Core Scientific, Inc./tx (CORZ)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > SIC Major Group 61 > SIC 6199 Finance Services
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1839341. Latest filing source: 0001628280-26-013305.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Business
Read CORZ's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.
Risk Factors
Read CORZ's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 319,019,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-02 |
| Net income | -288,616,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-02 |
| Assets | 2,347,644,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-02 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-03-02. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001839341.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 60,320,000 | 544,483,000 | 640,313,000 | 502,400,000 | 510,672,000 | 319,019,000 | |
| Net income | -12,206,000 | 47,312,000 | -2,146,318,000 | -246,487,000 | -1,437,874,000 | -288,616,000 | |
| Operating income | -6,327,000 | 131,494,000 | -2,109,553,000 | 8,961,000 | -142,065,000 | -245,589,000 | |
| Gross profit | 9,392,000 | 238,862,000 | 8,400,000 | 123,459,000 | 121,070,000 | 37,898,000 | |
| Diluted EPS | -0.14 | 0.20 | -6.30 | -0.65 | -4.87 | -0.88 | |
| Operating cash flow | -23,765,000 | -56,735,000 | 205,187,000 | 65,114,000 | 42,896,000 | 278,250,000 | |
| Capital expenditures | 0.00 | 0.00 | 383,980,000 | 16,161,000 | 94,961,000 | 729,000,000 | |
| Share buybacks | 31,646,000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Assets | 15,000 | 2,438,864,000 | 807,686,000 | 712,156,000 | 1,475,946,000 | 2,347,644,000 | |
| Liabilities | 400 | 1,053,178,000 | 1,217,032,000 | 1,309,097,000 | 2,418,995,000 | 3,310,384,000 | |
| Stockholders' equity | 106,329,000 | 89,224,000 | 1,341,210,000 | -409,346,000 | -596,941,000 | -943,049,000 | -962,740,000 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 117,871,000 | 15,884,000 | 50,409,000 | 836,197,000 | 311,378,000 | ||
| Free cash flow | -23,765,000 | -56,735,000 | -178,793,000 | 48,953,000 | -52,065,000 | -450,750,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | -20.24% | 8.69% | -49.06% | -90.47% | |||
| Operating margin | -10.49% | 24.15% | 1.78% | -27.82% | -76.98% | ||
| Return on assets | 1.94% | -34.61% | -97.42% | -12.29% | |||
| Current ratio | 2.36 | 0.46 | 0.20 | 6.72 | 1.15 |
Industry Peer Context
Net margin peer context
Operating margin peer context
ROA peer context
Financial Bridges
Income statement bridge from reported figures
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Revenue: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept Revenues; source concepts us-gaap:Revenues | Gross profit: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept GrossProfit; source concepts us-gaap:GrossProfit | Operating income: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept OperatingIncomeLoss; source concepts us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss | Net income: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept NetIncomeLoss; source concepts us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss
Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Operating cash flow: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | Capital expenditures: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | Free cash flow: accession 0001628280-26-013305; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
Financial Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: OperatingIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: GrossProfit. Source concepts: us-gaap:GrossProfit.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2024 ended 2024-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013232; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue. Source concepts: us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-013305; filed 2026-03-02. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-07-28. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001839341.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | -1.23 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | -0.03 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-03-31 | 0.00 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 112,904,000 | -41,146,000 | -0.11 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 141,929,000 | -195,693,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 179,291,000 | 210,691,000 | 0.78 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 141,102,000 | -804,896,000 | -4.51 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 95,354,000 | -455,259,000 | -1.17 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 94,925,000 | -265,541,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 79,525,000 | 580,693,000 | 1.25 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 78,628,000 | -936,799,000 | -0.04 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 81,103,000 | -144,027,000 | -0.45 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 79,763,000 | 215,959,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 115,244,000 | -347,188,000 | -1.06 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2026-Q2 | 2026-06-30 | 164,201,000 | -1,155,310,000 | -3.32 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001839341-26-000014; filed 2026-07-28. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001839341-26-000014; filed 2026-07-28. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0001839341-26-000014; filed 2026-07-28. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0001839341-26-000014.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q) as well as the financial and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026. This section generally discusses the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to June 30, 2025.
As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2026.
Overview
Core Scientific, Inc. is a leader in designing, building and operating large-scale purpose-built data centers for HDC services. We develop and operate facilities serving AI and HPC related workloads and are a provider of digital infrastructure to our third-party customers. The majority of our revenue is derived from HDC service.
Our strategic objective is to maximize the value of our large-scale data center infrastructure portfolio by converting power capacity across our facilities into long-term contracted HDC revenue streams. We believe this strategy enhances the predictability of future cash flows, reduces the relative contribution of bitcoin market volatility to our operating results, and increases the long-term value of our infrastructure platform relative to its historical use in digital asset mining operations.
In 2024, we announced our first HDC contract with CoreWeave, a provider of HPC services, which was subsequently expanded to approximately 590 MW of leased customer power capacity across five sites. As of June 30, 2026, approximately 395 MW has commenced billing. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, certain CoreWeave license agreements were assigned to a special purpose vehicle financing structure while CoreWeave remained a primary obligor under the agreements. See “Strategic Transition to High-Density Colocation Services” below for a more detailed discussion of this arrangement and the associated risks. While our current colocation revenue remains concentrated with a single customer, we believe our available unleased power capacity provides a meaningful opportunity to diversify our customer base over time.
As of June 30, 2026, we controlled approximately 2.1 GW of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 1.3 GW of total leasable customer power capacity across 11 data centers in seven U.S. states including Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (4). We continue to develop, convert and expand most of our facilities to support AI and HPC workloads while pursuing additional land and power opportunities to expand our data center footprint.
We expect colocation revenue to increase as additional contracted capacity is commissioned and delivered to our existing customer and as we add new customer relationships over time. We continue to operate a self-mining fleet at two facilities and provide hosted mining services to one remaining customer. Our hosted mining operations are expected to conclude by December 31, 2026, while we continue to wind down our self-mining operations.
2026 Highlights:
•On July 28, 2026, we announced a strategic commercial relationship with AMD with the potential to support up to 2.5 GW of leasable capacity, anchored by a 15-year agreement for approximately 530 MW across five sites.
•On May 6, 2026, our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Core Scientific Finance completed a $3.3 billion offering of 7.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2031 (the "Senior Secured Notes”). The net proceeds were used to fund a debt service reserve account and to repay in full and terminate our Term Loan Facility. The Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by first-priority liens, among other things, on substantially all assets of Core Scientific Finance and its subsidiary guarantors, which own or operate our specified data center development projects. For additional details, see Note 7 — Debt to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
29
•Billable customer power capacity of 395 MW as of June 30, 2026, against 590 MW of leased customer power capacity, with the remaining 195 MW in various stages of construction and commissioning.
•On May 5, 2026, we closed on the acquisition of land and related electrical power in Hunt County, Texas for approximately $233 million in cash, which is expected to support approximately 430 MW of gross power capacity, with an approved ERCOT interconnection ramp schedule. For additional details, see Note 3 — Asset Acquisition to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
•In May 2026, we announced our entry into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire Polaris DS LLC, for approximately $421 million in cash, subject to certain adjustments. The acquisition will add approximately 40 additional acres adjacent to our existing data center operating in Muskogee, Oklahoma, and will provide up to 440 MW of gross utility power capacity. The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2026. For additional details, see Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
These operational milestones, together with the strategic financing and portfolio developments outlined above, drove the financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, which are summarized below.
Financial Results:
•Total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was $164.2 million and $279.4 million, respectively, compared to $78.6 million and $158.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025.
◦Colocation revenue was $136.7 million and $214.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $10.6 million and $19.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. The increase in colocation revenue was driven by incremental billable customer power capacity delivered to our customer.
◦Digital asset self-mining revenue was $21.5 million and $51.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $62.4 million and $129.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. The decrease reflected a reduction in bitcoin mined of 53% and 49% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, as well as a decline in the average bitcoin price of 27% and 23% for the same periods, respectively.
◦The increase in colocation revenue and corresponding decline in self-mining revenue reflects the continued execution of our strategy to reallocate power capacity from digital asset mining to long-term contracted colocation services.
•Net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was $1.2 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, compared to $936.8 million and $360.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. Net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 was primarily driven by the change in fair value of warrants. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2026 was also impacted by a $266.5 million impairment charge on mining-related property, plant and equipment recognized during the first quarter of 2026.
•Adjusted EBITDA was $41.1 million and $50.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $28.5 million and $26.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for our definition and reconciliation to net loss.
•Capital expenditures were $954.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, of which $180.9 million was funded by CoreWeave pursuant to its existing colocation service agreement with the Company.
•Cash and cash equivalents and digital assets totaled $1.8 billion as of June 30, 2026.
Recent Developments
On July 27, 2026, the Company entered into Lease Agreements (collectively, the “AMD Leases”) with Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (“AMD”) for an aggregate of 377 MW of critical IT capacity at the Company’s Pecos, TX; Muskogee, OK; and Hunt County, TX sites; and Lease Agreements (the “Neocloud Leases,” and collectively with the AMD Leases, the “Leases”) with a Neocloud (“Neocloud”), for 152 MW of critical IT capacity at the Company’s Auburn, AL and Dalton Phase 3, GA sites. Each of the Leases is for a fifteen year term with three five-year options. The AMD Leases provide AMD a reservation of capacity right to lease from the Company at certain times and under certain circumstances an additional 1,925 MWs of critical IT capacity through December 28, 2028.
30
In connection with the Neocloud Leases, each of the Company, Neocloud and AMD has entered into a Credit Support Agreement with respect to each Neocloud Lease: (i) establishing protections for AMD equipment held within the applicable Neocloud Lease premises, (ii) providing AMD the right, but not the obligation, to cure certain defaults of Neocloud under the applicable Neocloud Lease, and (iii) establishing AMD’s rights and obligations in the event of certain material defaults by a Neocloud with respect to the applicable Neocloud Lease. Each Credit Support Agreement will terminate automatically upon earliest to occur of the expiration of the applicable Neocloud Lease, specified circumstances relating to the insolvency or default of Neocloud, and 15 years from the effective date of the applicable Neocloud Lease. In addition, AMD may terminate the applicable Credit Support Agreement upon the Company’s breach of a material representation, subject to a specified cure period.
In addition, the Company issued to AMD a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 30 million shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Common Stock”) at an exercise price of $23.47 per share, which represents the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market for the five trading days prior to execution of the Leases.
The Warrant is exercisable immediately, subject to satisfaction of the vesting conditions therein, and will terminate on July 27, 2031. The Warrant Shares will vest at a rate of 12,222 shares per each one megawatt (“MW”) of critical IT load contemplated by the Leases. As a result of the Leases executed on July 27, 2026, an aggregate of approximately 6.5 million Warrant Shares vested and became exercisable.
The Warrant was issued, and the Warrant Shares are expected to be issued, in reliance on the exemption from registration purs
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,”
or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is
intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to,
and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
(Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of operations for 2025 compared to 2024. For
discussion related to the results of operations and changes in consolidated financial condition for 2024 compared to 2023 refer to
Part II, Item 7. — “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our fiscal year 2024
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 20, 2025.
Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2025” and “2024” in this MD&A refer to the years ended December 31, 2025
and 2024, respectively.
As described in Note 3 — Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 to the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report, during the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2025, the Company identified errors in its previously issued consolidated financial statements related to the accounting
for property, plant and equipment demolished in connection with the conversion of certain facilities from digital asset mining
operations to high-density colocation infrastructure. The Company is concurrently filing an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2024 and amended Quarterly Reports on Forms 10-Q/A for the quarterly periods ended March 31,
2025, June 30, 2025, and September 30, 2025. The discussion that follows presents 2024 comparative data on an as-restated basis.
As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never
materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those
discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Core Scientific, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core”) designs, builds and operates large-scale
purpose-built data centers that support high-density colocation services and digital asset mining for both our own account and to a
lesser extent, third-party customers. Our data centers are optimized for power-intensive, mission-critical computing workloads, with a
focus on artificial intelligence (“AI”) and other high-performance computing (“HPC”) applications.
In 2024, the Company announced its first high-density colocation contract with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave), a provider of
high-performance computing (“HPC”) services, which subsequently had been expanded to 590 megawatts (“MW”) of leased customer
power capacity over the exercise of several contractual options. We believe leveraging our existing infrastructure for high-density
colocation services will provide more stable and predictable revenue streams, and represents substantially less risk over time than our
traditional hosted bitcoin mining or self-mining operations.
We are constructing, refurbishing, reallocating or converting our ten facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North
Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3) to support artificial intelligence related workloads, in support of our
existing colocation customer, but also to support our commitment to meeting the growing demand for high-density colocation
solutions and diversifying our customer base. This will be done as circumstances allow and in a manner designed to retain access to
electrical power under our control, maximize the value of our digital asset mining equipment to third parties, and fulfill existing
obligations to suppliers and customers. We intend to convert every megawatt in our portfolio to high-density colocation infrastructure
over the next three years. In addition to converting our existing portfolio, we are actively pursuing the acquisition of new sites,
including land and power capacity, to expand our data center footprint beyond our current facilities.
Currently, the vast majority of our revenue is from mining bitcoin for our own account (“self-mining”). We will continue to
mine digital assets and manage our self-mining fleet with a focus on power expense coverage and cash generation while we convert
our data centers for alternative high-density colocation service business opportunities. We expect to increase revenue derived from
high-density colocation (“HDC”) services as capacity gets delivered to our current end customer as well as when we sign and begin
generating revenue from new colocation customers.
50
As of December 31, 2025, we operated a diversified portfolio of ten data centers across seven U.S. states, representing
approximately 1.4 gigawatts (“GW”) of gross utility power capacity, or approximately 920 megawatts (“MW”) of total leasable
customer power capacity. We continue to be in active discussions with both our existing and future potential utility providers
regarding additional power allocations.
During 2025, total revenue decreased to $319.0 million from $510.7 million, primarily due to lower digital asset self-mining
revenue and digital asset hosted mining revenue as we shifted capital and infrastructure toward colocation, partially offset by higher
colocation revenue from incremental billable customer power capacity. Operating loss increased to $245.6 million in 2025 from
$142.1 million in 2024. Net loss was $288.6 million in 2025 and included significant non-cash items, including changes of $33.1
million in the fair value of warrants and contingent value rights. Adjusted EBITDA decreased to $29.7 million in 2025 from $157.4
million in 2024. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP
Financial Measures” below for our definition of, and additional information related to Adjusted EBITDA.
Developments During 2025
On July 7, 2025, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with CoreWeave, Inc.
(“CoreWeave”) pursuant to which CoreWeave would acquire the Company in an all-stock transaction, subject to stockholder approval
and other customary closing conditions. On October 30, 2025, the Company terminated the Merger Agreement in accordance with its
terms following Company stockholder rejection of the terms of the Merger Agreement at a special meeting of stockholders on that
date.
The Company incurred $21.6 million of advisory, legal, and other professional or consulting fees related to the proposed
transaction which are reflected in our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2025. Other than these costs, the
termination of the Merger Agreement did not result in any termination fees and did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.
Our Business Model
Business Overview
As a large-scale owner and operator of high-power digital infrastructure, we generate revenue primarily through (i) Colocation
services (ii) Digital Asset Self‑Mining, and (iii) Digital Asset Hosted Mining services. We are in the process of reallocating significant
portions of our infrastructure and capital from bitcoin mining to HDC services for AI and HPC workloads.
We focus primarily on contracting our digital infrastructure for Colocation, mining bitcoin, and enhancing efficiencies in our
operations. In self‑mining, we earn bitcoin by operating our owned mining fleet through mining pool arrangements, and in hosted
mining and colocation we earn fees for providing infrastructure, power and related services to third parties.
Our data centers house bitcoin mining computers and will increasingly house specialized compute accelerators, including
graphics processing units (“GPUs”). These facilities leverage our specialized design and construction capabilities by employing high-
density, innovative engineering, power designs and modular construction. For digital asset mining, our proprietary thermodynamic
structural design manages heat and airflow to deliver reliable operations to us and our customers. As part of our go-forward strategy,
we are in the process of converting our entire data center portfolio to support our high-density Colocation operations for AI and HPC
workloads.
Business Strategy
Our strategy is to grow our revenue and profitability by converting and expanding our large-scale data center infrastructure
portfolio to deliver high-density colocation services for artificial intelligence and HPC workloads. We plan to develop and bring
online the infrastructure required to meet our existing contractual commitments to our high-density colocation customer, expand our
infrastructure portfolio by securing additional land and power at new and existing sites, and sign additional colocation customers to
diversify our revenue base.
Our customer strategy targets hyperscale cloud-based providers, neoclouds, and enterprises, including customers we believe
have significant data center infrastructure needs that have not yet been outsourced or will require additional data center space and
power to support their growth and their increasing reliance on technology infrastructure in their operations.
51
Segments
We have three operating segments: “Colocation,” consisting of providing high-density colocation services to customers
employing AI and HPC related workloads, “Digital Asset Self-Mining,” consisting of performing digital asset mining for our own
account, and “Digital Asset Hosted Mining,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for digital asset mining. Prior to
April 1, 2024, we operated primarily in the Digital Asset Self-Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segments.
Our Colocation segment provides space, power, cooling, facilities operations, security and other services to third-party
customers to support workloads for machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining operation segment generates revenue from the deployment and operation of our own large fleet
of miners within our owned digital infrastructure as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more
blockchain networks. In exchange for this activity, we receive digital assets in the form of bitcoin.
Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment generates revenue from recurring hosting services, which are generally
priced based on power usage and other service components. Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment provides a full suite
of services to our digital asset mining customers. We provide deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance
of our customers’ digital asset mining equipment and provide necessary electrical power, repair and other infrastructure services
necessary for our customers to operate, maintain and efficiently mine digital assets. We do not currently expect to further expand our
Digital Asset Hosted Mining operations in future years.
Mining Equipment
On July 5, 2024, we entered into an arrangement with Block, Inc. (“Block”), a technology company developing ASICs,
pursuant to which we received ASICs during 2025 and expect to receive additional ASICs during 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we
estimate approximately $64.8 million of remaining cash payments associated with this arrangement, of which approximately $36.6
million was paid upon delivery in January 2026, with the remaining balance payable on a deferred basis primarily during 2026 and
extending into early 2027.
Aside from the miners received in 2025 and those expected from Block, we do not anticipate entering into new large-scale
bitcoin mining equipment procurement agreements as we continue to shift capital allocation toward HDC infrastructure. As a result,
we expect future capital expenditures related to mining equipment to decline. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a discussion
of our material cash requirements and expected sources of funding, including capital expenditures and commitments.
The tables below summarize the total number of self- and hosted miners in operation as of December 31, 2025 and
December 31, 2024 (miners in thousands):
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2025 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |
| Self-miners | 15.7 | 135.5 | |
| Hosted miners | 2.2 | 15.9 | |
| Total mining equipment | 17.9 | 151.4 |
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2024 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |
| Self-miners | 19.1 | 164.0 | |
| Hosted miners | 1.0 | 7.1 | |
| Total mining equipment | 20.1 | 171.1 |
See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non‑GAAP Financial Measures” below for definitions and discussion of the
operating metrics management uses to evaluate our performance.
52
Key Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance
Our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows are affected by a number of factors, including (i) our ability to execute our
strategic transition toward high‑density colocation services, (ii) bitcoin market conditions and network fundamentals that drive
self‑mining economics, (iii) broader macroeconomic and regulatory developments, (iv) power prices and curtailment activity, and (v)
the competitive landscape for our industry. The factors below highlight key drivers that have affected, and may continue to affect, our
financial performance.
Our financial performance depends in part on our ability to operate our self‑mining fleet profitably and, as we transition our
business, to execute and expand our colocation operations and attract and retain colocation customers. Increases in power costs,
inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins and could have
a material near-term adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, sustained declines in
bitcoin prices or adverse changes in network conditions could reduce cash generated from self‑mining during periods where
self‑mining remains a significant contributor to our results.
Strategic Transition to High-Density Colocation Services
As we grow our Colocation operations over the next several years by converting the remaining bitcoin mining sites and adding
new infrastructure and customers, we expect Colocation to represent a larger share of our results and gradually reduce our exposure to
bitcoin spot price volatility. The Colocation segment is characterized by the implementation of long-term contracts with customers
spanning 10+ years with terms and conditions resulting in stable, predictable revenue and cash flows over each period.
The pace of this transition, and the timing of related revenue and cash flows, depends on (i) customer deployment schedules
under existing and future contracts and (ii) the timing and cost of converting and commissioning incremental billable customer power
capacity. Conversion capital expenditures and timelines are sensitive to equipment lead times and availability, labor constraints,
permitting and interconnection sequencing, and supply chain and logistical challenges. Changes in these inputs can affect when
incremental capacity becomes billable and therefore may affect the timing of colocation revenue, cost of services and related cash
flows.
Bitcoin Market Conditions
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin. The prices of digital assets,
specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to
identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as
technology, regulatory developments and enforcement actions. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on
various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand. Changes in
the market price of bitcoin can materially affect (i) revenue recognized from self‑mining, (ii) the fair value of digital assets we hold
and related gains or losses recognized in our results of operations, and (iii) liquidity to the extent we sell bitcoin as part of our treasury
strategy. Bitcoin miners also receive a transaction fee in the form of a portion of bitcoin for validating transactions on the Bitcoin
network. The transaction fee can vary in value over time, with higher fees prioritizing certain transactions over those with lower fees.
An increase in Bitcoin network transaction fees increases mining proceeds.
Higher power costs, lower realized bitcoin prices, or reduced mining efficiency would reduce self-mining margins and cash
generation during periods when self-mining remains a significant contributor to our results. As we transition, the timing of colocation
conversions and customer deployments, and our ability to execute and scale colocation operations and retain colocation customers,
will increasingly influence our revenue mix and profitability.
Bitcoin Network Fundamentals
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices and transaction fees, but also by increases in the
competition for digital asset production. For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the
growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index
associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks. Increases in network hash rate generally increase
network difficulty over time, which can reduce the amount of bitcoin earned for a given level of deployed hash rate and power
consumption.
53
Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to
upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Difficulty and network conditions are
outside of our control and can materially affect our self‑mining revenue and margins.
Tariffs
Beginning on February 1, 2025, the United States government announced a series of additional tariffs on goods imported to the
United States, raising concerns about material price inflation and delivery delays with respect to equipment and materials needed for
our high-density colocation data center conversions and also with respect to parts, machinery and hardware used in our digital asset
mining business. To date, tariffs have had no material impact on our costs or business operations, but we continue to analyze the
impact of these tariffs on our business and actions we can take to minimize any future impact. Our agreement with our HDC customer
is funded almost entirely by the customer and our financial contribution is capped at a fixed dollar amount, limiting the overall
potential impact of tariffs on our existing and future capital expenditures. Tariffs, however, could have additional impacts on our
results of operations in future years. To the extent tariffs increase the cost and/or lead time of key equipment and materials, they could
affect conversion economics, timelines and/or operating costs, which could affect the timing and profitability of our colocation
expansion.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for our mining fleet, as well as for the hosted mining services provided to customers.
The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer
months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators. Severe winter weather can increase the cost of
electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s
ability to deliver power. Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can
adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas. Other events out of our control can
also impact electricity costs and availability. In our self‑mining and hosted mining operations, increases in power prices and/or
increased curtailments can materially reduce margins and cash generation. In our colocation operations, power costs are passed
through to customers and changes in power prices may increase revenue and cost of colocation services without a corresponding
change in gross profit.
Our Competition and Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, the success of our Colocation business greatly
depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers, secure additional infrastructure and attract new
customers.
Competition in digital asset mining is driven in part by access to low‑cost power, scale, fleet efficiency and capital availability,
and can contribute to increases in network hash rate and difficulty. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business,
including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access
to sites with reliable sources of high power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
Based on available data, we believe that an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining
industry has continued to increase network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners
mining for bitcoin.
Despite this trend, our ability to compete in self‑mining will depend on managing fleet efficiency, power costs and capital
allocation as we shift resources toward colocation.
In our Colocation operations, we compete with other providers of high-power data center capacity, such as major data center
real estate investment trusts, developers of data centers, hyperscalers and bitcoin miners with capacity suitable for high-density
colocation services. This competition focuses primarily on the identification and acquisition of new, high-power sites, but also
includes competition for the capital required to build or modify existing sites to support high-density colocation.
Competition in colocation may affect pricing, contract terms, and the pace at which we can secure additional power and sites,
and therefore may affect revenue growth and required capital expenditures.
54
Regulation
We operate in a dynamic regulatory environment. For a discussion of federal, state, and international regulatory developments
affecting our digital asset mining and colocation activities, see “Government Regulation” in the Part I, Item 1 “Business” section in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We continue to evaluate whether any such developments present known trends or uncertainties that
may materially impact our operations, energy costs, or customer demand. Regulatory developments affecting digital assets, data
centers, energy markets and environmental matters could affect compliance costs, power availability and pricing, and customer
demand, which could impact our results of operations and liquidity.
Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our financial results, we use the following business operating metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to
evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions. These operating
metrics and non‑GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our consolidated financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
Management also uses the following data center capacity and power metrics (measured in megawatts) to evaluate the scale of
our utility power footprint and customer IT load capacity, monitor customer commitments and remaining available capacity, assess
commissioning progress and deployment pacing, and inform capital allocation and site planning decisions. Unless otherwise indicated,
these metrics are presented as of period end and represent management estimates based on operational and engineering data and may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other operators.
| Metric (MW) | Definition | How management uses it |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Utility Power Capacity | Total electric utility power capacity agreements associated with our data center sites under our control as of period end, including capacity that is commissioned for future use. | Used for portfolio planning and utility power allocation discussions. |
| Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity | Our estimate of the total non-redundant customer IT load that our data center sites could support in the aggregate as of period end, regardless of whether such capacity has been contracted with customers or remains available for sale. This metric is representative of the amount of power available for customer use in servicing their workloads. | Used to assess total customer‑usable IT load available for leasing, evaluate leased versus unleased capacity, and plan conversion/development sequencing and sales capacity. |
| Leased Customer Power Capacity | Power capacity that is committed to customers under executed customer contracts, regardless of whether service has commenced as of period end. | Used to monitor signed customer commitments and contracted backlog and to plan future deployment/commissioning requirements. |
| Unleased Customer Power Capacity | The portion of Total Leasable Customer Power not committed under customer contracts as of period end. This metric is calculated as Total Leasable Customer Power minus Leased Customer Power Capacity. | Used to monitor remaining uncommitted customer IT load and to prioritize incremental contracting and conversion/commissioning plans. |
| Billable Customer Power Capacity | Portion of Leased Customer Power Capacity for which service has commenced and we are actively billing as of period end. | Used to monitor in-service customer power that is billing and to track deployment/commissioning pace and near-term revenue ramp. |
55
The following table presents the values for these metrics as of December 31, 2025 (in megawatts).
| December 31, | |
|---|---|
| 2025 | |
| Gross Utility Power Capacity | 1,426 |
| Total Leasable Customer Power Capacity | 920 |
| Leased Customer Power Capacity | 590 |
| Unleased Customer Power Capacity | 330 |
| Billable Customer Power Capacity | 120 |
Adjusted EBITDA
We report our financial results in accordance with GAAP. To supplement our consolidated financial statements, we provide
investors with Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non‑GAAP financial measure. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as our net loss, adjusted to
eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net; (ii) provision for income taxes;
(iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) stock-based compensation expense; (v) Reorganization items, net; (vi) unrealized fair value
adjustment on energy derivatives; (vii) change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights; (viii) Colocation segment startup
costs primarily related to the initial ramp up of new colocation sites, (ix) impairment of property, plant and equipment, (x) site
demolition costs incurred in connection with the conversion of existing facilities to colocation data center operations, (xi) post-
emergence bankruptcy advisory costs incurred related to reorganization, (xii) transaction costs incurred in connection with the Merger
Agreement, including advisory, legal, and other professional or consulting fees, (xiii) loss on legal settlements, and (xiv) certain
additional non-cash items that do not reflect the performance of our ongoing business operations. The most directly comparable
GAAP measure to Adjusted EBITDA is net loss. For additional information, including a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted
EBITDA, please refer to the table below.
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our Board of Directors to
evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by
making the adjustments described above. In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and
evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it
removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges and timing differences. Moreover, we have
included Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measurement used by our management internally
to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial
planning.
The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature or because the
amount and timing of these items are not related to the current results of our core business operations which renders evaluation of our
current performance, comparisons of performance between periods and comparisons of our current performance with our competitors
less meaningful. However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to
those excluded when calculating this measure. Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future
results will be unaffected by unusual items. Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or
as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily
on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis. Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the
same fashion. You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial
measure to evaluate our business.
56
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
(in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
| Adjusted EBITDA | |||
| Net loss | $(288,616) | $(1,437,874) | |
| Adjustments: | |||
| Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | |
| Income tax expense | 583 | 859 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 68,841 | 113,205 | |
| Stock-based compensation expense | 98,236 | 51,924 | |
| Unrealized fair value adjustment on energy derivatives | — | (2,262) | |
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 9,680 | 4,210 | |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | |
| Site conversion demolition costs | 4,442 | — | |
| Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,933 | 487 | |
| Colocation startup costs | — | 4,611 | |
| Merger Agreement related costs | 21,588 | — | |
| Post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs | 1,784 | 4,822 | |
| Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | |
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | |
| Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | |
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | |
| Other | — | 123 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $(29,659) | $157,437 |
57
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods indicated (in
thousands).
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Revenue: | |||||
| Colocation revenue | $65,424 | $24,378 | $41,046 | ||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | 229,207 | 408,740 | (179,533) | ||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 24,388 | 77,554 | (53,166) | ||
| Total revenue | 319,019 | 510,672 | (191,653) | ||
| Cost of revenue: | |||||
| Cost of colocation services | 45,679 | 21,709 | 23,970 | ||
| Cost of digital asset self-mining | 218,868 | 314,335 | (95,467) | ||
| Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 16,574 | 53,558 | (36,984) | ||
| Total cost of revenue | 281,121 | 389,602 | (108,481) | ||
| Gross profit | 37,898 | 121,070 | (83,172) | ||
| Decrease in fair value of digital assets | 31,603 | 1,052 | 30,551 | ||
| Decrease in fair value of energy derivatives | — | 2,757 | (2,757) | ||
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 9,680 | 4,210 | 5,470 | ||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | (111,510) | ||
| Colocation organizational and site startup costs | 48,249 | 13,734 | 34,515 | ||
| Advisor fees | 23,372 | 4,822 | 18,550 | ||
| Selling, general and administrative | 159,224 | 113,691 | 45,533 | ||
| Operating loss | (245,589) | (142,065) | (103,524) | ||
| Non-operating expense (income), net: | |||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | 1,933 | 487 | 1,446 | ||
| Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | (40,347) | ||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | (1,336,098) | ||
| Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | 111,439 | ||
| Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | 8,620 | ||
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | 2,434 | ||
| Total non-operating expense, net | 42,444 | 1,294,950 | (1,252,506) | ||
| Loss before income taxes | (288,033) | (1,437,015) | 1,148,982 | ||
| Income tax expense | 583 | 859 | (276) | ||
| Net loss | $(288,616) | $(1,437,874) | $1,149,258 |
58
The following table summarizes gross profit and gross margin by reportable segment for 2025 and 2024.
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | Change | |||
| Colocation Segment | |||||
| Colocation gross profit | $19,745 | $2,669 | $17,076 | ||
| Colocation gross margin | 30% | 11% | 19% | ||
| Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment | |||||
| Digital asset self-mining gross profit | $10,339 | $94,405 | $(84,066) | ||
| Digital asset self-mining gross margin | 5% | 23% | (18)% | ||
| Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment | |||||
| Digital asset hosted mining gross profit | $7,814 | $23,996 | $(16,182) | ||
| Digital asset hosted mining gross margin | 32% | 31% | 1% |
Gross profit represents segment revenue less segment cost of revenue. Accordingly, the year over year changes in gross profit
and gross margin by segment are primarily driven by the changes in revenue and cost of revenue discussed in the “Revenue” and
“Cost of revenue” sections below.
Revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Revenue: | |||||
| Colocation revenue | $65,424 | $24,378 | $41,046 | ||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | 229,207 | 408,740 | (179,533) | ||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 24,388 | 77,554 | (53,166) | ||
| Total revenue | $319,019 | $510,672 | $(191,653) | ||
| Percentage of total revenue: | |||||
| Colocation revenue | 20% | 5% | |||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | 72% | 80% | |||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 8% | 15% | |||
| Total revenue | 100% | 100% |
Colocation revenue
Colocation revenue consists of fees charged to customers for licensed data center space, power and related services. Under our
contracts, customers generally pay fixed monthly fees based on billable customer power capacity and variable usage‑based charges
and other billable services. Power fees are passed through to customers without markup and are recognized as revenue on a gross
basis, with a corresponding charge to cost of colocation services. As a result, changes in power prices can cause fluctuations in
colocation revenue that are not indicative of changes in our underlying colocation margins.
The year over year increase in colocation revenue was primarily attributable to incremental billable customer power capacity at
our Denton, Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers. In addition, lease operations at our Austin, Texas data center, which
commenced in the second quarter of 2024, contributed to higher colocation revenue.
Digital asset self-mining revenue
Digital asset self‑mining revenue consists primarily of bitcoin earned from operating our owned mining fleet. We participate in
mining pools under which we receive consideration based on the hash rate we contribute to the pool.
The year over year decrease in self-mining revenue was driven primarily by lower bitcoin production, partially offset by higher
average bitcoin prices.
59
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | % Change | |||
| Bitcoin mined | 2,276 | 6,595 | (65)% | ||
| Average price of bitcoin | $101,639 | $65,894 | 54% | ||
| Self-mining hash rate | 15.7 | 19.1 | (18)% |
The decrease in bitcoin mined was driven primarily by (i) a reduction in our deployed mining fleet due primarily to our
strategic shift to colocation, (ii) the Bitcoin network’s halving, which reduced bitcoin earned per unit of hash rate beginning in April
2024, and (iii) more challenging network conditions, including higher network difficulty.
Digital asset hosted mining revenue
Digital asset hosted mining revenue represents fees earned for providing infrastructure, power and related services to third‑party
miners. Under our hosting contracts, customers are generally billed monthly based on power capacity and/or power consumption over
the term of the arrangement, which typically ranges from one to three years.
The year over year decrease in hosted mining revenue from customers was primarily driven by our shift to our Colocation
operations.
Cost of revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Cost of revenue: | |||||
| Cost of colocation services | $45,679 | $21,709 | $23,970 | ||
| Cost of digital asset self-mining | 218,868 | 314,335 | (95,467) | ||
| Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 16,574 | 53,558 | (36,984) | ||
| Total cost of revenue | $281,121 | $389,602 | $(108,481) |
Cost of revenue includes the costs to operate our colocation, digital asset self‑mining, and digital asset hosted mining
businesses, including power fees, depreciation, personnel and facility-related costs.
Colocation cost of revenue
The year over year increase in cost of colocation services was driven primarily by incremental billable capacity at our Denton,
Texas and Marble, North Carolina data centers during 2025. In addition, costs related to lease operations at our Austin, Texas data
center, which commenced in the second quarter of 2024, contributed to higher colocation cost of revenue in 2025.
Digital asset self-mining cost of revenue
The year over year decrease in cost of digital asset self-mining was driven primarily by reduced self-mining activity during
2025, including lower power consumption and depreciation.
Digital asset hosted mining cost of revenue
The year over year decrease in cost of digital asset hosted mining services was driven primarily by the wind-down of hosted
mining arrangements, which resulted in lower power consumption.
60
Decrease in fair value of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Decrease in fair value of digital assets | $31,603 | $1,052 | $30,551 | ||
| Percentage of total revenue | 10% | —% |
The year over year change in fair value of digital assets was primarily driven by higher bitcoin holdings in 2025 under our
bitcoin holding strategy and bitcoin price declines during portions of 2025.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 11,359 | 122,869 | $(111,510) | ||
| Percentage of total revenue | 4% | 24% |
The year over year decrease was primarily driven by a lower volume of assets committed to demolition in connection with the
conversion of data center facilities from digital asset mining to high-density colocation operations, compared to a significantly higher
volume of such charges recognized in 2024. We expect to incur future impairments of PP&E at the point at which the assets become
committed to demolition, which is generally expected to occur at the time of colocation customer contract execution.
Colocation organizational and site startup costs
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Colocation organizational and site startup costs | $48,249 | $13,734 | $34,515 | ||
| Percentage of total revenue | 15% | 3% |
Colocation organizational and site startup costs primarily consist of employee compensation, including stock-based
compensation. The year over year increase was primarily driven by site startup costs incurred to convert facilities from digital asset
mining to colocation operations, partially offset by the absence of organizational startup costs incurred in 2024 in connection with the
formation of the colocation segment.
Selling, general and administrative
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Selling, general and administrative | $159,224 | $113,691 | $45,533 | ||
| Percentage of total revenue | 50% | 22% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) consist primarily of personnel-related costs and professional fees.
61
The increase in SG&A was driven primarily by:
•a $34.1 million increase in stock-based compensation expense;
•a $6.8 million increase in payroll expense; and
•a $6.4 million increase in professional fees.
Non-operating expenses (income), net
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | |||
| Non-operating expenses (income), net: | |||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | $1,933 | $487 | $1,446 | ||
| Interest (income) expense, net | (3,277) | 37,070 | (40,347) | ||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 33,059 | 1,369,157 | (1,336,098) | ||
| Reorganization items, net | — | (111,439) | 111,439 | ||
| Loss on legal settlements | 10,690 | 2,070 | 8,620 | ||
| Other non-operating expense (income), net | 39 | (2,395) | 2,434 | ||
| Total non-operating expense, net | $42,444 | $1,294,950 | $(1,252,506) |
Non-operating expenses (income), net primarily reflects (i) non-cash changes in the fair value of warrants and contingent value
rights and (ii) interest (income) expense, net, and reorganization-related items.
