grepcent / static financial knowledge base

AMERICAN STATES WATER CO (AWR)

CIK: 0001056903. SIC: 4941 Water Supply. Latest 10-K as of: 2026-02-18.

SIC breadcrumb: Transportation, Communications, Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services > Electric, Gas, And Sanitary Services > SIC 4941 Water Supply

SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1056903. Latest filing source: 0001628280-26-009114.

Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.

Business

Read AWR's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.

Risk Factors

Read AWR's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.

Selected Fundamentals

MetricValueUnitFYFiled
Revenue658,073,000USD20252026-02-18
Net income130,442,000USD20252026-02-18
Assets2,715,092,000USD20252026-02-18

Financials

Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-18. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001056903.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.

Download these verified figures (annual + quarterly, with per-value filing provenance): JSON · CSV

Flow metrics use full-year FY periods from 10-K/10-K/A filings; balance-sheet metrics use FY-end instants. Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures. Missing metrics are omitted rather than fabricated.

Metric2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Revenue440,603,000436,816,000473,869,000488,243,000498,853,000491,528,000595,699,000595,459,000658,073,000
Net income59,743,00069,367,00063,871,00084,342,00086,425,00094,347,00078,396,000124,921,000119,268,000130,442,000
Operating income114,192,000127,095,000100,983,000127,073,000130,499,000140,977,000126,636,000196,740,000184,483,000203,275,000
Diluted EPS1.621.881.722.282.332.552.113.363.173.37
Operating cash flow96,949,000144,552,000136,774,000116,864,000122,170,000115,584,000117,799,00067,683,000198,732,000229,730,000
Capital expenditures129,867,000113,126,000126,561,000151,940,000130,423,000144,515,000166,240,000188,540,000231,960,000236,822,000
Dividends paid33,408,00036,417,00038,937,00042,702,00047,206,00051,689,00056,356,00061,195,00067,017,00074,658,000
Assets1,470,493,0001,416,734,0001,501,433,0001,641,331,0001,791,603,0001,900,983,0002,034,374,0002,246,122,0002,500,209,0002,715,092,000
Stockholders' equity494,297,000529,945,000558,223,000601,530,000641,673,000685,947,000709,549,000776,109,000920,051,0001,045,581,000
Cash and cash equivalents436,000214,0007,141,0001,334,00036,737,0004,963,0005,997,00014,073,00026,661,00018,824,000
Free cash flow-32,918,00031,426,00010,213,000-35,076,000-8,253,000-28,931,000-48,441,000-120,857,000-33,228,000-7,092,000

Ratios

ROE and ROA use period-end equity/assets. Liabilities / equity uses total liabilities divided by stockholders' equity. Current ratio uses current assets divided by current liabilities when both are reported.

Metric2016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Net margin15.74%14.62%17.80%17.70%18.91%15.95%20.97%20.03%19.82%
Operating margin28.85%23.12%26.82%26.73%28.26%25.76%33.03%30.98%30.89%
Return on equity12.09%13.09%11.44%14.02%13.47%13.75%11.05%16.10%12.96%12.48%
Return on assets4.06%4.90%4.25%5.14%4.82%4.96%3.85%5.56%4.77%4.80%
Current ratio0.940.990.901.061.330.890.381.240.821.32

Industry Peer Context

Each number-line places AWR against the min, median, and max of latest reported values among companies in the same SIC industry when at least three peers report that ratio.

Net margin peer context

AWR Net margin versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 10.AWR Net margin versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 10.10 SIC peersMin 5.3%Median 20.7%Max 50.3%AWR 19.8%

Operating margin peer context

AWR Operating margin versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 10.AWR Operating margin versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 10.10 SIC peersMin 12.8%Median 28.7%Max 37.2%AWR 30.9%

ROE peer context

AWR ROE versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 11.AWR ROE versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 11.11 SIC peersMin -146.8%Median 8.3%Max 12.5%AWR 12.5%

ROA peer context

AWR ROA versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 11.AWR ROA versus SIC peer range. Source: grepcent computed from latest SEC companyfacts ratios for SIC industry 4941; peer count 11.11 SIC peersMin -24.2%Median 3.1%Max 8.1%AWR 4.8%

Financial Bridges

Waterfall figures reconcile reported SEC companyfacts components. Missing bridges are omitted when required components are not present for the same fiscal year.

Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures

AWR FY2025 free cash flow bridge from reported figures.AWR FY2025 free cash flow bridge from reported figures.AWR free cash flow bridgeFY2025: operating cash flow less capital expendituresSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Free cash flow bridgeReported amount-$250.0M$0.0B$250.0M$229.7MOperating cash flow-$236.8MCapex-$7.1MFree cash flow

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Operating cash flow: accession 0001628280-26-009114; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | Capital expenditures: accession 0001628280-26-009114; concept PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | Free cash flow: accession 0001628280-26-009114; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment

Financial Charts

AWR revenue, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR revenue, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR RevenueLatest point: FY2025 = $658.1MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearReported revenue$0.0B$375.0M$750.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.

AWR net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR net income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Net incomeLatest point: FY2025 = $130.4MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearNet income$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.

AWR operating income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR operating income, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Operating incomeLatest point: FY2025 = $203.3MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearOperating income$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: OperatingIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:OperatingIncomeLoss.

AWR diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR diluted eps, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Diluted EPSLatest point: FY2025 = $3.37/shareSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDiluted EPS (USD/share)$0.00/share$2.00/share$4.00/shareFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

AWR operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR operating cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Operating cash flowLatest point: FY2025 = $229.7MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearOperating cash flow$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.

AWR capital expenditures, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR capital expenditures, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Capital expendituresLatest point: FY2025 = $236.8MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearCapital expenditures$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.

AWR dividends paid, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR dividends paid, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Dividends paidLatest point: FY2025 = $74.7MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearDividends paid$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: PaymentsOfDividends. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividends.

AWR assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR assets, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR AssetsLatest point: FY2025 = $2.7BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearAssets$0.0B$2.0B$4.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.

AWR stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR stockholders' equity, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Stockholders' equityLatest point: FY2025 = $1.0BSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearStockholders' equity$0.0B$1.0B$2.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.

AWR cash and cash equivalents, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR cash and cash equivalents, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Cash and cash equivalentsLatest point: FY2025 = $18.8MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearCash and cash equivalents$0.0B$125.0M$250.0MFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue. Source concepts: us-gaap:CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue.

AWR free cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR free cash flow, last 5 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts FY2025.AWR Free cash flowLatest point: FY2025 = -$7.1MSource: SEC companyfacts FY2025.Fiscal yearFree cash flow-$250.0M-$125.0M$0.0BFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0001628280-26-009114; filed 2026-02-18. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.

Quarterly

Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-06. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001056903.json.

Flow metrics use discrete quarter-length periods from 10-Q/10-Q/A filings. Q4 revenue and net income are derived only when annual FY and nine-month YTD facts exist for the same fiscal year; derived Q4 values are labeled. EPS Q4 is not derived.

QuarterEnd DateRevenueNet IncomeDiluted EPSMethod
2022-Q22022-06-300.54reported discrete quarter
2022-Q32022-09-300.69reported discrete quarter
2023-Q12023-03-310.93reported discrete quarter
2023-Q22023-03-3134,407,000reported discrete quarter
2023-Q22023-06-30157,400,0001.04reported discrete quarter
2023-Q32023-06-3038,521,000reported discrete quarter
2023-Q32023-09-30151,696,0000.85reported discrete quarter
2023-Q42023-12-31125,180,00020,428,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2024-Q12024-03-31135,251,00023,135,0000.62reported discrete quarter
2024-Q22024-03-3123,135,000reported discrete quarter
2024-Q22024-06-30155,328,0000.85reported discrete quarter
2024-Q32024-06-3031,864,000reported discrete quarter
2024-Q32024-09-30161,782,0000.95reported discrete quarter
2024-Q42024-12-31143,098,00028,435,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2025-Q12025-03-31148,013,00026,844,0000.70reported discrete quarter
2025-Q22025-03-3126,844,000reported discrete quarter
2025-Q22025-06-30163,066,0000.87reported discrete quarter
2025-Q32025-06-3033,690,000reported discrete quarter
2025-Q32025-09-30182,716,0001.06reported discrete quarter
2025-Q42025-12-31164,278,00028,741,000derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD
2026-Q12026-03-31169,191,00029,948,0000.76reported discrete quarter

Quarterly Charts

AWR quarterly revenue, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR quarterly revenue, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR Quarterly RevenueLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $169.2MSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Revenue$0.0B$125.0M$250.0M2023-Q22023-Q32023-Q42024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32024-Q42025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001628280-26-031364; filed 2026-05-06. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.

AWR quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR quarterly net income, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR Quarterly Net incomeLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $29.9MSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Net income$0.0B$125.0M$250.0M2023-Q22023-Q32023-Q42024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32024-Q42025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32025-Q42026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001628280-26-031364; filed 2026-05-06. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.

AWR quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR quarterly diluted eps, last 12 periods. Source: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.AWR Quarterly Diluted EPSLatest point: 2026-Q1 = $0.76/shareSource: SEC companyfacts 2026-Q1.Fiscal quarterQuarterly Diluted EPS (USD/share)$0.00/share$0.75/share$1.50/share2022-Q22022-Q32023-Q12023-Q22023-Q32024-Q12024-Q22024-Q32025-Q12025-Q22025-Q32026-Q1

Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-03-31; accession 0001628280-26-031364; filed 2026-05-06. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.

Macro Cross-References

Latest quarter (10-Q)

Latest 10-Q source: 0001628280-26-031364.

Extracted structurally from real Item 2 body heading to real Item 3/4 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-05-06. Report date: 2026-03-31.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and includes specific references to (i) GSWC, AWR’s regulated water utility segment, (ii) BVES, AWR’s regulated electric utility segment, (iii) ASUS and its subsidiaries, collectively, AWR’s contracted services segment, and (iv) AWR (parent) where applicable.

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment’s earnings divided by AWR’s weighted average number of diluted Common Shares. All of the measures discussed are derived from consolidated financial information of Registrant, but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These items constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which supplement our GAAP disclosures but should not be considered as an alternative to the respective GAAP measures. Furthermore, the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other registrants.

AWR uses earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent) as an important measure in evaluating its operating results and believes it provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its business segments and the parent company. AWR reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. A reconciliation to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP is included in the discussion under the section titled “Summary of First Quarter Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2025 filed with the SEC.

Although Registrant operates solely in the U.S., geopolitical developments abroad, such as the ongoing U.S. military operation in Iran, could indirectly affect our business through volatility in commodity prices, inflationary pressures, supply chain and operating cost impacts, and potential disruptions in banking systems and capital markets. Management is actively engaged with vendors and business partners to monitor and mitigate financial risks of global uncertainties; however, the scope and duration of any impacts remain uncertain. As of the date of this filing, geopolitical developments during the first quarter of 2026 have not had a material impact on the Company.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California. BVES’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are primarily earned through delivering electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California. Rates charged to GSWC and BVES customers are authorized by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital.  GSWC and BVES plan to continue seeking recovery of their operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVES are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVES may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings:

Water General Rate Case for the Years 2025–2027

On January 30, 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC’s general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office, which determines new water rates for the years 2025 - 2027. Among other things, the approved settlement authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $573.1 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year capital cycle. The $573.1 million of infrastructure investment includes $17.7 million of advice letter capital investments to be filed for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. In addition, the approved settlement agreement includes $58.2 million of advice letter capital investments, that began construction in 2023, to be filed for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. All of the advice letter projects were allowed to accrue in a memorandum account (i) interest during the construction period at GSWC’s adopted cost of debt until the assets are in service, and (ii) the full rate of return that includes a debt and equity component and all applicable components of the revenue requirement for the projects from the period the assets are in service until the date of the attrition filings.

23

Table of Contents

In December 2025, GSWC received approval from the CPUC to implement its full second-year rate increases, effective January 1, 2026, that will result in higher adopted operating revenues less water supply cost for 2026 of approximately $32.0 million compared to 2025’s adopted operating revenues less water supply cost. Included in the 2026 increase is nearly $11 million related to the advice letter capital projects previously discussed. The assets from the advice letter projects and the related amounts in the memorandum account were added to the adopted rate base for inclusion in the revenue requirement effective January 1, 2026.

The final decision also addressed GSWC’s request for various regulatory mechanisms that were litigated during the proceeding. Among other things, the final decision rejected GSWC’s request for the continuation of a full sales and revenue decoupling mechanism such as the WRAM and a full cost balancing account for water supply such as the MCBA, and instead ordered GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM or “M-WRAM”) and an incremental cost balancing account (“ICBA”) for supply costs. The final decision also adopted GSWC’s M-WRAM rate design proposal authorizing GSWC to increase the revenue requirement recovery in its fixed service charges to between 45-48% of the revenue requirement depending on the ratemaking area representing approximately 65% of GSWC’s fixed costs in aggregate, and approved GSWC’s request for the continuation of a sales reconciliation mechanism that would allow GSWC to adjust its sales forecast throughout the general rate case cycle to address significant fluctuations in consumption. The M-WRAM tracks the difference between the revenue based on actual metered sales through a tiered volumetric rate and the revenue that would have been received with the same actual metered sales if a standard single quantity rate had been in effect. The ICBA for supply costs tracks differences between the authorized per-unit prices and actual per-unit prices for each supply cost (purchased water, pump tax, and purchased power). The M-WRAM and ICBA were effective January 1, 2025.

The new 2026 rates have been reflected in GSWC’s earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2026 resulting in an increase in recorded revenues of $11.1 million largely from the second-year rates and advice letter filings, and an increase in recorded water supply costs of $4.8 million, which combined is an increase of $6.3 million, compared to the same period in 2025. As a result of the discontinuation of the WRAM and MCBA effective January 1, 2025, GSWC’s earnings have been and will continue to be subject to volatility as a result of fluctuations in consumption and/or changes in water supply source mix compared to adopted levels.

Electric General Rate Cases:

General Rate Case for the Years 2023–2026

On January 16, 2025, the CPUC adopted a final decision in BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set new electric rates retroactive to January 1, 2023 and approved the settlement agreement reached between BVES, Cal Advocates and another intervenor in its entirety. Among other things, the settlement agreement, (i) settled and adopted the revenue requirements for each of the four years 2023 through 2026, and the rate increases for 2024 through 2026 are not subject to an earnings test, (ii) authorized BVES to invest approximately $52.5 million in capital infrastructure included in base rates over the four-year rate cycle and at least an additional $23.1 million (plus an allowance for funds used during construction, or “AFUDC”) to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed; (iii) adopted a cost of capital that increased BVES’s adopted return on equity from 9.6% to 10.0%, lowered the cost of debt from 6.6% to 5.51%, and maintained the capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, and (iv) approved for recovery the requested capital expenditures and other incremental operating costs already incurred prior to 2023 in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were previously not included in customer rates.

The final decision provides for an increase in adopted operating revenues of $3.3 million in 2026. In addition, the advice letter projects of at least $23.1 million are expected to generate additional annual operating revenues of approximately $3 million when the respective projects are completed, placed in service, and filed for recovery in customer rates. These projects also accrued AFUDC during construction that further increases the revenue requirement. In 2025, BVES implemented new base rates to recover the revenue requirement associated with $23.8 million (including AFUDC) of capital projects approved for recovery through advice letters that were completed and placed in service.

General Rate Case for the Years 2027–2030

On January 30, 2026, BVES filed a new general rate case application that will determine new electric rates for the years 2027 through 2030. Among other things, BVES requested (i) capital budgets of approximately $133 million for the four-year rate cycle, and another approximately $17 million, plus AFUDC, for capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed, and (ii) a capital structure for BVES of 60% equity and 40% debt, a return on equity of 11.30%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.92%, and a return on rate base of 9.15%.

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract, additional firm-fixed-price contracts, task order agreements

24

Table of Contents

and subcontracts with third party prime contractors on military bases. Currently, ASUS has one subsidiary that has entered into a task order agreement with the U.S. government that has a term of 15 years. The contract prices for each of the contracts and recurring task order agreements are subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on annual economic price adjustments, and new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors. ASUS’s subsidiaries expect to continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served.

Early in 2026, the U.S. government experienced partial shutdowns affecting mainly the Department of Homeland Security and other federal departments. Amid the recent U.S. government shutdown, the subsidiaries of ASUS have not experience

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Latest 10-K MD&A

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-02-18. Report date: 2025-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and includes specific references to (i) GSWC, AWR’s regulated water utility segment, (ii) BVES, AWR’s regulated electric utility segment, (iii) ASUS and its subsidiaries, collectively, AWR’s contracted services segment, and (iv) AWR (parent) where applicable.

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment’s recorded earnings and adjusted earnings (if applicable) divided by AWR’s weighted average number of diluted Common Shares. The impact of a one-time tax benefit recorded in 2024 at the water segment has been excluded in the analysis when communicating AWR’s consolidated and water segment results for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. This adjustment has been excluded from the analysis to help facilitate comparisons of AWR’s performance from period to period.

All of the measures discussed above are derived from consolidated financial information of Registrant, but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These items constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which supplement our GAAP disclosures but should not be considered as an alternative to the respective GAAP measures. Furthermore, the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other registrants.

AWR uses earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), a non-GAAP financial measure, as an important measure in evaluating its operating results and believes it provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments.  AWR reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. Reconciliations of this measure and of diluted earnings per share as adjusted to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP are included in the discussion under the section titled “Summary Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under the Overview section in Item 1. Business and Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The U.S. government announced a comprehensive set of tariffs in the second quarter. Following the pause of certain of these tariffs, the majority of the previously announced tariffs have been implemented. The U.S. government has continued to indicate that they could impose additional tariffs on particular countries and to impose global tariffs on certain goods. Such tariffs could impact our results of operations by increasing the costs of various goods, including construction materials. Management is actively engaged with vendors and business partners to reduce financial risks of tariffs; however, the impact of such tariffs is subject to uncertainties regarding whether the U.S. government ultimately imposes additional tariffs, the timing of their implementation, the magnitude of such tariffs and possible exemption for certain goods, among other unknowns.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California. BVES’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are primarily earned through delivering electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California. Rates charged to GSWC and BVES customers are authorized by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital.  GSWC and BVES plan to continue seeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVES are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVES may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:

Water General Rate Case for the years 2025–2027

On January 30, 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC’s general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office, which determines new water rates for the years 2025 - 2027. Among other things, the final decision adopted a settlement agreement between GSWC and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC, which authorized GSWC to invest approximately $573.1 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year capital cycle. The $573.1 million of infrastructure investment includes $17.7 million of advice letter capital investments to be filed for revenue recovery during the second- and third-year attrition increases when those projects are completed. In addition, the approved settlement agreement includes $58.2 million of advice letter capital investments that began construction in 2023 to be filed for revenue recovery during the second- and third-year attrition increases when those projects are completed. Under the approved settlement agreement, beginning in 2025, all of the advice letter projects were allowed to accrue in a memorandum account (i) interest

36

Table of Contents

during the construction period at GSWC’s adopted cost of debt until the assets are in service, and (ii) the full rate of return that includes a debt and equity component and all applicable components of the revenue requirement for the projects from the period the assets are in service until the date of the attrition filings.

Excluding revenues for all of the advice letter capital projects discussed above, under the terms of the settlement agreement, GSWC’s adopted operating revenues less water supply costs for 2025 increased by approximately $23 million as compared to the 2024 adopted operating revenues less water supply costs. In December, 2025, GSWC received approval from the CPUC to implement its full second-year rate increases, effective January 1, 2026, that will result in higher adopted operating revenues less water supply cost for 2026 of approximately $32.0 million compared to 2025’s adopted operating revenues less water supply cost. Included in the 2026 increase is nearly $11 million related to the advice letter capital projects previously discussed. The assets from the advice letter projects and the related amounts in the memorandum account were added to the adopted rate base for inclusion in the revenue requirement effective January 1, 2026.

The final decision also addressed GSWC’s request for various regulatory mechanisms that were litigated during the proceeding. Among other things, the final decision rejected GSWC’s request for the continuation of a full sales and revenue decoupling mechanism such as the WRAM and a full cost balancing account for water supply such as the MCBA, and instead ordered GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM or “M-WRAM”) and an incremental cost balancing account (“ICBA”) for supply costs. The final decision also adopted GSWC’s M-WRAM rate design proposal authorizing GSWC to increase the revenue requirement recovery in its fixed service charges to between 45-48% of the revenue requirement depending on the ratemaking area representing approximately 65% of GSWC’s fixed costs in aggregate, and approved GSWC’s request for the continuation of a sales reconciliation mechanism that would allow GSWC to adjust its sales forecast throughout the general rate case cycle to address significant fluctuations in consumption. The M-WRAM tracks the difference between the revenue based on actual metered sales through a tiered volumetric rate and the revenue that would have been received with the same actual metered sales if a standard single quantity rate had been in effect. The ICBA for supply costs tracks differences between the authorized per-unit prices and actual per-unit prices for each supply cost (purchased water, pump tax, and purchased power). The M-WRAM and ICBA were effective January 1, 2025.

Without the WRAM and MCBA, GSWC’s earnings in 2025 were favorably impacted from an actual water supply source mix that included less purchased water than what was authorized in the general rate case and included in the revenue requirement, which was partially offset by the negative impact from a nearly 4% decrease in water consumption compared to amounts adopted in the final general rate case. As a result, the combined impact from changes in water supply source mix compared to adopted levels and fluctuations in consumption did not have a material impact on GSWC’s 2025 earnings. The new 2025 rates and the implementation of the new M-WRAM and ICBA regulatory mechanisms approved in the final decision have been reflected in GSWC’s earnings for the year ended December 31, 2025 that resulted in an increase in recorded revenues of $46.7 million largely from the new rates and an increase in recorded water supply costs of $21.9 million, which combined is an increase of $24.8 million, compared to 2024. GSWC’s future earnings will continue to be subject to volatility as a result of fluctuations in consumption and/or changes in water supply source mix compared to adopted levels.

Water Cost of Capital (“COC”) Proceeding

2026 COC Application

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. In November 2025, GSWC, along with three other investor-owned California water utilities, requested a further extension of the date by which each of them must file their cost of capital applications. In November 2025, the CPUC approved the request to defer the cost of capital application by another year. The CPUC’s approval postponed the filing date by one year until May 1, 2027, with a corresponding effective date of January 1, 2028. The CPUC also approved the joint parties’ request to leave the current Water Cost of Capital Mechanism (“WCCM”) in place through the one-year deferral period. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.93%, based on its weighted cost of capital, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2027. The 7.93% return on rate base includes a return on equity of 10.06%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a capital structure with 57% equity and 43% debt.

Electric General Rate Cases:

General Rate Case for Years 2023–2026

On January 16, 2025, the CPUC adopted a final decision in BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set new electric rates retroactive to January 1, 2023 and approved the settlement agreement reached between BVES, Cal Advocates and another intervenor in its entirety. Among other things, the settlement agreement, (i) settled and adopted the revenue requirements for each of the four years 2023 through 2026, and the rate increases for 2024 through 2026 are not subject to an earnings test, (ii) authorized BVES to invest approximately $52.5 million in capital infrastructure included in base rates over the four-year rate cycle and at least an additional $23.1 million (plus an allowance for funds used during construction, or “AFUDC”) to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed; (iii) adopted a cost of capital that increased BVES’s adopted return on equity from 9.6% to 10.0%, lowered the cost of debt from 6.6% to 5.51%, and maintained the capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, and (iv) approved for recovery the requested capital expenditures and other incremental

37

Table of Contents

operating costs already incurred prior to 2023 in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were previously not included in customer rates.

The new electric rates were implemented on March 1, 2025. BVES was also authorized by the CPUC to establish a general rate case memorandum account that made the new rates retroactive to January 1, 2023. The general rate case memorandum account tracked the revenue differences between the 2022 adopted rates and the 2023 and 2024 new rates authorized by the CPUC for future recovery. As of December 31, 2025, the aggregate cumulative under-collection in retroactive revenues related to the full year of 2023 and 2024 amounted to $8.2 million. On April 1, 2025, BVES implemented surcharges to recover the retroactive amounts accumulated related to the new rates, as well as recovery of incremental operating costs incurred prior to 2023 in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were being tracked in memorandum accounts prior to the new rate cycle.

The final decision provided for an increase in adopted operating revenues of $2.2 million for 2025. Furthermore, the previously mentioned advice letter projects of at least $23.1 million are expected to generate additional annual operating revenues of approximately $3 million when the respective projects are completed, placed in service, and filed for recovery in customer rates. These projects also accrue AFUDC during construction that will further increase the revenue requirement. On April 1, 2025, BVES implemented new base rates to recover the revenue requirement associated with $11.6 million (including AFUDC) of capital projects approved for recovery through advice letters. In addition, effective October 1, 2025, BVES began to recover the revenue requirement as a result of an additional advice letter capital project totaling approximately $12.2 million (including AFUDC) that was completed and placed in service.

General Rate Case for Years 2027–2030

On January 30, 2026, BVES filed a new general rate case application that will determine new electric rates for the years 2027 through 2030. Among other things, BVES requested (i) capital budgets of approximately $133 million for the four-year rate cycle, and another approximately $17 million, plus AFUDC, for capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed, and (ii) a capital structure for BVES of 60% equity and 40% debt, a return on equity of 11.30%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.92%, and a return on rate base of 9.15%.

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract, additional firm-fixed-price contracts, task order agreements and subcontracts with third party prime contractors on military bases. Currently, ASUS has one subsidiary that has entered into a task order agreement with the U.S. government that has a term of 15 years. The contract prices for each of the contracts and recurring task order agreements are subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on annual economic price adjustments, and new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors.

During 2025, ASUS was awarded approximately $29.4 million in new construction projects, some of which were completed in 2025 and the remainder of which are expected to be completed through 2028. ASUS’s subsidiaries expect to continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served.

Effective October 1, 2025, the U.S. government announced its shutdown, which officially ended on November 12, 2025. Amid the U.S. government shutdown, the subsidiaries of ASUS did not experience any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an “excepted service.” In the event of a future shutdown, management expects that an impact on ASUS and its operations through its subsidiaries would likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. government, (d) the timing of construction work associated with delays in receiving construction permits from furloughs at government agencies, and/or (e) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense contracting programs. However, in the event a future U.S. government shutdown extends for an unprecedented and much longer period, ASUS’s liquidity and earnings could be impacted.

38

Table of Contents

Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share by business segment and for the parent company:

Diluted Earnings per Share
Year Ended
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGE
Water$2.61$2.51$0.10
Electric0.250.210.04
Contracted services0.610.550.06
AWR (parent)(0.09)(0.10)0.01
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as recorded (GAAP)3.373.170.20
Adjustment to GAAP measure:
Impact of a tax benefit recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024 resulting from a final decision in the water general rate case*(0.13)0.13
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)$3.37$3.04$0.33
Water diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)*$2.61$2.38$0.23

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

* The water segment’s adjusted earnings for 2024 exclude the impact of a one-time tax benefit of $0.13 per share recorded during the fourth quarter of 2024 as a result of receiving a final decision from the CPUC in the water general rate case.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, AWR’s recorded consolidated diluted earnings were $3.37 per share, as compared to $3.17 per share for 2024, an increase of $0.20 per share. Excluding the impact of a one-time tax benefit shown separately in the table above and discussed below, adjusted consolidated diluted earnings for 2024 were $3.04 per share as compared to recorded diluted earnings of $3.37 per share for 2025, an adjusted increase of $0.33 per share largely from the implementation of new customer rates at the regulated utilities, and higher earnings at the contracted services segment largely from an increase in management fee revenues and construction activities. AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings in 2025 were negatively impacted by approximately $0.10 per share from the higher number of dilutive shares in 2025 compared to 2024 due to the continued issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program.

Included in the consolidated results for 2024 was a tax benefit of $5.0 million, or $0.13 per share, resulting from the final decision issued by the CPUC on January 30, 2025 in connection with GSWC’s latest general rate case proceeding. The final decision adopted a settlement agreement between GSWC and Cal Advocates, which excluded from customer rates certain excess deferred income tax balances generated by activities outside of ratemaking that were previously recorded as regulatory liabilities as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. GSWC recorded the tax benefit to reflect a change in estimate that decreased its regulatory liabilities associated with excess deferred income tax balances as of December 31, 2024.

The following is a computation and reconciliation of diluted earnings per share from the measure of net income (loss) by business segment as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to AWR’s consolidated fully diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

WaterElectricContracted ServicesAWR (Parent)Consolidated (GAAP)
In 000's except per share amounts2025202420252024202520242025202420252024
Net income (loss) (Note 17)$100,946$94,463$9,615$7,754$23,457$20,642$(3,576)$(3,591)$130,442$119,268
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares38,67337,58338,67337,58338,67337,58338,67337,58338,67337,583
Diluted earnings per share$2.61$2.51$0.25$0.21$0.61$0.55$(0.09)$(0.10)$3.37$3.17

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

39

Table of Contents

Water Segment:

For the year ended December 31, 2025, recorded diluted earnings from the water utility segment were $2.61 per share, as compared to $2.51 per share for 2024, an increase of $0.10 per share, which included the impact of a one-time tax benefit of $0.13 per share as previously discussed above. Excluding the impact of this item from 2024, adjusted diluted earnings at the water segment would be $2.38 per share for 2024 as compared to recorded diluted earnings of $2.61 per share for 2025, an adjusted increase at the water segment of $0.23 per share. The discussion below presents the major variances in earnings for the two periods:

•An increase in water operating revenues of approximately $46.7 million largely as a result of the CPUC-authorized new rate increases effective January 1, 2025 in connection with the approved general rate case. GSWC transitioned from a full revenue decoupling mechanism to the M-WRAM effective January 1, 2025. As a result, GSWC’s revenues and earnings may be subject to future volatility from significant fluctuations in customer consumption compared to adopted levels.

•An increase in water supply costs of $21.9 million primarily related to higher overall per-unit purchased water costs covered in rates. As a result of transitioning from a full cost balancing account for water supply to the ICBA, GSWC’s earnings for the year ended December 31, 2025 were favorably impacted by an actual water supply source mix that included less purchased water than what was authorized in the general rate case and included in the revenue requirement. For the year ended December 31, 2025, GSWC’s pumped water sources, which cost less than purchased water, were capable of meeting a greater portion of customer demand when compared to a higher purchased water mix being recovered in the new adopted rates. GSWC’s earnings will be subject to future volatility as a result of favorable and unfavorable changes in the water supply source mix compared to the adopted mix incorporated in the revenue requirement.

•An overall increase in operating expenses of $10.0 million (excluding supply costs) mainly due to increases in (i) overall labor costs, (ii) maintenance expense, (iii) insurance-related costs, (iv) depreciation and amortization expenses, which are impacted by increasing capital additions placed in service and are reflected and recovered in customer rates, and (v) non-income taxes; partially offset by a decrease in other operation-related costs including lower chemicals and water treatment costs, administrative and general expenses (excluding labor) primarily due to lower outside services costs including those related to regulatory filings as compared to 2024, and property taxes resulting from favorable true-ups in assessed property values. Lastly, as a result of receiving a final decision on its general rate case, GSWC was authorized to recover certain costs through various memorandum accounts that were recorded in 2024 and did not recur in 2025.

•An overall increase in other income (net of other expense) of $0.3 million due primarily to gains of $5.5 million generated on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans as compared to gains of $5.3 million recorded during 2024.

•Excluding the one-time tax benefit of $5.0 million recorded in 2024, an overall decrease in the effective income tax rate due to changes in certain flowed-through income taxes and permanent items included in GSWC’s income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 favorably impacted the water segment’s earnings. As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as being flowed-through in computing its income tax expense consistent with the income tax method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction rate making. Changes in the magnitude of flowed-through items either increase or decrease tax expense, thereby affecting diluted earnings per share.

•A decrease in earnings of approximately $0.07 per share due to the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program. Under the program, AWR may offer and sell its Common Shares, with an aggregate gross offering price of up to $200 million, from time to time at its sole discretion, with $40.7 million currently remaining available for sale. Through December 31, 2025, AWR has sold 2,048,988 Common Shares through this ATM offering program.

Electric Segment:

Diluted earnings from the electric utility segment increased $0.04 per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024, largely resulting from an increase in revenues from the third-year rate increases in 2025 as a result of receiving a final decision approved by the CPUC in connection with BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set new rates for 2023 - 2026 (retroactive to January 1, 2023), as well as receiving approval in 2025 of certain advice letter projects that increased base rates to recover the revenue requirement associated with these capital projects. In addition, there was an overall decrease in the effective income tax rate due to changes in certain flowed-through income taxes as compared to 2024 that favorably impacted the electric segment’s earnings. These increases in the electric segment’s earnings were partially offset by an overall increase in operating expenses. There was also a decrease in earnings of approximately $0.01 per share due to the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program.

40

Table of Contents

Contracted Services Segment:

Diluted earnings from the contracted services segment increased $0.06 per share for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024, largely due to (i) an increase in management fee revenues resulting from the commencement of operations in April 2024 at the new bases (Naval Air Station Patuxent River and Joint Base Cape Cod) and the resolution of various economic price adjustments, (ii) an increase in construction activities, and (iii) lower interest expense resulting from lower borrowing levels and interest rates; partially offset by higher overall operating expenses (excluding construction expenses), and a decrease in earnings of approximately $0.02 per share due to the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program.

AWR (Parent):

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the diluted loss from AWR (parent) decreased $0.01 per share compared to 2024 due to higher income from the lease of AWR’s water rights; partially offset by higher interest expense resulting from higher average borrowing levels under AWR’s credit facility.

The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 provide information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVES and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

41

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water$464,114$417,410$46,70411.2%
Electric57,21751,6455,57210.8%
Contracted services136,742126,40410,3388.2%
Total operating revenues658,073595,45962,61410.5%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased98,22474,27423,95032.2%
Power purchased for pumping14,07615,025(949)-6.3%
Groundwater production assessment21,48924,145(2,656)-11.0%
Power purchased for resale18,11011,6306,48055.7%
Supply cost balancing accounts(5,014)(1,894)(3,120)164.7%
Other operation47,04141,3185,72313.9%
Administrative and general102,811100,9411,8701.9%
Depreciation and amortization47,78443,6474,1379.5%
Maintenance21,66320,2551,4087.0%
Property and other taxes28,00827,0919173.4%
ASUS construction60,60654,5446,06211.1%
Total operating expenses454,798410,97643,82210.7%
OPERATING INCOME203,275184,48318,79210.2%
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense(46,776)(50,382)3,606-7.2%
Interest income5,6507,874(2,224)-28.2%
Other, net7,6497,4661832.5%
(33,477)(35,042)1,565-4.5%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE169,798149,44120,35713.6%
Income tax expense39,35630,1739,18330.4%
NET INCOME$130,442$119,268$11,1749.4%
Basic earnings per Common Share$3.37$3.17$0.206.3%
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share$3.37$3.17$0.206.3%

42

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

General

GSWC and BVES rely upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plants. ASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. Current operating revenues and earnings may be negatively impacted if ASUS’s subsidiaries do not receive adequate price adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of construction projects at its subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Water

For the year ended December 31, 2025, revenues from water operations increased to $464.1 million, an increase of $46.7 million compared to 2024. The increase in water revenues during 2025 is primarily a result of the CPUC-approved new 2025 rate increases effective January 1, 2025 in connection with the recently approved general rate case, as well as an increase in water consumption compared to 2024. There was also an increase in CPUC-approved surcharges billed in 2025 compared to 2024 to recover previously incurred costs. These surcharges are largely offset by corresponding increases in operating expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.

While billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2025 was higher by 1.9% compared to 2024 due primarily to lower amounts of seasonal precipitation for 2025 compared to 2024, 2025 consumption was nearly 4% lower as compared to consumption amounts adopted in the final general rate case. Prior to 2025, changes in consumption had not had a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved full revenue decoupling mechanism, known as the WRAM, which adjusted volumetric revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC. As previously discussed, the final decision in the latest general rate case rejected GSWC’s request for the continuation of the WRAM, and instead ordered GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM or “M-WRAM”). Without having a full revenue decoupling mechanism, GSWC’s revenues and earnings will be subject to future volatility as a result of significant fluctuations in customer consumption compared to adopted levels.

Electric

Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $5.6 million to $57.2 million largely resulting from an increase in revenues from third-year electric rate increases implemented in 2025.

Electric usage for the year ended December 31, 2025 was 1.1% lower than 2024. Due to the CPUC-approved BRRBA, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.

Contracted Services

Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For the year ended December 31, 2025, revenues from contracted services increased $10.3 million to $136.7 million as compared to $126.4 million for 2024. The increase was primarily due to an increase in management fee revenue from annual economic price adjustments and the new operations at Joint Base Cape Cod and Naval Air Station Patuxent River and an increase in construction activities.

ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50- and 15-year contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Operating Expenses:

Supply Costs

Total supply costs at the regulated utilities comprise the largest portion of total consolidated operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for approximately 32.3% and 30.0% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Water segment supply costs

Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers.

43

Table of Contents

Since the implementation in 2008 of the previously CPUC-approved MCBA, GSWC was able to track adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC recorded the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses as a regulatory asset or liability. GSWC recovered from, or refunded to, customers the amount of such variances. Without the MCBA mechanism in place, beginning in 2025, there may be volatility to Registrant’s earnings as a result of changes in water supply source mix. The MCBA has been replaced with an incremental supply cost balancing account that will not include the impact from changes in water supply source mix compared to the adopted mix incorporated in the revenue requirement, but allows GSWC to track differences between the authorized per-unit prices of water production costs and actual per-unit prices of water production costs.

Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, water supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water purchased$98,224$74,274$23,95032.2%
Power purchased for pumping14,07615,025(949)-6.3%
Groundwater production assessment21,48924,145(2,656)-11.0%
Water supply cost balancing accounts *(96)(1,621)1,525-94.1%
Total water supply costs$133,693$111,823$21,87019.6%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(5.0) million and $(1.9) million for 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased to $98.2 million as compared to $74.3 million for 2024. The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were 48% and 41%, respectively, resulting in higher purchased water volume and costs in 2025. The increase in purchased water costs was also due to increases in wholesale water prices. Power purchased for pumping and groundwater production assessment both decreased due, in part, to the shift in actual supply source mix resulting in lower production volume in 2025 as compared to 2024. These decreases were partially offset by increases in pump tax rates and electricity provider rates.

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the water supply cost balancing account had a $0.1 million under-collection as compared to a $1.6 million under-collection in 2024. The change in water supply cost balancing accounts was primarily due to a change in the supply cost recovery mechanisms, as previously described. Unlike the MCBA, the incremental supply cost balancing account only tracks differences between the authorized per-unit prices of water production costs and actual per-unit prices of water production costs.

Electric segment supply costs

Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, electric supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Power purchased for resale$18,110$11,630$6,48055.7%
Electric supply cost balancing account *(4,918)(273)(4,645)**
Total electric supply costs$13,192$11,357$1,83516.2%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(5.0) million and $(1.9) million for 2025 and 2024, respectively.

** not meaningful

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES’s customers increased to $18.1 million as compared to $11.6 million for 2024 primarily due to higher overall average prices per megawatt-hour. The change in the electric supply balancing account in 2025 when compared to 2024 was due primarily to increases in energy prices.

44

Table of Contents

Other Operation

The primary components of other operation expenses include payroll costs, materials and supplies, chemicals and water treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices and the electric system.  Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$32,181$28,349$3,83213.5%
Electric Services4,6743,4241,25036.5%
Contracted Services10,1869,5456416.7%
Total other operation$47,041$41,318$5,72313.9%

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the increase in other operation expenses at the water segment was due, in part, from an increase of $1.6 million in billed surcharges to recover previously incurred costs that had been tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Increases in revenues from billed surcharges have a corresponding and offsetting increase in other operation expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. Furthermore, for the year ended December 31, 2024, there was a reduction of $2.0 million as a result of receiving the final decision in the recent water general rate case that authorized the recovery of previously incurred operation-related costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts and which became probable of future recovery. There was no similar item in 2025. There was also an increase in operation-related labor cost, partially offset by a decrease in chemicals and water treatment costs.

The increase at the electric segment was due primarily to higher operation-related labor costs, transportation costs, and bad debt expense.

The increase at the contracted services segment was due primarily to the new operations at Joint Base Cape Cod and Naval Air Station Patuxent and higher operation-related labor costs.

Administrative and General

Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$66,637$64,510$2,1273.3%
Electric Services12,60113,241(640)-4.8%
Contracted Services23,56723,1833841.7%
AWR (parent)67(1)-14.3%
Total administrative and general$102,811$100,941$1,8701.9%

Administrative and general expenses increased at the water segment due, in large part, to an increase of $1.0 million in billed surcharges to recover previously incurred costs that had been tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Increases in revenues from billed surcharges have a corresponding and offsetting increase in administrative and general expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. There was also an increase in labor and insurance-related costs, partially offset by a decrease in outside services costs including those related to regulatory filings as compared to 2024.

Administrative and general expenses decreased at the electric segment primarily due to the approval of the final decision in the electric general rate case proceeding with rates retroactive to 2023 but recorded in 2024. Higher costs incurred to support BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans of $1.3 million related to the full year 2023 were expensed during the fourth quarter of 2024 as the costs prior to 2023 were being tracked in memorandum accounts prior to receiving the approved general rate case decision at the time. Higher expenses related to the wildfire mitigation activities are reflected and recovered in the new customer rates implemented. There was also a decrease in outside services costs. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $1.6 million in billed surcharges in 2025 to recover previously incurred costs that had been tracked in CPUC-

45

Table of Contents

authorized memorandum accounts. Increases in revenues from billed surcharges have a corresponding and offsetting increase in administrative and general expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.

Administrative and general expenses increased at the contracted services segment due to higher labor costs, employee-related benefits, and from the new operations at Joint Base Cape Cod and Naval Air Station Patuxent River, partially offset by lower overall legal costs.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$40,336$37,187$3,1498.5%
Electric Services3,8563,16069622.0%
Contracted Services3,5923,3002928.8%
Total depreciation and amortization$47,784$43,647$4,1379.5%

The overall increase in depreciation and amortization expense resulted primarily from capital additions to utility plant and other fixed assets placed in service.

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$10,286$9,788$4985.1%
Electric Services5,7735,901(128)-2.2%
Contracted Services5,6044,5661,03822.7%
Total maintenance$21,663$20,255$1,4087.0%

Overall maintenance expense increased at the water segment due to an increase in maintenance activities when compared to 2024.

Maintenance expense decreased at the electric segment primarily due to the approval of the final decision in the electric general rate case proceeding with rates retroactive to 2023 but recorded in 2024. Higher maintenance costs incurred to support BVES’s vegetation management activities of $2.4 million related to the full year 2023 were expensed during the fourth quarter of 2024 as the costs prior to 2023 were being tracked in memorandum accounts prior to receiving the approved general rate case decision at the time. Higher expenses related to vegetation management activities are reflected and recovered in the new customer rates implemented. This decrease was largely offset by an increase of $2.3 million in billed surcharges to recover previously incurred costs that had been tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Increases in revenues from billed surcharges have a corresponding and offsetting increase in maintenance expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.

Overall maintenance expense increased at the contracted services segment due to higher planned and unplanned maintenance-related activities compared to 2024. Furthermore, the new operations at Joint Base Cape Cod and Naval Air Station Patuxent River also contributed to the higher maintenance expense.

Property and Other Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$22,617$22,233$3841.7%
Electric Services2,8042,39940516.9%
Contracted Services2,5872,4591285.2%
Total property and other taxes$28,008$27,091$9173.4%

46

Table of Contents

Property and other taxes increased at the water segment due largely to an increase in franchise fees from higher revenues, partially offset by an overall decrease in property taxes resulting from favorable true-ups in assessed property values.

Property and other taxes increased at the electric segment due largely to higher property taxes from capital additions and an increase in franchise fees from higher revenues.

Property and other taxes increased at the contracted services segment largely as a result of an increase in payroll taxes due, in part, from the operations at the new bases.

ASUS Construction

For the year ended December 31, 2025, construction expenses for contracted services were $60.6 million, increasing by $6.1 million compared to 2024 primarily due to an increase in construction activity as compared to 2024.

Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$35,747$38,532$(2,785)-7.2%
Electric Services4,2883,81247612.5%
Contracted Services6202,166(1,546)-71.4%
AWR (parent)6,1215,8722494.2%
Total interest expense$46,776$50,382$(3,606)-7.2%

AWR’s borrowings consist of bank notes under revolving credit facilities, while GSWC and BVES borrowings consist of revolving credit facilities and long-term debt issuances. Consolidated interest expense decreased as compared to 2024 resulting primarily from overall lower average interest rates. The overall combined average interest rates were 5.07% and 5.36% for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In addition, the decrease in the water segment’s interest expense was also attributed to the impact of capitalizing debt costs related to certain advice letter projects approved by the CPUC in the latest general rate case effective January 1, 2025. The increase at the electric segment was due to higher average borrowings, partially offset by lower average interest rates. The decrease at the contracted services segment was largely attributed to lower borrowings and lower average interest rates.

The combination of debt and equity financing is used to support, among other things, the capital expenditures program at the regulated utilities. Total average borrowing levels in 2025 increased slightly as compared to 2024. That is because during 2025 and 2024, AWR raised proceeds (net of commissions) of $67.3 million and $89.5 million, respectively, under its ATM offering program, and used the proceeds to pay down borrowings under its credit facility and make equity contributions to its regulated subsidiaries in support of their operations and capital expenditures.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$3,245$6,018$(2,773)-46.1%
Electric Services1,54297656658.0%
Contracted Services809782273.5%
AWR (parent)5498(44)-44.9%
Total interest income$5,650$7,874$(2,224)-28.2%

The decrease in interest income at the water segment was due primarily to a decrease in interest income earned on regulatory assets. Regulatory asset balances will decrease as surcharges are approved and implemented. The increase at the electric segment was due to higher levels of regulatory asset balances earning interest income.

