WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN (WFC) FY 2021 MD&A
This page reproduces the company's own Item 7 MD&A text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.
Overview
Wells Fargo & Company is a leading financial services company that has approximately $1.9 trillion in assets, proudly serves one in three U.S. households and more than 10% of small businesses in the U.S., and is the leading middle market banking provider in the U.S. We provide a diversified set of banking, investment and mortgage products and services, as well as consumer and commercial finance, through our four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending, Commercial Banking, Corporate and Investment Banking, and Wealth and Investment Management. Wells Fargo ranked No. 37 on Fortune’s 2021 rankings of America’s largest corporations. We ranked fourth in assets and third in the market value of our common stock among all U.S. banks at December 31, 2021.
Wells Fargo’s top priority remains building a risk and control infrastructure appropriate for its size and complexity. The Company is subject to a number of consent orders and other regulatory actions, which may require the Company, among other things, to undertake certain changes to its business, operations, products and services, and risk management practices. Addressing these regulatory actions is expected to take multiple years, and we are likely to experience issues or delays along the way in satisfying their requirements. Issues or delays with one regulatory action could affect our progress on others, and failure to satisfy the requirements of a regulatory action on a timely basis could result in additional penalties, enforcement actions, and other negative consequences, which could be significant. While we still have significant work to do, the Company is committed to devoting the resources necessary to operate with strong business practices and controls, maintain the highest level of integrity, and have an appropriate culture in place.
Federal Reserve Board Consent Order Regarding Governance Oversight and Compliance and Operational Risk Management
On February 2, 2018, the Company entered into a consent order with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). As required by the consent order, the Company’s Board of Directors (Board) submitted to the FRB a plan to further enhance the Board’s governance and oversight of the Company, and the Company submitted to the FRB a plan to further improve the Company’s compliance and operational risk management program. The Company continues to engage with the FRB as the Company works to address the consent order provisions. The consent order also requires the Company, following the FRB’s acceptance and approval of the plans and the Company’s adoption and implementation of the plans, to complete an initial third-party review of the enhancements and improvements provided for in the plans. Until this third-party review is complete
and the plans are approved and implemented to the satisfaction of the FRB, the Company’s total consolidated assets as defined under the consent order will be limited to the level as of December 31, 2017. Compliance with this asset cap is measured on a two-quarter daily average basis to allow for management of temporary fluctuations. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, on April 8, 2020, the FRB amended the consent order to allow the Company to exclude from the asset cap any on-balance sheet exposure resulting from loans made by the Company in connection with the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program and the FRB’s Main Street Lending Program. As required under the amendment to the consent order, to the extent the Company chooses to exclude these exposures from the asset cap, certain fees and other economic benefits received by the Company from loans made in connection with these programs shall be transferred to the U.S. Treasury or to nonprofit organizations approved by the FRB that support small businesses. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had not excluded these exposures from the asset cap. After removal of the asset cap, a second third-party review must also be conducted to assess the efficacy and sustainability of the enhancements and improvements.
Consent Orders with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency Regarding Compliance Risk Management Program, Automobile Collateral Protection Insurance Policies, and Mortgage Interest Rate Lock Extensions
On April 20, 2018, the Company entered into consent orders with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to pay an aggregate of $1 billion in civil money penalties to resolve matters regarding the Company’s compliance risk management program and past practices involving certain automobile collateral protection insurance (CPI) policies and certain mortgage interest rate lock extensions. As required by the consent orders, the Company submitted to the CFPB and OCC an enterprise-wide compliance risk management plan and a plan to enhance the Company’s internal audit program with respect to federal consumer financial law and the terms of the consent orders. In addition, as required by the consent orders, the Company submitted for non-objection plans to remediate customers affected by the automobile collateral protection insurance and mortgage interest rate lock matters, as well as a plan for the management of remediation activities conducted by the Company. The Company continues to work to address the provisions of the consent orders. The Company has not yet satisfied certain aspects of the consent orders, and as a result, we believe regulators may impose additional penalties or take other
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 2 | Wells Fargo & Company |
enforcement actions. On September 9, 2021, the OCC assessed a $250 million civil money penalty against the Company related to insufficient progress in addressing requirements under the OCC’s April 2018 consent order and loss mitigation activities in the Company’s Home Lending business.
Consent Order with the OCC Regarding Loss Mitigation Activities
On September 9, 2021, the Company entered into a consent order with the OCC requiring the Company to improve the execution, risk management, and oversight of loss mitigation activities in its Home Lending business. In addition, the consent order restricts the Company from acquiring certain third-party residential mortgage servicing and limits transfers of certain mortgage loans requiring customer remediation out of the Company’s mortgage servicing portfolio until remediation is provided.
Retail Sales Practices Matters and Other Customer Remediation Activities
In September 2016, we announced settlements with the CFPB, the OCC, and the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney, and entered into related consent orders with the CFPB and the OCC, in connection with allegations that some of our retail customers received products and services they did not request. As a result, it remains a priority to rebuild trust through a comprehensive action plan that includes making things right for our customers, employees, and other stakeholders, and building a better Company for the future. On September 8, 2021, the CFPB consent order regarding retail sales practices expired.
Our priority of rebuilding trust has also included an effort to identify other areas or instances where customers may have experienced financial harm, provide remediation as appropriate, and implement additional operational and control procedures. We are working with our regulatory agencies in this effort. We have previously disclosed key areas of focus as part of our rebuilding trust efforts and are in the process of providing remediation for those matters. We have accrued for the probable and estimable remediation costs related to our rebuilding trust efforts, which amounts may change based on additional facts and information, as well as ongoing reviews and communications with our regulators. As our ongoing reviews continue and as we continue to strengthen our risk and control infrastructure, we have identified and may in the future identify additional items or areas of potential concern. To the extent issues are identified, we will continue to assess any customer harm and provide remediation as appropriate.
For additional information regarding retail sales practices matters and other customer remediation activities, including related legal and regulatory risk, see the “Risk Factors” section and Note 15 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Recent Developments
COVID-19 Pandemic
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have been working diligently to protect employee safety while continuing to carry out Wells Fargo’s role as a provider of essential services to the public. We have taken comprehensive steps to help customers, employees and communities.
We have strong levels of capital and liquidity, and we remain focused on delivering for our customers and communities to get through these unprecedented times.
PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) created funding for the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) loan program providing forgiveness of up to the full principal amount of qualifying loans guaranteed under a program called the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). We funded approximately $14.0 billion in loans under the PPP. At December 31, 2021, we had $2.4 billion of PPP loans outstanding. We voluntarily committed to donate all of the gross processing fees received from PPP loans funded in 2020. In 2021, we fulfilled this approximately $420 million commitment.
LIBOR Transition
The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is a widely referenced benchmark rate that seeks to estimate the cost at which banks can borrow on an unsecured basis from other banks. On March 5, 2021, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority and ICE Benchmark Administration, the administrator of LIBOR, announced that certain settings of LIBOR would no longer be published on a representative basis after December 31, 2021, and the most commonly used U.S. dollar (USD) LIBOR settings would no longer be published on a representative basis after June 30, 2023. Central banks in various jurisdictions convened committees to identify replacement rates to facilitate the transition away from LIBOR. The committee convened by the Federal Reserve in the United States, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), recommended the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as the replacement rate for USD LIBOR. Additionally, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) have issued guidance strongly encouraging banking organizations to cease using USD LIBOR as a reference rate in new contracts.
In preparation for the cessation of the various LIBOR settings, we have undertaken a variety of activities. Among other things, we proactively implemented internal “stop-sell” dates to discontinue offering products referencing LIBOR except pursuant to limited exceptions consistent with regulatory guidance. At the same time, we expanded our suite of product offerings that are indexed to alternative reference rates.
We also continue to transition our legacy LIBOR contracts to alternative reference rates. We transitioned substantially all of our legacy contracts with LIBOR settings impacted by the December 31, 2021, cessation date to alternative reference rates, and we will continue to address contracts with LIBOR settings that are impacted by the June 30, 2023, cessation date.
•For USD LIBOR contracts that mature before June 30, 2023, those contracts that are renewed or replaced will be indexed to alternative reference rates.
•At December 31, 2021, the notional amount of our derivatives indexed to USD LIBOR, including bilateral contracts that mature after June 30, 2023, and centrally-cleared contracts that mature either before or after June 30, 2023, was over $6 trillion. We expect substantially all of these contracts to transition to SOFR either prior to or immediately after June 30, 2023, in accordance with existing fallback provisions.
•At December 31, 2021, we had over $350 billion of USD LIBOR commercial credit facilities that mature after June 30, 2023. These contracts generally do not contain appropriate fallback provisions. We are proactively engaging with our clients and contract parties to amend these contracts to replace LIBOR with an alternative reference rate or to include appropriate fallback provisions, if necessary.
•At December 31, 2021, we had approximately $30 billion of USD LIBOR consumer loans and lines secured by residential real estate that mature after June 30, 2023. We expect
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 3 |
Overview (continued)
these contracts to transition to alternative reference rates in accordance with existing fallback provisions.
•At December 31, 2021, we had approximately $45 billion of debt securities indexed to USD LIBOR that mature after June 30, 2023. Substantially all of these debt securities contain fallback provisions and are expected to transition to an alternative reference rate immediately after June 30, 2023.
Additionally, we continue to monitor legislative developments that would provide a statutory framework to replace LIBOR with a benchmark rate based on SOFR in contracts that do not have fallback provisions or that have fallback provisions resulting in a replacement rate based on LIBOR.
For information regarding the risks and potential impact of LIBOR or any other referenced financial metric being significantly changed, replaced, or discontinued, see the “Risk Factors” section in this Report.
Capital Matters
Effective October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022, the Company’s stress capital buffer used to determine our minimum risk-based capital requirements under the Standardized Approach became 3.10%. Beginning January 1, 2022, our global systemically important bank (G-SIB) capital surcharge decreased by 50 basis points from 2.00% to 1.50%.
Effective January 1, 2022, we are required to use the Standardized Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR) for calculating exposure amounts for credit risk-weighted assets (RWAs) on derivative contracts. The adoption of SA-CCR resulted in an increase of less than 1.00% in total RWAs under the Standardized Approach (which was our binding approach at December 31, 2021) and a decrease of less than 0.50% in total leverage exposure at January 1, 2022.
On January 25, 2022, the Board approved an increase to the Company’s first quarter 2022 common stock dividend to $0.25 per share. For additional information about capital planning, see the “Capital Management – Capital Planning and Stress Testing” section in this Report.
Business Divestitures
On November 1, 2021, we closed our previously announced agreement to sell our Corporate Trust Services business and our previously announced agreement to sell Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM). We recorded net gains of $674 million and $269 million, respectively, from these sales, which are subject to certain post-closing adjustments and earn-out provisions.
Financial Performance
In 2021, we generated $21.5 billion of net income and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) of $4.95, compared with $3.4 billion of net income and EPS of $0.43 in 2020. Financial performance for 2021, compared with 2020, included the following:
•total revenue increased due to higher net gains from equity securities, mortgage banking income, and investment advisory and other asset-based fee income, partially offset by lower net interest income;
•provision for credit losses decreased reflecting continued improvements in the economic environment, which led to lower charge-offs and better portfolio credit quality;
•noninterest expense decreased due to lower operating losses, restructuring charges, and professional and outside
services expense, partially offset by higher incentive and revenue-related compensation in personnel expense;
•average loans decreased due to paydowns exceeding originations in our residential mortgage loan portfolio, weak demand for commercial loans, and the reclassification of student loans (included in other consumer loans) to loans held for sale (LHFS); and
•average deposits increased driven by growth in the Consumer Banking and Lending, Commercial Banking, and Wealth and Investment Management (WIM) operating segments due to higher levels of liquidity and savings for consumer and commercial customers reflecting government stimulus programs and continued economic uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the impact of payment deferral programs on consumer customers, partially offset by actions taken to manage under the asset cap which reduced deposits in the Corporate and Investment Banking operating segment and Corporate.
In second quarter 2021, we retroactively changed the accounting for certain tax-advantaged investments. These changes had a nominal impact on net income and retained earnings on an annual basis and did not impact historical trends or business drivers. Prior period financial statement line items have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. Prior period risk-based capital and certain other regulatory related metrics were not revised. For additional information, including the financial statement line items impacted by these changes, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Capital and Liquidity
We maintained a strong capital position in 2021, with total equity of $190.1 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $185.7 billion at December 31, 2020. Our liquidity and regulatory capital ratios remained strong at December 31, 2021, including:
•our Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio was 11.35% under the Standardized Approach (our binding ratio), which continued to exceed both the regulatory requirement of 9.60% and our current internal target;
•our eligible external total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets was 23.03%, compared with the regulatory requirement of 21.50%; and
•our liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) was 118%, which continued to exceed the regulatory minimum of 100%.
See the “Capital Management” and the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding” sections in this Report for additional information regarding our capital and liquidity, including the calculation of our regulatory capital and liquidity amounts.
Credit Quality
Credit quality reflected the improving economic environment.
•The allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans of $13.8 billion at December 31, 2021, decreased $5.9 billion from December 31, 2020.
•Our provision for credit losses for loans was $(4.2) billion in 2021, down from $14.0 billion in 2020. The decrease in the ACL for loans and the provision for credit losses in 2021, compared with 2020, reflected continued improvements in the economic environment, which led to lower charge-offs and better portfolio credit quality.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 4 | Wells Fargo & Company |
•The allowance coverage for total loans was 1.54% at December 31, 2021, compared with 2.22% at December 31, 2020.
•Commercial portfolio net loan charge-offs were $295 million, or 6 basis points of average commercial loans, in 2021, compared with net loan charge-offs of $1.6 billion, or 31 basis points, in 2020, due to lower losses and higher recoveries in our commercial and industrial portfolio primarily driven by the oil, gas and pipelines industry, and in the real estate mortgage portfolio.
•Consumer portfolio net loan charge-offs were $1.3 billion, or 33 basis points of average consumer loans, in 2021, compared with net loan charge-offs of $1.7 billion, or 39 basis points, in 2020, predominantly driven by lower losses in our credit card portfolio as a result of government stimulus programs instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, improvements in the economic environment and
better portfolio credit quality, partially offset by $152 million of residential mortgage loan charge-offs as a result of a change in practice to fully charge-off certain delinquent legacy residential mortgage loans.
•Nonperforming assets (NPAs) of $7.3 billion at December 31, 2021, decreased $1.6 billion, or 18%, from December 31, 2020, predominantly driven by decreases in our commercial and industrial portfolio as a result of paydowns in the oil, gas, and pipelines industry, partially offset by increases in our residential mortgage – first lien portfolio from certain borrowers exiting COVID-19 related accommodation programs. NPAs represented 0.82% of total loans at December 31, 2021.
Table 1 presents a three-year summary of selected financial data and Table 2 presents selected ratios and per common
share data.
Table 1: Summary of Selected Financial Data
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions, except per share amounts) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Income statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 35,779 | 39,956 | (4,177) | (10) | % | $ | 47,303 | (7,347) | (16) | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 42,713 | 34,308 | 8,405 | 24 | 39,529 | (5,221) | (13) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 78,492 | 74,264 | 4,228 | 6 | 86,832 | (12,568) | (14) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 1,582 | 3,370 | (1,788) | (53) | 2,762 | 608 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (5,737) | 10,759 | (16,496) | NM | (75) | 10,834 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (4,155) | 14,129 | (18,284) | NM | 2,687 | 11,442 | 426 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 53,831 | 57,630 | (3,799) | (7) | 58,178 | (548) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income before noncontrolling interests | 23,238 | 3,662 | 19,576 | 535 | 20,206 | (16,544) | (82) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests | 1,690 | 285 | 1,405 | 493 | 491 | (206) | (42) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo net income | 21,548 | 3,377 | 18,171 | 538 | 19,715 | (16,338) | (83) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per common share | 4.99 | 0.43 | 4.56 | NM | 4.12 | (3.69) | (90) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | 4.95 | 0.43 | 4.52 | NM | 4.09 | (3.66) | (89) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per common share | 0.60 | 1.22 | (0.62) | (51) | 1.92 | (0.70) | (36) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance sheet (at year end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities | 537,531 | 501,207 | 36,324 | 7 | 497,125 | 4,082 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | 895,394 | 887,637 | 7,757 | 1 | 962,265 | (74,628) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | 12,490 | 18,516 | (6,026) | (33) | 9,551 | 8,965 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 72,886 | 60,008 | 12,878 | 21 | 66,439 | (6,431) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | 1,948,068 | 1,952,911 | (4,843) | — | 1,925,753 | 27,158 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits | 1,482,479 | 1,404,381 | 78,098 | 6 | 1,322,626 | 81,755 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 160,689 | 212,950 | (52,261) | (25) | 228,191 | (15,241) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stockholders’ equity | 168,331 | 164,570 | 3,761 | 2 | 166,387 | (1,817) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Wells Fargo stockholders’ equity | 187,606 | 184,680 | 2,926 | 2 | 186,864 | (2,184) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 190,110 | 185,712 | 4,398 | 2 | 187,702 | (1,990) | (1) |
NM – Not meaningful
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 5 |
Overview (continued)
Table 2: Ratios and Per Common Share Data
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Performance ratios | ||||||||
| Return on average assets (ROA) (1) | 1.11 | % | 0.17 | 1.03 | ||||
| Return on average equity (ROE) (2) | 12.0 | 1.1 | 10.4 | |||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) (3) | 14.3 | 1.3 | 12.4 | |||||
| Efficiency ratio (4) | 69 | 78 | 67 | |||||
| Capital and other metrics (5) | ||||||||
| At year end: | ||||||||
| Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to assets | 8.64 | 8.43 | 8.64 | |||||
| Total equity to assets | 9.76 | 9.51 | 9.75 | |||||
| Risk-based capital ratios and components (6): | ||||||||
| Standardized Approach: | ||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) | 11.35 | 11.59 | 11.14 | |||||
| Tier 1 capital | 12.89 | 13.25 | 12.76 | |||||
| Total capital | 15.84 | 16.47 | 15.75 | |||||
| Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions) | $ | 1,239.0 | 1,193.7 | 1,245.9 | ||||
| Advanced Approach: | ||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) | 12.60 | % | 11.94 | 11.91 | ||||
| Tier 1 capital | 14.31 | 13.66 | 13.64 | |||||
| Total capital | 16.72 | 16.14 | 16.16 | |||||
| Risk-weighted assets (RWAs) (in billions) | $ | 1,116.1 | 1,158.4 | 1,165.1 | ||||
| Tier 1 leverage ratio | 8.34 | % | 8.32 | 8.31 | ||||
| Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) | 6.89 | 8.05 | 7.07 | |||||
| Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC) Ratio (7) | 23.03 | 25.74 | 23.28 | |||||
| Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) (8) | 118 | 133 | 120 | |||||
| Average balances: | ||||||||
| Average Wells Fargo common stockholders’ equity to average assets | 8.73 | 8.43 | 9.15 | |||||
| Average total equity to average assets | 9.85 | 9.51 | 10.31 | |||||
| Per common share data | ||||||||
| Dividend payout ratio (9) | 12.1 | 283.7 | 46.9 | |||||
| Book value (10) | $ | 43.32 | 39.71 | 40.24 |
(1)Represents Wells Fargo net income divided by average assets.
(2)Represents Wells Fargo net income applicable to common stock divided by average common stockholders’ equity.
(3)Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total equity less preferred equity, noncontrolling interests, goodwill, certain identifiable intangible assets (other than mortgage servicing rights) and goodwill and other intangibles on nonmarketable equity securities, net of applicable deferred taxes. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management believes that return on average tangible common equity, which utilizes tangible common equity, is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s use of equity. For additional information, including a corresponding reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) financial measures, see the “Capital Management – Tangible Common Equity” section in this Report.
(4)The efficiency ratio is noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(5)See the “Capital Management” section and Note 28 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
(6)The information presented reflects fully phased-in CET1, tier 1 capital, and RWAs, but reflects total capital in accordance with transition requirements. For additional information, see the “Capital Management” section and Note 28 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
(7)Represents TLAC divided by the greater of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches, which is our binding TLAC ratio.
(8)Represents high-quality liquid assets divided by projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule.
(9)Dividend payout ratio is dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per common share.
(10)Book value per common share is common stockholders’ equity divided by common shares outstanding.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 6 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Earnings Performance
Wells Fargo net income for 2021 was $21.5 billion ($4.95 diluted EPS), compared with $3.4 billion ($0.43 diluted EPS) for 2020. Net income increased in 2021, compared with 2020, due to a $18.3 billion decrease in provision for credit losses, a $8.4 billion increase in noninterest income, and a $3.8 billion decrease in noninterest expense, partially offset by a $6.7 billion increase in income tax expense, a $4.2 billion decrease in net interest income, and a $1.4 billion increase in net income from noncontrolling interests.
For a discussion of our 2020 financial results, compared with 2019, see the “Earnings Performance” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the interest earned on debt securities, loans (including yield-related loan fees) and other interest-earning assets minus the interest paid on deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt. The net interest margin is the average yield on earning assets minus the average interest rate paid for deposits and our other sources of funding.
Net interest income and the net interest margin in any one period can be significantly affected by a variety of factors including the mix and overall size of our earning assets portfolio and the cost of funding those assets. In addition, variable sources of interest income, such as loan fees, periodic dividends, and collection of interest on nonaccrual loans, can fluctuate from period to period.
Net interest income and net interest margin decreased in 2021, compared with 2020, due to the impact of lower interest rates, lower loan balances reflecting soft demand, elevated prepayments and refinancing activity, the sale of our student loan portfolio in the first half of 2021, unfavorable hedge ineffectiveness accounting results, and higher securities premium amortization, partially offset by lower costs and balances of interest-bearing deposits and long-term debt. Net interest income in 2021 included interest income from PPP loans of $518 million. Additionally, in 2021, we had interest income associated with loans we purchased from Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) loan securitization pools of $1.1 billion. For additional information about loans purchased from GNMA loan securitization pools, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Activities” section in this Report.
Table 3 presents the individual components of net interest income and the net interest margin. Net interest income and net interest margin are presented on a taxable-equivalent basis in Table 3 to consistently reflect income from taxable and tax-exempt loans and debt and equity securities based on a 21% federal statutory tax rate for the periods ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 7 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Table 3: Average Balances, Yields and Rates Paid (Taxable-Equivalent Basis) (1)
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Interest rates | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Interest rates | Average balance | Interest income/ expense | Interest rates | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | $ | 236,281 | 314 | 0.13 | % | $ | 186,386 | 547 | 0.29 | % | $ | 135,741 | 2,875 | 2.12 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | 69,720 | 14 | 0.02 | 82,798 | 393 | 0.47 | 99,286 | 2,164 | 2.18 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading debt securities | 88,282 | 2,107 | 2.39 | 94,731 | 2,544 | 2.69 | 93,655 | 3,149 | 3.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | 189,237 | 2,924 | 1.55 | 229,077 | 5,248 | 2.29 | 262,694 | 8,493 | 3.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 245,304 | 4,589 | 1.87 | 173,505 | 3,841 | 2.21 | 149,105 | 3,814 | 2.56 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 522,823 | 9,620 | 1.84 | 497,313 | 11,633 | 2.34 | 505,454 | 15,456 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale (2) | 27,554 | 865 | 3.14 | 27,493 | 947 | 3.45 | 21,516 | 892 | 4.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – U.S. | 252,025 | 6,526 | 2.59 | 281,080 | 7,912 | 2.82 | 284,888 | 12,107 | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S. | 71,114 | 1,448 | 2.04 | 66,915 | 1,673 | 2.50 | 64,274 | 2,385 | 3.71 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | 121,638 | 3,276 | 2.69 | 122,482 | 3,842 | 3.14 | 121,813 | 5,356 | 4.40 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate construction | 21,589 | 667 | 3.09 | 21,608 | 760 | 3.52 | 21,183 | 1,095 | 5.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 15,519 | 692 | 4.46 | 17,801 | 877 | 4.93 | 19,302 | 957 | 4.96 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | 481,885 | 12,609 | 2.62 | 509,886 | 15,064 | 2.95 | 511,460 | 21,900 | 4.28 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 249,862 | 7,903 | 3.16 | 288,105 | 9,661 | 3.35 | 288,059 | 10,974 | 3.81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 19,710 | 818 | 4.15 | 26,700 | 1,185 | 4.44 | 31,989 | 1,800 | 5.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 35,471 | 4,086 | 11.52 | 37,093 | 4,315 | 11.63 | 38,865 | 4,889 | 12.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 51,576 | 2,317 | 4.49 | 48,362 | 2,379 | 4.92 | 45,901 | 2,362 | 5.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 25,784 | 962 | 3.73 | 31,642 | 1,719 | 5.43 | 34,682 | 2,412 | 6.95 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | 382,403 | 16,086 | 4.21 | 431,902 | 19,259 | 4.46 | 439,496 | 22,437 | 5.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans (2) | 864,288 | 28,695 | 3.32 | 941,788 | 34,323 | 3.64 | 950,956 | 44,337 | 4.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 31,946 | 608 | 1.91 | 28,950 | 557 | 1.92 | 35,930 | 966 | 2.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 10,052 | 6 | 0.06 | 7,505 | 14 | 0.18 | 5,579 | 90 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,762,664 | 40,122 | 2.28 | % | $ | 1,772,233 | 48,414 | 2.73 | % | $ | 1,754,462 | 66,780 | 3.81 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | 24,562 | — | 21,676 | — | 19,558 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 26,087 | — | 26,387 | — | 26,409 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 128,592 | — | 121,413 | — | 111,361 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest-earning assets | $ | 179,241 | — | 169,476 | — | 157,328 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 1,941,905 | 40,122 | 1,941,709 | 48,414 | 1,911,790 | 66,780 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand deposits | $ | 450,131 | 127 | 0.03 | % | $ | 98,182 | 184 | 0.19 | % | $ | 59,121 | 789 | 1.33 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 423,221 | 124 | 0.03 | 744,226 | 1,492 | 0.20 | 705,957 | 4,132 | 0.59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 36,519 | 122 | 0.33 | 81,674 | 892 | 1.09 | 123,634 | 2,776 | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposits in non-U.S. offices | 28,297 | 15 | 0.05 | 39,260 | 236 | 0.60 | 53,438 | 938 | 1.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 938,168 | 388 | 0.04 | 963,342 | 2,804 | 0.29 | 942,150 | 8,635 | 0.92 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 35,245 | 8 | 0.02 | 58,971 | 276 | 0.47 | 102,888 | 2,169 | 2.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other short-term borrowings | 12,020 | (48) | (0.41) | 11,235 | (25) | (0.22) | 12,449 | 148 | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total short-term borrowings | 47,265 | (40) | (0.09) | 70,206 | 251 | 0.36 | 115,337 | 2,317 | 2.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | 178,742 | 3,173 | 1.78 | 224,587 | 4,471 | 1.99 | 232,491 | 7,350 | 3.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 28,809 | 395 | 1.37 | 28,435 | 438 | 1.54 | 25,771 | 551 | 2.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,192,984 | 3,916 | 0.33 | % | $ | 1,286,570 | 7,964 | 0.62 | % | $ | 1,315,749 | 18,853 | 1.43 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | 499,644 | — | 412,669 | — | 344,111 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other noninterest-bearing liabilities | 58,058 | — | 57,781 | — | 54,756 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest-bearing liabilities | $ | 557,702 | — | 470,450 | — | 398,867 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | $ | 1,750,686 | 3,916 | 1,757,020 | 7,964 | 1,714,616 | 18,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 191,219 | — | 184,689 | — | 197,174 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,941,905 | 3,916 | 1,941,709 | 7,964 | 1,911,790 | 18,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread on a taxable-equivalent basis (3) | 1.95 | % | 2.11 | % | 2.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin and net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (3) | $ | 36,206 | 2.05 | % | $ | 40,450 | 2.28 | % | $ | 47,927 | 2.73 | % |
(1)The average balance amounts represent amortized costs. The interest rates are based on interest income or expense amounts for the period and are annualized. Interest rates and amounts include the effects of hedge and risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.
(2)Nonaccrual loans and any related income are included in their respective loan categories.
(3)Includes taxable-equivalent adjustments of $427 million, $494 million and $624 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, predominantly related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and securities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 8 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 4 allocates the changes in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis to changes in either average balances or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the numerous simultaneous volume and rate changes during any period, it is not possible to precisely
allocate such changes between volume and rate. For this table, changes that are not solely due to either volume or rate are allocated to these categories on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute value of the change due to average volume and average rate.
Table 4: Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest income: | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | $ | 119 | (352) | (233) | 797 | (3,125) | (2,328) | ||||||||||
| Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements | (53) | (326) | (379) | (309) | (1,462) | (1,771) | |||||||||||
| Debt securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Trading debt securities | (165) | (272) | (437) | 35 | (640) | (605) | |||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | (813) | (1,511) | (2,324) | (991) | (2,254) | (3,245) | |||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 1,405 | (657) | 748 | 584 | (557) | 27 | |||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 427 | (2,440) | (2,013) | (372) | (3,451) | (3,823) | |||||||||||
| Loans held for sale | 2 | (84) | (82) | 219 | (164) | 55 | |||||||||||
| Loans: | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans: | |||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – U.S. | (775) | (611) | (1,386) | (160) | (4,035) | (4,195) | |||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial – Non-U.S. | 99 | (324) | (225) | 94 | (806) | (712) | |||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | (26) | (540) | (566) | 29 | (1,543) | (1,514) | |||||||||||
| Real estate construction | (1) | (92) | (93) | 22 | (357) | (335) | |||||||||||
| Lease financing | (106) | (79) | (185) | (74) | (6) | (80) | |||||||||||
| Total commercial loans | (809) | (1,646) | (2,455) | (89) | (6,747) | (6,836) | |||||||||||
| Consumer loans: | |||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | (1,232) | (526) | (1,758) | 2 | (1,315) | (1,313) | |||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | (294) | (73) | (367) | (270) | (345) | (615) | |||||||||||
| Credit card | (188) | (41) | (229) | (216) | (358) | (574) | |||||||||||
| Auto | 153 | (215) | (62) | 125 | (108) | 17 | |||||||||||
| Other consumer | (281) | (476) | (757) | (198) | (495) | (693) | |||||||||||
| Total consumer loans | (1,842) | (1,331) | (3,173) | (557) | (2,621) | (3,178) | |||||||||||
| Total loans | (2,651) | (2,977) | (5,628) | (646) | (9,368) | (10,014) | |||||||||||
| Equity securities | 54 | (3) | 51 | (165) | (244) | (409) | |||||||||||
| Other | 4 | (12) | (8) | 23 | (99) | (76) | |||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) in interest income | (2,098) | (6,194) | (8,292) | (453) | (17,913) | (18,366) | |||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in interest expense: | |||||||||||||||||
| Deposits: | |||||||||||||||||
| Demand deposits | $ | 208 | (265) | (57) | 324 | (929) | (605) | ||||||||||
| Savings deposits | (461) | (907) | (1,368) | 217 | (2,857) | (2,640) | |||||||||||
| Time deposits | (340) | (430) | (770) | (748) | (1,136) | (1,884) | |||||||||||
| Deposits in non-U.S. offices | (52) | (169) | (221) | (202) | (500) | (702) | |||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | (645) | (1,771) | (2,416) | (409) | (5,422) | (5,831) | |||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings: | |||||||||||||||||
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | (80) | (188) | (268) | (671) | (1,222) | (1,893) | |||||||||||
| Other short-term borrowings | (2) | (21) | (23) | (14) | (159) | (173) | |||||||||||
| Total short-term borrowings | (82) | (209) | (291) | (685) | (1,381) | (2,066) | |||||||||||
| Long-term debt | (855) | (443) | (1,298) | (242) | (2,637) | (2,879) | |||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 6 | (49) | (43) | 52 | (165) | (113) | |||||||||||
| Total increase (decrease) in interest expense | (1,576) | (2,472) | (4,048) | (1,284) | (9,605) | (10,889) | |||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis | $ | (522) | (3,722) | (4,244) | 831 | (8,308) | (7,477) |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 9 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Noninterest Income
Table 5: Noninterest Income
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | $ | 5,475 | 5,221 | 254 | 5 | % | $ | 5,819 | (598) | (10) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 1,445 | 1,381 | 64 | 5 | 1,474 | (93) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment advisory and other asset-based fees | 11,011 | 9,863 | 1,148 | 12 | 9,814 | 49 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commissions and brokerage services fees | 2,299 | 2,384 | (85) | (4) | 2,461 | (77) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,354 | 1,865 | 489 | 26 | 1,797 | 68 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card fees | 4,175 | 3,544 | 631 | 18 | 4,016 | (472) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net servicing income | 194 | (139) | 333 | 240 | 522 | (661) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales | 4,762 | 3,632 | 1,130 | 31 | 2,193 | 1,439 | 66 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 4,956 | 3,493 | 1,463 | 42 | 2,715 | 778 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains from trading activities | 284 | 1,172 | (888) | (76) | 993 | 179 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains on debt securities | 553 | 873 | (320) | (37) | 140 | 733 | 524 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains from equity securities | 6,427 | 665 | 5,762 | 866 | 2,843 | (2,178) | (77) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease income | 996 | 1,245 | (249) | (20) | 1,614 | (369) | (23) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 2,738 | 2,602 | 136 | 5 | 5,843 | (3,241) | (55) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 42,713 | 34,308 | 8,405 | 24 | $ | 39,529 | (5,221) | (13) |
NM – Not meaningful
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Deposit-related fees increased driven by:
•higher consumer transaction volumes as 2020 included reduced volumes due to the economic slowdown associated with the COVID-19 pandemic;
•lower fee waivers and reversals as 2020 included elevated fee waivers due to our actions to support customers during the COVID-19 pandemic; and
•higher treasury management fees on commercial accounts driven by an increase in transaction service volumes and repricing, as well as a lower earnings credit rate due to the lower interest rate environment.