•The year over year decrease in change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights was driven by changes in our
stock price, which increased by $0.51 per share during 2025, compared to an increase of $10.61 from January 23, 2024, the
date of our emergence from bankruptcy, to December 31, 2024; and
•The absence of Reorganization items, net in 2025 was due to our emergence from bankruptcy on January 23, 2024.
•The year over year decrease in Interest (income) expense, net was driven primarily by a $23.2 million decrease in interest
expense due to lower interest rates on outstanding debt, including the repayment of certain higher-interest notes during 2025,
and a $17.3 million increase in interest income earned on money market funds.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
We finance our operating and capital requirements primarily through a combination of (i) cash and cash equivalents, (ii) cash
generated from operations, (iii) sales of digital assets (bitcoin), subject to market conditions and our treasury strategy, and (iv)
financing activities, including debt financing arrangements. We also receive customer prepayments under our colocation
arrangements, which are associated with, and are expected to offset a significant portion of, the capital expenditures required to build
out and convert facilities for those arrangements.
During 2026, we currently expect to monetize substantially all of our bitcoin holdings, subject to market conditions, to enhance
liquidity and fund our planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements. We currently anticipate that the majority of these
sales would occur during the first quarter of 2026. However, the timing and amount of any sales will depend on market conditions and
our liquidity needs and may change.
Our planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements may require additional external financing. We may from time to
time seek additional financing to fund our operations and capital expenditures. If we are unable to obtain financing on acceptable
terms, we may be required to reduce, delay or modify planned expenditures or pursue other alternatives.
We have assessed our current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements and our current and expected
sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of December 31, 2025,
62
that our available liquidity, including cash and cash equivalents and expected operating cash flows and customer funding related to our
colocation arrangements, will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents and the fair value of our digital assets (in thousands):
| December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $311,378 | $836,197 | |
| Digital assets | $222,000 | $23,893 |
The following table presents our cash flows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | ||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 278,250 | 42,896 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (740,750) | (95,192) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (63,102) | 819,567 |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $278.3 million in 2025 from $42.9 million in 2024, primarily due to
higher cash inflows from operating working capital driven by deferred revenue associated with colocation services.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $740.8 million in 2025 from $95.2 million in 2024, primarily reflecting capital
expenditures related to our colocation expansion.
Net cash used in financing activities was $63.1 million in 2025 compared to net cash provided of $819.6 million in 2024,
primarily due to the absence of prior-year financing proceeds.
Material Cash Requirements
Our material cash requirements from known contractual and other obligations consist primarily of (i) obligations for long-term
debt and related interest, (ii) operating lease obligations for property, and (iii) capital expenditure commitments related to the
conversion of a significant portion of our data centers to high-density colocation operations.
During 2025 and 2024, we spent $729.0 million and $95.0 million on capital expenditures, respectively. We expect to increase
capital expenditures in 2026 relative to 2025 to support our strategic shift to colocation services.
For additional information regarding our operating lease obligations, convertible notes, and purchase commitments, refer to
Note 7 — Leases, Note 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable, and Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies, respectively, to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant
impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
The Company has made significant investments in Bitcoin mining equipment, which constitutes a substantial portion of its
property, plant, and equipment. Accounting for this equipment involves significant judgment and estimation uncertainty, particularly
regarding the determination of its estimated useful life for depreciation purposes and the assessment of potential impairment.
The Company depreciates its Bitcoin mining equipment using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three
years. This estimate reflects management’s judgment based on the current state of technology and industry practices. However, the
actual useful life of this equipment is uncertain due to the rapid pace of technological advancements in the Bitcoin mining industry.
63
The Company evaluates its Bitcoin mining equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the equipment may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the
asset to the sum of the undiscounted futures cash flows expected from its use and disposal. If the carrying amount is not recoverable,
the impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the asset's fair value. Potential impairment triggers
include a significant decline in the market price of Bitcoin or the introduction of new technologies that reduce the efficiency or
profitability of the Company’s existing equipment. These assessments rely on significant judgment and require assumptions about
future events and conditions, including Bitcoin prices, mining difficulty rates, electricity costs, and anticipated technological
advancements.
Management believes that its current estimates and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available. Actual
results may differ, and any such differences could materially impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
The valuation of equity awards that contain market conditions, including the 2025 performance restricted stock units with a
relative total shareholder return condition, requires the use of a Monte Carlo pricing model. The model incorporates assumptions that
are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, including expected volatility of the Company’s common
stock and its correlation with the Russell 2000 Index, which reflect anticipated variability and relative performance of the Company’s
stock price over the performance period. These assumptions involve judgment and are based on a combination of historical data and
market information. If different assumptions had been used, the resulting grant-date fair value of these awards, and the related stock-
based compensation expense recognized over the requisite service period, could have been materially different. Management believes
the estimates and assumptions used in the valuation of these awards are reasonable based on information available at the time of grant.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-25-008302.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core” refer to Core Scientific, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of operations for 2024 compared to 2023. For discussion related to the results of operations and changes in consolidated financial condition for 2023 compared to 2022 refer to Part II, Item 7. — “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our fiscal year 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 13, 2024.
As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Core Scientific, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core”) is a leader in designing, building and operating digital infrastructure for high-performance computing. Since our inception in 2018, we have been a premier provider and operator of dedicated, purpose-built facilities and software solutions for digital asset mining for ourselves and our third-party
44
customers. and in March 2024, we announced the provision of digital infrastructure colocation services to a third party engaged in high-performance computing (“HPC”).
In May 2024, we expanded our relationship with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave”) the artificial intelligence (“AI”) hyperscaler, to provide approximately 200 megawatts (“MW”) of digital infrastructure to host CoreWeave’s HPC operations and provided CoreWeave options with respect to the Company’s existing facilities to provide approximately 500 MW of digital infrastructure on similar terms. In June and August 2024, the Company announced CoreWeave’s execution of options to secure an additional 70 MW and 112 MW, respectively, of infrastructure to host its HPC operations. In October 2024, the Company announced that CoreWeave had exercised its final option for an additional 120 MW of infrastructure.
These new agreements leverage the Company’s existing digital infrastructure and expertise in third-party hosting solutions. We believe that using our existing infrastructure for HPC hosting operations will provide more consistent dollar-based revenue and represents substantially less risk than our traditional hosted bitcoin mining or our bitcoin self-mining operations. As a result, we intend to focus our business development and marketing efforts on expanding our HPC hosting customer base. As a result, we initiated a significant strategic transition from bitcoin mining to hosting and colocation services for customers employing hosting services for HPC workloads such as artificial intelligence-related applications.
During 2024, we were substantially engaged in constructing, refurbishing, reallocating or converting a substantial portion of our ten facilities in Alabama (1), Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1), Oklahoma (1), and Texas (3) to support artificial intelligence related workloads, primarily for our one existing HPC customer, but also to support our commitment to meeting the growing demand for HPC solutions and diversifying our revenue streams.
Currently, the vast majority of our revenue is from mining bitcoin for our own account (‘self-mining”). We remain committed to maintaining the efficiency of our digital asset mining while capitalizing on the opportunities presented by the growing HPC hosting business.
We had an average hourly operating power demand of approximately 572 megawatts (“MW”) for the year ended December 31, 2024. We had secured approximately 1,317 MW of contracted power capacity at our sites as of December 31, 2024. We also operate and manage one of the largest data center infrastructure asset bases among publicly listed North American miners with operational capacity of approximately 784 MW in support of our mining and HPC operations.
Our average self-mining fleet energy efficiency for the year ended December 31, 2024 was 25.1 joules per terahash, compared to 27.9 joules per terahash for the year ended December 31, 2023. Self-mining fleet energy efficiency is a measure of our fleet’s average actual energy efficiency over the period presented.
Our total revenue was $510.7 million, $502.4 million and $640.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. We generated an operating loss of $19.2 million and operating income of $9.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and an operating loss of $2.11 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. We incurred net loss of $1.32 billion, $246.5 million and $2.15 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) was $157.4 million, $169.5 million and $(11.6) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for our definition of, and additional information related to Adjusted EBITDA.
Developments During 2024
CoreWeave HPC Hosting Agreements
On February 29, 2024, the Company entered into a long-term contract with CoreWeave, Inc. (“CoreWeave”) to deliver 16 MW of infrastructure at the Company’s Austin, Texas facility. Following the commencement of operations in the Austin, Texas facility, on June 3, 2024, the Company entered into a series of long-term contracts with CoreWeave to deliver approximately 200 MW of infrastructure to host CoreWeave’s HPC operations, which will require the Company to modify multiple existing sites. The site modifications commenced in the second half of fiscal 2024 and operational status is expected to begin in the first half of fiscal 2025. On June 25, 2024, the Company announced CoreWeave’s execution of an option to secure an additional 70 MW of infrastructure to host its HPC operations. Operational status for the additional 70 MW is expected in the second half of 2025. Further, on August 6, 2024, the Company announced that CoreWeave had executed an option to secure an additional 112 MW of infrastructure to host its
45
HPC operations. On October 22, 2024, the Company announced that CoreWeave had exercised its final option for an additional 120 MW of infrastructure.
Convertible Notes Offerings
On December 5, 2024, the Company completed a private offering (the “2031 Convertible Notes Offering”) of $625.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 (the “2031 Convertible Notes”). The net proceeds from the 2031 Convertible Notes Offering were approximately $608.7 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and the Company’s estimated offering expenses. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the 2031 Convertible Notes Offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital, operating expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions of complementary businesses or assets, or other repurchases of its securities.
On August 19, 2024, the Company completed a private offering (the “2029 Convertible Notes Offering”) of $460.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029 (the “2029 Convertible Notes”). The net proceeds from the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering were approximately $447.6 million, after deducting the initial purchasers’ discounts and commissions and the Company’s estimated offering expenses. The Company used approximately $62.0 million of the net proceeds from the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering to repay in full the outstanding loans under the Exit Credit Agreement, of which $0.8 million was paid for interest. Additionally, the Company used approximately $154.1 million of the net proceeds from the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering to redeem all of the outstanding Secured Notes, of which $4.1 million was paid for interest. Further, the Company paid $49.6 million to repay the BlockFi facility in full, of which $0.7 million was paid for interest, and paid $6.5 million to repay the Stonebriar facility in full, of which $0.1 million was paid for interest. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds from the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering for general corporate purposes, including working capital, operating expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions of complementary businesses or assets, or other repurchases of its securities.
For more detailed information regarding the 2031 Convertible Notes Offering and the 2029 Convertible Notes Offering conversion, refer to Note 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Halving
On April 19, 2024, the Bitcoin protocol executed its fourth planned halving, wherein the bitcoin rewards issued for each solved block declined from 6.25 bitcoin to 3.125 bitcoin, reducing the bitcoin received from bitcoin mining by 50% (excluding transaction fee rewards). As a result, revenue generated from bitcoin mining declined, adversely impacting gross profit.
Emergence from Bankruptcy
On January 15, 2024, the Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) the Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Core Scientific, Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors (with Technical Modifications) (the “Plan of Reorganization”). On January 16, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan of Reorganization. On January 23, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan of Reorganization were satisfied or waived and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. On January 24, 2024, the Company’s common shares began trading on the Nasdaq market under the ticker symbol CORZ.
On the Effective Date, the obligations of the Company under the Company’s notes sold pursuant to (i) the Secured Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2021 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder (the “Secured Convertible Notes”), and (ii) the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2021 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder (the “Other Convertible Notes,” and together with the Secured Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”), replacement debtor-in-possession credit agreement, stock certificates, book entries, and any other certificate, share, note, bond, indenture, purchase right, option, warrant, or other instrument or document, directly or indirectly, evidencing or creating any indebtedness or obligation of or ownership interest in the Debtors giving rise to any claim or interest (except such certificates, notes or other instruments or documents evidencing indebtedness or obligations of, or interests in, the Debtors that are specifically reinstated pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization) were cancelled, and the duties and obligations of all parties thereto were deemed satisfied in full, canceled, released, discharged, and of no force or effect.
46
On the Effective Date, Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization
•The Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement (the “Exit Credit Agreement”), consisting of an $80 million first-lien credit facility with certain holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes. The Exit Credit Agreement was paid in full on August 19, 2024.
•The Company issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2028 (the “Secured Notes”) pursuant to a secured notes indenture (the “Secured Notes Indenture”). The Secured Notes were paid in full on August 19, 2024.
•The Company issued $260.0 million aggregate principal amount of secured convertible notes due 2029 (the “New Secured Convertible Notes”) pursuant to a secured convertible notes indenture (the “New Secured Convertible Notes Indenture”). The New Secured Convertible Notes were issued to holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes. The New Secured Convertible notes were mandatorily converted as of July 10, 2024 and are no longer outstanding.
•The Company entered into an agreement which provided for the issuance of contingent value rights (the “CVRs”) to holders of the Company’s Convertible Notes and provided for the issuance of CVRs issued to holders of allowed general unsecured claims (the GUC CVRs”). On July 1, 2024, the GUC CVR obligations were extinguished pursuant to their terms when the VWAP of the Company’s New Common Stock on Nasdaq National Market System exceeded $5.02 for 20 trading days within the applicable 30 consecutive trading day period.
•The holders of our pre-emergence Secured Convertible Notes and Other Convertible Notes received Secured Notes Indenture, New Secured Convertible Notes Indenture, post-emergence common stock and CVRs. Certain holders of New Secured Convertible Notes also funded and received the Exit Credit Agreement.
For more detailed information regarding our emergence from bankruptcy, refer to Notes 3 — Chapter 11 Filing and Emergence from Bankruptcy, 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable, 9 — Contingent Value Rights and Warrant Liabilities and 12 — Stockholders' Deficit to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our Business Model
Business Overview
As a large-scale owner and operator of high-power digital infrastructure for digital asset mining and hosting services, we believe that we are well positioned to serve customers in digital asset mining and an expanding market for HPC operations. As noted in the “Business Strategy” section below, we believe that opportunities for growth exist in various applications of our data centers for third-party customers focused on cloud computing as well as machine learning and artificial intelligence, which has driven our recent expansion into providing HPC hosting services. Furthermore, we believe that the adoption and mainstream use of bitcoin and the blockchain technology on which it is based has accelerated the demand for bitcoin and other digital currencies.
We focus primarily on contracting our digital infrastructure for HPC hosting, and mining and selling bitcoin for cash, enhancing efficiencies in our operations (reducing our cost to mine). Our digital asset mining operation is focused on earning bitcoin by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific bitcoin blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Our digital asset self-mining activity competes with myriad mining operations throughout the world to complete new blocks on the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of bitcoin.
Our data centers house bitcoin mining computers and will increasingly house graphics processing units (“GPUs”). These specialized facilities lever our specialized design and construction proficiency by employing high-density, low-cost engineering, power designs and modular construction. For digital asset mining, our proprietary thermodynamic structural design manages heat and airflow to deliver best-in-class uptime and, ultimately, increased mining rewards to us and our customers. We are allocating a significant portion of our current and future data centers to support other forms of high-value computing, such as HPC hosting operations, in connection with our short-, medium- and long-term strategic plan.
Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to grow our revenue and profitability by expanding our existing large-scale data center infrastructure portfolio configured for specialized computers performing specific, high-value applications such as cloud computing, machine learning and artificial intelligence, and maximizing the portion of our existing infrastructure portfolio contracted for HPC hosting. We intend to continue to strategically develop and make operational the infrastructure necessary to support our existing contractual commitments to our existing HPC customer and to support expected customer growth and additional demand by leveraging our data center expertise and capabilities. We intend to seek additional opportunities and to engage additional customers in the HPC Hosting
47
segment to expand our business into these areas using our knowledge, expertise, existing and future infrastructure where favorable market opportunities exist.
Our strategy is focused on hyperscale cloud-based providers and enterprises, including potential customers we believe have significant data center infrastructure needs that have not yet been outsourced or will require additional data center space and power to support their growth and their increasing reliance on technology infrastructure in their operations. We believe our capabilities for serving the needs of large hyperscale providers and enterprises will continue to enable us to capitalize on the growing demand for outsourced data center facilities in our markets and in new markets where our customers are located or plan to be located in the future.
Segments
We have three operating segments: “Digital Asset Self-Mining,” consisting of performing digital asset mining for our own account, “Digital Asset Hosted Mining,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for digital asset mining, and “HPC Hosting,” consisting of providing hosting services to third parties for GPU-based HPC hosting operations. Prior to April 1, 2024, we operated only in the Digital Asset Self-Mining and Digital Asset Hosted Mining segments.
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining operation segment generates revenue from the deployment and operation our own large fleet of miners within our owned digital infrastructure as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for this activity, we receive digital assets in the form of bitcoin. We began digital asset mining at scale in 2018 and in 2020 became one of the largest North American providers of hosting services primarily for third-party mining customers. We had an average hourly operating power demand of approximately 572 MW for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment generates revenue through the sale of electricity-based consumption contracts for our hosting services, which are recurring in nature. Our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operation segment provides a full suite of services to our digital asset mining customers. We provide deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance of our customers’ digital asset mining equipment and provide necessary electrical power, repair and other infrastructure services necessary for our customers to operate, maintain and efficiently mine digital assets. We do not expect to further expand our Digital Asset Hosted Mining operations in 2025 and future years.
Our HPC Hosting operation segment generates revenue by providing colocation, cloud and connectivity services to customers in exchange for a fee. Our HPC Hosting operation segment provides colocation, facilities operations, security and other services to third-party HPC customers to support workloads for machine learning and artificial intelligence. As of December 31, 2024, we have operational capacity of approximately 784 MW to support of our existing and planned HPC operations.
Mining Equipment
We own and host specialized computers (“miners”) configured for the purpose of validating transactions on multiple digital asset network blockchains (referred to as, “mining”), predominantly the Bitcoin network. Substantially all of the miners we own and host were manufactured by Bitmain Technologies Limited (“Bitmain”) and incorporate application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips specialized to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchains using the 256-bit secure hashing algorithm (“SHA-256”) in return for bitcoin digital asset rewards.
We have entered into and facilitated agreements with vendors to supply mining equipment for our digital asset mining operations. The majority of our purchases are made on multi-month contracts with installment payments due in advance of scheduled deliveries. Delivery schedules have ranged from one month to 12 months. As of December 31, 2023, we had two active purchase agreements with Bitmain. The first agreement was for the acquisition of Antminer S19J XP miners with a combined exahash of 4.1 or 28,400 miners. The second agreement was for the acquisition of Antminer S21 miners with a combined exahash of 2.5 or approximately 12,900 miners. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had received all of the miners and completed all 2024 payments due on miners ordered for deployment this year.
48
The tables below summarize the total number of self- and hosted miners in operation as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 (miners in thousands):
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | ||
| Self-miners | 19.1 | 164.0 | ||
| Hosted miners | 1.0 | 7.1 | ||
| Total mining equipment | 20.1 | 171.1 |
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |
| Self-miners | 16.9 | 158.0 | |
| Hosted miners | 6.3 | 51.1 | |
| Total mining equipment | 23.2 | 209.1 |
Summary of Digital Asset Activity
Activity related to our digital asset balances for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, were as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital assets, beginning of period | $ | 2,284 | $ | 724 | ||
| Cumulative effect of ASU 2023-08, adopted January 1, 20241 | 24 | — | ||||
| Digital assets, beginning of period, as adjusted | 2,308 | 724 | ||||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue, net of receivables2 | 409,560 | 389,456 | ||||
| Mining proceeds from shared hosting | 15,693 | 17,626 | ||||
| Proceeds from sales of digital assets | (402,461) | (404,686) | ||||
| Change in fair value of digital assets | (1,052) | — | ||||
| Gain from sale of digital assets | — | 3,886 | ||||
| Impairment of digital assets | — | (4,406) | ||||
| Payment of board fee | (89) | (316) | ||||
| Other | (66) | — | ||||
| Digital assets, end of period | $ | 23,893 | $ | 2,284 |
1 Reflects the impact of the Company’s adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-08, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets (“ASU 2023-08”) effective January 1, 2024.
2 As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, there was $0.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of digital asset receivable included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Performance Metrics
Hash Rate
Miners perform computational operations in support of digital asset blockchains measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations. The equipment originally employed for mining bitcoin used the central processing unit (“CPU”) of a computer to mine various forms of digital assets. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining was rapidly replaced by the GPU, which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced as the standard in the mining industry by ASIC chips such as those found in the miners we and our customers use to mine bitcoin (although they continue to have uses in other industries). These ASIC chips are designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations.
49
Network Hash Rate
In digital asset mining, hash rate is a measure of the processing speed at which a mining computer operates in its attempt to secure a specific digital asset. A participant in a blockchain network’s mining function has a hash rate equivalent to the total of all its miners seeking to mine a specific digital asset. System-wide, the total network hash rate reflects the sum total of all miners seeking to mine each specific type of digital asset. A participant’s higher total hash rate relative to the system-wide total hash rate generally results in a corresponding higher success rate in digital asset rewards over time as compared to mining participants with relatively lower total hash rates.
However, as the relative market price for a digital asset, such as bitcoin, increases, more users are incentivized to mine for that digital asset, which increases the network’s overall hash rate. As a result, a mining participant must increase its total hash rate in order to maintain its relative possibility of solving a block on the network blockchain. Achieving greater hash rate power by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever greater quantities has become one of the bitcoin mining industry’s great sources of competition. Our goal is to deploy a powerful fleet of self- and hosted-miners, while operating as energy-efficiently as possible.
Key Factors Affecting Our Financial Performance
Market Price of Digital Assets
Our Digital Asset Self-Mining segment is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin. The prices of digital assets, specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation, and media reporting. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.
Our financial performance and continued growth depend in large part on our ability to mine for digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our digital asset hosted mining services. Increases in power costs, inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins, impact our ability to attract customers for our services, may harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Over time, we have observed a positive trend in the total market capitalization of digital assets, which suggests increased adoption. However, historical trends are not indicative of future adoption, and it is possible that the adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology may slow, take longer to develop, or never be broadly adopted, which would negatively impact our business and operating results.
Network Hash Rate
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices, but also by increases in the competition for digital asset production. For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Difficulty
The increase in bitcoin’s network hash rate results in a regular increase in the cryptographic complexity associated with solving blocks on its blockchain, or its difficulty. Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Similarly, a decline in network hash rate results in a decrease in difficulty, increasing mining proceeds.
Transaction Fees
Bitcoin miners receive a transaction fee in the form of a portion of bitcoin for validating transactions on the Bitcoin network. The transaction fee can vary in value over time, with higher fees prioritizing certain transactions over those with lower fees. An increase in Bitcoin network transaction fees increases mining proceeds.
50
The table below provides a summary of the impact to revenue from the increase or decrease in the market price of bitcoin, difficulty and our hash rate. The impact to revenue in each scenario assumes only one driver increases or decreases and all others are held constant.
| Impact to Revenue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver | Increase in Driver | Decrease in Driver | ||
| Market Price of Bitcoin | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Core Scientific Hash Rate | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Difficulty | Unfavorable | Favorable | ||
| Transaction Fees | Favorable | Unfavorable |
Halving
Further affecting the industry, and particularly for the bitcoin blockchain, the digital asset reward for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halving. Halving is a process designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in digital assets using a proof-of-work consensus algorithm. At a predetermined block, the mining reward is reduced by half, hence the term “halving.” A reduction in the number of bitcoins rewarded per block would result in a reduction of revenue to those mining bitcoin, barring any increase in the spot price of bitcoin or decrease in Bitcoin network hash rate or difficulty. Historically, the network hash rate has tended to decline, for a period of time, post-halving as less efficient mining servers become less profitable to operate and their operators discontinue or limit their use.
For bitcoin, our most significant digital asset to which our mining power is devoted, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin rewards per block. The bitcoin blockchain has undergone halving four times since its inception, as follows: (1) on November 28, 2012, at block 210,000; (2) on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000; (3) on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000; and (4) on April 19, 2024 at block 840,000, when the reward was reduced to its current level of 3.125 bitcoin per block. The next halving for the bitcoin blockchain is anticipated to occur in 2028 at block 1,050,000. This process will repeat until the total amount of bitcoin rewards issued reaches 21 million and the theoretical supply of new bitcoin is exhausted, which is expected to occur around the year 2140. Many factors influence the price of bitcoin and the other digital assets we may mine for, and potential increases or decreases in prices in advance of or following a future halving are unknown.
Business Mix Shift to HPC
The planned growth of our HPC data center hosting operations business, through increased investment in conversion of several of our bitcoin mining sites to HPC data center hosting sites over the next several years, should gradually reduce our overall exposure to volatility in the spot price of bitcoin as HPC begins to account for a comparatively larger percentage of our financial results. The HPC data center hosting business is characterized by implementation of long-term contracts with customers spanning several years with terms and conditions outlining and resulting in stable, predictable revenue and cash flows over each period.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for the mining fleet, as well as for the hosting services provided to customers and related parties. The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators. Severe winter weather can increase the cost of electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s ability to deliver power. Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas. Other events out of our control can also impact electricity costs and availability. In certain power markets, financial hedging can be employed to protect buyers from the financial impact of significant increases in power prices.
Equipment Costs
Increases in the market value of digital assets increases the demand for new miners, which can result in a scarcity in the supply of, and increases in the price of, those miners. Declines in the market value of digital assets can result in excess supply of miners and a general decline in their prices. As a result, the cost of new miners can be unpredictable and could be significantly different than our historical cost for new miners.
51
Our Competition and Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, the success of our HPC hosting business greatly depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers, secure additional infrastructure and attract new customers.
Our business environment is constantly evolving. However, digital asset mining is now dominated by large-scale, industrial miners operating large dedicated facilities around the world, including sovereign nation states with vast resources who mine directly or support mining operations through their sovereign wealth funds, all of whom compete to solve new blocks, acquire new and used miners, and purchase and consume energy and supplies to build mining facilities. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access to sites with reliable sources of high power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
Presently, the information concerning the activities of digital asset miners may not be readily available as most of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly, or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info;” however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
Based on available data, we believe that an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining industry has continued to increase network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners mining for bitcoin.
Despite this trend, we believe we have continued to maintain a competitive hash rate capacity among both public and private bitcoin miners. However, remaining competitive in our evolving industry, both against new entrants into the market and existing competitors, will require the expansion of our existing miner fleet by purchasing new and available used miners, as well as innovating to develop and implement new technologies and mining solutions.
In HPC hosting, we compete with other providers of high-power data center capacity, such as major data center real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), developers of data centers, hyperscalers and bitcoin miners with capacity suitable for HPC hosting. This competition focuses primarily on the identification and acquisition of new, high-power sites, but also includes competition for the capital required to build or modify existing sites to support HPC hosting. Additionally, the modification of some of our data centers to accommodate HPC hosting involves the procurement of critical equipment, technologies and skilled labor, which are in high demand from other entities seeking to address the same market opportunity, thereby putting us into competition with many other organizations for those resources.
We believe that because of our operational high-power data center capacity and the experience, knowledge, capabilities and relationships of our data center development and operations team, we are uniquely qualified to address the current strong demand for high-power data center capacity to support HPC applications successfully.
Differentiation, Innovation and Expansion of Our Platform
Our investments in research and development drive differentiation of our service offerings, core technology innovation and our ability to bring new products to market.
We believe that we differentiate ourselves by offering premium products and services, including our ability to manage our power sourcing and construct proprietary, passively-cooled digital asset mining data centers at scale. Our operational digital asset mining facilities lever our specialized design and construction proficiency by employing high-density, low-cost engineering and power designs. Our proprietary thermodynamic solution manages heat and airflow to deliver best-in-class uptime and, ultimately, increases mining rewards to us and to our hosted mining customers. We design our facilities to maximize both the efficiency and lifespan of our mining equipment. We have developed expertise in the installation, operation, optimization and repair of digital mining equipment. We continue to refine and develop our data center design and technology solutions to optimize our operations with the knowledge gained from our considerable digital asset mining experience, including optimizing the location of miners in our data centers to increase profitability. Our approach to data center design enables us to deliver efficiency at scale.
We believe we possess unique knowledge of data center design principles and systems integration architectures, as well as extensive experience designing, constructing and operating data centers that differentiates and informs our plans for modifying digital
52
asset mining data centers to support HPC hosting, and for developing new data centers designed to support future high-value computing requirements. This knowledge includes designs for higher rack energy densities than currently offered in the legacy data center market to satisfy emerging requirements for advanced technologies supporting emerging workloads such as artificial intelligence.
We develop proprietary hardware and software solutions that support our current operations and represent potential future growth opportunities. We intend to continue to invest judiciously in research and development activities to extend our platform management and software solutions in order to manage our infrastructure and mining fleet more efficiently and productively.
Regulation
Due to the relatively short history of digital assets, and their emergence as a new asset class, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is constantly evolving, with increased interest expressed by U.S. and internal regulators. In October 2020, the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework” that detailed the Department’s view with respect to digital assets and the tools at the Department’s disposal to deal with threats posed by digital assets. In February 2021, representatives of the government of Inner Mongolia, China announced plans to ban digital asset mining within the province due to the energy and rare earth mineral demands of the industry. In March 2021, the nominee for Chair of the SEC expressed the need for investor protection along with promotion of innovation in the digital asset space. In March 2022, former President Biden signed an Executive Order outlining an “whole-of-government” approach to addressing the risks and harnessing the potential benefits of digital assets and its underlying technology. The executive order lays out a national policy for digital assets over six highlighted priorities. In January 2023, the U.S. House of Representatives created a new congressional subcommittee focused on digital assets, the Subcommittee of Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion, operating under the House Financial Services Committee. Most recently, in January 2025, the Acting SEC Chairman announced the launch of a crypto task force dedicated to developing a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets, in contrast to the SEC’s prior reliance on enforcement actions to regulate cryptocurrencies. The extent and content of any forthcoming laws and regulations are not yet ascertainable with certainty, and they may not be ascertainable in the near future.
In addition to the activities of the United States federal government and its various agencies and regulatory bodies, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is also under active consideration by similar entities in other countries and transnational organizations, such as the European Union. State and local regulations within the United States also may apply to our activities and other activities in which we may participate in the future. Other governmental or semi-governmental regulatory bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in blockchain or digital asset businesses. For instance, the SEC has taken an active role in regulating the use of public offerings of proprietary coins (so-called “initial coin offerings”) and has made statements and official promulgations as to the status of certain digital assets as “securities” subject to regulation by the SEC.
Key Business Operating Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our financial results, we use the following business operating metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions. For a definition of these key business operating metrics, see the sections titled “Self-Mining Hash Rate,” and “Cost of Self-Mining One Bitcoin and Hash Cost,” (below), and for non-GAAP financial measures, see the section titled “Adjusted EBITDA” (below).
| December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||
| Self-Mining Hash rate (Exahash per second) | 19.1 | 16.9 | 15.7 | |||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) | $ | 157.4 | $ | 169.5 | $ | (11.6) |
53
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Cash Costs per Bitcoin | ||||||||||||||
| Power cost per bitcoin self-mined | $ | 24,375 | $ | 12,464 | $ | 10,545 | ||||||||
| Operational costs per bitcoin self-mined1 | 6,012 | 2,443 | 1,736 | |||||||||||
| Total cost to self-mine one bitcoin2 | $ | 30,387 | $ | 14,907 | $ | 12,281 | ||||||||
| Cash-Based Hash Cost3 | ||||||||||||||
| Power cost per terahash | $ | 0.025 | $ | 0.033 | $ | 0.044 | ||||||||
| Operational costs per terahash1 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.007 | |||||||||||
| Total cash-based hash cost3 | $ | 0.031 | $ | 0.039 | $ | 0.051 |
1 Includes personnel and related costs, software, telecommunications, security, etc. Amount excludes stock-based compensation and depreciation.
2 Represents our direct cash costs of power and operational costs based on our self-mining/hosting mix divided by total bitcoin self-mined during the periods presented.
3 Represents the cash expense of power and facilities operation cost divided by our self-mining fleet hash rate, in terahash.
Self-Mining Hash Rate
We operate mining hardware which performs computational operations in support of the blockchain measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which the hardware is capable of solving such computations. Our hash rate represents the hash rate of our miner fleet, which drives the digital asset rewards that will be earned by our fleet. We calculate and report our hash rate in exahash per second (“EH/s”). One exahash equals one quintillion hashes per second.
We measure the hash rate produced by our mining fleet through our management software MinderTM, which consolidates the reported hash rate from each miner. The method by which we measure our hash rate may differ from how other operators present such a measure.
Generally, miners with a greater hash rate relative to the global Bitcoin network hash rate at a given time will over time, have a greater chance of earning a bitcoin, as compared to miners with relatively lower total hash rates. Further, with the increase in demand for bitcoin contributing to an increase in computational resources for digital asset mining, the global network hash rate has increased, and we expect it to continue to increase. As such, our self-mining hash rate provides useful information to investors because it demonstrates our capacity, and our competitive advantage, for mining bitcoin, which contributes to our digital asset self-mining revenue. Management uses our self-mining hash rate to monitor our performance and competitive advantage in mining bitcoin as global competition also increases.
Our self-mining hash rate was 19.1 EH/s and 16.9 EH/s as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively representing a 13% increase year over year.
Our combined self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rate decreased 13%, to 20.1 EH/s as of December 31, 2024, from 23.2 EH/s as of December 31, 2023.
Cost of Self-Mining One Bitcoin and Hash Cost
Our profitability with respect to self-mining is heavily dependent upon our cost to mine a bitcoin, calculated during a particular period as the actual cash expense for power and other mining facility operations cash expenditures attributable to bitcoin self-mined, divided by the total bitcoin self-mined during the period presented. Our cost efficiency with respect to solving computations on the Bitcoin network to mine bitcoin is reflected in our cash-based hash cost, which is calculated as the actual cash expense for power and other mining facility operations cash expenditures attributable to bitcoin self-mined, divided by our self-mining hash rate, in terahash. The Company excludes stock-based compensation and depreciation from calculations of these operating metrics.
Cash Costs per Bitcoin and Cash-Based Hash Cost are key business operating metrics. The cost of self-mining one bitcoin metric provides useful information to investors as it demonstrates our capacity to profitably mine bitcoin when comparing it to the
54
price of bitcoin, particularly given volatility in energy prices as well as in the price of bitcoin. Management uses this metric to monitor both our cost efficiency in mining bitcoin as compared to our past performance and the performance of competitors, as well as our continued ability to profitably mine bitcoin. Similarly, the hash cost provides useful information to investors as it demonstrates our cost efficiency in solving computations on the Bitcoin network to mine bitcoin. Management uses this information to monitor our cost efficiency in mining bitcoin as compared to our past performance and the performance of our competitors.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as our net loss, adjusted to eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net; (ii) provision for income taxes; (iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) stock-based compensation expense; (v) Reorganization items, net; (vi) unrealized fair value adjustment on energy derivatives; (vii) change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights; (viii) HPC organizational startup costs which are not reflective of the ongoing costs incurred after startup, (ix) post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs incurred related to reorganization which are not reflective of the ongoing costs incurred in post-emergence operations, and (x) certain additional non-cash items that do not reflect the performance of our ongoing business operations. For additional information, including the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA, please refer to the table below. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our Board of Directors to evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by making the adjustments described above. In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges and timing differences. Moreover, we have included Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measurement used by our management internally to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial planning.
The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature or because the amount and timing of these items are not related to the current results of our core business operations which renders evaluation of our current performance, comparisons of performance between periods and comparisons of our current performance with our competitors less meaningful. However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to those excluded when calculating this measure. Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future results will be unaffected by unusual items. Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis. Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the same fashion. You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.
55
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 20231 | 20221 | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | ||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,315,005) | $ | (246,487) | $ | (2,146,318) | ||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 37,070 | 86,238 | 96,826 | |||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 859 | 683 | (17,091) | |||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 113,205 | 96,003 | 225,259 | |||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 51,924 | 58,892 | 182,894 | |||||||||||
| Unrealized fair value adjustment on energy derivatives | (2,262) | 2,262 | — | |||||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | — | — | 1,059,265 | |||||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | — | — | 590,673 | |||||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | 4,210 | 1,956 | 28,025 | |||||||||||
| Gain on sale of intangible assets | — | — | (5,904) | |||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | 487 | (20,065) | 287 | |||||||||||
| Cash restructuring charges | — | — | 1,320 | |||||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on acquired vendor liability | — | — | 9,498 | |||||||||||
| Equity line of credit expenses | — | — | 1,668 | |||||||||||
| HPC organizational startup costs | 4,611 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Post-emergence bankruptcy advisory costs | 4,822 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Change in fair value of convertible notes | — | — | 186,853 | |||||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | — | — | (37,937) | |||||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (111,439) | 191,122 | (197,405) | |||||||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 1,369,157 | — | — | |||||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses (income), net | (325) | (2,530) | 5,232 | |||||||||||
| Other | 123 | 1,474 | 5,276 | |||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 157,437 | $ | 169,548 | $ | (11,579) |
1 Certain prior year amounts have been omitted for consistency with the current year presentation.
Components of Results of Operations
Revenue
Our revenue consists primarily of digital asset self-mining income, and fees from our digital asset hosting and HPC hosting operations. The Company’s HPC and cloud compute operations began during the second quarter of 2024.
•Digital asset self-mining revenue. We operate a digital asset self-mining operation using specialized computers equipped with ASIC chips (known as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards (primarily bitcoin). The Company participates in “mining pools” organized by “mining pool operators” in which we share our mining power (known as “hash rate”) with the hash rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards. The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in the mining pool. The pool uses software that coordinates the pool members’ mining power, identifies new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool, and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed to the pool in connection with solving a block. Revenues from digital asset self-mining are impacted by volatility in bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the bitcoin blockchain’s network hash
56
rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
•Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers and related parties. Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers and related parties is based on electricity-based consumption contracts with our customers and related parties. Most contracts are renewable, and our customers are generally billed on a fixed and recurring basis each month for the duration of their contract, which vary from one to three years in length. During the second quarter of 2023, we initiated our first new digital asset hosted mining customer contracts based on proceed sharing. Under these new contracts, customers pay for the cost of digital asset hosting and infrastructure, and we share the proceeds that are generated.
