BV Financial, Inc. (BVFL)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > Depository Institutions > SIC 6035 Savings Institution, Federally Chartered
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1302387. Latest filing source: 0001193125-26-128285.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Business
Read BVFL's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.
Risk Factors
Read BVFL's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 45,596,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-27 |
| Net income | 13,495,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-27 |
| Assets | 912,213,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-03-27 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-03-27. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001302387.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 31,259,000 | 37,742,000 | 41,003,000 | 45,596,000 | |
| Net income | 10,524,000 | 13,707,000 | 11,723,000 | 13,495,000 | |
| Diluted EPS | 1.32 | 1.47 | 1.09 | 1.43 | |
| Operating cash flow | 9,714,000 | 15,194,000 | 16,063,000 | 19,024,000 | |
| Capital expenditures | 502,000 | 155,000 | 611,000 | 237,000 | |
| Share buybacks | 17,705,000 | 30,023,000 | |||
| Assets | 844,963,000 | 885,254,000 | 911,821,000 | 912,213,000 | |
| Liabilities | 747,212,000 | 686,189,000 | 716,322,000 | 728,409,000 | |
| Stockholders' equity | 83,446,000 | 97,751,000 | 199,065,000 | 195,499,000 | 183,804,000 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 68,652,000 | 73,742,000 | 70,500,000 | 55,705,000 | |
| Free cash flow | 9,212,000 | 15,039,000 | 15,452,000 | 18,787,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 33.67% | 36.32% | 28.59% | 29.60% | |
| Return on equity | 10.77% | 6.89% | 6.00% | 7.34% | |
| Return on assets | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.29% | 1.48% | |
| Liabilities / equity | 7.64 | 3.45 | 3.66 | 3.96 |
Industry Peer Context
Net margin peer context
ROE peer context
ROA peer context
Financial Bridges
Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Operating cash flow: accession 0001193125-26-128285; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | Capital expenditures: accession 0001193125-26-128285; concept PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | Free cash flow: accession 0001193125-26-128285; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
Financial Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: InterestAndFeeIncomeLoansAndLeases. Source concepts: us-gaap:InterestAndFeeIncomeLoansAndLeases.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue. Source concepts: us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001193125-26-128285; filed 2026-03-27. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-11. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001302387.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | 0.42 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 9,327,000 | 3,899,000 | 0.52 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 9,764,000 | 3,684,000 | 0.35 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 9,879,000 | 3,009,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 9,782,000 | 2,574,000 | 0.24 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 10,177,000 | 3,399,000 | 0.32 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 10,522,000 | 3,798,000 | 0.35 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 10,522,000 | 1,952,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 10,741,000 | 2,099,000 | 0.21 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 11,334,000 | 2,861,000 | 0.29 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 11,519,000 | 3,730,000 | 0.41 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 12,002,000 | 4,805,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 11,143,000 | 1,091,000 | 0.13 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-216089; filed 2026-05-11. Concept: InterestAndFeeIncomeLoansAndLeases. Source concepts: us-gaap:InterestAndFeeIncomeLoansAndLeases.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-216089; filed 2026-05-11. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001193125-26-216089; filed 2026-05-11. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0001193125-26-216089.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
Management’s discussion and analysis is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The financial information in this section is derived from the accompanying financial statements. You should read the financial information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s 2025 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2026.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “intend,” “target” and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
•
statements of our goals, financial condition and performance, intentions and expectations;
•
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;
•
statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and
•
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. We are under no duty to and do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
•
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected, including as a result of unemployment levels and labor shortages, and any potential recession or slowed economic growth;
•
changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses;
•
changes in the economic assumptions and methodology used to calculate the allowance for credit losses;
•
our ability to access cost-effective funding;
•
changes in liquidity, including the size and composition of our deposit portfolio and the percentage of uninsured deposits in the portfolio;
•
fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions;
•
our continued ability to originate loans outside of our market area;
•
our ability to implement and update our business strategies;
•
competition among depository and other financial institutions;
•
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins and yields, the fair value of financial instruments or our level of loan originations or prepayments on loans we have made and make;
•
adverse changes in the securities markets;
33
BV FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
•
changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements and insurance premiums;
•
the imposition of tariffs or other domestic or international governmental policies and retaliatory responses;
•
the impact of a potential government shutdown;
•
the current or anticipated impact of military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events;
•
changes in the quality or composition of our loan or investment portfolios;
•
technological changes that may be more difficult or expensive than expected;
•
system failure or cyber-security breaches of our information technology infrastructure;
•
the failure to maintain current technologies and/or successfully implement future information technology enhancements;
•
the inability of third-party providers to perform as expected;
•
our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk in the current economic environment;
•
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
•
our ability to successfully integrate into our operations any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel we may acquire, and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto;
•
changes in investor sentiment and consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
•
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;
•
our ability to retain key employees;
•
our compensation expense associated with equity allocated or awarded to our employees; and
•
changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law or regulation, we do not undertake, and we specifically disclaim any obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Critical Accounting Estimates
Our accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or discretion or to make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The ACL is an estimate of the expected credit losses for loans held for investment and for off-balance sheet exposures. ASC 326, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses," requires an immediate recognition of the credit losses expected to occur over the lifetime of a financial asset whether originated or purchased. Charge-offs are recorded to the ACL when management believes a loan is uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ACL. Management believes the ACL is maintained in accordance with GAAP and in compliance with appropriate regulatory guidelines. The ACL includes quantitative estimates of losses for collectively and individually evaluated loans. The quantitative estimate for collectively evaluated loans (other than investor commercial real estate loans) is determined using the average charge-off method that utilizes historical losses for all Maryland banks with assets less than $1 billion beginning in March 2000. The investor
34
BV FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
commercial real estate portfolio utilizes the national loss history for banks with assets less than $1 billion over the same time period. Investor CRE loans are made nationwide, therefore, management deems it appropriate to utilize national loss rates when evaluating this portfolio. Adjustments are made to the historical loss factors under each scenario for economic conditions, portfolio concentrations, collateral values, the level and trend of delinquent and non-accrual loans and internal changes in staffing, loan policies and monitoring of the portfolio. Loans are selected for individual evaluation primarily based on their payment status and whether the loan has been placed on non-accrual status. Loans on non-accrual status include all loans greater than 90 days delinquent and other loans with weaknesses sufficient for management to place these loans on non-accrual status. The ACL is measured on a collective basis when similar risk factors exist as determined by internal loan coding and assignment to a portfolio segment. The Company utilizes reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions when estimating the ACL on loans. The model's calculation also uses an adjustment for a 12-month forecast period utilizing the most recent 12-month economic forecast from the Federal Reserve Board for national gross domestic product ("GDP") and the national unemployment rate. The model compares the average history of loss rates described above to the forecasted GDP and unemployment to determine the necessity and amount of any forward-looking adjustment. The establishment of the ACL is significantly affected by management's judgment and by economic and other uncertainties, and different amounts may be reported under different conditions or assumptions. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Maryland Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the ACL for reasonableness and, as a result of such reviews, we may be required to increase our ACL or recognize loan charge-offs. The calculation of ACL excludes accrued interest receivable balances because these balances are reversed in a timely manner against previously recognized interest income when a loan is placed on non-accrual.
Goodwill
The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets from acquisitions, or goodwill, is evaluated for impairment at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates it is likely impairment has occurred. Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. In any given year, the Company may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of the carrying value, or if the Company elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, a quantitative impairment test is performed. In performing a quantitative test for impairment, the fair value of net assets is estimated based on analyses of the Company’s market value, discounted cash flows, and peer values. The determination of goodwill impairment is sensitive to market conditions and other key assumptions used in determining or allocating fair value. Variability in the market and changes in assumptions or subjective measurements used to estimate fair value are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations. Our annual goodwill impairment test is performed each year as of September 30. The Company performed its 2025 goodwill impairment qualitative assessment and determined its goodwill was not considered impaired.
Deferred Income Taxes
At March 31, 2026, we had a net deferred tax asset totaling $7.4 million. In accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If currently available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the am
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This discussion and analysis reflects the information contained in our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information at and for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this annual report. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the other business and financial information contained in this annual report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes of BV Financial.
Overview
Summary of Financial Condition and Operating Results. At December 31, 2025, we had $912.2 million in consolidated assets, an increase of $392,000, or 0.04%, from $911.8 million at December 31, 2024. The increase was due primarily to a $19.2 million increase in net loans receivable to $748.5 million at December 31, 2025, partially offset by a $14.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and a $4.0 million decrease in securities available for sale. Total liabilities increased $12.1 million, or 1.7%, from $716.3 million at December 31, 2024 to $728.4 million at December 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase in total deposits of $24.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in borrowings of $14.9 million.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $11.7 million or 6.0%, to $183.8 million at December 31, 2025, primarily due to $30.0 million in stock repurchases, offset by $13.5 million of net income and $4.2 million in other adjustments, primarily equity compensation. During the year, the Company repurchased 1,823,997 shares of common stock at an average cost of $16.23.
Net income increased $1.8 million, or 15.1%, to $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was due primarily to an increase of $3.0 million in interest income and an increase in the recovery of provision for credit losses of $2.2 million, offset by a $1.3 million increase in interest expense, a $1.7 million increase in non-interest expense, and a $700,000 increase in income tax expense.
Business Strategy
We have focused primarily on continuing and enhancing our community-oriented retail banking strategy. Highlights of our current business strategy include the following:
37
•
Pursue opportunistic acquisitions and partnerships. We intend to continue to prudently pursue opportunities to acquire banks that offer opportunities for solid financial returns. Our primary focus will be on franchises that enhance our funding profile, product capabilities or geographic density or footprint, while maintaining an acceptable risk profile. We believe in the need to make significant technological investments and the importance of scale in banking.
•
Grow our loan portfolio with an emphasis on commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending. While we intend to continue to focus on the origination of commercial real estate loans, we intend to remain a residential mortgage lender in our market area and maintain a balance between the commercial real estate and residential mortgage portfolios. We originated $52.8 million of commercial real estate and $32.9 million of residential mortgages loans during the year ended December 31, 2025. At December 31, 2025, $401.4 million, or 53.2%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans and $258.5 million, or 34.2%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgages.
•
Manage credit risk to maintain a low level of non-performing assets. We believe that maintaining strong asset quality is paramount to our long-term success. We follow conservative underwriting guidelines with sound loan administration, and focus on originating loans secured by real estate. This includes enhanced loan monitoring of higher risk portfolio segments, higher risk individual loans and larger relationships within the portfolio, and frequent loan grade review. Our non-performing assets totaled $2.3 million, or 0.25% of total assets, at December 31, 2025. Our total non-performing loans to total loans ratio was 0.30% at December 31, 2025.
•
Increase core deposits with an emphasis on non-interest-bearing deposits. Deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and investment. Core deposits (which we define as all deposits except for time deposits) were 69.8% of total deposits at December 31, 2025. In particular, non-interest-bearing demand deposits were 20.5% of our total deposits at December 31, 2025. We continue to focus on expanding core deposits by leveraging our business development officers and commercial lending and retail relationships.
We intend to continue to pursue these business strategies, subject to changes necessitated by future market conditions, regulatory restrictions and other factors. While we are committed to the business strategies noted above, we recognize the challenges and uncertainties of the current environment and plan to execute these strategies as market conditions allow.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we may delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. We have determined to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
The following represent our critical accounting policies:
Allowance for Credit Losses. The determination of our allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate by management because of the high degree of judgment involved in determining qualitative loss factors, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the forecasted economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation amount that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on our loan portfolio. The allowance is established through provisions for credit losses charged against income. When available information confirms that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these amounts are charged against the allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a no less than a quarterly basis by
38
management. In evaluating the level of the allowance for credit losses, management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and non-accrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our accounting policies and methodologies for establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Non-accrual, substandard, and other loans as determined by management have risk characteristics different from other loans in their portfolio segment are individually analyzed for potential uncollectable balances. Reserves on individually assessed loans are measured on a loan-by-loan basis using one of three acceptable methods: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Determinations as to the need for a specific allowance are made after considering all relevant factors regarding the borrower, the collateral and economic conditions. Depending on this assessment, management may establish a specific allowance on the loan.
Goodwill. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets from acquisitions, or goodwill, is evaluated for impairment at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates it is likely impairment has occurred. Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. BV Financial may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of the carrying value, or if BV Financial elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, a quantitative impairment test is performed. In performing a quantitative test for impairment, the fair value of net assets is estimated based on analyses of BV Financial’s market value, discounted cash flows, and peer values. The determination of goodwill impairment is sensitive to market-based economics and other key assumptions used in determining or allocating fair value. Variability in the market and changes in assumptions or subjective measurements used to estimate fair value are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
Our annual goodwill impairment test is performed each year as of September 30. BV Financial performed its 2025 annual goodwill impairment qualitative assessment and determined BV Financial’s goodwill was not considered impaired. We monitor our performance and evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently as needed.
Deferred Income Taxes. At December 31, 2025, we had a net deferred tax asset totaling $7.6 million. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If currently available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established if it is not more likely than not realizable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets are inherently subjective and are reviewed on a regular basis as regulatory or business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance that results in additional income tax expense in the period in which it is recognized would negatively affect income. Management believes, based upon current facts, that it is more likely than not that there will be sufficient taxable income in future years to realize its federal and state deferred tax asset.
For more information on our critical accounting policies, see Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data sets forth certain financial highlights of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
39
| At December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||
| Selected Financial Condition Data: | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 912,213 | $ | 911,821 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 55,705 | 70,500 | |||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 33,226 | 37,259 | |||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 5,736 | 5,979 | |||||
| Loans receivable | 748,484 | 729,238 | |||||
| Investment in life insurance | 20,441 | 20,058 | |||||
| Goodwill | 14,420 | 14,420 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset, net | 7,563 | 8,899 | |||||
| Deposits | 676,094 | 651,491 | |||||
| Borrowings | 35,000 | 49,883 | |||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 183,804 | 195,499 |
| At December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Selected Operating Data: | ||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 49,707 | $ | 46,682 | ||||
| Interest expense | 12,806 | 11,495 | ||||||
| Net interest income | 36,901 | 35,187 | ||||||
| (Recovery of) provision for credit losses | (2,429 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||
| Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses | 39,330 | 35,390 | ||||||
| Non-interest income | 2,720 | 2,514 | ||||||
| Non-interest expense | 23,187 | 21,498 | ||||||
| Income before income taxes | 18,863 | 16,406 | ||||||
| Income taxes | 5,368 | 4,683 | ||||||
| Net income | 13,495 | 11,723 | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.44 | $ | 1.10 | ||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.43 | $ | 1.09 |
| At or For the Years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2025 | 2024 | |||
| Performance Ratios: | ||||
| Return on average assets | 1.48% | 1.32% | ||
| Return on average equity | 7.01% | 5.77% | ||
| Interest rate spread(1) | 3.61% | 3.50% | ||
| Net interest margin(2) | 4.35% | 4.27% | ||
| Non-interest expense to average assets | 2.54% | 2.42% | ||
| Efficiency ratio(3) | 58.52% | 57.02% | ||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | 149.10% | 154.92% | ||
| Average equity to average assets | 21.07% | 22.88% | ||
| Capital Ratios(4): | ||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | 22.06% | 25.49% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 21.13% | 24.24% | ||
| Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 21.13% | 24.24% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to average assets | 16.44% | 19.83% | ||
| Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans | 0.85% | 1.15% | ||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans | 284.72% | 212.51% | ||
| Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average outstanding loans during the year | 0.00% | -0.04% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans | 0.30% | 0.54% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets | 0.25% | 0.44% | ||
| Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.25% | 0.46% | ||
| Other: | ||||
| Number of offices | 12 | 13 | ||
| Number of full-time equivalent employees | 102 | 111 | ||
| (1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||
| (2) Represents the net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. | ||||
| (3) Represents non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. | ||||
| (4) BayVanguard Bank only. |
40
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024
Total Assets.
Total assets were $912.2 million at December 31, 2025, an increase of $392,000, or 0.04%, from $911.8 million at December 31, 2024. The increase was due primarily to a $19.2 million increase in net loans receivable to $748.5 million at December 31, 2025, offset by a $14.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents, and a $4.0 million decrease in securities available for sale.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $14.8 million, or 21.0%, to $55.7 million at December 31, 2025 from $70.5 million at December 31, 2024 as excess cash was used to fund loans and repay the Company's subordinated debt.
Securities.
Securities available for sale (“AFS”) decreased $4.0 million, or 10.8%, to $33.2 million at December 31, 2025 from $37.3 million at December 31, 2024. Securities held to maturity ("HTM") decreased $243,000 or 4.1% to $5.7 million at December 31, 2025. The decreases were due to pay-downs and maturities.
Management monitors and manages the investment portfolio on a monthly basis and believes the risks inherent in the portfolio are acceptable. AFS securities are reviewed each quarter to determine whether a decline in the fair value of the securities is a result of a deterioration in credit quality. No reserve for credit losses has been recorded on AFS securities.
Gross unrealized losses on AFS securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $1.6 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The unrealized losses are the result of changes in interest rates since the securities were issued. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold investment securities with unrealized losses until they mature, at which time the Company expects to receive pay-offs in full for the security.
The AFS portfolio holds 91%, or $31.7 million, of its portfolio in securities issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSE") backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The remainder of the portfolio consists of bonds issued by bank holding companies.
The HTM portfolio consists of $2.5 million in securities issued by GSEs and $3.2 million in securities issued by bank holding companies. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the securities in the HTM portfolio not issued by a GSE had an allowance for credit loss of $2,000 and $4,000, respectively.
No individual security in either the AFS or HTM portfolios issued by a non-GSE has a book value greater than $750,000.
Net Loans Receivable.
Net loans receivable increased $19.2 million, or 2.6%, to $748.5 million at December 31, 2025 from $729.2 million at December 31, 2024. Increases in 1-4 family owner occupied, construction loans and commercial loans offset decreases in owner occupied commercial real estate loans, commercial investor loans, non-owner occupied one- to four- family loans, farm loans, consumer loans and loans guaranteed by the U.S. Government.
Total Liabilities.
Total liabilities increased $12.1 million, or 1.7%, to $728.4 million at December 31, 2025 from $716.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in deposits of $24.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in borrowings of $14.9 million.
Deposits.
Total deposits increased $24.6 million, or 3.8%, to $676.1 million at December 31, 2025 from $651.5 million at December 31, 2024. Interest-bearing deposits increased $16.0 million, or 3.1%, to $537.7 million at December 31, 2025 from $521.8 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to the $14.0 million increase in certificates of deposit. Noninterest bearing deposits increased $8.6 million, or 6.7%, to $138.4 million at December 31, 2025 from $129.7 million at December 31, 2024.
41
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings.
The Company had $35.0 million of FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2025 compared to $15.0 million in FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2024. The increased borrowings from the FHLB replaced the $35.0 million in subordinated debt issued in 2020 and paid off in 2025.
Stockholders’ Equity.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $11.7 million or 6.0%, to $183.8 million at December 31, 2025 primarily due to $30.0 million in stock repurchases, offset by $13.5 million of net income and $4.2 million in other adjustments, primarily equity compensation. During the year, the Company repurchased 1,823,997 shares of common stock at an average cost of $16.23.
Average Balance Sheets
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense. Net deferred loan fees totaled $2.2 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands) | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 746,435 | $ | 45,596 | 6.11 | % | $ | 703,411 | $ | 41,003 | 5.81 | % | ||||||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 35,267 | 1,326 | 3.76 | % | 35,544 | 1,319 | 3.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 6,816 | 185 | 2.71 | % | 9,542 | 314 | 3.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and other interest-earning assets | 59,338 | 2,600 | 4.41 | % | 73,096 | 4,046 | 5.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 847,856 | 49,707 | 5.86 | % | 821,593 | 46,682 | 5.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets | 65,793 | 68,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 913,649 | $ | 890,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 79,288 | 679 | 0.86 | % | $ | 84,655 | 878 | 1.03 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 119,083 | 499 | 0.42 | % | 134,795 | 323 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Money market deposits | 125,508 | 3,055 | 2.43 | % | 101,831 | 2,274 | 2.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 203,464 | 6,471 | 3.18 | % | 173,932 | 5,567 | 3.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 527,343 | 10,704 | 2.03 | % | 495,213 | 9,042 | 1.82 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 6,547 | 279 | 4.26 | % | 41 | 2 | 4.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 34,766 | 1,823 | 5.24 | % | 35,071 | 2,451 | 6.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total borrowings | 41,313 | 2,102 | 5.09 | % | 35,112 | 2,453 | 6.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 568,656 | 12,806 | 2.25 | % | 530,325 | 11,495 | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | 134,643 | 137,935 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 17,838 | 19,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 721,137 | 687,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 192,512 | 203,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 913,649 | $ | 890,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 36,901 | $ | 35,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest rate spread 1 | 3.61 | % | 3.50 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest-earning assets 2 | $ | 279,200 | $ | 291,268 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin 3 | 4.35 | % | 4.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | 149.10 | % | 154.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Netinterest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Net interest marghin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets. |
42
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. There were no out-of-period items or adjustments required to be excluded from the table below.
| December 31, 2025 vs. 2024 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Income Increase (Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 2,566 | $ | 2,027 | $ | 4,593 | ||||||
| Investment securities AFS | (7 | ) | 14 | 7 | ||||||||
| Investment securities HTM | (74 | ) | (55 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||
| Total Investment securities | (81 | ) | (41 | ) | (122 | ) | ||||||
| Equity Investments | 1 | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
| Short-term investments and other | ||||||||||||
| interest-earning assets | (618 | ) | (825 | ) | (1,443 | ) | ||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 1,868 | 1,157 | 3,025 | |||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||
| Deposits | 643 | 1,019 | 1,662 | |||||||||
| FHLB Borrowings & Other Borrowings | 277 | — | 277 | |||||||||
| Jr. Subordinated Debentures | ||||||||||||
| Subordinated Debentures | (16 | ) | (612 | ) | (628 | ) | ||||||
| Total Borrowings | 261 | (612 | ) | (351 | ) | |||||||
| Escrow Balances | ||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 904 | 407 | 1,311 | |||||||||
| Change in net interest income | $ | 964 | $ | 750 | $ | 1,714 |
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024
General.