47

Table of Contents

Other Income and (Expense), net

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$6,634$6,326$3084.9%
Electric Services519968(449)-46.4%
Contracted Services(18)(82)64-78.0%
AWR (parent)514254260102.4%
Total other income and (expenses), net$7,649$7,466$1832.5%

For the year ended December 31, 2025, other income (net of other expense) increased due primarily to gains of $5.5 million generated on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans as compared to gains of $5.3 million recorded in 2024, due to financial market conditions. The decrease in other income (net of other expense) in the electric segment is due primarily to lower AFUDC (equity) earned on certain CPUC-approved advice letter projects while under construction compared to 2024. The increase in other income for AWR (parent) is due primarily to an increase in non-regulated-related activities.

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202512/31/2024CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$31,550$22,869$8,68138.0%
Electric Services2,4752,541(66)-2.6%
Contracted Services7,3146,6996159.2%
AWR (parent)(1,983)(1,936)(47)2.4%
Total income tax expense$39,356$30,173$9,18330.4%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by $9.2 million primarily due to the increase in consolidated pretax income as compared to 2024. AWR’s ETRs were 23.2% and 20.2% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. GSWC’s ETR was 23.8% for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 19.5% for 2024. The increase in GSWC’s ETR was due largely due to a one-time tax benefit of $5.0 million recorded in 2024 as a result of receiving the final decision in the water general rate case as previously discussed. There was no similar item recorded in 2025. This was partially offset by changes in certain flowed-through income taxes and permanent items.

Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2024 and 2023 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the headings “Summary Results by Segment” and “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the SEC.

48

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC and BVES operate extensively in regulated businesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.

Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC and BVES. When either files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s operations are no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, they are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s assets are not recoverable in customer rates, management is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.  Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event that management’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC disallows costs included in the ratemaking process.

Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.

Revenue Recognition — GSWC and BVES record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.  Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.

In 2008, the CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms through the adoption of the WRAM. With the adoption of this alternative revenue program, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM for the difference between what is billed to its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC. GSWC’s request, in its most recent general rate case, to continue using a revenue decoupling mechanism, similar to the WRAM, has been denied by the CPUC. The CPUC has ordered GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM) effective January 1, 2025. The M-WRAM tracks the difference between the revenue based on actual metered sales through a tiered volumetric rate and the revenue that would have been received with the same actual metered sales if a standard single quantity rate had been in effect. The CPUC also granted BVES a revenue decoupling mechanism through the BRRBA. BVES adjusts revenues in the BRRBA for the difference between what is billed to its electric customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC.

As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC and BVES are required to collect their M-WRAM/WRAM and BRRBA balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRBA revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period. This can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.

ASUS’s firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and

49

Table of Contents

Equipment on AWR’s consolidated balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS’s operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts thereafter. Revenues from construction activities are recognized as performance obligations are satisfied. Performance obligations related to firm-fixed-price contracts are satisfied over time as ASUS’s performance typically creates or enhances an asset that the U.S. government controls. ASUS recognizes revenue on its firm-fixed-price contracts as performance obligations are satisfied and control of the promised good and/or service is transferred to the U.S. government by measuring the progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation(s) using an input method. Revenues for construction activities are recognized over time, with progress toward completion measured based on the input method using costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs (cost-to-cost method). Due to the nature of these construction projects, ASUS has determined the cost-to-cost input measurement to be the best method to measure progress towards satisfying its construction contract performance obligations, as compared to using an output measurement such as units produced. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.

Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVES, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.

As regulated utilities, GSWC and BVES treat certain temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments in computing their income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flowed-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVES were not required to account for their income taxes as regulated enterprises. As of December 31, 2025, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.

Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers’ accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions. Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense. To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan’s assets was 6.00% for 2025 and 2024.

For the pension plan obligation, Registrant decreased the discount rate to 5.57% as of December 31, 2025 from 5.70% as of December 31, 2024 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2025. A hypothetical 25-basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have decreased total net periodic pension expense for 2025 by approximately $0.1 million, which includes an increase in service cost that was more than offset by the decrease in interest cost, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2025 by a total of $5.6 million.  A 25-basis point decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 2025 pension cost by approximately $0.5 million.

In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status.  Changes in market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, a decrease in the overfunded position, and increase the required future contributions.

50

Table of Contents

The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVES to each maintain a two-way balancing account to track differences between their forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs. As of December 31, 2025, GSWC has a $2.1 million over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account for the general office and water regions. As of December 31, 2025, BVES has an insignificant balance in its two-way pension balancing account.

Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations. In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 2026, the pension contribution is not expected to be significant given its current funded status. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts. Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.

Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension plan.  Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan instead of the pension plan.

51

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR

AWR’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund construction programs at its regulated utilities and if market interest rates increase. In addition, as the capital investment program continues to increase, AWR and its subsidiaries anticipate they will need to access external financing more often. External financing may also be needed to cover costs incurred in connection with capital investments that are not covered in rates due to delays in obtaining approval of general rate cases by the CPUC.

AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVES to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $933.7 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2025. Approximately $117.7 million was available for BVES to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2025. ASUS’s ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in which each ASUS subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS’s ability to pay dividends under California law.

When necessary, AWR obtains funds from external sources through the capital markets and from bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets.

On February 27, 2024, AWR entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with third-party sales agents, under which AWR may offer and sell Common Shares, from time to time at its sole discretion, through an ATM offering program having an aggregate gross offering price of up to $200 million over a three-year period and pursuant to AWR’s effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. In 2024, AWR began raising proceeds under its ATM offering program and has used the net proceeds from these sales, after deducting commissions on such sales and offering expenses, for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, repayment of debt and making equity contributions to its subsidiaries. Through this ATM offering program, during 2025 and 2024, AWR raised proceeds of $67.3 million, net of approximately $1.0 million in commissions paid and $89.5 million, net of $1.4 million in commissions paid, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, approximately $40.7 million remained available for sale under the ATM offering program which are expected to be fully used by the end of 2026.

In June 2023, AWR and GSWC each entered into credit agreements with an original term of five years provided by a syndicate of banks and financial institutions. Both credit agreements, as amended, are now scheduled to mature in June 2029. The credit agreements provide AWR and GSWC unsecured revolving credit facilities with current borrowing capacities of $195.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. Under the terms of the credit agreements, the borrowing capacities for AWR and GSWC may be expanded up to an additional $30.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively, subject to the lenders’ approval. AWR’s credit facility primarily provides support to AWR (parent) and ASUS, while GSWC’s credit agreement provides support to its water operations and capital expenditures. As of December 31, 2025, AWR’s and GSWC’s outstanding borrowings under the credit facilities were $124.0 million and $13.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, AWR’s borrowings under its credit facility have been classified as non-current liabilities on AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. The CPUC requires GSWC to completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period after which GSWC may again borrow under its facility. GSWC’s pay-off period for its credit facility ends in December 2027. Accordingly, GSWC’s outstanding borrowings under its credit facility as of December 31, 2025 have been classified as non-current liabilities in both AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and GSWC’s Balance Sheet.

In March 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC’s financing application, which among other things, approved GSWC’s request to issue up to $750.0 million of additional long-term debt and equity securities. Subsequently, on May 29, 2025, GSWC executed a note purchase agreement for the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $100.0 million. In connection with the transaction, GSWC issued (i) $75.0 million at a coupon rate of 5.30% due May 29, 2032, and (ii) $25.0 million at a coupon rate of 5.65% due May 29, 2037. In addition, on May 30, 2025, GSWC issued 3.6500 common shares to its parent in exchange for a contribution of $50.0 million. GSWC used the proceeds from both the issuance of the notes and equity to fully pay down all outstanding borrowings as of May 31, 2025 under GSWC’s credit agreement. In December 2025, GSWC issued an additional 0.9750 of common shares to AWR for total proceeds of approximately $12.0 million. GSWC again used the proceeds from the stock issuance to pay down outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and to fund its operations and capital expenditures.

In August 2024, the CPUC issued a final decision in BVES’s financing application, which among other things, approved BVES’s request to issue up to $120 million of new long-term debt and equity securities. On February 12, 2025, BVES completed the issuance of $50.0 million in unsecured private-placement notes with a coupon rate of 6.12% maturing on February 12, 2030. BVES used the proceeds from the notes to pay down all amounts under its revolving credit facility outstanding satisfying the CPUC’s requirement at that time.

52

Table of Contents

BVES has a separate revolving credit facility without a parent guaranty that supports its electric operations and capital expenditures, which provides a borrowing capacity, as amended, of $65.0 million and expires on December 19, 2028. Under BVES’s amended credit agreement, executed on December 19, 2025, BVES extended the term of its credit facility to 2028 and also expanded the borrowing capacity of up to an additional $25.0 million, subject to lender’s approval. BVES’s revolving credit facility is considered a short-term debt arrangement by the CPUC. Therefore, pursuant to the CPUC’s requirements, borrowings under this credit facility are required to be fully paid off within a 24 month period, after which, BVES may borrow under the credit facility again. BVES’s next pay-off period ends in June 2027. As of December 31, 2025, the outstanding balance under BVES’s credit facility of $4.0 million has been classified as a non-current liability in AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Furthermore, in December 2025, BVES issued 3.33 common shares to AWR for total proceeds of $6.0 million. BVES used the proceeds from the stock issuance to pay down outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and to fund its operations and capital expenditures.

Our primary sources of liquidity to fund operations continue to be from the recovery of costs charged to customers at our regulated utilities and the collection of payments from the U.S government. We believe that capital investment costs associated with our capital programs at our regulated utilities will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers, as well as funds from credit facilities from our regulated utilities. In addition, AWR’s credit facility will continue to be used to support ASUS’s operations and AWR (parent). The long-term capital-intensive nature of our regulated utilities have required us to continually seek future financing opportunities beyond the short-term. Future long-term financing at GSWC and BVES will consist of both long-term debt and equity issuances in order to manage to the CPUC-authorized capital structure. Under the current financing applications authorized by the CPUC, GSWC and BVES have $588.0 million and $82.0 million, respectively, remaining and available under each utility’s authorized applications that provide for long-term financing and which are expected to be used over the next 2-6 years to pay down outstanding borrowings under their respective credit facilities and support operations.

Management believes that AWR’s and GSWC’s sound capital structures and strong credit ratings, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case AWR may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.

AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. On February 10, 2026, AWR’s Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.5040 per share on AWR’s Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 5, 2026 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 23, 2026. AWR has paid common dividends every year since 1931, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 71 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. AWR’s quarterly dividend rate has grown at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 8.5% over the last five years since the first quarter of 2021, and has achieved a 10-year CAGR of 8.3% in its calendar year dividend payments through 2025. AWR’s current policy is to achieve a CAGR in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVES, and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. AWR’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; delays in receiving approvals of general rate cases, changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; newly imposed tariffs; compliance with water quality regulations and environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; its customers’ ability to pay utility bills; and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases, and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.

ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under 15- and 50-year contracts for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS’s subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or other subsidiaries of ASUS.

53

Table of Contents

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and deferred income taxes. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities of AWR was $229.7 million for 2025 as compared to $198.7 million for 2024. The increase in operating cash flow was largely due to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to working capital items. In particular, the implementation of new rates and surcharges at our regulated utilities added to cash flows from operations. In addition, in 2025, GSWC and one of ASUS’s subsidiaries received combined approximately $17 million in PFAS contamination litigation proceeds as plaintiffs in class action lawsuits. The increase in cash flows from operating activities is partially offset by the differences at ASUS in the timing of vendor payments and the receipt of cash for construction work at military bases. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work. Furthermore, in March 2024, as a result of the Extended Arrearage Program, GSWC received $3.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the State of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic. There were no similar relief funds received during 2025.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $237.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $232.8 million in 2024, which is mostly related to capital expenditures at the regulated utilities. GSWC and BVES invest capital to provide essential services to their regulated customer bases, while working with the CPUC to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. AWR’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs (to replace infrastructure, including those to mitigate wildfire risk) and major capital investment projects (to construct new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities). The regulated utilities may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.

During 2026, the regulated utilities’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $185 – $225 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

AWR’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares, (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to financial institutions, and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, GSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Borrowings on AWR’s credit facility are used to support AWR (parent) and its contracted services subsidiary, and borrowings on GSWC’s and BVES’s credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVES capital programs, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. AWR may also from time to time make equity contributions to GSWC and BVES. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by the regulated utilities.

Net cash used by financing activities was $26,000 for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to cash provided of $46.6 million for 2024. The change in cash from financing activities in 2025 was due primarily to a decrease in total net borrowings required in 2025 as compared to 2024 due, in large part, to an increase in cash flows from operating activities. Financing activities in 2025 included the issuance of long-term debt of $50.0 million by BVES and $100.0 million by GSWC, and the proceeds were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under their respective credit facilities. Credit facilities have been used to support their operations and ongoing capital expenditure programs. In June 2024, GSWC completed the issuance of $65.0 million in unsecured private placement notes. The proceeds from the private placement notes were used by GSWC for general corporate purposes including the repayment of outstanding borrowings under its credit facility and the support of its operations and capital expenditures. During 2025, AWR had net payments on its credit facilities of $148.0 million, while during 2024, AWR had net payments on its credit facilities of $44.5 million. In addition, during 2025, AWR sold 903,769 Common Shares through its ATM offering program and raised net of issuance cost of $67.0 million, while during 2024, AWR sold 1,145,219 Common Shares through its ATM offering program and raised proceeds net of issuance cost of $88.7 million.

GSWC

GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends to AWR on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental and water quality regulations, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes,

54

Table of Contents

changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers. Internal cash flows have also been impacted by delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers.

GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources for long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments from its parent, AWR, to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. GSWC has its own separate credit agreement that provides for a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to support GSWC’s operations and capital expenditures. GSWC’s borrowing capacity under this credit agreement may be expanded up to an additional $75.0 million, subject to the lenders’ approval.

In March 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC’s financing application, which among other things, approved GSWC's request to issue up to $750.0 million of additional long-term debt and equity securities. Subsequently, on May 29, 2025, GSWC executed a note purchase agreement for the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $100.0 million. In connection with the transaction, GSWC issued (i) $75.0 million at a coupon rate of 5.30% due May 29, 2032, and (ii) $25.0 million at a coupon rate of 5.65% due May 29, 2037. In addition, during 2025, GSWC issued a total of 4.6250 common shares to AWR for total proceeds of approximately $62.0 million. Under the current financing application authorized by the CPUC, GSWC has $588.0 million remaining and available that provides for long-term financing and which are expected to be used over the next 2 to 6 years to pay down portions of the outstanding borrowings under GSWC’s credit facility and support its operations and capital program.

In addition, GSWC also receives advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $183.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $158.6 million for 2024. The increase in operating cash flow was due primarily to (i) new water rates implemented effective January 1, 2025 that were approved in the latest general rate case proceeding, (ii) the implementation, in May 2025, of the WRAM/MCBA surcharges related to the recovery of all pre-2025 revenue and supply cost activity with the majority to be recovered over 18 months, (iii) the implementation of other surcharges during the year, and (iv) receipt of approximately $14.7 million in PFAS contamination litigation proceeds as plaintiffs in class action lawsuits. In March 2024, GSWC received $3.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the State of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic, which did not recur in 2025. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $204.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $198.8 million for 2024, which is mostly related to spending under GSWC’s infrastructure investment plans that are consistent with capital budgets authorized in its general rate cases.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to $48.3 million for 2024.  The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities was due primarily to a decrease in total capital (debt and equity) raised in 2025 as compared to 2024 due, in large part, to an increase in cash flows from operating activities. During 2025, GSWC issued long-term debt of $100.0 million and issued common shares to AWR (parent) in exchange for contribution of $62.0 million used. GSWC used the proceeds from both issuances to pay down outstanding borrowings under its credit facility that is used to support its water operations and capital expenditures program. In 2024, GSWC completed the issuance of $65.0 million in unsecured private placement notes and issued common shares to AWR (parent) in exchange for contribution of approximately $40.0 million. Finally, GSWC paid $37.5 million in dividends to AWR during 2025 as compared to $35.1 million during 2024.

55

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2025. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract and additional firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below.

Payments/Commitments Due (1)
($ in thousands)TotalLess than 1 Year
Notes/Debentures (2)$187,000$
Private Placement Notes (3)595,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)10,1967,957
Other Debt Instruments (5)2,114252
Total AWR Long-Term Debt$794,310$8,209
Credit Facilities (6)$141,000$
Interest on Long-Term Debt (7)277,88940,504
Advances for Construction (8)81,8063,875
Renewable Energy Credit Agreements (9)8,817986
Purchased Power Contracts (10)53,2898,977
Capital Expenditures (11)106,10297,526
Water Purchase Agreements (12)1,984467
Operating Leases (13)6,9462,315
SUB-TOTAL677,833154,650
Other Commitments (14)12,396
TOTAL$1,484,539$162,859

(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.

(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.

(3) Consists of GSWC senior private placement notes of $510.0 million and BVES unsecured private placement notes of $85.0 million, totaling $595.0 million issued to various banks and financial institutions. GSWC’s most recent private placement notes include $65.0 million issued in June 2024 and $100.0 million issued in May 2025. Under the terms of each of the senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. Under the terms of its amended credit agreement and unsecured private placement notes, BVES must maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 times its interest expense. BVES is also required to maintain a maximum consolidated total debt to consolidated total capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1.00. GSWC and BVES were in compliance with all of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2025.  GSWC and BVES do not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on their properties.

(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $2.5 million of obligations with respect to GSWC’s 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.

56

Table of Contents

(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC’s Arden-Cordova District.

(6) Credit facilities consists of (i) a $195.0 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $124.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2025; (ii) a $200.0 million revolving credit facility under GSWC, of which $13.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2025; and (iii) a $65.0 million revolving credit facility under BVES, of which $4.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2025.

(7) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.

(8) Advances for construction represent contract refunds mostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.

(9) Consists of agreements executed by BVES to purchase renewable energy credits through 2035. These renewable energy credits are used to meet California’s renewables portfolio standard.

(10) Consists of BVES fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed in July 2023 and in May 2025 with Shell Energy North America (US), L.P and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., respectively.

(11) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVES as of December 31, 2025.

(12) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $0.9 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $1.1 million of water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2026 through 2038.

(13) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.

(14) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) $11.4 million in asset retirement obligations of GSWC that reflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (ii) irrevocable letters of credit in the amount of $1.0 million for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policies; and (iii) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to AWR’s revolving credit facility.

Information comparing the liquidity and capital resources for fiscal years 2024 and 2023 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 filed with the SEC.

BVES Power-Supply Arrangements

BVES purchases power pursuant to purchase power contracts approved by the CPUC. In May 2025, the CPUC approved a new power purchase contract between BVES and a third party. The new contract provides for the purchase of electricity during a delivery period from June 1, 2025 through December 31, 2028 and is subject to the accounting guidance for derivatives and requires mark-to-market accounting. In addition, BVES continues to procure renewable portfolio standard eligible energy and renewable energy credits as a bundled product through a contract that delivers through December 31, 2035. In addition to the purchased power contracts, BVES buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells surplus power when necessary. BVES is pursuing short- and long-term renewable energy contracts to replace any power purchase agreements that have expired in addition to satisfying its requirements related to its resource portfolio for the next compliance period (2025 - 2027) and beyond. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased to $125.61 per MWh in 2025 from $71.89 per MWh in 2024. BVES has an electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate any impacts to earnings.

Construction Program

GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC and BVES upgrade their facilities in accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements and new legislation.  California requires investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval, and requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

As of December 31, 2025, GSWC and BVES have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $106.1 million.  During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, GSWC and BVES had capital

57

Table of Contents

expenditures of $223.3 million, $244.0 million and $182.7 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, capital expenditures funded by developers were $12.5 million, $8.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively. During 2026, the water and electric segments’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $185 - 225 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues. These amounts include approximately $13.2 million estimated to be spent by BVES on wildfire mitigation projects.

Contracted Services

Under the terms of the contracts with the U.S. government, each contract’s price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for ASUS’s subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.

During sequestration or automatic spending cuts, and the U.S. government shutdown, the subsidiaries of ASUS did not experience any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an “excepted service.” With the expiration of sequestration, similar issues including further sequestration pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act may arise as part of the fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. Any future impact on ASUS and its operations through its subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. Government, (d) the timing of construction work associated with delays in receiving construction permits from furloughs at government agencies, and/or (e) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense contracting programs. In the event a future U.S. government shutdown extends for an unprecedented and much longer period, ASUS’s liquidity and earnings could be impacted.

At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.

Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for ASUS’s subsidiaries in fiscal 2026.

Military BaseEPA periodFiling Date
Fort Bliss (FBWS)October 2026 - September 2027Third Quarter 2026
Fort Lee (ODUS)February 2026 - January 2027Fourth Quarter 2025
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS)April 2026 - March 2027First Quarter of 2026
Joint Base Andrews (TUS)February 2026 - January 2027Fourth Quarter 2025
Fort Jackson (PSUS)February 2026 - January 2027Fourth Quarter 2025
Fort Bragg (ONUS)March 2026 - February 2027First Quarter 2026
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)June 2026 - May 2027Second Quarter 2026
Fort Riley (FRUS)July 2026 - June 2027Second Quarter 2026
Joint Base Cape Cod (BSUS)April 2026 - March 2027First Quarter 2026
Naval Air Station Patuxent River (PRUS)April 2026 - March 2027First Quarter 2026

58

Table of Contents

Regulatory Matters

A discussion on various regulatory matters is included in the section titled “Overview” in this Form 10-K’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The discussion below focuses on other regulatory matters and developments.

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

GSWC and BVES hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas they serve. ASUS subsidiaries are regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas. The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, and may exercise its jurisdiction over the water and wastewater utility operation at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company. ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS, FRUS and BSUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states’ utility commissions.

GSWC and BVES are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.

Rates that GSWC and BVES are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.

GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses in the second and third years of the rate case cycle. For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. GSWC’s cost of capital is determined in a separate proceeding. Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. BVES’s general rate cases are typically filed every four years, which also includes a determination of BVES’s cost of capital. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.

Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVES and ASUS and between GSWC and BVES and AWR.

General Rate Cases and Other Regulatory Matters

Water Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. In January 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC’s latest general rate case proceeding that will set new rates for the years 2025 - 2027. Accordingly, new water rates for 2025 have been implemented and reflected in GSWC’s results for the year ended December 31, 2025.

In December 2025, GSWC received approval from the CPUC to implement its full second-year rate increases, effective January 1, 2026, that will result in higher adopted operating revenues less water supply cost for 2026 of approximately $32.0 million compared to 2025’s adopted operating revenues less water supply cost. Included in the 2026 increase is nearly $11 million related to advice letter capital projects. The assets from the advice letter projects and the related amounts in the memorandum account were added to the adopted rate base for inclusion in the revenue requirement effective January 1, 2026.

Expansion of GSWC’s Water Operations:

In 2014, the CPUC issued a final decision granting GSWC the authority to provide water utility service to a new area to be developed near Sacramento called Sutter Pointe, in Sutter County, California. Specific plans for the new development have been approved by Sutter County that will allow for the construction of 17,500 total dwelling units at full buildout, which is currently expected to occur over the next 20 or more years. Among other things, the final decision in 2014 ordered GSWC to file a separate application before the commencement of any construction in order to establish initial water service rates. The first phase of the new development has begun and is expected to occur over the next five years, and will serve up to 3,800 customer connections. Accordingly, in August 2024, GSWC filed an application prior to the start of construction. In October

59

Table of Contents

2025, the CPUC issued a final decision authorizing initial water service rates covering the new development for the years 2026 through 2028.

On January 27, 2026, GSWC filed an application with the CPUC to acquire the water system assets from a city located within Los Angeles County. The application requested the expansion of GSWC’s CPCN to incorporate the new service area into one of GSWC’s existing ratemaking areas, and to include the $5.25 million purchase price in rate base. The acquisition is forecasted to increase revenues by approximately $1.0 million, if approved as filed. The city's service area serves almost 900 primarily residential customers.

Electric Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

Rates that BVES is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. In January 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set new rates for the years 2023 - 2026, retroactive to January 1, 2023. Accordingly, new electric rates for 2025, which is the third year in the rate cycle, have been implemented and reflected in BVES results for the year ended December 31, 2025. As a result of receiving the final decision, the impact from retroactive rates for the full year of 2023 and from the second-year rate increases for the full year of 2024 were reflected in BVES’s 2024 fourth quarter results.

Among other things, the final decision also approved for recovery the requested capital expenditures and other incremental operating costs already incurred prior to 2023 in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans (“WMP”s) that were not included in customer rates prior to receiving a CPUC final decision on its latest general rate case. The decision approved BVES’s recovery of incremental vegetation management costs and other wildfire mitigation and prevention costs incurred prior to 2023 that were being tracked in memorandum accounts for future recovery and were recorded as regulatory assets. As of December 31, 2025, BVES has a total of approximately $11.3 million in regulatory assets related to these memorandum accounts. During the first quarter of 2025, BVES filed an advice letter to recover all pre-2023 costs included in the vegetation management and other WMP memorandum accounts, which will be recovered over a period of 24 to 36 months through surcharges that were implemented on March 1, 2025 and April 1, 2025.

General Rate Case for Years 2027–2030:

On January 30, 2026, BVES filed a general rate case application that will determine new electric rates for the years 2027 through 2030. Among other things, BVES requested (i) capital budgets of approximately $133 million for the four-year rate cycle, and another approximately $17 million, plus AFUDC, for capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed, and (ii) a capital structure for BVES of 60% equity and 40% debt, a return on equity of 11.30%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.92%, and a return on rate base of 9.15%.

BVES Solar Energy and Battery Storage Projects:

In May 2024, BVES filed an application with the CPUC for approval to construct the solar energy and battery storage projects that will provide BVES with its first solar power generation facility and battery energy storage system. In July 2025, BVES and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion with the CPUC to adopt a settlement agreement resolving all issues in the proceeding. Among other things, the settlement agreement authorizes BVES to construct the solar energy and battery storage facility and system for a total combined cost of approximately $28.0 million, plus additional funds used during construction. In December 2025, BVES received a final decision approving the settlement agreement and authorizing construction of the solar and battery projects. The costs associated with the projects are recoverable in customer rates at the time the projects are completed and in service.

For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

60

Table of Contents

Environmental Matters

AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC and ASUS are required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. EPA. GSWC is also required to comply with the safe drinking water standards by the Division of Drinking Water (“DDW”), under the SWRCB. The DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA’s program in California. Similarly, ASUS is required to comply with the drinking water standards that are administered by the relevant state agencies in the states in which it operates. The U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction.

GSWC and ASUS currently test their water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act. They work proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening their water sources. They also incur operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in their sources of supply, and additional expenses to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, drought impacts, and consumer expectations. Both GSWC and ASUS will see increased operating costs to meet newly established and future water quality standards. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. The request for equitable adjustment process and capital funding request mechanism provide ASUS with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred operating costs and capital investment requirement in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC and the U.S. government.

Perfluoroalkyl Substances (“PFAS”)

PFAS have negatively impacted water systems across the country including those of GSWC. PFAS were used in fire suppression agents, certain fabric and other materials and used in various industrial processes. In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals. Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notifications by water systems when they detect levels of PFAS above response levels.

PFAS Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Levels

On April 10, 2024, the U.S. EPA announced the final regulations that established maximum contaminant levels (“MCLs”) for six PFAS compounds in drinking water. The regulation established MCLs for perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (“PFOS”), and several other contaminants with individual MCLs that range from 4 ppt to 10 ppt. In addition, the regulation established a MCL for PFAS mixtures containing at least two of the regulated PFAS compounds for the combined and co-occurring levels of these PFAS in drinking water. The final rule requires public water systems to implement PFAS monitoring and reporting within three years (2027), and where exceedances are identified, to implement solutions within five years (2029) to reduce PFAS levels to below the MCLs. In May 2025, U.S. EPA announced its intention to extend the deadline for drinking water systems to comply with the new PFAS maximum contaminant levels by two years to 2031, but it has not yet issued regulations to put this extension into effect.

Currently, there are more than 35 sources at GSWC and 7 sources at ASUS that have exceeded one or more of the PFAS MCLs. These new MCLs will increase capital investment expenditures over the next five years and increase operation and maintenance expenses over the long-term. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track incremental expenses, including laboratory testing and monitoring costs, customer and public notification costs, and chemical and operating treatment costs, incurred as a result of PFAS contamination in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

Hexavalent Chromium

California State Division of Drinking Water adopted an MCL of 10 parts per billion for Hexavalent Chromium, which went into effect on October 1, 2024. Depending on the size of the water system, water systems will have two to four years from the effective date to come into compliance with the MCL. Currently, there are approximately eight sources at GSWC that exceed or are within eighty percent of the MCL. These MCLs are also expected to increase GSWC’s capital investments and operations and maintenance expenses.

The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC for both PFAS compounds and hexavalent chromium.

61

Table of Contents

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (“PFAS”) Contamination Litigation Proceeds Memorandum Account

GSWC has been a plaintiff in class action lawsuits (against 3M Company, DuPont, and others) related to PFAS contamination affecting public water systems. The class settlement agreement among 3M Company and the class of eligible public water systems was entered into on June 22, 2023 and resolved any claims for PFAS contamination with 3M Company. The class settlement agreement between the parties was approved by an order issued by the Federal District Court of South Carolina on March 29, 2024. As a result of the settlement, GSWC was notified in the second quarter of 2025 that it will receive from 3M Company approximately $19.0 million, net of legal fees. In June 2025, 3M Company paid a portion of this amount into a qualified settlement fund totaling approximately $12.5 million to be administered by a custodian for the benefit of GSWC. GSWC received the first payment of approximately $3.8 million into this settlement fund in August, and the remainder of the $12.5 million was received in October 2025. GSWC expects to be paid the remaining settlement payments totaling approximately $6.5 million during 2026 – 2033. One of ASUS’s subsidiaries is also a participant in this class settlement agreement with 3M Company and is expected to receive approximately $2 million of settlement payments during 2025 – 2033. During the fourth quarter, GSWC and one of ASUS’s subsidiaries received class settlement payments of $2.2 million and $0.3 million, net of legal and other costs, respectively, from DuPont pursuant to respective class settlement agreements.

Settlement proceeds received by GSWC may be used for future capital investments or operations and maintenance expenses related to PFAS water contamination to its water systems or any PFAS related litigation against its water systems, which benefit GSWC’s customers. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track in a memorandum account the settlement payments received by GSWC from lawsuits related to PFAS contamination in its water systems, which include the proceeds received for participation in class action lawsuits. The amounts in the memorandum account have been recorded as a regulatory liability to be used in the future to offset incremental investments in replacement and treatment of property, as well as operations and maintenance expenses and other direct expenses related to PFAS contamination.

GSWC continues to monitor contaminant levels in its water for PFAS compounds in accordance with final U.S. EPA regulations. Proceeds received from the defendants will not be sufficient to pay for all PFAS-related liabilities that will ultimately be incurred by GSWC, whether related to capital investments, operation and maintenance expenses, or litigation brought against GSWC. However, the CPUC has also authorized GSWC to track incremental expenses, including laboratory testing and monitoring costs, customer and public notification costs and chemical and operating treatment costs, incurred as a result of PFAS contamination in a separate memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup

GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at one of its plant sites that contained an underground storage tank which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.

As of December 31, 2025, the total amount spent to clean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.9 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2025, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated remaining cost of $1.3 million to complete the site remediation project. The estimate includes costs for continued activities to monitor groundwater, conduct soil gas sampling, and appropriate decommissioning/destruction of the wells after case closure approval. The ultimate cost may vary depending on additional monitoring or remediation required for case closure. The estimate is based on best available information at this time. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved in rate base by the CPUC as approved historically.

Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

On October 30, 2024, the U.S. EPA published its final Lead and Copper Rule Improvements. The rule went into effect on December 30, 2024. The rule sets a 10-year requirement for replacing lead service lines in drinking water systems, changes sampling requirements and reduces the lead action level from 15 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion. Although no lead service lines have been found yet in GSWC and ASUS and their customer service lines, the changes in this regulation are expected to increase expenses related to sampling, public education, and lead service line field verification activities. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track any incremental expenses and carrying costs on capital investments incurred by GSWC as a result of the Lead and Copper Rule revisions in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

Matters Relating to Military Base Contracts

Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable federal, state and local requirements. Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air

62

Table of Contents

or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of ASUS’s subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.

Security Issues

We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.

Both GSWC and BVES have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyberattacks.  GSWC and BVES utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect their facilities.  These measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing their respective capital improvement plans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that either may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of their utility systems.

On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of its water systems. These assessments and plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and must be resubmitted every five years.

ASUS’s subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades, such as key card requirements at all access points and security camera systems, were completed at military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.

Registrant has evaluated its cybersecurity systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cybersecurity of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates.

Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cybersecurity incident or other attacks will not cause water, wastewater or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.

Water Supply

GSWC

During 2025, GSWC delivered approximately 57.5 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 362 acre-feet per day or 118 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 50% of GSWC’s supply came from groundwater produced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from MWD member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 48% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 2%) under agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.

Groundwater

GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in the implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $2.0 million as of December 31, 2025.  Included in the $2.0 million is a remaining commitment of $0.9 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for ten additional years. The remaining $1.1 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.

63

Table of Contents

Imported Water

GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. GSWC purchases water from various governmental entities and other parties through a total of 61 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. The largest water wholesaler that GSWC interacts with is the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD”), which is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies in the Southern California region. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. Out of the 61 connections mentioned, 46 connections are to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 51,534 acre-feet annually. MWD sources its supplies from Northern California via the State Water Project and the Colorado River through the Colorado River Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements.

Drought Impact

The California Legislature passed two bills in 2018 to establish a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The framework sets aggressive water use objective standards and performance metrics that water suppliers will be required to meet by the year 2040. The framework includes an indoor water use standard that is reduced over time, with 42 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) by 2030 being the final indoor water use standard. Each Urban Water Supplier will have an overall water use objective that will include both an indoor standard as well as outdoor use standards.

Water year 2024-25 (“WY2025”), which ended on September 30, 2025, started out with normal conditions but became increasingly drier as the water year progressed. Water year 2025-26 (“WY2026”) began on October 1, 2025. As of January 28, 2026, the average level for the State’s major reservoirs is at 125% of the historical average for this time of the year. The Northern Sierra and Central Sierra snowpacks as of February 4, 2026 are trending below normal with the snowpack in the northern Sierra at 41% of normal and in the southern Sierra at 75% of normal. The northern Sierra precipitation is currently at 32.8 inches which is 139% of the average for the 2026 water year.

The State Water Project (“SWP”) allocation for WY2026 increased from 10% to 30% as of January 29, 2026. Invasive Golden Mussels were detected in the SWP conveyance network in mid-2025 which may impact groundwater basin spreading operations that are critical water recharge facilities used to manage groundwater extractions in Southern California. As such, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, which owns and operates key spreading facilities in the San Gabriel Basin have already placed a moratorium on allowing SWP into their spreading basins. Basin agencies are working on mitigation plans to address this impact to basin management. The WY2026 began with drier conditions than in WY2025, but a series of November and December precipitation events has improved state conditions. As of February 10, 2026, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that 1% of California was in an “Abnormally Dry” condition, as compared to a year ago where nearly 21% of California was considered to be in “Extreme Drought.”

Prolonged drought conditions continue in the Colorado River System, which has experienced historically low reservoir levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell since 2023. Projected 2026 inflow scenarios for the Colorado River at continued low flow levels are expected and a Level 1 Shortage Condition will continue into 2026 that will impose mandatory water reductions to the lower Colorado River States. Urgent action to reduce water demand on the lower river by 2 to 4 million acre feet annually has been requested by the US Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”) which resulted in a multi-year agreement known as the “California Colorado River Contractor Forbearance Agreement for 2024-2026” by the Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley Water District, MWD, Palo Verde Irrigation District and the City of Needles. This agreement commits to collective Colorado River water savings of 300,000 acre-feet annually with a three-year cap of 700,000 acre feet. Operational agreements on how the Colorado River is managed will expire in 2026. The Bureau is working with both the upper and lower states on a revised set of agreements and a consensus has not yet been reached. GSWC will continue to monitor developments related to the Colorado River System and assess its impact on MWD and GSWC's systems that utilized water sources provided by MWD member agencies.

Military Base Operations

The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by ASUS’s subsidiaries at no cost to ASUS’s subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the compliance with all federal, state and local regulations. Furthermore, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring compliance with the reduction and/or removal of all constituents as required under its wastewater treatment plant operating permits. ASUS works closely with state regulators and industry associations to stay current with emergent issues and proactively addresses any change in wastewater treatment regulation to ensure permit compliance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

64

Table of Contents

MD&A history

Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.

FY 2024 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0001628280-25-006389.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Published MD&A gate trimmed front/tail over-capture. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2025-02-19. Report date: 2024-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and includes specific references to (i) GSWC, AWR’s regulated water utility segment, (ii) BVES, AWR’s regulated electric utility segment, (iii) ASUS and its subsidiaries, collectively, AWR’s contracted services segment, and (iv) AWR (parent) where applicable.

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment’s earnings divided by AWR’s weighted average number of diluted Common Shares.  The impact of retroactive rates related to the full year of 2022 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023 resulting from the final decision in the water general rate case approved in June 2023 and the impact from the reversal of revenues subject to refund recorded in 2022 due to a change in estimates recorded in 2023 following the receipt of a final cost of capital decision in June 2023 have been excluded in this analysis when communicating AWR’s consolidated and water segment results for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 to help facilitate comparisons of Registrant’s performance from period to period.

All of the measures discussed above are derived from consolidated financial information of Registrant, but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These items constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which supplement our GAAP disclosures but should not be considered as an alternative to the respective GAAP measures. Furthermore, the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other registrants.

AWR uses earnings per share by business segment, a non-GAAP financial measure, as an important measure in evaluating its operating results and believes it provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments.  AWR reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. A reconciliation to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP is included in the discussion under the section titled “Summary Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under the Overview section in Item 1. Business and Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California. BVES’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are primarily earned through delivering electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California. Rates charged to GSWC and BVES customers are authorized by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital.  GSWC and BVES plan to continue seeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVES are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVES may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:

Water General Rate Case for the years 2025–2027

On August 14, 2023, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2025 – 2027. On July 12, 2024, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office (“Cal Advocates”) of the CPUC filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Cal Advocates in connection with the water utility general rate case. A proposed decision in the water general rate case was issued on November 15, 2024 and an alternate proposed decision was subsequently issued on December 27, 2024. The proposed decision adopted the settlement agreement and also addressed various unresolved issues related to GSWC’s requests for certain regulatory mechanisms. Among other things, the proposed decision rejected GSWC’s request for the continuation of a sales reconciliation mechanism, which would allow GSWC to adjust its sales forecast throughout the general rate case cycle to address significant fluctuations in consumption. An alternate decision issued by the assigned Commissioner on December 27, 2024, approved GSWC’s request to continue this mechanism. No other material changes were made to the proposed decision. On January 30, 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in this proceeding that approved the alternate proposed decision, which adopted the settlement agreement. GSWC continued to bill its customers based on the existing adopted 2024 rates until the new 2025 rates were approved and implemented effective February 1, 2025. GSWC had filed with the CPUC to establish memorandum accounts to track interim rates, which made the new 2025 rates retroactive to January 1, 2025.

35

Table of Contents

The settlement agreement approved in the final decision resolved most of the issues related to the calculation of the 2025 annual revenue requirement in the general rate case application leaving only two unresolved issues. Among other things, the approved settlement authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $573.1 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year capital cycle. The $573.1 million of infrastructure investment includes $17.7 million of advice letter capital investments to be filed for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. In addition, the approved settlement agreement includes $58.2 million of advice letter capital investments that began construction in 2023 that we expect to file for revenue recovery during the second and third year attrition increases when those projects are completed. For all of the advice letter projects, GSWC will be allowed to accrue interest during construction at the adopted cost of debt and recover the full rate of return, including all applicable components of the revenue requirement after the assets are placed in service up until the assets are placed in customer rates.

Excluding revenues for all of the advice letter capital projects discussed above, under the terms of the approved settlement agreement (i) GSWC’s adopted operating revenues less water supply costs for 2025 will increase by approximately $23 million as compared to the 2024 adopted operating revenues less water supply costs, and (ii) there are potential additional revenue increases of approximately $20 million for each of the years 2026 and 2027 based on inflation factors used at the time of the application filing in August 2023. The increases in 2026 and 2027 are subject to the results of an earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values. Actual increases for 2026 and 2027 will be determined when the CPUC approves the filings to implement the new rate increases, using inflationary index values applicable at that time.

The two remaining 2025 revenue requirement issues that were not resolved in the approved settlement agreement were related to the sales forecast and supply mix. The final decision adopts GSWC’s recommended sales forecast and adopts a supply mix that splits the difference between GSWC’s and Cal Advocates’ forecasts. In addition, certain items related to GSWC’s request for various regulatory mechanisms were litigated that were also addressed in the final decision. With regards to these requests, the final decision (i) rejects GSWC’s request for the continuation of a full sales and revenue decoupling mechanism such as the WRAM and a full cost balancing account for water supply such as the MCBA, and instead orders GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM or “M-WRAM”) and an incremental cost balancing account (“ICBA”) for supply costs, (ii) accepts GSWC’s sales reconciliation mechanism, (iii) rejects GSWC’s supply mix adjustment mechanism, and (iv) rejects GSWC’s request to modify the existing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) memorandum account to track carrying costs on capital investments needed to comply with the new PFAS maximum contaminant levels established by the U.S. EPA (with monitoring and reporting required effective 2027), and instead orders GSWC to file for recovery of PFAS-related capital projects through a separate application or future general rate case. The final decision also adopted GSWC’s M-WRAM rate design proposal, authorizing GSWC to increase the revenue requirement in its fixed service charges to between 45-48% depending on the ratemaking area representing approximately 65% of GSWC’s fixed costs in aggregate. The M-WRAM tracks the difference between the revenue based on actual metered sales through a tiered volumetric rate and the revenue that would have been received with the same actual metered sales if a blended tier standard quantity rate had been in effect. The ICBA for supply costs tracks differences between the authorized per-unit prices of water production costs and actual per-unit prices of water production costs. The M-WRAM and ICBA are effective January 1, 2025.

As noted above, GSWC litigated its request for the continued use of the WRAM and MCBA. In August 2020, the CPUC had issued a decision that mandated the discontinuation of the existing WRAM used by investor-owned water utilities since 2008 that, in conjunction with tiered rates, incentivizes water conservation, and also ordered the discontinued use of the MCBA. In response to the CPUC’s order, GSWC, three other investor-owned water utilities and the California Water Association each separately filed a petition in 2021 with the California Supreme Court (the “Court”) to review the CPUC’s decision-making processes that resulted in discontinuing the use of the WRAM and MCBA. On July 8, 2024, the Court issued a ruling that set aside the previously issued order by the CPUC and vacated the portions of the CPUC’s August 2020 decision related to the discontinued use of the WRAM and MCBA used by water utilities and its accompanying findings and conclusions. Furthermore, in September 2022, the governor of California signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 1469, which allowed Class A water utilities, including GSWC, to continue requesting the use of a revenue decoupling mechanism in their next general rate case. However, despite the Court’s ruling and SB 1469, GSWC’s request to continue using the WRAM and MCBA was rejected by the CPUC and as a result, GSWC will not be able to recognize under-collections of revenue caused by fluctuations in consumption or changes in water supply cost mix beginning in 2025. However, the final decision did approve GSWC’s request for the continuation of a sales reconciliation mechanism, which would allow GSWC to adjust its sales forecast throughout the general rate case cycle to address significant fluctuations in consumption.

Finally, included in the consolidated results for 2024 is a tax benefit of $5 million, or $0.13 per share, resulting from the final decision that adopted a settlement agreement, which excluded from customer rates certain excess deferred income tax balances generated by activities outside of ratemaking that were previously recorded as regulatory liabilities as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. Because of the final CPUC decision, and the alternate proposed decision received in December 2024, both of which approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, GSWC recorded the tax benefit in 2024 to reflect a change in estimate that decreased its regulatory liabilities associated with excess deferred income tax balances as of December 31, 2024.

36

Table of Contents

Water General Rate Case for years 2022 - 2024

In June 2023, the CPUC adopted a final decision in GSWC’s general rate case application for all its water regions and its general office that determined new water rates for the years 2022–2024 retroactive to January 1, 2022. The impact of retroactive rates for the full year of 2022 as well as the 2023 estimated second-year rate increases have been reflected in the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.

