SELECTIVE INSURANCE GROUP INC (SIGI)
SIC breadcrumb: Finance, Insurance, And Real Estate > Insurance Carriers > SIC 6331 Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
SEC company page: https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=230557. Latest filing source: 0000230557-26-000006.
Informational only - descriptive public-record data, not investment advice.
Business
Read SIGI's verbatim Item 1 Business section from its latest 10-K: Business.
Risk Factors
Read SIGI's verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from its latest 10-K: Risk Factors.
Selected Fundamentals
| Metric | Value | Unit | FY | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5,336,928,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-09 |
| Net income | 466,411,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-09 |
| Assets | 15,155,710,000 | USD | 2025 | 2026-02-09 |
Financials
Annual standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-02-09. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000230557.json. Derived margins, ratios, and free cash flow are computed from the extracted annual SEC facts.
| Metric | 2009 | 2010 | 2012 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2,284,270,000 | 2,469,984,000 | 2,586,080,000 | 2,846,491,000 | 2,922,274,000 | 3,379,164,000 | 3,558,062,000 | 4,232,106,000 | 4,861,664,000 | 5,336,928,000 | |||
| Net income | 158,495,000 | 168,826,000 | 178,939,000 | 271,623,000 | 246,355,000 | 403,837,000 | 224,886,000 | 365,238,000 | 207,012,000 | 466,411,000 | |||
| Diluted EPS | 2.70 | 2.84 | 3.00 | 4.53 | 4.09 | 6.50 | 3.54 | 5.84 | 3.23 | 7.49 | |||
| Operating cash flow | 226,699,000 | 379,545,000 | 454,944,000 | 477,495,000 | 554,045,000 | 771,422,000 | 802,409,000 | 758,908,000 | 1,099,888,000 | 1,233,021,000 | |||
| Capital expenditures | 8,207,000 | 6,522,000 | 16,110,000 | 30,986,000 | 22,064,000 | 22,163,000 | 26,019,000 | 22,631,000 | 30,810,000 | 38,742,000 | |||
| Dividends paid | 33,758,000 | 37,045,000 | 42,097,000 | 47,675,000 | 54,486,000 | 60,136,000 | 66,920,000 | 73,827,000 | 84,936,000 | 92,884,000 | |||
| Share buybacks | 4,992,000 | 6,015,000 | 6,556,000 | 8,164,000 | 7,053,000 | 9,050,000 | 18,344,000 | 7,930,000 | 15,620,000 | 92,595,000 | |||
| Assets | 7,355,848,000 | 7,686,431,000 | 7,952,729,000 | 8,797,150,000 | 9,687,913,000 | 10,461,389,000 | 10,802,261,000 | 11,802,546,000 | 13,514,189,000 | 15,155,710,000 | |||
| Liabilities | 5,824,478,000 | 5,973,474,000 | 6,160,927,000 | 6,602,214,000 | 6,949,024,000 | 7,478,504,000 | 8,274,697,000 | 8,848,165,000 | 10,394,113,000 | 11,546,735,000 | |||
| Stockholders' equity | 1,531,370,000 | 1,712,957,000 | 1,791,802,000 | 2,194,936,000 | 2,738,889,000 | 2,982,885,000 | 2,527,564,000 | 2,954,381,000 | 3,120,076,000 | 3,608,975,000 | |||
| Free cash flow | 438,834,000 | 446,509,000 | 531,981,000 | 749,259,000 | 776,390,000 | 736,277,000 | 1,069,078,000 | 1,194,279,000 |
Ratios
| Metric | 2009 | 2010 | 2012 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 6.94% | 6.84% | 6.92% | 9.54% | 8.43% | 11.95% | 6.32% | 8.63% | 4.26% | 8.74% | |||
| Return on equity | 10.35% | 9.86% | 9.99% | 12.37% | 8.99% | 13.54% | 8.90% | 12.36% | 6.63% | 12.92% | |||
| Return on assets | 2.15% | 2.20% | 2.25% | 3.09% | 2.54% | 3.86% | 2.08% | 3.09% | 1.53% | 3.08% | |||
| Liabilities / equity | 3.80 | 3.49 | 3.44 | 3.01 | 2.54 | 2.51 | 3.27 | 2.99 | 3.33 | 3.20 |
Industry Peer Context
Net margin peer context
ROE peer context
ROA peer context
Financial Bridges
Free cash flow = operating cash flow - capital expenditures