•HPC hosting revenue. HPC hosting revenue is generated by licensing data center space and related services to licensees at our Austin, Texas data center. These licensing agreements and orders include lease components, nonlease components (such as power delivery, physical security, maintenance and other billable expenses), as well as noncomponent elements such as taxes. Under these contracts, customers pay fixed payments (based on electric capacity) and variable payments on a recurring basis. HPC hosting power fees are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in HPC hosting revenue.
Cost of revenue
The Company’s cost of digital asset self-mining and digital asset hosted mining services, primarily consist of electricity costs, salaries, stock-based compensation, depreciation of property, plant and equipment used to perform mining operations and hosting services and other related costs. Cost of HPC hosting services relate to our Austin, Texas data center, and primarily consists of facility operations expense, which includes maintenance and lease expense, power fees, payroll and benefits expense and stock-based compensation expense. HPC hosting power fees are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in Cost of HPC hosting services.
Change in fair value of digital assets
The Company adopted ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024. Under ASU 2023-08, the Company measures digital assets at fair value with the changes in fair value during the reporting period recognized in change in fair value of digital assets. Recognition of digital asset results prior to adoption are described below.
Gain from sale of digital assets
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, gain from sale of digital assets consisted of the excess of sales proceeds over the carrying value of the digital assets at the time of sale. Gains were recognized as they were realized upon sale(s).
Impairment of digital assets
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, impairment losses were recognized in the period in which the impairment was identified. The impaired digital assets were written down to their fair value at the time of impairment and the new carrying value would not be adjusted upward for any subsequent increase in fair value until sale.
Change in fair value of energy derivatives
The Change in fair value of energy derivatives represents changes in the fair value of the derivative liability related to the energy forward purchase contract described in more detail in “Energy Forward Purchase Contract” in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment are measured as the differences between the carrying value of the property, plant and equipment disposed of and fair value of the consideration received upon disposal.
57
Operating expenses
Operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. Each is outlined in more detail below.
•Research and development. We invest in research and development to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our mining operations and hosting services and to support our efforts to capture business opportunities in adjacent high-value computing markets. Research and development costs include compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation, other personnel related costs and professional fees.
•Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of marketing expenses, trade shows and events, professional fees, compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation and other personnel-related costs.
•General and administrative. General and administrative expenses include compensation, benefits, other personnel-related expenses for employees who are not part of our operating sites, research, development, sales, or marketing functions. Also included are stock-based compensation, rent, HPC organizational and site startup costs, post-emergence bankruptcy advisor fees related to the reorganization, professional fees, business insurance, auditor fees, bad debt, amortization of intangibles, franchise taxes, and bank fees. HPC organizational startup costs were primarily consulting costs that were specifically incurred preparing for and entering into the HPC hosting business, and are not expected to be incurred in the ongoing operations of the HPC hosting business. HPC site startup costs are noncapitalizable costs associated with the administration of converting and building of future HPC hosting operating sites, and include compensation and other personnel-related expenses, including stock-based compensation. Similar costs will be incurred in the future operations of the HPC hosting sites.
Non-operating expenses (income), net:
Non-operating expenses (income), net includes loss (gain) on debt extinguishment, interest expense, net, reorganization items, net, fair value adjustments of convertible notes, warrants and contingent value rights, and other non-operating (income) expenses, net. Reorganization items, net consists of costs directly associated with the reorganization during the bankruptcy period, including professional fees (including reimbursed third-party professional fees) and other bankruptcy related costs, negotiated settlements, satisfaction of allowed claims, and debtor-in-possession finance fees.
Income tax expense
Income tax expense consists of U.S. federal and state income taxes. We maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets as realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income, the timing and amount of which are uncertain and therefore have concluded it is not more likely than not that we will realize our net deferred tax assets.
Income tax expense consists of federal and state tax expense on our operating activity, and changes to our deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability.
Deferred income tax expense consists of income taxes recorded using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. These differences are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when these differences are anticipated to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management believes it is not more likely than not to be realized.
58
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
The following table sets forth our selected Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the periods indicated (in thousands).
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | $ | 408,740 | $ | 390,333 | $ | 18,407 | ||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 77,554 | 102,005 | (24,451) | |||||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties | — | 10,062 | (10,062) | |||||||
| HPC hosting revenue | 24,378 | — | 24,378 | |||||||
| Total revenue | 510,672 | 502,400 | 8,272 | |||||||
| Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||
| Cost of digital asset self-mining | 314,335 | 291,696 | 22,639 | |||||||
| Cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 53,558 | 87,245 | (33,687) | |||||||
| Cost of HPC hosting services | 21,709 | — | 21,709 | |||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 389,602 | 378,941 | 10,661 | |||||||
| Gross profit | 121,070 | 123,459 | (2,389) | |||||||
| Change in fair value of digital assets | (1,052) | — | (1,052) | |||||||
| Gain from sale of digital assets | — | 3,893 | (3,893) | |||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | — | (4,406) | 4,406 | |||||||
| Change in fair value of energy derivatives | (2,757) | (3,918) | 1,161 | |||||||
| Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | (4,210) | (1,956) | (2,254) | |||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||
| Research and development | 11,830 | 7,184 | 4,646 | |||||||
| Sales and marketing | 9,969 | 7,019 | 2,950 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 110,448 | 93,908 | 16,540 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 132,247 | 108,111 | 24,136 | |||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (19,196) | 8,961 | (28,157) | |||||||
| Non-operating expenses (income), net: | ||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | 487 | (20,065) | 20,552 | |||||||
| Interest expense, net | 37,070 | 86,238 | (49,168) | |||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (111,439) | 191,122 | (302,561) | |||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 1,369,157 | — | 1,369,157 | |||||||
| Other non-operating income, net | (325) | (2,530) | 2,205 | |||||||
| Total non-operating expenses, net | 1,294,950 | 254,765 | 1,040,185 | |||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (1,314,146) | (245,804) | (1,068,342) | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 859 | 683 | 176 | |||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,315,005) | $ | (246,487) | $ | (1,068,518) |
59
Revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | $ | 408,740 | $ | 390,333 | $ | 18,407 | ||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 77,554 | 102,005 | (24,451) | |||||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties | — | 10,062 | (10,062) | |||||||
| HPC hosting revenue | 24,378 | — | 24,378 | |||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 510,672 | $ | 502,400 | $ | 8,272 | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue: | ||||||||||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | 80 | % | 78 | % | ||||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | 15 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties | — | % | 2 | % | ||||||
| HPC hosting revenue | 5 | % | — | % | ||||||
| Total revenue | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Total revenue increased by $8.3 million or 2%, to $510.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $502.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, as a result of the factors described below.
Digital asset self-mining revenue increased by $18.4 million or 5%, to $408.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $390.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The year over year increase in self-mining revenue was driven primarily by:
•a 128% increase in the average price of bitcoin to $65,894 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $28,859 for the year ended December 31, 2023;
•a 13% increase in self-mining hash rate to 19.1 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2024, from 16.9 EH/s for the same period in the prior year;
•an approximate net increase of 6,000 mining units deployed; and
•and an increase in our average self-mining hash rate fleet mix and efficiency to 25.1 joules per terahash.
This increase in self-mining revenue was partially offset by:
•a 52% decrease in bitcoin mined to 6,595 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 13,762 for the year ended December 31, 2023, driven primarily by:
◦a 50% decrease in block rewards as a result of the April 2024 halving;
◦the operational shift from digital asset self-mining to HPC hosting; and
◦a 66% increase in the twelve-month average network hash rate over prior year.
Total digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers decreased by $24.5 million or 24%, to $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $102.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in hosted mining revenue from customers was primarily driven by the termination of contracts with several customers since 2023, due primarily to our shift to HPC hosting.
Total digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties was nil for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. There were no related-party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Total HPC hosting revenue was $24.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to nil for the same period in the prior year due to the initiation of HPC hosting operations at our Austin, Texas data center during the quarter ended June 30, 2024.
60
Cost of revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 389,602 | $ | 378,941 | $ | 10,661 | ||||
| Gross profit | 121,070 | 123,459 | (2,389) | |||||||
| Gross margin | 24 | % | 25 | % |
Cost of revenue increased by $10.7 million or 3%, to $389.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $378.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue totaled 76% and 75% for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to:
•a $21.7 million increase in HPC hosting costs, primarily rent and power incurred during the current fiscal year with no comparable activity for the same period in fiscal 2023;
•a $16.7 million increase in depreciation expense driven by the increase in the number of miners in service;
•a $5.9 million increase in payroll and benefits is due to increases in bonuses and salaries driven primarily by an increase in employee headcount; and
•a $1.9 million increase in stock-based compensation expense; partially offset by
•a $32.0 million decrease in power costs from lower rates and usage and $3.3 million lower facility operations expense.
Change in fair value of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of digital assets | $ | (1,052) | $ | — | $ | (1,052) | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | — | % |
Change in fair value of digital assets was $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, and reflects the Company’s adoption of ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024.
Gain from sale of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Gain from sale of digital assets | $ | — | $ | 3,893 | $ | (3,893) | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | 1 | % |
Gain from sale of digital assets was nil for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to a gain of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. There are no gains from sale of digital assets recorded in fiscal 2024 due to the Company’s adoption of ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the carrying value of our digital assets sold was $400.8 million and the sales price was $404.7 million.
61
Impairment of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | $ | — | $ | (4,406) | $ | 4,406 | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | (1) | % |
Impairment of digital assets was nil for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. Upon the Company’s adoption of ASU 2023-08 effective January 1, 2024, the Company measures digital assets at fair value each reporting period with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-08, impairment existed when the carrying amount exceeded its fair value. Impairment was measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value was being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, were collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. If the then current carrying value of a digital asset exceeded the fair value so determined, an impairment loss occurred with respect to those digital assets in the amount equal to the difference between their carrying value and the price determined. The carrying value of our digital assets amounted to $23.9 million as of December 31, 2024, and $2.3 million as of December 31, 2023.
Change in fair value of energy derivatives
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of energy derivatives | $ | (2,757) | $ | (3,918) | $ | 1,161 | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (1) | % | (1) | % |
Change in fair value of energy derivatives, which is related to the change in fair value of the derivative liability of the energy forward purchase contract entered into in October 2023, was $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | $ | (4,210) | $ | (1,956) | $ | (2,254) | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (1) | % | — | % |
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment increased by $2.3 million to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. This loss was due to the disposal of mining equipment.
62
Operating Expenses
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 11,830 | $ | 7,184 | $ | 4,646 | ||
| Sales and marketing | 9,969 | 7,019 | 2,950 | |||||
| General and administrative | 110,448 | 93,908 | 16,540 | |||||
| Total operating expenses | $ | 132,247 | $ | 108,111 | $ | 24,136 | ||
| Percentage of total revenue | 26 | % | 22 | % |
Total operating expenses increased $24.1 million or 22%, to $132.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $108.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Research and development expenses increased by $4.6 million or 65%, to $11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was driven by a $3.1 million increase in payroll and benefits expense due to increases in bonuses and salaries driven primarily by an increase in employee headcount, and a $1.5 million increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $3.0 million to $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was driven primarily by:
•a $1.1 million increase in advertising and marketing expenses;
•a $0.9 million increase in stock-based compensation expense;
•a $0.5 million increase in payroll and benefits expense due to increases in bonuses and salaries driven primarily by an increase in employee headcount; and
•a $0.4 million increase in travel and training expense.
General and administrative expenses increased by $16.5 million or 18%, to $110.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $93.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily driven by:
•an $18.2 million increase in payroll and benefits expense due to increases in bonuses and salaries driven primarily by an increase in employee headcount to support our transition to HPC operations;
•a $5.0 million increase in professional fees;
•a $4.8 million in post-emergence bankruptcy advisor fees;
•a $0.9 million increase in property tax;
•a $0.9 million increase in advertising and marketing; and
•a $0.7 million increase in software subscriptions.
This increase in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by:
•$12.3 million lower stock-based compensation primarily due to cancellation and forfeitures of equity-based awards during the year ended December 31, 2024, and also due to no new equity awards granted during fiscal 2023; and
•a $2.2 million decrease in other operating expense primarily driven by decreased business insurance expense.
For the year ended December 31, 2024, $9.1 million of general and administrative expenses are classified as HPC site startup costs. These costs are primarily payroll, benefits, and stock-based compensation for activities related to the startup of our HPC sites that have transitioned from digital asset site operations and administration.
63
Non-operating expenses (income), net
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Non-operating expenses (income), net: | ||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | $ | 487 | $ | (20,065) | $ | 20,552 | ||||
| Interest expense, net | 37,070 | 86,238 | (49,168) | |||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 1,369,157 | — | 1,369,157 | |||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (111,439) | 191,122 | (302,561) | |||||||
| Other non-operating income, net | (325) | (2,530) | 2,205 | |||||||
| Total non-operating expenses, net | $ | 1,294,950 | $ | 254,765 | $ | 1,040,185 |
Total non-operating expenses, net increased by $1.04 billion, to $1.29 billion for the year ended December 31, 2024, from total non-operating expenses, net of $254.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in total non-operating expenses, net was primarily driven by:
•the Company’s entry into a warrant agreement and Convertible Value Rights Agreement pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we incurred a $1.37 billion Change in fair value of warrant and contingent value rights due to the increase in the price of the underlying instruments driven by the increase in the Company’s stock price to $14.05 per share as of December 31, 2024, from $3.44 per share as of the Effective Date. The increase in stock price resulted in a $1.45 billion increase in the fair value of the warrant liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2024, partially offset by a $82.1 million decrease in fair value of contingent value rights; and
•a $20.1 million Gain on extinguishment of debt recognized during the same period in the prior year.
This increase was partially offset by:
•a $302.6 million decrease in Reorganization items, net related to a $238.4 million gain associated with the satisfaction of allowed claims, a $70.7 million decrease in professional fees and other bankruptcy costs, and a $24.5 million decrease in debtor-in-possession financing costs, partially offset by a $18.2 million increase in negotiated settlements and a $12.8 million increase in reimbursed claimant professional fees; and
•a $49.2 million decrease in Interest expense, net resulting from lower average debt balances during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Income tax expense
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | $ | 859 | $ | 683 | $ | 176 | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | — | % |
Income tax expense consists of U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our income tax expense was $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The Company's effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024, was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to a valuation allowance on the Company’s deferred tax assets and certain non-deductible expenses.
64
Segment Total Revenue and Gross Profit
The following table presents total revenue and gross profit by reportable segment for the periods presented (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Digital Asset Self-Mining Segment | ||||||||||
| Digital asset self-mining revenue | $ | 408,740 | $ | 390,333 | $ | 18,407 | ||||
| Cost of digital asset self-mining: | ||||||||||
| Power fees | 160,833 | 165,848 | (5,015) | |||||||
| Depreciation expense | 108,499 | 88,628 | 19,871 | |||||||
| Employee compensation | 26,129 | 16,853 | 9,276 | |||||||
| Facility operations expense | 13,274 | 14,055 | (781) | |||||||
| Other segment items | 5,600 | 6,312 | (712) | |||||||
| Total cost of digital asset self-mining | 314,335 | 291,696 | 22,639 | |||||||
| Digital Asset Self-Mining gross profit | $ | 94,405 | $ | 98,637 | $ | (4,232) | ||||
| Digital Asset Self-Mining gross margin | 23 | % | 25 | % | (2) | % | ||||
| Digital Asset Hosted Mining Segment | ||||||||||
| Digital asset hosted mining revenue from customers | $ | 77,554 | $ | 112,067 | $ | (34,513) | ||||
| Cost of digital asset hosted mining services: | — | |||||||||
| Power fees | 35,408 | 62,366 | (26,958) | |||||||
| Depreciation expense | 3,604 | 6,806 | (3,202) | |||||||
| Employee compensation | 4,933 | 6,337 | (1,404) | |||||||
| Facility operations expense | 2,765 | 5,285 | (2,520) | |||||||
| Other segment items | 6,848 | 6,451 | 397 | |||||||
| Total cost of digital asset hosted mining services | 53,558 | 87,245 | (33,687) | |||||||
| Digital Asset Hosted Mining gross profit | $ | 23,996 | $ | 24,822 | $ | (826) | ||||
| Digital Asset Hosted Mining gross margin | 31 | % | 22 | % | 9 | % | ||||
| HPC Hosting Segment | ||||||||||
| HPC hosting revenue: | ||||||||||
| License fees | $ | 17,498 | $ | — | $ | 17,498 | ||||
| Maintenance and other | 73 | — | 73 | |||||||
| Licensing revenue | 17,571 | — | 17,571 | |||||||
| Power fees passed through to customer | 6,807 | — | 6,807 | |||||||
| Total HPC hosting revenue | 24,378 | — | 24,378 | |||||||
| Cost of HPC hosting services: | ||||||||||
| Depreciation expense | 3 | — | 3 | |||||||
| Employee compensation | 2,514 | — | 2,514 | |||||||
| Facility operations expense | 11,907 | — | 11,907 | |||||||
| Other segment items | 478 | — | 478 | |||||||
| Cost of licensing revenue | 14,902 | — | 14,902 | |||||||
| Power fees passed through to customer | 6,807 | — | 6,807 | |||||||
| Total cost of HPC hosting services | 21,709 | — | 21,709 | |||||||
| HPC Hosting gross profit | $ | 2,669 | $ | — | $ | 2,669 | ||||
| HPC Hosting licensing gross margin | 15 | % | — | % | 15 | % | ||||
| HPC Hosting gross margin | 11 | % | — | % | 11 | % | ||||
| Consolidated | ||||||||||
| Consolidated total revenue | $ | 510,672 | $ | 502,400 | $ | 8,272 | ||||
| Consolidated cost of revenue | $ | 389,602 | $ | 378,941 | $ | 10,661 | ||||
| Consolidated gross profit | $ | 121,070 | $ | 123,459 | $ | (2,389) | ||||
| Consolidated gross margin | 24 | % | 25 | % | (1) | % |
65
Digital Asset Self-Mining
For the year ended December 31, 2024, gross profit in the Digital Asset Self-Mining segment decreased by $4.2 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting a Digital Asset Self-Mining segment gross margin of 23% for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 25% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in the Digital Asset Self-Mining segment gross profit was primarily due to:
•a $22.6 million or 8% increase in the total cost of digital asset self-mining driven by:
◦a $19.9 million or 22% increase in depreciation expense, which was driven primarily by an approximate net increase of 6,000 miners placed in service during the current year; and
◦a $9.3 million or 55% increase in employee compensation due to increases in bonuses and salaries driven primarily by an increase in employee headcount; partially offset by
◦a $5.0 million decrease in power costs due primarily to lower power rates.
This increase in the total cost of digital asset self-mining was partially offset by:
•a 5% increase in self-mining revenue driven by:
◦a 128% increase in the average price of bitcoin;
◦a 13% increase in our self-mining hash rate to 19.1 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 16.9 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2023; and
◦an approximate net increase of 6,000 mining units deployed; partially offset by
◦a 52% decrease in bitcoin mined to 6,595 for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to 13,762 for the year ended December 31, 2023, driven primarily by:
▪a 50% decrease in block rewards as a result of the April 2024 halving;
▪the operational shift from digital asset self-mining to HPC hosting; and
▪a 66% increase in the twelve-month average network hash rate over prior year.
Digital Asset Hosted Mining
For the year ended December 31, 2024, gross profit in the Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment decreased by $0.8 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting a Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment gross margin of 31% for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to a gross margin of 22% for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in Digital Asset Hosted Mining segment gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the year ended December 31, 2023 was primarily due to:
•a $34.5 million or 31% decrease in the digital asset hosted mining revenue driven primarily by a $24.5 million decrease from the termination of contracts with several customers since 2023, due primarily to our shift to HPC hosting, and a $10.1 million decrease in digital asset hosted mining revenue from related parties as there were no related party transactions during fiscal 2024, partially offset by:
• a $33.7 million or 39% decrease in the total cost of digital asset hosted mining services driven primarily by a $27.0 million decrease in power costs from lower rates and usage.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the top three hosting customers accounted for approximately 89% and 72%, respectively, of the Digital Asset Hosting’s segment total revenue.
HPC Hosting
For the year ended December 31, 2024, gross profit in the HPC Hosting segment was $2.7 million compared to nil for the year ended December 31, 2023, due to the HPC Hosting segment starting operation during the quarter ended June 30, 2024. HPC hosting revenue includes a base license fee as well as the direct pass-through of power costs to our client, with no margin added. HPC hosting costs at our Austin, Texas data center consist primarily of lease expense, the direct pass-through of power costs, and direct and indirect facilities operations expenses, including personnel and benefit costs and stock-based compensation.
66
A reconciliation of the reportable segment gross profit to loss before income taxes included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, is as follows (in thousands):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Reportable segment gross profit | $ | 121,070 | $ | 123,459 | $ | (2,389) | ||||
| Change in fair value of digital assets | (1,052) | — | (1,052) | |||||||
| Gain from sale of digital assets | — | 3,893 | (3,893) | |||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | — | (4,406) | 4,406 | |||||||
| Change in fair value of energy derivatives | (2,757) | (3,918) | 1,161 | |||||||
| Loss on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (4,210) | (1,956) | (2,254) | |||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||
| Research and development | 11,830 | 7,184 | 4,646 | |||||||
| Sales and marketing | 9,969 | 7,019 | 2,950 | |||||||
| General and administrative | 110,448 | 93,908 | 16,540 | |||||||
| Total operating expenses | 132,247 | 108,111 | 24,136 | |||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (19,196) | 8,961 | (28,157) | |||||||
| Non-operating expenses (income), net: | ||||||||||
| Loss (gain) on debt extinguishment | 487 | (20,065) | 20,552 | |||||||
| Interest expense, net | 37,070 | 86,238 | (49,168) | |||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (111,439) | 191,122 | (302,561) | |||||||
| Change in fair value of warrants and contingent value rights | 1,369,157 | — | 1,369,157 | |||||||
| Other non-operating (income) expense, net | (325) | (2,530) | 2,205 | |||||||
| Total non-operating expenses, net | 1,294,950 | 254,765 | 1,040,185 | |||||||
| Loss before income taxes | $ | (1,314,146) | $ | (245,804) | $ | (1,068,342) |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash
We finance our operations primarily through cash generated from operations, including the sale of self-mined bitcoin and fees from licensing HPC data center space, debt issuances, equipment financing arrangements, and sales of equity securities. Although our present needs will likely still result in sales of a significant portion of our self-mined bitcoin, we also may employ strategies intended to optimize cash received from self-mined bitcoin which may entail, subject to market conditions, holding bitcoin for future sale at any particular point in time.
Historically, a substantial portion of our liquidity needs arose from debt service on our outstanding indebtedness and from funding the costs of operations, working capital and capital expenditures. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Company successfully repaid a significant portion of its outstanding loans, notes, and obligations, issued in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization. This extinguishment of these loans, notes and obligations was achieved either through mandatory conversion events triggered by the Company's stock price or through proactive measures taken by the Company to settle its debts ahead of schedule. In part, the Company used its net proceeds from its 2029 Convertible Notes Offering and 2031 Convertible Notes Offering to extinguish its debt. For further information regarding the extinguishment of the Company’s debt and its private debt offerings, refer to Notes 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable and 9 — Contingent Value Rights and Warrant Liabilities to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We have assessed our current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements and our current and expected sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of December 31, 2024, that our operating cash flows, existing cash balances, and continued access to debt markets will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements over the next twelve months and beyond.
67
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
| December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | $ Change | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 836,197 | $ | 50,409 | $ | 785,788 | ||||
| Restricted cash | 783 | 19,300 | (18,517) | |||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 836,980 | $ | 69,709 | $ | 767,271 |
As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, restricted cash of $0.8 million and $19.3 million, consisted of cash held in escrow to pay for construction and development activities.
The following table summarizes our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash flows for the periods indicated.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash – beginning of period | $ | 69,709 | $ | 52,240 | ||
| Net cash provided by (used in) | ||||||
| Operating activities | 42,896 | 65,114 | ||||
| Investing activities | (95,192) | (2,996) | ||||
| Financing activities | 819,567 | (44,649) | ||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - end of period | $ | 836,980 | $ | 69,709 |
Our principal uses of cash in recent periods have been funding our operations and investing in capital expenditures.
Operating Activities
Changes in net cash from operating activities results primarily from cash received from hosting customers payments for power fees and equipment purchases. Other drivers of the changes in net cash from operating activities include research and development costs, sales and marketing costs and general and administrative expenses (including personnel expenses and fees for professional services) and interest payments on debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 and $65.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a increase in net loss of $1.07 billion, a $194.6 million decrease in working capital components, a $143.8 million increase in non-cash reorganization items, a $82.1 million decrease in the fair value of contingent value rights, a $18.2 million increase in digital asset self-mining and shared hosting revenue, and a $7.0 million decrease in stock-based compensation. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was partially offset by a $1.45 billion increase in the fair value of warrant liabilities, a $20.6 million decrease in loss on debt extinguishment, and a $17.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization.
Investing Activities
Our net cash used in investing activities consists primarily of purchases of property, plant and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $95.2 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The increase in net cash used in investing activities was driven primarily by a $78.8 million increase in purchases of property, plant and equipment, partially offset by $14.0 million of proceeds from the sale of the Cedarvale, Texas facility for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities consists of proceeds from stock issuances, issuances of debt, net of issuance costs and principal payments on debt, including notes payable and finance leases.
68
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $819.6 million. Net cash used by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $44.6 million. The change was due primarily to an inflow of $610.2 million from the proceeds for the issuance of the 0.00% convertible senior notes, net, $447.6 million from the proceeds for the issuance of the 3.00% convertible senior notes, net, $55.0 million from the issuance of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2024, and a $20.0 million draw from the Exit Facility. The increase in net cash provided by financing activities was partially offset by an increase in principal payments on debt of $263.8 million.
Future Commitments and Contractual Obligations
Our material cash commitments from known contractual and other obligations consist primarily of obligations for long-term debt and related interest, leases for property and equipment, and capital expenditures related to the conversion of a significant portion of our data centers to hosting HPC operations. Certain amounts included in our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2024, are based on our estimates and assumptions about these obligations, including their duration, anticipated actions by third parties and other factors.
Debt Obligations and Interest Payments
As of December 31, 2024, future principal payment obligations on our convertible notes and other notes payable totaled $1.12 billion, of which $17.7 million is expected to be due within one year. Cash payments for expected interest on our convertible notes and other notes payable is $15.8 million within the next twelve months and $56.1 million thereafter. For more information, refer to Note 8 — Convertible and Other Notes Payable, to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Operating Lease Payments
As of December 31, 2024, our future payments under operating leases are $151.5 million, of which $18.6 million is due within one year. For more information, refer to Note 7 — Leases, to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Capital Expenditure Commitment
As of December 31, 2024, the Company was contractually committed for approximately $1.14 billion of capital expenditures, primarily related to infrastructure modifications, equipment procurement, and labor associated with the conversion of a significant portion of its data centers to deliver hosting services for HPC. Of this amount, $899.3 million is reimbursable by our customer under our agreements. These capital expenditures are expected to occur over the next year. For additional discussion of Commitments and Contractual Obligations, refer to Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Block, Inc. Purchase Agreement
On July 5, 2024, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with Block, Inc. for the purchase of 3 nanometer ASIC chips representing approximately 15 EH/s of hash rate. On July 12, 2024, the Company paid a $10.0 million deposit which will be applied evenly towards the ASIC chips. Payments are due in installments, starting six months prior to delivery. Delivery of the ASIC chips is expected to begin by the second half of 2025. On January 15, 2025, the Company made a $21.3 million prepayment under the agreement. The Company expects to make additional payments over the next year in connection with the agreement, subject to the timing of anticipated deliveries.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - Digital Asset Self-Mining Revenue
The recognition of digital asset mining revenue involves estimation uncertainty due to the variable and non-cash nature of the consideration received. We receive non-cash compensation in the form of bitcoin, less operator fees, for providing hash calculation services to mining pools. These amounts vary based on factors such as our share of the total network hash rate, Bitcoin network block rewards, and transaction fees. Operator fees also fluctuate depending on these rewards and fees.
69
We determine the fair value of this non-cash consideration using the spot rate for bitcoin as quoted on Coinbase Global, Inc., our principal market.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
The Company has made significant investments in Bitcoin mining equipment, which constitutes a substantial portion of its property, plant, and equipment. Accounting for this equipment involves significant judgment and estimation uncertainty, particularly regarding the determination of its estimated useful life for depreciation purposes and the assessment of potential impairment.
The Company depreciates its Bitcoin mining equipment using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three years. This estimate reflects management’s judgment based on the current state of technology and industry practices. However, the actual useful life of this equipment is uncertain due to the rapid pace of technological advancements in the Bitcoin mining industry.
The Company evaluates its Bitcoin mining equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the equipment may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of the undiscounted futures cash flows expected from its use and disposal. If the carrying amount is not recoverable, the impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying amount and the asset's fair value. Potential impairment triggers include a significant decline in the market price of Bitcoin or the introduction of new technologies that reduce the efficiency or profitability of the Company’s existing equipment. These assessments rely on significant judgment and require assumptions about future events and conditions, including Bitcoin prices, mining difficulty rates, electricity costs, and anticipated technological advancements.
Management believes that its current estimates and assumptions are reasonable based on the information available. Actual results may differ, and any such differences could materially impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
Stock-Based Compensation
The valuation of market condition restricted stock units ("MSUs") involves judgment due to the uncertainty in assumptions used in the Monte Carlo pricing model on the date of grant, which required inputs that were both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, including estimated volatility, which reflects anticipated variability in the Company’s stock price over time. If we had used different assumptions or estimates, the estimated fair value and expense recognition of the MSUs could have been materially different. Management believes its estimates are reasonable based on the information available.
Contingent Value Rights Liabilities
On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company entered into a contingent value rights agreement which provided for the issuance of the CVRs to certain creditors. When the CVRs were recognized on the Effective Date, observable market data was not available. The Monte Carlo simulation model was used to determine their fair value, which required inputs that were both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, including expected volatility, which reflects anticipated variability in the Company’s stock price over time. If we had used different assumptions or estimates, the estimated fair value of the CVRs could have been materially different. At each reporting date subsequent to the Effective Date, the fair value of the CVRs has been determined based on the observable listed trading price for such CVRs, thereby eliminating the significant level of estimation uncertainty in periods subsequent to the initial recognition of the CVRs.
Warrant Liabilities
On the Effective Date, pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, holders of the Company’s previous common stock received warrants. When the warrants were recognized on the Effective Date, observable market data was not available. The Monte Carlo simulation model was used to determine their fair value, which required inputs that were both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement, including expected volatility, which reflects anticipated variability in the Company’s stock price over time. If we had used different assumptions or estimates, the estimated fair value of the warrants could have been materially different. At each reporting date subsequent to the Effective Date, the fair value of the warrants has been determined based on the observable listed trading price for such warrants, thereby eliminating the significant level of estimation uncertainty in periods subsequent to the initial recognition of the warrants.
70
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
As a result of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the payment of pre-petition liabilities was subject to compromise or other treatment pursuant to a plan of reorganization. The determination of how liabilities were ultimately settled or treated was determined by the confirmed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization when it became effective. Accordingly, the ultimate amount of such claims is not determinable until such time as the Bankruptcy Court determines their allowed amount. Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are reported at the amounts management expects to become allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for different amounts upon confirmation. The amounts currently classified as Liabilities subject to compromise are preliminary and may be subject to future adjustments depending on Bankruptcy Court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, rejection of executory contracts, continued reconciliation or other events.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Emerging Growth Company
Prior to December 31, 2024, we qualified as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. We were able to take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements, including not being required to have our internal control over financial reporting audited by our independent registered public accounting firm under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments.
On the last business day of the second quarter in 2024, the aggregate market value of the Company’s shares of common stock held by non-affiliate stockholders exceeded $700 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2024, the Company qualified as a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, and ceased to be an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act.
The impact of this change in filing status includes being subject to the requirements of large accelerated filers, which includes shortened filing timelines, no delayed adoption of certain accounting standards, and attestation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting by its independent auditor.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-24-010682.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “Core Scientific,” or “Core” refer to Core Scientific Holding Co. and its subsidiaries prior to the consummation of the Business Combination (as defined below) and Core Scientific, Inc. (f/k/a Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.) and its subsidiaries after the consummation of the Business Combination. References to “XPDI” refer to the predecessor registrant prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of operations for 2023 compared to 2022. For discussion related to the results of operations and changes in consolidated financial condition for 2022 compared to 2021 refer to Part II, Item 7. — “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our fiscal year 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on April 4, 2023.
As discussed in the section titled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below, and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Core Scientific is a best-in-class large-scale operator of dedicated, purpose-built facilities for digital asset mining and a premier provider of blockchain infrastructure, software solutions and services. We employ our own large fleet of computers (“miners”), primarily manufactured by Bitmain Technologies Limited (“Bitmain”), to produce bitcoin for our own account and provide hosting services for large bitcoin mining customers at our seven operational data centers in Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1) and Texas (2). We derive the majority of our revenue from earning bitcoin for our own account (“self-mining”). We began digital asset mining at scale in 2018 and in 2020 became one of the largest North American providers of hosting services for third-party mining customers. As of December 31, 2023, we had an average hourly operating power demand of approximately 592 MW for the year, and we had secured approximately 1,198 MW of contracted power capacity at our sites. We also owned and managed the largest infrastructure asset base of publicly listed miners in North America of 724 MW and improved our average self-mining fleet energy efficiency to 27.94 joules per terahash.
Although our business operations date back to 2018 (and was known as “Core Scientific” (“Legacy Core”)), the current corporate entity operating our business was formerly known as Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (“XPDI”) which was a special purpose acquisition corporation formed for the purpose of acquiring an operating business such as Legacy Core. On July 20, 2021, XPDI, Core Scientific Holding Co., and XPDI Merger Sub entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) which provided for business combination transactions (the “Business Combination”) pursuant to which the business of Legacy Core was combined with XPDI and XPDI changed its name to Core Scientific, Inc. (“New Core” or the “Company”). XPDI’s stockholders approved the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination at a special meeting of stockholders held on January 19, 2022. For more detailed information regarding the Business Combination, refer to Note 4 — Business Combinations, Acquisitions and Restructuring to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our total revenue was $502.4 million and $640.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. We had operating income of $9.0 million and operating loss of $2.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase of $2.12 billion in operating income was predominantly due to a $1.06 billion impairment of goodwill and other intangibles and a $590.7 million impairment of property, plant and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2023, a $226.9 million decrease in impairment of digital assets year over year, as well as higher total operating expenses of $144.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. We had a net loss of $246.5 million and $2.15 billion for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Our adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”) was $170.0 million and $(10.7) million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below for our definition of, and additional information related to, Adjusted EBITDA.
46
Recent Developments
On January 15, 2024, the Debtors filed with the Bankruptcy Court (both defined below) the Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Core Scientific, Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors (with Technical Modifications) (the “Plan of Reorganization”). On January 16, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Plan of Reorganization (the “Confirmation Order”). On January 23, 2024 (the “Effective Date”), the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan of Reorganization were satisfied or waived and the Company emerged from bankruptcy.
On the Effective Date, a new Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) was constituted and the Company, in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization satisfied and extinguished claims in the Chapter 11 Cases (as defined below) through the issuance of (i) new common stock (“New Common Stock”), (ii) new warrants (“New Warrants”), (iii) contingent value rights (“CVRs”), (iv) new secured convertible notes due 2029 (“New Secured Convertible Notes”), and (v) new secured notes due 2028 (“New Secured Notes”). For more detailed information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, refer to Notes 3 — Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters and 17 — Subsequent Events to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On March 6, 2024, the Company announced a multi-year contract for Core Scientific to supply up to 16 MW of data center infrastructure to CoreWeave, Inc. The total potential revenue associated with the contract is more than $100 million. Under the terms of the contract, Core Scientific will deliver up to 16 MW of capacity at its new Austin, Texas data center to host CoreWeave, Inc.’s infrastructure. Core Scientific is leasing a tier 3 data center in Austin that formerly housed Hewlett Packard to include high performance computing.
Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters - Pre-Emergence
Chapter 11
On December 21, 2022, the Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Chapter 11 Cases were jointly administered under Case No. 22-90341. The Debtors operated their business and managed their properties as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. For detailed discussion about the Chapter 11 Cases, refer to Note 3 — Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Original DIP Credit Agreement and Restructuring Support Agreement
In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors entered into a senior secured super-priority debtor-in-possession loan and security agreement, dated as of December 22, 2022 (the “Original DIP Credit Agreement”), with Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as administrative agent, and the lenders from time-to-time party thereto (collectively, the “Original DIP Lenders”). The Original DIP Lenders are also holders or affiliates, partners or investors of holders under the Company’s notes sold pursuant to (i) the Secured Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2021 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder (the “Secured Convertible Notes”), and (ii) the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2021, (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder (together with the Secured Convertible Notes, the “Convertible Notes”).
Also in connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company entered into a restructuring support agreement (together with all exhibits and schedules thereto, the “Restructuring Support Agreement”) with the ad hoc group of noteholders, representing more than 70% of the holders of the Convertible Notes (the “Ad Hoc Noteholder Group”) pursuant to which the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group agreed to provide commitments for a debtor-in-possession facility (the “Original DIP Facility”) of more than $57 million and agreed to support the syndication of up to an additional $18 million in new money debtor-in-possession facility loans to all holders of Convertible Notes. The Company terminated the Restructuring Support Agreement pursuant to a “fiduciary out” which permitted the Company to pursue better alternatives.