The third-year rate increases for 2024, which were effective January 1, 2024, have been reflected in the year ended December 31, 2024 results. There was an increase in recorded water operating revenues of $22.3 million when compared to 2023, largely as a result of the third-year rate increases for 2024 that reflects, among other things, a higher revenue requirement for increases in recorded supply costs of $3.6 million, which combined is an increase of $0.36 per share, when compared to 2023, and excludes the impact of (i) retroactive rates for the full year of 2022 resulting from the final general rate case decision, and (ii) reversing the revenues subject to refund liability previously recorded in 2022 resulting from the final cost of capital decision, with both decisions received and recorded in 2023. Actual water supply costs are tracked against adopted costs in the revenue requirement, and passed through to customers on a dollar-for-dollar basis by way of the CPUC-approved water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs results in a corresponding increase in water operating revenues and has no net impact on the water segment’s profitability. Due to the delay in finalizing the previous water general rate case, water revenues billed to customers for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the period from January 1, 2023 to July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates and new 2023 rate increases went into effect on July 31, 2023. In October 2023, surcharges were implemented to recover all retroactive rate differences accumulated in memorandum accounts for the full year of 2022 and for 2023 through July 30, 2023 over 36 months. As of December 31, 2024, there is an aggregate cumulative balance of $37.7 million in CPUC-approved general rate case memorandum accounts that have been recognized as regulatory assets with a corresponding increase in water revenues.

Cost of Capital (“COC”) Proceedings

2026 COC Application

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. After receiving an extension in February 2024, GSWC’s next cost of capital application was scheduled to be filed on May 1, 2025 effective for the years 2026 - 2028. On January 14, 2025, the CPUC approved a request to defer the cost of capital application by another year. In December 2024, GSWC, along with three other investor-owned California water utilities, requested a further extension of the date by which each of them must file their cost of capital applications. The CPUC’s approval postponed this filing date by one year until May 1, 2026, with a corresponding effective date of January 1, 2027. The CPUC also approved the joint parties’ request to leave the current WCCM in place through the one-year deferral period. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.93%, based on its weighted cost of capital, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2026. The 7.93% return on rate base includes a return on equity of 10.06%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a capital structure with 57% equity and 43% debt.

2021 COC Application

On June 29, 2023, the CPUC adopted a final decision in the cost of capital proceeding effective July 31, 2023 that, among other things, allowed for the continuation of the WCCM. The WCCM adjusts the return on equity and rate of return on rate base between the three-year cost of capital proceedings only if there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points in the average of the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate as measured over the period October 1 through September 30. If there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points, the return on equity is adjusted by one half of the difference. Based on the final decision, all adjustments to rates were effective July 31, 2023. Accordingly, GSWC billed its water customers and recognized revenues for the period from January 1 through July 30, 2023 based on the previously authorized return on equity of 8.9%. After receiving the final cost of capital decision, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM and related adjustment for 2023, which increased GSWC’s 8.85% adopted return on equity in the decision to 9.36% effective July 31, 2023. For the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate increased by 139.7 basis points from the benchmark, which again triggered a WCCM adjustment and increased GSWC’s 9.36% adopted return on equity to 10.06% effective January 1, 2024.

Based on the final decision in the cost of capital proceeding issued in June 2023, all adjustments to rates were prospective and not retroactive. Following the receipt of the final decision that became effective July 31, 2023, management updated its analysis and reassessed the accounting estimates recorded to date related to GSWC’s lower cost of debt. Accordingly, during the second quarter of 2023, GSWC recorded a change in estimate that resulted in an increase to water revenues in the amount of $6.4 million, or approximately $0.13 per share, as a result of reversing its regulatory liability for revenues subject to refund that it had recorded during 2022.

37

Table of Contents

Electric General Rate Case for the years 2023–2026

On August 30, 2022, BVES filed a general rate case application that determines new electric rates for the years 2023 – 2026. On November 1, 2024, BVES, Cal Advocates, and the other intervenor in the proceeding filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the parties resolving all issues in connection with the pending general rate case. On January 16, 2025, the CPUC adopted a final decision in BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set the new electric rates retroactive to January 1, 2023 and approves the settlement agreement in its entirety.

Among other things, the settlement agreement, (i) settles and adopts the revenue requirements for each of the four years 2023 through 2026, (ii) authorizes BVES to invest approximately $52.5 million in capital infrastructure included in base rates over the four-year rate cycle and at least an additional $23.1 million (plus an allowance for funds used during construction, or “AFUDC”) to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when the projects are completed; (iii) adopts a cost of capital that increases BVES’s adopted return on equity from 9.6% to 10.0%, lowers the cost of debt from 6.6% to 5.51%, and maintains the capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, and (iv) approves for recovery the requested capital expenditures and other incremental operating costs already incurred in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were previously not included in customer rates.

Because of receiving a proposed decision in December 2024 followed by a final decision in January 2025, both of which approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, the impact of retroactive rates for the full year of 2023 and the 2024 second-year rate increases have been reflected in the 2024 fourth quarter results as it became probable that the approved retroactive rates for 2023 and 2024 would be permitted to be billed to customers in the future. The new rates are expected to go into effect on March 1, 2025. BVES was also authorized by the CPUC to establish a general rate case memorandum account that made the new rates retroactive to January 1, 2023. Due to the delay in finalizing the electric general rate case, billed electric revenues for the years of 2023 and 2024, were based on 2022 adopted rates. The general rate case memorandum account tracks the revenue differences between the 2022 adopted rates and the 2023 and 2024 new rates authorized by the CPUC for future recovery. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2024, an aggregate cumulative under-collection amount of $9.8 million in retroactive revenues related to the full year of 2023 and 2024 was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2024 along with a corresponding increase to BVES’s regulatory assets for future recovery from customers. Within 90 days from the effective date of the final decision, BVES will file for recovery of retroactive amounts accumulated related to the new rates, as well as recovery of incremental operating costs incurred prior to 2023 in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were being tracked in memorandum accounts prior to the new rate cycle.

As a result of reflecting the new rates in 2024 retroactive to January 1, 2023, there was an increase in 2024 recorded electric revenues of $9.8 million when compared to 2023 largely reflecting the new customer rates for 2023 and 2024 that, for this approved rate cycle cover, among other things, the growth in rate base and the higher operating costs as settled in the revenue requirement including those related to BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that prior to 2023 were previously not included in customer rates and not expensed because they were being tracked in memorandum accounts. The increase in recorded revenues was largely offset by higher operating expenses and interest costs to support, among other things, BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans including investing in capital all of which is dedicated to improving the system safety and reliability for the community it serves. The final decision will also provide for an increase in adopted operating revenues of $2.2 million for 2025 and $3.3 million in 2026. The rate increases for 2024 - 2026 are not subject to an earnings test. Furthermore, the previously mentioned advice letter projects of at least $23.1 million are expected to generate additional annual operating revenues of approximately $3 million when the respective projects are completed, placed in service, and filed for recovery in customer rates. These projects also accrue AFUDC during construction that will further increase the revenue requirement. In the settlement agreement, the parties agreed to remove portions of the requested capital budgets from rates until they were completed and placed in service. For all of the advice letter projects, BVES will be allowed to accrue AFUDC during the construction period at the adopted rate of return, which will be added to the cost of the assets and recovered in customer rates when the assets are placed in service.

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm fixed-price contract, additional firm fixed-price contracts, task order agreements and subcontracts with third party prime contractors on military bases. Currently, ASUS has one subsidiary that has entered into a task order agreement with the U.S. government that has a term of 15 years. The contract price for each of the contracts and recurring task order agreements is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on annual economic price adjustments, and new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors. ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served.

38

Table of Contents

During 2024, ASUS has been awarded approximately $56.5 million in new construction projects for completion beginning in 2024 through 2027. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contracts, additional contracts thereafter with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

In August and September of 2023, ASUS was awarded new contracts with the U.S. government to serve two military bases for which operations began in April 2024. After completion of the transition periods, ASUS began operating the water and wastewater utility systems at Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland under a 50-year privatization contract with the U.S. government and at Joint Base Cape Cod in Massachusetts under a 15-year contract with the U.S. government. The initial value of its contract at Naval Air Station Patuxent River was estimated at approximately $349 million over a 50-year period and is subject to annual economic price adjustments. In July 2024, the estimated contract value was increased to $378 million after an inventory adjustment. Under its contract at Joint Base Cape Cod, ASUS performs work through the annual issuance of task orders by the U.S. government over a 15-year period up to a maximum value to ASUS of $75.0 million, subject to adjustments as task orders are issued. In April 2024, the U.S. government awarded a task order to ASUS valued at $4.1 million for the first year of operation, maintenance, and renewal and replacement services of the water and wastewater systems at Joint Base Cape Cod.

39

Table of Contents

Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share by business segment and for the parent company:

Diluted Earnings per Share
Year Ended
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGE
Water$2.51$2.77$(0.26)
Electric0.210.200.01
Contracted services0.550.500.05
AWR (parent)(0.10)(0.10)
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as recorded (GAAP)3.173.36(0.19)
Adjustments to GAAP measure:
Impact of retroactive rates related to the full year of 2022 from the decision in the water general rate case*(0.38)0.38
Impact related to the final cost of capital decision*(0.13)0.13
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)*$3.17$2.85$0.32
Water diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)*$2.51$2.26$0.25

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

* All adjustments to 2023’s recorded diluted earnings per share relate to the water segment. The water segment’s adjusted earnings for 2023 exclude both the impact of the final decision in the water general rate case that included retroactive rates related to the full year of 2022 and the impact of reversing previously recorded estimated 2022 revenues subject to refund as a result of the final cost of capital decision issued in June 2023 that made all adjustments to rates prospective. Both adjustments are shown separately in the table above.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, AWR’s recorded consolidated diluted earnings were $3.17 per share, as compared to $3.36 per share for 2023, a decrease of $0.19 per share, which includes: (i) the impact from the final decision in the water general rate case recorded in 2023 that included retroactive new rates related to the full 2022 year of $0.38 per share, and (ii) the impact of the final cost of capital decision that resulted in the reversal during the year ended December 31, 2023 of estimated revenues subject to refund recorded in 2022 of $6.4 million, or $0.13 per share. Excluding these two items from 2023, adjusted consolidated diluted earnings would be $2.85 per share for 2023 as compared to adjusted and recorded diluted earnings of $3.17 per share for 2024, an adjusted increase of $0.32 per share.

Furthermore, included in the consolidated results for 2024 was a tax benefit of $5 million, or $0.13 per share, resulting from the final decision issued by the CPUC on January 30, 2025 in connection with GSWC’s recent general rate case proceeding. The final decision adopted a settlement agreement between GSWC and Cal Advocates, which excluded from customer rates certain excess deferred income tax balances generated by activities outside of ratemaking that were previously recorded as regulatory liabilities as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. Because of the final CPUC decision, and the alternate proposed decision received in December 2024, both of which approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, GSWC recorded the tax benefit to reflect a change in estimate that decreased its regulatory liabilities associated with excess deferred income tax balances as of December 31, 2024. In addition, AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings in 2024 were negatively impacted by approximately $0.04 per share due to the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program.

The following is a computation and reconciliation of diluted earnings per share from the measure of net income (loss) by business segment as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to AWR’s consolidated fully diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

WaterElectricContracted ServicesAWR (Parent)Consolidated (GAAP)
In 000's except per share amounts2024202320242023202420232024202320242023
Net income (loss) (Note 17)$94,463$102,708$7,754$7,479$20,642$18,596$(3,591)$(3,862)$119,268$124,921
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares37,58337,07737,58337,07737,58337,07737,58337,07737,58337,077
Diluted earnings per share$2.51$2.77$0.21$0.20$0.55$0.50$(0.10)$(0.10)$3.17$3.36

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

40

Table of Contents

Water Segment:

For the year ended December 31, 2024, recorded diluted earnings from the water utility segment were $2.51 per share, as compared to $2.77 per share for 2023, a decrease of $0.26 per share, which includes: (i) the impact from the final decision in the water general rate case recorded in 2023 that included retroactive new rates related to the full 2022 year of $0.38 per share, and (ii) the impact of the final cost of capital decision that resulted in the reversal of estimated water revenues subject to refund previously recorded in 2022 of $6.4 million, or $0.13 per share. Excluding the impact of these two items from 2023, adjusted diluted earnings at the water segment would be $2.26 per share for 2023 as compared to adjusted and recorded diluted earnings of $2.51 per share for 2024, an adjusted net increase at the water segment of $0.25 per share due primarily to the following items:

•Excluding the revenue impact related to 2022 resulting from the decisions in both the general rate case and cost of capital proceedings recorded for the year ended December 31, 2023 as previously discussed, there was an increase in water operating revenues of approximately $22.3 million mainly as a result of the third-year rate increases that went into effect on January 1, 2024, as well as an increase in GSWC’s return on rate base in 2024 compared to 2023 resulting from the final cost of capital proceeding received in June 2023 that allowed for the continuation of the WCCM as previously discussed.

•An increase in water supply costs of $3.6 million, which consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs is primarily related to an increase in customer water usage, wholesale water prices and water production costs. During 2024 and 2023, actual water supply costs were tracked against adopted costs in the revenue requirement, and passed through to customers on a dollar-for-dollar basis by way of the CPUC-approved water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs results in a corresponding increase in water operating revenues and has no material impact on the water segment’s profitability.

•An overall increase in operating expenses of $8.9 million (excluding supply costs) mainly due to increases in (i) overall labor costs and other employee-related benefits, (ii) administrative and general expenses resulting largely from higher outside-services costs related to the general rate case application and other regulatory filings, and an increase in insurance-related costs, and (iii) depreciation and amortization expenses as well as property taxes, both of which are impacted by the increasing capital expenditures and are reflected and recovered in customer rates. These increases were partially offset by decreases in other operation-related and maintenance expenses.

•An overall increase in interest expense (net of interest income) of $6.5 million resulting primarily from an increase in interest rates, as well as an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditure programs at GSWC.

•An overall increase in other income (net of other expense) of $1.4 million due primarily to a change in the non-service cost components related to GSWC’s benefit plans resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions including expected returns on plan assets. However, as a result of GSWC’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefits costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings.

•An overall decrease in the effective income tax rate due to (i) a tax benefit of $5 million, or $0.13 per share, resulting from the final decision in GSWC’s latest general rate case proceeding as previously discussed, and (ii) changes in certain flowed-through income taxes and permanent items included in GSWC’s income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023 that favorably impacted the water segment's earnings. As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as being flowed-through in computing its income tax expense consistent with the income tax method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction rate making. Changes in the magnitude of flowed-through items either increase or decrease tax expense, thereby affecting diluted earnings per share.

•A decrease in earnings of approximately $0.03 per share due to the dilutive effects from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program. Under the program, AWR may offer and sell its Common Shares, with an aggregate gross offering price of up to $200 million, from time to time at its sole discretion. Through December 31, 2024, AWR has sold 1,145,219 Common Shares through this ATM offering program.

41

Table of Contents

Electric Segment:

Diluted earnings from the electric utility segment increased $0.01 per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023. On January 16, 2025, the CPUC adopted a final decision in connection with BVES’s general rate case proceeding that set new rates for 2023 – 2026, with new electric rates retroactive to January 1, 2023. As a result of receiving the final decision, the impact from retroactive rates for the full year of 2023 and from the second-year rate increases through the year ended December 31, 2024 have been reflected in the 2024 fourth quarter results. The new rates resulted in an increase in electric revenues that supports, among other things, the growth in rate base and higher operating costs related to BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that were previously not included in customer rates and not expensed because they were being tracked in memorandum accounts. The increase in electric revenues in 2024 compared to 2023 was largely offset by higher operating expenses and interest costs to support, among other things, BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans including investing in capital all of which is dedicated to improving the system safety and reliability for the community it serves.

Contracted Services Segment:

Diluted earnings from the contracted services segment increased $0.05 per share for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 2023, largely due to an increase in management fee revenues resulting from the commencement of operation at the new bases (Naval Air Station Patuxent River and Joint Base Cape Cod) and the resolution of various economic price adjustments, partially offset by higher overall operating expenses (excluding construction expenses) from the new bases as compared to 2023, and a decrease in earnings of approximately $0.01 per share due to the dilutive effects on ASUS from the issuance of equity under AWR’s ATM offering program.

AWR (Parent):

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the diluted loss from AWR (parent) is consistent compared to 2023.

The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 provide information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVES and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

42

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water$417,410$433,473$(16,063)-3.7%
Electric51,64541,8329,81323.5%
Contracted services126,404120,3946,0105.0%
Total operating revenues595,459595,699(240)%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased74,27472,8641,4101.9%
Power purchased for pumping15,02512,8292,19617.1%
Groundwater production assessment24,14520,8503,29515.8%
Power purchased for resale11,63013,275(1,645)-12.4%
Supply cost balancing accounts(1,894)12,118(14,012)-115.6%
Other operation41,31840,2711,0472.6%
Administrative and general100,94188,27312,66814.4%
Depreciation and amortization43,64742,4031,2442.9%
Maintenance20,25514,2186,03742.5%
Property and other taxes27,09124,0463,04512.7%
ASUS construction54,54457,912(3,368)-5.8%
Gain on sale of assets(100)100-100.0%
Total operating expenses410,976398,95912,0173.0%
OPERATING INCOME184,483196,740(12,257)-6.2%
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense(50,382)(42,762)(7,620)17.8%
Interest income7,8747,4164586.2%
Other, net7,4665,1262,34045.6%
(35,042)(30,220)(4,822)16.0%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE149,441166,520(17,079)-10.3%
Income tax expense30,17341,599(11,426)-27.5%
NET INCOME$119,268$124,921$(5,653)-4.5%
Basic earnings per Common Share$3.17$3.37$(0.20)-5.9%
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share$3.17$3.36$(0.19)-5.7%

43

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

General

GSWC and BVES rely upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plants. ASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. Current operating revenues and earnings may be negatively impacted if ASUS’s subsidiaries do not receive adequate price adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of construction projects at its subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Water

For the year ended December 31, 2024, revenues from water operations decreased by $16.1 million to $417.4 million, compared to 2023. The decrease in water revenues was largely due to the impact of retroactive rates related to the full 2022 year resulting from the general rate case decision of approximately $32 million and the impact of the final cost of capital decision that resulted in the reversal of $6.4 million of revenues subject to refund previously recorded in 2022, with both decisions received and recorded in 2023. The increase to revenues from both of these items recorded in 2023 did not recur in 2024 and was partially offset by an increase in water revenues resulting from the third-year rate increases that went into effect on January 1, 2024, and an increase in water revenues as a result of a higher return on rate base in 2024 compared to 2023 resulting from the final cost of capital proceeding received in June 2023 that allowed for the continuation of the WCCM as previously discussed.

Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2024 was higher by 4.5% compared to 2023 due primarily to lower amounts of seasonal precipitation and higher temperatures in the summer months for 2024 compared to 2023. Changes in consumption have not had a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM that has been in place in all but one small rate-making area. During 2024 and 2023, GSWC recorded the difference between what it bills its water customers and what is authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities.

Electric

Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased $9.8 million to $51.6 million due, in large part, to the final decision in the electric general rate case proceeding that set rates for 2023 - 2026, and was retroactive to January 1, 2023. The retroactive revenues for the full year of 2023 and the second-year increases for 2024 have been reflected in 2024 as previously discussed.

Electric usage for the year ended December 31, 2024 was consistent with 2023. Due to the CPUC-approved Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.

Contracted Services

Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For the year ended December 31, 2024, revenues from contracted services increased $6.0 million to $126.4 million as compared to $120.4 million for 2023. The increase was largely due to an increase in management fee revenue from the commencement of operations at the new bases and the resolution of annual economic price adjustments, partially offset by lower overall construction activity resulting from timing differences of when construction work was performed in 2024 as compared to the same period in 2023.

ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2024, ASUS was awarded approximately $56.5 million in new construction projects for completion in 2024 through 2027. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contracts and additional contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

Operating Expenses:

Supply Costs

Total supply costs at the regulated utilities comprise the largest segment of total consolidated operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for 30.0% and 33.1% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

44

Table of Contents

Water segment supply costs

Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were 41% and 43%. The decrease in the actual percentage of purchased water resulted primarily from wells coming back on-line that had previously been out of service.

Under the CPUC-approved MCBA, GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses as a regulatory asset or liability. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances.  GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area. Without the MCBA mechanism in place beginning in 2025, there may be volatility to Registrant’s earnings as a result of changes in water supply cost mix. However, the MCBA will be replaced with an incremental supply cost balancing account that will not include changes in water supply cost mix, but will allow GSWC to track differences between the authorized per-unit prices of water production costs and actual per-unit prices of water production costs.

Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, water supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water purchased$74,274$72,864$1,4101.9%
Power purchased for pumping15,02512,8292,19617.1%
Groundwater production assessment24,14520,8503,29515.8%
Water supply cost balancing accounts *(1,621)13,839(15,460)-111.7%
Total water supply costs$111,823$120,382$(8,559)-7.1%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(1.9) million and $12.1 million for 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 2024 increased to $74.3 million as compared to $72.9 million for 2023 primarily due to increases in wholesale water costs, partially offset by a reduction in purchased water resulting from wells coming back on-line. There was an overall increase in well production costs compared to 2023 due to an increase in customer water usage, which increases power purchased for pumping and groundwater production assessments. The increases to water production costs were also a result of increases in electricity provider rates and increases in pump tax rates.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the water supply cost balancing account had a $1.6 million under-collection as compared to a $13.8 million over-collection in 2023. The change in water supply cost balancing accounts was primarily due to updated adopted supply costs from the final decision in the previous water general rate case proceeding recorded in 2023. The over-collection recorded in 2023 included the full year impact of 2022 that reflected the new adopted supply costs retroactive to January 1, 2022.

Electric segment supply costs

Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, electric supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Power purchased for resale$11,630$13,275$(1,645)-12.4%
Electric supply cost balancing account *(273)(1,721)1,448-84.1%
Total electric supply costs$11,357$11,554$(197)-1.7%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(1.9) million and $12.1 million for 2024 and 2023, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES’s customers decreased to $11.6 million as compared to $13.3 million for 2023 primarily due to lower overall average prices per megawatt-hour. The change in the electric supply balancing account in 2024 when compared to 2023 is also due to decreases in energy prices.

45

Table of Contents

Other Operation

The primary components of other operation expenses include payroll costs, materials and supplies, chemicals and water treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices.  Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$28,349$29,064$(715)-2.5%
Electric Services3,4244,057(633)-15.6%
Contracted Services9,5457,1502,39533.5%
Total other operation$41,318$40,271$1,0472.6%

For the year ended December 31, 2024, the decrease in other operation expenses at the water segment was due primarily to a reduction of $2.0 million as a result of receiving the final decision in the recent water general rate case that authorized the recovery of previously incurred operation-related costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts and which became probable of future recovery; partially offset by higher operation-related labor, as well as bad debt expense due to COVID relief funds for past due bills recorded in 2023 that did not recur in 2024.

The decrease at the electric segment was due primarily to an overall decrease in surcharges billed to customers for the recovery of previously incurred costs, which had a corresponding decrease in other operation expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. The decrease was largely due to the expiration of a surcharge as a result of fully recovering incremental costs previously tracked in a memorandum account that arose from the impact of a winter storm in 2018.

The increase at the contracted services segment was due primarily to the operations at the new bases, higher operation-related labor costs, and water treatment and other related costs.

Administrative and General

Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$64,510$59,313$5,1978.8%
Electric Services13,2418,7454,49651.4%
Contracted Services23,18320,4312,75213.5%
AWR (parent)7(216)223*
Total administrative and general$100,941$88,273$12,66814.4%

* not meaningful

Administrative and general expenses increased at the water segment due, in large part, to higher outside-services costs incurred in connection with the water general rate case application and other regulatory filings, labor and employee-related expenses, and insurance-related costs. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2023, there was a reduction of approximately $0.4 million recorded to reflect the final decision issued in June 2023 on the prior water general rate case proceeding that authorized the recovery of previously incurred administrative and general expenses that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts.

Administrative and general expenses increased at the electric segment primarily due to the approval of the final decision in the electric general rate case proceeding with rates retroactive to January 1, 2023. The new electric rates for 2023 and 2024 included the recovery of higher (i) costs incurred in 2023 and 2024 related to wildfire mitigation activities that were temporarily deferred and recorded as regulatory assets through the third quarter of 2023 while awaiting the general rate case decision and which have now been expensed during the fourth quarter as they are included in the new rates, and (ii) the amortization of regulatory commission costs incurred in this proceeding; with both items retroactively included in the new electric customer rates that resulted in a combined increase in 2024 expenses of $4.3 million compared to 2023 expenses. The higher expenses are reflected and recovered in the new customer rates. The electric segment recorded an increase in revenues

46

Table of Contents

retroactive to January 1, 2023 in 2024 that offset the effects of the increased administrative and general expenses related to the decision. There was also an increase in labor costs, and legal and other outside services costs.

Administrative and general expenses increased at the contracted services segment due to the operations of the new bases, an increase in labor and employee-related costs, and insurance-related costs, partially offset by lower outside legal costs.

Administrative and general expenses at AWR (parent) during the year ended December 31, 2023 reflected the reversal of a previous accrual for a matter that was favorably resolved and did not recur in 2024.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$37,187$35,886$1,3013.6%
Electric Services3,1603,256(96)-2.9%
Contracted Services3,3003,261391.2%
Total depreciation and amortization$43,647$42,403$1,2442.9%

Depreciation and amortization expense increased at the water segment due largely to additions to utility plant recorded in 2024, partially offset by the retroactive impact for the full year of 2022 of $0.6 million recorded in 2023 as a result of receiving a final decision in the water general rate case in 2023. The overall decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses at the electric segment is primarily due to the retroactive impact of an overall lower composite depreciation rate supported by the latest depreciation study adopted in the final decision in the electric general rate case that was recorded in 2024 related to the full year of 2023 and 2024. The lower adopted depreciation expense levels from the updated study is also reflected in the new revenue requirements, resulting in no significant impact to earnings. This decrease was partially offset by additions to utility plant.

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$9,788$9,906$(118)-1.2%
Electric Services5,9019244,977*
Contracted Services4,5663,3881,17834.8%
Total maintenance$20,255$14,218$6,03742.5%

* not meaningful

Maintenance expense decreased at the water segment due to lower unplanned maintenance costs experienced in 2024 as compared to 2023.

Maintenance expense was higher at the electric segment as compared to 2023 due largely to the approval of the final decision in the electric general rate case proceeding with rates retroactive to January 1, 2023. Maintenance costs of approximately $4.7 million recorded in 2024 reflect the impact of the higher levels of vegetation management costs approved in the final decision related to the full year of 2023 and 2024 that have been included in the new retroactive customer rates. The electric segment also recorded revenues retroactive to January 1, 2023 in 2024 that offset the effects of the incremental increases in maintenance costs adopted in the final decision. There was also an increase in other maintenance-related activities.

Maintenance expense was higher at the contracted services segment as compared to the same period in 2023 due to higher planned and unplanned maintenances, and maintenance activity at the new bases that was not incurred in the same period in 2023.

47

Table of Contents

Property and Other Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$22,233$19,845$2,38812.0%
Electric Services2,3992,10029914.2%
Contracted Services2,4592,10135817.0%
Total property and other taxes$27,091$24,046$3,04512.7%

Property and other taxes increased at the water segment due, in part, to a favorable property tax adjustment recorded in 2023 resulting from changes to property tax assessments of certain counties at that time, with no such adjustment occurring in 2024, as well as an increase in capital additions and related higher assessed values.

Property and other taxes increased at the electric segment due to higher property taxes resulting from capital additions and related higher assessed values.

Property and other taxes increased at the contracted services segment largely as a result of an increase in gross receipts taxes resulting from higher revenues, and an increase in payroll taxes due, in part, from the operations at the new bases.

ASUS Construction

For the year ended December 31, 2024, construction expenses for contracted services were $54.5 million, decreasing by $3.4 million compared to 2023 primarily due to an overall decrease in construction activity resulting from timing differences of when such work was performed in 2024 as compared to 2023.

Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$38,532$31,283$7,24923.2%
Electric Services3,8123,29851415.6%
Contracted Services2,1662,127391.8%
AWR (parent)5,8726,054(182)-3.0%
Total interest expense$50,382$42,762$7,62017.8%

AWR’s borrowings consist of bank notes under revolving credit facilities, while GSWC and BVES borrowings consist of revolving credit facilities and long-term debt issuances. Consolidated interest expense increased as compared to 2023 resulting primarily from an increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditures programs at the regulated utilities, as well as an overall increase in average interest rates. The overall combined average interest rates were 5.36% and 5.22% for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$6,018$5,557$4618.3%
Electric Services9761,060(84)-7.9%
Contracted Services782806(24)-3.0%
AWR (parent)98(7)105*
Total interest income$7,874$7,416$4586.2%

* not meaningful

The increase in interest income at the water segment was due primarily to higher interest income earned on regulatory assets bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rates, which have increased compared to rates in 2023, as well as an overall higher average net regulatory assets balance recorded during 2024 compared to 2023.

48

Table of Contents

Other Income and (Expense), net

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$6,326$4,946$1,38027.9%
Electric Services96836932*
Contracted Services(82)(125)43-34.4%
AWR (parent)254269(15)-5.6%
Total interest income$7,466$5,126$2,34045.6%

* not meaningful

For the year ended December 31, 2024, other income (net of other expense) increased primarily due to a change in the non-service cost components related to the Company’s defined-benefit pension plan and other retirement benefits resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions including expected returns on plan assets. However, as a result of GSWC’s and BVES’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefit costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings. The increase in other income (net of other expense) in the electric segment also includes CPUC-authorized recovery of AFUDC on certain capital projects recorded in 2024 of $0.9 million as a result of receiving the final decision on the electric general rate case.

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202412/31/2023CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$22,869$35,689$(12,820)-35.9%
Electric Services2,5411,5151,02667.7%
Contracted Services6,6996,1095909.7%
AWR (parent)(1,936)(1,714)(222)13.0%
Total income tax expense$30,173$41,599$(11,426)-27.5%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2024 decreased by $11.4 million primarily due to a decrease in consolidated pretax income and a tax benefit of $5 million recorded at GSWC in 2024 as a result of receiving a final decision in the latest water general rate proceeding as previously discussed. AWR’s ETRs were 20.2% and 25.0% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. GSWC’s ETR was 19.5% for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to 25.8% for 2023, which fluctuated due to the tax benefit discussed above and changes in certain flowed-through income taxes and permanent items.

Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the headings “Summary Results by Segment” and “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC.

49

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC and BVES operate extensively in regulated businesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.

Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC and BVES. When either files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s operations are no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, they are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s assets are not recoverable in customer rates, management is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.  Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event that management’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC disallows costs included in the ratemaking process.

Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.

Revenue Recognition — GSWC and BVES record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.  Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.

In 2008, the CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms through the adoption of the WRAM.  With the adoption of this alternative revenue program, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM for the difference between what is billed to its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC. GSWC’s request, in its most recent general rate case, to continue using a revenue decoupling mechanism, similar to the WRAM, has been denied by the CPUC. The CPUC has ordered GSWC to transition to a modified rate adjustment mechanism (a Monterey-style WRAM or “M-WRAM”) effective January 1, 2025. The M-WRAM tracks the difference between the revenue based on actual metered sales through a tiered volumetric rate and the revenue that would have been received with the same actual metered sales if a blended tier standard quantity rate had been in effect. The CPUC also granted BVES a revenue decoupling mechanism through the BRRAM. BVES adjusts revenues in the BRRAM for the difference between what is billed to its electric customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC.

As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC and BVES are required to collect their WRAM and BRRAM balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period. This can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.

ASUS’s firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and

50

Table of Contents

Equipment on AWR’s consolidated balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS’s operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts thereafter. Revenues from construction activities are recognized as performance obligations are satisfied. Performance obligations related to firm-fixed-price contracts are satisfied over time as ASUS’s performance typically creates or enhances an asset that the U.S. government controls. ASUS recognizes revenue on its firm-fixed-price contracts as performance obligations are satisfied and control of the promised good and/or service is transferred to the U.S. government by measuring the progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation(s) using an input method. Revenues for construction activities are recognized over time, with progress toward completion measured based on the input method using costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs (cost-to-cost method). Due to the nature of these construction projects, ASUS has determined the cost-to-cost input measurement to be the best method to measure progress towards satisfying its construction contract performance obligations, as compared to using an output measurement such as units produced. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.

Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVES, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.

As regulated utilities, GSWC and BVES treat certain temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments in computing their income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flowed-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVES were not required to account for their income taxes as regulated enterprises. As of December 31, 2024, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.

Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers’ accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions. Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense. To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan’s assets was 6.00% and 5.75% for 2024 and 2023, respectively.

For the pension plan obligation, Registrant increased the discount rate to 5.70% as of December 31, 2024 from 5.16% as of December 31, 2023 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2024. A hypothetical 25-basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have decreased total net periodic pension expense for 2024 by approximately $0.1 million, which includes an increase in service cost that was more than offset by the decrease in interest cost, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2024 by a total of $5.5 million.  A 25-basis point decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 2024 pension cost by approximately $0.5 million.

In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status.  Changes in market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, a decrease in the overfunded position, and increase the required future contributions.

51

Table of Contents

The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVES to each maintain a two-way balancing account to track differences between their forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs. As of December 31, 2024, GSWC has a $1.7 million over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account for the general office and water regions. As of December 31, 2024, BVES has an insignificant balance in its two-way pension balancing account.

Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations. In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 2025, the pension contribution is expected to be approximately $3.4 million. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts. Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.

Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension plan.  Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan instead of the pension plan.

52

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR

AWR’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund construction programs at its regulated utilities and if market interest rates increase. In addition, as the capital investment program continues to increase, AWR and its subsidiaries anticipate they will need to access external financing more often. External financing may also be needed to cover costs incurred in connection with capital investments that are not covered in rates due to delays in obtaining approval of general rate cases by the CPUC.

AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVES to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $805.8 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2024. Approximately $102.1 million was available for BVES to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2024. ASUS’s ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in which each ASUS subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS’s ability to pay dividends under California law.

When necessary, AWR obtains funds from external sources through the capital markets and from bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets.

On February 27, 2024, AWR entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement with third-party sales agents, under which AWR may offer and sell Common Shares, from time to time at its sole discretion, through an ATM offering program having an aggregate gross offering price of up to $200 million over a three-year period and pursuant to AWR’s effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3. AWR intends to use the net proceeds from these sales, after deducting commissions on such sales and offering expenses, for general corporate purposes, including, but not limited to, repayment of debt and making equity contributions to its subsidiaries. During 2024, AWR sold 1,145,219 Common Shares through this ATM offering program and raised proceeds of $89.5 million, net of $1.4 million in commissions paid under the terms of the Equity Distribution Agreement. As of December 31, 2024, approximately $109.1 million remained available for sale under the ATM offering program.

In June 2023, AWR and GSWC each entered into credit agreements with a term of five years provided by a syndicate of banks and financial institutions. Both credit agreements will mature in June 2028. The credit agreements provide AWR and GSWC unsecured revolving credit facilities with current borrowing capacities of $165.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. Under the terms of the credit agreements, the borrowing capacities for AWR and GSWC may be expanded up to an additional $60.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively, subject to the lenders’ approval. AWR’s credit facility primarily provides support to AWR (parent) and ASUS, while GSWC’s credit agreement provides support to its water operations and capital expenditures. AWR’s and GSWC’s outstanding borrowings under the new credit facilities were $120.0 million and $124.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2024. The CPUC requires GSWC to completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period after which GSWC may again borrow under its facility. GSWC’s pay-off period for its credit facility ends in June 2025. Accordingly, GSWC’s outstanding borrowings under its credit facility as of December 31, 2024 have been classified as current liabilities in both AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet and GSWC’s Balance Sheet.

GSWC expects to issue long-term debt and/or equity in 2025 to facilitate the pay-off of its credit facility. Under the current financing application authorized by the CPUC, GSWC does not have any remaining funds available for the issuance of long-term financing. On January 22, 2024, GSWC filed a new financing application with the CPUC, pending approval, that requests authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $750.0 million. A proposed decision has yet to be issued by the CPUC in GSWC’s new financing application as of the date of this filing. If an approval is not received soon, GSWC will file a request with the CPUC to extend its 24-month pay-off period past the June 2025 deadline while it awaits a final decision from the CPUC on its financing application that will enable GSWC to issue the necessary long-term financing to pay-off its borrowings under the credit facility.

On June 5, 2024, GSWC completed the issuance of $65.0 million in unsecured private placement notes with a coupon rate of 5.50%, maturing on June 5, 2027. GSWC used the proceeds from the private placement notes to pay down outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and to fund its operations and capital expenditures. Interest payments are due semiannually on June 5 and December 5 each year, commencing December 5, 2024. The private placement notes rank equally with GSWC’s other unsecured and unsubordinated debt. GSWC may, at its option, redeem all or portions of the notes at any time upon written notice, subject to payment of a make-whole premium. The covenant requirements under these private placement notes are similar to the terms of other private placement notes issued by GSWC.

53

Table of Contents

On December 30, 2024, GSWC issued 2.7586 Common Shares to AWR for total proceeds of approximately $40.0 million. GSWC used the proceeds from the stock issuance to pay down outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and to fund its operations and capital expenditures.

BVES has a separate revolving credit facility without a parent guaranty that supports its electric operations and capital expenditures with a current borrowing capacity of $65.0 million that matures on July 1, 2026. Currently, the credit agreement provides BVES an option to increase the borrowing capacity of the facility by an additional $10.0 million. BVES’s revolving credit facility is considered a short-term debt arrangement by the CPUC. Therefore, pursuant to the CPUC’s requirements, borrowings under this credit facility are required to be fully paid off within a 24-month period, after which, BVES may borrow under the credit facility again. BVES’s extended pay-off period as approved by the CPUC was set to end on May 1, 2025. On August 1, 2024, the CPUC issued a final decision in BVES’s financing application, which among other things, approved BVES’s request to issue up to $120 million of new long-term debt and equity securities. As a result of receiving approval of the new financing application, on February 12, 2025, BVES completed the issuance of $50.0 million in unsecured private-placement notes with a coupon rate of 6.12% maturing on February 12, 2030. BVES used the proceeds from the notes to pay down all amounts under its revolving credit facility outstanding at the time of issuing the notes. As a result of refinancing the outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility with 5-year term notes, as of December 31, 2024 the outstanding balance under BVES’s credit facility of $45.0 million has been classified as a non-current liability in AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. Furthermore, in September 2024, BVES issued eleven Common Shares to AWR for total proceeds of $22.0 million. BVES used the proceeds from the stock issuance to pay down outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility and to fund its operations and capital expenditures.

Our primary sources of liquidity to fund operations continue to be from the recovery of costs charged to customers at our regulated utilities and the collection of payments from the U.S government. We believe that capital investment costs associated with our capital programs at our regulated utilities will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers, as well as funds from credit facilities from our regulated utilities. In addition, AWR’s credit facility will continue to be used to support ASUS’s operations and AWR (parent). The long-term capital-intensive nature of our regulated utilities have required us to continually seek future financing opportunities beyond the short-term. Future long-term financing at GSWC and BVES will consist of both long-term debt and equity issuances in order to manage to the CPUC-authorized capital structure. Under the current financing applications authorized by the CPUC, BVES has $88.0 million remaining available that provides for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities, which are expected to be used over the next 2-5 years to pay down outstanding borrowings under the respective credit facilities and support its operations. As previously discussed, GSWC awaits a final decision from the CPUC on its new financing application that would provide authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $750.0 million expected to be used over the next 1-5 years.

Management believes that AWR’s and GSWC’s sound capital structures and strong credit ratings, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case AWR may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.

AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. On February 4, 2025, AWR’s Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.4655 per share on AWR’s Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 3, 2025 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 18, 2025. AWR has paid common dividends every year since 1931, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 70 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. AWR’s quarterly dividend rate has grown at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 8.8% over the last five years through 2024 and has achieved a 10-year CAGR of 8.0% in its calendar year dividend payments through 2024. AWR’s current policy is to achieve a CAGR in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVES, and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. AWR’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on its customers’ ability to pay utility bills; and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the

54

Table of Contents

construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases, and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.

ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under long-term contracts with the U.S. government for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS’s subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or other subsidiaries of ASUS.

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and deferred income taxes. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities of AWR was $198.7 million for 2024 as compared to $67.7 million for 2023. The increase in operating cash flow was largely due to the implementation of new CPUC-approved billed water rates and surcharges at GSWC during the second-half of 2023 as a result of receiving the final CPUC decision in June 2023 on in the previous water general rate case proceeding. With the delay in receiving the water general rate case decision at the time, billed water revenues in 2023 through July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates pending a final CPUC decision, while operating expenses continued to rise primarily due to inflation and increasing costs in complying with water quality regulations. GSWC filed for the implementation of the CPUC-approved rate increases that went into effect in July 2023. GSWC also filed for the recovery of retroactive rate amounts accumulated through July 30, 2023 related to the CPUC approved rate increases for 2022 and 2023. Surcharges were implemented in October 2023 to recover the cumulative retroactive rate differences over 36-months. Furthermore, in March 2024, as a result of the Extended Arrearage Program, GSWC received $3.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the State of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic. There were no similar relief funds received during 2023. Finally, a 4.5% increase in billed water consumption also contributed to the increase in operating cash flows.

In addition, the increase in cash flows from operating activities resulted from differences at ASUS in the timing of vendor payments and the receipt of cash for construction work at military bases. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work.

These increases in operating cash flows discussed above were partially offset by differences in the timing of income tax payments between the two periods. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $232.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to $188.8 million in 2023, which is mostly related to capital expenditures at the regulated utilities that are consistent with capital budgets approved in the general rate case proceedings. AWR invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, while working with the CPUC to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. AWR’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs (to replace infrastructure, including those to mitigate wildfire risk) and major capital investment projects (to construct new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities). The regulated utilities may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.

During 2025, the regulated utilities’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $170 – $210 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

AWR’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares, (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to financial institutions, (iii) the proceeds from unsecured new or existing revolving credit facilities for AWR, GSWC and BVES, and (iv) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, GSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Borrowings on AWR’s new credit facility is used to support AWR (parent) and its contracted services subsidiary, and borrowings on GSWC’s and BVES’s credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVES capital programs, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. AWR may also from time to time make equity contributions to GSWC and BVES. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by the regulated utilities.

55

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by financing activities was $46.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to cash provided of $129.2 million for 2023. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities in 2024 was due primarily to a decrease in total new borrowings required in 2024 as compared to 2023 due, in large part, to an increase in cash flows from operating activities. In January 2023, GSWC issued $130.0 million of unsecured notes in a private placement and used the proceeds to pay down the majority of its outstanding intercompany borrowings from AWR at that time, which in turn used the proceeds to pay down outstanding borrowings under its credit facility. In June 2024, GSWC completed the issuance of $65.0 million in unsecured private placement notes. The proceeds from the private placement notes were used by GSWC for general corporate purposes including the repayment of outstanding borrowings under its credit facility and the support of its operations and capital expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2024, AWR had net payments on its credit facilities of $44.5 million, while during the year ended December 31, 2023, AWR had net borrowings on its credit facilities of $54.6 million. Credit facilities have been used to support operations and capital expenditures. In addition, during 2024, AWR sold 1,145,219 Common Shares through its ATM offering program and raised proceeds of $89.5 million, net of $1.4 million in commissions paid under the terms of the Equity Distribution Agreement.

GSWC

GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends to AWR on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers. Internal cash flows have also been impacted by delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers due to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources for long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments from its parent, AWR, to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. On June 28, 2023, GSWC executed its own separate credit agreement that provides for a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to support GSWC’s operations and capital expenditures. GSWC’s borrowing capacity under this credit agreement may be expanded up to an additional $75.0 million, subject to the lenders’ approval.

The CPUC requires GSWC to pay-off all intercompany borrowings it has from AWR within a 24-month period. GSWC’s borrowings under its credit facility will be required to be paid-off in full within a 24-month period after which GSWC may continue to borrow under its facility. GSWC’s next pay-off period ends in June 2025. On December 30, 2024, GSWC issued 2.7586 Common Shares to AWR for total proceeds of approximately $40.0 million. After this issuance, under the current financing application authorized by the CPUC, GSWC has no remaining authorized funds that provides for long-term financing. On January 22, 2024, GSWC filed a new financing application with the CPUC, pending approval, that requests the authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $750.0 million. A proposed decision has yet to be issued by the CPUC in GSWC’s new financing application as of the date of this filing. If an approval is not received soon, GSWC will file a request with the CPUC to extend its 24-month pay-off period past the June 2025 deadline while it awaits a final decision from the CPUC on its new financing application that will enable GSWC to issue the necessary long-term financing to pay-off its borrowings under the credit facility.

GSWC also receives advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $158.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to $54.3 million for 2023. The increase in operating cash flow was largely due to the implementation of new CPUC-approved billed water rates and surcharges during the second-half of 2023 as a result of receiving the final water general rate case decision in June 2023. Also, in March 2024, as a result of the Extended Arrearage Program, GSWC received $3.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the State of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic, with no similar relief funds received during 2023. The increase in cash flow was also due to a 4.5% increase in billed water consumption and the timing of vendor payments. These increases in operating cash flows were partially offset by differences in the timing of income tax payments between two periods. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

56

Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $198.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to $162.2 million for 2023, which is mostly related to spending under GSWC’s infrastructure investment plans that are consistent with capital budgets authorized in its general rate cases.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $48.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 as compared to $110.6 million for 2023.  The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities in 2024 was due primarily to a decrease in total new borrowings required to support water operations and capital expenditures program at GSWC as a result of an increase in cash flows from operating activities.

In January 2023, GSWC issued $130.0 million of unsecured notes in a private placement and $10.0 million of equity to AWR. GSWC used the proceeds from both issuances to pay-off all of its outstanding intercompany borrowings from AWR at that time. In June 2023, GSWC executed its own separate credit agreement that it began using to support its water operations and capital expenditures program. On June 5, 2024, GSWC completed the issuance of $65.0 million in unsecured private placement notes and used the proceeds for general corporate purposes including the repayment of a portion of the outstanding borrowings under its credit facility and support of its operations and capital expenditures. In addition, in December 2024, GSWC issued approximately $40.0 million of equity to AWR. Finally, GSWC paid $35.1 million in dividends to AWR during 2024 as compared to $55.4 million during 2023.

