WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN (WFC) FY 2024 MD&A
This page reproduces the company's own Item 7 MD&A text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.
Overview
Wells Fargo & Company is a leading financial services company that has approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. We provide a diversified set of banking, investment and mortgage products and services, as well as consumer and commercial finance, through our four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending, Commercial Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking, and Wealth and Investment Management. Wells Fargo ranked No. 34 on Fortune’s 2024 rankings of America’s largest corporations. We ranked fourth in assets and third in the market value of our common stock among all U.S. banks at December 31, 2024.
Wells Fargo’s top priority remains building a risk and control infrastructure appropriate for its size and complexity. The Company is subject to a number of consent orders and other regulatory actions, some of which are described below. These regulatory actions may require the Company, among other things, to undertake certain changes to its business, operations, products and services, and risk management practices. While we still have work to do and have not yet satisfied certain aspects of these regulatory actions, the Company is committed to devoting the resources necessary to operate with strong business practices and controls, maintain the highest level of integrity, and have an appropriate culture in place. For additional information regarding the risks related to regulatory actions, see the “Risk Factors” section in this Report.
Federal Reserve Board Consent Order Regarding Governance Oversight and Compliance and Operational Risk Management
On February 2, 2018, the Company entered into a consent order with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). As required by the consent order, the Company’s Board of Directors (Board) submitted to the FRB a plan to further enhance the Board’s governance and oversight of the Company, and the Company submitted to the FRB a plan to further improve the Company’s compliance and operational risk management program. The Company continues to engage with the FRB as the Company works to address the consent order provisions. The consent order also requires the Company, following the FRB’s acceptance and approval of the plans and the Company’s adoption and implementation of the plans, to complete an initial third-party review of the enhancements and improvements provided for in the plans. Until this third-party review is complete and the plans are adopted and implemented to the satisfaction of the FRB, the Company’s total consolidated assets as defined under the consent order will be limited to the level as of December 31, 2017. Compliance with this asset cap is measured on a two-quarter daily average basis to allow for management of temporary fluctuations. After removal of the asset cap, a second
third-party review must also be conducted to assess the efficacy and sustainability of the enhancements and improvements.
Consent Orders with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Regarding Compliance Risk Management Program
On April 20, 2018, the Company entered into consent orders with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) requiring the Company to enhance its compliance risk management program and its management of customer remediation activities. On February 13, 2025, the Company announced the OCC had terminated its consent order.
Consent Order with the OCC Regarding Loss Mitigation Activities
On September 9, 2021, the Company entered into a consent order with the OCC requiring the Company to improve the execution, risk management, and oversight of loss mitigation activities in its Home Lending business.
Consent Order with the CFPB Regarding Automobile Lending, Consumer Deposit Accounts, and Mortgage Lending
On December 20, 2022, the Company entered into a consent order with the CFPB that the Company announced was terminated on January 28, 2025.
Formal Agreement with the OCC Regarding Anti-Money Laundering and Sanctions Risk Management Practices
On September 12, 2024, the Company announced that Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. entered into a formal agreement with the OCC requiring the bank to enhance its anti-money laundering and sanctions risk management practices.
Customer Remediation Activities
Customer remediation activities are associated with our efforts to identify areas or instances where customers may have experienced financial harm and provide remediation as appropriate. We have accrued for the probable and estimable costs related to our customer remediation activities, which amounts may change based on additional facts and information, as well as ongoing reviews and communications with our regulators. We had $236 million and $819 million of accrued liabilities for customer remediation activities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 2 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Recent Developments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Special Assessment
In November 2023, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) finalized a rule to recover losses to the FDIC deposit insurance fund as a result of bank failures in the first half of 2023. Under the rule, the FDIC will collect a special assessment based on an insured depository institution’s estimated amount of uninsured deposits. Upon the FDIC’s finalization of the rule, we expensed an estimated amount of our special assessment of $1.9 billion (pre-tax) in fourth quarter 2023. During 2024, the FDIC provided updates on losses to the deposit insurance fund, which resulted in an additional expense of $243 million (pre-tax) for the year ended December 31, 2024, for the estimated amount of the special assessment. We expect the ultimate amount of the special assessment may continue to change as the FDIC determines the actual net losses to the deposit insurance fund.
Overdraft Fees Rule
In December 2024, the CFPB issued a final rule addressing overdraft fees that provides the following three options for banks with more than $10 billion in assets when charging an overdraft fee: charge no more than a five-dollar fee, charge a fee that covers no more than a bank’s costs or losses related to an overdraft, or treat the overdraft as a loan. The rule becomes effective October 1, 2025, but is pending third-party litigation challenging the rule. Additionally, the status of certain proposed and enacted rules and regulations is uncertain based on directions given to the CFPB and other agencies. If the rule becomes effective in its current form, we would expect a significant reduction to our fees for overdraft services, which are included in deposit-related fees.
Debit Card Interchange Fees Proposal
On October 25, 2023, the FRB issued a proposed rule that would reduce the amount of debit card interchange fees received by debit card issuers. In addition, the proposed rule would allow for an update to the debit card interchange fee cap every other year based on an analysis of certain costs incurred by debit card issuers. We expect a significant reduction to our debit card interchange fees, which are included in card fees, if the rule is adopted as currently proposed.
Financial Performance
In 2024, we generated $19.7 billion of net income and diluted EPS of $5.37, compared with $19.1 billion of net income and diluted EPS of $4.83 in 2023. Financial performance for 2024, compared with 2023, included the following:
•total revenue decreased due to lower net interest income, partially offset by higher noninterest income;
•noninterest expense decreased due to lower expense for the FDIC special assessment, and lower professional and outside services expense, partially offset by higher technology, telecommunications and equipment expense and higher operating losses;
•average loans decreased driven by declines in our commercial and consumer loan portfolios; and
•average deposits decreased driven by a decline in our noninterest-bearing deposits, partially offset by an increase in our interest-bearing deposits.
Capital and Liquidity
We maintained a strong capital and liquidity position in 2024, which included the following:
•our Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio was 11.07% under the Standardized Approach (our binding ratio), which continued to exceed the regulatory minimum and buffers of 9.80%;
•our total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets was 24.83%, compared with the regulatory minimum of 21.50%; and
•our liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) was 125%, which continued to exceed the regulatory minimum of 100%.
See the “Capital Management” and the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding” sections in this Report for additional information regarding our capital and liquidity, including the calculation of our regulatory capital and liquidity amounts.
Credit Quality
Credit quality reflected the following:
•The allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans of $14.6 billion at December 31, 2024, decreased $452 million from December 31, 2023.
•Our provision for credit losses for loans was $4.3 billion in 2024, compared with $5.4 billion in 2023, reflecting an increase in net loan charge-offs which was more than offset by the change in allowance for credit losses for loans driven by decreases across most loan portfolios, partially offset by increases for credit card loans.
•The allowance coverage for total loans was 1.60% at December 31, 2024, compared with 1.61% at December 31, 2023.
•Commercial portfolio net loan charge-offs were $1.5 billion, or 29 basis points of average commercial loans, in 2024, compared with net loan charge-offs of $923 million, or 17 basis points, in 2023, due to higher losses, primarily in our commercial real estate portfolio driven by the office property type.
•Consumer portfolio net loan charge-offs were $3.2 billion, or 85 basis points of average consumer loans, in 2024, compared with net loan charge-offs of $2.5 billion, or 65 basis points, in 2023, due to higher losses in our credit card portfolio driven by higher loan balances, partially offset by lower losses in our auto portfolio.
•Nonperforming assets (NPAs) of $7.9 billion at December 31, 2024, decreased $507 million, or 6%, from December 31, 2023, driven by a decrease in commercial real estate and residential mortgage nonaccrual loans, partially offset by an increase in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans. NPAs represented 0.87% of total loans at December 31, 2024.
•Criticized loans in the commercial portfolio were $35.7 billion at December 31, 2024, compared with $33.0 billion at December 31, 2023, primarily driven by increases in criticized commercial and industrial loans.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 3 |
Overview (continued)
Table 1 presents a three-year summary of selected financial data and Table 2 presents selected ratios and per common share data.
Table 1: Summary of Selected Financial Data
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions, except per share amounts) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 47,676 | 52,375 | (4,699) | (9) | % | $ | 44,950 | 7,425 | 17 | % | |||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 34,620 | 30,222 | 4,398 | 15 | 29,418 | 804 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 82,296 | 82,597 | (301) | — | 74,368 | 8,229 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 4,759 | 3,450 | 1,309 | 38 | 1,609 | 1,841 | 114 | |||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (425) | 1,949 | (2,374) | NM | (75) | 2,024 | NM | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses (1) | 4,334 | 5,399 | (1,065) | (20) | 1,534 | 3,865 | 252 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 54,598 | 55,562 | (964) | (2) | 57,205 | (1,643) | (3) | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,399 | 2,607 | 792 | 30 | 2,251 | 356 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo net income | 19,722 | 19,142 | 580 | 3 | 13,677 | 5,465 | 40 | |||||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock | 18,606 | 17,982 | 624 | 3 | 12,562 | 5,420 | 43 | |||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share | 5.43 | 4.88 | 0.55 | 11 | 3.30 | 1.58 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | 5.37 | 4.83 | 0.54 | 11 | 3.27 | 1.56 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per common share | 1.50 | 1.30 | 0.20 | 15 | 1.10 | 0.20 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance sheet (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 519,131 | 490,458 | 28,673 | 6 | 496,808 | (6,350) | (1) | |||||||||||||||
| Loans | 912,745 | 936,682 | (23,937) | (3) | 955,871 | (19,189) | (2) | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses for loans | 14,636 | 15,088 | (452) | (3) | 13,609 | 1,479 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 60,644 | 57,336 | 3,308 | 6 | 64,414 | (7,078) | (11) | |||||||||||||||
| Assets | 1,929,845 | 1,932,468 | (2,623) | — | 1,881,020 | 51,448 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Deposits | 1,371,804 | 1,358,173 | 13,631 | 1 | 1,383,985 | (25,812) | (2) | |||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 173,078 | 207,588 | (34,510) | (17) | 174,870 | 32,718 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
| Common stockholders’ equity | 160,656 | 166,444 | (5,788) | (3) | 160,952 | 5,492 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity | 179,120 | 185,735 | (6,615) | (4) | 180,227 | 5,508 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 181,066 | 187,443 | (6,377) | (3) | 182,213 | 5,230 | 3 |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Includes provision for credit losses for loans, debt securities, and other financial assets.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 4 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 2: Ratios and Per Common Share Data
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||
| Return on average assets (ROA) (1) | 1.03 | % | 1.02 | 0.72 | ||||
| Return on average equity (ROE) (2) | 11.4 | 11.0 | 7.8 | |||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) (3) | 13.4 | 13.1 | 9.3 | |||||
| Efficiency ratio (4) | 66 | 67 | 77 | |||||
| Capital and other metrics (5) | ||||||||
| Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to assets | 8.32 | 8.61 | 8.56 | |||||
| Total equity to assets | 9.38 | 9.70 | 9.69 | |||||
| Risk-based capital ratios and components: | ||||||||
| Standardized Approach: | ||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) | 11.07 | 11.43 | 10.60 | |||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.57 | 12.98 | 12.11 | |||||
| Total capital | 15.18 | 15.67 | 14.82 | |||||
| Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions) | $ | 1,216.1 | 1,231.7 | 1,259.9 | ||||
| Advanced Approach: | ||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) | 12.40 | % | 12.63 | 12.00 | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 14.09 | 14.34 | 13.72 | |||||
| Total capital | 16.08 | 16.40 | 15.94 | |||||
| Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions) | $ | 1,085.0 | 1,114.3 | 1,112.3 | ||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 8.08 | % | 8.50 | 8.26 | ||||
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 6.74 | 7.09 | 6.86 | |||||
| Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Ratio (6) | 24.83 | 25.05 | 23.27 | |||||
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) (7) | 125 | 125 | 122 | |||||
| Average balances: | ||||||||
| Average Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to average assets | 8.54 | 8.67 | 8.53 | |||||
| Average total equity to average assets | 9.59 | 9.80 | 9.67 | |||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||
| Dividend payout ratio (8) | 27.9 | 26.9 | 33.6 | |||||
| Book value (9) | $ | 48.85 | 46.25 | 41.98 |
(1)Represents Wells Fargo net income divided by average assets.
(2)Represents Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock divided by average common stockholders’ equity.
(3)Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total equity less preferred equity, noncontrolling interests, goodwill, certain identifiable intangible assets (other than mortgage servicing rights) and goodwill and other intangibles on investments in consolidated portfolio companies, net of applicable deferred taxes. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management believes that return on average tangible common equity, which utilizes tangible common equity, is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s use of equity. For additional information, including a corresponding reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) financial measures, see the “Capital Management – Tangible Common Equity” section in this Report.
(4)The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(5)See the “Capital Management” section and Note 26 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(6)Represents TLAC divided by risk-weighted assets (RWAs), which is our binding TLAC ratio, determined by using the greater of RWAs under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.
(7)Represents average high-quality liquid assets divided by average projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule.
(8)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per common share.
(9)Book value per common share is common stockholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 5 |
Earnings Performance
Wells Fargo net income for 2024 was $19.7 billion ($5.37 diluted EPS), compared with $19.1 billion ($4.83 diluted EPS) in 2023. Net income increased in 2024, compared with 2023, predominantly due to a $4.4 billion increase in noninterest income, a $1.1 billion decrease in provision for credit losses, and a $1.0 billion decrease in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $4.7 billion decrease in net interest income and a $792 million increase in income tax expense.
For a discussion of our 2023 financial results, compared with 2022, see the “Earnings Performance” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the interest earned on debt securities, loans (including yield-related loan fees) and other interest-earning assets minus the interest paid on deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. The net interest margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid for deposits and our other sources of funding.
Net interest income and the net interest margin in any one period can be significantly affected by a variety of factors including the mix and overall size of our earning assets portfolio and the cost of funding those assets. In addition, variable sources of interest income, such as loan fees, periodic dividends, and collection of interest on nonaccrual loans, can fluctuate from period to period.
Net interest income and net interest margin decreased in 2024, compared with 2023, driven by the impact of higher interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities, including a deposit mix shift to interest-bearing deposits, as well as lower loan balances, partially offset by higher interest rates on interest-earning assets.
Table 3 presents the individual components of net interest income and net interest margin. Net interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis in Table 3 to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and debt and equity securities. The calculation for taxable-equivalent basis was based on a federal statutory tax rate of 21%.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 6 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 3: Average Balances, Yields and Rates Paid (Taxable-Equivalent Basis) (1)
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Average interest rates | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Average interest rates | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Interest rates | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | $ | 189,261 | 9,182 | 4.85 | % | $ | 149,401 | 6,973 | 4.67 | % | $ | 145,802 | 2,245 | 1.54 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 79,128 | 4,021 | 5.08 | 69,878 | 3,374 | 4.83 | 62,137 | 859 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading debt securities | 121,398 | 5,051 | 4.16 | 104,588 | 3,805 | 3.64 | 91,515 | 2,490 | 2.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | 154,866 | 6,592 | 4.26 | 142,743 | 5,365 | 3.76 | 141,404 | 3,167 | 2.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 254,048 | 6,623 | 2.61 | 275,441 | 7,246 | 2.63 | 296,540 | 6,480 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 530,312 | 18,266 | 3.44 | 522,772 | 16,416 | 3.14 | 529,459 | 12,137 | 2.29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale (2) | 6,794 | 491 | 7.23 | 5,762 | 363 | 6.29 | 13,900 | 513 | 3.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – U.S. | 307,909 | 21,742 | 7.06 | 307,953 | 20,941 | 6.80 | 291,996 | 11,293 | 3.87 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S. | 64,803 | 4,630 | 7.14 | 74,410 | 5,043 | 6.78 | 80,033 | 2,681 | 3.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 144,763 | 9,879 | 6.82 | 153,761 | 10,210 | 6.64 | 152,814 | 5,965 | 3.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 16,428 | 914 | 5.56 | 15,386 | 749 | 4.87 | 14,555 | 607 | 4.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 533,903 | 37,165 | 6.96 | 551,510 | 36,943 | 6.70 | 539,398 | 20,546 | 3.81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 255,027 | 9,316 | 3.65 | 264,931 | 9,313 | 3.51 | 264,688 | 8,641 | 3.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 53,665 | 6,858 | 12.78 | 48,202 | 6,246 | 12.96 | 41,275 | 4,752 | 11.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 44,535 | 2,291 | 5.14 | 51,116 | 2,415 | 4.72 | 55,429 | 2,366 | 4.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 28,246 | 2,379 | 8.42 | 28,157 | 2,349 | 8.34 | 29,030 | 1,489 | 5.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 381,473 | 20,844 | 5.46 | 392,406 | 20,323 | 5.18 | 390,422 | 17,248 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans (2) | 915,376 | 58,009 | 6.34 | 943,916 | 57,266 | 6.07 | 929,820 | 37,794 | 4.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 26,105 | 678 | 2.60 | 25,920 | 683 | 2.63 | 30,575 | 708 | 2.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 9,219 | 469 | 5.08 | 9,638 | 463 | 4.80 | 13,275 | 204 | 1.54 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,756,195 | 91,116 | 5.19 | % | $ | 1,727,287 | 85,538 | 4.95 | % | $ | 1,724,968 | 54,460 | 3.16 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 28,193 | — | 27,463 | — | 25,817 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 25,172 | — | 25,173 | — | 25,177 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-earning assets | 107,137 | — | 105,552 | — | 118,341 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest-earning assets | $ | 160,502 | — | 158,188 | — | 169,335 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 1,916,697 | 91,116 | 1,885,475 | 85,538 | 1,894,303 | 54,460 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand deposits | $ | 448,689 | 10,258 | 2.29 | % | $ | 418,542 | 6,947 | 1.66 | % | $ | 432,745 | 1,356 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 353,916 | 4,527 | 1.28 | 376,233 | 2,723 | 0.72 | 433,415 | 406 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 171,622 | 8,758 | 5.10 | 132,492 | 6,215 | 4.69 | 33,148 | 449 | 1.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits in non-U.S. offices | 19,309 | 739 | 3.83 | 19,278 | 618 | 3.21 | 19,191 | 138 | 0.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 993,536 | 24,282 | 2.44 | 946,545 | 16,503 | 1.74 | 918,499 | 2,349 | 0.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 91,363 | 4,766 | 5.22 | 65,696 | 3,313 | 5.04 | 24,553 | 407 | 1.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other short-term borrowings | 13,849 | 544 | 3.93 | 15,337 | 535 | 3.49 | 15,257 | 175 | 1.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total short-term borrowings | 105,212 | 5,310 | 5.05 | 81,033 | 3,848 | 4.75 | 39,810 | 582 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 184,551 | 12,463 | 6.75 | 180,464 | 11,572 | 6.41 | 157,742 | 5,505 | 3.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 34,608 | 1,045 | 3.02 | 32,950 | 820 | 2.49 | 34,126 | 638 | 1.87 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,317,907 | 43,100 | 3.27 | % | $ | 1,240,992 | 32,743 | 2.64 | % | $ | 1,150,177 | 9,074 | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing deposits | 352,379 | — | 399,737 | — | 505,770 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 62,532 | — | 59,886 | — | 55,189 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest-bearing liabilities | $ | 414,911 | — | 459,623 | — | 560,959 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 1,732,818 | 43,100 | 1,700,615 | 32,743 | 1,711,136 | 9,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 183,879 | — | 184,860 | — | 183,167 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,916,697 | 43,100 | 1,885,475 | 32,743 | 1,894,303 | 9,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread on a taxable-equivalent basis (3) | 1.92 | % | 2.31 | % | 2.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin and net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (3) | $ | 48,016 | 2.73 | % | $ | 52,795 | 3.06 | % | $ | 45,386 | 2.63 | % |
(1)The average balance amounts represent amortized costs, except for certain held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities, which exclude unamortized basis adjustments related to the transfer of those securities from available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. Amortized cost amounts exclude any valuation allowances and unrealized gains or losses, which are included in other noninterest-earning assets and other noninterest-bearing liabilities. The average interest rates are based on interest income or expense amounts for the period and are annualized. Interest rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(2)Nonaccrual loans and any related income are included in their respective loan categories.
(3)Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments of $340 million, $420 million, and $436 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, predominantly related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and securities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 7 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Table 4 allocates the changes in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis to changes in either average balances or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the numerous simultaneous volume and rate changes during any period, it is not possible to precisely
allocate such changes between volume and rate. For this table, changes that are not solely due to either volume or rate are allocated to these categories on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute value of the change due to average volume and average rate.
Table 4: Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income: | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | $ | 1,930 | 279 | 2,209 | 56 | 4,672 | 4,728 | ||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 465 | 182 | 647 | 120 | 2,395 | 2,515 | |||||||||||
| Debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Trading debt securities | 660 | 586 | 1,246 | 391 | 924 | 1,315 | |||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | 478 | 749 | 1,227 | 30 | 2,168 | 2,198 | |||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | (568) | (55) | (623) | (482) | 1,248 | 766 | |||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 570 | 1,280 | 1,850 | (61) | 4,340 | 4,279 | |||||||||||
| Loans held for sale | 70 | 58 | 128 | (396) | 246 | (150) | |||||||||||
| Loans: | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – U.S. | (3) | 804 | 801 | 650 | 8,998 | 9,648 | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S. | (672) | 259 | (413) | (200) | 2,562 | 2,362 | |||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | (605) | 274 | (331) | 37 | 4,208 | 4,245 | |||||||||||
| Lease financing | 54 | 111 | 165 | 36 | 106 | 142 | |||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | (1,226) | 1,448 | 222 | 523 | 15,874 | 16,397 | |||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (358) | 361 | 3 | 8 | 664 | 672 | |||||||||||
| Credit card | 700 | (88) | 612 | 854 | 640 | 1,494 | |||||||||||
| Auto | (328) | 204 | (124) | (191) | 240 | 49 | |||||||||||
| Other consumer | 7 | 23 | 30 | (46) | 906 | 860 | |||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 21 | 500 | 521 | 625 | 2,450 | 3,075 | |||||||||||
| Total loans | (1,205) | 1,948 | 743 | 1,148 | 18,324 | 19,472 | |||||||||||
| Equity securities | 4 | (9) | (5) | (116) | 91 | (25) | |||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | (20) | 26 | 6 | (70) | 329 | 259 | |||||||||||
| Total increase in interest income | $ | 1,814 | 3,764 | 5,578 | 681 | 30,397 | 31,078 | ||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense: | |||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||
| Demand deposits | $ | 528 | 2,783 | 3,311 | (46) | 5,637 | 5,591 | ||||||||||
| Savings deposits | (171) | 1,975 | 1,804 | (58) | 2,375 | 2,317 | |||||||||||
| Time deposits | 1,962 | 581 | 2,543 | 3,173 | 2,593 | 5,766 | |||||||||||
| Deposits in non-U.S. offices | 1 | 120 | 121 | 1 | 479 | 480 | |||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 2,320 | 5,459 | 7,779 | 3,070 | 11,084 | 14,154 | |||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 1,332 | 121 | 1,453 | 1,312 | 1,594 | 2,906 | |||||||||||
| Other short-term borrowings | (55) | 64 | 9 | 1 | 359 | 360 | |||||||||||
| Total short-term borrowings | 1,277 | 185 | 1,462 | 1,313 | 1,953 | 3,266 | |||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 266 | 625 | 891 | 891 | 5,176 | 6,067 | |||||||||||
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 43 | 182 | 225 | (23) | 205 | 182 | |||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) in interest expense | 3,906 | 6,451 | 10,357 | 5,251 | 18,418 | 23,669 | |||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis | $ | (2,092) | (2,687) | (4,779) | (4,570) | 11,979 | 7,409 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 8 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Noninterest Income
Table 5: Noninterest Income
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | $ | 5,015 | 4,694 | 321 | 7 | % | $ | 5,316 | (622) | (12) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 1,500 | 1,446 | 54 | 4 | 1,397 | 49 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment advisory and other asset-based fees | 9,775 | 8,670 | 1,105 | 13 | 9,004 | (334) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commissions and brokerage services fees | 2,521 | 2,375 | 146 | 6 | 2,242 | 133 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,665 | 1,649 | 1,016 | 62 | 1,439 | 210 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card fees | 4,342 | 4,256 | 86 | 2 | 4,355 | (99) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 1,047 | 829 | 218 | 26 | 1,383 | (554) | (40) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains from trading activities | 5,284 | 4,799 | 485 | 10 | 2,116 | 2,683 | 127 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains (losses) from debt securities | (920) | 10 | (930) | NM | 151 | (141) | (93) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains (losses) from equity securities | 1,070 | (441) | 1,511 | 343 | (806) | 365 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease income | 1,231 | 1,237 | (6) | — | 1,269 | (32) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,090 | 698 | 392 | 56 | 1,552 | (854) | (55) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 34,620 | 30,222 | 4,398 | 15 | $ | 29,418 | 804 | 3 |
NM – Not meaningful
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Deposit-related fees increased reflecting higher treasury management fees on commercial accounts driven by increased transaction service volumes and repricing.