The Company reported net income of $13.5 million or $1.43 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to net income of $11.7 million or $1.09 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Interest Income.
Total interest income increased 3.0 million, or 6.48% for the year ended December 31, 2025 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Interest income on loans increased by $4.6 million or 11.2%. Higher yields on loans contributed $2.0 million to the increase while an increase in the average balance outstanding contributed $2.6 million to the increase.
Interest income on investment securities available-for-sale increased by $7,000 or 0.5% as the increase in yields on new purchases were offset by a decline in the average balance of AFS investments.
Interest income on investment securities held-to-maturity decreased $129,000 or 41.1%, primarily due to lower average balances in these securities.
Other interest income primarily consists of interest earned on overnight cash investments. Interest income in this category decreased by $1.4 million, or 35.7%, primarily due to lower average balances.
43
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense increased by $1.3 million or 11.4% to $12.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Both the increase in the average balance of deposits and borrowings and the cost of interest-bearing deposits drove the increase in total interest expense.
Interest paid on interest-bearing deposits increased by $1.7 million or 18.4% for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Higher rates paid on deposits were influenced by, among other factors, intense competition for deposits in the Bank's market area, and a greater percentage of deposits consisting of higher-yielding certificates of deposit. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased in the year as customers took advantage of higher market interest rates to redeploy their excess cash into interest-bearing products.
Interest expense on advances from the FHLB increased by $277,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025 as the Bank utilized FHLB borrowings to replace the $35.0 million in subordinated debt issued in 2020.
Interest expense on subordinated debt decreased by $628,000, or 25.6%, during the year. The decrease was due primarily to the pay-off of $3.0 million in junior subordinated debt which included the write-off (increase in interest expense) of the remaining purchase accounting fair market value adjustment of $566,000 during 2024.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income before the provision for credit losses was $36.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $35.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2024. The net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2025 was 4.35% compared to 4.27% for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Provision for Credit Losses.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded a credit of $2.4 million compared to a credit of $203,000 for the year ended December 31, 2024. During the fourth quarter, based on a recommendation from a third-party validation report on the CECL model and methodology, the Company expanded the number of independent variables used in the forecast economic adjustment. The Company added the Federal Reserve’s forecast of the unemployment rate to the regression analysis that had previously used only the Federal Reserve’s forecast of GDP. This change resulted in a decrease in the required ACL-Loans in the fourth quarter of $945,000. The remaining decrease in the calculated required ACL-loans was primarily due to formula-driven qualitative factor adjustments for loan segment growth and asset quality.
The $2.4 million credit to the provision for credit losses consisted of a $2.2 million credit to the allowance for credit losses - loans, and a $2,000 credit to the allowance for credit losses - HTM securities and a $259,000 credit to the allowance for off balance sheet commitments. In the year ended December 31, 2025, net recoveries of previously charged-off loans totaled $83,000. These recoveries directly reduced the required amount of the allowance for credit losses-loans.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Service fees on deposits | $ | 462 | $ | 426 | $ | 36 | 8.45 | % | ||||||||
| Fees from debit cards | 706 | 706 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Income from investment in life insurance | 383 | 400 | (17 | ) | (4.25 | )% | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | 26 | — | 26 | — | ||||||||||||
| (Loss) gain on sale of premises and equipment | (32 | ) | — | (32 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Other income | 1,175 | 982 | 193 | 19.65 | % | |||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | $ | 2,720 | $ | 2,514 | $ | 206 | 8.19 | % |
Non-interest income increased $206,000 to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 from $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
44
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and related benefits | $ | 16,237 | $ | 14,005 | $ | 2,232 | 15.94 | % | ||||||||
| Occupancy | 1,624 | 1,616 | 8 | 0.50 | % | |||||||||||
| Data processing | 1,528 | 1,480 | 48 | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
| Advertising | 37 | 23 | 14 | 60.87 | % | |||||||||||
| Professional fees | 933 | 1,008 | (75 | ) | -7.44 | % | ||||||||||
| Equipment | 370 | 396 | (26 | ) | (6.57 | )% | ||||||||||
| Other real estate owned and repossessed assets holding costs | 5 | 13 | (8 | ) | (61.54 | )% | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 180 | 181 | (1 | ) | (0.55 | )% | ||||||||||
| FDIC insurance premiums | 330 | 326 | 4 | 1.23 | % | |||||||||||
| Other | 1,943 | 2,450 | (507 | ) | -20.69 | % | ||||||||||
| Total non-interest expense | $ | 23,187 | $ | 21,498 | $ | 1,689 | 7.86 | % |
For the year ended December 31, 2025 noninterest expense totaled $23.2 million compared to $21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Compensation and benefits increased by 15.9% due to a full year of costs of the equity awards granted after the stockholders approved the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan compared to four months of costs of the plan in 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025 expense related to this plan was $3.9 million as compared to $1.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2024.
Other operating expenses decreased by $507,000 or (20.7%) due to decreases in outside service fees, IT repairs and maintenance and miscellaneous loan expenses.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $5.4 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.5%. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $4.7 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.5%.
Management of Market Risk
General. Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk because, as a financial institution, the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Therefore, a principal goal of our operations is to manage interest rate risk and limit the exposure of our financial condition and results of operations to changes in market interest rates. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee, which consists of members of senior management, is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the policy and guidelines approved by our board of directors. We currently utilize a third-party modeling program, prepared on a quarterly basis, to evaluate our sensitivity to changing interest rates, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. We have implemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
1.
growing core deposit accounts;
2.
holding higher levels of cash and cash equivalents;
3.
continuing the diversification of our loan portfolio by adding more commercial-related loans, which typically have variable rates and shorter maturities; and
4.
purchasing short-term and adjustable rate securities.
By following these strategies, we believe that we are better positioned to react to increases and decreases in market interest rates.
We have not engaged in hedging activities, such as engaging in futures or options, or investing in high-risk mortgage derivatives, such as collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests, real estate mortgage investment conduit residual interests or stripped mortgage-backed securities.
Change in Net Interest Income. We analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through a net interest income model. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans
45
and securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We estimate what our net interest income would be for a 12-month period. We then calculate what the net interest income would be for the same period under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points or decreases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the “Change in Interest Rates” column below.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2025, the calculation of the estimated changes in our net interest income that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100bp | + 200 bp | + 300bp | + 400bp |
| December 31, 2025 | -18.00% | -14.23% | -8.66% | -3.79% | 2.16% | 4.12% | 5.85% | 7.36% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The tables above indicate that at December 31, 2025, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 4.12% increase in net interest income. In the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 8.66% decrease in net interest income.
The table above also illustrates that BV Financial’s net interest income is subject to significant decreases if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by the amounts presented. This is due to a number of factors including:
1.
Short-term assets such as cash and cash equivalents will reprice immediately based on the Fed Funds target rate.
2.
The floating-rate securities in the available-for-sale portfolio will reprice lower with a short (quarterly) lag.
3.
Loans with variable interest rates will begin to reprice at rates lower than the current note rates.
4.
New assets (loans and investment securities) will be placed on the balance sheet at the lower current market interest rates.
5.
Our non-maturing deposits remain at historical low rates and with the level of rate decreases presented, the rates paid on these deposits could not be lowered by a similar amount.
6.
Our certificate of deposit liabilities will take time to reprice to lower market rates.
The increase in net interest income in the rising rate scenarios is less than the decrease in the falling rate scenario primarily due to the largest category of interest-earning assets, the loan portfolio, takes longer to reprice to the higher market rates than other assets and liabilities. A high level of new loan growth at higher market rates would be required to help offset the delay in the repricing of the current loan portfolio. The model also assumes that the non-maturing deposit portfolio will quickly reprice to a calculated percentage of the increase in market rates.
Economic Value of Equity. We also compute amounts by which the net present value of our assets and liabilities (economic value of equity or “EVE”) would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. This model uses a discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based pricing approach to measure the interest rate sensitivity of net portfolio value. The model estimates the economic value of each type of asset, liability and off-balance sheet contract under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point increments or a decrease instantaneously by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. EVE as a measurement tool for interest rate risk measures the changes in the values of assets and liabilities based on the structure of the individual instrument (maturity, interest rate, re-pricing characteristic) when different levels of market interest rates are assumed.
46
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2025, the calculation of the estimated changes in our EVE that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100 bp | + 200 bp | + 300 bp | + 400 bp |
| December 31, 2025 | -34.78% | -25.30% | -14.15% | -6.07% | 3.41% | 5.41% | 6.56% | 6.89% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2025, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 5.41% increase in EVE, and in the event of an instantaneous 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience an 14.15% decrease in EVE. As indicated in the table above, our EVE falls considerably in the instantaneous down scenarios due to the value of the low or zero rate non-maturing deposit portfolio declining as the theoretical spread between the cost of these deposits and new assets declines. In the up scenarios, the value of these instruments increases less as the model assumes a significant lag before these rates increase.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net interest income and net economic value tables presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates, and actual results may differ. Furthermore, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of changes in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.
Interest rate risk calculations also may not reflect the fair values of financial instruments. For example, decreases in market interest rates can increase the fair values of our loans, deposits and borrowings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity. Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities and proceeds from maturities of securities. We also have the ability to borrow from the FHLB of Atlanta. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $171.6 million and $157.5 million available under a line of credit with the FHLB of Atlanta, and had $35.0 million and $15 million outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, with the FHLB of Atlanta. In addition, at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Bank had $29.0 million and $23.0 million in unfunded letters of credit used to secure municipal deposits outstanding against the line of credit with the FHLB of Atlanta.
While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Our most liquid assets are cash and short-term investments including interest-bearing demand deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period.
Our cash flows are comprised of three primary classifications: cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $19.0 million and $16.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities, which consists primarily of investments in loans and securities, was $13.3 million and $32.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Net cash provided by used in financing activities, consisting primarily of changes in deposits and advances and the repayment of advances to the FHLB, was $20.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to net cash provided of $13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024.
47
We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Time deposits that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from December 31, 2025 totaled $79.9 million. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained. However, if a substantial portion of these deposits is not retained, we may utilize FHLB advances or raise interest rates on deposits to attract new accounts, which may result in higher levels of interest expense.
Capital Resources. At December 31, 2025, BayVanguard Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements, and was categorized as well capitalized. Management is not aware of any conditions or events since the most recent notification that would change our category.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. At December 31, 2025, we had outstanding commitments to extend credit of $45.9 million and $832,000 of letters of credit. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include data processing services, operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of BV Financial for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 included with this document for a description of recent accounting pronouncements that may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates, generally, have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than does inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000950170-25-045947.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This discussion and analysis reflects the information contained in our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information at and for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this annual report. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the other business and financial information contained in this annual report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes of BV Financial.
Overview
Summary of Financial Condition and Operating Results. At December 31, 2024, we had $911.8 million in consolidated assets, an increase of $26.6 million, or 3.0%, from $885.3 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was due primarily to a $33.0 million increase in net loans receivable to $729.2 million at December 31, 2024, and a $2.5 million increase in available for-for-sale securities, partially offset by a decrease of $3.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and a $4.2 million decrease in held to maturity securities. Total liabilities increased $30.1 million, or 4.4%, from $686.2 million at December 31, 2023 to $716.3 million at December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in total deposits of $17.4 million, and an increase in borrowings of $12.6 million.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $3.6 million, or 1.8%, to $195.5 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to the $17.8 million of repurchased common stock, partially offset by the $11.7 million in net income.
Net income decreased $2.0 million, or 14.5%, to $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was due primarily to an increase of $2.1 million in noninterest expense and a $1.2 million decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by a $1.0 million increase in net interest income.
Business Strategy
We have focused primarily on continuing and enhancing our community-oriented retail banking strategy. Highlights of our current business strategy include the following:
38
•
Pursue opportunistic acquisitions and partnerships. We intend to continue to prudently pursue opportunities to acquire banks that offer opportunities for solid financial returns. Our primary focus will be on franchises that enhance our funding profile, product capabilities or geographic density or footprint, while maintaining an acceptable risk profile. We believe in the need to make significant technological investments and the importance of scale in banking.
•
Grow our loan portfolio with an emphasis on commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending. While we intend to continue to focus on the origination of commercial real estate loans, we intend to remain a residential mortgage lender in our market area and maintain a balance between the commercial real estate and residential mortgage portfolios. We originated $77.5 million of commercial real estate and $14.2 million of residential mortgages loans during the year ended December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2024, $411.3 million, or 55.8%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans and $241.7 million, or 32.8%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgages. Additionally, the Bank purchased a package of $14.0 million of one-to-four family owner occupied residential mortgages.
•
Manage credit risk to maintain a low level of non-performing assets. We believe that maintaining strong asset quality is paramount to our long-term success. We follow conservative underwriting guidelines with sound loan administration, and focus on originating loans secured by real estate. This includes enhanced loan monitoring of higher risk portfolio segments, higher risk individual loans and larger relationships within the portfolio, and frequent loan grade review. In 2024, our largest loan on non-accrual, a $3.8 million investor commercial real estate loan paid off. Our non-performing assets totaled $4.2 million, or 0.46% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. Our total non-performing loans to total loans ratio was 0.54% at December 31, 2024.
•
Increase core deposits with an emphasis on non-interest-bearing deposits. Deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and investment. Core deposits (which we define as all deposits except for time deposits) were 70.8% of total deposits at December 31, 2024. In particular, non-interest-bearing demand deposits were 19.9% of our total deposits at December 31, 2024. We continue to focus on expanding core deposits by leveraging our business development officers and commercial lending and retail relationships.
We intend to continue to pursue these business strategies, subject to changes necessitated by future market conditions, regulatory restrictions and other factors. While we are committed to the business strategies noted above, we recognize the challenges and uncertainties of the current environment and plan to execute these strategies as market conditions allow.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we may delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. We have determined to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
The following represent our critical accounting policies:
39
Allowance for Credit Losses. The determination of our allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate by management because of the high degree of judgment involved in determining qualitative loss factors, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the forecasted economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation amount that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on our loan portfolio. The allowance is established through provisions for credit losses charged against income. When available information confirms that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these amounts are charged against the allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a no less than a quarterly basis by management. In evaluating the level of the allowance for credit losses, management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and non-accrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements for a detailed discussion of our accounting policies and methodologies for establishing the allowance for credit losses.
Non-accrual, substandard, and other loans as determined by management have risk characteristics different from other loans in their portfolio segment are individually analyzed for potential uncollectable balances. Reserves on individually assessed loans are measured on a loan-by-loan basis using one of three acceptable methods: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Determinations as to the need for a specific allowance are made after considering all relevant factors regarding the borrower, the collateral and economic conditions. Depending on this assessment, management may establish a specific allowance on the loan.
Goodwill. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets from acquisitions, or goodwill, is evaluated for impairment at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates it is likely impairment has occurred. Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. In any given year BV Financial may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of the carrying value, or if BV Financial elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, a quantitative impairment test is performed. In performing a quantitative test for impairment, the fair value of net assets is estimated based on analyses of BV Financial’s market value, discounted cash flows, and peer values. The determination of goodwill impairment is sensitive to market-based economics and other key assumptions used in determining or allocating fair value. Variability in the market and changes in assumptions or subjective measurements used to estimate fair value are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
Our annual goodwill impairment test is performed each year as of September 30. BV Financial performed its 2024 annual goodwill impairment qualitative assessment and determined BV Financial’s goodwill was not considered impaired. We monitor our performance and evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently as needed.
Deferred Income Taxes. At December 31, 2024, we had a net deferred tax asset totaling $8.9 million. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If currently available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established if it is not more likely than not realizable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets are inherently subjective and are reviewed on a regular basis as regulatory or business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance that results in additional income tax expense in the period in which it is recognized would negatively affect income. Management believes, based upon current facts, that it is more likely than not that there will be sufficient taxable income in future years to realize its federal and state deferred tax asset.
40
For more information on our critical accounting policies, see Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data sets forth certain financial highlights of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| At December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
| Selected Financial Condition Data: | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 911,821 | $ | 885,254 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 70,500 | 73,742 | |||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 37,259 | 34,781 | |||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 5,979 | 10,209 | |||||
| Loans receivable | 729,238 | 696,248 | |||||
| Investment in life insurance | 20,058 | 19,657 | |||||
| Goodwill | 14,420 | 14,420 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset, net | 8,899 | 8,969 | |||||
| Deposits | 651,491 | 634,120 | |||||
| Borrowings | 49,883 | 37,251 | |||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 195,499 | 199,065 |
| At December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Selected Operating Data: | ||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 46,682 | $ | 43,419 | ||||
| Interest expense | 11,495 | 9,190 | ||||||
| Net interest income | 35,187 | 34,229 | ||||||
| (Recovery of) provision for credit losses | (203 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
| Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses | 35,390 | 34,274 | ||||||
| Non-interest income | 2,514 | 3,757 | ||||||
| Non-interest expense | 21,498 | 19,409 | ||||||
| Income before income taxes | 16,406 | 18,622 | ||||||
| Income taxes | 4,683 | 4,915 | ||||||
| Net income | 11,723 | 13,707 | ||||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.47 | ||||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.47 |
41
| At or For the Years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2024 | 2023 | |||
| Performance Ratios: | ||||
| Return on average assets | 1.32% | 1.54% | ||
| Return on average equity | 5.77% | 9.93% | ||
| Interest rate spread(1) | 3.50% | 3.74% | ||
| Net interest margin(2) | 4.27% | 4.23% | ||
| Non-interest expense to average assets | 2.42% | 2.19% | ||
| Efficiency ratio(3) | 57.02% | 51.03% | ||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | 154.92% | 142.89% | ||
| Average equity to average assets | 22.88% | 15.55% | ||
| Capital Ratios(4): | ||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | 25.49% | 25.26% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 24.24% | 24.00% | ||
| Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 24.24% | 24.00% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to average assets | 19.83% | 18.50% | ||
| Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans | 1.15% | 1.21% | ||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans | 212.51% | 82.94% | ||
| Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average outstanding loans during the year | -0.04% | -0.07% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans | 0.54% | 1.46% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets | 0.44% | 1.17% | ||
| Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.46% | 1.19% | ||
| Other: | ||||
| Number of offices | 13 | 14 | ||
| Number of full-time equivalent employees | 111 | 112 | ||
| (1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||
| (2) Represents the net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. | ||||
| (3) Represents non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. | ||||
| (4) BayVanguard Bank only. |
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023
Total Assets.
Total assets were $911.8 million at December 31, 2024, an increase of $26.5 million, or 3.0%, from $885.3 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was due primarily to a $33.0 million increase in net loans receivable to $729.2 million at December 31, 2024, and a $2.5 million increase in securities available for sale partially offset by a $4.2 million decrease in securities held to maturity, a $3.2 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and decreases in premises and equipment and other assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents decreased $3.2 million, or 4.4%, to $70.5 million at Decemer 31, 2024 from $73.7 million at December 31, 2023.
Securities.
Securities available for sale (“AFS”) increased $2.5 million, or 7.2%, to $37.3 million at December 31, 2024 from $34.8 million at December 31, 2023. Securities held to maturity (HTM) decreased $4.2 million or 41.2% to $6.0 million at December 31, 2024. Maturities and paydowns in the HTM portfolio were replaced, as deemed necessary by securities in the AFS portfolio.