57

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2024. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract and additional firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

Payments/Commitments Due (1)
($ in thousands)TotalLess than 1 Year
Notes/Debentures (2)$187,000$
Private Placement Notes (3)445,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)9,537143
Other Debt Instruments (5)2,356242
Total AWR Long-Term Debt$643,893$385
Credit Facilities (6)$289,000$124,000
Interest on Long-Term Debt (7)255,60932,153
Advances for Construction (8)73,5253,714
Renewable Energy Credit Agreements (9)8,948335
Purchased Power Contracts (10)41,1163,736
Capital Expenditures (11)96,62390,240
Water Purchase Agreements (12)2,294459
Operating Leases (13)9,2852,422
Employer Contributions (14)3,4003,400
SUB-TOTAL779,800260,459
Other Commitments (15)11,655
TOTAL$1,435,348$260,844

(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.

(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.

(3) Consists of GSWC senior private placement notes of $410.0 million and BVES unsecured private placement notes of $35.0 million, totaling $445.0 million issued to various banks and financial institutions. GSWC's most recent private placement notes include $130.0 million issued in January 2023 and $65.0 million issued in June 2024. Under the terms of each of the senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. BVES amended its term loan agreement related to the unsecured private placement notes, where effective December 19, 2024 and through the end of 2025, BVES must maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.0 times its interest expense, and 4.5 times its interest expense thereafter. BVES is also required to maintain a maximum consolidated total debt to consolidated total capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1.00. GSWC and BVES were in compliance with all of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2024.  GSWC and BVES do not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on its properties.

(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $1.8 million of obligations with respect to GSWC’s 500 acre-foot

58

Table of Contents

entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.

(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC’s Arden-Cordova District.

(6) Credit facilities consists of (i) a $165.0 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $120.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2024; (ii) a $200.0 million revolving credit facility under GSWC, of which $124.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2024; and (iii) a $65.0 million revolving credit facility under BVES, of which $45.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2024, and which was refinanced on February 12, 2025 with the issuance of long-term financing consisting of unsecured private-placement notes due on February 12, 2030.

(7) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.

(8) Advances for construction represent contract refunds mostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.

(9) Consists of agreements executed by BVES to purchase renewable energy credits through 2035. These renewable energy credits are used to meet California’s renewables portfolio standard.

(10) Consists of BVES fixed-cost purchased power contract executed in July 2023 with Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.

(11) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVES as of December 31, 2024.

(12) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $1.1 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $1.2 million of other water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2025 through 2038.

(13) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.

(14) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan for the year 2024. Contributions to the pension plan are expected to be the higher of the minimum required contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the amounts that are recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such amounts.

(15) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) $10.8 million in asset retirement obligations of GSWC that reflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (ii) irrevocable letters of credit in the amount of $0.9 million for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policies; and (iii) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to AWR’s revolving credit facility.

Information comparing the liquidity and capital resources for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 filed with the SEC.

BVES Power-Supply Arrangements

BVES purchases power pursuant to purchase power contracts approved by the CPUC. Prior to 2023, BVES had entered into purchase power contracts with three- and five-year terms depending on the amount of power and the period during which the power is purchased under the contracts. These remaining contracts expired in 2024. In July 2023, the CPUC approved a new power purchase agreement between BVES and a third party to procure renewable portfolio standard eligible energy and renewable energy credits as a bundled product. BVES began taking power under this long-term contract during the fourth quarter of 2024 to replace the expired contracts. The new contract provides for the purchase of electricity during a delivery period from November 1, 2024 through December 31, 2035. In addition to the purchased power contracts, BVES buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells surplus power when necessary. BVES is pursuing short- and long-term renewable energy contracts to replace any power purchase agreements that have expired in addition to satisfying its requirements related to its resource portfolio for the next compliance period (2025-2027) and beyond. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, decreased to $71.89 per MWh in 2024 from $79.80 per MWh in 2023. BVES has an electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate any impacts to earnings.

59

Table of Contents

Construction Program

GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC and BVES upgrade their facilities in accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements and new legislation.  California requires investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval, and requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

As of December 31, 2024, GSWC and BVES have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $96.6 million.  During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, GSWC and BVES had capital expenditures of $244.0 million, $182.7 million and $174.3 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, capital expenditures funded by developers were $8.5 million, $7.0 million and $6.9 million, respectively. During 2025, the water and electric segments’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $170 - 210 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues. These amounts include approximately $9.1 million estimated to be spent by BVES on wildfire mitigation projects.

Contracted Services

Under the terms of the contracts with the U.S. government, each contract’s price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for ASUS’s subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.

During sequestration or automatic spending cuts, the subsidiaries of ASUS did not experience any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an “excepted service.” With the expiration of sequestration, similar issues including further sequestration pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act may arise as part of the fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. Any future impact on ASUS and its operations through its subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. Government, and/or (d) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense contracting programs.

At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.

60

Table of Contents

Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for ASUS’s subsidiaries in fiscal 2025.

Military Base (1)EPA periodFiling Date
Fort Bliss (FBWS)October 2025 - September 2026Third Quarter 2025
Fort Gregg-Adams (ODUS)February 2025 - January 2026Fourth Quarter 2024
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS)April 2025 - March 2026First Quarter of 2025
Joint Base Andrews (TUS)February 2025 - January 2026Fourth Quarter 2024
Fort Jackson (PSUS)February 2025 - January 2026Fourth Quarter 2024
Fort Liberty (ONUS)March 2025 - February 2026First Quarter 2025
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)June 2025 - May 2026Second Quarter 2025
Fort Riley (FRUS)July 2025 - June 2026Second Quarter 2025
Joint Base Cape Cod (BSUS)April 2025 - March 2026First Quarter 2025
Naval Air Station Patuxent River (PRUS)April 2025 - March 2026First Quarter 2025

(1) Names of military bases are as of December 31, 2024.

Regulatory Matters

A discussion on various regulatory matters is included in the section titled “Overview” in this Form 10-K’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The discussion below focuses on other regulatory matters and developments.

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

GSWC and BVES hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas they serve. ASUS subsidiaries are regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas. The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, and may exercise its jurisdiction over the water and wastewater utility operation at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company. ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS, FRUS and BSUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states’ utility commissions.

GSWC and BVES are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.

Rates that GSWC and BVES are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.

GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses in the second and third years of the rate case cycle. For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. GSWC’s cost of capital is determined in a separate proceeding. Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. BVES’s general rate cases are typically filed every four years, which also includes a determination of BVES's cost of capital. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.

Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVES and ASUS and between GSWC and BVES and AWR.

61

Table of Contents

General Rate Cases and Other Regulatory Matters

Water Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. Water revenues billed to customers for the year ended December 31, 2024 were based on 2024 adopted rates. However, due to a delay in receiving a final decision on GSWC’s water general rate application that determined new water rates for 2022 and 2023, retroactive to January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, GSWC recorded the cumulative retroactive rate differences to CPUC-authorized general rate case memorandum accounts recognized as regulatory assets, which through December 31, 2024 totaled $37.7 million. In October 2023, GSWC also filed for the recovery of all retroactive amounts for 2022 and 2023 accumulated up to the effective date of the new 2023 rates, July 30, 2023, with surcharges implemented in October 2023.

Water General Rate Case for the years 2025–2027:

On August 14, 2023, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2025 – 2027. On July 12, 2024, GSWC and Cal Advocates of the CPUC filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Cal Advocates in connection with the water utility general rate case. On January 30, 2025, the CPUC adopted a decision approving the settlement agreement and establishing new rates retroactive to January 1, 2025. GSWC filed an advice letter on January 31, 2025 to implement new rates effective February 1, 2025. GSWC had filed with the CPUC to establish memorandum accounts to track interim rates, which made the new 2025 rates retroactive to January 1, 2025.

Cost of Capital Proceeding for the years 2022–2024:

On June 29, 2023, a final decision was adopted by the CPUC in the cost of capital proceeding that, among other things, (i) adopts GSWC’s requested capital structure; (ii) adopts a cost of debt of 5.1% for GSWC as compared to 6.6% previously authorized; (iii) adopts a return on equity of 8.85% for GSWC as compared to 8.9% previously authorized; (iv) allows for the continuation of the WCCM through December 31, 2024; and (v) adopts the new cost of capital for the three-year period commencing January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Based on the final decision issued in June, all adjustments to rates were prospective and not retroactive. GSWC filed an advice letter that implemented the new cost of capital effective July 31, 2023.

On June 30, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2023, which was approved by the CPUC and increased the 8.85% adopted return on equity in the decision to 9.36% effective July 31, 2023. Additionally, on October 12, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2024, which has been approved by the CPUC, and increased GSWC’s 9.36% adopted return on equity to 10.06% effective January 1, 2024.

2024-2025 COC Application:

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. After receiving an extension in February 2024, GSWC’s next cost of capital application was scheduled to be filed on May 1, 2025 effective for the years 2026 - 2028. On January 14, 2025, the CPUC approved a request to defer the cost of capital application by another year. In December 2024, GSWC, along with three other investor-owned California water utilities, requested a further extension of the date by which each of them must file their cost of capital applications. The CPUC’s approval postponed this filing date by one year until May 1, 2026, with a corresponding effective date of January 1, 2027. The CPUC also approved the joint parties’ request to leave the current WCCM in place through the one-year deferral period. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.93%, based on its weighted cost of capital, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2026. The 7.93% return on rate base includes a return on equity of 10.06%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a capital structure with 57% equity and 43% debt.

San Juan Oaks Mutual Acquisition:

In August 2023, GSWC entered into an agreement to purchase the water and wastewater system assets from San Juan Oaks Mutual Water Company in San Benito County, California. The new master-planned community, known as San Juan Oaks, will serve up to an estimated 1,300 customers once the community is built as planned. The transaction is subject to CPUC approval. In December 2023, GSWC filed an application to establish the new service area and to set water and sewer rates for the San Juan Oaks service area in San Benito County, California. On December 5, 2024, the CPUC approved a final decision granting GSWC’s CPCN and establishing rates for water and sewer service.

62

Table of Contents

Electric Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

On August 30, 2022, BVES filed a new general rate case application with the CPUC to determine new rates for the years 2023–2026. Electric revenues billed to customers for 2024 and 2023 were based on 2022 adopted rates and remained in effect until finalization of the pending general rate case application. On December 15, 2022, the CPUC approved a decision for BVES to establish a general rate case memorandum account that makes the new 2023 rates effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023. On January 16, 2025, the CPUC adopted a final decision in connection with the pending general rate case proceeding that adopts the settlement agreement in its entirety and will determine new electric rates for the years 2023 - 2026. The new rates will be effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023 and are expected to go into effect on March 1, 2025. As a result of receiving the final decision, the impact from retroactive rates for the full year of 2023 and from the second-year rate increases for the full year of 2024 have been reflected in the 2024 fourth quarter results.

Vegetation Management, Wildfire Mitigation Plans and Legislation:

The CPUC adopted regulations intended to enhance the fire safety of overhead electric power lines. Those regulations included increased minimum clearances around electric power lines. BVES was authorized to track incremental costs incurred to implement the regulations in a fire hazard prevention memorandum account for the purpose of obtaining cost recovery in a future general rate case. On January 16, 2025, the CPUC issued a final decision in the electric general rate case, which set new rates through the year 2026. Costs related to vegetation management, such as costs for increased minimum clearances around electric power lines, have been included in the revenue requirement for the years 2023 through 2026. Among other things, the decision authorizes BVES to record incremental costs related to vegetation management in a CPUC-approved balancing account for future recovery up to a capped amount. In addition, the decision approves BVES’s recovery of vegetation management costs incurred and recorded prior to 2023 through a surcharge. As of December 31, 2024, BVES has approximately $9.9 million in incremental vegetation management costs recorded as a regulatory asset.

California legislation enacted in September 2018 requires all investor-owned electric utilities to have a wildfire mitigation plan (“WMP”) approved by the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety (“OEIS”) and ratified by the CPUC. The WMP must include a utility’s plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating its electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. In the fourth quarter of 2024, OEIS approved BVES’s 2025 WMP Update to its 2023-2025 WMP, which was ratified by the CPUC on January 16, 2025. The general rate case decision approved by the CPUC on January 16, 2025 also included costs related to BVES’s WMP in BVES’s revenue requirement. Furthermore, the decision allows for continued tracking of incremental costs related to wildfire mitigation activities through WMP memorandum accounts. As of December 31, 2024, BVES recorded approximately $4.8 million as regulatory assets related to expenses accumulated in its WMP memorandum accounts for future recovery.

Additionally, the governor of California approved AB 1054 in July 2019 that, among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC proceedings for an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeking to recover wildfire costs. Previously, an electric utility seeking to recover costs had the burden to prove that it acted reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a “serious doubt” as to the reasonableness of the utility’s conduct. In December 2024, OEIS issued a renewal of the safety certification for BVES for 12 months.

For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Environmental Matters

AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC and ASUS are required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. EPA. GSWC is also required to comply with the safe drinking water standards by the Division of Drinking Water (“DDW”), under the SWRCB. The DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA’s program in California. Similarly, ASUS is required to comply with the drinking water standards that are administered by the relevant state agencies in the states in which it operates. The U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction.

GSWC and ASUS currently test their water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act. They work proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening their water sources. They also incur operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply, and additional expenses to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, drought impacts, and consumer

63

Table of Contents

expectations. Both GSWC and ASUS will see increased operating costs to meet newly established and future water quality standards. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. The request for equitable adjustment process and capital funding request mechanism provide ASUS with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred operating costs and capital investment requirement in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC and the U.S. government.

Drinking Water Notification Levels

In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes. These chemicals were also present in certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as PFAS. Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The U.S. EPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notifications by water systems when they detect levels of PFAS above response levels.

GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS. GSWC has removed some wells from service and expects to incur additional costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with information regarding PFAS detection and provides updated information via its website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion (“ppt”) for perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and 40 ppt for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”). In March 2021, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 0.5 parts per billion (“ppb”) and 5 ppb, respectively, for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (“PFBS”). In June 2022, the U.S. EPA issued interim updated drinking-water health advisories for PFOA and PFOS, and also issued final health advisories for PFBS and other compounds known as GenX chemicals. In October 2022, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 3 ppt and 20 ppt, respectively, for perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (“PFHxS”).

Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Levels

On April 10, 2024, the U.S. EPA announced the final regulations that established maximum contaminant levels (“MCLs”) for six PFAS compounds in drinking water. The regulation established MCLs for PFOA, PFOS, and several other contaminants with individual MCLs that range from 4 ppt to 10 ppt. In addition, the regulation established MCL for PFAS mixtures containing at least two of certain of the regulated PFAS compounds for the combined and co-occurring levels of PFAS in drinking water. The final rule requires public water systems to implement PFAS monitoring and reporting within three years (2027), and where exceedances are identified, to implement solutions within five years (2029) to reduce PFAS levels to below the MCLs.

Currently, there are more than 45 sources at GSWC and 7 sources at ASUS that have exceeded one or more of the PFAS MCLs. These new MCLs will increase capital investments and operations and maintenance expenses over the next five years. In addition, due to the volatility of the supply chain and demand for PFAS treatment components, both the capital investments and operations and maintenance expenses are likely to further increase. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track incremental expenses, including laboratory testing and monitoring costs, customer and public notification costs, and chemical and operating treatment costs, incurred as a result of PFAS contamination in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

California State Division of Drinking Water adopted an MCL of 10 parts per billion for Hexavalent Chromium, which went into effect on October 1, 2024. Depending on the size of the water system, water systems will have two to four years from the effective date to come into compliance with the MCL. Currently, there are approximately eight sources at GSWC that exceed or are within eighty percent of the MCL. These MCLs are also expected to increase GSWC’s capital investments and operations and maintenance expenses.

The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC for both PFAS compounds and hexavalent chromium.

Designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances

On May 8, 2024, the U.S. EPA issued a final rule to designate PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). This designation is expected to increase GSWC’s and ASUS’s water treatment and disposal costs. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track incurred incremental expenses as a result of PFAS contamination in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

64

Table of Contents

Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup

GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at one of its plant sites that contained an underground storage tank which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.

As of December 31, 2024, the total amount spent to clean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.8 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2024, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated remaining cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved in rate base by the CPUC as approved historically.

Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

On October 30, 2024, the U.S. EPA published its final Lead and Copper Rule Improvements. The rule went into effect on December 30, 2024. The rule sets a 10-year requirement for replacing lead service lines in drinking water systems, changes sampling requirements and reduces the lead action level from 15 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion. Although no lead service lines have been found yet in GSWC and ASUS and their customer service lines, the changes in this regulation are expected to increase expenses related to sampling, public education, and lead service line field verification activities. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track any incremental expenses and carrying costs on capital investments incurred by GSWC as a result of the Lead and Copper Rule revisions in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

Matters Relating to Military Base Contracts

Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable federal, state and local requirements.

Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of ASUS’s subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.

Security Issues

We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.

Both GSWC and BVES have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyberattacks.  GSWC and BVES utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect their facilities.  These measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing their respective capital improvement plans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that either may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of their utility systems.

On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of its water systems. These assessments and plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and must be resubmitted every five years.

ASUS’s subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades, such as key card requirements at all access points and security camera systems, were completed at military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.

Registrant has evaluated its cybersecurity systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cybersecurity of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates.

65

Table of Contents

Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cybersecurity incident or other attacks will not cause water, wastewater or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.

Water Supply

GSWC

During 2024, GSWC delivered approximately 56.7 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 357 acre-feet per day or 116 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 57% of GSWC’s supply came from groundwater produced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from MWD member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 40% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 3%) under agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.

Groundwater

GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in the implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $2.3 million as of December 31, 2024.  Included in the $2.3 million is a remaining commitment of $1.1 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for ten additional years. The remaining $1.2 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.

Imported Water

GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. For example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities and other parties to purchase water through a total of 59 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. GSWC has 45 connections to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 42,708 acre-feet annually. MWD sources its supplies from Northern California via the State Water Project and the Colorado River through the Colorado River Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements.

MWD currently has supply levels of 1.3 million acre-feet (“MAF”) with annual demands of approximately 1.4 MAF resulting in a supply gap of approximately 100 thousand acre feet. MWD also has a record level of 3.8 MAF of water in storage at the end of 2024. MWD has available access to store more than 1.6 MAF of water in Lake Mead as part of an intentionally created surplus program developed under a 2007 Interim Shortage agreement and is available for use during dry years. Currently, 1.6 MAF is stored as Intentionally Created Surplus credit.

Drought Impact

The California Legislature passed two bills in 2018 that provide a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The framework sets aggressive water use objective standards and performance metrics that water suppliers will be required to meet by the year 2040 with interim milestones, as revised by the recent Conservation Regulation described below. A key milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (“gpcd”) until 2025. As of January 1, 2025 the standard was dropped to 47 gpcd per legislation signed by the governor of California into law in September 2022. The indoor standard will now set at 47 gpcd will be reduced to 42 gpcd in 2030. The California SWRCB approved the Conservation Regulation referred to as “To Make Conservation a California Way of Life” on July 3, 2024 and became effective on January 1, 2025. Each Urban Water Supplier will have an overall water use objective that will include both an indoor standard as well as outdoor use standards.

66

Table of Contents

Water year 2024-25 (“WY2025”) began on October 1, 2024 with the State’s major reservoirs currently at above average capacity with Lake Oroville at 74% of capacity and Lake Shasta at 77% capacity. The State Water Project allocation for WY2025 was initially set at 5% in early December and was increased to 20% on January 28, 2025 with good early precipitation in northern California. The new water year has begun with good conditions but has progressively become drier statewide and as of February 11, 2025, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that 21% of California was in extreme drought with 35% identified as “severe drought” as compared to a year ago when 0% was in “moderate drought” and 7% was listed as “abnormally dry.”

Prolonged drought conditions continue on the Colorado River System, which has experienced historically low reservoir levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell since 2023. Lake Powell and Lake Mead are at 36 and 34 percent capacity as of January 21, 2025, which is comparable to the same approximate value a year ago. Urgent action to reduce water demand on the lower river by 2 to 4 million acre feet annually has been requested by the US Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”). On October 1, 2024, a multi-year agreement known as the “California Colorado River Contractor Forbearance Agreement for 2024-2026” was put in place by Imperial Irrigation District, Coachella Valley Water District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Palo Verde Irrigation District and the City of Needles. This agreement commits to collective Colorado River water savings of 300,000 acre-feet annually with a three-year cap of 700,000 acre feet. In 2026, operational agreements on how the Colorado River is managed will expire. The Bureau is working with both the upper and lower states on a revised set of agreements and a draft is expected in early 2025. GSWC will continue to monitor developments related to the Colorado River System and assess its impact on GSWC.

Military Base Operations

The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by ASUS’s subsidiaries at no cost to ASUS’s subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations. Furthermore, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring compliance with the reduction and/or removal of all constituents required under its wastewater treatment plant operating permits. ASUS works closely with state regulators and industry associations to stay current with emergent issues and proactively addresses any change in wastewater treatment regulation to ensure permit compliance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

FY 2023 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0001628280-24-005922.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2024-02-21. Report date: 2023-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and its subsidiaries (GSWC, BVES, and ASUS and its subsidiaries), and AWR (parent) where applicable.

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment’s earnings divided by AWR’s weighted average number of diluted Common Shares.  The gains and losses generated on the investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 have been excluded when communicating the results to help facilitate comparisons of AWR’s performance from period to period. In addition, both the impact of retroactive rates related to the full year 2022 recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023 resulting from the final decision on the water general rate case, and the impact from the estimates of revenues subject to refund recorded in 2022 and changes to estimates recorded in 2023 following the receipt of a final cost of capital decision in June 2023 have been excluded when communicating AWR’s consolidated and water segment results for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 to help facilitate comparisons of the Company’s performance from period to period.

All of the measures discussed above are derived from consolidated financial information of Registrant, but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These items constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which supplement our GAAP disclosures but should not be considered as an alternative to the respective GAAP measures. Furthermore, the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other registrants.

AWR uses earnings per share by business segment, a non-GAAP financial measure, as an important measure in evaluating its operating results and believes it provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments.  AWR reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. A reconciliation to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP is included in the discussion under the section titled “Summary Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under the Overview section in Item 1. Business and Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC’s and BVES’s revenues, operating income, and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California, respectively. Rates charged to GSWC and BVES customers are authorized by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital.  GSWC and BVES plan to continue seeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVES are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVES may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:

Water General Rate Case for the years 2025–2027:

On August 14, 2023, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2025 – 2027. Among other things, GSWC requested capital budgets of approximately $611.4 million for the three-year capital cycle. GSWC also requested the continuation of mechanisms to accommodate fully decoupled revenues and sales, and track differences between recorded and CPUC-authorized supply-related expenses. In an August 2020 decision, the CPUC discontinued the use of the WRAM and the MCBA by water utilities, which GSWC implemented in 2008, but would be discontinued for GSWC after 2024. However, on September 30, 2022, the governor of California signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 1469 and effective January 1, 2023, SB 1469 allows Class A water utilities, including GSWC, to continue requesting the use of a revenue decoupling mechanism in their next general rate case. With the passage of SB 1469, GSWC’s request to continue using a revenue decoupling mechanism will be subject to CPUC approval. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, a proposed decision in the water general rate case is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2024, with new rates to become effective January 1, 2025.

34

Table of Contents

Water General Rate Case for years 2022 - 2024:

On June 29, 2023, the CPUC adopted a final decision in GSWC’s general rate case application for all its water regions and its general office that determined new water rates for the years 2022–2024 retroactive to January 1, 2022. Among other things, the final decision (i) adopted the full settlement agreement between GSWC and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC (“Public Advocates”) that resolved all issues related to the 2022 annual revenue requirement in the general rate case application and authorized GSWC to invest approximately $404.8 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year capital cycle (excluding advice letter projects), and (ii) allowed for additional increases in adopted revenues for 2023 and 2024 subject to an earnings test and inflationary index values at the time of filing for implementation of the new rates. The impact of retroactive rates for the full year of 2022 as well as second-year rate increases for 2023 have been reflected in the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023.

As a result of receiving the final decision that approved the settlement agreement in its entirety, the net impact of retroactive new rates for the full year of 2022 was $0.38 per share and has been reflected in the year ended December 31, 2023 results, which consisted primarily of the increase in 2022’s annual revenue requirement (excluding advice letter projects) that, among other things, incorporated an increase in supply costs, and which combined is a net increase of approximately $0.40 per share; partially offset by the approval of new operating expense levels related to 2022 that resulted in an increase in recorded depreciation expense of approximately $790,000, or $0.02 per share, resulting from updated composite depreciation rates adopted in the final decision, and which are reflected in the 2022 adopted revenue requirement.

The second-year rate increases for 2023, which were retroactive to January 1, 2023, have also been reflected in the year ended December 31, 2023 results. Excluding the impact of retroactive rates for 2022 discussed above, there was an increase in recorded water operating revenues of $48.1 million largely as a result of the second-year rate increases for 2023 that, among other things, incorporated the increase in recorded supply costs of $10.0 million, which combined is an increase of $0.74 per share. Upon receiving the final decision, GSWC filed for the implementation of new 2023 rate increases that went into effect on July 31, 2023. Due to the delay in finalizing the water general rate case, water revenues billed to customers for the year ended December 31, 2022 and for the period from January 1, 2023 to July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates. In October 2023, GSWC also filed with the CPUC to recover all retroactive rate amounts accumulated in memorandum accounts for the full 2022 year and for 2023 through July 30, 2023. Surcharges were implemented to recover the cumulative retroactive rate differences over 36 months. As of December 31, 2023, there is an aggregate cumulative balance of $52.8 million in CPUC-approved general rate case memorandum accounts that have been recognized as regulatory assets with a corresponding increase in water revenues.

Cost of Capital (“COC”) Proceedings:

2024 COC Application:

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. GSWC’s next cost of capital application was scheduled to be filed on May 1, 2024 effective for the years 2025 - 2027. However, GSWC, along with three other Class A investor-owned water utilities in California, filed a joint request with the CPUC to defer the filing deadline of the next cost of capital applications by one year, which was approved on February 2, 2024. The joint request asked that the utilities keep the cost of capital currently authorized for 2024 in effect through 2025, and file new cost of capital applications by May 1, 2025 to set the cost of debt, return on equity and capital structure starting January 1, 2026. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.93% effective January 1, 2024, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2025. Additionally, GSWC's Water Cost of Capital Adjustment Mechanism (“WCCM”) will remain active through the one year deferral period.

2021 COC Application:

GSWC filed its last cost of capital application with the CPUC in May 2021. On June 29, 2023, the CPUC adopted a final decision that, among other things, (i) adopted GSWC’s requested capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt; (ii) adopted a cost of debt of 5.1% for GSWC as compared to 6.6% previously authorized; (iii) adopted a return on equity of 8.85% for GSWC as compared to 8.9% previously authorized; (iv) allowed for the continuation of the WCCM through December 31, 2024; and (v) adopted the new cost of capital for the three-year period commencing January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Based on the final decision issued in June 2023, all adjustments to rates are prospective and not retroactive. GSWC filed an advice letter that implemented the new cost of capital effective July 31, 2023.

Following the receipt of the final decision in the cost of capital proceeding, management updated its analysis and reassessed the accounting estimates recorded to date related to GSWC’s lower cost of debt. Accordingly, during the second quarter of 2023, GSWC recorded a change in estimate that resulted in an increase to water revenues in the amount of $6.4 million, or approximately $0.13 per share, as a result of reversing its regulatory liability for revenues subject to refund that it had recorded during 2022.

The WCCM adjusts the return on equity and rate of return on rate base between the three-year cost of capital proceedings only if there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points in the average of the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate as measured over the period October 1 through September 30. If there is a positive or negative change of more than

35

Table of Contents

100 basis points, the return on equity is adjusted by one half of the difference. For the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate increased by 102.8 basis points from the benchmark, which triggered the WCCM adjustment. GSWC recognized revenues for the period from January 1 through July 30, 2023 and all of 2022 based on the previously authorized return of equity of 8.9% that had also been billed to water customers through the same period. On June 30, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2023, which increased GSWC’s 8.85% adopted return on equity in the decision to 9.36% effective July 31, 2023. Additionally, for the period from October 1, 2022 through September 30, 2023, the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate increased by 139.7 basis points from the benchmark, which triggered another WCCM adjustment. On October 12, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2024, which has been approved by the CPUC and increased GSWC’s 9.36% adopted return on equity to 10.06% effective January 1, 2024.

Final Decision in the First Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:

In August 2020, the CPUC issued a final decision in the first phase of the CPUC’s Order Instituting Rulemaking evaluating the low income ratepayer assistance and affordability objectives contained in the CPUC’s 2010 Water Action Plan. This decision also addressed other issues, including mandating discontinuance of the WRAM and the MCBA. The MCBA is a full-cost balancing account used to track the difference between adopted and actual water supply costs (including the effects of changes in both rates and volume). Based on the final decision, any general rate case application filed by GSWC and the other California water utilities after August 27, 2020 may not include a proposal to continue the use of the WRAM or MCBA, but may instead include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism and an incremental supply cost balancing account. The discontinuation of the WRAM and MCBA for GSWC would be effective for years after 2024. However, on September 30, 2022, the governor of California signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 1469. Effective January 1, 2023, SB 1469 allows Class A water utilities, including GSWC, to continue requesting the use of a full revenue decoupling mechanism in their general rate case. With the passage of SB 1469, GSWC was able to request the continued use of a full revenue decoupling mechanism, similar to the WRAM in its general rate case application filed on August 14, 2023 that establishes new rates for the years 2025 – 2027. GSWC’s request to continue using a full revenue decoupling mechanism in its general rate case is subject to CPUC approval. Since its implementation in 2008, the WRAM and MCBA have helped mitigate fluctuations in GSWC’s earnings due to changes in water consumption by its customers or changes in water supply mix. Replacing them with mechanisms recommended in the final decision will likely result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could result in less than, or more than, full recovery of its authorized revenue and supply costs.

In October 2020, GSWC, three other investor-owned water utilities (“IOWUs”) operating in California, and the California Water Association (“CWA”) filed applications with the CPUC for rehearing on the discontinuation of the WRAM and MCBA, which the CPUC denied in September 2021. GSWC, the three other IOWUs and CWA each separately filed a petition with the California Supreme Court to review the CPUC’s decision revoking prior authorization of the WRAM and MCBA. In May 2022, the Court granted the petition for writ of review. The Court ordered GSWC, along with the other IOWUs and CWA, to file opening briefs, which were filed on September 1, 2022. The CPUC’s answer to the opening briefs was originally due by November 15, 2022 and reply briefs were due by December 15, 2022. However, as a result of SB 1469, in October 2022 the CPUC filed a motion to dismiss the IOWUs and CWA’s petition with the Court, and also requested that the Court suspend the proceeding schedule until it rules on the motion to dismiss. The Court granted the CPUC’s request to suspend the proceeding schedule. In November 2022, the Supreme Court denied the CPUC’s motion to dismiss and established a new proceeding schedule whereby the CPUC filed their answer brief on December 9, 2022 and the IOWUs filed their reply brief on January 13, 2023. At this time, management cannot predict the final outcome of this matter.

Electric General Rate Case for the years 2023–2026:

On August 30, 2022, BVES filed a general rate case application that will determine new electric rates for the years 2023 – 2026. In February 2023, a scoping memo and ruling that set the final schedule and scope of issues in BVES’s general rate case proceeding was issued by the CPUC. Electric revenues billed to customers for 2023 were based on 2022 adopted rates and will remain in effect until finalization of the pending general rate case application. On December 15, 2022, the CPUC approved a decision for BVES to establish a general rate case memorandum account that makes the new 2023 rates effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023. When a decision is issued in the electric general rate case, cumulative adjustments will be recorded at that time.

Among other things, BVES requested (i) capital budgets of approximately $62.0 million for the four-year rate cycle, and another $6.2 million for a large line replacement capital project to be filed for revenue recovery through an advice letter when the project is completed, and (ii) a capital structure for BVES of 61.8% equity and 38.2% debt, a return on equity of 11.25%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.51%, and a return on rate base of 9.05%. Included in the general rate case application is a request for recovery of all capital expenditures and other incremental costs incurred over the last few years in connection with BVES’s wildfire mitigation plans that are currently not included in customer rates. These costs will be subject to review by the CPUC during the general rate case proceeding.

36

Table of Contents

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract, additional firm-fixed-price contracts, task order agreements and subcontracts with third party prime contractors on military bases. Currently, ASUS has one subsidiary that has entered into a task order agreement with the U.S. government that has a term of 15 years. The contract price for each of the contracts and recurring task order agreements is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on annual economic price adjustments, and new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors. ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served.

During 2023, excluding the first task order of Joint Base Cape Cod (“JBCC”) and the new contract for Naval Air Station Patuxent River, ASUS was awarded approximately $24.1 million in new construction projects for completion beginning in 2023 through 2026. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contracts, additional contracts thereafter with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

On August 15, 2023, ASUS was awarded a new 50-year contract by the U.S. government to operate, maintain, and provide construction management services for the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, a United States Navy air station located in Maryland. The initial firm-fixed-price value of the contract is estimated at $349 million over a 50-year period and is subject to annual economic price adjustments. This initial value is also subject to adjustment based on the results of a joint inventory of assets to be performed during the transition period and will be finalized during the first year of operations.

On September 29, 2023, ASUS was awarded a new 15-year contract by the U.S. government, that is different than ASUS's other existing 50-year contracts, to operate, maintain, and provide construction management services for the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at JBCC located in Massachusetts. Under this contract, ASUS will have the opportunity to perform work at JBCC through the periodic issuance of task orders by the U.S. government for up to a maximum initial firm-fixed-price value of $45.0 million over a 15-year period, subject to adjustments as task orders are issued. In September 2023, the first task order was issued with a value of $2.3 million to perform an evaluation, construction and transition services that are scheduled for completion in 2024.

Entering into contracts with the U.S. government subjects ASUS to potential government audits or investigations of its business practices and compliance with government procurement statutes and regulations. ASUS had been under a civil government investigation over bidding and estimating practices used in certain capital upgrade projects. In July 2023, ASUS and the U.S. government entered into an agreement that settles civil and monetary claims by the U.S. government. This settlement did not have a material impact on Registrant’s financial statements.

37

Table of Contents

Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share by business segment and for the parent company:

Diluted Earnings per Share
Year Ended
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGE
Water$2.77$1.45$1.32
Electric0.200.24(0.04)
Contracted services0.500.460.04
AWR (parent)(0.10)(0.04)(0.06)
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as recorded (GAAP)3.362.111.25
Adjustments to GAAP measure:
Impact of retroactive rates related to the full year of 2022 from the final decision in the water general rate case*(0.38)(0.38)
Impact related to the final cost of capital decision*(0.13)0.13(0.26)
Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)*$2.85$2.24$0.61
Water diluted earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP)*$2.26$1.58$0.68

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

* All adjustments to recorded diluted earnings per share relate to the water segment. The water segment’s adjusted earnings for 2023 exclude the impact of retroactive rates related to the full year of 2022 resulting from the final CPUC decision in the general rate case previously discussed, and for 2023 and 2022 they exclude the impact of changes in estimates resulting from revenues subject to refund related to the cost of capital proceeding, both shown separately in the table above.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, AWR’s recorded consolidated diluted earnings were $3.36 per share, as compared to $2.11 per share for 2022, an increase of $1.25 per share, which includes: (i) the impact of retroactive new rates related to the full 2022 year of $0.38 per share as a result of receiving a final decision in the water general rate case as previously discussed and shown separately in the table above, and (ii) a net favorable variance of $0.26 per share, also shown separately in the table above, related to the impact of the final cost of capital decision that resulted in the reversal during 2023 of revenues subject to refund of $6.4 million, or $0.13 per share, due to a change in estimate from what had been recorded during 2022. Excluding these items from both periods, for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, adjusted consolidated diluted earnings were $2.85 per share and $2.24 per share, respectively, an adjusted increase of $0.61 per share. Also, included in the results for 2023 were gains totaling $5.0 million, or approximately $0.10 per share, on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans, as compared to losses of $5.2 million, or approximately $0.10 per share, for 2022, both due to financial market conditions.

Excluding the gains and losses on the retirement plan investments from both periods, the impact of retroactive rates recorded in 2023 related to the full year of 2022, and the impact of changes in estimates from the cost of capital proceeding from both periods, adjusted consolidated diluted earnings for the year of 2023 would be $2.75 per share as compared to adjusted diluted earnings of $2.34 per share for 2022, an adjusted increase of $0.41 per share or a 17.5% increase, largely due to new 2023 water rates approved in GSWC’s final decision in its general rate case proceeding.

The following is a computation and reconciliation of diluted earnings per share from the measure of operating income by business segment as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to AWR’s consolidated fully diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:

WaterElectricContracted ServicesAWR (Parent)Consolidated (GAAP)
In 000's except per share amounts2023202220232022202320222023202220232022
Operating income (Note 17)$159,177$92,455$11,196$11,740$26,151$22,449$216$(8)$196,740$126,636
Other (income) and expense20,78022,3392,2024251,446(273)5,7922,08530,22024,576
Income tax expense (benefit)35,68916,3461,5152,4396,1095,476(1,714)(597)41,59923,664
Net income (loss)$102,708$53,770$7,479$8,876$18,596$17,246$(3,862)$(1,496)$124,921$78,396
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares37,07737,03937,07737,03937,07737,03937,07737,03937,07737,039
Diluted earnings per share$2.77$1.45$0.20$0.24$0.50$0.46$(0.10)$(0.04)$3.36$2.11

Note: Certain amounts in the table above may not foot or crossfoot due to rounding.

38

Table of Contents

Water Segment:

For the year ended December 31, 2023, recorded diluted earnings from the water utility segment were $2.77 per share, as compared to $1.45 per share for 2022, an increase of $1.32 per share, which includes: (i) the impact of retroactive new rates related to the full 2022 year of $0.38 per share (shown separately in the Summary Results by Segment table above), (ii) a net favorable variance of $0.26 per share (shown separately in the Summary Results by Segment table above) from the impact of the final cost of capital decision that resulted in the reversal of $6.4 million, or $0.13 per share, due to a change in estimate from what had been recorded during 2022, and (iii) a net favorable variance of $0.20 per share from gains totaling $5.0 million, or $0.10 per share, recorded during 2023 on investments held to fund a retirement plan, as compared to losses of $5.2 million, or $0.10 per share, recorded in 2022.

Excluding the gains and losses on the retirement plan investments from both periods, the impact of retroactive rates recorded in 2023 related to the full year of 2022, and the impact of changes in estimates from the cost of capital proceeding from both periods, adjusted diluted earnings for 2023 at the water segment were $2.16 per share as compared to adjusted diluted earnings of $1.68 per share for 2022, an adjusted net increase at the water segment of $0.48 per share, or a 28.6% increase, due primarily to the following items:

•An increase in the water operating revenues of $48.1 million largely as a result of the second-year rate increases for 2023 that are retroactive to January 1, 2023 and have been reflected in the results for the year ended December 31, 2023, partially offset by the impact of the prospective change in the new cost of capital effective July 31, 2023. GSWC filed for the implementation of new 2023 rates upon receiving the final decisions in June 2023 in both its general rate case and cost of capital proceedings. The increase in water revenues during 2023 represents the difference from the 2023 second-year rate increases and the 2021 adopted rates in place and recorded during 2022.

•An increase in water supply costs of $10.0 million, which consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. Adopted supply costs for the year of 2023 were based on 2023 authorized amounts approved in the final CPUC decision in the water general rate case as compared to 2021 authorized amounts in place during 2022. Actual water supply costs are tracked and passed through to customers on a dollar-for-dollar basis by way of the CPUC-approved water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs results in a corresponding increase in water operating revenues and has no net impact on the water segment’s profitability.

•An overall increase in operating expenses of $3.4 million (excluding supply costs), which negatively impacted earnings and was mainly due to increases in (i) overall labor costs and other employee-related benefits, (ii) administrative and general expenses resulting from higher legal and other outside-services costs, (iii) depreciation and amortization expenses resulting from additions to utility plant and higher composite depreciation rates based on a revised depreciation study approved in the water general rate case, and (iv) franchise fees resulting from higher water revenues. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in water treatment costs, and bad debt expense as a result of additional state relief funds expected to be received for unpaid water bills accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

•An overall increase in interest expense (net of interest and other income) of $4.8 million resulting primarily from an increase in interest rates, as well as an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditure programs at GSWC; partially offset by higher interest income earned on regulatory assets bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial-paper rate, which increased compared to 2022’s rates, as well as an increase in the level of regulatory assets recorded resulting, in large part, from the decision on the water general rate case that had been delayed.

•An overall increase in other expense (net of other income) of $4.6 million due largely to a net increase in the non-service cost components related to GSWC’s benefit plans resulting from changes in actuarial assumptions recorded during the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022. However, as a result of GSWC’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefit costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings, which accounts for the majority of the increase in non-service costs.

•Changes in certain flowed-through income taxes and permanent items included in GSWC’s income tax expense for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 as compared to the same period in 2022 that unfavorably impacted the water segment's earnings. As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as being flowed-through in computing its income tax expense consistent with the income tax method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction rate making. Changes in the magnitude of flowed-through items either increase or decrease tax expense, thereby affecting diluted earnings per share.

39

Table of Contents

Electric Segment:

Diluted earnings from the electric utility segment decreased $0.04 per share for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022, largely resulting from not having new rates in 2023 while awaiting the processing of the pending electric general rate case that will set new rates for 2023 – 2026, while also experiencing continued increases in overall operating expenses and interest costs, partially offset by favorable changes in certain flowed-through income taxes. When a decision is issued in the electric general rate case, new rates are expected to be retroactive to January 1, 2023 and cumulative adjustments will be recorded at that time.

Contracted Services Segment:

Diluted earnings from the contracted services segment increased $0.04 per share for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 2022, largely due to an increase in management fee revenues resulting from the resolution of various economic price adjustments and an increase in construction activity, partially offset by higher overall operating expenses (excluding construction expenses) and interest costs as compared to 2022.

AWR (Parent):

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the diluted loss from AWR (parent) increased $0.06 per share compared to 2022 due primarily to an increase in interest expense resulting from higher short-term interest rates and higher borrowings made under AWR’s revolving credit facility, as well as changes in state unitary taxes.

The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 provide information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVES and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

40

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water$433,473$340,602$92,87127.3%
Electric41,83239,9861,8464.6%
Contracted services120,394110,9409,4548.5%
Total operating revenues595,699491,528104,17121.2%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased72,86475,939(3,075)-4.0%
Power purchased for pumping12,82911,8619688.2%
Groundwater production assessment20,85019,0711,7799.3%
Power purchased for resale13,27515,039(1,764)-11.7%
Supply cost balancing accounts12,118(12,000)24,118-201.0%
Other operation40,27138,0952,1765.7%
Administrative and general88,27386,1902,0832.4%
Depreciation and amortization42,40341,3151,0882.6%
Maintenance14,21813,3928266.2%
Property and other taxes24,04622,8941,1525.0%
ASUS construction57,91253,1714,7418.9%
Gain on sale of assets(100)(75)(25)33.3%
Total operating expenses398,959364,89234,0679.3%
OPERATING INCOME196,740126,63670,10455.4%
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense(42,762)(27,027)(15,735)58.2%
Interest income7,4162,3265,090218.8%
Other, net5,1261255,001*
(30,220)(24,576)(5,644)23.0%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE166,520102,06064,46063.2%
Income tax expense41,59923,66417,93575.8%
NET INCOME$124,921$78,396$46,52559.3%
Basic earnings per Common Share$3.37$2.12$1.2559.0%
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share$3.36$2.11$1.2559.2%

* not meaningful

41

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues

General

GSWC and BVES rely upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plant. ASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. Current operating revenues and earnings may be negatively impacted if ASUS’s subsidiaries do not receive adequate price adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of construction projects at its subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Water

For the year ended December 31, 2023, revenues from water operations increased by $92.9 million to $433.5 million, compared to 2022. The increase in water revenues was largely because of the adoption in June 2023 of a final decision in the water general rate case that included the impact of retroactive rates associated with the increase in 2022’s annual revenue requirement (excluding advice letter projects), as well as the second-year rate increases for 2023, partially offset by the impact of the prospective change in the new cost of capital effective July 31, 2023. In addition, because of receiving a final decision in the cost of capital proceeding in June 2023, in which the CPUC made adjustments to rates prospective, GSWC recorded a change in estimate that resulted in an increase to water revenues in 2023 totaling $6.4 million as a result of reversing its regulatory liability for revenues subject to refund that it had recorded during 2022.

Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2023 was lower by 7.8% compared to 2022 due primarily to overall above average rainfall in California during the year of 2023 compared to 2022. Currently, changes in consumption generally do not have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM that is in place in all but one small rate-making area. GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities.

Electric

Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased $1.8 million to $41.8 million due, in large part, to the final decision adopted in the water general rate case proceeding that updates the costs allocated from the general corporate office to the electric segment. The final decision authorizes an increase in the allocation ratio to the electric segment. The increase in general corporate office expenses allocated to the electric segment also includes a corresponding and offsetting increase in adopted electric revenues as provided in BVES’s last general rate case proceeding, resulting in no impact to earnings. There was also an increase in electric revenues from an advice letter filing related to a completed capital project.