Investment advisory and other asset-based fees increased driven by higher asset-based fees reflecting higher market valuations.
Fees from the majority of Wealth and Investment Management (WIM) advisory assets are based on a percentage of the market value of the assets at the beginning of the quarter. For additional information on certain client investment assets, see the “Earnings Performance – Operating Segment Results – Wealth and Investment Management – WIM Advisory Assets” section in this Report.
Commissions and brokerage services fees increased driven by higher brokerage transaction activity, partially offset by lower other brokerage service fees.
Investment banking fees increased due to higher debt and equity underwriting fees and higher advisory fees driven by increased activity.
Mortgage banking increased due to:
•higher net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales related to increased commercial mortgage loan securitization sales volumes; and
•higher income from net hedge results related to mortgage servicing rights (MSR) valuations.
Net gains from trading activities increased driven by higher revenue in foreign exchange and structured products, partially offset by losses related to our implementation of a change to incorporate funding valuation adjustments (FVA) for our derivatives.
Net gains (losses) from debt securities decreased driven by losses related to a repositioning of our investment portfolio.
Net gains (losses) from equity securities increased driven by:
•higher realized and unrealized gains on equity securities from our venture capital investments; and
•lower impairment of equity securities from our venture capital investments.
Other income increased driven by impacts related to the expanded use of the proportional amortization method of accounting for renewable energy tax credit investments, which reclassified the amortization of the investment cost from other noninterest income to income tax expense. For additional information on our adoption in first quarter 2024 of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-02 – Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 9 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Noninterest Expense
Table 6: Noninterest Expense
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personnel | $ | 35,729 | 35,829 | (100) | — | % | $ | 34,340 | 1,489 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Technology, telecommunications and equipment | 4,583 | 3,920 | 663 | 17 | 3,375 | 545 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy | 3,052 | 2,884 | 168 | 6 | 2,881 | 3 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating losses (1) | 1,757 | 1,183 | 574 | 49 | 6,984 | (5,801) | (83) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional and outside services | 4,607 | 5,085 | (478) | (9) | 5,188 | (103) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leases (2) | 633 | 697 | (64) | (9) | 750 | (53) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advertising and promotion | 869 | 812 | 57 | 7 | 505 | 307 | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 3,368 | 5,152 | (1,784) | (35) | 3,182 | 1,970 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 54,598 | 55,562 | (964) | (2) | $ | 57,205 | (1,643) | (3) |
(1)Includes expenses for legal actions of $290 million, $179 million, and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, and expenses for customer remediation activities of $722 million, $207 million, and $2.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.
(2)Represents expenses for assets we lease to customers.
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Personnel expense decreased slightly due to lower severance expense and the impact of efficiency initiatives, partially offset by higher revenue-related compensation expense driven by higher fees in our Wealth and Investment Management business.
For additional information on personnel expense, see
Note 21 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Technology, telecommunications and equipment expense increased due to higher expense for the amortization of internally developed software and higher expense for software maintenance and licenses.
Operating losses increased driven by higher expense for customer remediation activities related to the further refinement of the remediation costs for historical mortgage lending and other consumer products matters, and higher expense for legal actions.
For additional information on customer remediation activities, see the “Overview” section above. For additional information on operating losses, see Note 21 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Professional and outside services expense decreased driven by lower expense for consulting projects related to our risk and control work, as well as efficiency initiatives to reduce our spending on consultants and contractors.
Other expense decreased reflecting lower expense for the FDIC special assessment. For additional information on the FDIC’s special assessment, see Note 21 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Income Tax Expense
Table 7: Income Tax Expense
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 23,364 | 21,636 | 1,728 | 8 | % | $ | 15,629 | 6,007 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 3,399 | 2,607 | 792 | 30 | 2,251 | 356 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effective income tax rate (1) | 14.7 | % | 12.0 | 14.1 | % |
(1)Represents (i) Income tax expense (benefit) divided by (ii) Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) less Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests.
The increase in the effective income tax rate for 2024, compared with 2023, was driven by higher pre-tax income and the impacts related to the adoption of ASU 2023-02 in first quarter 2024 for our renewable energy tax credit investments, which reclassified the amortization of the investment cost from other noninterest income to income tax expense. For additional information on our adoption of ASU 2023-02 – Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
For additional information on income taxes, see Note 23 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 10 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Operating Segment Results
Our management reporting is organized into four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending; Commercial Banking; Corporate and Investment Banking; and Wealth and Investment Management. All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. For additional information, see Table 8 below. We define our reportable operating segments by type of product and customer segment, and their results are based on our management reporting process. The management reporting process measures the performance of the reportable operating segments based on the Company’s management structure, and the results are regularly reviewed with our Chief Executive Officer and relevant senior management. The management reporting process is based on U.S. GAAP and includes specific adjustments, such as funds transfer pricing for asset/liability management, shared revenue and expenses, and taxable-equivalent adjustments to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt sources, which allows management to assess performance consistently across the operating segments.
Funds Transfer Pricing. Corporate treasury manages a funds transfer pricing methodology that considers interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other product characteristics. Operating segments pay a funding charge for their assets and receive a funding credit for their deposits, both of which are included in net interest income. The net impact of the funding charges or credits is recognized in corporate treasury.
Revenue Sharing and Expense Allocations. When lines of business jointly serve customers, the line of business that is responsible for providing the product or service recognizes revenue or expense with a referral fee paid or an allocation of cost to the other line of business based on established internal revenue-sharing agreements.
When a line of business uses a service provided by another line of business, expense is generally allocated based on the cost
and use of the service provided. Enterprise functions, such as operations, technology, and risk management, are included in Corporate with an allocation of their applicable costs to the reportable operating segments based on the level of support provided by the enterprise function. We periodically assess and update our revenue sharing and expense allocation methodologies.
Taxable-Equivalent Adjustments. Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for affordable housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.
Allocated Capital. Reportable operating segments are allocated capital under a risk-sensitive framework that is primarily based on aspects of our regulatory capital requirements, and the assumptions and methodologies used to allocate capital are periodically assessed and updated. Management believes that return on allocated capital is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess a reportable operating segment’s use of capital.
Selected Metrics. We present certain financial and nonfinancial metrics that management uses when evaluating reportable operating segment results. Management believes that these metrics are useful to investors and others to assess the performance, customer growth, and trends of reportable operating segments or lines of business.
Table 8: Management Reporting Structure
| Wells Fargo & Company | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Banking and Lending | Commercial Banking | Corporate and Investment Banking | Wealth and Investment Management | Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| • Consumer, Small and Business Banking • Home Lending • Credit Card • Auto • Personal Lending | • Middle Market Banking • Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | • Banking • Commercial Real Estate • Markets | • Wells Fargo Advisors • The Private Bank | • Corporate Treasury • Enterprise Functions • Investment Portfolio • Venture capital and private equity investments • Non-strategic businesses |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 11 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Table 9 and the following discussion present our results by reportable operating segment. For additional information, see Note 20 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 9: Operating Segment Results – Highlights
| (in millions) | Consumer Banking and Lending | Commercial Banking | Corporate and Investment Banking | Wealth and Investment Management | Corporate (1) | Reconciling Items (2) | Consolidated Company | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 28,303 | 9,096 | 7,935 | 3,473 | (791) | (340) | 47,676 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 7,898 | 3,682 | 11,409 | 11,963 | 1,129 | (1,461) | 34,620 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 36,201 | 12,778 | 19,344 | 15,436 | 338 | (1,801) | 82,296 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 3,561 | 290 | 521 | (22) | (16) | — | 4,334 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 23,274 | 6,190 | 9,029 | 12,884 | 3,221 | — | 54,598 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 9,366 | 6,298 | 9,794 | 2,574 | (2,867) | (1,801) | 23,364 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 2,357 | 1,599 | 2,456 | 672 | (1,884) | (1,801) | 3,399 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests | 7,009 | 4,699 | 7,338 | 1,902 | (983) | — | 19,965 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests | — | 10 | — | — | 233 | — | 243 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 7,009 | 4,689 | 7,338 | 1,902 | (1,216) | — | 19,722 | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 30,185 | 10,034 | 9,498 | 3,966 | (888) | (420) | 52,375 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 7,734 | 3,415 | 9,693 | 10,725 | 431 | (1,776) | 30,222 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 37,919 | 13,449 | 19,191 | 14,691 | (457) | (2,196) | 82,597 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 3,299 | 75 | 2,007 | 6 | 12 | — | 5,399 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 24,024 | 6,555 | 8,618 | 12,064 | 4,301 | — | 55,562 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 10,596 | 6,819 | 8,566 | 2,621 | (4,770) | (2,196) | 21,636 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 2,657 | 1,704 | 2,140 | 657 | (2,355) | (2,196) | 2,607 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests | 7,939 | 5,115 | 6,426 | 1,964 | (2,415) | — | 19,029 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests | — | 11 | — | — | (124) | — | (113) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 7,939 | 5,104 | 6,426 | 1,964 | (2,291) | — | 19,142 | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 27,044 | 7,289 | 8,733 | 3,927 | (1,607) | (436) | 44,950 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 8,766 | 3,631 | 6,509 | 10,895 | 1,192 | (1,575) | 29,418 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 35,810 | 10,920 | 15,242 | 14,822 | (415) | (2,011) | 74,368 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 2,276 | (534) | (185) | (25) | 2 | — | 1,534 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 26,277 | 6,058 | 7,560 | 11,613 | 5,697 | — | 57,205 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 7,257 | 5,396 | 7,867 | 3,234 | (6,114) | (2,011) | 15,629 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 1,816 | 1,366 | 1,989 | 812 | (1,721) | (2,011) | 2,251 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests | 5,441 | 4,030 | 5,878 | 2,422 | (4,393) | — | 13,378 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrollinginterests | — | 12 | — | — | (311) | — | (299) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 5,441 | 4,018 | 5,878 | 2,422 | (4,082) | — | 13,677 |
(1)All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. For additional information, see the “Corporate” section below.
(2)Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for affordable housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 12 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Consumer Banking and Lending offers diversified financial products and services for consumers and small businesses with annual sales generally up to $10 million. These financial products and services include checking and savings accounts, credit and
debit cards, as well as home, auto, personal, and small business lending. Table 9a and Table 9b provide additional information for Consumer Banking and Lending.
Table 9a: Consumer Banking and Lending – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 28,303 | 30,185 | (1,882) | (6) | % | $ | 27,044 | 3,141 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 2,734 | 2,702 | 32 | 1 | 3,093 | (391) | (13) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card fees | 4,076 | 3,967 | 109 | 3 | 4,067 | (100) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 650 | 512 | 138 | 27 | 1,100 | (588) | (53) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 438 | 553 | (115) | (21) | 506 | 47 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 7,898 | 7,734 | 164 | 2 | 8,766 | (1,032) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 36,201 | 37,919 | (1,718) | (5) | 35,810 | 2,109 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 3,546 | 2,784 | 762 | 27 | 1,693 | 1,091 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | 15 | 515 | (500) | (97) | 583 | (68) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 3,561 | 3,299 | 262 | 8 | 2,276 | 1,023 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 23,274 | 24,024 | (750) | (3) | 26,277 | (2,253) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 9,366 | 10,596 | (1,230) | (12) | 7,257 | 3,339 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,357 | 2,657 | (300) | (11) | 1,816 | 841 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,009 | 7,939 | (930) | (12) | $ | 5,441 | 2,498 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer, Small and Business Banking | $ | 24,510 | 25,922 | (1,412) | (5) | $ | 22,967 | 2,955 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | 3,383 | 3,389 | (6) | — | 4,221 | (832) | (20) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 5,908 | 5,809 | 99 | 2 | 5,725 | 84 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 1,118 | 1,464 | (346) | (24) | 1,716 | (252) | (15) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 1,282 | 1,335 | (53) | (4) | 1,181 | 154 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 36,201 | 37,919 | (1,718) | (5) | $ | 35,810 | 2,109 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Banking and Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital (1) | 14.8 | % | 17.5 | 10.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (2) | 64 | 63 | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail bank branches (#, period-end) | 4,177 | 4,311 | (3) | 4,598 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Digital active customers (# in millions, period-end) (3) | 36.0 | 34.8 | 3 | 33.5 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mobile active customers (# in millions, period-end) (3) | 31.4 | 29.9 | 5 | 28.3 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer, Small and Business Banking: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit spread (4) | 2.5 | % | 2.6 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debit card purchase volume ($ in billions) (5) | $ | 507.5 | 492.8 | 14.7 | 3 | $ | 486.6 | 6.2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Debit card purchase transactions (# in millions) (5) | 10,230 | 10,000 | 2 | 9,852 | 2 |
(continued on following page)
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 13 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
(continued from previous page)
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net servicing income | $ | 422 | 300 | 122 | 41 | % | $ | 368 | (68) | (18) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales | 228 | 212 | 16 | 8 | 732 | (520) | (71) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total mortgage banking | $ | 650 | 512 | 138 | 27 | $ | 1,100 | (588) | (53) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail originations ($ in billions) | $ | 20.2 | 24.2 | (4.0) | (17) | $ | 64.3 | (40.1) | (62) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| % of originations held for sale (HFS) | 40.6 | % | 44.6 | 52.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Third-party mortgage loans serviced ($ in billions, period-end) (6) | $ | 486.9 | 559.7 | (72.8) | (13) | $ | 679.2 | (119.5) | (18) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) carrying value (period-end) | 6,844 | 7,468 | (624) | (8) | 9,310 | (1,842) | (20) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) (6) | 1.41 | % | 1.33 | 1.37 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home lending loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (7)(8)(9) | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Point of sale (POS) volume ($ in billions) | $ | 170.5 | 153.1 | 17.4 | 11 | $ | 135.9 | 17.2 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| New accounts (# in thousands) | 2,429 | 2,566 | (5) | 2,247 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (8)(9) | 2.91 | % | 2.80 | 2.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card loans 90+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (8)(9) | 1.51 | 1.41 | 0.96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto originations ($ in billions) | $ | 16.9 | 17.2 | (0.3) | (2) | $ | 23.1 | (5.9) | (26) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto loans 30+ days delinquency rate (period-end) (8)(9) | 2.31 | % | 2.80 | 2.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New volume ($ in billions) | $ | 10.1 | 11.9 | (1.8) | (15) | $ | 12.6 | (0.7) | (6) |
(1)Return on allocated capital is segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock divided by segment average allocated capital. Segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock is segment net income (loss) less allocated preferred stock dividends.
(2)Efficiency ratio is segment noninterest expense divided by segment total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(3)Digital and mobile active customers is based on the number of consumer and small business customers who have logged on via a digital or mobile device, respectively, in the prior 90 days. Digital active customers includes both online and mobile customers.
(4)Deposit spread is (i) the internal funds transfer pricing credit on segment deposits minus interest paid to customers for segment deposits, divided by (ii) average segment deposits.
(5)Debit card purchase volume and transactions reflect combined activity for both consumer and business debit card purchases.
(6)Excludes residential mortgage loans subserviced for others.
(7)Excludes residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).
(8)Excludes loans held for sale.
(9)Delinquency balances exclude nonaccrual loans.
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Revenue decreased driven by lower net interest income due to lower deposit balances and lower loan balances.
Provision for credit losses reflected an increase in net charge-offs driven by credit card loans.
Noninterest expense decreased due to:
•lower personnel expense driven by lower severance expense and the impact of efficiency initiatives;
•lower professional and outside services expense driven by the impact of efficiency initiatives; and
•lower operating costs;
partially offset by:
•higher operating losses.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 14 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 9b: Consumer Banking and Lending – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer, Small and Business Banking | $ | 6,292 | 6,740 | (448) | (7) | % | $ | 7,895 | (1,155) | (15) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | 210,972 | 219,601 | (8,629) | (4) | 219,157 | 444 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 48,322 | 42,894 | 5,428 | 13 | 36,388 | 6,506 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 45,048 | 51,689 | (6,641) | (13) | 55,994 | (4,305) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 14,529 | 14,996 | (467) | (3) | 12,999 | 1,997 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 325,163 | 335,920 | (10,757) | (3) | $ | 332,433 | 3,487 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 774,660 | 811,091 | (36,431) | (4) | 883,130 | (72,039) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 45,500 | 44,000 | 1,500 | 3 | 48,000 | (4,000) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer, Small and Business Banking | $ | 6,256 | 6,735 | (479) | (7) | $ | 7,411 | (676) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | 207,022 | 215,823 | (8,801) | (4) | 223,525 | (7,702) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 50,992 | 46,735 | 4,257 | 9 | 40,768 | 5,967 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 42,914 | 48,283 | (5,369) | (11) | 54,281 | (5,998) | (11) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 14,246 | 15,291 | (1,045) | (7) | 14,544 | 747 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 321,430 | 332,867 | (11,437) | (3) | $ | 340,529 | (7,662) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 783,490 | 782,309 | 1,181 | — | 859,695 | (77,386) | (9) |
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Total loans (average and period-end) decreased due to:
•a decline in loan balances in our Home Lending business reflecting our more focused strategy for Home Lending, including paydowns of legacy residential mortgage loans; and
•a decline in loan balances in our Auto business as paydowns exceeded originations reflecting our actions related to credit tightening;
partially offset by:
•an increase in loan balances in our Credit Card business due to higher point of sale volume and the impact of new product launches.
Total deposits (average) decreased driven by customer migration to higher yielding deposit products.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 15 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Commercial Banking provides financial solutions to private, family owned and certain public companies. Products and services include banking and credit products across multiple
industry sectors and municipalities, secured lending and lease products, and treasury management. Table 9c and Table 9d provide additional information for Commercial Banking.
Table 9c: Commercial Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 9,096 | 10,034 | (938) | (9) | % | $ | 7,289 | 2,745 | 38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 1,180 | 998 | 182 | 18 | 1,131 | (133) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 555 | 531 | 24 | 5 | 491 | 40 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease income | 532 | 644 | (112) | (17) | 710 | (66) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,415 | 1,242 | 173 | 14 | 1,299 | (57) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 3,682 | 3,415 | 267 | 8 | 3,631 | (216) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 12,778 | 13,449 | (671) | (5) | 10,920 | 2,529 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 333 | 96 | 237 | 247 | 4 | 92 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (43) | (21) | (22) | NM | (538) | 517 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 290 | 75 | 215 | 287 | (534) | 609 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 6,190 | 6,555 | (365) | (6) | 6,058 | 497 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 6,298 | 6,819 | (521) | (8) | 5,396 | 1,423 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,599 | 1,704 | (105) | (6) | 1,366 | 338 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests | 10 | 11 | (1) | (9) | 12 | (1) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 4,689 | 5,104 | (415) | (8) | $ | 4,018 | 1,086 | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 8,562 | 8,762 | (200) | (2) | $ | 6,574 | 2,188 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 4,216 | 4,687 | (471) | (10) | 4,346 | 341 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 12,778 | 13,449 | (671) | (5) | $ | 10,920 | 2,529 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending and leasing | $ | 5,201 | 5,314 | (113) | (2) | $ | 5,253 | 61 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury management and payments | 5,690 | 6,214 | (524) | (8) | 4,483 | 1,731 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,887 | 1,921 | (34) | (2) | 1,184 | 737 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 12,778 | 13,449 | (671) | (5) | $ | 10,920 | 2,529 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 17.1 | % | 19.1 | 19.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 48 | 49 | 55 |
NM – Not meaningful
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Revenue decreased driven by:
•lower net interest income reflecting the impact of higher interest rates on deposit costs;
partially offset by:
•higher deposit-related fees reflecting higher treasury management fees on commercial accounts driven by increased transaction service volumes and repricing; and
•higher other noninterest income related to renewable energy tax credit investments.
Provision for credit losses reflected an increase in net charge-offs.
Noninterest expense decreased due to lower personnel expense reflecting lower severance expense and the impact of efficiency initiatives.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 16 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 9d: Commercial Banking – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 162,827 | 164,062 | (1,235) | (1) | % | $ | 147,379 | 16,683 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 44,898 | 45,705 | (807) | (2) | 45,130 | 575 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing and other | 15,332 | 14,335 | 997 | 7 | 13,523 | 812 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 223,057 | 224,102 | (1,045) | — | $ | 206,032 | 18,070 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 125,414 | 120,819 | 4,595 | 4 | $ | 114,634 | 6,185 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 97,643 | 103,283 | (5,640) | (5) | 91,398 | 11,885 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 223,057 | 224,102 | (1,045) | — | $ | 206,032 | 18,070 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 172,129 | 165,235 | 6,894 | 4 | 186,079 | (20,844) | (11) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 26,000 | 25,500 | 500 | 2 | 19,500 | 6,000 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 163,464 | 163,797 | (333) | — | $ | 163,797 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 44,506 | 45,534 | (1,028) | (2) | 45,816 | (282) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing and other | 15,348 | 15,443 | (95) | (1) | 13,916 | 1,527 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 223,318 | 224,774 | (1,456) | (1) | $ | 223,529 | 1,245 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 126,877 | 118,482 | 8,395 | 7 | $ | 121,192 | (2,710) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 96,441 | 106,292 | (9,851) | (9) | 102,337 | 3,955 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 223,318 | 224,774 | (1,456) | (1) | $ | 223,529 | 1,245 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 188,650 | 162,526 | 26,124 | 16 | 173,942 | (11,416) | (7) |
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Total loans (average and period-end) decreased driven by lower loan demand reflecting the impact of a higher interest rate environment, partially offset by increased client working capital needs.
Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 17 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Corporate and Investment Banking delivers a suite of capital markets, banking, and financial products and services to corporate, commercial real estate, government and institutional clients globally. Products and services include corporate banking, investment banking, treasury management, commercial real estate lending and servicing, equity and fixed income solutions as well as sales, trading, and research capabilities. In August 2024,
we entered into a definitive agreement to sell the non-agency third-party servicing segment of our commercial mortgage servicing business, including the related mortgage servicing rights and servicer advances. We will continue to service agency and government-sponsored enterprise loans and loans held on our balance sheet. Table 9e and Table 9f provide additional information for Corporate and Investment Banking.
