 1,674 | |||||
| Origination Year | |||||||||||||||||
| 2012 and prior | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | $ | 11 | $ | 10 | $ | 23 | $ | 22 | |||||
| 2013 | 80 | 79 | - | - | 80 | 79 | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 15 | 14 | - | - | 15 | 14 | |||||||||||
| 2015 | 28 | 26 | - | - | 28 | 26 | |||||||||||
| 2016 | 111 | 100 | 4 | 4 | 115 | 104 | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 355 | 327 | - | - | 355 | 327 | |||||||||||
| 2018 | 194 | 181 | - | - | 194 | 181 | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 350 | 309 | - | - | 350 | 309 | |||||||||||
| 2020 | 259 | 207 | 5 | 4 | 264 | 211 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 235 | 177 | 39 | 30 | 274 | 207 | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 205 | 182 | 14 | 12 | 219 | 194 | |||||||||||
| Total by origination year (1)(2) | $ | 1,844 | $ | 1,614 | $ | 73 | $ | 60 | $ | 1,917 | $ | 1,674 | |||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||||||||||||||
| commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 1.7% | 1.7% |
(1)Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $160 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $160 million in trading securities consisted of $120 million of multiple property CMBS and $40 million of single property CMBS.
(2)Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $137 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $137 million in trading securities consisted of $101 million of multiple property CMBS and $36 million of single property CMBS.
(3)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
As of December 31, 2022, the net amortized cost and fair value of our fixed maturity AFS exposure to monoline insurers was $306 million and $296 million, respectively.
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings.
82
Table of Contents
The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2022, was as follows:
| % | % | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Net | Gross | Gross | % | ||||||||||
| Amortized | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||
| Cost | Cost | Losses | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| Healthcare | $ | 6,229 | 6.5% | $ | 1,238 | 9.5% | $ | 4,991 | 6.0% | |||||
| Electric | 8,233 | 8.6% | 1,216 | 9.3% | 7,017 | 8.4% | ||||||||
| ABS | 10,559 | 11.0% | 904 | 6.9% | 9,655 | 11.6% | ||||||||
| Banking | 6,967 | 7.2% | 765 | 5.9% | 6,202 | 7.5% | ||||||||
| Technology | 5,142 | 5.3% | 675 | 5.2% | 4,467 | 5.4% | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 4,293 | 4.5% | 613 | 4.7% | 3,680 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 2,756 | 2.9% | 518 | 4.0% | 2,238 | 2.7% | ||||||||
| Manufacturing | 3,066 | 3.2% | 422 | 3.2% | 2,644 | 3.2% | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 2,237 | 2.3% | 422 | 3.2% | 1,815 | 2.2% | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 1,901 | 2.0% | 320 | 2.5% | 1,581 | 1.9% | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 2,642 | 2.7% | 317 | 2.4% | 2,325 | 2.8% | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 1,983 | 2.1% | 306 | 2.4% | 1,677 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Chemicals | 2,296 | 2.4% | 305 | 2.3% | 1,991 | 2.4% | ||||||||
| Retail | 1,983 | 2.1% | 282 | 2.2% | 1,701 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 2,327 | 2.4% | 268 | 2.1% | 2,059 | 2.5% | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 1,879 | 2.0% | 258 | 2.0% | 1,621 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Life | 1,627 | 1.7% | 257 | 2.0% | 1,370 | 1.6% | ||||||||
| Non-agency CMBS | 1,782 | 1.9% | 246 | 1.9% | 1,536 | 1.8% | ||||||||
| Midstream | 1,853 | 1.9% | 224 | 1.7% | 1,629 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 1,483 | 1.5% | 201 | 1.5% | 1,282 | 1.5% | ||||||||
| Utility – other | 1,100 | 1.1% | 187 | 1.4% | 913 | 1.1% | ||||||||
| Consumer products | 1,259 | 1.3% | 175 | 1.3% | 1,084 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| Wirelines | 1,151 | 1.2% | 174 | 1.3% | 977 | 1.2% | ||||||||
| Automotive | 1,565 | 1.6% | 172 | 1.3% | 1,393 | 1.7% | ||||||||
| Railroads | 953 | 1.0% | 139 | 1.1% | 814 | 1.0% | ||||||||
| Wireless | 844 | 0.9% | 136 | 1.0% | 708 | 0.9% | ||||||||
| Integrated | 925 | 1.0% | 134 | 1.0% | 791 | 1.0% | ||||||||
| Government sponsored | 541 | 0.6% | 127 | 1.0% | 414 | 0.5% | ||||||||
| Metals and mining | 960 | 1.0% | 115 | 0.9% | 845 | 1.0% | ||||||||
| Entertainment | 835 | 0.9% | 108 | 0.8% | 727 | 0.9% | ||||||||
| Project finance | 957 | 0.9% | 102 | 0.9% | 855 | 1.0% | ||||||||
| Building materials | 876 | 0.9% | 102 | 0.8% | 774 | 0.9% | ||||||||
| Cable – satellite | 646 | 0.7% | 101 | 0.8% | 545 | 0.7% | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | ||||||||||||||
| less than $100 million | 12,290 | 12.7% | 1,489 | 11.5% | 10,801 | 12.9% | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 96,140 | 100.0% | $ | 13,018 | 100.0% | $ | 83,122 | 100.0% | |||||
| Total by industry as a percentage of | ||||||||||||||
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 86.1% | 100.0% | 83.3% |
As of December 31, 2022, the net amortized cost and fair value of securities subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss position was $58 million and $55 million, respectively.
83
Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||
| Current | $ | 16,987 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 18,366 | 99.8% | |||
| Delinquent (1) | - | 13 | 13 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | - | 21 | 21 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 16,987 | 1,413 | 18,400 | 100.0% | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (84 | ) | (15 | ) | (99 | ) | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 16,903 | $ | 1,398 | $ | 18,301 |
| As of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,168 | $ | 889 | $ | 18,057 | 99.8% | |||
| Delinquent (1) | - | 14 | 14 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | - | 16 | 16 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,168 | 919 | 18,087 | 100.0% | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (79 | ) | (17 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,089 | $ | 902 | $ | 17,991 |
(1)As of December 31, 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 24 residential mortgage loans were delinquent. As of December 31, 2021, 2 commercial mortgage loans and 31 residential mortgage loans were delinquent.
(2)As of December 31, 2022, no commercial mortgage loans and 49 residential mortgage loans were in foreclosure. As of December 31, 2021, no commercial mortgage loans and 34 residential mortgage loans were in foreclosure.
As of December 31, 2022, there were 2 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of less than $1 million and 37 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $16 million. As of December 31, 2021, there were 4 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $1 million and 50 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $22 million.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, was less than $1 million. The total outstanding principal and interest on residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent, excluding foreclosures, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $13 million and $14 million, respectively.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| As of | As of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Segment | |||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | 3,536 | $ | 3,890 | |||
| Annuities | 7,008 | 6,732 | |||||
| Group Protection | 1,417 | 1,435 | |||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 4,253 | 4,326 | |||||
| Other Operations | 2,087 | 1,608 | |||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 18,301 | $ | 17,991 |
84
Table of Contents
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
| As of December 31, 2022 | As of December 31, 2022 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||
| Value | % | Value | % | |||||||
| Property Type | State | |||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,445 | 32.2% | CA | $ | 4,641 | 27.5% | |||
| Industrial | 4,071 | 24.1% | TX | 1,569 | 9.3% | |||||
| Office building | 3,588 | 21.2% | NY | 1,011 | 6.0% | |||||
| Retail | 2,595 | 15.4% | PA | 869 | 5.1% | |||||
| Other commercial | 773 | 4.6% | FL | 788 | 4.7% | |||||
| Hotel/motel | 226 | 1.3% | MD | 704 | 4.3% | |||||
| Mixed use | 205 | 1.2% | WA | 662 | 3.9% | |||||
| Total | $ | 16,903 | 100.0% | AZ | 615 | 3.6% | ||||
| Geographic Region | GA | 614 | 3.6% | |||||||
| Pacific | 5,633 | 33.3% | TN | 548 | 3.2% | |||||
| South Atlantic | 3,427 | 20.3% | OH | 423 | 2.5% | |||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,153 | 12.7% | VA | 412 | 2.4% | |||||
| West South Central | 1,706 | 10.1% | NC | 402 | 2.4% | |||||
| Mountain | 1,231 | 7.3% | WI | 358 | 2.1% | |||||
| East North Central | 1,218 | 7.2% | OR | 329 | 1.9% | |||||
| East South Central | 671 | 4.0% | SC | 306 | 1.8% | |||||
| West North Central | 461 | 2.7% | IL | 302 | 1.8% | |||||
| New England | 371 | 2.2% | Non U.S. | 32 | 0.2% | |||||
| Non U.S. | 32 | 0.2% | All other states | 2,318 | 13.7% | |||||
| Total | $ | 16,903 | 100.0% | Total | $ | 16,903 | 100.0% |
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Principal Repayment Year | ||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 800 | $ | 17 | $ | 817 | 4.4% | |||
| 2024 | 973 | 18 | 991 | 5.4% | ||||||
| 2025 | 1,044 | 19 | 1,063 | 5.8% | ||||||
| 2026 | 1,400 | 20 | 1,420 | 7.7% | ||||||
| 2027 | 1,681 | 22 | 1,703 | 9.3% | ||||||
| 2028 and thereafter | 11,124 | 1,281 | 12,405 | 67.4% | ||||||
| Total | $ | 17,022 | $ | 1,377 | $ | 18,399 | 100.0% |
See Note 4 for information regarding our loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
85
Table of Contents
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Life Insurance | $ | 47 | $ | 522 | $ | 140 | ||
| Annuities | 8 | 63 | 23 | |||||
| Group Protection | 5 | 41 | 15 | |||||
| Retirement Plan Services | 4 | 38 | 14 | |||||
| Other Operations | 2 | 15 | 5 | |||||
| Total (1) | $ | 66 | $ | 679 | $ | 197 |
(1)Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, alternative investments included investments in 337 and 311 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 2% of total investments. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing was $11 million and $14 million, respectively.
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Net Investment Income | |||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 4,469 | $ | 4,351 | $ | 4,334 | |||
| Trading securities | 182 | 167 | 202 | ||||||
| Equity securities | 11 | 3 | 3 | ||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 689 | 680 | 677 | ||||||
| Policy loans | 101 | 115 | 125 | ||||||
| Cash and invested cash | 13 | - | 12 | ||||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment | |||||||||
| and bond make-whole premiums (1) | 105 | 199 | 82 | ||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 66 | 679 | 197 | ||||||
| Consent fees | 8 | 10 | 7 | ||||||
| Other investments | 79 | 64 | 46 | ||||||
| Investment income | 5,723 | 6,268 | 5,685 | ||||||
| Investment expense | (212 | ) | (153 | ) | (175 | ) | |||
| Net investment income | $ | 5,511 | $ | 6,115 | $ | 5,510 |
(1)See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
86
Table of Contents
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Interest Rate Yield | |||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on | |||||
| real estate and other, net of investment expenses | 3.87% | 3.92% | 4.12% | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | |||||
| bond make-whole premiums | 0.08% | 0.15% | 0.06% | ||
| Alternative investments | 0.05% | 0.51% | 0.16% | ||
| Net investment income yield on invested assets | 4.00% | 4.58% | 4.34% |
We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the contract holder on our average fixed account values, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek life and annuity reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. The consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” reflect insurance premiums, insurance fees, benefits and DAC amortization net of insurance ceded. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements. For information regarding reserve financing and LOC expenses from inter-company reinsurance agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Material Cash Outflows” below.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an AM Best rating of A+ or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
As a result of our modified coinsurance agreement with Athene to reinsure fixed annuity products, we reported a $3.8 billion deposit asset within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022. For additional information, see Note 8.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2022, 83%, or $16.6 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $16.4 billion was held by reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), $130 million was held in our funds withheld portfolios and $93 million was secured by LOCs for which we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement. The total in our funds withheld portfolios was $2.3 billion and reported in other
87
Table of Contents
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022. The excess funds withheld represent funds above the reinsurance recoverable from our reinsurers.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, LNL and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.7 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2022. LNL must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $1.1 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2022. LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least 160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by which we established $612 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2022, LLANY must maintain an AM Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of these arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 8 and 13 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital –Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and statutory earnings performance. Based on the sources of liquidity available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs.
Capital
Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below. Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets may materially affect our business operations and results of operations. These poor market conditions may reduce our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC.
Reductions to our subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC may cause them to retain more capital, which may pressure their ability to pay dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. As a result of the charge taken in connection with the annual assumption review in the third quarter of 2022, we expect an approximate $300 million statutory capital impact in the
88
Table of Contents
fourth quarter of 2022 that will reduce our RBC ratio by approximately 12 points. We believe we have adequate capital to operate our business as we replenish statutory capital back to our targeted levels. For more information, see “Subsidiaries’ Capital” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, issuance of debt or other types of securities and contract holder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed below. Our primary uses are to pay policy claims and benefits, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our common and preferred stockholders, to repurchase our common stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $4.0 billion, $151 million and $534 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common and preferred stock dividends, common stock repurchases, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Dividends from Subsidiaries | ||||||||
| LNL | $ | 645 | $ | 1,910 | $ | 660 | ||
| First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company | 22 | 45 | - | |||||
| Lincoln Investment Management Company | 38 | 20 | 25 | |||||
| Lincoln National Management Corporation | 7 | 10 | 5 | |||||
| Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited | 85 | 75 | 150 | |||||
| Total dividends from subsidiaries | $ | 797 | $ | 2,060 | $ | 840 | ||
| Interest from Subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Interest on inter-company notes | $ | 118 | $ | 111 | $ | 123 |
See Note 19 for information on the increase in dividends from LNL in 2021. The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, issuance of preferred stock, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend, along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits. LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains.
89
Table of Contents
Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $1.7 billion in 2023 without prior approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.”
Subsidiaries’ Capital
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus will affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying capacity. For a discussion of the actions management is taking to rebuild statutory capital, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Rebuilding Risk-Based Capital.” For additional information on RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our insurance subsidiaries’ regulatory capital levels are affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. Our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves calculated pursuant to Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”). Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by AG38 by reinsuring the business to reinsurance captives. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2022, was $1.8 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance arrangements for UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 12. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $3.9 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves as of December 31, 2022; of this amount, $3.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 3. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves established for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates and are affected by the level of account values relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Our insurance subsidiaries’ cede a portion of the guaranteed benefit riders to Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited (“LNBAR”) through inter-company reinsurance arrangements. Our variable annuity hedge program in LNBAR seeks to hedge our exposure to selected risk and income statement volatility caused by changes in the capital markets associated with the variable annuity guarantees. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and derivative instruments hedging these reserves. The capital markets environment in 2022 led to market volatility and increased hedge breakage that has impacted capital in LNBAR. As a result, we did not take dividends out of LNBAR after the first quarter of 2022. In December 2022, LNC issued a $500 million long-term note to a non-affiliated variable interest entity in exchange for a corporate bond AFS security of like principal and duration. LNC contributed the security to LNBAR to address asset value volatility based on market conditions. There are no impacts to the LNC Consolidated Balance Sheets based on the set-off right provided in the transaction. For more information, see Note 3.
In September 2022, we announced enhancements to our variable annuity hedge program that continues to focus on generating sufficient assets to fund future claims with a goal of maximizing distributable earnings and explicitly protecting capital. The revised variable annuity hedge program, effective January 1, 2023, aligns with our increased strategic focus on maximizing the economic value as measured by distributable earnings, which is achieved by managing risks to capital generation due to market volatility. For additional information on our variable annuity hedge program, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Variable Annuity Hedge
90
Table of Contents
Program.” For risks related to our variable annuity hedge program, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Our hedging strategies may not be fully effective to offset the changes in the carrying value of the guarantees on certain of our products, which could result in volatility in our results of operations and financial condition under GAAP and in the capital levels of our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries.”
We also use long-dated LOCs or other capital market solutions to reduce the potential strain caused by temporary mismatches between movements in the statutory reserves and derivative instruments for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders reinsured to LNBAR. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2022, was $1.6 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance arrangements for variable annuity guaranteed benefit riders. For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 12.
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital among our insurance subsidiaries, including our captive reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and variable universal life insurance separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also increases. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries may also decrease, which will affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
We continue to analyze the use of our existing captive reinsurance structures, as well as additional third-party reinsurance arrangements, and our hedging strategies relative to managing the effects of equity markets and interest rates on the statutory reserves, statutory capital and the dividend capacity of our life insurance subsidiaries.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2022, were as follows:
| Maturities, | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repayments | in Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | and | Value | Other | Ending | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance | Issuance | Refinancing | Hedges | Changes (1) | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt (2) | $ | 300 | $ | - | $ | (300 | ) | $ | - | $ | 500 | $ | 500 | ||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 4,867 | $ | 300 | $ | - | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (514 | ) | $ | 4,497 | |||||||
| Term loans | 250 | - | - | - | - | 250 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes (3) | 995 | - | - | - | - | 995 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital securities (3) | 213 | - | - | - | - | 213 | |||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 6,325 | $ | 300 | $ | - | $ | (156 | ) | $ | (514 | ) | $ | 5,955 |
(1)Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2)As of December 31, 2022, consisted of $500 million principal amount of our 4.00% Senior Notes due September 1, 2023.
(3)To hedge the variability in rates, we purchased interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining terms of the subordinated notes and capital securities.
On March 1, 2022, we completed the issuance and sale of $300 million aggregate principal amount of our 3.40% Senior Notes due 2032. We intend to use the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of debt on or prior to its maturity.
LNC made interest payments to service debt of $298 million, $294 million and $277 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities, see Note 12.
91
Table of Contents
Preferred Stock
In November 2022, we raised approximately $1 billion through the issuance of preferred stock, $780 million of which was contributed to LNL in the fourth quarter to strengthen LNL’s statutory capital. We intend to use the remaining proceeds to fund part of the repayment upon maturity of our 4.00% Senior Notes due September 1, 2023. For additional information, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Rebuild Risk-Based Capital Ratio” above and Note 14.
Capital Contributions to Subsidiaries
LNC made capital contributions to subsidiaries of $925 million, $65 million and $518 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. The amount and timing of share repurchases depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of dividends from our subsidiaries and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. We paused our common stock repurchases under our buyback program beginning in the fourth quarter of 2022, and we expect the pause to continue through the end of 2023. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Dividends to common stockholders | $ | 310 | $ | 319 | $ | 311 | ||
| Repurchase of common stock | 550 | 1,105 | 275 | |||||
| Total cash returned to common stockholders | $ | 860 | $ | 1,424 | $ | 586 | ||
| Number of shares repurchased | 8.7 | 16.2 | 4.9 |
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
In order to manage our capital more efficiently, we have an inter-company cash management program where certain subsidiaries can lend to or borrow from the holding company to meet short-term borrowing needs. The cash management program is essentially a series of demand loans between LNC and participating subsidiaries that reduces overall borrowing costs by allowing LNC and its subsidiaries to access internal resources instead of incurring third-party transaction costs. As of December 31, 2022, the holding company had a net outstanding receivable (payable) of $62 million from (to) certain subsidiaries resulting from loans made by subsidiaries in excess of amounts placed (borrowed) by the holding company and subsidiaries in the inter-company cash management account. Any change in holding company cash management program balances is offset by the immediate and equal change in holding company cash and invested cash. Loans under the cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
LNC entered into a facility agreement in 2020 with a Delaware trust that gives LNC the right over a 10-year period to issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of 2.330% senior notes to the trust in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by the trust. By agreeing to purchase the 2.330% senior notes in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities upon exercise of the issuance right, the trust will provide a source of liquid assets for the Company. The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure to make certain payments to the trust, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving LNC. We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below a minimum threshold (which was $2.75 billion as of December 31, 2022, and is subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases) and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement. For additional information, see Note 12.
92
Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of December 31, 2022, LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility and maximum available borrowing based on qualifying assets of $6.1 billion. As of December 31, 2022, LNL had outstanding borrowings of $3.1 billion under this facility reported within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31, 2022, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Securities Lending Programs and Repurchase Agreements
Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can access liquidity through securities lending programs and repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2022, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $298 million. In addition, our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to $2.25 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which $25 million was utilized as of December 31, 2022. The cash received in our securities lending programs and repurchase agreements is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures hedged. As of December 31, 2022, we were in a net collateral payable position of $3.1 billion compared to $4.9 billion as of December 31, 2021. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to post collateral with a counterparty. If we do not have sufficient high-quality securities or cash and invested cash to provide as collateral, we have committed liquidity sources through facilities that can provide up to $1.25 billion of additional liquidity to help meet collateral needs. Access to such facilities is contingent upon interest rates having achieved certain threshold levels. In addition to these facilities, we have the facility agreement for senior notes issuance, the FHLB facilities and the repurchase agreements discussed above as well as the five-year revolving credit facility discussed in Note 12 to leverage that would be eligible for collateral posting. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 5.
93
Table of Contents
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2022, were as follows:
| Less | More | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | Than | |||||||||||
| 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||
| Future contract benefits and other contract holder | ||||||||||||||
| obligations (1) | $ | 22,681 | $ | 46,546 | $ | 48,204 | $ | 402,968 | $ | 520,399 | ||||
| Short-term and long-term debt (2) | 500 | 550 | 400 | 4,881 | 6,331 | |||||||||
| Reserve financing and LOC expenses (3) | 66 | 125 | 112 | 256 | 559 | |||||||||
| Payables for collateral on investments (4) | 3,428 | - | - | - | 3,428 | |||||||||
| Investment commitments (5) | 651 | 441 | 1,142 | 151 | 2,385 | |||||||||
| Operating leases (6) | 44 | 80 | 52 | 15 | 191 | |||||||||
| Finance leases (6) | 82 | 25 | 4 | - | 111 | |||||||||
| Certain financing arrangements (7) | 43 | 222 | 366 | - | 631 | |||||||||
| Retirement and other plans (8) | 101 | 200 | 195 | 453 | 949 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 27,596 | $ | 48,189 | $ | 50,475 | $ | 408,724 | $ | 534,984 |
(1)Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years and are not discounted for the time value of money. New business issued or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2)Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 12 for additional information.
(3)Estimates are based on the level of capacity we expect to utilize during the life of the LOCs and other reserve financing arrangements. See Note 12 for additional information.
(4)Excludes collateral payable held for derivative investments. See Note 4 for additional information.
(5)See Note 4 for additional information.
(6)See Note 13 for additional information.
(7)Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See Note 13 for additional information.
(8)Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2032 and known payments under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined benefit plans. See Note 17 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. All credit ratings are on outlook negative except for the ratings assigned by S&P, which are on outlook stable.