Electric usage for the year ended December 31, 2023 was lower by 2.9% compared to 2022. Due to the CPUC-approved Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.

Contracted Services

Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For the year ended December 31, 2023, revenues from contracted services increased $9.5 million to $120.4 million as compared to $110.9 million for 2022. The increase was largely due to higher construction activity and an increase in management fee revenue from annual economic price adjustments as compared to 2022.

ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2023, excluding the first task order of JBCC and the new contract for Naval Air Station Patuxent River, ASUS was awarded approximately $24.1 million in new construction projects for completion in 2023 through 2026. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contracts and additional contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

42

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses:

Supply Costs

Total supply costs at the regulated utilities comprise the largest segment of total consolidated operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for 33.1% and 30.1% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Water segment supply costs

Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 were 43% and 45%, as compared to the adopted percentages of 41% and 34% for 2023 and 2022. The higher actual percentage of purchased water as compared to adopted resulted from a higher volume of purchased water costs due to several wells being out of service.

Under the current CPUC-approved MCBA, GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses as a regulatory asset or liability. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances.  GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area.

Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, water supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water purchased$72,864$75,939$(3,075)-4.0%
Power purchased for pumping12,82911,8619688.2%
Groundwater production assessment20,85019,0711,7799.3%
Water supply cost balancing accounts *13,839(8,643)22,482-260.1%
Total water supply costs$120,382$98,228$22,15422.6%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $12.1 million and $(12.0) million for 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 2023 decreased to $72.9 million as compared to $75.9 million for 2022 primarily due to decreases in water consumption and production that were driven by overall above-average rainfall in 2023 and from overall improvements in drought conditions in 2023 as compared to 2022, partially offset by increases in wholesale water costs. The increase in power purchased for pumping was due to increases in electricity provider rates. Groundwater production assessments increased due to increases in pump tax rates during 2023 as compared to 2022.

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the water supply cost balancing account had a $13.8 million over-collection as compared to an $8.6 million under-collection in 2022. The change in water supply cost balancing accounts was primarily due to updated adopted supply costs from the final decision in the water general rate case proceeding received in June 2023. This increase includes the full year impact of 2022 to reflect newly adopted supply costs retroactive to January 1, 2022, with a corresponding and offsetting increase in adopted water revenues, resulting in no impact to earnings.

Electric segment supply costs

Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, electric supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Power purchased for resale$13,275$15,039$(1,764)-11.7%
Electric supply cost balancing account *(1,721)(3,357)1,636-48.7%
Total electric supply costs$11,554$11,682$(128)-1.1%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $12.1 million and $(12.0) million for 2023 and 2022, respectively.

43

Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES’s customers decreased to $13.3 million as compared to $15.0 million for 2022 primarily due to a decrease in customer usage and lower average price per megawatt-hour (“MWh”). The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, decreased to $79.80 per MWh in 2023 from $97.89 per MWh in 2022. The lower customer usage resulted in a lower under-collection of $1.7 million recorded in the electric supply balancing account in 2023 when compared to an under-collection of $3.4 million during 2022.

Other Operation

The primary components of other operation expenses include payroll costs, materials and supplies, chemicals and water treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices.  Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$29,064$28,117$9473.4%
Electric Services4,0573,31174622.5%
Contracted Services7,1506,6674837.2%
Total other operation$40,271$38,095$2,1765.7%

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the increase in other operation expenses at the water segment was due primarily to higher operation-related labor, transportation and outside-service costs, partially offset by lower water treatment costs and bad debt expense. As a result of receiving the final decision in the water general rate case, the increase at the water segment also included a cumulative depreciation adjustment for 2022 of $212,000 on GSWC’s transportation equipment, which is recorded in other operation expenses.

The increases at the electric and contracted services segments were due primarily to higher operation-related labor and outside-services costs.

Administrative and General

Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$59,313$58,358$9551.6%
Electric Services8,7457,90184410.7%
Contracted Services20,43119,9235082.5%
AWR (parent)(216)8(224)*
Total administrative and general$88,273$86,190$2,0832.4%

* not meaningful

Administrative and general expenses increased at the water segment due, in large part, to an increase in legal and other outside-service costs, labor and employee-related expenses, partially offset by a decrease in the service cost component of GSWC’s defined-benefit pension plan. Due to GSWC’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefit costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings. In addition, there was a reduction of approximately $447,000 to reflect the final decision in the water general rate case that authorized the one-time recovery of previously incurred administrative and general expenses that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts.

Administrative and general expenses increased at the electric segment due, in part, to an increase in labor costs and a higher allocation of costs from the general corporate office because of the updated allocation ratio authorized in the final decision on the water general rate case. The increase in general corporate office expenses allocated to the electric segment also includes a corresponding and offsetting increase in adopted electric revenues, resulting in no impact on earnings.

44

Table of Contents

Administrative and general expenses increased at the contracted services segment due to an increase in outside service, labor, and employee-related benefit costs.

Administrative and general expenses at AWR (parent) during the year ended December 31, 2023 reflect the reversal of a previous accrual for a matter that was favorably resolved.

Depreciation and Amortization

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$35,886$34,805$1,0813.1%
Electric Services3,2562,79246416.6%
Contracted Services3,2613,718(457)-12.3%
Total depreciation and amortization$42,403$41,315$1,0882.6%

The water general rate case final decision approved an overall higher composite depreciation rates based on a revised depreciation study. The increase in composite depreciation rates increases the adopted water revenue requirement, with a corresponding increase in adopted depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. The overall increase in depreciation and amortization expenses at the water segment included the retroactive impact for the full year of 2022 of $576,000. In addition, the increase to depreciation and amortization expense was also attributed to additions to utility plant and other fixed assets at both regulated utilities.

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$9,906$9,559$3473.6%
Electric Services92472320127.8%
Contracted Services3,3883,1102788.9%
Total maintenance$14,218$13,392$8266.2%

Maintenance expense increased at each of the business segments due to higher planned and unplanned maintenance activities as compared to the same period in 2022.

Property and Other Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$19,845$19,080$7654.0%
Electric Services2,1001,83726314.3%
Contracted Services2,1011,9771246.3%
Total property and other taxes$24,046$22,894$1,1525.0%

Property and other taxes increased at the water segment primarily due to an increase in franchise fees resulting from higher water revenues, partially offset by favorable property tax adjustments resulting from changes in property tax assessments for certain counties. In addition, there was an increase in property taxes at the electric segment resulting from an increase in capital additions and higher assessed values, and an increase in gross receipts taxes at the contracted services segment from higher construction activity.

ASUS Construction

For the year ended December 31, 2023, construction expenses for contracted services were $57.9 million, increasing by $4.7 million compared to 2022 primarily due to an increase in construction activity as compared to 2022.

45

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$31,283$22,742$8,54137.6%
Electric Services3,2981,2252,073169.2%
Contracted Services2,1277431,384186.3%
AWR (parent)6,0542,3173,737161.3%
Total interest expense$42,762$27,027$15,73558.2%

AWR’s borrowings consist of bank notes under revolving credit facilities, while GSWC and BVES borrowings consist of revolving credit facilities and long-term debt issuances. Consolidated interest expense increased as compared to 2022 resulting from an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditures programs at the regulated utilities, as well as overall increases in average interest rates both short- and long-term. On January 13, 2023, GSWC issued $130.0 million unsecured notes in a private placement consisting of $100.0 million in aggregate notes at a coupon rate of 5.12% due January 31, 2033, and $30.0 million in aggregate notes at a coupon rate of 5.22% due January 31, 2038. Also, in April 2022, BVES issued $35.0 million in unsecured notes in a private placement consisting of 10 and 15 year term notes bearing interest at 4.548% and 4.949%, respectively.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$5,557$1,083$4,474*
Electric Services1,060394666169.0%
Contracted Services806875(69)-7.9%
AWR (parent)(7)(26)19-73.1%
Total interest income$7,416$2,326$5,090218.8%

* not meaningful

The overall increase in interest income was due primarily to higher interest income earned on regulatory assets at the regulated utilities bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial-paper rates, which have increased since 2022, as well as an overall increase in regulatory assets recorded as a result of the final decision in the water general rate case, partially offset by lower interest income recognized on certain construction projects at the contracted services segment as compared to 2022.

Other Income and (Expense), net

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$4,946$(680)$5,626*
Electric Services36406(370)-91.1%
Contracted Services(125)141(266)-188.7%
AWR (parent)269258114.3%
Total interest income$5,126$125$5,001*

* not meaningful

For the year ended December 31, 2023, other income (net of other expense) increased mostly because of gains of $5.0 million recorded on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans, as compared to losses of $5.2 million incurred in 2022, both due to financial market conditions. This was partially offset by an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs related to the Company’s defined-benefit pension plan and other retirement benefits. However, as a result of GSWC’s and BVES’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefit costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings.

46

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202312/31/2022CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$35,689$16,346$19,343118.3%
Electric Services1,5152,439(924)-37.9%
Contracted Services6,1095,47663311.6%
AWR (parent)(1,714)(597)(1,117)187.1%
Total income tax expense$41,599$23,664$17,93575.8%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 increased by $17.9 million primarily due to an increase in pretax income as compared to 2022. AWR’s ETRs were 25.0% and 23.2% for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. GSWC’s ETR was 25.8% for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to 23.3% for 2022. The increase in GSWC’s ETR was also primarily due to the effect of the increase in its pretax income. The increase in AWR (parent)’s tax benefit was primarily due to an increase in pretax loss resulting from higher interest expense, as well as changes in state unitary taxes.

Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2022 and 2021 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the headings “Summary Results by Segment” and “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC.

47

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC and BVES operate extensively in regulated businesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.

Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC and BVES. When either files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s operations are no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, they are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVES’s assets are not recoverable in customer rates, management is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.  Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event that management’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC disallows costs included in the ratemaking process.

Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.

Revenue Recognition — GSWC and BVES record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.  Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.

In 2008, the CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms through the adoption of the WRAM.  With the adoption of this alternative revenue program, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM for the difference between what is billed to its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC. GSWC’s request to continue using a revenue decoupling mechanism, similar to the WRAM, in its next general rate case is subject to CPUC approval. The CPUC also granted BVES a revenue decoupling mechanism through the BRRAM. BVES adjusts revenues in the BRRAM for the difference between what is billed to its electric customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC.

As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC and BVES are required to collect their WRAM and BRRAM balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period. This can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.

ASUS’s firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on AWR’s consolidated balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS’s operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts thereafter. Revenues from construction activities are recognized as performance obligations are satisfied. Performance obligations related to firm-fixed-price contracts are satisfied over time as the ASUS’s performance typically creates or enhances

48

Table of Contents

an asset that the U.S. government controls. ASUS recognizes revenue on its firm-fixed-price contracts as performance obligations are satisfied and control of the promised good and/or service is transferred to the U.S. government by measuring the progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation(s) using an input method. Revenues for construction activities are recognized over time, with progress toward completion measured based on the input method using costs incurred relative to the total estimated costs (cost-to-cost method). Due to the nature of these construction projects, ASUS has determined the cost-to-cost input measurement to be the best method to measure progress towards satisfying its construction contract performance obligations, as compared to using an output measurement such as units produced. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.

Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVES, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.

As regulated utilities, GSWC and BVES treat certain temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments in computing their income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flowed-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flowed-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVES were not required to account for their income taxes as regulated enterprises. As of December 31, 2023, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.

Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers’ accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions.  Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.  A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense.  To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan’s assets was 5.75% for 2023 and 2022.

For the pension plan obligation, Registrant decreased the discount rate to 5.16% as of December 31, 2023 from 5.41% as of December 31, 2022 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2023. A hypothetical 25-basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have decreased total net periodic pension expense for 2023 by approximately $46,000, which includes an increase in service cost that was more than offset by the decrease in interest cost, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation at December 31, 2023 by a total of $6.1 million.  A 25-basis point decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 2023 pension cost by approximately $456,000.

In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status.  Changes in market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, an increase in the underfunded position, and increase the required future contributions.

The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVES to each maintain a two-way balancing account to track differences between their forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs.  As of December 31, 2023, GSWC has a $1.1 million over-collection in its two-

49

Table of Contents

way pension balancing account for the general office and water regions. As of December 31, 2023, BVES has a $277,000 over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account.

Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations.  In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 2024, the pension contribution is expected to be approximately $3.3 million. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts.  Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.

Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension plan.  Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan instead of the pension plan.

50

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR

AWR’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund construction programs at its regulated utilities and if market interest rates increase. In addition, as the capital investment program continues to increase, AWR and its subsidiaries anticipate they will need to access external financing more often.

AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVES to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $703.8 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2023. Approximately $72.3 million was available for BVES to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2023. ASUS’s ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in which each ASUS Subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS’s ability to pay dividends under California law.

When necessary, AWR obtains funds from external sources through the capital markets and from bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets.

On June 28, 2023, AWR and GSWC each executed new credit agreements with terms of five years provided by a syndicate of banks and financial institutions for total combined unsecured revolving credit facilities of $350.0 million. These syndicated credit facilities replaced AWR’s previous credit agreement with a sole bank. AWR previously borrowed under a revolving credit facility with a borrowing capacity of $280.0 million and provided funds to both GSWC and ASUS in support of their operations through intercompany borrowing agreements on terms that are similar to that of the credit facility. AWR’s new credit agreement was for a $150.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to support AWR (parent) and its contracted services subsidiary, while GSWC’s credit agreement is a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to support its water operations and capital expenditures. AWR (parent) may also from time to time borrow under its credit facility in order to make equity contributions to GSWC and BVES. Both credit facilities may be expanded up to an additional $75.0 million, subject to the lenders’ approval. On November 6, 2023, AWR’s credit facility was amended to increase the borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to $165.0 million to provide additional support to AWR (parent) and its contracted services subsidiary. In connection with the increase in borrowing capacity, the amendment also provides for the addition of a new bank to the existing syndicate group participating in AWR’s credit facility. AWR’s and GSWC’s outstanding borrowings under the new credit facilities were $141.5 million and $150.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2023.

BVES has a separate revolving credit facility without a parent guaranty, which was amended on June 16, 2023, to increase BVES’s borrowing capacity from $35.0 million to $50.0 million. The amendment to BVES’s credit agreement also included (i) the extension of the term of the credit facility to July 1, 2026, (ii) conversion of the interest rate on new borrowings to the benchmark rate Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), and (iii) an option to increase the facility by an additional $25.0 million, subject to lender approval. On February 15, 2024, BVES increased the borrowing capacity from $50.0 million to $65.0 million. The CPUC requires BVES to completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period. BVES’s pay-off period for its credit facility ends in August 2024. Accordingly, the $42.0 million outstanding under BVES’s credit facility has been classified as a current liability in AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2023.

Our primary sources of liquidity to fund operations continue to be from the recovery of costs charged to customers at our regulated utilities and the collection of payments from the U.S government. We believe that capital investment costs associated with our capital programs at our regulated utilities will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers, as well as funds from credit facilities from our regulated utilities. In addition, AWR's credit facility will continue to be used to support ASUS's operations and AWR (parent). The long-term capital-intensive nature of our regulated utilities have required us to continually seek future financing opportunities beyond the short-term. Future long-term financing at GSWC and BVES will consist of both long-term debt and equity issuances in order to manage to the CPUC-authorized capital structure. Under the current financing applications authorized by the CPUC, GSWC and BVES have $105.0 million and $40.0 million, respectively, remaining available that provides for long-term financing and which are expected to be used over the next 6-18 months to pay down portions of the outstanding borrowings under the respective credit facilities. On January 22, 2024, GSWC filed a new financing application with the CPUC, pending approval, that requests the authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $750.0 million. On June 13, 2023, BVES filed a new financing application with the CPUC that is also pending approval, and that requests the authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $120.0 million. The CPUC issued a ruling on January 8, 2024 in BVES's pending financing application stating that a proposed decision is expected to be received no later than 90 days from the date of the ruling. In addition, AWR intends to seek $150.0 million to $200.0 million of additional capital over the next three years through equity offerings, which may include an at-the-market program. AWR could use the net proceeds from equity offerings for, but not limited to, equity contributions to its wholly owned subsidiaries.

51

Table of Contents

Management believes that AWR’s and GSWC’s sound capital structures and strong credit ratings, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case AWR may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.

AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. On February 6, 2024, AWR’s Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.43 per share on AWR’s Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 1, 2024 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 20, 2024. AWR has paid common dividends every year since 1931, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 69 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. AWR’s quarterly dividend rate has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 9.4% over the last five years. AWR’s current policy is to achieve a compound annual growth rate in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVES, and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. AWR’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on its customers’ ability to pay utility bills; and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases, and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.

ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under long-term contracts with the U.S. government for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS’s subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or other subsidiaries of ASUS.

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and deferred income taxes. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities of AWR was $67.7 million for 2023 as compared to $117.8 million for the same period in 2022. During 2022, GSWC and BVES received $9.5 million and $473,000, respectively, in COVID-19 relief funds from the state of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water and electric customer bills incurred during the pandemic. There were no similar relief funds received during 2023.

The decrease in operating cash flow was also due to a 7.8% decrease in billed water consumption, as well as the delay in receiving the water general rate case final decision as billed water revenues in 2022 and 2023 through July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates pending a final CPUC decision, while operating expenses continued to rise primarily due to inflation. A final decision from the CPUC was received on June 29, 2023 on the water general rate case with 2022 and 2023 rates retroactive to January 1, 2022 and 2023, respectively. GSWC filed for the implementation of the CPUC-approved rate increases that went into effect on July 31, 2023. In addition, GSWC filed for the recovery of retroactive rate amounts accumulated through July 30, 2023 related to the CPUC approved rate increases for 2022 and 2023, and surcharges were implemented in October 2023 to recover the cumulative retroactive rate differences over 36-months.

Furthermore, the decrease in operating cash flows was due to differences in the timing of vendor payments and the timing of billing of and cash receipts for construction work at military bases. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work.

The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

52

Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $188.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $167.1 million for the same period in 2022, which is mostly related to capital expenditures at the regulated utilities. AWR invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, while working with the CPUC to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. AWR’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs (to replace infrastructure, including those to mitigate wildfire risk) and major capital investment projects (to construct new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities). The regulated utilities may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.

During 2024, the water and electric segments’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $160 – $200 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

AWR’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to banks, (ii) the proceeds from unsecured new or existing revolving credit facilities for AWR, GSWC and BVES, and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, GSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Borrowings on AWR's new credit facility is used to support AWR (parent) and its contracted services subsidiary and borrowings on GSWC’s and BVES’s credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVES capital expenditures, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. AWR (parent) may also from time to time make equity contributions to GSWC and BVES. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund a portion of the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by the regulated utilities.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $129.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to cash provided of $50.3 million for 2022. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2023 was due primarily to an increase in total borrowing levels necessary to support operations affected by a decrease in cash flows from operating activities and to support, among other things, the capital expenditures program at the regulated utilities. In January 2023, GSWC issued $130.0 million of unsecured notes in a private placement and used the proceeds to pay down the majority of its outstanding intercompany borrowings from AWR, which in turn used the proceeds to pay down outstanding borrowings under the AWR credit facility at that time.

On June 28, 2023, AWR and GSWC each executed new unsecured syndicated credit facilities to replace AWR’s previous credit agreement with a sole bank. During the year ended December 31, 2023, AWR had a net increase in borrowings on its credit facilities of $54.6 million to support operations and capital expenditures. During 2022, AWR had a net increase in borrowings on its credit facilities of $72.0 million.

GSWC

GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends to AWR on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers. Internal cash flows have also been impacted by delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers due to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources for long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments from its parent, AWR, to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. On June 28, 2023, GSWC executed its own separate credit agreement that provides for a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility to support GSWC’s operations and capital expenditures. GSWC’s borrowing capacity under this credit agreement may be expanded up to an additional $75.0 million, subject to the lenders’ approval. Previously, AWR borrowed under a revolving credit facility and provided funds to GSWC in support of its operations under intercompany borrowing arrangements.

In January 2023, GSWC issued (i) one common share to AWR for $10.0 million, and (ii) $130.0 million in unsecured long-term notes in a private placement. GSWC used the proceeds from both the issuance of equity and long-term debt to pay-off all intercompany borrowings from AWR. On June 28, 2023, GSWC borrowed for the first time under its new syndicated credit facility and used the proceeds to again pay-off its short-term intercompany borrowings due to AWR. The CPUC requires GSWC to pay-off all intercompany borrowings it has from AWR within a 24-month period. GSWC’s borrowings under its new

53

Table of Contents

credit facility will also be required to be paid-off in full within a 24-month period. GSWC’s next pay-off period ends in June 2025. Under the current financing application authorized by the CPUC, GSWC has $105.0 million remaining available that provides for long-term financing and which are expected to be used over the next 6-18 months to pay down portions of the outstanding borrowings under GSWC's credit facility. On January 22, 2024, GSWC filed a new financing application with the CPUC, pending approval, that requests the authorization for the issuance and sale of additional long-term debt and equity securities of up to $750.0 million.

In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $94.5 million for 2022.  During the first quarter of 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the state of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic. There were no similar relief funds received during 2023. The decrease in operating cash flow was also due to a 7.8% decrease in billed water consumption, as well as the delay in receiving the water general rate case final decision as billed water revenues in 2022 and 2023 through July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates pending a final CPUC decision, while operating expenses continued to rise primarily due to inflation. A final decision from the CPUC was received on June 29, 2023 on the water general rate case with 2022 and 2023 rates retroactive to January 1, 2022 and 2023, respectively. GSWC filed for the implementation of new 2023 rate increases that went into effect on July 31, 2023. In addition, GSWC filed for the recovery of retroactive rate amounts accumulated through July 30, 2023 related to the new 2022 and 2023 rates, and surcharges were implemented in October 2023 to recover the cumulative retroactive rate differences over 36-months. The decrease in operating cash flow was also due to the timing of vendor payments. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $162.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $147.7 million for 2022, which is mostly related to spending under GSWC’s infrastructure investment plans that are consistent with capital budgets authorized in its general rate cases.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $110.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to $53.1 million for 2022.  The increase in net cash provided by financing activities in 2023 was due primarily to an increase in total borrowing levels necessary to support water operations affected by a decrease in cash flows from operating activities and to support, among other things, the capital expenditures program at GSWC.

In January 2023, GSWC issued $130.0 million of unsecured notes in a private placement and $10.0 million of equity to AWR. GSWC used the proceeds from both issuances to pay-off all of its outstanding intercompany borrowings from AWR at that time. On June 28, 2023, GSWC entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility. GSWC used the proceeds from the borrowings under the new credit facility to again pay-off all of its intercompany borrowings owed to AWR. The CPUC requires GSWC to fully pay-off all intercompany borrowings from AWR within a 24-month period. GSWC’s borrowings under its new credit facility will also be required to be paid-off in full within a 24-month period.

54

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2023. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our initial 50-year, firm-fixed-price contract and additional firm-fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

Payments/Commitments Due (1)
($ in thousands)TotalLess than 1 Year
Notes/Debentures (2)$187,000$
Private Placement Notes (3)380,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)9,459121
Other Debt Instruments (5)2,588232
Total AWR Long-Term Debt$579,047$353
Credit Facilities (6)$333,500$42,000
Interest on Long-Term Debt (7)275,44428,587
Advances for Construction (8)71,1093,678
Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (9)8,948131
Purchased Power Contracts (10)45,8014,685
Capital Expenditures (11)105,165102,865
Water Purchase Agreements (12)2,732491
Operating Leases (13)9,2902,161
Employer Contributions (14)3,3003,300
SUB-TOTAL855,289187,898
Other Commitments (15)11,399
TOTAL$1,445,735$188,251

(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.

(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.

(3) Consists of GSWC senior private placement notes of $345.0 million and BVES unsecured private placement notes of $35.0 million, issued in April 2022, totaling $380.0 million issued to various banks, including $160.0 million of unsecured private placement notes issued in July 2020 by GSWC and $130.0 million of unsecured private placement notes in January 2023 by GSWC. Under the terms of each of the senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. GSWC is in compliance with all of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2023.  GSWC does not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on its properties.

(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $1.7 million of obligations with respect to GSWC’s 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.

55

Table of Contents

(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC’s Arden-Cordova District.

(6) Credit facilities consists of (i) a $165.0 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $141.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2023; (ii) a $200.0 million revolving credit facility under GSWC, of which $150.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2023; and (iii) a $50.0 million revolving credit facility under BVES, of which $42.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2023.

(7) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.

(8) Advances for construction represent contract refunds mostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.

(9) Consists of an agreement by BVES to purchase renewable energy credits through 2035. These renewable energy credits are used to meet California’s renewables portfolio standard.

(10) Consists of BVES fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed (i) in September 2019 with Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., and (ii) in July 2023 with Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.

(11) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVES as of December 31, 2023.

(12) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $1.3 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $1.4 million of other water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2025 through 2038.

(13) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.

(14) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan for the year 2024. Contributions to the pension plan are expected to be the higher of the minimum required contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the amounts that are recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such amounts.

(15) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) $10.5 million in asset retirement obligations of GSWC that reflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (ii) irrevocable letters of credit in the amount of $874,600 for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policies; and (iii) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to AWR’s revolving credit facility.

Information comparing the liquidity and capital resources for fiscal years 2022 and 2021 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC.

BVES Power-Supply Arrangements

BVES purchases power pursuant to purchase power contracts approved by the CPUC. Prior to 2023, BVES had entered into purchase power contracts with three- and five-year terms depending on the amount of power and the period during which the power is purchased under the contracts. These remaining contracts will expire in 2024. In July 2023, the CPUC approved a new power purchase agreement between BVES and a third party to procure renewable portfolio standard eligible energy and renewable energy credits as a bundled product. BVES will begin taking power under this long-term contract during the fourth quarter of 2024 to replace the existing expiring contracts. The new contract provides for the purchase of electricity during a delivery period from November 1, 2024 through December 31, 2035. In addition to the purchased power contracts, BVES buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells surplus power when necessary. BVES is pursuing short- and long-term renewable energy contracts to replace any power purchase agreements that have expired in addition to satisfying its requirements related to its resource portfolio for the next compliance period (2021-2024) and beyond. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, decreased to $79.80 per MWh in 2023 from $97.89 per MWh in 2022. BVES has an electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate any impacts to earnings.

Construction Program

GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC and BVES upgrade their facilities in

56

Table of Contents

accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements and new legislation.  California requires investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval, and requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

As of December 31, 2023, GSWC and BVES have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $105.2 million.  During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, GSWC and BVES had capital expenditures of $182.7 million, $174.3 million and $150.6 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, capital expenditures funded by developers were $7.0 million, $6.9 million and $8.0 million, respectively. During 2024, the water and electric segments’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $160 – $200 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to unfavorable weather conditions and supply chain issues. These amounts include approximately $16.7 million estimated to be spent by BVES on wildfire mitigation projects.

Contracted Services

Under the terms of the contracts with the U.S. government, each contract’s price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for ASUS’s subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.

During sequestration or automatic spending cuts, the subsidiaries of ASUS did not experience any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an “excepted service.” With the expiration of sequestration, similar issues including further sequestration pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act may arise as part of the fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. Any future impact on ASUS and its operations through its subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. Government, and/or (d) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense contracting programs.

At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.

Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for ASUS’s subsidiaries in fiscal 2024.

Military BaseEPA periodFiling Date
Fort Bliss (FBWS)October 2023 - September 2024Third Quarter 2023
Fort Gregg-Adams (ODUS)February 2024 - January 2025Fourth Quarter 2023
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS)April 2024 - March 2025First Quarter of 2024
Joint Base Andrews (TUS)February 2024 - January 2025Fourth Quarter 2023
Fort Jackson (PSUS)February 2024 - January 2025Fourth Quarter 2023
Fort Liberty (ONUS)March 2024 - February 2025First Quarter 2024
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)June 2024 - May 2025Second Quarter 2024
Fort Riley (FRUS)July 2024 - June 2025Second Quarter 2024

57

Table of Contents

Regulatory Matters

A discussion on various regulatory matters is included in the section titled “Overview” in this Form 10-K’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The discussion below focuses on other regulatory matters and developments.

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

GSWC and BVES hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas they serve. ASUS subsidiaries are regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas. The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, based on certain conditions and is expected to approve the right of PRUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Maryland when operations begin. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company. ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS, FRUS and BSUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states’ utility commissions.

GSWC and BVES are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.

Rates that GSWC and BVES are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.

GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses in the second and third years of the rate case cycle. For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. GSWC’s cost of capital is determined in a separate proceeding. Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. BVES’s general rate cases are typically filed every four years, which also includes a determination of BVES's cost of capital. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.

Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVES and ASUS and between GSWC and BVES and AWR.

General Rate Cases and Other Regulatory Matters

Water Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. Water revenues billed to customers for the year ended December 31, 2022 and from January 1, 2023 through July 30, 2023 were based on 2021 adopted rates. On June 29, 2023, GSWC received a final decision on its water general rate case application that determined new rates for 2022 and 2023 and are effective and retroactive to January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023, respectively. The impact of retroactive rates for the full year of 2022 and the second-year 2023 rate increases have been reflected in the results for 2023. GSWC filed for the implementation of new 2023 rate increases effective on July 31, 2023. In October 2023, GSWC also filed for the recovery of all retroactive amounts for 2022 and 2023 accumulated up to the effective date of the new 2023 rates, July 30, 2023. Surcharges were implemented in October 2023 to recover these cumulative retroactive rate differences over 36 months, which through December 31, 2023 totaled $52.8 million and were included in CPUC-authorized general rate case memorandum accounts recognized as regulatory assets.

Water General Rate Case for the years 2025–2027:

On August 14, 2023, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all its water regions and the general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2025 – 2027. Among other things, GSWC requested capital budgets of approximately $611.4 million for the three-year capital cycle. GSWC also requested the continuation of mechanisms to accommodate fully decoupled revenues and sales and track differences between recorded and CPUC-authorized supply-related expenses. GSWC has requested the CPUC to permit it to continue using a revenue decoupling mechanism. As

58

Table of Contents

of the filing date of this Form 10-K, a proposed decision in the water general rate case is scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2024, with new rates to become effective January 1, 2025.

Cost of Capital Proceeding for the years 2022–2024:

On June 29, 2023, a final decision was adopted by the CPUC in the cost of capital proceeding that, among other things, (i) adopts GSWC’s requested capital structure; (ii) adopts a cost of debt of 5.1% for GSWC as compared to 6.6% previously authorized; (iii) adopts a return on equity of 8.85% for GSWC as compared to 8.9% previously authorized; (iv) allows for the continuation of the WCCM through December 31, 2024; and (v) adopts the new cost of capital for the three-year period commencing January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2024. Based on the final decision issued in June, all adjustments to rates were prospective and not retroactive. GSWC filed an advice letter that implemented the new cost of capital effective July 31, 2023.

On June 30, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2023, which increased the 8.85% adopted return on equity in the decision to 9.36% effective July 31, 2023. Additionally, on October 12, 2023, GSWC filed an advice letter to establish the WCCM for 2024, which has been approved by the CPUC, and increased GSWC’s 9.36% adopted return on equity to 10.06% effective January 1, 2024.

2024 COC Application:

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. GSWC’s next cost of capital application was scheduled to be filed on May 1, 2024 effective for the years 2025 - 2027. However, GSWC, along with three other Class A investor-owned water utilities in California, filed a joint request with the CPUC to defer the filing deadline of the next cost of capital applications by one year, which was approved on February 2, 2024. The joint request asked that the utilities keep the cost of capital currently authorized for 2024 in effect through 2025, and file new cost of capital applications by May 1, 2025 to set the cost of debt, return on equity and capital structure starting January 1, 2026. GSWC’s current authorized rate of return on rate base is 7.93% effective January 1, 2024, which will continue in effect through December 31, 2025. Additionally, GSWC’s WCCM will remain active through the one year deferral period.

San Juan Oaks Mutual Acquisition:

In August 2023, GSWC entered into an agreement to purchase the water and wastewater system assets from San Juan Oaks Mutual Water Company (“SJO Mutual”) in San Benito County, California. The new master-planned community, known as San Juan Oaks, will serve up to an estimated 1,300 customers once the community is built as planned. The transaction is subject to CPUC approval. In December 2023, GSWC filed an application to establish the new service area and to set water and sewer rates for the San Juan Oaks service area in San Benito County, California.

Electric Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

On August 30, 2022, BVES filed a new general rate case application with the CPUC to determine new rates for the years 2023–2026. Electric revenues billed to customers for 2023 were based on 2022 adopted rates and will remain in effect until finalization of the pending general rate case application. On December 15, 2022, the CPUC approved a decision for BVES to establish a general rate case memorandum account that makes the new 2023 rates effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023. Because new rates are expected to be retroactive to January 1, 2023, when a decision is issued in the electric general rate case, cumulative adjustments will be recorded at that time.

Vegetation Management, Wildfire Mitigation Plans and Legislation:

The CPUC adopted regulations intended to enhance the fire safety of overhead electric power lines. Those regulations included increased minimum clearances around electric power lines. BVES was authorized to track incremental costs incurred to implement the regulations in a fire hazard prevention memorandum account for the purpose of obtaining cost recovery in a future general rate case. The August 2019 final decision also authorized BVES to record incremental costs related to vegetation management, such as costs for increased minimum clearances around electric power lines, in the CPUC-approved memorandum account for future recovery. As of December 31, 2023, BVES had approximately $11.8 million in incremental vegetation management costs recorded as a regulatory asset. As part of its general rate case application filing with the CPUC in August 2022, BVES requested recovery of the costs accumulated in this memorandum account as of March 31, 2022.

California legislation enacted in September 2018 requires all investor-owned electric utilities to have a wildfire mitigation plan (“WMP”) approved by the OEIS and ratified by the CPUC. The WMP must include a utility’s plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating its electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. In May 2023, BVES submitted its WMP covering the three-year period 2023-2025 to OEIS for approval prior to going to the CPUC for ratification. In the fourth quarter of 2023, OEIS issued a final decision of approval and the CPUC ratified BVES’s 2023-2025 WMP. As of December 31, 2023, BVES has approximately $5.9 million related to expenses accumulated in its WMP memorandum accounts that have been recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. All capital expenditures and other

59

Table of Contents

costs incurred through December 31, 2023 as a result of BVES’s WMPs are not currently in rates and have been filed for future recovery in BVES’s general rate case application in August 2022.

Additionally, the governor of California approved AB 1054 in July 2019 that, among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC proceedings in which an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeks to recover wildfire costs. Previously, an electric utility seeking to recover costs had the burden to prove that it acted reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a “serious doubt” as to the reasonableness of the utility’s conduct. In December 2023, OEIS issued a renewal of the safety certification for BVES for 12 months.

For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Environmental Matters

AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC is required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) and the Division of Drinking Water (“DDW”), under the SWRCB. The USEPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The DDW, acting on behalf of the USEPA, administers the USEPA’s program in California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in which Registrant operates.

GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”). GSWC works proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening GSWC water sources. GSWC also incurs operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply, and additional expense to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, drought impacts, as well as to meet future water quality standards and consumer expectations. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.

Drinking Water Notification Levels

In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes. These chemicals were also present in certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as PFAS. Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The USEPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notifications by water systems when they detect levels of PFAS above response levels.

GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS. GSWC has removed some wells from service, and expects to incur additional costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with information regarding PFAS detection and provides updated information via its website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion (“ppt”) for perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and 40 ppt for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”). In March 2021, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 0.5 parts per billion (“ppb”) and 5 ppb, respectively, for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (“PFBS”). In June 2022, the USEPA issued interim updated drinking-water health advisories for PFOA and PFOS, and also issued final health advisories for PFBS and other compounds known as GenX chemicals. In October 2022, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 3 ppt and 20 ppt, respectively, for perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (“PFHxS”). Lower MCL levels are expected to be promulgated in 2024 and depending on how low the levels are set, these new requirements will likely increase GSWC’s water treatment and other operating costs.

Drinking Water Proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels

In March 2023, the USEPA proposed maximum contaminant levels (“MCLs”) for six PFAS compounds in drinking water. When finalized, the proposed regulation will require public water systems to monitor and treat water for these chemicals. It will also require water systems to notify its customers and reduce the levels if it exceeds the regulatory standards. The USEPA anticipates finalizing and adopting this rule in early 2024. Once the rule is finalized, water systems will be required to comply with the MCLs after a specified implementation period, which is currently anticipated to be three years from the rule-adoption date. These proposed MCLs, once finalized, are expected to increase GSWC’s water treatment and other operating

60

Table of Contents

costs. The CPUC has authorized GSWC to track incremental costs, including laboratory testing and monitoring costs, customer and public notification costs, and chemical and operating treatment costs, incurred as a result of PFAS contamination in a memorandum account to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup

GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at one of its plant sites that contained an underground storage tank which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.

As of December 31, 2023, the total amount spent to clean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.3 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2023, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated remaining cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved in rate base by the CPUC.

Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

On December 16, 2021, the USEPA announced the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions under an executive order with a compliance date of October 16, 2024. Additionally, the USEPA announced its intention to develop a new proposed rule, the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (“LCRI”) that will further strengthen the regulatory framework prior to the October 2024 compliance date. There are still many unknowns regarding the implementation of the rule. The details of the requirements will be better understood over the next year once the LCRI is published and a final rule is approved.

Matters Relating to Military Base Contracts

Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable law.

Each of the ASUS’s subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of ASUS’s Subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.

Security Issues

We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.

Both GSWC and BVES have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyber-attacks.  GSWC and BVES utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect their facilities.  These measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing their respective capital-improvement plans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that either may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of their utility systems.

On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act (“AWIA”) became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of its water systems. These assessments and plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and must be resubmitted every five years.

ASUS’s subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades were completed at various military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.

Registrant has evaluated its cyber-security systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cyber-security of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates.

61

Table of Contents

Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cybersecurity incident or other attacks will not cause water, wastewater or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.

Water Supply

GSWC

During 2023, GSWC delivered approximately 54.3 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 342 acre-feet per day or 111 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 53% of GSWC’s supply came from groundwater produced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from MWD member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 43% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 4%) under agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District. GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.

Groundwater

GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in the implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $2.7 million as of December 31, 2023.  Included in the $2.7 million is a remaining commitment of $1.3 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for ten additional years. The remaining $1.4 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.

Imported Water

GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. For example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities and other parties to purchase water through a total of 59 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. GSWC has 45 connections to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 43,810 acre-feet annually. MWD sources its supplies from Northern California via the State Water Project and the Colorado River through the Colorado River Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements.

MWD currently has supply levels of 1.14 million acre-feet (“MAF”) with annual demands of approximately 1.54 MAF resulting in a supply gap of 399 thousand acre feet. MWD has available access to store more than 1.65 MAF of water in Lake Mead as part of an intentionally created surplus program developed under a 2007 Interim Shortage agreement and is available for use during dry years. In addition, MWD, along with the seven other Basin states which use water from the Colorado River, developed and agreed to the Drought Contingency Plan in 2019 where each lower Basin state which diverts water from the Colorado River below Lees Ferry agrees to store defined amounts of water in Lake Mead to prevent both Lake Mead and Lake Powell from reaching critically low levels. California is a lower Basin state. On December 1, 2023, the Department of Water Resources set the initial allocation for the water year to 10% due to the possibility that 2024 may be a dry year.

Drought Impact

In May 2018, the California Legislature passed two bills that provide a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The initial steps in implementation of this legislation have been laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”) and SWRCB. A notable milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (“gpcd”) until 2025. Legislation signed by the Governor into law in September 2022 has set more stringent indoor standard targets than initially set forth in the 2018 legislation. The indoor standard will now be set at 47 gpcd in 2025 and then reduced to 42 gpcd in 2030 (previously had been set at 52.5 gpcd and 50 gpcd, respectively). The SWRCB released a draft of the Conservation Regulation in mid-year 2023.

62

Table of Contents

The SWRCB is expected to consider the adoption of the regulation by October 2024. Water suppliers including GSWC have provided extensive comments to date on the draft regulation and will work with state agencies on the final regulation and its implementation.

California’s recent period of multi-year drought has resulted in reduced recharge to the state’s groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially smaller basins, experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought. Several of GSWC’s service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in California’s Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain service areas in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply shortages from the locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply.

After a very wet 2023, California could still potentially be entering into a dry 2024 even with the recent storm events in California in January and February 2024. Since the start of the water year, both the Sierra snowpack and precipitation has been below normal. The southern Sierra snowpack was at 52% of normal and the 5-station precipitation index was at 71% of normal on February 12, 2024. However, a series of atmospheric storm events in late January and early February are providing a promising outlook to the State’s supply conditions. As of February 13, 2024, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that none of California was in drought with only 7% identified as “abnormally dry” as compared to a year ago when 85% was in “moderate drought.”

Prolonged drought conditions also exist on the Colorado River System, which is experiencing historically low reservoir levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell. Urgent action to reduce water demand on the lower river by 2 to 4 million acre feet annually has been requested by the US Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”). In December 2023, several California water agencies signed agreements with the Bureau to conserve up to 643,000 Acre-feet of water in Lake Mead through 2025. This includes contracts with the Coachella Valley Water District, the Quechan Indian Tribe and the Imperial Irrigation District. Additional contracts are expected to be signed by Palo Verde Irrigation District in cooperation with MWD in 2024. GSWC will continue to monitor developments related to the Colorado River System and assess its impact on GSWC.

Military Base Operations

The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by ASUS’s subsidiaries at no cost to ASUS’s subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations. Furthermore, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring compliance with the reduction and/or removal of all constituents required under its wastewater treatment plant operating permits. ASUS works closely with state regulators and industry associations to stay current with emergent issues and proactively addresses any change in wastewater treatment regulation to ensure permit compliance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

63

Table of Contents

FY 2022 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0001628280-23-005869.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2023-03-01. Report date: 2022-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and its subsidiaries (GSWC, BVESI, and ASUS and its subsidiaries), and AWR (parent) where applicable. The subsidiaries of ASUS are collectively referred to as the “Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries.”

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment’s earnings divided by AWR’s weighted average number of diluted common shares.  Furthermore, the gains and losses generated on the investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 have been excluded and the retroactive impact of new 2022 water rates not yet recorded due to the delay in receiving a final decision from the CPUC, which will be retroactive to January 1, 2022 when approved, have been included to calculate adjusted diluted earnings per share when communicating AWR’s consolidated and its water segment’s results for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 to help facilitate comparisons of AWR’s performance from period to period. Diluted earnings per share by business segment and adjusted diluted earnings per share constitute “non-GAAP financial measures” under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which supplement our GAAP disclosures but should not be considered as an alternative to the respective GAAP measures. Furthermore, the non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures of other registrants. All of these measures are derived from consolidated financial information of the Registrant, but are not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

AWR uses earnings per share by business segment as an important measure in evaluating its operating results and believes it provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments.  AWR reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. A reconciliation to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP is included in the discussion under the section titled “Summary Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under the Overview section in Item 1. Business and Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC’s and BVESI’s revenues, operating income, and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California, respectively. Rates charged to GSWC and BVESI customers are determined by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on capital.  GSWC and BVESI plan to continue seeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVESI are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVESI may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:

Water General Rate Case for years 2022 - 2024:

In July 2020, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water regions and its general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2022 – 2024. In November 2021, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC (“Public Advocates”) filed with the CPUC a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Public Advocates on this general rate case application. The settlement agreement, if approved, resolves all issues related to the 2022 annual revenue requirement in the general rate case application, leaving only three unresolved issues. Among other things, the settlement authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $404.8 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year cycle. The settlement also authorizes GSWC to complete certain advice letter capital projects approved in the last general rate case, which have been completed for a total capital investment of $9.4 million. The additional annual revenue requirements generated from these capital investments total $1.2 million and became effective February 15, 2022. Advice letter projects are filed for revenue recovery only when the projects are completed.

Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the amounts included in the settlement agreement would increase the 2022 adopted revenues by approximately $30.3 million, or $0.59 per share, as compared to the 2021 adopted revenues, and increase the 2022 adopted supply costs by $9.6 million, or $0.19 per share, as compared to the 2021 adopted supply costs, which combined is an increase of $0.40 per share. The settlement agreement also allows for the potential of additional increases in adopted revenues for 2023 and 2024 subject to an earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values.

28

The three remaining unresolved issues relate to GSWC’s requests for: (i) a medical insurance cost balancing account, (ii) a general liability insurance cost balancing account, and (iii) the consolidation of two of GSWC’s customer service areas. GSWC and Public Advocates have filed briefs with the CPUC on these unsettled issues. A proposed decision will address the three unresolved issues along with the settlement agreement filed by GSWC and Public Advocates. Pending a final decision on this general rate case application, GSWC filed with the CPUC for interim rates that will make the new 2022 rates, once approved in a CPUC final decision, effective January 1, 2022. In January 2023, the CPUC issued a decision that approved a second extension of the statutory deadline for a final decision in the water general rate case proceeding to April 7, 2023.

Due to the delay in finalizing the water general rate case, water revenues billed and recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates, pending a final decision by the CPUC. When approved, the new rates will be retroactive to January 1, 2022 and cumulative adjustments will be recorded upon receiving a decision by the CPUC that approves the settlement agreement. Had the new 2022 water rates been approved and effective January 1, 2022 consistent with the settlement agreement reached between GSWC and Public Advocates, GSWC would have recorded the additional revenues of $30.3 million, or $0.59 per share, and the additional water supply costs of $9.6 million, or $0.19 per share, per the settlement agreement previously discussed, as well as an additional reduction to revenues of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, to reflect the incremental impact of revenues subject to refund from the new 2022 rates as a result of the lower cost of debt in the pending cost of capital proceeding discussed below, which all combined would have been $0.38 per share higher than what was actually recorded for the year of 2022.