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts FY 2025. Operating cash flow: accession 0000230557-26-000006; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities | Capital expenditures: accession 0000230557-26-000006; concept PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment | Free cash flow: accession 0000230557-26-000006; concept NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment; source concepts us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
Financial Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsOfDividendsCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock. Source concepts: us-gaap:PaymentsForRepurchaseOfCommonStock.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: Assets. Source concepts: us-gaap:Assets.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: Liabilities. Source concepts: us-gaap:Liabilities.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: StockholdersEquity. Source concepts: us-gaap:StockholdersEquity.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2025 ended 2025-12-31; accession 0000230557-26-000006; filed 2026-02-09. Concept: NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities - PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities; us-gaap:PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment.
Quarterly
Quarterly standardized facts from SEC companyfacts as of latest extracted filing date 2026-07-24. Source: https://data.sec.gov/api/xbrl/companyfacts/CIK0000230557.json.
| Quarter | End Date | Revenue | Net Income | Diluted EPS | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-Q3 | 2022-09-30 | 0.66 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q1 | 2023-03-31 | 1.48 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q2 | 2023-06-30 | 0.92 | reported discrete quarter | ||
| 2023-Q3 | 2023-09-30 | 1,081,081,000 | 89,208,000 | 1.42 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2023-Q4 | 2023-12-31 | 1,110,681,000 | 124,848,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2024-Q1 | 2024-03-31 | 1,164,959,000 | 82,518,000 | 1.31 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q2 | 2024-06-30 | 1,196,005,000 | -63,319,000 | -1.08 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q3 | 2024-09-30 | 1,244,306,000 | 92,278,000 | 1.47 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2024-Q4 | 2024-12-31 | 1,256,394,000 | 95,535,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2025-Q1 | 2025-03-31 | 1,285,186,000 | 109,896,000 | 1.76 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q2 | 2025-06-30 | 1,326,745,000 | 85,943,000 | 1.36 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q3 | 2025-09-30 | 1,360,110,000 | 115,340,000 | 1.85 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2025-Q4 | 2025-12-31 | 1,364,887,000 | 155,232,000 | derived Q4 = FY annual - nine-month YTD | |
| 2026-Q1 | 2026-03-31 | 1,358,925,000 | 97,676,000 | 1.58 | reported discrete quarter |
| 2026-Q2 | 2026-06-30 | 1,387,035,000 | 129,385,000 | 2.11 | reported discrete quarter |
Quarterly Charts
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0000230557-26-000020; filed 2026-07-24. Concept: Revenues. Source concepts: us-gaap:Revenues.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0000230557-26-000020; filed 2026-07-24. Concept: NetIncomeLoss. Source concepts: us-gaap:NetIncomeLoss.
Figure provenance: SEC companyfacts. Latest point: FY 2026 ended 2026-06-30; accession 0000230557-26-000020; filed 2026-07-24. Concept: EarningsPerShareDiluted. Source concepts: us-gaap:EarningsPerShareDiluted.
