Enact Holdings, Inc. (ACT)

CIK: 0001823529. SIC: 6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service. Latest 10-K as of: 2026-02-27.

SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > SIC Major Group 64 > SIC 6411 Insurance Agents, Brokers & Service

SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=1823529. Latest filing source: 0001823529-26-000060.

Selected Fundamentals

Financials

Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-27. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001823529.json. Derived margins are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.

Flow metrics use full-year FY periods from 10-K/10-K/A filings; balance-sheet metrics use FY-end instants. Missing metrics are omitted rather than fabricated.

Financial Charts

Quarterly

Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-05-06. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0001823529.json.

Flow metrics use discrete quarter-length periods from 10-Q/10-Q/A filings. Q4 revenue and net income are derived only when annual FY and nine-month YTD facts exist for the same fiscal year; derived Q4 values are labeled. EPS Q4 is not derived.

Quarterly Charts

Macro Cross-References

• CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
• UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
• FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
• CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
• DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
• DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
• DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
• DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
• DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
• DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
• T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
• CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
• CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
• CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
• CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
• PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
• PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
• PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
• T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
• U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
• PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
• CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
• EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
• UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
• CE16OV - Employment Level
• ICSA - Initial Claims
• JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
• JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
• GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
• A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
• INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
• TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
• HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
• PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
• RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
• PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
• DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
• PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
• M2SL - M2
• BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
• MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
• HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
• RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
• TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
• RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
• TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
• REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
• DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
• GDP - Gross Domestic Product
• GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
• GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
• PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
• NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
• GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
• GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
• FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
• FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
• FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
• MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
• USCONS - All Employees, Construction
• USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
• USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
• USGOVT - All Employees, Government
• AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
• DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
• NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
• BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
• EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
• IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
• IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
• PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand

Latest quarter (10-Q)

Latest 10-Q source: 0001823529-26-000109.

Extracted between Part I Item 2 and the next Item 3/4 or Part II heading after HTML sanitization. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-05-06. Report date: 2026-03-31.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 (the “Annual Report”).

In addition to historical information, this discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. Factors that could cause such differences are discussed in the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” above and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report. We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made. Future results could differ significantly from the historical results presented in this section. References to “EHI,” “Enact,” “Enact Holdings,” the “Company,” “we” or “our” herein are, unless the context otherwise requires, to EHI on a consolidated basis.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results

There have been no material changes to the factors affecting our results, as compared to those disclosed in the Annual Report, other than the impact of items as discussed below in “—Trends and Conditions.”

Trends and Conditions

Macroeconomic environment. During the first quarter of 2026, the United States economy continued to be subject to significant volatility and uncertainty, largely related to geopolitical tensions including the Iran conflict, changing economic policies, and continued inflationary pressure. The ancillary effects of these factors on the domestic and global economies could materially impact the United States housing markets and our business.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in March 2026 that Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) inflation was 3.3% year-over-year compared to 2.7% year-over-year in December 2025 while the unemployment rate has fallen slightly to 4.3% in March 2026 from 4.4% in December 2025. Elevated inflation remains a challenge for the Federal Open Market Committee as it navigates heightened uncertainty.

U.S. mortgage rates were especially volatile during the first quarter of 2026. Lower rates earlier in the quarter drove higher refinance volume in the market, while the mortgage origination market remained relatively slow, particularly as rates rose later in the quarter. Over the past few years, housing affordability has deteriorated as elevated mortgage rates and home price appreciation outpaced median family income according to the National Association of Realtors Housing Affordability Index. Despite slowing of house price growth nationally according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) Monthly Purchase-Only House Price Index (Seasonally Adjusted), affordability remains challenged.

Regulatory developments. Private mortgage insurance market penetration and eventual market size are affected in part by actions that impact housing or housing finance policy taken by the GSEs and the U.S. government, including but not limited to, the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and the FHFA. In the past, these actions have included announced changes, or potential changes, to underwriting standards, including changes to the GSEs’ automated underwriting systems, FHA pricing, GSE guaranty fees, loan limits and alternative products.

In July 2025, the FHFA announced that it will implement the acceptance of VantageScore 4.0 for mortgages delivered to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSEs have since released preliminary

30

implementation details and timelines, but the full impact of this initiative on our business, processes and financial results remains uncertain.

Competitive environment. The U.S. private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. Our market share is influenced by the execution of our go to market strategy, including but not limited to, pricing competitiveness relative to our peers and our selective participation in forward commitment transactions. We continue to manage the quality of new business through pricing and our underwriting guidelines, which are modified from time to time when circumstances warrant. We see the market and underwriting conditions, including the pricing environment, as being within our risk-adjusted return appetite enabling us to write new business at attractive returns. Ultimately, we expect our new insurance written with its strong credit profile and attractive pricing to positively contribute to our future profitability and return on equity.

Our portfolio. New insurance written (“NIW”) of $12.8 billion in the first quarter of 2026 increased 30% compared to the first quarter of 2025. The increase is largely driven by refinance volume in the first quarter. Changes in NIW are primarily impacted by the size of the mortgage insurance market and our market share. Our primary persistency rate was 80% during the first quarter of 2026 and 84% for the first quarter of 2025. The persistency rate decreased largely due to lapse, driven by mortgage rate volatility and increased refinance activity.

Net earned premiums decreased modestly in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the first quarter of 2025 primarily as a result of higher ceded premiums and lapse-driven rate decline partially offset by insurance in-force and assumed premium growth.

Loss experience. Our loss ratio for the three months ended March 31, 2026, was 15% as compared to 12% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. Both periods were impacted by favorable reserve development. In the first quarter of 2026, we released $39 million of reserves, driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities. This compares to the first quarter of 2025, where we recorded a $47 million reserve release driven by cure performance and loss mitigation activities.

New delinquencies in the first quarter of 2026 increased compared to the first quarter of 2025 due to the normal loss development pattern on newer books. Current period primary delinquencies of 13,559 contributed $76 million of loss expense in the first quarter of 2026. This compares to $75 million of loss expense from 12,237 primary delinquencies that were reported in the first quarter of 2025. In determining the loss expense estimate, considerations were given to recent cure and claim experience and the prevailing and prospective economic conditions.

The severity of loss on loans that go to claim may be negatively impacted by extended forbearance and foreclosure timelines, the associated elevated expenses and the higher loan amount of the recent new delinquencies. These negative influences on loss severity could be mitigated, in part, by embedded home price appreciation. The majority of our mortgage insurance policies limit the number of months of unpaid interest and associated expenses that are included in the mortgage insurance claim amount to a maximum of 36 months.

Capital requirements and ratings. As of March 31, 2026, EMICO’s estimated risk-to-capital ratio under North Carolina law and enforced by the North Carolina Department of Insurance (“NCDOI”), EMICO’s domestic insurance regulator, was 10.0:1, compared with risk-to-capital ratios of 10.1:1 and 10.5:1 as of December 31, 2025, and March 31, 2025, respectively. EMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio remains below the NCDOI’s maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25:1. North Carolina’s calculation of risk-to-capital excludes the risk in-force for delinquent loans given the established loss reserves against all delinquencies. EMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by EMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the impact of quota share reinsurance, the amount of policy lapses and the amount of additional capital that is generated or distributed by the business.

31

Under PMIERs, we are subject to operational and financial requirements that private mortgage insurers must meet in order to remain eligible to insure loans that are purchased by the GSEs. As of March 31, 2026, we had estimated available assets of $5,016 million against $3,097 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,015 million against $3,096 million net required assets as of December 31, 2025. The sufficiency ratio as of March 31, 2026, was 162%, or $1,919 million, above the PMIERs requirements, compared to 162%, or $1,919 million, above the PMIERs requirements as of December 31, 2025. Our PMIERs required assets benefited from a reinsurance credit of $1,944 million and $1,932 million related to third-party reinsurance as of March 31, 2026, and December 31, 2025, respectively.

On August 21, 2024, the GSEs and the FHFA released updated PMIERs requirements phasing in a revision to available asset standards between March 31, 2025, and September 30, 2026. The updated standards differentiate between bonds based on credit quality and liquidity. The updates also establish limits for assets backed by residential mortgages or commercial real estate to mitigate the impact if such assets lose value during periods of housing stress. We expect to hold capital sufficiency well in excess of these requirements and do not expect the impact of these updates to be material to our sufficiency.

Recent transactions. None

Capital returns. In March 2026, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, paid a dividend to EHI that supports our ability to return capital to shareholders. We paid a dividend of $0.185 per common share during the first quarter of 2025. In April 2025, we announced an increase of our dividend to $0.21 per common share which was paid quarterly through March 2026. In May 2026, we announced the increase of our quarterly dividend from $0.21 to $0.24 per common share, payable in June 2026. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each quarter.

On May 1, 2024, we announced the authorization of a share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to $250 million of EHI’s common stock. The Company completed the repurchase of shares under this authorization in the second quarter of 2025. On April 30, 2025, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to an additional $350 million of EHI’s common stock. The Company completed the repurchase of shares under this authorization during the first quarter of 2026. On February 3, 2026, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $500 million of EHI’s common stock. Under the programs, share repurchases may be made at our discretion from time to time in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, privately negotiated transactions, or by other means, including through Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. In support, Enact has entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its Enact shares as part of the program to maintain Genworth’s current ownership interest in Enact. We expect the timing and amount of any future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availabilit

[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]

Latest 10-K MD&A

Extracted between Item 7 and the next Item 7A/8 heading after HTML sanitization. Confidence: high. Filing date: 2026-02-27. Report date: 2025-12-31.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 included in Item 8 of this Annual Report. This discussion includes forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. For factors that could cause such differences refer to the sections entitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We are not undertaking any obligation to update any forward-looking statements or other statements we may make in the following discussion or elsewhere in this document even though these statements may be affected by events or circumstances occurring after the forward-looking statements or other statements were made. Future results could differ significantly from the historical results presented in this section. References to EHI, the “Company,” “we” or “our” herein are, unless the context otherwise requires, to EHI on a consolidated basis.

Overview of Business

We are a leading private mortgage insurance company, having served the United States housing finance market since 1981, and operate in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Our mortgage insurance products provide credit protection to mortgage lenders, covering a portion of the unpaid principal balance of Low Down Payment Loans in the event of a default. Our business objective is to leverage our competitive strengths to drive market share, maintain our strong capitalization and strong earnings profile and deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders. We also offer mortgage and credit-related insurance and reinsurance through our other subsidiaries, including our wholly owned Bermuda-based subsidiary, Enact Re.

