grepcent / static financial knowledge base

Informational only - not investment advice.

enCore Energy Corp. (EU)

CIK: 0001500881. SIC: 1090 Miscellaneous Metal Ores. Latest 10-K as of: 2026-03-31.

SIC breadcrumb: Mining > Metal Mining > SIC 1090 Miscellaneous Metal Ores

SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1500881. Latest filing source: 0001628280-26-022507.

Selected Fundamentals

MetricValueUnitFYFiled
Revenue43,155,000USD20252026-03-31
Net income-56,856,000USD20252026-03-31
Assets430,422,000USD20252026-03-31

Financials

Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-03-31. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001500881.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.

Flow metrics use full-year FY periods from 10-K/10-K/A filings; balance-sheet metrics use FY-end instants. Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures. Missing metrics are omitted rather than fabricated.

Metric2022202320242025
Revenue4,245,00022,148,00058,334,00043,155,000
Net income-23,155,000-25,611,000-61,392,000-56,856,000
Operating income-25,911,000-40,723,000-72,183,000-65,766,000
Gross profit1,589,0002,575,000-7,207,0009,692,000
Diluted EPS-0.22-0.18-0.34-0.30
Operating cash flow-20,310,000-22,987,000-45,204,000-24,992,000
Capital expenditures980,0007,727,00011,348,00019,997,000
Assets326,567,000392,722,000430,422,000
Liabilities64,601,00074,180,000172,042,000
Stockholders' equity261,966,000285,736,000229,245,000
Cash and cash equivalents7,493,00039,701,00052,403,000
Free cash flow-21,290,000-30,714,000-56,552,000-44,989,000

Ratios

ROE and ROA use period-end equity/assets. Liabilities / equity uses total liabilities divided by stockholders' equity. Current ratio uses current assets divided by current liabilities when both are reported.

Metric2022202320242025
Net margin-115.64%-105.24%-131.75%
Operating margin-123.74%
Return on equity-9.78%-21.49%-24.80%
Return on assets-7.84%-15.63%-13.21%
Liabilities / equity0.250.260.75
Current ratio4.032.918.03

Financial Charts

Quarterly

Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-14. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001500881.json.

Flow metrics use discrete quarter-length periods from 10-Q/10-Q/A filings. Q4 revenue and net income are derived only when annual FY and nine-month YTD facts exist for the same fiscal year; derived Q4 values are labeled. EPS Q4 is not derived.

QuarterEnd DateRevenueNet IncomeDiluted EPSMethod
2025-Q12025-03-3118,239,000-24,243,000-0.13reported discrete quarter
2025-Q22025-06-303,664,000-6,326,000-0.03reported discrete quarter
2025-Q32025-09-308,876,000-4,762,000-0.03reported discrete quarter
2025-Q42025-12-3112,375,000-21,525,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2026-Q12026-03-3118,301,0005,404,0000.03reported discrete quarter

Quarterly Charts

Macro Cross-References

Latest quarter (10-Q)

Latest 10-Q source: 0001628280-26-035003.

Extracted structurally from real Item 2 body heading to real Item 3/4 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-05-14. Report date: 2026-03-31.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2025. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, projected, forecasted or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report and the information under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item IA, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report. Our management believes the assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes may not be an indication of our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Business Overview

enCore Energy Corp., America’s Clean Energy Company™, was incorporated on October 30, 2009, under the Laws of British Columbia and is a reporting issuer in all of the provinces and territories of Canada. As of January 1, 2025, the Company ceased to be a “foreign private issuer” and has become a “domestic issuer” within the meanings under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company must comply with the filing deadlines and disclosure obligations of a domestic issuer and non-accelerated filer as set forth in the Exchange Act. This classification impacts the timing of our periodic filings, internal control assessments, and other regulatory requirements. The Company’s common shares are listed on Nasdaq Capital Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) and the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the trading symbol EU.

We are an Exploration Stage Issuer as defined by S-K 1300 as we have not established proven or probable mineral reserves, through the completion of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for any of our uranium projects, as required by the SEC to be defined as a Development Stage Issuer. Even though we commenced extraction of uranium at our Rosita Project and our Alta Mesa Project, the Company remains classified as an Exploration Stage Issuer and will continue to remain an Exploration Stage Issuer until such time as proven or probable mineral reserves have been established at one of our uranium projects.

The Company is focused on extracting domestic uranium within the United States. The Company utilizes only proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy. In 2023, the Company commenced uranium extraction in South Texas. The Company’s strategy is to build uranium extraction capacity by developing and placing into operation a series of uranium extraction facilities in South Texas, followed by a future pipeline of exploration projects in South Dakota and Wyoming, becoming a leading supplier of domestic uranium to fuel a growing demand for clean energy generation using nuclear power.

Industry and Market Update

The primary use of uranium is to fuel nuclear power plants for the generation of carbon and emission free electricity. According to the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”), as of April 2026, there were 438 operable nuclear reactors world-wide, which required approximately 178 to 180 million pounds of U3O8 annually at full operation. According to data from TradeTech LLC (“TradeTech”), the world continues to require more uranium than it produces from primary extraction. The gap between demand and primary supply is being filled by stockpiled inventories and secondary supplies, which the Company believes have dwindled significantly in recent years.

Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet the levels of electrical generating capacity remains a significant challenge to the nuclear industry. To meet those goals, the global industry must protect existing capacity, and there have been multiple public pronouncements from several countries, including the United States to protect existing nuclear generating capacity. In the United States, as a result of clean energy credits granted by several states and the production tax credit for nuclear power provided in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, several nuclear utilities have announced operating life extensions and capacity expansions within their existing operating fleet. Also, the industry has seen an unprecedented trend in reactor recommissioning. In the United States, where just a few years ago reactors were being shut down prematurely, nuclear plants such as Palisades, Three Mile Island, and Duane Arnold are positioned to re-enter service.