Management monitors and manages the investment portfolio on a monthly basis and believes the inherent risks in the portfolio are acceptable. AFS securities are reviewed each quarter to determine whether a decline in the fair value of
42
the securities is a result of a deterioration in credit quality. No reserve for credit losses has been recorded on AFS securities.
Gross unrealized losses on AFS securities at December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $2.3 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The unrealized losses are the result of changes in interest rates since the securities were issued. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold investment securities with unrealized losses until they mature, at which time the Company will receive pay-offs in full for the security.
The AFS portfolio holds 96%, or $35.7 million of its portfolio in securities issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSE") backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The remainder of the portfolio consists of bonds issued by bank holding companies.
The held-to-maturity ("HTM") portfolio consists of $2.8 million in securities issued by GSEs and $3.2 million in securities issued by bank holding companies. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the securities in the HTM portfolio not issued by a GSE has an allowance for credit loss of $4,000 and $6,000, respectively.
No individual security in either the AFS or HTM portfolios issued by a non-GSE has a book value greater than $750,000.
Net Loans Receivable.
Net loans receivable increased $33.0 million, or 4.74%, to $729.2 million at December 31, 2024 from $696.2 million at December 31, 2023. Increases in investor commercial real estate, 1-4 family owner occupied, construction loans and commercial loans offset decreases in owner occupied commercial real estate loans, non-owner occupied 1-4 family loans, farm loans, consumer loans and loans guaranteed by the U.S. Government.
Foreclosed Real Estate.
Foreclosed real estate decreased by $11,000 or 6.5%.
Total Liabilities.
Total liabilities increased $30.1 million or 4.4%, to $716.3 million at December 31, 2024 from $686.2 million at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily due to a increase in total deposits of $17.4 million, and an increase in borrowings of $12.6 million.
Deposits.
Total deposits increased $17.4 million, or 2.7%, to $651.5 million at December 31, 2024 from $634.1 million at December 31, 2023. Interest-bearing deposits increased $36.3 million, or 7.5%, to $521.8 million at December 31, 2024 from $492.1 million at December 31, 2023. Noninterest bearing deposits decreased $12.3 million, or 8.7%, to $129.7 million at December 31, 2024 from $142.0 million at December 31, 2023. The Company utilized $50 million in brokered certificates of deposits with five year terms to replace a $16.5 million reduction in retail certificates of deposit and to fund loan growth.
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings.
The Company had $15.0 million of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings at December 31, 2024 compared to $0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings at December 31, 2023.
Stockholders’ Equity.
Stockholders’ equity decreased $3.6 million or 1.8%, to $195.5 million at December 31, 2024. During the year, the Company repurchased 1.1 million shares of common stock at an average cost of $16.27. The reduction in stockholders equity resulting from the repurchase program exceeded net income and other adjustments.
Average Balance Sheets
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial. All average
43
balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense. Net deferred loan fees totaled $2.2 million and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 703,411 | $ | 41,003 | 5.81 | % | $ | 683,657 | $ | 37,742 | 5.52 | % | ||||||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 35,544 | 1,319 | 3.70 | % | 35,607 | 1,156 | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 9,542 | 314 | 3.28 | % | 12,003 | 367 | 3.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and other interest-earning assets | 73,096 | 4,046 | 5.53 | % | 77,865 | 4,154 | 5.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 821,593 | 46,682 | 5.67 | % | 809,132 | 43,419 | 5.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets | 68,865 | 78,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 890,458 | $ | 887,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 84,655 | 878 | 1.03 | % | $ | 86,114 | 614 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 134,795 | 323 | 0.24 | % | 154,629 | 202 | 0.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Money market deposits | 101,831 | 2,274 | 2.23 | % | 91,573 | 803 | 0.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 173,932 | 5,567 | 3.19 | % | 170,299 | 3,995 | 2.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 495,213 | 9,042 | 1.82 | % | 502,615 | 5,614 | 1.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 41 | 2 | 4.86 | % | 26,503 | 1,411 | 5.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 35,071 | 2,451 | 6.97 | % | 37,149 | 2,165 | 5.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total borrowings | 35,112 | 2,453 | 6.97 | % | 63,652 | 3,576 | 5.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 530,325 | 11,495 | 2.16 | % | 566,267 | 9,190 | 1.62 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | 137,935 | 149,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 19,074 | 33,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 687,334 | 749,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 203,124 | 137,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 890,458 | $ | 887,232 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 35,187 | $ | 34,229 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest rate spread | 3.50 | % | 3.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest-earning assets | $ | 291,268 | $ | 242,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 4.27 | % | 4.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | 154.92 | % | 142.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Netinterest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Net interest marghin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets. |
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due
44
to rate and the changes due to volume. There were no out-of-period items or adjustments required to be excluded from the table below.
| December 31, 2024 vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Income Increase (Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 673 | $ | 2,588 | $ | 3,261 | ||||||
| Investment securities AFS | (2 | ) | 164 | 162 | ||||||||
| Investment securities HTM | (81 | ) | 28 | (53 | ) | |||||||
| Total Investment securities | (83 | ) | 192 | 109 | ||||||||
| Short-term investments and other | ||||||||||||
| interest-earning assets | (266 | ) | 158 | (108 | ) | |||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 324 | 2,938 | 3,262 | |||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||
| Deposits | (291 | ) | 3,720 | 3,429 | ||||||||
| FHLB Borrowings & Other Borrowings | (1,738 | ) | 329 | (1,409 | ) | |||||||
| Subordinated Debentures | (145 | ) | 430 | 285 | ||||||||
| Total Borrowings | (1,883 | ) | 759 | (1,124 | ) | |||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | (2,174 | ) | 4,479 | 2,305 | ||||||||
| Change in net interest income | $ | 2,498 | $ | (1,541 | ) | $ | 957 |
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023
General.
The Company reported net income of $11.7 million or $1.09 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to net income of $13.7 million or $1.47 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Interest Income.
Total interest income increased 7.52 % for the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Interest income on loans increased by $3.3 million or 8.6%. Higher yields on loans contributed $2.6 million to the increase while an increase in the average balance outstanding contributed $673,000 to the increase.
Interest income on investment securities available-for-sale increased by $163,000 or 14.1% as the increase in yields on new purchases and the adjustable-rate portion of the portfolio offset a decline in the average balance of AFS investments.
Interest income on investment securities held-to-maturity decreased $53,000 or 14.4%, primarily due to lower average balances in these securities.
Other interest income primarily consists of interest earned on overnight cash investments. Interest income in this category decreased by $108,000, or 2.6%, primarily due to lower average balances.
45
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense increased by $2.3 million or 25.1% to $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits was the primary driver in the increase in total interest expense.
Interest paid on interest-bearing deposits increased by $3.4 million or 61.1% for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. The impact of higher rates paid offset a lower average balance on these deposits. Higher rates paid on deposits were influenced by, among other factors, the Federal Reserve rate increases during the year, intense competition for deposits in the Bank's market area, and a greater percentage of deposits consisting of higher-yielding certificates of deposit. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased in the year as customers took advantage of higher market interest rates to redeploy their excess cash into interest-bearing products.
Interest expense on advances from the FHLB decreased by $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as the Bank had a no advances outstanding for the majority of the year.
Interest expense on subordinated debt increased by $286,000, or 13.2%, during the year. The increase was due primarily to the pay-off of $3.0 million in junior subordinated debt which included the write-off (increase in interest expense) of the remaining purchase accounting fair market value adjustment of $566,000.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income was $35.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $34.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2023. The net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2024 was 4.27% compared to 4.23% for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Provision for Credit Losses.
The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2024 was a credit of $203,000 compared to a credit of $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements detail the impacts of the adoption of the standard.
The $203,000 credit to the provision for credit losses consisted of a $347,000 credit to the allowance for credit losses - loans and a $2,000 credit to the allowance for credit losses - HTM securities offset by an allowance of $146,000 in the allowances for credit losses for off balance sheet commitments. In the year ended December 31, 2023, net recoveries of previously charged-off loans totaled $314,000. These recoveries directly reduced the required increase in the allowance for credit losses-loans.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Service fees on deposits | $ | 426 | $ | 413 | $ | 13 | 3.15 | % | ||||||||
| Fees from debit cards | 706 | 724 | (18 | ) | (2.49 | )% | ||||||||||
| Income from investment in life insurance | 400 | 641 | (241 | ) | (37.60 | )% | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | — | 709 | (709 | ) | (100.00 | )% | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of premises and equipment | — | 188 | (188 | ) | (100.00 | )% | ||||||||||
| Other income | 982 | 1,082 | (100 | ) | (9.24 | )% | ||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | $ | 2,514 | $ | 3,757 | $ | (1,243 | ) | (33.08 | )% |
Non-interest income decreased $1.2 million to $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized a gain of $709,000 on the sale of foreclosed real estate and $225,000 in excess life insurance proceeds and a $188,000 gain on the sale of a closed branch office building.
46
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and related benefits | $ | 14,005 | $ | 12,257 | $ | 1,748 | 14.26 | % | ||||||||
| Occupancy | 1,616 | 1,604 | 12 | 0.75 | % | |||||||||||
| Data processing | 1,480 | 1,373 | 107 | 7.79 | % | |||||||||||
| Advertising | 23 | 43 | (20 | ) | (46.51 | )% | ||||||||||
| Professional fees | 1,008 | 886 | 122 | 13.77 | % | |||||||||||
| Equipment | 396 | 425 | (29 | ) | (6.82 | )% | ||||||||||
| Other real estate owned and repossessed assets holding costs | 13 | 186 | (173 | ) | (93.01 | )% | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 181 | 183 | (2 | ) | (1.09 | )% | ||||||||||
| FDIC insurance premiums | 326 | 336 | (10 | ) | (2.98 | )% | ||||||||||
| Other | 2,450 | 2,116 | 334 | 15.78 | % | |||||||||||
| Total non-interest expense | $ | 21,498 | $ | 19,409 | $ | 2,089 | 10.76 | % |
Non-interest expense increased $2.1 million to $21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase was due primarily to increases in compensation and benefits due to increases in salaries and the costs of the equity awards granted after the stockholders approved the 2024 Equity Incentive Plan.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 was $4.7 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.5%. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $4.9 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 26.4%.
Management of Market Risk
General. Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk because, as a financial institution, the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Therefore, a principal goal of our operations is to manage interest rate risk and limit the exposure of our financial condition and results of operations to changes in market interest rates. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee, which consists of members of senior management, is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the policy and guidelines approved by our board of directors. We currently utilize a third-party modeling program, prepared on a quarterly basis, to evaluate our sensitivity to changing interest rates, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. We have implemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
1.
growing our volume of core deposit accounts;
2.
holding higher levels of cash and cash equivalents;
3.
continuing the diversification of our loan portfolio by adding more commercial-related loans, which typically have variable rates and shorter maturities; and
4.
purchasing short-term and adjustable rate securities.
By following these strategies, we believe that we are better positioned to react to increases and decreases in market interest rates.
We have not engaged in hedging activities, such as engaging in futures or options, or investing in high-risk mortgage derivatives, such as collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests, real estate mortgage investment conduit residual interests or stripped mortgage-backed securities.
Change in Net Interest Income. We analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through a net interest income model. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We estimate what our net interest income would be for a 12-month period. We then calculate what the net interest income would be for the same period under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points or decreases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. A basis point equals
47
one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the “Change in Interest Rates” column below.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2024, the calculation of the estimated changes in our net interest income that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100bp | + 200 bp | + 300bp | + 400bp |
| December 31, 2024 | -12.72% | -8.73% | -5.31% | -2.52% | 1.59% | 3.27% | 4.93% | 6.57% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The tables above indicate that at December 31, 2024, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 3.27% increase in net interest income. In the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 5.31% decrease in net interest income.
The table above also illustrates that BV Financial’s net interest income is subject to significant decreases if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by the amounts presented. This is due to a number of factors including:
1.
Short-term assets such as cash and cash equivalents will reprice immediately based on the Fed Funds target rate.
2.
The floating rate securities in the available-for-sale portfolio will reprice lower with a short (quarterly) lag.
3.
Loans with variable interest rates will begin to reprice at rates lower than the current note rates.
4.
New assets (loans & investment securities) will be placed on the balance sheet at the lower current market interest rates.
5.
Our non-maturing deposits remain at historical low rates and with the level of rate decreases presented, the rates paid on these deposits could not be lowered by a similar amount.
6.
Our certificate of deposit liabilities will take time to reprice to lower market rates.
The increase in net interest income in the rising rate scenarios is less than the decrease in the falling rate scenario primarily due to the largest category of interest-earning assets, the loan portfolio, takes longer to reprice to the higher market rates than other assets and liabilities. A high level of new loan growth at higher market rates would be required to help offset the delay in the repricing of the current loan portfolio. The model also assumes that the non-maturing deposit portfolio will quickly reprice to a calculated percentage of the increase in market rates.
Economic Value of Equity. We also compute amounts by which the net present value of our assets and liabilities (economic value of equity or “EVE”) would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. This model uses a discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based pricing approach to measure the interest rate sensitivity of net portfolio value. The model estimates the economic value of each type of asset, liability and off-balance sheet contract under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point increments or a decrease instantaneously by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. EVE as a measurement tool for interest rate risk measures the changes in the values of assets and liabilities based on the structure of the individual instrument (maturity, interest rate, re-pricing characteristic) when different levels of market interest rates are assumed.
48
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2024, the calculation of the estimated changes in our EVE that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100 bp | + 200 bp | + 300 bp | + 400 bp |
| December 31, 2024 | -18.08% | -11.46% | -6.55% | -2.97% | 1.41% | 2.36% | 2.57% | 2.46% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2024, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 2.36% increase in EVE, and in the event of an instantaneous 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience an 6.55% decrease in EVE. As indicated in the table above, our EVE falls considerably in the instantaneous down scenarios due to the value of the low or zero rate non-maturing deposit portfolio declining as the theoretical spread between the cost of these deposits and new assets declines. In the up scenarios, the value of these instruments increases less as the model assumes a significant lag before these rates increase.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net interest income and net economic value tables presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates, and actual results may differ. Furthermore, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of changes in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.
Interest rate risk calculations also may not reflect the fair values of financial instruments. For example, decreases in market interest rates can increase the fair values of our loans, deposits and borrowings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity. Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities and proceeds from maturities of securities. We also have the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, we had $157.5 million and $150.0 million available under a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, and had $15.0 million and $0 million outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively, with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. In addition, at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Bank had $23.0 million and $25.0 million in unfunded letters of credit used to secure municipal deposits outstanding against the line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.
While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Our most liquid assets are cash and short-term investments including interest-bearing demand deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period.
Our cash flows are comprised of three primary classifications: cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $16.1 million and $15.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities, which consists primarily of investments in loans and securities, was $(32.5) million and $(35.2) million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities, consisting primarily of changes in deposits and advances and the repayment of advances to the Federal Home Loan Bank, was $13.2 million and $25.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
49
We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Time deposits that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from December 31, 2024 totaled $107.5 million. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained. However, if a substantial portion of these deposits is not retained, we may utilize Federal Home Loan Bank advances or raise interest rates on deposits to attract new accounts, which may result in higher levels of interest expense.
Capital Resources. At December 31, 2024, BayVanguard Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements, and was categorized as well capitalized at December 31, 2024. Management is not aware of any conditions or events since the most recent notification that would change our category.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. At December 31, 2024, we had outstanding commitments to extend credit of $51.3 million and $592,000 of letters of credit. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include data processing services, operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of BV Financial for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 included with this document for a description of recent accounting pronouncements that may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates, generally, have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than does inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000950170-24-035306.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This discussion and analysis reflects the information contained in our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information at and for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this annual report. You should read the information in this section in conjunction with the other business and financial information contained in this annual report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes of BV Financial.
Overview
Summary of Financial Condition and Operating Results. At December 31, 2023, we had $885.3 million in consolidated assets, an increase of $40.3 million, or 4.8%, from $845.0 million at December 31, 2022. The increase was due primarily to a $37.1 million increase in net loans receivable to $696.2 million at December 31, 2023, a $5.1 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $1.7 million increase in available-for-sale securities, partially offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in foreclosed real estate. Total liabilities decreased $61.0 million, or 8.2%, from $747.2 million at December 31, 2022 to $686.2 million at December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in total deposits of $50.5 million, and a decrease in borrowings of $12.0 million slightly offset by a $1.3 million increase in other liabilities.
Stockholders’ equity increased $101.3 million, or 103.6%, to $199.1 million at December 31, 2023, primarily due to the net proceeds of $86.9 million from the sale of 9.8 million shares of common stock and $13.7 million in net income.
Net income increased $3.2 million, or 30.3%, to $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was due primarily to a $4.3 million increase in net interest income, and a $1.0 million decrease in the provision for credit losses partially offset by a decrease of $1.9 million in noninterest income.
Business Strategy
We have focused primarily on continuing and enhancing our community-oriented retail banking strategy. Highlights of our current business strategy include the following:
•
Pursue opportunistic acquisitions and partnerships. We intend to continue to prudently pursue opportunities to acquire banks that offer opportunities for solid financial returns. Our primary focus will be on franchises that enhance our funding profile, product capabilities or geographic density or footprint, while maintaining an acceptable risk profile. We believe in the need to make significant technological investments and the importance of scale in banking.
37
•
Grow our loan portfolio with an emphasis on commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending. While we intend to continue to focus on the origination of commercial real estate loans, we intend to remain a residential mortgage lender in our market area and maintain a balance between the commercial real estate and residential mortgage portfolios. We originated $106.9 million of commercial real estate and $6.4 million of residential mortgages loans during the year ended December 31, 2023. At December 31, 2023, $389.7 million, or 55.3%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate loans and $238.1 million, or 33.8%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgages.
•
Manage credit risk to maintain a low level of non-performing assets. We believe that maintaining strong asset quality is paramount to our long-term success. We follow conservative underwriting guidelines with sound loan administration, and focus on originating loans secured by real estate. This includes enhanced loan monitoring of higher risk portfolio segments, higher risk individual loans and larger relationships within the portfolio, and frequent loan grade review. Our non-performing assets totaled $ 10.7 million, or 1.21% of total assets, at December 31, 2023. Our total non-performing loans to total loans ratio was 1.50% at December 31, 2023.
•
Increase core deposits with an emphasis on non-interest-bearing deposits. Deposits are our primary source of funds for lending and investment. Core deposits (which we define as all deposits except for time deposits) were 72.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2023. In particular, non-interest-bearing demand deposits were 22.4% of our total deposits at December 31, 2023. We continue to focus on expanding core deposits by leveraging our business development officers and commercial lending and retail relationships.
We intend to continue to pursue these business strategies, subject to changes necessitated by future market conditions, regulatory restrictions and other factors. While we are committed to the business strategies noted above, we recognize the challenges and uncertainties of the current environment and plan to execute these strategies as market conditions allow.
Summary of Critical Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.
The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we may delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. We have determined to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.
The following represent our critical accounting policies:
Allowance for Credit Losses. The determination of our allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate by management because of the high degree of judgment involved in determining qualitative loss factors, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the forecasted economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation amount that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on our loan portfolio. The allowance is established through provisions for credit losses charged against income. When available information confirms that specific loans, or portions thereof, are uncollectible, these amounts are charged against the allowance, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for credit losses is evaluated on a no less than a quarterly basis by management. In evaluating the level of the allowance for credit losses, management analyzes several qualitative loan portfolio risk factors including, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and non-accrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. See Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial
38
statements for a detailed discussion of our accounting policies and methodologies for establishing the allowance for credit losses.
BV Financial adopted this “current expected loss” model on January 1, 2023 using the modified retrospective approach for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit commitments. Prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Under the previous “incurred loss” model, provisions for loan losses were charged to operations to establish an allowance for loan losses at a level necessary to absorb known and inherent losses in our loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the date of the consolidated financial statements. Prior to adoption of this now standard, BV Financial segregated the loan portfolios acquired via mergers and evaluated them against a credit allowance established at acquisition. As part of the adoption of the “current expected loss” model, in 2023, $3.8 million in remaining acquisition credit marks were transferred to the allowance for credit losses.
To estimate expected credit losses under CECL, BV Financial relies on information about historical losses, current market conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts relevant to assessing the collectability of the loans. Historical loss experience serves as the foundation for our estimated credit losses. Quantitative and qualitative adjustments to our historical loss experience are made for differences in current loan portfolio segment credit risk characteristics such as the impact of changing forecasts for gross domestic product growth in the United States, portfolio concentrations and trends in the growth of portfolio segments and other prevailing economic conditions and factors that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, reduce the estimated value of underlying collateral or impact the internal capabilities of the Company to manage the loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
Non-accrual, substandard, and other loans as determined by management have risk characteristics different from other loans in their portfolio segment are individually analyzed for potential uncollectable balances. Reserves on individually assessed loans are measured on a loan-by-loan basis using one of three acceptable methods: the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Determinations as to the need for a specific allowance are made after considering all relevant factors regarding the borrower, the collateral and economic conditions. Depending on this assessment, management may establish a specific allowance on the loan.