47
Replacement DIP Credit Agreement
On February 2, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an interim order authorizing, among other things, the Debtors to obtain senior secured non-priming super-priority replacement post-petition financing (the “Replacement DIP Facility”). On February 27, 2023, the Debtors entered into a senior secured super-priority replacement debtor-in-possession loan and security agreement governing the Replacement DIP Facility (the “Replacement DIP Credit Agreement”), with B. Riley Commercial Capital, LLC, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “Replacement DIP Lender”). Proceeds of the Replacement DIP Facility were used to, among other things, repay amounts outstanding under the Original DIP Facility, including payment of all fees and expenses required to be paid under the terms of the Original DIP Facility. These funds, along with ongoing cash generated from operations, were anticipated to provide the necessary financing to effectuate the planned restructuring, facilitate the emergence from Chapter 11, and cover the fees and expenses of legal and financial advisors.
The Replacement DIP Facility, among other things, provides for a non-amortizing super-priority senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70 million. Under the Replacement DIP Facility, (i) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Interim DIP Order and (ii) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Final DIP Order. Loans under the Replacement DIP Facility will bear interest at a rate of 10%, which will be payable in kind in arrears on the first day of each calendar month. The Administrative Agent received an upfront payment equal to 3.5% of the aggregate commitments under the Replacement DIP Facility on February 3, 2023, payable in kind, and the Replacement DIP Lender will receive an exit premium equal to 5% of the amount of the loans being repaid, reduced or satisfied, payable in cash. The Replacement DIP Credit Agreement includes representations and warranties, covenants applicable to the Debtors, and events of default. If an event of default under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement occurs, the Administrative Agent may, among other things, permanently reduce any remaining commitments and declare the outstanding obligations under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable.
In January 2024, the Replacement DIP Facility was repaid in full and terminated on the Effective Date of the Company’s Plan of Reorganization.
NYDIG Settlement
On February 26, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order whereby the Debtors and NYDIG agreed that the Debtors would transfer the miners serving as collateral under the NYDIG Loan back to NYDIG over a period of several months in exchange for the full extinguishment of the NYDIG Loan. The final shipment of miners that served as collateral under the NYDIG Loan occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2023, after which the NYDIG Loan was extinguished in full and the Company recorded a $20.8 million Gain on debt extinguishment in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Priority Power Settlement
On March 20, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order (the “Priority Power Order”), whereby the Debtors and Priority Power Management, LLC (“Priority Power”) agreed that the Debtors would transfer equipment to Priority Power and assume an Energy Management and Consulting Services Agreement and other new agreements. Priority Power was determined to have a single aggregate allowed claim of $20.8 million which was secured by a perfected mechanic’s lien. The claim was deemed paid and fully satisfied by transfer of specific equipment from the Debtors to Priority Power on the date of the Priority Power Order, thereby releasing all Priority Power liens. The satisfaction of the obligation and transfer of the equipment is a noncash transaction which resulted in a gain of $4.9 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
City of Denton Lease Settlement
On August 16, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of City of Denton and Denton Municipal Electric (“Denton”) against the Debtors and releasing any and all liens related to the Debtors’ lease of the Denton facility in exchange for the Debtors’ execution lease cure costs totaling $1.5 million. There was no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a result of the satisfaction of the settlement.
Huband-Mantor Construction Settlement
On August 18, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of Huband-Mantor Construction (“HMC”) and its subcontractors against the Debtors and releasing any and all liens in favor of HMC and its
48
subcontractors in exchange for the Debtors’ payment of $2 million and the Debtors’ execution of a promissory note in favor of HMC in the principal amount of $15.5 million. The promissory note is secured by a mortgage of the Debtors’ Cottonwood 1 facility in Texas. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of $8.3 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023. For more information on the promissory note, refer to Note 7 — Notes Payable to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Celsius Mining LLC Settlement
On September 14, 2023, the Debtors and Celsius Mining LLC (“Celsius”) entered into a purchase and sale agreement, as amended, (the “PSA”) that provides in addition to a full mutual release of claims asserted against each party in the respective bankruptcy cases for a cash payment by Celsius to the Company of $14.0 million and a full and final release of all claims of Celsius against the Debtors related to the Celsius Contracts, in exchange for the Debtors’ (i) sale to Celsius of the Debtor’s Ward County, Texas bitcoin mining data center site (the “Cedarvale Facility”) and certain related assets, (ii) grant to Celsius of a perpetual, non-transferable (except as described in Section 14 of the PSA), non-exclusive limited license to use identified Company intellectual property solely as and to the extent necessary to (x) finish construction and development of the Cedarvale Facility, (y) develop and construct other mining facilities on other properties owned or leased by Celsius similar in type and scope to the Cedarvale Facility, and (z) operate all of the foregoing, (iii) assumption and assignment to Celsius of certain executory contracts, and (iv) unequivocal release of claims against Celsius asserted by the Company in connection with the Celsius Chapter 11 Cases and the Company’s Chapter 11 Cases. On November 2, 2023, the Company received the payment of $14.0 million from Celsius in connection with the PSA.
The sale of the Cedarvale Facility resulted in a loss of $2.2 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 10 — Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the sale.
ACM ELF ST LLC Lease Settlement
In September 2023, the Company entered into a $7.5 million equipment finance agreement with ACM ELF ST LLC in settlement and satisfaction of a previous equipment finance agreement which resulted in a gain of $5.0 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 7 — Notes Payable to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the promissory note.
J.W. Didado Electric, LLC Settlement
On October 2, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of J.W. Didado Electric, LLC (“Didado”) against the Debtors and releasing any and all liens related to the Debtors’ Muskogee datacenter in exchange for the Debtors’ execution of an unsecured promissory note in favor of Didado in the principal amount of $13.0 million to be paid over 36 months upon emergence from bankruptcy. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of $0.7 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Trilogy LLC Settlement
On October 2, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of Trilogy LLC (“Trilogy”) against the Debtors and releasing any and all liens related to the Trilogy contracts in exchange for the Debtors’ execution of an unsecured promissory note in favor of Trilogy in the principal amount of $2.9 million to be paid over 30 months starting three months after the confirmation date. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a gain of $0.4 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Harper Construction Company, Inc. Settlement
On November 4, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of Harper Construction Company, Inc (“Harper”) against the Debtors and releasing any and all liens related to the Debtors’ Muskogee datacenter in exchange for the Debtors’ execution of an unsecured promissory note in favor of Harper in the principal amount of $4.7 million to be paid over 30 months starting forty-five days after the emergence date. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of
49
$5.0 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Dalton Settlement
On December 29, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims of Dalton Utilities (“Dalton”) against the Debtors including the Dalton cure claims in exchange for Debtors’ execution of an unsecured promissory note. As of December 31, 2023, the Company accrued the face value of the pending settlement of $9.1 million as the execution of the promissory note is still pending. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a gain of $1.1 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Maddox Settlement
On January 16, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to terminate and reject all existing purchase orders and enter into a new purchase order. Pursuant to the new purchase order, the Company will pay a total purchase price of $2.8 million in seven equal monthly installments to Maddox Industrial Transformer LLC for 39 18 kilovolt transformers. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of $1.3 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Sphere 3D Corp. and Gryphon Settlement
On January 16, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting Sphere 3D Corp. (“Sphere”) an allowed $10 million general unsecured claim and a complete and final release of all claims of Sphere and Gryphon Digital Mining, Inc. (“Gryphon”) against the Debtors related to the hosting contracts. As part of the resolution, all miners have been returned to the client. Furthermore, the adversary proceeding was dismissed with prejudice, against both Gryphon and Sphere. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a gain of $23.3 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
McCarthy & Humphrey Settlement
On January 18, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the parties’ agreement to settle all claims and release all liens of McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. (“McCarthy”) and Humphrey & Associates, Inc. (“Humphrey”) against the Company in exchange for cash payments ($6.8 million to McCarthy and $5.6 million to Humphrey) within 90 days of emergence and promissory notes (to McCarthy in principal amount of $5.4 million and to Humphrey in principal amount of $1.4 million). However, if the Company delivers notice to McCarthy to proceed with construction activities, the Company will make the cash payments within three business days of such notice and pay off the promissory notes in full within one business day of such notice. As the amount of the expected settlement results in amounts that are estimable and probable, the Company accrued for those liabilities as of December 31, 2023. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of $4.6 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Foundry Settlement
On January 16, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting Foundry Digital LLC (“Foundry”) an allowed $5.5 million general unsecured claim and a comprehensive release of all claims of Foundry against the Debtors. Concurrently, hosting contracts are assumed, and common stock in Core after emergence from bankruptcy have been confirmed as part of the resolution. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a gain of $12.6 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Settlement
On January 24, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company (“OG&E”) an allowed $4.8 million general unsecured claim in full and final satisfaction of all claims of OG&E against the Debtors. The satisfaction of the settlement resulted in a loss of $4.8 million recorded to Reorganization items, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.
50
Our Business Model
Business Overview
As a large-scale bitcoin digital asset miner and provider of blockchain solutions, we believe that we are well positioned to serve customers in a rapidly expanding market for digital asset mining and blockchain solutions. We believe that the adoption and mainstream use of bitcoin and the blockchain technology on which it is based has accelerated the demand for bitcoin and other digital currencies.
As one of the largest owner operators of infrastructure for digital asset mining in North America, we focus primarily on mining bitcoin and selling the bitcoin generated for cash and activities directly related to growing our mining capabilities (increasing the number of bitcoin mined) and enhancing efficiencies in our operations (reducing our cost to mine). Our rapidly growing digital asset mining operation is focused on the generation of digital assets by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset network blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Our digital asset self-mining activity competes with myriad mining operations throughout the world to complete new blocks in the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of an established unit of a digital asset. The terms of our debt agreements currently require that we sell our digital assets as we receive them, and we typically use the proceeds to fund our growth strategies or for general corporate purposes. We also provide hosting services for large bitcoin mining customers at our seven operational data centers in Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1) and Texas (2).
Our proprietary data centers in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, North Dakota, and Texas are purpose-built facilities optimized for the unique requirements of high density bitcoin mining computers. We currently have seven fully operational data centers in Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (1), North Dakota (1) and Texas (2), with approximately 592 MW of average hourly operating electric power demand for the year ended December 31, 2023. Our existing, completed facilities lever our specialized construction proficiency by employing high-density, low-cost engineering and power designs. Our proprietary thermodynamic system manages heat and airflow to deliver best-in-class uptime and, ultimately, increasing mining rewards to us and our customers. As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 1,198 MW of contracted power capacity at our sites. We continually evaluate our mining performance, including our ability to access additional megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates. We may explore additional mining facilities and mining arrangements in connection with our short-, medium- and long-term strategic planning.
Segments
We have two operating segments: “Mining,” consisting of bitcoin self-mining, and “Hosting,” consisting of our third-party hosting business. Our Mining operation segment generates revenue from operating our own mining computers as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for this activity, we receive digital assets in the form of bitcoin. Our Hosting operation segment generates revenue through the sale of electricity-based consumption contracts for our hosting services, which are recurring in nature. During 2022, our “Hosting” segment also included sales of mining equipment to customers and was referred to as “Hosting and Equipment Sales.” We derived equipment sales revenue from our ability to lever our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers to secure equipment in advance, which we then sold to our customers when they were unable to obtain them otherwise.
Mining Equipment
We own and host specialized computers (“miners”) configured for the purpose of validating transactions on multiple digital asset network blockchains (referred to as, “mining”), predominantly the Bitcoin network. Substantially all of the miners we own and host were manufactured by Bitmain and incorporate application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips specialized to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchains using the 256-bit secure hashing algorithm (“SHA-256”) in return for bitcoin digital asset rewards.
We have entered into and facilitated agreements with vendors to supply mining equipment for our digital asset mining operations. The majority of our purchases are made on multi-month contracts with installment payments due in advance of scheduled deliveries. Delivery schedules have ranged from one month to 12 months. We currently have two active purchase agreements with Bitmain. The first agreement is for the acquisition of Antminer S19J XP miners with a combined exahash of 4.08 or 28,400 miners to be delivered from the fourth quarter of 2023 through early 2024. The second agreement is for the acquisition of Antminer S21 miners with a combined exahash of 2.52 or approximately 12,900 miners to be delivered during the first half of 2024. We are accelerating the delivery and deployment of the Antminer S21 miners. As of December 31, 2023, we are current on our payment commitments under both agreements. As of the reporting date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have completed payment on all new bitcoin miners ordered for 2024.
51
As of December 31, 2023, we had deployed approximately 209,100 bitcoin miners, which number consists of approximately 158,000 self-miners and approximately 51,100 hosted miners, which represented 16.9 EH/s and 6.3 EH/s for self-miners and hosted miners, respectively.
The tables below summarize the total number of self- and hosted miners in operation as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively (miners in thousands).
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |||
| Self-miners | 16.9 | 158.0 | |||
| Hosted miners | 6.3 | 51.1 | |||
| Total mining equipment | 23.2 | 209.1 |
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |||
| Self-miners | 15.7 | 153.0 | |||
| Hosted miners | 8.0 | 81.0 | |||
| Total mining equipment | 23.7 | 234.0 |
During the fourth quarter of December 31, 2022, the hosting contracts for 24 customers, (including two related-party customers) were terminated. The previously hosted ASIC servers were removed from our data center facilities and returned to the customers.
Summary of Digital Asset Activity
Activity related to our digital asset balances for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital assets, beginning of period | $ | 724 | $ | 234,298 | ||
| Digital asset mining revenue, net of receivables* | 389,456 | 397,796 | ||||
| Mining proceeds from shared hosting | 17,626 | — | ||||
| Proceeds from sales of digital assets | (404,686) | (444,353) | ||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 3,886 | 44,298 | ||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (4,406) | (231,315) | ||||
| Payment of board fee | (316) | — | ||||
| Digital assets, end of period | $ | 2,284 | $ | 724 |
* As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there was $1.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of digital asset receivable from our mining pool customer included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Performance Metrics
Hash Rate
Miners perform computational operations in support of digital asset blockchains measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations. The equipment originally employed for mining bitcoin used the Central Processing Unit (“CPU”) of a computer to mine various forms of digital assets. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining was rapidly replaced by the Graphics Processing Unit (“GPU”), which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced as the standard in the mining industry by ASIC chips such as those found in the miners we and our customers use to mine bitcoin (although they continue to have uses in other industries). These ASIC chips are designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations.
52
Network Hash Rate
In digital asset mining, hash rate is a measure of the processing speed at which a mining computer operates in its attempt to secure a specific digital asset. A participant in a blockchain network’s mining function has a hash rate equivalent to the total of all its miners seeking to mine a specific digital asset. System-wide, the total network hash rate reflects the sum total of all miners seeking to mine each specific type of digital asset. A participant’s higher total hash rate relative to the system-wide total hash rate generally results in a corresponding higher success rate in digital asset rewards over time as compared to mining participants with relatively lower total hash rates.
However, as the relative market price for a digital asset, such as bitcoin, increases, more users are incentivized to mine for that digital asset, which increases the network’s overall hash rate. As a result, a mining participant must increase its total hash rate in order to maintain its relative possibility of solving a block on the network blockchain. Achieving greater hash rate power by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever greater quantities has become one of the bitcoin mining industry’s great sources of competition. Our goal is to deploy a powerful fleet of self- and hosted-miners, while operating as energy-efficiently as possible.
The Business Combination and Public Company Costs
The merger of Legacy Core and XPDI provided gross proceeds of approximately $221.6 million from the XPDI trust account, resulting in approximately $201.0 million in net cash proceeds to Core Scientific, after the payment of transaction expenses. As a result of the merger, former Core Scientific stockholders owned 90.7%, former XPDI public stockholders owned 6.7% and XPDI’s sponsor owned 2.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, respectively, of the Company, excluding the impact of unvested restricted stock units and options. The proceeds from the merger were used to fund mining equipment purchases and infrastructure build-out as the Company expanded its leadership position. As a result of the merger, among other things, each outstanding share of Legacy Core common stock was cancelled in exchange for the right to receive 1.6001528688 of a share of the Company’s common stock.
The merger was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization and XPDI was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Legacy Core was deemed the predecessor and Core Scientific, Inc., the post-combination company, is the successor SEC registrant, meaning that Legacy Core’s financial statements for periods prior to the consummation of the merger are disclosed in Core Scientific’s periodic reports.
As a consequence of the merger, the Company and XPDI collectively incurred an aggregate of $39.0 million in professional fees associated with legal services, M&A advisor fees, financial advice, due diligence, and other deal-related costs. These transaction costs were allocated to all instruments assumed or issued in the merger on a relative fair value basis as of the date of the merger. Transaction costs allocated to equity-classified instruments were recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital within total stockholders’ equity while transaction costs allocated to liability-classified instruments that were subsequently measured at fair value through earnings were expensed in the first quarter of 2022.
Key Factors Affecting Our Performance
Market Price of Digital Assets
Our business is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin, as well as other digital assets. The prices of digital assets, specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, which may reflect “bubble” type volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation, and media reporting. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.
Our financial performance and continued growth depend in large part on our ability to mine for digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our hosting services. Increases in power costs, inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins, impact our ability to attract customers for our services, may harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Over time, we have observed a positive trend in the total market capitalization of digital assets, which suggests increased adoption. However, historical trends are not indicative of future adoption, and it is possible that the adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology may slow, take longer to develop, or never be broadly adopted, which would negatively impact our business and operating results.
53
Network Hash Rate
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices, but also by increases in the competition for digital asset production. For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Difficulty
The increase in bitcoin’s network hash rate results in a regular increase in the cryptographic complexity associated with solving blocks on its blockchain, or its difficulty. Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Similarly, a decline in network hash rate results in a decrease in difficulty, increasing mining proceeds and profitability.
Transaction Fees
Bitcoin miners receive a transaction fee in the form of a portion of bitcoin for validating transactions on the Bitcoin network. The transaction fee can vary in value over time, with higher fees prioritizing certain transactions over those with lower fees. An increase in Bitcoin network transactions could represent a more significant component of miner revenue if their value increases over time.
The table below provides a summary of the impact to revenue from the increase or decrease in the market price of bitcoin, difficulty and our hash rate. The impact to revenue in each scenario assumes only one driver increases or decreases and all others are held constant.
| Impact to Revenue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver | Increase in Driver | Decrease in Driver | ||
| Market Price of Bitcoin | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Core Scientific Hash Rate | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Difficulty | Unfavorable | Favorable | ||
| Transaction Fees | Favorable | Unfavorable |
Halving
Further affecting the industry, and particularly for the bitcoin blockchain, the digital asset reward for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halving. Halving is a process designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in digital assets using a proof-of-work consensus algorithm. At a predetermined block, the mining reward is reduced by half, hence the term “halving.” A reduction in the number of bitcoins rewarded per block would result in a reduction of revenue to those mining bitcoin, barring any increase in the spot price of bitcoin or decrease in Bitcoin network hash rate or difficulty. Historically, the network hash rate has tended to decline, for a period of time, post-halving as less efficient mining servers become less profitable to operate and their operators discontinue or limit their use.
For bitcoin, our most significant digital asset to which our mining power is devoted, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin rewards per block. The bitcoin blockchain has undergone halving three times since its inception, as follows: (1) on November 28, 2012, at block 210,000; (2) on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000; (3) on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000, when the reward was reduced to its current level of 6.25 bitcoin per block. The next halving for the bitcoin blockchain is anticipated to occur in April 2024 at block 840,000. This process will repeat until the total amount of bitcoin rewards issued reaches 21 million and the theoretical supply of new bitcoin is exhausted, which is expected to occur around the year 2140. Many factors influence the price of bitcoin and the other digital assets we may mine for, and potential increases or decreases in prices in advance of or following a future halving are unknown.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for the mining fleet, as well as for the hosting services provided to customers and related parties. The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators. Severe winter weather can increase the
54
cost of electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s ability to deliver power. Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas. Locally, factors such as animal incursion, sabotage and other events out of our control can also impact electricity costs and availability. In certain power markets, financial hedging can be employed to protect buyers from the financial impact of significant increases in power prices.
Equipment Costs
Increases in the market value of digital assets increases the demand for new miners, which can result in a scarcity in the supply of, and increases in the price of, those miners. Declines in the market value of digital assets can result in excess supply of miners and a general decline in their prices. As a result, the cost of new miners can be unpredictable and could be significantly different than our historical cost for new miners.
Our Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, our success greatly depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers and to attract new customers. On July 30, 2021, we acquired an existing hosting customer, Blockcap, Inc. (“Blockcap”), and thereby increased our self-mining operations.
Our business environment is constantly evolving, and digital asset miners can range from individual enthusiasts to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. The Company competes with other enterprises that focus all or a portion of their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
Presently, the information concerning the activities of these enterprises may not be readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly, or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info;” however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
Based on available data we believe that, despite the significant decrease in market prices for bitcoin and other major digital assets during 2022, an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining industry has continued to increase network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners mining for bitcoin.
Despite this trend, we believe we have continued to maintain a competitive hash rate capacity among both public and private bitcoin miners. However, to remain competitive in our evolving industry, both against new entrants into the market and existing competitors, we anticipate that we will need to continue to expand our existing miner fleet by purchasing new and available used miners, as well as innovating to develop and implement new technologies and mining solutions.
We believe that our integrated services portfolio, as well as our differentiated customer experience and technology, are keys to retaining and growing revenue from existing customers and to acquiring new customers. For example, we believe our significant build-out and ready power combined with our MinderTM fleet management software layer represent meaningful competitive advantages favorable to our business.
Differentiation, Innovation and Expansion of Our Platform
Our investments in research and development drive differentiation of our service offerings, core technology innovation and our ability to bring new products to market.
We believe that we differentiate ourselves by offering premium products and services, including our ability to manage our electricity sourcing, construct proprietary passive cooled data centers. Our existing, completed facilities lever our specialized construction proficiency by employing high-density, low-cost engineering and power designs. Our proprietary thermodynamic system manages heat and airflow to deliver best-in-class uptime and, ultimately, increases mining rewards to us and our customers. Our facilities are designed to maximize not only mining equipment efficiency but mining equipment life. We have accumulated expertise in the installation, operation, optimization and repair of digital mining equipment. We continue to refine and develop our data center design and technology solutions to optimize our data center and mining operations with the knowledge gained from our considerable
55
digital asset mining experience, including optimizing the location of miners in our data centers to increase profitability. Our approach to data center design enables us to deliver efficiency at scale.
We intend to continue to invest judiciously in research and development activities to extend our platform management and software solutions in order to manage our mining fleet more efficiently and productively.
Regulation
Due to the relatively short history of digital assets, and their emergence as a new asset class, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is constantly evolving, with increased interest expressed by U.S. and internal regulators. In October 2020, the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework” that detailed the Department’s view with respect to digital assets and the tools at the Department’s disposal to deal with threats posed by digital assets. In February 2021, representatives of the government of Inner Mongolia, China announced plans to ban digital asset mining within the province due to the energy and rare earth mineral demands of the industry. In March 2021, the nominee for Chair of the SEC expressed the need for investor protection along with promotion of innovation in the digital asset space. In March 2022, President Biden signed an Executive Order outlining an “whole-of-government” approach to addressing the risks and harnessing the potential benefits of digital assets and its underlying technology. The executive order lays out a national policy for digital assets over six highlighted priorities. In January 2023, the U.S. House of Representatives created a new congressional subcommittee focused on digital assets, the Subcommittee of Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion, operating under the House Financial Services Committee.
In addition to the activities of the United States federal government and its various agencies and regulatory bodies, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is also under active consideration by similar entities in other countries and transnational organizations, such as the European Union. State and local regulations within the United States also may apply to our activities and other activities in which we may participate in the future. Other governmental or semi-governmental regulatory bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in blockchain or digital asset businesses. For instance, the SEC has taken an active role in regulating the use of public offerings of proprietary coins (so-called “initial coin offerings”) and has made statements and official promulgations as to the status of certain digital assets as “securities” subject to regulation by the SEC.
Strategic Investments
Our business strategy is to grow our revenue and profitability by increasing the capacity and efficiency of our self-mining fleet and by enhancing our third-party hosting business. We intend to strategically develop the infrastructure necessary to support business growth and profitability and take advantage of adjacent opportunities that lever our mining expertise and capabilities.
56
Condensed Statements of Operations
The following table presents a condensed statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 502,400 | $ | 640,313 | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | 378,941 | 631,913 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 123,459 | 8,400 | ||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 3,893 | 44,298 | ||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (4,406) | (231,315) | ||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative instruments | (3,918) | — | ||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | — | (1,059,265) | ||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | — | (590,673) | ||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (1,956) | (28,025) | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 108,111 | 252,973 | ||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 8,961 | (2,109,553) | ||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net1 | 254,765 | 53,856 | ||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (245,804) | (2,163,409) | ||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 683 | (17,091) | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (246,487) | $ | (2,146,318) |
1 Total non-operating expense, net includes Reorganization items, net of $191.1 million and $(197.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to our financial results, we use the following business metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions. For a definition of these key business metrics, see the sections titled “Self-Mining Hash Rate” and “Adjusted EBITDA” (below).
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||
| Self-Mining Hash rate (Exahash per second) | 16.9 | 15.7 | ||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) | $ | 170.0 | $ | (10.7) |
Self-Mining Hash Rate
We operate mining hardware which performs computational operations in support of the blockchain measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which the hardware is capable of performing such computations. Our hash rate represents the aggregate hash rate of all miners deployed in our fleet. Our hash rate expressed as a percentage of the total Bitcoin network hash rate generally determines the number of bitcoin rewards that will be earned by our fleet. We calculate and report our hash rate in exahash per second (“EH/s”). One exahash equals one quintillion hashes per second.
We measure the hash rate produced by our mining fleet through our management software MinderTM, which consolidates the reported hash rate from each miner. The method by which we measure our hash rate may differ from how other operators present such measure.
57
Generally, miners with a greater hash rate relative to the global Bitcoin network hash rate at a given time will, over time, have a greater chance of earning a bitcoin, as compared to miners with relatively lower total hash rates. Further, with the increase in demand for bitcoin contributing to an increase in computational resources for digital asset mining, the global network hash rate has increased, and we expect it to continue to increase. As such, our self-mining hash rate provides useful information to investors because it demonstrates our capacity, and our competitive advantage, for mining bitcoin, which contributes to our digital asset mining revenue. Management uses our self-mining hash rate to monitor our performance and competitive advantage in mining bitcoin as global competition also increases.
Our self-mining hash rate was 16.9 EH/s and 15.7 EH/s for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively representing an 8% improvement year over year.
Our combined self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rate decreased 2%, to 23.2 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2023 from 23.7 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as our net income or (loss), adjusted to eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net; (ii) provision for income taxes; (iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) stock-based compensation expense; (v) restructuring charges1; (vi) Reorganization items, net2; (vii) unrealized changes in fair value of derivative instruments; and (viii) certain additional non-cash or non-recurring items, that do not reflect the performance of our ongoing business operations. For additional information, including the reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA, please refer to the table below. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our Board of Directors to evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by making the adjustments described above. In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges, and timing differences. Moreover, we have included Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measurement used by our management internally to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial planning.
The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature or because the amount and timing of these items are not related to the current results of our core business operations which renders evaluation of our current performance, comparisons of performance between periods and comparisons of our current performance with our competitors less meaningful. However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to those excluded when calculating this measure. Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis. Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the same fashion. You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.
1 Within the financial statements and relating to financial metrics “restructuring charges” refers to charges relating to a prepetition restructuring plan completed in October 2022 and described further in Note 4 — Business Combinations, Acquisitions and Restructuring to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2 Within the financial statements and relating to financial metrics “Reorganization items, net” refers to charges requiring separate presentation under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852, Reorganizations (“ASC 852”) and described further in Note 3 — Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
58
The following table presents a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 20221,2 | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | (in thousands) | |||||
| Net loss | $ | (246,487) | $ | (2,146,318) | ||
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | 86,238 | 96,826 | ||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 683 | (17,091) | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 96,003 | 225,259 | ||||
| Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets | 442 | 834 | ||||
| (Gain) loss on debt extinguishment | (20,065) | 287 | ||||
| Stock-based compensation expense3 | 58,892 | 182,894 | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | — | (37,937) | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | — | 186,853 | ||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | — | 1,059,265 | ||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | — | 590,673 | ||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | 1,956 | 28,025 | ||||
| Gain on sale of intangible assets | — | (5,904) | ||||
| Cash restructuring charges | — | 1,320 | ||||
| Reorganization items, net | 191,122 | (197,405) | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on acquired vendor liability | — | 9,498 | ||||
| Equity line of credit expenses | — | 1,668 | ||||
| Unrealized change in fair value of derivative instruments | 2,262 | — | ||||
| Other non-operating (income) expenses, net | (2,530) | 5,232 | ||||
| Other items | 1,474 | 5,276 | ||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 169,990 | $ | (10,745) |
1 Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation.
2 Previously, the Company had held the bitcoin it earned as an investment for long-term appreciation. This strategy was outside our primary business operations and the results of impairments and realized gains and losses had been excluded from Adjusted EBITDA. With our current strategy of monetizing our bitcoin revenue soon after earning it and recent changes in accounting standards, management is no longer excluding these amounts from its Adjusted EBITDA.
3 Includes $1.0 million of stock-based compensation that was provided in severance as part of restructuring charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022.
59
Components of Results of Operations
Revenue
Our revenue consists primarily of fees from our hosting operations, including the sales of mining equipment to be hosted in our data centers and digital asset mining revenue.
•Hosting revenue from customers and related parties. Hosting revenue from customers and related parties is based on electricity-based consumption contracts with our customers and related parties. Most contracts are renewable, and our customers are generally billed on a fixed and recurring basis each month for the duration of their contract, which vary from one to three years in length. During the second quarter of 2023, we initiated our first new customer contracts based on proceed sharing. Under these new contracts, customers pay for the cost of hosting and infrastructure, and we share the proceeds that are generated. See Item 13 — “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.” in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
•Equipment sales to customers and related parties. Equipment sales to customers and related parties is derived from our ability to lever our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers to secure equipment in advance, which is then sold to our customers and related parties. Our equipment sales are typically in connection with a hosting contract. After fiscal 2022, we no longer sell equipment to customers and related parties.
•Digital asset mining revenue. We operate a digital asset mining operation using specialized computers equipped with ASIC chips (known as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards (primarily bitcoin). The Company participates in “mining pools” organized by “mining pool operators” in which we share our mining power (known as “hash rate”) with the hash rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards. The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in the mining pool. The pool uses software that coordinates the pool members’ mining power, identifies new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool, and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed to the pool in connection with solving a block. Revenues from digital asset mining are impacted by volatility in bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the bitcoin blockchain’s network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Costs of Revenue
The Company’s cost of hosting services and cost of digital asset mining primarily consist of electricity costs, salaries, stock-based compensation, depreciation of property, plant and equipment used to perform hosting services and mining operations and other related costs. Cost of equipment sales includes costs of computer equipment sold to customers.
Gain from sales of digital assets
Gain from sales of digital assets consist of gain on sales of digital assets.
Impairment of digital assets
Digital assets, which are initially recognized and measured at fair value, are remeasured only when an impairment is recognized. Impairment exists when the current carrying amount exceeds its current fair value. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. To the extent that an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new costs basis and carrying value of the digital asset.
Impairment losses are recognized in the period in which the impairment is identified. The impaired digital assets are written down to their fair value at the time of impairment and this new carrying value will not be adjusted upward for any subsequent increase in fair value. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
60
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
The change in fair value of derivative instruments represents changes in the fair value of the derivative liability related to the energy forward purchase contract described in more detail in “Energy Forward Purchase Contract” in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles
The Company does not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually as of October 31 each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units are less than their carrying amounts as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If management determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the reporting unit’s carrying amount, or management chooses not to perform a qualitative assessment, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed. The quantitative test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with the reporting unit’s carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the resulting measurement of goodwill becomes its new cost basis. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable and operating segments.
The Company tests intangible assets subject to amortization whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. Intangible assets may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the intangible asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist. Intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
The Company tests property, plant and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist.
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment are measured as the differences between the carrying value of the property, plant and equipment exchanged or disposed of and fair value of the consideration received upon exchange or disposal. The fair value of noncash consideration received in an exchange of property, plant and equipment is determined as of contract inception.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses consists of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. Each is outlined in more detail below.
•Research and development. We invest in research and development to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our mining operations and hosting services and to support our efforts to capture business opportunities in adjacent high-value compute markets. Research and development costs include compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation, other personnel related costs and professional fees.
•Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of marketing expenses, trade shows and events, professional fees, compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation and other personnel related costs.
•General and administrative. General and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits expenses for employees who are not part of the research and development and sales and marketing organization, professional fees, and
61
other personnel-related expenses. Also included are stock-based compensation, professional fees, business insurance, auditor fees, bad debt, amortization of intangibles, franchise taxes, and bank fees.
Non-operating expenses, net
Non-operating expenses, net includes (gain) loss on debt extinguishment, interest expense, net, fair value adjustment on convertible notes, fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities, reorganization items, net and other non-operating expenses, net. Reorganization items, net consists of expenses (including professional fees), realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses that can be directly associated with the reorganization.
Income tax expense (benefit)
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of U.S. federal and state income taxes. We maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax assets as realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income, the timing and amount of which are uncertain and therefore have concluded it is not more likely than not that we will realize our net deferred tax assets.
Income tax expense consists of federal and state tax expense on our operating activity, and changes to our deferred tax asset and deferred tax liability.
Deferred income tax expense consists of income taxes recorded using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. These differences are measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when these differences are anticipated to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management believes it is not more likely than not to be realized.
62
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages).
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| Revenue: | |||||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | $ | 102,005 | $ | 130,234 | $ | (28,229) | (22)% | ||||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 10,062 | 29,454 | (19,392) | (66)% | |||||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | — | 11,391 | (11,391) | NM | |||||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | — | 71,438 | (71,438) | NM | |||||||||
| Digital asset mining revenue | 390,333 | 397,796 | (7,463) | (2)% | |||||||||
| Total revenue | 502,400 | 640,313 | (137,913) | (22)% | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | |||||||||||||
| Cost of hosting services | 87,245 | 169,717 | (82,472) | (49)% | |||||||||
| Cost of equipment sales | — | 67,114 | (67,114) | NM | |||||||||
| Cost of digital asset mining | 291,696 | 395,082 | (103,386) | (26)% | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 378,941 | 631,913 | (252,972) | (40)% | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 123,459 | 8,400 | 115,059 | NM | |||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 3,893 | 44,298 | (40,405) | (91)% | |||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (4,406) | (231,315) | 226,909 | NM | |||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative instruments | (3,918) | — | — | NM | |||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | — | (1,059,265) | 1,059,265 | NM | |||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | — | (590,673) | 590,673 | NM | |||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (1,956) | (28,025) | 26,069 | NM | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||
| Research and development | 7,184 | 26,962 | (19,778) | (73)% | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 7,019 | 12,731 | (5,712) | (45)% | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 93,908 | 213,280 | (119,372) | (56)% | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 108,111 | 252,973 | (144,862) | (57)% | |||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | 8,961 | (2,109,553) | 2,118,514 | NM | |||||||||
| Non-operating expenses, net: | |||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on debt extinguishment | (20,065) | 287 | (20,352) | NM | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 86,238 | 96,826 | (10,588) | (11)% | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | — | 186,853 | (186,853) | NM | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | — | (37,937) | 37,937 | NM | |||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | 191,122 | (197,405) | 388,527 | NM | |||||||||
| Other non-operating (income) expenses, net | (2,530) | 5,232 | (7,762) | (148)% | |||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | 254,765 | 53,856 | 200,909 | 373% | |||||||||
| Loss before income taxes | (245,804) | (2,163,409) | 1,917,605 | NM | |||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 683 | (17,091) | 17,774 | NM | |||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (246,487) | $ | (2,146,318) | $ | 1,899,831 | NM |
NM - Not Meaningful
63
Revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||
| Revenue: | (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | $ | 102,005 | $ | 130,234 | $ | (28,229) | (22)% | ||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 10,062 | 29,454 | (19,392) | (66)% | |||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | — | 11,391 | (11,391) | NM | |||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | — | 71,438 | (71,438) | NM | |||||||
| Digital asset mining revenue | 390,333 | 397,796 | (7,463) | (2)% | |||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 502,400 | $ | 640,313 | $ | (137,913) | (22)% | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue: | |||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | 20 | % | 20 | % | |||||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 2 | % | 5 | % | |||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | — | % | 2 | % | |||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | — | % | 11 | % | |||||||
| Digital asset mining revenue | 78 | % | 62 | % | |||||||
| Total Revenue | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Total revenue decreased by $137.9 million to $502.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $640.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as a result of the factors described below.