Macro Cross-References
- CPIAUCSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items in U.S. City Average
- UNRATE - Unemployment Rate
- FEDFUNDS - Federal Funds Effective Rate
- CES0500000003 - Average Hourly Earnings of All Employees, Total Private
- DFEDTARU - Federal Funds Target Range - Upper Limit
- DFEDTARL - Federal Funds Target Range - Lower Limit
- DGS3MO - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 3-Month Constant Maturity
- DGS2 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 2-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS10 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 10-Year Constant Maturity
- DGS30 - Market Yield on U.S. Treasury Securities at 30-Year Constant Maturity
- T10Y2Y - 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Minus 2-Year Treasury Constant Maturity
- CPILFESL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items Less Food and Energy
- CPIUFDSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Food
- CPIENGSL - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Energy
- CUSR0000SAH1 - Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Shelter
- PCEPI - Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index
- PCEPILFE - Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: Chain-type Price Index
- PPIACO - Producer Price Index by Commodity: All Commodities
- T10YIE - 10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate
- U6RATE - Total Unemployed, Plus All Marginally Attached Workers Plus Total Employed Part Time for Economic Reasons
- PAYEMS - All Employees, Total Nonfarm
- CIVPART - Labor Force Participation Rate
- EMRATIO - Employment-Population Ratio
- UNEMPLOY - Unemployed
- CE16OV - Employment Level
- ICSA - Initial Claims
- JTSJOL - Job Openings: Total Nonfarm
- JTSQUR - Quits: Total Nonfarm
- GDPC1 - Real Gross Domestic Product
- A191RL1Q225SBEA - Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change from Preceding Period
- INDPRO - Industrial Production: Total Index
- TCU - Capacity Utilization: Total Index
- HOUST - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units
- PERMIT - New Privately-Owned Housing Units Authorized in Permit-Issuing Places: Total Units
- RSAFS - Advance Retail Sales: Retail Trade
- PCE - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- DSPIC96 - Real Disposable Personal Income
- PSAVERT - Personal Saving Rate
- M2SL - M2
- BOPGSTB - U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services: Balance
- MSPUS - Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States
- HSN1F - New One Family Houses Sold: United States
- RHORUSQ156N - Homeownership Rate in the United States
- TTLCONS - Total Construction Spending: Total Construction in the United States
- RRVRUSQ156N - Rental Vacancy Rate in the United States
- TOTALSL - Total Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- REVOLSL - Revolving Consumer Credit Owned and Securitized
- DRCCLACBS - Delinquency Rate on Credit Card Loans, All Commercial Banks
- GDP - Gross Domestic Product
- GPDI - Gross Private Domestic Investment
- GCE - Government Consumption Expenditures and Gross Investment
- PCEC - Personal Consumption Expenditures
- NETEXP - Net Exports of Goods and Services
- GFDEBTN - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt
- GFDEGDQ188S - Federal Debt: Total Public Debt as Percent of Gross Domestic Product
- FYFSD - Federal Surplus or Deficit
- FGRECPT - Federal Government Current Receipts
- FGEXPND - Federal Government: Current Expenditures
- MANEMP - All Employees, Manufacturing
- USCONS - All Employees, Construction
- USTRADE - All Employees, Retail Trade
- USFIRE - All Employees, Financial Activities
- USGOVT - All Employees, Government
- AWHAETP - Average Weekly Hours of All Employees, Total Private
- DGORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Durable Goods
- NEWORDER - Manufacturers' New Orders: Nondefense Capital Goods Excluding Aircraft
- BUSINV - Total Business Inventories
- EXPGS - Exports of Goods and Services
- IMPGS - Imports of Goods and Services
- IR - Import Price Index (End Use): All Commodities
- PPIFIS - Producer Price Index by Commodity: Final Demand
Latest quarter (10-Q)
Latest 10-Q source: 0000230557-26-000020.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward-Looking Statements
The terms “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Parent”) and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires. Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward‑looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). The PSLRA provides a safe harbor for forward‑looking statements under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward‑looking statements include our expectations, intentions, beliefs, projections, estimates, or forecasts regarding future events or financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, activity levels, or performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward‑looking statements. In some cases, forward‑looking statements may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “predict,” “potential,” “pro forma,” “seek,” “target,” “continue,” or similar terms.