Goodwill. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets from acquisitions, or goodwill, is evaluated for impairment at least annually and on an interim basis if an event or circumstance indicates it is likely impairment has occurred. Goodwill impairment is determined by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount. In any given year BV Financial may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is in excess of its carrying value. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is in excess of the carrying value, or if BV Financial elects to bypass the qualitative assessment, a quantitative impairment test is performed. In performing a quantitative test for impairment, the fair value of net assets is estimated based on analyses of BV Financial’s market value, discounted cash flows, and peer values. The determination of goodwill impairment is sensitive to market-based economics and other key assumptions used in determining or allocating fair value. Variability in the market and changes in assumptions or subjective measurements used to estimate fair value are reasonably possible and may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or results of operations.
Our annual goodwill impairment test is performed each year as of September 30. BV Financial performed its 2023 annual goodwill impairment qualitative assessment and determined BV Financial’s goodwill was not considered impaired. We monitor our performance and evaluate our goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently as needed.
Deferred Income Taxes. At December 31, 2023, we had a net deferred tax asset totaling $9.0 million. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 “Income Taxes,” we use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If currently available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established if it is not more likely than not realizable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets are inherently subjective and are reviewed on a regular basis
39
as regulatory or business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance that results in additional income tax expense in the period in which it is recognized would negatively affect income. Management believes, based upon current facts, that it is more likely than not that there will be sufficient taxable income in future years to realize its federal and state deferred tax asset.
For more information on our critical accounting policies, see Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data sets forth certain financial highlights of the Company and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| At December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| Selected Financial Condition Data: | |||||||
| Total assets | $ | 885,254 | $ | 844,963 | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 73,742 | 68,652 | |||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 34,781 | 33,034 | |||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 10,209 | 10,461 | |||||
| Loans receivable, net | 696,248 | 659,131 | |||||
| Investment in life insurance | 19,657 | 19,983 | |||||
| Goodwill | 14,420 | 14,420 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset, net | 8,969 | 9,113 | |||||
| Deposits | 634,120 | 684,618 | |||||
| Borrowings | 37,251 | 49,039 | |||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 199,065 | 97,751 |
| At December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (amounts in thousands, except per share data) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| Selected Operating Data: | |||||||
| Interest income | $ | 43,419 | $ | 33,350 | |||
| Interest expense | 9,190 | 3,430 | |||||
| Net interest income | 34,229 | 29,920 | |||||
| (Recovery of) provision for credit losses | (45 | ) | 1,038 | ||||
| Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses | 34,274 | 28,882 | |||||
| Non-interest income | 3,757 | 5,665 | |||||
| Non-interest expense | 19,409 | 19,994 | |||||
| Income before income taxes | 18,622 | 14,553 | |||||
| Income taxes | 4,915 | 4,029 | |||||
| Net income | 13,707 | 10,524 | |||||
| Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.32 | |||
| Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.47 | $ | 1.32 |
40
| At or For the Years | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ended December 31, | ||||
| 2023 | 2022 | |||
| Performance Ratios: | ||||
| Return on average assets | 1.54% | 1.24% | ||
| Return on average equity | 9.93% | 11.49% | ||
| Interest rate spread(1) | 3.74% | 3.75% | ||
| Net interest margin(2) | 4.23% | 3.91% | ||
| Non-interest expense to average assets | 2.19% | 2.35% | ||
| Efficiency ratio(3) | 51.03% | 57.88% | ||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities | 142.89% | 135.36% | ||
| Average equity to average assets | 15.55% | 10.78% | ||
| Capital Ratios(4): | ||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets | 25.26% | 17.34% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 24.00% | 16.76% | ||
| Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets | 24.00% | 16.76% | ||
| Tier 1 capital to average assets | 18.50% | 13.39% | ||
| Asset Quality Ratios: | ||||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of total loans | 1.21% | 0.57% | ||
| Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of non-performing loans | 82.94% | 64.80% | ||
| Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average outstanding loans during the year | -0.07% | 0.00% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans | 1.46% | 0.88% | ||
| Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets | 1.17% | 0.70% | ||
| Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 1.19% | 0.93% | ||
| Other: | ||||
| Number of offices | 14 | 15 | ||
| Number of full-time equivalent employees | 112 | 107 | ||
| (1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. | ||||
| (2) Represents the net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. | ||||
| (3) Represents non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. | ||||
| (4) BayVanguard Bank only. |
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022
Total Assets.
Total assets were $885.3 million at December 31, 2023, an increase of $40.3 million, or 4.8%, from $845.0 million at December 31, 2022. The increase was due primarily to a $37.1 million increase in net loans receivable to $696.2 million at December 31, 2023, a $5.1 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $1.7 million increase in available-for-sale securities, partially offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in foreclosed real estate.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $5.1 million, or 7.4%, to $73.7 million at December 31, 2023 from $68.7 million at December 31, 2022 primarily due to the proceeds of the stock offering. Proceeds were also used to fund loan growth and deposit outflows as well as pay-off FHLB advances.
Securities.
Securities available for sale (“AFS”) increased $1.7 million, or 5.3%, to $34.8 million at December 31, 2023 from $33.0 million at December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily due to an increase of $4.0 million in agency securities, and a
41
$500,000 increase in the market value of the AFS portfolio, partially offset by decreases in mortgage-backed and corporate securities due to paydowns and maturities.
Management monitors and manages the investment portfolio on a monthly basis and believes the inherent risks in the portfolio are acceptable. AFS securities are reviewed each quarter to determine whether a decline in the fair value of the securities is a result of a deterioration in credit quality. No reserve for credit losses has been recorded on AFS securities.
Gross unrealized losses on AFS securities at December 31, 2023 and 2022 were $2.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively. The unrealized losses are the result of changes in interest rates since the securities were issued. The Company intends to, and has the ability to, hold investment securities with unrealized losses until they mature, at which time the Company will receive pay-offs in full for the security.
The AFS portfolio holds 95%, or $35.8 million of its portfolio in securities issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises ("GSE") backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. The remainder of the portfolio consists of bonds issued by bank holding companies.
The held-to-maturity ("HTM") portfolio consists of $7.0 million in securities issued by GSEs and $1.7 million in securities issued by bank holding companies. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, the securities in the HTM portfolio not issued by a GSE has an allowance for credit loss of $6,000 and $0, respectively.
No individual security in either the AFS or HTM portfolios issued by a non-GSE has a book value greater than $750,000.
Net Loans Receivable.
Net loans receivable increased $37.1 million, or 5.6%, to $696.2 million at December 31, 2023 from $659.1 million at December 31, 2022. The increases were due to increases of $60.3 million in investor commercial real estate, $10.7 million in owner occupied commercial real estate, $3.9 million in construction loans and $1.1 million farm loans offset by decreases of $24.7 million in owner and non-owner occupied one- to four-family loans and $9.8 million in commercial loans. The decreases in one- to four-family loans and commercial loans were due primarily to payoffs and paydowns exceeding originations during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Foreclosed Real Estate.
Foreclosed real estate decreased by $1.8 million or 91.4% as the largest foreclosed real estate asset, that consisted of two vacant buildings in Baltimore City, Maryland, were sold, generating a gain of $709,000. These buildings were assumed in the acquisition of Delmarva Bancshares and its subsidiary, 1880 Bank in 2020.
Total Liabilities.
Total liabilities decreased $61.0 million or 8.2%, to $686.2 million at December 31, 2023 from $747.2 million at December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in total deposits of $50.5 million, and a decrease in borrowings of $12 million slightly offset by an increase in other liabilities.
Deposits.
Total deposits decreased $50.5 million, or 7.4%, to $634.1 million at December 31, 2023 from $684.6 million at December 31, 2022. Interest-bearing deposits decreased $25.3 million, or 4.9%, to $492.1 million at December 31, 2023 from $517.4 million at December 31, 2022. Noninterest bearing deposits decreased $25.2 million, or 15.1%, to $142.0 million at December 31, 2023 from $167.2 million at December 31, 2022. During the fourth quarter of 2023, $15.0 million in certificates of deposit held by a local government entity were moved to another financial institution. Other deposits decreased as customers both reallocated non-interest bearing deposit balances to other asset classes and sought higher rates available elsewhere. The Company had no brokered deposits as of December 31, 2023.
42
Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings.
The Company had no Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings at December 31, 2023 compared to $12.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings at December 31, 2022. In the quarter ended December 31, 2023, the Company paid off all of the $37.5 million in borrowings that were outstanding.
Stockholders’ Equity.
Stockholders’ equity increased $101.3 million, or 103.6%, to $199.1 million at December 31, 2023, primarily due to net proceeds of $86.9 million from the stock offering and $13.7 million in net income.
Average Balance Sheets
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense. Net deferred loan fees totaled $1.8 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | Average Outstanding Balance | Interest | Average Yield/Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | 683,657 | $ | 37,742 | 5.52 | % | $ | 634,152 | $ | 31,259 | 4.93 | % | ||||||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 35,607 | 1,156 | 3.25 | % | 36,551 | 610 | 1.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Securities held-to-maturity | 12,003 | 367 | 3.06 | % | 8,220 | 245 | 2.98 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and other interest-earning assets | 77,865 | 4,154 | 5.34 | % | 85,859 | 1,236 | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 809,132 | 43,419 | 5.37 | % | 764,782 | 33,350 | 4.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets | 78,100 | 87,128 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 887,232 | $ | 851,910 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 86,114 | 614 | 0.71 | % | $ | 95,261 | 65 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 154,629 | 202 | 0.13 | % | 169,678 | 97 | 0.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Money market deposits | 91,573 | 803 | 0.88 | % | 108,492 | 231 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 170,299 | 3,995 | 2.35 | % | 154,346 | 964 | 0.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 502,615 | 5,614 | 1.12 | % | 527,777 | 1,357 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 26,503 | 1,411 | 5.32 | % | 296 | 11 | 3.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 37,149 | 2,165 | 5.83 | % | 36,938 | 2,062 | 5.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total borrowings | 63,652 | 3,576 | 5.62 | % | 37,234 | 2,073 | 5.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 566,267 | 9,190 | 1.62 | % | 565,011 | 3,430 | 0.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | 149,630 | 169,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 33,363 | 24,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 749,260 | 759,603 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 137,972 | 92,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 887,232 | $ | 851,910 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 34,229 | $ | 29,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest rate spread | 3.74 | % | 3.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest-earning assets | $ | 242,865 | $ | 199,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin | 4.23 | % | 3.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | 142.89 | % | 135.37 | % |
1.
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities.
2.
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
3.
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.
43
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. There were no out-of-period items or adjustments required to be excluded from the table below.
| December 31, 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Income Increase (Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||
| Interest income: | |||||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 2,733 | $ | 3,750 | $ | 6,483 | |||||
| Investment securities AFS | (31 | ) | 577 | 546 | |||||||
| Investment securities HTM | 116 | 6 | 122 | ||||||||
| Total Investment securities | 85 | 583 | 668 | ||||||||
| Equity Investments | — | 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| Short-term investments and other | |||||||||||
| interest-earning assets | (428 | ) | 3,340 | 2,912 | |||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 2,390 | 7,679 | 10,069 | ||||||||
| Interest expense: | |||||||||||
| Deposits | (281 | ) | 4,538 | 4,257 | |||||||
| FHLB Borrowings & Other Borrowings | 1,395 | 5 | 1,400 | ||||||||
| Subordinated Debentures | 12 | 91 | 103 | ||||||||
| Total Borrowings | 1,407 | 96 | 1,503 | ||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 1,126 | 4,634 | 5,760 | ||||||||
| Change in net interest income | $ | 1,264 | $ | 3,045 | $ | 4,309 |
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022
General.
The Company reported net income of $13.7 million or $1.47 per diluted share compared to net income of $10.5 million or $1.32 per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Interest Income.
Total interest income increased 30.2 % for the year ended December 31, 2023 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Interest income on loans increased by $6.5 million or 20.7%. Higher yields on loans contributed $3.8 million to the increase while an increase in the average balance outstanding contributed $2.7 million to the increase.
Interest income on investment securities available-for-sale increased by $546,000 or 89.5% as the increase in yields on the adjustable-rate portion of the portfolio offset a decline in the average balance of AFS investments.
Interest income on investment securities held-to-maturity increased $122,000 or 49.8%, primarily due to higher average balances in these securities.
Other interest income primarily consists of interest earned on overnight cash investments. Interest income in this category increased by $2.9 million, or 236.1%, due to the impact of higher rates offsetting lower average balances.
44
Interest Expense.
Total interest expense increased by $5.8 million or 167.9% to $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in the cost of interest-bearing deposits and the increase in the average balance of FHLB borrowings were the primary drivers in the increase in total interest expense.
Interest paid on interest-bearing deposits increased by $4.3 million or 313.7% for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The impact of higher rates paid offset a lower average balance on these deposits. Higher rates paid on deposits were influenced by, among other factors, the Federal Reserve rate increases during the year, intense competition for deposits in the Bank's market area, and a greater percentage of deposits consisting of higher-yielding certificates of deposit. Non-interest bearing deposits decreased in the year as customers took advantage of higher market interest rates to redeploy their excess cash into interest-bearing products.
Interest expense on advances from the FHLB increased by $1.4 million in the year from a de minimus amount in the previous year as the Bank had advances outstanding for the majority of the year. However, the $37.5 million in outstanding FHLB advances were repaid in October 2023.
Interest expense on subordinated debt increased by $103,000, or 4.9%, during the year primarily due to the increase in the rate paid on the $3.1 million floating rate junior subordinated debt assumed in the acquisition of Delmarva Bancshares in 2020. This debt was paid in full in February 2024.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income increased $4.3 million to $34.2 million from $29.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in the rates earned on interest-earning assets and the increased balances in these assets offset the increase in interest expense that resulted from higher rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities and the higher average balance of these liabilities.
Provision for Credit Losses.
The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2023 was a credit of $45,000 compared to an expense of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Company adopted ASC 326 (CECL) as of January 1, 2023. Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements detail the impacts of the adoption of the new standard.
The $45,000 credit to the provision for credit losses consisted of a $42,000 addition to the allowance for credit losses - loans offset by decreases of $5,000 and $82,000 in the allowances for credit losses for HTM securities and off balance sheet commitments, respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2023, net recoveries of previously charged-off loans totaled $467,000. These recoveries directly reduced the required increase in the allowance for credit losses-loans.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Service fees on deposits | $ | 413 | $ | 460 | $ | (47 | ) | -10.22 | % | |||||||
| Fees from debit cards | 724 | 755 | (31 | ) | -4.11 | % | ||||||||||
| Income from investment in life insurance | 641 | 1,492 | (851 | ) | -57.04 | % | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets | 709 | — | 709 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||
| Gain on sale of premises and equipment | 188 | 246 | (58 | ) | -23.58 | % | ||||||||||
| Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale | — | 1 | (1 | ) | -100.00 | % | ||||||||||
| Bargain purchase gain | — | 1,340 | (1,340 | ) | -100.00 | % | ||||||||||
| Other income | 1,082 | 1,371 | (289 | ) | -21.08 | % | ||||||||||
| Total non-interest income | 3,757 | 5,665 | (1,908 | ) | -33.68 | % |
45
Non-interest income decreased $1.9 million to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was due primarily to there being no gain on bargain purchases in 2023 as compared to $1.3 million recognized in 2022 related to the acquisition of North Arundel Savings Bank on January 1, 2022. Lower income generated from the investment in life insurance due to the $1.1 million in death benefits received in 2022 compared to $235,000 received in 2023, offsetting higher gains on the sale of foreclosed real estate of $706,000 in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense information is as follows.
| Years Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and related benefits | $ | 12,257 | $ | 10,130 | $ | 2,127 | 21.00 | % | ||||||||
| Occupancy | 1,604 | 1,661 | (57 | ) | -3.43 | % | ||||||||||
| Data processing | 1,373 | 1,419 | (46 | ) | -3.24 | % | ||||||||||
| Advertising | 43 | 23 | 20 | 86.96 | % | |||||||||||
| Professional fees | 886 | 607 | 279 | 45.96 | % | |||||||||||
| Equipment | 425 | 436 | (11 | ) | -2.52 | % | ||||||||||
| Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets holding costs | 186 | 965 | (779 | ) | -80.73 | % | ||||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets | 183 | 183 | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||
| FDIC insurance premiums | 336 | 219 | 117 | 53.42 | % | |||||||||||
| Other | 2,116 | 4,351 | (2,235 | ) | -51.37 | % | ||||||||||
| Total non-interest expense | $ | 19,409 | $ | 19,994 | $ | (585 | ) | -2.93 | % |
Non-interest expense decreased $586,000 to $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was due primarily to decreases in merger expenses (included in the "Other" category) of $2.5 million and foreclosed real estate holding costs of $779,000 primarily related to the sale of two foreclosed properties in 2022, partially offset by increases in compensation and benefits of $2.2 million due to increases in staffing and salary levels. Professional fees increased due to higher accruals for audit and reviews of the periodic SEC filings as well as higher internal audit accruals due to an expanded scope of work to include review and testing of FDICIA controls.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $4.9 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 26.4%. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $4.0 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 27.7%. The primary reason for the increase in the respective effective tax rates was a lower amount of tax exempt income, primarily income from life insurance.
Management of Market Risk
General. Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk because, as a financial institution, the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Therefore, a principal goal of our operations is to manage interest rate risk and limit the exposure of our financial condition and results of operations to changes in market interest rates. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee, which consists of members of senior management, is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the policy and guidelines approved by our board of directors. We currently utilize a third-party modeling program, prepared on a quarterly basis, to evaluate our sensitivity to changing interest rates, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. We have implemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
1.
growing our volume of core deposit accounts;
2.
holding higher levels of cash and cash equivalents;
3.
continuing the diversification of our loan portfolio by adding more commercial-related loans, which typically have variable rates and shorter maturities; and
4.
purchasing short-term and adjustable rate securities.
46
By following these strategies, we believe that we are better positioned to react to increases and decreases in market interest rates.
We have not engaged in hedging activities, such as engaging in futures or options, or investing in high-risk mortgage derivatives, such as collateralized mortgage obligation residual interests, real estate mortgage investment conduit residual interests or stripped mortgage-backed securities.
Change in Net Interest Income. We analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through a net interest income model. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We estimate what our net interest income would be for a 12-month period. We then calculate what the net interest income would be for the same period under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points or decreases instantaneously by up to 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the “Change in Interest Rates” column below.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2023, the calculation of the estimated changes in our net interest income that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Net Interest Income | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100bp | + 200 bp | + 300bp | + 400bp |
| December 31, 2023 | -18.25% | -13.23% | -7.90% | -3.32% | 2.11% | 4.17% | 6.22% | 8.28% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The tables above indicate that at December 31, 2023, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 4.17% increase in net interest income.
The table above also illustrates that BV Financial’s net interest income is subject to significant decreases if interest rates were to decrease instantaneously by the amounts presented. This is due to a number of factors including:
1.
Short-term assets such as cash and cash equivalents will reprice immediately based on the Fed Funds target rate.
2.
The floating rate securities in the available-for-sale portfolio will reprice lower with a short (quarterly) lag.
3.
Loans with variable interest rates will begin to reprice at rates lower than the current note rates.
4.
New assets (loans & investment securities) will be placed on the balance sheet at the lower current market interest rates.
5.
Our non-maturing deposits remain at historical low rates and with the level of rate decreases presented, the rates paid on these deposits could not be lowered very much.
6.
Our certificate of deposit liabilities will take time to reprice to lower market rates.
The increase in net interest income in the rising rate scenarios is less than the decrease in the falling rate scenario primarily due to the largest category of interest-earning assets, the loan portfolio, takes longer to reprice to the higher market rates than other assets and liabilities. A high level of new loan growth at higher market rates would be required to help offset the delay in the repricing of the current loan portfolio. The model also assumes that the non-maturing deposit portfolio will quickly reprice to a calculated percentage of the increase in market rates.