As of February 13, 2023, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “aaa to c” | “AAA to D” | “Aaa to C” | “AAA to D” | |||
| bbb+ | BBB+ | Baa1 | BBB+ | |||
| (8th of 22) | (8th of 21) | (8th of 21) | (8th of 22) |
94
Table of Contents
As of February 13, 2023, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| AM Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “AMB-1+ to AMB-4” | “F1 to D” | “P-1 to NP” | “A-1+ to D” | |||
| AMB-2 | F2 | P-2 | A-2 | |||
| (3rd of 6) | (3rd of 8) | (2nd of 4) | (3rd of 7) |
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event with respect to LNC if its long-term senior debt ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s); or with respect to LNL if its financial strength ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products.
See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000059558-22-000008.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
| Page | |
|---|---|
| Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language | 36 |
| Introduction | 37 |
| Executive Summary | 37 |
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | 41 |
| Results of Consolidated Operations | 52 |
| Results of Annuities | 54 |
| Results of Retirement Plan Services | 58 |
| Results of Life Insurance | 62 |
| Results of Group Protection | 67 |
| Results of Other Operations | 71 |
| Realized Gain (Loss) | 73 |
| Consolidated Investments | 76 |
| Reinsurance | 88 |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | 89 |
35
Table of Contents
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the financial condition as of December 31, 2021, compared with December 31, 2020, and the results of operations in 2021 compared to 2020 of Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Part II – Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2020 Form 10-K. Unless otherwise stated or the context otherwise requires, “LNC,” “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us” refers to Lincoln National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements (“Notes”) presented in “Part II – Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” as well as “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” above.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS – CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE
Certain statements made in this report and in other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). A forward-looking statement is a statement that is not a historical fact and, without limitation, includes any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements. Forward-looking statements may contain words like: “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “shall,” “will” and other words or phrases with similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, trends in our businesses, prospective services or products, future performance or financial results and the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings. We claim the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the PSLRA.
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including:
The continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, or future outbreaks of COVID-19, and uncertainty surrounding the length and severity of future impacts on the global economy and on our business, results of operations and financial condition;
Further deterioration in general economic and business conditions that may affect account values, investment results, guaranteed benefit liabilities, premium levels and claims experience;
Adverse global capital and credit market conditions that may affect our ability to raise capital, if necessary, and may cause us to realize impairments on investments and certain intangible assets, including goodwill and the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, which may reduce future earnings and/or affect our financial condition and ability to raise additional capital or refinance existing debt as it matures;
The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the holding company in sufficient amounts, which could harm the holding company’s ability to meet its obligations;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes, both domestic and foreign, that affect: the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products; the required amount of reserves and/or surplus; our ability to conduct business and our captive reinsurance arrangements as well as restrictions on the payment of revenue sharing and 12b-1 distribution fees;
The impact of U.S. federal tax reform legislation on our business, earnings and capital;
The impact of Regulation Best Interest or other regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Department of Labor or other federal or state regulators or self-regulatory organizations relating to the standard of care owed by investment advisers and/or broker-dealers that could affect our distribution model;
Actions taken by reinsurers to raise rates on in-force business;
Further declines in or sustained low interest rates causing a reduction in investment income, the interest margins of our businesses, estimated gross profits (“EGPs”) and demand for our products;
Rapidly increasing interest rates causing contract holders to surrender life insurance and annuity policies, thereby causing realized investment losses, and reduced hedge performance related to variable annuities;
The impact of the implementation of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to the regulation of derivatives transactions;
The initiation of legal or regulatory proceedings against us, and the outcome of any legal or regulatory proceedings, such as: adverse actions related to present or past business practices common in businesses in which we compete; adverse decisions in significant actions including, but not limited to, actions brought by federal and state authorities and class action cases; new decisions that result in changes in law; and unexpected trial court rulings;
A decline or continued volatility in the equity markets causing a reduction in the sales of our subsidiaries’ products; a reduction of asset-based fees that our subsidiaries charge on various investment and insurance products; an acceleration of the net amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) and deferred front-end loads (“DFEL”); and an increase in liabilities related to guaranteed benefit features of our subsidiaries’ variable annuity products;
Ineffectiveness of our risk management policies and procedures, including various hedging strategies used to offset the effect of changes in the value of liabilities due to changes in the level and volatility of the equity markets and interest rates;
36
Table of Contents
A deviation in actual experience regarding future persistency, mortality, morbidity, interest rates or equity market returns from the assumptions used in pricing our subsidiaries’ products, in establishing related insurance reserves and in the net amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL, which may reduce future earnings;
Changes in accounting principles that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, including the pending implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-12, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts;
Lowering of one or more of our debt ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations and the adverse effect such action may have on our ability to raise capital and on our liquidity and financial condition;
Lowering of one or more of the insurer financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries and the adverse effect such action may have on the premium writings, policy retention, profitability of our insurance subsidiaries and liquidity;
Significant credit, accounting, fraud, corporate governance or other issues that may adversely affect the value of certain financial assets, as well as counterparties to which we are exposed to credit risk, requiring that we realize losses on financial assets;
Interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to safeguard the confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems, including from cyberattacks or other breaches of our data security systems;
The effect of acquisitions and divestitures, restructurings, product withdrawals and other unusual items;
The inability to realize or sustain the benefits we expect from, greater than expected investments in, and the potential impact of efforts related to, our strategic initiatives, including the Spark Initiative;
The adequacy and collectability of reinsurance that we have obtained;
Future pandemics, acts of terrorism, war or other man-made and natural catastrophes that may adversely affect our businesses and the cost and availability of reinsurance;
Competitive conditions, including pricing pressures, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors, that may affect the level of premiums and fees that our subsidiaries can charge for their products;
The unknown effect on our subsidiaries’ businesses resulting from evolving market preferences and the changing demographics of our client base; and
The unanticipated loss of key management, financial planners or wholesalers.
The risks and uncertainties included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and other reports that we file with the SEC include additional factors that could affect our businesses and financial performance, including “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” which are incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, we operate in a rapidly changing and competitive environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors.
Further, it is not possible to assess the effect of all risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. In addition, we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date of this report.
INTRODUCTION
Executive Summary
We are a holding company that operates multiple insurance and retirement businesses through subsidiary companies. We sell a wide range of wealth protection, accumulation, retirement income and group protection products and solutions through our four business segments:
Annuities;
Retirement Plan Services;
Life Insurance; and
Group Protection
We also have Other Operations, which includes the financial data for operations that are not directly related to the business segments. See “Part I – Item 1. Business” above for a discussion of our business segments and products.
37
Table of Contents
In this report, in addition to providing consolidated revenues and net income (loss), we also provide segment operating revenues and income (loss) from operations because we believe they are meaningful measures of revenues and the profitability of our operating segments. Operating revenues and income (loss) from operations are the financial performance measures we use to evaluate and assess the results of our segments. Accordingly, we define and report operating revenues and income (loss) from operations by segment in Note 21. Our management believes that operating revenues and income (loss) from operations explain the results of our ongoing businesses in a manner that allows for a better understanding of the underlying trends in our current businesses. Certain items are excluded from operating revenue and income (loss) from operations because they are unpredictable and not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance of the business segments, and, in many instances, decisions regarding these items do not necessarily relate to the operations of the individual segments. In addition, we believe that our definitions of operating revenues and income (loss) from operations will provide investors with a more valuable measure of our performance because it better reveals trends in our businesses.
We provide information about our segments’ and Other Operations’ operating revenue and expense line items and realized gain (loss), key drivers of changes and historical details underlying the line items below. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
Industry Trends
We continue to be influenced by a variety of trends that affect the industry.
COVID-19 Pandemic
The health, economic and business conditions precipitated by the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic that emerged in 2020 continued to adversely affect us during 2021 and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition in 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic led to an extreme downturn in and volatility of the capital markets in the early part of 2020, record-low interest rates and wide-ranging changes in consumer behavior, including as a result of quarantines, shelter-in-place orders and limitations on business activity. While various treatments and vaccines are now available, COVID-19 variants continue to emerge, which could prolong or lead to increased hospitalization and death rates. We continue to monitor U.S. CDC reports related to COVID-19 and the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our Life Insurance and Group Protection segments. See “Additional Information” within Results of Life Insurance and Results of Group Protection below for expected impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2022.
The ultimate impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition depends on the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and related health, economic and business impacts and actions taken by governmental authorities and other third parties in response, each of which is uncertain, rapidly changing and difficult to predict. For more information on the risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain” above.
Economic Environment
Because the profitability of some of our business depends in part on interest rates, changes in interest rates may impact both our margins and our return on invested capital. Some of our products, principally our fixed annuities and universal life insurance (“UL”), including indexed universal life insurance (“IUL”) and linked-benefit UL, have interest rate guarantees that expose us to the risk that changes in interest rates or prolonged low interest rates will reduce our spread, or the difference between the interest that we are required to credit to contracts and the yields that we are able to earn on our general account investments supporting our obligations under the contracts.
In response to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates to near zero in March 2020. In December 2021, in light of substantial progress since 2020 in the economy and elevated inflation, the Federal Reserve announced its intention to further reduce the monthly pace of its large-scale bond-buying program. Additionally, short-term interest rates are expected to slowly rise beginning in 2022, although we expect the continuation of the low interest rate environment to continue to adversely affect the interest margins of our businesses. We continue to be proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this continued low interest rate environment. For risks related to sustained low interest rates, see “Significant Operational Matters – Sustained Low Interest Rate Environment” below and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals.”
In addition, although the economic environment has continued to improve from the early part of 2020 and economic restrictions have eased, there could be ongoing weakness if there is a resurgence of COVID-19 cases that causes renewed restrictions on economic activity. This could impact select corporate industries and parts of the commercial mortgage loan market, which could lead to increased credit defaults and/or negative ratings migrations within our investment portfolio. We continue to closely monitor developments relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
38
Table of Contents
For more information on the risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain” above.
Regulatory Environment
U.S.-domiciled insurance entities are regulated at the state level, while certain products and services are also subject to federal regulation. Regulators may refine capital requirements and introduce new reserving standards for the life insurance industry. Regulations recently adopted or currently under review can potentially affect the capital requirements and profitability of the industry and result in increased regulation and oversight for the industry. See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory” and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Legislative, Regulatory and Tax” for a discussion of regulatory developments that may impact the Company and the associated risks.
Significant Operational Matters
Spark and Strategic Digitization Initiatives
In the fourth quarter of 2021, we formally communicated our new expense savings initiative, the Spark Initiative, focused on driving efficiencies throughout all aspects of our business, from leveraging automation to simplifying and improving process efficiency. In addition, this program will target benefits beyond cost savings including improving the way we work by focusing on reskilling and upskilling our valuable employee base.
Because we have almost completed the investments related to our strategic digitization initiative first announced in 2016, we have integrated the 2021 strategic digitization initiative program amounts and the remainder of the program’s projected amounts into the amounts associated with the Spark Initiative. During 2021, we recognized benefits of approximately $9 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax, net of investments, as a result of these initiatives. We expect the greatest level of investments in 2022, with investments expected to exceed benefits by approximately $25 million to $65 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax. We ultimately expect to realize annual benefits of approximately $260 million to $300 million, pre-DAC and pre-tax, net of investments, by the end of 2024.
For risks related to the Spark Initiative, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We may not realize or sustain all of the benefits we expect from the Spark Initiative, our investments associated with the initiative could be greater than expected, and our efforts with respect to the initiative may result in disruption of our businesses or distraction of our management and employees, which could have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations” above.
Targeted Annual Operating Earnings Per Share Growth
Growth in operating earnings per share (“EPS”) is a key driver of our long-term performance. We believe that the key drivers to growing our operating EPS over time include:
Generating new business and positive net flows through our product development and distribution;
Capital markets performing in-line with our expectations;
Ongoing expense discipline as well as our Spark and strategic digitization initiatives driving improvement in operating margins; and
Capital generation and active capital deployment, consisting of returning capital to common stockholders.
39
Table of Contents
Sources of Earnings
We monitor our sources of earnings as a factor in managing our businesses. This information may be useful in assessing our risk profile and cost of capital. We continue to focus on achieving our long-term goal of increasing mortality and morbidity margins. Growth in this source of earnings component could be driven by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, pricing actions on our life and group products and acquiring blocks of mortality/morbidity business. The following table presents the sources of earnings components of income (loss) from operations, before income taxes, excluding Other Operations:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Investment spread (1) | 27.1% | 16.6% | 19.2% | |||||
| Mortality/morbidity (2) | 8.6% | 1.4% | 23.5% | |||||
| Fees on AUM (3) | 62.0% | 88.8% | 55.2% | |||||
| VA riders (4) | 2.3% | -6.8% | 2.1% | |||||
| Total (5) | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
(1)Investment spread earnings consist primarily of net investment income, net of interest credited, earned on the underlying general account investments supporting our fixed products less related expenses.
(2)Mortality/morbidity earnings result from mortality margins, morbidity margins, and certain expense assessments and related fees that are a function of the rates priced into the product and level of business in force.
(3)Fees on assets under management (“AUM”) earnings consist primarily of asset-based fees charged on variable account values less associated benefits and related expenses.
(4)Variable annuity (“VA”) riders’ earnings consist of fees charged to the contract holder related to guaranteed benefit rider features, less the net valuation premium and associated change in benefit reserves and related expenses.
(5)The sources of earnings components include the effect of unlocking resulting from our comprehensive review of assumptions, which for 2020 and 2019 were significantly unfavorable. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
See Note 21 for additional information on income (loss) from operations by segment.
Sustained Low Interest Rate Environment
Although we have been proactive in our investment strategies, product designs, crediting rate strategies, expense management actions and overall asset-liability practices to mitigate the risk of unfavorable consequences in this continued low interest rate environment, declines in our spread, or instances where the returns on our general account investments are not enough to support the interest rate guarantees on these products, could have an adverse effect on some of our businesses or results of operations. We have provided disclosures around interest rate risk in “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals,” “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review – Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity” below and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Variable Annuity Hedge Program Performance
We offer variable annuity products with living benefit guarantees. As described below in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Future Contract Benefits – GLB,” we use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to the risks and earnings volatility that result from the guaranteed living benefit (“GLB”) embedded derivatives and benefit ratio unlocking in certain of our variable annuity products. The income statement effect due to the change in fair value of these instruments tends to move in the opposite direction of the change in embedded derivative reserves and benefit ratio unlocking. These results are excluded from the Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments’ operating revenues and income (loss) from operations (see Note 21). See “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below for information on our methodology for calculating the non-performance risk (“NPR”), which affects the discount rate used in the calculation of the GLB embedded derivative reserves.
We also offer variable annuity products with death benefit guarantees. As described below in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Future Contract Benefits – GDB,” we use derivative instruments to hedge the income statement effect of the guaranteed death benefit (“GDB”) benefit ratio unlocking for movements in equity markets. These results are excluded from income (loss) from operations (see Note 21).
The costs of derivative instruments that we use to hedge these variable annuity products may increase as a result of a low interest rate environment.
40
Table of Contents
Earnings from Account Values
The Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments are the most sensitive to the equity markets, as well as, to a lesser extent, our Life Insurance segment. We discuss the earnings effect of the equity markets on account values and the related asset-based earnings below in each business segment’s operating results section and “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Equity Market Risk – Effect of Equity Market Sensitivity.”
Outlook
Management expects to continue focusing on the following in 2022:
Selling new business at attractive returns while increasing consumer choice, expanding customer value propositions and leveraging digital capabilities;
Monitoring and adjusting product pricing to ensure we are achieving the necessary return on capital;
Focusing a large majority of our new business mix on products without long-term guarantees, which are less sensitive to interest rates, in line with our long-term growth strategies;
Exploring reinsurance and other strategies to maximize the value of our existing blocks of business;
Making investments in our businesses, product innovation and distribution to grow revenues, drive margin expansion and reduce costs;
Focusing on expense discipline and managing our expenses aggressively, including executing the recently announced Spark Initiative to drive efficiencies throughout all aspects of our business;
Closely monitoring our capital and liquidity positions taking into account changing economic conditions, ongoing regulatory activities and our capital deployment strategy;
Closely monitoring ongoing activities in the legal and regulatory environment and taking an active role in the legislative and/or regulatory process;
Implementing the FASB ASU 2018-12, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts, for adoption on January 1, 2023; and
Maintaining risk management and the flexibility to adjust our hedge program in response to regulatory and other changes.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial condition. In applying these critical accounting policies in preparing our financial statements, management must use critical assumptions, estimates and judgments concerning future results or other developments, including the likelihood, timing or amount of one or more future events. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our assumptions, estimates and judgments based upon historical experience and various other information that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. For a detailed discussion of other significant accounting policies, see Note 1.
DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL
Deferrals
Qualifying deferrable acquisition expenses are recorded as an asset on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as DAC for products we sold during a period or VOBA for books of business we acquired during a period. In addition, we defer costs associated with DSI and revenues associated with DFEL. DSI is an asset included within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and when amortized, increases interest credited on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). DFEL is a liability included within other contract holder funds on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and when amortized, increases fee income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
We incur certain costs that can be capitalized in the acquisition of insurance contracts. Only those costs incurred that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts may be capitalized as deferrable acquisition costs. This determination of deferability must be made on a contract-level basis. Some examples of acquisition costs that are subject to deferral include the following:
Employee, agent or broker commissions;
Wholesaler production bonuses;
Renewal commissions and bonuses to agents or brokers;
Medical and inspection fees;
Premium-related taxes and assessments; and
A portion of the salaries and benefits of certain employees involved in the underwriting, contract issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales force contract selling functions.
41
Table of Contents
All other acquisition-related costs, including costs incurred by the insurer for soliciting potential customers, market research, training, administration, management of distribution and underwriting functions, unsuccessful acquisition or renewal efforts and product development, are considered non-deferrable acquisition costs and must be expensed in the period incurred.
In addition, the following indirect costs are considered non-deferrable acquisition costs and must be charged to expense in the period incurred:
Administrative costs;
Rent;
Depreciation;
Occupancy costs;
Equipment costs (including data processing equipment dedicated to acquiring insurance contracts);
Trail commissions; and
Other general overhead.
Our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL balances (in millions) by business segment as of December 31, 2021, were as follows:
| Retirement | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plan | Life | Group | |||||||||||||||
| Annuities | Services | Insurance | Protection | Total | |||||||||||||
| DAC and VOBA | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 4,224 | $ | 221 | $ | 6,430 | $ | 171 | $ | 11,046 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | (138 | ) | (69 | ) | (4,758 | ) | - | (4,965 | ) | ||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 4,086 | $ | 152 | $ | 1,672 | $ | 171 | $ | 6,081 | |||||||
| DSI | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 165 | $ | 14 | $ | 32 | $ | - | $ | 211 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | (7 | ) | - | (1 | ) | - | (8 | ) | |||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 158 | $ | 14 | $ | 31 | $ | - | $ | 203 | |||||||
| DFEL | |||||||||||||||||
| Gross | $ | 298 | $ | - | $ | 3,026 | $ | - | $ | 3,324 | |||||||
| Unrealized (gain) loss | (2 | ) | - | (2,907 | ) | - | (2,909 | ) | |||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 296 | $ | - | $ | 119 | $ | - | $ | 415 |
Fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities and certain derivatives are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”), net of associated DAC, VOBA, DSI, future contract benefits, other contract holder funds and deferred income taxes. The unrealized balances in the table above represent the DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL balances for these effects of unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity AFS securities and certain derivatives.
Amortization
For our traditional life insurance and group protection products, we amortize deferrable acquisition costs either on a straight-line basis or as a level percent of premium of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. DAC for variable annuity and deferred fixed annuity contracts and UL and variable universal life insurance (“VUL”) policies is amortized over the expected lives of the contracts in relation to the incidence of EGPs derived from the contracts.
EGPs vary based on a number of factors, including assumptions about policy persistency, mortality, fee income, investment margins, expense margins and realized gains and losses on investments. When actual gross profits are higher in the period than EGPs, we recognize more amortization than planned. When actual gross profits are lower in the period than EGPs, we recognize less amortization than planned. In a calendar year where the gross profits for a certain group of policies, or “cohorts,” are negative, our actuarial process limits, or floors, the amortization expense offset to zero. For a discussion of the periods over which we amortize our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL see “DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” in Note 1.
During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used for our EGPs underlying the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL that may result in unlocking of assumptions. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
42
Table of Contents
Reversion to the Mean
Because returns within the variable sub-accounts (“variable funds”) have a significant effect on the value of variable annuity and VUL products and the fees earned on these accounts, EGPs could increase or decrease with movements in variable fund returns. Significant and sustained changes in variable funds have had and could in the future have an effect on DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization primarily within our Annuities and RPS segments, as well as, to a lesser extent, our Life Insurance segment.
As variable fund returns do not move in a systematic manner, we reset the baseline of account values from which EGPs are projected, which we refer to as our reversion to the mean (“RTM”) process. Under our RTM process, future EGPs are projected using stochastic modeling of a large number of market scenarios in conjunction with best estimates of lapse rates, interest rate spreads and mortality rates to develop a statistical distribution of the present value of future EGPs for our variable annuity products. Because variable fund returns are unpredictable, the underlying premise of this process is that best estimate projections of future EGPs need not be affected by random short-term and insignificant deviations from expectations in variable fund returns. However, long-term or significant deviations from expected variable fund returns require a change to best estimate projections of EGPs and unlocking of DAC, VOBA, DSI, DFEL and changes in future contract benefits. The statistical distribution is designed to identify when the deviations from expected returns have become significant enough to warrant a change of the future variable fund growth rate assumption.
As discussed above, stochastic modeling is used to develop a range of reasonably possible future EGPs. We compare the range of the present value of the future EGPs from the stochastic modeling to that used in our amortization model. A set of intervals around the mean of these scenarios is utilized to calculate two separate statistical ranges of reasonably possible EGPs. These intervals are then compared to the present value of the EGPs used in the amortization model. If the present value of EGPs utilized for amortization were to exceed the reasonable range of statistically calculated EGPs, a revision of the EGPs used to calculate amortization would be considered. If a revision is deemed necessary, future EGPs would be re-projected using the current account values at the end of the period during which the revision occurred along with a long-term variable fund growth rate assumption such that the re-projected EGPs would be our best estimate of EGPs.
Our practice is not necessarily to unlock immediately after exceeding the first of the two statistical ranges, but, rather, if we stay between the first and second statistical range for several quarters, we would likely unlock. Additionally, if we exceed the ranges as a result of a short-term market reaction, we would not necessarily unlock. However, if the second statistical range is exceeded for more than one quarter, it is likely that we would unlock. While this approach reduces adjustments to DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL due to short-term fluctuations, significant changes in variable fund returns that extend beyond one or two quarters could result in a significant favorable or unfavorable unlocking. Notwithstanding these intervals, if a severe decline or increase in variable fund values were to occur or should other circumstances suggest that the present value of future EGPs no longer represents our best estimate, we could determine that a revision of the EGPs is necessary.