Cost of Capital Proceeding:

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. GSWC filed a cost of capital application with the CPUC in May 2021 currently pending approval, which requested a capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, a return on equity of 10.5%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a return on rate base of 8.18%. Hearings on this proceeding occurred in May 2022 and briefs were filed in June 2022.

The 5.1% cost of debt requested in the pending cost of capital proceeding is lower than the previously authorized amount of 6.6%. The new cost of debt is expected to lower 2022 adopted water revenues by approximately $7.5 million, or $0.15 per share, as compared to 2021 adopted water revenues at the currently authorized cost of debt of 6.6% that is presently being billed to water customers until a final decision is issued in this proceeding. Based on management’s analysis of this regulatory proceeding and associated accounting to date, for the year ended December 31, 2022, GSWC reduced revenues by $6.4 million, or approximately $0.13 per share, based on 2021 billed rates and recorded a corresponding regulatory liability for revenues subject to refund based on its best estimate at this time, which includes the impact of GSWC’s lower cost of debt requested in its application. However, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the cost of capital application and the associated impact on 2022 revenues. Changes in estimates will be made, if necessary, as more information in this proceeding becomes available. Due to the delay in finalizing the water general rate case previously discussed, water revenues billed and recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates and, therefore, an additional reduction of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, will be recorded once a decision is approved in the general rate case to reflect the incremental impact of revenues subject to refund from the new 2022 rates resulting from the lower cost of debt in the pending cost of capital proceeding.

In the pending cost of capital proceeding, GSWC requested authorization to continue the Water Cost of Capital Mechanism (“WCCM”). The WCCM adjusts return on equity and rate of return on rate base between the three-year cost of capital proceedings only if there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points in the average of the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate as measured over the period October 1 through September 30. If there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points, the return on equity is adjusted by one half of the difference. For the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, the Moody’s rate increased by more than 100 basis points from the benchmark, which triggered the WCCM adjustment. The WCCM is expected to be addressed by the CPUC in the pending proposed decision.

Final Decision in the First Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:

In August 2020, the CPUC issued a final decision in the first phase of the CPUC’s Order Instituting Rulemaking evaluating the low income ratepayer assistance and affordability objectives contained in the CPUC’s 2010 Water Action Plan. This decision also addressed other issues, including the discontinued use of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism (“WRAM”) and the Modified Cost Balancing Account (“MCBA”). The MCBA is a full-cost balancing account used to track the difference between adopted and actual water supply costs (including the effects of changes in both rates and volume). Based on the final decision, any general rate case application filed by GSWC and the other California water utilities after August 27, 2020 may not include a proposal to continue the use of the WRAM or MCBA, but may instead include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism and an incremental supply cost balancing account. Since its implementation in 2008, the WRAM and MCBA have helped mitigate fluctuations in GSWC’s earnings due to changes in water consumption by its customers or changes in water supply mix. Replacing them with mechanisms recommended in the final decision will likely

29

result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could result in less than, or more than, full recovery of its authorized revenue and supply costs.

As a result of the August 2020 decision, the discontinuation of the WRAM and MCBA for GSWC would be effective for years after 2024. However, on September 30, 2022, the governor of California signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 1469. Effective January 1, 2023, SB 1469 allows Class A water utilities, including GSWC, to continue requesting the use of the WRAM in their next general rate case. With the passage of SB 1469, GSWC will be able to request the continued use of the WRAM in its next general rate case to be filed in 2023 that will establish new rates for the years 2025 – 2027. GSWC’s request to continue using the WRAM in its next general rate case will be subject to CPUC approval.

In October 2020, GSWC, three other investor-owned water utilities (“IOWUs”) operating in California, and the California Water Association (“CWA”) filed applications with the CPUC for rehearing on the discontinuation of the WRAM and MCBA, which the CPUC denied in September 2021. GSWC, the three other IOWUs and CWA each separately filed a petition with the California Supreme Court (“Court”) to review the CPUC’s decision revoking prior authorization of the WRAM and MCBA. In May 2022, the Court granted the petition for writ of review. The Court ordered GSWC, along with the other IOWUs and CWA, to file opening briefs, which were filed on September 1. The CPUC’s answer to the opening briefs was originally due by November 15 and reply briefs were due by December 15. However, as a result of SB 1469, in October 2022 the CPUC filed a motion to dismiss the IOWUs and CWA’s petition with the Court, and also requested that the Court suspend the proceeding schedule until it rules on the motion to dismiss. The Court granted the CPUC’s request to suspend the proceeding schedule. In November 2022, the Supreme Court denied the CPUC’s motion to dismiss and established a new proceeding schedule whereby the CPUC filed their answer brief on December 9 and the IOWUs filed their reply brief on January 13, 2023. At this time, management cannot predict the final outcome of this matter.

Final Decision in the Second Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:

On July 15, 2021, the CPUC issued a final decision in the second phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking. The final decision requires that amounts tracked in GSWC’s COVID-19 Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account (“CEMA”) account for unpaid customer bills be first offset by any (i) federal or state relief for customers’ utility bill debt, and (ii) customer payments through payment-plan arrangements prior to receiving recovery from customers at large. In January 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million of relief funding from the state of California for customers’ unpaid water bills incurred during the pandemic, which it applied to its delinquent customers’ eligible balances.

In August 2021, GSWC, in addition to three other parties, filed separate applications to the CPUC for rehearing on certain aspects of this final decision, which the CPUC denied in May 2022. In March 2022, CWA filed a petition for writ of review to the California Supreme Court, urging the Court to review the CPUC’s final decision on the second phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking. CWA amended its petition to reflect the CPUC’s decision denying the requests for rehearing. In September 2022, the Supreme Court denied CWA’s amended petition for writ of review.

Electric General Rate Cases:

On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on the electric general rate case that set new rates for the years 2018 – 2022. Among other things, the decision increased adopted electric revenues by $1.0 million in 2022 not subject to an earnings test. The decision also allowed BVESI to construct all the capital projects requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate cycle. The decision authorized a return on equity for the electric segment of 9.6% and included a capital structure and a debt cost that are consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC’s water segment cost of capital proceeding.

On August 30, 2022, BVESI filed a general rate case application that will determine new electric rates for the years 2023 – 2026. Among other things, BVESI requested (i) capital budgets of approximately $62 million for the four-year rate cycle, and another $6.2 million for a large line replacement capital project to be filed for revenue recovery through an advice letter when the project is completed, and (ii) a capital structure for BVESI of 61.8% equity and 38.2% debt, a return on equity of 11.25%, an embedded cost of debt of 5.1%, and a return on rate base of 9.05%. Furthermore, included in the general rate case application is a request for recovery of all capital expenditures and other costs incurred over the last few years in connection with BVESI’s wildfire mitigation plans that are currently not in customer rates. These costs will be subject to review by the CPUC during the general rate case proceeding. On December 16, 2022, a pre-hearing conference was held to discuss the scope of issues and schedule for the proceeding. On December 15, 2022, the CPUC approved a decision for BVESI to establish a general rate case memorandum account that makes the new 2023 rates effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023. In February 2023, a scoping memo and ruling that set the final schedule and scope of issues in BVESI’s general rate case proceeding was issued by the CPUC. Based on the schedule, a proposed decision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2023.

30

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS’s revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities for the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to an initial 50-year firm fixed-price contract and additional firm fixed-price contracts. The contract price for each of these contracts is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on annual economic price adjustments, and new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors. ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2022, ASUS was awarded approximately $34.4 million in new construction projects for completion beginning in 2022 through 2025. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contract or additional contracts thereafter with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

Entering into contracts with the U.S. government subjects ASUS to potential government audits or investigations of its business practices and compliance with government procurement statutes and regulations. ASUS is currently under a civil government investigation over bidding and estimating practices used in certain capital upgrade projects. ASUS is cooperating fully with the investigation and management does not currently believe that the investigation will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. However, at this time, management cannot predict the final outcome or recommendations that may result from the investigation or determine the amount, if any, of penalties and damages that may be assessed.

COVID-19:

GSWC, BVESI and ASUS have continued their operations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic given that their water, wastewater and electric utility services are deemed essential. AWR and its subsidiaries continue to monitor the guidance provided by federal, state, and local health authorities and other government officials. While continuing to monitor transmission rates and other variables, employees have returned to company offices. Thus far, the COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on ASUS’s current operations.

In response to orders issued by the CPUC and the governor of California, GSWC and BVESI suspended service disconnections for nonpayment. However, pursuant to the CPUC’s July 15, 2021 decision in the Second Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking discussed previously, the moratorium on water-service disconnections due to non-payment of past-due amounts billed to residential customers expired on February 1, 2022. The CPUC’s moratoriums on service disconnections for nonpayment for water and electric customers have ended and as a result, disconnections for delinquent residential customers resumed in June 2022. However, water service cannot be disconnected so long as customers make timely payments on current bills and are provided and adhere to payment plans to pay down past-due bills resulting from the pandemic. In addition, electric-service disconnections for non-payment can only be done after taking into account certain conditions such as average daily temperatures, and residential disconnections are capped on an annual basis at 2.5% of the total residential customers during the previous calendar year.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its lingering effects to the economy has contributed to significant volatility in financial markets resulting in fluctuations in the fair value of plan assets in GSWC’s pension and other retirement plans. In addition, the economic impact of the pandemic has also significantly increased the amount of delinquent customer accounts receivable, resulting in both GSWC and BVESI increasing their allowance for doubtful accounts. The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to track incremental costs, including bad debt expense, in excess of what is included in their respective revenue requirements incurred as a result of the pandemic in COVID-19 emergency-related memorandum accounts, which GSWC and BVESI intend to file with the CPUC for future recovery.

Without the ability to disconnect service for non-payment, during the first half of 2022, GSWC and BVESI continued to experience delinquent customer accounts receivable due to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in both GSWC and BVESI increasing their allowance for doubtful accounts. As of December 31, 2022, GSWC and BVESI had approximately $3.5 million and $497,000, respectively, in regulatory asset accounts related to bad debt expense in excess of their revenue requirements, the purchase of personal protective equipment, additional incurred printing costs, and other incremental COVID-19-related costs. Emergency-type memorandum accounts are well-established cost recovery mechanisms authorized as a result of a state/federal declared emergency, and are therefore recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. As a result, the amounts recorded in the COVID-19 emergency-related memorandum accounts have not impacted GSWC’s or BVESI’s earnings.

In January 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million in COVID relief funds through the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program to provide assistance to customers for their water debt accrued during the COVID-19 pandemic by remitting federal funds that the state received from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to the utility on behalf of eligible customers. GSWC applied these funds to its delinquent customers’ eligible balances. During 2022, BVESI received a total of $473,000 from the state of California for similar customer relief funding for unpaid electric customer bills incurred during the pandemic. The CPUC requires that amounts tracked in GSWC’s and BVESI’s COVID-19 emergency-related memorandum

31

accounts for unpaid customer bills be first offset by any (i) federal and state relief for water or electric utility bill debt, and (ii) customer payments through payment plan arrangements, prior to receiving recovery from customers at large. After these offsets are made, GSWC will file with the CPUC for recovery of the remaining balance. BVESI intends to include the remaining balance in its COVID-19 emergency-related memorandum account for recovery once all alternative sources of funding have been exhausted and credited to eligible customer accounts.

On January 30, 2023, the Biden Administration announced that the COVID-19 national emergency and public health emergency will end on May 11, 2023. The COVID-19 emergency-related memorandum accounts for GSWC and BVESI will remain open until the COVID-19 national emergency and public health emergency ends.

32

Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share by business segment and for the parent company:

Diluted Earnings per Share
Year Ended
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGE
Water$1.45$1.87$(0.42)
Electric0.240.210.03
Contracted services0.460.48(0.02)
AWR (parent)(0.04)(0.01)(0.03)
Consolidated fully diluted earnings per share, as reported (GAAP)$2.11$2.55$(0.44)

For the year ended December 31, 2022, AWR’s recorded consolidated diluted earnings were $2.11 per share, as compared to $2.55 per share for the same period in 2021, a decrease of $0.44 per share. Included in the results for the year ended December 31, 2022 were losses totaling $5.2 million, or approximately $0.10 per share, on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans, as compared to gains of $4.3 million, or approximately $0.08 per share, for the same period in 2021, both due to financial market conditions. Furthermore, due to the delay in receiving a final decision from the CPUC on GSWC’s pending water general rate case that will set new rates beginning in 2022, water revenues billed and recorded for the year of 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates, pending a final decision. When approved, the new rates will be retroactive to January 1, 2022 and cumulative adjustments will be recorded upon receiving a decision by the CPUC. Had the new 2022 water rates been approved effective January 1, 2022 and consistent with the settlement agreement reached between GSWC and Public Advocates, GSWC would have recorded additional revenues of $30.3 million, or $0.59 per share, and additional water supply costs of $9.6 million, or $0.19 per share, as well as an additional reduction to revenues of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, to reflect the incremental impact of revenues subject to refund from the new 2022 rates as a result of the lower cost of debt in the pending cost of capital proceeding, which all combined would have been $0.38 per share higher than what was actually recorded for the year of 2022.

Excluding the gains and losses on investments from both periods, and including the additional net revenues and water supply costs in the results for the year of 2022 had a final decision in the water general rate case not been delayed, adjusted consolidated diluted earnings for the year of 2022 would have been $2.59 per share as compared to adjusted diluted earnings of $2.47 per share for the same period in 2021, an adjusted increase of $0.12 per share.

The following is a computation and reconciliation of diluted earnings per share from the measure of operating income by business segment as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to AWR’s consolidated fully diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

WaterElectricContracted ServicesAWR (Parent)Consolidated (GAAP)
In 000's except per share amounts2022202120222021202220212022202120222021
Operating income (Note 17)$92,455$107,573$11,740$10,738$22,449$22,675$(8)$(9)$126,636$140,977
Other income and expense22,33916,263425(101)(273)(488)2,08553324,57616,207
Income tax expense (benefit)16,34622,0952,4392,9755,4765,434(597)(81)23,66430,423
Net income (loss)$53,770$69,215$8,876$7,864$17,246$17,729$(1,496)$(461)$78,396$94,347
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares37,03937,01037,03937,01037,03937,01037,03937,01037,03937,010
Diluted earnings per share$1.45$1.87$0.24$0.21$0.46$0.48$(0.04)$(0.01)$2.11$2.55

Water Segment:

For the year ended December 31, 2022, recorded diluted earnings from the water utility segment were $1.45 per share, as compared to $1.87 per share for the same period in 2021, a decrease of $0.42 per share. As discussed above, the decrease at the water segment was partly due to losses of $0.10 per share incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022 on investments held to fund a retirement plan, as compared to gains of $0.08 per share for the same period in 2021, a net decrease in earnings of $0.18 per share. Furthermore, and also discussed above, the water segment’s results for the year ended December 31, 2022 would have included an additional $0.38 per share had there been no delay in receiving a decision approving the settlement agreement with Public Advocates in the water general rate case that approves the new 2022 rates effective January 1, 2022.

33

Excluding the gains and losses on investments from both periods, and including the additional net revenues and water supply costs in the result for the year ended December 31, 2022 had a final decision in the water general rate case not been delayed, adjusted diluted earnings for the year ended December 31, 2022 at the water segment were $1.93 per share as compared to adjusted diluted earnings of $1.79 per share for the same period in 2021, an adjusted increase at the water segment of $0.14 per share, or a 7.8% increase, despite an approximate $0.13 per share reduction in earnings during the year ended December 31, 2022 as a result of the lower cost of debt in the pending cost of capital proceeding discussed below.

Excluding only the gains and losses on investments from both periods discussed above, adjusted diluted earnings at the water segment for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $1.55 per share, as compared to adjusted earnings of $1.79 per share for 2021, an adjusted decrease of $0.24 per share due to the following items:

•A decrease in the water operating revenues of $6.5 million largely as a result of the lower cost of debt included in the pending cost of capital application. GSWC recorded a reduction to revenues during the year ended December 31, 2022 of $6.4 million, or approximately $0.13 per share, to reflect management’s best estimate at this time of revenues subject to refund from the pending cost of capital proceeding, which includes the impact of GSWC’s lower cost of debt requested in its application. However, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the cost of capital application and the associated impact on 2022 revenues. Changes in estimates will be made, if necessary, as more information in this proceeding becomes available. As discussed previously, water revenues billed and recorded for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates, pending a final decision by the CPUC on the general rate case application.

•An increase in water supply costs of $1.1 million, which consist primarily of the changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts due to the effect of rate increases implemented mid-year 2021 reducing the under-collections offset by a decrease in water purchased due to decreases in water consumption and production that are being driven by drought conditions and water use restrictions, partially offset by increases in wholesale water costs. Adopted supply costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 authorized amounts, pending a final decision by the CPUC in the water general rate case application. Actual water supply costs are tracked and passed through to customers on a dollar-for-dollar basis by way of the CPUC-approved water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs results in a corresponding increase in water operating revenues and has no net impact on the water segment’s profitability.

•An overall increase in operating expenses of $7.1 million (excluding supply costs), which negatively impacted earnings and was mainly due to increases in (i) overall labor costs, (ii) operation-related expenses resulting from higher chemical and water treatment costs and transportation expenses, (iii) administrative and general expenses resulting from higher insurance costs, and employee-related benefits, (iv) depreciation and amortization expenses resulting from additions to utility plant, and (v) maintenance expenses.

•The sale of non-utility-related land at the water segment resulted in a gain of $409,000 recorded during 2021, with no equivalent item in 2022.

•An overall increase in interest expense (net of interest and other income) of $613,000 resulting primarily to an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditures program at GSWC and higher short-term interest rates. This was partially offset by an increase in interest income earned on regulatory assets at the water segment bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rate, which increased compared to 2021.

•An overall increase in other income (net of other expenses) of $4.0 million due primarily from a decrease in the non-service cost components related to GSWC’s benefit plans resulting from lower actuarial losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021.

•A decrease in the effective income tax rate, which positively impacted earnings. The decrease resulted primarily from changes in certain flow-through and permanent items. As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as flow-through in computing its income tax expense consistent with the income tax method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction ratemaking. Changes in the magnitude of flow-through items either increase or decrease tax expense, thereby affecting diluted earnings per share.

Electric Segment:

Diluted earnings from the electric utility segment increased $0.03 per share for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021, largely due to an increase in electric operating revenues resulting from CPUC-approved rate increases effective January 1, 2022 and a lower effective income tax rate at the electric segment due to changes in flow-through taxes, partially offset by higher interest expense (net of interest income). In April 2022, BVESI completed the issuance of $35.0 million in unsecured private-placement notes consisting of 10 and 15 year terms. BVESI used the proceeds to pay down all outstanding borrowings under its credit facility as required by the CPUC. Generally, borrowings under the credit facility bear lower short-term rates.

34

Contracted Services Segment:

Diluted earnings from the contracted services segment decreased $0.02 per share for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021, largely due to a decrease in construction activity resulting from timing differences of when such work was performed as compared to the same period of 2021, as well as a slowdown caused by longer materials supply-chain lead-times, delays in receiving capital upgrade awards, and other delays. There was also an increase in overall operating expenses (excluding construction expenses). These decreases to earnings at the contracted services segment were partially offset by an increase in management fee revenues resulting from the annual economic price adjustments.

AWR (Parent):

For the year ended December 31, 2022, diluted earnings from AWR (parent) decreased $0.03 per share compared to 2021 due primarily to an increase in interest expense resulting from higher short-term interest rates on borrowings made under AWR’s revolving credit facility.

The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 provide information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

35

Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water$340,602$347,112$(6,510)-1.9%
Electric39,98638,3451,6414.3%
Contracted services110,940113,396(2,456)-2.2%
Total operating revenues491,528498,853(7,325)-1.5%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased75,93977,914(1,975)-2.5%
Power purchased for pumping11,86111,1037586.8%
Groundwater production assessment19,07119,412(341)-1.8%
Power purchased for resale15,03911,2403,79933.8%
Supply cost balancing accounts(12,000)(11,421)(579)5.1%
Other operation38,09534,7383,3579.7%
Administrative and general86,19083,5472,6433.2%
Depreciation and amortization41,31539,5961,7194.3%
Maintenance13,39212,7816114.8%
Property and other taxes22,89422,5223721.7%
ASUS construction53,17156,909(3,738)-6.6%
Gain on sale of assets(75)(465)390-83.9%
Total operating expenses364,892357,8767,0162.0%
OPERATING INCOME126,636140,977(14,341)-10.2%
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense(27,027)(22,834)(4,193)18.4%
Interest income2,3261,49383355.8%
Other, net1255,134(5,009)-97.6%
(24,576)(16,207)(8,369)51.6%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE102,060124,770(22,710)-18.2%
Income tax expense23,66430,423(6,759)-22.2%
NET INCOME$78,396$94,347$(15,951)-16.9%
Basic earnings per Common Share$2.12$2.55$(0.43)-16.9%
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share$2.11$2.55$(0.44)-17.3%

36

Operating Revenues

General

GSWC and BVESI rely upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plant. ASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. Current operating revenues and earnings may be negatively impacted if the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries do not receive adequate price adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of construction projects at the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Water

Due to the delay in the CPUC issuing a final decision on the water general rate case, billed water revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates, pending a CPUC final decision on GSWC’s general rate case application. For the year ended December 31, 2022, revenues from water operations decreased by $6.5 million to $340.6 million, compared to the same period in 2021 as a result of the lower cost of debt included in the pending cost of capital application. GSWC recorded a reduction to water revenues of $6.4 million to reflect management’s best estimate at this time of revenues subject to refund from the pending cost of capital proceeding, which includes the impact of GSWC’s lower cost of debt requested in its application.

Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2022 was lower by 6.0% compared to 2021. Currently, changes in consumption generally do not have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM that is in place in all but one small rate-making area. GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities.

Electric

Electric revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022 increased $1.6 million to $40.0 million as a result of new CPUC-approved electric rates effective January 1, 2022 and a 6.5% increase in electric usage as compared to 2021. Due to the CPUC-approved Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.

Contracted Services

Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For the year ended December 31, 2022, revenues from contracted services decreased $2.5 million to $110.9 million as compared to $113.4 million for 2021. The decrease was due to lower construction activity resulting, in part, from timing differences of when such work was performed as compared to the same period of 2021, as well as a slowdown primarily caused by longer materials supply-chain lead-times, delays in receiving capital upgrade awards, and other delays. This decrease was partially offset by increases in management fees due to the successful resolution of various economic price adjustments.

ASUS’s subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2022, ASUS was awarded approximately $34.4 million in new construction projects for completion in 2022 through 2025. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

Operating Expenses:

Supply Costs

Total supply costs at the regulated utilities comprise the largest segment of total consolidated operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for 30.1% and 30.2% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Water segment supply costs

Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were 45%, as compared to the adopted percentages of 34% for 2022 and 2021. The higher actual percentage of purchased water as compared to the adopted percentage resulted from a higher volume of purchased water costs due to several wells being out of service.  Due to the delay in finalizing the water general rate case, which will set new rates for the years 2022 through 2024, adopted supply

37

costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 authorized amounts, pending a final decision by the CPUC on GSWC’s general rate case application.

Under the current CPUC-approved Modified Cost Balancing Account (“MCBA”), GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses as a regulatory asset or liability. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances.  GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area.

Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, water supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water purchased$75,939$77,914$(1,975)-2.5%
Power purchased for pumping11,86111,1037586.8%
Groundwater production assessment19,07119,412(341)-1.8%
Water supply cost balancing accounts *(8,643)(11,295)2,652-23.5%
Total water supply costs$98,228$97,134$1,0941.1%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(12,000,000) and $(11,421,000) for 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Purchased water costs for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased to $75.9 million as compared to $77.9 million for 2021 primarily due to decreases in water consumption and production that are being driven by drought conditions and water use restrictions, partially offset by increases in wholesale water costs. The increase in power purchased for pumping was due to increases in electric rates. Groundwater production assessments decreased due to a decrease in water usage, partially offset by increases in pump tax rates during the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the water supply cost balancing account had $8.6 million under-collection as compared to an $11.3 million under-collection in 2021. The decrease in under-collection was primarily due to the effect of rate increases implemented mid-year 2021 at certain rate-making areas to specifically cover increases in supply costs experienced in these areas, thereby reducing their under-collections.

Electric segment supply costs

Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVESI’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, electric supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Power purchased for resale$15,039$11,240$3,79933.8%
Electric supply cost balancing account *(3,357)(126)(3,231)2,564.3%
Total electric supply costs$11,682$11,114$5685.1%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(12,000,000) and $(11,421,000) for 2022 and 2021, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVESI’s customers increased to $15.0 million as compared to $11.2 million for 2021 primarily due to higher average price per megawatt-hour (“MWh”). The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased to $97.89 per MWh in 2022 from $71.94 per MWh in 2021. This increase in price resulted in an under-collection of $3.4 million recorded in the electric supply balancing account during 2022 as compared to an under-collection of $126,000 during 2021.

38

Other Operation

The primary components of other operation expenses include payroll, materials and supplies, chemicals and water-treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices.  Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$28,117$25,781$2,3369.1%
Electric Services3,3113,01130010.0%
Contracted Services6,6675,94672112.1%
Total other operation$38,095$34,738$3,3579.7%

For the year ended December 31, 2022, other operation costs at the water segment increased due primarily to higher water treatment and chemical costs, as well as transportation costs. The increase at the electric segment was due primarily to higher operation-related outside-service costs. The increase at the contracted services segment was due primarily to higher water treatment and chemical costs, operation-related labor, and transportation costs. Transportation costs were higher due, in part, to increases in fuel and maintenance costs.

Administrative and General

Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$58,358$55,552$2,8065.1%
Electric Services7,9018,694(793)-9.1%
Contracted Services19,92319,2926313.3%
AWR (parent)89(1)-11.1%
Total administrative and general$86,190$83,547$2,6433.2%

Administrative and general expenses increased at the water segment largely due to increases in employee-related benefits, including an increase of $1.2 million related to the service cost component of GSWC’s defined-benefit pension plan. As a result of GSWC’s two-way pension balancing account authorized by the CPUC, increases in pension costs are fully recovered in customer rates, thus having no material impact to earnings. There was also an increase in insurance and general corporate costs, partially offset by decreases in regulatory and other outside-service costs.

Administrative and general expenses decreased at the electric segment due, in part, to a decrease of $192,000 in surcharges billed to customers for the recovery of previously incurred costs, which had a corresponding decrease in administrative and general expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. There was also a decrease in outside-service and other administrative and general costs.

Administrative and general expenses increased at the contracted services segment due to an increase in outside services, insurance, travel, and labor expenses.

39

Depreciation and Amortization

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$34,805$33,384$1,4214.3%
Electric Services2,7922,5722208.6%
Contracted Services3,7183,640782.1%
Total depreciation and amortization$41,315$39,596$1,7194.3%

The overall increase in depreciation expense resulted primarily from additions to utility plant and other fixed assets since 2021.

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$9,559$9,056$5035.6%
Electric Services723697263.7%
Contracted Services3,1103,028822.7%
Total maintenance$13,392$12,781$6114.8%

Maintenance expense increased at the water segment due to higher unplanned maintenance and maintenance-related materials expenses incurred as compared to 2021.

Property and Other Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$19,080$19,041$390.2%
Electric Services1,8371,51931820.9%
Contracted Services1,9771,962150.8%
Total property and other taxes$22,894$22,522$3721.7%

Property and other taxes increased at the water and electric segment primarily due to an increase in property taxes resulting from higher assessed property values brought about by capital additions. The increase at the water segment from property taxes was partially offset by a decrease in franchise fees resulting from lower water revenues recognized in 2022 compared to 2021.

ASUS Construction

For the year ended December 31, 2022, construction expenses for contracted services were $53.2 million, decreasing by $3.7 million compared to 2021 primarily due to a decrease in construction activity resulting from timing differences of when such work was performed as compared to 2021, as well as a slowdown caused by longer materials supply-chain lead-times, delays in receiving capital upgrade awards, and other delays.

Gain On Sale of Assets

The decrease in gain on sale of assets in 2022 compared to 2021 was related primarily to the sale of a parcel of non-utility-related land at the water segment in 2021 with no equivalent item in 2022.

40

Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$22,742$21,474$1,2685.9%
Electric Services1,225259966373.0%
Contracted Services743370373100.8%
AWR (parent)2,3177311,586217.0%
Total interest expense$27,027$22,834$4,19318.4%

AWR’s borrowings consist of bank debts under revolving credit facilities and long-term debt issuances at GSWC and BVESI. Consolidated interest expense increased as compared to 2021 resulting from an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditures programs at the regulated utilities, as well as overall increases in short- and long-term interest rates. Increases to borrowing levels include BVESI’s issuance of $35.0 million in unsecured private-placement notes in April 2022 consisting of 10 and 15 year term notes with interest rates at 4.548% and 4.949%, respectively.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$1,083$428$655153.0%
Electric Services394118276233.9%
Contracted Services8751,007(132)-13.1%
AWR (parent)(26)(60)34-56.7%
Total interest income$2,326$1,493$83355.8%

The overall increase in interest income was due primarily to higher interest income earned on regulatory assets at the water and electric segments bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial-paper rates, which have increased since 2021, partially offset by lower interest income recognized on certain construction projects at the contracted services segment as compared to 2021.

Other Income and (Expense), net

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$(680)$4,783$(5,463)-114.2%
Electric Services40624216467.8%
Contracted Services141(149)290-194.6%
AWR (parent)258258%
Total interest income$125$5,134$(5,009)-97.6%

For the year ended December 31, 2022, other income (net of other expense) decreased mostly as a result of losses incurred on investments held to fund one of the Company’s retirement plans, as compared to gains generated during 2021, both due to financial market conditions. This was partially offset by a decrease in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs related to the Company’s defined-benefit pension plan and other retirement benefits resulting from lower actuarial losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021. However, as a result of GSWC’s and BVESI’s two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in total net periodic benefit costs related to the pension plan have no material impact to earnings.

41

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202212/31/2021CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$16,346$22,095$(5,749)-26.0%
Electric Services2,4392,975(536)-18.0%
Contracted Services5,4765,434420.8%
AWR (parent)(597)(81)(516)637.0%
Total income tax expense$23,664$30,423$(6,759)-22.2%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 decreased by $6.8 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax income as compared to the same period in 2021. AWR’s ETRs were 23.2% and 24.4% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. GSWC’s ETR was 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 24.2% for 2021. The decrease in GSWC’s ETR was primarily due to net changes in certain flow-through and permanent items. The increase in AWR (parent)’s tax benefit was primarily due to an increase in pretax loss resulting from higher interest expense.

Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2021 and 2020 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020” in AWR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC.

42

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC and BVESI operate extensively in regulated businesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.

Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC and BVESI. When either files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI’s operations are no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, they are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI’s assets are not recoverable in customer rates, management is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.  Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event that management’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC were to disallow costs included in the ratemaking process.

Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.

Revenue Recognition — GSWC and BVESI record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.  Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.

In 2008, the CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms through the adoption of the WRAM.  With the adoption of this alternative revenue program, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM for the difference between what is billed to its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC. GSWC’s request to continue using the WRAM in its next general rate case is subject to CPUC approval. The CPUC also granted BVESI a revenue decoupling mechanism through the BRRAM. BVESI adjusts revenues in the BRRAM for the difference between what is billed to its electric customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC.

As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC and BVESI are required to collect their WRAM and BRRAM balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period. This can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.

ASUS’s fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on Registrant’s balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS’s operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts thereafter. Revenues from construction activities are recognized based on either the percentage-of-completion or cost-plus methods of

43

accounting.  In accordance with GAAP, revenue recognition under these methods requires management to estimate the progress toward completion on a contract in terms of efforts, such as costs incurred.  This approach is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the initial 50-year contract and additional contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.

Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVESI, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.

As regulated utilities, GSWC and BVESI treat certain temporary differences as flow-through adjustments in computing their income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flow-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flow-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVESI were not required to account for its income taxes as regulated enterprises. As of December 31, 2022, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.

Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers’ accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions.  Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.  A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense.  To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan’s assets was 5.75% for 2022 and 6.00% for 2021.

For the pension plan obligation, Registrant increased the discount rate to 5.41% as of December 31, 2022 from 2.89% as of December 31, 2021 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2022. A hypothetical 25-basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have increased total net periodic pension expense for 2022 by approximately $795,000, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) at December 31, 2022 by a total of $5.8 million.  A 25-basis point decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 2022 pension cost by approximately $572,000.

In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status.  Changes in market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, an increase in the underfunded position, and increase the required future contributions.

The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to each maintain a two-way balancing account to track differences between their forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs.  As of December 31, 2022, GSWC has a $1.5 million over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account for the general office and water regions. As of December 31, 2022, BVESI has a $496,000 over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account.

Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations.  In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or

44

the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 2023, the pension contribution is expected to be approximately $2.8 million. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts.  Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.

Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension plan.  Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan instead of the pension plan.

45

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR

AWR’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund construction programs at its regulated utilities and as market interest rates increase. In addition, as the capital investment program continues to increase, coupled with the elimination of bonus depreciation for regulated utilities due to tax reform enacted in 2017, AWR and its subsidiaries anticipate they will need to access external financing more often. AWR believes that costs associated with capital used to fund construction at GSWC and BVESI will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers.

AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVESI to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $643.9 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2022. Approximately $64.9 million was available for BVESI to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2022. ASUS’s ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in which each Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS’s ability to pay dividends under California law.

When necessary, AWR obtains funds from external sources through the capital markets and from bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets.

AWR borrows under a revolving credit facility and provides funds to GSWC and ASUS in support of their operations through intercompany borrowing agreements.  AWR’s credit agreement expires in May 2023 and all intercompany borrowing agreements will expire concurrent with the expiration of AWR’s credit facility. AWR intends to execute new intercompany borrowing agreements with its subsidiaries consistent with a new credit facility. On April 22, 2022, AWR’s credit facility was amended to increase the borrowing capacity from $200.0 million to $280.0 million. The amendment also changed the benchmark interest rate from the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). The change in benchmark rates has not had a material impact on its financing costs. The interest rate charged to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR’s interest expense under the credit facility.

Given that AWR’s credit agreement will expire in May 2023, the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility of $255.5 million as of December 31, 2022 have been classified as a current liability on AWR’s Consolidated Balance Sheet, thus creating a negative working-capital condition for AWR of $245.2 million. As further detailed below, on January 13, 2023, GSWC through a delayed-draw feature of its note purchase agreement, issued unsecured private placement notes totaling $130.0 million. Also, in January 2023, GSWC used the proceeds to pay off $129.0 million of outstanding borrowings as of December 31, 2022 under its intercompany borrowing arrangement with AWR. AWR then used the proceeds to pay off $124.0 million of the outstanding borrowings under its credit facility thereby improving AWR’s working-capital condition. As of March 1, 2023, AWR does not have sufficient liquidity or capital resources to repay its credit facility without extending its existing credit facility, entering into a new credit facility, or issuing new debt or equity.

Management plans to either renew and extend AWR’s credit facility or to enter into a new credit facility prior to its expiration date, and is confident, given AWR’s history in obtaining revolving credit facilities to meet its working-capital needs, that AWR will be able to do so with the needed borrowing capacities required to run its operations. In addition, AWR's plans included the issuance of long-term debt through GSWC during the fourth quarter of 2022, which it completed with the execution of a note purchase agreement in December 2022 for the issuance of unsecured private placement notes as discussed below. Management believes that execution of its plan is probable based on Registrant’s ability to generate consistent cash flows, its A+ credit ratings, its relationships with lenders, and its history of successfully raising debt necessary to fund its operations as recently evidenced by the issuance of long-term debt at GSWC. Accordingly, management has concluded that AWR will be able to satisfy its obligations, including those under its credit facility, for at least the next twelve months from the issuance date of these financial statements. However, AWR’s ability to access the capital markets or to otherwise obtain sufficient financing may be affected by future conditions and, accordingly, no assurances can be made that AWR will be successful in implementing its plan.

On December 15, 2022, GSWC executed a note purchase agreement for the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $130.0 million. The note purchase agreement included a delayed-draw feature. On January 13, 2023, GSWC requested the funds and issued (i) $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series A Senior Notes at a coupon rate of 5.12% due January 31, 2033, and (ii) $30.0 million aggregate principal amount of Series B Senior Notes at a coupon rate of 5.22% due January 31, 2038. Interest will be payable semiannually for both Series A and Series B notes.

46

BVESI has a separate $35.0 million revolving credit facility without a parent guaranty, which was amended in December 2021 to reduce the interest rate and fees charged, as well as to extend the maturity date by a year to July 1, 2024. As of December 31, 2022, there were $22.0 million outstanding borrowings under this facility. Under the terms of the credit agreement, BVESI has the option to increase the facility by an additional $15.0 million, subject to lender approval. The CPUC requires BVESI to completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period. BVESI’s next pay-off period for its credit facility ends in September 2024.

On April 28, 2022, BVESI completed the issuance of $35.0 million in unsecured private-placement notes consisting of $17.5 million at a coupon rate of 4.548% due April 28, 2032 and $17.5 million at a coupon rate of 4.949% due April 28, 2037. BVESI used the proceeds from the notes to pay down all amounts under its revolving credit facility outstanding at the time of issuing the notes. Interest on these notes is payable semiannually, and the covenant requirements under these notes are similar to the terms of BVESI’s revolving credit facility.

During the first half of 2022, GSWC and BVESI continued to experience delinquent customer accounts receivable due to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic that has affected cash flows from operations. The CPUC’s moratoriums on service disconnections for nonpayment for water and electric customers have ended and as a result, disconnections for delinquent residential customers resumed in June 2022. Thus far, the COVID-19 pandemic has not had a material impact on ASUS’s current operations.

In January 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million in COVID relief funds through the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program to provide assistance to customers for their water debt accrued during the COVID-19 pandemic by remitting federal funds that the state received from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to the utility on behalf of eligible customers. GSWC applied these funds to its delinquent customers’ eligible balances. During 2022, BVESI received a total of $473,000 from the state of California for similar customer relief funding for unpaid electric customer bills incurred during the pandemic.

In June 2022, Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”) affirmed an A+ credit rating for both AWR and GSWC. S&P also affirmed its negative outlook for both companies. S&P’s debt ratings range from AAA (highest possible) to D (obligation is in default). In January 2023, Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) affirmed its A2 rating with a stable outlook for GSWC. Securities ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold a security, and are subject to change or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies. Management believes that AWR’s and GSWC’s sound capital structures and A+ credit ratings, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case AWR may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.

AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. On February 7, 2023, AWR’s Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.3975 per share on AWR’s Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 1, 2023 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 21, 2023. AWR has paid common dividends every year since 1931, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 68 consecutive years, which places it in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. AWR has achieved a 9.2% compound annual growth rate in its annual dividend payments from 2012 – 2022. AWR’s current policy is to achieve a compound annual growth rate in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVESI, and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. AWR’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on its customers’ ability to pay utility bills; and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases, and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.

ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under contracts with the U.S. government for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as

47

investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS’s subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or other subsidiaries of ASUS.

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and deferred income taxes. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities of AWR was $117.8 million for 2022 as compared to $115.6 million for the same period in 2021. During 2022, GSWC and BVESI received $9.5 million and $473,000, respectively, in COVID-19 relief funds from the state of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water and electric customer bills incurred during the pandemic. The increase in operating cash flow was also due to differences in the timing of vendor payments and income tax paid between the two periods, as well as the timing of billing of and cash receipts for construction work at military bases. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work.

The increases in cash flows from operations discussed above were partially offset by a decrease in customer cash collections resulting from decreased water consumption brought about by drought conditions and water use restrictions. These under-collections are being captured in the 2022 WRAM. Furthermore, the delay in the water general rate case decision has negatively affected cash flows from operating activities as billed revenues in 2022 have been based on 2021’s adopted customer rates while operating expenses have continued to increase.

The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $167.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $145.1 million for the same period in 2021, which is mostly related to capital expenditures at the regulated utilities. AWR invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, while working with the CPUC to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. AWR’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs (to replace infrastructure, including those to mitigate wildfire risk) and major capital investment projects (to construct new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities). The regulated utilities may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.

For the year 2023, the regulated utilities’ company-funded capital expenditures are expected to be between $140 million and $160 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to supply-chain issues or any continued lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

AWR’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares, (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to banks, and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, GSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Borrowings on AWR’s and BVESI’s credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVESI capital expenditures, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund a portion of the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by the regulated utilities.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $50.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to cash used of $2.3 million for 2021. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2022 was due, in part, to the issuance by BVESI of new unsecured private-placement notes totaling $35.0 million. The proceeds were used to pay down outstanding borrowings under BVESI’s credit facility. In addition, during 2021, cash was used for the early redemption of GSWC’s 9.56% private-placement notes in the amount of $28.0 million in May 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2022, AWR had a net increase in borrowings on its credit facilities of $72.0 million to support operations and capital expenditures. During 2021, AWR had a net increase in borrowings on its credit facilities of $71.3 million.

GSWC

GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously

48

incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers. Internal cash flows may also be impacted by delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers due to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources for long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments and intercompany borrowings from its parent, AWR, to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. AWR borrows under a revolving credit facility and provides funds to GSWC in support of its operations under intercompany borrowing arrangements. On April 22, 2022, the AWR credit facility was amended to increase the borrowing capacity from $200.0 million to $280.0 million, which provided an increase in GSWC’s borrowing capacity under its intercompany borrowing agreement. All intercompany borrowing agreements expire concurrent with the expiration of AWR’s credit facility in May 2023. AWR intends to execute a new intercompany borrowing agreement with GSWC consistent with a new credit facility. As of December 31, 2022, GSWC had $129.0 million outstanding under its intercompany borrowing arrangement with AWR. The CPUC requires GSWC to completely pay off all intercompany borrowings with AWR within a 24-month period. On January 31, 2023, GSWC used the proceeds from the issuance of equity to AWR and from the issuance of long-term debt discussed below to pay-off all of its intercompany borrowing from AWR.

On December 15, 2022, GSWC executed a note purchase agreement for the issuance of unsecured private placement notes totaling $130.0 million. The note purchase agreement includes a delayed-draw feature that allows for the sale and purchase of the notes to occur on a business day on or prior to March 1, 2023. On January 13, 2023, GSWC, through the delayed-draw feature, requested and issued unsecured private placement notes totaling $130.0 million. GSWC used the proceeds to pay off the majority of outstanding borrowings under the intercompany borrowing arrangement with AWR.

In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $94.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $100.3 million for 2021.  The overall decrease in GSWC’s cash flows from operations was largely due to a decrease in customer cash collections resulting from decreased water consumption brought about by drought conditions and water use restrictions. These under-collections are being captured in the 2022 WRAM balances. Furthermore, the delay in the water general rate case decision has negatively affected cash flows from operating activities as billed revenues in 2022 have been based on 2021’s adopted customer rates while operating expenses have continued to increase. These decreases were partially offset by state relief funds. During the first quarter of 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million in COVID-19 relief funds from the state of California to provide assistance to customers for delinquent water customer bills incurred during the pandemic. The decrease was also partially offset by differences in the timing of vendor payments and income tax paid between the two periods. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $147.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $124.3 million for 2021, which is mostly related to spending under GSWC’s infrastructure investment plans that are consistent with capital budgets authorized in its general rate cases.

AWR issued an interest-bearing promissory note to GSWC that expires in May 2023, and that allows AWR to borrow amounts up to $30.0 million for working-capital purposes. During 2021, AWR borrowed and subsequently repaid $26.0 million under the terms of the note. During 2022, there were no borrowings under this arrangement.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $53.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to $11.1 million net cash used for 2021.  The higher cash used for financing activities in 2021 was largely due to the early redemption of GSWC’s 9.56% private-placement notes in the amount of $28.0 million in May 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2022, GSWC had an increase in net intercompany borrowings of $80.0 million from AWR parent to support its operations and capital expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2021, GSWC had an increase in net intercompany borrowings of $49.0 million from AWR parent. The CPUC requires GSWC to fully pay off all intercompany borrowings it has from AWR within a 24-month period.

49

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2022. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our initial 50-year firm, fixed-price contract and additional firm fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

Payments/Commitments Due (1)
($ in thousands)TotalLess than 1 Year
Notes/Debentures (2)$187,000$
Private Placement Notes (3)250,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)10,564178
Other Debt Instruments (5)2,809221
Total AWR Long-Term Debt$450,373$399
Credit Facilities (6)$277,500$255,500
Interest on Long-Term Debt (7)227,66121,846
Advances for Construction (8)67,9673,617
Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (9)619619
Purchased Power Contracts (10)8,9664,906
Capital Expenditures (11)94,99194,991
Water Purchase Agreements (12)3,066459
Operating Leases (13)11,0872,256
Employer Contributions (14)2,8002,800
SUB-TOTAL694,657386,994
Other Commitments (15)10,743
TOTAL$1,155,773$387,393

(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.

(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.

(3) Consists of GSWC senior private placement notes of $215.0 million and BVESI unsecured private placement notes of $35.0 million totaling $250.0 million issued to various banks, including $160.0 million of unsecured private placement notes issued in July 2020 by GSWC and $35.0 million of unsecured private placement notes issued by BVESI in April 2022. Under the terms of each of the senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. GSWC is in compliance with all of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2022.  GSWC does not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on its properties.

(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $2.8 million of obligations with respect to GSWC’s 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants

50

believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.

(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC’s Arden-Cordova District.

(6) Credit facilities consists of (i) a $280.0 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $255.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022; and (ii) a $35.0 million revolving credit facility under BVESI, of which $22.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022.