47
Economic Value of Equity. We also compute amounts by which the net present value of our assets and liabilities (economic value of equity or “EVE”) would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. This model uses a discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based pricing approach to measure the interest rate sensitivity of net portfolio value. The model estimates the economic value of each type of asset, liability and off-balance sheet contract under the assumptions that the United States Treasury yield curve increases instantaneously by 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point increments or a decrease instantaneously by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points, with changes in interest rates representing immediate and permanent, parallel shifts in the yield curve. EVE as a measurement tool for interest rate risk measures the changes in the values of assets and liabilities based on the structure of the individual instrument (maturity, interest rate, re-pricing characteristic) when different levels of market interest rates are assumed.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2023, the calculation of the estimated changes in our EVE that would result from the designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve.
| Estimated Changes in Economic Value of Equity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in Interest Rates(1): | - 400 bp | - 300 bp | - 200 bp | - 100 bp | + 100 bp | + 200 bp | + 300 bp | + 400 bp |
| December 31, 2023 | -25.88% | -22.06% | -12.40% | -5.00% | 3.70% | 5.58% | 5.93% | 5.92% |
1.
Assumes an immediate uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2023, in the event of an instantaneous parallel 200 basis point increase in interest rates, we would experience a 5.58% increase in EVE, and in the event of an instantaneous 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience an 5.00% decrease in EVE. As indicated in the table above, our EVE falls considerably in the instantaneous down scenarios due to the value of the low or zero rate non-maturing deposit portfolio declining as the theoretical spread between the cost of these deposits and new assets declines. In the up scenarios, the value of these instruments increases less as the model assumes a significant lag before these rates increase.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net interest income and net economic value tables presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates, and actual results may differ. Furthermore, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of changes in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables.
Interest rate risk calculations also may not reflect the fair values of financial instruments. For example, decreases in market interest rates can increase the fair values of our loans, deposits and borrowings.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity. Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities and proceeds from maturities of securities. We also have the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. At December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $150.0 million and $96.8 million available under a line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, and had no and $12.0 million outstanding as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. In addition, at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Bank had $25.0 million and $40.0 million in unfunded letters of credit used to secure municipal deposits outstanding against the line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta.
48
While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Our most liquid assets are cash and short-term investments including interest-bearing demand deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period.
Our cash flows are comprised of three primary classifications: cash flows from operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $15.2 million and $9.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities, which consists primarily of investments in loans and securities, was $(35.2) million and $(27.8) million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities, consisting primarily of changes in deposits and advances and the repayment of advances to the Federal Home Loan Bank, was $25.1 million and $(24.5) million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Time deposits that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from December 31, 2023 totaled $111.4 million. Based on our deposit retention experience and current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a significant portion of maturing time deposits will be retained. However, if a substantial portion of these deposits is not retained, we may utilize Federal Home Loan Bank advances or raise interest rates on deposits to attract new accounts, which may result in higher levels of interest expense.
Capital Resources. At December 31, 2023, BayVanguard Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements, and was categorized as well capitalized at December 31, 2023. Management is not aware of any conditions or events since the most recent notification that would change our category.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. At December 31, 2023, we had outstanding commitments to extend credit of $49.4 million and $935,000 of letters of credit. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include data processing services, operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of BV Financial for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 included with this document for a description of recent accounting pronouncements that may affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates, generally, have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than does inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
FY 2009 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001193125-09-197035.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
The objective of this section is to help potential investors understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read
this discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Income. Our primary source of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the
difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. To a much lesser extent, we also recognize income from service
charge income—mostly from service charges on deposit accounts and fees for late loan payments—and from the increase in surrender value of our bank-owned life insurance.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Expenses. The expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and related expenses, occupancy expenses, data processing
expenses, telephone and postage expenses, advertising expenses, professional fees, equipment expenses and other miscellaneous expenses.
Compensation and related expenses consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits, including the
23
Table of Contents
employee stock ownership plan. Expense for the employee stock ownership plan is based on the average market value of the shares committed to be released. An
equal number of shares will be released each year over the 15-year term of the loan. Expense for shares of restricted stock awards and stock options is based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Compensation and related
expenses is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of
land and building, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets,
which range from 15 to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or term of the lease.
Data processing expenses include fees paid for third-party data processing service.
Telephone and postage expenses include our
communication lines between branch offices, our Internet access and our mailing expenses, including certain deposit statements.
Advertising expenses include expenses for print advertisements, promotions and premium items.
Professional fees primarily include
fees paid to our independent registered public accountants, as well as our attorneys, predominantly in relation to problem assets and due to the costs of operating a public company.
Equipment expense includes expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment. Depreciation of equipment is computed using the
straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to ten years.
FDIC insurance premium expense
includes premiums paid for federal insurance on deposits.
Other expenses include amortization of intangible assets, charitable
contributions, regulatory assessments, office supplies and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying
value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the allowance for loan losses, fair value measurement for financial assets, the determination of other than temporary impairment of investments, intangible asset
impairment and the deferred tax asset valuation allowance to be critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses,
which is charged to income. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing
of future cash flows on impaired loans; the value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. We recorded charge-offs of
$581,000 and $21,000 in relation to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, we had net charge-offs to average loans of 0.68% for fiscal 2009 compared to net charge offs to average loans of
0.02% for fiscal 2008.
Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, and establishes the provision for
loan losses based on an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, economic conditions and business conditions affecting our primary market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan
portfolio, the duration of the current business cycle and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions
to the allowance may be necessary if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. For example, a further downturn
24
Table of Contents
in the local economy could cause increases in non-performing loans. Additionally, a further decline in real estate values could cause some of our loans to
become inadequately collateralized. In either case, this may require us to increase our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact earnings. Further, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process,
periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. An increase to the allowance required
to be made by the Office of Thrift Supervision would negatively impact our earnings. Additionally, a large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings. See
notes 1 and 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.
At each of June 30, 2009 and 2008, over
89.2% of the loan portfolio consisted of real estate loans. However, over 19.0% of the real estate loans consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate and construction loans, which carry a higher risk of default than one-to four-family
residential real estate loans. The level of the allowance for loan losses has changed due to a provision for loan losses of $729,000 for fiscal 2008, offset by $583,000 in charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses also reflects changes in the size
of loan portfolio, which decreased by 4.4% for fiscal 2009 and increased by 6.2% fiscal 2008, respectively.
Fair Value Measurement
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes a three level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Management has presented certain financial instruments measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis by level within the hierarchy. Management obtains fair values from various broker pricing
sources on a monthly basis, at a minimum, and reviews the fair values for reasonableness. Although the Company believes that it uses the best information available to establish fair values for these certain financial instruments, future changes to
the fair value may be significant if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making determinations about fair value. For example, market data used as inputs to calculate pricing for a particular
financial instrument may change dramatically.
Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities. There are certain
securities in the Company’s portfolio in an unrealized loss position that management believes at this time are temporarily impaired. If the fair value of these securities does not recover in a reasonable period of time or management can no
longer demonstrate the ability and intent to hold them until recovery, a write-down through the consolidated statements of income would be necessary.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the
length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the Company’s intent to not sell the security and hold the security until the
specified maturity or repricing date. In analyzing the issuer’s financial condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance and projected target prices of investment analysts.
Intangible Asset Impairment. The Company has goodwill and core deposit intangible assets arising from a branch purchase. The goodwill is
evaluated annually for impairment while the core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years and also evaluated annually for impairment. Goodwill impairment was tested at May 31, 2009. A valuation analysis identified impairment, and
as a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.9 million, which eliminated all goodwill at the Company. The goodwill impairment charge did not affect the Company’s regulatory capital or cash flow.
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as prescribed in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. We
25
Table of Contents
exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to
make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in
estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Management determined during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 that a deferred tax asset valuation allowance was warranted for its
mutual fund security based on the Company’s ability to generate future capital gains if necessary to offset capital losses. In addition, management determined that no deferred tax asset valuation allowance was warranted for its goodwill
impairment write-down due to the expectation of taxable income going forward and the availability of tax planning strategies to generate future income to offset operating losses.
Operating Strategy
Our mission is to operate and grow a profitable community-oriented financial
institution. We plan to achieve this by executing our strategy of:
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | aggressively attracting core deposits; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | continuing to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | pursuing opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real estate lending in our market area; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | continuing to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio; and |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | providing exceptional service to attract and retain customers. |
Aggressively attract core deposits
Core deposits (accounts other than certificates of deposit)
comprised 53.4% of our total deposits at June 30, 2009. We value core deposits because they represent longer-term customer relationships and a lower cost of funding compared to certificates of deposit. We aggressively seek core deposits through
competitive pricing and targeted advertising.
Continue to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate
loans
Our primary lending activity is the origination of residential mortgage loans secured by homes in our market area. We intend to
continue emphasizing the origination of residential mortgage loans going forward. At June 30, 2009, 70.3% of our total loans were one- to four-family residential real estate loans. We believe that our emphasis on residential lending, which
carries a lower credit risk, contributes to our high asset quality.
Pursue opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real
estate lending in our market area
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans provide us with the opportunity to earn more income
because they tend to have higher interest rates than residential mortgage loans. Additionally, we offer adjustable-rate multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Adjustable-rate loans, which reprice periodically, help to offset the adverse
effects of an increase in interest rates, which improves our interest rate risk management. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $3.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and comprised approximately 13.5% of total loans.
There are many multi-family and commercial properties located in our market area, and we will continue to pursue these opportunities, while continuing to originate any such loans in accordance with what we believe are our conservative underwriting
guidelines.
26
Table of Contents
Continue to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio
We believe that high asset quality is a key to long-term financial success. We have sought to maintain a high level of asset quality
and moderate credit risk by using underwriting standards which we believe are conservative. While our non-performing loans (loans that are 90 or more days delinquent) at June 30, 2009 decreased to 0.8% of our total loan portfolio and 0.6% of
our total assets, the decrease was attributable to two residential construction loans totaling $2.2 million being removed from non-accrual status due to $1.8 million in payoffs and $426,000 in charge-offs. We intend to continue our efforts to
originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans and our philosophy of managing large loan exposures through our conservative approach to lending.
Provide exceptional service to attract and retain customers
As a community-oriented financial
institution, we emphasize providing exceptional customer service as a means to attract and retain customers. We deliver personalized service and respond with flexibility to customer needs. We believe that our community orientation is attractive to
our customers and distinguishes us from the large banks that operate in our market area. We have also provided Internet banking since 1997.
Balance
Sheet Analysis
Loans. Our primary lending activity is the origination of loans secured by real estate. We
originate real estate loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, and to a much lesser extent, secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. At June 30, 2009, real estate loans totaled $110.0 million, or 89.2% of total
loans, compared to $115.1 million, or 89.9%, of total loans at June 30, 2008.
The largest segment of our real estate loans is one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. At June 30, 2009, one- to four-family residential real estate loans totaled $86.6 million, which represented 78.7% of real estate loans and 70.3% of total loans compared to $90.5 million at
June 30, 2008, which represented 78.6% of real estate loans and 70.7% of total loans. One- to four-family residential real estate loans decreased $3.9 million, or 4.3%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 due to borrower payoffs from their
refinancing with a competitor offering a lower rate, loan roll-off and a reduced demand for these loans.
Multi-family and commercial real
estate loans totaled $16.6 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 15.1% of real estate loans and 13.5% of total loans, compared to $13.6 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 11.8% of real estate loans and 10.6% of total loans.
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $3.0 million, or 22.4%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 due to the continued emphasis of this type of lending.
We purchase and originate loans secured by mobile homes. Mobile home loans totaled $11.5 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 9.3% of total
loans, compared to $11.8 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 9.2% of total loans. To mitigate our exposure to this type of lending, we have limited the amount of mobile home loans to 15% of our loan portfolio. Mobile home loans
decreased in fiscal 2009 due to roll-off exceeding additional purchases from Forward National and Mainland Financial. A further discussion of our mobile home loans is contained in “Business—Lending Activities—Mobile Home
Loans.”
We also originate construction loans secured by residential, multi-family and commercial real estate and loans to
individuals to acquire land upon which they intend to build a residence. This portfolio totaled $6.8 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 5.5% of total loans, compared to $11.1 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 8.7% of
total loans. Construction loans decreased $4.3 million, or 38.9%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to management reducing exposure in this area, the completion of the construction period for some loans and resulting conversion to
permanent loans, and the foreclosure of a $1.0 million construction loan resulting in a charge-off of $426,000.
We also originate a
variety of consumer loans, including loans secured by passbook or certificate accounts. Consumer loans totaled $888,000 and represented 0.7% of total loans at June 30, 2009, compared to $824,000, or 0.7% of total loans, at June 30, 2008.
27
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family (1) | $ | 86,589 | 70.24 | % | $ | 90,494 | 70.66 | % | ||||||
| Multi-family and commercial | 16,614 | 13.48 | 13,572 | 10.60 | ||||||||||
| Construction | 6,797 | 5.51 | 11,125 | 8.68 | ||||||||||
| Total real estate loans | 110,000 | 89.23 | 115,191 | 89.94 | ||||||||||
| Mobile home loans | 11,471 | 9.31 | 11,810 | 9.22 | ||||||||||
| Other consumer loans | 888 | 0.72 | 824 | 0.65 | ||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 12,359 | 10.03 | 12,634 | 9.87 | ||||||||||
| Commercial | 909 | 0.74 | 244 | 0.19 | ||||||||||
| Total gross loans | 123,268 | 100.00 | % | 128,069 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
| Loans in process | (3,178 | ) | (2,533 | ) | ||||||||||
| Deferred loan costs, net | — | 16 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (855 | ) | (709 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total loans receivable, net | $ | 119,235 | $ | 124,843 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Includes second mortgage loans, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. |
The following table sets forth certain information at June 30, 2009 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments, which
significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.
| One- to Four- Family | Multi- Family and commercial | Construction | Mobile Home | Other Consumer | Commercial | Total Loans | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts due in: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| One year or less | $ | 1,693 | $ | 344 | $ | 5,460 | $ | 6 | $ | 8 | $ | 750 | $ | 8,261 | |||||||
| More than one year to five years | 9,825 | 2,018 | 1,337 | 256 | 543 | 159 | 14,138 | ||||||||||||||
| More than five years | 75,071 | 14,252 | — | 11,209 | 337 | — | 100,869 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount due | $ | 86,589 | $ | 16,614 | $ | 6,797 | $ | 11,471 | $ | 888 | $ | 909 | $ | 123,268 |
28
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at June 30, 2009 that are due after
June 30, 2010 and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates.
| Due After June 30, 2010 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed-Rates | Floating or Adjustable-Rates | Total | |||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||
| One- to four-family | $ | 73,919 | $ | 10,977 | $ | 84,896 | |||
| Multi-family and commercial | 6,552 | 9,718 | 16,270 | ||||||
| Construction | 1,337 | — | 1,337 | ||||||
| Mobile home | 11,465 | — | 11,465 | ||||||
| Other consumer loans | 880 | — | 880 | ||||||
| Commercial | 159 | — | 159 | ||||||
| Total loans | $ | 94,312 | $ | 20,695 | $ | 115,007 |
The following table shows loan activity during the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||
| Total loans at beginning of period | $ | 124,843 | $ | 116,051 | |||
| Loans originated: | |||||||
| One- to four-family | 9,376 | 10,795 | |||||
| Multi-family and commercial | 5,634 | 2,936 | |||||
| Construction | 3,975 | 3,048 | |||||
| Mobile home | 263 | 545 | |||||
| Other consumer | 290 | 311 | |||||
| Total loans originated | 19,538 | 17,635 | |||||
| Loans and participations purchased | 1,621 | 5,250 | |||||
| Deduct: | |||||||
| Principal loan repayments | 22,858 | 13,049 | |||||
| Loans and participations sold | 3,290 | 890 | |||||
| Transfer to foreclosed real estate/repossessed assets | 619 | 42 | |||||
| Other | — | 112 | |||||
| Net loan activity | (5,608 | ) | 8,792 | ||||
| Total loans at end of period | $ | 119,235 | $ | 124,843 |
Securities. Our securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. Treasury and
U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate loans. Securities decreased approximately $4.8 million, or 26.0%, in the year ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to $9.0 million of
U.S. government agency securities being called or maturing and $2.5 million principal collected on mortgage-backed securities offset by $7.0 million of U.S. government agency securities purchases. All of our mortgage-backed securities were issued by
Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
29
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the carrying amounts and fair values of our securities portfolio at the
dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $ | 4,052 | $ | 4,079 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 2,013 | ||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | 7,485 | 7,610 | 7,788 | 7,648 | ||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities | 11,537 | 11,689 | 9,788 | 9,661 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | — | — | 5,000 | 4,947 | ||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | — | — | 2,547 | 2,547 | ||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | 1,146 | 1,179 | 1,351 | 1,344 | ||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities | 1,146 | 1,179 | 8,898 | 8,838 | ||||||||
| Trading securities: | ||||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 1,076 | 1,076 | — | — | ||||||||
| Total trading securities | 1,076 | 1,076 | — | — | ||||||||
| Total securities | $ | 13,759 | $ | 13,944 | $ | 18,686 | $ | 18,499 |
At June 30, 2009, we had no investments that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of
our equity at June 30, 2009. Management analyzed its exposure to U.S. federal agencies securities and mortgage-backed securities held and found no other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2009.
30
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the maturities and weighted average yields of securities at June 30,
2009. Weighted average yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the investment portfolio does not include any tax-exempt obligations.
| One Year or Less | More than One Year to Five Years | More than Five Years to Fifteen Years | More than Fifteen Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $ | 1,000 | 1.25 | % | $ | 3,052 | 1.45 | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | 4,052 | 4.47 | % | ||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | — | — | 2,616 | 3.33 | 1,917 | 4.22 | 2,952 | 5.65 | 7,485 | 2.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities | $ | 1,000 | 1.25 | $ | 5,668 | 2.81 | $ | 1,917 | 4.22 | $ | 2,952 | 5.65 | $ | 11,537 | 3.71 | |||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | $ | — | — | % | $ | 36 | 6.50 | % | $ | 123 | 5.50 | % | $ | 1,020 | 5.15 | % | $ | 1,179 | 5.22 | % | ||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities | $ | — | — | $ | 36 | 6.50 | $ | 123 | 5.50 | $ | 1,020 | 5.15 | $ | 1,179 | 5.22 | |||||||||||||||
| Trading securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | $ | 1,076 | 5.09 | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | 1,076 | 5.09 | % | ||||||||||
| Total trading securities | $ | 1,076 | 5.09 | $ | — | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | — | $ | 1,076 | 5.09 |
31
Table of Contents
Deposits. Our primary source of funds is our deposit accounts, which are comprised
of demand deposits, savings accounts and time deposits. These deposits are provided primarily by individuals within our market area. We do not use brokered deposits as a source of funding. Deposits increased $584,000, or 0.4%, for the year ended
June 30, 2009 primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in time deposits and a $150,000 increase in savings accounts, offset by a $2.6 million decrease in NOW and money market accounts. The Bank aggressively marketed time deposits early in
fiscal year 2009 attracting new monies while also seeing movement from other deposit categories.