30

With increasing demand expectations, an increase in uranium production must occur in an environment beset by risks, including import bans, sanctions, and secondary sanctions imposed by various countries, transportation issues, trade restrictions in other goods and services beyond nuclear fuel, and fewer available ports, all of which have combined to create widespread uncertainty in the market regarding the availability of both current and future supply.

Below is a list of some of the recent government policy, U.S. market and global market news that can influence the uranium market.

U.S. Government Policy News

•In January 2026, the DOE awarded $900 million each to Centrus Energy Corp., General Matter, Inc. and Orano. Distribution of the $2.7 billion award is contingent on specific milestones and is aimed at supporting the expansion of US domestic enrichment capacity. According to DOE’s task order, most of the funds will be directed toward construction of high-assay low enriched uranium enrichment capacity while also providing funds for additional low-enriched uranium capacity.

•On January 15, 2026, U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Todd Young alongside U.S. Representatives Rob Wittman and John Moolenaar, introduced new bipartisan, bicameral legislation to support domestic supply chains for critical minerals to meet national and economic security needs through the creation of a new Strategic Resilience Reserve (SRR). This announcement along with President Donald Trump’s signing the proclamation on January 14, 2026 to also address national security threats posed by imports of processed critical minerals and their derivative products, shows a coordinated policy push toward strengthening the U.S. critical mineral security.

•During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) formally announced a major agency-wide reorganization to streamline decision making, consolidate functions, and align with national goals for a more efficient licensing and deployment of safe and innovative nuclear technology. The agency will reorganize around three core business lines, new reactors, operating reactors, and nuclear materials and waste.

U.S. Market News

•In January 2026, U.S based tech company Meta signed deals with existing and new nuclear power providers to supply up to 6.6 giga watt of nuclear power by 2035. Meta stated the deals will provide ongoing collaboration with electric utility companies and power providers to meet the electricity demand for data centers it intends to bring online and will create in the next decade.

•U.S. energy company Vistra has entered into 20-year power purchase agreement to provide more than 2,600 mega watts of zero-carbon energy from a combination of three different Vistra nuclear power plants to support Meta's operations. Meta said its deal with Vistra involves more than 2.1 giga watts of power from Vistra’s Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Plant in the state of Pennsylvania and its Perry and David-Besse Nuclear Power Plants in Ohio, in addition to uprates at the Ohio plants. Meta's purchases under the agreements will begin in late 2026, with additional capacity added to the grid through 2034, when the full 2,609 mega watts of power will be online.

•On January 26, 2026, U.S. nuclear fuel supplier Centrus Energy, along with the state of Tennessee, announced the planned expansion in the state, transitioning its Oak Ridge facility to a "high-rate manufacturing plant." As part of the expansion, Centrus plans to invest more than $560 million in Anderson County, Tennessee over the next several years to support the investment in the production of thousands of advanced centrifuges.

•U.S. based nuclear services company, Energy Solutions has submitted a notice of intent to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirming plans to apply for a “major licensing action” for new nuclear generation at the shuttered Kewaunee Power Station in the state of Wisconsin.

•U.S. based Solstice Advanced Materials announced plans to expand uranium conversion production at its Metropolis Works Facility, in the state of Illinois, the sole United States uranium conversion facility. The additional production will bring the plant capacity to 10,000 tonnes of uranium fluorine.

•For the first time in a decade, the NRC has approved the construction of a new commercial nuclear reactor—Unit 1 at TerraPower’s Kemmerer Power Station in the state of Wyoming.

31

•Centrus Energy and Palantir Technologies Inc. have announced a partnership that will apply Palantir's artificial intelligence software to Centrus' expansion of its uranium enrichment capacity in the state of Ohio.

•Arizona Public Service has officially notified the NRC of its intent to renew the operating licenses for all three units at its Palo Verde Generating Station in Arizona, which could extend operations from the mid-2040s through the mid-2060s.

Global Market News

•On March 14, 2026, GE Vernova and Hitachi, Ltd. have entered a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to explore opportunities to deploy the BWRX-300 small modular reactor in Southeast Asia.

•Japan announced that it is scrapping the safety screening for two reactors at the Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant in central Japan, after plant operator Chubu Electric Power Co. was found to have fabricated data about earthquake risks.

32

Sales of Uranium and Sales Agreements

During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company completed uranium sales totaling 270,000 pounds of U3O8, not including converter and transaction costs, for an average sales price of $67.78 per pound of U3O8.

enCore’s uranium sales strategy provides a base level of projected income from sales contracts while preserving a significant ability to realize opportunities when strong short-term market fundamentals are present.

The Company has been able to use improving uranium market conditions to create a balanced uranium sales agreement portfolio, to provide multiple pricing structures to support future market changes and support production plans. As of March 31, 2026, we have executed fourteen uranium sales agreements to supply uranium to nuclear power plants in the United States and one legacy uranium sales agreement with a uranium trading company. enCore’s uranium sales agreement portfolio is a mix of market related pricing, hybrid base price and market related pricing, base escalated pricing, and fixed prices. Of enCore’s fourteen current uranium sales agreements, two are market-related with no floors or ceilings and eight are market related that typically retain exposure to spot pricing, while including minimum floor and maximum ceiling prices, some of which are adjusted upward

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Latest 10-K MD&A

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-03-31. Report date: 2025-12-31.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is a discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and historical results of operations. The following should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected, forecasted or expected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Refer to “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements” and Item 1A. Risk Factors herein. Our management believes the assumptions underlying the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are reasonable. However, the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes may not be an indication of our financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Business Overview

enCore Energy Corp., America’s Clean Energy Company™, was incorporated on October 30, 2009, under the Laws of British Columbia and is a reporting issuer in all of the provinces and territories of Canada. As of January 1, 2025, the Company ceased to be a “foreign private issuer” and has become a “domestic issuer” and a non-accelerated filer within the meanings under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company must comply with the filing deadlines and disclosure obligations of a domestic issuer and non-accelerated filer as set forth in the Exchange Act. This classification impacts the timing of our periodic filings, internal control assessments, and other regulatory requirements. The Company’s common shares are listed on Nasdaq and the TSX-V under the trading symbol EU.