In January 2022, we announced enhancements and changes to help our consumer customers avoid overdraft-related fees. We expect this will lower certain deposit-related fees starting in 2022.
Lending-related fees increased reflecting higher loan commitment fees.
Investment advisory and other asset-based fees increased reflecting:
• higher market valuations on WIM advisory assets;
partially offset by:
•lower asset-based fees due to the sale of WFAM on November 1, 2021.
For additional information on certain client investment assets, see the “Earnings Performance – Operating Segment Results – Wealth and Investment Management – WIM Advisory Assets” and “Earnings Performance – Operating Segment Results – Corporate – Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) Assets Under Management” sections in this Report.
Commission and brokerage services fees decreased driven by lower transactional revenue.
Investment banking fees increased driven by higher debt underwriting fees, including loan syndication fees, as well as higher advisory fees and equity underwriting fees.
Card fees increased reflecting:
•higher interchange fees driven by increased purchase and transaction volumes;
partially offset by:
•higher rewards, including promotional offers on our new Active CashSM card.
Net servicing income increased reflecting:
•negative mortgage servicing right (MSR) valuation adjustments in 2020 for higher expected servicing costs and higher prepayment estimates due to improved economic conditions in 2021;
partially offset by:
•lower servicing fees due to a lower balance of loans serviced for others.
Net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales increased
driven by:
•higher gains in 2021 related to the resecuritization of loans we purchased from GNMA loan securitization pools in 2020;
•losses in 2020 driven by the impact of interest rate volatility on hedging activities associated with our residential mortgage loans held for sale portfolio and pipeline, as well as valuation losses on certain residential and commercial loans held for sale due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on market conditions; and
•a shift in production to more retail loans, which have a higher production margin compared with correspondent loans.
For additional information on servicing income and net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales, see Note 9 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 10 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Net gains from trading activities decreased reflecting:
•lower volumes of interest rate products;
•lower client trading activity for equity products due to market volatility in 2020; and
•lower client trading activity for credit products, reflecting greater market liquidity in 2020 from government actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic;
partially offset by:
•higher client trading activity for asset-backed finance products.
Net gains on debt securities decreased due to:
• lower gains on sales of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and municipal bonds;
partially offset by:
•higher gains on sales of corporate and other debt securities.
Net gains from equity securities increased driven by:
•higher unrealized gains on nonmarketable equity securities from our affiliated venture capital and private equity businesses;
•higher realized gains on the sales of equity securities; and
•lower impairment of equity securities due to improved market conditions in 2021.
Lease income decreased driven by a $268 million impairment of certain rail cars in our rail car leasing business used for the transportation of coal products.
Other income increased due to gains in 2021 of:
•$674 million on the sale of our Corporate Trust Services business;
•$355 million on the sale of our student loan portfolio; and
•$269 million on the sale of WFAM;
partially offset by:
•lower gains on the sales of certain residential mortgage loans which were reclassified to held for sale;
•higher valuation losses related to the retained litigation risk, including the timing and amount of final settlement, associated with shares of Visa Class B common stock that we previously sold. For additional information, see the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Market Risk – Equity Securities” section in this Report; and
•lower income from our investments accounted for under the equity method.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 11 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Noninterest Expense
Table 6: Noninterest Expense
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personnel | $ | 35,541 | 34,811 | 730 | 2 | % | $ | 35,128 | (317) | (1) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Technology, telecommunications and equipment | 3,227 | 3,099 | 128 | 4 | 3,276 | (177) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy | 2,968 | 3,263 | (295) | (9) | 2,945 | 318 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating losses | 1,568 | 3,523 | (1,955) | (55) | 4,321 | (798) | (18) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional and outside services | 5,723 | 6,706 | (983) | (15) | 6,745 | (39) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leases (1) | 867 | 1,022 | (155) | (15) | 1,155 | (133) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advertising and promotion | 600 | 600 | — | — | 1,076 | (476) | (44) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restructuring charges | 76 | 1,499 | (1,423) | (95) | — | 1,499 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 3,261 | 3,107 | 154 | 5 | 3,532 | (425) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 53,831 | 57,630 | (3,799) | (7) | $ | 58,178 | (548) | (1) |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Represents expenses for assets we lease to customers.
Full Year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Personnel expense increased driven by:
•higher revenue-related compensation expense;
•higher incentive compensation expense;
•higher market valuations on stock-based compensation; and
•higher deferred compensation expense;
partially offset by:
•lower salaries as a result of reduced headcount.
In second quarter 2020, we entered into arrangements to transition our economic hedges of the deferred compensation plan liabilities from equity securities to derivative instruments. As a result of this transition, changes in fair value of derivatives used to economically hedge the deferred compensation plan are reported in personnel expense rather than in net gains (losses) from equity securities within noninterest income. For additional information on the derivatives used in the economic hedges, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Technology, telecommunications and equipment expense increased due to higher expense for technology contracts and the reversal of a software licensing liability accrual in 2020.
Occupancy expense decreased driven by:
•lower cleaning fees, supplies, and equipment expenses as 2020 included higher expenses due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and
•lower rent expense.
Operating losses decreased driven by lower expense for customer remediation accruals and litigation accruals, partially offset by a $250 million civil money penalty associated with the September 2021 OCC enforcement action.
Professional and outside services expense decreased driven by efficiency initiatives to reduce our spending on consultants and contractors.
Leases expense decreased driven by lower depreciation expense from the reduction in the size of our operating lease asset portfolio.
Restructuring charges decreased due to lower personnel costs related to our efficiency initiatives that began in third quarter 2020. For additional information on restructuring charges, see Note 22 (Restructuring Charges) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Other expenses increased driven by a write-down of goodwill in 2021 related to the sale of our student loan portfolio.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $5.6 billion in 2021, compared with an income tax benefit of $1.2 billion in 2020, driven by higher pre-tax income. The effective income tax rate was 20.6% for 2021, compared with (52.1)% for 2020. The effective income tax rate for 2021 reflected the impact of higher pre-tax income while the effective income tax rate for 2020 reflected both the impact of income tax benefits (including tax credits) on lower pre-tax income and income tax benefits related to the resolution and reevaluation of prior period matters with U.S. federal and state tax authorities. The income tax expense (benefit) and our effective income tax rate for both years reflected the impact of changes in accounting policy for certain tax-advantaged investments adopted in second quarter 2021. For additional information on income taxes, see Note 23 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Operating Segment Results
Our management reporting is organized into four reportable operating segments: Consumer Banking and Lending; Commercial Banking; Corporate and Investment Banking; and Wealth and Investment Management. All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. For additional information, see Table 7. We define our reportable operating segments by type of product and customer segment, and their results are based on our management reporting process. The management reporting process measures the performance of the reportable operating segments based on the Company’s management structure, and the results are regularly reviewed by our Chief Executive Officer and Operating Committee. The management reporting process is based on U.S. GAAP and includes specific adjustments, such as funds transfer pricing for asset/liability management, shared revenues and expenses, and taxable-equivalent adjustments to consistently reflect income
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 12 | Wells Fargo & Company |
from taxable and tax-exempt sources, which allows management to assess performance consistently across the operating segments.
In February 2021, we announced an agreement to sell WFAM, and in first quarter 2021, we moved the business from the Wealth and Investment Management operating segment to Corporate. In March 2021, we announced an agreement to sell our Corporate Trust Services business and, in second quarter 2021, we moved the business from the Commercial Banking operating segment to Corporate. Prior period balances have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. These changes did not impact the previously reported consolidated financial results of the Company. On November 1, 2021, we closed the sales of our Corporate Trust Services business and WFAM.
In second quarter 2021, we elected to change our accounting method for low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) investments and elected to change the presentation of investment tax credits related to solar energy investments. These accounting policy changes had a nominal impact on reportable operating segment results. Prior period financial statement line items for the Company, as well as for the reportable operating segments, have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. Our LIHTC investments are included in the Corporate and Investment Banking operating segment and our solar energy investments are included in the Commercial Banking operating segment. For additional information, see the “Overview – Recent Developments” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Funds Transfer Pricing Corporate treasury manages a funds transfer pricing methodology that considers interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other product characteristics. Operating segments pay a funding charge for their assets and receive a funding credit for their deposits, both of which are included in net interest income. The net impact of the funding charges or credits is recognized in corporate treasury.
Revenue and Expense Sharing When lines of business jointly serve customers, the line of business that is responsible for providing the product or service recognizes revenue or expense with a referral fee paid or an allocation of cost to the other line of business based on established internal revenue-sharing agreements.
When a line of business uses a service provided by another line of business or enterprise function (included in Corporate), expense is generally allocated based on the cost and use of the service provided.
Taxable-Equivalent Adjustments Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for low-income housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.
Allocated Capital Reportable operating segments are allocated capital under a risk-sensitive framework that is primarily based on aspects of our regulatory capital requirements, and the assumptions and methodologies used to allocate capital are periodically assessed and revised. Management believes that return on allocated capital is a useful financial measure because it enables management, investors, and others to assess a reportable operating segment’s use of capital.
Selected Metrics We present certain financial and nonfinancial metrics that management uses when evaluating reportable operating segment results. Management believes that these metrics are useful to investors and others to assess the performance, customer growth, and trends of reportable operating segments or lines of business.
Table 7: Management Reporting Structure
| Wells Fargo & Company | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer Banking and Lending | Commercial Banking | Corporate and Investment Banking | Wealth and Investment Management | Corporate | |||||||||||||||
| • Consumer and Small Business Banking • Home Lending • Credit Card • Auto • Personal Lending | • Middle Market Banking • Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | • Banking • Commercial Real Estate • Markets | • Wells Fargo Advisors • The Private Bank | • Corporate Treasury • Enterprise Functions • Investment Portfolio • Affiliated venture capital and private equity businesses • Non-strategic businesses |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 13 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Table 8 and the following discussion present our results by reportable operating segment. For additional information, see Note 26 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 8: Operating Segment Results – Highlights
| (in millions) | Consumer Banking and Lending | Commercial Banking | Corporate and Investment Banking | Wealth and Investment Management | Corporate (1) | Reconciling Items (2) | Consolidated Company | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 22,807 | 4,960 | 7,410 | 2,570 | (1,541) | (427) | 35,779 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 12,070 | 3,589 | 6,429 | 11,776 | 10,036 | (1,187) | 42,713 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 34,877 | 8,549 | 13,839 | 14,346 | 8,495 | (1,614) | 78,492 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (1,178) | (1,500) | (1,439) | (95) | 57 | — | (4,155) | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 24,648 | 5,862 | 7,200 | 11,734 | 4,387 | — | 53,831 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 11,407 | 4,187 | 8,078 | 2,707 | 4,051 | (1,614) | 28,816 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 2,852 | 1,045 | 2,019 | 680 | 596 | (1,614) | 5,578 | |||||||||||||
| Net income before noncontrolling interests | 8,555 | 3,142 | 6,059 | 2,027 | 3,455 | — | 23,238 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests | — | 8 | (3) | — | 1,685 | — | 1,690 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 8,555 | 3,134 | 6,062 | 2,027 | 1,770 | — | 21,548 | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 23,378 | 6,134 | 7,509 | 2,988 | 441 | (494) | 39,956 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 10,638 | 3,041 | 6,419 | 10,225 | 4,916 | (931) | 34,308 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 34,016 | 9,175 | 13,928 | 13,213 | 5,357 | (1,425) | 74,264 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 5,662 | 3,744 | 4,946 | 249 | (472) | — | 14,129 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 26,976 | 6,323 | 7,703 | 10,912 | 5,716 | — | 57,630 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 1,378 | (892) | 1,279 | 2,052 | 113 | (1,425) | 2,505 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 302 | (208) | 330 | 514 | (670) | (1,425) | (1,157) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests | 1,076 | (684) | 949 | 1,538 | 783 | — | 3,662 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests | — | 5 | (1) | — | 281 | — | 285 | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 1,076 | (689) | 950 | 1,538 | 502 | — | 3,377 | ||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 25,786 | 7,981 | 8,008 | 3,906 | 2,246 | (624) | 47,303 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 12,105 | 3,721 | 6,442 | 10,506 | 7,550 | (795) | 39,529 | |||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 37,891 | 11,702 | 14,450 | 14,412 | 9,796 | (1,419) | 86,832 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 2,184 | 190 | 173 | 2 | 138 | — | 2,687 | |||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 26,998 | 6,598 | 7,432 | 12,167 | 4,983 | — | 58,178 | |||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 8,709 | 4,914 | 6,845 | 2,243 | 4,675 | (1,419) | 25,967 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 2,814 | 1,246 | 1,658 | 562 | 900 | (1,419) | 5,761 | |||||||||||||
| Net income before noncontrolling interests | 5,895 | 3,668 | 5,187 | 1,681 | 3,775 | — | 20,206 | |||||||||||||
| Less: Net income (loss) from noncontrollinginterests | — | 6 | (1) | — | 486 | — | 491 | |||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 5,895 | 3,662 | 5,188 | 1,681 | 3,289 | — | 19,715 |
(1)All other business activities that are not included in the reportable operating segments have been included in Corporate. For additional information, see the “Corporate” section below.
(2)Taxable-equivalent adjustments related to tax-exempt income on certain loans and debt securities are included in net interest income, while taxable-equivalent adjustments related to income tax credits for low-income housing and renewable energy investments are included in noninterest income, in each case with corresponding impacts to income tax expense (benefit). Adjustments are included in Corporate, Commercial Banking, and Corporate and Investment Banking and are eliminated to reconcile to the Company’s consolidated financial results.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 14 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Consumer Banking and Lending offers diversified financial products and services for consumers and small businesses with annual sales generally up to $5 million. These financial products and services include checking and savings accounts, credit and
debit cards, as well as home, auto, personal, and small business lending. Table 8a and Table 8b provide additional information for Consumer Banking and Lending.
Table 8a: Consumer Banking and Lending – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 22,807 | 23,378 | (571) | (2) | % | $ | 25,786 | (2,408) | (9) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 3,045 | 2,904 | 141 | 5 | 3,582 | (678) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Card fees | 3,930 | 3,318 | 612 | 18 | 3,672 | (354) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking | 4,490 | 3,224 | 1,266 | 39 | 2,314 | 910 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 605 | 1,192 | (587) | (49) | 2,537 | (1,345) | (53) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 12,070 | 10,638 | 1,432 | 13 | 12,105 | (1,467) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 34,877 | 34,016 | 861 | 3 | 37,891 | (3,875) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 1,439 | 1,875 | (436) | (23) | 2,235 | (360) | (16) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (2,617) | 3,787 | (6,404) | NM | (51) | 3,838 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (1,178) | 5,662 | (6,840) | NM | 2,184 | 3,478 | 159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 24,648 | 26,976 | (2,328) | (9) | 26,998 | (22) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 11,407 | 1,378 | 10,029 | 728 | 8,709 | (7,331) | (84) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,852 | 302 | 2,550 | 844 | 2,814 | (2,512) | (89) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 8,555 | 1,076 | 7,479 | 695 | $ | 5,895 | (4,819) | (82) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer and Small Business Banking | $ | 18,958 | 18,684 | 274 | 1 | $ | 21,148 | (2,464) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | 8,154 | 7,875 | 279 | 4 | 8,817 | (942) | (11) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 5,527 | 5,288 | 239 | 5 | 5,707 | (419) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 1,733 | 1,575 | 158 | 10 | 1,567 | 8 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 505 | 594 | (89) | (15) | 652 | (58) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 34,877 | 34,016 | 861 | 3 | $ | 37,891 | (3,875) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer Banking and Lending: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital (1) | 17.2 | % | 1.6 | 12.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (2) | 71 | 79 | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headcount (#) (period-end) | 112,913 | 125,034 | (10) | 134,881 | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail bank branches (#) | 4,777 | 5,032 | (5) | 5,352 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Digital active customers (# in millions) (3) | 33.0 | 32.0 | 3 | 30.3 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mobile active customers (# in millions) (3) | 27.3 | 26.0 | 5 | 24.4 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer and Small Business Banking: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit spread (4) | 1.5 | % | 1.8 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debit card purchase volume ($ in billions) (5) | $ | 471.5 | 391.9 | 79.6 | 20 | $ | 367.6 | 24.3 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Debit card purchase transactions (# in millions) (5) | 9,808 | 8,792 | 12 | 9,189 | (4) |
(continued on following page)
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 15 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
(continued from previous page)
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage banking: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net servicing income | $ | 35 | (160) | 195 | 122 | % | $ | 454 | (614) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains on mortgage loan originations/sales | 4,455 | 3,384 | 1,071 | 32 | 1,860 | 1,524 | 82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total mortgage banking | $ | 4,490 | 3,224 | 1,266 | 39 | $ | 2,314 | 910 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Originations ($ in billions): | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail | $ | 138.5 | 118.7 | 19.8 | 17 | $ | 96.4 | 22.3 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | 66.5 | 104.0 | (37.5) | (36) | 107.6 | (3.6) | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total originations | $ | 205.0 | 222.7 | (17.7) | (8) | $ | 204.0 | 18.7 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| % of originations held for sale (HFS) | 64.6 | % | 73.9 | 66.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end)($ in billions) (6) | $ | 716.8 | 856.7 | (139.9) | (16) | $ | 1,063.4 | (206.7) | (19) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage servicing rights (MSR) carrying value (period-end) | 6,920 | 6,125 | 795 | 13 | 11,517 | (5,392) | (47) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratio of MSR carrying value (period-end) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end) (6) | 0.97 | % | 0.71 | 1.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home lending loans 30+ days delinquencyrate (7)(8)(9) | 0.39 | 0.64 | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Point of sale (POS) volume ($ in billions) | $ | 102.5 | 81.6 | 20.9 | 26 | $ | 88.2 | (6.6) | (7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| New accounts (# in thousands) (10) | 1,640 | 1,022 | 60 | 1,840 | (44) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit card loans 30+ days delinquency rate (9) | 1.50 | % | 2.17 | 2.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto originations ($ in billions) | $ | 33.9 | 22.8 | 11.1 | 49 | $ | 25.4 | (2.6) | (10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto loans 30+ days delinquency rate (8)(9) | 1.84 | % | 1.77 | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New funded balances | $ | 2,507 | 1,599 | 908 | 57 | $ | 2,829 | (1,230) | (43) |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Return on allocated capital is segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock divided by segment average allocated capital. Segment net income (loss) applicable to common stock is segment net income (loss) less allocated preferred stock dividends.
(2)Efficiency ratio is segment noninterest expense divided by segment total revenue (net interest income and noninterest income).
(3)Digital and mobile active customers is the number of consumer and small business customers who have logged on via a digital or mobile device, respectively, in the prior 90 days. Digital active customers includes both online and mobile customers.
(4)Deposit spread is (i) the internal funds transfer pricing credit on segment deposits minus interest paid to customers for segment deposits, divided by (ii) average segment deposits.
(5)Debit card purchase volume and transactions reflect combined activity for both consumer and business debit card purchases.
(6)Excludes residential mortgage loans subserviced for others.
(7)Excludes residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and loans held for sale.
(8)Excludes nonaccrual loans.
(9)Beginning in second quarter 2020, customer payment deferral activities instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic may have delayed the recognition of delinquencies for those customers who would have otherwise moved into past due or nonaccrual status.
(10)Excludes certain private label new account openings.
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher mortgage banking noninterest income due to higher gains in 2021 related to the resecuritization of loans we purchased from GNMA loan securitization pools in 2020, losses in 2020 driven by the impact of interest rate volatility on hedging activities and valuation losses due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on market conditions, and a shift in production to more retail loans, which have a higher production margin compared with correspondent loans;
•higher card fees reflecting higher interchange fees driven by increased purchase and transaction volumes, partially offset by higher rewards, including promotional offers on our new Active CashSM card; and
•higher deposit-related fees driven by higher consumer transaction volumes as 2020 included reduced volumes due to the economic slowdown associated with the COVID-19 pandemic;
partially offset by:
•lower net interest income reflecting a lower deposit spread and lower loan balances, partially offset by higher deposit balances; and
•lower other income driven by lower gains on the sales of certain residential mortgage loans which were reclassified to held for sale.
Provision for credit losses decreased driven by an improved economic environment.
Noninterest expense decreased driven by:
•lower operating losses due to lower expense for customer remediation accruals and litigation accruals;
•lower personnel expense reflecting additional payments made in 2020 to certain customer-facing and support employees and for back-up child care services, as well as lower branch staffing expense in 2021 related to efficiency initiatives in Consumer and Small Business Banking, partially
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 16 | Wells Fargo & Company |
offset by higher revenue-related compensation in Home Lending;
•lower advertising and promotion expense; and
•lower occupancy expense related to lower cleaning fees, supplies, and equipment expenses as 2020 included higher expenses due to the COVID-19 pandemic;
partially offset by:
•higher charitable donations expense driven by the donation of PPP processing fees; and
•higher Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) deposit assessment expense driven by both a higher assessment rate and a higher deposit assessment base.
Table 8b: Consumer Banking and Lending – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | $ | 224,446 | 268,586 | (44,140) | (16) | % | $ | 276,962 | (8,376) | (3) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 52,293 | 49,460 | 2,833 | 6 | 47,117 | 2,343 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 35,471 | 37,093 | (1,622) | (4) | 38,865 | (1,772) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Small Business | 16,625 | 15,173 | 1,452 | 10 | 9,951 | 5,222 | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 5,050 | 6,151 | (1,101) | (18) | 6,871 | (720) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 333,885 | 376,463 | (42,578) | (11) | $ | 379,766 | (3,303) | (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 834,739 | 722,085 | 112,654 | 16 | 629,110 | 92,975 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 48,000 | 48,000 | — | — | 46,000 | 2,000 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Lending | $ | 214,407 | 253,942 | (39,535) | (16) | $ | 278,325 | (24,383) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Auto | 57,260 | 49,072 | 8,188 | 17 | 49,124 | (52) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Card | 38,453 | 36,664 | 1,789 | 5 | 41,013 | (4,349) | (11) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Small Business | 11,270 | 17,743 | (6,473) | (36) | 9,695 | 8,048 | 83 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personal Lending | 5,184 | 5,375 | (191) | (4) | 6,845 | (1,470) | (21) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 326,574 | 362,796 | (36,222) | (10) | $ | 385,002 | (22,206) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 883,674 | 784,565 | 99,109 | 13 | 647,152 | 137,413 | 21 |
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Total loans (average and period-end) decreased as paydowns exceeded originations. Home Lending loan balances were also impacted by actions taken in 2020 to temporarily curtail certain non-conforming residential mortgage originations and suspend home equity originations. Small Business period-end loan balances were also impacted by a decline in PPP loans.
Total deposits (average and period-end) increased driven by higher levels of liquidity and savings for consumer customers reflecting government stimulus programs and payment deferral programs, as well as continued economic uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 17 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Commercial Banking provides financial solutions to private, family owned and certain public companies. Products and services include banking and credit products across multiple
industry sectors and municipalities, secured lending and lease products, and treasury management. Table 8c and Table 8d provide additional information for Commercial Banking.
Table 8c: Commercial Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 4,960 | 6,134 | (1,174) | (19) | % | $ | 7,981 | (1,847) | (23) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 1,285 | 1,219 | 66 | 5 | 1,175 | 44 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 532 | 531 | 1 | — | 524 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease income | 682 | 646 | 36 | 6 | 931 | (285) | (31) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,090 | 645 | 445 | 69 | 1,091 | (446) | (41) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 3,589 | 3,041 | 548 | 18 | 3,721 | (680) | (18) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 8,549 | 9,175 | (626) | (7) | 11,702 | (2,527) | (22) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 101 | 590 | (489) | (83) | 215 | 375 | 174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (1,601) | 3,154 | (4,755) | NM | (25) | 3,179 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (1,500) | 3,744 | (5,244) | NM | 190 | 3,554 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 5,862 | 6,323 | (461) | (7) | 6,598 | (275) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 4,187 | (892) | 5,079 | 569 | 4,914 | (5,806) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 1,045 | (208) | 1,253 | 602 | 1,246 | (1,454) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests | 8 | 5 | 3 | 60 | 6 | (1) | (17) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | 3,134 | (689) | 3,823 | 555 | $ | 3,662 | (4,351) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 4,642 | 5,067 | (425) | (8) | $ | 6,691 | (1,624) | (24) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 3,907 | 4,108 | (201) | (5) | 5,011 | (903) | (18) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 8,549 | 9,175 | (626) | (7) | $ | 11,702 | (2,527) | (22) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending and leasing | $ | 4,835 | 5,432 | (597) | (11) | $ | 5,983 | (551) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury management and payments | 2,825 | 3,205 | (380) | (12) | 4,872 | (1,667) | (34) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 889 | 538 | 351 | 65 | 847 | (309) | (36) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 8,549 | 9,175 | (626) | (7) | $ | 11,702 | (2,527) | (22) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 15.1 | % | (4.5) | 16.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 69 | 69 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headcount (#) (period-end) | 18,397 | 20,241 | (9) | 21,798 | (7) |
NM – Not meaningful
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Revenue decreased driven by:
•lower net interest income reflecting lower loan balances driven by weak demand and the lower interest rate environment, partially offset by higher income from higher deposit balances;
partially offset by:
•higher other noninterest income due to higher realized and unrealized gains on the sales of equity securities and higher income from renewable energy investments; and
•higher deposit-related fees due to higher treasury management fees driven by an increase in transaction volumes and repricing.
Provision for credit losses decreased driven by an improved economic environment.
Noninterest expense decreased driven by:
•lower spending related to efficiency initiatives, including lower personnel expense from reduced headcount;
•lower lease expense driven by lower depreciation expense from a reduction in the size of our operating lease asset portfolio; and
•lower professional and outside services expense reflecting decreased project-related expense.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 18 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 8d: Commercial Banking – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 120,396 | 143,263 | (22,867) | (16) | % | $ | 157,829 | (14,566) | (9) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 47,018 | 52,220 | (5,202) | (10) | 54,416 | (2,196) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing and other | 13,823 | 15,953 | (2,130) | (13) | 17,109 | (1,156) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 181,237 | 211,436 | (30,199) | (14) | $ | 229,354 | (17,918) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 102,882 | 112,848 | (9,966) | (9) | $ | 119,717 | (6,869) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 78,355 | 98,588 | (20,233) | (21) | 109,637 | (11,049) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 181,237 | 211,436 | (30,199) | (14) | $ | 229,354 | (17,918) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 197,269 | 178,946 | 18,323 | 10 | 159,763 | 19,183 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 19,500 | 19,500 | — | — | 20,500 | (1,000) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 131,078 | 124,253 | 6,825 | 5 | $ | 153,601 | (29,348) | (19) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 45,467 | 49,903 | (4,436) | (9) | 53,526 | (3,623) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lease financing and other | 13,803 | 14,821 | (1,018) | (7) | 17,654 | (2,833) | (16) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 190,348 | 188,977 | 1,371 | 1 | $ | 224,781 | (35,804) | (16) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Middle Market Banking | $ | 106,834 | 101,193 | 5,641 | 6 | $ | 115,187 | (13,994) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-Based Lending and Leasing | 83,514 | 87,784 | (4,270) | (5) | 109,594 | (21,810) | (20) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 190,348 | 188,977 | 1,371 | 1 | $ | 224,781 | (35,804) | (16) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 205,428 | 188,292 | 17,136 | 9 | 168,081 | 20,211 | 12 |
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Total loans (average) decreased driven by lower loan demand, including lower line utilization, and higher paydowns reflecting continued high levels of client liquidity and strength in the capital markets, partially offset by modest loan growth in late 2021 driven by higher line utilization, as well as customer growth.
Total deposits (average and period-end) increased due to higher levels of liquidity and lower investment spending reflecting government stimulus programs and continued economic uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 19 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Corporate and Investment Banking delivers a suite of capital markets, banking, and financial products and services to corporate, commercial real estate, government and institutional clients globally. Products and services include corporate banking, investment banking, treasury management, commercial real
estate lending and servicing, equity and fixed income solutions, as well as sales, trading, and research capabilities. Table 8e and Table 8f provide additional information for Corporate and Investment Banking.