Total hosting revenue from customers decreased by $28.2 million or 22%, to $102.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $130.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in hosting revenue from customers was primarily driven by the termination of contracts for several customers in the portfolio at less profitable hosting rates and the associated reduction in the total number of hosting miners in the fleet for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Total hosting revenue from related parties decreased by $19.4 million or 66%, to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in related party hosting contracts was primarily driven by the termination of hosting contracts during the fourth quarter of December 31, 2022, when the hosting contracts for 24 customers, (including two related-party customers) were terminated. The previously hosted ASIC servers were removed from our data center facilities and returned to the customers. The Company produced approximately 5,512 bitcoin for hosting customers in its data centers for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Equipment sales to customers decreased by $11.4 million or 100%, to nil for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in equipment sales to customers was primarily driven by the Company’s decision to exit the Equipment Sales business due to the increasing number of hosting customers purchasing mining equipment directly from manufacturers for deployments in our data centers during the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Equipment sales to related parties decreased by $71.4 million or 100%, to nil for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $71.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in equipment sales to related parties was primarily driven the Company’s decision to exit the Equipment Sales business due to the increasing number of hosting customers purchasing mining equipment directly from manufacturers for deployments in our data centers during the year ended December 31, 2023, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Digital asset mining revenue decreased by $7.5 million or 2%, to $390.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $397.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The year over year decrease in mining revenue was driven primarily by increased mining difficulty associated with the growth in the global Bitcoin network hash rate in fiscal year 2023 relative to fiscal year 2022, partially offset by the increase in the number of mining units deployed in our self-mining fleet. Our self-mining hash rate increased by 8%, to 16.9 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2023, from 15.7 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2022. The total number of bitcoins self-mined for the year ended December 31, 2023, was 13,762 compared to 14,436 for the year ended
64
December 31, 2022. The average price of bitcoin for the year ended December 31, 2023, was $28,859 as compared to $28,198 for the year ended December 31, 2022, an improvement of 2%.
Cost of revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 378,941 | $ | 631,913 | $ | (252,972) | (40) | % | ||||||
| Gross profit | 123,459 | 8,400 | 115,059 | NM | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 25 | % | 1 | % |
Cost of revenue decreased by $253.0 million or 40%, to $378.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $631.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue totaled 75% and 99% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The decrease in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to $128.1 million of decreased depreciation expense driven by a late fiscal 2022 impairment adjustment to the depreciable base for the deployed self-mining units, $67.1 million of lower equipment sales costs due to the Company exiting the selling of equipment, $41.8 million of lower power costs, and lower stock-based compensation of $20.7 million as the prior year included accelerated vesting of awards and a decrease in equity awards granted for the current fiscal year.
Gain from sales of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | $ | 3,893 | $ | 44,298 | $ | (40,405) | (91) | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 1 | % | 7 | % |
Gain from sales of digital assets decreased by $40.4 million to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from a gain of $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. Gains are recorded when realized upon sale(s). In determining the gain to be recognized upon sale, we calculate the difference between the sales price and carrying value of the digital assets sold immediately prior to sale. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the carrying value of our digital assets sold was $400.8 million and the sales price was $404.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the carrying value of our digital assets sold was $400.1 million and the sales price was $444.4 million.
Impairment of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | $ | (4,406) | $ | (231,315) | $ | 226,909 | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (1) | % | (36) | % |
Impairment of digital assets decreased by $226.9 million to $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $231.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, due primarily to the falling prices of digital assets during fiscal 2022. Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. If the then current carrying value of a digital asset exceeds the fair value so determined, an impairment loss has occurred with respect to those digital assets in the amount equal to the difference between their carrying value and the price
65
determined. The carrying value of our digital assets amounted to $2.3 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of derivative instruments | $ | (3,918) | $ | — | $ | (3,918) | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (1) | % | — | % |
Change in fair value of derivative instruments was $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 and was driven by the change in fair value of the derivative liability related to the energy forward purchase contract described in more detail in 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | $ | — | $ | (1,059,265) | $ | 1,059,265 | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | (165) | % |
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles decreased by $1.06 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. We identified triggering events as of June 30, 2022, September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2022, due to declines in the market price of bitcoin, the market price of our common stock and our market capitalization and, as such, we performed the quantitative test to compare the fair value to the carrying value for each reporting unit. We concluded the carrying value of the Mining reporting unit and Equipment Sales and Hosting reporting unit exceeded each reporting unit’s fair value and, as such, recorded an impairment of goodwill of $996.5 million in our Mining reporting unit and $58.2 million in our Equipment Sales and Hosting reporting unit. In addition, as part of the restructuring activities during the second quarter of 2022, the Company determined that $4.5 million of software intangible assets would no longer be used. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | $ | — | $ | (590,673) | $ | 590,673 | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | (92) | % |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment decreased by $590.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. During the second half of December 31, 2022, our operating performance and liquidity continued to be severely impacted by the prolonged decrease in the price of bitcoin, the increase in electricity costs, the increase in the global Bitcoin network hash rate and an increase in additional operating costs related to these factors. Additionally, primary and secondary market prices for ASIC miners of the type used in our business operations have decreased significantly from previous levels, including prices for those miners acquired earlier in 2022. Accordingly, we evaluated whether the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from the operation of our data center facilities sites would recover the carrying value of the property, plant and equipment located at the sites and used in site operations, including our deployed mining equipment. Based on this evaluation, we determined that the carrying value of the fleet of deployed mining equipment and of the other non-mining equipment property, plant and equipment at the Cedarvale and Cottonwood, Texas facility sites may no longer be fully recoverable by the cash flows of the site. We measured the
66
amount of impairment of the fleet of deployed mining equipment as the difference between their carrying amount of $690.4 million and the estimated fair value of $176.3 million, resulting in an impairment of $514.1 million on the fleet of deployed mining equipment for the year ended December 31, 2022. We measured the amount of impairment at the identified facility sites as the difference between the carrying amount of the site asset group of $211.6 million and the estimated fair value of the site asset group of $135.1 million, resulting in an impairment of the facility site’s property, plant and equipment of $76.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. See the discussion of long-lived asset impairments in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | $ | (1,956) | $ | (28,025) | $ | 26,069 | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | (4) | % |
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment decreased by $26.1 million to $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from loss of $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was due primarily to a noncash exchange of mining equipment during 2022.
Operating Expenses
Research and development
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 7,184 | $ | 26,962 | $ | (19,778) | (73)% | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 1 | % | 4 | % |
Research and development expenses decreased by $19.8 million or 73%, to $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $27.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was driven by lower stock-based compensation of $20.8 million, as the prior year included accelerated vesting of awards and a decrease in equity awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily offset by higher personnel and related expenses of $1.0 million.
Sales and marketing
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | $ | 7,019 | $ | 12,731 | $ | (5,712) | (45)% | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 1 | % | 2 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $5.7 million or 45%, to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by lower stock-based compensation of $4.5 million, as the prior year included accelerated vesting of awards and a decrease in equity awards granted for the current fiscal year, $0.8 million of lower advertising and marketing expenses and $0.4 million lower personnel and related expenses.
67
General and administrative
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| General and administrative | $ | 93,908 | $ | 213,280 | $ | (119,372) | (56)% | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 19 | % | 33 | % |
General and administrative expenses decreased by $119.4 million to $93.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $213.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by lower stock-based compensation of $77.9 million, as the prior year included accelerated vesting of awards and a decrease in equity awards granted during the current fiscal year, $14.1 million of lower professional fees primarily related to investments made to support public company readiness, $10.0 million of lower advisor fees in the prior year, $9.0 million decrease in bad debt expense, $3.2 million of lower payroll and benefit costs associated with lower headcount, $2.6 million lower employee related expenses such as travel and software, and $1.3 million decrease in rent expense, partially offset by higher corporate taxes of $1.0 million.
Non-operating expenses, net
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| Non-operating expenses, net: | (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on debt extinguishment | $ | (20,065) | $ | 287 | $ | (20,352) | NM | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | 86,238 | 96,826 | (10,588) | (11)% | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | — | 186,853 | (186,853) | NM | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | — | (37,937) | 37,937 | NM | |||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | 191,122 | (197,405) | 388,527 | NM | |||||||||
| Other non-operating (income) expenses, net | (2,530) | 5,232 | (7,762) | (148)% | |||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | $ | 254,765 | $ | 53,856 | $ | 200,909 | 373% |
Total non-operating expenses, net increased by $200.9 million, to $254.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, from $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in non-operating expenses, net was primarily driven by a $388.5 million increase in Reorganization items, net related to DIP financing fees and bankruptcy advisor fees post-petition during the year ended December 31, 2023, changes in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities of $37.9 million, partially offset by a fair value adjustment on the convertible notes of $186.9 million (excluding interest expense and changes in instrument-specific credit risk) for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to no adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2023, a $20.4 million gain on extinguishment of debt primarily related to the settlement of the NYDIG Loan for the year ended December 31, 2023, and a $10.6 million decrease in Interest expense, net as a result of suspension of interest during the Chapter 11 Cases,.
Income tax expense (benefit)
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 683 | $ | (17,091) | $ | 17,774 | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | — | % | (3) | % |
Income tax expense (benefit) consists of U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our income tax expense was $0.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our income tax benefit was $17.1 million. The $17.8 million increase in the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to same period in 2022, was primarily due to a reduction in our US federal deferred tax liability. The Company's effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2023, was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to losses and certain deductions for which no tax benefit can be
68
recognized. We evaluate our ability to recognize our deferred tax assets quarterly by considering all positive and negative evidence available as proscribed by the FASB under its general principles of ASC 740, Income Taxes. See Note 13 — Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
Segment Total Revenue and Gross Profit
The following table presents total revenue and gross profit by reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| Hosting Segment1 | (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Hosting revenue | $ | 112,067 | $ | 159,688 | $ | (47,621) | (30)% | |||||||
| Equipment sales | — | 82,829 | (82,829) | NM | ||||||||||
| Total revenue | 112,067 | 242,517 | (130,450) | (54)% | ||||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of hosting services | 87,245 | 169,717 | (82,472) | (49) | % | |||||||||
| Cost of equipment sales | — | 67,114 | (67,114) | (100) | % | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | $ | 87,245 | $ | 236,831 | $ | (149,586) | (63) | % | ||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 24,822 | $ | 5,686 | $ | 19,136 | NM | |||||||
| Gross margin2 | 22 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Mining Segment | ||||||||||||||
| Digital asset mining revenue | $ | 390,333 | $ | 397,796 | $ | (7,463) | (2) | % | ||||||
| Total revenue | 390,333 | 397,796 | (7,463) | (2) | % | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 291,696 | 395,082 | (103,386) | (26) | % | |||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 98,637 | $ | 2,714 | $ | 95,923 | NM | |||||||
| Gross margin2 | 25 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||
| Consolidated total revenue | $ | 502,400 | $ | 640,313 | $ | (137,913) | (22) | % | ||||||
| Consolidated cost of revenue | $ | 378,941 | $ | 631,913 | $ | (252,972) | (40) | % | ||||||
| Consolidated gross profit | $ | 123,459 | $ | 8,400 | $ | 115,059 | NM |
1 During the year ended December 31. 2022, our “Hosting” segment also included sales of mining equipment to customers and was referred to as “Hosting and Equipment Sales”.
2 Gross margin is calculated as gross profit as a percentage of total revenue.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, cost of revenue included depreciation expense of $6.9 million for the Hosting segment and $88.5 million for the Mining segment. For the year ended December 31, 2022, cost of revenue included depreciation expense of $12.1 million for the Equipment Sales and Hosting segment and $214.8 million for the Mining segment.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the top three customers accounted for approximately 72% and 57%, respectively, of the Hosting’s segment total revenue.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, gross profit in the Hosting segment increased $19.1 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, reflecting a Hosting segment gross margin of 22% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 2% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in Hosting segment gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, was primarily due to a decrease in stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenues as prior year included accelerated vesting of awards. The increase in the Hosting segment gross profit was partially offset by a decrease in hosting revenue driven by the termination of contracts for several customers in the portfolio at less profitable hosting rates.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, gross profit in the Mining segment increased $95.9 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, due to a higher Mining segment gross margin of 25% for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 1% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in the Mining segment gross profit was primarily due to a decrease in depreciation as a percentage of segment revenues, which was driven by an impairment adjustment to the depreciable base for the deployed self-mining
69
units, a decrease in stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenues as prior year included accelerated vesting of awards, and an improvement in our self-mining hash rate, which was 16.9 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to 15.7 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase in the Mining segment gross profit margin is partially offset by a 2% improvement in the average price of bitcoin and by higher power costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of equity securities, debt issuances, equipment financing arrangements and cash generated from operations, including sales of self-mined bitcoin and other digital assets. Subsequent to filing Chapter 11, our primary sources of cash are cash flows from operations, cash on hand and proceeds from the Original DIP Facility and the Replacement DIP Facility. See below for discussion of cash flows from operating activities and cash and cash equivalents. At December 31, 2023, we had unrestricted cash on hand of $50.4 million and $35.0 million of undrawn borrowing capacity under the Replacement DIP Facility. In January 2024, the Replacement DIP Facility was repaid in full and terminated on the Effective Date of the Company’s Plan of Reorganization. On the Effective Date, we entered into a new $80.0 million credit and guaranty agreement (the “Exit Credit Agreement”), and currently have $20.0 million of undrawn borrowing capacity under that facility.
For a discussion of Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters, refer to “Recent Developments — Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters” above for more information on the Chapter 11 Cases and the effect on our liquidity.
Operating and Capital Resources
Historically, a substantial portion of our liquidity needs arose from debt service on our outstanding indebtedness and from funding the costs of operations, working capital and capital expenditures. Our previous level of capital expenditures have been reduced since filing Chapter 11 and we expect them to remain at a reduced level following our emergence from Chapter 11.
We have assessed our current and expected operating and capital expenditure requirements and our current and expected sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of December 31, 2023, that our operating cash flows, existing cash balances, and access to the Replacement DIP Facility and Exit Credit Agreement will be adequate to finance our working capital requirements, fund capital expenditures and make our required debt interest and principal payments, pay taxes and make other payments due under the Plan of Reorganization. We believe that our current liquidity and expected funding requirements will allow us to operate for at least the next 12 months.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, and Cash Flow Activities
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
| December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 50,409 | $ | 15,884 | $ | 34,525 | 217% | ||||||
| Restricted cash | 19,300 | 36,356 | (17,056) | NM | |||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 69,709 | $ | 52,240 | $ | 17,469 | 33% |
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, restricted cash of $19.3 million and $36.4 million, respectively, consisted of cash held in escrow under the Original DIP Credit Agreement and to pay for construction and development activities.
70
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash flows for the periods indicated.
| December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 69,709 | $ | 52,240 | ||
| Cash provided by (used in) | ||||||
| Operating activities | 65,114 | 205,187 | ||||
| Investing activities | (2,996) | (590,778) | ||||
| Financing activities | (44,649) | 306,153 | ||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash – beg. of period | 52,240 | 131,678 | ||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash – end of period | $ | 69,709 | $ | 52,240 |
Our principal uses of cash in recent periods have been funding our operations and investing in capital expenditures.
Operating Activities
Changes in net cash from operating activities results primarily from cash received from hosting customers and equipment sales and payments for power fees and equipment purchases. Other drivers of the changes in net cash from operating activities include research and development costs, sales and marketing costs and general and administrative expenses (including personnel expenses and fees for professional services) and interest payments on debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $65.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $205.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, was primarily due to a decrease in net loss of $1.90 billion, a decrease in intangible impairments of $1.65 billion, a decrease in fair value adjustments on convertible notes of $186.9 million, and a decrease in stock-based compensation of $124.0 million.
Investing Activities
Our net cash used in investing activities consists of purchases of property, plant and equipment, deposits for self-mining equipment, proceeds from the sale of intangible assets, and investments in internally developed software. Net cash used in investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, was $3.0 million and $590.8 million, respectively. The change over prior year was driven primarily by $367.8 million decrease in purchases of property, plant and equipment and to a $217.7 million decrease in deposits for self-mining equipment.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities consists of proceeds from stock issuances, issuances of debt, net of issuance costs and principal payments on debt, including notes payable and finance leases.
In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company recorded approximately $2.5 million in financing costs related to the issuance of the Original DIP Facility for the year ended December 31, 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $44.6 million, primarily related to $41.0 million of principal payments on debt and $3.7 million of principal repayments of finance leases.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $306.2 million, primarily related to $261.3 million from the issuance of debt, driven by equipment financing arrangements and $25.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs (including $201.0 million in net cash proceeds received from the merger with XPDI after payment of transaction expenses, $21.3 million in cash proceeds received for shares issued under the Equity Line of Credit (as defined in Note 12 — Stockholders' (Deficit) Equity in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), and $3.8 million in cash proceeds received for employee stock option exercises). Offsetting this increase to net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $113.3 million of principal payments on debt, $31.6 million for the repurchase of common shares to pay employee withholding taxes and $30.3 million of principal repayments of finance leases.
71
Future Commitments and Contractual Obligations
Legal Proceedings—The Company is subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues losses for a legal proceeding when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. However, the uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings make it difficult to reasonably estimate the costs and effects of resolving these matters. Accordingly, actual costs incurred may differ materially from amounts accrued and could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, cash flows, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Unless otherwise indicated, the Company is unable to estimate reasonably possible losses in excess of any amounts accrued. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, there were no loss contingency accruals for legal matters.
Commitments
Purchase Commitments
In September 2023, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire S19 XP miners with a combined exahash of 4.08 or 28,400 miners from Bitmain for approximately $77.1 million, of which $4.1 million was paid as of December 31, 2023. As of the reporting date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have completed payment on all new bitcoin miners ordered for 2024. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had received approximately 22,700 miners. The remaining miners were received in January 2024.
In October 2023, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire S21 miners with a combined exahash of 2.52 or approximately 12,900 miners from Bitmain for approximately $50.4 million, of which $2.4 million was paid as a deposit as of December 31, 2023, and included in other current assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Delivery of the miners is expected between the first and second quarters of 2024.
Leases
Our lease portfolio primarily consists of offices, data facilities, mining and networking equipment, electrical infrastructure and office equipment. For additional information, see Note 9 — Leases in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Notes Payable
We have long-term debt with varying maturities dates through 2027. For additional information, see Note 7 — Notes Payable in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Other Events
Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters
For a discussion of Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters, refer to “Recent Developments — Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters” above for more information on the Chapter 11 Cases and the effect on our liquidity.
Related Party Transactions
We had agreements to provide hosting services to various entities that are managed and invested in by individuals who were directors and executives of Core Scientific. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized hosting revenue of $10.1 million and $29.5 million, respectively, from the contracts with these entities. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we recognized equipment sales revenue of nil and $71.4 million, respectively, from these entities. Receivables from these entities were nil as of December 31, 2023 and a nominal amount as of December 31, 2022.
Core Scientific reimburses certain of its officers and directors for use of a personal aircraft for flights taken on Company business. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we incurred reimbursements of nil and $1.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, nil was payable, and as of December 31, 2022, $0.2 million was payable.
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk
The vast majority of our cash generated from revenue are denominated in U.S. dollars.
72
Critical Accounting Estimates
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions, judgments and the related policies that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
As a result of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the payment of pre-petition liabilities is subject to compromise or other treatment pursuant to a plan of reorganization. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be settled or treated is determined by the confirmed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization when it becomes effective. Accordingly, the ultimate amount of such claims is not determinable until such time as the Bankruptcy Court determines their allowed amount. Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are reported at the amounts management expects to become allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for different amounts upon confirmation. The amounts currently classified as Liabilities subject to compromise are preliminary and may be subject to future adjustments depending on Bankruptcy Court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, rejection of executory contracts, continued reconciliation or other events.
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - Digital Asset Mining Revenue
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 606”). The core principle of the revenue standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The following five steps are applied to achieve that core principle:
•Step 1: Identify the contract with the customer
•Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract
•Step 3: Determine the transaction price
•Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
•Step 5: Recognize revenue when the Company satisfies a performance obligation
In order to identify the performance obligations in a contract with a customer, an entity must assess the promised goods or services in the contract and identify each promised good or service that is distinct. A performance obligation meets ASC 606’s definition of a “distinct” good or service (or bundle of goods or services) if both of the following criteria are met:
•The customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer (i.e., the good or service is capable of being distinct); and
•The entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract (i.e., the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).
If a good or service is not distinct, the good or service is combined with other promised goods or services until a bundle of goods or services is identified that is distinct.
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The consideration promised in a contract with a customer may include fixed amounts, variable amounts, or both. When determining the transaction price, an entity must consider the effects of all of the following:
•Variable consideration
•Constraining estimates of variable consideration
•The existence of a significant financing component in the contract
•Noncash consideration
•Consideration payable to a customer
Variable consideration is included in the transaction price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized under the accounting contract will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.
73
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis.
The transaction price allocated to each performance obligation is recognized when that performance obligation is satisfied, at a point in time or over time, as appropriate.
Application of the five-step model to the Company’s mining operations
One of the Company’s ongoing major or central operations is to provide a service of performing hash calculations to third-party pool operators alongside collectives of third-party bitcoin miners (such collectives, “mining pools”) as a participant. The Company considers the third-party mining pool operators to be its customers under Topic 606. Contract inception and our enforceable right to consideration begins when we commence providing hash calculation services to the mining pool operators. Each party to the contract has the unilateral right to terminate the contract at any time without any compensation to the other party for such termination. As such, the duration of a contract is less than a day and may be continuously renewed multiple times throughout the day. The implied renewal option is not a material right because there are no upfront or incremental fees in the initial contract and the terms, conditions, and compensation amount for the renewal options are at the then market rates.
The Company is entitled to non-cash compensation based on the Full-Pay-Per-Share (“FPPS”) model of the mining pool it is a participant in. FPPS pools pay block rewards and transaction fees, less mining pool fees and the participants are entitled to non-cash consideration even if a block is not successfully validated by the mining pool operator. The Company is entitled to compensation once it begins to perform hash calculations for the pool operator in accordance with the operator’s specifications over a 24-hour period beginning mid-night UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC on a daily basis. The non-cash consideration that we are entitled to for providing hash calculations to the pool operator under the FPPS payout method is made up of block rewards and transaction fees less pool operator expenses determined as follows:
•The non-cash consideration in the form of a block reward is based on the total blocks expected to be generated on the Bitcoin Network for the daily 24-hour period beginning midnight UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC in accordance with the following formula: the daily hash calculations that we provided to the pool operator as a percent of the Bitcoin Network’s implied hash calculations as determined by the network difficulty, multiplied by the total Bitcoin Network block rewards expected to be generated for the same daily period.
•The non-cash consideration in the form of transaction fees paid by transaction requestors is based on the share of total actual fees paid over the daily 24-hour period beginning midnight UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC in accordance with the following formula: total actual transaction fees generated on the Bitcoin Network during the 24-hour period as a percent of total block rewards the Bitcoin Network actually generated during the same 24-hour period, multiplied by the block rewards we earned for the same 24-hour period noted above.
• The block reward and transaction fees earned by the Company is reduced by mining pool fees charged by the operator for operating the pool based on a rate schedule per the mining pool contract. The mining pool fee is only incurred to the extent we perform hash calculations and generate revenue in accordance with the pool operator’s payout formula during the same 24-hour period beginning mid-night UTC daily.
The above non-cash consideration is variable, since the amount of block reward earned depends on the amount of hash calculations we perform; the amount of transaction fees we are entitled to depends on the actual Bitcoin Network transaction fees over the same 24-hour period; and the operator fees for the same 24-hour period are variable since it is determined based on the total block rewards and transaction fees in accordance with the pool operator’s agreement. While the non-cash consideration is variable, the Company has the ability to estimate the variable consideration at contract inception with reasonable certainty without the risk of significant revenue reversal. The Company does not constrain this variable consideration because it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of revenue recognized from the contract will not occur when the uncertainty is subsequently resolved and recognizes the non-cash consideration on the same day that control is transferred, which is the same day as contract inception.
The Company measures the non-cash consideration based on the volume weighted average spot rates of aggregated exchanges over a 24-hour period beginning mid-night UTC and ending 23:59:59 UTC on the day of contract inception using the Company’s primary bitcoin pricing source system. The Company recognizes non-cash consideration on the same day that control of the contracted service is transferred to the pool operator, which is the same day as the contract inception.
Direct expenses associated with providing hash calculation services to a third-party operated mining pool are recorded as cost of revenues. Depreciation and amortization expenses on fixed and right-of-use assets, including digital asset mining equipment, used to provide the services are also recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
74
Equipment Sales (Applicable to years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021)
We entered contracts with more than one performance obligation. For example, we entered into contacts that include both hosting services and sales of computer equipment to those same customers, for which revenue is recognized at the point in time when control of the equipment is transferred to the customer (typically at the start of the contract period). For these contracts, revenue was recognized based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract.
The Company recognized revenue from sales of computer equipment to customers at the point in time when control of the equipment is transferred to the customer, which generally occurred upon deployment of the equipment. Customers made a series of deposits on equipment purchases with the final payment typically being due at least one month prior to deployment. Self-mining computer equipment that was subsequently sold to customers was recognized as Equipment Sales to Customers in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Due to the change to Bitmain worldwide sale strategy, we do not expect to enter equipment sales contracts in the future or to have any equipment sales revenue after December 31, 2022.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Black-Scholes assumptions used in evaluating our awards are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 (1) | 2022 | ||||
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | |
| Expected volatility | — | % | 72.29 | % | |
| Risk-free interest rate | — | % | 1.82 | % | |
| Expected life (years) | 0 | 7.00 |
(1) No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2023.
We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the assumptions related to our stock-based compensation on a prospective basis. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock, we may refine our estimation process, which could materially impact our future stock-based compensation expense.
In addition, for awards with performance conditions, primarily restricted stock unit awards, we recognize the estimated fair value of the awards based on management’s judgment as to whether or not it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved.
Common Stock Valuations
In valuing the fair value of our common stock prior to the Business Combination, we used the most observable inputs available. We used the market approach, which estimates the value of our business by applying valuation multiples derived from the observed valuation multiples of comparable public companies to our expected financial results.
When observable inputs were not available, we used the income approach. This approach typically projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values were then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. Projections of cash flows were based on management’s earnings forecasts.
Applying these valuation and allocation approaches involves the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are highly complex and subjective, such as those regarding the Company’s expected future revenue, expenses and cash flows, as well as discount rates, valuation multiples, the selection of comparable public companies and the probability of future events. Changes in any or all of these estimates and assumptions, or the relationships between these assumptions, impact the Company’s valuation as of each valuation date and may have a material impact on the valuation of the Company’s common stock and common stock warrants issued with the Company’s debt and equity instruments.
Long-Lived Assets
We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets include intangible assets subject to amortization. A long-lived asset may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If
75
that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. We did not have any impairments in our long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a $4.5 million impairment of other intangibles and a $590.7 million impairment of property, plant and equipment.
Digital Assets
Our digital assets, e.g., bitcoin, are accounted for as intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. We initially recognize digital currency assets that are earned as digital asset mining revenue based on the fair value of the digital assets using prices in connection with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Digital asset disposals are on a first-in-first-out (“FIFO”) basis. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset obtained from the Company’s primary market at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a continuous basis. The Company deems the price of digital assets to be a Level 1 input under the ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurement hierarchy as these are based on observable quoted prices in the Company’s primary market for identical assets. To the extent an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes a new carrying value of the digital asset lot. Subsequent reversal of impairment losses is not permitted. Digital assets are classified on our balance sheet as a current asset due to the Company’s ability to sell it in a highly liquid marketplace and its intent to liquidate its digital assets to fund operations when necessary.
For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recognized net gains of $3.9 million and $44.3 million, respectively, on sales of digital assets. Purchases and sales of digital assets by the Company and digital assets awarded to the Company are included within Cash flows from operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Any realized gains or losses from sales of bitcoin are included in Operating income (loss) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for its gains or losses by lot on a FIFO basis.
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk
Substantially all revenue and operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Emerging Growth Company
We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. We may take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements, including not being required to have our internal control over financial reporting audited by our independent registered public accounting firm under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments. We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years or until we are no longer an emerging growth company, whichever is earlier. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use the extended transition period under the JOBS Act. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
We will remain an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act until the earliest of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following February 12, 2026, the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the Company in a registered offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates meets or exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.
76
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001628280-23-010454.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Core Scientific” refer to Core Scientific Holding Co. and its subsidiaries prior to the consummation of the Business Combination (as defined below) and Core Scientific, Inc. (f/k/a Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.) and its subsidiaries after the consummation of the Business Combination. References to “XPDI” refer to the predecessor registrant prior to the consummation of the Business Combination.
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to promote understanding of the results of operations and financial condition. This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements (Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K). This section generally discusses the results of operations for 2022 compared to 2021. For discussion related to the results of operations and changes in financial condition for 2021 compared to 2020 refer to Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our fiscal year 2021 Form 10-K, which was filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 30, 2022.
Overview
Core Scientific is a best-in-class large-scale operator of dedicated, purpose-built facilities for digital asset mining and a premier provider of blockchain infrastructure, software solutions and services. We mine digital assets for our own account and provide colocation hosting services for other large-scale miners. We began digital asset mining in 2018 and in 2020 became one of the largest North American providers of colocation hosting services for third-party mining customers. Historically, we derived almost all of our revenue from third-party colocation hosting fees and the resale of digital asset mining machines and currently derive almost all of our revenue from self-mining bitcoin. We are one of the largest blockchain infrastructure, hosting provider and digital asset mining companies in North America, with approximately 457MW of power as of December 31, 2021, and 592MW of power as of December 31, 2022. We predominately mine bitcoin for third-party hosting customers and for our own account at our eight fully operational data centers in Georgia (2), Kentucky (1), North Carolina (2), North Dakota (1) and Texas (2). In February 2022, the Muskogee City-County Port Authority (Oklahoma) announced an agreement with us to develop a 500MW data center at the Port of Muskogee John T. Griffin Industrial Park which remains substantially undeveloped.
Although our business operations date uninterrupted back to 2018 (and was known as “Core Scientific” (“Old Core”)), the current corporate entity operating our business was formerly known as Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (“XPDI”) which was a special purpose acquisition corporation formed for the purpose of acquiring an operating business like Old Core. On July 20, 2021, XPDI, Core Scientific Holding Co., and XPDI Merger Sub entered into a merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) which provided for the business combination transactions provided therein (the “Business Combination”) pursuant to which the business of Old Core was combined with XPDI and XPDI changed its name to Core Scientific, Inc. (“New Core” or the “Company”). XPDI’s stockholders approved the transactions (collectively, the “Merger”) contemplated by the Business Combination at a special meeting of stockholders held on January 19, 2022. See our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information on the Business Combination.
In July 2021, Old Core completed the acquisition of Blockcap, Inc. (“Blockcap”), one of Old Core’s largest hosting customers. Prior to its acquisition, Blockcap had retained Old Core to host in the data centers operated by Old Core Blockcap’s industrial scale digital asset mining operations. Blockcap’s primary historical business was the mining of digital asset coins and tokens, primarily bitcoin and, to a lesser extent, Siacoin and Ethereum. At the time of its acquisition, Blockcap claimed to be the largest independent cryptocurrency mining operator in North America. While Blockcap did sell or exchange the digital assets it mined to fund its growth strategies or for general corporate purposes from time to time, it generally retained its digital assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value” and a more accessible and efficient medium of exchange than traditional fiat currencies.
Our total revenue was $640.3 million and $544.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We had an operating loss of $2.11 billion and operating income of $131.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We had a net loss of $2.15 billion and net income of $47.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our Adjusted EBITDA was $174.9 million and $238.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measure” below for our definition of, and additional information related to, Adjusted EBITDA.
66
Recent Developments
Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters
Chapter 11
On December 21, 2022 (the “Petition Date”), the “Company and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Chapter 11 Cases are jointly administered under Case No. 22-90341. The Debtors continue to operate their business and manage their properties as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors filed various “first day” motions with the Bankruptcy Court requesting customary relief, which were generally approved by the Bankruptcy Court on December 22, 2022, that have enabled the Company to operate in the ordinary course while under Chapter 11 protection. For detailed discussion about the Chapter 11 Cases, refer to Note 3 — Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
Original DIP Credit Agreement and Restructuring Support Agreement
In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors entered into a Senior Secured Super-Priority Debtor-in-Possession Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2022 (the “Original DIP Credit Agreement”), with Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as administrative agent, and the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “Original DIP Lenders”). The Original DIP Lenders are also holders or affiliates, partners or investors of holders under the Company’s notes sold pursuant to (i) the Secured Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2021 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder, and (ii) the Convertible Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2021, (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Core Scientific, Inc. (as successor of Core Scientific Holding Co.), the guarantors party thereto from time to time, U.S. Bank National Association, as note agent and collateral agent, and the purchasers of the notes issued thereunder (collectively, the “Convertible Notes”).
Also in connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company entered into a restructuring support agreement (together with all exhibits and schedules thereto, the “Restructuring Support Agreement”) with the ad hoc group of noteholders, representing more than 70% of the holders of its convertible notes (the “Ad Hoc Noteholder Group”) pursuant to which the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group agreed to provide commitments for a debtor-in-possession facility (the “Original DIP Facility”) of more than $57 million and agreed to support the syndication of up to an additional $18 million in new money DIP (defined below) facility loans to all holders of convertible notes. The Restructuring Support Agreement was terminated by the Company pursuant to a “fiduciary out” which permitted the Company to pursue better alternatives.
Replacement DIP Credit Agreement
On February 2, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an interim order (the “Replacement Interim DIP Order”) authorizing, among other things, the Debtors to obtain senior secured non-priming super-priority replacement post-petition financing (the “Replacement DIP Facility”). On February 27, 2023, the Debtors entered into a Senior Secured Super-Priority Replacement Debtor-in-Possession Loan and Security Agreement governing the Replacement DIP Facility (the “Replacement DIP Credit Agreement”), with B. Riley Commercial Capital, LLC, as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”), and the lenders from time to time party thereto (collectively, the “Replacement DIP Lender”). Proceeds of the Replacement DIP Facility were used to, among other things, repay amounts outstanding under the Original DIP Facility, including payment of all fees and expenses required to be paid under the terms of the Original DIP Facility. These funds, along with ongoing cash generated from operations, were anticipated to provide the necessary financing to effectuate the planned restructuring, facilitate the emergence from Chapter 11, and cover the fees and expenses of legal and financial advisors.
The Replacement DIP Facility, among other things, provides for a non-amortizing super-priority senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70 million. Under the Replacement DIP Facility, (i) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Interim DIP Order and (ii) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Final DIP Order. Loans under the Replacement DIP Facility will bear interest at a rate of 10%,
67
which will be payable in kind in arrears on the first day of each calendar month. The Administrative Agent received an upfront payment equal to 3.5% of the aggregate commitments under the Replacement DIP Facility on February 3, 2023, payable in kind, and the Replacement DIP Lender will receive an exit premium equal to 5% of the amount of the loans being repaid, reduced or satisfied, payable in cash. The Replacement DIP Credit Agreement includes representations and warranties, covenants applicable to the Debtors, and events of default. If an event of default under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement occurs, the Administrative Agent may, among other things, permanently reduce any remaining commitments and declare the outstanding obligations under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable.
The maturity date of the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement is December 22, 2023, which can be extended, under certain conditions, by an additional three months to March 22, 2024. The Replacement DIP Credit Agreement will also terminate on the date that is the earliest of the following (i) the effective date of any chapter 11 plan of reorganization with respect to the Borrowers (as defined in the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement) or any other Debtor; (ii) the consummation of any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Debtors pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) the date of the acceleration of the Loans and the termination of the Commitments (whether automatically, or upon any Event of Default or as otherwise provided in the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement); and (iv) conversion of the Chapter 11 Cases into cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On March 1, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Replacement DIP Facility on a final basis and the terms under which the Debtors are authorized to use the cash collateral of the holders of their convertible notes (the “Final DIP Order”). For detailed discussion about the Replacement DIP Facility, refer to Note 21 — Subsequent Events to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
The Bankruptcy Court has appointed two official committees: the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the "Creditors' Committee"), which represents general unsecured creditors, and the Official Committee of Equity Security Holders (the “Equity Committee”), which represents equity security holders. These committees have the right to be heard on all matters that come before the Bankruptcy Court and have important roles in the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors are required to bear certain costs and expenses of the committees, including those of their counsel and financial advisors, in each case subject to a limited budget.
Going Concern
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company generated a net loss of $2.15 billion and used cash in operating activities of $205.2 million. The Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $15.9 million as of December 31, 2022, compared to $117.9 million as of December 31, 2021. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2022 primarily reflected $205.2 million of cash used in operating activities (including $58.1 million of interest payments on debt), $0.59 billion of cash used in investing activities (including $384.0 million of purchases of property, plant and equipment and $217.7 million of deposits for self-mining equipment) and $306.2 million of cash used in financing activities (including $261.3 million of principal payments on debt, net of issuance costs). The Company has historically generated cash primarily from the issuance of common stock and debt, through sales of digital assets received as digital asset mining revenue and from operations through contracts with customers.
Celsius Bankruptcy
In July 2022, one of our largest customers, Celsius Mining LLC (“Celsius”), along with its parent company and certain affiliates, filed for voluntary relief under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On September 28, 2022, Celsius filed a motion in the chapter 11 case alleging that the Company is violating the automatic stay with respect to the Master Services Agreement between Celsius and us (the “Celsius Agreement”). Celsius is also using its chapter 11 proceeding to withhold payment of certain charges billed to Celsius pursuant to the Celsius Agreement. We strongly disagree with the allegations made in the Celsius motion and the interpretation of the Celsius Agreement espoused therein and are vigorously defending our interests, including seeking resolution from the bankruptcy court and payment of any outstanding amounts owed under the Celsius Agreement (subject to applicable bankruptcy law in the Celsius chapter 11 case). The parties have agreed to stay the proceedings, including the evidentiary hearing previously scheduled for November 18, 2022. There can be no guarantee that the Celsius bankruptcy court will rule in our favor in a timely manner or that Celsius will honor the terms of the Celsius Agreement. As of December 31, 2022, $8.7 million was due from Celsius, for which we had reserved $8.7 million as an allowance, that is presented within accounts receivable, net, of which $1.6 million was outstanding in July 2022 at the time of the Celsius bankruptcy petition. Celsius may take actions in its chapter 11 proceeding to seek to reduce our claims for services and damages to which we may be entitled. Our recovery on our claims will be subject to factors outside of our control.