Table 9e: Corporate and Investment Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 7,935 | 9,498 | (1,563) | (16) | % | $ | 8,733 | 765 | 9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 1,073 | 976 | 97 | 10 | 1,068 | (92) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 842 | 790 | 52 | 7 | 769 | 21 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,675 | 1,738 | 937 | 54 | 1,492 | 246 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains from trading activities | 5,091 | 4,553 | 538 | 12 | 1,886 | 2,667 | 141 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,728 | 1,636 | 92 | 6 | 1,294 | 342 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 11,409 | 9,693 | 1,716 | 18 | 6,509 | 3,184 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 19,344 | 19,191 | 153 | 1 | 15,242 | 3,949 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 909 | 581 | 328 | 56 | (48) | 629 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (388) | 1,426 | (1,814) | NM | (137) | 1,563 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 521 | 2,007 | (1,486) | (74) | (185) | 2,192 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 9,029 | 8,618 | 411 | 5 | 7,560 | 1,058 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 9,794 | 8,566 | 1,228 | 14 | 7,867 | 699 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,456 | 2,140 | 316 | 15 | 1,989 | 151 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 7,338 | 6,426 | 912 | 14 | $ | 5,878 | 548 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending | $ | 2,758 | 2,872 | (114) | (4) | $ | 2,222 | 650 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury Management and Payments | 2,712 | 3,036 | (324) | (11) | 2,369 | 667 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment Banking | 1,814 | 1,404 | 410 | 29 | 1,206 | 198 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Banking | 7,284 | 7,312 | (28) | — | 5,797 | 1,515 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 5,144 | 5,311 | (167) | (3) | 4,534 | 777 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) | 5,093 | 4,688 | 405 | 9 | 3,660 | 1,028 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equities | 1,789 | 1,809 | (20) | (1) | 1,115 | 694 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Adjustment (CVA/DVA/FVA) and Other (1) | (14) | 65 | (79) | NM | 20 | 45 | 225 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Markets | 6,868 | 6,562 | 306 | 5 | 4,795 | 1,767 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 48 | 6 | 42 | 700 | 116 | (110) | (95) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 19,344 | 19,191 | 153 | 1 | $ | 15,242 | 3,949 | 26 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 15.7 | % | 13.8 | 15.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 47 | 45 | 50 |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)In fourth quarter 2024, we implemented a change to incorporate funding valuation adjustments (FVA) for our derivatives, which resulted in a loss of $85 million.
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher investment banking fees due to higher debt and equity underwriting fees and higher advisory fees driven by increased activity; and
•higher net gains from trading activities driven by higher revenue in foreign exchange and structured products, partially offset by losses related to our implementation of a change to incorporate funding valuation adjustments (FVA) for our derivatives;
partially offset by:
•lower net interest income driven by higher deposit costs and lower loan balances.
Provision for credit losses reflected a decrease in the allowance for credit losses driven by commercial real estate loans.
Noninterest expense increased driven by higher operating costs, partially offset by the impact of efficiency initiatives.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 18 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 9f: Corporate and Investment Banking – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 183,792 | 191,602 | (7,810) | (4) | % | $ | 198,424 | (6,822) | (3) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 93,247 | 100,373 | (7,126) | (7) | 98,560 | 1,813 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 277,039 | 291,975 | (14,936) | (5) | $ | 296,984 | (5,009) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking | $ | 87,318 | 95,783 | (8,465) | (9) | $ | 106,440 | (10,657) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 125,799 | 135,702 | (9,903) | (7) | 133,719 | 1,983 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets | 63,922 | 60,490 | 3,432 | 6 | 56,825 | 3,665 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 277,039 | 291,975 | (14,936) | (5) | $ | 296,984 | (5,009) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 135,751 | 118,130 | 17,621 | 15 | $ | 112,213 | 5,917 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Reverse repurchase agreements/securities borrowed | 72,374 | 61,510 | 10,864 | 18 | 50,491 | 11,019 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 18,883 | 18,636 | 247 | 1 | 27,421 | (8,785) | (32) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 227,008 | 198,276 | 28,732 | 14 | $ | 190,125 | 8,151 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 568,035 | 553,722 | 14,313 | 3 | 557,396 | (3,674) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 192,592 | 162,062 | 30,530 | 19 | 161,720 | 342 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 44,000 | 44,000 | — | — | 36,000 | 8,000 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 192,573 | 189,379 | 3,194 | 2 | $ | 196,529 | (7,150) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 86,107 | 98,053 | (11,946) | (12) | 101,848 | (3,795) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 278,680 | 287,432 | (8,752) | (3) | $ | 298,377 | (10,945) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking | $ | 86,328 | 93,987 | (7,659) | (8) | $ | 101,183 | (7,196) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 117,213 | 131,968 | (14,755) | (11) | 137,495 | (5,527) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets | 75,139 | 61,477 | 13,662 | 22 | 59,699 | 1,778 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 278,680 | 287,432 | (8,752) | (3) | $ | 298,377 | (10,945) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 142,727 | 115,562 | 27,165 | 24 | $ | 111,801 | 3,761 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Reverse repurchase agreements/securities borrowed | 96,470 | 63,614 | 32,856 | 52 | 55,407 | 8,207 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 21,332 | 18,023 | 3,309 | 18 | 22,218 | (4,195) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 260,529 | 197,199 | 63,330 | 32 | $ | 189,426 | 7,773 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 597,278 | 547,203 | 50,075 | 9 | 550,177 | (2,974) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 212,948 | 185,142 | 27,806 | 15 | 157,217 | 27,925 | 18 |
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Total loans (average and period-end) decreased due to loan payoffs exceeding originations and draws on existing accounts.
Total trading-related assets (average and period-end) increased reflecting:
•higher trading account securities driven by growth across all asset classes; and
•an increased volume of reverse repurchase agreements.
Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 19 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Wealth and Investment Management provides personalized wealth management, brokerage, financial planning, lending, private banking, trust and fiduciary products and services to affluent, high-net worth and ultra-high-net worth clients. We operate through financial advisors in our brokerage and wealth
offices, consumer bank branches, independent offices, and digitally through WellsTrade® and Intuitive Investor®. Table 9g and Table 9h provide additional information for Wealth and Investment Management (WIM).
Table 9g: Wealth and Investment Management
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 3,473 | 3,966 | (493) | (12) | % | $ | 3,927 | 39 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment advisory and other asset-based fees | 9,534 | 8,446 | 1,088 | 13 | 8,847 | (401) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commissions and brokerage services fees | 2,153 | 2,058 | 95 | 5 | 1,931 | 127 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 276 | 221 | 55 | 25 | 117 | 104 | 89 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 11,963 | 10,725 | 1,238 | 12 | 10,895 | (170) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 15,436 | 14,691 | 745 | 5 | 14,822 | (131) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (2) | (1) | (1) | (100) | (7) | 6 | 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (20) | 7 | (27) | NM | (18) | 25 | 139 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (22) | 6 | (28) | NM | (25) | 31 | 124 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 12,884 | 12,064 | 820 | 7 | 11,613 | 451 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 2,574 | 2,621 | (47) | (2) | 3,234 | (613) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 672 | 657 | 15 | 2 | 812 | (155) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,902 | 1,964 | (62) | (3) | $ | 2,422 | (458) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 28.3 | % | 30.7 | 27.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 83 | 82 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Client assets ($ in billions, period-end): | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory assets | $ | 998 | 891 | 107 | 12 | $ | 797 | 94 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other brokerage assets and deposits | 1,295 | 1,193 | 102 | 9 | 1,064 | 129 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total client assets | $ | 2,293 | 2,084 | 209 | 10 | $ | 1,861 | 223 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 83,005 | 82,755 | 250 | — | $ | 85,228 | (2,473) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 107,689 | 112,069 | (4,380) | (4) | 164,883 | (52,814) | (32) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 6,500 | 6,250 | 250 | 4 | 8,750 | (2,500) | (29) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 84,340 | 82,555 | 1,785 | 2 | $ | 84,273 | (1,718) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 127,008 | 103,902 | 23,106 | 22 | 138,760 | (34,858) | (25) |
NM- Not meaningful
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher investment advisory and other asset-based fees driven by higher asset-based fees reflecting higher market valuations; and
•higher commissions and brokerage services fees driven by higher brokerage transaction activity, partially offset by lower other brokerage service fees;
partially offset by:
•lower net interest income driven by lower deposit balances, customers reallocating cash into higher yielding alternatives, and higher deposit costs reflecting the impact of increased pricing on sweep deposits in advisory brokerage accounts.
Noninterest expense increased reflecting higher personnel expense driven by higher revenue-related compensation, partially offset by the impact of efficiency initiatives.
Total deposits (period-end) increased driven by higher brokerage deposit balances.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 20 | Wells Fargo & Company |
WIM Advisory Assets. In addition to transactional accounts, WIM offers advisory account relationships to brokerage customers. Fees from advisory accounts are based on a percentage of the market value of the assets as of the beginning of the quarter, which vary across the account types based on the distinct services provided, and are affected by investment performance as well as asset inflows and outflows. Advisory accounts include assets that are financial advisor-directed and separately managed by third-party managers as well as certain client-directed brokerage assets where we earn a fee for advisory and other services, but do not have investment discretion.
WIM also manages personal trust and other assets for high net worth clients, with fee income earned based on a percentage of the market value of these assets. Table 9h presents advisory assets activity by WIM line of business. Management believes that advisory assets is a useful metric because it allows management, investors, and others to assess how changes in asset amounts may impact the generation of certain asset-based fees.
For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, the average fee rate by account type ranged from 50 to 120 basis points.
Table 9h: WIM Advisory Assets
| Year ended | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in billions) | Balance, beginningof period | Inflows (outflows), net (1) | Market impact (2) | Balance, end of period | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client-directed (3) | $ | 185.3 | (2.5) | 22.9 | 205.7 | |||||||||||
| Financial advisor-directed (4) | 264.6 | 1.4 | 43.2 | 309.2 | ||||||||||||
| Separate accounts (5) | 198.4 | 2.6 | 24.7 | 225.7 | ||||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (6) | 83.3 | (5.3) | 7.7 | 85.7 | ||||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 731.6 | (3.8) | 98.5 | 826.3 | |||||||||||
| The Private Bank (7) | 159.5 | (2.8) | 14.7 | 171.4 | ||||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 891.1 | (6.6) | 113.2 | 997.7 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client-directed (3) | $ | 165.2 | (1.7) | 21.8 | 185.3 | |||||||||||
| Financial advisor-directed (4) | 222.9 | 2.0 | 39.7 | 264.6 | ||||||||||||
| Separate accounts (5) | 176.5 | (2.4) | 24.3 | 198.4 | ||||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (6) | 78.6 | (5.4) | 10.1 | 83.3 | ||||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 643.2 | (7.5) | 95.9 | 731.6 | |||||||||||
| The Private Bank (7) | 153.6 | (9.5) | 15.4 | 159.5 | ||||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 796.8 | (17.0) | 111.3 | 891.1 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client-directed (3) | $ | 205.6 | (7.2) | (33.2) | 165.2 | |||||||||||
| Financial advisor-directed (4) | 255.5 | (2.6) | (30.0) | 222.9 | ||||||||||||
| Separate accounts (5) | 203.3 | (1.9) | (24.9) | 176.5 | ||||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (6) | 102.1 | (6.3) | (17.2) | 78.6 | ||||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 766.5 | (18.0) | (105.3) | 643.2 | |||||||||||
| The Private Bank (7) | 198.0 | (19.7) | (24.7) | 153.6 | ||||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 964.5 | (37.7) | (130.0) | 796.8 |
(1)Inflows include new advisory account assets, contributions, dividends, and interest. Outflows include closed advisory account assets, withdrawals, and client management fees.
(2)Market impact reflects gains and losses on portfolio investments.
(3)Investment advice and other services are provided to the client, but decisions are made by the client and the fees earned are based on a percentage of the advisory account assets, not the number and size of transactions executed by the client.
(4)Professionally managed portfolios with fees earned based on respective strategies and as a percentage of certain client assets.
(5)Professional advisory portfolios managed by third-party asset managers. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.
(6)Program with portfolios constructed of load-waived, no-load, and institutional share class mutual funds. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.
(7)Discretionary and non-discretionary portfolios held in personal trusts, investment agency, or custody accounts with fees earned based on a percentage of client assets.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 21 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Corporate includes corporate treasury and enterprise functions, net of expense allocations, in support of the reportable operating segments (including funds transfer pricing, capital, and liquidity), as well as our investment portfolio and venture capital and private equity investments. Corporate also includes certain lines
of business that management has determined are no longer consistent with the long-term strategic goals of the Company as well as results for previously divested businesses. Table 9i and Table 9j provide additional information for Corporate.
Table 9i: Corporate – Income Statement
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | (791) | (888) | 97 | 11 | % | $ | (1,607) | 719 | 45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 1,129 | 431 | 698 | 162 | 1,192 | (761) | (64) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 338 | (457) | 795 | 174 | (415) | (42) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (27) | (10) | (17) | NM | (33) | 23 | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | 11 | 22 | (11) | (50) | 35 | (13) | (37) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (16) | 12 | (28) | NM | 2 | 10 | 500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 3,221 | 4,301 | (1,080) | (25) | 5,697 | (1,396) | (25) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax benefit | (2,867) | (4,770) | 1,903 | 40 | (6,114) | 1,344 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax benefit | (1,884) | (2,355) | 471 | 20 | (1,721) | (634) | (37) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests (1) | 233 | (124) | 357 | 288 | (311) | 187 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | (1,216) | (2,291) | 1,075 | 47 | $ | (4,082) | 1,791 | 44 |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Reflects results attributable to noncontrolling interests associated with our venture capital investments.
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher net gains from equity securities reflecting higher realized and unrealized gains on equity securities from our venture capital investments and lower impairment of equity securities;
partially offset by:
•higher net losses from debt securities related to a repositioning of our investment portfolio.
Noninterest expense decreased reflecting:
•lower expense for the FDIC special assessment. For additional information on the FDIC special assessment, see Note 21 (Revenue and Expenses) to Financial Statements in this Report;
partially offset by:
•higher operating losses due to higher expense for customer remediation activities.
Corporate includes our rail car leasing business, which had long-lived operating lease assets, net of accumulated depreciation, of $4.5 billion and $4.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The average age of our rail cars is 22 years and the rail cars are typically leased to customers under short-term leases of 3 to 5 years. Our four largest concentrations, which represented 66% of our rail car fleet as of December 31, 2024, were rail cars used for the transportation of cement/sand, agricultural grain, plastics, and coal products. We may incur impairment charges based on changing economic and market conditions affecting the long-term demand and utility of specific types of rail cars. Our assumptions for impairment are sensitive to estimated utilization and rental rates as well as the estimated economic life of the leased asset. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 8 (Leasing Activity) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 22 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 9j: Corporate – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | $ Change 2024/ 2023 | % Change 2024/ 2023 | 2022 | $ Change 2023/ 2022 | % Change 2023/ 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | $ | 138,983 | 123,542 | 15,441 | 12 | % | $ | 124,308 | (766) | (1) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 246,577 | 267,672 | (21,095) | (8) | 290,087 | (22,415) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 15,441 | 15,635 | (194) | (1) | 15,695 | (60) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 652,024 | 619,002 | 33,022 | 5 | 638,011 | (19,009) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 98,845 | 95,825 | 3,020 | 3 | 28,457 | 67,368 | 237 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | $ | 154,397 | 118,923 | 35,474 | 30 | $ | 102,669 | 16,254 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 231,892 | 259,748 | (27,856) | (11) | 294,141 | (34,393) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 15,437 | 15,810 | (373) | (2) | 15,508 | 302 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 633,799 | 674,075 | (40,276) | (6) | 601,218 | 72,857 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 59,708 | 124,294 | (64,586) | (52) | 54,371 | 69,923 | 129 |
Full year 2024 vs. full year 2023
Total assets (average) increased reflecting an increase in interest-earning deposits with banks that are managed by corporate treasury.
Total assets (period-end) decreased reflecting a decrease in interest-earning deposits with banks that are managed by corporate treasury.
Total deposits (period-end) decreased driven by maturities of certificates of deposit (CDs) issued by corporate treasury.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 23 |
Balance Sheet Analysis
At December 31, 2024, our assets totaled $1.93 trillion, down $2.6 billion from December 31, 2023.
The following discussion provides additional information about the major components of our consolidated balance sheet. See the “Capital Management” section in this Report for information on changes in our equity.
Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
Table 10: Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Amortized cost, net (1) | Net unrealized gains (losses) | Fair value | Weighted average expected maturity (yrs) | Amortized cost, net (1) | Net unrealized gains (losses) | Fair value | Weighted average expected maturity (yrs) | ||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale (2) | $ | 170,607 | (7,629) | 162,978 | 7.2 | $ | 137,155 | (6,707) | 130,448 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity (3) | 234,948 | (41,169) | 193,779 | 8.3 | 262,708 | (35,392) | 227,316 | 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 405,555 | (48,798) | 356,757 | n/a | $ | 399,863 | (42,099) | 357,764 | n/a |
(1)Represents amortized cost of the securities, net of the allowance for credit losses of $34 million and $1 million related to available-for-sale debt securities and $95 million and $93 million related to held-to-maturity debt securities at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(2)Available-for-sale debt securities are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value.
(3)Held-to-maturity debt securities are carried on our consolidated balance sheet at amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
Table 10 presents a summary of our portfolio of investments in available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities. See Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on AFS and HTM debt securities, including a summary of debt securities by security type, contractual maturities and weighted average yields. The size and composition of our AFS and HTM debt securities is dependent upon the Company’s liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives. The AFS debt securities portfolio can be used to meet funding needs that arise in the normal course of business or due to market stress. Changes in our interest rate risk profile may occur due to changes in overall economic or market conditions, which could influence loan origination demand, prepayment rates, or deposit balances and mix. In response, the AFS debt securities portfolio can be rebalanced to meet the Company’s interest rate risk management objectives. In addition to meeting liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives, the AFS and HTM debt securities portfolios may provide yield enhancement over other short-term assets. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management” section in this Report for additional information on liquidity and interest rate risk.
The AFS and HTM debt securities portfolios predominantly consist of liquid, high-quality U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The portfolios also include securities issued by U.S. states and political subdivisions and highly rated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). Debt securities are classified as HTM at the time of purchase or when transferred from the AFS debt securities portfolio. Our intent is to hold these securities to maturity and collect the contractual cash flows.
The amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses, of the total AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio increased from December 31, 2023. Purchases of AFS debt securities were partially offset by paydowns and maturities of AFS and HTM debt securities, as well as sales of AFS debt securities.
The total net unrealized losses on AFS and HTM debt securities increased from December 31, 2023, due to changes in interest rates, partially offset by the realization of losses related to a repositioning of our AFS debt securities portfolio. The repositioning included the sale of approximately $28.4 billion of AFS debt securities and reinvestment of the proceeds into AFS debt securities with higher yields.
At December 31, 2024, 99% of the combined AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio was rated AA- or above. Ratings are based on external ratings where available and, where not available, based on internal credit grades.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 24 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Loan Portfolios
Table 11 provides a summary of total outstanding loans by portfolio segment. Commercial loans decreased from December 31, 2023, due to a decline in the commercial real estate loan portfolio as paydowns exceeded originations and advances. Consumer loans decreased from December 31, 2023,
driven by decreases in the residential mortgage and auto loan portfolios as paydowns exceeded originations, partially offset by an increase in credit card loans due to higher point of sale volume and the impact of new product launches.
Table 11: Loan Portfolios
| ($ in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | $ | 534,159 | 547,427 | (13,268) | (2) | % | ||||||
| Consumer | 378,586 | 389,255 | (10,669) | (3) | ||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 912,745 | 936,682 | (23,937) | (3) |
Average loan balances and a comparative detail of average loan balances is included in Table 3 under “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Additional information on total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable is included in the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” section in this Report. Period-end balances and other loan related information are in Note 5 (Loans
and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 12 shows loan maturities based on contractually scheduled repayment timing and the distribution by changes in interest rates for loans with a contractual maturity greater than one year. Nonaccrual loans and loans with indeterminate maturities have been classified as maturing within one year.
Table 12: Loan Maturities
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan maturities | Loans maturing after one year | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Within one year | After one year through five years | After five years through fifteen years | After fifteen years | Total | Fixed interest rates | Floating/variable interest rates | |||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 136,093 | 218,532 | 24,581 | 2,035 | 381,241 | 28,120 | 217,028 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 60,395 | 60,744 | 13,888 | 1,478 | 136,505 | 16,821 | 59,289 | |||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 3,679 | 10,744 | 1,958 | 32 | 16,413 | 12,649 | 85 | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 200,167 | 290,020 | 40,427 | 3,545 | 534,159 | 57,590 | 276,402 | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | 9,903 | 29,901 | 86,501 | 123,964 | 250,269 | 170,410 | 69,956 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 56,542 | — | — | — | 56,542 | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Auto | 11,458 | 29,316 | 1,593 | — | 42,367 | 30,909 | — | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 24,913 | 4,404 | 73 | 18 | 29,408 | 3,899 | 596 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 102,816 | 63,621 | 88,167 | 123,982 | 378,586 | 205,218 | 70,552 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 302,983 | 353,641 | 128,594 | 127,527 | 912,745 | 262,808 | 346,954 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 25 |
Balance Sheet Analysis (continued)
Deposits
Deposits increased from December 31, 2023, reflecting:
•growth in commercial deposits driven by additions of deposits from new and existing customers; and
•growth in consumer deposits driven by higher brokerage deposits in WIM;
partially offset by:
•lower time deposits driven by maturities of CDs issued by corporate treasury.
Table 13 provides additional information regarding deposit balances. Certain deposit balances, including noninterest-bearing
and interest-bearing demand deposits, were impacted by efforts to align legacy products with current deposit product offerings. Information regarding the impact of deposits on net interest income and a comparison of average deposit balances is provided in the “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” section and Table 3 earlier in this Report. Our average deposit cost in fourth quarter 2024 increased to 1.73%, compared with 1.58% in fourth quarter 2023.
Table 13: Deposits
| ($ in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | % oftotaldeposits | Dec 31, 2023 | % of total deposits | $ Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 383,616 | 28 | % | $ | 360,279 | 26 | % | $ | 23,337 | 6 | % | ||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | 473,738 | 35 | 436,908 | 32 | 36,830 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 359,731 | 26 | 349,181 | 26 | 10,550 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 137,128 | 10 | 187,989 | 14 | (50,861) | (27) | ||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits in non-U.S. offices | 17,591 | 1 | 23,816 | 2 | (6,225) | (26) | ||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 1,371,804 | 100 | % | $ | 1,358,173 | 100 | % | $ | 13,631 | 1 |
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, total deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured, were estimated to be $550 billion and $505 billion, respectively. Estimated uninsured domestic deposits reflect amounts disclosed in the U.S. regulatory reports of our subsidiary banks, with adjustments for amounts related to consolidated
subsidiaries. All non-U.S. deposits are treated for these purposes as uninsured.
Table 14 presents the contractual maturities of estimated time deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured. All non-U.S. time deposits are uninsured.
Table 14: Uninsured Time Deposits by Maturity
| (in millions) | Three months or less | After three months through six months | After six months through twelve months | After twelve months | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||
| Domestic time deposits | $ | 13,114 | 3,213 | 1,069 | 526 | 17,922 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. time deposits | 1,967 | 530 | 253 | — | 2,750 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 15,081 | 3,743 | 1,322 | 526 | 20,672 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 26 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet, or may be recorded on our consolidated balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements include unfunded credit commitments, transactions with unconsolidated entities, guarantees, derivatives, and other commitments. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, and/or (3) diversify our funding sources.
Unfunded Credit Commitments
Unfunded credit commitments are legally binding agreements to lend to customers with terms covering usage of funds, contractual interest rates, expiration dates, and any required collateral. The maximum credit risk for these commitments will generally be lower than the contractual amount because these commitments may expire without being used or may be cancelled at the customer’s request. Our credit risk monitoring activities include managing the amount of commitments, both to individual customers and in total, and the size and maturity structure of these commitments. For additional information, see Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Transactions with Unconsolidated Entities
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts, limited liability companies or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Generally, SPEs are formed in connection with securitization transactions and are considered variable interest entities (VIEs). For additional information, see Note 16 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Guarantees and Other Commitments
Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby and direct pay letters of credit, written options, recourse obligations, exchange and clearing house guarantees, indemnifications, and other types of similar arrangements. We also enter into other commitments such as commitments to purchase securities under resale agreements. For additional information, see Note 17 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Derivatives
We use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. Derivatives are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and volume can be measured in terms of the notional amount, which is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. The notional amount is not recorded on our consolidated balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments. For additional information, see Note 14 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 27 |
Risk Management
Wells Fargo manages a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance and our ability to meet the expectations of our customers, shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders.