Our long-term variable fund growth rate assumption, which is used in the determination of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization for the variable component of our variable annuity and VUL products, is an immediate decrease of approximately 19% followed by growth going forward of 6.5% to 8.25% depending on the block of business and reflecting differences in contract holder fund allocations between fixed-income and equity-type investments. If we had unlocked our RTM assumption as of December 31, 2021, we would have recorded favorable unlocking of approximately $475 million, pre-tax, primarily within our Annuities segment.
Investments
Investments are an integral part of our operations, and we invest in fixed maturity securities that are primarily classified as AFS and carried at fair value with the difference from amortized cost due to factors other than credit loss included in stockholders’ equity as a component of AOCI. The difference between amortized cost and fair value due to credit loss impairment is recognized in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). We also invest in equity securities that are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in realized gain (loss). See “Consolidated Investments” below for more information.
Investment Valuation
Our measurement of fair value is based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset or NPR, which would include our own credit risk. Our estimate of an exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability (“exit price”) in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that asset or liability, as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or receive a liability (“entry price”). We categorize our financial instruments carried at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy, based on the priority of inputs to the respective valuation technique. The three-level hierarchy for fair value measurement is defined in Note 1.
43
Table of Contents
The following summarizes investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets carried at fair value by pricing source and fair value hierarchy level (in millions) as of December 31, 2021:
| Quoted | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prices | |||||||||||||||
| in Active | |||||||||||||||
| Markets for | Significant | Significant | |||||||||||||
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||||||
| (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| Priced by third-party pricing services | $ | 521 | $ | 105,150 | $ | 215 | $ | 105,886 | |||||||
| Priced by independent broker quotations | - | - | 4,391 | 4,391 | |||||||||||
| Priced by matrices | - | 15,117 | - | 15,117 | |||||||||||
| Priced by other methods (1) | - | - | 3,805 | 3,805 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 521 | $ | 120,267 | $ | 8,411 | $ | 129,199 | |||||||
| Percent of total | 0% | 93% | 7% | 100% |
(1)Represents primarily securities for which pricing models were used to compute fair value.
For the categories and associated fair value of our fixed maturity AFS securities classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, see Notes 1 and 20.
Our investments are valued using the appropriate market inputs based on the investment type, and include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data. In addition, market indicators and industry and economic events are monitored, and further market data is acquired if certain triggers are met. We incorporate the issuer’s credit rating and a risk premium, if warranted, given the issuer’s industry and the security’s time to maturity. We use an internationally recognized pricing service as our primary pricing source, and we do not adjust prices received from third parties or obtain multiple prices when measuring the fair value of our investments. We generally use prices from the pricing service rather than broker quotes because we have documentation from the pricing service on the observable market inputs they use, as compared to the limited information on the pricing inputs from broker quotes. For private placement securities, we use pricing matrices that utilize observable pricing inputs of similar public securities and Treasury yields as inputs to the fair value measurement. It is possible that different valuation techniques and models, other than those described above, could produce materially different estimates of fair value.
When the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability, we believe that the market is not active. Activities that may indicate a market is not active include fewer recent transactions in the market, price quotations that lack current information and/or vary substantially over time or among market makers, limited public information, uncorrelated indexes with recent fair values of assets and abnormally wide bid-ask spread. As of December 31, 2021, we evaluated the markets that our securities trade in and concluded that none were inactive. We will continue to re-evaluate this conclusion, as needed, based on market conditions.
We use unobservable inputs to measure the fair value of securities trading in less liquid or illiquid markets with limited or no pricing information. We obtain broker quotes for securities such as synthetic convertibles, index-linked certificates of deposit and collateralized debt obligations when sufficient security structure or other market information is not available to produce an evaluation. For broker-quoted only securities, non-binding quotes from market makers or broker-dealers are obtained from sources recognized as market participants. Broker-quoted securities are based solely on receipt of updated quotes from a single market maker or a broker-dealer recognized as a market participant. Our broker-quoted only securities are generally classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of December 31, 2021, we used broker quotes for 99 securities as our final price source, representing 1% of total securities owned.
In order to validate the pricing information and broker quotes, we employ, where possible, procedures that include comparisons with similar observable positions, comparisons with subsequent sales and observations of general market movements for those security classes. Our primary third-party pricing service has policies and processes to ensure that it is using objectively verifiable observable market data. The pricing service regularly reviews the evaluation inputs for securities covered, including broker quotes, executed trades and credit information, as applicable. If the pricing service determines it does not have sufficient objectively verifiable information about a security’s valuation, it discontinues providing a valuation for the security. The pricing service regularly publishes and updates a summary of inputs used in its valuations by major security type. In addition, we have policies and procedures in place to review the process that is utilized by the third-party pricing service and the output that is provided to us by the pricing service. On a periodic basis, we test the pricing for a sample of securities to evaluate the inputs and assumptions used by the pricing service, and we perform a comparison of the pricing service output to an alternative pricing source. In addition, we check prices provided by our primary pricing service to ensure that they are not stale or unreasonable by reviewing the prices for unusual changes from period to period based on certain parameters or for lack of change from one period to the next. If such anomalies in the pricing are observed, we may use pricing information from another pricing source.
44
Table of Contents
Valuation of Alternative Investments
Recognition of investment income on alternative investments is delayed due to the availability of the related financial statements, which are generally obtained from the partnerships’ general partners, as our venture capital, real estate and oil and gas portfolios are generally reported to us on a three-month delay, and our hedge funds are reported to us on a one-month delay. In addition, the effect of annual audit adjustments related to completion of calendar-year financial statement audits of the investees are typically received during the first or second quarter of each calendar year. Accordingly, our investment income from alternative investments for any calendar year period may not include the complete effect of the change in the underlying net assets for the partnership for that calendar year period. Recorded audit adjustments affect our investment income on alternative investments in the period that the adjustments are recorded.
Measurement of Allowances for Credit Losses and Recognition of Impairments
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related. Realized gains and losses generally originate from asset sales to reposition the portfolio or to respond to product experience. In the process of evaluating whether a security with an unrealized loss reflects declines that are related to credit losses, we consider our ability and intent to sell the security prior to a recovery of value. However, subsequent decisions on securities sales are made within the context of overall risk monitoring, assessing value relative to other comparable securities and overall portfolio maintenance. Although our portfolio managers may, at a given point in time, believe that the preferred course of action is to hold securities with unrealized losses attributable to factors other than credit loss until such losses are recovered, the dynamic nature of portfolio management may result in a subsequent decision to sell. These subsequent decisions are consistent with the classification of our investment portfolio as AFS. We expect to continue to manage all non-trading investments within our portfolios in a manner that is consistent with the AFS classification.
We consider economic factors and circumstances within industries and countries where recent impairments have occurred in our assessment of the position of securities we own of similarly situated issuers. While it is possible for realized or unrealized losses on a particular investment to affect other investments, our risk management strategy has been designed to identify correlation risks and other risks inherent in managing an investment portfolio. Once identified, strategies and procedures are developed to effectively monitor and manage these risks. The areas of risk correlation that we pay particular attention to are risks that may be correlated within specific financial and business markets, risks within specific industries and risks associated with related parties. When the detailed analysis by our external asset managers and investment portfolio managers leads us to the conclusion that a security’s decline in fair value is due to credit loss, a credit loss allowance is recorded. In instances where declines are related to factors other than credit loss, the security will continue to be carefully monitored.
There are risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether an investment shows indications of impairment. These include subsequent significant changes in general overall economic conditions, as well as specific business conditions affecting particular issuers, future financial market effects such as interest rate spreads, stability of foreign governments and economies, future rating agency actions and significant accounting, fraud or corporate governance issues that may adversely affect certain investments. In addition, there are often significant estimates and assumptions that we use to estimate the fair values of securities as described in “Investment Valuation” above. We continually monitor developments and update underlying assumptions and financial models based upon new information.
For certain securitized fixed maturity AFS securities with contractual cash flows, including asset-backed securities (“ABS”), we use our best estimate of cash flows for the life of the security to determine whether it is credit impaired. In addition, we review for other indicators of impairment as required by the Investments – Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”).
Write-downs on real estate and other investments are experienced when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. Write-downs and allowance for credit losses for commercial mortgage loans are established when the estimated value of the asset is deemed to be less than the carrying value. All commercial mortgage loans that are impaired are individually reviewed to determine an appropriate credit loss allowance. Changing economic conditions affect our valuation of commercial mortgage loans. Increasing vacancies, declining rents and the like are incorporated into the allowance for credit losses analysis that we perform for monitored loans and may contribute to an increase in the allowance for credit losses. In addition, we continue to monitor the entire commercial mortgage loan portfolio to identify both current and projected future risk based on reasonable and supportable forecasts. Areas of emphasis include properties that have deteriorating credits or have experienced debt-service coverage and/or loan-to-value reduction. Where warranted, we have established or increased our allowance for credit losses based upon this analysis.
We have also established an allowance for credit losses on our residential mortgage loan portfolio that includes a specific credit loss allowance for loans that are deemed to be impaired as well as an allowance for credit losses for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. The allowance for credit losses for the performing population of loans is based on historical performance for similar loans, as well as projected future losses based on modeling, which includes reasonable and supportable forecasts. The historical data utilized in the allowance for credit losses calculation process is adjusted for current economic conditions.
Amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds reflect an assumption for an expected level of credit-related investment losses. When actual credit-related investment losses are realized, we recognize a true-up to our DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL amortization and changes in other contract holder funds within realized losses reflecting the incremental effect of actual
45
Table of Contents
versus expected credit-related investment losses. These actual to expected amortization adjustments could create volatility in net realized gains and losses.
Derivatives
Derivatives are primarily used for hedging purposes. We hedge certain portions of our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk, basis risk, equity market risk, credit risk and foreign currency exchange risk by entering into derivative transactions. We also purchase and issue financial instruments that contain embedded derivative instruments. See “Future Contract Benefits” and “Other Contract Holder Funds” below for information on embedded derivatives. Assessing the effectiveness of these hedging programs and evaluating the carrying values of the related derivatives often involve a variety of assumptions and estimates.
We carry our derivative instruments at fair value, which we determine through valuation techniques or models that use market data inputs or independent broker quotations. The fair values fluctuate from period to period due to the volatility of the valuation inputs, including but not limited to swap interest rates, interest and equity volatility and equity index levels, foreign currency forward and spot rates, credit spreads and correlations, some of which are significantly affected by economic conditions. The effect to revenue is reported in realized gain (loss) and such amount along with the associated federal income taxes is excluded from income (loss) from operations of our segments.
For more information on derivatives, see Notes 1 and 5. For more information on market exposures associated with our derivatives, including sensitivities, see “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Future Contract Benefits
Reserves
Reserves are the amounts that, with the additional premiums to be received and interest thereon compounded annually at certain assumed rates, are calculated to be sufficient to meet the various policy and contract obligations as they mature. Generally, the reserves in excess of account value are reported within future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Establishing adequate reserves for our obligations to contract holders requires assumptions to be made that are intended to represent an estimation of experience for the period that policy benefits are payable. If actual experience is better than or equal to the assumptions, then reserves should be adequate to provide for future benefits and expenses. If experience is worse than the assumptions, additional reserves may be required. Significant assumptions include mortality rates, morbidity, policy persistency and interest rates. We periodically review our experience and update our policy reserves for new issues and reserve for all claims incurred, as we believe appropriate.
GLB
We have certain GLB variable annuity products with GWB and GIB features that are embedded derivatives. Certain features of these guarantees have elements of both insurance benefits accounted for under the Financial Services – Insurance – Claim Costs and Liabilities for Future Policy Benefits Subtopic of the FASB ASC (“benefit reserves”) and embedded derivative reserves. We calculate the value of the embedded derivative reserve and the benefit reserve based on the specific characteristics of each GLB feature. Through our hybrid accounting approach, for reserve calculation purposes we assign product cash flows to the embedded derivative or insurance portion of the reserves based on the life-contingent nature of the benefits. We report the insurance portion of the reserves in future contract benefits with the embedded derivative reported in either other assets or other liabilities. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information. These embedded derivatives are valued based on a stochastic projection of scenarios of the embedded derivative cash flows. The scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant and include assumptions for capital markets, actuarial lapse, benefit utilization, mortality, risk margin, administrative expenses and a margin for profit. In addition, an NPR component is determined at each valuation date that reflects our risk of not fulfilling the obligations of the underlying liability. The spread for the NPR is added to the discount rates used in determining the fair value from the net cash flows. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. These embedded derivatives are carried at fair value and are all classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. It is possible that different valuation techniques and assumptions could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. Changes in the fair value of these embedded derivatives result primarily from changes in market conditions. For more information, see Notes 1 and 20.
We have a dynamic hedging strategy designed to mitigate selected risk and income statement volatility caused by changes in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities associated with GWB and GIB features that are available in our variable annuity products. In addition to mitigating selected risk and income statement volatility, the hedge program is also focused on a long-term goal of accumulating assets that could be used to pay claims under these benefits.
46
Table of Contents
Changes in the value of the hedge contracts hedge the income statement effect of changes in GLB embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves. This dynamic hedging strategy utilizes options and total return swaps on U.S.-based equity indices, and futures on U.S.-based and international equity indices, as well as interest rate futures, interest rate swaps and currency futures. The notional amounts of the underlying hedge instruments are such that the magnitude of the change in the value of the hedge instruments due to changes in equity markets, interest rates and implied volatilities is designed to offset the magnitude of the change in the GLB embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves caused by changes in equity markets, as well as the change in GLB embedded derivative reserves caused by changes in interest rates and implied volatilities. See “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below for information on how we determine our NPR, including the sensitivity of the NPR factor.
As part of our current hedging program, equity market, interest rate and market-implied volatility conditions are monitored on a daily basis. We rebalance our hedge positions based upon changes in these factors as needed. While we actively manage our hedge positions, these positions may not completely offset changes in the fair value of embedded derivative reserves and benefit reserves caused by movements in these factors due to, among other things, differences in timing between when a market exposure changes and corresponding changes to the hedge positions, extreme swings in the equity markets, interest rates and market-implied volatilities, realized market volatility, contract holder behavior, divergence between the performance of the underlying funds and the hedging indices, divergence between the actual and expected performance of the hedge instruments or our ability to purchase hedging instruments at prices consistent with our desired risk and return trade-off.
Within our annuity business, 55% and 59% of our variable annuity account values contained GLB features as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Underperforming equity markets increase our exposure to potential benefits with the GLB features. A contract with a GLB feature is “in the money” if the contract holder’s account balance falls below the present value of guaranteed withdrawal or income benefits, assuming no lapses. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, 7% and 10%, respectively, of all in-force contracts with a GLB feature were “in the money,” and our exposure, after reinsurance, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, was $453 million and $582 million, respectively. However, the only way the contract holder can realize the excess of the present value of benefits over the account value of the contract is through a series of withdrawals or income payments that do not exceed a maximum amount. If, after the series of withdrawals or income payments, the account value is exhausted, the contract holder will continue to receive a series of annuity payments. The account value can also fluctuate with equity market returns on a daily basis resulting in increases or decreases in the excess of the present value of benefits over account value.
As a result of these factors, the ultimate amount to be paid by us related to GLB guarantees is uncertain and could be significantly more or less than $453 million, net of reinsurance. Our fair value estimates of the GLB embedded derivatives, which are based on detailed models of future cash flows under a wide range of market-consistent scenarios, reflect a more comprehensive view of the related factors and represent our best estimate of the present value of these potential liabilities. The market-consistent scenarios used in the determination of the fair value of the GLB embedded derivatives are similar to those used by an investment bank to value derivatives for which the pricing is not transparent and the aftermarket is nonexistent or illiquid. We use risk-neutral Monte Carlo simulations in our calculation to value the entire block of guarantees, which involve 100 unique scenarios per policy or approximately 45 million scenarios. The market-consistent scenario assumptions, at each valuation date, are those we view to be appropriate for a hypothetical market participant. The market-consistent inputs include, but are not limited to, assumptions for capital markets (e.g., implied volatilities, correlation among indices, risk-free swap curve, etc.), policyholder behavior (e.g., policy lapse, rider utilization, etc.), mortality, risk margins, maintenance expenses and a margin for profit. We believe these assumptions are consistent with those that would be used by a market participant; however, as the related markets develop, we will continue to reassess our assumptions. It is possible that different valuation techniques and assumptions could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. For information on our variable annuity hedge program performance, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below.
47
Table of Contents
The following table presents our estimates of the potential instantaneous effect to net income (loss) that could result from sudden changes that may occur in equity markets, interest rates and implied market volatilities (in millions) at the levels indicated in the table and excludes the net cost of operating the hedging program. The amounts represent the estimated difference between the change in the portion of GLB reserves that is calculated on a fair value basis and the change in the value of the underlying hedge instruments after the amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and taxes. These effects do not include any estimate of unlocking that could occur, nor do they estimate any change in the NPR component of the GLB reserve or any estimate of effects to our GLB benefit ratio unlocking. These estimates are based upon the recorded reserves as of December 31, 2021, and the related hedge instruments in place as of that date. The effects presented in the table below are not representative of the aggregate impacts that could result if a combination of such changes to equity market returns, interest rates and implied volatilities occurred.
| In-Force Sensitivities | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Market Return | -20% | -10% | -5% | 5% | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | (261 | ) | $ | (59 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (11 | ) |
| Interest Rates | -50 bps | -25 bps | +25 bps | +50 bps | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (14 | ) |
| Implied Volatilities | 4% | 2% | -2% | -4% | ||||||||
| Hypothetical effect to net income | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (2 | ) |
The following table shows the effect (dollars in millions) of indicated changes in instantaneous shifts in equity market returns, interest rate scenarios and market-implied volatilities:
| Assumptions of Changes In | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity | Interest | Market | ||||||||||
| Market | Rate | Implied | Net | |||||||||
| Return | Yields | Volatilities | Income | |||||||||
| Scenario 1 | -5% | -12.5 bps | +1% | $ | (19 | ) | ||||||
| Scenario 2 | -10% | -25.0 bps | +2% | (84 | ) | |||||||
| Scenario 3 | -20% | -50.0 bps | +4% | (365 | ) |
The actual effects of the results illustrated in the two tables above could vary significantly depending on a variety of factors, many of which are out of our control, and consideration should be given to the following:
The analysis is only valid as of December 31, 2021, due to changing market conditions, contract holder activity, hedge positions and other factors;
The analysis assumes instantaneous shifts in the capital market factors and no ability to rebalance hedge positions prior to the market changes;
The analysis assumes constant exchange rates and implied dividend yields;
Assumptions regarding shifts in the market factors, such as assuming parallel shifts in interest rate and implied volatility term structures, may be overly simplistic and not indicative of actual market behavior in stress scenarios;
It is very unlikely that one capital market sector (e.g., equity markets) will sustain such a large instantaneous movement without affecting other capital market sectors; and
The analysis assumes that there is no tracking or basis risk between the funds and/or indices affecting the GLB reserves and the instruments utilized to hedge these exposures.
GDB
The reserves related to the GDB features available in our variable annuity products are based on the application of a “benefit ratio” (the present value of total expected benefit payments over the life of the contract divided by the present value of total expected assessments over the life of the contract) to total variable annuity assessments received in the period. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the variable annuity. These reserves are reported within future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with the change reported in benefits in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The change in the liability for a period is the benefit ratio multiplied by the assessments recorded for the period less GDB claims paid in the period plus interest. As experience or assumption changes result in a change in expected benefit payments or assessments, the benefit ratio is unlocked or, in other words, recalculated using the updated expected benefit payments and assessments over the life of the contract since inception. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating these reserves and unlock assumptions similar to the DAC discussion above. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants
48
Table of Contents
updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
We utilize a delta hedging strategy for variable annuity products with a GDB feature, which uses futures and total return swaps on equity market indices to hedge against movements in equity markets. The hedging strategy is designed to hedge our exposure to earnings volatility that results from equity market driven changes in the reserve for GDB contracts. Because the GDB reserves are based upon projected long-term equity market return assumptions, and because the value of the hedging contracts will reflect current capital market conditions, the quarterly changes in values for the GDB reserves and the hedging contracts may not exactly offset each other. For information on our variable annuity hedge program performance, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss) – Variable Annuity Net Derivatives Results” below.
UL Products with Secondary Guarantees
We issue UL-type contracts where we provide a secondary guarantee to the contract holder. The policy can remain in force, even if the base policy account value is zero, as long as contractual secondary guarantee requirements have been met. The reserves related to UL products with secondary guarantees are based on the application of a benefit ratio the same as our GDB features, which are discussed above. These secondary guarantees are reported within future contract benefits on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The level and direction of the change in reserves will vary over time based on the emergence of the benefit ratio and the level of assessments associated with the contracts. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models used in estimating these reserves and unlock assumptions similar to the DAC discussion above. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Liability for Unpaid Claims
Future contract benefits include reserves for long-term life and disability claims associated with our Group Protection segment. These reserves are based on assumptions as to interest, claim resolution rates and offsets for other insurance including social security. Claim resolution rate assumptions and social security offsets are based on our actual experience. The interest rate assumption used for discounting long-term claim reserves is an important part of the reserving process due to the long benefit period for these claims. The interest rate assumptions used for discounting claim reserves are based on projected portfolio yield rates, after consideration for defaults and investment expenses, for assets supporting the liabilities. Our long-term disability reserves are discounted using rates ranging from 2.5% to 5.0% and vary by year of claim incurral. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and reserving models used in calculating these reserves. We may also identify and implement actuarial modeling refinements that result in increases or decreases to the carrying values of these reserves. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Other Contract Holder Funds
Other contract holder funds includes account balances on UL and VUL insurance and investment-type annuity products where account balances are equal to deposits plus interest credited less withdrawals, surrender charges, asset-based fees and contract administration charges, as well as amounts representing the fair value of embedded derivative instruments associated with our IUL and indexed annuity products. During the third quarter of each year, we conduct our comprehensive review of the assumptions and projection models underlying our reserves and embedded derivatives. We may have unlocking in other quarters as we become aware of information that warrants updating assumptions outside of our comprehensive review. See “Annual Assumption Review” below for more information.