Forward‑looking statements are predictions only, and we cannot guarantee that the expectations expressed in such statements will prove correct. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward‑looking statements, except as required by law.
We discuss factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward‑looking statements in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of this Form 10‑Q. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge at any time. We cannot predict these new factors, their potential impact on our business, or the extent to which any factor – or combination of factors – may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward‑looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward‑looking events discussed in this report may not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For additional information about these segments, refer to Note 9. "Segment Information" in Item 1. "Financial Statements." of this Form 10-Q and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025 ("2025 Annual Report").
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program. We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, a nationally authorized non-admitted carrier for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
The following is Management’s Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of our financial condition and consolidated results of operations, including an evaluation of the amounts and certainty of cash flows from operations and outside sources, trends, and uncertainties that may have a material impact in future periods. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 1. "Financial Statements." of this Form 10-Q and the consolidated financial statements in our 2025 Annual Report filed with the United States ("U.S.") Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the MD&A, we discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for the second quarters ended June 30, 2026 ("Second Quarter 2026") and June 30, 2025 ("Second Quarter 2025"); and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2026 ("Six Months 2026") and June 30, 2025 ("Six Months 2025")
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes;
•Liquidity and Capital Resources; and
•Ratings.
28
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include amounts for which we have made informed estimates and judgments for transactions not yet completed. These estimates and judgments affect the reported amounts in our consolidated financial statements. Our 2025 Annual Report outlines the estimates and judgments most critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements: (i) reserve for loss and loss expense; (ii) investment valuation and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities; and (iii) reinsurance. These estimates and judgments require our use of assumptions about highly uncertain matters that could change as facts and circumstances develop. Different estimates or judgments could result in materially different reported amounts. For additional information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to pages 38 through 45 of our 2025 Annual Report.
Financial Highlights of Results for Second Quarter and Six Months 2026 and Second Quarter and Six Months 20251
| Quarter ended June 30, | Change % or Points | Six Months ended June 30, | Change % or Points | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 1,387,035 | 1,326,745 | 5 | % | $ | 2,745,960 | 2,611,931 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 119,206 | 101,421 | 18 | 232,271 | 197,042 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income (loss) | 19,267 | (1,914) | (1,107) | 36,051 | 34,139 | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before federal income tax | 162,845 | 108,905 | 50 | 287,047 | 247,791 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 129,385 | 85,943 | 51 | 227,061 | 195,839 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | 127,085 | 83,643 | 52 | 222,461 | 191,239 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 98.0 | % | 100.2 | (2.2) | pts | 98.1 | % | 98.2 | (0.1) | pts | |||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 3.34 | 3.33 | — | % | $ | 3.34 | 3.33 | — | % | |||||||||||||
| Annualized after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 4.2 | % | 3.9 | 0.3 | pts | 4.1 | % | 3.9 | 0.2 | pts | |||||||||||||
| Return on common equity ("ROE") | 14.8 | 10.7 | 4.1 | 13.0 | 12.5 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written ("NPW") to statutory surplus | $ | 1.30 | 1.45 | (10) | % | $ | 1.30 | 1.45 | (10) | % | |||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 2.11 | 1.36 | 55 | % | $ | 3.69 | 3.12 | 18 | % | |||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 58.13 | 52.09 | 12 | 58.13 | 52.09 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 0.43 | 0.38 | 13 | 0.86 | 0.76 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss)2 | $ | 117,629 | 80,348 | 46 | % | $ | 219,562 | 187,762 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share2 | 1.95 | 1.31 | 49 | 3.64 | 3.06 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE2 | 13.7 | % | 10.3 | 3.4 | pts | 12.8 | % | 12.3 | 0.5 | pts | |||||||||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share2 | $ | 60.56 | 54.48 | 11 | % | $ | 60.56 | 54.48 | 11 | % |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to our 2025 Annual Report as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this Form 10-Q.