We are an Exploration Stage Issuer as defined by S-K 1300 as we have not established proven or probable mineral reserves, through the completion of a pre-feasibility or feasibility study for any of our uranium projects, as required by the SEC to be defined as a Development Stage Issuer. Even though we commenced extraction of uranium at our Rosita Project and our Alta Mesa Project, the Company remains classified as an Exploration Stage Issuer and will continue to remain an Exploration Stage Issuer until such time as proven or probable mineral reserves have been established at one of our uranium projects.

80

Table of Contents

The Company is focused on extracting domestic uranium within the United States. The Company utilizes only proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy. In 2023, the Company commenced uranium extraction at the Rosita CPPs and at the Alta Mesa CPP in South Texas. enCore’s strategy is to build uranium extraction capacity by developing and placing into operation a series of uranium extraction facilities in South Texas, followed by a future pipeline of exploration projects in South Dakota and Wyoming, becoming a leading supplier of domestic uranium to fuel a growing demand for clean energy generation using nuclear power.

Industry and Market Update

The primary use of uranium is to fuel nuclear power plants for the generation of carbon and emission free electricity. According to the World Nuclear Association (“WNA”), as of September 2025, there were 440 operable nuclear reactors world-wide, which required approximately 180 to 225 million pounds of U3O8 annually at full operation. According to data from TradeTech LLC (“TradeTech”), the world continues to require more uranium than it produces from primary extraction. The gap between demand and primary supply is being filled by stockpiled inventories and secondary supplies, which the Company believes have dwindled significantly in recent years.

Expanding the current reactor fleet to meet the levels of electrical generating capacity remains a significant challenge to the nuclear industry. To meet those goals, the global industry must protect existing capacity, and there have been multiple public pronouncements from several countries, including the United States to protect existing nuclear generating capacity. In the United States, as a result of clean energy credits granted by several states and the production tax credit for nuclear power provided in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, several nuclear utilities have announced operating life extensions and capacity expansions within their existing operating fleet. Also, the industry has seen an unprecedented trend in reactor recommissioning. In the United States, where just a few years ago reactors were being shut down prematurely, nuclear plants such as Diablo Canyon, Palisades, Three Mile Island, and Duane Arnold are positioned to re-enter service.

With increasing demand expectations, an increase in uranium production must occur in an environment beset by risks, including import bans, sanctions, and secondary sanctions imposed by various countries, transportation issues, trade restrictions in other goods and services beyond nuclear fuel, and fewer available ports, all of which have combined to create widespread uncertainty in the market regarding the availability of both current and future supply.

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued two Executive Orders that specifically referenced nuclear power and uranium as key parts to expanding energy production in the United States. The Executive Order titled, “Unleashing American Energy,” in addition to directing federal agencies to advance permitting for energy projects also called for uranium to be designated as a “critical mineral” by the U.S. Geological Survey. The Executive Order titled, “Declaring a National Energy Emergency,” directs federal agencies, under emergency authority, to advance permit and license approvals for the production of energy and energy resources. In that Executive Order, uranium is defined as an “energy resource” and subject to the emergency declaration. The U.S. Senate, on February 3, 2025, confirmed Chris Wright, former CEO of Denver-based Liberty Energy, to serve as Energy Secretary. The following day, Wright issued his first Secretarial Order, which directs the Department of Energy (“DOE”) to take immediate action to unleash energy produced in the U.S. in accordance with President Trump’s executive orders. See updates below related to President Trump’s Executive Orders.

Below is a list of some of the recent government policy, U.S. market and global market news that can influence the uranium market.

U.S. Government Policy News

•U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (Republican - South Dakota) is reportedly prepared to schedule a vote on a previously postponed Russia sanctions measure. The legislation, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 (S. 1241), was introduced in April by Senators Lindsey Graham (Republican-South Carolina) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat - Connecticut) and currently has the support of 84 additional senators. A companion measure in the House of Representatives has garnered backing from more than 100 members.

•U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (Republican – Texas) and Martin Heinrich (Democrat – New Mexico) introduced the Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of in October 2025. The proposed legislation would direct the United States DOE to conduct a comprehensive study evaluating the costs, benefits, and risks associated with recycling the nation’s spent nuclear fuel, with particular emphasis on comparisons to interim storage alternatives.

81

Table of Contents

•Westinghouse Electric Company, Cameco Corporation, and Brookfield Asset Management have announced that the U.S. Government has entered into a strategic partnership to accelerate the deployment of nuclear power pursuant to Executive Orders issued by President Donald Trump on May 23, 2025. The initiative is expected to be supported by at least by an $80 billion investment for the construction of new nuclear reactors across the United States, utilizing Westinghouse reactor technology. Under the terms of the partnership, the U.S. Government will be granted a participation interest that, upon vesting, would entitle it to receive 20 percent of certain cash distributions made by Westinghouse, in excess of $17.5 billion, following the granting of the participation interest. Vesting is contingent upon the U.S. Government making a final investment decision and entering into definitive agreements for the construction of new Westinghouse nuclear reactors in the United States.