Our indexed annuity and IUL contracts permit the holder to elect a fixed interest rate return or a return where interest credited to the contracts is linked to the performance of the S&P 500® Index or other indices. The value of the variable portion of the contract holder’s account balance varies with the performance of the underlying variable funds chosen by the contract holder. Contract holders may elect to rebalance among the various accounts within the product at renewal dates. At the end of each indexed term, which can be up to six years, we have the opportunity to re-price the indexed component by establishing different participation rates, caps, spreads or specified rates, subject to contractual guarantees. We purchase and sell index options that are highly correlated to the portfolio allocation decisions of our contract holders, such that we are economically hedged with respect to equity returns for the current reset period. The mark-to-market of the options held generally offsets the change in value of the embedded derivative within the contract, both of which are recorded as a component of realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC require that we calculate fair values of index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations in future reset periods. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indicators of volatility and interest rates. Changes in the fair values of these liabilities are included as a component of realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). For information on our index benefits hedging results, see our discussion in “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
49
Table of Contents
Annual Assumption Review
Details underlying the effect to net income (loss) from our annual assumption review (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | |||||||||
| Annuities | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (101 | ) | $ | (93 | ) |
| Retirement Plan Services | - | (3 | ) | - | |||||
| Life Insurance | (26 | ) | (440 | ) | (320 | ) | |||
| Group Protection | 16 | (3 | ) | 10 | |||||
| Excluded realized gain (loss) | 6 | 58 | 3 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (489 | ) | $ | (400 | ) |
The impacts of our annual assumption review were driven primarily by the following:
2021
For Annuities, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior and interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to expense assumptions.
For Life Insurance, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior and interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to investment allocation assumptions.
For Group Protection, favorable updates to long-term disability termination rate assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable updates to interest rate assumptions.
For excluded realized gain (loss), favorable unlocking was driven by updates to expense assumptions and other items, partially offset by unfavorable updates to policyholder behavior assumptions.
2020
As part of our annual assumption review in the third quarter of 2020, we updated our interest rate assumptions. These updates included lowering starting new money rates to reflect the current interest rate environment and reducing our long-term new money investment yield assumption by 50 basis points, resulting in an ultimate long-term assumption of 3.0% for a 10-year U.S. Treasury. As a result of these updates, we recorded unfavorable after-tax unlocking of $361 million for Life Insurance, $140 million for Annuities and $7 million for Retirement Plan Services.
For Annuities, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to policyholder behavior assumptions and other items.
For Retirement Plan Services, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to expense assumptions and other items.
For Life Insurance, unfavorable unlocking was driven by updates to interest rate and policyholder behavior assumptions.
For Group Protection, unfavorable updates to interest rate assumptions, partially offset by favorable updates to long-term disability termination rate assumptions.
For excluded realized gain (loss), favorable unlocking was driven by updates to policyholder behavior and expense assumptions, partially offset by unfavorable updates to other items.
Long-Term New Money Investment Yield Sensitivity
New money rates continue to be at low levels and, as a result, require careful analysis when forecasting the future direction of changes in rates. If we change our view of future new money rates and lower our current long-term new money investment yield assumption, then, assuming that all other assumptions remain constant, we estimate the impact of lowering this assumption by 50 basis points would be approximately $(160) million to income (loss) from operations due primarily to unlocking our DAC and VOBA assets. This impact would be most pronounced in our Life Insurance segment. The actual impact of a 50 basis point decline in the yield would be based upon a number of factors existing at the time of the assumption update, and, therefore, the actual amount of the loss may differ from our current estimate. In addition, lower investment margins may also impact the recoverability of intangible assets such as goodwill, require the establishment of additional liabilities or trigger loss recognition events on certain policyholder liabilities. For more information on our interest rate risk, see “II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
50
Table of Contents
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1 and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Intangibles that do not have indefinite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. We perform a quantitative goodwill impairment test where the fair value of the reporting unit is determined and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, goodwill is impaired and written down to the reporting unit’s fair value. The results of one test on one reporting unit cannot subsidize the results of another reporting unit. For the purposes of the evaluation of the carrying value of goodwill, our reporting units (Annuities, Retirement Plan Services, Life
Insurance and Group Protection) correspond with our reporting segments.
The fair values of our reporting units are comprised of the value of in-force (i.e., existing) business and the value of new business. Specifically, new business is representative of cash flows and profitability associated with policies or contracts we expect to issue in the future, reflecting our forecasts of future sales volume and product mix over a 10-year period. To determine the values of in-force and new business, we use a discounted cash flows technique that applies a discount rate reflecting the market expected, weighted-average rate of return adjusted for the risk factors associated with operations to the projected future cash flows for each reporting unit.
As of October 1, 2021 and 2020, we performed our annual quantitative goodwill impairment test for our reporting units, and, as of each such date, the fair value was in excess of each reporting unit’s carrying value for Annuities, Retirement Plan Services, Life Insurance and Group Protection.
We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Factors that can influence the value of goodwill include the capital markets, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, consumer confidence and any items that can directly or indirectly affect new business future cash flows. Factors that could affect production levels and profitability of new business include mix of new business, pricing changes, customer acceptance of our products and distribution strength. Spread compression and related effects to profitability caused by lower interest rates affect the valuation of in-force business more significantly than the valuation of new business, as new business pricing assumptions reflect the current and anticipated future interest rate environment. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments. Examples of unfavorable changes to assumptions or factors that could result in future impairment include, but are not limited to, the following:
Lower expectations for future sales levels or future sales profitability;
Higher discount rates on new business assumptions;
Weakened expectations for the ability to execute future reserve financing transactions for life insurance business over the long-term or expectations for significant increases in the associated costs;
Legislative, regulatory or tax changes that affect the cost of, or demand for, our subsidiaries’ products, the required amount of reserves and/or surplus, or otherwise affect our ability to conduct business, including changes to statutory reserve requirements or changes to risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements; and
Valuations of significant mergers or acquisitions of companies or blocks of business that would provide relevant market-based inputs for our impairment assessment that could support less favorable conclusions regarding the estimated fair value of our reporting units.
Refer to Note 9 for goodwill and specifically identifiable intangible assets by segment.
Income Taxes
Management uses certain assumptions and estimates in determining the income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, the deferred income tax liabilities and assets for items recognized differently in its financial statements from amounts shown on its income tax returns and the federal income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis and interpretation of current tax laws and regulations. Management exercises considerable judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting income tax liabilities and assets. These judgments and estimates are re-evaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Legislative changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, modifications or new regulations, administrative rulings, or court decisions could increase or decrease our effective tax rate.
The application of GAAP requires us to evaluate the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realizable. Considerable judgment and the use of estimates are required in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, and if so, the amount of such valuation allowance. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider many factors, including: the nature and character of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; taxable income in prior carryback years; future reversals of existing temporary differences; the length of time carryovers can be utilized; and any tax planning strategies we would employ to avoid a tax benefit from expiring unused. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss deferred tax asset, will be realized. For additional information on our income taxes, see Note 6.
51
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Details underlying the consolidated results, deposits, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Net Income (Loss) | |||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations: | |||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 1,283 | $ | 983 | $ | 954 | |||
| Retirement Plan Services | 235 | 168 | 172 | ||||||
| Life Insurance | 535 | (34 | ) | 259 | |||||
| Group Protection | (127 | ) | 43 | 238 | |||||
| Other Operations | (375 | ) | (295 | ) | (268 | ) | |||
| Excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax | (325 | ) | (570 | ) | (627 | ) | |||
| Benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax | 196 | 194 | 277 | ||||||
| Net impact from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | - | 37 | 17 | ||||||
| Transaction and integration costs related to mergers, | |||||||||
| acquisitions and divestitures, after-tax | (11 | ) | (15 | ) | (103 | ) | |||
| Gain (loss) on modification or early extinguishment | |||||||||
| of debt, after-tax | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | (33 | ) | |||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,405 | $ | 499 | $ | 886 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Deposits | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 11,740 | $ | 11,260 | $ | 14,525 | ||
| Retirement Plan Services | 10,840 | 10,017 | 9,465 | |||||
| Life Insurance | 5,693 | 5,890 | 7,320 | |||||
| Total deposits | $ | 28,273 | $ | 27,167 | $ | 31,310 | ||
| Net Flows | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | (2,569 | ) | $ | (341 | ) | $ | 1,851 |
| Retirement Plan Services | 464 | 166 | 620 | |||||
| Life Insurance | 3,982 | 4,137 | 5,422 | |||||
| Total net flows | $ | 1,877 | $ | 3,962 | $ | 7,893 |
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Account Values | ||||||||
| Annuities | $ | 172,725 | $ | 157,518 | $ | 142,128 | ||
| Retirement Plan Services | 99,114 | 88,307 | 78,689 | |||||
| Life Insurance | 51,846 | 57,605 | 54,255 | |||||
| Total account values | $ | 323,685 | $ | 303,430 | $ | 275,072 |
52
Table of Contents
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Net income increased due primarily to the following:
Higher investment income on alternative investments, and higher prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
The effect of unlocking.
Lower realized losses.
Growth in average account values, business in force and group earned premiums.
The increase in net income was partially offset by the following:
Unfavorable experience in our Group Protection segment driven by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Higher trail commissions, legal expenses, incentive compensation and Spark and strategic digitization investments, partially offset by continued focus on expense management.
Spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields, partially offset by actions implemented to reduce interest crediting rates.
For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
53
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF ANNUITIES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Annuities (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 116 | $ | 121 | $ | 502 | ||
| Fee income | 2,724 | 2,394 | 2,357 | |||||
| Net investment income | 1,401 | 1,272 | 1,140 | |||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) (2) | 208 | 214 | 190 | |||||
| Amortization of deferred gain on | ||||||||
| business sold through reinsurance | 26 | 29 | 30 | |||||
| Other revenues (3) | 527 | 425 | 381 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 5,002 | 4,455 | 4,600 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 811 | 773 | 698 | |||||
| Benefits (1) | 548 | 696 | 938 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 2,119 | 1,854 | 1,871 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 3,478 | 3,323 | 3,507 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 1,524 | 1,132 | 1,093 | |||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 241 | 149 | 139 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 1,283 | $ | 983 | $ | 954 |
(1)Insurance premiums include primarily our income annuities that have a corresponding offset in benefits. Benefits include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums.
(2)See “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
(3)Consists primarily of revenues attributable to broker-dealer services, which are subject to market volatility, and the net settlement related to certain reinsurance transactions, which has a corresponding offset in net investment income and interest credited.
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
Higher fee income driven by higher average daily variable account values.
Lower benefits due to the effect of unlocking.
Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by prepayment and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses due to trail commissions resulting from higher average account values, amortization expense as a result of higher actual gross profits and incentive compensation as a result of production performance, partially offset by expense management.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
Additional Information
For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. As a result of our strategic actions, deposits increased from 2020 to 2021 but remain below pre-pandemic levels contributing to negative net flows. We expect the trend of negative net flows to persist.
54
Table of Contents
The other component of net flows relates to the retention of new business and account values. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused by full surrenders, deaths and other contract benefits. These outflows as a percentage of average gross account values were 8%, 7% and 9% in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Our fixed and indexed variable annuities have discretionary fixed and indexed crediting rates that reset on an annual or periodic basis and may be subject to surrender charges. Our ability to retain these annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, account values and net flows (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Fee Income | |||||||||
| Mortality, expense and other assessments | $ | 2,713 | $ | 2,381 | $ | 2,336 | |||
| Surrender charges | 11 | 16 | 25 | ||||||
| DFEL: | |||||||||
| Deferrals | (27 | ) | (31 | ) | (38 | ) | |||
| Amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 32 | 26 | 34 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (5 | ) | 2 | - | |||||
| Total fee income | $ | 2,724 | $ | 2,394 | $ | 2,357 |
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Variable Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits (1) | $ | 5,220 | $ | 3,978 | $ | 5,293 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | (6,283 | ) | (5,262 | ) | (4,805 | ) | |||
| Change in market value (1) | 16,997 | 16,106 | 19,844 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (2,838 | ) | (2,554 | ) | (2,491 | ) | |||
| Transfers to the variable portion of variable annuity | |||||||||
| products from the fixed portion of variable | |||||||||
| annuity products | 588 | 831 | 1,760 | ||||||
| Variable annuity account values (1) | 136,721 | 128,175 | 119,047 | ||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account values (1) | 133,888 | 116,117 | 112,978 | ||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index (2) | 4,269 | 3,218 | 2,914 |
(1)Excludes the fixed portion of variable.
(2)We generally use the S&P 500 Index as a benchmark for the performance of our variable account values. The account values of our variable annuity contracts are invested by our policyholders in a variety of investment options including, but not limited to, domestic and international equity securities and fixed income, which do not necessarily align with S&P 500 Index performance. See Note 10 for additional information.
55
Table of Contents
We charge contract holders mortality and expense assessments on variable annuity accounts to cover insurance and administrative expenses. These assessments are a function of the rates priced into the product and the average daily variable account values. Average daily variable account values are driven by net flows and variable fund returns. Charges on GLB riders are assessed based on a contractual rate that is applied either to the account value or the guaranteed amount. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity contract holders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals. Fee income includes charges on both our variable and fixed annuity products, but excludes the attributed fees on our GLB riders; see “Realized Gain (Loss) – Operating Realized Gain (Loss)” below for discussion of these attributed fees.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income, interest credited and fixed account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Net Investment Income | |||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | |||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 1,155 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 1,004 | |||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | |||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 70 | 23 | 29 | ||||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 176 | 127 | 107 | ||||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 1,401 | $ | 1,272 | $ | 1,140 | |||
| Interest Credited | |||||||||
| Amount provided to contract holders | $ | 794 | $ | 755 | $ | 690 | |||
| DSI deferrals | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (21 | ) | |||
| Interest credited before DSI amortization | 791 | 751 | 669 | ||||||
| DSI amortization: | |||||||||
| Amortization, excluding unlocking | 21 | 21 | 26 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (1 | ) | 1 | 3 | |||||
| Total interest credited | $ | 811 | $ | 773 | $ | 698 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Fixed Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits (1) | $ | 6,520 | $ | 7,282 | $ | 9,232 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | 3,714 | 4,921 | 6,656 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (86 | ) | (66 | ) | (43 | ) | |||
| Transfers from the fixed portion of variable annuity | |||||||||
| products to the variable portion of variable | |||||||||
| annuity products | (588 | ) | (831 | ) | (1,760 | ) | |||
| Reinvested interest credited (1) | 3,286 | 1,686 | 1,489 | ||||||
| Fixed annuity account values (1)(2) | 36,004 | 29,343 | 23,081 | ||||||
| Average fixed account values (1)(2) | 32,803 | 25,804 | 19,717 |
(1)Includes the fixed portion of variable.
(2)Net of reinsurance ceded.
56
Table of Contents
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our deferred fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Changes in commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Benefits
Details underlying benefits (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Benefits | ||||||||
| Net death and other benefits, excluding unlocking | $ | 540 | $ | 553 | $ | 834 | ||
| Unlocking | 8 | 143 | 104 | |||||
| Total benefits | $ | 548 | $ | 696 | $ | 938 |
Benefits for this segment include changes in income annuity reserves driven by premiums, changes in benefit reserves and costs associated with the hedging of our benefit ratio unlocking on benefit reserves associated with our variable annuity GDB and GLB riders. For a corresponding offset of changes in income annuity reserves, see footnote 1 of “Income (Loss) from Operations” above.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions: | |||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 450 | $ | 480 | $ | 606 | |||
| Non-deferrable | 686 | 581 | 565 | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 439 | 427 | 453 | ||||||
| Inter-segment reimbursement associated with reserve | |||||||||
| financing and LOC expenses (1) | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 45 | 31 | 35 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred, excluding broker-dealer | 1,622 | 1,522 | 1,663 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (515 | ) | (548 | ) | (681 | ) | |||
| Total pre-broker-dealer expenses incurred, | |||||||||
| excluding amortization, net of interest | 1,107 | 974 | 982 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 449 | 401 | 396 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (7 | ) | (14 | ) | 12 | ||||
| Broker-dealer expenses incurred | 570 | 493 | 481 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 2,119 | $ | 1,854 | $ | 1,871 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of sales/deposits | 4.4% | 4.9% | 4.7% |
(1)Includes reimbursements to Annuities from the Life Insurance segment for reserve financing, net of expenses incurred by Annuities for its use of letters of credit (“LOCs”). The inter-segment amounts are not reported on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Broker-dealer expenses that vary with and are related to sales are expensed as incurred and not deferred and amortized. Fluctuations in these expenses correspond with fluctuations in other revenues. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
57
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Retirement Plan Services (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Fee income | $ | 296 | $ | 253 | $ | 252 | ||
| Net investment income | 992 | 933 | 924 | |||||
| Other revenues (1) | 36 | 27 | 24 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 1,324 | 1,213 | 1,200 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 617 | 615 | 585 | |||||
| Benefits | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 420 | 404 | 418 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 1,040 | 1,021 | 1,005 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 284 | 192 | 195 | |||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 49 | 24 | 23 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 235 | $ | 168 | $ | 172 |
(1)Consists primarily of mutual fund account program revenues from mid to large employers.
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by prepayment and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio, partially offset by spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields.
Higher fee income driven by higher average account values.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses driven by trail commissions resulting from higher average account values and incentive compensation as a result of production performance, partially offset by expense management.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
Additional Information
For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
Net flows in this business fluctuate based on the timing of larger plans being implemented and terminating over the course of the year.
New deposits are an important component of net flows and key to our efforts to grow our business. Although deposits do not significantly affect current period income from operations, they can significantly impact future income from operations. The other component of net flows relates to the retention of the business. An important measure of retention is the reduction in account values caused by plan sponsor terminations and participant withdrawals. These outflows as a percentage of average account values were 11%, 13% and 12% for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Our net flows are negatively affected by the continued net outflows from our oldest blocks of annuities business (as presented on our Net Flows By Market table below as “Multi-Fund® and other”), which are among our higher margin product lines in this segment, due to the fact that they are mature blocks with low distribution and servicing costs. The proportion of these products to our total account values was 18%, 19% and 21% for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Due to this overall shift in business mix toward products with lower returns, new deposit production continues to be necessary to maintain earnings at current levels.
58
Table of Contents
Our fixed annuity business includes products with discretionary and index-based crediting rates that are reset on either a quarterly or semi-annual basis. Our ability to retain quarterly or semi-annual reset annuities will be subject to current competitive conditions at the time interest rates for these products reset. We expect to manage the effects of spreads on near-term income from operations through portfolio management and, to a lesser extent, crediting rate actions, which assumes no significant changes in net flows into or out of our fixed accounts or other changes that may cause interest rate spreads to differ from our expectations. For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, net flows and account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Fee Income | ||||||||
| Annuity expense assessments | $ | 219 | $ | 184 | $ | 184 | ||
| Mutual fund fees | 77 | 68 | 67 | |||||
| Total expense assessments | 296 | 252 | 251 | |||||
| Surrender charges | - | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Total fee income | $ | 296 | $ | 253 | $ | 252 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Net Flows By Market | |||||||||
| Small market | $ | 133 | $ | 350 | $ | 449 | |||
| Mid – large market | 1,800 | 792 | 1,336 | ||||||
| Multi-Fund® and other | (1,469 | ) | (976 | ) | (1,165 | ) | |||
| Total net flows | $ | 464 | $ | 166 | $ | 620 |
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Variable Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Variable annuity deposits (1) | $ | 2,218 | $ | 1,843 | $ | 1,880 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in variable annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | (733 | ) | (333 | ) | (518 | ) | |||
| Change in market value (1) | 3,247 | 2,731 | 3,426 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (185 | ) | (156 | ) | (155 | ) | |||
| Variable annuity account values (1) | 20,957 | 18,755 | 16,952 | ||||||
| Average daily variable annuity account values (1) | 20,147 | 16,426 | 15,960 | ||||||
| Average daily S&P 500® Index | 4,269 | 3,218 | 2,914 |
(1) Excludes the fixed portion of variable.
| As of or For the Years Ended | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Mutual Fund Account Value Information | ||||||||
| Mutual fund deposits | $ | 6,297 | $ | 5,449 | $ | 5,602 | ||
| Mutual fund net flows | 1,323 | 100 | 1,316 | |||||
| Mutual fund account values (1) | 54,518 | 46,636 | 41,179 |
(1) Mutual funds are not included in the separate accounts reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as we do not have any ownership interest in them.
59
Table of Contents
Our fee income is primarily composed of expense assessments that we charge to cover insurance and administrative expenses, and mutual fund fees earned for services we provide to our mutual fund programs. Fee income is primarily based on average account values, both fixed and variable, which are driven by net flows and the equity markets. Fee income is also driven by non-account value-related items such as participant counts. We may collect surrender charges when our fixed and variable annuity contract holders surrender their contracts during the surrender charge period to protect us from premature withdrawals.
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income, interest credited and fixed account values (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 828 | $ | 834 | $ | 831 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 58 | 23 | 26 | |||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 106 | 76 | 67 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 992 | $ | 933 | $ | 924 | ||
| Interest Credited | $ | 617 | $ | 615 | $ | 585 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
| As of or For the Years Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | |||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Fixed Account Value Information | |||||||||
| Fixed annuity deposits (1) | $ | 2,325 | $ | 2,725 | $ | 1,983 | |||
| Increases (decreases) in fixed annuity account values: | |||||||||
| Net flows (1) | (126 | ) | 399 | (178 | ) | ||||
| Reinvested interest credited (1) | 616 | 613 | 585 | ||||||
| Contract holder assessments (1) | (14 | ) | (13 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
| Fixed annuity account values (1) | 23,639 | 22,916 | 20,558 | ||||||
| Average fixed account values (1) | 23,147 | 21,696 | 20,119 |
(1)Includes the fixed portion of variable.
A portion of our investment income earned is credited to the contract holders of our fixed annuity products, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments supporting the fixed annuity product line, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts, and what we credit to our fixed annuity contract holders’ accounts, including the fixed portion of variable annuity contracts. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, investment income on alternative investments and surplus investment income can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Benefits
Benefits for this segment include changes in annuity benefit reserves.
60
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions: | |||||||||
| Deferrable | $ | 5 | $ | 5 | $ | 6 | |||
| Non-deferrable | 79 | 71 | 73 | ||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 309 | 304 | 319 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 17 | 16 | 17 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 410 | 396 | 415 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (22 | ) | (21 | ) | (23 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 388 | 375 | 392 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 32 | 25 | 27 | ||||||
| Unlocking | - | 4 | (1 | ) | |||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 420 | $ | 404 | $ | 418 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of annuity sales/deposits | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% |
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized over the lives of the contracts in relation to EGPs. Certain types of commissions, such as trail commissions that are based on account values, are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. Distribution expenses associated with the sale of mutual fund products are expensed as incurred. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
61
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF LIFE INSURANCE
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Life Insurance (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Operating Revenues | |||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 1,033 | $ | 950 | $ | 885 | |||
| Fee income | 3,863 | 3,727 | 3,882 | ||||||
| Net investment income | 3,209 | 2,823 | 2,658 | ||||||
| Operating realized gain (loss) (2) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | |||
| Amortization of deferred gain on | |||||||||
| business sold through reinsurance | 20 | 12 | - | ||||||
| Other revenues | 21 | 10 | 19 | ||||||
| Total operating revenues | 8,137 | 7,516 | 7,438 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||
| Interest credited | 1,439 | 1,491 | 1,433 | ||||||
| Benefits | 4,275 | 4,586 | 4,183 | ||||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,766 | 1,506 | 1,516 | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 7,480 | 7,583 | 7,132 | ||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | 657 | (67 | ) | 306 | |||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | 122 | (33 | ) | 47 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | 535 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 259 |
(1)Includes term insurance premiums, which have a corresponding partial offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
(2)See “Realized Gain (Loss)” below.