68
B. Riley Equity Line of Credit
In July 2022, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Equity Line of Credit”) and a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with B. Riley Principal Capital II, LLC (“B. Riley”). Pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Equity Line of Credit, we had the right to sell to B. Riley, up to $100.0 million of shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Equity Line of Credit, from time to time during the term of the Equity Line of Credit. Sales of common stock pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit, and the timing of any sales, were solely at our option, and we were under no obligation to sell any securities to B. Riley under the Equity Line of Credit. At present the Company is unable to satisfy the conditions set forth in the Equity Line of Credit and is unable to sell Common Stock to B. Riley.
Pursuant to the terms of the Equity Line of Credit, in no event may the Company issue to B. Riley under the Equity Line of Credit more than 70.3 million shares of Common Stock, which number of shares is equal to approximately 19.99% of the shares of the Common Stock outstanding immediately prior to the execution of the Equity Line of Credit (the “Exchange Cap”), unless (i) we obtain stockholder approval to issue shares of Common Stock in excess of the Exchange Cap in accordance with applicable Nasdaq rules, or (ii) the average price per share paid by B. Riley for all of the shares of Common Stock that the Company directs B. Riley to purchase from us pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit, if any, equals or exceeds $1.75 per share (representing the lower of the official closing price of the our Common Stock on Nasdaq on the trading day immediately preceding the date of the Equity Line of Credit and the average official closing price of our Common Stock on Nasdaq for the five consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the date of the Equity Line of Credit, as adjusted pursuant to applicable Nasdaq rules). Moreover, we may not issue or sell any shares of Common Stock to B. Riley under the Equity Line of Credit which, when aggregated with all other shares of Common Stock then beneficially owned by B. Riley and its affiliates (as calculated pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 13d-3 thereunder), would result in B. Riley beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued 13.4 million shares under the Equity Line of Credit for a total sales price to B. Riley of $20.7 million, which is net of $0.6 million for the fixed 3.0% discount to the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Common Stock, calculated in accordance with the Equity Line of Credit, which was recorded within other non-operating expenses, net on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2022, 56.9 million shares of Common Stock were available to be issued under the Equity Line of Credit.
As described below, 25% of the net cash proceeds received for shares issued under the Equity Line of Credit that is required to be applied by us to repay the outstanding principal amount of the Amended Bridge Notes. As of December 31, 2022, the Company owed $5.3 million on the Amended Bridge Notes related to proceeds received under the Equity Line of Credit.
Amended Bridge Notes
On August 1, 2022, we entered into two amended and restated bridge promissory notes, one in an aggregate principal amount of $60 million with B. Riley Commercial Capital, LLC (“B. Riley Commercial Capital”) and one in an aggregate principal amount of $15 million with an affiliate of B. Riley Commercial Capital (the “Amended Bridge Notes”). The Amended Bridge Notes amend the original notes having identical principal amounts to extend the maturity date from December 7, 2022 to June 1, 2023. The Amended Bridge Notes bear interest at a rate of 7% per annum and amortize collectively as follows (in thousands):
69
| Payment Dates | Payment Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| August 1, 2022 | $ | 18,000 |
| September 1, 2022 | $ | 4,875 |
| October 1, 2022 | $ | 4,875 |
| November 1, 2022 | $ | 4,875 |
| December 1, 2022 | $ | 4,875 |
| January 1, 2023 | $ | 6,250 |
| February 1, 2023 | $ | 6,250 |
| March 1, 2023 | $ | 6,250 |
| April 1, 2023 | $ | 6,250 |
| May 1, 2023 | $ | 6,250 |
The net proceeds of the notes were used by us for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The Amended Bridge Notes require the proceeds of (i) any equity issuances (other than issuances consummated for purposes of making tax payments in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and equity line of credit under the Equity Line of Credit (“ELOC”) sales), (ii) any secured debt incurred on or after April 7, 2022 (other than purchase money debt) in excess of $500 million and (iii) any ELOC sales in an amount equal to 25% of the net cash proceeds received from any such ELOC sale, in each case, to be applied by us to repay the outstanding principal amount of the Amended Bridge Notes. As a result of the Company’s Chapter 11 Cases, the Company is in default of the Amended Bridge Notes.
MassMutual Amendments
In August 2022, the Company amended the Mass Mutual Barings loans to defer principal payments for a period of six months beginning with payments due in August 2022. The amendments result in no change to the term of the loans and the remaining principal will amortize over the remaining life of the loans beginning in February 2023. The amendments also require an additional amount of blockchain computing equipment to be provided as collateral. Interest expense on the amended loans has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 13.0%. In August 2022, the Company issued 0.3 million shares of Common Stock to Mass Mutual Barings as an amendment fee.
In August 2022, the Company amended the finance lease agreements with MassMutual Asset Finance LLC to defer lease payments for a period of six months beginning with payments due in August 2022. The amendments result in no change to the term of the finance leases and the remaining principal will amortize over the remaining life of the leases beginning in February 2023. The amendments also requires an additional amount blockchain computing equipment to be provided as collateral. The leases under the amended agreements bear interest at a rate of 13.0% per annum. Interest expense on the amended leases has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 12.5%. As a result of the lease modification, the lease liabilities decreased by $7.7 million with a corresponding decrease to finance lease right-of assets of $7.7 million. As a result of the Company’s Chapter 11 Cases, the Company is in default of the Mass Mutual Barings loans and the amended finance lease agreement with MassMutual Asset Finance LLC.
Impairment Charges
During the year ended December 31, 2022, falling digital asset prices, significantly higher energy prices, inflation and supply chain disruptions increased our electricity costs, delayed facility development and miner deployments and reduced our profitability. The costs of constructing, developing, operating and maintaining facilities and growing our hosting operations also increased significantly, which have made it difficult for us to expand our business and reduced our operating profitability. Inflation and capital constraints have forced us and many companies like us to sell digital assets for cash that has contributed to large scale selling of digital assets and a decrease in the price of digital assets, including bitcoin. On June 30, 2022, September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2022, we identified a triggering event related to our assets and recorded a goodwill and other intangibles impairment charge of $1.06 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. The falling prices of digital assets also resulted in a $231.3 million impairment of digital assets being recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022. In addition, the prolonged decrease in the price of bitcoin, the increase in electricity costs and the increase in the global bitcoin network hash rate during the period resulted in an impairment of property, plant and equipment of $590.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. A continuation of these trends could result in further asset impairments in future periods.
70
RSU Amendment
During the year ended December 31, 2022, we amended our outstanding restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to provide for the waiver and elimination of the additional vesting requirement that Core Scientific undergo a “change in control” or a “public offering” for full vesting of outstanding time-vested awards (the “RSU Amendment”). As a result of the RSU Amendment, outstanding RSUs that were time-vested were net settled and outstanding RSUs not vested are subject only to time-based vesting. Share-based compensation expense increased by $144.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily as a result of the RSU Amendment.
Hosting contract terminations
During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, the hosting contracts for 24 customers, (including two related-party customers) were terminated. The previously-hosted ASIC servers were removed from our data center facilities and returned to the customers. For all 24 customers in the aggregate, we recorded total hosting revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022, of $60.1 million of which $32.5 million was hosting revenue from related parties. We replaced the previously-hosted third-party owned ASIC servers with our own self-mining equipment as the ASIC servers were removed and returned to the customers. As of January 31, 2023, we provided data center colocation services, technology and operating support for approximately 40,000 customer-owned ASIC servers.
Our Business Model
Company Overview
Core Scientific is a blockchain technology company with industrial scale digital asset mining, equipment sales and hosting operations. Our operations are currently conducted in the United States at state-of-the-art facilities specifically designed and constructed for housing advanced mining equipment. The Company’s primary business is self-mining and hosting third-party equipment used in mining of digital asset coins and tokens, including bitcoin.
Since July 2018, we have operated for ourselves and on behalf of our customers and related parties, miners of varying models, types, and manufacturers, but primarily miners of bitcoin manufactured by Bitmain Technologies, Ltd (“Bitmain”). We have accumulated significant expertise in the installation, operation, optimization, and repair of digital mining equipment. We have expanded our self-mining operation to take advantage of favorable market conditions and leverage our expertise for our own account.
We were originally known as Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. (“XPDI”). On July 20, 2021, we entered into the merger agreement between XPDI, Core Scientific Holding Co. and XPDI Merger Sub (the “Merger Agreement”). XPDI’s stockholders approved the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (collectively, the “Business Combination”) at a special meeting of stockholders held on January 19, 2022. Following the aforementioned approval on January 19, 2022, Core Scientific Holding Co., XPDI, and XPDI Merger Sub consummated the Business Combination. In connection with the Business Combination, we changed our name from Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. to Core Scientific, Inc.
In July 2021, Old Core completed the acquisition of Blockcap, Inc. (“Blockcap”), one of Old Core’s largest hosting customers. Prior to its acquisition, Blockcap had retained Old Core to host in the data centers operated by Old Core Blockcap’s industrial scale digital asset mining operations. Blockcap’s primary historical business was the mining of digital asset coins and tokens, primarily bitcoin and, to a lesser extent, Siacoin and Ethereum. At the time of its acquisition, Blockcap claimed to be the largest independent cryptocurrency mining operator in North America. While Blockcap did sell or exchange the digital assets it mined to fund its growth strategies or for general corporate purposes from time to time, it generally retained its digital assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value” and a more accessible and efficient medium of exchange than traditional fiat currencies.
Our hosting colocation business provides a full suite of services to digital asset mining customers. We provide deployment, monitoring, troubleshooting, optimization and maintenance of our customer’s digital asset mining equipment and provide necessary electrical power and repair and other infrastructure services necessary to operate, maintain and efficiently mine digital assets.
Our business strategy is to continue to grow our self-mining operations by significantly increasing the number of miners dedicated to producing digital assets for our own account, and to continue to develop and grow the infrastructure and facilities necessary to house our growing digital asset mining business and support our third-party hosting colocation business. We may also explore adjacent lines of businesses that leverage our mining expertise and bitcoin assets.
71
Our proprietary data centers in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, North Dakota and Texas are purpose-built facilities optimized for the unique requirements of high density blockchain computer servers. These facilities have long-term power contracts at approximately 457MW of power as of December 31, 2021 and 592MW of power as of December 31, 2022. In February 2022, the Muskogee City-County Port Authority (Oklahoma) announced an agreement with us to develop a 500MW data center at the Port of Muskogee John T. Griffin Industrial Park which remains substantially undeveloped. Our existing completed facilities leverage our specialized construction proficiency by employing high-density, low-cost engineering and power designs. We continually evaluate our mining performance, including our ability to access additional megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates. We may explore additional mining facilities and mining arrangements in connection with our short-, medium- and long-term strategic planning.
Segments
We have two operating segments: “Equipment Sales and Hosting” which consists primarily of our blockchain infrastructure and third-party hosting business and equipment sales to customers, and “Mining” consisting of digital asset mining for our own account. The blockchain hosting business generates revenue through the sale of consumption-based contracts for our hosting services which are recurring in nature. Equipment sales revenue is derived from our ability to leverage our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers to secure equipment in advance, which is then sold to our customers when they are unable to obtain them otherwise. The Mining segment generates revenue from operating owned computer equipment as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for these services, we receive digital assets.
Mining Equipment
We own and host specialized computers (“miners”) configured for the purpose of validating transactions on multiple digital asset network blockchains (referred to as, “mining”), predominantly the bitcoin network. Substantially all of the miners we own and host were manufactured by Bitmain and incorporate application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips specialized to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchains using the 256-bit secure hashing algorithm (“SHA-256”) in return for bitcoin digital asset rewards.
We have entered into and facilitated agreements with vendors to supply mining equipment for our and our users’ digital asset mining operations. We pay for these new miners in installments, with payment due in advance of the scheduled delivery dates set forth in the applicable purchase agreement. We allocate in advance our mining equipment orders between our self -mining operations and our hosting operations conducted on behalf of customers based on our estimates of where such equipment can most profitably and efficiently be used and in accordance with contractual arrangements with our customers. As of December 31, 2022, all new miners have been paid for in arrangements with our customers.
As of December 31, 2022, we had deployed approximately 234,000 bitcoin miners, which number consists of approximately 153,000 self-miners and approximately 81,000 hosted miners, which represented 15.7 EH/s and 8.0 EH/s for self-miners and hosted miners, respectively.
The tables below summarize the total number of self- and hosted miners in operation as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively (miners in thousands).
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |||
| Self-miners | 15.7 | 153.0 | |||
| Hosted miners | 8.0 | 81.0 | |||
| Total mining equipment | 23.7 | 234.0 |
72
| Bitcoin Miners in Operation as of December 31, 2021 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mining Equipment | Hash rate to be deployed (EH/s) | Number of Miners | |||
| Self-miners1 | 6.7 | 66.8 | |||
| Hosted miners | 7.0 | 73.9 | |||
| Total mining equipment | 13.7 | 140.7 |
1 Blockcap’s hash rate and number of miners is included in self-miners in the table above.
Summary of Digital Asset Activity
Activity related to our digital asset balances for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were as follows (in thousands):
| December 31, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital assets, beginning of period | $ | 234,298 | $ | 63 | ||
| Digital asset mining revenue | 397,796 | 216,925 | ||||
| Blockcap acquisition | — | 77,560 | ||||
| Proceeds from sales of digital assets and other | (444,353) | (27,858) | ||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 44,298 | 4,814 | ||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (231,315) | (37,206) | ||||
| Digital assets, end of period | $ | 724 | $ | 234,298 |
The estimated fair value of the Company’s digital assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $0.7 million and $248.1 million, respectively.
Performance Metrics
Hash Rate
Miners perform computational operations in support of digital asset blockchains measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations. The original equipment used for mining bitcoin utilized the Central Processing Unit (“CPU”) of a computer to mine various forms of digital assets. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining was rapidly replaced by the Graphics Processing Unit (“GPU”), which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced as the standard in the mining industry by ASIC chips such as those found in the miners we and our customers use to mine bitcoin. These ASIC chips are designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations.
Network Hash Rate
In digital asset mining, hash rate is a measure of the processing speed at which a mining computer operates in its attempt to secure a specific digital asset. A participant in a blockchain network’s mining function has a hash rate equivalent to the total of all its miners seeking to mine a specific digital asset. System-wide, the total network hash rate reflects the sum total of all miners seeking to mine each specific type of digital asset. A participant’s higher total hash rate relative to the system-wide total hash rate generally results in a corresponding higher success rate in digital asset rewards over time as compared to mining participants with relatively lower total hash rates.
However, as the relative market price for a digital asset, such as bitcoin, increases, more users are incentivized to mine for that digital asset, which increases the network’s overall hash rate. As a result, a mining participant must increase its total hash rate in order to maintain its relative possibility of solving a block on the network blockchain. Achieving greater hash rate power by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever greater quantities has become one of the bitcoin mining industry’s great sources of competition. Our goal is to deploy a powerful fleet of self- and hosted-miners, while operating as energy-efficiently as possible.
73
The Merger and Public Company Costs
The merger of Old Core and XPDI provided gross proceeds of approximately $221.6 million from the XPDI trust account, resulting in approximately $201.0 million in net cash proceeds to Core Scientific, after the payment of transaction expenses. As a result of the merger, former Core Scientific stockholders owned 90.7%, former XPDI public stockholders owned 6.7% and XPDI’s sponsor owned 2.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, respectively, of the Company, excluding the impact of unvested restricted stock units and options. The proceeds from the merger were used to fund mining equipment purchases and infrastructure build-out as the Company expands its leadership position. As a result of the merger, among other things, each outstanding share of Old Core common stock was cancelled in exchange for the right to receive 1.6001528688 of a share of the Company’s common stock.
The merger was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization and XPDI was treated as the “acquired” company for financial reporting purposes. Old Core was deemed the predecessor and Core Scientific, Inc., the post-combination company, is the successor Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) registrant, meaning that Old Core’s financial statements for periods prior to the consummation of the merger are disclosed in Core Scientific’s periodic reports.
As a consequence of the merger, the Company and XPDI collectively incurred an aggregate of $39.0 million in professional fees associated with legal services, M&A advisor fees, financial advice, due diligence, and other deal-related costs. These transaction costs were allocated to all instruments assumed or issued in the merger on a relative fair value basis as of the date of the merger. Transaction costs allocated to equity-classified instruments were recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital within total stockholders’ equity while transaction costs allocated to liability-classified instruments that were subsequently measured at fair value through earnings were expensed in the first quarter of 2022.
Key Factors Affecting Our Performance
Market Price of Digital Assets
Our business is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin, as well as other digital assets. The prices of digital assets, specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, which may reflect “bubble” type volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation, and media reporting. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.
Our financial performance and continued growth depend in large part on our ability to mine for digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our hosting services. Increases in power costs, inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins, impact our ability to attract customers for our services, may harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Over time, we have observed a positive trend in the total market capitalization of digital assets which suggests increased adoption. However, historical trends are not indicative of future adoption, and it is possible that the adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology may slow, take longer to develop, or never be broadly adopted, which would negatively impact our business and operating results.
Network Hash Rate
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices, but also by increases in the competition for digital asset production. For bitcoin, this increased competition is described as the network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain, and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Difficulty
The increase in bitcoin’s network hash rate results in a regular increase in the cryptographic complexity associated with solving blocks on its blockchain, or its difficulty. Increased difficulty reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires bitcoin miners to upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners. Similarly, a decline in network hash rate results in a decrease in difficulty, increasing mining proceeds and profitability.
74
The table below provides a summary of the impact to revenue from the increase or decrease in the market price of bitcoin, difficulty and our hash rate. The impact to revenue in each scenario assumes only one driver increases or decreases and all others are held constant.
| Impact to Revenue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver | Increase in Driver | Decrease in Driver | ||
| Market Price of Bitcoin | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Difficulty | Unfavorable | Favorable | ||
| Core Scientific Hash Rate | Favorable | Unfavorable |
Halvening
Further affecting the industry, and particularly for the bitcoin blockchain, the digital asset reward for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halvening. Halvening is a process designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in digital assets using a proof of work consensus algorithm. At a predetermined block, the mining reward is reduced by half, hence the term “halvening.”
For bitcoin, our most significant digital asset to which the vast majority of our mining power is devoted, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin currency rewards per block. The bitcoin blockchain has undergone halvening three times since its inception, as follows: (1) on November 28, 2012, at block 210,000; (2) on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000; (3) on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000, when the reward was reduced to its current level of 6.25 bitcoin per block. The next halvening for the bitcoin blockchain is anticipated to occur in early 2024 at block 840,000. This process will repeat until the total amount of bitcoin currency rewards issued reaches 21 million and the theoretical supply of new bitcoin is exhausted, which is expected to occur around the year 2140. Many factors influence the price of bitcoin and the other digital assets we may mine for, and potential increases or decreases in prices in advance of or following a future halvening are unknown.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for the mining fleet, as well as for the hosting services provided to customers and related parties. The cost and availability of electricity are affected primarily by changes in seasonal demand, with peak demand during the summer months driving higher costs and increased curtailments to support grid operators. Severe winter weather can increase the cost of electricity and the frequency of curtailments when it results in damage to power transmission infrastructure that reduces the grid’s ability to deliver power. Geopolitical and macroeconomic factors, such as overseas military or economic conflict between states, can adversely affect electricity costs by raising the cost of power generation inputs such as natural gas. Locally, factors such as animal incursion, sabotage and other events out of our control can also impact electricity costs and availability.
Equipment Costs
The long-term trend of increasing digital assets market value has increased demand for the newest, most efficient miners and has resulted in scarcity in the supply of, and thereby a resulting increase in the price of, those miners. The recent decline in the market value of digital assets has resulted in excess supply of miners and a decline in their price. As a result, the cost of new machines can be unpredictable, and could be significantly higher than our historical cost for new miners.
Our Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, our success greatly depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers and to attract new customers. On July 30, 2021, we acquired an existing hosting customer, Blockcap, and thereby increased our self-mining operations.
Our business environment is constantly evolving, and digital asset miners can range from individual enthusiasts to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. The Company competes with other enterprises that focus all or a portion of their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining low-cost electricity, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
75
At present, the information concerning the activities of these enterprises may not be readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly, or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info;” however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
We believe, based on available data, that despite the significant decrease in market prices for bitcoin and other major digital assets during 2022, an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining industry has continued increasing network hash rate, with new entrants and existing competitors increasing the number of miners mining for bitcoin.
Despite this trend, we believe, we have continued to maintain a competitive hash rate capacity among both public and private Bitcoin miners. However, to remain competitive in our evolving industry, both against new entrants into the market and existing competitors, we anticipate that we will need to continue to expand our existing miner fleet by purchasing new and available used miners, as well as innovating to develop and implement new technologies and mining solutions.
We believe that our integrated blockchain service portfolio, as well as our differentiated customer experience and technology, are keys to retaining and growing revenue from existing customers and to acquiring new customers. For example, we believe our significant build-out and ready power along with our MinderTM fleet management software layer represent meaningful competitive advantages favorable to our business.
Differentiation, Innovation and Expansion of Our Platform
Our investments in research and development drive differentiation of our service offerings, core technology innovation and our ability to bring new products to market.
We believe that we differentiate ourselves by offering premium products and services, including our ability to manage our electricity sourcing, construct proprietary passive cooled data centers, and enable the efficient performance of commercially available mining equipment through our MinderTM fleet management software.
We intend to continue to invest judiciously in research and development activities to extend our platform management and software solutions in order to manage our mining fleet more efficiently, expand within existing accounts, and gain new customers by offering differentiated capabilities.
Regulation
Due to the relatively short history of digital assets, and their emergence as a new asset class, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is constantly evolving, with increased interest expressed by U.S. and internal regulators. In October 2020, the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework” that detailed the Department’s view with respect to digital assets and the tools at the Department’s disposal to deal with threats posed by digital assets. In February 2021, representatives of the government of Inner Mongolia, China announced plans to ban digital asset mining within the province due to the energy and rare earth mineral demands of the industry. In March 2021, the nominee for Chair of the SEC expressed the need for investor protection along with promotion of innovation in the digital asset space. In March 2022, President Biden signed an Executive Order outlining an “whole-of-government” approach to addressing the risks and harnessing the potential benefits of digital assets and its underlying technology. The executive order lays out a national policy for digital assets over six highlighted priorities. In January 2023, the U.S. House of Representatives created a new congressional subcommittee focused on digital assets, the Subcommittee of Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion, operating under the House Financial Services Committee.
In addition to the activities of the United States federal government and its various agencies and regulatory bodies, government regulation of blockchain and digital assets is also under active consideration by similar entities in other countries and transnational organizations, such as the European Union. State and local regulations within the United States also may apply to our activities and other activities in which we may participate in the future. Other governmental or semi-governmental regulatory bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in blockchain or digital asset businesses. For instance, the SEC has taken an active role in regulating the use of public offerings of proprietary coins (so-called “initial coin offerings”) and has made statements and official promulgations as to the status of certain digital assets as “securities” subject to regulation by the SEC.
76
Strategic Acquisitions and Investments
Our business strategy is to grow our revenue and profitability by increasing the capacity and efficiency of our self-mining fleet and by enhancing our third-party colocation business. We intend to strategically develop the infrastructure necessary to support business growth and profitability and take advantage of adjacent opportunities that leverage our mining expertise and capabilities.
2021 Acquisitions
In July 2021, Old Core acquired Blockcap, a Nevada corporation engaged in the business of digital asset mining and through its subsidiary, RADAR, an early-stage company focused on technology enhancement and development in the digital asset industry. Pursuant to the Core/Blockcap merger agreement, each eligible share of Blockcap was converted into shares of Core common stock in accordance with a determined ratio, and Blockcap was merged with a wholly owned subsidiary of Old Core. As a result of the merger we acquired for self-mining all of the digital asset mining machines owned by Blockcap and hosted by us in our facilities. As a result, the existing hosting agreement between Old Core and Blockcap was terminated.
Condensed Statements of Operations
The following table presents a condensed statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||
| Total Revenue | $ | 640,313 | $ | 544,483 | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | 631,913 | 305,621 | ||||||||
| Gross profit | 8,400 | 238,862 | ||||||||
| (Loss) gain on legal settlement | — | (2,636) | ||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 44,298 | 4,814 | ||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (231,315) | (37,206) | ||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | (1,059,265) | — | ||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | (590,673) | — | ||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (28,025) | (118) | ||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 252,973 | 72,222 | ||||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (2,109,553) | 131,494 | ||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | 53,856 | 68,419 | ||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (2,163,409) | 63,075 | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | (17,091) | 15,763 | ||||||||
| Net (loss) income | $ | (2,146,318) | $ | 47,312 |
Key Business Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measure
In addition to our financial results, we use the following business metrics and non-GAAP financial measures to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, and make strategic decisions. For a definition of these key business metrics, see the section titled “Self-Mining Hash Rate” and “Adjusted EBITDA” (below).
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Self-Mining Hash rate (Exahash per second) | 15.70 | 6.66 | ||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) | $ | 174.9 | $ | 238.9 |
77
Self-Mining Hash Rate
We operate mining hardware which performs computational operations in support of the blockchain measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which the hardware is capable of solving such computations. Our hash rate represents the hash rate of our miners as a proportion of the total bitcoin network hash rate and drives the number of digital asset rewards that will be earned by our fleet. We calculate and report our hash rate in exahash per second (“EH/s”). One exahash equals one quintillion hashes per second.
We measure the hash rate produced by our mining fleet through our management software MinderTM, which consolidates the reported hash rate from each miner. The method by which we measure our hash rate may differ from how other operators present such measure.
Our self-mining hash rate was 15.70 EH/s and 6.66 EH/s for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively representing a 136% increase year over year.
Our combined self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rate grew 73%, to 23.69 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2022 from 13.69 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure defined as our net income or (loss), adjusted to eliminate the effect of (i) interest income, interest expense, and other income (expense), net; (ii) provision for income taxes; (iii) depreciation and amortization; (iv) stock-based compensation expense; (v) gain on sale of intangible assets; (vi) restructuring charges1; (vii) Reorganization items, net2; and (viii) certain additional non-cash or non-recurring items, that do not reflect our ongoing business operations. For additional information, including the reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA, please refer to the table below. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is an important measure because it allows management, investors, and our board of directors to evaluate and compare our operating results, including our return on capital and operating efficiencies, from period-to-period by making the adjustments described above. In addition, it provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our results of operations, as well as provides a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of our business, as it removes the effect of net interest expense, taxes, certain non-cash items, variable charges, and timing differences. Moreover, we have included Adjusted EBITDA in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is a key measurement used by our management internally to make operating decisions, including those related to operating expenses, evaluate performance, and perform strategic and financial planning.
The above items are excluded from our Adjusted EBITDA measure because these items are non-cash in nature, or because the amount and timing of these items is unpredictable, not driven by core results of operations and renders comparisons with prior periods and competitors less meaningful. However, you should be aware that when evaluating Adjusted EBITDA, we may incur future expenses similar to those excluded when calculating this measure. Our presentation of this measure should not be construed as an inference that its future results will be unaffected by unusual or non-recurring items. Further, this non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA on a supplemental basis. Our computation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures computed by other companies because not all companies calculate this measure in the` same fashion. You should review the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.
1 Within the financial statements and relating to financial metrics “restructuring charges” refers to charges relating to a prepetition restructuring plan completed in October 2022 and described further in Note 5 - Acquisitions, Dispositions and Restructuring of the financial statements.
2 Within the financial statements and relating to financial metrics “Reorganization items, net” refers to charges requiring separate presentation under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification(“ASC”) 852, Reorganizations (“ASC 852”) and described further in Note 3 - Chapter 11 Filing and Other Related Matters of the financial statements.
78
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | (in thousands) | |||||
| Net loss | $ | (2,146,318) | $ | 47,312 | ||
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | 96,826 | 44,354 | ||||
| Income tax expense | (17,091) | 15,763 | ||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 225,259 | 33,362 | ||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment | 287 | 8,016 | ||||
| Stock-based compensation expense1 | 182,894 | 38,937 | ||||
| Loss on legal settlement | — | 2,636 | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | (37,937) | — | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | 186,853 | 16,047 | ||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | (44,298) | (4,814) | ||||
| Impairment of digital assets | 231,315 | 37,206 | ||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | 1,059,265 | — | ||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | 590,673 | — | ||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | 28,025 | 118 | ||||
| Gain on sale of intangible assets | (5,904) | — | ||||
| Cash restructuring charges | 1,320 | — | ||||
| Reorganization items, net | (197,405) | — | ||||
| Fair value adjustment on acquired vendor liability | 9,498 | — | ||||
| Equity line of credit expenses | 1,668 | — | ||||
| Non-cash and other items | 9,942 | 3 | ||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 174,872 | $ | 238,940 |
1 Includes $1.0 million of stock-based compensation that was provided in severance as part of restructuring charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022.
79
Components of Results of Operations
Revenue
Our revenue consists primarily of returns from our hosting operations, including the sales of mining equipment to be hosted in our data centers and digital asset mining income.
•Hosting revenue from customers and related parties. Hosting revenue from customers and related parties is based on electricity-based consumption contracts with our customers and related parties. Most contracts are renewable, and our customers are generally billed on a fixed and recurring basis each month for the duration of their contract, which vary from one to three years in length. See Item 13 - “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”
•Equipment sales to customers and related parties. Equipment sales to customers and related parties is derived from our ability to leverage our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers to secure equipment in advance, which is then sold to our customers and related parties. Our equipment sales are typically in connection with a hosting contract.
•Digital asset mining income. We operate a digital asset mining operation using specialized computers equipped with application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips (known as “miners”) to solve complex cryptographic algorithms in support of the bitcoin blockchain (in a process known as “solving a block”) in exchange for digital asset rewards (primarily bitcoin). The Company participates in “mining pools” organized by “mining pool operators” in which we share our mining power (known as “hash rate”) with the hash rate generated by other miners participating in the pool to earn digital asset rewards. The mining pool operator provides a service that coordinates the computing power of the independent mining enterprises participating in the mining pool. The pool uses software that coordinates the pool members’ mining power, identifies new block rewards, records how much hash rate each participant contributes to the pool, and assigns digital asset rewards earned by the pool among its participants in proportion to the hash rate each participant contributed to the pool in connection with solving a block. Revenues from digital asset mining are impacted by volatility in bitcoin prices, as well as increases in the bitcoin blockchain’s network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Costs of Revenue
The Company’s Cost of Hosting Services and Cost of Digital Asset Mining primarily consist of electricity costs, salaries, stock-based compensation, depreciation of property, plant and equipment used to perform hosting services and mining operations and other related costs. Cost of Equipment Sales includes costs of computer equipment sold to customers.
Loss on legal settlements
Loss on legal settlements represent amounts received as part of the resolution of legal actions for damages resulting from the early termination of agreements by former customers or stock disbursements for resolution of a legal settlement with a former customer.
Gain from sales of digital assets
Gain from sales of digital assets consist of gain on sales of digital assets.
Impairment of digital assets
We initially recognize digital assets that are received as digital asset mining revenue based on the fair value of the digital assets when earned and received. Digital assets that are purchased in an exchange of one digital asset for another digital asset are recognized at the fair value of the asset received at the time of the transaction.
These assets are adjusted to fair value only when an impairment is recognized. Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. To the extent that an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new costs basis of the digital asset.
Impairment losses are recognized in the period in which the impairment is identified. The impaired digital assets are written down to their fair value at the time of impairment and this new carrying value will not be adjusted upward for any subsequent increase
80
in fair value. See Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for additional information.
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles
The Company does not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually as of October 31 each year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. The Company has the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair values of the reporting units are less than their carrying amounts as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If management determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the reporting unit’s carrying amount, or management chooses not to perform a qualitative assessment, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed. The quantitative test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with the reporting unit’s carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the resulting measurement of goodwill becomes its new cost basis. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable and operating segments.
The Company tests intangible assets subject to amortization whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets. Intangible assets may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the intangible asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the intangible asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist. Intangible assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
The Company tests property, plant and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist.
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment are measured as the differences between the carrying value of the property, plant and equipment exchanged or disposed of and fair value of the consideration received upon exchange or disposal. The fair value of noncash consideration received in an exchange of property, plant and equipment is determined as of contract inception.
Operating expenses
Operating expenses consists of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses. Each is outlined in more detail below.
•Research and development. We invest in research and development to build capabilities to extend our blockchain platform management and software solutions, in order to manage our mining fleet more efficiently, expand within existing accounts, and to gain new customers by offering differentiated blockchain hosting services. Research and development costs include compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation, other personnel related costs and professional fees.
•Sales and Marketing. Sales and Marketing expenses consist of marketing expenses, trade shows and events, professional fees, compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation and other personnel related costs.
•General and administrative. General and administrative expenses include compensation and benefits expenses for employees, who are not part of the research and development and sales and marketing organization, professional fees, and other personnel related expenses. Also included are stock-based compensation, professional fees, business insurance, auditor fees, bad debt, amortization of intangibles, franchise taxes, and bank fees.
81
Non-operating expenses, net
Non-operating expenses, net includes loss on debt extinguishment, interest expense, net, fair value adjustment on convertible notes, fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities, Reorganization items, net and other non-operating expenses, net.
Income tax (benefit) expense
Income tax (benefit) expense consists of U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our income tax benefit was $17.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our income tax expense was $15.8 million. The $32.9 million decrease in the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to same period in 2021, was primarily due to a reduction in our US federal deferred tax liability. The Company's effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to losses and certain deductions for which no tax benefit can be recognized. We evaluate our ability to recognize our deferred tax assets quarterly by considering all positive and negative evidence available as proscribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) under its general principles of ASC 740, Income Taxes. See Note 17 — Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for further information.
82
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of operations for each of the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages).
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | $ | 130,234 | $ | 62,350 | $ | 67,884 | 109 | % | ||||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 29,454 | 16,973 | 12,481 | 74 | % | |||||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | 11,391 | 138,376 | (126,985) | (92) | % | |||||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | 71,438 | 109,859 | (38,421) | (35) | % | |||||||||
| Digital asset mining income | 397,796 | 216,925 | 180,871 | 83 | % | |||||||||
| Total revenue | 640,313 | 544,483 | 95,830 | 18 | % | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of hosting services | 169,717 | 77,678 | 92,039 | 118 | % | |||||||||
| Cost of equipment sales | 67,114 | 177,785 | (110,671) | (62) | % | |||||||||
| Cost of digital asset mining | 395,082 | 50,158 | 344,924 | 688 | % | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | 631,913 | 305,621 | 326,292 | 107 | % | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 8,400 | 238,862 | (230,462) | (96) | % | |||||||||
| (Loss) gain on legal settlement | — | (2,636) | 2,636 | NM | ||||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 44,298 | 4,814 | 39,484 | 820 | % | |||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (231,315) | (37,206) | (194,109) | 522 | % | |||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | (1,059,265) | — | (1,059,265) | NM | ||||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | (590,673) | — | (590,673) | NM | ||||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (28,025) | (118) | (27,907) | NM | ||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 26,962 | 7,674 | 19,288 | 251 | % | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 12,731 | 4,062 | 8,669 | 213 | % | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 213,280 | 60,486 | 152,794 | 253 | % | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 252,973 | 72,222 | 180,751 | 250 | % | |||||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (2,109,553) | 131,494 | (2,241,047) | NM | ||||||||||
| Non-operating expenses, net: | ||||||||||||||
| Loss on debt from extinguishment | 287 | 8,016 | (7,729) | (96) | % | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 96,826 | 44,354 | 52,472 | 118 | % | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | 186,853 | 16,047 | 170,806 | NM | ||||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | (37,937) | — | (37,937) | NM | ||||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (197,405) | — | (197,405) | NM | ||||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses, net | 5,232 | 2 | 5,230 | NM | ||||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | 53,856 | 68,419 | (14,563) | (21) | % | |||||||||
| (Loss) income before income taxes | (2,163,409) | 63,075 | (2,226,484) | NM | ||||||||||
| Income tax (benefit) expense | (17,091) | 15,763 | (32,854) | (208) | % | |||||||||
| Net (loss) income | $ | (2,146,318) | $ | 47,312 | $ | (2,193,630) | NM |
NM - Not Meaningful
83
Revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||
| Revenue: | (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | $ | 130,234 | $ | 62,350 | $ | 67,884 | 109 | % | ||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 29,454 | 16,973 | 12,481 | 74 | % | |||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | 11,391 | 138,376 | (126,985) | (92) | % | |||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | 71,438 | 109,859 | (38,421) | (35) | % | |||||||
| Digital asset mining income | 397,796 | 216,925 | 180,871 | 83 | % | |||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 640,313 | $ | 544,483 | $ | 95,830 | 18 | % | ||||
| Percentage of total revenue: | ||||||||||||
| Hosting revenue from customers | 20 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||
| Hosting revenue from related parties | 5 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
| Equipment sales to customers | 2 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||
| Equipment sales to related parties | 11 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||
| Digital asset mining income | 62 | % | 40 | % | ||||||||
| Total Revenue | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Total revenue increased by $95.8 million to $640.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $544.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as a result of the factors described below.
Total hosting revenue from customers increased by $67.9 million or 109%, to $130.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $62.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in hosting revenue from customers was primarily driven by the full year impact of onboarding of new clients in 2021 and improvements in hosting prices for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Total hosting revenue from related parties increased by $12.5 million or 74%, to $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in related party hosting contracts was primarily driven by the onboarding of new related party hosting contracts for miners deployed during the year ended December 31, 2022.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, the hosting contracts for 24 customers, (including two related-party customers) were terminated. The previously-hosted ASIC servers were removed from our data center facilities and returned to the customers. For all 24 customers in the aggregate, we recorded total hosting revenue for the year ended December 31, 2022, of $60.1 million of which $32.5 million was hosting revenue from related parties.
Equipment sales to customers decreased by $127.0 million or 92%, to $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $138.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in equipment sales to customers was primarily driven by more of our hosting customers purchasing mining equipment directly from manufacturers for deployments in our data centers during the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.