•On November 18, 2025, the U.S. Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Energy, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman Al Saud, signed a Joint Declaration confirming the completion of negotiations on civil nuclear cooperation. The declaration established a legal foundation for expanded civil nuclear cooperation between the two countries and signaled the intent for a long-term, multi-billion-dollar partnership in civil nuclear energy, which may include development, deployment, and technology collaboration involving U.S. companies.

•The U.S. Army has identified nine military installations as potential sites for microreactor power plants under its Janus Program, a next-generation nuclear power initiative aimed at enhancing energy resilience. The program envisions the deployment of commercially built microreactors at selected bases across the United States.

•The U.S. DOE has selected the TVA and Holtec Government Services to support the early deployment of advanced light-water SMRs in the United States. The selected project teams are eligible to receive up to $800 million in federal cost-shared funding to advance initial SMR projects in Tennessee and Michigan.

•U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright noted in September 2025, that the United States should consider expanding its strategic uranium reserve, emphasizing the importance of securing long-term uranium supplies to support the nation’s nuclear energy program. During the quarter ended December 31, 2025, the DOE issued funding opportunities and notices to accelerate domestic critical minerals and materials production, supporting technologies that underpin nuclear fuel supply chains and other strategic materials. In January 2026, DOE announced approximately $2.7 billion in contract awards to expand domestic uranium enrichment capacity for both low-enriched uranium (LEU) and high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU). This initiative supports development of a more secure U.S. nuclear fuel supply chain and complements strategic reserve discussions by enhancing production capabilities.

•Since March 30, 2025, the United States has implemented a series of aggressive tariff measures that have reshaped global trade relations. On March 24, President Trump issued Executive Order 14245, imposing a 25% tariff on all goods imported from countries that continue purchasing Venezuelan oil. This was followed by a broader escalation during what the administration termed “Liberation Day,” from April 2 to April 5. The United States enacted a sweeping 10% baseline tariff on nearly all imports, with reciprocal rates reaching as high as 34% on Chinese goods and 20–24% on products from the European Union and Japan. Steel and aluminum tariffs were also significantly increased during this period, rising to 50% globally. Legal challenges quickly followed: On May 28, 2025, the United States Court of International Trade ruled that the Liberation Day tariffs exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), issuing an injunction to block enforcement. Tariffs based on Section 232 (national security) and Section 301 (China-related trade practices) remain legally intact and enforceable as of December 31, 2025. The IEEPA tariffs also remains, thus collection continued until February 2026, when the Supreme Court ruled the tariffs were unconstitutional.

•President Trump signed an Executive Order on February 14, 2025, to establish the National Energy Dominance Council, which is chaired by the Secretary of Interior, Doug Burgum, and vice-chaired by Energy Secretary, Chris Wright. The council's members also include the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, and Secretary of Transportation. The Council was expected to present President Trump with a plan for how to raise awareness of the American energy dominance plan within 100 days. As of December 31, 2025, the council has actively advanced its agenda with the following:

82

Table of Contents

•Encouragement for power plants to increase output by 10% to 15% to support rising electricity demand, especially from artificial intelligence systems.

•Advancing the reversal of the Biden era Liquefied Natural Gas (“LNG”) export clause. The reversal of the export clause has led to the approval of record levels of future U.S. LNG exports in an effort to position the U.S. as the leading LNG exporter in the world.

•The Council has also outlined the initiative to re-open closed power plants, expanding energy infrastructure, launching small modular nuclear reactors, and fast tracking mining/mineral projects.

The Council met during the year ended December 31, 2025, however, no public version of the meeting notes and/or strategy has been made available.

U.S. Market News

•X-Energy Reactor Company, LLC, a U.S. based developer of advanced nuclear reactor and fuel technologies, has announced a Series C-1 financing round totaling approximately $500 million, anchored by Amazon.com, Inc. The investment will support the completion of X-Energy’s reactor design and licensing activities, as well as fund the initial phase of its TRISO-X fuel fabrication facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to help address growing energy demand.

•Global Laser Enrichment (“GLE”) has concluded an independent, third-party validation of its next-generation uranium enrichment technology, which confirms that the company has achieved Technology Readiness Level 6 following the completion of its large-scale enrichment demonstration program.

•California-based General Matter announced plans to build a privately developed facility to enrich uranium in the state of Kentucky. The company, which is backed by investor Peter Thiel, said it intends to make a “historic investment in American nuclear infrastructure” by restoring a shuttered facility in Paducah, Kentucky. General Matter was one of four companies selected in October 2024 by the DOE to provide enrichment services to help establish a U.S. supply of high-assay low-enriched uranium for advanced reactor designs.

•Uranium Energy Corporation launched the United States Uranium Refining and Conversion Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary that will engage in the feasibility of developing a new state-of-the-art American uranium refining and conversion facility.

•During the year ended December 31, 2025, NextEra Energy announced two agreements with Google, which will strengthen U.S. nuclear leadership and help meet growing energy demand from artificial intelligence (AI) with clean and reliable nuclear energy. The cornerstone of this collaboration is the planned restart of the Duane Arnold Energy Center, the only nuclear facility in the U.S. state of Iowa. The plant (615 MWe BWR), which was shut down in 2020, is expected to be fully operational by the first quarter of 2029, pending regulatory approvals to restart the plant.

•The New York Power Authority has issued its first solicitations as part of a new initiative to develop 1 GW of advanced nuclear energy.