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Income from operations for this segment increased due primarily to the following:
Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by investment income on alternative investments and prepayment and bond make-whole premiums, partially offset by the impact of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement (see “Additional Information” below) and spread compression due to average new money rates trailing our current portfolio yields.
Lower benefits due to the effect of unlocking, partially offset by growth in business in force; both periods were impacted by elevated mortality claims due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Higher fee income due to the effect of unlocking, growth in business in force and higher DFEL amortization as a result of higher actual gross profits, partially offset by the impact of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement.
Higher amortization of deferred gain on business sold through reinsurance as a result of the fourth quarter 2021 reinsurance agreement.
The increase in income from operations was partially offset by higher commissions and other expenses due to the effect of unlocking and incentive compensation as a result of production performance, partially offset by expense management.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information about unlocking.
62
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2021, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Security Life of Denver Insurance Company (a subsidiary of Resolution Life that we refer to herein as “Resolution Life”) to reinsure liabilities under a block of in-force executive benefit and universal life policies. For more information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Return of Capital to Common Stockholders” below and Note 8. We expect an ongoing reduction in income from operations in future periods as a result of this reinsurance agreement.
We continue to expect elevated mortality to persist into the first quarter of 2022 as a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
For information on interest rate spreads and interest rate risk, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – Changes in interest rates and sustained low interest rates may cause interest rate spreads to decrease, impacting our profitability, and make it more challenging to meet certain statutory requirements, and changes in interest rates may also result in increased contract withdrawals” and “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk.”
Insurance Premiums
Insurance premiums relate to traditional products and are a function of the rates priced into the product and insurance in force. Insurance in force, in turn, is driven by sales, persistency and mortality claims.
Fee Income
Details underlying fee income, sales, net flows, account values and in-force face amount (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Fee Income | |||||||||
| Cost of insurance assessments | $ | 2,362 | $ | 2,377 | $ | 2,280 | |||
| Expense assessments | 1,507 | 1,502 | 1,694 | ||||||
| Surrender charges | 31 | 33 | 41 | ||||||
| DFEL: | |||||||||
| Deferrals | (989 | ) | (972 | ) | (1,063 | ) | |||
| Amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 560 | 514 | 504 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 392 | 273 | 426 | ||||||
| Total fee income | $ | 3,863 | $ | 3,727 | $ | 3,882 |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Sales by Product | |||||||||
| UL | $ | 8 | $ | 20 | $ | 57 | |||
| MoneyGuard® | 101 | 127 | 298 | ||||||
| IUL | 96 | 91 | 155 | ||||||
| VUL | 181 | 188 | 265 | ||||||
| Term | 152 | 132 | 144 | ||||||
| Total individual life sales | 538 | 558 | 919 | ||||||
| Executive Benefits | 122 | 72 | 163 | ||||||
| Total sales | $ | 660 | $ | 630 | $ | 1,082 | |||
| Net Flows | |||||||||
| Deposits | $ | 5,693 | $ | 5,890 | $ | 7,320 | |||
| Withdrawals and deaths | (1,711 | ) | (1,753 | ) | (1,898 | ) | |||
| Net flows | $ | 3,982 | $ | 4,137 | $ | 5,422 | |||
| Contract Holder Assessments | $ | 5,201 | $ | 5,154 | $ | 5,243 |
63
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Account Values | ||||||||
| General account | $ | 32,532 | $ | 37,496 | $ | 37,485 | ||
| Separate account | 19,314 | 20,109 | 16,770 | |||||
| Total account values | $ | 51,846 | $ | 57,605 | $ | 54,255 | ||
| In-Force Face Amount | ||||||||
| UL and other | $ | 362,106 | $ | 358,554 | $ | 357,726 | ||
| Term insurance | 611,854 | 535,387 | 472,050 | |||||
| Total in-force face amount | $ | 973,960 | $ | 893,941 | $ | 829,776 | ||
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Average General Account Values | $ | 36,560 | $ | 37,791 | $ | 37,215 |
Fee income relates only to interest-sensitive products and includes cost of insurance assessments, expense assessments and surrender charges. Both cost of insurance and expense assessments can have deferrals and amortization related to DFEL. Cost of insurance and expense assessments are deducted from our contract holders’ account values. These amounts are a function of the rates priced into the product and premiums received, face amount in force and account values.
Sales are not recorded as a component of revenues (other than for traditional products) and do not have a significant effect on current quarter income from operations but are indicators of future profitability. Generally, we have higher sales during the second half of the year with the fourth quarter being our strongest. For more information on sales, see “Additional Information” above.
Sales in the table above and as discussed above were reported as follows:
UL, IUL and VUL – first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premiums received;
MoneyGuard® linked-benefit products – MoneyGuard (UL), 15% of total expected premium deposits, and MoneyGuard Market AdvantageSM (VUL), 150% of commissionable premiums;
Executive Benefits – insurance and corporate-owned UL and VUL, first-year commissionable premiums plus 5% of excess premium received, and single premium bank-owned UL and VUL, 15% of single premium deposits; and
Term – 100% of annualized first-year premiums.
We monitor the business environment, including but not limited to the regulatory and interest rate environments, and make changes to our product offerings and in-force products as needed, and as permitted under the terms of the policies, to sustain the future profitability of our segment.
64
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
Details underlying net investment income and interest credited (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 2,512 | $ | 2,531 | $ | 2,448 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 46 | 24 | 47 | |||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 522 | 140 | 12 | |||||
| Surplus investments (3) | 129 | 128 | 151 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 3,209 | $ | 2,823 | $ | 2,658 | ||
| Interest Credited | $ | 1,439 | $ | 1,491 | $ | 1,433 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for additional information.
(3)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities.
A portion of the investment income earned for this segment is credited to contract holder accounts. Statutory reserves will typically grow at a faster rate than account values because of reserve requirements. Investments allocated to this segment are based upon the statutory reserve liabilities and are affected by various reserve adjustments, including financing transactions providing relief from reserve requirements. These financing transactions lead to a transfer of investments from this segment to Other Operations. We expect to earn a spread between what we earn on the underlying general account investments and what we credit to our contract holders’ accounts. We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated growth of our policy reserves for traditional products. Commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums and investment income on alternative investments can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors, and, therefore, may contribute to investment income results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Benefits
Details underlying benefits (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Benefits | |||||||||
| Death claims direct and assumed | $ | 5,866 | $ | 5,521 | $ | 4,594 | |||
| Death claims ceded | (2,325 | ) | (2,019 | ) | (1,689 | ) | |||
| Reserves released on death | (708 | ) | (738 | ) | (616 | ) | |||
| Net death benefits | 2,833 | 2,764 | 2,289 | ||||||
| Change in secondary guarantee life insurance product | |||||||||
| reserves: | |||||||||
| Change in reserves, excluding unlocking | 703 | 644 | 625 | ||||||
| Unlocking | (190 | ) | 112 | 445 | |||||
| Change in MoneyGuard® reserves: | |||||||||
| Change in reserves, excluding unlocking | 548 | 482 | 451 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 33 | 272 | 48 | ||||||
| Other benefits (1) | 348 | 312 | 325 | ||||||
| Total benefits | $ | 4,275 | $ | 4,586 | $ | 4,183 | |||
| Death claims per $1,000 of in-force | 3.05 | 3.21 | 2.92 |
(1)Includes primarily changes in reserves and dividends on traditional and other products.
65
Table of Contents
Benefits for this segment include claims incurred during the period in excess of the associated reserves for its interest-sensitive and traditional products. In addition, benefits include the change in secondary guarantee and linked-benefit life insurance product reserves. These reserves are affected by changes in expected future trends of assessments and benefits causing unlocking adjustments to these liabilities similar to DAC, VOBA and DFEL. Generally, we have higher mortality in the first quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims.
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 639 | $ | 687 | $ | 931 | |||
| General and administrative expenses | 576 | 557 | 617 | ||||||
| Expenses associated with reserve financing | 100 | 99 | 95 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 162 | 163 | 184 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,477 | 1,506 | 1,827 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA deferrals | (745 | ) | (788 | ) | (1,094 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 732 | 718 | 733 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest: | |||||||||
| Amortization, net of interest, excluding unlocking | 450 | 339 | 441 | ||||||
| Unlocking | 580 | 445 | 338 | ||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,766 | $ | 1,506 | $ | 1,516 | |||
| DAC and VOBA Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of sales | 112.9% | 125.1% | 101.1% |
Commissions and costs that result directly from and are essential to successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and for our interest-sensitive products are generally amortized over the life of the contracts in relation to EGPs. For our traditional products, DAC and VOBA are amortized on either a straight-line basis or as a level percent of premium of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. When comparing DAC and VOBA deferrals as a percentage of sales for 2021 and 2020, the decrease was primarily a result of changes in sales mix to products with lower commission rates. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
66
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF GROUP PROTECTION
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Group Protection (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Operating Revenues | ||||||||
| Insurance premiums | $ | 4,450 | $ | 4,280 | $ | 4,113 | ||
| Net investment income | 366 | 330 | 307 | |||||
| Other revenues (1) | 180 | 183 | 168 | |||||
| Total operating revenues | 4,996 | 4,793 | 4,588 | |||||
| Operating Expenses | ||||||||
| Interest credited | 6 | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Benefits | 3,890 | 3,500 | 3,036 | |||||
| Commissions and other expenses | 1,260 | 1,234 | 1,246 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | 5,156 | 4,739 | 4,287 | |||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (160 | ) | 54 | 301 | ||||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (33 | ) | 11 | 63 | ||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | 238 |
(1)Consists of revenue from third parties for administrative services performed, which has a corresponding partial offset in commissions and other expenses.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Income (Loss) from Operations by Product Line | |||||||||
| Life | $ | (243 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | 77 | |
| Disability | 122 | 126 | 169 | ||||||
| Dental | (6 | ) | 12 | (9 | ) | ||||
| Total non-medical | (127 | ) | 43 | 237 | |||||
| Medical | - | - | 1 | ||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | 238 |
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Income from operations for this segment decreased due primarily to the following:
Higher benefits driven by unfavorable experience in our life and disability businesses in 2021 and lower utilization in our dental business in 2020, partially offset by favorable reserve adjustments in our disability business. See “Additional Information” below for further discussion on the impacts to benefits.
Higher commissions and other expenses due to incentive compensation as a result of production performance and investments in our claims organization to address higher claims volume attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by a decrease in amortization as a VOBA intangible asset was fully amortized in 2020.
The decrease in income from operations was partially offset by the following:
Higher insurance premiums due to growth in the business and favorable persistency.
Higher net investment income, net of interest credited, driven by investment income on alternative investments within our surplus portfolio and prepayment and bond make-whole premiums.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for information on our reserve adjustments.
67
Table of Contents
Additional Information
The total loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2021, increased due primarily to higher mortality in our life business and higher morbidity in our disability business as a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. We continue to expect elevated mortality in our life business, and we believe there is an on-going risk of morbidity headwinds in our disability business during the first quarter of 2022 as a result of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
Management compares trends in actual loss ratios to pricing expectations as group-underwriting risks change over time. We expect normal fluctuations in our total loss ratio, as claims experience is inherently uncertain. For every one percent increase in the total loss ratio, we would expect an annual decrease to income from operations of approximately $34 million to $38 million. The effects are symmetrical for a comparable decrease in the loss ratio and, therefore, move in an equal and opposite direction.
For information on the effects of current interest rates on our long-term disability claim reserves, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk – Effect of Interest Rate Sensitivity.”
Insurance Premiums
Details underlying insurance premiums (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Insurance Premiums by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,653 | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,500 | ||
| Disability | 2,569 | 2,401 | 2,320 | |||||
| Dental | 228 | 266 | 293 | |||||
| Total insurance premiums | $ | 4,450 | $ | 4,280 | $ | 4,113 | ||
| Sales by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | 264 | 265 | 344 | |||||
| Disability | 284 | 397 | 319 | |||||
| Dental | 38 | 44 | 89 | |||||
| Total sales | $ | 586 | $ | 706 | $ | 752 |
Our cost of insurance and policy administration charges are embedded in the premiums charged to our customers. The premiums are a function of the rates priced into the product and our business in force. Business in force, in turn, is driven by sales and persistency experience.
Sales relate to new contract holders and new programs sold to existing contract holders. We believe that the trend in sales is an important indicator of development of business in force over time. Sales in the table above are the combined annualized premiums for our products.
68
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
We use our investment income to offset the earnings effect of the associated build of our reserves, which are a function of our insurance premiums and the yields on our investments. Details underlying net investment income (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Net Investment Income | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on real estate | ||||||||
| and other, net of investment expenses | $ | 237 | $ | 240 | $ | 239 | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and bond | ||||||||
| make-whole premiums (1) | 16 | 9 | - | |||||
| Surplus investments (2) | 113 | 81 | 68 | |||||
| Total net investment income | $ | 366 | $ | 330 | $ | 307 |
(1)See “Consolidated Investments – Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)Represents net investment income on the required statutory surplus for this segment and includes the effect of investment income on alternative investments for such assets that are held in the portfolios supporting statutory surplus versus the portfolios supporting product liabilities. See “Consolidated Investments – Alternative Investments” below for more information on alternative investments.
Benefits and Interest Credited
Details underlying benefits and interest credited (in millions) and loss ratios by product line were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Benefits and Interest Credited by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | $ | 1,630 | $ | 1,399 | $ | 1,045 | ||
| Disability | 2,092 | 1,938 | 1,783 | |||||
| Dental | 174 | 168 | 213 | |||||
| Total benefits and interest credited | $ | 3,896 | $ | 3,505 | $ | 3,041 | ||
| Loss Ratios by Product Line | ||||||||
| Life | 98.6% | 86.7% | 69.7% | |||||
| Disability | 81.4% | 80.5% | 76.8% | |||||
| Dental | 76.3% | 63.1% | 72.8% | |||||
| Total | 87.5% | 81.8% | 73.9% |
Generally, we experience higher mortality in the first quarter of the year and higher disability claims in the fourth quarter of the year due to the seasonality of claims. For additional information on our loss ratios, see “Additional Information” above.
69
Table of Contents
Commissions and Other Expenses
Details underlying commissions and other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Commissions and Other Expenses | |||||||||
| Commissions | $ | 361 | $ | 359 | $ | 367 | |||
| General and administrative expenses | 731 | 697 | 741 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees | 120 | 122 | 114 | ||||||
| Total expenses incurred | 1,212 | 1,178 | 1,222 | ||||||
| DAC deferrals | (91 | ) | (92 | ) | (110 | ) | |||
| Total expenses recognized before amortization | 1,121 | 1,086 | 1,112 | ||||||
| DAC and VOBA amortization, net of interest | 107 | 115 | 112 | ||||||
| Other intangible amortization | 32 | 33 | 22 | ||||||
| Total commissions and other expenses | $ | 1,260 | $ | 1,234 | $ | 1,246 | |||
| DAC Deferrals | |||||||||
| As a percentage of insurance premiums | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Commissions and other costs that result directly from and are essential to the successful acquisition of new or renewal business are deferred to the extent recoverable and are amortized as a level percent of insurance premiums of the related contracts, depending on the block of business. Certain broker commissions that vary with and are related to paid premiums are expensed as incurred rather than deferred and amortized. For more information, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL” above.
70
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OTHER OPERATIONS
Income (Loss) from Operations
Details underlying the results for Other Operations (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Operating Revenues | |||||||||
| Insurance premiums (1) | $ | 19 | $ | 21 | $ | 13 | |||
| Net investment income | 147 | 152 | 194 | ||||||
| Other revenues | 14 | 12 | 13 | ||||||
| Total operating revenues | 180 | 185 | 220 | ||||||
| Operating Expenses | |||||||||
| Interest credited | 42 | 39 | 58 | ||||||
| Benefits | 81 | 117 | 110 | ||||||
| Other expenses | 189 | 69 | 62 | ||||||
| Interest and debt expense | 262 | 269 | 284 | ||||||
| Spark and strategic digitization expense | 87 | 68 | 66 | ||||||
| Total operating expenses | 661 | 562 | 580 | ||||||
| Income (loss) from operations before taxes | (481 | ) | (377 | ) | (360 | ) | |||
| Federal income tax expense (benefit) | (106 | ) | (82 | ) | (92 | ) | |||
| Income (loss) from operations | $ | (375 | ) | $ | (295 | ) | $ | (268 | ) |
(1)Includes our disability income business, which has a corresponding offset in benefits for changes in reserves.
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
Loss from operations for Other Operations increased due primarily to the following:
Higher other expenses related to a one-time legal expense and the effect of changes in our stock price on our deferred compensation plans, as our stock price increased significantly during 2021, compared to a significant decrease during 2020.
Higher Spark and strategic digitization expense as part of our Spark and strategic digitization initiatives.
Lower net investment income, net of interest credited, related to lower allocated investments driven by a decrease in excess capital retained by Other Operations.
The increase in loss from operations was partially offset by the following:
Lower benefits attributable to favorable experience in our run-off institutional pension and disability income businesses and modifying certain assumptions in 2020 on the reserves supporting our institutional pension business.
Lower interest and debt expense driven by a decline in average interest rates.
Additional Information
We expect to continue making investments as part of our Spark and strategic digitization initiatives. For more information, see “Introduction – Executive Summary – Significant Operational Matters – Spark and Strategic Digitization Initiatives.”
Net Investment Income and Interest Credited
We utilize an internal formula to determine the amount of capital that is allocated to our business segments. Investment income on capital in excess of the calculated amounts is reported in Other Operations. If our business segments require increases in statutory reserves, surplus or investments, the amount of excess capital that is retained by Other Operations would decrease and net investment income would be negatively affected.
Write-downs for impairments decrease the recorded value of investments owned by the business segments. These write-downs are not included in the income from operations of our business segments. When impairment occurs, assets are transferred to the business segments’ portfolios and will reduce the future net investment income for Other Operations. Statutory reserve adjustments for our business segments can also cause allocations of investments between the business segments and Other Operations.
71
Table of Contents
The majority of our interest credited relates to our reinsurance operations sold to Swiss Re Life & Health America, Inc. (“Swiss Re”) in 2001. A substantial amount of the business was sold through indemnity reinsurance transactions, which is still recorded in our consolidated financial statements. The interest credited corresponds to investment income earnings on the assets we continue to hold for this business. There is no effect to income or loss in Other Operations or on a consolidated basis for these amounts because interest earned on the blocks that continue to be reinsured is passed through to Swiss Re in the form of interest credited.
Benefits
Benefits are recognized when incurred for institutional pension products and disability income business.
Other Expenses
Details underlying other expenses (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| General and administrative expenses: | |||||||||
| Legal | $ | 94 | $ | - | $ | - | |||
| Branding | 45 | 43 | 45 | ||||||
| Other (1) | 61 | 46 | 36 | ||||||
| Total general and administrative expenses | 200 | 89 | 81 | ||||||
| Taxes, licenses and fees (2) | (9 | ) | (11 | ) | (7 | ) | |||
| Other (3) | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (12 | ) | |||
| Total other expenses | $ | 189 | $ | 69 | $ | 62 |
(1)Includes expenses that are corporate in nature including charitable contributions, the portion of our deferred compensation plan expense attributable to participants’ selection of LNC stock as the measure for their investment return and other expenses not allocated to our business segments.
(2)Includes state guaranty funds assessments to cover losses to contract holders of insolvent or rehabilitated insurance companies. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in future premium taxes in some states.
(3)Consists primarily of reimbursements to Other Operations from the Life Insurance segment for the use of proceeds from certain issuances of senior notes that were used as long-term structured solutions, net of expenses incurred by Other Operations for its access to a financing facility and issuance of LOCs.
Interest and Debt Expense
Our current level of interest expense may not be indicative of the future due to, among other things, the timing of the use of cash, the availability of funds from our inter-company cash management program and the future cost of capital. For additional information on our financing activities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Debt” below.
72
Table of Contents
REALIZED GAIN (LOSS)
Details underlying realized gain (loss), after-DAC (1) (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Components of Realized Gain (Loss), Pre-Tax | |||||||||
| Total operating realized gain (loss) | $ | 199 | $ | 208 | $ | 184 | |||
| Total excluded realized gain (loss) | (411 | ) | (721 | ) | (794 | ) | |||
| Total realized gain (loss), pre-tax | $ | (212 | ) | $ | (513 | ) | $ | (610 | ) |
| Components of Excluded Realized Gain (Loss), | |||||||||
| After-Tax | |||||||||
| Realized gain (loss) related to certain financial assets | $ | 89 | $ | (136 | ) | $ | (58 | ) | |
| Realized gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on | |||||||||
| certain instruments (2) | 60 | 33 | (95 | ) | |||||
| Variable annuity net derivative results: | |||||||||
| Hedge program performance, including unlocking | |||||||||
| for GLB reserves hedged and benefit ratio unlocking | (109 | ) | (564 | ) | (97 | ) | |||
| GLB NPR component | (195 | ) | 293 | (41 | ) | ||||
| Total variable annuity net derivative results | (304 | ) | (271 | ) | (138 | ) | |||
| Indexed annuity forward-starting option | 26 | (2 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
| Excluded realized gain (loss) including benefit | |||||||||
| ratio unlocking, after-tax | (129 | ) | (376 | ) | (350 | ) | |||
| Less: benefit ratio unlocking, after tax | 196 | 194 | 277 | ||||||
| Total excluded realized gain (loss), after-tax | $ | (325 | ) | $ | (570 | ) | $ | (627 | ) |
(1)DAC refers to the associated amortization of DAC, VOBA, DSI and DFEL and changes in other contract holder funds and funds withheld reinsurance assets and liabilities.
(2)The modified coinsurance investment portfolio includes fixed maturity securities classified as AFS with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”). Since the corresponding and offsetting changes in fair value of the embedded derivatives related to the modified coinsurance investment portfolio are recorded in realized gain (loss), volatility can occur within net income (loss). See Note 8 for more information.
Comparison of 2021 to 2020
We had lower realized losses due primarily to the following:
Gains related to certain financial assets in 2021 as compared to losses in 2020 due to changes in economic projections associated with our review of credit losses for mortgage loans on real estate.
Gains related to our indexed annuity forward-starting option driven by an increase in discount rates, partially offset by the effect of unlocking.
Gains related to the mark-to-market on certain instruments due to favorable changes in the fair value of embedded derivatives related to certain modified coinsurance arrangements.
The lower realized losses were partially offset by unfavorable variable annuity net derivative results driven by an update to our NPR input to the fair value calculation of our GLB embedded derivatives in 2020 and the effects of unlocking, partially offset by less unfavorable hedge program performance due to less volatile capital markets.