Equipment sales to related parties decreased by $38.4 million or 35%, to $71.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $109.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in equipment sales to related parties was primarily driven by more of our hosting customers purchasing mining equipment directly from manufacturers for deployments in our data centers during the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.
Digital asset mining revenue increased by $180.9 million to $397.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $216.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The year over year increase in mining revenue was driven primarily by an increase in our self-mining hash rate from increases in the number of mining units deployed, partially offset by the decrease in the price of bitcoin and an increase in the global bitcoin network hash rate. Our self-mining hash rate increased by 138%, to 15.70 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2022, from 6.66 EH/s for the year ended December 31, 2021. The total number of bitcoins mined for the year ended December 31, 2022, was 14,436 compared to 3,948 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The average price of bitcoin for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $28,198 as compared to $47,437 for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of 41%.
84
Cost of revenue
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of revenue | $ | 631,913 | $ | 305,621 | $ | 326,292 | 107 | % | ||||||
| Gross profit | 8,400 | 238,862 | (230,462) | NM | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 1 | % | 44 | % |
Cost of revenue increased by $326.3 million or 107%, to $631.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $305.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. As a percentage of total revenue, cost of revenue totaled 99% and 56% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to increased depreciation expense of $191.9 million driven by an increase in the number of self-mining units deployed and completion of construction on new data center facilities, higher power consumption costs of $193.6 million driven by an increase in the number of self-mining and hosted miners operating in our fleet and an increase in power rates, higher personnel and facilities operating costs driven by the opening and expansion of our data centers of $51.8 million, which includes increased payroll and benefit costs for personnel of $10.1 million and increased stock-based compensation of $21.7 million, primarily reflecting the RSU Amendment described above, partially offset by lower equipment sales costs of $110.9 million.
Loss on legal settlements
The loss on legal settlement of $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, was driven by the resolution of legal actions for damages resulting from the early termination of agreements by former customers.
Gain from sales of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | $ | 44,298 | $ | 4,814 | $ | 39,484 | 820 | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 7 | % | 1 | % |
Gain from sales of digital assets increased by $39.5 million to $44.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from a gain of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Gains are recorded when realized upon sale(s). In determining the gain to be recognized upon sale, we calculate the difference between the sales price and carrying value of the digital assets sold immediately prior to sale. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the carrying value of our digital assets sold was $400.1 million and the sales price was $444.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the carrying value of our digital assets sold was $68.5 million and the sales price was $73.3 million.
Impairment of digital assets
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | $ | (231,315) | $ | (37,206) | $ | (194,109) | 522 | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (36) | % | (7) | % |
Impairment of digital assets increased by $194.1 million to $231.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $37.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low
85
prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. If the then current carrying value of a digital asset exceeds the fair value so determined, an impairment loss has occurred with respect to those digital assets in the amount equal to the difference between their carrying value and the price determined. The carrying value of our digital assets amounted to $0.7 million and $234.3 million as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | $ | (1,059,265) | $ | — | $ | (1,059,265) | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (165) | % | — | % |
Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles increased by $1.06 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. We identified triggering events as of June 30, 2022, September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2022, due to declines in the market price of bitcoin, the market price of our common stock and our market capitalization and, as such, we performed the quantitative test to compare the fair value to the carrying value for each reporting unit. We concluded the carrying value of the Mining reporting unit and Equipment Sales and Hosting reporting unit exceeded each reporting unit’s fair value and, as such, recorded an impairment of goodwill of $996.5 million in our Mining reporting unit and $58.2 million in our Equipment Sales and Hosting reporting unit. See Note 6 — Goodwill to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for further information.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | $ | (590,673) | $ | — | $ | (590,673) | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (92) | % | — | % |
Impairment of property, plant and equipment increased by $590.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. During the second half of December 31, 2022, our operating performance and liquidity continued to be severely impacted by the prolonged decrease in the price of bitcoin, the increase in electricity costs, the increase in the global bitcoin network hash rate and an increase in additional operating costs related to these factors. Additionally, primary and secondary market prices for ASIC miners of the type used in our business operations have decreased significantly from previous levels, including prices for those miners acquired earlier in 2022. Accordingly, we evaluated whether the estimated future undiscounted cash flows from the operation of our data center facilities sites would recover the carrying value of the property, plant and equipment located at the sites and used in site operations, including our deployed mining equipment. Based on this evaluation, we determined that the carrying value of the fleet of deployed mining equipment and of the other non-mining equipment property, plant and equipment at Cedarvale and Cottonwood, Texas facility sites may no longer be fully recoverable by the cash flows of the site. We measured the amount of impairment of the fleet of deployed mining equipment as the difference between their carrying amount of $690.4 million and the estimated fair value of $176,3 million, resulting in an impairment of $514.1 million on the fleet of deployed mining equipment for the year ended December 31, 2022. We measured the amount of impairment at the identified facility sites as the difference between the carrying amount of the site asset group of $211.6 million and the estimated fair value of the site asset group of $135.1 million, resulting in an impairment of the facility site’s property, plant and equipment of $76.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. See the discussion of long-lived asset impairments in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for further information.
86
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | $ | (28,025) | $ | (118) | $ | (27,907) | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (4) | % | — | % |
Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment increased by $27.9 million to $28.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from a nominal loss for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was due to various noncash exchange s of mining equipment. See nonrecurring fair value measurements in Note 12 — Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for more information.
Operating Expenses
Research and development
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 26,962 | $ | 7,674 | $ | 19,288 | 251 | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 4 | % | 1 | % |
Research and development expenses increased by $19.3 million or 251%, to $27.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was driven by higher stock-based compensation of $21.0 million, reflecting the RSU Amendment described above, primarily offset by lower personnel and related expenses of $1.1 million, and a decrease in professional fees of $0.7 million.
Sales and marketing
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| Sales and marketing | $ | 12,731 | $ | 4,062 | $ | 8,669 | 213 | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 2 | % | 1 | % |
Sales and marketing expenses increased by $8.7 million or 213%, to $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was driven by higher stock-based compensation of $8.6 million, primarily reflecting the RSU Amendment described above.
General and administrative
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | $ | 213,280 | $ | 60,486 | $ | 152,794 | 253 | % | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | 33 | % | 11 | % |
87
General and administrative expenses increased by $152.8 million to $213.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $60.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase was primarily driven by $91.7 million higher stock-based compensation driven by the impact of the Blockcap acquisition and the RSU Amendment described above, $18.9 million of higher professional fees primarily related to investments made to support public company readiness, $10.4 million of higher business insurance primarily for D&O insurance. $10.0 million of higher advisor fees related to the development and consummating of restructuring and reorganization transactions, $9.0 million of higher bad debt expense primarily related to Celsius, $6.9 million of higher payroll and benefit costs for personnel, $2.3 million of higher restructure expenses, $3.6 million of higher other expenses related to rent, workplace services, software and IT expenses, and taxes.
Non-operating expenses, net
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| Non-operating expenses, net: | (in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||
| Loss on debt from extinguishment | $ | 287 | $ | 8,016 | $ | (7,729) | NM | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | 96,826 | 44,354 | 52,472 | 118 | % | ||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | 186,853 | 16,047 | 170,806 | NM | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | (37,937) | — | (37,937) | NM | |||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (197,405) | — | (197,405) | NM | |||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses, net | 5,232 | 2 | 5,230 | NM | |||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | $ | 53,856 | $ | 68,419 | $ | (14,563) | NM |
Total non-operating expenses, net decreased by $14.6 million, to $53.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $68.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in non-operating expenses, net was primarily driven by a gain of $197.4 million of Reorganization items, net related to an adjustment of liabilities subject to compromise to their expected allowed amounts under reorganization accounting of $199.7 million (gain) offset by initial reorganization advisory costs of $2.3 million and a decrease in the fair value of the derivative warrant liabilities and corresponding gain of $37.9 million, partially offset by a higher increase in the fair value of the convertible notes (excluding interest expense and changes in instrument-specific credit risk) and a corresponding higher recognized loss of $119.3 million and higher interest expense, net of $52.7 million. The increase in the fair value of the convertible notes was primarily driven by the elimination of the negotiation discount described below, partially offset by a decrease in the market value of our common stock during the year ended December 31, 2022. See Note 12 — Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for further information.
As discussed in Note 12 — Fair Value Measurements to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report, the fair value of our convertible notes as of December 31, 2021, included the effect of a negotiation discount, which is a calibration adjustment that reflects the illiquidity of the instruments and the Company's negotiating position. Since the transaction was an orderly transaction, we deemed that the fair value equaled the transaction price at initial recognition. However, the closing of the merger of XPDI (which represents the occurrence of a qualified financing event as defined by the terms of the notes) in January 2022 resulted in the elimination of the negotiation discount along with other changes in fair value, which resulted in a significant increase in the fair value of the convertible notes (excluding interest expense and changes in instrument-specific credit risk) of $186.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Income tax (benefit) expense
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax (benefit) expense | $ | (17,091) | $ | 15,763 | $ | (32,854) | NM | ||||||
| Percentage of total revenue | (3) | % | 3 | % |
Income tax (benefit) expense consists of U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. For the year ended December 31, 2022, our income tax benefit was $17.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our income tax expense was $15.8 million. The $32.9 million decrease in the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to same period in 2021, was
88
primarily due to a reduction in our US federal deferred tax liability. The Company's effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2022 was lower than the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily due to losses and certain deductions for which no tax benefit can be recognized. We evaluate our ability to recognize our deferred tax assets quarterly by considering all positive and negative evidence available as proscribed by the FASB under its general principles of ASC 740, Income Taxes. See Note 17 — Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report for further information.
Segment Total Revenue and Gross Profit
The following table presents total revenue and gross profit by reportable segment for the periods presented:
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | |||||||||||
| Equipment Sales and Hosting Segment | (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Hosting revenue | $ | 159,688 | $ | 79,323 | $ | 80,365 | 101 | % | ||||||
| Equipment sales | 82,829 | 248,235 | (165,406) | (67) | % | |||||||||
| Total revenue | 242,517 | 327,558 | (85,041) | (26) | % | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue: | ||||||||||||||
| Cost of hosting services | 169,717 | 77,678 | 92,039 | 118 | % | |||||||||
| Cost of equipment sales | 67,114 | 177,785 | (110,671) | (62) | % | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenue | $ | 236,831 | $ | 255,463 | $ | (18,632) | (7) | % | ||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 5,686 | $ | 72,095 | $ | (66,409) | (92) | % | ||||||
| Mining Segment | ||||||||||||||
| Digital asset mining income | $ | 397,796 | $ | 216,925 | $ | 180,871 | 83 | % | ||||||
| Total revenue | 397,796 | 216,925 | 180,871 | 83 | % | |||||||||
| Cost of revenue | 395,082 | 50,158 | 344,924 | 688 | % | |||||||||
| Gross profit | $ | 2,714 | $ | 166,767 | $ | (164,053) | (98) | % | ||||||
| Consolidated total revenue | $ | 640,313 | $ | 544,483 | $ | 95,830 | 18 | % | ||||||
| Consolidated cost of revenue | $ | 631,913 | $ | 305,621 | $ | 326,292 | 107 | % | ||||||
| Consolidated gross profit | $ | 8,400 | $ | 238,862 | $ | (230,462) | NM |
For the year ended December 31, 2022, cost of revenue included depreciation expense of $12.1 million for the Equipment Sales and Hosting segment and $214.8 million for the Mining segment. For the year ended December 31, 2021, cost of revenue included depreciation expense of $7.4 million for the Equipment Sales and Hosting segment and $24.3 million for the Mining segment.
For the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the top three customers accounted for approximately 57% and 64%, respectively, of the Equipment Sales and Hosting’s segment total revenue.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, gross profit in the Equipment Sales and Hosting segment decreased $66.4 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, reflecting a Hosting segment gross profit margin of 2% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 22% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in Hosting segment gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021 was primarily due to lower margins on equipment sales, an increase in stock-based compensation expense, which primarily reflected the RSU Amendment, and higher power costs.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, gross profit in the Mining segment decreased $164.1 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, due to a lower Mining segment gross profit margin of 1% for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to 77% for the year ended December 31, 2021. The decrease in the Mining segment gross profit margin was primarily due to an increase in power rates, an increase in depreciation as a percentage of segment revenues, which reflected higher costs of self-mining units more recently deployed, an increase in stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenues, which primarily reflected the RSU Amendment, and a 41% decrease in average price per bitcoin mined. The decrease in the Mining segment gross profit margin was partially offset by an increase in our self-mining hash rate, which was 15.70 EH/s at December 31, 2022, compared to 6.66 EH/s at December 31, 2021.
89
A reconciliation of the reportable segment gross profit to (loss) income before income taxes included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Reportable segment gross profit | $ | 8,400 | $ | 238,862 | $ | (230,462) | NM | ||||||
| (Loss) gain on legal settlement | — | (2,636) | 2,636 | NM | |||||||||
| Gain from sales of digital assets | 44,298 | 4,814 | 39,484 | 820 | % | ||||||||
| Impairment of digital assets | (231,315) | (37,206) | (194,109) | 522 | % | ||||||||
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangibles | (1,059,265) | — | (1,059,265) | NM | |||||||||
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment | (590,673) | — | (590,673) | NM | |||||||||
| Losses on exchange or disposal of property, plant and equipment | (28,025) | (118) | (27,907) | NM | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||
| Research and development | 26,962 | 7,674 | 19,288 | 251 | % | ||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 12,731 | 4,062 | 8,669 | 213 | % | ||||||||
| General and administrative | 213,280 | 60,486 | 152,794 | 253 | % | ||||||||
| Total operating expense | 252,973 | 72,222 | 180,751 | 250 | % | ||||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (2,109,553) | 131,494 | (2,241,047) | NM | |||||||||
| Non-operating expense, net: | |||||||||||||
| Loss on debt extinguishment and other | 287 | 8,016 | (7,729) | NM | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 96,826 | 44,354 | 52,472 | 118 | % | ||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on convertible notes | (37,937) | — | (37,937) | NM | |||||||||
| Fair value adjustment on derivative warrant liabilities | 186,853 | 16,047 | 170,806 | NM | |||||||||
| Reorganization items, net | (197,405) | — | (197,405) | NM | |||||||||
| Other non-operating expenses, net | 5,232 | 2 | 5,230 | NM | |||||||||
| Total non-operating expense, net | 53,856 | 68,419 | (14,563) | NM | |||||||||
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (2,163,409) | $ | 63,075 | $ | (2,226,484) | NM |
90
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Historically, we have financed our operations primarily through sales of equity securities, debt issuances, equipment financing arrangements and cash generated from operations, including sales of self-mined bitcoin and other digital assets.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to, subject to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval, implement the plan of reorganization, successfully emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases and generate sufficient liquidity from the restructuring to meet our obligations and operating needs. These factors, together with the Company’s recurring losses from operations and accumulated deficit, create substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
We have engaged Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, as legal advisers, and PJT Partners LP and AlixPartners, LLP, as financial advisers, to assist the Company in managing the Chapter 11 Cases and developing, confirming, and consummating a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or alternative restructuring transaction.
Refer to “Other Events —Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters” below for more information on the Chapter 11 Cases and their effect on our liquidity.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Cash Requirements and Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
| December 31, | Period over Period Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | Dollar | Percentage | ||||||||||
| (in thousands, except percentages) | |||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 15,884 | $ | 117,871 | $ | (101,987) | NM | ||||||
| Restricted Cash | 36,356 | 13,807 | 22,549 | 163% | |||||||||
| Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 52,240 | $ | 131,678 | $ | (79,438) | NM |
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, restricted cash of $36.4 million consisted of cash held in escrow under the Original DIP Credit Agreement and $13.8 million consisted of cash held in escrow to pay for construction and development activities.
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash flows for the periods indicated.
| December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | 52,240 | $ | 131,678 | ||
| Cash provided by (used in) | ||||||
| Operating activities | 205,187 | (56,735) | ||||
| Investing activities | (590,778) | (423,840) | ||||
| Financing activities | 306,153 | 603,532 | ||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash – beg. of period | 131,678 | 8,721 | ||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash – end of period | $ | 52,240 | $ | 131,678 |
Our principal uses of cash in recent periods have been funding our operations and investing in capital expenditures.
Operating Activities
Changes in net cash from operating activities results primarily from cash received from hosting customers and equipment sales and payments for power fees and equipment purchases. Other drivers of the changes in net cash from operating activities include
91
research and development costs, sales and marketing costs and general and administrative expenses (including personnel expenses and fees for professional services) and interest payments on debt.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $205.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $56.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, was primarily due to changes in working capital, which increased cash from operating activities by $528.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily driven by a $376.0 million decreased in digital assets and a $294.6 million decrease in deposits for equipment sales to customers, partially offset by a $167.9 million decrease in deferred revenue. Offsetting the increase in net cash provided due to changes in working capital was a decrease in net income, excluding non-cash adjustments, of $66.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily driven by a $192.8 million decrease in cash inflows on gross profit, a $53.7 million increase in cash outflows from operating expenses and a $30.3 million increase in cash outflows for interest payments on debt, partially offset by cash proceeds from sales of digital assets in excess of their carrying value of $39.5 million.
Investing Activities
Our net cash used in investing activities consists of purchases of property, plant and equipment and acquisitions of intangible assets, net of proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, was $0.59 billion and $423.8 million, respectively, driven primarily by $384.0 million used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment primarily related to the development of facilities and the acquisition of equipment used for generating digital asset mining revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2022, $217.7 million was used for deposits for self-mining equipment.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities consists of proceeds from stock issuances, issuances of debt, net of issuance costs and principal payments on debt, including notes payable and finance leases.
In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company recorded approximately $2.5 million in financing costs related to the issuance of the Original DIP Facility for the year ended December 31, 2022.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash provided by financing activities was $306.2 million, primarily related to $261.3 million from the issuance of debt, driven by equipment financing arrangements and $25.0 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs (including $201.0 million in net cash proceeds received from the merger with XPDI after payment of transaction expenses, $21.3 million in cash proceeds received for shares issued under the Equity Line of Credit, and $3.8 million in cash proceeds received for employee stock option exercises). Offsetting this increase to net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $113.3 million of principal payments on debt, $31.6 million for the repurchase of common shares to pay employee withholding taxes and $30.3 million of principal repayments of finance leases.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash provided by financing activities was $603.5 million, primarily related to $670.8 million from the issuance of debt, including the issuance of $420.9 million of convertible notes, $10.0 million received in January 2021 from a stockholder for the purchase of bitcoin mining equipment, the issuance of a $9.0 million tranche of senior secured notes (net of issuance costs) in February 2021, and $3.8 million, $13.4 million, $25.6 million and $1.0 million of additional loans under a master equipment finance agreement issued in March 2021, May 2021, July 2021 and August 2021, respectively. Offsetting this increase to net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $49.3 million of principal payments on debt.
Operating and Capital Expenditure Requirements
Historically, a substantial portion of our liquidity needs arise from debt service on our outstanding indebtedness and from funding the costs of operations, working capital and capital expenditures. Our primary sources of cash are cash flows from operations, cash on hand and proceeds from debt borrowings, including issuances of long-term debt and our $35.0 million undrawn borrowing capacity under the Replacement DIP Facility. We have assessed our current and expected funding requirements and our current and expected sources of liquidity, and have determined, based on our forecasted financial results and financial condition as of December 31, 2022, that our operating cash flows and existing cash balances, will be adequate to finance our working capital requirements, fund capital expenditures, make required debt interest and principal payments due under the plan of reorganization, pay taxes and make other payments due under the plan of reorganization. A number of factors, including but not limited to, losses of
92
customers, pricing pressure from increased competition, lower subsidy and switched access revenues, and the impact of economic conditions may negatively affect our cash generated from operations.
However, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to successfully emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases and generate sufficient liquidity from the restructuring to meet our obligations and operating needs. Refer to “Other Events —Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters” for more information on the terms of the Restructuring Support Agreement, the Chapter 11 Cases and the effects of both on our liquidity.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
Legal Proceedings—The Company is subject to legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues losses for a legal proceeding when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. However, the uncertainties inherent in legal proceedings make it difficult to reasonably estimate the costs and effects of resolving these matters. Accordingly, actual costs incurred may differ materially from amounts accrued and could materially adversely affect the Company’s business, cash flows, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Unless otherwise indicated, the Company is unable to estimate reasonably possible losses in excess of any amounts accrued. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, there were no loss contingency accruals for legal matters.
Loss on Legal Settlements—The Company recognized a loss of $2.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2021, with respect to the resolution of legal actions for damages resulting from the early termination of agreements by former customers.
Operating Leases—The Company has entered into non-cancellable operating leases for office and data facilities, with original lease periods expiring through 2028. In addition, certain leases contain bargain renewal options extending through 2051. The Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which includes any bargain renewal options. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Rent expense was $2.3 million and $0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The Company’s minimum payments under noncancellable operating leases having initial terms and bargain renewal period in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022, are as follows (in thousands):
| 2023 | $ | 2,082 |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,810 | |
| 2025 | 1,866 | |
| 2026 | 1,924 | |
| 2027 | 1,985 | |
| Thereafter | 12,037 | |
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 21,704 |
In addition to the above, in December 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to lease office space for its new corporate headquarters that the Company anticipates will commence in the second half of 2022. The lease includes base rent of approximately $14 million to be paid over a period of 130 months.
Finance Leases—The Company has entered into arrangements with various parties to finance the acquisition of computer and networking equipment, electrical infrastructure, and office equipment. These arrangements include options exercisable by the Company at the end of the initial terms to renew, purchase the equipment, or to terminate. These arrangements were reclassified as Liabilities subject to compromise at the Petition Date and as of December 31, 2022 the related finance lease obligations were $70.8 million. Prior to the Petition Date these arrangements were classified as finance leases and as of December 31, 2021, the related finance lease obligations were $90.6 million.
93
As of December 31, 2022, the future minimum lease payments and present value of the net minimum lease payments under these finance leases are as follows (in thousands):
| 2023 | $ | 38,876 |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39,769 | |
| 2025 | 1,972 | |
| 2026 | 32 | |
| 2027 | — | |
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 80,649 |
Other Events
Chapter 11 and Other Related Matters
Chapter 11 Cases
As an initial step towards implementation of the plan of reorganization, on the Petition Date, the Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. Each Debtor continues to operate its business as a “debtor in possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and the orders of the Bankruptcy Court. The Chapter 11 Cases are being jointly administered under Case No. 22-90341.
In general, as debtors-in-possession under the Bankruptcy Code, we are authorized to continue to operate as an ongoing business, however, we may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court. To ensure the Debtors’ ability to continue operating in the ordinary course of business and minimize the effect of the restructuring on the Debtors’ customers and employees, the Debtors filed certain motions and applications intended to limit the disruption of the bankruptcy proceedings on its operations (the “First Day Motions”), including authority to pay employee wages and benefits, and pay vendors and suppliers for goods and services provided both before and after the filing date, which were approved on a final basis for wages and interim basis for vendors on December 22, 2022. Pursuant to the First Day Motions, the Bankruptcy Court authorized us to conduct our business activities in the ordinary course, including, among other things and subject to the terms and conditions of such orders: continue to operate our cash management system and honor certain prepetition obligations related thereto; maintain existing business forms; continue to perform intercompany transactions; obtain super priority administrative expense status for post-petition intercompany balances; pay certain prepetition claims of critical vendors, lien claimants and section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code claimants in the ordinary course of business on a post-petition basis; pay prepetition employee wages, salaries, other compensation and reimbursable employee expenses and continue employee benefits programs; pay obligations under prepetition insurance policies, continue to pay certain brokerage fees; renew, supplement, modify or purchase insurance coverage; maintain our surety bond program; and pay certain prepetition taxes and fees.
Original DIP Credit Agreement and Restructuring Support Agreement
In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors entered into the Original DIP Credit Agreement, with Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as administrative agent, and the Original DIP Lenders.
Also in connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company entered into a Restructuring Support Agreement with the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group pursuant to which the Ad Hoc Noteholder Group agreed to provide commitments for the Original DIP Facility of more than $57 million and agreed to support the syndication of up to an additional $18 million in new money DIP (defined below) facility loans to all holders of convertible notes. The Restructuring Support Agreement was terminated by the Company pursuant to a “fiduciary out” which permitted the Company to pursue better alternatives.
Replacement DIP Credit Agreement
Proceeds of the Replacement DIP Facility were used to, among other things, repay amounts outstanding under the Original DIP Facility, including payment of all fees and expenses required to be paid under the terms of the Original DIP Facility. These funds, along with ongoing cash generated from operations, were anticipated to provide the necessary financing to effectuate the planned restructuring, facilitate the emergence from Chapter 11, and cover the fees and expenses of legal and financial advisors.
94
The Replacement DIP Facility, among other things, provides for a non-amortizing super-priority senior secured term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $70 million. Under the Replacement DIP Facility, (i) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Interim DIP Order and (ii) $35 million was made available following Bankruptcy Court approval of the Final DIP Order. Loans under the Replacement DIP Facility will bear interest at a rate of 10%, which will be payable in kind in arrears on the first day of each calendar month. The Administrative Agent received an upfront payment equal to 3.5% of the aggregate commitments under the Replacement DIP Facility on February 3, 2023, payable in kind, and the Replacement DIP Lender will receive an exit premium equal to 5% of the amount of the loans being repaid, reduced or satisfied, payable in cash. The Replacement DIP Credit Agreement includes representations and warranties, covenants applicable to the Debtors, and events of default. If an event of default under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement occurs, the Administrative Agent may, among other things, permanently reduce any remaining commitments and declare the outstanding obligations under the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement to be immediately due and payable.
The maturity date of the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement is December 22, 2023, which can be extended, under certain conditions, by an additional three months to March 22, 2024. The Replacement DIP Credit Agreement will also terminate on the date that is the earliest of the following (i) the effective date of any chapter 11 plan of reorganization with respect to the Borrowers (as defined in the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement) or any other Debtor; (ii) the consummation of any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Debtors pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code; (iii) the date of the acceleration of the Loans and the termination of the Commitments (whether automatically, or upon any Event of Default or as otherwise provided in the Replacement DIP Credit Agreement); and (iv) conversion of the Chapter 11 Cases into cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
On March 1, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the Replacement DIP Facility on a final basis and the terms under which the Debtors are authorized to use the cash collateral of the holders of their convertible notes (the “Final DIP Order”). For detailed discussion about the Replacement DIP Facility, refer to Note 21 — Subsequent Events to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
Financing Activities
In January 2022, as a result of the closing of the merger with XPDI, we received approximately $201.0 million in net cash proceeds after the payment of transaction expenses along with $0.3 million of cash acquired from XPDI.
In January through March 2022, we borrowed an additional $4.8 million under our lending agreement with Bremer Bank, National Association for the purchase of blockchain mining equipment and improvements to data center and infrastructure. In April 2022, we borrowed an additional $0.7 million from Bremer to finance the construction of our North Dakota facility. The loans bear interest at 5.5% annually and are due at the earlier of the date of sale of the underlying mining equipment or 60 months from issuance.
In January 2022, we borrowed an additional $20.0 million under our two lending agreements with Blockfi Lending, LLC for the purchase of blockchain mining equipment. The loans bear interest at 13.1% with a term of 24 months from issuance.
In February 2022, we drew down on the remaining $10.0 million of our master equipment finance facility agreement with Trinity Capital Inc. (“Trinity”) to finance the acquisition of blockchain computing equipment. The loan has a term of 36 months from issuance. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 11.0%.
In March 2022, we entered into a $20.0 million equipment loan and security agreement with Anchorage Lending CA, LLC. (“Anchor Labs”) to finance the purchase of blockchain computing equipment. We borrowed $20.0 million in March 2022. The loan has a term of 24 months from issuance. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 12.5%.
In March 2022, we entered into a $100.0 million equipment loan and security agreement with Barings BDC, Inc., Barings Capital Investment Corporation and Barings Private Credit Corp. (“Mass Mutual Barings”) to finance the purchase of blockchain computing equipment. In March 2022, we borrowed the first tranche of $30.0 million and borrowed the second tranche of $39.6 million in April 2022. The loan has a term of 36 months from issuance. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 9.8%.
In April 2022, we entered into a $60.0 million bridge promissory note with B. Riley Commercial Capital, LLC and a $15.0 million bridge promissory note with an affiliate of B. Riley Commercial Capital, LLC (the “Bridge Notes”) maturing in December 2022. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 7.0%. In August 2022, we amended the Bridge Notes to, among other things, extend the maturity date to June 2023.
95
In April 2022, we entered into an $11.0 million equipment finance agreement with Liberty Commercial Finance LLC (“Liberty”) to finance the Company’s purchase of blockchain computing equipment. We borrowed $11.0 million in April 2022. The loan has a term of 24 months from issuance. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 10.6%.
In May 2022, we entered into a $11.7 million equipment loan and security agreement with Anchor Labs to finance the purchase of blockchain computing equipment. We borrowed $11.7 million in May 2022. The loan has a term of 24 months from issuance. Interest expense on the loan has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 12.5%.
In July 2022, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement and a Registration Rights Agreement with B. Riley Principal Capital II, LLC. Pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit, we have the right to sell to B. Riley, up to $100.0 million of shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the Equity Line of Credit, from time to time during the term of the Equity Line of Credit. Sales of common stock pursuant to the Equity Line of Credit, and the timing of any sales, are solely at our option, and we are under no obligation to sell any securities to B. Riley under the Equity Line of Credit. As consideration for B. Riley’s commitment to purchase shares of Common Stock at our direction upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Equity Line of Credit, upon execution of the Equity Line of Credit, we issued 0.6 million shares to B. Riley. In addition, we reimbursed $0.1 million of reasonable legal fees and disbursements of B. Riley’s legal counsel in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Equity Line of Credit and the Registration Rights Agreement.
In August 2022, the Company amended the Bridge Notes to, among other things, extend the maturity date to June 2023 (the “Amended Bridge Notes”). Under the terms of the modified agreement, $37.5 million of principal payments previously due in the second half of 2022 are now due in the first half of 2023. The Amended Bridge Notes require the proceeds of (i) any equity issuances (other than issuances consummated for purposes of making tax payments in connection with the vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units and equity line of credit under the Equity Line of Credit (“ELOC”) sales discussed in Note 11 — Notes Payable to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report), (ii) any secured debt incurred on or after April 7, 2022 (other than purchase money debt) in excess of $500 million and (iii) any ELOC sales in an amount equal to 25% of the net cash proceeds received from any such ELOC sale, in each case, to be applied by us to repay the outstanding principal amount of the Amended Bridge Notes. On August 1, 2022, the Company issued a total of 0.4 million shares of Common Stock to B. Riley Securities, Inc., an affiliate of B. Riley Commercial Capital, in satisfaction of an advisory fee for providing advisory services to the Company in connection with entering into the Amended Bridge Notes.
In August 2022, the Company amended the Mass Mutual Barings loans to defer principal payments for a period of six months beginning with payments due in August 2022. The amendments result in no change to the term of the loans and the remaining principal will amortize over the remaining life of the loans beginning in February 2023. The amendments also required an additional amount of blockchain computing equipment to be provided as collateral. Interest expense on the amended loans has been recognized based on an effective interest rate of 13.0%. In August 2022, the Company issued 0.3 million shares of Common Stock to Mass Mutual Barings as an amendment fee.
In October 2022, the Company determined not to make certain payments with respect to several of its debt facilities, equipment financing facilities and leases and other financings, including our two bridge promissory notes.
On December 21, 2022, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In connection therewith, the Debtors entered into the Original DIP Facility, as approved on an interim basis by the Bankruptcy Court on December 23, 2022. On February 2, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Replacement Interim DIP Order, allowing the Debtors to, among other things, repay the Original DIP Facility. On March 1, 2023, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Replacement DIP Facility and Replacement DIP Credit Agreement on a final basis pursuant to the Final DIP Order.
Related Party Transactions
We have agreements to provide hosting services to various entities that are managed and invested in by individuals who are directors and executives of Core Scientific. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized hosting revenue from the contracts with these entities of $29.5 million. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized hosting revenue from the contracts with these entities of $17.0 million. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we recognized equipment sales revenue of $71.4 million and $109.9 million, respectively, from these entities. A nominal amount was receivable from these entities at December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2021, we had accounts receivable of $0.3 million from these entities.
96
Core Scientific reimburses certain of its officers and directors for use of a personal aircraft for flights taken on Company business. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, we incurred reimbursements of $1.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, $0.2 million was payable. A nominal amount was payable at December 31, 2021.
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk
The vast majority of our cash generated from revenue are denominated in U.S. dollars, with a small amount denominated in foreign currencies.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those accounting policies and estimates that are both the most important to the portrayal of our net assets and results of operations and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates are developed based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Critical accounting estimates are accounting estimates where the nature of the estimates are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and the impact of the estimates on financial condition or operating performance is material.
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Liabilities Subject to Compromise
As a result of the commencement of the Chapter 11 Cases, the payment of pre-petition liabilities is subject to compromise or other treatment pursuant to a plan of reorganization. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be settled or treated cannot be made until the confirmed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization becomes effective. Accordingly, the ultimate amount of such liabilities is not determinable at this time. Pre-petition liabilities that are subject to compromise are to be reported at the amounts expected to be allowed by the Bankruptcy Court, even if they may be settled for different amounts. The amounts currently classified as liabilities subject to compromise are preliminary and may be subject to future adjustments depending on Bankruptcy Court actions, further developments with respect to disputed claims, determinations of the secured status of certain claims, the values of any collateral securing such claims, rejection of executory contracts, continued reconciliation or other events.
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - Digital Asset Mining Income
The Company derives its digital asset mining income from operating its owned computer equipment as part of a pool of users, facilitated by a pool operator, that processes transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. The contracts with pool operators are terminable at any time by either party. In exchange for providing computing power to the pool, the Company is entitled to receive digital currency assets from the mining pool operator which is a variable amount based on either (a) the amount of computing power the Company has contributed to the mining pool or (b) a fractional share of the digital currency asset award the mining pool operator receives from the blockchain network upon successfully adding a block to the blockchain, based on the proportion of computing power the Company contributed to the mining pool operator to the total computing power contributed by all mining pool participants in processing the block.
Providing computing power in digital asset transaction verification services is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. Providing such computing power is the only performance obligation in the Company’s arrangements with mining pool operators. The transaction consideration the Company receives, if any, is noncash consideration that may be either fixed or variable depending on the payout methodology used by the pool operator. In certain arrangements, the Company does not have a reliable means to estimate its relative share of the rewards until they are paid to it and the variable consideration is constrained until the Company receives the consideration, at which time revenue is recognized. The Company measures consideration at fair value on the date received, which is historically not materially different than the fair value at inception of the arrangement or the time the Company has earned the award from the pools. The Company’s digital asset mining income is sensitive to changes in the market prices of digital currency assets which may be significant.
There is no significant financing component in these transactions.
97
Revenue From Contracts With Customers - Hosting and Equipment Sales
The Company primarily generates revenue from contracts with customers from hosting services and, sales of computer equipment. The Company generally recognizes revenue when the promised service is performed, or control of the promised equipment is transferred to customers. Revenue excludes any amounts collected on behalf of third parties, including sales and indirect taxes.
Performance Obligations
The Company’s performance obligations primarily relate to hosting services and equipment sales, which are described below. The Company has performance obligations associated with commitments in customer hosting contracts for future services and commitments to acquire and deploy customer equipment that have not yet been recognized in the financial statements. For contracts with original terms that exceed one year (typically ranging from 18 to 48 months), those commitments not yet recognized as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, were $159.6 million and $1.05 billion, respectively. The $159.6 million remaining performance obligation as of December 31, 2022, relates solely to the hosting services performance obligation because all equipment sales’ performance obligation commitments had been fulfilled and revenue recognized as of December 31, 2022.
Hosting Services
We regularly enter contracts that include hosting services, for which revenue is recognized as services are performed on a variable (power consumption) basis. We recognize variable hosting revenue each month as the uncertainty related to the consideration is resolved, hosting services are provided to our customers, and our customers utilize the hosting services (the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the Company’s performance).
The Company performs hosting services that enable customers to run blockchain and other high-performance computing operations. The Company’s performance obligation related to these services is satisfied over time. The Company recognizes revenue for services that are performed on a consumption basis, such as the amount of electricity used in a period, based on the customer’s use of such resources. The Company recognizes variable consumption usage hosting revenue each month as the uncertainty related to the consideration is resolved, hosting services are provided to our customers, and our customers utilize the hosting services (the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of the Company’s performance). The Company generally bills its customers in advance based on estimated consumption under the contract. The Company recognizes revenue based on actual consumption in the period and invoices adjustments in subsequent periods or retains credits toward future consumption. The term between invoicing and when payment is due typically does not exceed 30 days.
Equipment Sales
We entered contracts with more than one performance obligation. For example, we entered into contacts that include both hosting services and sales of computer equipment to those same customers, for which revenue is recognized at the point in time when control of the equipment is transferred to the customer (typically at the start of the contract period). For these contracts, revenue is recognized based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract.
The Company recognizes revenue from sales of computer equipment to customers at the point in time when control of the equipment is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon deployment of the equipment. Customers make a series of deposits on equipment purchases with the final payment typically being due at least one month prior to deployment. Self-mining computer equipment that is subsequently sold to customers is recognized as Equipment Sales to Customers in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. Due to the change to Bitmain worldwide sale strategy, we do not expect to enter equipment sales contracts in the future or to have any equipment sales revenue after December 31, 2022.
98
Stock-Based Compensation
The Black-Scholes assumptions used in evaluating our awards are as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||
| Dividend yield | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | |
| Expected volatility | 72.29 | % | 72.57 | % | |
| Risk-free interest rate | 1.82 | % | 1.39 | % | |
| Expected life (years) | 7.00 | 6.22 |
We will continue to use judgment in evaluating the assumptions related to our stock-based compensation on a prospective basis. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock, we may refine our estimation process, which could materially impact our future stock-based compensation expense.