Risk is Part of our Business Model. Risk is the possibility of an event occurring that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its strategic and business objectives. The Company routinely takes risks to achieve its business goals and to serve its customers. These risks include financial risks, such as interest rate, credit, liquidity, and market risks, and non-financial risks, such as operational (which includes compliance and model risks), strategic and reputation risks.
Risk Profile. The Company’s risk profile is an assessment of the aggregate risks associated with the Company’s exposures and business activities after taking into consideration risk management effectiveness. The Company monitors its risk profile, and the Board reviews risk profile reports and analysis.
Risk Capacity. Risk capacity is the maximum level of risk that the Company could assume given its current level of resources before triggering regulatory and other constraints on its capital and liquidity needs.
Risk Appetite. Risk appetite is the nature and level of risk the Company is willing to take, within its risk capacity, while pursuing its strategic and business objectives. Risk appetite is articulated in our Statement of Risk Appetite, which establishes acceptable risks and at what level and includes risk appetite principles. The Company’s Statement of Risk Appetite is defined by senior management, approved at least annually by the Board, and helps guide the Company’s business and risk leaders. The Company continuously monitors its risk appetite, and the Board reviews reports which include risk appetite information and analysis.
Risk and Strategy. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drives the Company’s strategic planning process, which identifies the Company’s most significant opportunities and challenges, develops plans to address them, evaluates the risks of those plans, and articulates the resulting decisions in the form of a company-wide strategic plan. The Company’s risk profile, risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness are considered in the strategic planning process, which is linked with the Company’s capital planning process. The Company’s Independent Risk Management (IRM) organization participates in strategic planning, providing challenge to and independent assessment of the risks associated with strategic initiatives. IRM also independently assesses and challenges the impact of the strategic plan on risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness at the principal lines of business, enterprise functions, and aggregate Company levels. The strategic plan is presented to the Board each year with IRM’s evaluation.
Risk and Climate Change. The Company continues to integrate climate considerations into its risk management program, consistent with regulatory expectations.
Risk is Managed by Everyone. Every employee, in the course of their daily activities, creates risk and is responsible for managing risk. Every employee has a role to play in risk management, including establishing and maintaining the Company’s risk and control environment. Every employee must comply with applicable laws, regulations, and Company policies.
Risk and Culture. Senior management sets the tone at the top by supporting a strong culture, defined by the Company’s expectations and Code of Conduct, that guides how employees conduct themselves and make decisions. The Board is responsible for holding senior management accountable for establishing and maintaining this culture and effectively managing risk. Senior management expects employees to speak up when they see something that could cause harm to the Company’s customers, communities, employees, shareholders,
or reputation. Because risk management is everyone’s responsibility, all employees are empowered to and expected to challenge risk decisions when appropriate and to escalate their concerns when they have not been addressed. The Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs are designed to establish a balanced framework for risk and reward under core principles that employees are expected to know and practice. The Board, through its Human Resources Committee, plays an important role in overseeing the Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs. Effective risk management is a central component of employee performance evaluations.
Risk Management Framework. The Company’s risk management framework sets forth the Company’s core principles for managing and governing its risk. It is approved by the Board’s Risk Committee and reviewed and updated annually. Many other documents and policies flow from its core principles.
Wells Fargo’s top priority is to strengthen our company by building an appropriate risk and control infrastructure. We continue to enhance and mature our risk management programs.
Risk Governance
Role of the Board. The Board oversees the Company’s business, including its risk management. It assesses senior management’s performance and holds senior management accountable for maintaining and adhering to an effective risk management program.
Board Committee Structure. The Board carries out its risk oversight responsibilities directly and through its committees. The Risk Committee reviews and approves the Company’s risk management framework and oversees management’s implementation of the framework, including how the Company manages and governs risk. The Risk Committee also oversees the Company’s adherence to its risk appetite. In addition, the Risk Committee supports the stature, authority and independence of IRM and oversees and receives reports on its operation. The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) reports functionally to the Risk Committee and administratively to the CEO.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 28 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Management Committee Structure. The Company has established management committees, including those focused on risk, that support management in carrying out its governance and risk management responsibilities. One type of management committee is a governance committee, which is a decision-making body that operates for a particular purpose and may report to a Board committee.
Each management governance committee, in accordance with its charter, is expected to discuss, document, and make
decisions regarding high priority and significant risks, emerging risks, risk acceptances, and risks and issues escalated to it; review and monitor progress related to critical and high-risk issues and remediation efforts, including lessons learned; and report key challenges, decisions, escalations, other actions, and open issues as appropriate.
Table 15 presents the structure of the Company’s Board committees and escalation paths of relevant management governance committees reporting to a Board committee.
Table 15: Board and Relevant Management-level Governance Committee Structure
| Wells Fargo & Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit Committee (1) | Finance Committee | RiskCommittee | Governance & Nominating Committee | Human Resources Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Management Governance Committees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure Committee | Capital Management Committee | Allowance for Credit Losses Approval Governance Committee | Enterprise Risk & Control Committee | Incentive Compensation & Performance Management Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory Reporting Oversight Committee | Corporate Asset/Liability Committee | Risk & Control Committees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recovery & Resolution Committee | Risk Type Committees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Topic Committees |
(1)The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s financial statements and disclosures to shareholders and regulatory agencies; oversees the internal audit function and external auditor independence, activities, and performance; and assists the Board and the Risk Committee in the oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
Management Governance Committees Reporting to the Risk Committee of the Board. The Enterprise Risk & Control Committee (ERCC) is a decision-making and escalation body that governs the management of all risk types. The ERCC receives information about risk and control issues, addresses escalated risks and issues, and actively oversees risk controls. The ERCC also makes decisions related to significant risks and changes to the Company’s risk appetite. The Risk Committee receives regular updates from the ERCC chairs and senior management regarding current and emerging risks and senior management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management program.
The ERCC is co-chaired by the CEO and CRO, with membership comprising the heads of principal lines of business and certain enterprise functions. The Chief Auditor or a designee attends all meetings of the ERCC. The ERCC has a direct escalation path to the Risk Committee. The ERCC also has an escalation path for certain human capital risks and issues to the Human Resources Committee. In addition, the CRO may escalate directly to the Board. Risks and issues are escalated to the ERCC in accordance with the Company’s escalation management policy.
Each principal line of business and enterprise function has a risk and control committee, which is a management governance committee with a mandate that aligns with the ERCC but with its scope limited to the respective principal line of business or enterprise function. These committees focus on and consider
risks that the respective principal line of business or enterprise function generate and manage, and the controls the principal line of business or enterprise function are expected to have in place.
As a complement to these risk and control committees, management governance committees dedicated to specific risk types and risk topics also report to the ERCC to enable more comprehensive governance of risks.
Risk Operating Model – Roles and Responsibilities
The Company has three lines of defense for managing risk: the Front Line, Independent Risk Management, and Internal Audit.
•Front Line. The Front Line, which comprises principal line of business and certain enterprise function activities, is the first line of defense. The Front Line is responsible for understanding the risks generated by its activities, applying adequate controls, and managing risk in the course of its business activities. The Front Line identifies, measures and assesses, controls, monitors, and reports on risk generated by or associated with its business activities and balances risk and reward in decision making while operating within the Company’s risk appetite.
•Independent Risk Management. IRM is the second line of defense. It establishes and maintains the Company’s risk management program and provides oversight, including challenge to and independent assessment and monitoring, of the Front Line’s execution of its risk management responsibilities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 29 |
Risk Management (continued)
•Internal Audit. Internal Audit is the third line of defense. It is responsible for acting as an independent assurance function.
Risk Type Classifications
The Company uses common classifications, hierarchies, and ratings to enable consistency across risk management programs and aggregation of information. Risk type classifications permit the Company to identify and prioritize its risk exposures, including emerging risk exposures.
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk, which in addition to those discussed in this section, includes compliance risk and model risk, is the risk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for operational risk, including significant supporting programs and/or policies regarding the Company’s business resiliency and disaster recovery, change management, data management, information security, technology, and third-party risk management. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant operational risk policies and oversees the Company’s operational risk management program.
At the management level, Operational Risk Management, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for operational risk. Operational Risk Management reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to operational risk to the Board’s Risk Committee. Operational Risk Management’s oversight responsibilities include change management risk, data management risk, fraud risk, human capital risk, information management risk, information security risk, technology risk, and third-party risk.
Information Security Risk Management. Information security risk, which includes cybersecurity risk, is a significant operational risk for financial institutions such as Wells Fargo and includes the risk arising from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information or information systems.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for information security risk and approves the Company’s information security program, which includes information protection and cyber resiliency. The Risk Committee receives regular reports from the Company’s Head of Technology and Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), as well as from Operational Risk Management representatives, on information security risks and significant information security developments, including certain incidents involving third parties.
As described above, at the management level, Operational Risk Management has oversight responsibility for information security risk. As a second line of defense, Operational Risk Management reviews and provides guidance to the Front Line technology team, including with respect to the development and maintenance of risk management policies, governance documents, processes, and controls, and oversees and challenges the Front Line technology team’s risk assessment activities.
The Company’s cybersecurity team, which is part of the broader technology team, provides Front Line information security risk assessment and management and is responsible for protecting the Company’s information systems, networks, and data, including customer and employee data, through the design, execution, and oversight of our information security program.
The technology team is led by the Company’s Head of Technology, who reports to the CEO and leads our efforts to manage information security and related risks across the enterprise, including overseeing the Company’s CISO. Our Head of Technology has over 30 years of technology and information security risk management experience in the financial services industry.
The Company has processes designed to prevent, detect, mitigate, escalate, and remediate cybersecurity incidents, including monitoring of the Company’s networks for actual or potential attacks or breaches. The Company’s incident response program includes notification, escalation, and remediation protocols for cybersecurity incidents, including to our Head of Technology and CISO as appropriate. In addition, to help monitor and assess our exposure to ongoing and evolving risks in these areas, the Company has a cyber and information security focused risk committee led by the CISO and a technology risk committee led by the Head of Technology.
Additional components of the Company’s information security program include: (i) enhancing and strengthening of our practices, policies, and procedures in response to the evolving information security landscape; (ii) designing our information security program to align with regulatory and industry standards; (iii) investing in emerging technologies to proactively monitor new vulnerabilities and reduce risk; (iv) conducting periodic internal and third-party assessments to test our information security systems and controls; (v) leveraging third-party specialists and advisors to review and strengthen our information security program; (vi) evaluating and updating our incident response planning and protocols; and (vii) requiring employees and third-party service providers who have access to our systems to complete annual information security training modules designed to provide guidance for identifying and avoiding information security risks.
In addition, Operational Risk Management oversees the Company’s third-party risk management program, which, among other things, is designed to identify and address information security risks arising from third-party service providers. Components of this program include incorporating information security and cybersecurity incident notification requirements into contracts with third-party service providers, requiring third parties to adhere to defined information security and control standards, and performing periodic third-party risk assessments.
Wells Fargo and other financial institutions, as well as our third-party service providers, continue to be the target of various evolving and adaptive information security threats, including cyberattacks, malware, ransomware, other malicious software intended to exploit hardware or software vulnerabilities, phishing, credential validation, and distributed denial-of-service, in an effort to disrupt the operations of financial institutions, test their cybersecurity capabilities, commit fraud, or obtain confidential, proprietary or other information. Cyberattacks have also focused on targeting online applications and services, such as online banking, as well as cloud-based and other products and services provided by third parties, and have targeted the infrastructure of the internet causing the widespread unavailability of websites and degrading website performance. As a result, information security and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes and systems designed to protect our networks, computers, software and data from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo is also involved in industry cybersecurity efforts and working with other parties, including our third-party service providers and governmental agencies, to continue to enhance defenses and improve resiliency to information security
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 30 | Wells Fargo & Company |
threats. See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding the risks and potential impacts associated with a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including as a result of cyberattacks or other information security incidents.
Compliance Risk Management
Compliance risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk resulting from the failure to comply with laws (legislation, regulations and rules) and regulatory guidance, and the failure to appropriately address associated impact, including to customers. Compliance risk encompasses violations of applicable internal policies, program requirements, procedures, and standards related to ethical principles applicable to the Company.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for all aspects of compliance risk, including financial crimes risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant supporting compliance risk and financial crimes risk policies and programs and oversees the Company’s compliance risk management and financial crimes risk management programs.
Conduct risk, a sub-category of compliance risk, is the risk that the behavior of an employee or third party acting on behalf of the Company involves, or a business practice produces, conduct that is unlawful, unethical, or conflicts with the Company's expectations for lawful and ethical behavior outlined in its Code of Conduct, which has the potential to adversely affect customers, employees, the Company, or its stakeholders. In connection with its oversight of conduct risk, the Board oversees the alignment of employee conduct to the Company’s risk appetite (which the Board approves annually). The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for conduct risk and risk management components of the Company’s culture, while the responsibilities of the Board’s Human Resources Committee include oversight of the Company’s culture, Code of Conduct, human capital management (including talent management and succession planning), performance management program, and incentive compensation risk management program.
At the management level, the Compliance function, which is part of IRM, monitors the implementation of the Company’s compliance and conduct risk programs. The Compliance function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to compliance risk to the Board's Risk Committee. Financial Crimes Risk Management, also part of IRM, oversees and monitors financial crimes risk, a sub-category of compliance risk. Financial Crimes Risk Management reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to financial crimes risk to the Board's Risk Committee.
Model Risk Management
Model risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk arising from the potential for adverse consequences of decisions made based on model output that may be incorrect or used inappropriately.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for model risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee oversees the Company’s model risk management policy, model governance, model performance, model issue remediation status, and adherence to model risk appetite metrics.
At the management level, the Model Risk function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for model risk and is responsible for governance, validation and monitoring of model risk across the Company. The Model Risk function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to model risk to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or liquidity arising from adverse business decisions, improper implementation of strategic initiatives, or inadequate responses to changes in the external operating environment.
The Board has primary oversight responsibility for strategic planning and oversees management’s development and implementation of and approves the Company’s strategic plan, and considers whether it is aligned with the Company’s risk appetite and risk management effectiveness. Management develops, executes and recommends significant strategic corporate transactions and the Board evaluates management’s proposals, including their impact on the Company’s risk profile and financial position. The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for the Company’s strategic risk and the adequacy of the Company’s strategic risk management program, including associated risk management practices, processes and controls.
At the management level, the Strategic Risk Oversight function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for strategic risk. The Strategic Risk Oversight function reports into the CRO and supports periodic reports related to strategic risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Reputation Risk Management
Reputation risk is the risk arising from the potential that negative stakeholder opinion or negative publicity regarding the Company’s business practices, whether true or not, will adversely impact current or projected financial conditions and resilience, cause a decline in the customer base, or result in costly litigation.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for reputation risk, while each Board committee has reputation risk oversight responsibilities related to their primary oversight responsibilities. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee receives reports from management that help it monitor how effectively the Company is managing reputation risk.
At the management level, the Reputation Risk Oversight function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for reputation risk. The Reputation Risk Oversight function reports into the CRO and supports periodic reports related to reputation risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 31 |
Credit Risk Management
Credit risk is the risk of loss associated with a borrower or counterparty default (failure to meet obligations in accordance with agreed upon terms). Credit risk exists with many of the Company’s assets and exposures such as debt security holdings, certain derivatives, and loans.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for credit risk. At the management level, Corporate Credit Risk, which is part of Independent Risk Management, has oversight responsibility for credit risk. Corporate Credit Risk reports to the Chief Risk Officer and supports periodic reports related to credit risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Loan Portfolio. Our loan portfolios represent the largest component of assets on our consolidated balance sheet for which we have credit risk. Table 16 presents our total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable.
Table 16: Total Loans Outstanding by Portfolio Segment and Class of Financing Receivable
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 381,241 | 380,388 | ||
| Commercial real estate | 136,505 | 150,616 | |||
| Lease financing | 16,413 | 16,423 | |||
| Total commercial | 534,159 | 547,427 | |||
| Residential mortgage | 250,269 | 260,724 | |||
| Credit card | 56,542 | 52,230 | |||
| Auto | 42,367 | 47,762 | |||
| Other consumer | 29,408 | 28,539 | |||
| Total consumer | 378,586 | 389,255 | |||
| Total loans | $ | 912,745 | 936,682 |
We manage our credit risk by establishing what we believe are sound credit policies for underwriting new business, while monitoring and reviewing the performance of our existing loan portfolios. We employ various credit risk management and monitoring activities to mitigate risks associated with multiple risk factors affecting loans we hold including:
•Loan concentrations and related credit quality;
•Counterparty credit risk;
•Economic and market conditions;
•Legislative or regulatory mandates;
•Changes in interest rates;
•Merger and acquisition activities; and
•Reputation risk.
Our credit risk management oversight process is governed centrally, but provides for direct management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, disciplined credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process.
A key to our credit risk management is adherence to a well-controlled underwriting process, which we believe is appropriate for the needs of our customers as well as investors who purchase the loans or securities collateralized by the loans.
Credit Quality Overview. Table 17 provides credit quality trends.
Table 17: Credit Quality Overview
| ($ in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonaccrual loans | |||||
| Commercial loans | $ | 4,618 | 4,914 | ||
| Consumer loans | 3,112 | 3,342 | |||
| Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 7,730 | 8,256 | ||
| Nonaccrual loans as a % of total loans | 0.85 | % | 0.88 | ||
| Allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans | $ | 14,636 | 15,088 | ||
| ACL for loans as a % of total loans | 1.60 | % | 1.61 | ||
| Net loan charge-offs as a % of: | |||||
| Average commercial loans | 0.29 | % | 0.17 | ||
| Average consumer loans | 0.85 | 0.65 |
Additional information on our loan portfolios and our credit quality trends follows.
Significant Loan Portfolio Reviews. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk and to support our determination of an appropriate allowance for credit losses. The following discussion provides additional characteristics and analysis of our significant portfolios. See Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for more analysis and credit metric information for each of the following portfolios.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING.
For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial and industrial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. We generally subject commercial and industrial loans and lease financing to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to regulatory definitions of pass and criticized categories with criticized segmented among special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss categories.
Generally, the primary source of repayment for our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio is the operating cash flows of customers, with the collateral securing this portfolio representing a secondary source of repayment. The majority of this portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory, and debt securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets.
We had $16.5 billion of the commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio internally classified as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at December 31, 2024, compared with $14.6 billion at December 31, 2023. The increase was primarily driven by the entertainment and recreation, and equipment, machinery, and parts manufacturing industries, partially offset by the retail industry.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 32 |
The portfolio increased at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, as a result of increased originations and loan draws, partially offset by paydowns. Table 18 provides our
commercial and industrial loans and lease financing by industry. The industry categories are based on the North American Industry Classification System.
Table 18: Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing by Industry
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Financials except banks | $ | 24 | 156,831 | 17 | % | $ | 255,576 | 9 | 146,635 | 16 | % | $ | 234,513 | ||||||||||||
| Technology, telecom and media | 106 | 23,590 | 3 | 61,813 | 60 | 25,460 | 3 | 59,216 | |||||||||||||||||
| Real estate and construction | 92 | 24,839 | 3 | 52,741 | 55 | 24,987 | 3 | 54,345 | |||||||||||||||||
| Equipment, machinery and parts manufacturing | 35 | 25,135 | 3 | 51,150 | 37 | 24,785 | 3 | 48,265 | |||||||||||||||||
| Retail | 91 | 17,709 | 2 | 43,374 | 72 | 19,596 | 2 | 48,829 | |||||||||||||||||
| Materials and commodities | 100 | 13,624 | 1 | 37,365 | 112 | 14,235 | 2 | 37,758 | |||||||||||||||||
| Food and beverage manufacturing | 9 | 16,665 | 2 | 35,079 | 15 | 16,047 | 2 | 33,957 | |||||||||||||||||
| Health care and pharmaceuticals | 27 | 13,620 | 1 | 30,726 | 26 | 14,863 | 2 | 30,386 | |||||||||||||||||
| Auto related | 8 | 16,507 | 2 | 30,537 | 8 | 15,203 | 2 | 28,795 | |||||||||||||||||
| Oil, gas and pipelines | 3 | 10,503 | 1 | 30,486 | 2 | 10,730 | 1 | 32,544 | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial services | 78 | 11,152 | 1 | 26,968 | 37 | 11,095 | 1 | 26,025 | |||||||||||||||||
| Utilities | — | 6,641 | * | 24,735 | 1 | 8,325 | * | 25,710 | |||||||||||||||||
| Diversified or miscellaneous | 9 | 9,115 | * | 22,847 | 67 | 8,284 | * | 22,877 | |||||||||||||||||
| Entertainment and recreation | 53 | 12,672 | 1 | 19,691 | 18 | 13,968 | 1 | 20,250 | |||||||||||||||||
| Transportation services | 154 | 9,560 | 1 | 16,477 | 134 | 9,277 | * | 16,750 | |||||||||||||||||
| Insurance and fiduciaries | 2 | 4,368 | * | 15,753 | 1 | 4,715 | * | 15,724 | |||||||||||||||||
| Government and education | 29 | 5,897 | * | 11,711 | 26 | 5,603 | * | 11,552 | |||||||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | 13 | 6,349 | * | 11,225 | 31 | 6,466 | * | 12,080 | |||||||||||||||||
| Banks | — | 7,772 | * | 8,701 | — | 11,820 | 1 | 12,981 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 14 | 5,105 | * | 12,687 | 15 | 4,717 | * | 12,297 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 847 | 397,654 | 44 | % | $ | 799,642 | 726 | 396,811 | 42 | % | $ | 784,854 |
*Less than 1%.
(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit and discretionary amounts where our approval or consent is required prior to any loan funding or commitment increase. For additional information on issued letters of credit, see Note 17 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(2)No other single industry had total loans in excess of $3.2 billion and $3.0 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
Table 18a provides further loan segmentation for our largest industry category, financials except banks. This category includes loans to investment firms, financial vehicles, nonbank creditors, rental and leasing companies, securities firms, and investment banks. These loans are generally secured and have features to help manage credit risk, such as structural credit enhancements,
collateral eligibility requirements, contractual re-margining of collateral supporting the loans, and loan amounts limited to a percentage of the value of the underlying assets considering underlying credit risk, asset duration, and ongoing performance.
Table 18a: Financials Except Banks Industry Category
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Asset managers and funds (2) | $ | 1 | 59,847 | 6 | % | $ | 106,926 | — | 51,842 | 6 | % | $ | 98,074 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial finance (3) | 2 | 51,786 | 6 | 84,652 | 2 | 52,007 | 6 | 78,369 | |||||||||||||||||
| Consumer finance (4) | 5 | 20,840 | 2 | 34,669 | — | 20,308 | 2 | 33,547 | |||||||||||||||||
| Real estate finance (5) | 16 | 24,358 | 3 | 29,329 | 7 | 22,478 | 2 | 24,523 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 24 | 156,831 | 17 | % | $ | 255,576 | 9 | 146,635 | 16 | % | $ | 234,513 |
(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit and discretionary amounts where our approval or consent is required prior to any loan funding or commitment increase. For additional information on issued letters of credit, see Note 17 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(2)Includes loans for subscription or capital calls and loans to prime brokerage customers and securities firms.
(3)Includes asset-based lending and leasing, including loans to special purpose entities, loans to commercial leasing entities, structured lending facilities to commercial loan managers, and also includes collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) in loan form, all of which were rated AA or above, of $3.7 billion and $7.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(4)Includes originators or servicers of financial assets collateralized by consumer loans such as auto loans and leases, and credit cards.