Table 8e: Corporate and Investment Banking – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 7,410 | 7,509 | (99) | (1) | % | $ | 8,008 | (499) | (6) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit-related fees | 1,112 | 1,062 | 50 | 5 | 1,029 | 33 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending-related fees | 761 | 684 | 77 | 11 | 710 | (26) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment banking fees | 2,405 | 1,952 | 453 | 23 | 1,804 | 148 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net gains from trading activities | 272 | 1,190 | (918) | (77) | 1,022 | 168 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,879 | 1,531 | 348 | 23 | 1,877 | (346) | (18) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 6,429 | 6,419 | 10 | — | 6,442 | (23) | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 13,839 | 13,928 | (89) | (1) | 14,450 | (522) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | (22) | 742 | (764) | NM | 173 | 569 | 329 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (1,417) | 4,204 | (5,621) | NM | — | 4,204 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (1,439) | 4,946 | (6,385) | NM | 173 | 4,773 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 7,200 | 7,703 | (503) | (7) | 7,432 | 271 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 8,078 | 1,279 | 6,799 | 532 | 6,845 | (5,566) | (81) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 2,019 | 330 | 1,689 | 512 | 1,658 | (1,328) | (80) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net loss from noncontrolling interests | (3) | (1) | (2) | NM | (1) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 6,062 | 950 | 5,112 | 538 | $ | 5,188 | (4,238) | (82) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenue by Line of Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lending | $ | 1,948 | 1,767 | 181 | 10 | $ | 1,811 | (44) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury Management and Payments | 1,468 | 1,680 | (212) | (13) | 2,290 | (610) | (27) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment Banking | 1,654 | 1,448 | 206 | 14 | 1,370 | 78 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Banking | 5,070 | 4,895 | 175 | 4 | 5,471 | (576) | (11) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 3,963 | 3,607 | 356 | 10 | 4,260 | (653) | (15) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) | 3,710 | 4,314 | (604) | (14) | 3,760 | 554 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equities | 897 | 1,204 | (307) | (25) | 1,078 | 126 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit Adjustment (CVA/DVA) and Other | 91 | 26 | 65 | 250 | (6) | 32 | 533 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Markets | 4,698 | 5,544 | (846) | (15) | 4,832 | 712 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 108 | (118) | 226 | 192 | (113) | (5) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 13,839 | 13,928 | (89) | (1) | $ | 14,450 | (522) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 16.9 | % | 1.8 | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 52 | 55 | 51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headcount (#) (period-end) | 8,489 | 8,178 | 4 | 7,918 | 3 |
NM – Not meaningful
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Revenue decreased driven by:
•lower net gains from trading activities driven by lower volumes of interest rate products, lower client trading activity for equity products due to market volatility in 2020, and lower client trading activity for credit products reflecting greater market liquidity in 2020 from government actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by higher client trading activity for asset-backed finance products;
partially offset by:
•higher investment banking fees due to higher debt underwriting fees, including loan syndication fees, as well as higher advisory fees and equity underwriting fees;
•higher other noninterest income driven by higher commercial mortgage banking income due to higher servicing income and gains on the sales of mortgage loans, as well as higher income from low-income housing investments; and
•higher lending-related fees reflecting increased loan commitment fees.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 20 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Provision for credit losses decreased driven by an improved economic environment.
Noninterest expense decreased driven by:
•lower operating losses due to lower expense for litigation accruals;
•lower expenses from operations and enterprise functions; and
•lower professional and outside services expense driven by efficiency initiatives to reduce our spending on consultants and contractors;
partially offset by:
•higher personnel expense driven by higher incentive compensation expense.
Table 8f: Corporate and Investment Banking – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 170,713 | 172,492 | (1,779) | (1) | % | $ | 168,506 | 3,986 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 86,323 | 82,832 | 3,491 | 4 | 79,804 | 3,028 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 257,036 | 255,324 | 1,712 | 1 | $ | 248,310 | 7,014 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking | $ | 93,766 | 93,501 | 265 | — | $ | 90,749 | 2,752 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 110,978 | 108,279 | 2,699 | 2 | 104,261 | 4,018 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets | 52,292 | 53,544 | (1,252) | (2) | 53,300 | 244 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 257,036 | 255,324 | 1,712 | 1 | $ | 248,310 | 7,014 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 110,386 | 109,803 | 583 | 1 | $ | 115,937 | (6,134) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Reverse repurchase agreements/securities borrowed | 59,044 | 71,485 | (12,441) | (17) | 89,190 | (17,705) | (20) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 25,315 | 21,986 | 3,329 | 15 | 12,762 | 9,224 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 194,745 | 203,274 | (8,529) | (4) | $ | 217,889 | (14,615) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 523,344 | 521,514 | 1,830 | — | 520,379 | 1,135 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 189,176 | 234,332 | (45,156) | (19) | 238,651 | (4,319) | (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 34,000 | 34,000 | — | — | 31,500 | 2,500 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 191,391 | 160,000 | 31,391 | 20 | $ | 173,985 | (13,985) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 92,983 | 84,456 | 8,527 | 10 | 79,451 | 5,005 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 284,374 | 244,456 | 39,918 | 16 | $ | 253,436 | (8,980) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans by Line of Business: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Banking | $ | 101,926 | 84,640 | 17,286 | 20 | $ | 93,117 | (8,477) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial Real Estate | 125,926 | 107,207 | 18,719 | 17 | 103,938 | 3,269 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Markets | 56,522 | 52,609 | 3,913 | 7 | 56,381 | (3,772) | (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 284,374 | 244,456 | 39,918 | 16 | $ | 253,436 | (8,980) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading-related assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading account securities | $ | 108,697 | 109,311 | (614) | (1) | $ | 124,808 | (15,497) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Reverse repurchase agreements/securities borrowed | 55,973 | 57,248 | (1,275) | (2) | 90,077 | (32,829) | (36) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets | 21,398 | 25,916 | (4,518) | (17) | 14,382 | 11,534 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total trading-related assets | $ | 186,068 | 192,475 | (6,407) | (3) | $ | 229,267 | (36,792) | (16) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 546,549 | 508,518 | 38,031 | 7 | 538,007 | (29,489) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 168,609 | 203,004 | (34,395) | (17) | 261,134 | (58,130) | (22) |
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Total assets (period-end) increased reflecting higher loan balances driven by customer usage of lines of credit due to increased corporate spending.
Total deposits (average and period-end) decreased reflecting continued actions to manage under the asset cap.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 21 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Wealth and Investment Management provides personalized wealth management, brokerage, financial planning, lending, private banking, trust and fiduciary products and services to affluent, high-net worth and ultra-high-net worth clients. We operate through financial advisors in our brokerage and wealth
offices, consumer bank branches, independent offices, and digitally through WellsTrade® and Intuitive Investor®. Table 8g and Table 8h provide additional information for Wealth and Investment Management.
Table 8g: Wealth and Investment Management
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 2,570 | 2,988 | (418) | (14) | % | $ | 3,906 | (918) | (24) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment advisory and other asset-based fees | 9,574 | 8,085 | 1,489 | 18 | 7,909 | 176 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commissions and brokerage services fees | 2,010 | 2,078 | (68) | (3) | 2,170 | (92) | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 192 | 62 | 130 | 210 | 427 | (365) | (85) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total noninterest income | 11,776 | 10,225 | 1,551 | 15 | 10,506 | (281) | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 14,346 | 13,213 | 1,133 | 9 | 14,412 | (1,199) | (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 10 | (3) | 13 | 433 | — | (3) | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | (105) | 252 | (357) | NM | 2 | 250 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | (95) | 249 | (344) | NM | 2 | 247 | NM | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 11,734 | 10,912 | 822 | 8 | 12,167 | (1,255) | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense | 2,707 | 2,052 | 655 | 32 | 2,243 | (191) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 680 | 514 | 166 | 32 | 562 | (48) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 2,027 | 1,538 | 489 | 32 | $ | 1,681 | (143) | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on allocated capital | 22.6 | % | 17.0 | 18.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio | 82 | 83 | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headcount (#) (period-end) | 25,906 | 28,306 | (8) | 29,530 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Advisory assets ($ in billions) | $ | 964 | 853 | 111 | 13 | $ | 778 | 75 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other brokerage assets and deposits ($ in billions) | 1,219 | 1,152 | 67 | 6 | 1,108 | 44 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total client assets ($ in billions) | $ | 2,183 | 2,005 | 178 | 9 | $ | 1,886 | 119 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Annualized revenue per advisor ($ in thousands) (1) | 1,114 | 939 | 175 | 19 | 985 | (46) | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total financial and wealth advisors (#) (period-end) | 12,367 | 13,513 | (8) | 14,414 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 82,364 | 78,775 | 3,589 | 5 | $ | 74,986 | 3,789 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 176,562 | 162,476 | 14,086 | 9 | 139,099 | 23,377 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allocated capital | 8,750 | 8,750 | — | — | 8,750 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 84,101 | 80,785 | 3,316 | 4 | $ | 77,140 | 3,645 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 192,548 | 175,483 | 17,065 | 10 | 143,830 | 31,653 | 22 |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Represents annualized segment total revenue divided by average total financial and wealth advisors for the period.
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher investment advisory and other asset-based fees due to higher market valuations on WIM advisory assets; and
•higher gains on deferred compensation plan investments, which are included in other noninterest income (largely offset by personnel expense);
partially offset by:
•lower net interest income reflecting the lower interest rate environment, partially offset by higher deposit and loan balances.
Provision for credit losses decreased driven by an improved economic environment.
Noninterest expense increased due to:
•higher personnel expense driven by higher revenue-related compensation expense and higher deferred compensation expense; and
•the reversal of a software licensing liability accrual in 2020;
partially offset by:
•lower professional and outside services expense driven by efficiency initiatives to reduce our spending on consultants and contractors.
Total loans (average and period-end) increased due to higher securities-based loan balances.
Total deposits (average and period-end) increased primarily due to growth in customer balances in both The Private Bank and Wells Fargo Advisors.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 22 | Wells Fargo & Company |
WIM Advisory Assets In addition to transactional accounts, WIM offers advisory account relationships to brokerage customers. Fees from advisory accounts are based on a percentage of the market value of the assets as of the beginning of the quarter, which vary across the account types based on the distinct services provided, and are affected by investment performance as well as asset inflows and outflows. Advisory accounts include assets that are financial advisor-directed and separately managed by third-party managers, as well as certain client-directed brokerage assets where we earn a fee for advisory and other services, but do not have investment discretion.
WIM also manages personal trust and other assets for high net worth clients, with fee income earned based on a percentage of the market value of these assets. Table 8h presents advisory assets activity by WIM line of business for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Management believes that advisory assets is a useful metric because it allows management, investors, and others to assess how changes in asset amounts may impact the generation of certain asset-based fees.
For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, the average fee rate by account type ranged from 50 to 120 basis points.
Table 8h: WIM Advisory Assets
| Year ended | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in billions) | Balance, beginning of period | Inflows (1) | Outflows (2) | Market impact (3) | Balance, end of period | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client-directed (4) | $ | 186.3 | 41.5 | (45.0) | 22.8 | 205.6 | ||||||||||
| Financial advisor-directed (5) | 211.0 | 48.7 | (41.1) | 36.9 | 255.5 | |||||||||||
| Separate accounts (6) | 174.6 | 31.8 | (30.7) | 27.6 | 203.3 | |||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (7) | 91.4 | 15.6 | (15.0) | 10.1 | 102.1 | |||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 663.3 | 137.6 | (131.8) | 97.4 | 766.5 | ||||||||||
| The Private Bank (8) | 189.4 | 40.0 | (51.1) | 19.7 | 198.0 | |||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 852.7 | 177.6 | (182.9) | 117.1 | 964.5 | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client directed (4) | $ | 169.4 | 36.4 | (38.2) | 18.7 | 186.3 | ||||||||||
| Financial advisor directed (5) | 176.3 | 40.6 | (33.6) | 27.7 | 211.0 | |||||||||||
| Separate accounts (6) | 160.1 | 24.6 | (27.4) | 17.3 | 174.6 | |||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (7) | 83.7 | 11.3 | (13.9) | 10.3 | 91.4 | |||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 589.5 | 112.9 | (113.1) | 74.0 | 663.3 | ||||||||||
| The Private Bank (8) | 188.0 | 34.0 | (45.8) | 13.2 | 189.4 | |||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 777.5 | 146.9 | (158.9) | 87.2 | 852.7 | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Client directed (4) | $ | 151.5 | 33.5 | (41.8) | 26.2 | 169.4 | ||||||||||
| Financial advisor directed (5) | 141.9 | 33.9 | (34.7) | 35.2 | 176.3 | |||||||||||
| Separate accounts (6) | 136.4 | 24.2 | (29.7) | 29.2 | 160.1 | |||||||||||
| Mutual fund advisory (7) | 71.3 | 11.8 | (14.1) | 14.7 | 83.7 | |||||||||||
| Total Wells Fargo Advisors | $ | 501.1 | 103.4 | (120.3) | 105.3 | 589.5 | ||||||||||
| Total Private Bank (8) | 173.0 | 34.5 | (43.8) | 24.3 | 188.0 | |||||||||||
| Total WIM advisory assets | $ | 674.1 | 137.9 | (164.1) | 129.6 | 777.5 |
(1)Inflows include new advisory account assets, contributions, dividends and interest.
(2)Outflows include closed advisory account assets, withdrawals and client management fees.
(3)Market impact reflects gains and losses on portfolio investments.
(4)Investment advice and other services are provided to client, but decisions are made by the client and the fees earned are based on a percentage of the advisory account assets, not the number and size of transactions executed by the client.
(5)Professionally managed portfolios with fees earned based on respective strategies and as a percentage of certain client assets.
(6)Professional advisory portfolios managed by WFAM or third-party asset managers. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.
(7)Program with portfolios constructed of load-waived, no-load and institutional share class mutual funds. Fees are earned based on a percentage of certain client assets.
(8)Discretionary and non-discretionary portfolios held in personal trusts, investment agency, or custody accounts with fees earned based on a percentage of client assets.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 23 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Corporate includes corporate treasury and enterprise functions, net of allocations (including funds transfer pricing, capital, liquidity and certain expenses), in support of the reportable operating segments, as well as our investment portfolio and affiliated venture capital and private equity businesses. In addition, Corporate includes all restructuring charges related to our efficiency initiatives. See Note 22 (Restructuring Charges) to
Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on restructuring charges. Corporate also includes certain lines of business that management has determined are no longer consistent with the long-term strategic goals of the Company, as well as results for previously divested businesses. Table 8i,
Table 8j, and Table 8k provide additional information for Corporate.
Table 8i: Corporate – Income Statement and Selected Metrics
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions, unless otherwise noted) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | (1,541) | 441 | (1,982) | NM | $ | 2,246 | (1,805) | (80) | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 10,036 | 4,916 | 5,120 | 104 | % | 7,550 | (2,634) | (35) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 8,495 | 5,357 | 3,138 | 59 | 9,796 | (4,439) | (45) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs | 54 | 166 | (112) | (67) | 139 | 27 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in the allowance for credit losses | 3 | (638) | 641 | 100 | (1) | (637) | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for credit losses | 57 | (472) | 529 | 112 | 138 | (610) | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 4,387 | 5,716 | (1,329) | (23) | 4,983 | 733 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 4,051 | 113 | 3,938 | NM | 4,675 | (4,562) | (98) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 596 | (670) | 1,266 | 189 | 900 | (1,570) | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Net income from noncontrolling interests (1) | 1,685 | 281 | 1,404 | 500 | 486 | (205) | (42) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 1,770 | 502 | 1,268 | 253 | $ | 3,289 | (2,787) | (85) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Metrics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Headcount (#) (period-end) (2) | 83,730 | 86,772 | (4) | 77,797 | 12 |
NM – Not meaningful
(1)Reflects results attributable to noncontrolling interests predominantly associated with the Company’s consolidated venture capital investments.
(2)Beginning in first quarter 2021, employees who were notified of displacement remained as headcount in their respective operating segment rather than included in Corporate.
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Revenue increased driven by:
•higher unrealized gains on nonmarketable equity securities from our affiliated venture capital and private equity businesses, higher realized gains on the sales of equity securities, as well as lower impairment of equity securities due to improved market conditions in 2021; and
•gains on the sales of our Corporate Trust Services business, our student loan portfolio, and WFAM;
partially offset by:
•lower net interest income reflecting the lower interest rate environment, unfavorable hedge ineffectiveness accounting results, and lower loan balances;
•lower gains on debt securities from sales of agency MBS and municipal bonds, partially offset by higher gains on sales of corporate and other debt securities;
•lower asset-based fees due to the sale of WFAM on November 1, 2021;
•lower lease income driven by a $268 million impairment of certain rail cars in our rail car leasing business used for the transportation of coal products; and
•higher valuation losses related to the retained litigation risk, including the timing and amount of final settlement, associated with shares of Visa Class B common stock that we previously sold.
Provision for credit losses increased due to a reduction in the allowance for credit losses in 2020 as a result of the reclassification of our student loan portfolio to loans held for sale, partially offset by an improved economic environment.
Noninterest expense decreased due to:
•lower restructuring charges; and
•lower expenses related to divested businesses;
partially offset by:
•higher incentive compensation expense, including the impact of higher market valuations on stock-based compensation;
•higher deferred compensation expense; and
•a write-down of goodwill in 2021 related to the sale of our student loan portfolio.
Corporate includes our rail car leasing business, which had long-lived operating lease assets (as a lessor) of $5.1 billion, which was net of $2.1 billion of accumulated depreciation, as of December 31, 2021. The average age of our rail cars is 22 years and the rail cars are typically leased under short-term leases of 3 to 5 years. Our three largest concentrations, which represented 55% of our rail car fleet as of December 31, 2021, were rail cars used for the transportation of agricultural grain, coal, and cement/sand products.
In 2021, we observed that a decline in the market led to continued weakening demand for certain rail cars used for the transportation of coal products. We expect that both utilization and rental rates for these leased rail cars may remain low in future periods and, therefore, we recognized an impairment charge related to these leased rail cars of $268 million in fourth quarter 2021 as an offset to our lease income, which is included in noninterest income. We believe no other classes of rail cars were impaired as of December 31, 2021. Additional impairment may result in the future based on changing economic and market conditions affecting the long-term demand and utility of specific types of rail cars. Our assumptions for impairment are sensitive to estimated utilization and rental rates, as well as the estimated
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 24 | Wells Fargo & Company |
economic life of the leased asset. For additional information on the accounting for impairment of operating lease assets, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 5 (Leasing Activity) to Financial Statements in this Report.
In addition, Corporate includes assets under management (AUM) and assets under administration (AUA) for Institutional
Retirement and Trust (IRT) client assets of $19 billion and $582 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2021, which we continue to administer at the direction of the buyer pursuant to a transition services agreement. The transition services agreement terminates in June 2022.
Table 8j: Corporate – Balance Sheet
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | $ Change 2021/ 2020 | % Change 2021/ 2020 | 2019 | $ Change 2020/ 2019 | % Change 2020/ 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (average) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | 236,124 | 183,420 | 52,704 | 29 | % | $ | 130,532 | 52,888 | 41 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | 181,841 | 221,493 | (39,652) | (18) | 252,099 | (30,606) | (12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 244,735 | 172,755 | 71,980 | 42 | 147,303 | 25,452 | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 12,720 | 12,445 | 275 | 2 | 13,188 | (743) | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | 9,766 | 19,790 | (10,024) | (51) | 18,540 | 1,250 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 743,089 | 675,250 | 67,839 | 10 | 623,075 | 52,175 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 40,066 | 78,172 | (38,106) | (49) | 119,638 | (41,466) | (35) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Balance Sheet Data (period-end) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | 209,696 | 235,262 | (25,566) | (11) | $ | 111,408 | 123,854 | 111 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale debt securities | 165,926 | 208,694 | (42,768) | (20) | 250,801 | (42,107) | (17) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity debt securities | 269,285 | 204,858 | 64,427 | 31 | 153,142 | 51,716 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 16,549 | 10,305 | 6,244 | 61 | 13,770 | (3,465) | (25) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans | 9,997 | 10,623 | (626) | (6) | 21,906 | (11,283) | (52) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 721,335 | 728,667 | (7,332) | (1) | 610,673 | 117,994 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 32,220 | 53,037 | (20,817) | (39) | 102,429 | (49,392) | (48) |
Full year 2021 vs. full year 2020
Total assets (average) increased due to:
•an increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash managed by corporate treasury as a result of an increase in deposits from the reportable operating segments; and
•an increase in held-to-maturity debt securities related to portfolio rebalancing to manage liquidity and interest rate risk;
partially offset by:
•a decline in available-for-sale debt securities related to portfolio rebalancing to manage liquidity and interest rate risk; and
•a decline in loans due to the sale of our student loan portfolio.
Total assets (period-end) decreased modestly reflecting the timing of cash deployment by our investment portfolio near the end of 2021, partially offset by an increase in equity securities related to our affiliated venture capital business.
Total deposits (average and period-end) decreased reflecting actions taken to manage under the asset cap.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 25 |
Earnings Performance (continued)
Wells Fargo Asset Management (WFAM) Assets Under Management On November 1, 2021 we closed our previously announced agreement to sell WFAM. Prior to the sale, we earned investment advisory and other asset-based fees from managing and administering assets through WFAM, which offered Wells Fargo proprietary mutual funds and managed institutional separate accounts. Generally, we earned fees from AUM where we had discretionary management authority over the investments and generated fees as a percentage of the market
value of the AUM. WFAM assets under management consisted of equity, alternative, balanced, fixed income, money market, and stable value, and included client assets that were managed or sub-advised on behalf of other Wells Fargo lines of business. Table 8k presents WFAM AUM activity for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Management believes that AUM is a useful metric because it allows management, investors, and others to assess how changes in asset amounts may impact the generation of certain asset-based fees.
Table 8k: WFAM Assets Under Management
| Year ended | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in billions) | Balance, beginning of period | Inflows (1) | Outflows (2) | Market impact (3) | Sale of WFAM on November 1, 2021 | Balance, end of period | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds (4) | $ | 197.4 | — | (6.3) | — | (191.1) | — | |||||||||||
| Other assets managed | 405.6 | 69.3 | (90.5) | 11.6 | (396.0) | — | ||||||||||||
| Total WFAM assets under management | $ | 603.0 | 69.3 | (96.8) | 11.6 | (587.1) | — | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds (4) | $ | 130.6 | 66.8 | — | — | — | 197.4 | |||||||||||
| Other assets managed | 378.2 | 101.3 | (104.7) | 30.8 | — | 405.6 | ||||||||||||
| Total WFAM assets under management | $ | 508.8 | 168.1 | (104.7) | 30.8 | — | 603.0 | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market funds (4) | $ | 112.4 | 18.2 | — | — | — | 130.6 | |||||||||||
| Other assets managed | 353.5 | 75.1 | (86.1) | 35.7 | — | 378.2 | ||||||||||||
| Total WFAM assets under management | $ | 465.9 | 93.3 | (86.1) | 35.7 | — | 508.8 |
(1)Inflows include new managed account assets, contributions, dividends and interest.
(2)Outflows include closed managed account assets, withdrawals and client management fees.
(3)Market impact reflects gains and losses on portfolio investments.
(4)Money Market funds activity is presented on a net inflow or net outflow basis, because the gross flows are not meaningful nor used by management as an indicator of performance.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 26 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Balance Sheet Analysis
At December 31, 2021, our assets totaled $1.95 trillion, down $4.8 billion from December 31, 2020.
The following discussion provides additional information about the major components of our consolidated balance sheet. See the “Capital Management” section in this Report for information on changes in our equity.
Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
Table 9: Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Amortized cost, net (1) | Net unrealized gains | Fair value | Weighted average expected maturity (yrs) | Amortized cost, net (1) | Net unrealized gains | Fair value | Weighted average expected maturity (yrs) | ||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale (2) | 175,463 | 1,781 | 177,244 | 5.2 | 215,533 | 4,859 | 220,392 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity (3) | 272,022 | 364 | 272,386 | 6.3 | 205,720 | 6,587 | 212,307 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 447,485 | 2,145 | 449,630 | n/a | 421,253 | 11,446 | 432,699 | n/a |
(1)Represents amortized cost of the securities, net of the allowance for credit losses of $8 million and $28 million related to available-for-sale debt securities and $96 million and $41 million related to held-to-maturity debt securities at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)Available-for-sale debt securities are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value.
(3)Held-to-maturity debt securities are carried on the consolidated balance sheet at amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses.
Table 9 presents a summary of our portfolio of investments in available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities. The size and composition of our AFS and HTM debt securities is dependent upon the Company’s liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives. The AFS debt securities portfolio can be used to meet funding needs that arise in the normal course of business or due to market stress. Changes in our interest rate risk profile may occur due to changes in overall economic or market conditions, which could influence loan origination demand, prepayment rates, or deposit balances and mix. In response, the AFS debt securities portfolio can be rebalanced to meet the Company’s interest rate risk management objectives. In addition to meeting liquidity and interest rate risk management objectives, the AFS and HTM debt securities portfolios may provide yield enhancement over other short-term assets. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management” section in this Report for additional information on liquidity and interest rate risk.
The AFS debt securities portfolio predominantly consists of liquid, high-quality U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and agency MBS. The portfolio also includes securities issued by U.S. states and political subdivisions and highly rated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs).
The HTM debt securities portfolio predominantly consists of liquid, high-quality U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and agency MBS. The portfolio also includes securities issued by U.S. states and political subdivisions and highly rated CLOs. Our intent is to hold these securities to maturity and collect the contractual cash flows. Debt securities are classified as HTM through purchases or through transfers from the AFS debt securities portfolio.
The amortized cost, net of the allowance for credit losses, of AFS and HTM debt securities increased from December 31, 2020. We continued to purchase AFS and HTM debt securities, including HTM debt securities through securitizations of LHFS, which more than offset portfolio runoff and AFS debt security sales. In addition, we transferred $56.0 billion of AFS debt securities to HTM debt securities in 2021 due to actions taken to reposition the overall portfolio for capital management purposes.
The total net unrealized gains on AFS and HTM debt securities decreased from December 31, 2020, driven by higher interest rates.
At December 31, 2021, 98% of the combined AFS and HTM debt securities portfolio was rated AA- or above. Ratings are based on external ratings where available and, where not available, based on internal credit grades. See Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on AFS and HTM debt securities, including a summary of debt securities by security type.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 27 |
Balance Sheet Analysis (continued)
Loan Portfolios
Table 10 provides a summary of total outstanding loans by portfolio segment. Commercial loans increased from December 31, 2020, predominantly due to an increase in the commercial and industrial loan portfolio, driven by higher loan demand resulting in increased originations and loan draws, partially offset by paydowns and PPP loan forgiveness. Consumer
loans decreased from December 31, 2020, predominantly driven by a decrease in the residential mortgage – first lien portfolio due to loan paydowns reflecting the low interest rate environment and the transfer of $17.8 billion of first lien mortgage loans to loans held for sale (LHFS) substantially all of which related to the sales of loans purchased from GNMA loan securitization pools in prior periods, partially offset by originations of $72.6 billion.
Table 10: Loan Portfolios
| (in millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial | $ | 513,120 | 478,417 | |||
| Consumer | 382,274 | 409,220 | ||||
| Total loans | $ | 895,394 | 887,637 | |||
| Change from prior year-end | $ | 7,757 | (74,628) |
Average loan balances and a comparative detail of average loan balances is included in Table 3 under “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” earlier in this Report. Additional information on total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable is included in the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management” section in this Report. Period-end balances and other loan related information are in Note 4 (Loans
and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 11 shows contractual maturities by class of loan and the distribution by changes in interest rates for loans with a contractual maturity greater than one year. Nonaccrual loans and loans with indeterminate maturities have been classified as maturing within one year.
Table 11: Loan Maturities
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loan maturities | Loans maturing after one year | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Within one year | After one year through five years | After five years through fifteen years | After fifteen years | Total | Fixed interest rates | Floating/variable interest rates | |||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 127,237 | 199,907 | 22,510 | 782 | 350,436 | 22,827 | 200,372 | ||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | 27,847 | 74,775 | 23,329 | 1,782 | 127,733 | 20,283 | 79,603 | |||||||||||||
| Real estate construction | 8,147 | 11,541 | 394 | 10 | 20,092 | 254 | 11,691 | |||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 3,519 | 10,178 | 1,083 | 79 | 14,859 | 11,340 | — | |||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 166,750 | 296,401 | 47,316 | 2,653 | 513,120 | 54,704 | 291,666 | |||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 10,489 | 28,557 | 82,159 | 121,065 | 242,270 | 163,105 | 68,676 | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 1,018 | 968 | 2,567 | 12,065 | 16,618 | 4,299 | 11,301 | |||||||||||||
| Credit card | 38,453 | — | — | — | 38,453 | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Auto | 13,034 | 40,120 | 3,505 | — | 56,659 | 43,625 | — | |||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 25,148 | 2,846 | 252 | 28 | 28,274 | 2,465 | 661 | |||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 88,142 | 72,491 | 88,483 | 133,158 | 382,274 | 213,494 | 80,638 | |||||||||||||
| Total loans | $ | 254,892 | 368,892 | 135,799 | 135,811 | 895,394 | 268,198 | 372,304 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 28 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Deposits
Deposits increased from December 31, 2020, reflecting:
•higher levels of liquidity and savings for consumer customers reflecting government stimulus programs and payment deferral programs, as well as continued economic uncertainty associated with the COVID-19 pandemic;
partially offset by:
•actions taken to manage under the asset cap resulting in declines in time deposits, such as brokered certificates of
deposit (CDs), and interest-bearing deposits in non-U.S. offices.
Table 12 provides additional information regarding deposits. Information regarding the impact of deposits on net interest income and a comparison of average deposit balances is provided in the “Earnings Performance – Net Interest Income” section and Table 3 earlier in this Report.
Table 12: Deposits
| ($ in millions) | Dec 31, 2021 | % oftotaldeposits | Dec 31, 2020 | % of total deposits | % Change | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 527,748 | 36 | % | $ | 467,068 | 33 | % | 13 | ||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | 465,887 | 31 | 447,446 | 32 | 4 | ||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 439,600 | 30 | 404,935 | 29 | 9 | ||||||||||
| Time deposits | 29,461 | 2 | 49,775 | 4 | (41) | ||||||||||
| Interest-bearing deposits in non-U.S. offices | 19,783 | 1 | 35,157 | 2 | (44) | ||||||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 1,482,479 | 100 | % | $ | 1,404,381 | 100 | % | 6 |
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, total deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured, were estimated to be $590 billion and $560 billion, respectively. Estimated uninsured domestic deposits reflect amounts disclosed in the U.S. regulatory reports of our subsidiary banks, with adjustments for amounts related to consolidated
subsidiaries. All non-U.S. deposits are treated for these purposes as uninsured.
Table 13 presents the contractual maturities of estimated time deposits that exceed FDIC insurance limits, or are otherwise uninsured. All non-U.S. time deposits are uninsured.
Table 13: Uninsured Time Deposits by Maturity
| (in millions) | Three months or less | After three months through six months | After six months through twelve months | After twelve months | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Domestic time deposits | $ | 2,866 | 491 | 467 | 773 | 4,597 | ||||||||
| Non-U.S. time deposits | 316 | 235 | — | — | 551 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,182 | 726 | 467 | 773 | 5,148 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 29 |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet, or may be recorded on the consolidated balance sheet in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. Our off-balance sheet arrangements include commitments to lend and purchase debt and equity securities, transactions with unconsolidated entities, guarantees, derivatives, and other commitments. These transactions are designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage our credit, market or liquidity risks, and/or (3) diversify our funding sources.
Commitments to Lend
We enter into commitments to lend to customers, which are usually at a stated interest rate, if funded, and for specific purposes and time periods. When we enter into commitments, we are exposed to credit risk. The maximum credit risk for these commitments will generally be lower than the contractual amount because a significant portion of these commitments are not funded. For additional information, see Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Transactions with Unconsolidated Entities
In the normal course of business, we enter into various types of on- and off-balance sheet transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs), which are corporations, trusts, limited liability companies or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. Generally, SPEs are formed in connection with securitization transactions and are considered variable interest entities (VIEs). For additional information, see Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Guarantees and Other Arrangements
Guarantees are contracts that contingently require us to make payments to a guaranteed party based on an event or a change in an underlying asset, liability, rate or index. Guarantees are generally in the form of standby and direct pay letters of credit, written options, recourse obligations, exchange and clearing house guarantees, indemnifications, and other types of similar arrangements. For additional information, see Note 13 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Commitments to Purchase Debt and Equity Securities
We enter into commitments to purchase securities under resale agreements. We also may enter into commitments to purchase debt and equity securities to provide capital for customers’ funding, liquidity or other future needs. For additional information, see Note 13 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Derivatives
We use derivatives to manage exposure to market risk, including interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign currency risk, and to assist customers with their risk management objectives. Derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and volume can be measured in terms of the notional amount, which is generally not exchanged, but is used only as the basis on which interest and other payments are determined. The notional amount is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet and is not, when viewed in isolation, a meaningful measure of the risk profile of the instruments. For additional information, see Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 30 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Risk Management
Wells Fargo manages a variety of risks that can significantly affect our financial performance and our ability to meet the expectations of our customers, shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders.