2Non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are comparable to net income (loss) available to common stockholders, net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after-tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments included in net income (loss). Adjusted book value per common share is comparable to book value per common share, but excludes total after-tax unrealized gains and losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These non-GAAP measures are important financial measures used by us, analysts, and investors because the timing of realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments could distort the analysis of trends.
The tables below provide reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures:
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income (loss) | Quarter ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | $ | 127,085 | 83,643 | $ | 222,461 | 191,239 | |||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | (11,971) | (4,172) | (3,670) | (4,401) | |||||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 2,515 | 877 | 771 | 924 | |||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) | $ | 117,629 | 80,348 | $ | 219,562 | 187,762 |
29
Table of Contents
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | Quarter ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 2.11 | 1.36 | $ | 3.69 | 3.12 | |||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | (0.20) | (0.07) | (0.06) | (0.07) | |||||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | $ | 1.95 | 1.31 | $ | 3.64 | 3.06 |
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | Quarter ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | ||||||||
| ROE | 14.8 | % | 10.7 | 13.0 | % | 12.5 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | (1.4) | (0.5) | (0.2) | (0.3) | |||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.3 | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | |||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 13.7 | % | 10.3 | 12.8 | % | 12.3 |
[[GREPCENT_TABLE]]
[["Reconciliation of book value per common share to adjusted book value per common share","","Quarter ended June 30,","","Six Months ended June 30,"],["","2026","","2025","","2026","","2025"],["Book value per common share","","$","58.13","","","52.09","","","$","58.13","","","52.09"],["Total unrealized investment (gains) losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax","","
[Excerpt truncated for page length; source filing is linked above.]
Latest 10-K MD&A
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The terms "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Parent") and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires. Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"). The PSLRA provides a forward-looking statement safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements discuss our intentions, beliefs, projections, estimations, or forecasts of future events and financial performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, activity levels, or performance to materially differ from those in or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements include the words "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "attribute," "confident," "strong," "target," "project," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "pro forma," "seek," "likely," "continue," or comparable terms. Our forward-looking statements are only predictions; we cannot guarantee or assure that such expectations will prove correct. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason except as required by law.
We discuss the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our projections, forecasts, or estimates in forward-looking statements in Item 1A. "Risk Factors." of this Form 10-K. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a constantly changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge at any time. We cannot predict these new risk factors, their impact on our businesses, or the extent to which one or any combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events we discuss might not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For more details about these segments, refer to Note 1. "Organization" and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program ("WYO"). We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance
37
Table of Contents
Company ("MUSIC"), a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of our financial condition and consolidated results of operations, including an evaluation of the amounts and certainty of cash flows from operations and outside sources, trends, and uncertainties that may have a material impact in future periods. The MD&A discusses and analyzes our 2025 results compared to 2024. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K. For discussion and analysis of our 2024 results compared to 2023, refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
In the MD&A, we will discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023;
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes; and
•Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations. We consider the policies and estimates most critical to the preparation of the Financial Statements to be (i) reserve for loss and loss expense, (ii) investment valuation and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities, and (iii) reinsurance.
Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense
Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of a claim to us, and the final claim settlement and payment. Insurers establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities to recognize liabilities for unpaid loss and loss expenses. The following tables provide case and incurred but not reported ("IBNR") reserves for loss and loss expenses and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss expense as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
| December 31, 2025 | Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 618,665 | 2,783,596 | 3,402,261 | 469,609 | 2,932,652 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 340,853 | 667,339 | 1,008,192 | 266,962 | 741,230 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 418,910 | 948,077 | 1,366,987 | 17,691 | 1,349,296 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 43,463 | 87,261 | 130,724 | 1,736 | 128,988 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 103,545 | 61,365 | 164,910 | 24,448 | 140,462 | ||||||||||
| Other | 6,554 | 10,169 | 16,723 | 2,255 | 14,468 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,531,990 | 4,557,807 | 6,089,797 | 782,701 | 5,307,096 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 77,557 | 131,980 | 209,537 | 32,766 | 176,771 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 20,387 | 39,795 | 60,182 | 490 | 59,692 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 12,596 | 41,546 | 54,142 | 38,719 | 15,423 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 110,540 | 213,321 | 323,861 | 71,975 | 251,886 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 132,171 | 645,966 | 778,137 | 23,015 | 755,122 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 14,944 | 18,659 | 33,603 | 152 | 33,451 | ||||||||||
| Total E&S Lines | 147,115 | 664,625 | 811,740 | 23,167 | 788,573 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,789,645 | 5,435,753 | 7,225,398 | 877,843 | 6,347,555 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure related to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our WYO flood losses.