We primarily generate revenues by providing mortgage credit protection to our customers in exchange for premiums, which we set based on our evaluation of the underlying risk we insure. Once the premium rate is established and coverage is activated, the premium rate remains unchanged for the first ten years of the policy; thereafter the premium rate resets to a lower rate used for the remaining life of the policy. In general, we can only cancel coverage for a failure to pay premiums or at servicer direction when the borrowers achieve the required amount of home equity. Our premium rate is applied predominantly to the original loan balance to determine either a monthly payment that the lender adds to the borrower’s monthly loan payment or a single upfront payment made by either the borrower or lender at loan closing. The amount of premiums earned from our insurance portfolio and the timing of premium recognition are also affected by persistency rate, which we measure as the percentage of loans that remain on our books based on the annualized cancellations for the period.

We also employ a CRT program to transfer a portion of our risk through traditional XOL and quota share reinsurance arrangements and the issuance of ILNs. In exchange, we cede a negotiated amount of our premiums to the reinsurers and ILN investors that participate in our CRT transactions. Importantly, our CRT program helps to manage risk in our operating model and spread the risk of loss across our counterparties while also providing capital relief.

We also invest our premiums in high quality, predominantly fixed income assets with the primary business objectives of preserving capital, generating investment income and maintaining sufficient liquidity to cover our operating expenses and pay future claims. The investment income generated through our investment portfolio is another significant source of our revenues.

We generate profits through collection of premiums and investment income less losses, operating expenses, interest expense and taxes. Our mortgage insurance coverage protects lenders against loss in the event of a borrower default by covering a portion of the outstanding principal balance of a loan. In the event of a borrower default, our coverage reduces and, in certain instances eliminates, losses to the insured by transferring the covered portion of the economic loss to us. Borrower defaults are first reported to us as new delinquencies when the borrower fails to make two consecutive monthly mortgage

60

payments. Incurred losses are our estimate of future claims on these new delinquencies as well as any change in the prior estimates for previously existing delinquencies. In addition, incurred losses include estimates of future claims on IBNR delinquencies. Our incurred losses are based on estimates of both the rate at which delinquencies will go to claim (i.e., claim rate) and the ultimate claim amount (i.e., claim severity). Claim frequency and severity estimates are established based on historical experience focusing on certain delinquency and loan attributes that influence the probability and amount of ultimate claim. Our estimates of ultimate claim amounts for each delinquency include loss adjustment expense (“LAE”) that are costs incurred in the settlement of the claim process such as legal fees and costs to record, process and adjust claims. Incurred losses are generally affected by macroeconomic conditions, borrower credit quality, certain loan attributes, underwriting quality and our loss mitigation efforts among other factors detailed below.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results

Our financial position and results of operations depend to a significant extent on the following factors, as noted below in “—Trends and Conditions.”

Mortgage Origination Volume

The level of mortgage origination volume is a key driver of our future revenues. The overall mortgage origination market is influenced by macroeconomic factors such as the rate of economic growth, the unemployment rate, interest rates, home affordability, household savings rates, the inventory of unsold homes, demographics of potential homebuyers and credit availability. The mortgage origination market is also influenced by various legislative and regulatory actions and GSE programs and policies that impact the housing and mortgage finance industries.

Penetration

The penetration rate of private mortgage insurance is mainly influenced by the competitiveness of private mortgage insurance compared to alternative products for Low Down Payment Loans provided by government agencies (principally the FHA and the VA), portfolio lenders that self-insure, reinsurers and capital market transactions designed to mitigate risk. In addition, the private mortgage insurance industry’s penetration rate is driven by the relative percentage of purchase mortgage originations versus refinances. Private mortgage insurance penetration tends to be significantly higher on new mortgages for purchased homes than on the refinance of existing mortgages, because average LTV ratios are typically higher on home purchases and therefore are more likely to require mortgage insurance. Lastly, we believe the penetration rate of private mortgage insurance is influenced by other factors, including lender preference, FHA competitiveness and risk appetite, loan limits, contractual terms including cancellability and loss mitigation practices.

Credit and Regulatory Environment

The level of private mortgage insurance market penetration and eventual market size is affected in part by actions taken by the GSEs and the United States government, including the FHA, the FHFA and Congress, that impact housing or housing finance policy. In the past, these actions have included announced changes, or potential changes, to underwriting standards, FHA pricing, GSE guaranty fees and loan limits, as well as low down payment programs available through the FHA or GSEs.

Competition and Market Share

Competitors include other private mortgage insurers that are eligible to write business for the GSEs. We compete with other private mortgage insurers based on pricing, underwriting guidelines, customer relationships, service levels, policy terms, loss mitigation practices, perceived financial strength (including comparative credit ratings), reputation, strength of management, product features and technology ease-of-use. We also compete with governmental agencies (principally the FHA and the VA) primarily based on price and underwriting guidelines.

61

Pricing is highly competitive in the mortgage insurance industry, with industry participants competing for market share, customer relationships and overall value. Pricing trends have introduced an increasing number of loan, borrower, lender and property attributes, resulting in expanded granularity in pricing regimes in order to better align price and risk. Our proprietary risk-based pricing model evaluates returns and volatility under multiple capital frameworks, which are sensitive to economic cycles and current housing market conditions. The model assesses the performance of new business under expected and stress scenarios on an individualized loan basis, which is used to determine pricing and inform our risk selection strategy that optimizes economic value by balancing return and volatility.

Seasonality

Consistent with the seasonality of home sales, purchase mortgage origination volumes typically increase in late spring and peak during summer months, leading to a rise in NIW volume during the second and third quarters of a given year. Refinancing volume, however, does not follow a similar seasonal trend and instead is primarily influenced by interest rates, which can overwhelm typical seasonal trends. Delinquency performance (new delinquency formation and cure behavior) is generally favorable in the first and second quarters of the year. Therefore, we typically experience lower levels of losses resulting from favorable delinquency activity in the first and second quarters, as compared to the third and fourth quarters.

The following table presents our NIW, number of cures and new delinquencies for primary policies, excluding our run-off business, for the periods indicated:

Seasonality

Three months ended

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Mar 31,

2024

Jun 30,

2024

Sep 30,

2024

Dec 31,

2024

Mar 31,

2025

Jun 30,

2025

Sep 30,

2025

Dec 31,

2025

NIW

$10,526

$13,619

$13,591

$13,266

$9,818

$13,254

$14,048

$14,386

% Change

0.7%

29.4%

(0.2)%

(2.4)%

(26.0)%

35.0%

6.0%

2.4%

Cure Counts

12,160

10,731

10,749

10,971

13,263

11,574

11,467

11,883

% Change

17.9%

(11.8)%

0.2%

2.1%

20.9%

(12.7)%

(0.9)%

3.6%

New Delinquency Count

11,395

10,461

12,964

13,717

12,237

11,567

12,998

13,679

% Change

(2.7)%

(8.2)%

23.9%

5.8%

(10.8)%

(5.5)%

12.4%

5.2%

NIW

NIW occurs when a lender activates mortgage insurance coverage on a closed mortgage loan. NIW increases our IIF, premiums written and premiums earned. NIW is affected by the overall size of the mortgage origination market, the penetration rate of private mortgage insurance into the overall mortgage origination market and our market share of the private mortgage insurance market.

Pricing

Our pricing strategy is designed to charge premium rates commensurate with the underlying risk of each loan we insure. Our proprietary platform provides us with a more flexible, granular and analytical approach to selecting and pricing risk. Using our platform, we can quickly change price to modify our risk selection levels, respond to industry pricing trends or adjust to changing economic conditions.

IIF

IIF at the time of origination is used to determine premiums as the premium rate is expressed as a percentage of IIF. IIF is one of the primary drivers of our future earned premium. Based on the composition of our insurance portfolio, with monthly premium policies comprising a larger proportion of our total portfolio than single premium policies, an increase or decrease in IIF generally has a corresponding impact on premiums earned. Cancellations of our insurance policies as a result of prepayments and other reductions of IIF, such as rescissions of coverage and claims paid, generally have a negative effect on premiums earned.

62

Persistency Rate and Business Mix

The percentage of our IIF that remains insured after taking into account annualized cancellations for the period presented is defined as our persistency rate. Because our insurance premiums are earned over the life of a policy, higher or lower persistency rates can have a significant impact on our profitability. Recent elevated interest rates have increased persistency in the portfolio, but this impact is partially offset by lower NIW.

Loan prepayment speeds and the relative mix of business between single premium policies and monthly premium policies also impact our profitability. Assuming all other factors remain constant over the life of the policies, prepayment speeds have an inverse impact on IIF and the expected premium from our monthly policies. Slower prepayment speeds, demonstrated by a higher persistency rate, result in IIF remaining in place, providing increased premium from monthly policies over time as premium payments continue. Earlier than anticipated prepayments, demonstrated by a lower persistency rate, reduce IIF and the premium from our monthly policies.

The following table presents the weighted average mortgage interest rate on outstanding primary IIF as of December 31, 2025, excluding our run-off business. Prepayment speeds may be affected by changes in interest rates, among other factors. An increasing interest rate environment generally will reduce refinancing activity and result in lower prepayments. A declining interest rate environment generally will increase refinancing activity and increase prepayments.

Policy Year

Weighted

average

rate (1)

2008 and prior

5.36 

%

2009-2017

4.02 

%

2018

4.86 

%

2019

4.24 

%

2020

3.26 

%

2021

3.12 

%

2022

4.89 

%

2023

6.59 

%

2024

6.67 

%

2025

6.57 

%

Total portfolio

5.21 

%

______________

(1)Average Annual Mortgage Interest Rate weighted by IIF.

In contrast to monthly premium policies, when single premium policies are cancelled by the insured because the loan has been paid off or otherwise, any remaining unearned premiums are earned at cancellation. Although these cancellations reduce IIF, assuming all other factors remain constant, the profitability of our single premium business increases when persistency rates are lower. Our concentration of single premium policies has declined in recent years, as a result of elevated interest rates. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, single premium policies comprised 9% and 9% of primary IIF, respectively.

Credit Quality

Improved analytics, stronger loan origination quality controls and regulatory developments have resulted in a significant improvement in the credit quality for loans originated in the private mortgage insurance market over time. Additionally, private mortgage insurers and the GSEs have maintained strong credit standards over the past decade, with average FICO scores for NIW persisting at levels significantly

63

above historical averages. As a result, the industry is insuring loans from borrowers who should be better positioned to meet their mortgage obligations.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income is determined primarily by the invested assets held and the average yield on our overall investment portfolio.

Net Investment Gains (Losses)

The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on such factors as market opportunities, our capital profile and overall market cycles that impact the timing of selling securities.