(5)Includes originators or servicers of financial assets collateralized by commercial or residential real estate loans.
Our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio included non-U.S. loans of $62.6 billion and $72.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Significant industry concentrations of non-U.S. loans at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, included:
•$36.3 billion and $40.5 billion in the financials except banks industry;
•$7.4 billion and $11.4 billion in the banks industry; and
•$2.3 billion and $2.0 billion in the oil, gas and pipelines industry.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 33 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (CRE). Our CRE loan portfolio is composed of CRE mortgage and CRE construction loans. The total CRE loan portfolio decreased $14.1 billion from December 31, 2023, as paydowns exceeded originations and advances. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations of CRE loans are in California, New York, Florida, and Texas, which represented a combined 48% of the total CRE portfolio. The largest property type concentrations are apartments at 29% and office at 20% of the portfolio. Unfunded credit commitments at December 31, 2024 and 2023, were $5.4 billion and $7.7 billion, respectively, for CRE mortgage loans and $7.1 billion and $13.2 billion, respectively, for CRE construction loans.
We generally subject CRE loans to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings.
We had $17.8 billion of CRE mortgage loans classified as criticized at December 31, 2024, compared with $17.5 billion at December 31, 2023. We had $1.5 billion of CRE construction loans classified as criticized at December 31, 2024, compared with $830 million at December 31, 2023. The increase in criticized CRE loans was predominantly driven by the apartments property type, partially offset by the office property type.
We continue to closely monitor the credit quality of the office property type given weakened demand for office space. Loans in California and New York represented approximately 40% of the office property type at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Table 19 provides our CRE loans by state and property type.
Table 19: CRE Loans by State and Property Type
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real estate mortgage | Real estate construction | Total commercial real estate | Total commercial real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | Nonaccrual loans | Loans outstanding balance | Loans as % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | Loans outstanding balance | Total commitments (1) | |||||||||||||||
| By state: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 1,119 | 25,141 | 10 | 2,858 | 1,129 | 27,999 | 3% | $ | 30,802 | 31,619 | 35,629 | |||||||||||||
| New York | 587 | 13,174 | — | 2,307 | 587 | 15,481 | 2 | 16,225 | 16,575 | 17,930 | |||||||||||||||
| Florida | 94 | 8,491 | — | 2,587 | 94 | 11,078 | 1 | 12,081 | 12,492 | 14,577 | |||||||||||||||
| Texas | 193 | 9,514 | — | 1,453 | 193 | 10,967 | 1 | 11,808 | 12,033 | 14,224 | |||||||||||||||
| Georgia | 131 | 5,014 | — | 872 | 131 | 5,886 | * | 6,277 | 6,105 | 6,804 | |||||||||||||||
| Arizona | 10 | 4,671 | — | 652 | 10 | 5,323 | * | 6,129 | 5,182 | 5,806 | |||||||||||||||
| North Carolina | 58 | 3,732 | — | 1,052 | 58 | 4,784 | * | 5,223 | 5,397 | 6,408 | |||||||||||||||
| Washington | 155 | 4,173 | — | 515 | 155 | 4,688 | * | 5,148 | 5,247 | 5,994 | |||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 60 | 2,736 | — | 1,441 | 60 | 4,177 | * | 4,545 | 4,364 | 5,130 | |||||||||||||||
| Massachusetts | 225 | 2,573 | — | 1,182 | 225 | 3,755 | * | 4,252 | 3,964 | 4,701 | |||||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 1,101 | 36,640 | 28 | 5,727 | 1,129 | 42,367 | 5 | 46,520 | 47,638 | 54,264 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,733 | 115,859 | 38 | 20,646 | 3,771 | 136,505 | 15% | $ | 149,010 | 150,616 | 171,467 | |||||||||||||
| By property: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apartments | $ | 85 | 28,359 | — | 11,399 | 85 | 39,758 | 4% | $ | 44,783 | 42,585 | 51,749 | |||||||||||||
| Office | 3,100 | 24,818 | 36 | 2,562 | 3,136 | 27,380 | 3 | 28,768 | 31,526 | 34,295 | |||||||||||||||
| Industrial/warehouse | 74 | 20,987 | — | 3,051 | 74 | 24,038 | 3 | 26,178 | 25,413 | 28,493 | |||||||||||||||
| Hotel/motel | 190 | 10,853 | — | 653 | 190 | 11,506 | 1 | 12,015 | 12,725 | 13,612 | |||||||||||||||
| Retail (excl shopping center) | 160 | 11,260 | 1 | 85 | 161 | 11,345 | 1 | 11,951 | 11,670 | 12,338 | |||||||||||||||
| Shopping center | 93 | 7,860 | — | 253 | 93 | 8,113 | * | 8,571 | 8,745 | 9,356 | |||||||||||||||
| Institutional | 12 | 4,048 | — | 1,138 | 12 | 5,186 | * | 5,524 | 5,986 | 6,568 | |||||||||||||||
| Mixed use properties | 18 | 2,303 | — | 13 | 18 | 2,316 | * | 2,427 | 3,511 | 3,763 | |||||||||||||||
| Mobile home park | — | 2,273 | — | — | — | 2,273 | * | 2,376 | 2,119 | 2,332 | |||||||||||||||
| Storage facility | — | 2,040 | — | 48 | — | 2,088 | * | 2,240 | 2,782 | 3,002 | |||||||||||||||
| Other | 1 | 1,058 | 1 | 1,444 | 2 | 2,502 | * | 4,177 | 3,554 | 5,959 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,733 | 115,859 | 38 | 20,646 | 3,771 | 136,505 | 15 | % | $ | 149,010 | 150,616 | 171,467 |
* Less than 1%.
(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit. For additional information on issued letters of credit, see Note 17 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(2)Includes 40 states and non-U.S. loans. No state in Other had loans in excess of $3.8 billion and $4.4 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Non-U.S. loans were $5.1 billion and $6.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 34 | Wells Fargo & Company |
COMMERCIAL CREDIT RISK MITIGATION. Risk mitigation actions, including the restructuring of repayment terms, securing collateral or guarantees, and entering into extensions, are based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. Extension terms generally range from six to thirty-six months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support, such as partial repayment, or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the value of collateral or financial condition of the borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we may rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extension.
Our ability to seek performance under a guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform, which is evaluated on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial information available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s reputation, creditworthiness, and willingness to work with us based on our analysis, as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating and accruing status are important factors in our allowance for credit losses methodology.
In considering the accrual status of the loan, we evaluate
the collateral and future cash flows, as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. In many cases, the
strength of the guarantor provides sufficient assurance that full repayment of the loan is expected. When full and timely collection of the loan becomes uncertain, including the performance of the guarantor, we place the loan on nonaccrual status. As appropriate, we also charge the loan down in accordance with our charge-off policies, generally to the net realizable value of the collateral securing the loan, if any.
NON-U.S. LOANS. Our classification of non-U.S. loans is based on whether the borrower’s primary address is outside of the United States. At December 31, 2024, non-U.S. loans totaled $67.9 billion, representing approximately 7% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, compared with $80.0 billion, or approximately 9% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, at December 31, 2023. Non-U.S. loans were approximately 4% of our total consolidated assets at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
COUNTRY RISK EXPOSURE. Our country risk monitoring process incorporates centralized monitoring of economic, political, social, legal, and transfer risks in countries where we do or plan to do business, along with frequent dialogue with our customers, counterparties and regulatory agencies. We establish exposure limits for each country through a centralized oversight process based on customer needs, and through consideration of the relevant and distinct risk of each country. We monitor exposures closely and adjust our country limits in response to changing conditions. We evaluate our individual country risk exposure based on our assessment of a borrower’s ability to repay,
which gives consideration for allowable transfers of risk, such as guarantees and collateral, and may be different from the reporting based on a borrower’s primary address.
Our largest single country exposure outside the U.S. at December 31, 2024, was the United Kingdom, which totaled $28.1 billion, or approximately 1% of our total assets, of which $4.3 billion were sovereign exposures and included deposits we have placed with the Bank of England pursuant to regulatory requirements in support of our London branch.
Table 20 provides information regarding our top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.), based on our assessment of risk, which gives consideration to the country of any guarantors and/or underlying collateral. With respect to Table 20:
•Lending and deposits with banks exposure includes outstanding loans, unfunded credit commitments (excluding discretionary amounts where our approval or consent is required prior to any loan funding or commitment increase), and deposits with non-U.S. banks. These balances are presented prior to the deduction of the allowance for credit losses or collateral received under the terms of the credit agreements, if any.
•Securities exposure represents debt and equity securities of non-U.S. issuers. Long and short positions are netted, and net short positions are reflected as negative exposure.
•Derivatives and other exposure represents foreign exchange contracts, derivative contracts, securities resale agreements, and securities lending agreements.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 35 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
Table 20: Select Country Exposures
| December 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lending and deposits with banks (1) | Securities | Derivatives and other | Total exposure | Total exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non-sovereign (2) | Total | Total (3) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Top 20 country exposures: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 4,300 | 20,707 | — | 28 | 19 | 3,025 | 4,319 | 23,760 | 28,079 | 27,782 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 6 | 14,716 | 634 | 810 | 147 | 658 | 787 | 16,184 | 16,971 | 17,542 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 14,388 | 608 | 667 | 232 | — | 132 | 15,055 | 972 | 16,027 | 9,260 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Luxembourg | — | 8,020 | (5) | 273 | — | 168 | (5) | 8,461 | 8,456 | 8,046 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Cayman Islands | — | 7,741 | — | — | — | 270 | — | 8,011 | 8,011 | 8,366 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | — | 5,387 | — | 133 | — | 77 | — | 5,597 | 5,597 | 5,282 | |||||||||||||||||||
| France | 5 | 3,960 | 40 | 92 | — | 86 | 45 | 4,138 | 4,183 | 4,793 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Bermuda | — | 3,629 | — | 27 | — | 74 | — | 3,730 | 3,730 | 3,855 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Germany | — | 3,093 | (109) | 258 | — | 95 | (109) | 3,446 | 3,337 | 3,405 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Guernsey | — | 2,855 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,855 | 2,855 | 2,484 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | — | 2,290 | — | 94 | — | 81 | — | 2,465 | 2,465 | 2,598 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | — | 1,277 | 28 | 15 | 2 | 520 | 30 | 1,812 | 1,842 | 1,536 | |||||||||||||||||||
| China | — | 1,199 | (195) | 532 | 136 | 10 | (59) | 1,741 | 1,682 | 2,761 | |||||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | 3 | 1,234 | (13) | 271 | 5 | 2 | (5) | 1,507 | 1,502 | 2,196 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Chile | — | 1,312 | — | 59 | — | 1 | — | 1,372 | 1,372 | 1,491 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Hong Kong | — | 361 | 17 | 843 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 1,207 | 1,226 | 681 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Australia | — | 769 | — | 226 | — | 196 | — | 1,191 | 1,191 | 2,029 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Norway | — | 964 | — | 62 | — | 31 | — | 1,057 | 1,057 | 1,537 | |||||||||||||||||||
| India | — | 920 | (64) | 174 | — | — | (64) | 1,094 | 1,030 | 1,052 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Jersey | — | 708 | — | 150 | — | 67 | — | 925 | 925 | 680 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 country exposures | $ | 18,702 | 81,750 | 1,000 | 4,279 | 311 | 5,496 | 20,013 | 91,525 | 111,538 | 107,376 |
(1)Includes sovereign and non-sovereign deposits with banks of $18.7 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2024.
(2)Total non-sovereign exposure consisted of $45.1 billion exposure to financial institutions and $46.4 billion to non-financial corporations at December 31, 2024.
(3)The 2023 exposures correspond to the ranking of the top 20 country exposures at December 31, 2024, and do not necessarily reflect our top 20 exposures at December 31, 2023.
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS. Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is composed of 1–4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans. Junior lien mortgage loans consist of residential mortgage lines of credit and loans that are subordinate in rights to an existing lien on the same property. Residential mortgage – first lien loans represented 96% of the total residential mortgage loan portfolio at both December 31, 2024 and 2023.
The residential mortgage loan portfolio includes loans with adjustable-rate features. We monitor the risk of default as a result of interest rate increases on adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans, which may be mitigated by product features that limit the amount of the increase in the contractual interest rate. The default risk of these loans is considered in our ACL for loans. ARM loans were $66.3 billion, or 7% of total loans, at December 31, 2024, compared with $66.7 billion, or 7% of total loans, at December 31, 2023, with an initial reset date in 2026 or later for the majority of this portfolio at December 31, 2024. We do not offer option ARM products, nor do we offer variable-rate mortgage products with fixed payment amounts, commonly referred to within the financial services industry as negative amortizing mortgage loans.
The outstanding balance of residential mortgage lines of credit (both first and junior lien) was $12.4 billion at December 31, 2024, compared with $15.0 billion at December 31, 2023. The unfunded credit commitments for these lines of credit totaled $22.5 billion at December 31, 2024, compared with $28.6 billion at December 31, 2023. Our residential mortgage lines of credit generally have draw periods of 10, 15 or 20 years with variable interest rate and payment
options available during the draw period of (1) interest-only or (2) 1.5% of outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest. The lines that enter their amortization period may experience higher delinquencies and higher loss rates than the ones in their draw or term period. We have considered this increased risk in our ACL for loans estimate. Interest-only lines and loans were $18.7 billion, or 2% of total loans, at December 31, 2024, compared with $20.0 billion, or 2% of total loans, at December 31, 2023.
We monitor changes in real estate values and underlying economic or market conditions for the geographic areas of our residential mortgage loan portfolio as part of our credit risk management process. Our periodic review of this portfolio includes original appraisals adjusted for the change in Home Price Index (HPI) or estimates from automated valuation models (AVMs) to support property values. AVMs are computer-based tools used to estimate the market value of homes. We have processes to periodically validate AVMs and specific risk management guidelines addressing the circumstances when AVMs may be used. For additional information about our use of appraisals and AVMs, see Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Part of our credit monitoring includes tracking delinquency, current Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) credit scores and loan to collateral values (LTV) on the entire residential mortgage loan portfolio. For junior lien mortgages, LTV uses the total combined loan balance of first and junior lien mortgages (including unused line of credit amounts). For additional information regarding credit quality indicators, see Note 5 (Loans and Related
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 36 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We continue to modify residential mortgage loans to assist homeowners and other borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Under these programs, we may provide concessions such as interest rate reductions, term extensions, forbearance of principal, and in some cases, principal forgiveness. These programs generally include a trial payment period of three months, and after successful completion and compliance with
terms during this period, the loan is permanently modified. For additional information on loan modifications, see Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Our residential mortgage loan portfolio decreased $10.5 billion from December 31, 2023, due to loan paydowns, partially offset by originations. Table 21 shows the outstanding balances of our first and junior lien mortgage loan portfolios.
Table 21: Residential Mortgage Loans
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | ||||||||
| California (1) | $ | 108,000 | 12 | % | 109,972 | 12 | ||||||
| New York | 30,777 | 3 | 31,322 | 3 | ||||||||
| Washington | 10,621 | 1 | 10,672 | 1 | ||||||||
| New Jersey | 9,841 | 1 | 10,161 | 1 | ||||||||
| Florida | 9,368 | 1 | 10,065 | 1 | ||||||||
| Other (2) | 65,336 | 7 | 69,893 | 8 | ||||||||
| Government insured/guaranteed loans (3) | 7,097 | 1 | 7,568 | 1 | ||||||||
| Total first lien mortgage portfolio | $ | 241,040 | 26 | % | 249,653 | 27 | ||||||
| Total junior lien mortgage portfolio (4) | 9,229 | 1 | 11,071 | 1 | ||||||||
| Total residential mortgage loan portfolio | $ | 250,269 | 27 | % | 260,724 | 28 | % |
(1)Our first lien mortgage loans to borrowers in California are located predominantly within the larger metropolitan areas, with no single California metropolitan area consisting of more than 4% of total loans.
(2)Consists of 45 states; no state in Other had loans in excess of $6.9 billion and $7.4 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
(3)Represents loans, substantially all of which were purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) loan securitization pools, where the repayment of the loans is insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, such as the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). For additional information on GNMA loan securitization pools, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Activities” section in this Report.
(4)Includes loans of $2.7 billion and $3.1 billion in California and no other state had loans in excess of $1.0 billion and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
CREDIT CARD, AUTO, AND OTHER CONSUMER LOANS. Table 22 shows the outstanding balance of our credit card, auto, and other consumer loan portfolios. For information regarding credit quality indicators for these portfolios, see Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 22: Credit Card, Auto, and Other Consumer Loans
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | ||||||||||
| Credit card | $ | 56,542 | 6 | % | $ | 52,230 | 6 | % | ||||||
| Auto | 42,367 | 5 | 47,762 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Other consumer (1) | 29,408 | 3 | 28,539 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 128,317 | 14 | % | $ | 128,531 | 14 | % |
(1)Includes $21.4 billion and $18.3 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, of securities-based loans originated by the WIM operating segment.
Credit Card. The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, was due to higher point of sale volume and the impact of new product launches.
Auto. The decrease in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, was due to paydowns exceeding originations reflecting our actions related to credit tightening.
Other Consumer. The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, was due to loan originations exceeding paydowns.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 37 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
NONPERFORMING ASSETS (NONACCRUAL LOANS AND FORECLOSED ASSETS). We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when:
•the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain (generally based on an assessment of the borrower’s financial condition and the adequacy of collateral, if any), such as in bankruptcy or other circumstances;
•they are 90 days (120 days with respect to residential mortgage loans) past due for interest or principal, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection;
•part of the principal balance has been charged off; or
•for junior lien mortgage loans, we have evidence that the related first lien mortgage may be 120 days past due or in the process of foreclosure regardless of the junior lien delinquency status.
Certain nonaccrual loans may be returned to accrual status after they perform for a period of time. Consumer credit card loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are generally fully charged off when the loan reaches 180 days past due.
Table 23 summarizes nonperforming assets.
Table 23: Nonperforming Assets (Nonaccrual Loans and Foreclosed Assets)
| ($ in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonaccrual loans: | ||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 763 | 662 | |||
| Commercial real estate | 3,771 | 4,188 | ||||
| Lease financing | 84 | 64 | ||||
| Total commercial | 4,618 | 4,914 | ||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | 2,991 | 3,192 | ||||
| Auto | 89 | 115 | ||||
| Other consumer | 32 | 35 | ||||
| Total consumer | 3,112 | 3,342 | ||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 7,730 | 8,256 | |||
| As a percentage of total loans | 0.85 | % | 0.88 | |||
| Foreclosed assets: | ||||||
| Government insured/guaranteed (2) | $ | 3 | 12 | |||
| Commercial | 169 | 135 | ||||
| Consumer | 34 | 40 | ||||
| Total foreclosed assets | 206 | 187 | ||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 7,936 | 8,443 | |||
| As a percentage of total loans | 0.87 | % | 0.90 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans are not placed on nonaccrual status when they are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, such as the FHA or the VA.
(2)Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed real estate resulting from government insured/guaranteed loans are classified as nonperforming. Both principal and interest related to these foreclosed real estate assets are collectible because the loans were insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Receivables related to the foreclosure of certain government guaranteed real estate mortgage loans are excluded from this table and included in accounts receivable in other assets. For additional information on the classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Total nonaccrual loans decreased $526 million from December 31, 2023, driven by decreases in commercial real estate and residential mortgage nonaccrual loans, partially offset by an increase in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans.
For additional information on commercial nonaccrual loans, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing” and “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate” sections in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 38 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 24 provides an analysis of the changes in nonaccrual loans. Typically, changes to nonaccrual loans period-over-period represent inflows for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status in accordance with our policies, offset by reductions for loans
that are paid down, charged off, sold, foreclosed, or are no longer classified as nonaccrual as a result of continued performance and an improvement in the borrower’s financial condition and loan repayment capabilities.
Table 24: Analysis of Changes in Nonaccrual Loans
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||
| Commercial nonaccrual loans | |||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 4,914 | 1,823 | ||||||
| Inflows | 4,613 | 6,524 | |||||||
| Outflows: | |||||||||
| Returned to accruing | (966) | (474) | |||||||
| Foreclosures | (58) | (70) | |||||||
| Charge-offs | (1,635) | (1,054) | |||||||
| Payments, sales and other | (2,250) | (1,835) | |||||||
| Total outflows | (4,909) | (3,433) | |||||||
| Balance, end of period | 4,618 | 4,914 | |||||||
| Consumer nonaccrual loans | |||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | 3,342 | 3,803 | |||||||
| Inflows | 1,283 | 1,314 | |||||||
| Outflows: | |||||||||
| Returned to accruing | (571) | (737) | |||||||
| Foreclosures | (88) | (101) | |||||||
| Charge-offs | (85) | (167) | |||||||
| Payments, sales and other | (769) | (770) | |||||||
| Total outflows | (1,513) | (1,775) | |||||||
| Balance, end of period | 3,112 | 3,342 | |||||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 7,730 | 8,256 |
We considered the risk of losses on nonaccrual loans in developing our allowance for loan losses. We believe exposure to losses on nonaccrual loans is mitigated by the following factors at December 31, 2024:
•98% of total commercial nonaccrual loans were secured, predominantly by real estate.
•61% of total commercial nonaccrual loans were current on interest and 52% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on both principal and interest, but were on nonaccrual status because the full or timely collection of interest or principal had become uncertain.
•99% of total consumer nonaccrual loans were secured, of which 96% were secured by real estate and 98% had an LTV ratio of 80% or less.
•$435 million of the $545 million of consumer loans in bankruptcy or discharged in bankruptcy, and classified as nonaccrual, were current.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 39 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
NET CHARGE-OFFS. Table 25 presents net loan charge-offs.
Table 25: Net Loan Charge-offs
| Quarter ended December 31, | Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Net loan charge- offs | % ofaverageloans (1) | Net loan charge- offs | % of average loans (1) | Net loan charge- offs | % ofaverageloans | Net loan charge- offs | % of average loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 132 | 0.14 | % | $ | 90 | 0.09 | % | $ | 597 | 0.16 | % | $ | 345 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 261 | 0.74 | 377 | 0.99 | 903 | 0.62 | 566 | 0.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 10 | 0.23 | 5 | 0.14 | 35 | 0.20 | 12 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 403 | 0.30 | 472 | 0.34 | 1,535 | 0.29 | 923 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage | (14) | (0.02) | 3 | — | (69) | (0.03) | (24) | (0.01) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 628 | 4.49 | 520 | 4.02 | 2,455 | 4.58 | 1,680 | 3.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 82 | 0.77 | 130 | 1.06 | 356 | 0.80 | 478 | 0.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 112 | 1.56 | 127 | 1.79 | 495 | 1.75 | 413 | 1.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 808 | 0.85 | 780 | 0.79 | 3,237 | 0.85 | 2,547 | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,211 | 0.53 | % | $ | 1,252 | 0.53 | % | $ | 4,772 | 0.52 | % | $ | 3,470 | 0.37 | % |
(1)Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans are annualized.
The increase in commercial net loan charge-offs in 2024, compared with 2023, was due to higher losses, primarily in our commercial real estate portfolio driven by the office property type.
The increase in consumer net loan charge-offs in 2024, compared with 2023, was due to higher losses in our credit card portfolio driven by higher loan balances, partially offset by lower losses in our auto portfolio.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES. We maintain an allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected lifetime credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either AFS or HTM, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, including deposits with banks, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures.