2Includes general liability (97% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages 3% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (94% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages 6% of net reserves).
38
Table of Contents
| December 31, 2024 | Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 515,057 | 2,391,162 | 2,906,219 | 396,702 | 2,509,517 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 347,555 | 688,323 | 1,035,878 | 238,995 | 796,883 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 343,969 | 764,709 | 1,108,678 | 14,774 | 1,093,904 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 46,076 | 78,048 | 124,124 | 2,604 | 121,520 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 119,858 | 71,223 | 191,081 | 36,313 | 154,768 | ||||||||||
| Other | 6,497 | 15,729 | 22,226 | 2,612 | 19,614 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,379,012 | 4,009,194 | 5,388,206 | 692,000 | 4,696,206 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 75,461 | 118,355 | 193,816 | 35,386 | 158,430 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 19,593 | 37,851 | 57,444 | 1,962 | 55,482 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 240,704 | 49,484 | 290,188 | 273,013 | 17,175 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 335,758 | 205,690 | 541,448 | 310,361 | 231,087 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 106,178 | 530,099 | 636,277 | 18,903 | 617,374 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 12,030 | 11,840 | 23,870 | 981 | 22,889 | ||||||||||
| E&S Lines | 118,208 | 541,939 | 660,147 | 19,884 | 640,263 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,832,978 | 4,756,823 | 6,589,801 | 1,022,245 | 5,567,556 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure relates to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (97% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (3% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (93% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (7% of net reserves).
The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was approximately 3.0 years at both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
How the reserve is established
Reserve for loss and loss expense includes case reserves on reported claims and IBNR reserves. Case reserves are estimated for each individual claim based on facts and circumstances known at the time. Case reserves may be adjusted up or down as the claim's specific facts and circumstances change. IBNR reserves are established at more aggregated levels and include provisions for (i) claims not yet reported, (ii) future development on reported claims, (iii) closed claims that could reopen in the future, and (iv) anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries.
We conduct quarterly internal reserve reviews using our own loss experience, considering various internal and external factors. Changes in claim dynamics can inherently alter paid and reported development patterns. Although our reserve analysis selections aim to account for these impacts, estimated reserves involve greater risk of variability.
In addition to our internal reserve reviews, an external consulting actuary performs an independent semiannual reserve review. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's report to determine our recorded reserves, but we review and discuss our observations on trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies with our consulting actuary. Our independent consulting actuary issues the annual statutory Statements of Actuarial Opinion for our Insurance Subsidiaries.
For additional information on our accounting policy for reserve for loss and loss expense, refer to Note. 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Range of Reasonable Reserve Estimates
We have estimated a range of reasonable reserve estimates for net loss and loss expense of $5,694 million to $6,960 million at December 31, 2025. This range reflects low and high reasonable reserve estimates determined after using judgment to adjust the methods, factors, and assumptions selected within the internal reserve review. This approach produces a range of reasonable reserve estimates but does not represent a distribution of all possible outcomes. Consequently, final outcomes may be greater or less than the estimates.
The range of reasonable reserve estimates increased as of December 31, 2025, relative to December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily related to reserve growth commensurate with our net premiums earned ("NPE") growth.