Risk is Part of our Business Model. Risk is the possibility of an event occurring that could adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its strategic or business objectives. The Company routinely takes risks to achieve its business goals and to serve its customers. These risks include financial risks, such as interest rate, credit, liquidity, and market risks, and non-financial risks, such as operational risk, which includes compliance and model risks, and strategic and reputation risks.
Risk Profile. The Company’s risk profile is an assessment of the aggregate risks associated with the Company’s exposures and business activities after taking into consideration risk management effectiveness. The Company monitors its risk profile, and the Board reviews risk profile reports and analysis.
Risk Capacity. Risk capacity is the maximum level of risk that the Company could assume given its current level of resources before triggering regulatory and other constraints on its capital and liquidity needs.
Risk Appetite. Risk appetite is the amount of risk, within its risk capacity, the Company is comfortable taking given its current level of resources. Risk appetite is articulated in our Statement of Risk Appetite, which establishes acceptable risks and at what level and includes risk appetite principles. The Company’s Statement of Risk Appetite is defined by senior management, approved at least annually by the Board, and helps guide the Company’s business and risk leaders. The Company continuously monitors its risk appetite, and the Board reviews reports which include risk appetite information and analysis.
Risk and Strategy. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drives the Company’s strategic planning process, which identifies the Company’s most significant opportunities and challenges, develops options to address them, and evaluates the risks and trade-offs of each. The Company’s risk profile, risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness are considered in the strategic planning process, which is closely linked with the Company’s capital planning process. The Company’s Independent Risk Management (IRM) organization participates in strategic planning, providing challenge to and independent assessment of the risks associated with strategic initiatives. IRM also independently assesses and challenges the impact of the strategic plan on risk capacity, risk appetite, and risk management effectiveness at the principal lines of business, enterprise functions, and aggregate Company level. After review, the strategic plan is presented to the Board each year with IRM’s evaluation.
Risk and Climate Change. The Company is committed to helping mitigate the impacts of climate change related to its activities and to partner with key stakeholders, including communities and customers, to do the same. The Company expects that climate change will increasingly impact the risk types it manages, and the Company will continue to integrate climate considerations into its risk management framework as its understanding of climate change and risks driven by it evolve.
Risk is Managed by Everyone. Every employee, in the course of their daily activities, creates risk and is responsible for managing risk. Every employee has a role to play in risk management, including establishing and maintaining the Company’s control environment. Every employee must comply with applicable laws, regulations, and Company policies.
Risk and Culture. Senior management sets the tone at the top by supporting a strong culture, defined by the Company’s expectations, that guides how employees conduct themselves and make decisions. The Board holds senior management accountable for establishing and maintaining this culture and for effectively managing risk. Senior management expects employees to speak up when they see something that could cause harm to the Company’s customers, communities, employees, shareholders, or reputation. Because risk management is everyone’s responsibility, all employees are empowered to and expected to challenge risk decisions when appropriate and to escalate their concerns when they have not been addressed. The Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs are designed to establish a balanced framework for risk and reward under core principles that employees are expected to know and practice. The Board, through its Human Resources Committee, plays an important role in overseeing and providing credible challenge to the Company’s performance management and incentive compensation programs. Effective risk management is a central component of employee performance evaluations.
Risk Management Framework. The Company’s risk management framework sets forth the Company’s core principles for managing and governing its risk. It is approved by the Board’s Risk Committee and reviewed and updated annually. Many other documents and policies flow from its core principles.
Wells Fargo’s top priority is to strengthen our company by building an appropriate risk and control infrastructure. We continue to enhance our risk management programs, including our operational and compliance risk management as required by the FRB’s February 2, 2018, and the CFPB/OCC’s April 20, 2018, consent orders.
Risk Governance
Role of the Board. The Board oversees the Company’s business, including its risk management. It assesses senior management’s performance and holds senior management accountable for maintaining and adhering to an effective risk management program.
Board Committee Structure. The Board carries out its risk oversight responsibilities directly and through its committees. The Risk Committee reviews and approves the Company’s risk management framework and oversees management’s implementation of the framework, including how the Company manages and governs risk. The Risk Committee also oversees the Company’s adherence to its risk appetite. In addition, the Risk Committee supports the stature, authority and independence of IRM and oversees and receives reports on its operation. The Chief Risk Officer (CRO) reports functionally to the Risk Committee and administratively to the CEO.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 31 |
Risk Management (continued)
Management Committee Structure. The Company has established management committees, including those focused on risk, that support management in carrying out its governance and risk management responsibilities. One type of management committee is a governance committee, which is a decision-making body that operates for a particular purpose and may report to a Board committee.
Each management governance committee, in accordance with its charter, is expected to discuss, document, and make decisions regarding high priority and significant risks, emerging
risks, risk acceptances, and risks and issues escalated to it; review and monitor progress related to critical and high-risk issues and remediation efforts, including lessons learned; and report key challenges, decisions, escalations, other actions, and open issues as appropriate.
Table 14 presents, as of December 31, 2021, the structure of the Company’s Board committees and management governance committees reporting to a Board committee, including relevant reporting and escalation paths.
Table 14: Board and Management-level Governance Committee Structure
| Wells Fargo & Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit Committee (1) | Finance Committee | Corporate Responsibility Committee | RiskCommittee | Governance & Nominating Committee | Human Resources Committee | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Management Governance Committees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Disclosure Committee | Capital Management Committee | Allowance for Credit Losses Approval Governance Committee | Enterprise Risk & Control Committee | Incentive Compensation and Performance Management Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory and Risk Reporting Oversight Committee | Corporate Asset/Liability Committee | Risk and Control Committees | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recovery and Resolution Committee | Risk Type Committees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Topic Committees |
(1)The Audit Committee additionally oversees the internal audit function; external auditor independence, activities, and performance; and the disclosure framework for financial, regulatory and risk reports prepared for the Board, management, and bank regulatory agencies; and assists the Board in its oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
Management Governance Committees Reporting to the Risk Committee of the Board. The Enterprise Risk & Control Committee (ERCC) is a decision-making and escalation body that governs the management of all risk types. The ERCC receives information about risk and control issues, addresses escalated risks and issues, and actively oversees risk controls. The ERCC also makes decisions related to significant risks and changes to the Company’s risk appetite. The Risk Committee receives regular updates from the ERCC chairs and senior management regarding current and emerging risks and senior management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management program.
The ERCC is co-chaired by the CEO and CRO, and its membership is comprised of principal line of business and certain enterprise function heads. The Chief Auditor or a designee attends all meetings of the ERCC. The ERCC has a direct escalation path to the Risk Committee. The ERCC also escalates certain human capital risks and issues to the Human Resources Committee. In addition, the CRO may escalate anything directly to the Board. Risks and issues are escalated to the ERCC in accordance with the Company’s escalation management policy.
Each principal line of business and enterprise function has a risk and control committee, which is a management governance committee with a mandate that aligns with the ERCC but with its scope limited to the respective principal line of business or enterprise function. These committees focus on and consider
risks that the respective principal line of business or enterprise function generate and manage, and the controls the principal line of business or enterprise function are expected to have in place.
As a complement to these risk and control committees, management governance committees dedicated to specific risk types and risk topics also report to the ERCC to enable more comprehensive governance of risks.
Risk Operating Model – Roles and Responsibilities
The Company has three lines of defense for managing risk: the Front Line, Independent Risk Management, and Internal Audit.
•Front Line The Front Line, which comprises principal line of business and certain enterprise function activities, is the first line of defense. The Front Line is responsible for understanding the risks generated by its activities, applying adequate controls, and managing risk in the course of its business activities. The Front Line identifies, measures and assesses, controls, monitors, and reports on risk generated by or associated with its business activities and balances risk and reward in decision making while operating within the Company’s risk appetite.
•Independent Risk Management IRM is the second line of defense. It establishes and maintains the Company’s risk management program and provides oversight, including challenge to and independent assessment of, the Front Line’s execution of its risk management responsibilities.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 32 | Wells Fargo & Company |
•Internal Audit Internal Audit is the third line of defense. It is responsible for acting as an independent assurance function and validates that the risk management program is adequately designed and functioning effectively.
Risk Type Classifications
The Company uses common classifications, hierarchies, and ratings to enable consistency across risk management programs and aggregation of information. Risk type classifications permit the Company to identify and prioritize its risk exposures, including emerging risk exposures.
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk, which in addition to those discussed in this section, includes compliance risk and model risk, is the risk resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for all aspects of operational risk, including significant supporting programs and/or policies regarding the Company’s business resiliency and disaster recovery, data management, information security, technology, and third-party risk management. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant operational risk policies and oversees the Company’s operational risk management program.
At the management level, Operational Risk Management, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for operational risk. Operational Risk Management reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to operational risk to the Board’s Risk Committee. Operational Risk Management’s oversight responsibilities include change management risk, human capital risk, technology risk, third-party risk, information management risk, information security risk, data management risk, and fraud risk.
Information security is a significant operational risk for financial institutions such as Wells Fargo and includes the risk arising from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information or information systems. The Board is actively engaged in the oversight of the Company’s information security risk management and cyber defense programs. The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for information security risk and approves the Company’s information security program, which includes the information security policy and the cyber defense program. A Technology Subcommittee of the Risk Committee assists the Risk Committee in providing oversight of technology, information security, and cybersecurity risks as well as data management risk. The Technology Subcommittee reviews and recommends to the Risk Committee for approval any significant programs and/or policies supporting information security risk (including cybersecurity risk), technology risk, and data management risk.
Wells Fargo and other financial institutions, as well as their third- party service providers, continue to be the target of various evolving and adaptive cyber attacks, including malware, ransomware, other malicious software intended to exploit hardware or software vulnerabilities, phishing, credential validation, and distributed denial-of-service, in an effort to disrupt the operations of financial institutions, test their cybersecurity capabilities, commit fraud, or obtain confidential, proprietary or other information. Cyber attacks have also focused on targeting online applications and services, such as online banking, as well as cloud-based and other products and services provided by third parties, and have targeted the
infrastructure of the internet causing the widespread unavailability of websites and degrading website performance. As a result, information security and the continued development and enhancement of our controls, processes and systems designed to protect our networks, computers, software and data from attack, damage or unauthorized access remain a priority for Wells Fargo. Wells Fargo is also proactively involved in industry cybersecurity efforts and working with other parties, including our third-party service providers and governmental agencies, to continue to enhance defenses and improve resiliency to cybersecurity and other information security threats. See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding the risks associated with a failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, including as a result of cyber attacks.
Compliance Risk Management
Compliance risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk resulting from the failure to comply with laws (legislation, regulations and rules) and regulatory guidance, and the failure to appropriately address associated impact, including to customers. Compliance risk encompasses violations of applicable internal policies, program requirements, procedures, and standards related to ethical principles applicable to the banking industry.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for all aspects of compliance risk, including financial crimes risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee reviews and approves significant supporting compliance risk and financial crimes risk policies and programs and oversees the Company’s compliance risk management and financial crimes risk management programs.
Conduct risk, a sub-category of compliance risk, is the risk of inappropriate, unethical, or unlawful behavior on the part of employees or individuals acting on behalf of the Company, caused by deliberate or unintentional actions or business practices. In connection with its oversight of conduct risk, the Board oversees the alignment of employee conduct to the Company’s risk appetite (which the Board approves annually). The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for conduct risk and risk management components of the Company’s culture, while the responsibilities of the Board’s Human Resources Committee include oversight of the Company’s culture, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct,
human capital management (including talent management and succession planning), performance management program, and incentive compensation risk management program.
At the management level, the Compliance function, which is part of IRM, monitors the implementation of the Company’s compliance and conduct risk programs. Financial Crimes Risk Management, which is part of the Compliance function, oversees and monitors financial crimes risk. The Compliance function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to compliance risk to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Model Risk Management
Model risk (a type of operational risk) is the risk arising from the potential for adverse consequences from decisions made based on model output that may be incorrect or used inappropriately.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for model risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee oversees the Company’s model risk management policy, model governance, model performance, model issue remediation status, and adherence to model risk appetite metrics.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 33 |
Risk Management (continued)
At the management level, the Model Risk function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for model risk and is responsible for governance, validation and monitoring of model risk across the Company. The Model Risk function reports to the CRO and provides periodic reports related to model risk to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Strategic Risk Management
Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, or liquidity arising from adverse business decisions, improper implementation of strategic initiatives, or inadequate responses to changes in the external operating environment.
The Board has primary oversight responsibility for strategic planning and oversees management’s development and implementation of and approves the Company’s strategic plan, and considers whether it is aligned with the Company’s risk appetite and risk management effectiveness. Management develops, executes and recommends significant strategic corporate transactions and the Board evaluates management’s proposals, including their impact on the Company’s risk profile and financial position. The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for the Company’s strategic risk and the adequacy of the Company’s strategic risk management program, including associated risk management practices, processes and controls. The Board’s Risk Committee also receives updates from management regarding new business initiatives activity and risks related to new or changing products, as appropriate.
At the management level, the Strategic Risk Oversight function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for strategic risk. The Strategic Risk Oversight function reports into the CRO and supports periodic reports related to strategic risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Reputation Risk Management
Reputation risk is the risk arising from the potential that negative stakeholder opinion or negative publicity regarding the Company’s business practices, whether true or not, will adversely impact current or projected financial conditions and resilience, cause a decline in the customer base, or result in costly litigation. Stakeholders include employees, customers, communities, shareholders, regulators, elected officials, advocacy groups, and media organizations.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for reputation risk, while each Board committee has reputation risk oversight responsibilities related to their primary oversight responsibilities. As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Board’s Risk Committee receives reports from management that help it monitor how effectively the Company is managing reputation risk. As part of its oversight responsibilities for social and public responsibility matters, the Board’s Corporate Responsibility Committee receives reports from management relating to stakeholder perceptions of the Company.
At the management level, the Reputation Risk Oversight function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for reputation risk. The Reputation Risk Oversight function reports into the CRO and supports periodic reports related to reputation risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee.
Credit Risk Management
We define credit risk as the risk of loss associated with a borrower or counterparty default (failure to meet obligations in accordance with agreed upon terms). Credit risk exists with many
of the Company’s assets and exposures such as loans, debt securities, and certain derivatives.
The Board’s Risk Committee has primary oversight responsibility for credit risk. A Credit Subcommittee of the Risk Committee assists the Risk Committee in providing oversight of credit risk. At the management level, Credit Risk, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for credit risk. Credit Risk reports to the CRO and supports periodic reports related to credit risk provided to the Board’s Risk Committee or its Credit Subcommittee.
Loan Portfolio Our loan portfolios represent the largest component of assets on our consolidated balance sheet for which we have credit risk. Table 15 presents our total loans outstanding by portfolio segment and class of financing receivable.
Table 15: Total Loans Outstanding by Portfolio Segment and Class of Financing Receivable
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial: | |||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 350,436 | 318,805 | ||
| Real estate mortgage | 127,733 | 121,720 | |||
| Real estate construction | 20,092 | 21,805 | |||
| Lease financing | 14,859 | 16,087 | |||
| Total commercial | 513,120 | 478,417 | |||
| Consumer: | |||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 242,270 | 276,674 | |||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 16,618 | 23,286 | |||
| Credit card | 38,453 | 36,664 | |||
| Auto | 56,659 | 48,187 | |||
| Other consumer | 28,274 | 24,409 | |||
| Total consumer | 382,274 | 409,220 | |||
| Total loans | $ | 895,394 | 887,637 |
We manage our credit risk by establishing what we believe are sound credit policies for underwriting new business, while monitoring and reviewing the performance of our existing loan portfolios. We employ various credit risk management and monitoring activities to mitigate risks associated with multiple risk factors affecting loans we hold including:
•Loan concentrations and related credit quality;
•Counterparty credit risk;
•Economic and market conditions;
•Legislative or regulatory mandates;
•Changes in interest rates;
•Merger and acquisition activities; and
•Reputation risk.
In addition, the Company will continue to integrate climate considerations into its credit risk management activities.
Our credit risk management oversight process is governed centrally, but provides for direct management and accountability by our lines of business. Our overall credit process includes comprehensive credit policies, disciplined credit underwriting, frequent and detailed risk measurement and modeling, extensive credit training programs, and a continual loan review and audit process.
A key to our credit risk management is adherence to a well-controlled underwriting process, which we believe is appropriate for the needs of our customers as well as investors who purchase the loans or securities collateralized by the loans.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 34 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Credit Quality Overview Credit quality in 2021 reflected continued improvement in the economic environment. In particular:
•Nonaccrual loans were $7.2 billion at December 31, 2021, down from $8.7 billion at December 31, 2020. Commercial nonaccrual loans decreased to $2.4 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $4.8 billion at December 31, 2020, and consumer nonaccrual loans increased to $4.8 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $3.9 billion at December 31, 2020. Nonaccrual loans represented 0.81% of total loans at December 31, 2021, compared with 0.98% at December 31, 2020.
•Net loan charge-offs as a percentage of our average commercial and consumer loan portfolios were 0.06% and 0.33%, respectively, in 2021, compared with 0.31% and 0.39%, respectively, in 2020.
•Loans that are not government insured/guaranteed and 90 days or more past due and still accruing were $235 million and $424 million in our commercial and consumer portfolios, respectively, at December 31, 2021, compared with $78 million and $612 million at December 31, 2020.
•Our provision for credit losses for loans was $(4.2) billion in 2021, compared with $14.0 billion in 2020.
•The ACL for loans decreased to $13.8 billion, or 1.54% of total loans, at December 31, 2021, compared with $19.7 billion, or 2.22%, at December 31, 2020.
Additional information on our loan portfolios and our credit quality trends follows.
COVID-Related Lending Accommodations During 2021, we provided customers with residential mortgage loan payment deferrals of up to 18 months in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At December 31, 2021, approximately $1.1 billion of unpaid principal balance related to residential mortgage loans, excluding those insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), remained in a deferral period.
Based on guidance in the CARES Act and the Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (Revised) issued by federal banking regulators in April 2020 (the Interagency Statement), both of which we elected to apply, loan modifications related to COVID-19 and that meet certain other criteria are exempt from troubled debt restructuring (TDR) classification. The TDR relief provided by the CARES Act guidance is no longer available after January 1, 2022; however, certain COVID-related lending accommodations may continue to be eligible for TDR relief under the Interagency Statement. At December 31, 2021, the majority of residential mortgage loans that were in a deferral period, excluding those that were government insured/guaranteed, met the criteria for TDR relief and were therefore not classified as TDRs.
Customers who were current prior to entering the deferral period and confirmed their ability to return to their contractual loan payments upon exiting the deferral period will remain on accrual status. Customers who are unable to resume making their contractual loan payments upon exiting the deferral period are generally placed on nonaccrual status until they perform for a period of time. Such customers may require further assistance after exiting from these deferral programs and may receive or be eligible to receive modifications, or may be charged-off in accordance with our policies. For additional information about our COVID-related modifications, see Note 1 (Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Significant Loan Portfolio Reviews Measuring and monitoring our credit risk is an ongoing process that tracks delinquencies, collateral values, Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) scores, economic trends by geographic areas, loan-level risk grading for certain portfolios (typically commercial) and other indications of credit risk. Our credit risk monitoring process is designed to enable early identification of developing risk and to support our determination of an appropriate allowance for credit losses. The following discussion provides additional characteristics and analysis of our significant portfolios. See Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for more analysis and credit metric information for each of the following portfolios.
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS AND LEASE FINANCING
For purposes of portfolio risk management, we aggregate commercial and industrial loans and lease financing according to market segmentation and standard industry codes. We generally subject commercial and industrial loans and lease financing to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. Our ratings are aligned to regulatory definitions of pass and criticized categories with criticized segmented among special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss categories.
We had $13.0 billion of the commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio internally classified as criticized in accordance with regulatory guidance at December 31, 2021, compared with $19.3 billion at December 31, 2020. The change was driven by decreases in the oil, gas and pipelines, retail, transportation services, and entertainment and recreation industries, as these industries continue to recover from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The majority of our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio is secured by short-term assets, such as accounts receivable, inventory and debt securities, as well as long-lived assets, such as equipment and other business assets. Generally, the primary source of repayment for this portfolio is the operating cash flows of customers, with the collateral securing this portfolio representing a secondary source of repayment.
The portfolio increased at December 31, 2021, compared with December 31, 2020, driven by higher loan demand resulting in increased originations and loan draws, partially offset by paydowns and PPP loan forgiveness. Table 16 provides our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing by industry. The industry categories are based on the North American Industry Classification System.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 35 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
Table 16: Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing by Industry
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Nonaccrual loans | Total portfolio | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | Nonaccrual loans | Total portfolio | % of total loans | Total commitments (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Financials except banks | $ | 104 | 142,283 | 16 | % | $ | 236,435 | $ | 160 | 117,726 | 13 | % | $ | 206,999 | ||||||||||||
| Technology, telecom and media | 64 | 23,345 | 3 | 63,551 | 144 | 23,061 | 3 | 56,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate and construction | 78 | 25,035 | 3 | 56,278 | 133 | 23,113 | 3 | 51,526 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Equipment, machinery and parts manufacturing | 24 | 18,130 | 2 | 43,778 | 81 | 18,158 | 2 | 41,332 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Retail | 27 | 17,645 | 2 | 41,447 | 94 | 17,393 | 2 | 41,669 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Materials and commodities | 32 | 14,684 | 2 | 36,704 | 39 | 12,071 | 1 | 33,879 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Food and beverage manufacturing | 7 | 13,242 | 1 | 30,903 | 17 | 12,401 | 1 | 28,908 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Health care and pharmaceuticals | 24 | 12,847 | 1 | 29,057 | 145 | 15,322 | 2 | 32,154 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Oil, gas and pipelines | 197 | 8,828 | * | 29,010 | 953 | 10,471 | 1 | 30,055 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Auto related | 31 | 10,629 | 1 | 25,772 | 79 | 11,817 | 1 | 25,034 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial services | 78 | 10,492 | 1 | 24,804 | 107 | 10,284 | 1 | 24,442 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Utilities | 77 | 6,982 | * | 22,428 | 2 | 5,031 | * | 18,564 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Diversified or miscellaneous | 3 | 7,493 | * | 19,395 | 7 | 5,437 | * | 14,717 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Entertainment and recreation | 23 | 9,907 | 1 | 17,943 | 263 | 9,884 | 1 | 17,551 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance and fiduciaries | 1 | 3,387 | * | 17,521 | 2 | 3,297 | * | 14,334 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Banks | — | 16,178 | 2 | 16,615 | — | 12,789 | 1 | 13,842 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Transportation services | 288 | 8,162 | * | 14,775 | 573 | 9,236 | 1 | 15,531 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Agribusiness | 35 | 6,086 | * | 11,701 | 81 | 6,314 | * | 11,642 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Government and education | 5 | 5,863 | * | 11,358 | 9 | 5,464 | * | 11,065 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 30 | 4,077 | * | 20,112 | 68 | 5,623 | * | 23,315 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,128 | 365,295 | 41 | % | $ | 769,587 | $ | 2,957 | 334,892 | 33 | % | $ | 713,059 |
*Less than 1%.
(1)Total commitments consist of loans outstanding plus unfunded credit commitments, excluding issued letters of credit.
(2)No other single industry had total loans in excess of $3.1 billion and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Loans to financials except banks, our largest industry concentration, is predominantly comprised of loans to investment firms, financial vehicles, nonbank creditors, rental and leasing companies, securities firms, and investment banks. We had $93.6 billion and $80.0 billion of loans originated by our Asset Backed Finance (ABF) and Financial Institution Group (FIG) lines of business at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These loans include: (i) loans to customers related to their subscription or capital calls, (ii) loans to nonbank lenders collateralized by commercial loans, and (iii) loans to originators or servicers of financial assets collateralized by residential real estate or other consumer loans such as credit cards, auto loans and leases, student loans and other financial assets eligible for the securitization market. These ABF and FIG loans are limited to a percentage of the value of the underlying financial assets considering underlying credit risk, asset duration, and ongoing performance. These ABF and FIG loans may also have other features to manage credit risk such as cross-collateralization, credit enhancements, and contractual re-margining of collateral supporting the loans. In addition, loans to financials except banks included collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) in loan form, all of which were rated AA or above, of $8.1 billion and $7.9 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Oil, gas and pipelines loans included $5.8 billion and $7.5 billion of senior secured loans outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Oil, gas and pipelines nonaccrual loans decreased at December 31, 2021, compared with December 31, 2020, driven by loan paydowns.
We continue to perform enhanced credit monitoring for certain industries that we consider to be directly and most adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our commercial and industrial loans and lease financing portfolio also includes non-U.S. loans of $78.0 billion and $63.8 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Significant industry concentrations of non-U.S. loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, included:
•$46.7 billion and $36.2 billion in the financials except banks category;
•$15.9 billion and $12.8 billion in the banks category; and
•$1.7 billion and $1.6 billion in the oil, gas and pipelines category.
Risk mitigation actions, including the restructuring of repayment terms, securing collateral or guarantees, and entering into extensions, are based on a re-underwriting of the loan and our assessment of the borrower’s ability to perform under the agreed-upon terms. Extension terms generally range from six to thirty-six months and may require that the borrower provide additional economic support in the form of partial repayment, or additional collateral or guarantees. In cases where the value of collateral or financial condition of the borrower is insufficient to repay our loan, we may rely upon the support of an outside repayment guarantee in providing the extension.
Our ability to seek performance under a guarantee is directly related to the guarantor’s creditworthiness, capacity and willingness to perform, which is evaluated on an annual basis, or more frequently as warranted. Our evaluation is based on the most current financial information available and is focused on various key financial metrics, including net worth, leverage, and current and future liquidity. We consider the guarantor’s reputation, creditworthiness, and willingness to work with us based on our analysis, as well as other lenders’ experience with the guarantor. Our assessment of the guarantor’s credit strength is reflected in our loan risk ratings for such loans. The loan risk rating and accruing status are important factors in our allowance for credit losses methodology.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 36 | Wells Fargo & Company |
In considering the accrual status of the loan, we evaluate
the collateral and future cash flows, as well as the anticipated support of any repayment guarantor. In many cases, the
strength of the guarantor provides sufficient assurance that full repayment of the loan is expected. When full and timely collection of the loan becomes uncertain, including the performance of the guarantor, we place the loan on nonaccrual status. As appropriate, we also charge the loan down in accordance with our charge-off policies, generally to the net realizable value of the collateral securing the loan, if any.
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (CRE) We generally subject CRE loans to individual risk assessment using our internal borrower and collateral quality ratings. We had $13.1 billion of CRE mortgage loans classified as criticized at December 31, 2021, compared with $12.0 billion at December 31, 2020, and $1.7 billion of CRE construction loans classified as criticized at December 31, 2021, compared with $1.6 billion at December 31, 2020. The increase in criticized CRE mortgage and construction loans was driven by the hotel/motel, apartment, and institutional property types and
reflected the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to uncertainty in the recovery from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, the credit quality of certain property types within our CRE loan portfolio, such as retail, hotel/motel, office buildings, and shopping centers, could continue to be adversely affected.
The total CRE loan portfolio increased $4.3 billion from December 31, 2020, driven by an increase in CRE mortgage loans predominantly related to apartments, 1-4 family structure, hotel/motel, and industrial property types, partially offset by a decrease in CRE construction loans. The CRE loan portfolio included $8.7 billion of non-U.S. CRE loans at December 31, 2021. The portfolio is diversified both geographically and by property type. The largest geographic concentrations of CRE loans are in California, New York, Texas, and Florida, which combined represented 48% of the total CRE portfolio. The largest property type concentrations are office buildings at 25% and apartments at 22% of the portfolio.
Table 17 summarizes CRE loans by state and property type with the related nonaccrual totals at December 31, 2021.
Table 17: CRE Loans by State and Property Type
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real estate mortgage | Real estate construction | Total | % of total loans | ||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Nonaccrual loans | Total portfolio | Nonaccrual loans | Total portfolio | Nonaccrual loans | Total portfolio | |||||||||||||||
| By state: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 187 | 31,007 | 2 | 3,661 | 189 | 34,668 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
| New York | 132 | 13,283 | 2 | 2,353 | 134 | 15,636 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Texas | 88 | 9,456 | — | 1,149 | 88 | 10,605 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Florida | 98 | 9,086 | 1 | 1,349 | 99 | 10,435 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Washington | 84 | 4,121 | — | 1,180 | 84 | 5,301 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Arizona | 45 | 4,712 | — | 334 | 45 | 5,046 | * | ||||||||||||||
| North Carolina | 5 | 4,124 | — | 631 | 5 | 4,755 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Georgia | 13 | 4,324 | — | 338 | 13 | 4,662 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Illinois | 15 | 3,563 | — | 479 | 15 | 4,042 | * | ||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 47 | 2,809 | — | 816 | 47 | 3,625 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Other (1) | 521 | 41,248 | 8 | 7,802 | 529 | 49,050 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,235 | 127,733 | 13 | 20,092 | 1,248 | 147,825 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| By property: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Office buildings | $ | 133 | 33,657 | 1 | 3,079 | 134 | 36,736 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
| Apartments | 13 | 24,663 | — | 7,238 | 13 | 31,901 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Industrial/warehouse | 78 | 16,086 | — | 1,628 | 78 | 17,714 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| Hotel/motel | 254 | 11,261 | — | 1,503 | 254 | 12,764 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Retail (excluding shopping center) | 132 | 12,352 | 3 | 98 | 135 | 12,450 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Shopping center | 422 | 9,554 | — | 894 | 422 | 10,448 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| Institutional | 50 | 5,344 | 1 | 2,399 | 51 | 7,743 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Mixed use properties | 80 | 5,321 | 1 | 982 | 81 | 6,303 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Collateral pool | — | 3,308 | — | 201 | — | 3,509 | * | ||||||||||||||
| 1-4 family structure | — | 8 | — | 1,049 | — | 1,057 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 73 | 6,179 | 7 | 1,021 | 80 | 7,200 | * | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,235 | 127,733 | 13 | 20,092 | 1,248 | 147,825 | 17 | % |
* Less than 1%.
(1)Includes 40 states; no state in Other had loans in excess of $3.6 billion.
NON-U.S. LOANS Our classification of non-U.S. loans is based on whether the borrower’s primary address is outside of the United States. At December 31, 2021, non-U.S. loans totaled $86.9 billion, representing approximately 10% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, compared with $72.9 billion, or approximately 8% of our total consolidated loans outstanding, at December 31, 2020. Non-U.S. loans were approximately 4% of
our total consolidated assets at both December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020.
COUNTRY RISK EXPOSURE Our country risk monitoring process incorporates centralized monitoring of economic, political, social, legal, and transfer risks in countries where we do or plan to do business, along with frequent dialogue with our customers,
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 37 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
counterparties and regulatory agencies. We establish exposure limits for each country through a centralized oversight process based on customer needs, and through consideration of the relevant and distinct risk of each country. We monitor exposures closely and adjust our country limits in response to changing conditions. We evaluate our individual country risk exposure based on our assessment of the borrower’s ability to repay,
which gives consideration for allowable transfers of risk, such as guarantees and collateral, and may be different from the reporting based on the borrower’s primary address.
Our largest single country exposure outside the U.S. at December 31, 2021, was the United Kingdom, which totaled $36.0 billion, or approximately 2% of our total assets, and included $7.9 billion of sovereign claims. Our United Kingdom sovereign claims arise from deposits we have placed with the Bank of England pursuant to regulatory requirements in support of our London branch.