The process for establishing the ACL for loans takes into consideration many factors, including historical and forecasted loss trends, loan-level credit quality ratings and loan grade-specific characteristics. The process involves subjective and complex judgments. In addition, we review a variety of credit metrics and trends. These credit metrics and trends, however, do not solely determine the amount of the allowance as we use several analytical tools. For additional information on our ACL, see the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report. For additional information on our ACL for loans, see Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report, and for additional information on our ACL for debt securities, see Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 26 presents the allocation of the ACL for loans by loan portfolio segment and class.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 40 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 26: Allocation of the ACL for Loans
| Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | ACL | ACL as % of loan class | Loans as % of total loans | ACL | ACL as % of loan class | Loans as % of total loans | ||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 4,151 | 1.09 | % | 42 | $ | 4,272 | 1.12 | % | 40 | ||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 3,583 | 2.62 | 15 | 3,939 | 2.62 | 16 | ||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 212 | 1.29 | 2 | 201 | 1.22 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 7,946 | 1.49 | 59 | 8,412 | 1.54 | 58 | ||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage (1) | 541 | 0.22 | 27 | 652 | 0.25 | 28 | ||||||||||||
| Credit card | 4,869 | 8.61 | 6 | 4,223 | 8.09 | 6 | ||||||||||||
| Auto | 636 | 1.50 | 5 | 1,042 | 2.18 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 644 | 2.19 | 3 | 759 | 2.66 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 6,690 | 1.77 | 41 | 6,676 | 1.72 | 42 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 14,636 | 1.60 | % | 100 | $ | 15,088 | 1.61 | % | 100 | ||||||||
| Components: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 14,183 | 14,606 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded credit commitments | 453 | 482 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 14,636 | 15,088 | |||||||||||||||
| Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total net loan charge-offs | 2.97x | 4.21 | ||||||||||||||||
| Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total nonaccrual loans | 1.83 | 1.77 | ||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans | 1.55 | % | 1.56 |
(1)Includes negative allowance for expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off.
The ratios for the allowance for loan losses and the ACL for loans presented in Table 26 may fluctuate from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength, and the value and marketability of collateral.
The ACL for loans decreased $452 million, or 3%, from December 31, 2023, reflecting decreases across most loan portfolios, partially offset by increases for credit card loans. The detail of the changes in the ACL for loans by portfolio segment (including charge-offs and recoveries by loan class) is included in Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We consider multiple economic scenarios to develop our estimate of the ACL for loans, which generally include a base scenario, along with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. We weighted the base scenario and the downside scenarios in our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31, 2024. The base scenario assumed slowing inflation with slowing economic growth and also reflected a significant decline in commercial real estate prices and increased unemployment rates from historically low levels. The downside scenarios assumed a more substantial economic contraction due to lower business and consumer confidence and declining property values.
Additionally, we consider qualitative factors that represent management’s judgment of risks related to our processes and assumptions used in establishing the ACL such as economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, process risk, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.
The forecasted key economic variables used in our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31 and September 30, 2024, are presented in Table 27.
Table 27: Forecasted Key Economic Variables
| 2Q 2025 | 4Q 2025 | 2Q 2026 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted blend of economic scenarios: | |||||||||
| U.S. unemployment rate (1): | |||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | 4.7 | % | 5.3 | 5.7 | |||||
| September 30, 2024 | 4.9 | 5.7 | 6.0 | ||||||
| U.S. real GDP (2): | |||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | (0.2) | (0.1) | 1.1 | ||||||
| September 30, 2024 | (0.5) | 0.3 | 1.7 | ||||||
| Home price index (3): | |||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | (0.5) | (2.9) | (3.9) | ||||||
| September 30, 2024 | (2.3) | (4.6) | (4.6) | ||||||
| Commercial real estate asset prices (3): | |||||||||
| December 31, 2024 | (7.2) | (9.6) | (7.4) | ||||||
| September 30, 2024 | (8.8) | (10.6) | (7.4) |
(1)Quarterly average.
(2)Percent change from the preceding period, seasonally adjusted annualized rate.
(3)Percent change year over year of national average; outlook differs by geography and property type.
Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality and mix changes, and changes in general economic conditions and expectations (including for unemployment and real GDP), among other factors.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 41 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
We believe the ACL for loans of $14.6 billion at December 31, 2024, was appropriate to cover expected credit losses, including unfunded credit commitments, at that date. The entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses from the total loan portfolio. The ACL for loans is subject to change and reflects existing factors as of the date of determination, including economic or market conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes. Due to the sensitivity of the ACL for loans to changes in the economic and business environment, it is possible that we will incur incremental credit losses not anticipated as of the balance sheet date. Our process for determining the ACL is discussed in the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES. We sell residential and commercial mortgage loans to various parties, including (1) government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), who include the mortgage loans in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, (2) SPEs that issue private label MBS, and (3) other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. In addition, we pool FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed residential mortgage loans that are then used to back securities guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). We may be required to repurchase these mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans (collectively, repurchase) in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a period (usually 90 days or less) after we receive notice of the breach.
In connection with our sales and securitization of residential mortgage loans, we have established a mortgage repurchase liability, initially at fair value, related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have a repurchase obligation, whether or not we currently service those loans, based on a combination of factors. See Note 16 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses.
We provide recourse to GSEs for commercial mortgage loans sold under various programs and arrangements. The terms of certain programs require that we incur a pro-rata share of actual losses in the event of borrower default. See Note 17 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our exposure to loss related to these programs.
In addition to servicing loans in our portfolio, we act as servicer and/or master servicer of residential and commercial mortgage loans included in GSE mortgage securitizations, GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations of FHA-insured/VA-guaranteed mortgages and private label mortgage securitizations, as well as for unsecuritized loans owned by institutional investors.
The loans we service were originated by us or by other mortgage loan originators. As servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) collect payments due from borrowers, (2) advance certain delinquent payments of principal and interest on the mortgage loans, (3) maintain and administer any hazard, title or primary mortgage insurance policies relating to the mortgage loans, (4) maintain any required escrow accounts for payment of
taxes and insurance and administer escrow payments, and (5) foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the related servicing agreement, consider alternatives to foreclosure, such as loan modifications or short sales, and for certain investors, manage the foreclosed property through liquidation. As master servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) supervise, monitor and oversee the servicing of the mortgage loans by the servicer, and (2) advance delinquent amounts required by non-affiliated servicers who fail to perform their advancing obligations. The amount and timing of reimbursement for advances of delinquent payments vary by investor and the applicable servicing agreements. See Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about residential and commercial servicing rights, servicer advances and servicing fees.
In accordance with applicable servicing guidelines, upon transfer as servicer, we have the option to repurchase loans from certain loan securitizations, which generally becomes exercisable based on delinquency status such as when three scheduled loan payments are past due. When we have the unilateral option to repurchase a loan, we recognize the loan and a corresponding liability on our balance sheet regardless of our intent to repurchase the loan. We may repurchase these loans for cash and as a result, our total consolidated assets do not change.
Loans repurchased from GNMA securitization pools that regain current status or are otherwise modified in accordance with applicable servicing guidelines may be included in future GNMA loan securitization pools. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, these loans, which we have repurchased or have the unilateral option to repurchase, were $7.5 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, which included $7.1 billion and $7.4 billion, respectively, in loans held for investment, with the remainder in loans held for sale. See Note 16 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our involvement with mortgage loan securitizations.
Each agreement under which we act as servicer or master servicer generally specifies a standard of responsibility for actions we take in such capacity. We are required to indemnify the securitization trustee against any failure by us, as servicer or master servicer, to perform our servicing obligations. In addition, if we commit a breach of our obligations as servicer or master servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period. The standards governing servicing in GSE-guaranteed securitizations, and the possible remedies for violations of such standards, vary, and those standards and remedies are determined by servicing guides maintained by the GSEs, contracts between the GSEs and individual servicers and topical guides published by the GSEs from time to time. Such remedies could include indemnification or repurchase of an affected mortgage loan. In addition, in connection with our servicing activities, we could continue to become subject to consent orders and settlement agreements with federal and state regulators for alleged servicing issues and practices. In general, these can require us to provide customers with loan modification relief, refinancing relief, and foreclosure prevention and assistance, and can result in business restrictions or the imposition of certain monetary penalties on us.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 42 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Asset/Liability Management
Asset/liability management involves measuring, monitoring and managing interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity and funding. Primary oversight of interest rate risk and market risk resides with the Finance Committee of the Board, while primary oversight of liquidity and funding resides with the Risk Committee of the Board. These committees oversee the administration and effectiveness of financial risk management policies and processes used to assess and manage these risks.
At the management level, the Corporate Asset/Liability Committee, which consists of management from finance, risk and business groups, oversees these risks and supports periodic reports provided to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee as appropriate. As discussed in more detail for market risk activities below, we employ separate management level oversight specific to market risk.
INTEREST RATE RISK. Interest rate risk is the risk that market fluctuations in interest rates, credit spreads, or foreign exchange can cause a loss of the Company’s earnings and capital stemming from mismatches in the cash flows of the Company’s assets and liabilities generally arising from customer-related lending and deposit-taking activities. We are subject to interest rate risk because:
•assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times or by different amounts;
•short-term and long-term market interest rates may change independently or with different magnitudes;
•the remaining maturity for various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change; or
•interest rates may also have a direct or indirect effect on loan demand, collateral values, credit losses, loan origination volume, and the fair value of financial instruments and MSRs.
We assess interest rate risk by comparing the earnings outcomes from multiple interest rate scenarios relative to our base scenario. The base scenario is a reference point used by the Company for financial planning purposes. These scenarios may differ in the direction of interest rate changes, the degree and speed of interest rate changes over time, and the projected shape of the yield curve. They also require assumptions regarding drivers of earnings and balance sheet composition such as loan originations, prepayment rates on loans and debt securities, deposit flows and mix, as well as pricing strategies. We periodically assess and enhance our scenarios and assumptions.
Table 28 presents the results of the estimated net interest income sensitivity over the next 12 months from the multiple scenarios compared with our base scenario. These hypothetical scenarios include instantaneous movements across the yield curve with both lower and higher interest rates under a parallel shift, as well as steeper and flatter non-parallel changes in the yield curve. Long-term interest rates are defined as all tenors three years and longer, and short-term interest rates are defined as all tenors less than three years. Our scenario assumptions reflected the following:
•Scenarios are dynamic and reflect anticipated changes to our assets and liabilities over time.
•Mortgage prepayment and origination assumptions vary across scenarios and reflect only the impact of the higher or lower interest rates.
•Other macroeconomic variables that could be correlated with the changes in interest rates are held constant.
•The funding forecast in our base scenario incorporates deposit mix changes and market funding levels consistent
with the base interest rate trajectory. Our hypothetical scenarios incorporate deposit mix that is the same as in the base scenario. In higher interest rate scenarios, potential customer deposit activity that shifts balances into higher yielding products and/or requires additional market funding could reduce the expected benefit from higher rates. Conversely, in lower interest rate scenarios, a potential shift to a funding mix with lower yielding deposits and/or less market funding could reduce the impact of lower rates on earning assets in these scenarios.
•The interest rate sensitivity of deposits as market interest rates change, referred to as deposit betas, are informed by historical behavior and expectations for near-term pricing strategies. Our actual experience may differ from expectations due to the lag or acceleration of deposit repricing, changes in consumer behavior, and other factors.
Table 28: Net Interest Income Sensitivity Over the Next 12 Months Using Instantaneous Movements
| ($ in billions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parallel shift: | |||||
| +100 bps shift in interest rates | $ | 1.1 | 1.8 | ||
| -100 bps shift in interest rates | (1.9) | (2.0) | |||
| -200 bps shift in interest rates | (3.8) | (4.3) | |||
| Steeper yield curve: | |||||
| +100 bps shift in long-term interest rates | 1.3 | 1.1 | |||
| -100 bps shift in short-term interest rates | (0.6) | (1.0) | |||
| Flatter yield curve: | |||||
| +100 bps shift in short-term interest rates | (0.3) | 0.7 | |||
| -100 bps shift in long-term interest rates | (1.3) | (1.1) |
The changes in our interest rate sensitivity from December 31, 2023, to December 31, 2024, reflected updates for our expected balance sheet composition. Our interest rate sensitivity indicates that we would expect to benefit from higher interest rates as our assets would reprice faster and to a greater degree than our liabilities, while in the case of lower interest rates, our assets would reprice downward and to a greater degree than our liabilities resulting in lower net interest income. The realized impact of interest rate changes may vary from our base and hypothetical scenarios for various reasons, including any deposit pricing lags.
We use interest rate derivatives and our debt securities portfolio to manage our interest rate exposures. We use derivatives for asset/liability management to (i) convert cash flows from selected assets and/or liabilities from floating-rate payments to fixed-rate payments, or vice versa, (ii) reduce accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) sensitivity of our AFS debt securities portfolio, and/or (iii) economically hedge our mortgage origination pipeline, funded mortgage loans, and MSRs. Derivatives used to hedge our interest rate risk exposures are presented in Note 14 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report. As interest rates increase, changes in the fair value of AFS debt securities may negatively affect AOCI, which lowers the amount of our regulatory capital. AOCI also includes unrealized gains or losses related to the transfer of debt securities from AFS to HTM, which are subsequently amortized into earnings over the life of the security with no further impact from interest rate changes. See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 43 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
additional information on our debt securities portfolio.
In addition to the net interest income sensitivity above, we also measure and evaluate the economic value sensitivity (EVS) of our balance sheet. EVS is the change in the present value of the life-time cash flows of the Company’s assets and liabilities across a range of scenarios. It is based on the existing balance sheet, at a point in time, and helps indicate whether we are exposed to higher or lower interest rates. We manage EVS through a set of limits that are designed to align with our interest rate risk appetite.
Our interest rate sensitive noninterest income and expense are impacted by mortgage banking activities that may have sensitivity impacts that move in the opposite direction of our net interest income. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section in this Report for additional information.
Interest rate sensitive noninterest income is also impacted by changes in earnings credit for noninterest-bearing deposits that reduce treasury management deposit-related service fees on commercial accounts, and by trading assets. In addition, the impact to net interest income does not include the fair value changes of trading securities, which, along with the effects of related economic hedges, are recorded in noninterest income. In addition to changes in interest rates, net interest income and noninterest income from trading securities may be impacted by the actual composition of the trading portfolio. For additional information on our trading assets and liabilities, see Note 2 (Trading Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
MORTGAGE BANKING INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK. We originate and service mortgage loans, which subjects us to various risks, including market, interest rate, credit, and liquidity risks that can be substantial. Based on market conditions and other factors, we reduce credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing mortgage loans. We determine whether mortgage loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment, but may change our intent to hold loans for investment or sale as part of our corporate asset/liability management activities. We may also retain securities in our investment portfolio at the time we securitize mortgage loans.
Changes in interest rates may impact mortgage banking noninterest income, including origination and servicing fees, and the fair value of our residential MSRs, LHFS, and derivative loan commitments (interest rate “locks”) extended to mortgage applicants. Interest rate changes will generally impact our mortgage banking noninterest income on a lagging basis due to the time it takes for the market to reflect a shift in customer demand, as well as the time required for processing a new application, providing the commitment, and securitizing and selling the loan. The amount and timing of the impact will depend on the magnitude, speed and duration of the changes in interest rates.
The valuation of our residential MSRs can be highly subjective and involve complex judgments by management about matters that are inherently unpredictable. Changes in interest rates influence a variety of significant assumptions captured in the periodic valuation of residential MSRs, including prepayment rates, expected returns and potential risks on the servicing asset portfolio, costs to service, the value of escrow deposit balances and other servicing valuation elements. See the “Critical Accounting Policies – Fair Value Measurements” section in this Report for additional information on the valuation of our residential MSRs.
An increase in interest rates generally reduces the propensity for refinancing, extends the expected duration of the managed servicing portfolio, and therefore increases the estimated fair value of the MSRs. However, an increase in interest rates can also reduce mortgage loan demand, including refinancing activity, which reduces noninterest income from origination activities. A decline in interest rates would generally have an opposite impact.
To reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates, our residential MSRs are economically hedged with a combination of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, Eurodollar futures, highly liquid mortgage forward contracts and interest rate options. Hedging the various sources of interest rate risk in mortgage banking is a complex process that requires sophisticated modeling and constant monitoring. There are several potential risks to earnings from mortgage banking related to origination volumes and mix, valuation of MSRs and associated hedging results, the relationship and degree of volatility between short-term and long-term interest rates, and changes in servicing and foreclosures costs. While we attempt to balance our mortgage banking interest rate and market risks, the financial instruments we use may not perfectly correlate with the values and income being hedged.
The size of the hedge and the particular combination of hedging instruments at any point in time is designed to reduce the volatility of our earnings over various time frames within a range of mortgage interest rates. Market factors, the composition of the managed servicing portfolio, and the relationship between the origination and servicing sides of our mortgage businesses change continually, and therefore the types of instruments used in our hedging are reviewed daily and rebalanced based on our evaluation of current market factors and the interest rate risk inherent in our portfolio.
For additional information on mortgage banking, including key assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value of MSRs, see Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities), Note 14 (Derivatives), and Note 15 (Fair Value Measurements) to Financial Statements in this Report.
MARKET RISK. Market risk is the risk of possible economic loss from adverse changes in market risk factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and the risk of possible loss due to counterparty exposure. This applies to implied volatility risk, basis risk, and market liquidity risk. It includes price risk in the trading book, mortgage servicing rights, the hedge effectiveness risk associated with the mortgage book held at fair value, and impairment on private equity investments.
The Board’s Finance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for market risk and oversees the Company’s market risk exposure and market risk management strategies. In addition, the Board’s Risk Committee has certain oversight responsibilities with respect to market risk, including counterparty risk. The Finance Committee also reports key market risk matters to the Risk Committee.
At the management level, the Market and Counterparty Risk Management function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for market risk across the enterprise. The Market and Counterparty Risk Management function reports into Corporate and Investment Banking Risk and provides periodic reports related to market risk to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee, as applicable.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 44 | Wells Fargo & Company |
MARKET RISK – TRADING ACTIVITIES. We engage in trading activities to accommodate the investment and risk management activities of our customers and to execute economic hedging to manage certain balance sheet risks. These trading activities predominantly occur within our CIB businesses. Debt and equity securities held for trading, trading loans, and trading derivatives are financial instruments used in our trading activities, and are measured at fair value through earnings. Income earned on the financial instruments used in our trading activities include net interest income, changes in fair value, and realized gains and losses. Net interest income earned from our trading activities is reflected in the interest income and interest expense components of our consolidated statement of income. Changes in fair value and realized gains and losses of the financial instruments used in our trading activities are reflected in net gains from trading activities. For additional information on the financial instruments used in our trading activities and the income from these trading activities, see Note 2 (Trading Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Value-at-risk (VaR) is a statistical risk measure used to estimate the potential loss from adverse moves in the financial markets, and Trading VaR is a measure used to provide insight
into the market risk exhibited by the Company’s trading positions on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company uses these VaR metrics complemented with sensitivity analysis and stress testing in measuring and monitoring market risk. The Company calculates Trading VaR for risk management purposes to establish and monitor line of business and Company-wide risk limits. Trading VaR is calculated based on all trading positions on our consolidated balance sheet.
Table 29 shows the Company’s Trading General VaR by risk category. Our Trading General VaR uses a historical simulation model which assumes that historical changes in market values are representative of the potential future outcomes and measures the expected earnings loss of the Company over a
1-day time interval at a 99% confidence level. Our historical simulation model is based on equally weighted data from a
12-month historical look-back period. We believe using a
12-month look-back period helps ensure the Company’s VaR is responsive to current market conditions. The 99% confidence level equates to an expectation that the Company would incur single-day trading losses in excess of the VaR estimate on average once every 100 trading days.
Table 29: Trading 1-Day 99% General VaR by Risk Category
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Period end | Average | Low | High | Period end | Average | Low | High | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company Trading General VaR Risk Categories | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | $ | 43 | 35 | 23 | 58 | 30 | 35 | 20 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 34 | 32 | 13 | 68 | 16 | 33 | 9 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 25 | 20 | 15 | 27 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity | 7 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diversification benefit (1) | (87) | (62) | (36) | (59) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company Trading General VaR | $ | 24 | 29 | 37 | 35 |
(1)The period-end and average VaR was less than the sum of the VaR components described above due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect arises because the risks are not perfectly correlated causing a portfolio of positions to usually be less risky than the sum of the risks of the positions alone. The diversification benefit is not meaningful for low and high metrics since they may occur on different days.
Sensitivity Analysis. Given the inherent limitations of the VaR models, the Company uses other measures, including sensitivity analysis, to measure and monitor risk. Sensitivity analysis is the measure of exposure to a single risk factor, such as a 0.01% increase in interest rates or a 1% increase in equity prices. We conduct and monitor sensitivity on interest rates, credit spreads, volatility, equity, commodity, and foreign exchange exposure. Sensitivity analysis complements VaR as it provides an indication of risk relative to each factor irrespective of historical market moves.
Stress Testing. While VaR captures the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market data, stress testing is designed to capture the Company’s exposure to extreme but low probability market movements. Stress scenarios estimate the risk of losses based on management’s assumptions of abnormal but severe market movements such as severe credit spread widening or a large decline in equity prices. These scenarios assume that the market moves happen instantaneously and no repositioning or hedging activity takes place to mitigate losses as events unfold (a conservative approach since experience demonstrates otherwise).
An inventory of scenarios is maintained representing both historical and hypothetical stress events that affect a broad
range of market risk factors with varying degrees of correlation and differing time horizons. Hypothetical scenarios assess the impact of large movements in financial variables on portfolio values. Typical examples include a 1% (100 basis point) increase across the yield curve or a 10% decline in equity market indexes. Historical scenarios utilize an event-driven approach: the stress scenarios are based on plausible but rare events, and the analysis addresses how these events might affect the risk factors relevant to a portfolio.
The Company’s stress testing framework is also used in calculating results in support of the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and internal stress tests. Stress scenarios are regularly reviewed and updated to address potential market events or concerns. For more detail on the CCAR process, see the “Capital Management” section in this Report.
MARKET RISK – EQUITY SECURITIES. We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity markets. We make and manage equity investments in various businesses, such as start-up companies and emerging growth companies, some of which are made by our venture capital business. We also invest in funds that make similar private equity investments. Private equity investments are approved by management and/or the Board
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 45 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
depending on investment size. Management reviews these investments at least quarterly to assess for impairment and identify observable price changes for investments accounted for using the measurement alternative, both of which may require us to make fair value measurements. Impairment assessments are based on facts and circumstances of each individual investment and the expectations for that investment’s cash flows and capital needs, the viability of its business model, and our exit strategy. Investments in nonmarketable equity securities include private equity investments accounted for under the equity method, fair value through net income, and the measurement alternative.
Additionally, as part of our business to support our customers, we trade public equities, listed/over-the-counter equity derivatives, and convertible bonds. We have parameters that govern these activities.
Changes in equity market prices may also indirectly affect our net income by (1) the value of third-party assets under management and, hence, fee income, (2) borrowers whose ability to repay principal and/or interest may be affected by the stock market, or (3) brokerage activity, related commission income and other business activities. Each business line monitors and manages these indirect risks. For additional information on our equity securities, see Note 4 (Equity Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
LIQUIDITY RISK AND FUNDING. Liquidity risk is the risk arising from the inability of the Company to meet obligations when they come due, or roll over funds at a reasonable cost, without incurring heightened costs. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that may require future cash payments, including funding for customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities and withdrawals, debt service, leases for premises and equipment, and other cash commitments. Liquidity risk also considers the stability of deposits, including the risk of losing uninsured or non-operational deposits. The objective of effective liquidity management is to be able to meet our contractual obligations and other cash commitments efficiently under both normal operating conditions and under periods of Wells Fargo-specific and/or market stress. For additional information on these obligations, see the following sections and Notes to Financial Statements in this Report:
•“Unfunded Credit Commitments” section within Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses (Note 5)
•Leasing Activity (Note 8)
•Deposits (Note 9)
•Long-Term Debt (Note 10)
•Guarantees and Other Commitments (Note 17)
•Employee Benefits (Note 22)
•Income Taxes (Note 23)
To help achieve this objective, the Board establishes liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. These guidelines are monitored on a monthly basis by the management-level Corporate Asset/Liability Committee and on a quarterly basis by the Board. These guidelines are established and monitored for both the Company and the Parent on a stand-alone basis so that the Parent is a source of strength for its banking subsidiaries.