Losses Incurred

Losses incurred represent current payments and changes in the estimated future payments on claims that result from delinquent loans. We estimate an expense only for delinquent loans as explained in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. Incurred losses depend to a significant extent on the following factors:

•deterioration of regional or national economic conditions leading to a reduction in borrowers’ income and thus their ability to make mortgage payments;

•legislative, regulatory, FHFA or GSE action, or executive orders permitting or mandating forbearance or a moratorium on foreclosures or evictions due to events such as natural disasters or a pandemic;

•a drop in housing values that could expose us to greater loss on resale of properties obtained through foreclosure proceedings and an adverse change in the effectiveness of loss mitigation actions that could result in an increase in the frequency of expected claim rates;

•a drop in housing values that negatively impacts a borrower’s willingness to continue mortgage payments, potentially leading to higher delinquencies and ultimately claims;

•if the foreclosure occurs in a state that imposes judicial process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed, which impacts severity of the claim;

•the credit characteristics in our in-force portfolio, as loans with higher risk characteristics generally result in more delinquencies and claims;

•the size of loans we insure, as loans with relatively higher average loan amounts generally result in higher incurred losses;

•the coverage percentage on insured loans, as loans with higher percentages of insurance coverage generally correlate with higher incurred losses;

•the level and amount of reinsurance coverage maintained with third parties; and

•the distribution of claims over the life of a book. Historically, the first few years after origination have relatively low claims, with claims increasing for several years subsequently and then declining. However, persistency, the condition of the economy, including unemployment and housing prices and other factors can affect this pattern.

Credit Risk Transfer

We use CRT transactions to transfer a portion of our risk to third parties, through traditional XOL and quota share reinsurance and the issuance of ILNs. Our CRT program reduces the volatility of our in-force

64

portfolio and provides capital relief under PMIERs. When we enter into a CRT transaction, the reinsurer receives a premium and, in exchange, insures an agreed upon portion of incurred losses. These arrangements have the impact of reducing our earned premiums and incurred losses, but also provide capital relief under PMIERs.

Operating Expenses

Our operating expenses include costs related to the acquisition and ongoing maintenance of our insurance contracts, including sales, underwriting and general operating costs. Acquisition expenses are influenced by the amount of our NIW. Acquisition costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition of new insurance policies, such as underwriting expenses, are deferred and amortized over the life of the underlying insurance policies. These deferred acquisition costs are referred to as “DAC.” The ongoing maintenance expenses of our insurance contracts are generally fixed in nature and include costs such as information technology, finance and legal, among others, including costs allocated from Genworth for certain activities on our behalf. See Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements regarding our related party transactions.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The accounting estimates (including sensitivities) discussed in this section are those that we consider to be particularly critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on our ability to judge the effect of inherently uncertain matters on our financial results. The sensitivities included in this section involve matters that are also inherently uncertain and involve the exercise of significant judgment in selecting the factors and amounts used in the sensitivities. Small changes in the amounts used in the sensitivities or the use of different factors could result in materially different outcomes from those reflected in the sensitivities. For all of these accounting estimates, we caution that future events seldom develop as estimated and management’s best estimates often require adjustment.

Loss Reserves

Loss reserves represent the amount needed to provide for the estimated ultimate cost of settling claims relating to insured events that have occurred on or before the end of the respective reporting period. The estimated liability includes requirements for future payments of: (a) losses that have been reported to the insurer; (b) losses related to insured events that have occurred but that have not been reported to the insurer as of the date the liability is estimated; and (c) LAE. LAE include costs incurred in the claim settlement process such as legal fees and costs to record, process and adjust claims. Consistent with U.S. GAAP and industry accounting practices, we do not establish loss reserves for future claims on insured loans that are not in default or believed to be in default.

Estimates and actuarial assumptions used for establishing loss reserves involve the exercise of significant judgment, and changes in assumptions or deviations of actual experience from assumptions can have material impacts on our loss reserves and net income (loss). Because these assumptions relate to factors that are not known in advance, change over time, are difficult to accurately predict and are inherently uncertain, we cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts we will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments. The sources of uncertainty affecting the estimates are numerous and include factors internal and external to us. Internal factors include, but are not limited to, changes in the mix of exposures, loss mitigation activities and claim settlement practices. Significant external influences include changes in home prices, unemployment, government housing policies, state foreclosure timeline, general economic conditions, interest rates, tax policy, credit availability and mortgage products. Small changes in assumptions or small deviations of actual experience from assumptions can have, and in the past have had, material impacts on our reserves, results of operations and financial condition.

We establish reserves to recognize the estimated liability for losses and LAE related to defaults on insured mortgage loans. Loss reserves are established by estimating the number of loans in our inventory

65

of delinquent loans that will result in a claim payment, which is referred to as the claim rate, and further estimating the amount of the claim payment, which is referred to as claim severity. The estimates are determined using a factor-based approach, in which assumptions of claim rates for loans in default and the average amount paid for loans that result in a claim are calculated using traditional actuarial techniques. Over time, as the status of the underlying delinquent loans moves toward foreclosure and the likelihood of the associated claim loss increases, the amount of the loss reserves associated with the potential claims may also increase.

Management monitors actual experience, and where circumstances warrant, will revise its assumptions. Our liability for loss reserves is reviewed regularly, with changes in our estimates of future claims recorded through net income. Estimation of losses is based on historical claim and cure experience and covered exposures and is inherently judgmental. Future developments may result in losses greater or less than the liability for loss reserves provided.

Loss reserves as of December 31, 2025, were $572 million, an increase of $48 million since December 31, 2024. In considering the potential sensitivity of the factors underlying management’s best estimate of our loss reserve, it is possible that even a relatively small change in the estimated claim and severity rates could have a significant impact on loss reserves and, correspondingly, on results of operations. For example, based on our actual experience during the three-year period immediately preceding December 31, 2025, a change of 4 percentage points, or 15%, in the average claim rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $79 million. Likewise, a change of 3 percentage points, or a change of 3%, in the average severity rate would change the gross loss reserve amount for such quarter by approximately $16 million.

Investments

Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities

Our portfolio of fixed maturity securities was valued at $6,051 million as of December 31, 2025, an increase of $426 million from December 31, 2024.

The methodologies, estimates and assumptions used in valuing our fixed maturity securities evolve over time and are subject to different interpretations, all of which can lead to materially different estimates of fair value. Additionally, because the valuation is based on market conditions at a specific point in time, the period-to-period changes in fair value may vary significantly due to changing interest rates, external macroeconomic and credit market conditions. For example, widening credit spreads will generally result in a decrease, while tightening of credit spreads will generally result in an increase in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. Also, during periods of increasing interest rates, the market values of lower-yielding assets will decline. See “Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on our investments portfolio.

Our portfolio of fixed maturity securities comprises primarily investment grade securities, which are carried at fair value. Estimates of fair values for fixed maturity securities are obtained primarily from industry-standard pricing methodologies utilizing market observable inputs. For our less liquid securities, such as our privately placed securities, we utilize independent market data to employ alternative valuation methods commonly used in the financial services industry to estimate fair value. Based on the market observability of the inputs used in estimating the fair value, the pricing level is assigned.

See Notes 2, 3 and 4 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the valuation of fixed maturity securities and a description of the fair value measurement estimates and level assignments.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Available-For-Sale Securities

As of each balance sheet date, we evaluate fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for changes to the allowance for credit losses. Determining the value of the unrealized losses is dependent

66

on the same methodologies and assumptions used in our valuation of fixed maturity securities. We also consider all available information relevant to the collectability of the security, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, when developing the estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. There is no recorded allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2025.

See Notes 2 and 3 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information related to the allowance for credit losses on fixed maturity securities.

Revenue Recognition

The majority of our insurance contracts have recurring monthly premiums. We recognize recurring premiums over the terms of the related insurance policy on a pro-rata basis. Premiums written on single premium policies and annual premium policies are initially deferred as unearned premium reserve and earned over the policy life. A portion of the revenue from single premium policies is recognized in premiums earned in the current period, and the remaining portion remains deferred as unearned premiums and earned over the estimated expiration of risk of the policy. If single premium policies are cancelled and the premium is non-refundable, then the remaining unearned premium related to each cancelled policy is recognized to earned premiums upon notification of the cancellation. For borrower-paid mortgage insurance, coverage ceases at the earlier of prepayment, or when the original principal is amortized to a 78% loan-to-value ratio in accordance with HOPA. Variation in cancellation rates and projected losses are inputs into our premium recognition models, causing uncertainty within our estimates.

We periodically review our premium earnings recognition models with any adjustments to the estimates reflected as a cumulative adjustment on a retrospective basis in current period net income. These reviews include the consideration of recent and projected loss and policy cancellation experience, and adjustments to the estimated earnings patterns are made, if warranted.

Unearned premiums were $92 million as of December 31, 2025, a decrease of $23 million compared to December 31, 2024. Changes in market conditions could cause a decline in mortgage originations, mortgage insurance penetration rates, persistency and our market share, all of which could impact new insurance written. For example, a decline in primary new insurance written of $1.0 billion would result in a reduction in earned premiums of approximately $3 million in the first full year. Likewise, if primary persistency rates declined on our existing insurance in-force by 10%, earned premiums would decline by approximately $95 million during the first full year, partially offset by higher policy cancellations in our single premium products. These reductions in earned premiums could be potentially offset by lower reserves due to policies no longer being in-force.

67

Trends and Conditions

Macroeconomic environment. Throughout 2025, the United States economy was subject to significant volatility and uncertainty, largely related to changing economic policies, including new and variable tariffs, continued inflationary pressure, the government shutdown and certain domestic and geopolitical tensions. The ancillary effects of these factors on the domestic and global economies could materially impact the United States housing markets and our business.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported in December 2025 that Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) inflation was 2.7% year-over-year compared to 2.9% year-over-year in December 2024, while the unemployment rate has risen to 4.4% in December 2025 from 4.1% in December 2024. Elevated inflation remains a challenge for the Federal Open Market Committee as it navigates heightened uncertainty.

The U.S. purchase mortgage originations remained relatively slow in response to elevated mortgage rates. Over the past few years, housing affordability has deteriorated as elevated mortgage rates and home price appreciation outpaced median family income according to the National Association of Realtors Housing Affordability Index. Affordability pressures eased slightly during the end of 2025 as mortgage rates began to decline and national house price growth has slowed according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) Monthly Purchase-Only House Price Index (Seasonally Adjusted).

Regulatory developments. Private mortgage insurance market penetration and eventual market size are affected in part by actions that impact housing or housing finance policy taken by the GSEs and the U.S. government, including but not limited to, the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and the FHFA. In the past, these actions have included announced changes, or potential changes, to underwriting standards, including changes to the GSEs’ automated underwriting systems, FHA pricing, GSE guaranty fees, loan limits and alternative products.

In July 2025, the FHFA announced that it will implement the acceptance of VantageScore 4.0 for mortgages delivered to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The GSEs have not yet released implementation details and timelines, and the full impact of this initiative on our business, processes and financial results remains uncertain.