Table 18 provides information regarding our top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.), based on our assessment of risk, which gives consideration to the country of any guarantors and/or underlying collateral. With respect to Table 18:
•Lending and deposits exposure includes outstanding loans, unfunded credit commitments, and deposits with non-U.S. banks. These balances are presented prior to the deduction of allowance for credit losses or collateral received under the terms of the credit agreements, if any.
•Securities exposure represents debt and equity securities of non-U.S. issuers. Long and short positions are netted, and net short positions are reflected as negative exposure.
•Derivatives and other exposure represents foreign exchange contracts, derivative contracts, securities resale agreements, and securities lending agreements.
Table 18: Select Country Exposures
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lending and deposits | Securities | Derivatives and other | Total exposure | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non-sovereign | Sovereign | Non- sovereign (1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| Top 20 country exposures: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| United Kingdom | $ | 7,912 | 24,793 | — | 978 | 1 | 2,365 | 7,913 | 28,136 | 36,049 | ||||||||||||||||
| Canada | 1 | 17,347 | — | 145 | 7 | 364 | 8 | 17,856 | 17,864 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cayman Islands | — | 6,971 | — | — | — | 95 | — | 7,066 | 7,066 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ireland | 557 | 4,904 | — | 185 | — | 68 | 557 | 5,157 | 5,714 | |||||||||||||||||
| Guernsey | — | 4,193 | — | — | — | 60 | — | 4,253 | 4,253 | |||||||||||||||||
| Bermuda | — | 3,877 | — | 68 | — | 63 | — | 4,008 | 4,008 | |||||||||||||||||
| Luxembourg | — | 3,582 | — | 99 | — | 87 | — | 3,768 | 3,768 | |||||||||||||||||
| Germany | — | 3,177 | — | 68 | — | 231 | — | 3,476 | 3,476 | |||||||||||||||||
| China | 8 | 3,287 | 1 | 66 | 29 | 27 | 38 | 3,380 | 3,418 | |||||||||||||||||
| France | 91 | 2,969 | — | 140 | 111 | 28 | 202 | 3,137 | 3,339 | |||||||||||||||||
| Netherlands | — | 2,191 | — | 83 | — | 81 | — | 2,355 | 2,355 | |||||||||||||||||
| South Korea | — | 2,025 | (4) | 137 | — | 13 | (4) | 2,175 | 2,171 | |||||||||||||||||
| India | — | 1,553 | — | 68 | — | 1 | — | 1,622 | 1,622 | |||||||||||||||||
| Switzerland | — | 1,380 | — | 1 | — | 200 | — | 1,581 | 1,581 | |||||||||||||||||
| Brazil | — | 1,516 | — | 3 | — | 2 | — | 1,521 | 1,521 | |||||||||||||||||
| Chile | — | 1,326 | — | 30 | — | 1 | — | 1,357 | 1,357 | |||||||||||||||||
| Australia | — | 1,231 | — | (9) | — | 14 | — | 1,236 | 1,236 | |||||||||||||||||
| Norway | — | 1,045 | — | 116 | — | 4 | — | 1,165 | 1,165 | |||||||||||||||||
| Japan | 166 | 809 | — | 48 | — | 37 | 166 | 894 | 1,060 | |||||||||||||||||
| United Arab Emirates | — | 881 | — | 82 | — | — | — | 963 | 963 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total top 20 country exposures | $ | 8,735 | 89,057 | (3) | 2,308 | 148 | 3,741 | 8,880 | 95,106 | 103,986 |
(1)Total non-sovereign exposure comprised $47.7 billion exposure to financial institutions and $47.4 billion to non-financial corporations at December 31, 2021.
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS Our residential mortgage loan portfolio is comprised of 1-4 family first and junior lien mortgage loans. Residential mortgage – first lien loans comprised 94% of the total residential mortgage loan portfolio at December 31, 2021, compared with 92% at December 31, 2020.
The residential mortgage loan portfolio includes some loans with adjustable-rate features and some with an interest-only feature as part of the loan terms. Interest-only loans were approximately 3% of total loans at both December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020. We believe our origination process appropriately addresses our adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) reset risk across our residential mortgage loans and our ACL for loans considers this risk. We do not offer option ARM products, nor do we offer variable-rate mortgage products with fixed payment amounts, commonly referred to within the financial services industry as negative amortizing mortgage loans.
The residential mortgage – junior lien portfolio consists of residential mortgage lines of credit and loans that are subordinate in rights to an existing lien on the same property. These lines and loans may have draw periods, interest-only
payments, balloon payments, adjustable rates and similar features. Junior lien loan products are primarily amortizing payment loans with fixed interest rates and repayment periods between five to 30 years. We continuously monitor the credit performance of our residential mortgage – junior lien portfolio for trends and factors that influence the frequency and severity of losses, such as junior lien performance when the first lien loan is delinquent.
Our residential mortgage lines of credit (both first and junior lien) generally have draw periods of 10, 15 or 20 years with variable interest rate and payment options available during the draw period of (1) interest-only or (2) 1.5% of outstanding principal balance plus accrued interest. As of December 31, 2021, lines of credit in a draw period primarily used the interest-only option. The lines that enter their amortization period may experience higher delinquencies and higher loss rates than the ones in their draw or term period. We have considered this increased risk in our ACL estimate.
During the draw period, the borrower has the option of converting all or a portion of the line from a variable interest rate
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 38 | Wells Fargo & Company |
to a fixed rate with terms including interest-only payments for a fixed period between three to seven years or a fully amortizing payment with a fixed period between five to 30 years. At the end of the draw period, a line of credit generally converts to an amortizing payment schedule with repayment terms of up to 30 years based on the balance at time of conversion. Certain lines and loans have been structured with a balloon payment, which requires full repayment of the outstanding balance at the end of the term period. The conversion of lines or loans to fully amortizing or balloon payoff may result in a significant payment increase, which can affect some borrowers’ ability to repay the outstanding balance.
In anticipation of our residential mortgage line of credit borrowers reaching the end of their contractual commitment, we have created a program to inform, educate and help these borrowers transition from interest-only to fully-amortizing payments or full repayment. We monitor the performance of the borrowers moving through the program in an effort to refine our ongoing program strategy.
We monitor changes in real estate values and underlying economic or market conditions for all geographic areas of our residential mortgage portfolio as part of our credit risk management process. Our periodic review of this portfolio includes original appraisals adjusted for the change in Home Price Index (HPI) or estimates from automated valuation models (AVMs) to support property values. AVMs are computer-based tools used to estimate the market value of homes. AVMs are a lower-cost alternative to appraisals and support valuations of large numbers of properties in a short period of time using market comparables and price trends for local market areas. The primary risk associated with the use of AVMs is that the value of an individual property may vary significantly from the average for the market area. We have processes to periodically validate AVMs and specific risk management guidelines addressing the circumstances when AVMs may be used. Additional information about appraisals, AVMs, and our policy for their use can be found in Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Part of our credit monitoring includes tracking delinquency, current FICO scores and loan/combined loan to collateral values (LTV/CLTV) on the entire residential mortgage loan portfolio. CLTV represents the ratio of the total loan balance of first and junior lien mortgages (including unused line amounts for credit line products) to property collateral value. Excluding government insured/guaranteed loans, these credit risk indicators on the residential mortgage portfolio were:
•Loans 30 days or more delinquent at December 31, 2021, totaled $3.3 billion, or 1% of residential mortgage loans, compared with $4.7 billion, or 2%, at December 31, 2020;
•Lines of credit in their draw period that were 30 days or more past due were $293 million, or 2% of such lines, at December 31, 2021, and $381 million, or 2%, at December 31, 2020, compared with amortizing lines of credit that were 30 days or more past due of $395 million, or 7% of such lines, at December 31, 2021, and $378 million, or 5%, at December 31, 2020;
•Loans with FICO scores lower than 640 totaled $3.8 billion, or 1% of residential mortgage loans, at December 31, 2021, compared with $5.6 billion, or 2%, at December 31, 2020; and
•Loans with a LTV/CLTV greater than 100% totaled $465 million at December 31, 2021, or less than 1% of residential mortgage loans, compared with $1.6 billion, or 1%, at December 31, 2020.
With respect to residential mortgage – junior lien loans that had a CLTV greater than 100%:
•Such loans totaled 1% of the junior lien portfolio at December 31, 2021, compared with 3% at December 31, 2020; and
•3% were 30 days or more delinquent at both December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020.
Customer payment deferral activities instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to delay the recognition of delinquencies. For additional information regarding credit quality indicators, see Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We continue to modify residential mortgage loans to assist homeowners and other borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Under these programs, we may provide concessions such as interest rate reductions, forbearance of principal, and in some cases, principal forgiveness. These programs generally include trial payment periods of three to four months, and after successful completion and compliance with terms during this period, the loan is permanently modified. Loans included under these programs are accounted for as TDRs at the start of the trial period or at the time of permanent modification, if no trial period is used. For additional information on customer accommodations, including loan modifications, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – COVID-Related Lending Accommodations” section in this Report.
Residential Mortgage – First Lien Portfolio Our residential mortgage – first lien portfolio decreased $34.4 billion from December 31, 2020, driven by loan paydowns reflecting the low interest rate environment and the transfer of $17.8 billion of first lien mortgage loans to loans held for sale (LHFS) substantially all of which related to the sales of loans purchased from GNMA loan securitization pools in prior periods, partially offset by originations of $72.6 billion.
Table 19 shows certain delinquency and loss information for the residential mortgage – first lien portfolio and lists the top five states by outstanding balance.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 39 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
Table 19: Residential Mortgage – First Lien Portfolio Performance
| Outstanding balance | % of total loans | % of loans 30 days or more past due | Net loan charge-off rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| California (2) | $ | 100,933 | 104,260 | 11.27 | % | 11.75 | 0.95 | 1.00 | (0.01) | (0.01) | |||||||||||||
| New York | 30,039 | 31,028 | 3.35 | 3.50 | 1.34 | 1.40 | 0.12 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 10,205 | 12,073 | 1.14 | 1.36 | 1.95 | 1.92 | 0.08 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Florida | 9,978 | 10,623 | 1.11 | 1.20 | 1.93 | 2.56 | 0.09 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Washington | 8,636 | 9,094 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 0.47 | 0.66 | — | (0.01) | |||||||||||||||
| Other (3) | 69,321 | 79,356 | 7.74 | 8.94 | 1.48 | 1.60 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
| Total | 229,112 | 246,434 | 25.57 | 27.77 | 1.23 | 1.34 | 0.02 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Government insured/guaranteed loans (4) | 13,158 | 30,240 | 1.47 | 3.41 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total first lien mortgage portfolio | $ | 242,270 | 276,674 | 27.04 | 31.18 |
(1)The net loan charge-off rate for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes $120 million of loan charge-offs related to a change in practice to fully charge-off certain delinquent legacy residential mortgage loans.
(2)Our residential mortgage loans to borrowers in California are located predominantly within the larger metropolitan areas, with no single California metropolitan area consisting of more than 4% of total loans.
(3)Consists of 45 states; no state in Other had loans in excess of $7.2 billion and $7.8 billion at December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively.
(4)Represents loans, substantially all of which were repurchased from GNMA loan securitization pools, where the repayment of the loans is predominantly insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). For additional information on GNMA loan securitization pools, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Mortgage Banking Activities” section in this Report.
Residential Mortgage – Junior Lien Portfolio Our residential mortgage – junior lien portfolio decreased $6.7 billion from December 31, 2020, driven by loan paydowns.
Table 20 shows certain delinquency and loss information for the residential mortgage – junior lien portfolio and lists the top five states by outstanding balance.
Table 20: Residential Mortgage – Junior Lien Portfolio Performance
| Outstanding balance | % of total loans | % of loans 30 daysor more past due | Net loan charge-off rate (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| California | $ | 4,310 | 6,237 | 0.48 | % | 0.70 | 3.52 | 2.20 | (0.59) | (0.35) | |||||||||||||
| New Jersey | 1,728 | 2,258 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 2.98 | 2.84 | 0.04 | (0.02) | |||||||||||||||
| Florida | 1,533 | 2,119 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 2.54 | 3.06 | (0.13) | (0.14) | |||||||||||||||
| Pennsylvania | 1,039 | 1,377 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 2.19 | 2.30 | (0.12) | (0.15) | |||||||||||||||
| Virginia | 976 | 1,355 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 2.56 | 2.41 | (0.30) | (0.10) | |||||||||||||||
| Other (2) | 7,032 | 9,940 | 0.79 | 1.12 | 2.75 | 2.31 | (0.39) | (0.19) | |||||||||||||||
| Total junior lien mortgage portfolio | $ | 16,618 | 23,286 | 1.86 | % | 2.62 | 2.91 | 2.41 | (0.36) | (0.21) |
(1)The net loan charge-off rate for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes $32 million of loan charge-offs related to a change in practice to fully charge-off certain delinquent legacy residential mortgage loans.
(2)Consists of 45 states; no state in Other had loans in excess of $1.0 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020, respectively.
The outstanding balance of residential mortgage lines of credit was $22.8 billion at December 31, 2021. The unfunded credit commitments for these lines of credit totaled $45.6 billion at December 31, 2021.
On a monthly basis, we monitor the payment characteristics of borrowers in our residential mortgage – first and junior lien lines of credit portfolios. In December 2021, excluding borrowers with COVID-related loan modification payment deferrals:
•Approximately 45% of these borrowers paid only the minimum amount due and approximately 50% paid more than the minimum amount due. The rest were either delinquent or paid less than the minimum amount due.
•For the borrowers with an interest-only payment feature, approximately 29% paid only the minimum amount due and approximately 66% paid more than the minimum amount due.
CREDIT CARD, AUTO AND OTHER CONSUMER LOANS Table 21 shows the outstanding balance of our credit card, auto and other consumer loan portfolios. For information regarding credit quality indicators for these portfolios, see Note 4 (Loans and
Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 21: Credit Card, Auto, and Other Consumer Loans
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | Outstanding balance | % of total loans | ||||||||||
| Credit card | $ | 38,453 | 4.29 | % | $ | 36,664 | 4.13 | % | ||||||
| Auto | 56,659 | 6.33 | 48,187 | 5.43 | ||||||||||
| Other consumer | 28,274 | 3.16 | 24,409 | 2.75 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 123,386 | 13.78 | % | $ | 109,260 | 12.31 | % |
Credit Card Our credit card portfolio totaled $38.5 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $36.7 billion at December 31, 2020, due to strong purchase volume and the launch of new products.
Auto Our auto portfolio totaled $56.7 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $48.2 billion at December 31, 2020. The increase in the outstanding balance at December 31, 2021,
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 40 | Wells Fargo & Company |
compared with December 31, 2020, was driven by strong consumer demand for automobiles.
Other Consumer Other consumer loans, which primarily include securities-based loans as well as personal lines and loans, totaled $28.3 billion at December 31, 2021, compared with $24.4 billion at December 31, 2020, driven by an increase in margin loans.
NONPERFORMING ASSETS (NONACCRUAL LOANS AND FORECLOSED ASSETS) We generally place loans on nonaccrual status when:
•the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain (generally based on an assessment of the borrower’s financial condition and the adequacy of collateral, if any), such as in bankruptcy or other circumstances;
•they are 90 days (120 days with respect to residential mortgage loans) past due for interest or principal, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection or the loan is in an active payment deferral as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic;
•part of the principal balance has been charged off; or
•for junior lien mortgages, we have evidence that the related first lien mortgage may be 120 days past due or in the process of foreclosure regardless of the junior lien delinquency status.
Certain nonaccrual loans may be returned to accrual status after they perform for a period of time. Consumer credit card loans are not placed on nonaccrual status, but are generally fully charged off when the loan reaches 180 days past due.
Customer payment deferral activities instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to delay the recognition of nonaccrual loans for those customers who would have otherwise moved into nonaccrual status. For additional information on customer accommodations, including loan modifications, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – COVID-Related Lending Accommodations” section in this Report.
Table 22 summarizes nonperforming assets (NPAs) at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 22: Nonperforming Assets (Nonaccrual Loans and Foreclosed Assets)
| December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
| Nonaccrual loans: | ||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 980 | 2,698 | |||
| Real estate mortgage | 1,235 | 1,774 | ||||
| Real estate construction | 13 | 48 | ||||
| Lease financing | 148 | 259 | ||||
| Total commercial | 2,376 | 4,779 | ||||
| Consumer: | ||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien (1) | 3,803 | 2,957 | ||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien (1) | 801 | 754 | ||||
| Auto | 198 | 202 | ||||
| Other consumer | 34 | 36 | ||||
| Total consumer | 4,836 | 3,949 | ||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 7,212 | 8,728 | |||
| As a percentage of total loans | 0.81 | % | 0.98 | |||
| Foreclosed assets: | ||||||
| Government insured/guaranteed (2) | $ | 16 | 18 | |||
| Non-government insured/guaranteed | 96 | 141 | ||||
| Total foreclosed assets | 112 | 159 | ||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 7,324 | 8,887 | |||
| As a percentage of total loans | 0.82 | % | 1.00 |
(1)Residential mortgage loans predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA are not placed on nonaccrual status because they are insured or guaranteed.
(2)Consistent with regulatory reporting requirements, foreclosed real estate resulting from government insured/guaranteed loans are classified as nonperforming. Both principal and interest related to these foreclosed real estate assets are collectible because the loans were predominantly insured by the FHA or guaranteed by the VA. Receivables related to the foreclosure of certain government guaranteed real estate mortgage loans are excluded from this table and included in Accounts Receivable in Other Assets. For additional information on the classification of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Commercial nonaccrual loans decreased $2.4 billion from December 31, 2020, primarily due to a decline in commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans, as a result of paydowns in the oil, gas, and pipelines industry. For additional information on commercial nonaccrual loans, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial and Industrial Loans and Lease Financing” and “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Commercial Real Estate” sections in this Report.
Consumer nonaccrual loans increased $887 million from December 31, 2020, predominantly driven by an increase in residential mortgage – first lien nonaccrual loans as certain customers exited from accommodation programs provided in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Customers requiring further payment assistance after exiting from these programs may have their loans modified or may be eligible to receive modifications.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 41 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
Table 23 provides an analysis of the changes in nonaccrual loans. Typically, changes to nonaccrual loans period-over-period represent inflows for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status in accordance with our policies, offset by reductions for loans
that are paid down, charged off, sold, foreclosed, or are no longer classified as nonaccrual as a result of continued performance and an improvement in the borrower’s financial condition and loan repayment capabilities.
Table 23: Analysis of Changes in Nonaccrual Loans
| Year ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Commercial nonaccrual loans | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | 4,779 | 2,254 | ||||||
| Inflows | 2,113 | 7,232 | ||||||
| Outflows: | ||||||||
| Returned to accruing | (1,003) | (385) | ||||||
| Foreclosures | (13) | (37) | ||||||
| Charge-offs | (533) | (1,669) | ||||||
| Payments, sales and other | (2,967) | (2,616) | ||||||
| Total outflows | (4,516) | (4,707) | ||||||
| Balance, end of period | 2,376 | 4,779 | ||||||
| Consumer nonaccrual loans | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | 3,949 | 3,092 | ||||||
| Inflows | 3,281 | 2,616 | ||||||
| Outflows: | ||||||||
| Returned to accruing | (828) | (757) | ||||||
| Foreclosures | (69) | (36) | ||||||
| Charge-offs (1) | (252) | (159) | ||||||
| Payments, sales and other | (1,245) | (807) | ||||||
| Total outflows | (2,394) | (1,759) | ||||||
| Balance, end of period | 4,836 | 3,949 | ||||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | 7,212 | 8,728 |
(1)Charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2021, includes $152 million of loan charge-offs related to a change in practice to fully charge-off certain delinquent legacy residential mortgage loans.
We believe exposure to loss on nonaccrual loans is mitigated by the following factors at December 31, 2021:
•95% of total commercial nonaccrual loans are secured.
•84% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on interest and 81% of commercial nonaccrual loans were current on both principal and interest, but were on nonaccrual status because the full or timely collection of interest or principal had become uncertain.
•99% of total consumer nonaccrual loans are secured, of which 95% are secured by real estate and 96% have a combined LTV (CLTV) ratio of 80% or less.
•of the $907 million of consumer loans in bankruptcy or discharged in bankruptcy, and classified as nonaccrual, $675 million were current.
•the remaining risk of loss of all nonaccrual loans has been considered in developing our allowance for loan losses.
If interest due on all nonaccrual loans (including loans that were, but are no longer on nonaccrual status at year end) had been accrued under the original terms, approximately $335 million of interest would have been recorded as income on these loans, compared with $309 million actually recorded as interest income in 2021, versus $329 million and $303 million, respectively, in 2020.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 42 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 24 provides a summary of foreclosed assets and an analysis of changes in foreclosed assets.
Table 24: Foreclosed Assets
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| Summary by loan segment | |||||||||
| Government insured/guaranteed | $ | 16 | 18 | ||||||
| Commercial | 54 | 70 | |||||||
| Consumer | 42 | 71 | |||||||
| Total foreclosed assets | 112 | 159 | |||||||
| Analysis of changes in foreclosed assets | |||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | $ | 159 | 303 | ||||||
| Net change in government insured/guaranteed (1) | (2) | (32) | |||||||
| Additions to foreclosed assets (2) | 370 | 332 | |||||||
| Reductions from sales and write-downs | (415) | (444) | |||||||
| Balance, end of period | $ | 112 | 159 |
(1)Foreclosed government insured/guaranteed loans are temporarily transferred to and held by us as servicer, until reimbursement is received from FHA or VA.
(2)Includes loans moved into foreclosed assets from nonaccrual status and repossessed autos.
As part of our actions to support customers during the COVID-19 pandemic, we temporarily suspended certain mortgage foreclosure activities through December 31, 2021, which has affected the amount of our foreclosed assets. Beginning January 1, 2022, we resumed these mortgage foreclosure activities. For additional information on loans in process of foreclosure, see Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 43 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS (TDRs) Table 25 provides information regarding the recorded investment of loans modified in TDRs. TDRs decreased from December 31, 2020, predominantly related to commercial and industrial loans and residential mortgage – first lien loans. The decrease in commercial and industrial loans was primarily due to paydowns in the oil, gas, and pipelines industry. The decrease in residential mortgage – first lien loans was due to paydowns and transfers to LHFS, which related to sales of repurchased loans from GNMA loan securitization pools.
The amount of our TDRs at December 31, 2021, would have otherwise been higher without the TDR relief provided by the
CARES Act and Interagency Statement. Customers who are unable to resume making their contractual loan payments upon exiting from these deferral programs may require further assistance and may receive or be eligible to receive modifications, which may be classified as TDRs. For additional information on the CARES Act and the Interagency Statement, see the “Risk Management – Credit Risk Management – Credit Quality Overview – COVID-Related Lending Accommodations” section in this Report.
Table 25: TDR Balances
| December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Commercial: | |||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 793 | 1,933 | ||
| Real estate mortgage | 543 | 774 | |||
| Real estate construction | 2 | 15 | |||
| Lease financing | 10 | 9 | |||
| Total commercial TDRs | 1,348 | 2,731 | |||
| Consumer: | |||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 7,282 | 9,764 | |||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 946 | 1,237 | |||
| Credit card | 309 | 458 | |||
| Auto | 169 | 176 | |||
| Other consumer | 57 | 67 | |||
| Trial modifications | 71 | 90 | |||
| Total consumer TDRs | 8,834 | 11,792 | |||
| Total TDRs | $ | 10,182 | 14,523 | ||
| TDRs on nonaccrual status | $ | 3,142 | 4,456 | ||
| TDRs on accrual status: | |||||
| Government insured/guaranteed | 2,462 | 3,721 | |||
| Non-government insured/guaranteed | 4,578 | 6,346 | |||
| Total TDRs | $ | 10,182 | 14,523 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 44 | Wells Fargo & Company |
In those situations where principal is forgiven, the entire amount of such forgiveness is immediately charged off. When we delay the timing on the repayment of a portion of principal (principal forbearance), we charge off the amount of forbearance if that amount is not considered fully collectible. The allowance for loan losses for TDRs was $211 million and $565 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Our nonaccrual policies are generally the same for all
loan types when a restructuring is involved. We may
re-underwrite loans at the time of restructuring to determine whether there is sufficient evidence of sustained repayment capacity based on the borrower’s documented income, debt
to income ratios, and other factors. Loans that are not re-underwritten or loans that lack sufficient evidence of sustained repayment capacity at the time of modification are charged down to the fair value of the collateral, if applicable. For an accruing loan that has been modified, if the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms and the underwriting process shows the capacity to continue to perform
under the restructured terms, the loan will generally remain in accruing status. Otherwise, the loan will be placed in nonaccrual status and may be returned to accruing status when the borrower demonstrates a sustained period of performance, generally six consecutive months of payments, or equivalent, inclusive of consecutive payments made prior to modification. Loans will also be placed on nonaccrual status, and a corresponding charge-off is recorded to the loan balance, when we believe that principal and interest contractually due under the modified agreement will not be collectible. See Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information regarding TDRs.
Table 26 provides an analysis of the changes in TDRs. Loans modified more than once as a TDR are reported as inflows only in the period they are first modified. In addition to foreclosures, sales and transfers to held for sale, we may remove loans from TDR classification, but only if they have been refinanced or restructured at market terms and qualify as a new loan.
Table 26: Analysis of Changes in TDRs
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| Commercial TDRs | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | 2,731 | 1,901 | |||||
| Inflows (1) | 746 | 2,775 | |||||
| Outflows | |||||||
| Charge-offs | (141) | (265) | |||||
| Foreclosure | (5) | — | |||||
| Payments, sales and other (2) | (1,983) | (1,680) | |||||
| Balance, end of period | 1,348 | 2,731 | |||||
| Consumer TDRs | |||||||
| Balance, beginning of period | 11,792 | 9,882 | |||||
| Inflows (1) | 1,665 | 4,768 | |||||
| Outflows | |||||||
| Charge-offs | (185) | (224) | |||||
| Foreclosure | (56) | (77) | |||||
| Payments, sales and other (2) | (4,363) | (2,532) | |||||
| Net change in trial modifications (3) | (19) | (25) | |||||
| Balance, end of period | 8,834 | 11,792 | |||||
| Total TDRs | 10,182 | 14,523 |
(1)Inflows include loans that modify, even if they resolve within the period, as well as gross advances on term loans that modified in a prior period and net advances on revolving TDRs that modified in a prior period.
(2)Other outflows include normal amortization/accretion of loan basis adjustments and loans transferred to LHFS. Occasionally, loans that have been refinanced or restructured at market terms qualify as new loans, which are also included as other outflows.
(3)Net change in trial modifications includes: inflows of new TDRs entering the trial payment period, net of outflows for modifications that either (i) successfully perform and enter into a permanent modification, or (ii) did not successfully perform according to the terms of the trial period plan and are subsequently charged-off, foreclosed upon or otherwise resolved.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 45 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
NET CHARGE-OFFS Table 27 presents net loan charge-offs.
Table 27: Net Loan Charge-offs
| Quarter ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Net loan charge- offs | % of avg. loans (1) | Net loan charge- offs | % of avg. loans | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 3 | — | % | $ | 218 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | 22 | 0.07 | 53 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate construction | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 3 | 0.09 | 24 | 0.16 | ||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 28 | 0.02 | 295 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 110 | 0.18 | 53 | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 8 | 0.19 | (70) | (0.36) | ||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 150 | 1.61 | 800 | 2.26 | ||||||||||||||
| Auto | 58 | 0.41 | 181 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 67 | 0.96 | 315 | 1.22 | ||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 393 | 0.41 | 1,279 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 421 | 0.19 | % | $ | 1,574 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 111 | 0.14 | % | $ | 1,239 | 0.36 | % | ||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | 162 | 0.53 | 283 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||
| Real estate construction | — | — | (19) | (0.09) | ||||||||||||||
| Lease financing | 35 | 0.83 | 87 | 0.49 | ||||||||||||||
| Total commercial | 308 | 0.26 | 1,590 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | (3) | — | (5) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | (24) | (0.39) | (55) | (0.21) | ||||||||||||||
| Credit card | 190 | 2.09 | 1,139 | 3.07 | ||||||||||||||
| Auto | 51 | 0.43 | 270 | 0.56 | ||||||||||||||
| Other consumer | 62 | 0.88 | 350 | 1.10 | ||||||||||||||
| Total consumer | 276 | 0.26 | 1,699 | 0.39 | ||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 584 | 0.26 | % | $ | 3,289 | 0.35 | % |
(1)Quarterly net charge-offs as a percentage of average respective loans are annualized.
The decrease in commercial net loan charge-offs in 2021, compared with the prior year, was due to lower losses and higher recoveries in the commercial and industrial portfolio primarily driven by the oil, gas, and pipeline industry, and in the real estate mortgage portfolio.
The decrease in consumer net loan charge-offs in 2021, compared with the prior year, was driven by lower losses in the credit card portfolio reflecting the impact of government stimulus programs instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, improvements in the economic environment and better portfolio credit quality, partially offset by $152 million of residential mortgage loan charge-offs related to a change in practice to fully charge-off certain delinquent legacy residential mortgage loans.
The COVID-19 pandemic may continue to impact the credit quality of our loan portfolio. Although the potential impacts were considered in our allowance for credit losses for loans, payment deferral activities instituted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could continue to delay the recognition of loan charge-offs. For additional information on customer accommodations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, see the “Risk Management
– Credit Risk Management – COVID-Related Lending Accommodations” section in this Report.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES We maintain an allowance for credit losses (ACL) for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected life-time credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either AFS or HTM, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures.
We apply a disciplined process and methodology to establish our ACL each quarter. The process for establishing the ACL for loans takes into consideration many factors, including historical and forecasted loss trends, loan-level credit quality ratings and loan grade-specific characteristics. The process involves subjective and complex judgments. In addition, we review a variety of credit metrics and trends. These credit metrics and trends, however, do not solely determine the amount of the allowance as we use several analytical tools. For additional information on our ACL, see the “Critical Accounting Policies –
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 46 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report. For additional information on our ACL for loans, see
Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report, and for additional
information on our ACL for debt securities, see Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 28 presents the allocation of the ACL for loans by loan portfolio segment and class at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 28: Allocation of the ACL for Loans
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | ACL | Loans as % of total loans | ACL | Loans as % of total loans | |||||||||
| Commercial: | |||||||||||||
| Commercial and industrial | $ | 4,873 | 39 | % | $ | 7,230 | 36 | % | |||||
| Real estate mortgage | 2,085 | 14 | 3,167 | 14 | |||||||||
| Real estate construction | 431 | 2 | 410 | 2 | |||||||||
| Lease financing | 402 | 2 | 709 | 2 | |||||||||
| Total commercial | 7,791 | 57 | 11,516 | 54 | |||||||||
| Consumer: | |||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage – first lien | 1,156 | 28 | 1,600 | 31 | |||||||||
| Residential mortgage – junior lien | 130 | 2 | 653 | 3 | |||||||||
| Credit card | 3,290 | 4 | 4,082 | 4 | |||||||||
| Auto | 928 | 6 | 1,230 | 5 | |||||||||
| Other consumer | 493 | 3 | 632 | 3 | |||||||||
| Total consumer | 5,997 | 43 | 8,197 | 46 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 13,788 | 100 | % | $ | 19,713 | 100 | % | |||||
| Components: | |||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 12,490 | 18,516 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for unfunded credit commitments | 1,298 | 1,197 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses | $ | 13,788 | 19,713 | ||||||||||
| Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total net loan charge-offs | 7.94x | 5.63 | |||||||||||
| Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total nonaccrual loans | 1.73 | 2.12 | |||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans | 1.39 | % | 2.09 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for credit losses for loans as a percentage of total loans | 1.54 | 2.22 |
The ratios for the allowance for loan losses and the ACL for loans presented in Table 28 may fluctuate from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength, and the value and marketability of collateral.