The above components of excluded realized gain (loss) are described including benefit ratio unlocking, after-tax.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Annual Assumption Review” above for more information about unlocking.
Operating Realized Gain (Loss)
Operating realized gain (loss) includes indexed annuity and IUL net derivative results representing the net difference between the change in the fair value of the options that we hold and a portion of the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities of our indexed annuity and IUL products. The portion of the change in the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities reported in operating realized gain (loss) represents the amount that is credited to the indexed annuity and IUL contracts.
73
Table of Contents
Our GWB, GIB and 4LATER® features have elements of both benefit reserves and embedded derivative reserves. We calculate the value of the benefit reserves and the embedded derivative reserves based on the specific characteristics of each GLB feature. For our GLBs that meet the definition of an embedded derivative under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC, we record them at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets with changes in fair value recorded in realized gain (loss) on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). In bifurcating the embedded derivative, we attribute to the embedded derivative the portion of total fees collected from the contract holder that relates to the GLB riders (the “attributed fees”). These attributed fees represent the present value of future claims expected to be paid for the GLB at the inception of the contract (the “net valuation premium”) plus a margin that a theoretical market participant would include for risk/profit (the “risk/profit margin”).
We also include the risk/profit margin portion of the GLB attributed rider fees in operating realized gain (loss) and include the net valuation premium of the GLB attributed rider fees in excluded realized gain (loss). For our Annuities and Retirement Plan Services segments, the excess of total fees collected from the contract holders over the GLB attributed rider fees is reported in fee income.
Realized Gain (Loss) Related to Certain Financial Assets
For information on realized gain (loss) related to certain financial assets, see Note 15.
Realized Gain (Loss) on the Mark-to-Market on Certain Instruments
Gain (loss) on the mark-to-market on certain instruments, including those associated with our consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) represents changes in the fair values of certain derivative investments (not including those associated with our variable annuity net derivative results), reinsurance related embedded derivatives and trading securities.
See Note 3 for information about our consolidated VIEs.
We also recognize the mark-to-market on certain mortgage loans on real estate for which we have elected the fair value option. See Note 20 for additional information.
Variable Annuity Net Derivative Results
Our variable annuity net derivative results include the net valuation premium, the change in the GLB embedded derivative reserves and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge them, including the cost of purchasing the hedging instruments. In addition, these results include the changes in reserves not accounted for at fair value and results from benefit ratio unlocking on our GDB and GLB riders and the change in the fair value of the derivative instruments we own to hedge the benefit ratio unlocking on our GDB and GLB riders.
We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to the risks and earnings volatility that result from changes in the GLB embedded derivative reserves. The change in fair value of these derivative instruments is designed to generally offset the change in embedded derivative reserves. Our variable annuity net derivative results can be volatile, especially when sudden and significant changes in equity markets and/or interest rates occur. We do not attempt to hedge the change in the NPR component of the liability. The NPR factors affect the discount rate used in the calculation of the GLB embedded derivative reserve. Our methodology for calculating the NPR component of the embedded derivative reserve utilizes an extrapolated 30-year NPR spread curve applied to a series of expected cash flows over the expected life of the embedded derivative. Our cash flows consist of both expected fees to be received from contract holders and benefits to be paid, and these cash flows are different on a pre- and post-NPR basis. We utilize a model based on our holding company’s credit default swap (“CDS”) spread adjusted to reflect the credit quality of our insurance subsidiary as the issuing entity. Because the guaranteed benefit liabilities are contained within our insurance subsidiaries, we apply items, such as the effect of our insurance subsidiaries’ claims-paying ratings compared to holding company credit risk and the over-collateralization of insurance liabilities, in order to determine factors that are representative of a theoretical market participant’s view of the NPR of the specific liability within our insurance subsidiaries.
74
Table of Contents
Details underlying our variable annuity hedging program (dollars in millions) were as follows:
| As of | As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | September 30, | June 30, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Variable annuity hedge program assets (liabilities) | $ | 721 | $ | 1,090 | $ | 881 | $ | 640 | $ | 2,284 | ||||||||||
| Variable annuity reserves – asset (liability): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Embedded derivative reserves, pre-NPR (1) | $ | 1,818 | $ | 1,511 | $ | 1,569 | $ | 1,619 | $ | 198 | ||||||||||
| NPR | 17 | 94 | 98 | 101 | 333 | |||||||||||||||
| Embedded derivative reserves | 1,835 | 1,605 | 1,667 | 1,719 | 531 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance benefit reserves | (1,231 | ) | (1,254 | ) | (1,135 | ) | (1,164 | ) | (1,150 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total variable annuity reserves – asset (liability) | $ | 604 | $ | 351 | $ | 532 | $ | 555 | $ | (619 | ) | |||||||||
| 10-year CDS spread | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 1.28% | 1.25% | |||||||||||||||
| NPR factor related to 10-year CDS spread | 0.70% | 0.74% | 0.70% | 0.78% | 0.70% |
(1)Embedded derivative reserves in an asset (liability) position indicate we estimate the present value of future benefits to be less (greater) than the present value of future net valuation premiums.
The following shows the hypothetical effect (in millions) to net income (loss) for changes in the NPR factor along all points on the spread curve as of December 31, 2021:
| Hypothetical | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effect | ||||
| NPR factor: | ||||
| Down 70 basis points to zero | $ | (182 | ) | |
| Up 20 basis points | 18 |
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Future Contract Benefits – GLB” above for additional information about our guaranteed benefits.
Indexed Annuity Forward-Starting Option
The liability for the forward-starting option reflects changes in the fair value of embedded derivative liabilities related to index options we may purchase or sell in the future to hedge contract holder index allocations applicable to future reset periods for our indexed annuity products accounted for under the Derivatives and Hedging and the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topics of the FASB ASC. These fair values represent an estimate of the cost of the options we will purchase or sell in the future, discounted back to the date of the balance sheet, using current market indications of volatility and interest rates, which can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and therefore can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
75
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS
Details underlying our consolidated investment balances (in millions) were as follows:
| Percentage of | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Investments | |||||||||||||
| As of | As of | As of | As of | ||||||||||
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
| Investments | |||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 118,746 | $ | 123,044 | 77.3% | 79.9% | |||||||
| Trading securities | 4,482 | 4,501 | 2.9% | 2.9% | |||||||||
| Equity securities | 318 | 129 | 0.2% | 0.1% | |||||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 17,991 | 16,763 | 11.7% | 10.9% | |||||||||
| Policy loans | 2,364 | 2,426 | 1.5% | 1.6% | |||||||||
| Derivative investments | 5,437 | 3,109 | 3.6% | 2.0% | |||||||||
| Alternative investments | 2,666 | 1,944 | 1.7% | 1.3% | |||||||||
| Other investments | 1,626 | 2,040 | 1.1% | 1.3% | |||||||||
| Total investments | $ | 153,630 | $ | 153,956 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Investment Objective
Investments are an integral part of our operations. We follow a balanced approach to investing for both current income and prudent risk management, with an emphasis on generating sufficient current income, net of income tax, to meet our obligations to customers, as well as other general liabilities. This balanced approach requires the evaluation of expected return and risk of each asset class utilized, while still meeting our income objectives. This approach is important to our asset-liability management because decisions can be made based upon both the economic and current investment income considerations affecting assets and liabilities. For a discussion of our risk management process, see “Part II – Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Investment Portfolio Composition and Diversification
Fundamental to our investment policy is diversification across asset classes. Our investment portfolio, excluding cash and invested cash, is composed of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate, real estate (either wholly-owned or in joint ventures) and other long-term investments. We purchase investments for our segmented portfolios that have yield, duration and other characteristics that take into account the liabilities of the products being supported.
We have the ability to maintain our investment holdings throughout credit cycles because of our capital position, the long-term nature of our liabilities and the matching of our portfolios of investment assets with the liabilities of our various products.
76
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Portfolios
Fixed maturity securities consist of portfolios classified as AFS and trading. Details underlying our fixed maturity AFS securities by industry classification (in millions) are presented in the tables below. These tables agree in total with the presentation of fixed maturity AFS securities in Note 4; however, the categories below represent a more detailed breakout of the fixed maturity AFS portfolio. Therefore, the investment classifications listed below do not agree to the investment categories provided in Note 4.
| As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | ||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | ||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | |||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | |||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 16,438 | $ | 1,981 | $ | 81 | $ | 18,338 | 15.4% | ||||
| Basic industry | 4,436 | 741 | 11 | 5,166 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| Capital goods | 7,316 | 1,040 | 31 | 8,325 | 7.0% | ||||||||
| Communications | 4,124 | 734 | 7 | 4,851 | 4.1% | ||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,811 | 616 | 22 | 6,405 | 5.4% | ||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 16,905 | 2,565 | 83 | 19,387 | 16.3% | ||||||||
| Energy | 4,932 | 728 | 13 | 5,647 | 4.8% | ||||||||
| Technology | 5,173 | 546 | 34 | 5,685 | 4.8% | ||||||||
| Transportation | 3,414 | 423 | 11 | 3,826 | 3.2% | ||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,159 | 174 | 11 | 2,322 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Utilities | 13,785 | 2,250 | 38 | 15,997 | 13.5% | ||||||||
| Government related entities | 1,863 | 315 | 7 | 2,171 | 1.8% | ||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage and other obligations (“CMOs”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,544 | 123 | 1 | 1,666 | 1.4% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 360 | 52 | 1 | 411 | 0.3% | ||||||||
| Mortgage pass through securities (“MPTS”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 429 | 21 | 2 | 448 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”): | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 20 | - | - | 20 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,532 | 61 | 14 | 1,579 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (“ABS”): | |||||||||||||
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 6,356 | 11 | 49 | 6,318 | 5.3% | ||||||||
| Credit card | 82 | 24 | 1 | 105 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Equipment receivables | 10 | - | - | 10 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Home equity | 236 | 54 | - | 290 | 0.2% | ||||||||
| Manufactured housing | 6 | - | - | 6 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Student loans | 7 | - | - | 7 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Other | 1,742 | 38 | 4 | 1,776 | 1.5% | ||||||||
| Municipals: | |||||||||||||
| Taxable | 5,250 | 1,290 | 12 | 6,528 | 5.5% | ||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 72 | 21 | - | 93 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Government: | |||||||||||||
| United States | 375 | 60 | 2 | 433 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Foreign | 373 | 64 | 5 | 432 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 408 | 107 | 11 | 504 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 105,158 | 14,039 | 451 | 118,746 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 4,170 | 343 | 31 | 4,482 | |||||||||
| Equity Securities | 285 | 55 | 22 | 318 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 109,613 | $ | 14,437 | $ | 504 | $ | 123,546 |
77
Table of Contents
| As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | % | ||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | Fair | ||||||||||
| Cost (1) | Gains | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| Fixed Maturity AFS Securities | |||||||||||||
| Industry corporate bonds: | |||||||||||||
| Financial services | $ | 15,889 | $ | 2,836 | $ | 32 | $ | 18,693 | 15.2% | ||||
| Basic industry | 4,719 | 992 | 3 | 5,708 | 4.6% | ||||||||
| Capital goods | 7,323 | 1,402 | 13 | 8,712 | 7.1% | ||||||||
| Communications | 4,331 | 1,036 | 4 | 5,363 | 4.4% | ||||||||
| Consumer cyclical | 5,707 | 926 | 12 | 6,621 | 5.4% | ||||||||
| Consumer non-cyclical | 16,600 | 3,412 | 17 | 19,995 | 16.3% | ||||||||
| Energy | 5,605 | 877 | 24 | 6,458 | 5.2% | ||||||||
| Technology | 4,590 | 742 | 7 | 5,325 | 4.3% | ||||||||
| Transportation | 3,450 | 619 | 12 | 4,057 | 3.3% | ||||||||
| Industrial other | 2,082 | 224 | 6 | 2,300 | 1.9% | ||||||||
| Utilities | 14,096 | 3,198 | 6 | 17,288 | 14.1% | ||||||||
| Government related entities | 1,885 | 398 | 14 | 2,269 | 1.8% | ||||||||
| CMOs: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 1,874 | 216 | 1 | 2,089 | 1.7% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 433 | 53 | - | 486 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| MPTS: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 457 | 44 | - | 501 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| CMBS: | |||||||||||||
| Agency backed | 20 | 1 | - | 21 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Non-agency backed | 1,370 | 114 | - | 1,484 | 1.2% | ||||||||
| ABS: | |||||||||||||
| CLOs | 5,571 | 23 | 11 | 5,583 | 4.5% | ||||||||
| Credit card | 78 | 31 | 1 | 108 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Equipment receivables | 15 | - | - | 15 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Home equity | 303 | 52 | 1 | 354 | 0.3% | ||||||||
| Manufactured housing | 7 | 1 | - | 8 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Student loans | 17 | 1 | - | 18 | 0.0% | ||||||||
| Other | 1,050 | 50 | 2 | 1,098 | 0.9% | ||||||||
| Municipals: | |||||||||||||
| Taxable | 5,249 | 1,532 | - | 6,781 | 5.5% | ||||||||
| Tax-exempt | 111 | 29 | - | 140 | 0.1% | ||||||||
| Government: | |||||||||||||
| United States | 397 | 88 | 1 | 484 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Foreign | 384 | 87 | 1 | 470 | 0.4% | ||||||||
| Hybrid and redeemable preferred securities | 548 | 97 | 30 | 615 | 0.5% | ||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | 104,161 | 19,081 | 198 | 123,044 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Trading Securities (2) | 4,072 | 477 | 48 | 4,501 | |||||||||
| Equity Securities | 132 | 21 | 24 | 129 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS, trading and equity securities | $ | 108,365 | $ | 19,579 | $ | 270 | $ | 127,674 |
(1)Represents amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
(2)Certain of our trading securities support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements and the investment results are passed directly to the reinsurers. See “Trading Securities” below for more information.
78
Table of Contents
Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
In accordance with the fixed maturity AFS accounting guidance, we reflect stockholders’ equity as if unrealized gains and losses were actually recognized and consider all related accounting adjustments that would occur upon such a hypothetical recognition of unrealized gains and losses. Such related balance sheet effects include adjustments to the balances of DAC, VOBA, DFEL, future contract benefits, other contract holder funds and deferred income taxes. Adjustments to each of these balances are charged or credited to AOCI. For instance, DAC is adjusted upon the recognition of unrealized gains or losses because the amortization of DAC is based upon an assumed emergence of gross profits on certain insurance business. Deferred income tax balances are also adjusted because unrealized gains or losses do not affect actual taxes currently paid.
The quality of our fixed maturity AFS securities portfolio, as measured at estimated fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity AFS securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire fixed maturity AFS security portfolio (in millions) was as follows:
| As of December 31, 2021 | As of December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating Agency | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||
| NAIC | Equivalent | Amortized | Fair | % of | Amortized | Fair | % of | |||||||||||
| Designation (1) | Designation (1) | Cost | Value | Total | Cost | Value | Total | |||||||||||
| Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | AAA / AA / A | $ | 58,542 | $ | 66,571 | 56.1% | $ | 57,934 | $ | 69,226 | 56.3% | |||||||
| 2 | BBB | 42,797 | 48,130 | 40.5% | 41,970 | 49,390 | 40.1% | |||||||||||
| Total investment grade securities | 101,339 | 114,701 | 96.6% | 99,904 | 118,616 | 96.4% | ||||||||||||
| Below Investment Grade Securities | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | BB | 2,278 | 2,492 | 2.1% | 2,959 | 3,157 | 2.6% | |||||||||||
| 4 | B | 1,424 | 1,441 | 1.2% | 1,249 | 1,218 | 1.0% | |||||||||||
| 5 | CCC and lower | 51 | 53 | 0.0% | 46 | 48 | 0.0% | |||||||||||
| 6 | In or near default | 66 | 59 | 0.1% | 3 | 5 | 0.0% | |||||||||||
| Total below investment grade securities | 3,819 | 4,045 | 3.4% | 4,257 | 4,428 | 3.6% | ||||||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 105,158 | $ | 118,746 | 100.0% | $ | 104,161 | $ | 123,044 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Total securities below investment | ||||||||||||||||||
| grade as a percentage of total | ||||||||||||||||||
| fixed maturity AFS securities | 3.6% | 3.4% | 4.1% | 3.6% |
(1)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) or the major credit rating agencies (Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) and S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”)). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
Comparisons between the NAIC designations and rating agency designations are published by the NAIC. The NAIC assigns securities quality designations and uniform valuations, which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC designations are similar to the rating agency designations of the Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations for marketable bonds. NAIC designations 1 and 2 include bonds generally considered investment grade (rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s, or rated BBB- or higher by S&P and Fitch) by such ratings organizations. However, securities designated NAIC 1 and 2 could be deemed below investment grade by the rating agencies as a result of the current RBC rules for residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and CMBS for statutory reporting. NAIC designations 3 through 6 include bonds generally considered below investment grade (rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s, or rated BB+ or lower by S&P and Fitch).
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, 94% and 78%, respectively, of the total fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position were investment grade. See Note 4 for maturity date information for our fixed maturity investment portfolio. Our gross unrealized losses recognized in OCI on fixed maturity AFS securities as of December 31, 2021, increased by $253 million since December 31, 2020. For further information on our unrealized losses on fixed maturity AFS securities, see “Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities” below.
79
Table of Contents
We regularly review our fixed maturity AFS securities for declines in fair value that we determine to be impairment-related, including those attributable to credit risk factors that may require a credit allowance. We believe the unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2021, did not require an impairment recognized in earnings as: (i) we did not intend to sell these fixed maturity AFS securities; (ii) it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the fixed maturity AFS securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis; and (iii) the difference in the fair value compared to the amortized cost was due to factors other than credit loss. This conclusion is consistent with our asset-liability management process. Management considered the following as part of the evaluation:
The current economic environment and market conditions;
Our business strategy and current business plans;
The nature and type of security, including expected maturities and exposure to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risk;
Our analysis of data from financial models and other internal and industry sources to evaluate the current effectiveness of our hedging and overall risk management strategies;
The current and expected timing of contractual maturities of our assets and liabilities, expectations of prepayments on investments and expectations for surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts;
The capital risk limits approved by management; and
Our current financial condition and liquidity demands.
We recognized $(11) million of credit loss benefit (expense) on our fixed maturity AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2021. In order to determine the amount of credit loss, we calculated the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows we expect to recover. To determine the recoverability, we considered the facts and circumstances surrounding the underlying issuer including, but not limited to, the following:
Historical and implied volatility of the security;
The extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost;
Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area;
Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and
Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
As reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, we had $156.2 billion of investments and cash and invested cash, which exceeded the liabilities for our future obligations under insurance policies and contracts, net of amounts recoverable from reinsurers, which totaled $132.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. If it were necessary to liquidate fixed maturity AFS securities prior to maturity or call to meet cash flow needs, we would first look to those fixed maturity AFS securities that are in an unrealized gain position, which had a fair value of $100.0 billion as of December 31, 2021, rather than selling fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position. The amount of cash that we have on hand at any point in time takes into account our liquidity needs in the future, other sources of cash, such as the maturities of investments, interest and dividends we earn on our investments and the ongoing cash flows from new and existing business. See “Fixed Maturity AFS Securities – Evaluation for Recovery of Amortized Cost” in Note 1 for additional discussion.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the estimated fair value for all private placement securities was $20.7 billion and $19.1 billion, respectively, representing 13% and 12% of total investments, respectively.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, which in certain cases support reinsurance funds withheld and our modified coinsurance agreements, are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded in net income as they occur. Investment results for these certain portfolios, including gains and losses from sales, are passed directly to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Offsetting these amounts in certain cases are corresponding changes in fair value of the embedded derivative liability associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. See Notes 1 and 8 for more information regarding modified coinsurance.
Mortgage-Backed Securities (Included in Fixed Maturity AFS and Trading Securities)
Our fixed maturity securities include mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”). These securities are subject to risks associated with variable prepayments. This may result in differences between the actual cash flow and maturity of these securities than that expected at the time of purchase. Securities that have an amortized cost greater than par and are backed by mortgages that prepay faster than expected will incur a reduction in yield or a loss. Those securities with an amortized cost lower than par that prepay faster than expected will generate an increase in yield or a gain. In addition, we may incur reinvestment risks if market yields are lower than the book yields earned on the securities. Prepayments occurring slower than expected have the opposite effect. The degree to which a security is susceptible to either gains or losses is influenced by: the difference between its amortized cost and par; the relative sensitivity of the underlying mortgages backing the assets to prepayment in a changing interest rate environment; and the repayment priority of the securities in the overall securitization structure.
We limit the extent of our risk on MBS by prudently limiting exposure to the asset class, by generally avoiding the purchase of securities with a cost that significantly exceeds par, by purchasing securities with improving collateral performance, and by primarily investing in
80
Table of Contents
securities that are current pay and senior priority in their trust structure. A significant amount of assets in our MBS portfolio are either guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, supported in the securitization structure by junior securities or purchased at discounted prices significantly lower than their expected recovery value, enabling the assets to achieve high investment grade status.
Our exposure to subprime mortgage lending is limited to investments in banks and other financial institutions that may be affected by subprime lending and direct investments in ABS and RMBS. Mortgage-related ABS are backed by home equity loans and RMBS are backed by residential mortgages. These securities are backed by loans that are characterized by borrowers of differing levels of creditworthiness: prime; Alt-A; and subprime. Prime lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers with excellent credit profiles. Alt-A lending is the origination of residential mortgage loans to customers who have prime credit profiles but lack documentation to substantiate income. Subprime lending is the origination of loans to customers with weak or impaired credit profiles.
Delinquency and loss rates on residential mortgages and home equity loans have been showing positive trends, and, as long as the unemployment rate remains stable to improving, we expect these trends to continue. We continue to expect to receive payments in accordance with contractual terms for a significant amount of our securities, largely due to the seniority of the claims on the collateral of the securities that we own. The tranches of the securities will experience losses according to their seniority level with the least senior (or most junior), typically the unrated residual tranche, taking the first loss. Our ABS home equity and RMBS had a market value of $2.9 billion and a net unrealized gain of $245 million as of December 31, 2021.