•Crusoe, an artificial intelligence data center developer, has entered into a partnership with Blue Energy, a U.S. based nuclear energy company, to develop a nuclear-powered data center campus with up to 1.5 GW of capacity at the Port of Victoria in Victoria, Texas. The planned 1,600-acre campus is expected to begin receiving power as early as 2028, initially supplied by natural gas–fired generation, with a transition to nuclear energy targeted for completion by 2031.

•Constellation, a U.S. based energy company, announced that its Crane Clean Energy Center has secured a $1.0 billion loan from the DOE. This transaction marks the first instance in which the DOE Loan Programs Office has simultaneously finalized a conditional loan commitment and achieved financial close.

•Urenco USA has achieved two significant milestones at its uranium enrichment facility in New Mexico: the company’s first production of enriched uranium exceeding 5% U-235, and the startup of an additional centrifuge cascade as part of its ongoing capacity expansion program.

83

Table of Contents

•Four public electric utilities -Nebraska Public Power District, Omaha Public Power District, and Lincoln Electric System—together with the Grand River Dam Authority of Oklahoma, have jointly announced the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding to establish the Great Plains New Nuclear Consortium.

•Centrus Energy announced that it has commenced domestic centrifuge manufacturing to support commercial LEU enrichment operations at its facility in Piketon, Ohio.

•The state of Texas is moving toward the creation of a taxpayer funded nuclear power incentive fund. About 80% of the fund’s $350 million would be dedicated toward reimbursing construction costs for functional nuclear reactors. The remainder would be used for research and development. As of October 2025, several companies and projects have expressed interest in Texas’s $350 million nuclear incentive fund, established under House Bill 14. The fund is administered by the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Office, which was created to support the development of advanced nuclear reactors and associated industries in the state.

Global Market News

•Following a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, the Government of Japan announced its intention to provide up to $332 billion in support for critical energy projects in the United States, including investments in the development and construction of nuclear reactor projects.

84

Table of Contents

Sales of Uranium and Sales Agreements

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company completed uranium sales totaling 655,000 pounds of U3O8, not including converter and transaction costs, for an average sales price of $65.89 per pound of U3O8.

enCore’s uranium sales strategy provides a base level of projected income from sales contracts while preserving a significant ability to realize opportunities when strong short-term market fundamentals are present.

The Company has been able to use improving uranium market conditions to create a balanced uranium sales agreement portfolio, to provide multiple pricing structures to support future market changes and support production plans. As of December 31, 2025, we have executed fourteen uranium sales agreements to supply uranium to nuclear power plants in the United States and one legacy uranium sales agreement with a uranium trading company. enCore’s uranium sales agreement portfolio is a mix of market related pricing, hybrid base price and market related pricing, base escalated pricing, and fixed prices. Of enCore’s fourteen current uranium sales agreements, two are market-related with no floors or ceilings and eight are market related that typically retain exposure to spot pricing, while including minimum floor and maximum ceiling prices, some of which are adjusted upwards periodically for inflation. Minimum floor prices are set at levels that provide the Company with a comfortable margin over its expected costs of operations in Texas while still allowing the Company to participate in anticipated escalations of the price of uranium. The Company will continue to assess opportunities to secure future sales agreements that will support its continued project and production growth strategies. The Company is committed to honoring all sales commitments.

Corporate Updates for the Fourth Quarter 2025

•On October 14, 2025, the Company announced new uranium discoveries had been made in areas in or near existing wellfields. These discoveries were made as a result of a major ongoing re-analysis of thousands of historic drill holes from across the Alta Mesa Project that began in April 2025. This more granular and detailed evaluation has identified uranium mineralized roll fronts in at least three areas to date.

85

Table of Contents

Operations Update

The Company is focused on producing uranium in the United States and delivering that uranium to customers. The Company currently utilizes only the proven ISR technology to provide necessary fuel for the generation of clean, reliable, and carbon-free nuclear energy.

enCore owns 3 of the 10 licensed and constructed CPPs in the United States. The Company has several key mineral resource projects in other jurisdictions within the United States. Our S-K 1300 compliant resources are listed below:

Total measured and indicated mineral resources 30.94 million lbs U3O8

Total inferred mineral resources 20.54 million lbs U3O8

The Company’s strategy over the next three years is centered around two of its fully licensed Texas CPPs: Rosita and Alta Mesa. The CPPs located at the Rosita and Alta Mesa projects are designed for, and fully capable of, processing feed resin from relocatable satellite IX plants employed at various deposits within a 100-mile radius of each plant. The Rosita CPP was the starting point for enCore’s Texas extraction strategy. In 2024, the Company announced it had commenced uranium extraction operations at Rosita from the Rosita Extension wellfield, PAA-5. Rosita is located approximately 60 miles from Corpus Christi, Texas and has an 800,000-pound U3O8 per year production capacity.

In February 2023, the Company acquired 100% of the Alta Mesa Uranium Project and the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project from Energy Fuels Inc., for $120 million. The Company’s fully licensed Alta Mesa CPP is located approximately 100 miles southwest of Corpus Christi, Texas, and has a production capacity of 1.5 million pounds of U3O8 per year through its IX system located at the plant. The facility has elution, precipitation, drying, and packaging capacity for 2.0 million pounds of U3O8 per year. This plant is designed to accept direct production feed to the IX columns in the plant and concurrently accept loaded resin from satellite locations, once the resin transfer system has been installed. The Alta Mesa Project includes existing and near-term production areas, including fully permitted and authorized production areas 6 and 7. The Mesteña Grande Uranium Project has additional inferred mineral resource areas that will require significant additional exploration drilling and permitting prior to being able to be brought online. In total, the Alta Mesa Uranium Project combined with the Mesteña Grande Uranium Project encompasses mineral leases on over 200,000 acres of private land. In February 2024, the Company sold a 30% interest in the Alta Mesa and Mesteña Grande projects to Boss for $60 million.