(7) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.

(8) Advances for construction represent contract refunds mostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.

(9) Consists of an agreement by BVESI to purchase renewable energy credits through 2023. These renewable energy credits are used to meet California’s renewables portfolio standard.

(10) Consists of BVESI fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed in September 2019 with Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.

(11) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVESI as of December 31, 2022.

(12) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $1.5 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $1.6 million of other water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2025 through 2038.

(13) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.

(14) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan for the year 2023. Contributions to the pension plan are expected to be the higher of the minimum required contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the amounts that are recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such amounts.

(15) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) $10.1 million in asset retirement obligations of GSWC that reflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (ii) irrevocable letters of credit in the amount of $624,600 for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policies; and (iii) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to AWR’s revolving credit facility.

BVESI Power-Supply Arrangements

BVESI purchased power pursuant to purchased power contracts approved by the CPUC effective in the fourth quarter of 2019 at a fixed cost over three and five-year terms depending on the amount of power and period during which the power is purchased under the contracts. In addition to the purchased power contracts, BVESI buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells surplus power when necessary. BVESI is pursuing short- and long-term renewable energy contracts to replace any power purchase agreements that have expired in addition to satisfying its requirements related to its resource portfolio for the next compliance period (2021-2024) and beyond. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased to $97.89 per MWh in 2022 from $71.94 per MWh in 2021. However, BVESI has an electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate any impacts to earnings.

Construction Program

GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC and BVESI upgrade their facilities in accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements, and new legislation.  California requires investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval, and requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

51

As of December 31, 2022, GSWC and BVESI have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $95.0 million.  During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, GSWC and BVESI had capital expenditures of $174.3 million, $150.6 million and $130.4 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, capital expenditures funded by developers were $6.9 million, $8.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively. During 2023, the water and electric segments’ company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $140 – $160 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to supply chain issues or the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. These amounts include approximately $13.6 million estimated to be spent by BVESI on wildfire mitigation projects.

Contracted Services

Under the terms of the current and future utility privatization contracts with the U.S. government, each contract’s price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the utility privatization contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.

During sequestration or automatic spending cuts, the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries did not experience any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an “excepted service.” With the expiration of sequestration, similar issues including further sequestration pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act may arise as part of the fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. Any future impact on ASUS and its operations through the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. Government, and/or (d) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense utility privatization program.

At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.

Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries in fiscal 2023.

Military BaseEPA periodFiling Date
Fort Bliss (FBWS)October 2022 - September 2023Third Quarter 2022
Joint Base Andrews (TUS)February 2023 - January 2024Fourth Quarter 2022
Fort Lee (ODUS)February 2023 - January 2024Fourth Quarter 2022
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS)April 2023 - March 2024First Quarter of 2023
Fort Jackson (PSUS)February 2023 - January 2024Fourth Quarter 2022
Fort Bragg (ONUS)March 2023 - February 2024First Quarter 2023
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)June 2023 - May 2024Second Quarter 2023
Fort Riley (FRUS)July 2023 - June 2024Second Quarter 2023

52

Regulatory Matters

A discussion on various regulatory matters is included in the section titled “Overview” in this Form 10-K’s "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." The discussion below focuses on other regulatory matters and developments.

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

GSWC and BVESI hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas they serve. ASUS is regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas. The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, based on certain conditions. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company. ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS and FRUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states’ utility commissions.

GSWC and BVESI are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.

Rates that GSWC and BVESI are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base. Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.

GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the first test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses for the second and third years of the rate case cycle. For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. GSWC’s cost of capital is determined in a separate proceeding. Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. BVESI's general rate cases are typically filed every four years. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.

Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and between GSWC and BVESI and AWR.

General Rate Cases and Other Regulatory Matters

Water Segment

Recent Changes in Rates:

Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. GSWC has a pending general rate case that will determine new water rates for the years 2022–2024. In November 2021, GSWC and Public Advocates filed with the CPUC a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Public Advocates on this general rate case application. Pending a final decision on this general rate case, GSWC filed with the CPUC for interim rates, which will make the new 2022 rates, once approved in a CPUC final decision, effective January 1, 2022. Due to the delay in finalizing the water general rate case, water revenues billed and recorded during the year ended December 31, 2022 were based on 2021 adopted rates, pending a final decision by the CPUC on this general rate case application. When approved, the new rates will be retroactive to January 1, 2022 and cumulative adjustments will be recorded upon receiving a decision by the CPUC that approves the settlement agreement.

Among other things, the settlement authorizes GSWC to complete certain advice letter capital projects approved in the last general rate case, which have been completed for a total capital investment of $9.4 million. The additional annual revenue requirements generated from these capital investments total $1.2 million and became effective February 15, 2022.

Pending Cost of Capital Proceeding:

GSWC also has a pending cost of capital proceeding that will determine a new return on rate base for the years 2022 – 2024. While this proceeding is pending, the previously authorized return is presently being billed to water customers during 2022 until a final decision is issued in this proceeding. However, based on management’s analysis of this regulatory

53

proceeding and associated accounting to date, for the year ended December 31, 2022, GSWC reduced revenues by $6.4 million and recorded a corresponding regulatory liability for revenues subject to refund based on its best estimate at this time, which includes the impact of GSWC’s lower cost of debt requested in its application. However, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the cost of capital application and the associated impact on 2022 revenues. Changes in estimates will be made, if necessary, as more information in this proceeding becomes available.

In the pending cost of capital proceeding, GSWC requested authorization to continue the Water Cost of Capital Mechanism (“WCCM”). The WCCM adjusts return on equity and rate of return on rate base between the three-year cost of capital proceedings only if there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points in the average of the Moody’s Aa utility bond rate as measured over the period October 1 through September 30. If there is a positive or negative change of more than 100 basis points, the return on equity is adjusted by one half of the difference. For the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022, the Moody’s rate increased by more than 100 basis points from the benchmark, which triggered the WCCM adjustment. The WCCM is expected to be addressed by the CPUC in the pending proposed decision.

Electric Segment

Recent Changes in Rates

In August 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on the electric segment’s general rate case which, among other things, increases adopted revenues by $1.0 million for 2022. On August 30, 2022, BVESI filed a new general rate case application with the CPUC to determine new rates for the years 2023 – 2026. On December 15, 2022, the CPUC approved a decision for BVESI to establish a general rate case memorandum account that makes the new 2023 rates effective and retroactive to January 1, 2023.

Vegetation Management, Wildfire Mitigation Plans and Legislation

The CPUC adopted regulations intended to enhance the fire safety of overhead electric power lines. Those regulations included increased minimum clearances around electric power lines. BVESI was authorized to track incremental costs incurred to implement the regulations in a fire hazard prevention memorandum account for the purpose of obtaining cost recovery in a future general rate case. The August 2019 final decision also authorized BVESI to record incremental costs related to vegetation management, such as costs for increased minimum clearances around electric power lines, in the CPUC-approved memorandum account for future recovery. As of December 31, 2022, BVESI had approximately $8.7 million in incremental vegetation management costs recorded as a regulatory asset. As part of its general rate case application filing with the CPUC in August 2022, BVESI requested recovery of the costs accumulated in this memorandum account as of March 31, 2022.

California legislation enacted in September 2018 requires all investor-owned electric utilities to have a wildfire mitigation plan (“WMP”) approved by the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety (“OEIS”) and ratified by the CPUC. The WMP must include a utility’s plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating its electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. BVESI submitted an update to its WMP in May 2022 to OEIS for approval prior to going to the CPUC for ratification. In December 2022, OEIS issued a final decision of approval to BVESI for its 2022 WMP update. In February 2023, the CPUC ratified BVESI’s current WMP. As of December 31, 2022, BVESI has approximately $4.3 million related to expenses accumulated in its WMP memorandum accounts that have been recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. All capital expenditures and other costs incurred through December 31, 2022 as a result of BVESI’s WMPs are not currently in rates and have been filed for future recovery in BVESI’s general rate case application in August 2022.

Additionally, the governor of California approved Assembly Bill (“AB”) 1054 in July 2019 that, among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC proceedings in which an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeks to recover wildfire costs. Previously, an electric utility seeking to recover costs had the burden to prove that it acted reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a “serious doubt” as to the reasonableness of the utility’s conduct. In September 2021, OEIS under the California Natural Resources Agency approved BVESI’s latest safety certification filing, which is valid until BVESI’s pending safety certification is approved or disapproved. In December 2022, OEIS issued a renewal of its safety certification to BVESI.

For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Environmental Matters

AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC is required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and the Division of Drinking Water (“DDW”), under the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”). The U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will

54

provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA’s program in California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in which Registrant operates.

GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”). GSWC works proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening GSWC water sources. GSWC also incurs operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply, and additional expense to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, drought impacts, as well as to meet future water quality standards and consumer expectations. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.

Drinking Water Notification Levels

In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes. These chemicals were also present in certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as perfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”). Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The U.S. EPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notifications by water systems when they detect levels of PFAS above response levels.

GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS under the direction of DDW. GSWC has removed some wells from service, and expects to incur additional costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with information regarding PFAS detection, and provided updated information via its website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion (“ppt”) for perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and 40 ppt for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”). In March 2021, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 0.5 parts per billion (“ppb”) and 5 ppb, respectively, for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (“PFBS”). In June 2022, the U.S. EPA issued interim updated drinking-water health advisories for PFOA and PFOS, and also issued final health advisories for PFBS and other compounds known as GenX chemicals. In October 2022, DDW issued drinking-water notification and response levels of 3 parts per trillion (“ppt”) and 20 ppt, respectively, for perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (“PFHxS”). Through these health advisories, the U.S. EPA has set levels at extremely low amounts, especially for PFOA and PFOS. This potentially may have an impact on the final maximum contaminant levels (“MCL”) that the U.S. EPA may require in the near future. Lower MCL levels are expected to be promulgated in 2023/2024 and depending on how low the levels are set, these new requirements will likely increase GSWC’s water treatment and other operating costs.

Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup

GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at one of its plant sites that contained an underground storage tank which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.  Analysis indicates that off-site monitoring wells may be necessary to document effectiveness of remediation.

As of December 31, 2022, the total amount spent to clean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.2 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2022, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated additional cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will be approved in rate base by the CPUC.

Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

On December 16, 2021, the U.S. EPA announced the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions under an executive order with a compliance date of October 16, 2024. Additionally, the EPA announced its intention to develop a new proposed rule, the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (“LCRI”) that will further strengthen the regulatory framework prior to the October 2024 compliance date. There are still many unknowns regarding the implementation of the rule. Some of the LCRI requirements may include timely replacement of customer lead service lines, corrosion control treatment, revised lead action levels, customer communications, etc. The details of the requirements will be better understood over the next year once the LCRI is published and a final rule is approved.

55

Matters Relating to Military Utility Privatization Contracts

Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable law.

Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.

Security Issues

We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.

Both GSWC and BVESI have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyber-attacks.  GSWC and BVESI utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect their facilities.  These measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing their respective capital-improvement plans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that either may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of their utility systems.

On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of our water systems. These assessments and plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and resubmitted every five years.

The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades were completed at various military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.

Registrant has evaluated its cyber-security systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cyber-security of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates. Registrant believes it is in compliance with these regulations.

Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cyber-attacks or other attacks will not cause water or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.

Water Supply

GSWC

During 2022, GSWC delivered approximately 58.0 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 365 acre-feet per day or 119 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 52% of GSWC’s supply came from groundwater produced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from Metropolitan Water District (“MWD”) member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 45% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 3%) under agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“SMUD”). GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.

Groundwater

GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-

56

made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $3.1 million as of December 31, 2022.  Included in the $3.1 million is a remaining commitment of $1.5 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont (“the City”) to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for 10 additional years. The remaining $1.6 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.

Imported Water

GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. For example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities and other parties to purchase water through a total of 58 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. GSWC has 45 connections to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 49,767 acre-feet annually. MWD sources its supplies from Northern California via the State Water Project and the Colorado River through the Colorado River Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements.

MWD currently has supply levels of 1.13 million acre-feet (MAF) with annual demands of approximately 1.71 MAF resulting in a supply gap of 574 thousand acre feet. MWD has available access to store more than 1.65 MAF of water in Lake Mead as part of an intentionally created surplus program developed under a 2007 Interim Shortage agreement and is available for use during dry years. In addition, MWD, along with the seven other Basin states which use water from the Colorado River, developed and agreed to the Drought Contingency Plan in 2019 where each lower Basin state which diverts water from the Colorado River below Lees Ferry agrees to store defined amounts of water in Lake Mead to prevent both Lake Mead and Lake Powell from reaching critically low levels. California is a lower Basin state. On December 1, 2022, the Department of Water Resources set the initial allocation for the water year to 5% due to the possibility that 2023 may be another critically dry year.

Drought Impact

In May 2018, the California Legislature passed two bills that provide a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The initial steps in implementation of this legislation have been laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”) and State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”). Over the next several years, State agencies, water suppliers and other entities will be working to meet the requirements and timelines of plan implementation. A notable milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (“gpcd”) until 2025. Legislation signed by the Governor into law in September 2022 has set more stringent indoor standard targets than initially set forth in the 2018 legislation. The indoor standard will now be set at 47 gpcd in 2025 and then reduced to 42 gpcd in 2030 (previously had been set at 52.5 gpcd and 50 gpcd, respectively).

California’s recent period of multi-year drought has resulted in reduced recharge to the state’s groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially smaller basins, experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought. Several of GSWC’s service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in California’s Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain service areas in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply shortages from the locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply.

California is potentially entering into a fourth year of drought after experiencing a very dry 2022 Water Year, beginning October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022, with the driest January to March in 100 years and the period of 2020 to 2022 being the driest 3-year period on record. However, a series of atmospheric storm events this January and February have delivered a promising outlook to the State’s supply conditions. As of February 21, 2023, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that none of California was in “Extreme Drought” as compared to 41% just three months ago, and 33% of California was in “Severe Drought” as compared to 85% just three months ago and 66% a year ago.

Due to the ongoing dry conditions in 2022, DWR set the State Water Project allocation to only 5% in March 2022. In April 2022, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (“MWD”) declared a water supply emergency condition for areas of their service area dependent on SWP supplies. This has impacted GSWC’s Simi Valley and Claremont service areas, which utilize a portion of their supply from the SWP. This action also includes a phased emergency conservation program that limits outdoor watering in those areas to one day per week. The impacted MWD areas as a whole achieved the goal of meeting their targets for 2022. MWD has continued the emergency conservation plan in 2023 but could modify the plan should the SWP

57

allocation be increased sufficiently in the coming months. DWR announced an updated SWP allocation of 30% on January 26th. However, MWD has not yet announced any change to their emergency conservation plan.

On March 28, 2022, the governor of California issued an executive order calling on all urban water suppliers to reduce water use by 20 – 30 percent. In June 2022, GSWC moved all of its water systems to the second stage of its Water Shortage Contingency Plan that limits outdoor watering to two days per week (except for the Claremont and Simi Valley Systems, which are restricted to one day per week). GSWC will continue to work with its local suppliers to assess water supply conditions and water-use restrictions in its service areas and make appropriate adjustments as needed. In 2021, the CPUC authorized GSWC to track incremental drought-related costs in a memorandum account for future recovery.

Prolonged drought conditions also exist on the Colorado River System, which is experiencing historically low reservoir levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell. Urgent action to reduce water demand on the lower river by 2 to 4 million acre feet annually has been requested by the US Bureau of Reclamation (the “Bureau”). Under the 2019 drought contingency plan on the river, the lower basin states (except California) will experience reductions in volume deliveries in 2023. However, on-going negotiations among the basin states to reach a consensus on how to share reductions called by the Bureau may result in proactive actions in 2023 by MWD. On December 13, 2022, MWD declared a regional drought emergency and began discussions among the member agencies to consider the development of a region-wide allocation program that may be adopted and implemented in spring 2023 to reduce demand on the river. The Bureau has initiated a process to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement that may result in modifications to the 2007 Interim Storage Agreement and the 2019 Drought Contingency Plan. In addition, the Department of the Interior has recently requested a response plan by January 31, 2023. Two plans were submitted by this deadline by the basin states. California submitted a plan and the other six basin states submitted an alternative plan. California’s framework builds on the previously committed 400,000 AF per year savings along with measures to protect storage in Lake Mead and stabilize the river system. The alternative plan relies on accounting for evaporative losses that would heavily impact California. The Department of Interior will consider these two plans in their evaluation of next steps for the river and that response may impact supplies to California in 2023 and beyond. GSWC will continue to monitor developments related to the Colorado River System and assess its impact on GSWC.

Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries

The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries at no cost to the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations. Furthermore, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring compliance with the reduction and/or removal of all constituents required under its wastewater treatment plant operating permits. ASUS works closely with state regulators and industry associations to stay current with emergent issues and proactively addresses any change in wastewater treatment regulation to ensure permit compliance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

58

FY 2021 10-K MD&A

SEC filing source: 0001056903-22-000022.

Extracted structurally from real Item 7 body heading to real Item 7A/8 boundary. Published MD&A gate trimmed front/tail over-capture. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2022-02-22. Report date: 2021-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and/or its subsidiaries: GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and its subsidiaries, and AWR (parent) where applicable.  On July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the electric utility assets and liabilities from its electric division to BVESI in exchange for common shares of BVESI. GSWC then immediately distributed all of BVESI's common shares to AWR, whereupon BVESI became wholly owned directly by AWR. The reorganization did not result in any substantive changes to AWR's operations or business segments.

Included in the following analysis is a discussion of Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment and AWR (parent), which equals each business segment's earnings divided by Registrant's weighted average number of diluted common shares.  This item is derived from consolidated financial information but is not presented in our financial statements that are prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States. This item constitutes a "non-GAAP financial measure" under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

Registrant believes that the disclosure of earnings per share by business segment provides investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its segments.  Registrant reviews this measurement regularly and compares it to historical periods and to its operating budget. However, this measure, which is not presented in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other enterprises and should not be considered as an alternative to earnings per share, which is determined in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation to AWR’s consolidated diluted earnings per share is included in the discussion under the sections titled “Summary Results by Segment.”

Overview

Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under the Overview section in Item 1. Business and Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Water and Electric Segments:

GSWC's and BVESI's revenues, operating income, and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California, respectively. Rates charged to GSWC and BVESI customers are determined by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on capital.  GSWC and BVESI plan to continue seeking additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs, and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC and BVESI are expected to remain at substantially higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC and BVESI may obtain funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.

General Rate Case Filings and Other Matters:

Water General Rate Case for years 2022 - 2024:

On July 15, 2020, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water regions and its general office. This general rate case will determine new water rates for the years 2022 – 2024. In November 2021, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC ("Public Advocates") filed with the CPUC a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Public Advocates on this general rate case application. The settlement agreement, if approved, resolves all issues related to the 2022 annual revenue requirement in the general rate case application, leaving only three unresolved issues. Among other things, the settlement authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $404.8 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year cycle. The settlement also authorizes GSWC to complete certain advice letter capital projects approved in the last general rate case, which have recently been completed for a total capital investment of $9.4 million. The additional annual revenue requirements generated from these capital investments are $1.2 million and became effective February 15, 2022. Advice letter projects are filed for revenue recovery only when those projects are completed. Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the amounts included in the settlement agreement would increase the 2022 adopted revenues by approximately $30.3 million as compared to the 2021 adopted revenues, and increase the 2022 adopted supply costs by $9.7 million as compared to the 2021 adopted supply costs. The settlement agreement also allows for potential additional increases in adopted revenues for 2023 and 2024 subject to an earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values.

The three remaining unresolved issues relate to GSWC's requests for: (i) a medical cost balancing account, (ii) a general liability insurance cost balancing account, and (iii) the consolidation of two of GSWC's customer service areas. GSWC and Public Advocates have filed briefs with the CPUC on these unsettled issues. A proposed decision is expected in mid-2022, and would address the three unresolved issues along with the settlement agreement filed by GSWC and Public Advocates. Pending a final decision on this general rate case application, GSWC filed with the CPUC for interim rates, which will make new 2022 rates, once approved in a CPUC final decision, retroactively effective January 1, 2022.

28

Water General Rate Case for years 2019 – 2021:

In May 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision in GSWC's water general rate case for the years 2019 – 2021, with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019. Among other things, the final decision authorized GSWC to invest approximately $334.5 million over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment included $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed. Due to changes in circumstances, including permitting delays, scope adjustments and constraints out of GSWC's control, not all the anticipated advice letter projects have been completed during this rate cycle. The majority of the $20.4 million of advice letter capital projects were included in GSWC’s water general rate case for the years 2022 – 2024.

The final decision also allowed for water rate increases in 2020 and 2021, subject to an earnings test. Effective January 1, 2020, GSWC received its full second-year step increase, which it achieved because of passing an earnings test at all of its ratemaking areas. The full step increase generated an additional $9.6 million in water revenues for 2020. Adopted supply costs for 2020 were $789,000 lower than the 2019 adopted supply costs. The CPUC also approved all of the third-year rate increases effective January 1, 2021, which generated an additional increase in the adopted water revenues of approximately $16.4 million in 2021. Adopted water supply costs for 2021 were $5.3 million higher than the 2020 adopted supply costs.

Final Decision in the First Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:

On August 27, 2020, the CPUC issued a final decision in the first phase of the CPUC’s Order Instituting Rulemaking evaluating the low income ratepayer assistance and affordability objectives contained in the CPUC’s 2010 Water Action Plan. This decision also addressed other issues, including the continued use of the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism ("WRAM") and the Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA"). The MCBA is a full-cost balancing account used to track the difference between adopted and actual water supply costs (including the effects of changes in both rates and volume). Based on the final decision, any general rate case application filed by GSWC and the other California water utilities after August 27, 2020 may not include a proposal to continue the use of the WRAM or MCBA, but may instead include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism and an incremental supply cost balancing account.

The final decision did not have any impact on GSWC's WRAM or MCBA balances during the 2019 – 2021 rate cycle. In February 2021, the assigned administrative law judge in the pending general rate case proceeding confirmed that GSWC may continue using the WRAM and MCBA through the year 2024. GSWC’s next general rate case application will be filed in 2023 to establish new rates for the years 2025 – 2027, which may not include the WRAM or MCBA for those years.

Since its implementation in 2008, the WRAM and MCBA have helped mitigate fluctuations in GSWC’s earnings due to changes in water consumption by its customers or changes in water supply mix. Replacing them with mechanisms recommended in the final decision will likely result in more volatility in GSWC’s future earnings and could result in less than, or more than, full recovery of its authorized revenue and supply costs. In October 2020, GSWC, certain other California water utilities, and the California Water Association filed separate applications for rehearing on this matter. Due to the delay in the CPUC issuing a decision on any of these applications for rehearing, GSWC filed a petition for writ of review to the California Supreme Court in May 2021, requesting the Court to review the CPUC's final decision on this matter. The CPUC requested that the Court hold GSWC’s request in abeyance until such time as the CPUC acts on the pending request for rehearing. In September 2021, the CPUC issued a decision denying all the October 2020 applications for rehearing. In October 2021, GSWC re-filed its writ of review to the California Supreme Court, requesting the Court to review the CPUC's final decision on this matter. Certain other California water utilities, and the California Water Association also filed separate writs of review with the Court. On January 28, 2022, the CPUC served its response to GSWC’s and other parties petitions requesting the Court to deny the requests. Management cannot currently predict the final outcome of this matter.

Final Decision in the Second Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking:

On July 15, 2021, the CPUC issued a final decision in the second phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking. Among other things, the decision extended the suspension of water-service disconnection implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic due to non-payment of past-due amounts billed to residential customers until February 1, 2022. The final decision also requires that amounts tracked in GSWC's COVID-19 Catastrophic Event Memorandum Account ("CEMA") account for unpaid customer bills be first offset by any (i) federal or state relief for customers' utility bill debt, and (ii) customer payments through payment-plan arrangements prior to receiving recovery from customers at large. In January 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million from the state of California of relief funding for customers' unpaid water bills incurred during the pandemic, which it is applying to its delinquent customers' eligible balances as discussed later under the section titled COVID-19. In August 2021, GSWC, in addition to three other parties, filed separate applications to the CPUC for rehearing on certain aspects of this final decision. In January 2022, the California Water Association filed a writ of review to the California Supreme Court, urging the Court to review the CPUC's final decision on the second phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking. Management cannot currently predict the final outcome of this matter.

29

Cost of Capital Proceeding:

Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. GSWC filed a cost of capital application with the CPUC in May 2021 requesting a capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, a return on equity of 10.5%, and a return on rate base of 8.18%. Hearings on this proceeding are scheduled for the second quarter of 2022. A proposed decision on this proceeding is expected in the second half of 2022. A final decision on this proceeding, once issued by the CPUC, is expected to have an effective date retroactive to January 1, 2022. GSWC's last authorized rate of return on rate base of 7.91% remained applicable through December 31, 2021.

Electric Segment:

On August 15, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on the electric general rate case. Among other things, the decision (i) extended the rate cycle by one year (new rates were effective for 2018 - 2022); (ii) allows the electric segment to construct all the capital projects requested in its application, which are dedicated to improving system safety and reliability and total approximately $44 million over the 5-year rate cycle; and (iii) increased the adopted electric revenues by $1.2 million for each of the years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022. The rate increases for 2019 – 2022 are not subject to an earnings test. The decision authorized a return on equity for the electric segment of 9.6% and included a capital structure and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding. The rate case decision continues to apply to BVESI.

Contracted Services Segment:

ASUS's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of facilities at the water and/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to 50-year firm fixed-price contracts. The contract price for each of these 50-year contracts is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on new construction activities under contract modifications with the U.S. government or agreements with other third-party prime contractors.

COVID-19:

GSWC, BVESI and ASUS have continued their operations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic given that their water, wastewater and electric utility services are deemed essential. AWR's responses take into account orders issued by the CPUC, and the guidance provided by federal, state, and local health authorities and other government officials for the COVID-19 pandemic. Some of the actions taken by GSWC and BVESI included suspending service disconnections for nonpayment pursuant to CPUC and state orders, and telecommuting by employees. The suspension of water-service disconnections at GSWC was implemented in response to an executive order from the governor of California, as well as CPUC orders. Pursuant to the CPUC's July 15, 2021 decision in the Second Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking discussed previously, the moratorium on water-service disconnections due to non-payment of past-due amounts billed to residential customers expired on February 1, 2022. However, water service cannot be disconnected so long as customers make timely payments on current bills, and are provided and adhere to payment plans to pay down past-due bills resulting from the pandemic. The moratorium on electric customer service disconnections ended on September 30, 2021. However, electric-service disconnections for non-payment can only be done after taking into account certain conditions such as average daily temperatures.

The pandemic has caused volatility in financial markets resulting in fluctuations in the fair value of plan assets in GSWC's pension and other retirement plans. In addition, the economic impact of the pandemic has also significantly increased the amount of delinquent customer accounts receivable, resulting in both GSWC and BVESI increasing their allowance for doubtful accounts throughout the pandemic. However, the CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to track incremental costs, including bad debt expense in excess of what is included in their respective revenue requirements, incurred as a result of the pandemic in COVID-19-related memorandum accounts to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery.

On July 12, 2021, the governor of California approved SB-129 Budget Act of 2021, in which nearly $1 billion in relief funding for overdue water customer bills, and nearly $1 billion in relief funding for overdue electric customer bills were included. The water customer relief funding is being managed by the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB") through the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program to provide assistance to customers for their water debt accrued during the COVID-19 pandemic by remitting federal funds that the state received from the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to the utility on behalf of eligible customers. In December 2021, GSWC received SWRCB approval for $9.5 million of relief funding of customers' unpaid water bills incurred during the pandemic. In January 2022, GSWC received these funds, which it is applying to its delinquent customers' eligible balances. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2021, GSWC has reflected these relief funds as a reduction to its COVID-19 CEMA account, as well as a reduction to its estimated customer

30

bad debt reserve. In February 2022, BVESI received $321,000 from the state of California for similar customer relief funding for unpaid electric bills incurred during the pandemic.

GSWC and BVESI continue to experience delinquent account activity because of the ongoing pandemic. As of December 31, 2021, GSWC and BVESI had approximately $1.7 million and $302,000, respectively, in regulatory asset accounts related to bad debt expense in excess of their revenue requirements, the purchase of personal protective equipment, additional printing costs, and other incremental COVID-19-related costs. The CPUC requires that amounts tracked in GSWC's and BVESI's COVID-19 memorandum accounts for unpaid customer bills be first offset by any (i) federal or state relief for customers' utility bill debt, and (ii) customer payments through payment-plan arrangements prior to receiving recovery from customers at large. After these offsets are made, GSWC and BVESI will each file with the CPUC for recovery of any remaining balances.

By tracking incremental COVID-19-related costs in the CPUC-approved memorandum accounts, GSWC and BVESI can later ask for recovery of these costs from the CPUC. The CEMA and other emergency-type memorandum accounts are established as a result of a state or federally declared emergency, and are therefore recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. As a result, the amounts recorded in the COVID-19-related memorandum accounts have not impacted GSWC's and BVESI's earnings during the pandemic. ASUS has experienced delays in receiving contract modifications from the U.S. government for additional construction projects due to government staffing shortages resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic but this has not had a material impact on its current operations.

In September 2021, the president of the United States issued orders and instructions on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of all federal employees, federal contractors and employees of companies with 100 or more employees. On January 13, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to stop the president's administration from enforcing a requirement that employees at businesses with at least 100 employees be vaccinated against COVID-19 or undergo weekly testing and wear a mask on the job. Therefore, there is no COVID-19 vaccination mandate for Registrant’s regulated utilities workforce. However, although the federal contractor COVID-19 mandate has been challenged, it was not addressed in the January 13, 2022 ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court and, therefore, its applicability to Registrant’s non-regulated workforce remains uncertain at this time.

Summary Results by Segment

The table below sets forth a comparison of the diluted earnings per share contribution by business segment and for the parent company for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Diluted Earnings per Share
Year Ended
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGE
Water$1.87$1.66$0.21
Electric0.210.200.01
Contracted services0.480.470.01
AWR (parent)(0.01)(0.01)
Consolidated fully diluted earnings per share, as reported (GAAP)$2.55$2.33$0.22

31

The following is a computation and reconciliation of diluted earnings per share from the measure of operating income by business segment as disclosed in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to AWR’s consolidated fully diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020:

WaterElectricContracted ServicesAWR (Parent)Consolidated (GAAP)
In 000's except per share amounts2021202020212020202120202021202020212020
Operating income (Note 17)$107,573$97,896$10,738$10,303$22,675$22,309$(9)$(9)$140,977$130,499
Other income and expense16,26315,817(101)336(488)(358)5338216,20715,877
Income tax expense (benefit)22,09520,5152,9752,6895,4345,201(81)(208)30,42328,197
Net income (loss)$69,215$61,564$7,864$7,278$17,729$17,466$(461)$117$94,347$86,425
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares37,01036,99537,01036,99537,01036,99537,01036,99537,01036,995
Diluted earnings per share$1.87$1.66$0.21$0.20$0.48$0.47$(0.01)$$2.55$2.33

Water Segment:

Diluted earnings per share from the water segment for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased by $0.21 per share as compared to 2020. Included in the results for 2021 were gains on investments held to fund one of the Company's retirement plans totaling $4.3 million, or $0.08 per share, as compared to $3.0 million, or $0.06 per share, in gains generated during 2020 largely due to market conditions. Excluding these gains from both years, adjusted diluted earnings at the water segment for 2021 were $1.79 per share as compared to adjusted diluted earnings of $1.60 per share for 2020. This adjusted increase of $0.19 per share was due to the following items:

•An increase in the water segment’s operating revenues of $16.5 million, largely as a result of new rates authorized by the CPUC. GSWC received its full third-year step increase effective January 1, 2021 as well as mid-year increases to reflect higher water supply costs. Due to regulatory mechanisms in place for water supply costs, the increase in operating revenues includes the full recovery of increases in supply costs discussed below.

•An increase in water supply costs of $4.1 million, which consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. Actual water supply costs are tracked and passed through to customers on a dollar-for-dollar basis by way of the CPUC-approved water supply cost balancing accounts. The increase in water supply costs results in a corresponding increase in water operating revenues and has no net impact on the water segment’s profitability.

•An overall increase in operating expenses (excluding supply costs and a gain on the sale of assets) of $3.1 million, which negatively impacted the water segment's earnings. The increase was primarily due to higher chemical and water treatment costs, conservation costs, regulatory costs, insurance costs, depreciation expense, and property and other taxes as compared to 2020, partially offset by a decrease in maintenance expense.

•The sale of non-utility-related land at the water segment resulted in a gain of $409,000 recorded during 2021, with no equivalent item in 2020.

•An overall increase in interest expense (net of interest and other income) of $1.7 million, which negatively impacted earnings. GSWC issued $160 million of long-term debt in July 2020 and used the proceeds to pay down its intercompany borrowings (as required by the CPUC); intercompany borrowings bear lower short-term rates. There was also a decrease in interest income earned on regulatory assets at the water segment bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rate, which decreased compared to 2020, as well as a decrease in the receipt of other income amounts owed by developers.

•A decrease in the effective income tax rate, which favorably impacted earnings. The decrease resulted primarily from changes in certain flow-through taxes and permanent items during 2021 as compared to 2020. As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as flow-through in computing its income tax expense consistent with the income tax method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction ratemaking. Changes in the magnitude of flow-through items either increase or decrease tax expense, thereby affecting diluted earnings per share.

Electric Segment:

Diluted earnings from the electric segment was $0.21 per share for 2021, as compared to $0.20 per share recorded for 2020, an increase of $0.01 per share. There was an increase in electric revenues due to CPUC-approved rate increases effective January 1, 2021, as well as lower interest expense as compared to 2020. The decrease in interest expense was due primarily to the elimination of interest expense allocated from GSWC effective July 1, 2020 as a result of the spin-off of GSWC's electric division to BVESI. These increases to net earnings were partially offset by an increase in electric supply costs and other operating expenses. Due to regulatory mechanisms in place, the increase in electric supply costs results in a corresponding increase in electric operating revenues and has no net impact on the electric segment’s profitability.

32

Contracted Services Segment:

Diluted earnings from the contracted services segment was $0.48 per share, as compared to $0.47 per share for 2020, an increase of $0.01 per share. This was due to an increase in management fee revenue, as well as a decrease in overall operating expenses, partially offset by overall lower construction activity as compared to 2020. The decrease in overall operating expenses was due to, among other things, lower legal and outside services costs and other non-income taxes.

AWR (Parent):

For the year ended December 31, 2021, diluted earnings from AWR (parent) decreased $0.01 per share compared to 2020 due primarily to changes in state unitary taxes.

The following discussion and analysis for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 provide information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and subsidiaries: GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and its subsidiaries.

33

Consolidated Results of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES
Water$347,112$330,637$16,4755.0%
Electric38,34537,0241,3213.6%
Contracted services113,396120,582(7,186)-6.0%
Total operating revenues498,853488,24310,6102.2%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Water purchased77,91474,5543,3604.5%
Power purchased for pumping11,10310,1349699.6%
Groundwater production assessment19,41220,392(980)-4.8%
Power purchased for resale11,24010,4238177.8%
Supply cost balancing accounts(11,421)(11,803)382-3.2%
Other operation34,73833,2361,5024.5%
Administrative and general83,54783,615(68)-0.1%
Depreciation and amortization39,59636,8502,7467.5%
Maintenance12,78115,702(2,921)-18.6%
Property and other taxes22,52222,1993231.5%
ASUS construction56,90962,411(5,502)-8.8%
(Gain) loss on sale of assets(465)31(496)*
Total operating expenses357,876357,744132%
OPERATING INCOME140,977130,49910,4788.0%
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest expense(22,834)(22,531)(303)1.3%
Interest income1,4931,801(308)-17.1%
Other, net5,1344,8532815.8%
(16,207)(15,877)(330)2.1%
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE124,770114,62210,1488.9%
Income tax expense30,42328,1972,2267.9%
NET INCOME$94,347$86,425$7,9229.2%
Basic earnings per Common Share$2.55$2.34$0.219.0%
Fully diluted earnings per Common Share$2.55$2.33$0.229.4%

* not meaningful

34

Operating Revenues

General

GSWC and BVESI rely upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plant. ASUS relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. Current operating revenues and earnings may be negatively impacted if the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries do not receive adequate price adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of construction projects at the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.

Water

For the year ended December 31, 2021, revenues from water operations increased by $16.5 million to $347.1 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2020 as a result of full third-year step increases for 2021 approved by the CPUC. These increases were partially offset by lower CPUC-approved surcharges billed in 2021 to recover previously incurred costs. These surcharges are largely offset by corresponding decreases in operating expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.

Billed water consumption for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased slightly compared to 2020. In general, changes in consumption do not have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved WRAM accounts in place in the majority of GSWC's rate-making areas. GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is currently authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities. The August 2020 CPUC decision on the First Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking eliminates the continued use of the WRAM beginning with the next general rate case application that will be filed in 2023 and will set new rates for the years 2025 – 2027.

Electric

For the year ended December 31, 2021, revenues from electric operations were $38.3 million as compared to $37.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. This increase was due to new CPUC-approved electric rates effective January 1, 2021, partially offset by a 2% decrease in electric usage as compared to the same period in 2020. Due to the CPUC-approved Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have an impact on earnings.

Contracted Services

Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases.  For the year ended December 31, 2021, total revenues from contracted services were $113.4 million as compared to $120.6 million for 2020.  The decrease was due to an overall decrease in construction activity as compared to 2020, partially offset by an increase in management fees resulting from the successful resolution of various economic price adjustments and other filings at the military bases served.

ASUS's subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the military bases served. During 2021, ASUS was awarded approximately $17.3 million in new construction projects, some of which have been completed during 2021. The majority of the remainder are expected to be completed in 2022. Furthermore, in September 2021, ASUS received a contract modification that provided for additional infrastructure assets located at Joint Base Andrews to be operated and maintained by ASUS under its utility privatization contract with the U.S. government. The operation and maintenance, and renewal and replacement of these assets is expected to contribute additional revenue of approximately $41.0 million over the remaining life of the 50-year contract, through January 2056. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the original 50-year contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.

Operating Expenses:

Supply Costs

Total supply costs comprise the largest segment of total operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for 30.2% and 29.0% of total operating expenses for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Water segment supply costs

Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. The overall actual percentages for purchased water for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 was 45% and 44%,

35

respectively, as compared to the adopted percentages of 34% for 2021 and 2020. The higher actual percentages of purchased water as compared to adopted percentages resulted primarily from several wells being out of service.

Under the CPUC-approved Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA"), GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power and pump tax expenses. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances.  GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area. The August 2020 CPUC decision on the First Phase of the Low-Income Affordability Rulemaking, which eliminates the continued use of the WRAM, also eliminates the MCBA for GSWC beginning in the year 2025.

Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, water supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water purchased$77,914$74,554$3,3604.5%
Power purchased for pumping11,10310,1349699.6%
Groundwater production assessment19,41220,392(980)-4.8%
Water supply cost balancing accounts *(11,295)(12,060)765-6.3%
Total water supply costs$97,134$93,020$4,1144.4%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(11,421,000) and $(11,803,000) for 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Purchased water costs for 2021 increased to $77.9 million as compared to $74.6 million for 2020 primarily due to the higher mix of purchased water as compared to pumped water and an increase in wholesale water costs. The cost of power purchased for pumping increased to $11.1 million in 2021 as compared to $10.1 million for 2020, due to increased electricity costs. Groundwater production assessments decreased to $19.4 million in 2021 as compared to $20.4 million in 2020 due to a higher amount of purchased water versus pumped water.

The under-collection in the water supply cost balancing account decreased $765,000 during 2021 as compared to 2020 due to rate increases to specifically cover increases in supply costs experienced in these areas, partially offset by higher costs related to purchased water.

Electric segment supply costs

Supply costs for the electric segment consist primarily of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVESI’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, electric supply costs consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Power purchased for resale$11,240$10,423$8177.8%
Electric supply cost balancing account *(126)257(383)-149.0%
Total electric supply costs$11,114$10,680$4344.1%

* The sum of water and electric supply-cost balancing accounts are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(11,421,000) and $(11,803,000) for 2021 and 2020, respectively.

For 2021, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVESI's customers was $11.2 million as compared to $10.4 million for 2020 due to an increase in the average price per megawatt-hour ("MWh"). The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased to $71.94 per MWh in 2021 from $67.52 per MWh in 2020. This increase in price resulted in an under-collection of $126,000 recorded in the electric supply balancing account during 2021 as compared to an over-collection of $257,000 during 2020.

36

Other Operation

The primary components of other operation expenses include payroll, materials and supplies, chemicals and water-treatment costs, and outside service costs of operating the regulated water and electric systems, including the costs associated with transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices.  Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$25,781$23,690$2,0918.8%
Electric Services3,0112,70530611.3%
Contracted Services5,9466,841(895)-13.1%
Total other operation$34,738$33,236$1,5024.5%

For the year ended December 31, 2021, other operation costs at the water segment increased due to increases in chemical and water treatment costs including outside service costs associated with the water treatment processes, as well as increases in water conservation costs incurred to address current drought conditions.

Other operation expenses for the electric segment increased primarily due to higher operation-related labor and outside services costs.

The change in other operation expenses for contracted services was primarily due to (i) higher bad debt expense experienced in 2020 related to certain receivable balances due from other prime contractors working for the U.S. government, and (ii) lower pre-contract costs incurred in 2021 as compared to 2020.

Administrative and General

Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$55,552$55,067$4850.9%
Electric Services8,6948,639550.6%
Contracted Services19,29219,900(608)-3.1%
AWR (parent)99%
Total administrative and general$83,547$83,615$(68)-0.1%

For the year ended December 31, 2021, administrative and general expenses at the water segment increased $485,000. Excluding the impact of a reduction in billed surcharges, administrative and general expenses increased $739,000 due to higher employee-related benefits, insurance costs, and regulatory costs. Decreases in billed surcharges have a corresponding decrease in administrative and general expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, administrative and general expenses for contracted services decreased by $608,000 due to lower legal and other outside services as compared to 2020. Legal and outside services tend to fluctuate from period to period.

37

Depreciation and Amortization

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, depreciation and amortization expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$33,384$30,969$2,4157.8%
Electric Services2,5722,479933.8%
Contracted Services3,6403,4022387.0%
Total depreciation and amortization$39,596$36,850$2,7467.5%

The increases in depreciation expense resulted primarily from additions to utility plant and other fixed assets since 2020.

Maintenance

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, maintenance expense by segment consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$9,056$11,737$(2,681)-22.8%
Electric Services697985(288)-29.2%
Contracted Services3,0282,980481.6%
Total maintenance$12,781$15,702$(2,921)-18.6%

Maintenance expense decreased at the water segment due largely to lower unplanned maintenance incurred as compared to 2020. The need for unplanned maintenance activities for the water segment were significantly higher in 2020 than in 2021.

The decrease in maintenance at the electric segment was due to a decrease in billed surcharges as compared to 2020, which has a corresponding decrease in maintenance expense and, therefore, no earnings impact.

Property and Other Taxes

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, property and other taxes by segment, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$19,041$18,261$7804.3%
Electric Services1,5191,23228723.3%
Contracted Services1,9622,706(744)-27.5%
Total property and other taxes$22,522$22,199$3231.5%

Property and other taxes at the water and electric segments increased during 2021 as compared to 2020 due, in large part, to an increase in property taxes resulting from capital additions and the associated higher assessed property values. The decrease at the contracted services segment was due to lower non-income tax assessments and fees as compared to 2020.

ASUS Construction

For the year ended December 31, 2021, construction expenses for contracted services were $56.9 million, decreasing by $5.5 million compared to 2020 due to an overall decrease in construction activity.

(Gain) Loss On Sale of Assets

The gain on sale of assets in 2021 was related primarily to the sale of a parcel of non-utility-related land at the water segment with no equivalent item in 2020. The loss on sale of assets in 2020 related to the sale of fixed assets at the contracted services segment.

38

Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$21,474$20,946$5282.5%
Electric Services259767(508)-66.2%
Contracted Services370478(108)-22.6%
AWR (parent)731340391115.0%
Total interest expense$22,834$22,531$3031.3%

Registrant's borrowings consist of bank debts under revolving credit facilities and long-term debt issuances at GSWC. Consolidated interest expense increased as compared to 2020 resulting from an overall increase in total borrowing levels to support, among other things, the capital expenditures program at the regulated utilities. In July 2020, GSWC issued unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million. The increase in borrowing levels was partially offset by an overall decrease in average interest rates due, in part, from the early redemption in May 2021 of GSWC's 9.56% private placement notes in the amount of $28 million.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$428$634$(206)-32.5%
Electric Services118183(65)-35.5%
Contracted Services1,007974333.4%
AWR (parent)(60)10(70)-700.0%
Total interest income$1,493$1,801$(308)-17.1%

For the year ended December 31, 2021, overall interest income decreased by $308,000 as compared to 2020 due primarily to lower interest income earned on regulatory assets at the water segment bearing interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rate, which decreased compared to 2020.

Other Income and (Expense), net

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, other income and (expense) by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$4,783$4,495$2886.4%
Electric Services242248(6)-2.4%
Contracted Services(149)(138)(11)8.0%
AWR (parent)258248104.0%
Total interest income$5,134$4,853$2815.8%

For the year ended December 31, 2021, other income increased mostly as a result of larger gains generated and recorded on investments held to fund one of Registrant's retirement plans as compared to 2020 due to market conditions. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the receipt of other income amounts owed by developers, and an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs related to Registrant's defined benefit pension plans and other retirement benefits as compared to 2020. Because of GSWC's and BVESI's two-way pension balancing accounts authorized by the CPUC, changes in pension costs have no material impact to net earnings at the regulated utilities.