The following table sets forth the
balances of our deposit products at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Non-interest bearing accounts | $ | 6,041 | $ | 6,040 | ||
| NOW and money market accounts | 50,896 | 53,520 | ||||
| Savings accounts | 16,604 | 16,454 | ||||
| Certificates of deposit | 64,075 | 61,018 | ||||
| Total | $ | 137,616 | $ | 137,032 |
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until
maturity as of June 30, 2009. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000.
| Maturity Period | Amount | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (In thousands) | |||
| Three months or less | $ | 7,316 | |
| Over three through six months | 1,645 | ||
| Over six through twelve months | 4,798 | ||
| Over twelve months | 9,620 | ||
| Total | $ | 23,379 |
The following table sets forth time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| 1.00 - 1.99% | $ | 4,511 | $ | — | ||
| 2.00 - 2.99% | 11,804 | 6,019 | ||||
| 3.00 - 3.99% | 14,634 | 8,579 | ||||
| 4.00 - 4.99% | 18,247 | 29,662 | ||||
| 5.00 - 5.99% | 14,759 | 16,395 | ||||
| 6.00 - 6.99% | 120 | 363 | ||||
| Total | $ | 64,075 | $ | 61,018 |
32
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2009.
| Amount Due | Total | Percent of Total Certificate Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Year or Less | More Than One Year to Two Years | More Than Two Years to Three Years | More Than Three Years to Four Years | More Than Four Years | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.00 - 1.99% | $ | 3,733 | $ | 778 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,511 | 7.04 | % | |||||||
| 2.00 - 2.99% | 10,690 | 855 | 120 | 14 | 125 | 11,804 | 18.42 | ||||||||||||||
| 3.00 - 3.99% | 11,562 | 847 | 332 | 277 | 1,616 | 14,634 | 22.84 | ||||||||||||||
| 4.00 - 4.99% | 11,693 | 3,485 | 924 | 1,030 | 1,115 | 18,247 | 28.48 | ||||||||||||||
| 5.00 - 5.99% | 970 | 11,893 | 564 | — | 1,332 | 14,759 | 23.03 | ||||||||||||||
| 6.00 - 6.99% | 100 | 20 | — | — | — | 120 | 0.19 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 38,748 | $ | 17,878 | $ | 1,940 | $ | 1,321 | $ | 4,188 | $ | 64,075 | 100.00 | % |
The following table sets forth the deposit activity for the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 137,032 | $ | 98,492 | ||||
| Decrease before branch acquisition and interest credited | (3,148 | ) | (17,655 | ) | ||||
| Increase due to branch acquisition | — | 51,521 | ||||||
| Interest credited | 3,732 | 4,674 | ||||||
| Net increase in deposits | 584 | 38,540 | ||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 137,616 | $ | 137,032 |
Borrowings. We use advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank to supplement our
supply of lendable funds or to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The following tables present certain information regarding our advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank during the periods and at the dates indicated.
| For the Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Maximum amount of advances outstanding at any month end | $ | 12,500 | $ | 16,000 | ||||
| Average advances outstanding | 9,062 | 9,605 | ||||||
| Weighted average rate paid on advances | 7.00 | % | 4.86 | % | ||||
| At June 30, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Balance outstanding at end of year | $ | — | $ | 7,500 | ||||
| Weighted average rate on advances at end of year | — | % | 4.68 | % |
33
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Overview.
| % Change | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009/2008 | |||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (2,717 | ) | $ | (330 | ) | 723.3 | % | |||
| Return on average assets | (1.70 | )% | (0.20 | )% | 750.0 | % | |||||
| Return on average equity | (20.09 | )% | (2.44 | )% | 723.4 | % | |||||
| Average equity to average assets | 8.45 | % | 8.15 | % | 3.7 | % | |||||
| Dividend payout ratio | (17.09 | )% | (142.86 | )% | (88.0 | )% |
Net loss increased $2.4 million, or 723.3%, for fiscal 2009 due primarily to a $3.9 million
goodwill impairment write-down, a $401,000 increase in the provision for loan losses and a $471,000 loss in securities trading, offset by a $1.7 million increase in benefit for income taxes.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $420,000, or 11.3%, to $4.1 million for fiscal 2009. The increase in net
interest income for fiscal 2009 was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest expense to lower interest rates. Our net interest margin increased from 2.48% for fiscal 2008 to 2.80% for fiscal 2009 and our interest rate spread increased from
2.13% for fiscal 2008 to 2.54% for fiscal 2009.
Total interest income decreased $355,000, or 4.0%, to $8.5 million for fiscal 2009,
resulting from lower average balances and interest rates earned. During fiscal 2009, average interest-earning assets decreased by $2.3 million, or 1.6%, to $147.1 million, while the average yield decreased 15 basis points to 5.77%. The composition
of interest-earning assets consists of loans, securities and interest-bearing deposits. Interest on loans increased $286,000, or 3.8%, to $7.8 million for fiscal 2009 due to an increase in the average balance, offset by a decrease in the average
yield from 6.26% to 6.21%. During fiscal 2009, other interest income decreased $677,000, or 97.1%, due to a decrease in the average balance on federal funds and a decrease in the average yield on overnight federal funds from 4.11% to 0.29%. Interest
on securities increased 5.9% due to an increase in the average balance, offset by a decrease in the average yield from 5.03% to 4.29%.
Total interest expense decreased $775,000 or 15.1%, to $4.4 million for fiscal 2009 primarily due to decreases in interest paid on deposits, offset by an increase in interest paid on borrowings. The average interest rate paid on deposits
decreased 75 basis points to 2.95%. The interest paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased due to an increase in the average rate paid from 4.86% to 7.00%, offset by a decrease in average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances from $9.6
million for fiscal 2008 to $9.1 million for fiscal 2009. The increase in the average rate paid was due to prepayment penalties in connection with the prepayment of higher-interest rate advances.
Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the
total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for
the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using daily average
balances.
34
Table of Contents
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Average Balance | Interest and Dividends | Average Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest and Dividends | Average Yield/ Rate | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans (1) | $ | 125,825 | $ | 7,819 | 6.21 | % | $ | 120,324 | $ | 7,533 | 6.26 | % | ||||||||
| Securities taxable | 15,110 | 648 | 4.29 | 12,164 | 612 | 5.03 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits | 563 | 4 | 0.71 | 537 | 23 | 4.28 | ||||||||||||||
| Federal Funds | 5,589 | 17 | 0.29 | 16,411 | 675 | 4.11 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 147,087 | 8,488 | 5.77 | 149,436 | 8,843 | 5.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 13,039 | 16,792 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 160,126 | $ | 166,228 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Passbook accounts | $ | 4,782 | 34 | 0.71 | % | $ | 5,172 | 42 | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||
| Statement savings | 11,057 | 167 | 1.51 | 12,210 | 268 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 39,672 | 942 | 2.37 | 40,578 | 1,423 | 3.51 | ||||||||||||||
| NOW accounts | 8,424 | 37 | 0.44 | 8,079 | 47 | 0.58 | ||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 62,345 | 2,552 | 4.09 | 60,140 | 2,894 | 4.81 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 126,280 | 3,732 | 2.95 | 126,179 | 4,674 | 3.70 | ||||||||||||||
| FHLB advances | 9,062 | 634 | 7.00 | 9,605 | 467 | 4.86 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 135,342 | 4,366 | 3.23 | 135,784 | 5,141 | 3.79 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing deposits | 6,766 | 5,518 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-interest-bearing liabilities | 4,491 | 11,383 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 146,599 | 152,685 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 13,527 | 13,543 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 160,126 | $ | 166,228 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 4,122 | $ | 3,702 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread (2) | 2.54 | % | 2.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin (3) | 2.80 | 2.48 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities | 108.68 | % | 110.05 | % |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Amount is net of deferred loan origination costs, undisbursed proceeds of loans in process, allowance for loan losses and includes non-accrual loans. |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (2) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (3) | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
35
Table of Contents
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates
and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes
due to rate and the changes due to volume.
| 2009 Compared to 2008 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Net | ||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 342 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 286 | |||||
| Securities | 135 | (99 | ) | 36 | ||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits | 1 | (20 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||
| Federal Funds | (273 | ) | (385 | ) | (658 | ) | ||||||
| Total interest income | 205 | (560 | ) | (355 | ) | |||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||
| Deposit: | ||||||||||||
| Passbook accounts | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||
| Savings accounts | (23 | ) | (78 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||||
| Money market accounts | (31 | ) | (450 | ) | (481 | ) | ||||||
| NOW accounts | 2 | (12 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 103 | (445 | ) | (342 | ) | |||||||
| Total deposits | 48 | (990 | ) | (942 | ) | |||||||
| Borrowings | (28 | ) | 195 | 167 | ||||||||
| Total interest expense | 20 | (795 | ) | (775 | ) | |||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 185 | $ | 235 | $ | 420 |
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses increased $401,000, from $328,000 for fiscal 2008 to $729,000 for fiscal 2009. This was a result of increased charge-offs
and classified loans.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, non-performing loans and classified loans is presented
under “Risk Management—Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets” and “Risk Management—Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Non-Interest Income. The following table shows the components of other income and the percentage changes from year to year.
| 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Service fees on deposits | $ | 121 | $ | 119 | 1.7 | % | |||||
| Service fees on loans | 35 | 31 | 12.9 | ||||||||
| Income from investment in life insurance | 76 | 76 | — | ||||||||
| Loss on securities trading | (471 | ) | — | N/A | |||||||
| Loss on sale of securities available for sale | — | (19 | ) | 100.0 | |||||||
| Termination of split-dollar life insurance policy | 240 | — | N/A | ||||||||
| Other income | 93 | 81 | 14.8 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 94 | $ | 288 | (67.4 | ) |
36
Table of Contents
Total non-interest income decreased $194,000 from $288,000 to $94,000 or 67.4% primarily due to a
$471,000 loss on securities trading associated with a decline in the AMF Short Mortgage Mutual Fund offset by $240,000 in income from the termination of a split-dollar life insurance policy.
Non-Interest Expenses. The following table shows the components of non-interest expenses and the percentage changes from year to year.
| 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Compensation and related expenses | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,250 | (1.1 | )% | |||||
| Occupancy | 267 | 257 | 3.9 | ||||||||
| Data processing | 373 | 375 | (0.5 | ) | |||||||
| Telephone and postage | 67 | 65 | 3.1 | ||||||||
| Advertising | 110 | 115 | (4.4 | ) | |||||||
| Professional fees | 277 | 213 | 30.0 | ||||||||
| Equipment | 148 | 175 | (15.4 | ) | |||||||
| Impairment write-down of investment securities | — | 274 | (100.0 | ) | |||||||
| Net amortization of intangible assets | 110 | 112 | (1.8 | ) | |||||||
| Goodwill impairment | 3,940 | — | N/A | ||||||||
| Repossessed assets expense | 64 | (12 | ) | 633.3 | |||||||
| FDIC Insurance Premiums | 235 | 19 | 1,136.8 | ||||||||
| Other | 366 | 403 | (9.2 | ) | |||||||
| Total | $ | 8,182 | $ | 4,246 | 92.7 | ||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 194.1 | % | 106.4 | % |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Computed as non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and other income. If goodwill impairment for 2009 and impairment write-down of investment securities for 2008 were excluded, the efficiency ratio would be 100.6% and 99.6% for 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Total non-interest
expenses increased $3.9 million from $4.3 million to $8.2 million or 92.7% primarily due to a $3.9 million goodwill impairment charge off recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Pasadena, Maryland branch office in August 2007. The
increased non-interest expense also reflected increased FDIC insurance premiums due to the one-time special assessment and an increase in the overall assessment rate. Other expenses decreased due to management controlling costs and reductions in
office supplies, check printing, bank charges and insurance expenses.
Income Taxes. The benefit for income taxes increased
$1.7 million, or 678.7%, from a benefit of $254,000 for fiscal year 2008 to $2.0 million for fiscal year 2009 due primarily to the decrease in pre-tax income. The Company’s effective tax rate was (42.1)% for fiscal year 2009 compared to
(43.5%) for fiscal year 2008.
Risk Management
Overview. Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is
the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from
fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we encounter are operational risks, liquidity
risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or
borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
37
Table of Contents
Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having
well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans. Our strategy also emphasizes the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which typically have lower
default rates than other types of loans and are secured by collateral that generally tends to appreciate in value.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past
due. If payment is not received by the 35th day of delinquency, a letter from our
President and Chief Executive Officer is sent. Typically, when the loan becomes 60 days past due, a letter is sent from our attorney notifying the borrower that we will commence foreclosure proceedings if the loan is not paid in full within 30 days.
Generally, loan workout arrangements are made with the borrower at this time; however, if an arrangement cannot be structured before the loan becomes 90 days past due, we will commence foreclosure proceedings against any real property that secures
the loan or attempt to repossess any personal property that secures a consumer loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the
loan generally is sold at foreclosure.
Management informs the board of directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30
days.
Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets. We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more
past due to be non-performing assets. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on non-accrual status at which time the accrual of interest ceases and an allowance for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged
against operations. Typically, payments received on a non-accrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan.
Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When
property is acquired, it is recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Non-performing assets totaled $1.6 million, or 1.02% of total assets, at June 30, 2009, which was a decrease of $1.2 million, or 42.9%, from
June 30, 2008. The decrease in non-performing assets was due primarily to a $2.6 million decrease in non-accruing construction loans offset by a $651,000 increase in non-accruing one- to four-family loans and a $500,000 increase in foreclosed
real estate. The decrease in non-accruing construction loans was due to $2.2 million in pay-offs, $426,000 in charge-offs and a $405,000 loan becoming current.
In August 2008, the Bank refinanced one of the non-accruing construction loans present at June 30, 2008 by splitting the original loan amount between the two primary borrowers and making two loans. One
borrower’s new loan was secured by two properties that were only 85% complete. This borrower provided additional properties for collateral so that there would be enough equity to finish the remaining 15% of the project. This project has been
completed and the two properties are being rented providing cash flows for repayment of this loan. The other borrower’s new loan was secured by two completed properties that are being rented providing cash flows for repayment of this loan. This
borrower is adding personal cash to help make the loan payments. Both of the refinanced loans were granted at the current market rates available and the same risk and compliance standards as other such loans available. At June 30, 2009, these
loans were current and paying in accordance with the revised terms.
Non-accrual loans accounted for 41.2% of total non-performing assets
at June 30, 2009.
38
Table of Contents
The following table provides information with respect to our non-performing assets at the dates
indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Non-accruing loans: | ||||||||
| Construction | $ | — | $ | 2,623 | ||||
| One- to four-family | 651 | — | ||||||
| Other consumer | — | 62 | ||||||
| Total | 651 | 2,685 | ||||||
| Accruing loans past due 90 days or more | 270 | — | ||||||
| Troubled debt restructuring (1) | — | 46 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate | 500 | — | ||||||
| Other repossessed assets | 161 | 41 | ||||||
| Total non-performing assets | $ | 1,582 | $ | 2,772 | ||||
| Total non-performing loans to total loans | 0.55 | % | 2.10 | % | ||||
| Total non-performing loans to total assets | 0.42 | 1.64 | ||||||
| Total non-performing assets to total assets | 1.02 | 1.69 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | As defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15. |
Other than disclosed in the above table, there are no other loans at June 30, 2009 that management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present repayment terms.
Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended June 30, 2009 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms
amounted to $45,000. The amount of interest related to these loans included in interest income was $23,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are
three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies
are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values
questionable and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a
“special mention” category, described as assets that do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. When we
classify an asset as substandard or doubtful, we establish a specific allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified as loss.
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Special mention assets | $ | 2,853 | $ | — | ||
| Substandard assets | 1,776 | 2,603 | ||||
| Doubtful assets | — | — | ||||
| Loss assets | — | — | ||||
| Total classified assets | $ | 4,629 | $ | 2,603 |
39
Table of Contents
Total classified assets increased $2.0 million from $2.6 million to $4.6 million, or 76.9%,
primarily due to negative changes in customer payment histories and deterioration of customers’ personal credit histories.
There were ten loans at June 30, 2009 with an aggregate balance of $1.8 million that are classified as substandard and are considered non-performing. There were four loans at June 30, 2008 with an aggregate balance of $2.6 million
that were classified as substandard and were considered non-performing.
Delinquencies. The following table
provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | — | $ | — | — | $ | — | 2 | $ | 411 | 6 | $ | 2,623 | ||||||||
| One- to four-family residential | 5 | 1,347 | 4 | 588 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Mobile home | 3 | 71 | — | — | 4 | 163 | 2 | 62 | ||||||||||||
| Other consumer | — | — | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Total | 8 | $ | 1,418 | 5 | $ | 612 | 6 | $ | 574 | 8 | $ | 2,685 |
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance
for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish provisions against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additions to the allowance are necessary, a provision for
loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of three
key elements: (1) specific allowances for identified problem loans; (2) a general valuation allowance on certain identified problem loans; and (3) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we
determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowance Required for Identified Problem Loans. We establish an allowance on certain identified problem loans based on such factors as: (1) the strength of the customer’s personal or business cash flows;
(2) the availability of other sources of repayment; (3) the amount due or past due; (4) the type and value of collateral; (5) the strength of our collateral position; (6) the estimated cost to sell the collateral; and
(7) the borrower’s effort to cure the delinquency.
General Valuation Allowance on Certain Identified Problem Loans. We
also establish a general allowance for classified loans that do not have an individual allowance. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowances to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and
consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.
General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio. We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified to
recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category
and assigning allowances based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s
judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary
market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in
40
Table of Contents
particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are
re-evaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment.
The Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours.
At June 30, 2009, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.71% of total loans and 92.8% of non-performing loans. The allowance for loan losses
increased to $855,000 at June 30, 2009 from $709,000 at June 30, 2008, due to a provision for loan losses of $729,000 and charge-offs of $583,000. The higher allowance reflects higher general loss factors being established in all loan
categories except construction. A lower allowance for construction loans was required at June 30, 2009 due to $1.8 million in pay-offs of non-accruing construction loans and $426,000 in construction loan charge-offs during fiscal year 2009.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family | $ | 283 | 33.1 | % | 70.3 | % | $ | 178 | 25.1 | % | 70.7 | % | ||||||
| Multi-family and commercial | 290 | 33.9 | 13.5 | 73 | 10.3 | 10.6 | ||||||||||||
| Construction | 112 | 13.1 | 5.5 | 329 | 46.4 | 8.7 | ||||||||||||
| Mobile home | 152 | 17.8 | 9.3 | 118 | 16.6 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 13 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial | 5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 855 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | $ | 709 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % |
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan
losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while
we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for
loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should
the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
41
Table of Contents
Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the
allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific loan loss allowances have been established, any difference between the loss allowance and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to current income.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year | $ | 709 | $ | 402 | ||||
| Provision for loan losses | 729 | 328 | ||||||
| Charge-offs: | ||||||||
| Construction | 426 | — | ||||||
| Non-residential | 60 | — | ||||||
| Mobile home | 76 | 7 | ||||||
| Other consumer | 21 | 14 | ||||||
| Total charge-offs | 583 | 21 | ||||||
| Recoveries: | ||||||||
| Total recoveries | — | — | ||||||
| Net charge-offs | 583 | 21 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, end of period | $ | 855 | $ | 709 | ||||
| Allowance to non-performing loans | 92.83 | % | 26.40 | % | ||||
| Allowance to total loans outstanding at end of period | 0.71 | 0.57 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period | 0.46 | 0.02 |
Interest Rate Risk Management. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our
interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans
because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our
earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Also, we attempt to manage our interest rate risk through: the origination of adjustable-rate one-
to four-family residential real estate loans; an investment in a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate mortgage loans; an increased focus on multi-family and commercial real estate lending, which emphasizes the origination of shorter-term
adjustable-rate loans; and efforts to originate fixed-rate mortgage loans with maturities of fifteen years or less. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet
derivative financial instruments.
Our board of directors serves as our Asset/Liability Committee to communicate, coordinate and control
all aspects involving asset/liability management. The committee monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources.
Net Portfolio Value Simulation Analysis. We use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the Office of Thrift Supervision to
review our level of interest rate risk. This analysis measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market
interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk
of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 100 to 300 basis point increase or 50 basis point decrease in market interest rates. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value
over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table, which is based on information that we provide to the Office of Thrift Supervision, presents the change in our net portfolio value at June 30, 2009 that would occur in the event of
an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.
42
Table of Contents
| Net Portfolio Value (Dollars in thousands) | Net Portfolio Value as % of Portfolio Value of Assets | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates | $ Amount | $ Change | % Change | NPV Ratio | Change | |||||||||||
| 300 | $ | 10,687 | $ | (3,203 | ) | (23 | )% | 6.79 | % | (171 | )bp | |||||
| 200 | 12,466 | (1,424 | ) | (10 | ) | 7.79 | (71 | ) | ||||||||
| 100 | 13,623 | (267 | ) | (2 | ) | 8.40 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
| 50 | 13,857 | (33 | ) | — | 8.51 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Static | 13,890 | — | — | 8.50 | — | |||||||||||
| (50) | 13,856 | (33 | ) | — | 8.46 | (5 | ) | |||||||||
| (100) | 13,739 | (151 | ) | (1 | ) | 8.37 | (13 | ) |
The Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of
savings associations. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest
rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to
changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Further,
in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly adjust our investments in
liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits, federal funds sold and short- and intermediate-term U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At
June 30, 2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $11.2 million. Additionally, at June 30, 2009, the Company had interest-bearing deposits of $124,000. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of
liquidity, totaled $1.2 million at June 30, 2009. In addition, at June 30, 2009, we had the ability to borrow an additional $40.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. On that date, we had no outstanding borrowings.
At June 30, 2009, we had $471,000 in loan commitments outstanding. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $2.2 million
in unused lines of credit and $1.0 million in undisbursed construction loans in process. Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2009 totaled $38.7 million, or 28.2% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we
will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and lines of credit. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before June 30, 2010. We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by
adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. Our
primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage
the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposits. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates to attract certain deposit products.
43
Table of Contents
The following table presents our primary investing and financing activities during the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Investing activities: | ||||||||
| Loan originations | $ | 17,692 | $ | 17,635 | ||||
| Loan and participation purchases | 1,621 | 5,250 | ||||||
| New securities (sales) purchases | (3,000 | ) | 17,360 | |||||
| Loan participation sales | (3,290 | ) | (890 | ) | ||||
| Financing activities: | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in deposits | 584 | (8,402 | ) | |||||
| FHLB borrowings net | (7,500 | ) | (6,000 | ) |
Capital Management. We have managed our capital to maintain strong protection for
depositors and creditors. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and
a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2009, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well
capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Regulation and Supervision—Federal Savings Institution Regulation—Capital Requirements” and note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
We also will manage our capital for maximum shareholder benefit. We may use capital management tools such as cash dividends and share
repurchases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial
transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are
used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. A presentation of our outstanding loan commitments and unused lines of credit at June 30, 2009 and their effect on our
liquidity is presented at note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K and under “—Risk Management—Liquidity Management.”