81
Table of Contents
The market value of fixed maturity AFS and trading securities backed by subprime loans was $259 million and represented less than 1% of our total investment portfolio as of December 31, 2021. Fixed maturity AFS securities represented $247 million, or 96%, and trading securities represented $12 million, or 4%, of the subprime exposure as of December 31, 2021. The table below summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of residential mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2021:
| Subprime/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency | Prime | Alt-A | Option ARM (1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net | Net | Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Type | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RMBS | $ | 1,973 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 138 | $ | 151 | $ | 81 | $ | 96 | $ | 141 | $ | 164 | $ | 2,333 | $ | 2,525 | |||||||||
| ABS home equity | 1 | - | 22 | 23 | 25 | 38 | 188 | 229 | 236 | 290 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by type (2)(3) | $ | 1,974 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 160 | $ | 174 | $ | 106 | $ | 134 | $ | 329 | $ | 393 | $ | 2,569 | $ | 2,815 | |||||||||
| Rating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,599 | $ | 1,716 | $ | 14 | $ | 14 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,613 | $ | 1,730 | |||||||||
| AA | 368 | 391 | 17 | 17 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 393 | 416 | |||||||||||||||||||
| A | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BBB | - | - | 26 | 26 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 19 | 53 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||||
| BB and below | - | - | 95 | 109 | 90 | 117 | 292 | 354 | 477 | 580 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by rating (2)(3)(4) | $ | 1,974 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 160 | $ | 174 | $ | 106 | $ | 134 | $ | 329 | $ | 393 | $ | 2,569 | $ | 2,815 | |||||||||
| Origination Year | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 and prior | $ | 407 | $ | 452 | $ | 108 | $ | 122 | $ | 106 | $ | 134 | $ | 329 | $ | 393 | $ | 950 | $ | 1,101 | |||||||||
| 2012 | 18 | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 118 | 128 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 118 | 128 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 48 | 53 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 49 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 146 | 155 | 15 | 15 | - | - | - | - | 161 | 170 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 471 | 493 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 471 | 493 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 237 | 255 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 237 | 255 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 197 | 219 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 197 | 219 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 161 | 171 | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 162 | 172 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 73 | 73 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 73 | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 98 | 96 | 35 | 35 | - | - | - | - | 133 | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total by origination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| year (2)(3) | $ | 1,974 | $ | 2,114 | $ | 160 | $ | 174 | $ | 106 | $ | 134 | $ | 329 | $ | 393 | $ | 2,569 | $ | 2,815 | |||||||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| residential mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 2.4% | 2.4% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total prime, Alt-A and subprime/option ARM as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 0.6% | 0.6% |
(1)Includes the net amortized cost and fair value of option adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”) within RMBS, totaling $124 million and $146 million, respectively.
(2)Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $98 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $98 million in trading securities consisted of $87 million prime and $11 million subprime.
(3)Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $99 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $99 million in trading securities consisted of $87 million prime and $12 million subprime.
(4)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
None of these investments included any direct investments in subprime lenders or mortgages. We are not aware of material exposure to subprime loans in our alternative investment portfolio.
82
Table of Contents
The following summarizes our investments in fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of commercial mortgages (in millions) as of December 31, 2021:
| Multiple Property | Single Property | Total | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||
| Cost | Value | Cost | Value | Cost | Value | ||||||||||||
| Type | |||||||||||||||||
| CMBS (1)(2) | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,537 | $ | 59 | $ | 62 | $ | 1,552 | $ | 1,599 | |||||
| Rating | |||||||||||||||||
| AAA | $ | 1,252 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 11 | $ | 11 | $ | 1,263 | $ | 1,310 | |||||
| AA | 241 | 238 | 43 | 45 | 284 | 283 | |||||||||||
| A | - | - | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Total by rating (1)(2)(3) | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,537 | $ | 59 | $ | 62 | $ | 1,552 | $ | 1,599 | |||||
| Origination Year | |||||||||||||||||
| 2011 and prior | $ | 12 | $ | 14 | $ | 11 | $ | 14 | $ | 23 | $ | 28 | |||||
| 2012 | 14 | 14 | - | - | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||
| 2013 | 95 | 96 | - | - | 95 | 96 | |||||||||||
| 2014 | 13 | 13 | - | - | 13 | 13 | |||||||||||
| 2015 | 25 | 26 | - | - | 25 | 26 | |||||||||||
| 2016 | 112 | 115 | 4 | 4 | 116 | 119 | |||||||||||
| 2017 | 322 | 342 | - | - | 322 | 342 | |||||||||||
| 2018 | 168 | 184 | - | - | 168 | 184 | |||||||||||
| 2019 | 299 | 312 | - | - | 299 | 312 | |||||||||||
| 2020 | 238 | 229 | 5 | 5 | 243 | 234 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 195 | 192 | 39 | 39 | 234 | 231 | |||||||||||
| Total by origination year (1)(2) | $ | 1,493 | $ | 1,537 | $ | 59 | $ | 62 | $ | 1,552 | $ | 1,599 | |||||
| Total fixed maturity AFS securities backed by pools of | |||||||||||||||||
| commercial mortgages as a percentage of total fixed maturity AFS securities | 1.5% | 1.3% |
(1)Does not include the amortized cost of trading securities totaling $137 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $137 million in trading securities consisted of $56 million of multiple property CMBS and $81 million of single property CMBS.
(2)Does not include the fair value of trading securities totaling $137 million that primarily support our reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance agreements because investment results for these agreements are passed directly to the reinsurers. The $137 million in trading securities consisted of $56 million of multiple property CMBS and $81 million of single property CMBS.
(3)Based upon the rating designations determined and provided by the major credit rating agencies (Fitch, Moody’s and S&P). For securities where the ratings assigned by the major credit rating agencies are not equivalent, the second lowest rating assigned is used. For those securities where ratings by the major credit rating agencies are not available, which does not represent a significant amount of our total fixed maturity AFS securities, we base the ratings disclosed upon internal ratings.
As of December 31, 2021, the net amortized cost and fair value of our fixed maturity AFS exposure to monoline insurers was $331 million and $385 million, respectively.
Composition by Industry Categories of our Unrealized Losses on Fixed Maturity AFS Securities
When considering unrealized gain and loss information, it is important to recognize that the information relates to the position of securities at a particular point in time and may not be indicative of the position of our investment portfolios subsequent to the balance sheet date. Further, because the timing of the recognition of realized investment gains and losses through the selection of which securities are sold is largely at management’s discretion, it is important to consider the information provided below within the context of the overall unrealized gain or loss position of our investment portfolios. These are important considerations that should be included in any evaluation of the potential effect of securities in an unrealized loss position on our future earnings.
83
Table of Contents
The composition by industry categories of all fixed maturity AFS securities in an unrealized loss position (in millions) as of December 31, 2021, was as follows:
| % | % | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net | Net | Gross | Gross | % | ||||||||||
| Amortized | Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | Fair | |||||||||
| Cost | Cost | Losses | Losses | Value | Value | |||||||||
| ABS | $ | 4,697 | 24.5% | $ | 52 | 11.5% | $ | 4,645 | 24.7% | |||||
| Healthcare | 1,542 | 8.0% | 48 | 10.6% | 1,494 | 8.0% | ||||||||
| Technology | 1,036 | 5.4% | 34 | 7.5% | 1,002 | 5.3% | ||||||||
| Banking | 1,500 | 7.8% | 30 | 6.7% | 1,470 | 7.8% | ||||||||
| Electric | 601 | 3.1% | 22 | 4.9% | 579 | 3.1% | ||||||||
| Food and beverage | 802 | 4.2% | 19 | 4.2% | 783 | 4.2% | ||||||||
| Brokerage asset management | 611 | 3.2% | 16 | 3.5% | 595 | 3.2% | ||||||||
| Non agency CMBS | 497 | 2.6% | 14 | 3.1% | 483 | 2.6% | ||||||||
| Local authorities | 567 | 3.0% | 12 | 2.7% | 555 | 3.0% | ||||||||
| Pharmaceuticals | 458 | 2.4% | 12 | 2.7% | 446 | 2.4% | ||||||||
| Aerospace and defense | 367 | 1.9% | 12 | 2.7% | 355 | 1.9% | ||||||||
| Industrial – other | 391 | 2.0% | 12 | 2.7% | 379 | 2.0% | ||||||||
| Finance companies | 143 | 0.7% | 11 | 2.4% | 132 | 0.7% | ||||||||
| Property and casualty | 250 | 1.3% | 10 | 2.2% | 240 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| Manufacturing | 440 | 2.3% | 10 | 2.2% | 430 | 2.3% | ||||||||
| Retail | 324 | 1.7% | 9 | 1.9% | 315 | 1.7% | ||||||||
| Integrated | 160 | 0.8% | 9 | 1.9% | 151 | 0.8% | ||||||||
| Transportation services | 314 | 1.6% | 9 | 2.0% | 305 | 1.6% | ||||||||
| Life | 328 | 1.7% | 9 | 2.0% | 319 | 1.7% | ||||||||
| Automotive | 416 | 2.2% | 7 | 1.6% | 409 | 2.2% | ||||||||
| Metals and mining | 242 | 1.3% | 7 | 1.6% | 235 | 1.3% | ||||||||
| Project finance | 163 | 0.8% | 7 | 1.6% | 156 | 0.8% | ||||||||
| Natural gas | 221 | 1.2% | 7 | 1.6% | 214 | 1.1% | ||||||||
| Government owned, no guarantee | 62 | 0.3% | 5 | 1.1% | 57 | 0.3% | ||||||||
| Industries with unrealized losses | ||||||||||||||
| less than $5 million | 3,078 | 16.0% | 68 | 15.1% | 3,010 | 16.0% | ||||||||
| Total by industry | $ | 19,210 | 100.0% | $ | 451 | 100.0% | $ | 18,759 | 100.0% | |||||
| Total by industry as a percentage of | ||||||||||||||
| total fixed maturity AFS securities | 18.3% | 100.0% | 15.8% |
As of December 31, 2021, the net amortized cost and fair value of securities subject to enhanced analysis and monitoring for potential changes in unrealized loss position was $102 million and $94 million, respectively.
84
Table of Contents
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
The following tables summarize key information on mortgage loans on real estate (in millions):
| As of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||
| Current | $ | 17,168 | $ | 889 | $ | 18,057 | 99.8% | |||
| Delinquent (1) | - | 14 | 14 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | - | 16 | 16 | 0.1% | ||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 17,168 | 919 | 18,087 | 100.0% | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (79 | ) | (17 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,089 | $ | 902 | $ | 17,991 |
| As of December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Credit Quality Indicator | ||||||||||
| Current | $ | 16,230 | $ | 666 | $ | 16,896 | 99.6% | |||
| Delinquent (1) | - | 42 | 42 | 0.2% | ||||||
| Foreclosure (2) | - | 29 | 29 | 0.2% | ||||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate before allowance | 16,230 | 737 | 16,967 | 100.0% | ||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | (187 | ) | (17 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 16,043 | $ | 720 | $ | 16,763 |
(1)As of December 31, 2021, 2 commercial mortgage loans and 31 residential mortgage loans were delinquent. As of December 31, 2020, 2 commercial mortgage loans and 72 residential mortgage loans were delinquent.
(2)As of December 31, 2021, no commercial mortgage loans and 34 residential mortgage loans were in foreclosure. As of December 31, 2020, no commercial mortgage loans and 75 residential mortgage loans were in foreclosure.
As of December 31, 2021, there were 4 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $1 million and 50 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $22 million. As of December 31, 2020, there were 4 specifically identified impaired commercial mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $1 million and 76 specifically identified impaired residential mortgage loans on real estate with an aggregate carrying value of $34 million.
The total outstanding principal and interest on commercial mortgage loans on real estate that were two or more payments delinquent as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, was less than $1 million. The total outstanding principal and interest on residential mortgage loans on real estate that were three or more payments delinquent as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, was $14 million and $41 million, respectively.
See Note 1 for more information regarding our accounting policy relating to the impairment of mortgage loans on real estate.
The carrying value of mortgage loans on real estate by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| As of | As of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Segment | |||||||
| Annuities | $ | 6,732 | $ | 5,934 | |||
| Retirement Plan Services | 4,326 | 4,152 | |||||
| Life Insurance | 3,890 | 3,979 | |||||
| Group Protection | 1,435 | 1,374 | |||||
| Other Operations | 1,608 | 1,324 | |||||
| Total mortgage loans on real estate | $ | 17,991 | $ | 16,763 |
85
Table of Contents
The composition of commercial mortgage loans (in millions) by property type, geographic region and state is shown below:
| As of December 31, 2021 | As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||
| Value | % | Value | % | |||||||
| Property Type | State | |||||||||
| Apartment | $ | 5,820 | 34.1% | CA | $ | 4,479 | 26.2% | |||
| Industrial | 3,832 | 22.4% | TX | 1,549 | 9.1% | |||||
| Office building | 3,783 | 22.2% | NY | 1,060 | 6.2% | |||||
| Retail | 2,571 | 15.0% | GA | 841 | 4.9% | |||||
| Other commercial | 649 | 3.8% | FL | 711 | 4.3% | |||||
| Hotel/motel | 245 | 1.4% | MD | 704 | 4.1% | |||||
| Mixed use | 189 | 1.1% | PA | 701 | 4.1% | |||||
| Total | $ | 17,089 | 100.0% | WA | 690 | 4.0% | ||||
| Geographic Region | TN | 575 | 3.4% | |||||||
| Pacific | 5,483 | 32.1% | VA | 544 | 3.2% | |||||
| South Atlantic | 3,690 | 21.6% | OH | 504 | 2.9% | |||||
| Middle Atlantic | 2,037 | 11.9% | AZ | 489 | 2.9% | |||||
| West South Central | 1,690 | 9.9% | NC | 445 | 2.6% | |||||
| East North Central | 1,273 | 7.4% | IL | 341 | 2.0% | |||||
| Mountain | 1,196 | 7.0% | WI | 325 | 1.9% | |||||
| East South Central | 698 | 4.1% | UT | 315 | 1.8% | |||||
| West North Central | 493 | 2.9% | OR | 314 | 1.8% | |||||
| New England | 486 | 2.8% | Non U.S. | 43 | 0.2% | |||||
| Non-U.S. | 43 | 0.3% | All other states | 2,459 | 14.4% | |||||
| Total | $ | 17,089 | 100.0% | Total | $ | 17,089 | 100.0% |
The following table shows the principal amount (in millions) of our commercial and residential mortgage loans by year in which the principal is contractually obligated to be repaid:
| As of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | Residential | Total | % | |||||||
| Principal Repayment Year | ||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 859 | $ | 12 | $ | 871 | 4.8% | |||
| 2023 | 768 | 12 | 780 | 4.3% | ||||||
| 2024 | 1,182 | 13 | 1,195 | 6.6% | ||||||
| 2025 | 1,164 | 13 | 1,177 | 6.5% | ||||||
| 2026 | 1,439 | 15 | 1,454 | 8.0% | ||||||
| 2027 and thereafter | 11,770 | 827 | 12,597 | 69.8% | ||||||
| Total | $ | 17,182 | $ | 892 | $ | 18,074 | 100.0% |
See Note 4 for information regarding our loan-to-value and debt-service coverage ratios and our allowance for credit losses.
86
Table of Contents
Alternative Investments
Investment income (loss) on alternative investments by business segment (in millions) was as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Annuities | $ | 63 | $ | 23 | $ | 2 | ||
| Retirement Plan Services | 38 | 14 | 2 | |||||
| Life Insurance | 522 | 140 | 15 | |||||
| Group Protection | 41 | 15 | 2 | |||||
| Other Operations | 15 | 5 | 1 | |||||
| Total (1) | $ | 679 | $ | 197 | $ | 22 |
(1)Includes net investment income on the alternative investments supporting the required statutory surplus of our insurance businesses.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, alternative investments included investments in 311 and 271 different partnerships, respectively, and the portfolio represented approximately 2% and 1% of total investments, respectively. The partnerships do not represent off-balance sheet financing and generally involve several third-party partners. Some of our partnerships contain capital calls, which require us to contribute capital upon notification by the general partner. These capital calls are contemplated during the initial investment decision and are planned for well in advance of the call date. The capital calls are not material in size and are not material to our liquidity. Alternative investments are accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are included in other investments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Non-Income Producing Investments
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the carrying amount of fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans on real estate and real estate that were non-income producing was $14 million and $13 million, respectively.
Net Investment Income
Details underlying net investment income (in millions) and our investment yield were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||
| Net Investment Income | |||||||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities | $ | 4,351 | $ | 4,334 | $ | 4,281 | |||
| Trading securities | 167 | 202 | 191 | ||||||
| Equity securities | 3 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
| Mortgage loans on real estate | 680 | 677 | 629 | ||||||
| Real estate | - | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Policy loans | 115 | 125 | 129 | ||||||
| Invested cash | - | 12 | 40 | ||||||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment | |||||||||
| and bond make-whole premiums (1) | 199 | 82 | 119 | ||||||
| Alternative investments (2) | 679 | 197 | 22 | ||||||
| Consent fees | 10 | 7 | 8 | ||||||
| Other investments | 64 | 45 | 30 | ||||||
| Investment income | 6,268 | 5,685 | 5,454 | ||||||
| Investment expense | (153 | ) | (175 | ) | (231 | ) | |||
| Net investment income | $ | 6,115 | $ | 5,510 | $ | 5,223 |
(1)See “Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums” below for additional information.
(2)See “Alternative Investments” above for additional information.
87
Table of Contents
| For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||
| Interest Rate Yield | |||||
| Fixed maturity AFS securities, mortgage loans on | |||||
| real estate and other, net of investment expenses | 3.92% | 4.12% | 4.35% | ||
| Commercial mortgage loan prepayment and | |||||
| bond make-whole premiums | 0.15% | 0.06% | 0.10% | ||
| Alternative investments | 0.51% | 0.16% | 0.02% | ||
| Net investment income yield on invested assets | 4.58% | 4.34% | 4.47% |
We earn investment income on our general account assets supporting fixed annuity, term life, whole life, UL, interest-sensitive whole life and the fixed portion of retirement plan and VUL products. The profitability of our fixed annuity and life insurance products is affected by our ability to achieve target spreads, or margins, between the interest income earned on the general account assets and the interest credited to the contract holder on our average fixed account values, including the fixed portion of variable. Net investment income and the interest rate yield table each include commercial mortgage loan prepayments and bond make-whole premiums, alternative investments and contingent interest and standby real estate equity commitments. These items can vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors and, therefore, can provide results that are not indicative of the underlying trends.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Prepayment and Bond Make-Whole Premiums
Prepayment and make-whole premiums are collected when borrowers elect to call or prepay their debt prior to the stated maturity. A prepayment or make-whole premium allows investors to attain the same yield as if the borrower made all scheduled interest payments until maturity. These premiums are designed to make investors indifferent to prepayment.
REINSURANCE
Our insurance companies cede insurance to other companies. The portion of our life insurance risks exceeding each of our insurance companies’ retention limit is reinsured with other insurers. We seek life and annuity reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to mortality losses and/or to enhance our capital and risk management. We acquire other reinsurance as applicable with retentions and limits that management believes are appropriate for the circumstances. The consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” reflect insurance premiums, insurance fees, benefits and DAC amortization net of insurance ceded. Our insurance companies remain liable if their reinsurers are unable to meet contractual obligations under applicable reinsurance agreements. We utilize inter-company reinsurance agreements to manage our statutory capital position as well as our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees. With regard to risk retention from a consolidated basis, these inter-company agreements do not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements. For information regarding reserve financing and LOC expenses from inter-company reinsurance agreements, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Material Cash Outflows” below.
We focus on obtaining reinsurance from a diverse group of reinsurers. We have established standards and criteria for our use and selection of reinsurers. In order for a new reinsurer to participate in our current program, we generally require the reinsurer to have an A.M. Best rating of A+ or greater or an S&P rating of AA- or better and a specified RBC percentage (or similar capital ratio measure). If the reinsurer does not have these ratings, we may require them to post collateral as described below; however, we may waive the collateral requirements based on the facts and circumstances. In addition, we may require collateral from a reinsurer to mitigate credit/collectability risk. Typically, in such cases, the reinsurer must either maintain minimum specified ratings and RBC ratios or establish the specified quality and quantity of collateral. Similarly, we have also required collateral in connection with books of business sold pursuant to indemnity reinsurance agreements.
Reinsurers, including affiliated reinsurers, that are not licensed, accredited or authorized in the state of domicile of the reinsured (“ceding company”), i.e., unauthorized reinsurers, are required to post statutorily prescribed forms of collateral for the ceding company to receive reinsurance credit. The three primary forms of collateral are: (i) qualifying assets held in a reserve credit trust; (ii) irrevocable, unconditional, evergreen LOCs issued by a qualified U.S. financial institution; and (iii) assets held by the ceding company in a segregated funds withheld account. Collateral must be maintained in accordance with the rules of the ceding company’s state of domicile and must be readily accessible by the ceding company to cover claims under the reinsurance agreement. Accordingly, our insurance subsidiaries require unauthorized reinsurers to post acceptable forms of collateral to support their reinsurance obligations to us.
Effective October 1, 2021, we entered into a reinsurance agreement with Resolution Life to reinsure liabilities under a block of in-force executive benefit and universal life policies. For more information, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Return of Capital to Common Stockholders” below and Note 8.
88
Table of Contents
As a result of our modified coinsurance agreement with Athene to reinsure fixed annuity products, we recorded a $5.0 billion deposit asset reflected within other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. For additional information, see Note 8.
Our amounts recoverable from reinsurers represent receivables from and reserves ceded to reinsurers. As of December 31, 2021, 86%, or $17.5 billion, of our total reinsurance recoverable was secured by collateral for our benefit. Of this amount, $17.2 billion was held by reinsurers in reserve credit trusts (such reserve credit trusts are held by non-affiliated reinsurers; therefore, they are not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets), $2.1 billion was reflected as funds withheld reinsurance liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021, although only $143 million can be utilized as collateral due to excess funds withheld above the reinsurance recoverable from our reinsurers, and $157 million was secured by LOCs for which we are the beneficiary, an off-balance sheet arrangement.
We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentration risk with our largest reinsurers. We monitor all of our existing reinsurers’ financial strength ratings on a monthly basis. We also monitor our reinsurers’ financial health, trends and commitment to the reinsurance business, statutory surplus, RBC levels, statutory earnings and fluctuations, current claims payment aging and our reinsurers’ own reinsurers. In addition, we present at least annually information regarding our reinsurance exposures to the Finance Committee of our Board of Directors. For more discussion of our counterparty risk with our reinsurers, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Matters – We face risks of non-collectability of reinsurance and increased reinsurance rates, which could materially affect our results of operations.”
Under certain indemnity reinsurance agreements, two of our insurance subsidiaries, The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (“LNL”) and Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York (“LLANY”), provide 100% indemnity reinsurance for the business assumed; however, the third-party insurer, or the “cedent,” remains primarily liable on the underlying insurance business. These indemnity reinsurance arrangements require that our subsidiary, as the reinsurer, maintain certain insurer financial strength ratings and capital ratios. If these ratings or capital ratios are not maintained, depending upon the reinsurance agreement, the cedent may recapture the business, or require us to place assets in trust or provide LOCs at least equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under the LNL reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $2.9 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2021. LNL must maintain an A.M. Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. This arrangement may require LNL to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. Under LLANY’s largest indemnity reinsurance arrangement, we held approximately $1.1 billion of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2021. LLANY must maintain an A.M. Best financial strength rating of at least B+, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BB+ and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Ba1, as well as maintain an RBC ratio of at least 160% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 100%, or the cedent may recapture the business. Under two other LLANY arrangements, by which we established $655 million of statutory reserves as of December 31, 2021, LLANY must maintain an A.M. Best financial strength rating of at least B++, an S&P financial strength rating of at least BBB- and a Moody’s financial strength rating of at least Baa3. One of these arrangements also requires LLANY to maintain an RBC ratio of at least 185% or an S&P capital adequacy ratio of 115%. Each of these arrangements may require LLANY to place assets in trust equal to the relevant statutory reserves. See “Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for a description of our financial strength ratings.