In June 2024, the Company announced the successful startup of uranium extraction operations at the Alta Mesa Project. With the restart of the previously operating Alta Mesa Project, the Company is now the only uranium producer in the United States with multiple production facilities in operation as of December 31, 2025. The initial ramp-up was a progressive process to advance and continue increased uranium extraction via direct feed to the Alta Mesa CPP. Exploration drilling and wellfield installation continues at PAA-7 and the second IX circuit at the Alta Mesa CPP was brought online in early 2025 and production continues through both IX circuits. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the head grade through the South train peaked at 110mg/L and averaged 38mg/L, and the West train peaked at 141mg/L for an average grade of 67mg/L. Additional production wells are being brought online regularly which has brought both processing trains to near maximum flow capacity. Utilizing the Pathcad software, the Company is able to adjust wellfield flow patterns to more optimally recover the mineralization and are adjusting patterns and flow to help improve wellfield performance.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company announced new uranium discoveries made in areas in or near existing wellfields. These discoveries have been made as a result of a major ongoing re-analysis of thousands of historic drill holes that began in April 2025 across the Alta Mesa ISR Uranium Project. This more granular and detailed evaluation has identified uranium mineralized roll fronts in at least three areas to date. Follow up drilling by the Company has delineated these new roll fronts with drilling continuing to determine the extents of each.

This additional roll front uranium mineralization has been discovered in close proximity to known and already exploited roll fronts. One of these new roll fronts has progressed to the point that it has now advanced to permitting as a Wellfield 3 extension. Mineralized roll fronts have also been found overlying the past productive mineralization in Wellfield 4 with at least two new roll fronts discovered to date, each extending more than 2,500 feet in length with both included in the existing permit authorization. This newly discovered mineralization lies at a depth of 320 to 345 feet, almost 200 feet above the previously exploited roll front. This shallow mineralization makes for shorter drill times with less footage required, less cement and shorter casing intervals resulting in significant cost savings in delineation and extraction versus deeper mineralization. A third area extending south from the previously exploited mineralization in Wellfield 1 continues

86

Table of Contents

to expand with additional ongoing drilling. This granular re-analysis of previous drill data is continued through December 31, 2025, and follow-up delineation drilling is expected to continue into 2026.

The Kingsville Dome CPP is currently maintained in a standby condition and will require refurbishment prior to commencement of operations. This facility, similar in size and design to the Rosita CPP facility, has a capacity of 800,000 pounds of U3O8 per year.

As the Company has been increasing its operational pace to meet our targets for uranium extraction rates, we have successfully increased our drill rig capacity to facilitate replacing mineral resource depletion and adding mineral resources in South Texas. The Company started with 6 active drill rigs in South Texas at the beginning of 2024, and by December 31, 2024, the number increased to 17. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had 30 active rigs in South Texas. The Company has an experienced technical team with years of experience in ISR operations in Texas, Wyoming, and Nebraska supporting and managing our operations. We have been able to utilize our experience to self-execute the refurbishment of the Rosita and Alta Mesa CPPs, along with the design, construction and installation of infrastructure for three wellfields and two satellite IX facilities over a period of three years.

South Texas Regulatory Proceedings

Each of the Company’s production facilities maintain several permits and licenses in order to manage the current operations. For the Company’s operating locations, permits and licenses remain current and in effect. In specific cases, some of those permits and licenses are in renewal, and for some expansion activities, new permits or amendments will be necessary. All of our South Texas facility ISR and underground injection operations are regulated by the TCEQ and the Radioactive Material Licenses (“RMLs”) for Rosita and Alta Mesa are issued by the TCEQ under the NRC Agreement State Program that assures that a mature and consistent regulatory process is in place to provide more certainty regarding regulatory approvals.

Currently, at Alta Mesa, the RML and the Class III UIC Area Permit are in timely renewal and under technical review by the TCEQ, but those do not affect current expansion activities. At Upper Spring Creek, the TCEQ has issued the Class III UIC Area Permit, and the agency has approved the expansion of the Rosita RML to incorporate the Upper Spring Creek wellfield and satellite IX facility into the current license activities. Construction of the satellite and wellfield at Upper Spring Creek has commenced. Remaining permits needed to begin operations are the Production Area Authorization and the Class I Waste Disposal Well permit, both of which are under review by the TCEQ as of December 31, 2025.

South Dakota Developments

In addition to the Company’s operations in South Texas, it is also developing pipeline projects in other states. The advanced stage Dewey-Burdock Uranium Project in South Dakota has demonstrated ISR resources, including a 2024 S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary and Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report and PEA citing robust economics. The project has its source material license from the NRC and its underground injection permits and aquifer exemption from the EPA. In April 2024, the Company submitted its application to renew the ten year old Source Material License, SUA-1600. The NRC has confirmed that the Dewey-Burdock Source Material License is in timely renewal. The underground injection permits were appealed to the EPA’s EAB and the aquifer exemption was appealed to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals. On September 16, 2025, the Company announced that the EAB denied in full a petition for review filed by the Oglala Sioux Tribe, Black Hills Clean Water Alliance, and NDN Collective against the EPA’s issuance of Class III and Class V UIC permits for the Dewey Burdock Project in South Dakota. The decision allows the Dewey Burdock Project to advance through federal permitting with the commencement of state permitting activities in 2025, accelerating the Project towards development ahead of schedule.

In September of 2025, the Company announced the Dewey Burdock Project had been approved for inclusion in the Fast-41 Program by the U.S. Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council (“Permitting Council”). This is a component of the implementation of President Trump’s Executive Order on Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production. The Dewey-Burdock Project received its Source and Byproduct Materials License in 2014, from the NRC, now under timely renewal, and will work with the NRC as the lead agency for federal permitting. enCore’s objective is to advance the Dewey Burdock Project into development and operation utilizing the ISR uranium extraction process.