For the year ended June 30, 2009, we did not engage in any off-balance-sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
financial statements and related financial data presented in this annual report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial
companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of
inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
44
Table of Contents
FY 2008 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0001193125-08-202125.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The objective of this section is to help potential investors understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read
this discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Income. Our primary source of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the
difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. To a much lesser extent, we also recognize income from service
charge income—mostly from service charges on deposit accounts and fees for late loan payments—and from the increase in surrender value of our bank-owned life insurance.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Expenses. The expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and related expenses, occupancy expenses, data processing
expenses, telephone and postage expenses, advertising expenses, professional fees, equipment expenses and other miscellaneous expenses.
Compensation and related expenses consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits, including the employee stock ownership plan.
Expense for the employee stock ownership plan is based on the average market value of the shares committed to be released. An equal number of shares will be released each year over the 15-year term of the loan. Expense for shares of restricted stock
awards and stock options is based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Compensation and related expenses is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
21
Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of land and building, consist primarily of
lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets, which range from 15 to 40 years.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or term of the lease.
Data processing expenses
include fees paid for third-party data processing service.
Telephone and postage expenses include our communication lines between branch
offices, our Internet access and our mailing expenses, including certain deposit statements.
Advertising expenses include expenses for
print advertisements, promotions and premium items.
Professional fees primarily include fees paid to our independent registered public
accountants, as well as our attorneys, predominantly in relation to problem assets and due to the costs of operating a public company.
Equipment expense includes expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment. Depreciation of equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets, which range from
three to ten years.
Other expenses include federal insurance deposit premiums, charitable contributions, regulatory assessments,
office supplies and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying
value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the allowance for loan losses and the determination of other than temporary impairment to be critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent
in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment.
Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; the value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various
elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. However, historically, our estimates and assumptions have provided results that did not differ materially from actual results. For example, we recorded a loss
of $21,000 and a loss of $13,000 in relation to repossessed assets in fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively. Additionally, we had net charge-offs to average loans of 0.02% for fiscal 2008 compared to net charge offs to average loans of 0.01% for fiscal
2007.
Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, and establishes the provision for loan losses
based on an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, economic conditions and business conditions affecting our primary market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio,
the duration of the current business cycle and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions to the
allowance may be necessary if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. For example, a downturn in the local economy could cause increases in non-performing loans.
Additionally, a decline in real estate values could cause some of our loans to become inadequately collateralized. In either case, this may require us to increase our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact earnings. Further, the
Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available
to it at the time of its examination. An increase to the allowance required to be made by the Office of Thrift Supervision would negatively impact our earnings. Additionally, a large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased
22
provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings. See note 1 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this
Form 10-K.
At each of June 30, 2008 and 2007, over 89.9% of the loan portfolio consisted of real estate loans. However, over
19.2% of the real estate loans consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate and construction loans, which carry a higher risk of default than one-to four-family residential real estate loans. The level of the allowance for loan losses has
changed primarily due to an increase in nonperforming loans due to the addition of a $1.2 million residential construction loan to non-accrual status, and, to a lesser extent, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio and the growth of the
loan portfolio, which has increased by 6.2% and 2.7% for fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Other-than-Temporary Impairment of
Investment Securities. There are certain securities in an unrealized loss position that management believes at this time are temporarily impaired. If the fair value of these securities does not recover in a reasonable period of time or
management can no longer demonstrate the ability and intend to hold them until recovery, a write-down through the consolidated statements of income would be necessary.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the
length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value or until maturity.
In analyzing the issuer’s financial
condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance and project target prices of investment analysts. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company identified the Shay AMF Ultra Short Mortgage Fund
equity securities it holds as being an other-than-temporary impaired asset and realized an impairment loss of $274,000 on these securities. See note 1 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.
Intangible Asset Impairment. The Company has goodwill and core deposit intangible assets arising from a branch purchase. The goodwill is
evaluated regularly for impairment while the core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years.
Deferred Tax Asset
Valuation Allowance. Management determined that no valuation allowance was warranted based on a history of taxable income, the expectation of taxable income going forward and the availability of tax planning strategies to generate future
income, including capital gains if necessary to offset capital losses on the impaired mutual fund security.
Operating Strategy
Our mission is to operate and grow a profitable community-oriented financial institution. We plan to achieve this by executing our strategy of:
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | aggressively attracting core deposits; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | continuing to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | pursuing opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real estate lending in our market area; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | continuing to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio; and |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | providing exceptional service to attract and retain customers. |
23
Aggressively attract core deposits
Core deposits (accounts other than certificates of deposit) comprised 55.5% of our total deposits at June 30, 2008. We value core deposits because
they represent longer-term customer relationships and a lower cost of funding compared to certificates of deposit. We aggressively seek core deposits through competitive pricing and targeted advertising.
Continue to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans
Our primary lending activity is the origination of residential mortgage loans secured by homes in our market area. We intend to continue emphasizing the
origination of residential mortgage loans going forward. At June 30, 2008, 70.7% of our total loans were one- to four-family residential real estate loans. We believe that our emphasis on residential lending, which carries a lower credit risk,
contributes to our high asset quality.
Pursue opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real estate lending in our market
area
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans provide us with the opportunity to earn more income because they tend to have higher
interest rates than residential mortgage loans. Additionally, we offer adjustable-rate multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Adjustable-rate loans, which reprice periodically, help to offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest
rates, which improves our interest rate risk management. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $2.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2008 and comprised approximately 10.6% of total loans. There are many multi-family and
commercial properties located in our market area, and we will continue to pursue these opportunities, while continuing to originate any such loans in accordance with what we believe are our conservative underwriting guidelines.
Continue to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio
We believe that high asset quality is a key to long-term financial success. We have sought to maintain a high level of asset quality and moderate credit
risk by using underwriting standards which we believe are conservative. While our non-performing loans (loans that are 90 or more days delinquent) at June 30, 2008 increased to 2.2% of our total loan portfolio and 1.6% of our total assets, the
increase was attributable to two residential construction loans totaling $2.2 million being placed on non-accrual status. We intend to continue our efforts to originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans and our philosophy of managing
large loan exposures through our conservative approach to lending.
Provide exceptional service to attract and retain customers
As a community-oriented financial institution, we emphasize providing exceptional customer service as a means to attract and retain
customers. We deliver personalized service and respond with flexibility to customer needs. We believe that our community orientation is attractive to our customers and distinguishes us from the large banks that operate in our market area. We have
also provided Internet banking since 1997.
Balance Sheet Analysis
Loans. Our primary lending activity is the origination of loans secured by real estate. We originate real estate loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, and to a much lesser
extent, secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. At June 30, 2008, real estate loans totaled $115.1 million, or 89.9% of total loans, compared to $108.6 million, or 90.1%, of total loans at June 30, 2007.
The largest segment of our real estate loans is one- to four-family residential real estate loans. At June 30, 2008, one- to four-family residential
real estate loans totaled $90.5 million, which represented 78.6% of real estate loans and 70.7% of total loans compared to $86.5 million at June 30, 2007, which represented 79.6% of real estate loans and 71.8% of total loans. One- to
four-family residential real estate loans increased $4.0 million, or 4.6%, in the year ended June 30, 2008 due to the continuing low interest rate environment, competitive pricing and increased marketing efforts.
24
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans totaled $13.6 million at June 30, 2008, which
represented 11.8% of real estate loans and 10.6% of total loans, compared to $11.4 million at June 30, 2007, which represented 10.5% of real estate loans and 9.5% of total loans. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $2.1
million, or 18.8%, for the year ended June 30, 2008 due to the continued emphasis of this type of lending.
We purchase and originate
loans secured by mobile homes. Mobile home loans totaled $11.8 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 9.2% of total loans, compared to $11.0 million at June 30, 2007, which represented 9.1% of total loans. To mitigate our exposure to
this type of lending, we have limited the amount of mobile home loans to 15% of our loan portfolio. Mobile home loans increased in fiscal 2008 due to additional purchases from Forward National and Mainland Financial. A further discussion of our
mobile home loans is contained in “Business—Lending Activities—Mobile Home Loans.”
We also originate
construction loans secured by residential and multi-family and commercial real estate and loans to individuals to acquire land upon which they intend to build a residence. This portfolio totaled $11.1 million at June 30, 2008, which represented
8.7% of total loans, compared to $10.7 million at June 30, 2007, which represented 9.0% of total loans. Construction loans increased $396,000, or 3.7%, for the year ended June 30, 2008 primarily because of an increase in non-residential
and construction loans due to successful sales efforts.
We also originate a variety of consumer loans, including loans secured by passbook
or certificate accounts. Consumer loans totaled $824,000 and represented 0.7% of total loans at June 30, 2008, compared to $812,000, or 0.7% of total loans, at June 30, 2007.
25
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: | ||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family (1) | $ | 90,494 | 70.66 | % | $ | 86,485 | 71.75 | % | ||||||
| Multi-family and commercial | 13,572 | 10.60 | 11,421 | 9.48 | ||||||||||
| Construction | 11,125 | 8.68 | 10,729 | 8.90 | ||||||||||
| Total real estate loans | 115,191 | 89.94 | 108,635 | 90.13 | ||||||||||
| Mobile home loans | 11,810 | 9.22 | 10,981 | 9.11 | ||||||||||
| Other consumer loans | 824 | 0.65 | 812 | 0.67 | ||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 12,634 | 9.87 | 11,793 | 9.78 | ||||||||||
| Commercial | 244 | 0.19 | 108 | 0.09 | ||||||||||
| Total gross loans | 128,069 | 100.00 | % | 120,536 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
| Loans in process | (2,533 | ) | (4,107 | ) | ||||||||||
| Deferred loan costs, net | 16 | 24 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (709 | ) | (402 | ) | ||||||||||
| Total loans receivable, net | $ | 124,843 | $ | 116,051 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Includes second mortgage loans, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit. |
The following table sets forth certain information at June 30, 2008 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments, which
significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.
| One- to Four- Family | Multi-Family and Commercial | Construction | Mobile Home | Other Consumer | Commercial | Total Loans | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts due in: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| One year or less | $ | 2,494 | $ | 406 | $ | 9,275 | $ | 5 | $ | 6 | $ | 132 | $ | 12,318 | |||||||
| More than one year to five years | 9,948 | 76 | 1,850 | 228 | 511 | 112 | 12,725 | ||||||||||||||
| More than five years | 78,052 | 13,090 | — | 11,577 | 307 | — | 103,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Total amount due | $ | 90,494 | $ | 13,572 | $ | 11,125 | $ | 11,810 | $ | 824 | $ | 244 | $ | 128,069 |
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at June 30, 2008 that are due
after June 30, 2009 and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates.
| Due After June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed- Rates | Floating or Adjustable- Rates | Total | |||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||
| One- to four-family | $ | 83,290 | $ | 4,710 | $ | 88,000 | |||
| Multi-family and commercial | 2,453 | 10,713 | 13,166 | ||||||
| Construction | 449 | 1,401 | 1,850 | ||||||
| Mobile home | 11,805 | — | 11,805 | ||||||
| Other consumer loans | 818 | — | 818 | ||||||
| Commercial | 107 | 5 | 112 | ||||||
| Total loans | $ | 98,922 | $ | 16,829 | $ | 115,751 |
26
The following table shows loan activity during the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Total loans at beginning of period | $ | 116,051 | $ | 113,026 | ||
| Loans originated: | ||||||
| One- to four-family | 10,795 | 10,831 | ||||
| Multi-family and commercial | 2,936 | 1,880 | ||||
| Construction | 3,048 | 3,211 | ||||
| Mobile home | 545 | 1,154 | ||||
| Other consumer | 311 | 482 | ||||
| Total loans originated | 17,635 | 17,558 | ||||
| Loans and participations purchased | 5,250 | 2,797 | ||||
| Deduct: | ||||||
| Principal loan repayments | 13,049 | 17,195 | ||||
| Loans and participations sold | 890 | — | ||||
| Transfer to foreclosed real estate/repossessed assets | 42 | 13 | ||||
| Other | 112 | 122 | ||||
| Net loan activity | 8,792 | 3,025 | ||||
| Total loans at end of period | $ | 124,843 | $ | 116,051 |
Securities. Our securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. Treasury and
U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate loans. Securities increased approximately $12.7 million, or 212.7%, in the year ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the purchase of
$6.0 million in medium-term Federal Home Loan Bank notes, $10.2 million in mortgage-backed securities, and $1.0 million in Federal Farm Credit Bank notes. All of our mortgage-backed securities were issued by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
The following table sets forth the carrying amounts and fair values of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $ | 2,000 | $ | 2,013 | $ | 2,500 | $ | 2,443 | ||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | 7,788 | 7,648 | 156 | 158 | ||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities | 9,788 | 9,661 | 2,656 | 2,601 | ||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | 5,000 | 4,947 | — | — | ||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 2,547 | 2,547 | 2,945 | 2,859 | ||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | 1,351 | 1,344 | 443 | 441 | ||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities | 8,898 | 8,838 | 3,388 | 3,300 | ||||||||
| Total securities | $ | 18,686 | $ | 18,499 | $ | 6,044 | $ | 5,901 |
At June 30, 2008, marketable equity securities consisted of an investment in a variable-rate
mortgage mutual fund offered by American Funds, with an amortized cost of $2.5 million and a fair value of $2.5 million. We also had a Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed security with an amortized cost of $1.7 million and a fair value of $1.7 million. We
had no other investments that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our equity at June 30, 2008. Management analyzed its exposure to U.S. federal agencies securities and mortgage-backed securities held and found no impairment at
June 30, 2008. The above-mentioned mutual fund was written down by $274,000 in the 2008 fiscal year when it became evident that the impairment was not temporary.
27
The following table sets forth the maturities and weighted average yields of securities at June 30,
2008. Weighted average yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the investment portfolio does not include any tax-exempt obligations.
| One Year or Less | More than One Year to Five Years | More than Five Years to Ten Years | More than Ten Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | Carrying Amount | Weighted Average Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $ | — | — | % | $ | 2,000 | 5.00 | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | 2,000 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | — | — | 895 | 4.50 | 3,025 | 5.06 | 3,868 | 5.66 | 7,788 | 5.29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities | $ | — | — | $ | 2,895 | 4.85 | $ | 3,025 | 5.06 | $ | 3,868 | 5.66 | $ | 9,788 | 5.23 | |||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies | $ | — | — | % | $ | 3,976 | 4.24 | % | $ | 971 | 4.25 | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | 4,947 | 4.25 | % | ||||||||||
| Marketable equity securities | 2,547 | 4.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,547 | 4.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities | — | — | 54 | 6.50 | 153 | 5.50 | 1,137 | 5.14 | 1,344 | 5.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities | $ | 2,547 | 4.13 | $ | 4,030 | 4.27 | $ | 1,124 | 4.42 | $ | 1,137 | 5.14 | $ | 8,838 | 4.36 |
28
Deposits. Our primary source of funds is our deposit accounts, which are
comprised of demand deposits, savings accounts and time deposits. These deposits are provided primarily by individuals within our market area. We do not use brokered deposits as a source of funding. Deposits increased $38.5 million, or 39.1%, for
the year ended June 30, 2008. The Bank acquired $51.5 million in deposits, comprised mostly of $27.5 million in certificates of deposit and $20.2 million in NOW and money market accounts, in connection with a branch office purchase in August
2007. During the year ended June 30, 2008, certificates of deposit experienced a $9.5 million runoff.
The following table
sets forth the balances of our deposit products at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Non-interest bearing accounts | $ | 6,040 | $ | 3,571 | ||
| NOW and money market accounts | 52,630 | 32,978 | ||||
| Savings accounts | 17,344 | 18,924 | ||||
| Certificates of deposit | 61,018 | 43,019 | ||||
| Total | $ | 137,032 | $ | 98,492 |
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until
maturity as of June 30, 2008. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000.
| Maturity Period | Amount | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| (In thousands) | |||
| Three months or less | $ | 7,879 | |
| Over three through six months | 1,143 | ||
| Over six through twelve months | 3,321 | ||
| Over twelve months | 9,301 | ||
| Total | $ | 21,644 |
The following table sets forth time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| 1.00 - 1.99% | $ | — | $ | — | ||
| 2.00 - 2.99% | 6,019 | 26 | ||||
| 3.00 - 3.99% | 8,579 | 2,935 | ||||
| 4.00 - 4.99% | 29,662 | 16,559 | ||||
| 5.00 - 5.99% | 16,395 | 23,012 | ||||
| 6.00 - 6.99% | 363 | 487 | ||||
| Total | $ | 61,018 | $ | 43,019 |
29
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2008.
| Amount Due | Total | Percent of Total Certificate Accounts | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less Than One Year | More Than One Year to Two Years | More Than Two Years to Three Years | More Than Three Years to Four Years | More Than Four Years | |||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.00 - 2.99% | $ | 4,892 | $ | 1,127 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,019 | 9.86 | % | |||||||
| 3.00 - 3.99% | 4,198 | 3,646 | 405 | 72 | 258 | 8,579 | 14.06 | ||||||||||||||
| 4.00 - 4.99% | 22,223 | 3,327 | 2,244 | 973 | 895 | 29,662 | 48.61 | ||||||||||||||
| 5.00 - 5.99% | 4,174 | 840 | 10,847 | 534 | — | 16,395 | 26.87 | ||||||||||||||
| 6.00 - 6.99% | 263 | 100 | — | — | — | 363 | 0.60 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 35,750 | $ | 9,040 | $ | 13,496 | $ | 1,579 | $ | 1,153 | $ | 61,018 | 100.00 | % |
The following table sets forth the deposit activity for the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 98,492 | $ | 97,095 | ||||
| Decrease before branch acquisition and interest credited | (17,655 | ) | (2,249 | ) | ||||
| Increase due to branch acquisition | 51,521 | — | ||||||
| Interest credited | 4,674 | 3,646 | ||||||
| Net increase in deposits | 38,540 | 1,397 | ||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 137,032 | $ | 98,492 |
Borrowings. We use advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank to supplement our
supply of lendable funds or to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The following tables present certain information regarding our advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank during the periods and at the dates indicated.
| For the Years Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Maximum amount of advances outstanding at any month end | $ | 16,000 | $ | 16,000 | ||||
| Average advances outstanding | 9,605 | 14,321 | ||||||
| Weighted average rate paid on advances | 4.86 | % | 4.49 | % |
| At June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Balance outstanding at end of year | $ | 7,500 | $ | 13,500 | ||||
| Weighted average rate on advances at end of year | 4.68 | % | 4.95 | % |
30
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Overview.
| 2008 | 2007 | % Change 2008/2007 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Net (loss) income | $ | (330 | ) | $ | 91 | (462.6 | )% | ||||
| Return on average assets | (0.20 | )% | 0.07 | % | (385.7 | ) | |||||
| Return on average equity | (2.44 | )% | 0.68 | % | (458.8 | ) | |||||
| Average equity to average assets | 8.15 | % | 10.01 | % | (18.6 | ) | |||||
| Dividend payout ratio | (56 | )% | 179 | % | (131.3 | ) |
Net income decreased $421,000, or 462.6%, for fiscal 2008 due primarily to an increase in the
provision for loan losses and an increase in non-interest expense due to an impairment charge of $274,000 on a mutual fund, offset by an increase in net interest income.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased $353,000, or 10.5%, to $3.7 million for fiscal 2008. The increase in net interest income for fiscal 2008 was primarily attributable to an
increase in the volume of interest-earning assets, offset by a higher volume of interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest margin decreased from 2.67% for fiscal 2007 to 2.48% for fiscal 2008 and our interest rate spread decreased from 2.16% for
fiscal 2007 to 2.13% for fiscal 2008.
Total interest income increased $1.2 million, or 15.8%, to $8.8 million for fiscal 2008,
resulting from an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets. During fiscal 2008, average interest-earning assets increased by $23.8 million, or 19.0%, to $149.4 million, while the average yield decreased 16 basis points to 5.92%. The
composition of interest-earning assets consists of loans, securities and interest-bearing deposits. Interest on loans increased $469,000, or 6.6%, to $7.5 million for fiscal 2008 due to a $6.6 million, or 5.8%, increase in the average balance of
loans, plus an increase in the average yield from 6.21% to 6.26%. During fiscal 2008, other interest income increased $599,000, or 608.7%, due to an increase in overnight federal funds interest earned. Interest on securities increased 69.5% due to
an increase in the average balance of securities, offset by the decrease in the average yield from 5.12% to 5.03%.