Competitive environment. The U.S. private mortgage insurance industry is highly competitive. Our market share is influenced by the execution of our go to market strategy, including but not limited to, pricing competitiveness relative to our peers and our selective participation in forward commitment transactions. We continue to manage the quality of new business through pricing and our underwriting guidelines, which are modified from time to time when circumstances warrant. We see the market and underwriting conditions, including the pricing environment, as being within our risk-adjusted return appetite enabling us to write new business at attractive returns. Ultimately, we expect our new insurance written with its strong credit profile and attractive pricing to positively contribute to our future profitability and return on equity.

Our portfolio. New insurance written of $51.5 billion in 2025 increased 1% compared to 2024. Changes in NIW are primarily impacted by the size of the mortgage insurance market and our market share. Our primary persistency rate decreased to 82% during 2025 compared to 83% during 2024. Persistency remains slightly elevated due to high interest rates but decreased in 2025 due to rate volatility throughout the year. Elevated persistency and modest new insurance written growth has led to an increase in primary insurance in-force of $4.3 billion or 2% since December 31, 2024.

Net earned premiums increased marginally in 2025 compared to 2024 as higher average IIF and higher assumed premiums were mostly offset by higher ceded premiums and slightly lower average premium rates.

Our largest customer accounted for 12%, 11% and 10% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This customer also accounted for 22%, 20% and 19% of our total NIW during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. No other

68

customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues or NIW for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 or 2023.

Loss experience. Our loss ratio for the year ended December 31, 2025, was 11% as compared to 4% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Both periods were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments due to strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. In 2025, we recorded a net reserve release of $200 million. A majority of the reserve adjustments related to prior period delinquencies but a portion of the release also related to 2025 delinquencies as we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our current market expectations. In 2024, we recorded a reserve release of $252 million, primarily on prior accident year reserves.

New delinquencies in 2025 increased compared to 2024 primarily due to the normal loss development pattern on newer books. Current period primary delinquencies of 50,481 contributed $299 million of loss expense in 2025. We incurred $287 million of losses from 48,537 current period delinquencies in 2024. In determining the loss expense estimate, considerations were given to recent cure and claim experience and the prevailing and prospective economic conditions.

The severity of loss on loans that go to claim may be negatively impacted by extended forbearance and foreclosure timelines, the associated elevated expenses and the higher loan amount of the recent new delinquencies. These negative influences on loss severity could be mitigated, in part, by embedded home price appreciation. The majority of our mortgage insurance policies limit the number of months of unpaid interest and associated expenses that are included in the mortgage insurance claim amount to a maximum of 36 months.

Capital requirements and ratings. EMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio under the current regulatory framework as established under North Carolina law and enforced by the NCDOI, EMICO’s domestic insurance regulator, was approximately 10.1:1 as of December 31, 2025, and 10.5:1 as of December 31, 2024. EMICO’s risk-to-capital ratio remains below the NCDOI’s maximum risk-to-capital ratio of 25:1. North Carolina’s calculation of risk-to-capital excludes the risk-in-force for delinquent loans given the established loss reserves against all delinquencies. EMICO’s ongoing risk-to-capital ratio will depend principally on the magnitude of future losses incurred by EMICO, the effectiveness of ongoing loss mitigation activities, new business volume and profitability, the impact of quota share reinsurance, the amount of policy lapses and the amount of additional capital that is generated or distributed by the business.

As of December 31, 2025, we had estimated available assets of $5,015 million against $3,096 million net required assets under PMIERs compared to available assets of $5,095 million against $3,043 million net required assets as of December 31, 2024. The sufficiency ratio as of December 31, 2025, was 162% or $1,919 million above the PMIERs requirements, compared to 167% or $2,052 million above the PMIERs requirements as of December 31, 2024. Our PMIERs required assets also benefited from a reinsurance credit of $1,932 million and $1,885 million related to third-party reinsurance as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Our PMIERs required assets as of December 31, 2024, benefited $28 million from the application of a 0.30 multiplier applied to the risk-based required asset amount factor for certain non-performing loans as defined under PMIERs. Use of the multiplier was discontinued effective March 31, 2025.

On January 17, 2025, Fitch upgraded the long-term financial strength and issuer credit ratings of EMICO from A- to A.

On August 6, 2025, Moody’s upgraded the insurance financial strength rating of EMICO from A3 to A2.

Recent transactions. On January 24, 2025, we entered into two excess-of-loss reinsurance transactions that cover a portion of expected new insurance written from January 1, 2025, through December 31, 2025, and January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2026, and provide reinsurance coverage of approximately $225 million and $260 million, respectively.

69

On September 23, 2025, we entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with a panel of reinsurers. Under the agreement, EMICO will cede approximately 34% of a portion of its expected new insurance written for the period from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2027.

On September 30, 2025, we entered into a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility (the “2025 Revolving Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lenders in the initial aggregate principal amount of $435 million, which replaces the previous $200 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility remains undrawn as of December 31, 2025.

On October 27, 2025, we entered into an excess-of-loss reinsurance transaction that covers a portion of expected new insurance written from January 1, 2027, through December 31, 2027, and provides reinsurance coverage of approximately $170 million.

Capital returns. In March, June, September and December 2025, our primary mortgage insurance operating company, EMICO, paid dividends to EHI that support our ability to return capital to shareholders. We paid a dividend of $0.185 per common share during the first quarter of 2025. In April 2025, we announced an increase of our quarterly dividend to $0.21 per common share which was paid in June, September and December 2025. Future dividend payments are subject to quarterly review and approval by our Board of Directors and Genworth and will be targeted to be paid in the third month of each quarter.

On May 1, 2024, we announced the authorization of a share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to $250 million of EHI’s common stock. The Company completed the repurchase of shares under this authorization in the second quarter of 2025. On April 30, 2025, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $350 million of EHI’s common stock. Under the programs, share repurchases may be made at our discretion from time to time in open market transactions in compliance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, privately negotiated transactions, or by other means, including through Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. In support, Enact has entered into an agreement with Genworth Holdings, Inc. to repurchase its Enact shares as part of the program to maintain Genworth’s ownership interest in Enact. We expect the timing and amount of any future share repurchases will be opportunistic and will depend on a variety of factors, including EHI’s share price, capital availability, business and market conditions, regulatory requirements, and debt covenant restrictions. The programs do not obligate EHI to acquire any amount of common stock, may be suspended or terminated at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice, and do not have a specified expiration date.

Subsequent to year end, on February 3, 2026, we announced the authorization of a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to an additional $500 million of EHI’s common stock.

Returning capital to shareholders, balanced with our growth and risk management priorities, remains a key commitment as we look to drive shareholder value through time. Future return of capital will be shaped by our capital prioritization framework, which sets the following priorities: supporting our existing policyholders, growing our mortgage insurance business, funding attractive new business opportunities and returning capital to shareholders. Our total return of capital will also be based on our view of the prevailing and prospective macroeconomic conditions, regulatory landscape and business performance.

70

Results of Operations and Key Metrics

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our consolidated results for the periods indicated:

Year ended

December 31,

Increase (decrease)

and percentage

change

Increase (decrease)

and percentage

change

(Amounts in thousands)

2025

2024

2023

2025 vs. 2024

2024 vs. 2023

Revenues:

Premiums

$

980,505 

$

980,104 

$

957,075 

$

401 

— 

%

$

23,029 

2 

%

Net investment income

266,153 

240,564 

207,369 

25,589 

11 

%

33,195 

16 

%

Net investment gains (losses)

(16,276)

(22,807)

(14,022)

6,531 

29 

%

(8,785)

(63)

%

Other income

5,445 

3,913 

3,264 

1,532 

39 

%

649 

20 

%

Total revenues

1,235,827 

1,201,774 

1,153,686 

34,053 

3 

%

48,088 

4 

%

Losses and expenses:

Losses incurred

109,526 

38,657 

27,165 

70,869 

183 

%

11,492 

42 

%

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals

208,326 

213,310 

212,491 

(4,984)

(2)

%

819 

— 

%

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs and intangibles

9,189 

9,659 

10,654 

(470)

(5)

%

(995)

(9)

%

Interest expense

49,949 

51,157 

51,867 

(1,208)

(2)

%

(710)

(1)

%

Loss on debt extinguishment

— 

10,930 

— 

(10,930)

NM(4)

10,930 

NM

Total losses and expenses

376,990 

323,713 

302,177 

53,277 

16 

%

21,536 

7 

%

Income before income taxes

858,837 

878,061 

851,509 

(19,224)

(2)

%

26,552 

3 

%

Provision for income taxes

184,593 

189,993 

185,998 

(5,400)

(3)

%

3,995 

2 

%

Net income

$

674,244 

$

688,068 

$

665,511 

$

(13,824)

(2)

%

$

22,557 

3 

%

Loss ratio (1)

11 

%

4 

%

3 

%

Expense ratio (2)

22 

%

23 

%

23 

%

Earned premium rate (3)

0.35 

%

0.36 

%

0.37 

%

_______________

(1)Loss ratio is calculated by dividing losses incurred by net earned premiums.

(2)Expense ratio is calculated by dividing acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, plus amortization of DAC and intangibles by net earned premiums.

(3)Net earned premium rate is calculated by dividing direct earned premium less ceded premium, by average primary IIF.

(4)We define “NM” as not meaningful for increases or decreases greater than 300%.

Detailed discussions of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2023, including the year-over-year comparisons between 2024 and 2023, that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K can be found in Item 7 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2025.

Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024

Revenues

Premiums increased marginally, attributable to higher average IIF and higher assumed premiums, partially offset by higher ceded premiums and slightly lower average premium rates. The net earned premium rate was 35 basis points, down slightly from 36 basis points in 2024.

Net investment income increased primarily due to higher investment yields coupled with higher average invested assets.

Net investment losses during 2025 and 2024 were primarily driven by realized losses on the sale of fixed maturity securities as part of our yield optimization strategy that allows us to reinvest sales proceeds

71

and recoup higher investment income. Our yield optimization strategy enables opportunistic security sales based on current and changing market conditions. We had fewer losses on sales in 2025 than 2024.

Other income includes underwriting fee revenue, equity method investment income and other revenue.

Losses and expenses

Losses incurred in 2025 and 2024 were impacted by favorable reserve adjustments due to strong cure performance and loss mitigation efforts. In 2025, we recorded a net reserve release of $200 million. A majority of the reserve adjustments related to prior period delinquencies but a portion of the release also related to 2025 delinquencies as we reduced the expected claim rates as a result of sustained favorable cure performance and our current market expectations. During 2024, we recorded $252 million of reserve releases.

New primary delinquencies were 50,481 in 2025 compared to 48,537 in 2024, resulting in $299 million and $287 million of losses, respectively.