39
Table of Contents
Changes in Reserve Estimates (Loss Development)
Our quarterly reserving process may lead to changes in the recorded reserves for prior accident years, referred to as favorable or unfavorable prior year loss and loss expense development. In 2025, we experienced net unfavorable prior year loss development of $77.5 million, compared to net unfavorable development of $285.3 million in 2024 and net unfavorable development of $10.0 million in 2023. The following table summarizes prior year development by line of business:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Loss and Loss Expense Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | 40.0 | 316.0 | 55.0 | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 120.4 | 19.5 | 8.0 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (90.0) | (45.0) | (74.5) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | (2.1) | (1.7) | 7.6 | ||||||
| Commercial property | (11.8) | (23.4) | 0.7 | ||||||
| Bonds | (7.5) | (5.0) | — | ||||||
| Homeowners | 5.0 | (1.4) | 4.6 | ||||||
| Personal automobile | 13.0 | 11.1 | 15.3 | ||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10.0 | 20.0 | (5.0) | ||||||
| E&S property lines | 0.5 | (4.9) | (1.6) | ||||||
| Other | — | 0.1 | (0.1) | ||||||
| Total | $ | 77.5 | 285.3 | 10.0 |
A detailed discussion of recent reserve development by line of business follows.
Standard Market General Liability Line of Business
At December 31, 2025, our general liability line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $2.9 billion, representing 46% of our total net reserves. In 2025, this line experienced unfavorable reserve development of $40.0 million, primarily due to the impact of social inflation that increased loss severities in accident years 2022 and 2023. We attribute the increased severities to elevated social inflation, which we view as an industry dynamic characterized by higher claimant propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. Similarly, this line experienced unfavorable development in 2024 of $316.0 million, attributable to the impact of social inflation driving increased loss severities in accident years 2020 through 2023.
The general liability line of business presents a diverse set of exposures. Various factors influence losses and loss trends, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, and economic and social inflation. Economic inflation directly impacts our claims severities by increasing the costs of raw materials, medical procedures, and labor. Social inflation may impact both claim frequency and severity by affecting (i) claimant propensity to file a claim, (ii) the percentage of claimants who engage lawyers, and (iii) broader liability interpretations and the nature and amounts of judicial verdicts and associated awards, all influencing future settlement values. We monitor claim litigation rates regularly. We have observed the percentage of general liability claims with plaintiff attorney involvement increasing in recent periods. Other social inflationary factors, including the increased prevalence of third-party litigation funding, claimants' willingness to undergo surgery, evolving plaintiff attorney strategies and tactics, and broadening liability definitions and interpretations, are also impacting claims severities.
We have exposure to abuse or molestation claims, mainly through policies that we (i) underwrite through our Community and Public Services ("CAPS") strategic business unit and (ii) issue to schools, religious institutions, child-care facilities, and other social services. These CAPS business unit customers represented approximately 10% of our total Standard Commercial Lines net premiums written ("NPW") in 2025 and 2024. We continue to actively manage policy limits and monitor each jurisdiction's statute of limitations to ensure our rate level reflects increased exposure wherever regulations allow. We also engage our risk management specialists, many of whom are Certified Praesidium Guardians, to understand our insureds' screening, training, and monitoring policies and collaborate with them to improve their risk prevention in these areas. These underwriting and pricing actions have positioned the portfolio for future profitability but limited our CAPS growth in recent years.
Certain states have enacted state laws that extend the statute of limitations or permit windows for abuse or molestation claims and lawsuits that statutes of limitations previously barred. Consequently, we have received claims decades after the alleged acts involving complex claims coverage determinations, potential litigation, higher defense costs, and the need to collect from reinsurers under older reinsurance agreements. Our claims and actuarial departments actively monitor these claims to identify changes in frequency or severity and any emerging or shifting trends.
40
Table of Contents
Our active monitoring of claim patterns and emerging or shifting trends helps us better understand this rapidly evolving exposure. However, the ultimate impact of social, political, and legal trends remains highly uncertain and could substantially impact the ultimate settlement values for these claims.