In addition, for awards with performance conditions, primarily restricted stock unit awards, we recognize the estimated fair value of the awards based on management’s judgment as to whether or not it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved.
Common Stock Valuations
In valuing the fair value of our common stock prior to the Merger, we used the most observable inputs available. We used the market approach, which estimates the value of our business by applying valuation multiples derived from the observed valuation multiples of comparable public companies to our expected financial results.
When observable inputs are not available, we may use the income approach. This approach typically projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. Projections of cash flows are based on management’s earnings forecasts.
Applying these valuation and allocation approaches involves the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are highly complex and subjective, such as those regarding the Company’s expected future revenue, expenses and cash flows, as well as discount rates, valuation multiples, the selection of comparable public companies and the probability of future events. Changes in any or all of these estimates and assumptions, or the relationships between these assumptions, impact the Company’s valuation as of each valuation date and may have a material impact on the valuation of the Company’s common stock and common stock warrants issued with the Company’s debt and equity instruments.
Goodwill
The total purchase price of any of our acquisitions is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on estimates and assumptions around the valuation of our common stock at the time of the acquisition.
We do not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting units are less than their carrying amounts as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or choose not to perform a qualitative assessment, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed. The quantitative test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the resulting measurement of goodwill becomes its new cost basis. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company identified goodwill impairment triggering events which, after analysis, resulted in $1.05 billion impairment to goodwill. As of December 31, 2022, after impairment, the Company had no remaining goodwill. As of December 31, 2021, the carrying amount of goodwill was $1.06 billion. The increase in goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2021 was due to $1.00 billion of goodwill added for the Blockcap acquisition on July 30, 2021. There were no impairment losses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021.
99
Long-Lived Assets
We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets include intangible assets subject to amortization. A long-lived asset may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded a $4.5 million impairment of other intangibles and a $590.7 million impairment of property, plant and equipment. We did not have any impairments in our long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Digital Assets
Our digital assets, e.g., bitcoin, are accounted for as intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. We initially recognize digital currency assets that are received as digital asset mining income based on the fair value of the digital assets in connection with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Digital asset disposals are on a first-in-first-out (“FIFO”) basis. Impairment is measured using quoted prices of the digital asset at the time its fair value is being assessed. Quoted prices, including intraday low prices, are collected and utilized in impairment testing and measurement on a daily basis. To the extent an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes a new carrying value of the bitcoin lot. Subsequent reversal of impairment losses is not permitted. Digital assets are classified on our balance sheet as a current asset due to the Company’s ability to sell it in a highly liquid marketplace and its intent to liquidate its bitcoin to fund operations when needed.
For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recognized net gains of $44.3 million and $4.8 million, respectively, on sales of digital assets. Purchases and sales of digital assets by the Company and digital assets awarded to the Company are included within Cash flows from operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows regardless of the length of time for which the digital assets are held. Any realized gains or losses from sales of bitcoin are included in Operating income (expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company accounts for its gains or losses by lot on a FIFO basis.
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk
Substantially all revenue and operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting standards relevant to our business, refer to Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of this report.
Emerging Growth Company
We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. We may take advantage of certain exemptions from various public company reporting requirements, including not being required to have our internal control over financial reporting audited by our independent registered public accounting firm under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and any golden parachute payments. We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years or until we are no longer an emerging growth company, whichever is earlier. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company” can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to use the extended transition period under the JOBS Act. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of public companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
We will remain an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act until the earliest of (a) February 12, 2026, the fifth anniversary of XPDI’s initial public offering, (b) the last date of our fiscal year in which we have a total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (c) the date on which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the rules of the SEC with at least $700.0 million of outstanding securities held by non-affiliates or (d) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the previous three years.
100
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001193125-22-088850.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this Item to “Core,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to Core Scientific Holding Co. and its subsidiaries prior to the consummation of the Business Combination and Core Scientific, Inc. (f/k/a Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.) and its subsidiaries after the consummation of the Business Combination. References to “XPDI” refer to the predecessor registrant prior to the consummation of the Business Combination. The following discussion and analysis provides information which we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of XPDI’s results of operations and financial condition. This discussion and analysis should be read together with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes of XPDI that are included elsewhere in this Report.. In addition to historical financial information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A. “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Report. Actual results and timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”
Overview
During the year ended December 31, 2021 and prior to the Business Combination, XPDI was a blank check company incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses. For more information on the Business Combination, see the section entitled “Explanatory Note” elsewhere in this Report.
Following the Business Combination, Core is a
best-in-class
large-scale operator of dedicated, purpose-built facilities for digital asset mining and a premier provider of blockchain infrastructure, software solutions and services. We mine digital assets for our own account and provide hosting services for other large-scale miners. We are one of the largest blockchain infrastructure, hosting provider and digital asset mining companies in North America, with approximately 457MW of power as of December 31, 2021, and 497MW as of January 31, 2022. We mine Bitcoin, Ethereum and other digital assets for third-party hosting customers and for our own account at our six fully operational data centers in North Carolina (2), Georgia (2), North Dakota (1) and Kentucky (1). In addition, in October 2021, we announced the entry of an agreement with the City of Denton, Texas and an affiliate of Tenaska Energy, Inc. to develop our seventh facility, a blockchain data center in Denton, Texas, which became operational in February 2022 with an initial operating capacity approaching 22 MW and is expected to have 300MW of power when completed. In February 2022, the Muskogee City-County Port Authority announced an agreement with us to develop a 500MW data center at the Port of Muskogee John T. Griffin Industrial Park.
Our Business Model After the Business Combination
Company Overview
Core is a blockchain technology company with industrial scale digital asset mining, equipment sales and hosting operations. Our operations are currently conducted in the United States at
state-of-the-art
facilities specifically designed and constructed for housing advanced mining equipment, which utilize non- or low carbon emitting sources for over 50% of our energy requirements as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s primary business is self-mining and hosting third-party equipment used in mining of digital asset coins and tokens, including bitcoin. Core continues to evaluate investments in related blockchain technologies and ancillary businesses.
Our rapidly growing digital asset mining operation is focused on the generation of digital assets by solving complex cryptographic algorithms to validate transactions on specific digital asset network blockchains, which is commonly referred to as “mining.” Our digital asset self-mining activity competes with myriad mining
63
Table of Contents
operations throughout the world to complete new blocks in the blockchain and earn the reward in the form of an established unit of a digital asset. While the Company sells or exchanges a portion of the digital assets it mines to fund its growth strategies or for general corporate purposes, we will hold a portion of our digital assets as investments in anticipation of continued adoption of digital assets as a “store of value” and a more efficient medium of exchange than traditional fiat currencies. Following the Blockcap acquisition, Core significantly expanded its self-mining operation and consequently reevaluated its digital asset investment policy. In 2021, the Company adopted an investment policy pursuant to which an investment committee consisting of corporate officers use common risk management techniques to manage our assets in light of specified liquidity criteria. Liquidity will be maintained through management of a portfolio of money market instruments, obligations of the U.S. government, bank deposits, commercial paper, and certain digital asset currencies and digital asset instruments, each of which must satisfy certain risk criteria. The investment committee will retain the discretion to manage these approved investment instruments, including digital asset currencies and instruments, in accordance with the investment policy, which may involve opportunistic sales or conversions of digital asset currencies and instruments in light of market and other conditions.
As one of the largest blockchain hosting providers in North America, we focus on clients with large- scale deployments and provide power, racks, proprietary thermodynamic management (heat dissipation and airflow management), redundant connectivity, 24/7 security as well as our proprietary software platforms, MinderTM and MinderOSTM, which provide infrastructure management and custom firmware that boost performance and energy efficiency. Our blockchain business is one of the only large-scale vertically integrated digital asset mining and blockchain infrastructure and hosting solutions business in North America.
Our proprietary data centers in North Carolina, Georgia, Kentucky and North Dakota are purpose-built facilities optimized for the unique requirements of high density blockchain computer servers. These facilities have long-term power contracts at approximately 457MW of power as of December 31, 2021, and 497MW as of January 31, 2022. In addition, we opened a new facility in Denton, Texas in February 2022 with an initial operating capacity approaching 22 MW and expect to achieve full capacity of 300MW when completed. In February 2022, the Muskogee City-County Port Authority announced an agreement with us to develop a 500MW data center at the Port of Muskogee John T. Griffin Industrial Park. Our existing completed facilities leverage our specialized construction proficiency by employing high-density,
low-cost
engineering and power designs. Our North Dakota facility is expected to benefit from our operational mining experience and techniques to maximize operational efficiency. As the demand for digital assets increases and digital assets become more widely accepted, there is an increasing demand for professional-grade, scalable infrastructure to support growth of the blockchain ecosystem. We continually evaluate our mining performance, including our ability to access additional megawatts of electric power and to expand our total self-mining and customer and related party hosting hash rates. We may explore additional mining facilities and mining arrangements in connection with our short-, medium- and long-term strategic planning.
Segments
We have two operating segments: “Equipment Sales and Hosting” which consists primarily of our blockchain infrastructure and third-party hosting business and equipment sales to customers, and “Mining” consisting of digital asset mining for our own account. The blockchain hosting business generates revenue through the sale of consumption-based contracts for our hosting services which are recurring in nature. Equipment sales revenue is derived from our ability to leverage our partnerships with leading equipment manufacturers to secure equipment in advance, which is then sold to our customers when they are unable to obtain them otherwise. The digital asset mining operation segment generates revenue from operating our owned computer equipment as part of a pool of users that process transactions conducted on one or more blockchain networks. In exchange for these services, we receive digital currency assets.
Mining Equipment
We own and host specialized computers (“miners”) configured for the purpose of validating transactions on multiple digital asset network blockchains (referred to as, “mining”), predominantly the Bitcoin network.
64
Table of Contents
Substantially all of the miners we own and host were manufactured by Bitmain and incorporate application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) chips specialized to solve blocks on the bitcoin blockchains using the
256-bit
secure hashing algorithm
(“SHA-256”)
in return for bitcoin digital asset rewards.
We have entered into and facilitated agreements with vendors to supply mining equipment for our and our users’ digital asset mining operations. We pre pay a significant portion of the purchase price for these new miners as partially refundable deposits, with delivery scheduled to occur in monthly installments through December 2022, and the remainder of the purchase price for these new miners is payable in installments, with payment due in advance of the scheduled delivery dates set forth in the applicable purchase agreement.
Performance Metrics
Hash Rate
Miners perform computational operations in support of digital asset blockchains measured in “hash rate” or “hashes per second.” A “hash” is the computation run by mining hardware in support of the blockchain; therefore, a miner’s “hash rate” refers to the rate at which it is capable of solving such computations. The original equipment used for mining bitcoin utilized the Central Processing Unit (“CPU”) of a computer to mine various forms of digital assets. Due to performance limitations, CPU mining was rapidly replaced by the Graphics Processing Unit (“GPU”), which offers significant performance advantages over CPUs. General purpose chipsets like CPUs and GPUs have since been replaced as the standard in the mining industry by ASIC chips such as those found in the S17 and S19 miners Core and its customers use to mine bitcoin. These ASIC chips are designed specifically to maximize the rate of hashing operations.
Network Hash Rate
In digital assets mining, hash rate is a measure of the processing speed by a mining computer for a specific digital asset. A participant in a blockchain network’s mining function has a hash rate total of its miners seeking to mine a specific digital asset and, system-wide, there is a total hash rate of all miners seeking to mine each specific type of digital asset. A higher total hash rate relative to the system-wide total hash rate generally results over time in a corresponding higher success rate in digital asset rewards as compared to mining participants with relatively lower total hash rates.
However, as the relative market price for a digital asset, such as bitcoin, increases, more users are incentivized to mine that digital asset, which increases the network’s overall hash rate. As a result, a mining participant must increase its total hash rate in order to maintain its relative possibility of solving a block on the network blockchain. Achieving greater hash rate power by deploying increasingly sophisticated miners in ever greater quantities has become one of the Bitcoin mining industry’s great sources of competition. Our goal is to deploy a powerful fleet of self- and hosted-miners, while operating as energy-efficiently as possible.
Impact of
COVID-19
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the global outbreak of
COVID-19
to be a pandemic. We continue to closely monitor the impact of
COVID-19.
COVID-19
has had and continues to have an adverse impact on our business and operations, particularly as a result of preventive and precautionary measures that we, other businesses, and governments are taking. Refer to “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this Report for more information.
On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the “Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.” The CARES Act, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations, increased limitations on qualified charitable contributions, and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property.
65
Table of Contents
It also allocated funds for the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans that are forgivable in certain situations to promote continued employment, as well as Economic Injury Disaster Loans to provide liquidity to small businesses harmed by
COVID-19.
In April 2020, Legacy Core received a loan of $2.2 million from the PPP through the SBA. The loan was unsecured and bore interest at a rate per annum of 1% and monthly payments of principal were to begin in July 2021. The loan was due in full in April 2022, however in July 2021, Legacy Core repaid the loan in full.
We are unable to predict the full impact that the
COVID-19
pandemic, including variant strains of
COVID-19,
will have on our future results of operations, liquidity and financial condition due to numerous uncertainties, including the duration of the pandemic and the actions that may be taken by government authorities across the United States. However,
COVID-19,
including variant strains of
COVID-19,
is not expected to result in any significant changes in costs going forward. We will continue to monitor the performance of our business and assess the impacts of COVID-19 and the emergence of new variant strains of
COVID-19,
including potential constraints on the supply of new miners.
Key Factors Affecting Our Performance After the Business Combination
Market Price of Digital Assets
Our business is heavily dependent on the spot price of bitcoin, as well as other digital assets. The prices of digital assets, specifically bitcoin, have experienced substantial volatility, which may reflect “bubble” type volatility, meaning that high or low prices may have little or no relationship to identifiable market forces, may be subject to rapidly changing investor sentiment, and may be influenced by factors such as technology, regulatory void or changes, fraudulent actors, manipulation, and media reporting. Bitcoin (as well as other digital assets) may have value based on various factors, including their acceptance as a means of exchange by consumers and others, scarcity, and market demand.
Our financial performance and continued growth depend in large part on our ability to mine for digital assets profitably and to attract customers for our hosting services. Increases in power costs, inability to mine digital assets efficiently and to sell digital assets at favorable prices will reduce our operating margins, impact our ability to attract customers for our services, may harm our growth prospects and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Over time, we have observed a positive trend in the total market capitalization of digital assets which suggests increased adoption. However, historical trends are not indicative of future adoption, and it is possible that the adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology may slow, take longer to develop, or never be broadly adopted, which would negatively impact our business and operating results.
Network Hash Rate
Our business is not only impacted by the volatility in digital asset prices, but also by increases in the digital asset, primarily Bitcoin blockchain’s network hash rate resulting from the growth in the overall quantity and quality of miners working to solve blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain and the difficulty index associated with the secure hashing algorithm employed in solving the blocks.
Difficulty
The increase in digital assets, primarily, Bitcoin difficulty and hash rate reduces the mining proceeds of the equipment proportionally and eventually requires Bitcoin miners to upgrade their mining equipment to remain profitable and compete effectively with other miners.
The table below provides a summary of the impact to revenue from the increase or decrease in the market price of Bitcoin, difficulty and our hash rate. The impact to revenue in each scenario assumes only one driver increases or decreases and all others are held constant.
66
Table of Contents
| Impact to Revenue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driver | Increase in Driver | Decrease in Driver | ||
| Market Price of Bitcoin | Favorable | Unfavorable | ||
| Difficulty | Unfavorable | Favorable | ||
| Core Scientific Hash Rate | Favorable | Unfavorable |
Halvening
Further affecting the industry, and particularly for the Bitcoin blockchain, the digital asset reward for solving a block is subject to periodic incremental halvening. Halvening is a process designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in digital assets using a proof of work consensus algorithm. At a predetermined block, the mining reward is reduced by half, hence the term “halvening.”
For bitcoin, our most significant digital asset to which the majority of our mining power is devoted, the reward was initially set at 50 bitcoin currency rewards per block. The Bitcoin blockchain has undergone halvening three times since its inception as follows: (1) on November 28, 2012 at block 210,000; (2) on July 9, 2016 at block 420,000; (3) on May 11, 2020 at block 630,000, when the reward was reduced to its current level of 6.25 bitcoin per block. The next halvening for the Bitcoin blockchain is anticipated to occur in early 2024 at block 840,000. This process will repeat until the total amount of bitcoin currency rewards issued reaches 21 million and the theoretical supply of new bitcoin is exhausted, which is expected to occur around 2140. Many factors influence the price of bitcoin and the other digital assets we mine for, and potential increases or decreases in prices in advance of or following a future halvening are unknown.
Electricity Costs
Electricity cost is the major operating cost for the mining fleet, as well as for the hosting services provided to customers and related parties. Energy costs and availability are vulnerable to seasonality, with increased costs primarily in the summer months and risks of outages and power grid damage as a result of inclement weather, animal incursion, sabotage and other events out of our control.
Equipment Costs
As the market value of digital assets has increased, the demand for the newest, most efficient miners has also increased, leading to scarcity in the supply of and thereby a resulting increase in the price of miners. As a result, the cost of new machines can be unpredictable, and could also be significantly higher than our historical cost for new miners.
Similarly, as bitcoin prices have risen, we have observed a significant increase in the demand for miners. As a result, at times, we may obtain Bitmain miners and other hardware from Bitmain or from third parties at higher prices, to the extent they are available. For example, in the second half of 2020 and continuing into 2021, we have observed a significant appreciation in the market price of bitcoin, as well as an increase in the
per-unit
price of the new Bitmain Antminer model
S19-Pro
and
S19j-Pro
miners we purchased during this same period. While we cannot know definitively if these two phenomena are linked, we have seen a measurable increase in the prices for new miners offered by Bitmain.
Our Customers
In addition to factors underlying our mining business growth and profitability, our success greatly depends on our ability to retain and develop opportunities with our existing customers and to attract new customers. On July 30, 2021, we acquired an existing hosting customer, Blockcap, and thereby increased our self-mining operations.
Our business environment is constantly evolving, and digital asset miners can range from individual enthusiasts to professional mining operations with dedicated data centers. The Company competes with other companies that
67
Table of Contents
focus all or a portion of their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in every aspect of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, the ability to raise capital, obtaining
low-cost
electricity, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry.
At present, the information concerning the activities of these enterprises may not be readily available as the vast majority of the participants in this sector do not publish information publicly or the information may be unreliable. Published sources of information include “bitcoin.org” and “blockchain.info”; however, the reliability of that information and its continued availability cannot be assured.
We believe, based on available data, that the trend of increasing market prices for bitcoin and other major digital assets we observed beginning in the third fiscal quarter of calendar year 2020 has resulted in an increase in the scale and sophistication of competition in the digital asset mining industry, with new entrants and existing competitors gaining access to substantial capital resources to build larger and larger mining operations. If this trend of increasing market prices for bitcoin and other digital assets continues, which has occurred (though with significant volatility) throughout calendar year 2021, we believe many new and existing competitors may be encouraged to build or expand their Bitcoin mining operations.
Despite this trend, we believe, based on available data and assuming full deployment of the miners we have ordered from Bitmain, we have and will continue to maintain a competitive hash rate capacity among both public and private Bitcoin miners. However, to remain competitive in our evolving industry, both against new entrants into the market and existing competitors, we anticipate that we will have to continue to expand our existing miner fleet by purchasing the latest generation of miners, as well as innovating to develop and implement new technologies and mining solutions.
We believe that our integrated blockchain service portfolio, as well as our differentiated customer experience and technology, are keys to retaining and growing revenue from existing customers and to acquiring new customers. For example, we believe our significant
build-out
and ready power along with our MinderTM software layer represent meaningful competitive advantages favorable to our business.
Differentiation, Innovation and Expansion of Our Platform
Our investments in research and development drive differentiation of our service offerings, core technology innovation and our ability to bring new products to market.
We believe that we differentiate ourselves by offering premium products and services including our ability to manage our electricity sourcing, construct proprietary passive cooled data centers, and enable the efficient performance of commercially available mining equipment through our management software.
We intend to continue to invest in our research and development capabilities to extend our platform management and software solutions across the blockchain in order to manage our mining fleet more efficiently, expand within existing accounts, and gain new customers by offering differentiated blockchain products and services.
Grow Our
Go-to-Market
and Partnership Ecosystem
In addition to the activities of our sales organization, our success in our mining business as well as in retaining and attracting new customers will depend on our ability to expand our ecosystem of strategic partners.
For blockchain, strategic partners include OEM manufacturers of mining equipment, including Bitmain and others. Our blockchain business requires access to the latest generation miners. Our management team constantly evaluates current and future hardware for reliability, performance, and cost efficiency. These partnerships enable
at-scale
access to new equipment at competitive prices, which in turn helps secure the profitability of our fleet for the long term as well as provide our customers access to leading-edge mining technology.
68
Table of Contents
Regulation
Our financial prospects and continued growth depend in part on our ability to continue to operate in a compliant manner with all rules and regulations. Our business is subject to the oversight of numerous regulatory agencies in the United States and other jurisdictions. Our strategy is to continue to invest in our finance, legal, compliance, and security functions in order to remain at the forefront of crypto policy initiatives and regulatory trends. As the industry matures, we may experience fluctuations in our operating results as a result of changes in the law and regulations that are applicable to our business, which may limit our ability to support new blockchains and digital assets, onboard customers, and offer our products and services across jurisdictions.
Strategic Acquisitions and Investments
We intend to continue growing our platform through strategic acquisitions and investments. We plan to acquire and invest in companies with complementary products and technologies. Our strategic acquisitions may affect our future financial results. We will also continue to enter into strategic partnerships with various companies to scale our business, provide
best-in-class
blockchain infrastructure and hosting to our clients, grow our digital asset mining practice, and pioneer innovative financial products and services through blockchain technology.
2021 Acquisitions
In July 2021, we acquired Blockcap, a Nevada corporation engaged in the business of digital asset mining and through its subsidiary, RADAR, an early stage company focused on technology enhancement and development in the digital asset industry. Pursuant to the Core/Blockcap merger agreement, each eligible share of Blockcap was converted into shares of Core common stock in accordance with a determined ratio, and Blockcap was merged with a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Core. As a result of the merger we acquired for self-mining all of the digital asset mining machines owned by Blockcap and hosted by us in our facilities. As a result, the existing hosting agreement between Legacy Core and Blockcap was terminated. We intend to utilize RADAR’s business assets and the technical expertise of its principals in enhancing our existing blockchain mining technology and software and in further strengthening our leadership position and value creation potential through the development of DeFi products and services.
2020 Acquisitions
Through December 31, 2020 we have completed and substantially integrated two asset acquisitions primarily related to software and patents, Atrio and RStor. We routinely evaluate potential acquisitions that align with our growth strategy. Our acquisitions in any period may impact the comparability of our results with prior and subsequent periods. The integration of acquisitions also requires dedication of substantial time and resources, and we may never fully realize synergies and other benefits that we expect.
Recent Developments
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement and that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 1, 2021, as amended on January 14, 2022, by and among XPDI, Legacy Core, Merger Sub 3 and Blockcap, the Business Combination was effected by (i) the merger of Merger Sub with and into Legacy Core, which occurred on January 19, 2022, with Legacy Core surviving the First Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of XPDI, (ii) the merger of Legacy Core with and into XPDI, which occurred on January 20, 2022, with XPDI surviving the Second Merger and (iii) following the closing of the Second Merger on January 20, 2022, the merger of Blockcap with and into Merger Sub 3, with Merger Sub 3 surviving the Third Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of XPDI under the name “Core Scientific Acquired Mining LLC.” In connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, we changed our name from Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. to Core Scientific, Inc.
69
Table of Contents
In connection with the Special Meeting and the Business Combination, holders of 12,347,077 of the 34,500,000 then-outstanding shares of Class A common stock exercised their right to redeem their shares for cash at a redemption price of approximately $10.00 per share, for an aggregate redemption amount of $123,483,147.34.
As a result of the Business Combination, all of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock automatically converted into shares of Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis. The public warrants and private placement warrants became warrants to purchase Common Stock.
Results of Operations of XPDI
XPDI’s entire activities since inception through December 31, 2021 related to its formation and the preparation for the IPO, and since the closing of the IPO, identifying a target company for a prospective initial business combination and consummating the Business Combination. As of December 31, 2021, XPDI had neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues. XPDI
generated non-operating income
in the form of interest income on cash and cash equivalents and on marketable securities held in a trust account (the “Trust Account”). XPDI incurred expenses as a result of being a public company (for legal, financial reporting, accounting and auditing compliance), as well as for due diligence and merger and acquisition expenses in connection with completing its initial business combination.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, XPDI had a net loss of approximately $32.5 million, which consisted of a
non-operating
loss from changes in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities of approximately $26.2 million and operating losses of approximately $5.2 million, comprised of approximately $4.8 million of general and administrative expenses, $220,000 of related party general and administrative expenses and approximately $200,000 of franchise tax expenses, partially offset by approximately $35,000 of income from investments held in Trust Account.
For the period from December 29, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, we had cash and deferred offering costs of approximately $15,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of XPDI
On February 9, 2021, XPDI consummated its IPO of 34,500,000 units, at $10.00 per unit, including 4,500,000 units (the “over-allotment units”) issued pursuant to the full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option, generating total gross proceeds of $345.0 million and incurring offering costs of approximately $19.2 million, inclusive of approximately $12.1 million in deferred underwriting commissions. Simultaneous with the consummation of the IPO, pursuant to the securities subscription agreements that XPDI entered into with the Sponsor and the anchor investors, XPDI completed the private sale of an aggregate of 6,266,667 private placement warrants, at a price of $1.50 per private placement warrant, generating total proceeds of $9.4 million (the “Private Placement”).
Upon the closing of the IPO and the Private Placement on February 12, 2021, $345.0 million ($10.00 per unit) of the net proceeds of the sale of the units in the IPO, including proceeds from the sale of the over-allotment units and certain of the proceeds from the sale of the private placement warrants, were deposited into the segregated Trust Account, with Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, acting as trustee, and approximately $2.5 million of such net proceeds were deposited in XPDI’s operating account to pay expenses in connection with the closing of the IPO and for working capital following IPO.
As of December 31, 2021, XPDI had approximately $0.9 million in its operating bank account, and working capital deficit of approximately $2.7 million. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, XPDI used such funds not held in the Trust Account structuring, negotiating and consummating its initial business combination.
Prior to the Business Combination, XPDI’s liquidity needs were satisfied through (i) a payment of $25,000 by the Sponsor to cover certain offering costs in exchange for the issuance of the founder shares to the Sponsor and
70
Table of Contents
(ii) the loan under a promissory note with the Sponsor of approximately $90,000 and (iii) the net proceeds from the consummation of the Private Placement not held in the Trust Account. XPDI fully repaid the promissory note on February 15, 2021. In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an initial business combination, XPDI’s officers, directors and initial stockholders were permitted, but were not obligated, to provide XPDI working capital loan(s) as may have been required. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no amounts outstanding under any working capital loan, and no working capital loans were provided in connection with the Business Combination.
Contractual Obliga
tions of XPDI
Administrative Services Agreement
Commencing on the effective date of the registration statement for the IPO through the earlier of the consummation of its initial business combination and liquidation, XPDI agreed to pay affiliates of the Sponsor a total of $20,000 per month for office space and administrative and support services. XPDI incurred $220,000 in “General and administrative expenses—related party” in the accompanying audited statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 related to such services. The administrative services agreement was terminated upon the consummation of the Business Combination.
Advisory Services Agreements
In September and October of 2021, XPDI entered into advisory services agreements with four unaffiliated financial advisors, pursuant to which payments of up to $0.8 million in the aggregate was paid upon the closing of the merger in the first quarter of 2022.
Registration Rights
The holders of founder shares, private placement warrants and warrants that may have been issued upon conversion of working capital loans, if any (and any shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the private placement warrants or warrants issued upon conversion of the working capital loans and upon conversion of the founder shares), were entitled to registration rights pursuant to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 9, 2021, signed upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). These holders were entitled to certain demand and “piggyback” registration rights. However, the Registration Rights Agreement provided that XPDI would not be required to effect or permit any registration or cause any registration statement to become effective until termination of the applicable
lock-up
period. Under the Registration Rights Agreement, XPDI were obligated to bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statement.
On the Closing Date, the Registration Rights Agreement was amended and restated, and XPDI, certain persons and entities receiving shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the anchor investors and the Sponsor entered into the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “A&R Registration Rights Agreement”). The A&R Registration Rights Agreement provides for customary “demand” and “piggyback” registration rights for certain stockholders. Under the A&R Registration Rights Agreement, stockholders party to the A&R Registration Rights Agreement may request to sell all or any portion of their registrable securities in an underwritten offering under the terms and conditions set forth in the A&R Registration Rights Agreement. The A&R Registration Rights Agreement also provides that Core will pay certain expenses relating to such registrations and indemnify the registration rights holders against (or make contributions in respect of) certain liabilities which may arise under the Securities Act.
Underwriting Agreement
XPDI granted the underwriters a
45-day
option from the date of the final prospectus that formed a part of the registration statement for the IPO to purchase the over-allotment units to cover over-allotments, if any, at the IPO
71
Table of Contents
price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. On February 12, 2021, the underwriters fully exercised their option to purchase the over-allotment units. The underwriters did not earn any upfront underwriting commission in connection with 2,760,000 units, including the 2,405,700 units sold to the anchor investors. Except for those units, the underwriters were entitled to an underwriting discount of $0.20 per unit sold in the IPO on 31,740,000 units, or approximately $6.3 million, paid upon the closing of the IPO. An additional fee of $0.35 per unit sold in the IPO, or approximately $12.1 million in the aggregate, would be payable to the underwriters for deferred underwriting commissions. The deferred fee was payable to the underwriters from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event that we completed a business combination, subject to the terms of the underwriting agreement.
On the Closing Date, the deferred fee was paid from the amounts held in the Trust Account.
Critical Accounting Policies Before the Business Combination
This management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to fair value of financial instruments and accrued expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the following as being our critical accounting policies:
Derivative Warrant Liabilities
We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. Management evaluates all of XPDI’s financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”) and FASB ASC Topic
815-40,
“Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock” (“ASC 815”). The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be classified as liabilities or as equity,
is re-assessed at
the end of each reporting period.
The 8,625,000 public warrants issued in the IPO and the 6,266,667 private placement warrants are recognized as derivative liabilities in accordance with ASC 815. Accordingly, we recognize the warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjust the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. The liabilities are subject
to re-measurement at
each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in XPDI’s statements of operations. The initial estimated fair value of the public warrants is measured using a Monte Carlo simulation. The initial and subsequent fair value estimates of the private placement warrants are measured using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Beginning in April 2021, the estimated fair value of the private placement warrants is based on the listed price in an active market for such warrants.
Shares of Class
A Common Stock Subject to Possible Redemption
We account for shares of our Class A common stock subject to possible redemption in accordance with the guidance in ASC 480. Shares of our Class A common stock subject to mandatory redemption (if any) are classified as liability instruments and are measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable shares of Class A common stock (including shares of Class A common stock that feature redemption rights that are either within
72
Table of Contents
the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within our control) are classified as temporary equity. At all other times, shares of Class A common stock are classified as stockholders’ equity. Shares of our Class A common stock feature certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of our control and subject to the occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, 34,500,000 shares of Class A common stock subject to possible redemption are presented at redemption value as temporary equity, outside of the stockholders’ equity section of our condensed balance sheets. There was no Class A common stock issued or outstanding as of December 31, 2020.
Effective with the closing of the IPO (including exercise of the over-allotment option), we recognized the accretion from initial book value to redemption amount, which resulted in charges against additional
paid-in
capital (to the extent available) and accumulated deficit.
Net Income Per Common Share
We comply with accounting and disclosure requirements of FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings Per Share.” We have two classes of share, which are referred to as Class A common stock and Class B common stock. Income and losses are shared pro rata between the two classes of shares. Net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the respective period.
The calculation of diluted net income (loss) does not consider the effect of the public warrants and the private placement warrants to purchase an aggregate of 14,891,667 shares of Class A common stock in the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, because the exercise of such warrants is contingent upon future events and the inclusion of such warrants would be anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. As a result, diluted net income (loss) per share is the same as basic net income (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2021. Accretion associated with the redeemable Class A common stock is excluded from earnings per share as the redemption value approximates fair value.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2020, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2020-06, “Debt—Debt
with Conversion and Other Options
(Subtopic 470-20) and
Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity
(Subtopic 815-40): Accounting
for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity”
(“ASU 2020-06”), which
simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
ASU 2020-06 also
removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity-linked contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception, and it simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. We adopted
ASU 2020-06 on
January 1, 2021. Adoption of
ASU 2020-06 did
not impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying audited financial statements of XPDI included in this Report.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
As of December 31, 2021, we did not have
any off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of
Regulation S-K.
Critical Accounting Policies After the Business Combination
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those accounting policies and estimates that are both the most important to the portrayal of our net assets and results of operations and require the most difficult, subjective or
73
Table of Contents
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. These estimates are developed based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Critical accounting estimates are accounting estimates where the nature of the estimates are material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and the impact of the estimates on financial condition or operating performance is material.
The critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgments that we believe have the most significant impact on our consolidated financial statements are described below.
Revenue Recognition
Hosting and Equipment Sales
We may enter into contracts with more than one performance obligation. For example, we regularly enter into contracts that include both hosting services, for which revenue is recognized as services are performed on a consumption basis, and sales of computer equipment to those same customers, for which revenue is recognized at the point in time when control of the equipment is transferred to the customer (typically at the start of the contract period). For these contracts, revenue is recognized based on the relative standalone selling price of each performance obligation in the contract. The determination of the standalone selling price for contracts that involve more than one performance obligation can have a significant impact on the timing of revenue recognition and may require significant judgment, such as when the selling price of a good or service is not readily observable.
Stock-Based Compensation
We used Black-Scholes to evaluate our awards, and will continue to use judgment in evaluating the assumptions related to our stock-based compensation on a prospective basis. As we continue to accumulate additional data related to our common stock, we may refine our estimation process, which could materially impact our future stock-based compensation expense.
In addition, for awards with performance conditions, primarily restricted stock unit awards, we recognize the estimated fair value of the awards based on management’s judgment as to whether or not it is probable that the performance conditions will be achieved.
Common Stock Valuations
In valuing the fair value of our common stock, we use the most observable inputs available. We use the market approach, which estimates the value of our business by applying valuation multiples derived from the observed valuation multiples of comparable public companies to our expected financial results.
When observable inputs are not available, we may use the income approach. This approach typically projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. Projections of cash flows are based on management’s earnings forecasts.
Applying these valuation and allocation approaches involves the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are highly complex and subjective, such as those regarding the Company’s expected future revenue, expenses and cash flows, as well as discount rates, valuation multiples, the selection of comparable public companies and the probability of future events. Changes in any or all of these estimates and assumptions, or the relationships between these assumptions, impact the Company’s valuation as of each valuation date and may have a material impact on the valuation of the Company’s common stock and common stock warrants issued with the Company’s debt and equity instruments.
74
Table of Contents
Business Combinations and Goodwill
The total purchase price of any of our acquisitions is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over those fair values is recorded as goodwill. The fair value assigned to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on estimates and assumptions around the valuation of our common stock at the time of the acquisition.
We do not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually as of October 31, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. We have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of its reporting units are less than their carrying amounts as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, or chooses not to perform a qualitative assessment, then the quantitative goodwill impairment test will be performed. The quantitative test compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value is recognized as an impairment loss, and the resulting measurement of goodwill becomes its new cost basis. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the carrying amount of Goodwill was $58.2 million. There were no accumulated impairment losses as of January 1, 2019, and no impairment losses were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.
Long-Lived Assets
We test long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances have occurred that may affect the recoverability or the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets. Long-lived assets include intangible assets subject to amortization. A long-lived asset may be impaired when the estimated future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset. If that comparison indicates that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable, the impairment is measured based on the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. This evaluation is performed at the lowest level for which separately identifiable cash flows exist. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell.
In April 2019, management approved a plan to actively market and sell certain digital currency mining equipment. In April 2019, we recognized an impairment loss of $0.9 million representing the excess of the equipment’s carrying value over its estimated fair value less costs to sell, based on a quotation for the salvage value of the equipment. We completed the sale in October 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized losses of $2 thousand and $0.6 million, respectively, on sales of property, plant and equipment, primarily digital currency mining equipment. We have included these amounts for impairments of long-lived assets and losses on disposals of property, plant and equipment within general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Digital Currency Assets
Our digital currency assets are accounted for as intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. We initially recognize digital currency assets that are received as digital asset mining income based on the fair value of the digital currency assets. Digital currency assets that are purchased in an exchange of one digital currency asset for another digital currency asset are recognized at the fair value of the asset received. The Company recognizes realized gains or losses when digital currency assets are sold in an exchange for other digital currency assets or for cash using a
first-in
first-out
method of accounting. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recognized net gains of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, on sales of digital currency assets. We classified digital currency assets within current assets because we expected to sell the assets shortly after acquisition. We classify cash flows from digital currency assets within cash flows from operating activities.
75
Table of Contents
Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk
Substantially all revenue and operating expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars.
JOBS Act
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) contains provisions that, among other things, relax certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. We qualify as an “emerging growth company” and under the JOBS Act are allowed to comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements based on the effective date for private (not publicly traded) companies. We are electing to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards, and as a result, we may not comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required
for non-emerging growth
companies. As a result, the financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.
Additionally, we are in the process of evaluating the benefits of relying on the other reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if, as an “emerging growth company,” we choose to rely on such exemptions, we may not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our system of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404, (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of
non-emerging
growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the PCAOB regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis) and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the CEO’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply for a period of five years following the completion of the IPO or until we are no longer an “emerging growth company,” whichever is earlier.