Liquidity Stress Tests. Liquidity stress tests are performed to help the Company maintain sufficient liquidity to meet contractual and contingent outflows modeled under a variety of stress scenarios. Our scenarios utilize market-wide as well as idiosyncratic events, including a range of stress conditions and time horizons. Stress testing results facilitate evaluation of the Company’s projected liquidity position during stress and inform future needs in the Company’s funding plan.
Contingency Funding Plan. Our contingency funding plan (CFP), which is approved by the Corporate Asset/Liability Committee and the Board’s Risk Committee, sets out the Company’s strategies and action plans to address potential liquidity needs during market-wide or idiosyncratic liquidity events. The CFP establishes measures for monitoring emerging liquidity events and describes the processes for communicating and managing stress events should they occur. The CFP also identifies alternate funding and liquidity strategies available to the Company in a period of stress.
Liquidity Standards. We are subject to a rule issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC that establishes a quantitative minimum liquidity requirement, known as the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR). The rule requires a covered banking organization to hold high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) in an amount equal to or greater than its projected net cash outflows during a 30-day stress period. Our HQLA under the rule mainly consists of central bank deposits, government debt securities, and mortgage-backed securities of federal agencies. The LCR applies to the Company and to our insured depository institutions (IDIs) with total assets of $10 billion or more. In addition, rules issued by the FRB impose enhanced liquidity risk management standards on large bank holding companies (BHCs), such as Wells Fargo.
We are also subject to a rule issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC that establishes a stable funding requirement, known as the net stable funding ratio (NSFR), which requires a covered banking organization, such as Wells Fargo, to maintain a minimum amount of stable funding, including common equity, long-term debt and most types of deposits, in relation to its assets, derivative exposures and commitments over a one-year horizon period. The NSFR applies to the Company and to our IDIs with total assets of $10 billion or more. As of December 31, 2024, we were compliant with the NSFR requirement.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 46 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Liquidity Coverage Ratio. As of December 31, 2024, the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo National Bank West exceeded the minimum LCR requirement of 100%. The LCR represents average HQLA divided by average projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule.
Table 30 presents the Company’s quarterly average values for the daily-calculated LCR and its components calculated pursuant to the LCR rule requirements.
Table 30: Liquidity Coverage Ratio
| Average for quarter ended | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions, except ratio) | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | ||||
| HQLA (1): | |||||||
| Eligible cash | $ | 164,386 | 176,218 | 187,133 | |||
| Eligible securities (2) | 205,715 | 193,282 | 162,930 | ||||
| Total HQLA | 370,101 | 369,500 | 350,063 | ||||
| Projected net cash outflows (3) | 295,537 | 290,236 | 279,903 | ||||
| LCR | 125 | % | 127 | 125 |
(1)HQLA excludes excess HQLA at certain subsidiaries that is not transferable to other Wells Fargo entities.
(2)Net of applicable haircuts required under the LCR rule.
(3)Projected net cash outflows are calculated by applying a standardized set of outflow and inflow assumptions, defined by the LCR rule, to various exposures and liability types, such as deposits and unfunded loan commitments, which are prescribed based on a number of factors, including the type of customer and the nature of the account.
Liquidity Sources. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $891.7 billion of total available liquidity sources. Table 31 presents the components of our available liquidity sources.
We maintain primary sources of liquidity in the form of central bank deposits and high-quality liquid debt securities, which collectively totaled $530.7 billion as of December 31, 2024. Our high-quality liquid debt securities presented in Table 31 are substantially the same in composition as HQLA eligible securities under the LCR rule; however, they will generally exceed HQLA eligible securities due to the applicable LCR haircuts and the exclusion of LCR adjustments for excess liquidity that is not transferable from certain subsidiaries.
We believe our high-quality liquid debt securities provide reliable sources of liquidity through sales or by pledging to obtain
financing, in both normal and stressed market conditions. High-quality liquid debt securities include AFS, HTM, and trading debt securities, as well as debt securities received through securities financing activities.
As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $577.0 billion of borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Discount Window and Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB). This borrowing capacity included $215.9 billion related to pledged high-quality liquid debt securities within our primary sources of liquidity and $361.1 billion related to pledged loans and other debt securities within our contingent sources of liquidity.
Table 31: Total Available Liquidity Sources
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Sep 30, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary sources of liquidity: | ||||||||
| Central bank deposits | $ | 162,174 | 147,935 | 199,967 | ||||
| High-quality liquid debt securities (1) | 368,508 | 393,687 | 306,797 | |||||
| Total | 530,682 | 541,622 | 506,764 | |||||
| Contingent sources of liquidity (2): | ||||||||
| Pledged loans and other | 361,057 | 352,790 | 292,026 | |||||
| Total available liquidity | $ | 891,739 | 894,412 | 798,790 |
(1)Presented at fair value and includes unencumbered securities.
(2)Presented at borrowing capacity, net of haircuts.
Funding Sources. The Parent acts as a source of funding for the Company through the issuance of long-term debt and equity. WFC Holdings, LLC (the “IHC”) is an intermediate holding company and subsidiary of the Parent, which provides funding support for the ongoing operational requirements of the Parent and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries. For additional information on the IHC, see the “Regulation and Supervision – ‘Living Will’ Requirements and Related Matters” section in our 2024 Form 10-K. Additional subsidiary funding is provided by deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt.
Deposits have historically provided a sizable source of relatively low-cost funds. Loans were 67% and 69% of total deposits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 47 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
Table 32 presents a summary of our short-term borrowings, which generally mature in less than 30 days. The balances of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase may vary over time due to client activity, our own demand for financing, and our overall mix of liabilities. For additional information on the classification of our short-term borrowings, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report. We pledge certain financial instruments that we own to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings, as well as borrowings from the FHLB. For additional information, see the “Pledged Assets” section of Note 19 (Pledged Assets and Collateral) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 32: Short-Term Borrowings
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | $ | 95,235 | 77,676 | ||
| Other short-term borrowings (1) | 13,571 | 11,883 | |||
| Total | $ | 108,806 | 89,559 |
(1)Includes $1.0 billion and $0 of FHLB advances at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
We access domestic and international capital markets for long-term funding through issuances of registered debt securities, private placements, securitizations, and asset-backed secured funding. We issue long-term debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. Proceeds from securities issued were used for general corporate purposes unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus or prospectus supplement, and we expect the proceeds from securities issued in the future will be used for the same purposes. Depending on market conditions and our liquidity position, we may redeem or
repurchase, and subsequently retire, our outstanding debt securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions,
by tender offer, or otherwise. We issued $6.2 billion and had maturities of $5.9 billion of long-term debt in total during January and February 2025. Table 33 presents a summary of our long-term debt. For additional information on our long-term debt, including contractual maturities, see Note 10 (Long-Term Debt), and for information on the classification of our long-term debt, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 33: Long-Term Debt
| (in millions) | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company (Parent Only) | $ | 147,100 | 148,312 | ||
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and other bank entities (Bank) (1)(2) | 24,709 | 58,466 | |||
| Other consolidated subsidiaries | 1,269 | 810 | |||
| Total | $ | 173,078 | 207,588 |
(1)Includes $3.0 billion and $38.0 billion of FHLB advances at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. For additional information, see Note 10 (Long-Term Debt) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(2)Effective January 1, 2024, we reclassified $4.9 billion of unfunded commitment liabilities for affordable housing investments to accrued expenses and other liabilities in connection with the adoption of ASU 2023-02. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Credit Ratings. Investors in the long-term capital markets, as well as other market participants, generally will consider, among other factors, a company’s debt rating in making investment decisions. Rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, the level and quality of earnings, and rating agency assumptions regarding the probability and extent of federal financial assistance or support for certain large financial institutions. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a reduction of our credit rating; however, our debt securities do not contain credit rating covenants.
On November 20, 2024, Moody’s affirmed the Company’s ratings and maintained the stable outlook for Wells Fargo & Company and negative outlook for long-term bank deposits,
long-term issuer ratings, and senior unsecured debt. There were no other actions undertaken by the rating agencies with regard to our credit ratings during fourth quarter 2024.
See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding our credit ratings and the potential impact a credit rating downgrade would have on our liquidity and operations as well as Note 14 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report for information regarding additional collateral and funding obligations required for certain derivative instruments in the event our credit ratings were to fall below investment grade.
The credit ratings of the Parent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of December 31, 2024, are presented in Table 34.
Table 34: Credit Ratings as of December 31, 2024
| Wells Fargo & Company | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior debt | Short-term borrowings | Long-term deposits | Short-term borrowings | ||||
| Moody’s | A1 | P-1 | Aa1 | P-1 | |||
| S&P Global Ratings | BBB+ | A-2 | A+ | A-1 | |||
| Fitch Ratings | A+ | F1 | AA | F1+ | |||
| DBRS Morningstar | AA (low) | R-1 (middle) | AA | R-1 (high) |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 48 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Capital Management
We have an active program for managing capital through a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, and to meet both regulatory and market expectations. We primarily fund our capital needs through the retention of earnings net of both dividends and share repurchases, as well as through the issuance of preferred stock and long- and short-term debt. For additional information about capital planning, see the “Capital Planning and Stress Testing” section below.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Company and each of our IDIs are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Risk-based capital rules establish risk-adjusted ratios relating regulatory capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures as discussed below.
RISK-BASED CAPITAL AND RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS. The Company is subject to rules issued by federal banking regulators to implement Basel III capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations. The rules contain two frameworks for calculating capital requirements, a Standardized Approach and an Advanced Approach applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, and we must calculate our risk-based capital ratios under both approaches. The Company is required to satisfy the risk-based capital ratio requirements to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.
In July 2023, federal banking regulators issued a proposed rule to implement the final components of Basel III, which would impact risk-based capital requirements for certain banks. The proposed rule would eliminate the current Advanced Approach
and replace it with a new expanded risk-based approach for the measurement of risk-weighted assets, including more granular risk weights for credit risk, a new market risk framework, and a new standardized approach for measuring operational risk. Officials from federal banking regulators have since commented that there may be significant changes to the proposed rule.
Table 35 presents the risk-based capital requirements applicable to the Company under the Standardized Approach and Advanced Approach, respectively, as of December 31, 2024.
In addition to the risk-based capital requirements described in Table 35, if the FRB determines that a period of excessive credit growth is contributing to an increase in systemic risk, a countercyclical buffer of up to 2.50% could be added to the risk-based capital ratio requirements under federal banking regulations. The countercyclical buffer in effect at December 31, 2024, was 0.00%.
The capital conservation buffer is applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, under the Advanced Approach and is intended to absorb losses during times of economic or financial stress.
The stress capital buffer is calculated based on the decrease in a BHC’s risk-based capital ratios under the severely adverse scenario in the FRB’s annual supervisory stress test and related Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), plus four quarters of planned common stock dividends. Because the stress capital buffer is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, our stress capital buffer, and thus our risk-based capital ratio requirements under the Standardized Approach, are subject to change in future periods. Our stress capital buffer for the period October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025, is 3.80%. The FRB announced that it intends to propose changes to the supervisory stress test process.
Table 35: Risk-Based Capital Requirements – Standardized and Advanced Approaches
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 49 |
Capital Management (continued)
As a global systemically important bank (G-SIB), we are also subject to the FRB’s rule implementing an additional capital surcharge between 1.00-4.50% on the risk-based capital ratio requirements of G-SIBs. Under the rule, we must annually calculate our surcharge under two methods and use the higher of the two surcharges. The first method (method one) considers our size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability, and complexity, consistent with the methodology developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The second method (method two) uses similar inputs, but replaces substitutability with use of short-term wholesale funding and will generally result in higher surcharges than under method one. Because the G-SIB capital surcharge is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, the amount of the surcharge is subject to change in future years. If our annual calculation results in a decrease to our G-SIB capital surcharge, the decrease takes effect the next calendar year. If our annual calculation results in
an increase to our G-SIB capital surcharge, the increase takes effect in two calendar years. Our G-SIB capital surcharge will continue to be 1.50% in 2025. On July 27, 2023, the FRB issued a proposed rule that would impact the methodology used to calculate the G-SIB capital surcharge.
Under the risk-based capital rules, on-balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of several broad risk categories according to the obligor, or, if relevant, the guarantor or the nature of any collateral. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is then multiplied by the risk weight associated with that category. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories are aggregated for determining total risk-weighted assets (RWAs).
The tables that follow provide information about our risk-based capital and related ratios as calculated under Basel III capital rules. Table 36 summarizes our CET1, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, RWAs and capital ratios.
Table 36: Capital Components and Ratios
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approach | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Required Capital Ratios (1) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Required Capital Ratios (1) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | |||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 | (A) | $ | 134,588 | 140,783 | 134,588 | 140,783 | |||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital | (B) | 152,866 | 159,823 | 152,866 | 159,823 | ||||||||||||
| Total capital | (C) | 184,638 | 193,061 | 174,446 | 182,726 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets | (D) | 1,216,146 | 1,231,668 | 1,085,017 | 1,114,281 | ||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio | (A)/(D) | 9.80 | % | 11.07 | * | 11.43 | 8.50 | 12.40 | 12.63 | ||||||||
| Tier 1 capital ratio | (B)/(D) | 11.30 | 12.57 | * | 12.98 | 10.00 | 14.09 | 14.34 | |||||||||
| Total capital ratio | (C)/(D) | 13.30 | 15.18 | * | 15.67 | 12.00 | 16.08 | 16.40 |
*Denotes the binding ratio under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches at December 31, 2024.
(1)Represents the minimum ratios required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments at December 31, 2024.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 50 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 37 provides information regarding the calculation and composition of our risk-based capital under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.
Table 37: Risk-Based Capital Calculation and Components
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total equity | $ | 181,066 | 187,443 | |||
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Preferred stock | (18,608) | (19,448) | ||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock | 144 | 157 | ||||
| Noncontrolling interests | (1,946) | (1,708) | ||||
| Total common stockholders’ equity | $ | 160,656 | 166,444 | |||
| Adjustments: | ||||||
| Goodwill | (25,167) | (25,175) | ||||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | (73) | (118) | ||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets) | (735) | (878) | ||||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (1) | 947 | 919 | ||||
| Other (2) | (1,040) | (409) | ||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches | $ | 134,588 | 140,783 | |||
| Preferred stock | 18,608 | 19,448 | ||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock | (144) | (157) | ||||
| Other | (186) | (251) | ||||
| Total Tier 1 capital under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches | (A) | $ | 152,866 | 159,823 | ||
| Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 | 17,644 | 19,020 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 14,471 | 14,805 | ||||
| Other | (343) | (587) | ||||
| Total Tier 2 capital under the Standardized Approach | (B) | $ | 31,772 | 33,238 | ||
| Total qualifying capital under the Standardized Approach | (A)+(B) | $ | 184,638 | 193,061 | ||
| Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 | 17,644 | 19,020 | ||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (3) | 4,279 | 4,470 | ||||
| Other | (343) | (587) | ||||
| Total Tier 2 capital under the Advanced Approach | (C) | $ | 21,580 | 22,903 | ||
| Total qualifying capital under the Advanced Approach | (A)+(C) | $ | 174,446 | 182,726 |
(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.
(2)Includes a $60 million increase and $120 million increase at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, related to a current expected credit loss accounting standard (CECL) transition provision. In second quarter 2020, the Company elected to apply a modified transition provision issued by federal banking regulators related to the impact of CECL on regulatory capital. The rule permits certain banking organizations to exclude from regulatory capital the initial adoption impact of CECL, plus 25% of the cumulative changes in the allowance for credit losses (ACL) under CECL for each period until December 31, 2021, followed by a three-year phase-out period in which the benefit is reduced by 25% in year one, 50% in year two and 75% in year three.
(3)Differences between the approaches are driven by the qualifying amounts of ACL includable in Tier 2 capital. Under the Advanced Approach, eligible credit reserves represented by the amount of qualifying ACL in excess of expected credit losses (using regulatory definitions) is limited to 0.60% of Advanced credit RWAs, whereas the Standardized Approach includes ACL in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of Standardized credit RWAs. Under both approaches, any excess ACL is deducted from the respective total RWAs.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 51 |
Capital Management (continued)
Table 38 provides the composition and net changes in the components of RWAs under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.
Table 38: Risk-Weighted Assets
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approach (1) | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | $ Change2024/2023 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | $ Change2024/2023 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-weighted assets (RWAs): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Credit risk | $ | 1,156,572 | 1,182,805 | (26,233) | 726,855 | 756,905 | (30,050) | |||||||||||
| Market risk | 59,574 | 48,863 | 10,711 | 59,574 | 48,863 | 10,711 | ||||||||||||
| Operational risk | N/A | N/A | N/A | 298,588 | 308,513 | (9,925) | ||||||||||||
| Total RWAs | $ | 1,216,146 | 1,231,668 | (15,522) | 1,085,017 | 1,114,281 | (29,264) |
(1)RWAs calculated under the Advanced Approach utilize a risk-sensitive methodology, which relies upon the use of internal credit models based upon our experience with internal rating grades. The Advanced Approach also includes an operational risk component, which reflects the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
Table 39 provides an analysis of changes in CET1.
Table 39: Analysis of Changes in Common Equity Tier 1
| (in millions) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2023 | $ | 140,783 | |
| Cumulative effect from change in accounting policy (1) | (158) | ||
| Net income applicable to common stock | 18,606 | ||
| Common stock dividends | (5,140) | ||
| Common stock issued, repurchased, and stock compensation-related items | (18,496) | ||
| Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (596) | ||
| Goodwill | 8 | ||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 45 | ||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets) | 143 | ||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (2) | 28 | ||
| Other (3) | (635) | ||
| Change in Common Equity Tier 1 | (6,195) | ||
| Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2024 | $ | 134,588 |
(1)Effective January 1, 2024, we adopted ASU 2023-02. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(2)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.
(3)Includes a $60 million decrease from December 31, 2023, related to a CECL transition provision. In second quarter 2020, the Company elected to apply a modified transition provision issued by federal banking regulators related to the impact of CECL on regulatory capital. The rule permits certain banking organizations to exclude from regulatory capital the initial adoption impact of CECL, plus 25% of the cumulative changes in the allowance for credit losses (ACL) under CECL for each period until December 31, 2021, followed by a three-year phase-out period in which the benefit is reduced by 25% in year one, 50% in year two and 75% in year three.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 52 | Wells Fargo & Company |
TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY. We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible common equity. Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total equity less preferred equity, noncontrolling interests, goodwill, certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) and goodwill and other intangibles on investments in consolidated portfolio companies, net of applicable deferred taxes. The ratios are (i) tangible book value per common share, which represents tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding; and (ii) return on average tangible common
equity (ROTCE), which represents our annualized earnings as a percentage of tangible common equity. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management believes that tangible book value per common share and return on average tangible common equity, which utilize tangible common equity, are useful financial measures because they enable management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s use of equity.
Table 40 provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
Table 40: Tangible Common Equity
| Balance at period-end | Average balance | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period ended | Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except ratios) | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Total equity | $ | 181,066 | $ | 187,443 | $ | 182,213 | 183,879 | 184,860 | 183,167 | ||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock (1) | (18,608) | (19,448) | (19,448) | (18,581) | (19,698) | (19,930) | |||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock (1) | 144 | 157 | 173 | 147 | 168 | 143 | |||||||||||||||
| Unearned ESOP shares (1) | — | — | — | — | — | 512 | |||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | (1,946) | (1,708) | (1,986) | (1,751) | (1,844) | (2,323) | |||||||||||||||
| Total common stockholders’ equity | (A) | 160,656 | 166,444 | 160,952 | 163,694 | 163,486 | 161,569 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (25,167) | (25,175) | (25,173) | (25,172) | (25,173) | (25,177) | |||||||||||||||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | (73) | (118) | (152) | (95) | (136) | (190) | |||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on investments in consolidated portfolio companies (included in other assets) (2) | (735) | (878) | (2,427) | (895) | (2,083) | (2,359) | |||||||||||||||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (3) | 947 | 920 | 890 | 935 | 906 | 864 | |||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity | (B) | $ | 135,628 | 141,193 | 134,090 | 138,467 | 137,000 | 134,707 | |||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding | (C) | 3,288.9 | 3,598.9 | 3,833.8 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common stock | (D) | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | 18,606 | 17,982 | 12,562 | |||||||||||||
| Book value per common share | (A)/(C) | $ | 48.85 | 46.25 | 41.98 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
| Tangible book value per common share | (B)/(C) | 41.24 | 39.23 | 34.98 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
| Return on average common stockholders’ equity (ROE) | (D)/(A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.37 | % | 11.00 | 7.78 | |||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) | (D)/(B) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 13.44 | 13.13 | 9.33 |
(1)In fourth quarter 2022, we redeemed all outstanding shares of our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock.
(2)In third quarter 2023, we sold investments in certain private equity funds. As a result, we have removed the related goodwill and other intangible assets on private equity investments in consolidated portfolio companies.
(3)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period-end.
LEVERAGE REQUIREMENTS. As a BHC, we are required to maintain a supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments and maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio. Table 41 presents the leverage requirements applicable to the Company as of December 31, 2024.
Table 41: Leverage Requirements Applicable to the Company
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 53 |
Capital Management (continued)
In addition, our IDIs are required to maintain an SLR of at least 6.00% to be considered well-capitalized under applicable regulatory capital adequacy rules and maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.00%.
Table 42 presents information regarding the calculation and components of the Company’s SLR and Tier 1 leverage ratio. At December 31, 2024, each of our IDIs exceeded their applicable SLR requirements.
Table 42: Leverage Ratios for the Company
| ($ in millions) | Quarter ended December 31, 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | (A) | $ | 152,866 |
| Total consolidated assets | 1,929,845 | ||
| Adjustments: | |||
| Derivatives (1) | 62,906 | ||
| Repo-style transactions (2) | 6,296 | ||
| Credit equivalent amounts of other off-balance sheet exposures (3) | 307,204 | ||
| Other (4) | (38,610) | ||
| Total adjustments | 337,796 | ||
| Total leverage exposure | (B) | $ | 2,267,641 |
| Supplementary leverage ratio | (A)/(B) | 6.74 | % |
| Total adjusted average assets (5) | (C) | $ | 1,891,333 |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | (A)/(C) | 8.08 | % |
(1)Adjustment represents derivatives and collateral netting exposures as defined for supplementary leverage ratio determination purposes.
(2)Adjustment represents counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions where Wells Fargo & Company is the principal counterparty facing the client.
(3)Adjustment represents credit equivalent amounts of other off-balance sheet exposures not already included as derivatives and repo-style transactions exposures.
(4)Adjustment represents other permitted Tier 1 capital deductions and certain other adjustments as determined under capital rule requirements.
(5)Represents total average assets less goodwill and other permitted Tier 1 capital deductions.
TOTAL LOSS ABSORBING CAPACITY. As a G-SIB, we are required to have a minimum amount of equity and unsecured long-term debt for purposes of resolvability and resiliency, often referred to as Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). U.S. G-SIBs are required to have a minimum amount of TLAC (consisting of CET1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital issued directly by the top-tier or covered BHC plus eligible external long-term debt) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments as well as a minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt. The components used to calculate our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements as of December 31, 2024, are presented in Table 43.
Table 43: Components Used to Calculate TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt Requirements
| TLAC requirement Greater of: | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.00% of RWAs | 7.50% of total leverage exposure (the denominator of the SLR calculation) | |
| + | + | |
| TLAC buffer (equal to 2.50% of RWAs + method one G-SIB capital surcharge + any countercyclical buffer) | External TLAC leverage buffer (equal to 2.00% of total leverage exposure) | |
| Minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt Greater of: | ||
| 6.00% of RWAs | 4.50% of total leverage exposure | |
| + | ||
| Greater of method one and method two G-SIB capital surcharge |
In August 2023, the FRB proposed rules that would, among other things, modify the calculation of eligible long-term debt that counts towards the TLAC requirements, which would reduce our TLAC ratios.