The following table shows incurred losses related to current and prior accident years for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in thousands)

2025

2024

2023

Losses and LAE incurred related to current accident year

$

280,143 

$

289,482 

$

275,418 

Losses and LAE incurred related to prior accident years

(188,739)

(258,180)

(248,214)

Total incurred (1)

$

91,404 

$

31,302 

$

27,204 

_______________

(1)Excludes run-off business.

Acquisition and operating expenses, net of deferrals, decreased slightly driven primarily by prudent expense management coupled with severance expenses as a part of restructuring activities in 2024.

Amortization of DAC and intangibles declined slightly due to lower DAC amortization as a result of elevated persistency, driven by high mortgage rates and lower software amortization.

The expense ratio decreased slightly due to a small decrease in expenses and flat premium growth.

The loss on debt extinguishment relates to the expenses incurred associated with the redemption of our 2025 Notes in 2024.

Interest expense for 2025 primarily relates to our 2029 Notes while interest expense for 2024 relates primarily to our 2025 and 2029 Notes. For additional details see Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements.

Provision for income taxes

The effective tax rate was 21.5% and 21.6% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, consistent with the United States corporate federal income tax rate.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use a non-U.S. GAAP (“non-GAAP”) financial measure entitled “adjusted operating income.” This non-GAAP financial measure is additionally evaluated by both management and our Board of Directors. Management also uses adjusted operating income (loss) as a basis for determining awards and compensation for senior management and to evaluate performance on a basis comparable to that used by analysts. This measure has been established in order to increase transparency for the purposes of evaluating our core operating trends and enabling more meaningful comparisons with our peers. Although

72

“adjusted operating income” is a non-GAAP financial measure, for the reasons discussed above we believe this measure aids in understanding the underlying performance of our operations.

“Adjusted operating income” is defined as U.S. GAAP net income excluding the effects of (i) net investment gains (losses) (ii) reorganization or restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items and (iii) gains (losses) on the extinguishment of debt. .

(i)Net investment gains (losses)—The recognition of realized investment gains or losses can vary significantly across periods as the activity is highly discretionary based on the timing of individual securities sales due to such factors as market opportunities or exposure management. Trends in the profitability of our fundamental operating activities can be more clearly identified without the fluctuations of these realized gains and losses. We do not view them as indicative of our fundamental operating activities. Therefore, these items are excluded from our calculation of adjusted operating income.

(ii)Reorganization or restructuring costs and infrequent or unusual non-operating items are also excluded from adjusted operating income if, in our opinion, they are not indicative of overall operating trends.

(iii)Gains (losses) on the extinguishment of debt are also excluded from adjusted operating income, as we do not view them as indicative of overall operating trends.

In reporting non-GAAP measures in the future, we may make other adjustments for expenses and gains we do not consider reflective of core operating performance in a particular period. We may disclose other non-GAAP operating measures if we believe that such a presentation would be helpful for investors to evaluate our operating condition by including additional information.

Adjusted operating income is not a measure of total profitability, and therefore should not be considered in isolation or viewed as a substitute for U.S. GAAP net income. Our definition of adjusted operating income may not be comparable to similarly named measures reported by other companies, including our peers.

Adjustments to reconcile net income to adjusted operating income assume a 21% tax rate (unless otherwise indicated).

The following table includes a reconciliation of net income to adjusted operating income for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in thousands)

2025

2024

2023

Net income

$

674,244 

$

688,068 

$

665,511 

Adjustments to net income:

Net investment (gains) losses

16,276 

22,807 

14,022 

Costs associated with reorganization

820 

4,652 

(131)

Loss on debt extinguishment

— 

10,930 

— 

Taxes on adjustments

(3,590)

(8,061)

(2,917)

Adjusted operating income

$

687,750 

$

718,396 

$

676,485 

Adjusted operating income decreased in 2025 compared to 2024 primarily due to higher losses, partially offset by higher net investment income and lower expenses.

73

Key Metrics

Management reviews the key metrics included within this section when analyzing the performance of our business. The metrics provided in this section are on a direct basis and exclude activity related to our run-off business, which is immaterial to our consolidated results of operations.

The following table sets forth selected operating performance measures on a primary basis as of or for the years ended December 31:

(Dollar amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

New insurance written

$51,506

$51,002

$53,081

Primary insurance in-force (1)

$273,147

$268,825

$262,937

Primary risk in-force

$71,363

$69,985

$67,529

Persistency rate

82 

%

83 

%

85 

%

Primary policies in-force (count)

950,670

962,849

974,516

Delinquent loans (count)

24,885

23,566

20,432

Delinquency rate

2.62 

%

2.45 

%

2.10 

%

_______________

(1)Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance for loans we insure.

New insurance written

NIW for the year ended December 31, 2025 increased 1% compared to 2024. Changes in NIW are primarily impacted by the size of the mortgage insurance market and our market share. We manage the quality of new business through pricing and our underwriting guidelines, which we modify from time to time as circumstances warrant.

The following table presents NIW by product for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

Primary

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

Pool

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

The following table presents primary NIW by underlying type of mortgage for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

Purchases

$

46,192 

90 

%

$

47,693 

94 

%

$

51,723 

97 

%

Refinances

5,314 

10 

3,309 

6 

1,358 

3 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

The following table presents primary NIW by policy payment type for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

Monthly

$

49,320 

96 

%

$

48,830 

96 

%

$

51,869 

98 

%

Single

2,116 

4 

2,102 

4 

1,114 

2 

Other

70 

— 

70 

— 

98 

— 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

74

The following table presents primary NIW by FICO score for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

Over 760

$

26,339 

51 

%

$

24,843 

49 

%

$

24,680 

46 

%

740-759

8,477 

16 

8,096 

16 

8,994 

17 

720-739

6,278 

12 

6,768 

13 

7,220 

14 

700-719

4,523 

9 

4,932 

10 

5,214 

10 

680-699

2,967 

6 

3,237 

6 

3,652 

7 

660-679 (1)

1,729 

3 

1,759 

3 

2,086 

4 

640-659

835 

2 

972 

2 

952 

2 

620-639

335 

1 

369 

1 

268 

— 

620

23 

— 

26 

— 

15 

— 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

______________

(1)Loans with unknown FICO scores are included in the 660-679 category.

LTV ratio is calculated by dividing the original loan amount, excluding financed premium, by the property’s acquisition value or fair market value at the time of origination. The following table presents primary NIW by LTV ratio for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

95.01% and above

$

9,580 

19 

%

$

10,129 

20 

%

$

9,295 

18 

%

90.01% to 95.00%

18,835 

36 

19,270 

38 

19,861 

37 

85.01% to 90.00%

15,435 

30 

15,609 

30 

17,200 

32 

85.00% and below

7,656 

15 

5,994 

12 

6,725 

13 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

The following table presents primary NIW by DTI ratio for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

45.01% and above

$

15,186 

30 

%

$

14,545 

28 

%

$

15,600 

29 

%

38.01% to 45.00%

18,670 

36 

18,711 

37 

18,906 

36 

38.00% and below

17,650 

34 

17,746 

35 

18,575 

35 

Total

$

51,506 

100 

%

$

51,002 

100 

%

$

53,081 

100 

%

Insurance in-force and Risk in-force

IIF increased largely from NIW and elevated persistency in the current year, partially offset by lapses and cancellations. Primary persistency rate was 82% and 83% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. RIF increased primarily as a result of higher IIF.

75

The following table sets forth IIF and RIF as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Primary IIF

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

Pool IIF

331 

— 

379 

— 

436 

— 

Total IIF

$

273,478 

100 

%

$

269,204 

100 

%

$

263,373 

100 

%

Primary RIF

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

Pool RIF

51 

— 

57 

— 

69 

— 

Total RIF

$

71,414 

100 

%

$

70,042 

100 

%

$

67,598 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary IIF and primary RIF by origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Purchases IIF

$

249,902 

91 

%

$

243,730 

91 

%

$

231,526 

88 

%

Refinances IIF

23,245 

9 

25,095 

9 

31,411 

12 

Total IIF

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

Purchases RIF

$

65,890 

92 

%

$

64,031 

91 

%

$

60,497 

90 

%

Refinances RIF

5,473 

8 

5,954 

9 

7,032 

10 

Total RIF

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary IIF and primary RIF by product as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Monthly IIF

$

247,776 

91 

%

$

241,785 

90 

%

$

233,651 

89 

%

Single IIF

23,844 

9 

25,301 

9 

27,353 

10 

Other IIF

1,527 

— 

1,739 

1 

1,933 

1 

Total IIF

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

Monthly RIF

$

65,836 

92 

%

$

64,078 

91 

%

$

61,083 

90 

%

Single RIF

5,135 

7 

5,466 

8 

5,957 

9 

Other RIF

392 

1 

441 

1 

489 

1 

Total RIF

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

76

The following table sets forth primary IIF by policy year as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

2008 and prior

$

4,219 

2 

%

$

4,860 

2 

%

$

5,621 

2 

%

2009 to 2017

6,503 

2 

9,045 

3 

13,363 

5 

2018

3,917 

1 

4,790 

2 

5,750 

2 

2019

9,539 

4 

11,415 

4 

13,773 

5 

2020

28,074 

10 

34,940 

13 

44,486 

17 

2021

45,945 

17 

57,266 

21 

70,045 

27 

2022

46,173 

17 

53,063 

20 

59,267 

23 

2023

38,250 

14 

45,208 

17 

50,632 

19 

2024

42,043 

15 

48,238 

18 

— 

— 

2025

48,484 

18 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Total

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary RIF by policy year as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

2008 and prior

$

1,092 

2 

%

$

1,256 

2 

%

$

1,449 

2 

%

2009 to 2017

1,680 

2 

2,368 

3 

3,532 

5 

2018

1,010 

1 

1,233 

2 

1,476 

2 

2019

2,499 

4 

2,984 

4 

3,544 

5 

2020

7,739 

11 

9,553 

14 

11,697 

17 

2021

12,482 

17 

15,043 

21 

17,846 

27 

2022

11,884 

17 

13,476 

19 

14,907 

22 

2023

9,967 

14 

11,719 

17 

13,078 

20 

2024

10,812 

15 

12,353 

18 

— 

— 

2025

12,198 

17 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Total

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

The following table presents the development of primary IIF for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in millions)

2025

2024

2023

Beginning balance

$

268,825 

$

262,937 

$

248,262 

NIW

51,506 

51,002 

53,081 

Cancellations, principal repayments and other reductions (1)

(47,184)

(45,114)

(38,406)

Ending balance

$

273,147 

$

268,825 

$

262,937 

_____________

(1)Includes the estimated amortization of unpaid principal balance of covered loans.