For more information about reinsurance, see Notes 8 and 13 and “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital – Insurance Subsidiaries’ Statutory Capital and Surplus” below.
For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash from our normal operations to meet cash requirements with a prudent margin of safety. Capital refers to our long-term financial resources to support the operations of our businesses, to fund long-term growth strategies and to support our operations during adverse conditions. Our ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity and capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and access to the capital markets and other sources of liquidity and capital as described below.
When considering our liquidity, it is important to distinguish between the needs of our insurance subsidiaries and the needs of the holding company, LNC. As a holding company with no operations of its own, LNC is largely dependent upon the dividend capacity of its insurance subsidiaries as well as their ability to advance or repay funds to it through inter-company borrowing arrangements, which may be affected by factors influencing the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and statutory earnings performance. Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the capital and credit markets, including any current or future impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic, may materially affect our business operations and results of operations. These poor market conditions may reduce our insurance subsidiaries’ statutory surplus and RBC requiring them to retain more capital and may pressure their ability to pay dividends to LNC, which may lead us to take steps to preserve or raise additional capital. We monitor and adjust our liquidity and capital plans in light of market conditions, as well as changing needs and opportunities. Based on the sources of liquidity available to us as discussed below, we currently expect to be able to
89
Table of Contents
meet the holding company’s ongoing cash needs and to have sufficient capital to offer downside protection. For factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in this section and that could affect our expectations for liquidity and capital, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements – Cautionary Language” above. For a discussion of the COVID-19 pandemic, see “Introduction – Executive Summary” above and “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Market Conditions – The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have adversely affected and are expected to continue to adversely affect our business and results of operations, and the future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the company’s business, results of operations and financial condition remain uncertain.”
Consolidated Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital are insurance premiums and fees, investment income, maturities and sales of investments, issuance of debt and contract holder deposits. We also have access to alternative sources of liquidity as discussed below. Our primary uses are to pay policy claims and benefits, to fund commissions and other general operating expenses, to purchase investments, to fund policy surrenders and withdrawals, to pay dividends to our stockholders, to repurchase our stock and to repay debt. Our operating activities provided (used) cash of $151 million, $534 million and $(2.7) billion in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Holding Company Sources and Uses of Liquidity and Capital
The primary sources of liquidity and capital at the holding company level are dividends and interest payments from subsidiaries, augmented by holding company short-term investments, bank lines of credit and the ongoing availability of long-term public financing under an effective shelf registration statement, which allows us to issue, in unlimited amounts, securities, including debt securities, preferred stock, common stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and depository shares. These sources support the general corporate needs of the holding company, including its common stock dividends, common stock repurchases, interest and debt service, funding of callable securities, acquisitions and investment in core businesses.
Details underlying the primary sources of the holding company’s liquidity (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Dividends from Subsidiaries | ||||||||
| LNL | $ | 1,910 | $ | 660 | $ | 600 | ||
| First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Company | 45 | - | - | |||||
| Lincoln Investment Management Company | 20 | 25 | 30 | |||||
| Lincoln National Management Corporation | 10 | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Lincoln National Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Limited | 75 | 150 | 195 | |||||
| Total dividends from subsidiaries | $ | 2,060 | $ | 840 | $ | 830 | ||
| Interest from Subsidiaries | ||||||||
| Interest on inter-company notes | $ | 111 | $ | 123 | $ | 132 |
See Note 19 for information on the increase in dividends from LNL. The table above focuses on significant and recurring cash flow items and excludes the effects of certain financing activities, including the periodic issuance and retirement of debt, cash flows related to our inter-company cash management program and certain investing activities, including capital contributions to subsidiaries. These activities are discussed below. Taxes have been eliminated from the analysis due to a tax sharing agreement among our primary subsidiaries resulting in a modest effect on net cash flows at the holding company. Also excluded from this analysis is the modest amount of investment income on short-term investments of the holding company and employee stock exercise activity related to our stock-based incentive compensation plans. See “Part IV – Item 15(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules – Schedule II – Condensed Financial Information of Registrant” for the holding company cash flow statement.
90
Table of Contents
Restrictions on Subsidiaries’ Dividends
Our insurance subsidiaries are subject to certain insurance department regulatory restrictions as to the transfer of funds and payment of dividends to the holding company. Under Indiana laws and regulations, our Indiana insurance subsidiaries, including our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, may pay dividends to LNC without prior approval of the Indiana Insurance Commissioner (the “Commissioner”) only from unassigned surplus or must receive prior approval of the Commissioner to pay a dividend if such dividend, along with all other dividends paid within the preceding 12 consecutive months, would exceed the statutory limitation. The current statutory limitation is the greater of 10% of the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus, as shown on its last annual statement on file with the Commissioner or the insurer’s statutory net gain from operations for the previous 12 months, but in no event to exceed statutory unassigned surplus. Indiana law gives the Commissioner broad discretion to disapprove requests for dividends in excess of these limits. LNL’s subsidiary LLANY, a New York-domiciled insurance company, is bound by similar restrictions under New York law, with the applicable statutory limitation on dividends equal to the lesser of 10% of surplus to contract holders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year, not including realized capital gains.
Indiana law also provides that following the payment of any dividend, the insurer’s contract holders’ surplus must be reasonable in relation to its outstanding liabilities and adequate for its financial needs, and permits the Commissioner to bring an action to rescind a dividend that violates these standards. In the event the Commissioner determines that the contract holders’ surplus of one subsidiary is inadequate, the Commissioner could use his or her broad discretionary authority to seek to require us to apply payments received from another subsidiary for the benefit of that insurance subsidiary.
We expect our direct domestic insurance subsidiaries could pay dividends to LNC of approximately $865 million in 2022 without prior approval from the respective state commissioners. The amount of surplus that our insurance subsidiaries could pay as dividends is constrained by the amount of surplus we hold to maintain our ratings, to provide an additional layer of margin for risk protection and for future investment in our businesses. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – A decrease in the capital and surplus of our insurance subsidiaries may result in a downgrade to our credit and insurer financial strength ratings.”
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types and maturities. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks. An extended disruption in the credit and capital markets could adversely affect LNC and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, and there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all, in the current market environment. In addition, further impairment could reduce our statutory surplus, leading to lower RBC ratios and potentially reducing future dividend capacity from our insurance subsidiaries. See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Liquidity and Capital Position – Adverse capital and credit market conditions may affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, access to capital and cost of capital.”
Insurance Subsidiaries’ Statutory Capital and Surplus
Our insurance subsidiaries must maintain certain regulatory capital levels. We utilize the RBC ratio as a primary measure of the capital adequacy of our insurance subsidiaries. The RBC ratio is an important factor in the determination of the credit and financial strength ratings of LNC and its subsidiaries, as a reduction in our insurance subsidiaries’ surplus may affect their RBC ratios and dividend-paying capacity. For a discussion of RBC ratios, see “Part I – Item 1. Business – Regulatory – Insurance Regulation – Risk-Based Capital.”
Our regulatory capital levels are also affected by statutory accounting rules, which are subject to change by each applicable insurance regulator. Our term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees require reserves calculated pursuant to XXX and AG38, respectively. Our insurance subsidiaries employ strategies to reduce the strain caused by XXX and AG38 by reinsuring the business to reinsurance captives. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries provide a mechanism for financing a portion of the excess reserve amounts in a more efficient manner and free up capital the insurance subsidiaries can use for any number of purposes, including paying dividends to the holding company. We use long-dated LOCs and debt financing as well as other financing strategies to finance those reserves. Included in the LOCs issued as of December 31, 2021, was approximately $1.8 billion of long-dated LOCs issued to support inter-company reinsurance arrangements for UL products containing secondary guarantees. For information on the LOCs, see the credit facilities table in Note 12. Our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have also issued long-term notes of $4.0 billion to finance a portion of the excess reserves as of December 31, 2021; of this amount, $3.1 billion involve exposure to VIEs. For information on these long-term notes issued by our captive reinsurance and reinsurance subsidiaries, see Note 3. We have also used the proceeds from senior note issuances of $875 million to execute long-term structured solutions primarily supporting reinsurance of UL products containing secondary guarantees. LOCs and related capital market solutions lower the capital effect of term products and UL products containing secondary guarantees.
Statutory reserves established for variable annuity contracts and riders are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and interest rates, and are affected by the level of account values relative to the level of any guarantees, product design and reinsurance arrangements. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance is non-linear during any given reporting period. Market conditions greatly influence the ultimate capital required due to its effect on the valuation of reserves and derivative assets hedging these reserves. We also utilize inter-company reinsurance arrangements to manage our hedge program for variable annuity guarantees.
91
Table of Contents
Changes in equity markets may also affect the capital position of our insurance subsidiaries. We may decide to reallocate available capital among our insurance subsidiaries, including our captive reinsurance subsidiaries, which would result in different RBC ratios for our insurance subsidiaries. In addition, changes in the equity markets can affect the value of our variable annuity and variable universal life insurance separate accounts. When the market value of our separate account assets increases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries also increases. Contrarily, when the market value of our separate account assets decreases, the statutory surplus within our insurance subsidiaries may also decrease, which may affect RBC ratios, and in the case of our separate account assets becoming less than the related product liabilities, we must allocate additional capital to fund the difference.
We continue to analyze the use of our existing captive reinsurance structures, as well as additional third-party reinsurance arrangements, and our current hedging strategies relative to managing the effects of equity markets and interest rates on the statutory reserves, statutory capital and the dividend capacity of our life insurance subsidiaries.
Debt
Although our subsidiaries currently generate adequate cash flow to meet the needs of our normal operations, periodically LNC may issue debt to maintain ratings and increase liquidity, as well as to fund internal growth, acquisitions and the retirement of its debt.
Details underlying our debt activities (in millions) for the year ended December 31, 2021, were as follows:
| Maturities, | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repayments | in Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning | and | Value | Other | Ending | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance | Issuance | Refinancing | Hedges | Changes (1) | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
| Short-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 300 | $ | 300 | |||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior notes | $ | 5,225 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (46 | ) | $ | (312 | ) | $ | 4,867 | |||||||
| Term loans | 249 | - | - | - | 1 | 250 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated notes (2) | - | 995 | - | - | - | 995 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital securities (2) | 1,208 | - | (995 | ) | - | - | 213 | ||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt | $ | 6,682 | $ | 995 | $ | (995 | ) | $ | (46 | ) | $ | (311 | ) | $ | 6,325 |
(1)Includes the non-cash reclassification of long-term debt to current maturities of long-term debt, accretion (amortization) of discounts and premiums, amortization of debt issuance costs and amortization of adjustments from discontinued hedges, as applicable.
(2)To hedge the variability in rates, we purchased interest rate swaps to lock in a fixed rate of approximately 5% over the remaining terms of the subordinated notes and capital securities.
During August 2021, we exchanged $562 million of our 7.00% capital securities due 2066 for $562 million of floating rate subordinated notes due 2066, and $433 million of our 6.05% capital securities due 2067 for $433 million of floating rate subordinated notes due 2067. The subordinated notes contain benchmark transition provisions that will allow us to determine the interest rate payable on the subordinated notes based on a new reference rate once LIBOR is unavailable. See Note 2 for additional information on reference rate reform. For risks related to the elimination of LIBOR, see “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Investments – The elimination of LIBOR may affect the value of certain derivatives and floating rate securities we hold or have issued.” In connection with the exchange offer, we solicited and received the requisite number of consents to amend the indentures governing the remaining outstanding capital securities to eliminate various terms and conditions and other provisions, including the covenant that required us to make interest payments in accordance with an alternative coupon satisfaction mechanism upon the occurrence of certain trigger events.
LNC made interest payments to service debt of $294 million, $277 million and $288 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2021, we have pre-funded our $300 million senior notes due 2022.
For additional information about our short-term and long-term debt and our credit facilities, see Note 12.
Capital Contributions to Subsidiaries
LNC made capital contributions to subsidiaries of $65 million, $518 million and $50 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
92
Table of Contents
Return of Capital to Common Stockholders
One of our primary goals is to provide a return to our common stockholders through share price accretion, dividends and stock repurchases. In determining dividends, the Board of Directors takes into consideration items such as current and expected earnings, capital needs, rating agency considerations and requirements for financial flexibility. On November 2, 2021, our Board of Directors approved an increase to the quarterly dividend on our common stock from $0.42 per share to $0.45 per share. The amount and timing of share repurchases depends on key capital ratios, rating agency expectations, the generation of free cash flow and an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with alternative uses of capital. Free cash flow for the holding company generally represents the amount of dividends and interest received from subsidiaries less interest paid on debt.
The proceeds of $1.2 billion from the reinsurance agreement that became effective October 1, 2021, will predominantly be used to fund incremental share repurchases, with the remainder to be used for general corporate purposes, primarily paying down debt. As of December 31, 2021, we have completed $500 million in incremental share repurchases, and an additional $400 million in incremental repurchases is expected to be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2022. See Note 8 herein for additional information. For additional information regarding share repurchases, see “Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.”
Details underlying return of capital to common stockholders (in millions) were as follows:
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Dividends to common stockholders | $ | 319 | $ | 311 | $ | 298 | ||
| Repurchase of common stock | 1,105 | 275 | 640 | |||||
| Total cash returned to common stockholders | $ | 1,424 | $ | 586 | $ | 938 | ||
| Number of shares repurchased | 16.2 | 4.9 | 10.4 |
Alternative Sources of Liquidity
Inter-Company Cash Management Program
In order to manage our capital more efficiently, we have an inter-company cash management program where certain subsidiaries can lend to or borrow from the holding company to meet short-term borrowing needs. The cash management program is essentially a series of demand loans between LNC and participating subsidiaries that reduces overall borrowing costs by allowing LNC and its subsidiaries to access internal resources instead of incurring third-party transaction costs. As of December 31, 2021, the holding company had a net outstanding receivable (payable) of $168 million from (to) certain subsidiaries resulting from loans made by subsidiaries in excess of amounts placed (borrowed) by the holding company and subsidiaries in the inter-company cash management account. Any change in holding company cash management program balances is offset by the immediate and equal change in holding company cash and invested cash. Loans under the cash management program are permitted under applicable insurance laws subject to certain restrictions. For our Indiana-domiciled insurance subsidiary, the borrowing and lending limit is currently 3% of the insurance company’s admitted assets as of its most recent year end. For our New York-domiciled insurance subsidiary, it may borrow from LNC less than 2% of its admitted assets as of its most recent year end but may not lend any amounts to LNC.
Facility Agreement for Senior Notes Issuance
LNC entered into a facility agreement in 2020 with a Delaware trust that gives LNC the right over a 10-year period to issue, from time to time, up to $500 million of 2.330% senior notes to the trust in exchange for a corresponding amount of U.S. Treasury securities held by the trust. By agreeing to purchase the 2.330% senior notes in exchange for U.S. Treasury securities upon exercise of the issuance right, the trust will provide a source of liquid assets for the Company. The issuance right will be exercised automatically in full upon our failure to make certain payments to the trust, if the failure to pay is not cured within 30 days, or upon certain bankruptcy events involving LNC. We are also required to exercise the issuance right in full if our consolidated stockholders’ equity (excluding AOCI) falls below $2.75 billion, subject to adjustment from time to time in certain cases, and upon certain other events described in the facility agreement. For additional information, see Note 12.
Federal Home Loan Bank
Our primary insurance subsidiary, LNL, is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis (“FHLBI”). Membership allows LNL access to the FHLBI’s financial services, including the ability to obtain loans and to issue funding agreements as an alternative source of liquidity that are collateralized by qualifying mortgage-related assets, agency securities or U.S. Treasury securities. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBI’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LNL. As of December 31, 2021, LNL had an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $7.0 billion under the FHLBI facility and maximum available borrowing based on qualifying assets of $4.1 billion. As of December 31, 2021, LNL had outstanding borrowings of $3.1 billion under
93
Table of Contents
this facility reported within payables for collateral on investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. LLANY is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) with an estimated maximum borrowing capacity of $750 million. Borrowings under this facility are subject to the FHLBNY’s discretion and require the availability of qualifying assets at LLANY. As of December 31, 2021, LLANY had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Securities Lending Programs and Repurchase Agreements
Our insurance subsidiaries, by virtue of their general account fixed-income investment holdings, can access liquidity through securities lending programs and repurchase agreements. As of December 31, 2021, our insurance subsidiaries had securities pledged under securities lending agreements with a carrying value of $241 million. In addition, our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries had access to $1.75 billion through committed repurchase agreements, of which $25 million was utilized as of December 31, 2021. The cash received in our securities lending programs and repurchase agreements is typically invested in cash and invested cash or fixed maturity AFS securities. For additional information, see “Payables for Collateral on Investments” in Note 4.
Collateral on Derivative Contracts
Our cash flows associated with collateral received from counterparties (when we are in a net collateral payable position) and posted with counterparties (when we are in a net collateral receivable position) change as the market value of the underlying derivative contract changes. The net collateral position depends on changes in interest rates and equity markets related to the amount of the exposures hedged. As of December 31, 2021, we were in a net collateral payable position of $4.9 billion compared to $1.9 billion as of December 31, 2020. In the event of adverse changes in fair value of our derivative instruments, we may need to post collateral with a counterparty. If we do not have sufficient high quality securities or cash and invested cash to provide as collateral, we have committed liquidity sources through facilities that can provide up to $1.25 billion of additional liquidity to help meet collateral needs. Access to such facilities is contingent upon interest rates having achieved certain threshold levels. In addition to these facilities, we have the facility agreement for senior notes issuance, the FHLB facilities and the repurchase agreements discussed above as well as the five-year revolving credit facility discussed in Note 12 to leverage that would be eligible for collateral posting. For additional information, see “Credit Risk” in Note 5.
94
Table of Contents
Material Cash Outflows
Details underlying our estimated material cash outflows as of December 31, 2021, were as follows:
| Less | More | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Than | 1 - 3 | 3 - 5 | Than | |||||||||||
| 1 Year | Years | Years | 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||
| Future contract benefits and other contract holder | ||||||||||||||
| obligations (1) | $ | 25,153 | $ | 50,032 | $ | 51,137 | $ | 432,232 | $ | 558,554 | ||||
| Short-term and long-term debt (2) | 300 | 750 | 700 | 4,581 | 6,331 | |||||||||
| Reserve financing and LOC expenses (3) | 68 | 122 | 111 | 289 | 590 | |||||||||
| Payables for collateral on investments (4) | 3,371 | - | - | - | 3,371 | |||||||||
| Investment commitments (5) | 1,720 | 296 | 681 | 458 | 3,155 | |||||||||
| Operating leases (6) | 46 | 73 | 44 | 27 | 190 | |||||||||
| Finance leases (6) | 72 | 96 | 11 | - | 179 | |||||||||
| Certain financing arrangements (7) | 8 | 106 | 279 | 4 | 397 | |||||||||
| Retirement and other plans (8) | 111 | 214 | 207 | 481 | 1,013 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 30,849 | $ | 51,689 | $ | 53,170 | $ | 438,072 | $ | 573,780 |
(1)Estimates are based on financial projections over 40 years and are not discounted for the time value of money. New business issued or acquired, business ceded or sold, changes to or variances from actuarial assumptions and economic conditions will cause these amounts to change over time, possibly materially. See Note 1 for details of what these liabilities include and represent.
(2)Represents principal amounts of debt only. See Note 12 for additional information.
(3)Estimates are based on the level of capacity we expect to utilize during the life of the LOCs and other reserve financing arrangements. See Note 12 for additional information.
(4)Excludes collateral payable held for derivative investments. See Note 4 for additional information.
(5)See Note 4 for additional information.
(6)See Note 13 for additional information.
(7)Represents certain financing arrangements that did not meet the requirements to be classified as a sale-leaseback arrangement. See Note 13 for additional information.
(8)Includes anticipated funding for benefit payments for our retirement and postretirement plans through 2031 and known payments under deferred compensation arrangements. In addition to these benefit payments, we periodically fund the employees’ defined benefit plans. See Note 17 for additional information.
Ratings
Financial Strength Ratings
See “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings” for information on our financial strength ratings.
Credit Ratings
Our indicative credit ratings published by the primary rating agencies are set forth below. Securities are rated at the time of issuance so actual ratings may differ from the indicative ratings. There may be other rating agencies that also provide credit ratings, which we do not disclose in our reports. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. All ratings are on outlook stable except for the ratings assigned by S&P, which are on outlook negative.
As of February 11, 2022, our indicative long-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our long-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| A.M. Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “aaa to c” | “AAA to D” | “Aaa to C” | “AAA to D” | |||
| a- | BBB+ | Baa1 | A- | |||
| (7th of 22) | (8th of 21) | (8th of 21) | (7th of 22) |
95
Table of Contents
As of February 11, 2022, our indicative short-term credit ratings as published by the principal rating agencies that rate our short-term credit are indicated in the following table.
| A.M. Best | Fitch | Moody's | S&P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| “AMB-1+ to AMB-4” | “F1 to D” | “P-1 to NP” | “A-1+ to D” | |||
| AMB-1 | F2 | P-2 | A-2 | |||
| (2nd of 6) | (3rd of 8) | (2nd of 4) | (3rd of 7) |
All of our credit ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies, and therefore, no assurance can be given that we can maintain these ratings. A downgrade of our credit ratings could affect our ability to raise additional debt with terms and conditions similar to our current debt, and accordingly, likely increase our cost of capital. In addition, a downgrade of these ratings could make it more difficult to raise capital to refinance any maturing debt obligations, to support business growth at our insurance subsidiaries and to maintain or improve the current financial strength ratings of our insurance subsidiaries described in “Part I – Item 1. Business – Financial Strength Ratings.”
If our current financial strength ratings or credit ratings were downgraded in the future, terms in our derivative agreements may be triggered, which could negatively affect overall liquidity. For the majority of our derivative counterparties, there is a termination event with respect to LNC if its long-term senior debt ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s); or with respect to LNL if its financial strength ratings drop below BBB-/Baa3 (S&P/Moody’s). In addition, contractual selling agreements with intermediaries could be negatively affected, which could have an adverse effect on overall sales of annuities, life insurance and investment products.
See “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors – Covenants and Ratings – A downgrade in our financial strength or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered and/or hurt our relationships with creditors” for more information.