The ACL for loans decreased $5.9 billion, or 30%, from December 31, 2020, reflecting better portfolio credit quality and continued improvements in current and forecasted economic conditions. Total provision for credit losses for loans was $(4.2) billion in 2021, compared with $14.0 billion in 2020, reflecting continued improvements in the economic environment, which led to lower charge-offs and better portfolio credit quality. The detail of the changes in the ACL for loans by portfolio segment (including charge-offs and recoveries by loan class) is included in Note 4 (Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We consider multiple economic scenarios to develop our estimate of the ACL for loans, which generally include a base scenario, along with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. In our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31, 2021, we weighted the base scenario and the downside scenarios to reflect our expectations for overall limited economic improvement balanced against the potential for higher inflation, supply chain constraints, and a continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the possibility of additional variants. The base scenario assumed strong economic conditions in the near term with a return to normalized levels in 2023. The downside scenarios assumed economic contractions due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, including government restrictions and other economic disruptions.
Additionally, we consider qualitative factors that represent risks inherent in our processes and assumptions such as economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments. We also considered the significant uncertainty related to the duration and severity of the economic impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic and the incremental risks to our loan portfolio.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 47 |
Risk Management – Credit Risk Management (continued)
The forecasted key economic variables used in our estimate of the ACL for loans at December 31 and September 30, 2021, are presented in Table 29.
Table 29: Forecasted Key Economic Variables
| 2Q 2022 | 4Q 2022 | 2Q 2023 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted blend of economic scenarios: | |||||||||
| U.S. unemployment rate (1): | |||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | 6.2 | % | 6.6 | 6.7 | |||||
| December 31, 2021 | 4.8 | 5.4 | 5.9 | ||||||
| U.S. real GDP (2): | |||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | (0.2) | 0.6 | 2.0 | ||||||
| December 31, 2021 | 1.4 | (0.3) | 1.4 | ||||||
| Home price index (3): | |||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | (1.2) | (6.5) | (6.5) | ||||||
| December 31, 2021 | 5.9 | (4.3) | (6.0) | ||||||
| Commercial real estate asset prices (3): | |||||||||
| September 30, 2021 | (3.3) | (7.7) | (7.4) | ||||||
| December 31, 2021 | 5.0 | (4.2) | (6.0) |
(1)Quarterly average.
(2)Percent change from the preceding period, seasonally adjusted annualized rate.
(3)Percent change year over year of national average; outlook differs by geography and property type.
Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality and mix changes, and changes in general economic conditions and expectations (including for unemployment and GDP), among other factors. There remains uncertainty related to the length and severity of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the possibility of additional variants, and the impact of other factors that may influence the level of expected losses and associated amounts of the ACL. The COVID-19 pandemic could continue to impact the recognition of credit losses in our loan portfolios and may result in increases or decreases in our ACL.
We believe the ACL for loans of $13.8 billion at December 31, 2021, was appropriate to cover expected credit losses, including unfunded credit commitments, at that date. The entire allowance is available to absorb credit losses from the total loan portfolio. The ACL for loans is subject to change and reflects existing factors as of the date of determination, including economic or market conditions and ongoing internal and external examination processes. Due to the sensitivity of the ACL for loans to changes in the economic and business environment, it is possible that we will incur incremental credit losses not anticipated as of the balance sheet date. Our process for determining the ACL is discussed in the “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses” section and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES We sell residential and commercial mortgage loans to various parties, including (1) government-sponsored entities (GSEs) Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) who include the mortgage loans in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, (2) SPEs that issue private label MBS, and (3) other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investment or private label securitization. In addition, we pool FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed residential mortgage loans that are then used to back securities guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). We
may be required to repurchase these mortgage loans, indemnify the securitization trust, investor or insurer, or reimburse the securitization trust, investor or insurer for credit losses incurred on loans (collectively, repurchase) in the event of a breach of contractual representations or warranties that is not remedied within a period (usually 90 days or less) after we receive notice of the breach.
In connection with our sales and securitization of residential mortgage loans to various parties, we have established a mortgage repurchase liability, initially at fair value, related to various representations and warranties that reflect management’s estimate of losses for loans for which we could have a repurchase obligation, whether or not we currently service those loans, based on a combination of factors. See Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our liability for mortgage loan repurchase losses.
We provide recourse to GSEs for commercial mortgage loans sold under various programs and arrangements. The terms of these programs require that we incur a pro-rata share of actual losses in the event of borrower default. See Note 13 (Guarantees and Other Commitments) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our exposure to loss related to these programs.
In addition to servicing loans in our portfolio, we act as servicer and/or master servicer of residential and commercial mortgage loans included in GSE-guaranteed mortgage securitizations, GNMA-guaranteed mortgage securitizations of FHA-insured/VA-guaranteed mortgages and private label mortgage securitizations, as well as for unsecuritized loans owned by institutional investors.
The loans we service were originated by us or by other mortgage loan originators. As servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) collect payments due from borrowers, (2) advance certain delinquent payments of principal and interest on the mortgage loans, (3) maintain and administer any hazard, title or primary mortgage insurance policies relating to the mortgage loans, (4) maintain any required escrow accounts for payment of taxes and insurance and administer escrow payments, and (5) foreclose on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent consistent with the related servicing agreement, consider alternatives to foreclosure, such as loan modifications or short sales, and for certain investors, manage the foreclosed property through liquidation. As master servicer, our primary duties are typically to (1) supervise, monitor and oversee the servicing of the mortgage loans by the servicer, and (2) advance delinquent amounts required by non-affiliated servicers who fail to perform their advancing obligations. The amount and timing of reimbursement for advances of delinquent payments vary by investor and the applicable servicing agreements. See Note 9 (Mortgage Banking Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about residential and commercial servicing rights, servicer advances and servicing fees.
In accordance with applicable servicing guidelines, delinquency status continues to advance for loans with COVID-related payment deferrals, which has resulted in an increase in delinquent loans serviced for others and a corresponding increase in loans eligible for repurchase from GNMA loan securitization pools. Upon transfer as servicer, we retain the option to repurchase loans from GNMA loan securitization pools, which becomes exercisable when three scheduled loan payments remain unpaid by the borrower. We generally repurchase these loans for cash and as a result, our total consolidated assets do not change. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our repurchases of these loans were elevated in 2020, but returned to more
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 48 | Wells Fargo & Company |
normalized levels in 2021. These repurchased loan balances were $17.3 billion and $34.8 billion at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which included $12.9 billion and $29.9 billion, respectively, in our held for investment loan portfolio, with the remainder in loans held for sale.
Repurchased loans that regain current status or are otherwise modified in accordance with applicable servicing guidelines may be included in future GNMA loan securitization pools. However, in accordance with guidance issued by GNMA, certain loans repurchased after June 30, 2020, are ineligible for inclusion in future GNMA loan securitization pools until the borrower has timely made six consecutive payments. This requirement may delay our ability to resell loans into the securitization market. See Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information about our involvement with mortgage loan securitizations.
Each agreement under which we act as servicer or master servicer generally specifies a standard of responsibility for actions we take in such capacity. We are required to indemnify the securitization trustee against any failure by us, as servicer or master servicer, to perform our servicing obligations. In addition, if we commit a breach of our obligations as servicer or master servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period. The standards governing servicing in GSE-guaranteed securitizations, and the possible remedies for violations of such standards, vary, and those standards and remedies are determined by servicing guides maintained by the GSEs, contracts between the GSEs and individual servicers and topical guides published by the GSEs from time to time. Such remedies could include indemnification or repurchase of an affected mortgage loan. In addition, in connection with our servicing activities, we could become subject to consent orders and settlement agreements with federal and state regulators for alleged servicing issues and practices. In general, these can require us to provide customers with loan modification relief, refinancing relief, and foreclosure prevention and assistance, and can result in business restrictions or the imposition of certain monetary penalties on us. For example, on September 9, 2021, the Company entered into a consent order with the OCC requiring the Company to improve the execution, risk management, and oversight of loss mitigation activities in its Home Lending business. For additional information on the OCC consent order, see the “Overview” section in this Report.
Asset/Liability Management
Asset/liability management involves evaluating, monitoring and managing interest rate risk, market risk, liquidity and funding. Primary oversight of interest rate risk and market risk resides with the Finance Committee of the Board, which oversees the administration and effectiveness of financial risk management policies and processes used to assess and manage these risks. Primary oversight of liquidity and funding resides with the Risk Committee of the Board.
At the management level, the Corporate Asset/Liability Committee (Corporate ALCO), which consists of management from finance, risk and business groups, oversees these risks and supports periodic reports provided to the Board’s Finance Committee and Risk Committee as appropriate. As discussed in more detail for market risk activities below, we employ separate management level oversight specific to market risk.
INTEREST RATE RISK Interest rate risk is created in our role as a financial intermediary for customers based on investments such as loans and other extensions of credit and debt securities.
Interest rate risk can have a significant impact to our earnings. We are subject to interest rate risk because:
•assets and liabilities may mature or reprice at different times. If assets reprice faster than liabilities and interest rates are generally rising, earnings will initially increase;
•assets and liabilities may reprice at the same time but by different amounts;
•short-term and long-term market interest rates may change by different amounts. For example, the shape of the yield curve may affect yield for new loans and funding costs differently;
•the remaining maturity for various assets or liabilities may shorten or lengthen as interest rates change. For example, if long-term mortgage interest rates increase sharply, MBS held in the debt securities portfolio may pay down at a slower rate than anticipated, which could impact portfolio income; or
•interest rates may have a direct or indirect effect on loan demand, collateral values, credit losses, mortgage origination volume, and the fair value of MSRs and other financial instruments.
We assess interest rate risk by comparing outcomes under various net interest income simulations using many interest rate scenarios that differ in the direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. These simulations require assumptions regarding drivers of earnings and balance sheet composition such as loan originations, prepayment rates on loans and debt securities, deposit flows and mix, as well as pricing strategies.
Our most recent simulations, as presented in Table 30, estimate net interest income sensitivity over the next 12 months using instantaneous movements across the yield curve with both lower and higher interest rates relative to our base scenario. Steeper and flatter scenarios measure non-parallel changes in the yield curve, with long-term interest rates defined as all tenors three years and longer (e.g., 10-year U.S. Treasury securities) and short-term interest rates defined as all tenors less than three years. Where applicable, U.S. dollar interest rates are floored at 0.00%. The following describes the simulation assumptions for the scenarios presented in Table 30:
•Simulations are dynamic and reflect anticipated changes to our assets and liabilities.
•Other macroeconomic variables that could be correlated with the changes in interest rates are held constant.
•Mortgage prepayment and origination assumptions vary across scenarios and reflect only the impact of the higher or lower interest rates.
•Our base scenario deposit forecast incorporates mix changes consistent with the base interest rate trajectory. Deposit mix is modeled to be the same as in the base scenario across the alternative scenarios. In higher interest rate scenarios, customer deposit activity that shifts balances into higher-yielding products could impact expected net interest income.
•Deposit rates paid may change with market interest rate changes. Our interest rate sensitivity of deposits, referred to as deposit betas, is modeled using the historical behavior of our deposits portfolio. The actual deposit rates paid may differ from the assumed deposit rates paid in these scenarios due to lags in repricing and other factors.
•We hold the size of the projected debt and equity securities portfolios constant across scenarios.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 49 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
Table 30: Net Interest Income Sensitivity
| ($ in billions) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parallel Shift: | |||||
| +100 bps shift in interest rates | $ | 7.1 | 6.7 | ||
| -100 bps shift in interest rates | (3.3) | (2.7) | |||
| Steeper yield curve: | |||||
| +50 bps shift in long-term interest rates | 1.2 | 1.3 | |||
| Flatter yield curve: | |||||
| +50 bps shift in short-term interest rates | 2.6 | 2.2 | |||
| -50 bps shift in long-term interest rates | (1.0) | (1.4) |
The interest rate sensitivity included in Table 30 indicates that we would expect to benefit from higher interest rates as our assets would reprice faster and to a greater degree than our liabilities, while in the case of lower interest rates, our assets would reprice downward and to a greater degree than our liabilities resulting in lower net interest income. For the simulations with downward shifts in interest rates, the 0.00% interest rate floor limits the amount of the decline in net interest income. We may have a larger decline in net interest income when interest rates increase for the base scenario relative to the interest rate floor.
The sensitivity results above do not capture noninterest income or expense impacts. Our interest rate sensitive noninterest income and expense are predominantly driven by mortgage banking activities, and may move in the opposite direction of our net interest income. Mortgage originations generally decline in response to higher interest rates and generally increase in response to lower interest rates, particularly refinancing activity. Mortgage banking results are also impacted by the valuation of MSRs and related hedge positions. See the “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Mortgage Banking Interest Rate and Market Risk” section in this Report for additional information.
Interest rate sensitive noninterest income also results from changes in earnings credit for noninterest-bearing deposits that reduce treasury management deposit service fees. Additionally, our trading assets are (before the effects of certain economic hedges) generally less sensitive to changes in interest rates than the related funding liabilities. As a result, net interest income from the trading portfolio contracts and expands as interest rates rise and fall, respectively. The impact to net interest income does not include the fair value changes of trading securities, which, along with the effects of related economic hedges, are recorded in noninterest income. For additional information on our trading assets and liabilities, see Note 2 (Trading Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
We use the debt securities portfolio and exchange-traded and over-the-counter (OTC) interest rate derivatives to manage our interest rate exposures. See Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), and Note 3 (Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information on the use of the debt securities portfolios. The notional or contractual amount, credit risk amount and fair value of the derivatives used to hedge our interest rate risk exposures as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, are presented in Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report. We use derivatives for asset/liability management in two main ways:
•to convert the cash flows from selected asset and/or liability instruments/portfolios including investments, commercial loans and long-term debt, from fixed-rate payments to floating-rate payments, or vice versa; and
•to economically hedge our mortgage origination pipeline, funded mortgage loans, and MSRs.
MORTGAGE BANKING INTEREST RATE AND MARKET RISK We originate, fund and service mortgage loans, which subjects us to various risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. Based on market conditions and other factors, we reduce credit and liquidity risks by selling or securitizing mortgage loans. We determine whether mortgage loans will be held for investment or held for sale at the time of commitment, but may change our intent to hold loans for investment or sale as part of our corporate asset/liability management activities. We may also retain securities in our investment portfolio at the time we securitize mortgage loans.
We typically originate agency residential mortgage loans as held for sale and certain prime non-agency residential mortgage loans as held for investment. Occasionally, we designate some of our agency residential mortgage loans as held for investment and non-agency residential mortgage loan originations as held for sale in support of future issuances of private label residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). We issued $2.2 billion and $2.6 billion of RMBS in 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Interest rate and market risk can be substantial in our mortgage businesses. Changes in interest rates may impact origination and servicing fees, the fair value of our residential MSRs, LHFS, and derivative loan commitments (interest rate “locks”) extended to mortgage applicants, as well as the associated income or loss in mortgage banking noninterest income, including the gains or losses related to economic hedges of MSRs and LHFS. Given the time it takes for customer behavior to fully react to interest rate changes, as well as the time required for processing a new application, providing the commitment, and securitizing and selling the loan, interest rate changes will generally affect our mortgage banking noninterest income on a lagging basis. The amount and timing of the impact will depend on the magnitude, speed and duration of the changes in interest rates.
The valuation of our residential MSRs can be highly subjective and involve complex judgments by management about matters that are inherently unpredictable. See the “Critical Accounting Policies – Valuation of Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights” section in this Report for additional information. Changes in interest rates influence a variety of significant assumptions included in the periodic valuation of residential MSRs, including prepayment rates, expected returns and potential risks on the servicing asset portfolio, costs to service, the value of escrow balances and other servicing valuation elements. For additional information on mortgage banking, including key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the fair value of MSRs, see Note 9 (Mortgage Banking Activities) and Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
An increase in interest rates generally reduces the propensity for refinancing, extends the expected duration of the servicing portfolio and, therefore, increases the estimated fair value of the MSRs. However, an increase in interest rates can also reduce mortgage loan demand, which reduces noninterest income from origination activities. A decline in interest rates would generally have an opposite impact.
To reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates, our residential MSRs are economically hedged with a combination of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, Eurodollar futures, highly liquid mortgage forward contracts and interest rate options. MSR hedging results include a combination of directional gain or loss due to market changes as well as any carry
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 50 | Wells Fargo & Company |
income related to mortgage forward contracts. Carry income represents accretion from the forward delivery price to the spot price including both the yield earned on the reference securities and the market implied cost of financing during the period. A steep yield curve generally produces higher carry income while a flat or inverted yield curve can result in lower or potentially negative carry income.
The size of the hedge and the particular combination of hedging instruments at any point in time is designed to reduce the volatility of our earnings over various time frames within a range of mortgage interest rates. Because market factors, the composition of the mortgage servicing portfolio and the relationship between the origination and servicing sides of
our mortgage businesses change continually, the types of instruments used in our hedging are reviewed daily and rebalanced based on our evaluation of current market factors
and the interest rate risk inherent in our portfolio.
Hedging the various sources of interest rate risk in mortgage banking is a complex process that requires sophisticated modeling and constant monitoring. There are several potential risks to earnings from mortgage banking related to origination volumes and mix, valuation of MSRs and associated hedging results, the relationship and degree of volatility between short-term and long-term interest rates, and changes in servicing and foreclosures costs. While we attempt to balance our mortgage banking interest rate and market risks, the financial instruments we use may not perfectly correlate with the values and income being hedged.
MARKET RISK Market risk is the risk of possible economic loss from adverse changes in market risk factors such as interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and the risk of possible loss due to counterparty exposure. This applies to implied volatility risk, basis risk, and market liquidity risk. It also includes price risk in the trading book, mortgage servicing rights and the hedge effectiveness risk associated with the mortgage book, and impairment of private equity investments.
The Board’s Finance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for market risk and oversees the Company’s market risk exposure and market risk management strategies.
In addition, the Board’s Risk Committee has certain oversight responsibilities with respect to market risk, including adjusting the Company’s market risk appetite with input from the Finance Committee. The Finance Committee also reports key market risk matters to the Risk Committee.
At the management level, the Market and Counterparty Risk Management function, which is part of IRM, has oversight responsibility for market risk. The Market and Counterparty Risk Management function reports into the CRO and provides periodic reports related to market risk to the Board’s Finance Committee.
MARKET RISK – TRADING ACTIVITIES We engage in trading activities to accommodate the investment and risk management activities of our customers and to execute economic hedging to manage certain balance sheet risks. These trading activities predominantly occur within our CIB businesses and to a lesser extent other businesses of the Company. Debt securities held for trading, equity securities held for trading, trading loans and trading derivatives are financial instruments used in our trading activities, and all are carried at fair value. Income earned on the financial instruments used in our trading activities include net interest income, changes in fair value and realized gains and losses. Net interest income earned from our trading activities is
reflected in the interest income and interest expense components of our consolidated statement of income. Changes in fair value of the financial instruments used in our trading activities are reflected in net gains from trading activities. For additional information on the financial instruments used in our trading activities and the income from these trading activities, see Note 2 (Trading Activities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Value-at-risk (VaR) is a statistical risk measure used to estimate the potential loss from adverse moves in the financial markets. The Company uses VaR metrics complemented with sensitivity analysis and stress testing in measuring and monitoring market risk. These market risk measures are monitored at both the business unit level and at aggregated levels on a daily basis. Our corporate market risk management function aggregates and monitors all exposures to ensure risk measures are within our established risk appetite. Changes to the market risk profile are analyzed and reported on a daily basis. The Company monitors various market risk exposure measures from a variety of perspectives, including line of business, product, risk type, and legal entity.
Trading VaR is the measure used to provide insight into the market risk exhibited by the Company’s trading positions. The Company calculates Trading VaR for risk management purposes to establish line of business and Company-wide risk limits. Trading VaR is calculated based on all trading positions on our consolidated balance sheet.
Table 31 shows the Company’s Trading General VaR by risk category. Our Trading General VaR uses a historical simulation model which assumes that historical changes in market values are representative of the potential future outcomes and measures the expected earnings loss of the Company over a
1-day time interval at a 99% confidence level. Our historical simulation model is based on equally weighted data from a
12-month historical look-back period. We believe using a
12-month look-back period helps ensure the Company’s VaR is responsive to current market conditions. The 99% confidence level equates to an expectation that the Company would incur single-day trading losses in excess of the VaR estimate on average once every 100 trading days.
Average Company Trading General VaR was $49 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared with $123 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease in average Company Trading General VaR for the year ended December 31, 2021, was driven by market volatility due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular changes in interest rate curves and a significant widening of credit spreads exiting the 12-month historical look-back window used to calculate VaR.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 51 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
Table 31: Trading 1-Day 99% General VaR by Risk Category
| Year ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | Period end | Average | Low | High | Period end | Average | Low | High | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company Trading General VaR Risk Categories | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Credit | $ | 19 | 38 | 12 | 112 | 106 | 72 | 15 | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate | 15 | 25 | 4 | 120 | 81 | 104 | 5 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity | 15 | 30 | 13 | 72 | 32 | 14 | 4 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commodity | 10 | 7 | 2 | 28 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign exchange | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diversification benefit (1) | (40) | (52) | (126) | (71) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company Trading General VaR | 20 | 49 | 97 | 123 |
(1)The period-end VaR was less than the sum of the VaR components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect arises because the risks are not perfectly correlated causing a portfolio of positions to usually be less risky than the sum of the risks of the positions alone. The diversification benefit is not meaningful for low and high metrics since they may occur on different days.
Sensitivity Analysis Given the inherent limitations of the VaR models, the Company uses other measures, including sensitivity analysis, to measure and monitor risk. Sensitivity analysis is the measure of exposure to a single risk factor, such as a 0.01% increase in interest rates or a 1% increase in equity prices. We conduct and monitor sensitivity on interest rates, credit spreads, volatility, equity, commodity, and foreign exchange exposure. Sensitivity analysis complements VaR as it provides an indication of risk relative to each factor irrespective of historical market moves.
Stress Testing While VaR captures the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market data, stress testing is designed to capture the Company’s exposure to extreme but low probability market movements. Stress scenarios estimate the risk of losses based on management’s assumptions of abnormal but severe market movements such as severe
credit spread widening or a large decline in equity prices.
These scenarios assume that the market moves happen instantaneously and no repositioning or hedging activity takes place to mitigate losses as events unfold (a conservative approach since experience demonstrates otherwise).
An inventory of scenarios is maintained representing both historical and hypothetical stress events that affect a broad range of market risk factors with varying degrees of correlation and differing time horizons. Hypothetical scenarios assess the impact of large movements in financial variables on portfolio values. Typical examples include a 1% (100 basis point) increase across the yield curve or a 10% decline in equity market indexes. Historical scenarios utilize an event-driven approach: the stress scenarios are based on plausible but rare events, and the analysis addresses how these events might affect the risk factors relevant to a portfolio.
The Company’s stress testing framework is also used in calculating results in support of the Federal Reserve Board’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and internal stress tests. Stress scenarios are regularly reviewed and updated to address potential market events or concerns. For more detail on the CCAR process, see the “Capital Management” section in this Report.
MARKET RISK – EQUITY SECURITIES We are directly and indirectly affected by changes in the equity markets. We make and manage direct investments in start-up businesses, emerging growth companies, management buy-outs, acquisitions and corporate recapitalizations. We also invest in non-affiliated funds that make similar private equity investments. These private equity
investments are made within capital allocations approved by management and the Board. The Board’s policy is to review business developments, key risks and historical returns for the private equity investment portfolio at least annually. Management reviews these investments at least quarterly to assess them for impairment and observable price changes. For nonmarketable equity securities, the analysis is based on facts and circumstances of each individual investment and the expectations for that investment’s cash flows, capital needs, the viability of its business model, our exit strategy, and observable price changes that are similar to the investments held. Investments in nonmarketable equity securities include private equity investments accounted for under the equity method, fair value through net income, and the measurement alternative.
In conjunction with the March 2008 initial public offering (IPO) of Visa, Inc. (Visa), we received approximately 20.7 million shares of Visa Class B common stock, the class which was apportioned to member banks of Visa at the time of the IPO.
To manage our exposure to Visa and realize the value of the appreciated Visa shares, we incrementally sold these shares through a series of sales, thereby eliminating this position as of September 30, 2015. As part of these sales, we agreed to compensate the buyer for any additional contributions to a litigation settlement fund for the litigation matters associated with the Class B shares we sold. Our exposure to this retained litigation risk has been updated quarterly and is reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. For additional information about the associated litigation matters, see the “Interchange Litigation” section in Note 15 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
As part of our business to support our customers, we trade public equities, listed/OTC equity derivatives and convertible bonds. We have parameters that govern these activities. We also have marketable equity securities that include investments relating to our venture capital activities. We manage these marketable equity securities within capital risk limits approved by management and the Board and monitored by Corporate ALCO and the Market Risk Committee. The fair value changes in these marketable equity securities are recognized in net income. For additional information, see Note 6 (Equity Securities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Changes in equity market prices may also indirectly affect our net income by (1) the value of third-party assets under management and, hence, fee income, (2) borrowers whose ability to repay principal and/or interest may be affected by the stock market, or (3) brokerage activity, related commission income and
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 52 | Wells Fargo & Company |
other business activities. Each business line monitors and manages these indirect risks.
LIQUIDITY RISK AND FUNDING In the ordinary course of business, we enter into contractual obligations that may require future cash payments, including funding for customer loan requests, customer deposit maturities and withdrawals, debt service, leases for premises and equipment, and other cash commitments. The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that we can meet our contractual obligations and other cash commitments efficiently under both normal operating conditions and under periods of Wells Fargo-specific and/or market stress. For additional information on these obligations, see the following sections and Notes to Financial Statements in this Report:
•“Commitments to Lend” section within Loans and Related Allowance for Credit Losses (Note 4)
•Leasing Activity (Note 5)
•Deposits (Note 11)
•Long-Term Debt (Note 12)
•Guarantees and Other Commitments (Note 13)
•Employee Benefits and Other Expenses (Note 21)
•Income Taxes (Note 23)
To help achieve this objective, the Board establishes liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. These guidelines are monitored on a monthly basis by the Corporate ALCO and on a quarterly basis by the Board. These guidelines are established and monitored for both the consolidated company and for the Parent on a stand-alone basis to ensure that the Parent is a source of strength for its regulated, deposit-taking banking subsidiaries. The Parent acts as a source of funding for the Company through the issuance of long-term debt and equity, and WFC Holdings, LLC, an intermediate holding company and subsidiary of the Parent (the “IHC”), provides funding support for the ongoing operational requirements of the Parent and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries. For additional information on the IHC, see the “Regulatory Matters – ‘Living Will’ Requirements and Related Matters” section in this Report.
Liquidity Stress Tests Liquidity stress tests are performed to help ensure that the Company has sufficient liquidity to meet contractual and contingent outflows modeled under a variety of stress scenarios. Our scenarios utilize market-wide as well as corporate-specific events, including a range of stress conditions and time horizons. Stress testing results facilitate evaluation of
the Company’s projected liquidity position during stress and inform future needs in the Company’s funding plan.
Contingency Funding Plan Our contingency funding plan (CFP), which is approved by Corporate ALCO and the Board’s Risk Committee, sets out the Company’s strategies and action plans to address potential liquidity needs during market-wide or idiosyncratic liquidity events. The CFP establishes measures for monitoring emerging liquidity events and describes the processes for communicating and managing stress events should they occur. The CFP also identifies alternate funding and liquidity strategies available to the Company in a period of stress.
Liquidity Standards We are subject to a rule issued by the FRB, OCC and FDIC that establishes a quantitative minimum liquidity requirement consistent with the LCR established by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The rule requires a covered banking organization to hold high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) in an amount equal to or greater than its projected net cash outflows during a 30-day stress period. Our HQLA under the rule predominantly consists of central bank deposits, government debt securities, and mortgage-backed securities of federal agencies. The LCR applies to the Company on a consolidated basis and to our insured depository institutions (IDIs) with total assets of $10 billion or more. In addition, rules issued by the FRB impose enhanced liquidity risk management standards on large bank holding companies (BHCs), such as Wells Fargo.
The FRB, OCC and FDIC have also issued a rule implementing a stable funding requirement, known as the net stable funding ratio (NSFR), which requires a covered banking organization, such as Wells Fargo, to maintain a minimum amount of stable funding, including common equity, long-term debt and most types of deposits, in relation to its assets, derivative exposures and commitments over a one-year horizon period. The NSFR applies to the Company on a consolidated basis and to our IDIs with total assets of $10 billion or more. As of December 31, 2021, we were compliant with the NSFR requirement.
Liquidity Coverage Ratio As of December 31, 2021, the consolidated Company, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo National Bank West exceeded the minimum LCR requirement of 100%, which is calculated as HQLA divided by projected net cash outflows, as each is defined under the LCR rule. Table 32 presents the Company’s quarterly average values for the daily-calculated LCR and its components calculated pursuant to the LCR rule requirements.
Table 32: Liquidity Coverage Ratio
| Average for Quarter ended | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions, except ratio) | Dec 31, 2021 | Sep 30, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | ||||
| HQLA (1): | |||||||
| Eligible cash | $ | 210,527 | 244,260 | 213,937 | |||
| Eligible securities (2) | 172,761 | 138,525 | 201,060 | ||||
| Total HQLA | 383,288 | 382,785 | 414,997 | ||||
| Projected net cash outflows | 325,015 | 320,782 | 312,697 | ||||
| LCR | 118 | % | 119 | 133 |
(1)Excludes excess HQLA at certain subsidiaries that is not transferable to other Wells Fargo entities.
(2)Net of applicable haircuts required under the LCR rule.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 53 |
Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management (continued)
Liquidity Sources We maintain liquidity in the form of cash, cash equivalents and unencumbered high-quality, liquid debt securities. These assets make up our primary sources of liquidity. Our primary sources of liquidity are substantially the same in composition as HQLA under the LCR rule; however, our primary sources of liquidity will generally exceed HQLA calculated under the LCR rule due to the applicable haircuts to HQLA and the exclusion of excess HQLA at our subsidiary IDIs required under the LCR rule. Our primary sources of liquidity are presented in Table 33 at fair value, which also includes encumbered securities that are not included as available HQLA in the calculation of the LCR.
Our cash is predominantly on deposit with the Federal Reserve. Debt securities included as part of our primary sources of liquidity are comprised of U.S. Treasury and federal agency debt, and MBS issued by federal agencies within our debt securities portfolio. We believe these debt securities provide quick sources of liquidity through sales or by pledging to obtain financing, regardless of market conditions. Some of these debt securities are within our HTM portfolio and, as such, are not intended for sale but may be pledged to obtain financing.
Table 33: Primary Sources of Liquidity
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | Total | Encumbered | Unencumbered | Total | Encumbered | Unencumbered | |||||||||||
| Interest-earning deposits with banks | $ | 209,614 | — | 209,614 | 236,376 | — | 236,376 | ||||||||||
| Debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | 56,486 | 4,066 | 52,420 | 70,756 | 5,370 | 65,386 | |||||||||||
| Federal agency mortgage-backed securities | 293,870 | 58,955 | 234,915 | 258,668 | 49,156 | 209,512 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 559,970 | 63,021 | 496,949 | 565,800 | 54,526 | 511,274 |
In addition to our primary sources of liquidity shown in
Table 33, liquidity is also available through the sale or financing of other debt securities including trading and/or AFS debt securities, as well as through the sale, securitization or financing of loans, to the extent such debt securities and loans are not encumbered. As of December 31, 2021, we also maintained approximately $208.2 billion of available borrowing capacity at various Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal Reserve Discount Window.