77

The following table sets forth primary IIF by LTV ratio at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

95.01% and above

$

54,221 

20 

%

$

50,318 

18 

%

$

44,955 

17 

%

90.01% to 95.00%

114,315 

42 

112,362 

42 

109,227 

41 

85.01% to 90.00%

78,746 

29 

79,932 

30 

77,887 

30 

85.00% and below

25,865 

9 

26,213 

10 

30,868 

12 

Total

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary RIF by LTV ratio at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

95.01% and above

$

15,608 

22 

%

$

14,428 

21 

%

$

12,878 

19 

%

90.01% to 95.00%

33,260 

47 

32,686 

47 

31,781 

47 

85.01% to 90.00%

19,410 

27 

19,729 

28 

19,163 

28 

85.00% and below

3,085 

4 

3,142 

4 

3,707 

6 

Total

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary IIF by FICO score at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Over 760

$

120,093 

44 

%

$

115,554 

43 

%

$

110,635 

42 

%

740-759

44,898 

16 

43,955 

17 

43,053 

17 

720-739

37,897 

14 

37,717 

14 

37,020 

14 

700-719

29,486 

11 

29,819 

11 

29,766 

11 

680-699

20,773 

8 

21,355 

8 

21,835 

8 

660-679 (1)

11,091 

4 

11,245 

4 

11,357 

4 

640-659

5,988 

2 

6,147 

2 

6,137 

3 

620-639

2,398 

1 

2,461 

1 

2,504 

1 

620

523 

— 

572 

— 

630 

— 

Total

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

______________

(1)Loans with unknown FICO scores are included in the 660-679 category.

78

The following table sets forth primary RIF by FICO score at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Over 760

$

31,186 

44 

%

$

29,985 

43 

%

$

28,363 

42 

%

740-759

11,765 

16 

11,494 

17 

11,096 

17 

720-739

10,049 

14 

9,949 

14 

9,621 

14 

700-719

7,727 

11 

7,746 

11 

7,623 

11 

680-699

5,412 

8 

5,523 

8 

5,557 

8 

660-679 (1)

2,913 

4 

2,924 

4 

2,908 

4 

640-659

1,564 

2 

1,589 

2 

1,565 

3 

620-639

615 

1 

629 

1 

635 

1 

620

132 

— 

146 

— 

161 

— 

Total

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

______________

(1)Loans with unknown FICO scores are included in the 660-679 category.

The following table sets forth primary IIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

45.01% and above

$

65,275 

24 

%

$

59,864 

22 

%

$

53,440 

20 

%

38.01% to 45.00%

99,748 

36 

97,361 

36 

93,871 

36 

38.00% and below

108,124 

40 

111,600 

42 

115,626 

44 

Total

$

273,147 

100 

%

$

268,825 

100 

%

$

262,937 

100 

%

The following table sets forth primary RIF by DTI score at origination as of the dates indicated:

(Amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

45.01% and above

$

17,150 

24 

%

$

15,674 

22 

%

$

13,830 

20 

%

38.01% to 45.00%

25,893 

36 

25,226 

36 

24,072 

36 

38.00% and below

28,320 

40 

29,085 

42 

29,627 

44 

Total

$

71,363 

100 

%

$

69,985 

100 

%

$

67,529 

100 

%

Delinquent loans and claims

Our delinquency management process begins with notification by the loan servicer of a delinquency on an insured loan. “Delinquency” is defined in our master policies as the borrower’s failure to pay when due an amount equal to the scheduled monthly mortgage payment under the terms of the mortgage. Generally, our master policies require an insured to notify us of a delinquency if the borrower fails to make two consecutive monthly mortgage payments prior to the due date of the next mortgage payment. Borrowers default for a variety of reasons, including a reduction of income, unemployment, divorce, illness/death, inability to manage credit, falling home prices and interest rate levels. Borrowers may cure delinquencies by making all of the delinquent loan payments, agreeing to a loan modification, or by selling the property in full satisfaction of all amounts due under the mortgage. In most cases, delinquencies that are not cured result in a claim under our policy.

79

The following table shows a roll forward of the number of primary loans in default for the years ended December 31:

(Loan count)

2025

2024

2023

Number of delinquencies, beginning of period

23,566 

20,432 

19,943 

New defaults

50,481 

48,537 

41,617 

Cures

(48,187)

(44,611)

(40,475)

Claims paid

(937)

(743)

(615)

Rescissions and claim denials

(38)

(49)

(38)

Number of delinquencies, end of period

24,885 

23,566 

20,432 

The following table sets forth changes in our direct primary case loss reserves for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in thousands) (1)

2025

2024

2023

Loss reserves, beginning of period

$

472,110 

$

476,709 

$

479,343 

Claims paid

(52,374)

(30,550)

(23,357)

Increase in reserves

95,390 

25,951 

20,723 

Loss reserves, end of period

$

515,126 

$

472,110 

$

476,709 

______________

(1)Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.

The following tables set forth primary delinquencies, direct primary case reserves and RIF by aged missed payment status as of the dates indicated:

December 31, 2025

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Delinquencies

Direct primary case

reserves (1)

Risk

in-force

Reserves as % of risk in-force

Payments in default:

3 payments or less

12,647 

$

104 

$

867 

12 

%

4 - 11 payments

8,591 

206 

641 

32 

%

12 payments or more

3,647 

205 

270 

76 

%

Total

24,885 

$

515 

$

1,778 

29 

%

December 31, 2024

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Delinquencies

Direct primary case

reserves (1)

Risk

in-force

Reserves as % of risk in-force

Payments in default:

3 payments or less

12,712 

$

108 

$

849 

13 

%

4 - 11 payments

7,701 

191 

545 

35 

%

12 payments or more

3,153 

173 

213 

81 

%

Total

23,566 

$

472 

$

1,607 

29 

%

______________

(1)Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.

80

December 31, 2023

(Dollar amounts in millions)

Delinquencies

Direct primary case

reserves (1)

Risk

in-force

Reserves as % of risk in-force

Payments in default:

3 payments or less

10,166 

$

88 

$

629 

14 

%

4 - 11 payments

6,934 

205 

469 

44 

%

12 payments or more

3,332 

184 

200 

92 

%

Total

20,432 

$

477 

$

1,298 

37 

%

______________

(1)Direct primary case reserves exclude LAE, pool, IBNR and reinsurance reserves.

The total reserves as a percentage of RIF as of December 31, 2025, was flat compared to December 31, 2024.

The ratio of the claim paid to the current risk in-force for a loan is referred to as “claim severity.” The current risk in-force is equal to the unpaid principal amount multiplied by the coverage percentage. The main determinants of claim severity are the age of the mortgage loan, the value of the underlying property, accrued interest on the loan, expenses advanced by the insured and foreclosure expenses. These amounts depend partly upon the time required to complete foreclosure, which varies depending upon state laws. Pre-foreclosure sales, acquisitions and other early workout and claim administration actions help to reduce overall claim severity. Our average primary mortgage insurance claim severity was 96%, 99% and 97% for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The average claim severities have been impacted by low claim volumes and lifetime home price appreciation. These figures do not include the effects of agreements on non-performing loans.

Primary insurance delinquency rates differ from region to region in the United States at any one time depending upon economic conditions and cyclical growth patterns. Delinquency rates are shown by region based upon the location of the underlying property, rather than the location of the lender. The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2025:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

By state:

California

12 

%

13 

%

2.84 

%

Texas

9 

9 

2.81 

%

Florida (1)

8 

13 

3.35 

%

New York (1)

5 

9 

3.38 

%

Illinois (1)

4 

5 

3.15 

%

Arizona

4 

4 

2.78 

%

Michigan

4 

3 

2.33 

%

Georgia

3 

4 

3.33 

%

North Carolina

3 

2 

2.07 

%

Pennsylvania

3 

3 

2.29 

%

All other states (2)

45 

35 

2.32 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.62 

%

______________

(1)Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.

(2)Includes the District of Columbia.

81

The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2024:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

By state:

California

12 

%

12 

%

2.53 

%

Texas

9 

9 

2.64 

%

Florida (1)

8 

12 

3.67 

%

New York (1)

5 

10 

3.30 

%

Illinois (1)

4 

6 

2.96 

%

Arizona

4 

3 

2.35 

%

Michigan

4 

3 

2.14 

%

Georgia

3 

4 

3.02 

%

North Carolina

3 

2 

2.14 

%

Pennsylvania

3 

3 

2.17 

%

All other states (2)

45 

36 

2.10 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.45 

%

______________

(1)Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.

(2)Includes the District of Columbia.

The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest states by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2023:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

By state:

California

13 

%

12 

%

2.22 

%

Texas

8 

8 

2.22 

%

Florida (1)

8 

9 

2.39 

%

New York (1)

5 

12 

3.05 

%

Illinois (1)

4 

6 

2.61 

%

Arizona

4 

3 

1.93 

%

Michigan

4 

3 

1.94 

%

Georgia

3 

3 

2.23 

%

North Carolina

3 

2 

1.56 

%

Washington

3 

2 

1.77 

%

All other states (2)

45 

40 

1.93 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.10 

%

______________

(1)Jurisdiction predominantly uses a judicial foreclosure process, which generally increases the amount of time it takes for a foreclosure to be completed.

(2)Includes the District of Columbia.