Total interest expense
increased $852,000, or 19.9%, to $5.1 million for fiscal 2008 primarily due to increases in interest on deposits, offset by a decrease in the average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances with the funds obtained in the branch acquisition. The
average interest rate paid on deposits decreased 13 basis points to 3.70%. The average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased from $14.3 million for fiscal 2007 to $9.6 million for fiscal 2008.
Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the
total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for
the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using daily average
balances.
31
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Average Balance | Interest and Dividends | Average Yield/ Rate | Average Balance | Interest and Dividends | Average Yield/ Rate | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans (1) | $ | 120,324 | $ | 7,533 | 6.26 | % | $ | 113,720 | $ | 7,064 | 6.21 | % | ||||||||
| Securities taxable | 12,164 | 612 | 5.03 | 7,048 | 361 | 5.12 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits | 537 | 23 | 4.28 | 2,717 | 116 | 4.23 | ||||||||||||||
| Federal Funds | 16,411 | 675 | 4.11 | 2,127 | 97 | 4.56 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 149,436 | 8,843 | 5.92 | 125,612 | 7,638 | 6.08 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets | 16,792 | 7,905 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 166,228 | $ | 133,517 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Passbook accounts | $ | 5,172 | $ | 42 | 0.81 | % | $ | 6,107 | $ | 62 | 1.02 | % | ||||||||
| Statement savings | 12,210 | 268 | 2.19 | 14,074 | 370 | 2.63 | ||||||||||||||
| Money market accounts | 40,578 | 1,423 | 3.51 | 27,989 | 1,138 | 4.07 | ||||||||||||||
| NOW accounts | 8,079 | 47 | 0.58 | 5,156 | 44 | 0.85 | ||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 60,140 | 2,894 | 4.81 | 41,778 | 2,032 | 4.86 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 126,179 | 4,674 | 3.70 | 95,104 | 3,646 | 3.83 | ||||||||||||||
| FHLB advances | 9,605 | 467 | 4.86 | 14,321 | 643 | 4.49 | ||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 135,784 | 5,141 | 3.79 | 109,425 | 4,289 | 3.92 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-bearing deposits | 5,518 | 3,330 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other non-interest-bearing liabilities | 11,383 | 7,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 152,685 | 120,151 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 13,543 | 13,366 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 166,228 | $ | 133,517 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 3,702 | $ | 3,349 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread (2) | 2.13 | % | 2.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin (3) | 2.48 | % | 2.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities | 110.05 | % | 114.79 | % |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Amount is net of deferred loan origination costs, undisbursed proceeds of loans in process, allowance for loan losses and includes non-accrual loans. |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (2) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (3) | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
32
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates
and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes
due to rate and the changes due to volume.
| 2008 Compared to 2007 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to | ||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Net | ||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||
| Loans receivable | $ | 413 | $ | 56 | $ | 469 | ||||||
| Securities | 258 | (7 | ) | 251 | ||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits | (93 | ) | 1 | (92 | ) | |||||||
| Federal Funds | 588 | (10 | ) | 578 | ||||||||
| Total interest income | 1,166 | 40 | 1,206 | |||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||
| Deposit: | ||||||||||||
| Passbook accounts | (9 | ) | (11 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||
| Savings accounts | (45 | ) | (57 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||||
| Money market accounts | 458 | (173 | ) | 285 | ||||||||
| NOW accounts | 20 | (17 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 884 | (22 | ) | 862 | ||||||||
| Total deposits | 1,308 | (280 | ) | 1,028 | ||||||||
| Borrowings | (226 | ) | 50 | (176 | ) | |||||||
| Total interest expense | 1,082 | (230 | ) | 852 | ||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 84 | $ | 270 | $ | 354 |
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses increased $323,000, from $5,000 for fiscal 2007 to $328,000 for fiscal 2008. This was a result of an increase in non-accrual
loans primarily due to the addition of $2.6 million in residential construction loans to non-accrual status and a related $284,000 provision for loan losses.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, non-performing loans and classified loans is presented under “Risk Management—Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets” and
“Risk Management—Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Non-Interest
Income. The following table shows the components of other income and the percentage changes from year to year.
| 2008 | 2007 | % Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
| Service fees on deposits | $ | 119 | $ | 120 | (0.8 | )% | |||
| Service fees on loans | 31 | 29 | 6.9 | ||||||
| Income from investment in life insurance | 76 | 89 | (13.5 | ) | |||||
| Other income | 81 | 50 | 60.0 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 307 | $ | 288 | 6.6 |
Service fees on loans increased due to an increase in income from participation loans that we
service. Income from investment in life insurance policy decreased due to the lower performance of the life insurance policies because of the lower interest rate environment. Other income increased $30,000 or 60.0% primarily due to a $15,000
increase in debit card income as the Bank went through its first full year with the debit card product, an $8,000 increase in ATM fees due to the addition of an ATM at the new branch and increased usage of the existing ATMs.
33
Non-Interest Expenses. The following table shows the components of non-interest expenses
and the percentage changes from year to year.
| 2008 | 2007 | % Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
| Compensation and related expenses | $ | 2,250 | $ | 2,035 | 10.6 | % | |||||
| Occupancy | 257 | 174 | 47.7 | ||||||||
| Data processing | 375 | 288 | 30.2 | ||||||||
| Advertising | 115 | 104 | 10.6 | ||||||||
| Professional fees | 213 | 242 | (12.0 | ) | |||||||
| Equipment | 175 | 142 | 23.2 | ||||||||
| Impairment write-down of investment securities | 274 | — | 100.0 | ||||||||
| Net amortization of intangible assets | 112 | — | 100.0 | ||||||||
| Loss on sale of securities available for sale | 19 | — | 100.0 | ||||||||
| Other | 475 | 490 | (3.1 | ) | |||||||
| Total | $ | 4,265 | $ | 3,475 | 22.7 | ||||||
| Efficiency ratio (1) | 106.4 | % | 95.6 | % | 11.3 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Computed as non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and other income. |
Compensation and related expenses increased due to increased staff in connection with the branch acquisition and an increase in salaries and
medical benefit expense. Occupancy expense increased primarily due to the rental expense related to the new branch. Data processing costs increased due to additional charges related to the branch acquisition. Advertising increased as we increased
the advertising of our loan products. Equipment expense increased due to increased depreciation costs and building maintenance. A non-cash charge to earnings of $274,000, as a result of an other-than-temporary impairment in the value of the AMF
Ultra Short Mortgage Fund held in our investment portfolio also contributed to an increase in the non-interest expenses for 2008. Other expense increased due to the amortization of the core deposit premium that resulted from the branch acquisition,
offset by a decrease in debit card expense due to start up costs in 2007 and the settlement costs of a lawsuit in 2007. Professional fees decreased due primarily to the legal fees in connection with the branch acquisition being expensed during
fiscal year 2007.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes decreased $320,000, or 484.8%, from $66,000 for fiscal
year 2007 to a benefit of $254,000 for fiscal year 2008 due primarily to the decrease in pre-tax income. The Company’s effective tax rate was (43.49%) for fiscal year 2008 compared to 42.04% for fiscal year 2007.
Risk Management
Overview.
Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the
principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in
the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we encounter are operational risks, liquidity risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks
related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or
press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
34
Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having
well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans. Our strategy also emphasizes the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which typically have lower
default rates than other types of loans and are secured by collateral that generally tends to appreciate in value.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the
loan becomes 15 days past due. If payment is not received by the 35th day of delinquency, a letter from our President and Chief Executive Officer is
sent. Typically, when the loan becomes 60 days past due, a letter is sent from our attorney notifying the borrower that we will commence foreclosure proceedings if the loan is not paid in full within 30 days. Generally, loan workout arrangements are
made with the borrower at this time; however, if an arrangement cannot be structured before the loan becomes 90 days past due, we will commence foreclosure proceedings against any real property that secures the loan or attempt to repossess any
personal property that secures a consumer loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure.
Management informs the board of directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days.
Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets. We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due to be
non-performing assets. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on non-accrual status at which time the accrual of interest ceases and an allowance for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged against
operations. Typically, payments received on a non-accrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan.
Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When property is acquired, it is recorded at fair value, net of estimated
selling costs, at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Non-performing assets totaled $2.7 million, or 1.7% of total assets, at June 30, 2008, which is an increase of $2.5 million, or 966.2%, from June 30, 2007. The increase in non-performing assets was due
primarily to three residential construction loans totaling $2.6 million being placed on non-accrual status. There is a specific allowance for loan loss valuation of $284,000 for these three loans.
Two loans were to be repaid by the sale of the properties securing the loan. One of the two construction loans has been refinanced. In refinancing the
loan, the Bank split the original loan amount between the two primary borrowers. Two of the properties were only 85% complete. The borrower who took this part of the refinancing provided additional properties for collateral so that there would be
enough equity to finish the last 15% of the project. Once complete, the two units will be rented to improve cash flows for repayment. The borrower who refinanced the other properties is repaying a term loan that is secured by the two completed
units, which are rented and producing income. The borrower is adding personal cash to help make the payments.
The other impaired
construction loan is non-performing. The borrowers have stipulated that they will deed the two properties securing this loan in lieu of foreclosure. One of the two properties is complete, while the other unit is nearly complete. Once deeded to the
Bank, the Bank will use the funds in escrow to finish the incomplete unit and either lease or sell the properties as market conditions dictate.
Non-accrual loans accounted for 96.9% of total non-performing assets at June 30, 2008.
35
The following table provides information with respect to our non-performing assets at the dates
indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Non-accruing loans: | ||||||||
| Construction | $ | 2,623 | $ | 149 | ||||
| Other consumer | 62 | 3 | ||||||
| Total | 2,685 | 152 | ||||||
| Accruing loans past due 90 days or more | — | — | ||||||
| Troubled debt restructuring (1) | 46 | 64 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate | — | — | ||||||
| Other repossessed assets | 41 | 44 | ||||||
| Total non-performing assets | $ | 2,772 | $ | 260 | ||||
| Total non-performing loans to total loans | 2.10 | % | 0.13 | % | ||||
| Total non-performing loans to total assets | 1.64 | 0.11 | ||||||
| Total non-performing assets to total assets | 1.69 | 0.15 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | As defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15. |
Other than disclosed in the above table, there are no other loans at June 30, 2008 that management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present repayment terms.
Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended June 30, 2008 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms
amounted to $194,000. The amount of interest related to these loans included in interest income was $138,000 for the year ended June 30, 2008.
Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are
three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies
are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values
questionable and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a
“special mention” category, described as assets that do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. When we
classify an asset as substandard or doubtful, we establish a specific allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified as loss.
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Special mention assets | $ | — | $ | 425 | ||
| Substandard assets | 2,603 | 64 | ||||
| Doubtful assets | — | — | ||||
| Loss assets | — | — | ||||
| Total classified assets | $ | 2,603 | $ | 489 |
36
There were four loans at June 30, 2008 with an aggregate balance of $2.6 million that are classified
as substandard and are considered non-performing. There was one residential loan at June 30, 2007 with a principal balance of $63,677 that was classified as substandard and was considered non-performing.
Delinquencies. The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | 60-89 Days | 90 Days or More | |||||||||||||||||
| Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | Number of Loans | Principal Balance of Loans | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | 2 | $ | 411 | 6 | $ | 2,623 | 1 | $ | 1 | 6 | $ | 148 | ||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Mobile home | 4 | 163 | 2 | 62 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Other consumer | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 6 | $ | 574 | 8 | $ | 2,685 | 1 | $ | 1 | 7 | $ | 151 |
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance
for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish provisions against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additions to the allowance are necessary, a provision for
loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of three
key elements: (1) specific allowances for identified problem loans; (2) a general valuation allowance on certain identified problem loans; and (3) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we
determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowance Required for Identified Problem Loans. We establish an allowance on certain identified problem loans based on such factors as: (1) the strength of the customer’s personal or business cash flows;
(2) the availability of other sources of repayment; (3) the amount due or past due; (4) the type and value of collateral; (5) the strength of our collateral position; (6) the estimated cost to sell the collateral; and
(7) the borrower’s effort to cure the delinquency.
General Valuation Allowance on Certain Identified Problem Loans. We
also establish a general allowance for classified loans that do not have an individual allowance. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowances to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and
consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.
General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio. We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified to
recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category
and assigning allowances based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s
judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary
market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory
examination results. The applied loss factors are re-evaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment.
37
The Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews
our allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours.
At June 30, 2008, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.57% of total loans and 26.82% of non-performing loans. The allowance for loan losses increased to $709,000 at June 30, 2008 from $402,000 at
June 30, 2007, due to a provision for loan losses of $328,000 and charge-offs of $21,000. The provision reflects an increase in non-accrual loans as well as increasing levels of loan growth compared to 2007. In the first quarter of fiscal 2008,
the Bank increased its allowance factor for mobile home loans as there is no additional dealer reserve account to assist in offsetting losses. In addition, a higher general reserve was established for the few unsecured loans the Bank originated.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
| At June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance | % of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | |||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family | $ | 178 | 25.11 | % | 70.66 | % | $ | 172 | 42.79 | % | 71.75 | % | ||||||
| Multi-family and Commercial | 73 | 10.30 | 10.60 | 57 | 14.18 | 9.48 | ||||||||||||
| Construction | 329 | 46.40 | 8.69 | 54 | 13.43 | 8.90 | ||||||||||||
| Mobile home | 118 | 16.64 | 9.22 | 110 | 27.36 | 9.11 | ||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 8 | 1.13 | 0.64 | 8 | 1.99 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial | 3 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 1 | 0.25 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 709 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | $ | 402 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % |
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan
losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while
we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for
loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should
the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
38
Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the
allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific loan loss allowances have been established, any difference between the loss allowance and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to current income.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year | $ | 402 | $ | 410 | ||||
| Provision for loan losses | 328 | 5 | ||||||
| Charge-offs: | ||||||||
| Mobile home | 7 | — | ||||||
| Other consumer | 14 | 13 | ||||||
| Total charge-offs | 21 | 13 | ||||||
| Recoveries: | ||||||||
| Total recoveries | — | — | ||||||
| Net charge-offs | 21 | 13 | ||||||
| Allowance for loan losses, end of period | $ | 709 | $ | 402 | ||||
| Allowance to non-performing loans(1) | 26.40 | % | 264.47 | % | ||||
| Allowance to total loans outstanding at end of period | 0.57 | 0.35 | ||||||
| Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | The difference between fiscal 2008 and 2007 amounts were due primarily to a change in non-performing loan balances. |
Interest Rate Risk Management. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in
an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result,
sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and
liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Also, we attempt to manage our interest rate risk through: the origination of adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans; an investment in a
mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate mortgage loans; an increased focus on multi-family and commercial real estate lending, which emphasizes the origination of shorter-term adjustable-rate loans; and efforts to originate fixed-rate mortgage
loans with maturities of fifteen years or less. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments.
Our board of directors serves as our Asset/Liability Committee to communicate, coordinate and control all aspects involving asset/liability management.
The committee monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources.
Net Portfolio Value Simulation Analysis. We use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the Office of Thrift Supervision to review our level of interest rate risk. This analysis measures interest rate risk by
computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity
and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained
100 to 300 basis point increase or 100 and 200 basis point decrease in market interest rates. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table, which is based
on information that we provide to the Office of Thrift Supervision, presents the change in our net portfolio value at June 30, 2008 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision
assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.
39
| Net Portfolio Value (Dollars in thousands) | Net Portfolio Value as % of Portfolio Value of Assets | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates | $ Amount | $ Change | % Change | NPV Ratio | Change | |||||||||||
| 300 | $ | 4,746 | $ | (7,324 | ) | (61 | )% | 3.05 | % | (423 | )bp | |||||
| 200 | 7,593 | (4,477 | ) | (37 | ) | 4.77 | (252 | ) | ||||||||
| 100 | 10,137 | (1,932 | ) | (16 | ) | 6.23 | (106 | ) | ||||||||
| 50 | 11,226 | (843 | ) | (7 | ) | 6.83 | (45 | ) | ||||||||
| Static | 12,069 | — | — | 7.28 | — | |||||||||||
| (50) | 12,617 | 548 | 5 | 7.57 | 28 | |||||||||||
| (100) | 12,961 | 892 | 7 | 7.73 | 45 |
The Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of
savings associations. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest
rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to
changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Further,
in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly adjust our investments in
liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits, federal funds sold and short- and intermediate-term U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At
June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.9 million, including interest-bearing deposits of $580,000. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $8.8 million at June 30,
2008. In addition, at June 30, 2008, we had the ability to borrow an additional $32.5 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. On that date, we had $7.5 million outstanding.
At June 30, 2008, we had $2.8 million in loan commitments outstanding. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $2.3 million in unused
lines of credit and $2.4 million in undisbursed construction loans in process. Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2008 totaled $35.8 million, or 26.1% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be
required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and lines of credit. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before June 30, 2009. We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by
adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. Our
primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage
the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposits. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates to attract certain deposit products.
40
The following table presents our primary investing and financing activities during the periods indicated.
| Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Investing activities: | ||||||||
| Loan originations | $ | 17,635 | $ | 17,558 | ||||
| Loan participation purchases | 5,250 | 2,797 | ||||||
| Securities purchases | 17,360 | 140 | ||||||
| Loan participation sales | (890 | ) | — | |||||
| Financing activities: | ||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in deposits | (8,402 | ) | $ | 1,397 | ||||
| FHLB borrowings net | (6,000 | ) | (1,000 | ) |
Capital Management. We have managed our capital to maintain strong protection for
depositors and creditors. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and
a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2008, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well
capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Regulation and Supervision—Regulation of Federal Savings Associations—Capital Requirements” and “Regulatory Capital Compliance” and note 12 of the notes
to the consolidated financial statements.
We also will manage our capital for maximum shareholder benefit. We may use capital management
tools such as cash dividends and share repurchases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of
operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit,
interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. A presentation of our outstanding loan commitments and unused lines of
credit at June 30, 2008 and their effect on our liquidity is presented at note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K and under “—Risk Management—Liquidity Management.”
For the year ended June 30, 2008, we did not engage in any off-balance-sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that companies recognize in their financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not
of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and determined that upon adoption, it had no impact on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (R) “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141 (R)”). This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree. The Statement also provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a company’s fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This new pronouncement will
impact the Company’s accounting for business combinations completed beginning July 1, 2009.
41
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 160
“Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a company’s fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a significant impact on its financial statements.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (SAB 110) amends and replaces Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14, “Share-Based
Payment,” of the Staff Accounting Bulleting series. Question 6 of Section D.2 of Topic 14 expresses the views of the staff regarding the use of the “simplified” method in developing an estimate of expected term of “plain
vanilla” share options and allows usage of the “simplified” method for share option grants prior to December 31, 2007. SAB 110 allows public companies which do not have historically sufficient experience to provide a reasonable
estimate to continue use of the “simplified” method for estimating the expected term of “plain vanilla” share option grants after December 31, 2007. SAB 110 was effective January 1, 2008 and did not have a significant
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements,” which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB Statement No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective beginning July 1, 2008 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” that permits a
one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of Statement No. 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities (non-financial items) that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Therefore, if the change in fair value of a non-financial item is not required to be recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on an annual basis or more frequently, the effective date
of application of Statement 157 to that item is deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of FSP 157-2 on
its financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF Issue No. 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“EITF 06-4”). EITF 06-4 requires the recognition of a liability related to the postretirement
benefits covered by an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement. The consensus highlights that the employer (who is also the policyholder) has a liability for the benefit it is providing to its employee. As such, if the policyholder has
agreed to maintain the insurance policy in force for the employee’s benefit during his or her retirement, then the liability recognized during the employee’s active service period should be based on the future cost of insurance to be
incurred during the employee’s retirement. Alternatively, if the policyholder has agreed to provide the employee with a death benefit, then the liability for the future death benefit should be recognized by following the guidance in SFAS
No. 106 or Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 12, as appropriate. For transition, an entity can choose to apply the guidance using either of the following approaches: (a) a change in accounting principle through
retrospective application to all periods presented or (b) a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance in retained earnings at the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company adopted this EITF
effective July 1, 2007 and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $(221,000).
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain
other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company July 1, 2008. The
Company has elected to account for the Shay AMF Ultra Short Mortgage Fund mutual fund it holds at fair value and there was no impairment recognized with this adoption as the investment had been written down to fair value at June 30, 2008.
Future gains and losses will be reflected through earnings.
42
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11,
“Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 states that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on nonvested equity shares,
nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional paid in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid in capital should be included in the pool of excess tax benefits
available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 should be applied prospectively to income tax benefits of dividends on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are declared in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2007. Adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This
FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”
(“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R,
and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related financial data presented in this annual report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact
of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more
significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.