Deposits have historically provided a sizable source of relatively low-cost funds. Deposits were 166% and 158% of total
loans at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Additional funding is provided by long-term debt and short-term borrowings. Table 34 presents a summary of our short-term borrowings, which generally mature in less than 30 days. We pledge certain financial instruments that we own to collateralize repurchase agreements and other securities financings. For additional information, see the “Pledged Assets” section of
Note 14 (Pledged Assets and Collateral) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 34: Short-Term Borrowings
| (in millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase | $ | 21,191 | 46,362 | ||
| Other short-term borrowings | 13,218 | 12,637 | |||
| Total | $ | 34,409 | 58,999 |
We access domestic and international capital markets for long-term funding (generally greater than one year) through issuances of registered debt securities, private placements and asset-backed secured funding. We issue long-term debt in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding and to maintain an appropriate maturity profile. Proceeds from securities issued were used for general corporate purposes, and, unless otherwise specified in the applicable prospectus or prospectus supplement, we expect the proceeds
from securities issued in the future will be used for the same purposes. Depending on market conditions and our liquidity position, we may redeem or repurchase, and subsequently retire, our outstanding debt securities in privately negotiated or open market transactions, by tender offer, or otherwise. Table 35 presents a summary of our long-term debt. For additional information, including contractual maturities of our long-term debt, see Note 12 (Long-Term Debt) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 35: Long-Term Debt
| (in millions) | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company (Parent Only) | $ | 146,286 | 182,212 | ||
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and other bank entities (Bank) | 12,858 | 27,130 | |||
| Other consolidated subsidiaries | 1,545 | 3,608 | |||
| Total | $ | 160,689 | 212,950 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 54 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Credit Ratings Investors in the long-term capital markets, as well as other market participants, generally will consider, among other factors, a company’s debt rating in making investment decisions. Rating agencies base their ratings on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including capital adequacy, liquidity, asset quality, business mix, the level and quality of earnings, and rating agency assumptions regarding the probability and extent of federal financial assistance or support for certain large financial institutions. Adverse changes in these factors could result in a reduction of our credit rating; however, our debt securities do not contain credit rating covenants.
There were no actions undertaken by the rating agencies with regard to our credit ratings during fourth quarter 2021. On
February 16, 2022, Moody's Investors Service (Moody’s) affirmed the Company’s ratings and changed the rating outlook to stable from negative.
See the “Risk Factors” section in this Report for additional information regarding our credit ratings and the potential impact a credit rating downgrade would have on our liquidity and operations, as well as Note 16 (Derivatives) to Financial Statements in this Report for information regarding additional collateral and funding obligations required for certain derivative instruments in the event our credit ratings were to fall below investment grade.
The credit ratings of the Parent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as of December 31, 2021, are presented in Table 36.
Table 36: Credit Ratings as of December 31, 2021
| Wells Fargo & Company | Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior debt | Short-term borrowings | Long-term deposits | Short-term borrowings | ||||
| Moody’s | A1 | P-1 | Aa1 | P-1 | |||
| S&P Global Ratings | BBB+ | A-2 | A+ | A-1 | |||
| Fitch Ratings | A+ | F1 | AA | F1+ | |||
| DBRS Morningstar | AA (low) | R-1 (middle) | AA | R-1 (high) |
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK MEMBERSHIP The Federal Home Loan Banks (the FHLBs) are a group of cooperatives that lending institutions use to finance housing and economic development in local communities. We are a member of the FHLBs based in Dallas, Des Moines and San Francisco. FHLB members are required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock of the applicable FHLB. The board of directors of each FHLB can increase the minimum investment requirements in the event it has concluded that additional capital is required to allow it to meet its own regulatory capital requirements. Any increase in the minimum investment requirements outside of specified ranges requires the approval of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Because the extent of any obligation to increase our investment in any of the FHLBs depends entirely upon the occurrence of a future event, the amount of any future investment in the capital stock of the FHLBs is not determinable.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 55 |
Capital Management
We have an active program for managing capital through a comprehensive process for assessing the Company’s overall capital adequacy. Our objective is to maintain capital at an amount commensurate with our risk profile and risk tolerance objectives, and to meet both regulatory and market expectations. We primarily fund our capital needs through the retention of earnings net of both dividends and share repurchases, as well as through the issuance of preferred stock and long- and short-term debt. Retained earnings at December 31, 2021, increased $17.6 billion from December 31, 2020, predominantly as a result of $21.5 billion of Wells Fargo net income, partially offset by $3.7 billion of common and preferred stock dividends. During 2021, we issued $2.1 billion of common stock, substantially all of which was issued in connection with employee compensation and benefits. In 2021, we repurchased 306 million shares of common stock at a cost of $14.5 billion. For additional information about capital planning, see the “Capital Planning and Stress Testing” section below.
In 2021, we issued $5.8 billion of preferred stock and redeemed $6.7 billion of preferred stock. For additional information, see Note 18 (Preferred Stock) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
The Company and each of our IDIs are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. Risk-based capital rules establish risk-adjusted ratios relating regulatory capital to different categories of assets and off-balance sheet exposures as discussed below.
RISK-BASED CAPITAL AND RISK-WEIGHTED ASSETS The Company is subject to rules issued by federal banking regulators to implement Basel III capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations. The rules contain two frameworks for calculating capital requirements, a Standardized Approach and an Advanced Approach applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, and we must calculate our risk-based capital ratios under both approaches. The Company is required to satisfy the risk-based capital ratio requirements to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. Table 37 and Table 38 present the risk-based capital requirements applicable to the Company on a fully phased-in basis under the Standardized Approach and Advanced Approach, respectively, as of December 31, 2021.
Table 37: Risk-Based Capital Requirements – Standardized Approach as of December 31, 2021
Table 38: Risk-Based Capital Requirements – Advanced Approach as of December 31, 2021
In addition to the risk-based capital requirements described in Table 37 and Table 38, if the FRB determines that a period of excessive credit growth is contributing to an increase in systemic risk, a countercyclical buffer of up to 2.50% could be added to the risk-based capital ratio requirements under federal banking regulations. The FRB did not include a countercyclical buffer in the risk-based capital ratio requirements at December 31, 2021.
The capital conservation buffer is applicable to certain institutions, including Wells Fargo, under the Advanced Approach and is intended to absorb losses during times of economic or financial stress.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 56 | Wells Fargo & Company |
The stress capital buffer is calculated based on the decrease in a BHC’s risk-based capital ratios under the severely adverse scenario in the FRB’s annual supervisory stress test and related Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR), plus four quarters of planned common stock dividends. Because the stress capital buffer is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, our stress capital buffer, and thus our risk-based capital ratio requirements under the Standardized Approach, are subject to change in future periods. Our stress capital buffer for the period October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022, is 3.10%.
As a G-SIB, we are also subject to the FRB’s rule implementing an additional capital surcharge of between 1.00-4.50% on the risk-based capital ratio requirements of G-SIBs. Under the rule, we must annually calculate our surcharge under two methods and use the higher of the two surcharges. The first method (method one) considers our size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability, and complexity, consistent with the methodology developed by the BCBS and the Financial Stability Board (FSB). The second method (method two) uses similar inputs, but replaces substitutability with use of short-term wholesale funding and will generally result in higher surcharges than under method one. Because the G-SIB capital surcharge is calculated annually based on data that can differ over time, the amount of the surcharge is subject to change in future years. Our G-SIB capital surcharge decreased by 50 basis points to 1.50% beginning in first quarter 2022.
Under the risk-based capital rules, on-balance sheet assets and credit equivalent amounts of derivatives and off-balance sheet items are assigned to one of several broad risk categories according to the obligor, or, if relevant, the guarantor or the nature of any collateral. The aggregate dollar amount in each risk category is then multiplied by the risk weight associated with that category. The resulting weighted values from each of the risk categories are aggregated for determining total risk-weighted assets (RWAs).
Effective January 1, 2022, we are required by federal banking regulators to use the Standardized Approach for Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR) for calculating exposure amounts for credit RWAs on derivative contracts. SA-CCR replaced the current exposure method for calculating these exposure amounts for purposes of our risk-based capital ratios and our supplementary leverage ratio. The adoption of SA-CCR resulted in an increase of less than 1.00% in total RWAs under the Standardized Approach (which was our binding approach at December 31, 2021) and a decrease of less than 0.50% in total leverage exposure at January 1, 2022.
The Basel III capital requirements for calculating CET1 and tier 1 capital, along with RWAs, are fully phased-in. However, the requirements for determining tier 2 and total capital remained in accordance with transition requirements at December 31, 2021, but became fully phased-in beginning January 1, 2022.
The tables that follow provide information about our risk-based capital and related ratios as calculated under Basel III capital rules. Although we report certain capital amounts and ratios in accordance with transition requirements for bank regulatory reporting purposes, we manage our capital on a fully phased-in basis. For information about our capital requirements calculated in accordance with transition requirements, see
Note 28 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Table 39 summarizes our CET1, tier 1 capital, total capital, RWAs and capital ratios on a fully phased-in basis at December 31, 2021 and 2020. Fully phased-in total capital amounts and ratios are considered non-GAAP financial measures that are used by management, bank regulatory agencies, investors and analysts to assess and monitor the Company’s capital position. See Table 40 for information regarding the calculation and components of our CET1, tier 1 capital, total capital and RWAs, as well as a corresponding reconciliation to GAAP financial measures for our fully phased-in total capital amounts.
Table 39: Capital Components and Ratios (Fully Phased-In)
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approach | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions, except ratios) | Required Capital Ratios (1) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Required Capital Ratios (1) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 | (A) | $ | 140,643 | 138,297 | $ | 140,643 | 138,297 | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 Capital | (B) | 159,671 | 158,196 | 159,671 | 158,196 | ||||||||||||
| Total Capital | (C) | 196,281 | 196,529 | 186,553 | 186,803 | ||||||||||||
| Risk-Weighted Assets | (D) | 1,239,026 | 1,193,744 | 1,116,068 | 1,158,355 | ||||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio | (A)/(D) | 9.60 | % | 11.35 | * | 11.59 | 9.00 | 12.60 | 11.94 | ||||||||
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio | (B)/(D) | 11.10 | 12.89 | * | 13.25 | 10.50 | 14.31 | 13.66 | |||||||||
| Total Capital Ratio | (C)/(D) | 13.10 | 15.84 | * | 16.47 | 12.50 | 16.72 | 16.14 |
*Denotes the binding ratio under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches at December 31, 2021.
(1)Represents the minimum ratios required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments at December 31, 2021.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 57 |
Capital Management (continued)
Table 40 provides information regarding the calculation and composition of our risk-based capital under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Table 40: Risk-Based Capital Calculation and Components
| Standardized Approach | Advanced Approach | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | |||||||||||
| Total equity (1) | 190,110 | 185,712 | $ | 190,110 | 185,712 | ||||||||||
| Effect of accounting policy changes (1) | — | 208 | — | 208 | |||||||||||
| Total equity (as reported) | 190,110 | 185,920 | 190,110 | 185,920 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (20,057) | (21,136) | (20,057) | (21,136) | |||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock | 136 | 152 | 136 | 152 | |||||||||||
| Unearned ESOP shares | 646 | 875 | 646 | 875 | |||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | (2,504) | (1,033) | (2,504) | (1,033) | |||||||||||
| Total common stockholders’ equity | $ | 168,331 | 164,778 | 168,331 | 164,778 | ||||||||||
| Adjustments: | |||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (25,180) | (26,392) | (25,180) | (26,392) | |||||||||||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | (225) | (342) | (225) | (342) | |||||||||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on nonmarketable equity securities (included in other assets) | (2,437) | (1,965) | (2,437) | (1,965) | |||||||||||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (2) | 765 | 856 | 765 | 856 | |||||||||||
| CECL transition provision (3) | 241 | 1,720 | 241 | 1,720 | |||||||||||
| Other | (852) | (358) | (852) | (358) | |||||||||||
| Common Equity Tier 1 | $ | 140,643 | 138,297 | 140,643 | 138,297 | ||||||||||
| Preferred stock | 20,057 | 21,136 | 20,057 | 21,136 | |||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock | (136) | (152) | (136) | (152) | |||||||||||
| Unearned ESOP shares | (646) | (875) | (646) | (875) | |||||||||||
| Other | (247) | (210) | (247) | (210) | |||||||||||
| Total Tier 1 capital | (A) | $ | 159,671 | 158,196 | 159,671 | 158,196 | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 | 22,740 | 24,387 | 22,740 | 24,387 | |||||||||||
| Qualifying allowance for credit losses (4) | 14,149 | 14,134 | 4,421 | 4,408 | |||||||||||
| Other | (279) | (188) | (279) | (188) | |||||||||||
| Total Tier 2 capital (fully phased-in) | (B) | $ | 36,610 | 38,333 | 26,882 | 28,607 | |||||||||
| Effect of Basel III transition requirements | 27 | 131 | 27 | 131 | |||||||||||
| Total Tier 2 capital (Basel III transition requirements) | $ | 36,637 | 38,464 | 26,909 | 28,738 | ||||||||||
| Total qualifying capital (fully phased-in) | (A)+(B) | $ | 196,281 | 196,529 | 186,553 | 186,803 | |||||||||
| Total Effect of Basel III transition requirements | 27 | 131 | 27 | 131 | |||||||||||
| Total qualifying capital (Basel III transition requirements) | $ | 196,308 | 196,660 | 186,580 | 186,934 | ||||||||||
| Risk-Weighted Assets (RWAs)(5): | |||||||||||||||
| Credit risk | 1,186,810 | 1,125,813 | $ | 747,714 | 752,999 | ||||||||||
| Market risk | 52,216 | 67,931 | 52,216 | 67,931 | |||||||||||
| Operational risk | — | — | 316,138 | 337,425 | |||||||||||
| Total RWAs | $ | 1,239,026 | 1,193,744 | 1,116,068 | 1,158,355 |
(1)In second quarter 2021, we elected to change our accounting method for low-income housing tax credit investments and elected to change the presentation of investment tax credits related to solar energy investments. Prior period total equity was revised to conform with the current period presentation. Prior period risk-based capital and certain other regulatory related metrics were not revised.
(2)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period end.
(3)At December 31, 2021, the impact of the current expected credit losses (CECL) transition provision issued by federal banking regulators on our regulatory capital was an increase in capital of $241 million, reflecting a $991 million (post-tax) increase in capital recognized upon our initial adoption of CECL, offset by 25% of the $4.9 billion increase in our ACL under CECL from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021.
(4)Differences between the approaches are driven by the qualifying amounts of ACL includable in Tier 2 capital. Under the Advanced Approach, eligible credit reserves represented by the amount of qualifying ACL in excess of expected credit losses (using regulatory definitions) is limited to 0.60% of Advanced credit RWAs, whereas the Standardized Approach includes ACL in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of Standardized credit RWAs. Under both approaches, any excess ACL is deducted from the respective total RWAs.
(5)RWAs calculated under the Advanced Approach utilize a risk-sensitive methodology, which relies upon the use of internal credit models based upon our experience with internal rating grades. Advanced Approach also includes an operational risk component, which reflects the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 58 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Table 41 presents the changes in CET1 for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Table 41: Analysis of Changes in Common Equity Tier 1
| (in millions) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2020 | $ | 138,297 | |
| Net income applicable to common stock | 20,256 | ||
| Common stock dividends | (2,426) | ||
| Common stock issued, repurchased, and stock compensation-related items | (12,197) | ||
| Changes in cumulative other comprehensive income | (1,896) | ||
| Goodwill | 1,212 | ||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 117 | ||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on nonmarketable equity securities (included in other assets) | (472) | ||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangible assets (1) | (91) | ||
| CECL transition provision (2) | (1,479) | ||
| Other | (678) | ||
| Change in Common Equity Tier 1 | 2,346 | ||
| Common Equity Tier 1 at December 31, 2021 | $ | 140,643 |
(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period end.
(2)At December 31, 2021, the impact of the CECL transition provision issued by federal banking regulators on our regulatory capital was an increase in capital of $241 million, reflecting a $991 million (post-tax) increase in capital recognized upon our initial adoption of CECL, offset by 25% of the $4.9 billion increase in our ACL under CECL from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2021.
Table 42 presents net changes in the components of RWAs under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Table 42: Analysis of Changes in RWAs
| (in millions) | Standardized Approach | Advanced Approach | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWAs at December 31, 2020 | 1,193,744 | $ | 1,158,355 | ||
| Net change in credit risk RWAs | 60,997 | (5,285) | |||
| Net change in market risk RWAs | (15,715) | (15,715) | |||
| Net change in operational risk RWAs | — | (21,287) | |||
| Total change in RWAs | 45,282 | (42,287) | |||
| RWAs at December 31, 2021 | $ | 1,239,026 | $ | 1,116,068 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 59 |
Capital Management (continued)
TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY We also evaluate our business based on certain ratios that utilize tangible common equity. Tangible common equity is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents total equity less preferred equity, noncontrolling interests, goodwill, certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) and goodwill and other intangibles on nonmarketable equity securities, net of applicable deferred taxes. The ratios are (i) tangible book value per common share, which represents tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding; and (ii) return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE),
which represents our annualized earnings as a percentage of tangible common equity. The methodology of determining tangible common equity may differ among companies. Management believes that tangible book value per common share and return on average tangible common equity, which utilize tangible common equity, are useful financial measures because they enable management, investors, and others to assess the Company’s use of equity.
Table 43 provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures.
Table 43: Tangible Common Equity
| Balance at period end | Average balance | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarter ended | Year ended | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions, except ratios) | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Total equity | $ | 190,110 | 185,712 | 187,702 | 191,219 | 184,689 | 197,174 | |||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock | (20,057) | (21,136) | (21,549) | (21,151) | (21,364) | (22,522) | ||||||||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital on preferred stock | 136 | 152 | (71) | 137 | 148 | (81) | ||||||||||||||
| Unearned ESOP shares | 646 | 875 | 1,143 | 874 | 1,007 | 1,306 | ||||||||||||||
| Noncontrolling interests | (2,504) | (1,033) | (838) | (1,601) | (769) | (962) | ||||||||||||||
| Total common stockholders’ equity | (A) | 168,331 | 164,570 | 166,387 | 169,478 | 163,711 | 174,915 | |||||||||||||
| Adjustments: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | (25,180) | (26,392) | (26,390) | (26,087) | (26,387) | (26,409) | ||||||||||||||
| Certain identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs) | (225) | (342) | (437) | (294) | (389) | (493) | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles on nonmarketable equity securities (included in other assets) | (2,437) | (1,965) | (2,146) | (2,226) | (2,002) | (2,174) | ||||||||||||||
| Applicable deferred taxes related to goodwill and other intangibleassets (1) | 765 | 856 | 810 | 867 | 834 | 792 | ||||||||||||||
| Tangible common equity | (B) | $ | 141,254 | 136,727 | 138,224 | 141,738 | 135,767 | 146,631 | ||||||||||||
| Common shares outstanding | (C) | 3,885.8 | 4,144.0 | 4,134.4 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
| Net income applicable to common stock | (D) | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | 20,256 | 1,786 | 18,103 | ||||||||||||
| Book value per common share | (A)/(C) | $ | 43.32 | 39.71 | 40.24 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| Tangible book value per common share | (B)/(C) | 36.35 | 32.99 | 33.43 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
| Return on average common stockholders’ equity (ROE) | (D)/(A) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 11.95 | % | 1.09 | 10.35 | ||||||||||||
| Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) | (D)/(B) | N/A | N/A | N/A | 14.29 | 1.32 | 12.35 |
(1)Determined by applying the combined federal statutory rate and composite state income tax rates to the difference between book and tax basis of the respective goodwill and intangible assets at period end.
LEVERAGE REQUIREMENTS As a BHC, we are required to maintain a supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments and maintain a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio. Table 44 presents the leverage requirements applicable to the Company as of December 31, 2021.
Table 44: Leverage Requirements Applicable to the Company
In addition, our IDIs are required to maintain an SLR of at least 6.00% to be considered well capitalized under applicable regulatory capital adequacy rules and maintain a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.00%.
The FRB and OCC have proposed amendments to the SLR rules (Proposed SLR rules) that would replace the 2.00% supplementary leverage buffer with a buffer equal to one-half of our G-SIB capital surcharge. The Proposed SLR rules would similarly tailor the current 6.00% SLR requirement for our IDIs.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 60 | Wells Fargo & Company |
At December 31, 2021, the Company’s SLR was 6.89%, and each of our IDIs exceeded their applicable SLR requirements. Table 45 presents information regarding the calculation and components of the Company’s SLR and tier 1 leverage ratio.
Table 45: Leverage Ratios for the Company
| (in millions, except ratios) | Quarter ended December 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 capital | (A) | $ | 159,671 |
| Total average assets | 1,943,670 | ||
| Less: Goodwill and other permitted Tier 1 capital deductions (net of deferred tax liabilities) | 28,085 | ||
| Total adjusted average assets | 1,915,585 | ||
| Plus adjustments for off-balance sheet exposures: | |||
| Derivatives (1) | 71,926 | ||
| Repo-style transactions (2) | 3,080 | ||
| Other (3) | 325,488 | ||
| Total off-balance sheet exposures | 400,494 | ||
| Total leverage exposure | (B) | $ | 2,316,079 |
| Supplementary leverage ratio | (A)/(B) | 6.89 | % |
| Tier 1 leverage ratio (4) | 8.34 | % |
(1)Adjustment represents derivatives and collateral netting exposures as defined for supplementary leverage ratio determination purposes.
(2)Adjustment represents counterparty credit risk for repo-style transactions where Wells Fargo & Company is the principal counterparty facing the client.
(3)Adjustment represents credit equivalent amounts of other off-balance sheet exposures not already included as derivatives and repo-style transactions exposures.
(4)The tier 1 leverage ratio consists of tier 1 capital divided by total average assets, excluding goodwill and certain other items as determined under the rule.
TOTAL LOSS ABSORBING CAPACITY As a G-SIB, we are required to have a minimum amount of equity and unsecured long-term debt for purposes of resolvability and resiliency, often referred to as Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC). U.S. G-SIBs are required to have a minimum amount of TLAC (consisting of CET1 capital and additional tier 1 capital issued directly by the top-tier or covered BHC plus eligible external long-term debt) to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments, as well as a minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt. The components used to calculate our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements as of December 31, 2021, are presented in Table 46.
Table 46: Components Used to Calculate TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt Requirements
| TLAC requirement Greater of: | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.00% of RWAs | 7.50% of total leverage exposure (the denominator of the SLR calculation) | |
| + | + | |
| TLAC buffer (equal to 2.50% of RWAs + method one G-SIB capital surcharge + any countercyclical buffer) | External TLAC leverage buffer (equal to 2.00% of total leverage exposure) | |
| Minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt Greater of: | ||
| 6.00% of RWAs | 4.50% of total leverage exposure | |
| + | ||
| Greater of method one and method two G-SIB capital surcharge |
Under the Proposed SLR rules, the 2.00% external TLAC leverage buffer would be replaced with a buffer equal to one-half of our applicable G-SIB capital surcharge, and the leverage component for calculating the minimum amount of eligible unsecured long-term debt would be modified from 4.50% of total leverage exposure to 2.50% of total leverage exposure plus one-half of our applicable G-SIB capital surcharge.
Table 47 provides our TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt and related ratios as of December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2020.
Table 47: TLAC and Eligible Unsecured Long-Term Debt
| ($ in millions) | TLAC (1) | Regulatory Minimum (2) | Eligible Unsecured Long-term Debt | Regulatory Minimum | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||
| Total eligible amount | $ | 285,312 | 120,943 | ||||||||
| Percentage of RWAs (3) | 23.03 | % | 21.50 | 9.76 | 8.00 | ||||||
| Percentage of total leverage exposure | 12.32 | 9.50 | 5.22 | 4.50 | |||||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||
| Total eligible amount | $ | 307,226 | 140,703 | ||||||||
| Percentage of RWAs (3) | 25.74 | % | 22.00 | 11.79 | 8.00 | ||||||
| Percentage of total leverage exposure (4) | 15.64 | 9.50 | 7.16 | 4.50 |
(1)TLAC ratios are calculated using the CECL transition provision issued by federal banking regulators.
(2)Represents the minimum required to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.
(3)Our minimum TLAC and eligible unsecured long-term debt requirements are calculated based on the greater of RWAs determined under the Standardized and Advanced Approaches.
(4)Total leverage exposure at December 31, 2020, reflected an interim final rule issued by the FRB that temporarily allowed a bank holding company to exclude on-balance sheet amounts of U.S. Treasury securities and deposits at Federal Reserve Banks from the calculation of its total leverage exposure.
OTHER REGULATORY CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY MATTERS For information regarding the U.S. implementation of the Basel III LCR and NSFR, see the “Risk Management – Asset/ Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding – Liquidity Standards” section in this Report.
Capital Planning and Stress Testing
Our planned long-term capital structure is designed to meet regulatory and market expectations. We believe that our long-term targeted capital structure enables us to invest in and grow our business, satisfy our customers’ financial needs in varying environments, access markets, and maintain flexibility to return capital to our shareholders. Our long-term targeted capital structure also considers capital levels sufficient to exceed capital requirements including the G-SIB capital surcharge. Accordingly, we currently target a long-term CET1 capital ratio that is 100 basis points above our regulatory requirement plus an incremental buffer of 25 to 50 basis points. Our capital targets are subject to change based on various factors, including changes to the regulatory requirements for our capital ratios, planned capital actions, changes in our risk profile and other factors.
The FRB capital plan rule establishes capital planning and other requirements that govern capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, by certain BHCs, including Wells Fargo. The FRB assesses, among other things, the overall financial condition, risk profile, and capital adequacy of BHCs when evaluating their capital plans.
Federal banking regulators also require large BHCs and banks to conduct their own stress tests to evaluate whether the
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 61 |
Capital Management (continued)
institution has sufficient capital to continue to operate during periods of adverse economic and financial conditions.
Securities Repurchases
From time to time the Board authorizes the Company to repurchase shares of our common stock. Although we announce when the Board authorizes share repurchases, we typically do not give any public notice before we repurchase our shares. Various factors determine the amount of our share repurchases, including our capital requirements, the number of shares we expect to issue for employee benefit plans and acquisitions, market conditions (including the trading price of our stock), and
regulatory and legal considerations, including under the FRB’s capital plan rule. Due to the various factors that may impact the amount of our share repurchases and the fact that we tend to be in the market regularly to satisfy repurchase considerations under our capital plan, our share repurchases occur at various price levels. We may suspend share repurchase activity at any time.
At December 31, 2021, we had remaining Board authority to repurchase approximately 361 million shares, subject to regulatory and legal conditions. For additional information about share repurchases during fourth quarter 2021, see Part II, Item 5 in our 2021 Form 10-K.
Regulatory Matters
The U.S. financial services industry is subject to significant regulation and regulatory oversight initiatives. This regulation and oversight may continue to impact how U.S. financial services companies conduct business and may continue to result in increased regulatory compliance costs. The following highlights the more significant regulations and regulatory oversight initiatives that have affected or may affect our business. For additional information about the regulatory matters discussed below and other regulations and regulatory oversight matters, see Part I, Item 1 “Regulation and Supervision” of our 2021 Form 10-K, and the “Overview,” “Capital Management,” “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections and Note 28 (Regulatory Capital Requirements and Other Restrictions) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Dodd-Frank Act
The Dodd-Frank Act is the most significant financial reform legislation since the 1930s. The following provides additional information on the Dodd-Frank Act, including certain of its rulemaking initiatives.
•Enhanced supervision and regulation of systemically important firms. The Dodd-Frank Act grants broad authority to federal banking regulators to establish enhanced supervisory and regulatory requirements for systemically important firms. The FRB has finalized a number of regulations implementing enhanced prudential requirements for large bank holding companies (BHCs) like Wells Fargo regarding risk-based capital and leverage, risk and liquidity management, single counterparty credit limits, and imposing debt-to-equity limits on any BHC that regulators determine poses a grave threat to the financial stability of the United States. The FRB and OCC have also finalized rules implementing stress testing requirements for large BHCs and national banks. In addition, the FRB has proposed a rule to establish remediation requirements for large BHCs experiencing financial distress. Furthermore, in order to promote a BHC’s safety and soundness and the financial and operational resilience of its operations, the FRB has finalized guidance regarding effective boards of directors of large BHCs and has proposed related guidance identifying core principles for effective senior management. The OCC, under separate authority, has finalized guidelines establishing heightened governance and risk management standards for large national banks such as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The OCC guidelines require covered banks to establish and adhere to a written risk governance framework to manage and control their risk-taking activities. The guidelines also formalize roles and responsibilities for risk management practices within covered banks and create certain risk oversight
responsibilities for their boards of directors. In addition to the authorization of enhanced supervisory and regulatory requirements for systemically important firms, the Dodd-Frank Act also established the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the Office of Financial Research, which may recommend new systemic risk management requirements and require new reporting of systemic risks.
•Regulation of consumer financial products. The Dodd-Frank Act established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to ensure that consumers receive clear and accurate disclosures regarding financial products and are protected from unfair, deceptive or abusive practices. The CFPB has issued a number of rules impacting consumer financial products, including rules regarding the origination, servicing, notification, disclosure and other requirements with respect to residential mortgage lending, as well as rules impacting prepaid cards, credit cards, and other financial products and banking-related activities. In addition to these rulemaking activities, the CFPB is continuing its ongoing supervisory examination activities of the financial services industry with respect to a number of consumer businesses and products, including mortgage lending and servicing, fair lending requirements, and auto finance.
•Regulation of swaps and other derivatives activities. The Dodd-Frank Act established a comprehensive framework for regulating over-the-counter derivatives, and, pursuant to authority granted by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have adopted comprehensive sets of rules regulating swaps and security-based swaps, respectively, and the OCC and other federal regulatory agencies have adopted margin requirements for uncleared swaps and security-based swaps. As a provisionally-registered swap dealer and a conditionally-registered security-based swap dealer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., is subject to these rules. These rules, as well as others adopted or under consideration by regulators in the United States and other jurisdictions, may negatively impact customer demand for over-the-counter derivatives, impact our ability to offer customers new derivatives or amendments to existing derivatives, and may increase our costs for engaging in swaps, security-based swaps, and other derivatives activities.
Regulatory Capital, Leverage, and Liquidity Requirements
The Company and each of our IDIs are subject to various regulatory capital adequacy requirements administered by the FRB and the OCC. For example, the Company is subject to rules issued by federal banking regulators to implement Basel III risk-
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 62 | Wells Fargo & Company |
based capital requirements for U.S. banking organizations. The Company and its IDIs are also required to maintain specified leverage and supplementary leverage ratios. In addition, the Company is required to have a minimum amount of total loss absorbing capacity for purposes of resolvability and resiliency. Federal banking regulators have also issued final rules requiring a liquidity coverage ratio and a net stable funding ratio. For additional information on the final risk-based capital, leverage and liquidity rules, and additional capital requirements applicable to us, see the “Capital Management” and “Risk Management – Asset/Liability Management – Liquidity Risk and Funding – Liquidity Standards” sections in this Report.