82

The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2025:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct primary case reserves

Delinquency

rate

By MSA or MD:

Phoenix, AZ MSA

3 

%

3 

%

2.85 

%

Chicago-Naperville, IL MD

3 

4 

3.31 

%

Atlanta, GA MSA

3 

3 

3.59 

%

Dallas, TX MD

2 

2 

2.49 

%

Houston, TX MSA

2 

3 

3.54 

%

New York, NY MD

2 

5 

3.70 

%

Washington-Arlington, DC MD

2 

2 

2.62 

%

Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA

2 

3 

3.53 

%

Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD

2 

3 

3.26 

%

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA

2 

1 

1.85 

%

All Other MSAs/MDs

77 

71 

2.49 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.62 

%

The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2024:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct primary case reserves

Delinquency

rate

By MSA or MD:

Phoenix, AZ MSA

3 

%

3 

%

2.41 

%

Chicago-Naperville, IL MD

3 

4 

3.29 

%

Atlanta, GA MSA

3 

3 

3.02 

%

New York, NY MD

2 

6 

3.53 

%

Houston, TX MSA

2 

3 

3.58 

%

Dallas, TX MD

2 

2 

2.38 

%

Washington-Arlington, DC MD

2 

2 

2.03 

%

Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA

2 

3 

3.25 

%

Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD

2 

2 

2.65 

%

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA

2 

1 

1.38 

%

All Other MSAs/MDs

77 

71 

2.35 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.45 

%

83

The table below sets forth our primary delinquency rates for the ten largest MSAs or MDs by our primary RIF as of December 31, 2023:

Percent of RIF

Percent of direct primary case reserves

Delinquency

rate

By MSA or MD:

Phoenix, AZ MSA

3 

%

2 

%

2.01 

%

Chicago-Naperville, IL MD

3 

4 

2.88 

%

Atlanta, GA MSA

3 

3 

2.40 

%

New York, NY MD

2 

7 

3.60 

%

Washington-Arlington, DC MD

2 

2 

2.01 

%

Houston, TX MSA

2 

3 

2.67 

%

Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA MD

2 

2 

2.39 

%

Dallas, TX MD

2 

2 

1.92 

%

Riverside-San Bernardino, CA MSA

2 

3 

2.83 

%

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO MSA

2 

1 

1.12 

%

All Other MSAs/MDs

77 

71 

2.01 

%

Total

100 

%

100 

%

2.10 

%

The number of delinquencies often does not correlate directly with the number of claims received because delinquencies may cure. The rate at which delinquencies cure is influenced by borrowers’ financial resources and circumstances and regional economic differences. Whether a delinquency leads to a claim correlates highly with the borrower’s equity at the time of delinquency, as it influences the borrower’s willingness to continue to make payments, the borrower’s or the insured’s ability to sell the home for an amount sufficient to satisfy all amounts due under the mortgage loan, and the borrower’s financial ability to continue making payments. When we receive notice of a delinquency, we use our proprietary model to determine whether a delinquent loan is a candidate for a modification. When our model identifies such a candidate, our loan workout specialists prioritize cases for loss mitigation based upon the likelihood that the loan will result in a claim. Loss mitigation actions include loan modification, extension of credit to bring a loan current, foreclosure forbearance, pre-foreclosure sale and deed-in-lieu. These loss mitigation efforts often are an effective way to reduce our claim exposure and ultimate payouts.

84

The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2025:

Percent

of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

Cumulative

delinquency

rate (1)

Policy year:

2008 and prior

2 

%

8 

%

7.96 

%

5.55 

%

2009-2017

2 

7 

5.08 

%

0.59 

%

2018

1 

4 

5.31 

%

0.95 

%

2019

4 

5 

3.45 

%

0.84 

%

2020

11 

11 

2.41 

%

0.91 

%

2021

17 

19 

2.63 

%

1.52 

%

2022

17 

22 

2.98 

%

2.45 

%

2023

14 

15 

2.75 

%

2.23 

%

2024

15 

8 

1.73 

%

1.52 

%

2025

17 

1 

0.32 

%

0.30 

%

Total portfolio

100 

%

100 

%

2.62 

%

4.13 

%

______________

(1)Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force.

The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2024:

Percent

of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

Cumulative

delinquency

rate (1)

Policy year:

2008 and prior

2 

%

10 

%

8.17 

%

5.55 

%

2009-2016

2 

6 

4.75 

%

0.60 

%

2017

1 

4 

4.37 

%

0.84 

%

2018

2 

5 

4.66 

%

0.96 

%

2019

4 

8 

3.31 

%

0.89 

%

2020

14 

14 

2.14 

%

0.94 

%

2021

21 

21 

2.25 

%

1.51 

%

2022

19 

20 

2.50 

%

2.18 

%

2023

17 

10 

1.83 

%

1.64 

%

2024

18 

2 

0.49 

%

0.47 

%

Total portfolio

100 

%

100 

%

2.45 

%

4.17 

%

______________

(1)Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force.

85

The following table sets forth the dispersion of primary RIF and loss reserves by policy year and delinquency rates as of December 31, 2023:

Percent

of RIF

Percent of direct

primary case

reserves

Delinquency

rate

Cumulative

delinquency

rate (1)

Policy year:

2008 and prior

2 

%

18 

%

8.61 

%

5.56 

%

2009-2015

1 

4 

4.55 

%

0.63 

%

2016

2 

4 

3.20 

%

0.67 

%

2017

2 

5 

3.59 

%

0.87 

%

2018

2 

6 

4.42 

%

1.02 

%

2019

5 

8 

2.77 

%

0.85 

%

2020

17 

15 

1.70 

%

0.90 

%

2021

27 

21 

1.65 

%

1.29 

%

2022

22 

16 

1.57 

%

1.46 

%

2023

20 

3 

0.47 

%

0.46 

%

Total portfolio

100 

%

100 

%

2.10 

%

4.19 

%

______________

(1)Calculated as the sum of the number of policies where claims were ever paid to date and number of policies for loans currently in default divided by policies ever in-force.

Loss reserves in policy years 2008 and prior are outsized compared to their representation of RIF. The size of these policy years at origination, particularly 2005 through 2008, combined with the significant decline in home prices led to significant losses in policy years prior to 2009. Although uncertainty remains with respect to the ultimate losses we will experience on these policy years, they have become a smaller percentage of our total mortgage insurance portfolio. Loss reserves have shifted to newer book years in line with changes in RIF. As of December 31, 2025, our 2018 and newer policy years represented approximately 96% of our primary RIF and 85% of our total direct primary case reserves.

Investment Portfolio

Our investment portfolio is affected by factors described below, each of which in turn may be affected by current macroeconomic conditions as noted above in “—Trends and Conditions.” The investment portfolios of our insurance subsidiaries are directed by the Enact Investment Committee, a management-level committee, with Genworth serving as the primary investment manager. The investment portfolio of EHI is directed by a separate management-level EHI Investment Committee with a third-party investment manager. These parties, with oversight from our Board of Directors and our senior management team, are responsible for the execution of our investment strategy. Our investment portfolio is an important component of our consolidated financial results and represents our primary source of claims paying resources. Our investment portfolio primarily consists of a diverse mix of highly rated fixed maturity securities and is designed to achieve the following objectives:

•Meet policyholder obligations through maintenance of sufficient liquidity;

•Preserve capital;

•Generate investment income;

•Maximize statutory capital; and

•Increase shareholder value, among other objectives.

86

To achieve our portfolio objectives, our investment strategy focuses primarily on:

•Our business outlook, including current and expected future investment conditions;

•Investment selection based on fundamental, research-driven strategies;

•Diversification across a mix of fixed income, low-volatility investments while actively pursuing strategies to enhance yield;

•Regular evaluation and optimization of our asset class mix;

•Continuous monitoring of investment quality, duration and liquidity;

•Regulatory capital requirements; and

•Restriction of investments correlated to the residential mortgage market.

Fixed Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale

The following table presents the fair value of our fixed maturity securities available-for-sale as of the dates indicated:

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

(Amounts in thousands)

Fair value

% of

total

Fair value

% of

total

Fair value

% of

total

U.S. government, agencies and GSEs

$

257,307 

4.2 

%

$

277,363 

4.9 

%

$

195,129 

3.7 

%

State and political subdivisions

478,972 

7.9 

467,476 

8.3 

438,214 

8.3 

Non-U.S. government

185,462 

3.1 

83,802 

1.5 

11,467 

0.2 

U.S. corporate

2,810,727 

46.5 

2,825,679 

50.2 

2,723,730 

51.8 

Non-U.S. corporate

783,056 

12.9 

772,624 

13.7 

689,663 

13.1 

Residential mortgage-backed

349,333 

5.8 

8,364 

0.2 

10,755 

0.2 

Commercial mortgage-backed

129,562 

2.1 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Other asset-backed

1,056,123 

17.5 

1,189,465 

21.2 

1,197,183 

22.7 

Total available-for-sale fixed maturity securities

$

6,050,542 

100.0 

%

$

5,624,773 

100.0 

%

$

5,266,141 

100.0 

%

Our investment portfolio did not include any direct residential real estate or whole mortgage loans as of December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023. We have no derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.

As of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, 99%, 99% and 98% of our investment portfolio was rated investment grade, respectively. The following table presents the security ratings of our fixed maturity securities as of the dates indicated:

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

AAA

8 

%

11 

%

10 

%

AA

28 

22 

20 

A

30 

31 

33 

BBB

33 

35 

35 

BB & below

1 

1 

2 

Total

100 

%

100 

%

100 

%

87

The table below presents the effective duration and investment yield on our investments available-for-sale, excluding cash and cash equivalents:

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Duration (in years)

4.7

4.1

3.5

Pre-tax yield (% of average investment portfolio assets)

4.4 

%

4.0 

%

3.6 

%

We manage credit risk by analyzing issuers, transaction structures and any associated collateral. We also manage credit risk through country, industry, sector and issuer diversification and prudent asset allocation practices.

We primarily mitigate interest rate risk by employing a buy and hold investment philosophy that seeks to match fixed income maturities with expected liability cash flows in modestly adverse economic scenarios.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our consolidated cash flows for the years ended December 31:

(Amounts in thousands)

2025

2024

2023

Net cash provided by (used in):

Operating activities

$

724,519 

$

686,262 

$

632,038 

Investing activities

(226,381)

(320,514)

(229,404)

Financing activities

(515,077)

(381,999)

(300,726)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$

(16,939)

$

(16,251)

$

101,908 

Our most significant source of operating cash flows is from premiums received from our insurance policies, while our most significant uses of operating cash flows are generally for claims paid on our insured policies and our operating expenses. Net cash provided by operating activities increased largely due to higher net investment income and lower expenses. Cash flows from operations were also impacted by changes in reserves and unearned premiums.

Investing activities are primarily related to purchases, sales and maturities of our investment portfolio. Net cash used in investing activities was a result of purchases of fixed maturity securities outpacing maturities and sales in the current year due to the deployment of operating cash flows.

Financing activities for 2025 included dividends paid of $121 million and share repurchases of $382 million. The amount and timing of future dividends is discussed within “—Trends and Conditions” as well as below. In 2024, our cash flows from financing activities included the issuance of our 2029 Notes and the redemption of our 2025 Notes. During 2024 and 2023, our cash flows used in financing activities included dividends paid of $112 million and $213 million, respectively, and share repurchases of $244 million and $88 million, respectively.

Capital Resources and Financing Activities

We issued our 2029 Notes in the second quarter of 2024 with interest payable semi-annually in arrears in May and November of each year. The 2029 Notes mature on May 28, 2029. We may redeem the 2029 Notes, in whole or in part, at any time prior to April 28, 2029, at our option, by paying an additional premium. At any time on or after April 28, 2029, we may redeem the 2029 Notes, in whole or in part, at our option, at 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 2029 Notes contain customary events of default which, subject to certain notice and cure conditions, can result in the

88

acceleration of the principal and accrued interest on the outstanding notes if we breach the terms of the indenture.

The proceeds from our 2029 Notes, along with other available cash, were used to redeem our 2025 Notes during the second quarter of 2024.