87

Table of Contents

Under the Executive Order, the Permitting Council identifies priority infrastructure and critical mineral projects to receive accelerated permitting review. The addition of the first South Dakota ISR project supports the domestic uranium production focus of the United States. This focus enables the development of essential clean energy, extracted through environmentally responsible ISR technology, to provide affordable, reliable domestic energy.

Wyoming Developments

The Company has commenced the initial permitting work to advance the Gas Hills Project as an ISR uranium recovery operation located in central Wyoming, approximately 60 miles west of Casper. As part of the initial data collection for project permitting, the Company initiated core drilling during 2024. Our Gas Hills Project is located in the historic Gas Hills Uranium District in the brownfield area of extensive previous extraction.

In 2024, we disclosed that the Company initiated exploration drilling on the Dewey Terrace Project area. The near term goal of this drilling is designed to not only define the extent of the Dewey Terrace project mineralization, but also determine its eastern extent and potential to connect with our Dewey-Burdock deposit just across the state line in South Dakota. The drilling at both the Gas Hills and the Dewey Terrace Projects remain ongoing.

Results of Operations: 

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024:

Years Ended December 31

Increase

(Decrease)

Percent

Change

(in thousands except per share data)

2025

$

2024

$

Revenue

43,155 

58,334 

(15,179)

(26)%

Cost of sales

33,463 

65,541 

(32,078)

(49)%

Operating expenses, excluding stock option expense

71,254 

60,188 

11,066 

18%

Stock option expense

4,203 

4,788 

(585)

(12)%

Interest income

1,715 

2,476 

(761)

(31)%

Interest expense

(3,392)

(1,735)

(1,657)

96%

Loss on marketable securities, unrealized

(5,681)

(2,711)

(2,970)

110%

Gain on marketable securities, realized

9,613 

248 

9,365 

3,776%

Net loss before income taxes

(63,511)

(73,922)

10,411 

(14)%

Basic and diluted loss per share(1)

$

(0.30)

$

(0.34)

0.04 

(12)%

(1) For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, outstanding stock options, warrants, unvested restricted stock units and the Convertible Senior Notes are excluded from the calculation of our diluted weighted average common shares outstanding as their effect would be anti-dilutive due to a net loss from continuing operations.

The following table sets forth selected operating data and financial metrics for uranium sales for the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024. 

Year Ended December 31

Increase

(Decrease)

Percent

Change

2025

2024

Volumes sold (lbs)

655,000 

720,000 

(65,000)

(9)%

Realized sales price ($/lb)

65.89 

81.02 

(15.13)

(19)%

Costs applicable to revenues ($/lb)

51.09 

91.03 

(39.94)

(44)%

•Revenue - Revenue from uranium sales for the years ended December 31, 2025, was $43,155 compared to revenue of $58,334 for the years ended December 31, 2024, a decrease of $15,179. The decrease is driven by less volumes sold and lower realized sales prices caused by ceiling prices embedded in contracts with customers. The realized sales prices per pound of uranium for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $65.89 and $81.02, respectively, and included the contractual sales price less sales-related costs such as transfer fees. The realized sale price per pound decrease is dictated by the market for uranium, which is a commodity.

88

Table of Contents

•Cost of Sales - Costs applicable to uranium sales were $33,463 for the years ended December 31, 2025, related to the completed sale of 655,000 pounds of uranium at a weighted average cost of $51.09 per pound compared to uranium costs of $65,541 for the sale of 720,000 pounds at a weighted average cost of $91.03 per pound for the years ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in costs was the result of no purchases of uranium, offset by more sales placed on extracted uranium at a lower market price. The Company’s weighted average cost components include the cost of purchased uranium and uranium from extraction.

•Operating expenses - Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative expenses. Operating expenses, excluding stock option expenses, for the years ended December 31, 2025, were $71,254 as compared to $60,188 for the years ended December 31, 2024. This increase primarily reflects the growth and increased activity levels the Company experienced in 2025, which was driven primarily by the increased extraction of uranium at Alta Mesa and Rosita which commenced during the latter part of 2024, combined with increased professional fees related to the Convertible Senior Notes and increased staff costs.

•Stock option expense - Stock option expense decreased for the years ended December 31, 2025 at $4,203 compared to $4,788 for the same period in 2024. The decrease in stock option expense is driven by the issuance, exercise, expiration and forfeiture of issued options and common shares.

•Interest income - Interest income for the years ended December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, was $1,715 and $2,476, respectively. The decrease was primarily driven by the decrease in cash held in brokerage and bank accounts.

•Interest expense - Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, was $3,392 and $1,735, respectively. The increase is primarily driven by the interest expense related to the Convertible Senior Notes. See Note 15 - Debt for more information. 

•Gain/(Loss) on marketable securities, unrealized - The Company recognized a loss of $5,681 on the fair value of marketable securities, unrealized for the years ended, December 31, 2025 compared to a loss of $2,711 for the years ended December 31, 2024. Unrealized gains and losses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, are due to favorable and unfavorable market conditions for the respective periods.

•Gain on marketable securities, realized - The Company recognized a gain of $9,613 on the fair value of marketable securities, realized for the years ended December 31, 2025, as a result of the sale of common share investments compared to a gain $248 for the years ended December 31, 2024.