“Living Will” Requirements and Related Matters
Rules adopted by the FRB and the FDIC under the Dodd-Frank Act require large financial institutions, including Wells Fargo, to prepare and periodically submit resolution plans, also known as “living wills,” that would facilitate their rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. Under the rules, rapid and orderly resolution means a reorganization or liquidation of the covered company under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code that can be accomplished in a reasonable period of time and in a manner that substantially mitigates the risk that failure would have serious adverse effects on the financial stability of the United States. In addition to the Company’s resolution plan, our national bank subsidiary, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), is also required to prepare and periodically submit a resolution plan. If the FRB and/or FDIC determine that our resolution plan has deficiencies, they may impose more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements on us or restrict our growth, activities or operations until we adequately remedy the deficiencies. If the FRB and/or FDIC ultimately determine that we have been unable to remedy any deficiencies, they could require us to divest certain assets or operations. On June 29, 2021, we submitted our most recent resolution plan to the FRB and FDIC.
If Wells Fargo were to fail, it may be resolved in a bankruptcy proceeding or, if certain conditions are met, under the resolution regime created by the Dodd-Frank Act known as the “orderly liquidation authority.” The orderly liquidation authority allows for the appointment of the FDIC as receiver for a systemically important financial institution that is in default or in danger of default if, among other things, the resolution of the institution under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code would have serious adverse effects on financial stability in the United States. If the FDIC is appointed as receiver for Wells Fargo & Company (the “Parent”), then the orderly liquidation authority, rather than the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, would determine the powers of the receiver and the rights and obligations of our security holders. The FDIC’s orderly liquidation authority requires that security holders of a company in receivership bear all losses before U.S. taxpayers are exposed to any losses. There are substantial differences in the rights of creditors between the orderly liquidation authority and the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, including the right of the FDIC to disregard the strict priority of creditor claims under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in certain circumstances and the use of an administrative claims procedure instead of a judicial procedure to determine creditors’ claims.
The strategy described in our most recent resolution plan is a single point of entry strategy, in which the Parent would be the only material legal entity to enter resolution proceedings. However, the strategy described in our resolution plan is not binding in the event of an actual resolution of Wells Fargo, whether conducted under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or by the FDIC under the orderly liquidation authority. The FDIC has
announced that a single point of entry strategy may be a desirable strategy under its implementation of the orderly liquidation authority, but not all aspects of how the FDIC might exercise this authority are known and additional rulemaking is possible.
To facilitate the orderly resolution of systemically important financial institutions in case of material distress or failure, federal banking regulations require that institutions, such as Wells Fargo, maintain a minimum amount of equity and unsecured debt to absorb losses and recapitalize operating subsidiaries. Federal banking regulators have also required measures to facilitate the continued operation of operating subsidiaries notwithstanding the failure of their parent companies, such as limitations on parent guarantees, and have issued guidance encouraging institutions to take legally binding measures to provide capital and liquidity resources to certain subsidiaries to facilitate an orderly resolution. In response to the regulators’ guidance and to facilitate the orderly resolution of the Company, on June 28, 2017, the Parent entered into a support agreement, as amended and restated on June 26, 2019 (the “Support Agreement”), with WFC Holdings, LLC, an intermediate holding company and subsidiary of the Parent (the “IHC”), the Bank, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (“WFS”), Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC (“WFCS”), and certain other subsidiaries of the Parent designated from time to time as material entities for resolution planning purposes (the “Covered Entities”) or identified from time to time as related support entities in our resolution plan (the “Related Support Entities”). Pursuant to the Support Agreement, the Parent transferred a significant amount of its assets, including the majority of its cash, deposits, liquid securities and intercompany loans (but excluding its equity interests in its subsidiaries and certain other assets), to the IHC and will continue to transfer those types of assets to the IHC from time to time. In the event of our material financial distress or failure, the IHC will be obligated to use the transferred assets to provide capital and/or liquidity to the Bank, WFS, WFCS, and the Covered Entities pursuant to the Support Agreement. Under the Support Agreement, the IHC will also provide funding and liquidity to the Parent through subordinated notes and a committed line of credit, which, together with the issuance of dividends, is expected to provide the Parent, during business as usual operating conditions, with the same access to cash necessary to service its debts, pay dividends, repurchase its shares, and perform its other obligations as it would have had if it had not entered into these arrangements and transferred any assets. If certain liquidity and/or capital metrics fall below defined triggers, or if the Parent’s board of directors authorizes it to file a case under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the subordinated notes would be forgiven, the committed line of credit would terminate, and the IHC’s ability to pay dividends to the Parent would be restricted, any of which could materially and adversely impact the Parent’s liquidity and its ability to satisfy its debts and other obligations, and could result in the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings by the Parent at an earlier time than might have otherwise occurred if the Support Agreement were not implemented. The respective obligations under the Support Agreement of the Parent, the IHC, the Bank, and the Related Support Entities are secured pursuant to a related security agreement.
In addition to our resolution plans, we must also prepare and periodically submit to the FRB a recovery plan that identifies a range of options that we may consider during times of idiosyncratic or systemic economic stress to remedy any financial weaknesses and restore market confidence without extraordinary government support. Recovery options include the possible sale, transfer or disposal of assets, securities, loan
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 63 |
Regulatory Matters (continued)
portfolios or businesses. The Bank must also prepare and periodically submit to the OCC a recovery plan that sets forth the Bank’s plan to remain a going concern when the Bank is experiencing considerable financial or operational stress, but has not yet deteriorated to the point where liquidation or resolution is imminent. If either the FRB or the OCC determines that our recovery plan is deficient, they may impose fines, restrictions on our business or ultimately require us to divest assets.
Other Regulatory Related Matters
•Regulatory actions. The Company is subject to a number of consent orders and other regulatory actions, which may require the Company, among other things, to undertake certain changes to its business, operations, products and services, and risk management practices, and include the following:
◦Consent Orders Discussed in the “Overview” Section in this Report. For a discussion of certain consent orders applicable to the Company, see the “Overview” section in this Report.
◦OCC approval of director and senior executive officer appointments and certain post-termination payments. Under the April 2018 consent order with the OCC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., remains subject to requirements that were originally imposed in November 2016 to provide prior written notice to, and obtain non-objection from, the OCC with respect to changes in directors and senior executive officers, and remains subject to certain regulatory limitations on post-termination payments to certain individuals and employees.
•Regulatory Developments Related to COVID-19. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and related events, federal banking regulators undertook a number of measures to help stabilize the banking sector, support the broader economy, and facilitate the ability of banking organizations like Wells Fargo to continue lending to consumers and businesses. For example, in order to facilitate the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), federal banking regulators issued rules designed to encourage financial institutions to participate in stimulus measures, such as the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program. Similarly, the FRB launched a number of lending facilities designed to enhance liquidity and the functioning of markets, including facilities covering money market mutual funds and term asset-backed securities loans. Certain of these measures, including the acceptance of applications under the Paycheck Protection Program and the extension of credit under certain FRB lending facilities, ended in 2021. Federal banking regulators also issued rules amending the regulatory capital and TLAC rules and other prudential regulations to temporarily ease certain restrictions on banking organizations and encourage the use of certain FRB-established facilities in order to further promote lending to consumers and businesses.
In addition, the OCC and the FRB issued guidelines for banks and BHCs related to working with customers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including guidance with respect to waiving fees, offering repayment accommodations, and providing payment deferrals. Any current or future rules, regulations, and guidance related to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts could require us to change certain of our business practices, reduce our revenue and earnings, impose additional costs on us, or otherwise adversely affect our business operations and/or competitive position.
•Regulatory Developments in Response to Climate Change. Federal and state governments and government agencies have demonstrated increased attention to the impacts and potential risks associated with climate change. For example, federal banking regulators are reviewing the implications of climate change on the financial stability of the United States and the identification and management by BHCs of climate-related financial risks. The approaches taken by various governments and government agencies can vary significantly, evolve over time, and sometimes conflict. Any current or future rules, regulations, and guidance related to climate change and its impacts could require us to change certain of our business practices, reduce our revenue and earnings, impose additional costs on us, or otherwise adversely affect our business operations and/or competitive position.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 64 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report) are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and financial results. Six of these policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies govern:
•the allowance for credit losses;
•the valuation of residential MSRs;
•the fair value of financial instruments;
•income taxes;
•liability for contingent litigation losses; and
•goodwill impairment.
Management has discussed these critical accounting policies and the related estimates and judgments with the Board’s Audit Committee.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an ACL for loans, which is management’s estimate of the expected credit losses in the loan portfolio and unfunded credit commitments, at the balance sheet date, excluding loans and unfunded credit commitments carried at fair value or held for sale. Additionally, we maintain an ACL for debt securities classified as either HTM or AFS, other financial assets measured at amortized cost, net investments in leases, and other off-balance sheet credit exposures. For additional information, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) to Financial Statements in this Report.
For loans and HTM debt securities, the ACL is measured based on the remaining contractual term of the financial asset (including off-balance sheet credit exposures) adjusted, as appropriate, for prepayments and permitted extension options using historical experience, current conditions, and forecasted information. For AFS debt securities, the ACL is measured using a discounted cash flow approach and is limited to the difference between the fair value of the security and its amortized cost.
Changes in the ACL and, therefore, in the related provision for credit losses can materially affect net income. In applying the judgment and review required to determine the ACL, management considerations include the evaluation of past events, historical experience, changes in economic forecasts and conditions, customer behavior, collateral values, the length of the initial loss forecast period, and other influences. From time to time, changes in economic factors or assumptions, business strategy, products or product mix, or debt security investment strategy, may result in a corresponding increase or decrease in our ACL. While our methodology attributes portions of the ACL to specific financial asset classes (loan and debt security portfolios) or loan portfolio segments (commercial and consumer), the entire ACL is available to absorb credit losses of the Company.
Judgment is specifically applied in:
•Economic assumptions and the length of the initial loss forecast period. We forecast a wide range of economic variables to estimate expected credit losses. Our key economic variables include gross domestic product (GDP), unemployment rate, and collateral asset prices. While many of these economic
variables are evaluated at the macro-economy level, some economic variables are forecasted at more granular levels, for example, using the metro statistical area (MSA) level for unemployment rates, home prices and commercial real estate prices. Quarterly, we assess the length of the initial loss forecast period and have currently set the period to two years. For the initial loss forecast period, we forecast multiple economic scenarios that generally include a base scenario with an optimistic (upside) and one or more pessimistic (downside) scenarios. Management exercises judgment when assigning weight to the economic scenarios that are used to estimate future credit losses.
•Reversion to historical loss expectations. Our long-term average loss expectations are estimated by reverting to the long-term average, on a linear basis, for each of the forecasted economic variables. These long-term averages are based on observations over multiple economic cycles. The reversion period, which may be up to two years, is assessed on a quarterly basis.
•Credit risk ratings applied to individual commercial loans, unfunded credit commitments, and debt securities. Individually assessed credit risk ratings are considered key credit variables in our modeled approaches to help assess probability of default and loss given default. Borrower quality ratings are aligned to the borrower’s financial strength and contribute to forecasted probability of default curves. Collateral quality ratings combined with forecasted collateral prices (as applicable) contribute to the forecasted severity of loss in the event of default. These credit risk ratings are reviewed by experienced senior credit officers and subjected to reviews by an internal team of credit risk specialists.
•Usage of credit loss estimation models. We use internally developed models that incorporate credit attributes and economic variables to generate estimates of credit losses. Management uses a combination of judgment and quantitative analytics in the determination of segmentation, modeling approach, and variables that are leveraged in the models. These models are validated in accordance with the Company’s policies by an internal model validation group. We routinely assess our model performance and apply adjustments when necessary to improve the accuracy of loss estimation. We also assess our models for limitations against the company-wide risk inventory to help ensure that we appropriately capture known and emerging risks in our estimate of expected credit losses and apply overlays as needed.
•Valuation of collateral. The current fair value of collateral is utilized to assess the expected credit losses when a financial asset is considered to be collateral dependent. We apply judgment when valuing the collateral either through appraisals, evaluation of the cash flows of the property, or other quantitative techniques. Decreases in collateral valuations support incremental charge-downs and increases in collateral valuation are included in the ACL as a negative allowance when the financial asset has been previously written-down below current recovery value.
•Contractual term considerations. The remaining contractual term of a loan is adjusted for expected prepayments and certain expected extensions, renewals, or modifications. We extend the contractual term when we are not able to unconditionally cancel contractual renewals or extension
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 65 |
Critical Accounting Policies (continued)
options. We also incorporate any scenarios where we reasonably expect to provide an extension through a TDR. Credit card loans have indeterminate maturities, which requires that we determine a contractual life by estimating the application of future payments to the outstanding loan amount.
•Qualitative factors which may not be adequately captured in the loss models. These amounts represent management’s judgment of risks inherent in the processes and assumptions used in establishing the ACL. We also consider economic environmental factors, modeling assumptions and performance, process risk, and other subjective factors, including industry trends and emerging risk assessments.
Sensitivity The ACL for loans is sensitive to changes in key assumptions which requires significant judgment to be used by management. Future amounts of the ACL for loans will be based on a variety of factors, including loan balance changes, portfolio credit quality, and general economic conditions. General economic conditions are forecasted using economic variables, which could have varying impacts on different financial assets or portfolios. Additionally, throughout numerous credit cycles, there are observed changes in economic variables such as the unemployment rate, GDP and real estate prices which may not move in a correlated manner as variables may move in opposite directions or differ across portfolios or geography.
Our sensitivity analysis does not represent management’s view of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date. We applied 100% weight to the downside scenario in our sensitivity analysis to reflect the potential for further economic deterioration from a COVID-19 resurgence. The outcome of the scenario was influenced by the duration, severity, and timing of changes in economic variables within the scenario. The sensitivity analysis resulted in a hypothetical increase in the ACL for loans of approximately $4.4 billion at December 31, 2021. The hypothetical increase in our ACL for loans does not incorporate the impact of management judgment for qualitative factors applied in the current ACL for loans, which may have a positive or negative effect on the results. It is possible that others performing similar sensitivity analyses could reach different conclusions or results.
The sensitivity analysis excludes the ACL for debt securities and other financial assets given its size relative to the overall ACL. Management believes that the estimate for the ACL for loans was appropriate at the balance sheet date.
Valuation of Residential Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)
MSRs are assets that represent the rights to service mortgage loans for others. We recognize MSRs when we retain servicing rights in connection with the sale or securitization of loans we originate (asset transfers), or purchase servicing rights from third parties. We also have acquired MSRs in the past under co-issuer agreements that provide for us to service loans that were originated and securitized by third-party correspondents.
We carry our MSRs related to residential mortgage loans at fair value. Periodic changes in our residential MSRs and the economic hedges used to hedge our residential MSRs are reflected in earnings.
We use a model to estimate the fair value of our residential MSRs. The model is validated in accordance with Company policies by an internal model validation group. The model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income and incorporates inputs and assumptions that market participants use in estimating fair value. Certain
significant inputs and assumptions generally are not observable in the market and require judgment to determine. If observable market indications do become available, these are factored into the estimates as appropriate:
•The mortgage loan prepayment rate used to estimate future net servicing income. The prepayment rate is the annual rate at which borrowers are forecasted to repay their mortgage loan principal; this rate also includes estimated borrower defaults. We use models to estimate prepayment rate and borrower defaults which are influenced by changes in mortgage interest rates and borrower behavior.
•The discount rate used to present value estimated future net servicing income. The discount rate is the required rate of return investors in the market would expect for an asset with similar risk. To determine the discount rate, we consider the risk premium for uncertainties in the cash flow estimates such as from servicing operations (e.g., possible changes in future servicing costs, ancillary income and earnings on escrow accounts).
•The expected cost to service loans used to estimate future net servicing income. The cost to service loans includes estimates for unreimbursed expenses, such as delinquency and foreclosure costs, which considers the number of defaulted loans as well as the incremental cost to service loans in default and foreclosure. We use a market participant's view for our estimated cost to service and our actual costs may vary from that estimate.
Both prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions can, and generally will, change quarterly as market conditions and mortgage interest rates change. For example, an increase in either the prepayment rate or discount rate assumption results in a decrease in the fair value of the MSRs, while a decrease in either assumption would result in an increase in the fair value of the MSRs. In recent years, there have been significant market-driven fluctuations in loan prepayment rate and the discount rate. These fluctuations can be rapid and may be significant in the future. Additionally, future regulatory or investor changes in servicing standards, as well as changes in individual state foreclosure legislation or changes in market participant information regarding servicing cost assumptions, may have an impact on our servicing cost assumption and our MSR valuation in future periods. We periodically benchmark our MSR fair value estimate to independent appraisals.
For a description of our valuation and sensitivity of MSRs, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), Note 8 (Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities), Note 9 (Mortgage Banking Activities) and Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell a financial asset or paid to transfer a financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial instruments and to fulfill fair value disclosure requirements. For example, assets and liabilities held for trading purposes, marketable equity securities, AFS debt securities, derivatives and a majority of our LHFS are carried at fair value each period. Other financial instruments, such as certain LHFS, a majority of nonmarketable equity securities, and loans held for investment, are not carried at fair value each period but may require nonrecurring fair value adjustments due to application of lower-of-cost-or-market
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 66 | Wells Fargo & Company |
accounting, measurement alternative accounting or write-downs of individual assets. We also disclose our estimate of fair value for financial instruments not recorded at fair value, such as loans held for investment or issuances of long-term debt.
The accounting requirements for fair value measurements include a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for measurement are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-derived or market-based information obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our estimates about market data.
When developing fair value measurements, we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When available, we use quoted prices in active markets to measure fair value. If quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value measurement is based upon models that generally use market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including interest rate yield curves, prepayment rates, option volatilities and currency rates. However, when observable market data is limited or not available, fair value estimates are typically determined using internal models based on unobservable inputs. Internal models used to determine fair value are validated in accordance with Company policies by an internal model validation group. Additionally, we use third-party pricing services to obtain fair values, which are used to either record the price of an instrument or to corroborate internal prices. Third-party price validation procedures are performed over the reasonableness of the fair value measurements.
When using internal models based on unobservable inputs, management judgment is necessary as we make judgments about significant assumptions that market participants would use to estimate fair value. Determination of these assumptions includes consideration of many factors, including market conditions and liquidity levels. Changes in the market conditions, such as reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities, may reduce the availability and reliability of quoted prices or observable data used to determine fair value. In such cases, it may be appropriate to adjust available quoted prices or observable market data. For example, we may adjust a price received from a third-party pricing service using internal models based on discounted cash flows when the impact of illiquid markets has not already been incorporated in the fair value measurement. Additionally, for certain residential LHFS and certain debt and equity securities where the significant inputs have become unobservable due to illiquid markets and a third-party pricing service is not used, our discounted cash flow model uses a discount rate that reflects what we believe a market participant would require in light of the illiquid market.
We continually assess the level and volume of market activity in our debt and equity security classes in determining adjustments, if any, to quoted prices. Given market conditions can change over time, our determination of which securities markets are considered active or inactive can change. If we determine a market to be inactive, the degree to which quoted prices require adjustment, can also change.
Significant judgment is also applied in the determination of whether certain assets measured at fair value are classified as Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. When making this judgment, we consider available information, including observable market data, indications of market liquidity and orderliness, and our understanding of the valuation techniques and significant inputs used to estimate fair value. The classification as Level 2 or Level 3 is based upon the specific facts
and circumstances of each instrument or instrument category and judgments are made regarding the significance of unobservable inputs to each instrument’s fair value measurement in its entirety. If unobservable inputs are considered significant to the fair value measurement, the instrument is classified as Level 3.
Table 48 presents our (1) assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and (2) Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, both presented as a percentage of our total assets and total liabilities.
Table 48: Fair Value Level 3 Summary
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in billions) | Total balance | Level 3 (1) | Total balance | Level 3 (1) | |||||||
| Assets recorded at fairvalue on a recurring basis | $ | 348.9 | 19.6 | 380.3 | 21.9 | ||||||
| As a percentage of total assets | 18 | % | 1 | 19 | 1 | ||||||
| Liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis | $ | 30.1 | 2.6 | 39.0 | 2.0 | ||||||
| As a percentage of total liabilities | 2 | % | * | 2 | * |
*Less than 1%.
(1)Before derivative netting adjustments.
See Note 17 (Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities) to Financial Statements in this Report for a complete discussion on our fair value of financial instruments, our related measurement techniques and the impact to our financial statements.
Income Taxes
We file income tax returns in the jurisdictions in which we operate and evaluate income tax expense in two components: current and deferred income tax expense. Current income tax expense represents our estimated taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period and includes income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes has a greater than 50% likelihood of realization upon settlement. Tax benefits not meeting our realization criteria represent unrecognized tax benefits.
Deferred income taxes are based on the balance sheet method and deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Under the balance sheet method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and recognizes enacted changes in tax rates and laws in the period in which they occur. Deferred tax assets are recognized subject to management’s judgment that realization is more likely than not. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets to the realizable amount.
The income tax laws of the jurisdictions in which we operate are complex and subject to different interpretations by management and the relevant government taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. We must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions. Our interpretations may be subjected to review during examination by taxing authorities and disputes may arise over the respective tax positions. We attempt to resolve these
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 67 |
Critical Accounting Policies (continued)
disputes during the tax examination and audit process and ultimately through the court systems when applicable.
We monitor relevant tax authorities and revise our estimate of accrued income taxes due to changes in income tax laws and their interpretation by the courts and regulatory authorities on a quarterly basis. Revisions of our estimate of accrued income taxes also may result from our own income tax planning and from the resolution of income tax controversies. Such revisions in our estimates may be material to our operating results for any given quarter.
See Note 23 (Income Taxes) to Financial Statements in this Report for a further description of our provision for income taxes and related income tax assets and liabilities.
Liability for Contingent Litigation Losses
The Company is involved in a number of judicial, regulatory, governmental, arbitration and other proceedings or investigations concerning matters arising from the conduct of its business activities, and many of those proceedings and investigations expose the Company to potential financial loss or other adverse consequences. We establish accruals for legal actions when potential losses associated with the actions become probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For such accruals, we record the amount we consider to be the best estimate within a range of potential losses that are both probable and estimable; however, if we cannot determine a best estimate, then we record the low end of the range of those potential losses. The actual costs of resolving legal actions may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those actions.
We apply judgment when establishing an accrual for potential losses associated with legal actions and in establishing the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the accrual. Our judgment in establishing accruals and the range of reasonably possible losses in excess of the Company’s accrual for probable and estimable losses is influenced by our understanding of information currently available related to the legal evaluation and potential outcome of actions, including input and advice on these matters from our internal counsel, external counsel and senior management. These matters may be in various stages of investigation, discovery or proceedings. They may also involve a wide variety of claims across our businesses, legal entities and jurisdictions. The eventual outcome may be a scenario that was not considered or was considered remote in anticipated occurrence. Accordingly, our estimate of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly.
The outcomes of legal actions are unpredictable and subject to significant uncertainties, and it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible. It is also inherently difficult to estimate the amount of any loss and there may be matters for which a loss is probable or reasonably possible but not currently estimable. Accordingly, actual losses may be in excess of the established accrual or the range of reasonably possible loss.
See Note 15 (Legal Actions) to Financial Statements in this Report for additional information.
Goodwill Impairment
We test goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently as macroeconomic and other business factors warrant. These factors may include trends in short-term or long-term interest rates, negative trends from reduced revenue generating activities or increased costs, adverse actions by
regulators, or company specific factors such as a decline in market capitalization.
We identify reporting units to be assessed for goodwill impairment at the reportable operating segment level or one level below. We calculate reporting unit carrying amounts as allocated capital plus assigned goodwill and other intangible assets. We allocate capital to the reporting units under a risk-sensitive framework driven by our regulatory capital requirements. We estimate fair value of the reporting units based on a balanced weighting of fair values estimated using both an income approach and a market approach and are intended to reflect Company performance and expectations as well as external market conditions. The methodologies for calculating carrying amounts and estimating fair values are periodically assessed by senior management and revised as necessary.
The income approach is a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which estimates the present value of future cash flows associated with each reporting unit. A DCF analysis requires significant judgment to model financial forecasts for our lines of business. Significant assumptions include future expectations of economic conditions and balance sheet changes, and assumptions related to future business activities. The forecasts are reviewed by senior management. For periods after our financial forecasts, we incorporate a terminal value estimate based on an assumed long-term growth rate. We discount these forecasted cash flows using a rate derived from the capital asset pricing model which produces an estimated cost of equity specific to that reporting unit, which reflects risks and uncertainties in the financial markets and in our internally generated business projections.
The market approach utilizes observable market data from comparable publicly traded companies, such as price-to-earnings or price-to-tangible book value ratios, to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value. The results of the market approach include a control premium to represent our expectation of a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Management uses judgment in the selection of comparable companies and includes those with the most similar business activities.
The aggregate fair value of our reporting units exceeded our market capitalization for our fourth quarter 2021 assessment. Factors that we considered in our assessment and contributed to this difference included: (i) an overall premium that would be paid to gain control of the operating and financial decisions of the Company, (ii) synergies that we believe may not be reflected in the price of the Company’s common stock, (iii) a higher degree of complexity and execution risk at the Company level, compared with the individual reporting unit level, and (iv) risks or benefits at the Company level that may not be reflected in the fair value of the individual reporting units.
Based on our fourth quarter 2021 assessment, there was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2021. The fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount by a substantial amount.
Declines in our ability to generate revenue, significant increases in credit losses or other expenses, or adverse actions from regulators are factors that could result in material goodwill impairment in a future period.
For additional information on goodwill and our reportable operating segments, see Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), Note 10 (Intangible Assets), and Note 26 (Operating Segments) to Financial Statements in this Report.
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 68 | Wells Fargo & Company |
Current Accounting Developments
Table 49 provides the significant accounting updates applicable to us that have been issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) but are not yet effective.
Table 49: Current Accounting Developments – Issued Standards
| Description and Effective Date | Financial statement impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASU 2018-12 – Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Long-Duration Contracts and subsequent related updates | ||||
| The Update, effective January 1, 2023, requires market risk benefits (features of insurance contracts that protect the policyholder from other-than-nominal capital market risk and expose the insurer to that risk) to be measured at fair value through earnings with changes in fair value attributable to our own credit risk recognized in other comprehensive income. The Update also requires more frequent updates for insurance assumptions, mandates the use of a standardized discount rate for traditional long-duration contracts, and simplifies the amortization of deferred acquisition costs. | The most significant impact of adoption relates to reinsurance of variable annuity products for a limited number of our insurance clients. Our reinsurance business is no longer entering into new contracts. These variable annuity products contain guaranteed minimum benefits that require us to make benefit payments for the remainder of the policyholder's life once the account values are exhausted. These guaranteed minimum benefits meet the definition of market risk benefits and will be measured at fair value. The cumulative effect of the difference between fair value and the carrying value upon adoption of the Update, net of income tax adjustments and excluding the impact of our own credit risk, will be recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings in the earliest period presented and will affect our regulatory capital calculations. At December 31, 2021, our estimated liability related to these guaranteed minimum benefits was approximately $500 million and was associated with approximately $13.1 billion of policyholder account values. We expect future earnings volatility from changes in the fair value of market risk benefits, which are sensitive to changes in equity and fixed income markets, as well as policyholder behavior and changes in mortality assumptions. We plan to economically hedge the market volatility, where feasible. Changes in the accounting for the liability of future policy benefits for traditional long-duration contracts and deferred acquisition costs are not expected to be material. |
Other Accounting Developments
The following Updates are applicable to us but are not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements:
•ASU 2020-06 – Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity
•ASU 2021-05 – Leases (Topic 842): Lessors – Certain Leases with Variable Lease Payments
•ASU 2021-08 – Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers
•ASU 2021-10 – Government Assistance (Topic 832): Disclosures by Business Entities About Government Assistance
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 69 |
Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements. In addition, we may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “target,” “projects,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “can” and similar references to future periods. In particular, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make about: (i) the future operating or financial performance of the Company, including our outlook for future growth; (ii) our noninterest expense and efficiency ratio; (iii) future credit quality and performance, including our expectations regarding future loan losses, our allowance for credit losses, and the economic scenarios considered to develop the allowance; (iv) our expectations regarding net interest income and net interest margin; (v) loan growth or the reduction or mitigation of risk in our loan portfolios; (vi) future capital or liquidity levels, ratios or targets; (vii) the performance of our mortgage business and any related exposures; (viii) the expected outcome and impact of legal, regulatory and legislative developments, as well as our expectations regarding compliance therewith; (ix) future common stock dividends, common share repurchases and other uses of capital; (x) our targeted range for return on assets, return on equity, and return on tangible common equity; (xi) expectations regarding our effective income tax rate; (xii) the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings; (xiii) environmental, social and governance related goals or commitments; and (xiv) the Company’s plans, objectives and strategies.
Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:
•current and future economic and market conditions, including the effects of declines in housing prices, high unemployment rates, U.S. fiscal debt, budget and tax matters, geopolitical matters, and any slowdown in global economic growth;
•the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic, including on our credit quality and business operations, as well as its impact on general economic and financial market conditions;
•our capital and liquidity requirements (including under regulatory capital standards, such as the Basel III capital standards) and our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
•current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses,
including rules and regulations relating to bank products and financial services;
•developments in our mortgage banking business, including the extent of the success of our mortgage loan modification efforts, the amount of mortgage loan repurchase demands that we receive, any negative effects relating to our mortgage servicing, loan modification or foreclosure practices, and the effects of regulatory or judicial requirements or guidance impacting our mortgage banking business and any changes in industry standards;
•our ability to realize any efficiency ratio or expense target as part of our expense management initiatives, including as a result of business and economic cyclicality, seasonality, changes in our business composition and operating environment, growth in our businesses and/or acquisitions, and unexpected expenses relating to, among other things, litigation and regulatory matters;
•the effect of the current interest rate environment or changes in interest rates or in the level or composition of our assets or liabilities on our net interest income, net interest margin and our mortgage originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgage loans held for sale;
•significant turbulence or a disruption in the capital or financial markets, which could result in, among other things, reduced investor demand for mortgage loans, a reduction in the availability of funding or increased funding costs, and declines in asset values and/or recognition of impairments of securities held in our debt securities and equity securities portfolios;
•the effect of a fall in stock market prices on our investment banking business and our fee income from our brokerage and wealth management businesses;
•negative effects from the retail banking sales practices matter and from other instances where customers may have experienced financial harm, including on our legal, operational and compliance costs, our ability to engage in certain business activities or offer certain products or services, our ability to keep and attract customers, our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, and our reputation;
•resolution of regulatory matters, litigation, or other legal actions, which may result in, among other things, additional costs, fines, penalties, restrictions on our business activities, reputational harm, or other adverse consequences;
•a failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyber attacks;
•the effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs and net interest margin;
•fiscal and monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board;
•changes to U.S. tax guidance and regulations, as well as the effect of discrete items on our effective income tax rate;
•our ability to develop and execute effective business plans and strategies; and
•the other risk factors and uncertainties described under “Risk Factors” in this Report.
In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the amount and timing of any future common stock dividends or repurchases will depend on the earnings, cash requirements and financial condition of the Company, market conditions, capital
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| 70 | Wells Fargo & Company |
requirements (including under Basel capital standards), common stock issuance requirements, applicable law and regulations (including federal securities laws and federal banking regulations), and other factors deemed relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors, and may be subject to regulatory approval or conditions.
For additional information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, refer to our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the discussion under “Risk Factors” in this Report, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available on its website at www.sec.gov.1
Any forward-looking statement made by us speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
1 We do not control this website. Wells Fargo has provided this link for your convenience, but does not endorse and is not responsible for the content, links, privacy policy, or security policy of this website.
Forward-looking Non-GAAP Financial Measures. From time to time management may discuss forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures, such as forward-looking estimates or targets for return on average tangible common equity. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures because we are unable to provide, without unreasonable effort, a meaningful or accurate calculation or estimation of amounts that would be necessary for the reconciliation due to the complexity and inherent difficulty in forecasting and quantifying future amounts or when they may occur. Such unavailable information could be significant to future results.
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo & Company | 71 |