On September 30, 2025, we entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of lenders that provides for a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility (the “2025 Revolving Credit Facility”) in the initial aggregate principal amount of $435 million, which replaces the previous $200 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility matures in September 2030, but under certain conditions EHI may need to repay any outstanding amounts and terminate the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility earlier than the maturity date. We may use borrowings under the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility contains several covenants, including financial covenants relating to minimum net worth, maximum debt to capitalization level and PMIERs compliance. We are in compliance with all covenants of the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility and the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility has remained undrawn through December 31, 2025.

We continually evaluate opportunities based upon market conditions to further increase our financial flexibility including through raising additional capital, restructuring or refinancing some or all of our outstanding debt or pursuing other options such as reinsurance or credit risk transfer transactions. There can be no guarantee that any such opportunities will be available on favorable terms or at all.

Restrictions on the Payment of Dividends

The ability of our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries to pay dividends and distributions to us is restricted by certain provisions of North Carolina insurance laws. Our insurance subsidiaries may pay dividends only from unassigned surplus; payments made from sources other than unassigned surplus, such as paid-in and contributed surplus, are categorized as distributions. Notice of all dividends must be submitted to the Commissioner of the NCDOI (the “Commissioner”) within 5 business days after declaration of the dividend, and at least 30 days before payment thereof. No dividend may be paid until 30 days after the Commissioner has received notice of the declaration thereof and (i) has not within that period disapproved the payment or (ii) has approved the payment within the 30-day period. Any distribution, regardless of amount, requires that same 30-day notice to the Commissioner, but also requires the Commissioner’s affirmative approval before being paid. Based on our estimated statutory results and in accordance with applicable dividend restrictions, our insurance subsidiaries have the capacity to pay dividends of $3 million from unassigned surplus as of December 31, 2025, with 30-day advance notice to the Commissioner of the intent to pay. In addition to dividends and distributions, alternative mechanisms, such as share repurchases, subject to any requisite regulatory approvals, may be utilized from time to time to upstream surplus.

In addition, we review multiple other considerations in parallel to determine a prospective dividend strategy for our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries. Given the regulatory focus on the reasonableness of an insurer’s surplus in relation to its outstanding liabilities and the adequacy of its surplus relative to its financial needs for any dividend, our insurance subsidiaries consider the minimum amount of policyholder surplus after giving effect to any contemplated future dividends. Regulatory minimum policyholder surplus is not codified in North Carolina law and limitations may vary based on prevailing business conditions including, but not limited to, the prevailing and future macroeconomic conditions. We estimate regulators would require a minimum policyholder surplus of approximately $300 million to meet their threshold standard. We are subject to statutory accounting requirements that establish a contingency reserve of at least 50% of net earned premiums annually for ten years, after which time it is released into policyholder surplus. While we began 10-year contingency reserve releases during 2024, minimum policyholder surplus could be a limitation on the future dividends of our regulated operating subsidiaries.

89

Another consideration in the development of the dividend strategies for our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries is our expected level of compliance with PMIERs. Under PMIERs, EMICO is subject to operational and financial requirements that approved insurers must meet in order to remain eligible to insure loans purchased by the GSEs.

Our regulated insurance operating subsidiaries are also subject to statutory RTC requirements that affect the dividend strategies of our regulated operating subsidiaries. EMICO’s domiciliary regulator, the NCDOI, requires the maintenance of a statutory RTC ratio not to exceed 25:1. See “—Risk-to-Capital Ratio” for additional RTC trend analysis.

We consider potential future dividends compared to the prior year statutory net income in the evaluation of dividend strategies for our regulated operating subsidiaries. We also consider the dividend payout ratio, or the ratio of potential future dividends compared to the estimated U.S. GAAP net income, in the evaluation of our dividend strategies. In either case, we do not have prescribed target or maximum thresholds, but we do evaluate the reasonableness of a potential dividend relative to the actual or estimated income generated in the proceeding or preceding calendar year after giving consideration to prevailing business conditions including, but not limited to the prevailing and future macroeconomic conditions. In addition, the dividend strategies of our regulated operating subsidiaries are made in consultation with Genworth.

In 2025, EMICO completed distributions of approximately $610 million that supported our ability to pay cash dividends. We intend to use future EMICO distributions to fund the quarterly dividend as well as to bolster our financial flexibility at EHI and return additional capital to shareholders.

The revolving credit agreement requires EHI to maintain the following financial covenants: a minimum consolidated net worth equal to the sum of (i) $3,729,000,000, (ii) 50% of cumulative consolidated net income of the Company for each fiscal quarter of the Company (beginning with the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2025) for which consolidated net income is positive, and (iii) 50% of any increase in the consolidated net worth of the Company after September 30, 2025 resulting from the issuance of capital stock by or capital contributions to, in each case, the Company or any of its subsidiaries; a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 0.35 to 1.00; and compliance with all applicable financial requirements under the Private Mortgage Insurer Eligibility Requirements published by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association. For purposes of determining EHI’s compliance with the foregoing financial covenants, the consolidated net worth metric and debt-to-capitalization ratio (including, in each case, any component thereof) are each calculated as set forth in the credit agreement.

In addition to the restrictions described above, all dividends from EHI are subject to Genworth consent and EHI Board of Directors approval.

Risk-to-Capital Ratio

We compute our RTC ratio on a separate company statutory basis, as well as for our combined insurance operations. The RTC ratio is net RIF divided by policyholders’ surplus plus statutory contingency reserve. Our net RIF represents RIF, net of reinsurance ceded, and excludes risk on policies that are currently delinquent and for which loss reserves have been established. Statutory capital consists primarily of statutory policyholders’ surplus (which increases as a result of statutory net income and decreases as a result of statutory net loss and dividends paid), plus the statutory contingency reserve. The statutory contingency reserve is reported as a liability on the statutory balance sheet.

Certain states have insurance laws or regulations that require a mortgage insurer to maintain a minimum amount of statutory capital (including the statutory contingency reserve) relative to its level of RIF in order for the mortgage insurer to continue to write new business. While formulations of minimum capital vary in certain states, the most common measure applied allows for a maximum permitted RTC ratio of 25:1.

90

The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our combined mortgage insurance subsidiaries as of the dates indicated:

(Dollar amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Statutory policyholders’ surplus

$

806 

$

887 

$

1,085 

Contingency reserves

4,513 

4,336 

3,960 

Combined statutory capital

$

5,319 

$

5,223 

$

5,045 

Adjusted RIF (1)

$

53,893 

$

55,001 

$

58,277 

Combined risk-to-capital ratio

10.1 

10.5 

11.6 

______________

(1)Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating combined statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein. In accordance with NCDOI requirements, adjusted RIF excludes delinquent policies.

The following table presents the calculation of our RTC ratio for our principal insurance company, EMICO, as of the dates indicated:

(Dollar amounts in millions)

December 31, 2025

December 31, 2024

December 31, 2023

Statutory policyholders’ surplus

$

768 

$

850 

$

1,026 

Contingency reserves

4,498 

4,325 

3,953 

Combined statutory capital

$

5,266 

$

5,175 

$

4,979 

Adjusted RIF (1)

$

53,206 

$

54,418 

$

57,788 

EMICO risk-to-capital ratio

10.1 

10.5 

11.6 

______________

(1)Adjusted RIF for purposes of calculating EMICO statutory RTC differs from RIF presented elsewhere herein. In accordance with NCDOI requirements, adjusted RIF excludes delinquent policies.

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2025, we maintained liquidity in the form of cash and cash equivalents of $582 million compared to $599 million as of December 31, 2024, and we also held significant levels of investment-grade fixed maturity securities that can be monetized should our cash and cash equivalents be insufficient to meet our obligations.

On September 30, 2025, we entered into a five-year, unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of lenders in the initial aggregate principal amount of $435 million. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility matures in September 2030, but under certain conditions EHI may need to repay any outstanding amounts and terminate the 2025 Revolving Credit Facility earlier than the maturity date. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility may be used for working capital needs and general corporate purposes, including the execution of dividends to our shareholders and capital contributions to our insurance subsidiaries. The 2025 Revolving Credit Facility has remained undrawn through December 31, 2025.

The principal sources of liquidity in our business currently include insurance premiums, net investment income and cash flows from investment sales and maturities. We believe that the operating cash flows generated by our mortgage insurance subsidiary will provide the funds necessary to satisfy our claim payments, operating expenses and taxes in both the short-term and long-term. However, our subsidiaries are subject to regulatory and other capital restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends. We currently have no material financing commitments, such as lines of credit or guarantees, that are expected to affect our liquidity, other than the 2029 Notes and the Revolving Credit Facility.

Financial Strength Ratings

Ratings with respect to the financial strength of operating subsidiaries are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance companies. Ratings are important to maintaining public

91

confidence in us and our ability to market our products. Rating organizations review the financial performance and condition of most insurers and provide opinions regarding financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations to policyholders.

The financial strength ratings of our operating companies are not designed to be, and do not serve as, measures of protection or valuation offered to our stockholders. We cannot predict with any certainty the impact to us from any future disruptions in the credit markets or downgrades by one or more of the rating agencies of the financial strength ratings of our insurance company subsidiaries and/or the credit ratings of our holding company. We also cannot predict the impact on our ratings or future ratings of actions taken with respect to Genworth.

The following EMICO financial strength ratings have been independently assigned by third-party rating organizations and represent our current ratings, which are subject to change.

Name of Agency

Rating

Outlook

Change

Date of Rating

Moody’s Investor Service, Inc.

A2

Stable

Upgrade

August 6, 2025

Fitch Ratings, Inc.

A

Stable

Upgrade

January 17, 2025

S&P Global Ratings

A-

Positive

Affirm

January 15, 2026

A.M. Best

A-

Positive

Affirm

September 18, 2025

Enact Re is currently assigned a rating of A- by A.M. Best and a rating of A- by S&P Global Ratings.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We enter into agreements and other relationships with third parties in the ordinary course of our operations. However, we do not believe that our cash flow requirements can be assessed based upon analysis of these obligations, as the funding of these future cash obligations will be from future cash flows from premiums and investment income. Future cash outflows, whether they are contractual obligations or not, also will vary based upon our future needs. Although some outflows are fixed, others depend on future events. An example of obligations that are fixed include future lease payments. An example of obligations that will vary include insurance liabilities that depend on losses incurred. Refer to Note 3, Note 7 and Note 12 of our audited consolidated financial statements for discussion of borrowings and commitments and contingencies.

The liability for loss reserves as of December 31, 2025, represents our current best estimate; however, there may be future adjustments to this estimate and related assumptions. Such adjustments, reflecting any variety of new and adverse trends, could possibly be significant, and result in future increases to reserves by amounts that could be material to our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. Refer to Note 5 in our audited consolidated financial statements for discussion of our loss reserves.

Refer to Note 2 in our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 for a discussion of recently adopted and not yet adopted accounting standards.