89

Table of Contents

The table below presents total cost of extracted pounds and uranium costs per extracted pound during the reporting period. Total cost of extracted pounds is the cost of sales less the cost of sales of purchased goods, which includes the aggregate purchase price of uranium sourced from purchased uranium. Uranium cost per extracted pound is the total cost of extracted pounds divided by the pounds of uranium extracted during the period. Total cost of extracted pounds and uranium costs per extracted pound, includes the allocation of cash and non-cash costs

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company continued its uranium extraction activities at its South Texas operations.

Total Costs of U3O8 Sold

Year Ended December 31, 2025

Year Ended December 31, 2024

Pounds U3O8

Cost ($000s)

Cost/Pounds

Pounds U3O8

Cost ($000s)

Cost/Pounds

Total Cost of Pounds

655,000

$33,463

$51.09

720,000

$65,541

$91.03

Purchased (2024) inventory

(1)

245,000

$16,644

$67.93

580,000

$58,433

$100.75

Extracted total cost

410,000

$16,819

$41.02

140,000

$7,108

$35.99

Extracted:

Cash costs

(2)

$11,804

$28.79

$6,304

$31.40

Non-Cash costs

(3)

$5,015

$12.23

$804

$4.59

(1)

Lower of actual cost or market price of the year ended December 31, 2025

(2)

Cash costs of extracted pounds related to cost of goods sold are a metric for investors in evaluating the Company’s operations.

(3)

Non-cash costs of extracted pounds related to cost of goods sold as an insight into additional expenses that impact overall costs and include

Inventory Remaining on Hand

As of December 31, 2025

As of December 31, 2024

Pounds U3O8

Cost ($000s)

Cost/Pounds

Pounds U3O8

Cost ($000s)

Cost/Pounds

Total Cost of Inventory

132,013 

$5,317

$40.28

358,408 

$20,967

$58.50

Purchased (2024) inventory

- 

$-

$-

245,000 

$14,408

$58.81

Extracted total cost

132,013 

$5,317

$40.28

113,408 

$6,559

$57.84

Extracted:

          Cash costs

(1)

$4,605

$34.88

$4,883

$43.06

          Non-Cash costs

(2)

$713

$5.40

$1,676

$14.78

(1)

Cash costs of extracted pounds related to cost of goods sold are a metric for investors in evaluating the Company's operations.

(2)

Non-cash costs of extracted pounds related to cost of goods sold as an insight into additional expenses that impact overall costs and include depletion and certain sales related fees.

The Company remains committed to cost efficiency and production optimization, ensuring competitive uranium extraction and processing. The Company anticipates further cost efficiencies as additional wellfield patterns come online and economies of scale improve.

90

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our short-term cash requirements are primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our short-term cash requirements generally through existing working capital. As of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $52,403 and $39,701, respectively, and working capital of $96,134 and $57,334, respectively.

Our long-term cash requirements are also primarily driven by exploration and development activities aimed at advancing properties for uranium extraction. We expect to meet our long-term cash requirements through various sources of capital, which may include a revolving credit facility or line of credit and future debt or equity issuances, existing working capital, and net cash provided by operations and property dispositions. However, there are a number of factors that may have a material adverse effect on our ability to access these capital sources, including the state of overall equity and credit markets, our degree of leverage, our unencumbered asset base and borrowing restrictions imposed by lenders (including as a result of any failure to comply with financial covenants in future indebtedness), general market conditions for uranium mining companies and other energy companies, our operating performance and liquidity and market perceptions about us. The success of our business strategy will depend, in part, on our ability to access these various capital sources.

On August 22, 2025, we issued $115,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes. The Convertible Senior Notes bear an annual interest of 5.5%, payable semiannually in arrears and the Notes mature on August 15, 2030.

We believe that our available cash, expected operating cash flows, and future revolving credit facility or line of credit or equity or debt financings will provide sufficient funds for our operations and anticipated scheduled debt service payments for the next twelve-month period following December 31, 2025. We believe that our sources of long-term cash will be sufficient for our needs thereafter.

Cash Flows

The following table reflects cash flow activities for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Year Ended December 31,

2025

2024

Increase (Decrease)

Net cash used in operating activities

$

(24,992)

$

(45,204)

$

(20,212)

Net cash used in investing activities

(46,224)

(29,990)

16,234 

Net cash provided by financing activities

84,740 

107,417 

(22,677)

Impact of currency rate changes in cash

(185)

56 

(241)

Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

$

13,339 

$

32,279 

$

(18,940)

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities decreased by $20,212, to cash used in operating activities of $24,992, for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to cash used in operating activities of $45,204 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This is largely driven by paying off the note payable to a related party in 2025, as discussed in Note 15, offset by less purchases of uranium inventory during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the year ended December 31, 2024.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $16,234, to $46,224, for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $29,990 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This was largely driven by the purchase of marketable securities and the acquisition of property and equipment during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

91

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $22,677, to $84,740 for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $107,417 for the year ended December 31, 2024. This was largely driven by the proceeds from the Convertible Senior Notes offset by a reduction in equity financing and, payment of capped call premiums. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received proceeds from the sale of minority interest to Boss, exercised warrants and received proceeds from the private placement (see Note 13 - Stockholders’ Equity).

Commitments

The Company’s sales commitments, for all sales contracts, are presented in pounds (in thousands) below.

Year

Volume (in pounds)

2026

900

2027

850

2028

1,000

2029

1,500

2030

1,200

Thereafter

2,500

Total

7,950

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had no material off-balance sheet arrangements such as guarantee contracts, contingent interest in assets transferred to an entity, derivative instruments obligations or any obligations that trigger financing, liquidity, market or credit risk to the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Preparation of the financial statements requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amount of net sales and expenses, assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We consider an accounting judgment, estimate or assumption to be critical when the estimate or assumption is complex in nature or requires a high degree of judgment and when the use of different judgments, estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our Consolidated Financial Statements.