Table 44 provides our TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt and related ratios.
Table 44: TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt
| December 31, 2024 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Eligible Unsecured Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum | |||||||
| Total eligible amount | $ | 301,936 | 135,288 | ||||||||
| Percentage of RWAs (3) | 24.83 | % | 21.50 | 11.12 | 7.50 | ||||||
| Percentage of total leverage exposure | 13.31 | 9.50 | 5.97 | 4.50 |
(1)TLAC ratios are calculated using the CECL transition provision issued by federal banking regulators.
(2)Represents the minimum required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.
(3)Our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements are calculated based on the greater of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.
OTHER REGULATORY CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY MATTERS. For information regarding the U.S. implementation of the Basel III LCR and NSFR, see the “Risk Management – Asset/ Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding – Liquidity Standards” section in this Report.
Our principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC, are subject to regulations to maintain minimum net capital requirements. As of December 31, 2024, these broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their respective regulatory minimum net capital requirements.
Capital Planning and Stress Testing
Our planned long-term capital structure is designed to meet regulatory and market expectations. We believe that our long-term targeted capital structure enables us to invest in and grow our business, satisfy our customers’ financial needs in varying environments, access markets, and maintain flexibility to return capital to our shareholders. Our long-term targeted capital structure also considers capital levels sufficient to exceed capital requirements, including the G-SIB capital surcharge and the stress capital buffer, as well as potential changes to regulatory requirements for our capital ratios, planned capital actions, changes in our risk profile and other factors. Accordingly, our long-term target capital levels are set above their respective regulatory minimums plus buffers.
During 2024, we issued $993 million of common stock, substantially all of which was issued in connection with employee compensation and benefits, and we repurchased 333 million shares of common stock at a cost of $19.6 billion. We paid $6.2 billion of common and preferred stock dividends during 2024.
The FRB capital plan rule establishes capital planning and other requirements that govern capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, by certain BHCs, including Wells Fargo. The FRB assesses, among other things, the overall financial condition, risk profile, and capital adequacy of BHCs when evaluating their capital plans.
As part of the annual CCAR, the FRB generates a supervisory stress test. The FRB reviews the supervisory stress test results as required under the Dodd-Frank Act using a common set of
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 54 | Wells Fargo & Company |
capital actions for all large BHCs and also reviews the Company’s proposed capital actions.
Federal banking regulators also require large BHCs and banks to conduct their own stress tests to evaluate whether the institution has sufficient capital to continue to operate during periods of adverse economic and financial conditions.
Securities Repurchases
On July 25, 2023, we announced that our Board authorized a common stock repurchase program of up to $30 billion. Unless modified or revoked by the Board, this authorization does not expire and is our only common stock repurchase program in effect. At December 31, 2024, we had remaining Board authority to repurchase up to approximately $7.3 billion of common stock.
Various factors impact the amount and timing of our share repurchases, including the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, the impact to our balance sheet of expected customer activity, our capital requirements
and long-term targeted capital structure, the results of supervisory stress tests, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and regulatory and legal considerations, including regulatory requirements under the FRB’s capital plan rule. Although we announce when the Board authorizes a share repurchase program, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Due to the various factors that may impact the amount and timing of our share repurchases and the fact that we may be in the market throughout the year, our share repurchases occur at various prices. We may suspend share repurchase activity at any time.
Furthermore, the Company has a variety of benefit plans in which employees may own or obtain shares of our common stock. The Company may buy shares from these plans to accommodate employee preferences and these purchases are subtracted from our repurchase authority.
For additional information about share repurchases during fourth quarter 2024, see Part II, Item 5 in our 2024 Form 10-K.
Regulation and Supervision
The U.S. financial services industry is subject to significant regulation and regulatory oversight initiatives. This regulation and oversight may continue to impact how U.S. financial services companies conduct business and may continue to result in increased regulatory compliance costs.
For a discussion of certain consent orders and other regulatory actions applicable to the Company, see the “Overview” section in this Report. For a discussion of other significant regulations and regulatory oversight initiatives that have affected or may affect our business, see the “Regulation and Supervision” section in our 2024 Form 10-K and the “Risk Factors” section in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 55 |
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 (Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this
Report) are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Five of these policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies govern:
•the allowance for credit losses;
•fair value measurements;
•income taxes;
•liability for legal actions; and
•goodwill impairment.
Management has discussed these critical accounting policies and the related estimates and judgments with the Board’s Audit Committee.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either HTM or AFS, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 5 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
For loans and HTM debt securities, the ACL is measured based on the remaining contractual term of the financial asset (including off-balance sheet credit exposures) adjusted, as appropriate, for prepayments and permitted extension options using historical experience, current conditions, and forecasted information. For AFS debt securities, the ACL is measured using a discounted cash flow approach and is limited to the difference between the fair value of the security and its amortized cost.
Changes in the ACL and, therefore, in the related provision for credit losses can materially affect net income. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the ACL, management considerations include the evaluation of past events, historical experience, changes in economic forecasts and conditions, customer behavior, collateral values, the length of the initial loss forecast period, and other influences. From time to time, changes in economic factors or assumptions, business or investment strategy, or products or product mix may result in a corresponding increase or decrease in our ACL. While our methodology attributes portions of the ACL to specific financial asset classes (loan and debt security portfolios) or loan portfolio segments (commercial and consumer), the entire ACL is available to absorb credit losses of the Company.
Judgment is specifically applied in:
•Economic assumptions and the length of the initial loss forecast period. We forecast a wide range of economic variables to estimate expected credit losses. Our key economic variables include gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment rate, and collateral asset prices. While many of these economic variables are evaluated at the macro-economy level, some
economic variables are forecasted at more granular levels, for example, using the metro statistical area (MSA) level for unemployment rates, home prices and commercial real estate prices. At least annually, we assess the length of the initial loss forecast period and have currently set the period to two years. For the initial loss forecast period, we forecast multiple economic scenarios that generally include a base scenario with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. Management exercises judgment when assigning weight to the economic scenarios that are used to estimate future credit losses.
•Reversion to historical loss expectations. Our long-term average loss expectations are estimated by reverting to the long-term average, on a linear basis, for each of the forecasted economic variables. These long-term averages are based on observations over multiple economic cycles. The reversion period, which may be up to two years, is assessed on a quarterly basis.
•Credit risk ratings applied to individual commercial loans, unfunded credit commitments, and debt securities. Individually assessed credit risk ratings are considered key credit variables in our modeled approaches to help assess probability of default and loss given default. Borrower quality ratings are aligned to the borrower’s financial strength and contribute to forecasted probability of default curves. Collateral quality ratings combined with forecasted collateral prices (as applicable) contribute to the forecasted severity of loss in the event of default. These credit risk ratings are reviewed by experienced senior credit officers and subjected to reviews by an internal team of credit risk specialists.
•Usage of credit loss estimation models. We use internally developed models that incorporate credit attributes and economic variables to generate credit loss estimates. Management uses judgment and quantitative analytics in the determination of segmentation, modeling approach, and variables that are leveraged in the models. These models are independently validated in accordance with the Company’s policies. We routinely assess our model performance and apply adjustments when necessary. We also assess our models for limitations against the company-wide risk inventory to help appropriately capture known and emerging risks in our estimate of expected credit losses and apply overlays as needed.
•Valuation of collateral. The current fair value of collateral is utilized to assess the expected credit losses when a financial asset is considered to be collateral dependent. Judgment is applied when valuing the collateral through appraisals, evaluation of the cash flows of the property, or other quantitative techniques. Decreases in collateral valuations support incremental ACL or charge-downs and increases in collateral valuations support lower ACL or are included in the ACL as a negative allowance when the financial asset has been previously written-down below current recovery value.
•Contractual term considerations. The remaining contractual term of a loan is adjusted for expected prepayments and certain expected extensions, renewals, or modifications. We extend the contractual term when we are not able to unconditionally cancel contractual renewals or extension options. Credit card loans have indeterminate maturities, which requires that we determine a contractual life by
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 56 | Wells Fargo & Company |
estimating the application of future payments to the outstanding loan amount.
•Qualitative factors which may not be adequately captured in the loss models. These amounts represent management’s judgment of risks related to the processes and assumptions used in establishing the ACL. We also consider economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, process risk, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.
Sensitivity. The ACL for loans is sensitive to changes in key assumptions and requires significant management judgment. Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality, and general forecasted economic conditions. The forecasted economic variables used could have varying impacts on different financial assets or portfolios. Additionally, throughout numerous credit cycles, there are observed changes in economic variables such as the unemployment rate, GDP and real estate prices which may not move in a correlated manner as variables may move in opposite directions or differ across portfolios or geography.
Our sensitivity analysis does not represent management’s view of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date. We applied a 100% weight to a more severe downside scenario in our sensitivity analysis to reflect the potential for further economic deterioration. The outcome of the scenario was influenced by the duration, severity, and timing of changes in economic variables within the scenario. The sensitivity analysis resulted in a hypothetical increase in the ACL for loans of approximately $5.4 billion at December 31, 2024. The hypothetical increase in our ACL for loans does not incorporate the impact of management judgment for qualitative factors applied in the current ACL for loans, which may have a positive or negative effect on the results. It is possible that others performing similar sensitivity analyses could reach different conclusions or results. Management believes that the estimate for the ACL for loans was appropriate at the balance sheet date.
The sensitivity analysis excludes the ACL for debt securities and other financial assets given its size relative to the overall ACL.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell a financial asset or paid to transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
We use fair value measurements to comply with recognition and disclosure requirements. For example, assets and liabilities held for trading purposes, AFS debt securities, residential mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), derivatives, and marketable equity securities are recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet each period. Other assets and liabilities, such as loans held for investment, commercial MSRs and certain nonmarketable equity securities are not recorded at fair value each period but may require nonrecurring fair value adjustments through the write-down of individual assets or the application of accounting methods such as lower of cost or fair value (LOCOM) and the measurement alternative.
Fair value measurements are made using a three-level hierarchy which is based on whether the significant inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-derived or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset or liability.
When developing fair value measurements, we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When available, we use quoted prices in active markets to measure fair value. Such measurements are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value measurement is based upon internal models that generally use market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including interest rate yield curves, prepayment rates, option volatilities and currency rates. However, when observable market data is limited or not available, fair value measurement is based upon internal models that use unobservable inputs. These models are independently validated in accordance with the Company’s policies. We also obtain pricing information from third-party vendors to record fair values and to corroborate internal prices. Validation procedures are performed over the reasonableness of prices received from third parties.
When using internal models that use unobservable inputs, management judgment is necessary as our assumptions reflect those that we believe market participants would use to estimate fair value of the asset or liability. Determination of these assumptions includes consideration of many factors, including market conditions and liquidity levels. Changes in market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value. In such cases, adjustments to available quoted prices or observable market data may be required. For example, we may adjust a price received from a third-party pricing service using internal models based on discounted cash flows when the impact of illiquid markets has not already been incorporated in the fair value measurement.
We continually assess the level and volume of market activity to determine when adjustments, if any, are made to quoted prices. Given market conditions can change over time, our determination of which markets are considered active or inactive can change. If we determine a market to be inactive, the degree to which quoted prices require adjustment may also change.
For assets and liabilities not classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy, significant judgment may be needed to determine the classification as either Level 2 or Level 3. When making this judgment, we consider available information, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness of transactions, and our understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to estimate fair value. The classification as Level 2 or Level 3 is based upon the specific facts and circumstances of each instrument or instrument category and judgments are made regarding the significance of unobservable inputs to each instrument’s fair value measurement in its entirety. If one or more unobservable inputs are considered significant to the fair value measurement, the instrument is classified as Level 3. Significant unobservable inputs used in our Level 3 fair value measurements include discount rates, default rates, comparability adjustments, and prepayment rates.
MSRs are assets that represent the rights to service mortgage loans for others. We generally recognize MSRs when we retain servicing rights in connection with the sale or securitization of loans we originate. We have elected to carry our residential MSRs at fair value with periodic changes reflected in earnings. We use internal models to estimate the fair value of residential MSRs, which represent our most significant Level 3 asset. These models calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income and incorporate our estimates of
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 57 |
Critical Accounting Policies (continued)
inputs and assumptions that market participants would use to value the asset. Certain significant inputs and assumptions, such as discount rates, prepayment rates (blend of prepayment speeds and expected defaults), and estimated costs to service residential mortgage loans, are generally not observable in the market and require judgment to determine. Both prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions can, and generally will, change quarterly as market conditions and mortgage interest rates change. We periodically benchmark our residential MSR fair value estimates to independent appraisals.
Table 45 presents our (i) assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and (ii) Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, both presented as a percentage of our total assets and total liabilities.
Table 45: Fair Value Level 3 Summary
| December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in billions) | Total balance | Level 3 (1) | Total balance | Level 3 (1) | |||||||
| Assets recorded at fairvalue on a recurring basis | $ | 338.2 | 8.3 | 276.2 | 9.5 | ||||||
| As a percentage oftotal assets | 17.5 | % | 0.4 | 14.3 | 0.5 | ||||||
| Liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 48.9 | 5.6 | 47.7 | 6.2 | ||||||
| As a percentage of total liabilities | 2.8 | % | 0.3 | 2.7 | 0.4 |
(1)Before derivative netting adjustments.
See Note 15 (Fair Value Measurements) to Financial Statements in this Report for a complete discussion on fair value measurements, our related measurement techniques and the impact to our financial statements, including MSRs. See Note 6 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report for key weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation of residential MSRs and sensitivity to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions.
Income Taxes
We file income tax returns in the jurisdictions in which we operate and evaluate income tax expense in two components: current and deferred income tax expense. Current income tax expense represents our estimated taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period and includes income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes has a greater than 50% likelihood of realization upon settlement. Tax benefits not meeting our realization criteria represent unrecognized tax benefits.
Deferred income taxes are based on the balance sheet method and deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Under the balance sheet method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities and recognizes enacted changes in income tax rates and laws in the period in which they occur. Deferred tax assets, including those related to net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards, are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. When necessary, valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the realizable amounts.
The income tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate are complex and subject to different interpretations by management and the relevant government taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. We must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Our interpretations may be subjected to review during examination by taxing authorities and disputes may arise over the respective tax positions. We attempt to resolve these disputes during the tax examination and audit process and ultimately through the court systems when applicable.
We monitor relevant tax authorities and may update our estimate of accrued income taxes due to changes in income tax laws and their interpretation by the courts and regulatory authorities on a quarterly basis. Updates to our estimate of accrued income taxes also may result from our own income tax planning and from the resolution of income tax controversies. Such updates to our estimates may be material to our operating results for any given quarter.
See Note 23 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report for a further description of our provision for income taxes and related income tax assets and liabilities.
Liability for Legal Actions
The Company is involved in a number of judicial, regulatory, governmental, arbitration and other proceedings or investigations concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities, and many of those proceedings and investigations expose the Company to potential financial loss or other adverse consequences. We establish accruals for legal actions when potential losses associated with the actions become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For such accruals, we record the amount we consider to be the best estimate within a range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if we cannot determine a best estimate, then we record the low end of the range of those potential losses. The actual costs of resolving legal actions may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those actions.
We apply judgment when establishing an accrual for potential losses associated with legal actions and in establishing the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the accrual. Our judgment in establishing accruals and the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the Company’s accrual for probable and estimable losses is influenced by our understanding of information currently available related to the legal evaluation and potential outcome of actions, including input and advice on these matters from our external counsel. These matters may be in various stages of investigation, discovery or proceedings. They may also involve a wide variety of claims across our businesses, legal entities and jurisdictions. The eventual outcome may be a scenario that was not considered or was considered remote in anticipated occurrence. Accordingly, our estimate of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly.
The outcomes of legal actions are unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, and it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible. It is also inherently difficult to estimate the amount of any loss and there may be matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but not currently estimable. Accordingly, actual losses may be in excess of the established accrual or the range of reasonably possible loss.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 58 | Wells Fargo & Company |
See Note 13 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
Goodwill Impairment
We assess goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently depending on macroeconomic and other business factors. These factors may include trends in short-term or long-term interest rates, negative trends from reduced revenue generating activities or increased costs, adverse actions by regulators, or company specific factors such as a decline in market capitalization.
We identify reporting units to be assessed for goodwill impairment at the reportable operating segment level or one level below. Goodwill is allocated to the reporting unit at the time we acquire a business and does not change unless there is goodwill impairment or a significant business reorganization impacting the reporting unit. We determine the reporting unit carrying amounts as the allocated capital plus assigned goodwill and other intangible assets. We allocate capital to the reporting units under a risk-sensitive framework driven by our regulatory capital requirements. We estimate fair value of the reporting units based on a balanced weighting of fair values estimated using both an income approach and a market approach which are intended to reflect Company performance and expectations as well as external market conditions. The methodologies for determining the carrying amounts and estimating the fair values are periodically assessed and updated as necessary.
The income approach is a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which estimates the present value of future cash flows associated with each reporting unit. A DCF analysis requires significant judgment to estimate financial forecasts for our reporting units, which includes future expectations of economic conditions and balance sheet changes, as well as considerations related to future business activities. The forecasts are reviewed by senior management. For periods after our financial forecasts, we incorporate a terminal value estimate. We discount these forecasted cash flows using a rate derived from the capital asset pricing model that produces an estimated cost of equity for our reporting units, which reflects risks and uncertainties in the financial markets and in our financial forecasts.
The market approach utilizes observable market data from comparable publicly traded companies, such as price-to-earnings or price-to-tangible book value ratios, to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value. We use judgment to select comparable companies for each reporting unit and include those with the most similar business activities.
Our 2024 assessment indicated goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2024, based on the fair value of each reporting unit exceeding its carrying amount by a significant amount. The aggregate fair value of our reporting units exceeded our market capitalization, and we believe factors that contributed to this difference included an overall control premium and market volatility. Although the fair value of our Consumer Lending reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount by a significant amount, it was the most sensitive to changes in the estimated financial forecasts.
Adverse changes to forecasts or a significant increase in the discount rates may result in an impairment. Additionally, declines in our ability to generate revenue, significant increases in credit losses or other expenses, or adverse actions from regulators are factors that could result in material goodwill impairment of any reporting unit in a future period.
For additional information on goodwill and our reportable operating segments, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), Note 7 (Intangible Assets and Other Assets), and Note 20 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 59 |
Current Accounting Developments
Table 46 provides the significant accounting updates applicable to us that have been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) but are not yet effective.
Table 46: Current Accounting Developments – Issued Standards
| Description and Effective Date | Financial statement impact | |
|---|---|---|
| ASU 2023-09 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures | ||
| The Update, effective January 1, 2025 (with early adoption permitted), enhances annual income tax disclosures primarily to further disaggregate existing disclosures. | The Update impacts our annual income tax disclosures. We are currently evaluating the required changes to our income tax disclosures. Upon adoption, those disclosures may change as follows: •For the tabular effective income tax rate reconciliation, provide specific categories (where applicable) and further disaggregation of certain categories (where applicable) by nature and/or jurisdiction if the reconciling item is 5% or more of the statutory tax expense.•Description and disclosure of states and local jurisdictions that contribute the majority of the effect of the state and local income tax category of the effective income tax rate reconciliation.•Disaggregate the amount of income taxes paid (net of refunds) by federal, state, and non-U.S. taxes and further disaggregate by individual jurisdictions where income taxes paid (net of refunds) is 5% or more of total income taxes paid (net of refunds).•Disaggregate net income (or loss) before income tax expense (or benefit) between domestic and non-U.S. |
Other Accounting Developments
The following Update is applicable to us. We are currently evaluating the Update but it is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements:
•ASU 2024-03 – Income Statement– Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expense
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 60 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements. In addition, we may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “target,” “projects,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “can” and similar references to future periods. In particular, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make about: (i) the future operating or financial performance of the Company or any of its businesses, including our outlook for future growth; (ii) our expectations regarding noninterest expense and our efficiency ratio; (iii) future credit quality and performance, including our expectations regarding future loan losses, our allowance for credit losses, and the economic scenarios considered to develop the allowance; (iv) our expectations regarding net interest income and net interest margin; (v) loan growth or the reduction or mitigation of risk in our loan portfolios; (vi) future capital or liquidity levels, ratios or targets; (vii) the expected outcome and impact of legal, regulatory and legislative developments, as well as our expectations regarding compliance therewith; (viii) future common stock dividends, common share repurchases and other uses of capital; (ix) our targeted range for return on assets, return on equity, and return on tangible common equity; (x) expectations regarding our effective income tax rate; (xi) the outcome of contingencies, such as legal actions; (xii) environmental, social and governance related goals or commitments; and (xiii) the Company’s plans, objectives and strategies.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:
•current and future economic and market conditions, including the effects of declines in housing prices, high unemployment rates, declines in commercial real estate prices, U.S. fiscal debt, budget and tax matters, geopolitical matters, and any slowdown in global economic growth;
•our capital and liquidity requirements (including under regulatory capital standards, such as the Basel III capital standards) and our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
•current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses, including rules and regulations relating to bank products and financial services;
•our ability to realize any efficiency ratio or expense target as part of our expense management initiatives, including as a
result of business and economic cyclicality, seasonality, changes in our business composition and operating environment, growth in our businesses and/or acquisitions, and unexpected expenses relating to, among other things, litigation and regulatory matters;
•the effect of the current interest rate environment or changes in interest rates or in the level or composition of our assets or liabilities on our net interest income and net interest margin;
•significant turbulence or a disruption in the capital or financial markets, which could result in, among other things, a reduction in the availability of funding or increased funding costs, a reduction in our ability to sell or securitize loans, and declines in asset values and/or recognition of impairment of securities held in our debt securities and equity securities portfolios;
•the effect of a fall in stock market prices on our investment banking business and our fee income from our brokerage and wealth management businesses;
•negative effects from instances where customers may have experienced financial harm, including on our legal, operational and compliance costs, our ability to engage in certain business activities or offer certain products or services, our ability to keep and attract customers, our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, and our reputation;
•regulatory matters, including the failure to resolve outstanding matters on a timely basis and the potential impact of new matters, litigation, or other legal actions, which may result in, among other things, additional costs, fines, penalties, restrictions on our business activities, reputational harm, or other adverse consequences;
•a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyberattacks;
•the effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs and net interest margin;
•fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board;
•changes to tax laws, regulations, and guidance as well as the effect of discrete items on our effective income tax rate;
•our ability to develop and execute effective business plans and strategies; and
•the other risk factors and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in this Report.
In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the amount and timing of any future common stock dividends or repurchases will depend on the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, the impact to our balance sheet of expected customer activity, our capital requirements and long-term targeted capital structure, the results of supervisory stress tests, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), regulatory and legal considerations, including regulatory requirements under the Federal Reserve Board’s capital plan rule, and other factors deemed relevant by the Company, and may be subject to regulatory approval or conditions.
For additional information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, refer to our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the discussion under “Risk Factors” in this Report, as
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 61 |
Forward-Looking Statements (continued)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on its website at www.sec.gov.1
Any forward-looking statement made by us speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
1 We do not control this website. Wells Fargo has provided this link for your convenience, but does not endorse and is not responsible for the content, links, privacy policy, or security policy of this website.
Forward-looking Non-GAAP Financial Measures. From time to time management may discuss forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures, such as forward-looking estimates or targets for return on average tangible common equity. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures because we are unable to provide, without unreasonable effort, a meaningful or accurate calculation or estimation of amounts that would be necessary for the reconciliation due to the complexity and inherent difficulty in forecasting and quantifying future amounts or when they may occur. Such unavailable information could be significant to future results.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 62 | Wells Fargo & Company |