39

Income Tax Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, income tax expense by segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):

Year EndedYear Ended$%
12/31/202112/31/2020CHANGECHANGE
Water Services$22,095$20,515$1,5807.7%
Electric Services2,9752,68928610.6%
Contracted Services5,4345,2012334.5%
AWR (parent)(81)(208)127-61.1%
Total income tax expense$30,423$28,197$2,2267.9%

Consolidated income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2021 increased by $2.2 million due to an increase in pretax income, partially offset by a lower overall effective income tax rate ("ETR"). AWR's consolidated effective ETR was 24.4% and 24.6% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. GSWC's ETR was 24.2% for 2021 as compared to 25.0% for 2020 resulting primarily from net changes in certain flow-through and permanent items. The decrease in the tax benefit at AWR (parent) was the result of changes in state unitary taxes.

Information comparing the consolidated results of operations for fiscal years 2020 and 2019 can be found under Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis under the heading “Consolidated Results of Operations-Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019” in AWR's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC.

40

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. The following are accounting policies and estimates that are critical to the financial statements of AWR. For more information regarding the significant accounting policies of Registrant, see Note 1 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Accounting for Rate Regulation — Because GSWC and BVESI operate extensively in regulated businesses, they are subject to the authoritative guidance for accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation.  Application of this guidance requires accounting for certain transactions in accordance with regulations adopted by the regulatory commissions of the states in which rate-regulated operations are conducted.  Utility companies defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that those costs and credits will be recognized in the ratemaking process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. These deferred regulatory assets and liabilities are then reflected in the income statement in the period in which the same amounts are reflected in the rates charged for service.

Regulation and the effects of regulatory accounting have the most significant impact on the financial statements of GSWC and BVESI. When either files for adjustments to rates, the capital assets, operating costs and other matters are subject to review, and disallowances may occur. In the event that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI's operations are no longer subject to the accounting guidance for the effects of certain types of regulation, they are required to write-off related regulatory assets that are not specifically recoverable and determine if other assets might be impaired.  If the CPUC determines that a portion of either GSWC’s or BVESI's assets are not recoverable in customer rates, management is required to determine if it has suffered an asset impairment that would require a write-down in the asset valuation.  Management continually evaluates the anticipated recovery, settlement or refund of regulatory assets, liabilities, and revenues subject to refund and provides for allowances and/or reserves that it believes to be necessary.  In the event that management’s assessment as to the probability of the inclusion in the ratemaking process is incorrect, the associated regulatory asset or liability will be adjusted to reflect the change in assessment or the impact of regulatory approval of rates. Reviews by the CPUC may also result in additional regulatory liabilities to refund previously collected revenues to customers if the CPUC were to disallow costs included in the ratemaking process.

Registrant also reviews its utility plant in-service for possible impairment in accordance with accounting guidance for regulated entities for abandonments and disallowances of plant costs.

Revenue Recognition — GSWC and BVESI record water and electric utility operating revenues when the service is provided to customers. Operating revenues include unbilled revenues that are earned (i.e., the service has been provided) but not billed by the end of each accounting period. Unbilled revenues are calculated based on the number of days and total usage from each customer’s most recent billing record that was billed prior to the end of the accounting period and is used to estimate unbilled consumption as of the year-end reporting period.  Unbilled revenues are recorded for both monthly and bi-monthly customers.

In 2008, the CPUC granted GSWC the authority to implement revenue decoupling mechanisms through the adoption of the WRAM.  With the adoption of this alternative revenue program, GSWC adjusts revenues in the WRAM for the difference between what is billed to its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC. In a final decision issued by the CPUC in August 2020, any general rate case application filed by GSWC and the other California water utilities after the August 27, 2020 effective date of this decision, may not include a proposal to continue the use of the WRAM. Instead they include a proposal to use a limited price adjustment mechanism (the Monterey-Style WRAM). The final decision will not have any impact on GSWC's WRAM balances during the rate cycle covering the years 2019 – 2021, nor the pending general rate case application filed in July 2020 that will set new rates for the years 2022 – 2024. However, the next general rate case application in 2023 covering the years 2025 – 2027 is currently not permitted to include the continued use of the WRAM. The CPUC also granted BVESI a revenue decoupling mechanism through the BRRAM. BVESI adjusts revenues in the BRRAM for the difference between what is billed to its electric customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC.

As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC and BVESI are required to collect their WRAM and BRRAM balances, respectively, within 24 months following the year in which they are recorded.  The CPUC has set the recovery period for under-collected balances that are up to 15% of adopted annual revenues at 18 months or less.  For net WRAM under-collected balances greater than 15%, the recovery period is 19 to 36 months. As a result of the accounting guidance and CPUC-adopted recovery periods, Registrant must estimate if any WRAM and BRRAM revenues will be collected beyond the 24-month period. This can affect the timing of when such revenues are recognized.

41

ASUS's 50-year firm fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on Registrant’s balance sheet. Revenues for ASUS's operations and maintenance contracts are recognized when services have been rendered to the U.S. government pursuant to 50-year contracts. Revenues from construction activities are recognized based on either the percentage-of-completion or cost-plus methods of accounting.  In accordance with GAAP, revenue recognition under these methods requires management to estimate the progress toward completion on a contract in terms of efforts, such as costs incurred.  This approach is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress on these contracts. Changes in job performance, job conditions, change orders and estimated profitability, including those arising from any contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income, and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined. Unbilled receivables from the U.S. government represent amounts to be billed for construction work completed and/or for services rendered pursuant to the 50-year contracts with the U.S government, which are not presently billable but which will be billed under the terms of the contracts.

Income Taxes — Registrant’s income tax calculations require estimates due principally to the regulated nature of the operations of GSWC and BVESI, the multiple states in which Registrant operates, and potential future tax rate changes. Registrant uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in regulatory treatment, or significant changes in tax-related estimates, assumptions or law, could have a material impact on the financial position and results of operations of Registrant.

As regulated utilities, GSWC and BVESI treat certain temporary differences as flow-through adjustments in computing their income tax expense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.  Flow-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flow-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance between the effective tax rate and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC or BVESI were not required to account for its income taxes as regulated enterprises. As of December 31, 2021, Registrant’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was zero.

Pension Benefits — Registrant’s pension benefit obligations and related costs are calculated using actuarial concepts within the framework of accounting guidance for employers' accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits other than pensions.  Two critical assumptions, the discount rate and the expected return on plan assets, are important elements of expense and/or liability measurement. We evaluate these critical assumptions annually. Other assumptions include employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increase. The discount rate enables Registrant to state expected future cash payments for benefits as a present value on the measurement date. The guideline for setting this rate is a high-quality, long-term corporate bond rate. Registrant’s discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed using a large population of high-quality corporate bonds. The resulting discount rates reflect the matching of plan liability cash flows to the yield curves.  A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and increases periodic pension expense. Conversely, a higher discount rate decreases the present value of benefit obligations and decreases periodic pension expense.  To determine the expected long-term rate of return on the plan assets, Registrant considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. A lower expected rate of return on plan assets will increase pension expense. The long-term expected return on the pension plan's assets was 6.00% for 2021 and 6.25% for 2020.

For the pension plan obligation, Registrant increased the discount rate to 2.89% as of December 31, 2021 from 2.55% as of December 31, 2020 to reflect market interest-rate conditions at December 31, 2021. A hypothetical 25-basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate would have increased total net periodic pension expense for 2021 by approximately $1.1 million, or 23.0%, and would have increased the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) at December 31, 2021 by a total of $9.9 million, or 3.8%.  A 25-basis point decrease in the long-term return on pension-plan-asset assumption would have increased 2021 pension cost by approximately $523,000, or 10.8%.

In addition, changes in the fair value of plan assets will impact future pension cost and the Plan’s funded status.  Changes in market conditions can affect the value of plan assets held to fund future long-term pension benefits. Any reductions in the value of plan assets will result in increased future expense, an increase in the underfunded position, and increase the required future contributions.

The CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to each maintain a two-way balancing account to track differences between their forecasted annual pension expenses adopted in rates and the actual annual expense to be recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs.  As of December 31, 2021, GSWC has a $261,000 under-collection in its two-

42

way pension balancing account for the general office and water regions. As of December 31, 2021, BVESI has a $246,000 over-collection in its two-way pension balancing account.

Funding requirements for qualified defined benefit pension plans are determined by government regulations.  In establishing the contribution amount, Registrant has considered the potential impact of funding-rule changes under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. Registrant contributes the minimum required contribution as determined by government regulations or the forecasted annual pension cost authorized by the CPUC and included in customer rates, whichever is higher. In accordance with this funding policy, for 2022 the pension contribution is expected to be approximately $3.1 million. Any differences between the forecasted annual pension costs in rates and the actual pension costs are included in the two-way pension balancing accounts.  Additionally, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension plan. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions, our benefit obligations could materially increase.

Changes in demographics, including increased numbers of retirees or increases in life expectancy assumptions may also increase the funding requirements of our obligations related to the pension plan.  Mortality assumptions are a critical component of benefit obligation amounts and a key factor in determining the expected length of time for annuity payments. Assuming no changes in actuarial assumptions or plan amendments, the costs over the long term are expected to decrease due to the closure of Registrant’s defined benefit pension plan to new employees as of January 1, 2011.  Employees hired or rehired after December 31, 2010 are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan instead of the pension plan.

43

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AWR

Registrant’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase in future periods due to the need for additional external capital to fund its construction program and as market interest rates increase. AWR believes that costs associated with capital used to fund construction at GSWC and BVESI will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers.

AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC and BVESI to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $615.7 million was available for GSWC to pay dividends to AWR on December 31, 2021. Approximately $70.7 million was available for BVESI to pay dividends to AWR as of December 31, 2021. ASUS's ability to pay dividends to AWR is dependent upon state laws in which each Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary operates, as well as ASUS's ability to pay dividends under California law.

When necessary, Registrant obtains funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings under revolving credit facilities. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general, as well as conditions in the debt and equity capital markets. AWR currently has access to a $200.0 million credit facility and borrows under this facility, which expires in May 2023, to provide funds to GSWC and ASUS in support of their operations.  The interest rate charged to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR’s interest expense under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2021, there was $174.5 million outstanding under this facility. Registrant expects to issue long-term debt through GSWC prior to May 2023 and use the debt proceeds to pay off borrowings under this facility. This facility has interest rates generally based on the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), which will cease immediately after June 30, 2023. In connection with the May 2023 expiration of this credit facility, as well as the pending discontinuation of LIBOR, Registrant anticipates renewing or entering into a new credit facility prior to May 2023, with interest rates based on other benchmark rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"). Registrant does not believe the change in benchmark rates will have a material impact on financing costs.

BVESI has a $35.0 million revolving credit facility, which was amended in December 2021 to reduce the interest rate and fees charged, as well as extend the maturity date by one year to July 1, 2024. As of December 31, 2021, there was $31.0 million outstanding under this facility. Borrowings made under this facility support BVESI's operations and capital expenditures. Under the terms of the credit agreement, BVESI has the option to increase the facility by an additional $15.0 million, subject to lender approval. Interest rates under this facility are generally based on LIBOR. Under the terms of the December 2021 amendment, upon discontinuation of a benchmark rate such as LIBOR, the lender may replace LIBOR with a benchmark rate replacement such as SOFR. Registrant does not believe the change from LIBOR to a new benchmark rate will have a material impact on financing costs. Registrant does not have any other borrowings or debt indexed to LIBOR.

In 2019, the CPUC issued a decision approving BVESI's authority to issue long-term financing not to exceed $75 million. The CPUC requires BVESI to completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period. The next 24-month period in which BVESI is required to pay off its borrowings from the facility ends in July 2022. Accordingly, the $31.0 million outstanding under BVESI's credit facility has been classified as a current liability in AWR's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021. BVESI expects to fund this repayment through the issuance of long term debt during the first half of 2022.

In May 2021, GSWC redeemed its 9.56% private placement notes in the amount of $28.0 million, which pursuant to the note agreement included a redemption premium of 3.0% on par value, or $840,000. GSWC recovers redemption premiums in its embedded cost of debt as filed in cost of capital proceedings where the cost savings from redeeming higher interest rate debt are passed on to customers. Accordingly, the redemption premium has been deferred as a regulatory asset. Prior to May 15, 2021, the notes were subject to a make whole premium. GSWC funded the redemption by borrowing from AWR parent. AWR, in turn, funded this borrowing from its revolving credit facility.

The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the amount of delinquent customer accounts receivable, resulting in both GSWC and BVESI increasing their allowance for doubtful accounts throughout the pandemic. This has affected cash flows from operating activities at the regulated utilities and has increased the need to borrow under AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities. However, the CPUC has authorized GSWC and BVESI to track incremental costs, including bad debt expense in excess of what is included in their respective revenue requirements, incurred as a result of the pandemic in COVID-19-related memorandum accounts to be filed with the CPUC for future recovery. Furthermore, in January 2022, GSWC received $9.5 million from the state of California of relief funding for customers' unpaid water bills incurred during the pandemic, as previously discussed. As of December 31, 2021, GSWC has reflected these relief funds as a reduction to its COVID-19 related memorandum account, as well as a reduction to GSWC's estimated customer bad debt

44

reserve. In February 2022, BVESI received $321,000 from the state of California for similar customer relief funding for unpaid electric bills incurred during the pandemic. However, GSWC and BVESI continue to experience delinquent account activity because of the ongoing pandemic.

In March 2021, Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”) affirmed an A+ credit rating for both AWR and GSWC. S&P also revised its rating outlook to negative from stable for both companies. S&P’s debt ratings range from AAA (highest possible) to D (obligation is in default). In November 2021, Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") affirmed its A2 rating with a stable outlook for GSWC. Securities ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold a security, and are subject to change or withdrawal at any time by the rating agencies. Management believes that AWR’s sound capital structure and A+ credit rating, combined with its financial discipline, will enable Registrant to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case Registrant may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending.

AWR’s ability to pay cash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends in the future, on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. On February 1, 2022, AWR's Board of Directors approved a first quarter dividend of $0.365 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on March 1, 2022 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 15, 2022. AWR has paid dividends on its Common Shares for over 82 consecutive years, and has increased the dividends received by shareholders each calendar year for 67 consecutive years. This places AWR in an exclusive group of companies on the New York Stock Exchange that have achieved that result. Registrant's current policy is to achieve a compound annual growth rate in the dividend of more than 7% over the long-term. The Company has achieved nearly a 10% compound annual growth rate in its calendar year dividend payments from 2011–2021.

Registrant's current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated cash flows from operations, borrowings from AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities, and access to long-term financing from capital markets will be adequate to provide sufficient capital to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and BVESI, and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. Registrant’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its customers' ability to pay utility bills and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases and any adjustments arising out of an audit or investigation by federal governmental agencies.

ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under 50-year contracts for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS's subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or its subsidiaries.

Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization.  Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities was $115.6 million for 2021 as compared to $122.2 million for 2020.  The decrease was due primarily to different timing of income tax installment payments between the two years, as well as a decrease in billed surcharges to recover regulatory assets at GSWC. The decrease was also due to timing differences of when vendor payments are made for construction work performed at military bases and the billing of and cash receipts from the U.S. government for work completed. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work. These decreases were partially offset by an improvement in cash from accounts receivable related to utility customers due, in part, to improved economic conditions as compared to 2020, which were more affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

45

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $145.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $131.6 million used in 2020 largely due to an increase in capital expenditures at the regulated utilities. Registrant invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, while working with the CPUC to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. Registrant’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs (where infrastructure is replaced, as needed) and major capital investment projects (where new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities are constructed). The regulated utilities may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision. Cash used for other investments consists primarily of cash invested in a trust for a retirement benefit plan.

During 2022, the regulated utilities' company-funded capital expenditures are expected to be between $140 million and $160 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to supply chain issues or the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Registrant’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares, (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to banks, and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, GSWC also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Borrowings on AWR's and BVESI's credit facilities are used to fund GSWC and BVESI capital expenditures, respectively, until long-term financing is arranged. Overall debt levels are expected to increase to fund a portion of the costs of the capital expenditures that will be made by the regulated utilities.

Net cash used by financing activities was $2.3 million for 2021 as compared to cash provided of $44.8 million for 2020. During 2021, GSWC redeemed its 9.56% private placement notes in the amount of $28.0 million. This decrease in cash flows was offset by an increase in net borrowings on AWR's credit facility during 2021 to fund the redemption and support other operating and investing activities. In 2020, GSWC issued unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million. As required by the CPUC, GSWC used the proceeds from the notes to pay down a majority of its intercompany borrowings from AWR. AWR used the proceeds from GSWC to pay down amounts outstanding under its credit facility.

GSWC

GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, dividends on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers. Internal cash flows may also be impacted by delays in receiving payments from GSWC customers due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources for long-term financing, as well as obtain funds from equity investments and intercompany borrowings from its parent, AWR, to help fund a portion of its operations and construction expenditures. In July 2020, GSWC completed the issuance of long-term unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million. In addition, AWR borrows under a revolving credit facility and provides funds to GSWC in support of its operations under intercompany borrowing arrangements. This credit facility expires in May 2023. However, the CPUC requires GSWC to completely pay off all intercompany borrowings it has from AWR within a 24-month period. The next 24-month period in which GSWC is required to pay off its intercompany borrowings from AWR ends in May 2023.

In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. Generally, GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.

As is often the case with public utilities, GSWC’s current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated funds, along with the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, borrowings from AWR and common share issuances to AWR, will be adequate to provide sufficient capital to enable GSWC to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements pending recovery of costs in rates.

46

On July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the net assets from its electric utility division to BVESI. As a result of this transfer, from July 1, 2020 onward, the cash flows of the electric segment are no longer included in GSWC's statement of cash flows, but continue to be included in AWR's consolidated statement of cash flows.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities was $100.3 million for 2021 as compared to $110.3 million for 2020.  The decrease was due primarily to different timing of income tax installment payments between the two years, as well as a decrease in billed surcharges to recover regulatory assets. This decrease was partially offset by an improvement in cash from accounts receivable related to utility customers due, in part, to improved economic conditions as compared to 2020, which were more affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Net cash used in investing activities was $124.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $117.7 million for the same period in 2020. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, cash paid for capital expenditures was $123.5 million and $116.4 million, respectively. Due to the electric utility reorganization effective July 1, 2020, GSWC's cash flows from investing activities during 2021 do not include the electric segment's capital expenditures, whereas the cash flows for 2020 include six months of electric utility capital expenditures.

In October 2020, AWR issued an interest bearing promissory note to GSWC, which expires in May 2023. Under the terms of the note, AWR may borrow from GSWC amounts up to $30 million for working capital purposes. AWR agrees to pay any unpaid principal amounts outstanding under this note, plus accrued interest. During 2021 and 2020, AWR borrowed and repaid a total of $26 million and $6 million, respectively, from GSWC under the terms of the note. As of December 31, 2021, there were no amounts outstanding under this note.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Net cash used in financing activities was $11.1 million for 2021 as compared to net cash provided of $42.5 million for 2020. During 2021, GSWC redeemed early its 9.56% private placement notes in the amount of $28.0 million. In addition, GSWC paid $38.3 million in dividends to AWR parent in 2021 as compared to $22.5 million of dividends paid in 2020. These decreases in cash flows were partially offset by an increase in net intercompany borrowings from AWR to fund the redemption and support other operating and investing activities. During 2020, GSWC issued unsecured private placement notes totaling $160.0 million, and also issued five additional of GSWC common shares to AWR for $60.0 million. GSWC used these proceeds to pay down intercompany borrowings during 2020 as required by the CPUC.

47

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.  Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed. In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain annual sinking funds or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

The following table reflects Registrant’s contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments pursuant to contracts as of December 31, 2021. The table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our 50-year firm, fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government at our contracted services segment are not included in the amounts below. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance or private placement of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.

Payments/Commitments Due (1)
($ in thousands)TotalLess than 1 Year
Notes/Debentures (2)$187,000$
Private Placement Notes (3)215,000
Tax-Exempt Obligations (4)10,769167
Other Debt Instruments (5)3,019210
Total AWR Long-Term Debt$415,788$377
Interest on Long-Term Debt (6)$228,112$20,206
Advances for Construction (7)70,3373,610
Renewable Energy Credit Agreement (8)1,239619
Purchased Power Contracts (9)14,4795,513
Capital Expenditures (10)86,16386,163
Water Purchase Agreements (11)3,390436
Operating Leases (12)12,4122,548
Employer Contributions (13)3,0793,079
SUB-TOTAL419,211122,174
Other Commitments (14)215,27531,000
TOTAL$1,050,274$153,551

(1) Excludes dividends and facility fees.

(2) The notes and debentures have been issued by GSWC under an Indenture dated September 1, 1993, as amended in December 2008. The notes and debentures do not contain any financial covenants that Registrant believes to be material or any cross-default provisions.

(3) Consists of GSWC senior private placement notes totaling $215.0 million issued to various banks, including $160.0 million of unsecured private placement notes issued in July 2020. Under the terms of each of these senior notes, GSWC may not incur any additional debt or pay any distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect thereto, it would have a debt to capitalization ratio in excess of 0.6667-to-1 or a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ratio of more than 8-to-1. GSWC is in compliance with all of its covenant provisions as of December 31, 2021.  GSWC does not currently have any outstanding mortgages or other liens on indebtedness on its properties.

(4) Consists of obligations at GSWC related to (i) a loan agreement supporting $7.7 million in outstanding debt issued by the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, and (ii) $3.0 million of obligations with respect to GSWC's 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the State Water Project (“SWP”). These obligations do not contain any financial covenants believed to be material to Registrant or any cross-default provisions. In regard to its SWP entitlement, GSWC has entered into agreements with various developers for a portion of its 500 acre-foot entitlement to water from the SWP.

48

(5) Consists of the outstanding debt portion of funds received under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for reimbursements of capital costs related to the installation of meters for conversion of non-metered service to metered service in GSWC's Arden-Cordova District.

(6) Consists of expected interest expense payments based on the assumption that GSWC’s long-term debt remains outstanding until maturity.

(7) Advances for construction represent contract refunds mostly from GSWC to developers for the cost of water systems paid for by the developers. The advances are generally refundable in equal annual installments over 40-year periods.

(8) Consists of an agreement by BVESI to purchase renewable energy credits through 2023. These renewable energy credits are used to meet California's renewables portfolio standard.

(9) Consists of BVESI fixed-cost purchased power contracts executed in September 2019 with Exelon Generation Company, LLC and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.

(10) Consists primarily of capital expenditures estimated to be required under signed contracts at GSWC and BVESI as of December 31, 2021.

(11) Water purchase agreements consist of (i) a remaining amount of $1.7 million under an agreement expiring in 2028 to use water rights from a third party, and (ii) an aggregate amount of $1.7 million of other water purchase commitments with other third parties, which expire between 2025 through 2038.

(12) Reflects future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases for both GSWC and ASUS.

(13) Consists of expected contributions to Registrant's defined benefit pension plan for the year 2022. Contributions to the pension plan are expected to be the higher of the minimum required contributions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) or the amounts that are recovered in customer rates and approved by the CPUC. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change based on, among other things, the limits established for federal tax deductibility (pension plan) and the significant impact that returns on plan assets and changes in discount rates have on such amounts.

(14) Other commitments consist primarily of (i) a $200 million revolving credit facility under AWR, of which $174.5 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2021; (ii) a $35 million revolving credit facility under BVESI, of which $31 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2021; (iii) $9.7 million in asset retirement obligations of GSWC that reflect the retirement of wells by GSWC, which by law need to be properly capped at the time of removal; (iv) irrevocable letters of credit in the amount of $440,000 for the deductible in Registrant’s business automobile insurance policies; and (v) a $15,000 irrevocable letter of credit issued on behalf of GSWC pursuant to a franchise agreement with the City of Rancho Cordova. All of the letters of credit are issued pursuant to AWR's revolving credit facility. Pursuant to CPUC rules, BVESI must completely pay off all borrowings under its revolving credit facility within a 24-month period. The next 24-month period in which BVESI is required to pay off its borrowings from the facility ends in July 2022. Accordingly, the $31 million outstanding under BVESI's credit facility has been classified as a current liability in AWR's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2021. BVESI expects to fund this repayment through the issuance of long term debt during the first half of 2022.

BVESI Power-Supply Arrangements

BVESI purchases power pursuant to purchased power contracts approved by the CPUC effective in the fourth quarter of 2019 at a fixed cost over three and five-year terms depending on the amount of power and period during which the power is purchased under the contracts. In addition to the purchased power contracts, BVESI buys additional energy to meet peak demand as needed and sells surplus power when necessary. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased to $71.94 per MWh in 2021 from $67.52 per MWh for 2020. BVESI’s average energy costs are impacted by pricing fluctuations on the spot market. However, BVESI has an electric-supply-cost balancing account, as approved by the CPUC, to alleviate any impacts to earnings.

Construction Program

GSWC maintains an ongoing water distribution main replacement program throughout its customer service areas based on the age and type of distribution-system materials, priority of leaks detected, remaining productive life of the distribution system and an underlying replacement schedule. In addition, GSWC and BVESI upgrade their facilities in accordance with industry standards, local and CPUC requirements, and new legislation.  California requires investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan to the CPUC for approval, and requires all electric utilities to prepare plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating their electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfires.

As of December 31, 2021, GSWC and BVESI have unconditional purchase obligations for capital projects of approximately $86.2 million.  During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, GSWC and BVESI had capital

49

expenditures of $150.6 million, $130.4 million and $140.8 million, respectively.  A portion of these capital expenditures was funded by developers through contributions in aid of construction, which are not required to be repaid, and refundable advances. During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, capital expenditures funded by developers were $8.0 million, $7.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively. During 2022, the water and electric segments' company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $140 – $160 million, barring any delays resulting from changes in capital improvement schedules due to supply chain issues or the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. These amounts include approximately $13 million estimated to be spent by BVESI on wildfire mitigation projects.

Contracted Services

Under the terms of the current and future utility privatization contracts with the U.S. government, each contract's price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the utility privatization contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating, maintaining, renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.

Under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “2011 Act”), substantial automatic spending cuts, known as "sequestration," have impacted the expected levels of Department of Defense budgeting. The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries have not experienced any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an "excepted service" within the 2011 Act. With the expiration of the 2011 Act at the end of government fiscal year 2021, there are currently no discretionary spending caps in fiscal year 2022 and beyond. However, similar issues may arise as part of the fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. Any future impact on ASUS and its operations through the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. Government, and/or (d) delays in solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense utility privatization program.

At times, the DCAA and/or the DCMA may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.

Below is a summary of current and projected EPA filings for price adjustments to operations and maintenance fees and renewal and replacement fees for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries in fiscal 2022.

Military BaseEPA periodFiling Date
Fort Bliss (FBWS)October 2021 - September 2022Third Quarter 2021
Joint Base Andrews (TUS)February 2022 - January 2023Fourth Quarter 2021
Fort Lee (ODUS)February 2022 - January 2023Fourth Quarter 2021
Joint Base Langley Eustis and Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story (ODUS)April 2022 - March 2023First Quarter of 2022
Fort Jackson (PSUS)February 2022 - January 2023Fourth Quarter 2021
Fort Bragg (ONUS)March 2022 - February 2023First Quarter 2022
Eglin Air Force Base (ECUS)June 2022 - May 2023Second Quarter 2022
Fort Riley (FRUS)July 2022 - June 2023Second Quarter 2022

50

Regulatory Matters

A discussion on various regulatory matters is included] in the section titled “Overview” in this Form 10-K's "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". The discussion below focuses on other regulatory matters and developments.

Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

GSWC and BVESI hold Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”) granted by the CPUC in each of the ratemaking areas they serve. ASUS is regulated, if applicable, by the state in which it primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. FBWS holds a CPCN from the Public Utilities Commission of Texas.  The Virginia State Corporation Commission exercises jurisdiction over ODUS as a public service company. The Maryland Public Service Commission approved the right of TUS to operate as a water and wastewater utility at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, based on certain conditions. The South Carolina Public Service Commission exercises jurisdiction over PSUS as a public service company.  ONUS is regulated by the North Carolina Public Service Commission. ECUS and FRUS are not subject to regulation by their respective states' utility commissions.

GSWC and BVESI are subject to regulation by the CPUC which has broad authority over service and facilities, rates, classification of accounts, valuation of properties, the purchase, disposition and mortgaging of properties necessary or useful in rendering public utility service, the issuance of securities, the granting of certificates of public convenience and necessity as to the extension of services and facilities and various other matters.

Rates that GSWC and BVESI are authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases and are derived using rate base, cost of service and cost of capital, as projected for a future test year. Rates charged to customers vary according to customer class and rate jurisdiction and are generally set at levels allowing for recovery of prudently incurred costs, including a fair return on rate base.  Rate base generally consists of the original cost of utility plant in service, plus certain other assets, such as working capital and inventory, less accumulated depreciation on utility plant in service, deferred income tax liabilities and certain other deductions.

GSWC is required to file a water general rate case application every three years according to a schedule established by the CPUC. General rate cases typically include an increase in the first test year with inflation-rate adjustments for expenses for the second and third years of the rate case cycle.  For capital projects, there are two test years. Rates are based on a forecast of expenses and capital costs for each test year. GSWC's cost of capital is determined in a separate proceeding. Investor-owned water utilities serving California are required to file their cost of capital applications on a triennial basis. BVESI's general rate cases are typically filed every four years. Rates may also be increased by offsets for certain expense increases, including, but not limited to, supply-cost offset and balancing-account amortization, advice letter filings related to certain plant additions and other operating cost increases.

Neither the operations of AWR nor the operations and rates of ASUS are directly regulated by the CPUC. The CPUC does, however, regulate certain transactions between GSWC, BVESI and ASUS and between GSWC and BVESI and AWR.

General Rate Cases and Other Regulatory Matters

Water Segment

Changes in Rates:

Rates that GSWC is authorized to charge are determined by the CPUC in general rate cases. The last approved general rate case covered new water rates for the years 2019 – 2021. Effective January 1, 2021, the CPUC approved GSWC's full third-year step increase, which it achieved as a result of passing an earnings test. The higher water rates generated an additional increase in the adopted water revenues of approximately $16.4 million in 2021. Adopted water supply costs for 2021 were $5.3 million higher than the 2020 adopted supply costs.

GSWC has a pending general rate case that will determine new water rates for the years 2022 – 2024. In November 2021, GSWC and Public Advocates filed with the CPUC a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between GSWC and Public Advocates on this general rate case application. The settlement agreement, if approved, resolves all issues related to the 2022 annual revenue requirement in the general rate case application, leaving only three unresolved issues. Among other things, the settlement authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $404.8 million in capital infrastructure over the three-year cycle. The settlement also authorizes GSWC to complete certain advice letter capital projects approved in the last general rate case, which have recently been completed for a total capital investment of $9.4 million. The additional annual revenue requirements generated from these capital investments are $1.2 million and became effective February 15, 2022. Advice letter projects are filed for revenue recovery only when those projects are completed. Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the amounts included in the settlement agreement would increase the 2022 adopted revenues by approximately $30.3 million as compared to the 2021 adopted revenues, and increase the 2022 adopted supply costs by $9.7 million as compared to the 2021 adopted supply costs. The settlement agreement also allows for potential additional increases in adopted revenues for 2023 and 2024 subject to an earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values. GSWC has filed with the CPUC for

51

interim rates pending a final decision on this general rate case application, and will recognize revenues in 2022 based on 2021 adopted rates until the CPUC issues a final decision on the general rate case application, which is expected to be effective and retroactive to January 1, 2022.

Cost of Capital Proceeding:

GSWC filed a cost of capital application with the CPUC in May 2021 requesting a capital structure of 57% equity and 43% debt, a return on equity of 10.5%, and a return on rate base of 8.18%. Hearings on this proceeding are scheduled for the second quarter of 2022. A proposed decision on this proceeding is expected in the second half of 2022. A final decision on this proceeding, once issued by the CPUC, is expected to have an effective date retroactive to January 1, 2022.

Electric Segment

Completion of Electric Utility Reorganization Plan:

As authorized by the CPUC and FERC, on July 1, 2020, GSWC completed the transfer of the electric utility assets and liabilities from its electric division to BVESI in exchange for common shares of BVESI. GSWC then immediately distributed all of BVESI's common shares to AWR, whereupon BVESI became wholly owned directly by AWR. The reorganization did not result in any substantive changes to AWR's operations or business segments.

Recent Changes in Rates

In August 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on the electric general rate case, which set new rates for the years 2018 – 2022. Among other things, the final decision increased the adopted electric revenues by $1.1 million for 2021, and will increase adopted revenues by $1.0 million for 2022 (the electric rate increases are not subject to an earnings test). The rate case decision continues to apply for BVESI.

Vegetation Management, Wildfire Mitigation Plans and Legislation

The August 2019 final decision also authorized BVESI to record incremental costs related to vegetation management, such as costs for increased minimum clearances around electric power lines, in a CPUC-approved account for future recovery. As of December 31, 2021, BVESI has approximately $5.8 million in incremental vegetation management costs recorded as a regulatory asset. BVESI will seek future recovery of the costs accumulated in this memorandum account in its next general rate case filing. BVESI is scheduled to file a general rate case application with the CPUC in 2022 to determine new rates for the years 2023 through 2026.

California legislation enacted in September 2018 requires all investor-owned electric utilities to submit an annual wildfire mitigation plan (WMP) to the CPUC for approval. The WMP must include a utility's plans on constructing, maintaining, and operating its electrical lines and equipment to minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire. In September 2021, the CPUC approved BVESI's most recent WMP submission. Capital expenditures and other costs incurred as a result of the WMP are subject to CPUC audit. As a result, the CPUC’s Wildfire Safety Division (now part of the California Natural Resources Agency effective July 1, 2021) engaged an independent accounting firm to conduct examinations of the expenses and capital investments identified in the 2019 and 2020 WMPs for each of the investor-owned electric utilities, including BVESI. As of December 31, 2021, BVESI has approximately $2.8 million related to expenses accumulated in its WMP memorandum accounts that have been recognized as regulatory assets for future recovery. In December 2021, the independent accounting firm issued its final examination report, which contains the auditors' results and recommendations. While the final report did not identify any findings of inappropriate costs included in the WMP memorandum accounts under review, the report suggested that the CPUC should evaluate whether some of the costs recorded in the WMP memorandum accounts are incremental to what is being recovered in customer rates when BVESI seeks recovery in a future proceeding. At this time, BVESI considers the auditor's examination complete and does not expect further developments. In the future, the CPUC may refer to the recommendations in the final report when BVESI seeks recovery of the WMP memorandum accounts. All capital expenditures and other costs incurred through December 31, 2021 as a result of BVESI's WMPs are not currently in rates and are expected to be filed for future recovery in BVESI's next general rate case application.

Additionally, the governor of California approved Assembly Bill ("AB") 1054 in July 2019, which among other things, changed the burden of proof applicable in CPUC proceedings in which an electric utility with a valid safety certification seeks to recover wildfire costs. Previously, an electric utility seeking to recover costs had the burden to prove that it acted reasonably. Under AB 1054, if an electric utility has a valid safety certification, it will be presumed to have acted reasonably unless a party to the relevant proceeding creates a “serious doubt” as to the reasonableness of the utility’s conduct. In September 2021, the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety under the California Natural Resources Agency approved BVESI's latest safety certification filing, which is valid through September 2022.

For more information regarding significant regulatory matters, see Note 3 of “Notes to Financial Statements” included in Part II, Item 8, in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

52

Environmental Matters

AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations. GSWC is required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) and the Division of Drinking Water ("DDW"), under the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"). The U.S. EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The DDW, acting on behalf of the U.S. EPA, administers the U.S. EPA’s program in California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in which Registrant operates.

GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”). GSWC works proactively with third parties and governmental agencies to address issues relating to known contamination threatening GSWC water sources. GSWC also incurs operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply and additional expense to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, as well as to meet future water quality standards and consumer expectations. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs should be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.

Matters Relating to Environmental Cleanup

GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at one of its plant sites that contained an underground storage tank that was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site.

As of December 31, 2021, the total amount spent to clean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $6.1 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of December 31, 2021, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated additional cost of $1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment, and site closure related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved for inclusion in rate base by the CPUC.

Drinking Water Notification and Response Levels

In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes.  These chemicals were also present in certain fire suppression agents. These chemicals are referred to as perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Notification levels are health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The US EPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers and stakeholders is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded.  Assembly Bill 756, signed into law in July 2019 and effective in January 2020, requires, among other things, additional notification requirements for water systems detecting levels of PFAS above response levels. GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for PFAS under the direction of DDW. GSWC has removed some wells from service, and expects to incur additional treatment costs to treat impacted wells. GSWC has provided customers with information regarding PFAS detections, and provided updated information via its website. In February 2020, DDW established new response levels for two of the PFAS compounds: 10 parts per trillion for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and 40 parts per trillion for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). On March 5, 2021, DDW issued a drinking water notification level and response level of 0.5 parts per billion (ppb) and 5 ppb, respectively for perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS).

Lead and Copper Rule Revisions

On December 16, 2021, the U.S. EPA announced the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions under Executive Order 13990 which will go into effect effective immediately with a compliance date of October 16, 2024. Additionally, the EPA announced its intention to develop a new proposed rule, the Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (LCRI) that will further strengthen the regulatory framework prior to the October 2024 compliance date. There are still many unknowns regarding the implementation of the rule. The details of the requirements will be better understood over the next year once the LCRI is published.

53

Matters Relating to Military Utility Privatization Contracts

Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries is responsible for testing the water and wastewater systems on the military bases on which it operates in accordance with applicable law.

Each of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries has the right to seek an equitable adjustment to its contract in the event that there are changes in environmental laws, a change in the quality of water used in providing water service or wastewater discharged by the U.S. government, or contamination of the air or soil not caused by the fault or negligence of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiary. These changes can impact operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement costs under the contracts. The U.S. government is responsible for environmental contamination due to its fault or negligence and for environmental contamination that occurred prior to the execution of a contract.

Security Issues

We have physical and information security policies throughout our operations. Training on these matters begins during employee orientation and is ongoing through a series of training courses in addition to periodic, unannounced training exercises. We collaborate with various agencies, associations and third parties regarding information on possible threats and security measures for our operations. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls. These assessments provide areas for additional security focus, new controls, and policy changes.

Both GSWC and BVESI have security systems and infrastructure in place intended to prevent unlawful intrusion, service disruption and cyber-attacks.  GSWC and BVESI utilize a variety of physical security measures to protect their facilities.  These measures consider advances in security and emergency preparedness technology and relevant industry developments in developing their respective capital-improvement plans, and both intend to seek approval of the CPUC to recover any additional costs that either may incur in enhancing the security, reliability and resiliency of their utility systems.

On October 23, 2018, America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) became law. GSWC must now conduct additional risk and resilience assessments and develop emergency response plans for each of our water systems. These assessments and plans include natural hazards as well as malevolent acts. The first such assessments were completed in 2020. They will be reviewed and resubmitted every five years.

The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries operate facilities within the boundaries of military bases, which provide limited access to the general public.  To further enhance security, in prior years, certain upgrades were completed at various military bases through contract modifications funded by the U.S. government.

Registrant has evaluated its cyber-security systems and continues to address identified areas of improvement with respect to U.S. government regulations regarding cyber-security of government contractors. These improvements include the physical security at all of the office and employee facilities it operates. Registrant believes it is in compliance with these regulations.

Despite its efforts, Registrant cannot guarantee that intrusions, cyber-attacks or other attacks will not cause water or electric system problems, disrupt service to customers, compromise important data or systems or result in unintended release of customer or employee information.

Water Supply

GSWC

During 2021, GSWC delivered approximately 61.8 million hundred cubic feet (“ccf”) of water to its customers, which is an average of about 389 acre-feet per day or 127 million gallons per day (an acre-foot is approximately 435.6 ccf or 326,000 gallons). Approximately 53% of GSWC's supply came from groundwater produced from wells situated throughout GSWC’s service areas. GSWC supplemented its groundwater production with wholesale purchases from Metropolitan Water District ("MWD") member agencies and regional water suppliers (roughly 44% of total demand) and with authorized diversions from rivers (roughly 3%) under agreements with the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (“SMUD”). GSWC also utilizes recycled water supplies to serve recycled water customers in several service areas. GSWC continually assesses its water rights and groundwater storage assets to maximize use of lower cost groundwater sources where available.

Groundwater

GSWC has a diverse water supply portfolio which includes adjudicated groundwater rights, surface water rights, and a number of unadjudicated water rights to help meet supply requirements. The productivity of GSWC’s groundwater resources varies from year to year depending upon a variety of factors, including natural replenishment from snow-melt or rainfall, the availability of imported replenishment water, the amount of water previously stored in groundwater basins, natural or man-made contamination, legal production limitations, and the amount and seasonality of water use by GSWC’s customers and

54

others. GSWC actively participates in efforts to protect groundwater basins from over-use and from contamination. In some periods, these efforts may require reductions in groundwater pumping and increased reliance on alternative water resources. GSWC also participates in implementation of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act.

From time to time, GSWC may purchase or temporarily use water rights from others for delivery to customers. GSWC has contracts to purchase water or water rights for an aggregate amount of $3.4 million as of December 31, 2021.  Included in the $3.4 million is a remaining commitment of $1.7 million under an agreement with the City of Claremont (“the City”) to lease water rights that were ascribed to the City as part of the Six Basins adjudication. The initial term of the agreement expires in 2028. GSWC may exercise an option to renew this agreement for 10 additional years. The remaining $1.7 million is for commitments for purchased water with other third parties, which expire through 2038.

Imported Water

GSWC also manages a portfolio of water supply arrangements with water wholesalers who may import water from outside the immediate service area. For example, GSWC has contracts with various governmental entities (principally MWD member agencies) and other parties to purchase water through a total of 58 connections for distribution to customers, in addition to numerous emergency connections. MWD is a public agency organized and managed to provide a supplemental, imported supply to its member public agencies. There are 26 such member agencies, consisting of 14 cities, 11 municipal water districts and one county water authority. GSWC has 45 connections to MWD’s water distribution facilities and those of member agencies. GSWC purchases MWD water through six separate member agencies aggregating 52,732 acre-feet annually. MWD sources its supplies from the Colorado River from Northern California via the State Water Project through the Colorado River Aqueduct, which it owns and operates, and from local programs and transfer arrangements.

MWD currently has storage reserve levels of 2.5 million acre-feet (MAF) with annual demands of approximately 1.75 MAF. MWD has available access to store more than 1.65 MAF of water in Lake Mead as part of an intentionally created surplus program developed under a 2007 Interim Shortage agreement and is available for use during dry years. In addition, MWD, along with the seven other Basin states which use water from the Colorado River, developed and agreed to the Drought Contingency Plan in 2019 where each lower Basin state which diverts water from the Colorado River below Lees Ferry agrees to store defined amounts of water in Lake Mead to prevent both Lake Mead and Lake Powell from reaching critically low levels. Initial State Water Project allocations have been set at a zero percent allocation. On January 20, 2022, the Department of Water Resources increased the allocation to 15% due to improving water storage and snowpack from a series of winter storms in December and early January. California is a lower Basin state.

Drought Impact

In May 2018, the California Legislature passed two bills that provide a framework for long-term water-use efficiency standards and drought planning and resiliency. The initial steps in implementation of this legislation has been laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources ("DWR") and State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"). Over the next several years, State agencies, water suppliers and other entities will be working to meet the requirements and timelines of plan implementation. A notable milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) until 2025 at which time the standard may be reduced to 52.5 gpcd or other standard as recommend by DWR. A recent report prepared by DWR for the California legislature, recommends reducing the standard to 42 gpcd by 2030. Legislation has been introduced in the current legislative session to reduce the standard to this value.

California's recent period of multi-year drought resulted in reduced recharge to the state's groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially smaller basins, experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought. Several of GSWC's service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in California’s Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain service areas, in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply shortages beyond the locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply.

The 2021 water year ended as a critically dry period with the second driest single year for statewide precipitation and the second warmest year in statewide mean temperature. Precipitation to date in 2022 has been above average with several storm systems bringing the statewide snowpack up to about 150% of average. These values are approximately 50% of the April 1 average values. Should conditions remain dry up through April 1, 2022 the State will see on-going challenges in terms of water availability. As of February 15, 2022, the U.S. Drought Monitor reported that only 1.4% of California was considered in "Extreme Drought" as compared to 31% one year ago. This improvement was largely due to several storm systems experienced in late 2021. However, approximately 66% of California is considered to be in “Severe Drought” as compared to approximately 58% one year ago. Due to local conditions, water-use restrictions and allocations remain in place for customers in some of GSWC’s service areas. GSWC continues assessing water supply conditions and water-use restrictions in these service areas and intends to make appropriate adjustments as needed.

55

Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries

The U.S. government is responsible for providing the source of supply for all water on each of the bases served by the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries at no cost to the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. Once received from the U.S. government, ASUS's subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring the continued compliance of the provided source of supply with all federal, state and local regulations. Furthermore, ASUS’s subsidiaries are responsible for ensuring compliance with the reduction and/or removal of all constituents required under its wastewater treatment plant operating permits. ASUS works closely with state regulators and industry associations to stay current with emergent issues and proactively addresses any change in wastewater treatment regulation to ensure permit compliance.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Registrant is subject to newly issued accounting requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.