In addition, we have continued to implement underwriting changes in this line of business that we believe will lead to improved profitability. These changes may impact portfolio composition and may affect paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Standard Market Commercial Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2025, our commercial automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $1.3 billion, representing 21% of our total net reserves. In 2025, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $120.4 million, driven by increased severities for accident years 2022 through 2024, with 2024 being the primary driver. In 2024, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $19.5 million, driven by increased loss expenses in accident year 2023.
The commercial automobile line has experienced unfavorable trends in recent years that have negatively affected the industry's results and ours. These unfavorable trends are a result of risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence, which have reduced in frequency but resulted in significant severity increases. Risky driving behaviors and the impacts of social inflation continue to pressure this line's claim severities. As of year-end 2025, frequencies remained somewhat below pre-pandemic levels due to changes in commuting patterns.
Over the last several years, we have implemented underwriting changes in this line of business that we believe will lead to improved profitability. These changes may impact portfolio composition and may affect paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Standard Market Workers Compensation Line of Business
At December 31, 2025, our workers compensation line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $741 million, representing 12% of our total net reserves. During 2025, this line experienced favorable reserve development of $90.0 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2022 and prior. Similarly, this line experienced favorable reserve development during 2024 of $45.0 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2022 and prior. During both 2025 and 2024, the lower-than-expected loss emergence was partly due to (i) lower than initially anticipated medical inflation and (ii) our various implemented claims initiatives. Because injured workers can receive related medical treatment for an extended time, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development over an extended number of accident years.
A variety of issues can impact the workers compensation line of business, including:
•Unexpected changes in medical cost inflation – The industry has experienced an extended period of lower medical claim cost inflation. Changes to our historical workers compensation medical costs and potential changes in future medical inflation could increase reserve variability;
•Changes in statutory workers compensation benefits – Statutory benefit changes may affect all outstanding claims, including past and not-yet-settled claims. Depending on the social and political climate, these changes may either increase or decrease associated claim costs; and
•Changes in utilization of the workers compensation system – These changes may be driven by economic, legislative, or other changes, like increased use of prescriptions for pharmaceuticals, more complex medical procedures, changes in permanently injured workers' life expectancy, and health insurance availability. Industry analysis has indicated recent increases in workers compensation system utilization.
Standard Market Personal Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2025, our personal automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $177 million, representing 3% of our total net reserves. This line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $13.0 million in 2025, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident year 2024 concentrated in New Jersey. This line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $11.1 million in 2024, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2022 through 2023.
41
Table of Contents
We view increased vehicle repair cost trends as the likely causes of rising severities, exacerbated by riskier driving behaviors, including distracted driving. We continuously recalibrate our predictive models and refining our underwriting and pricing approaches. This includes prioritizing additional rate filings by state and further refining our pricing factors.
The rate increases we filed began to take effect early in 2023, and their volume and magnitude increased throughout 2024, remaining strong in 2025, though slightly lower than 2024. We expect these rates to continue outpacing loss trends in 2026, but at lower levels than those seen in 2024 and 2025. While we believe these underwriting and pricing changes will ultimately lead to improved profitability and greater stability, they may also alter our exposure profile. This could impact the patterns of paid and reported claims development, leading to increased reserve uncertainty in the near term.
E&S Casualty Lines of Business
At December 31, 2025, our E&S casualty lines of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $755 million, representing 12% of our total net reserves. In 2025, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $10.0 million, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2020 through 2023. In 2024, this line experienced unfavorable prior-year reserve development of $20.0 million, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2023 and prior.
Some of the risk factors for the general liability line also affect the E&S casualty lines. These include (i) economic inflation, such as materials and labor costs and (ii) social inflationary trends, such as increased attorney involvement, broader liability findings, and more generous settlement awards. In response to these social inflationary trends, we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates.
The E&S marketplace naturally leads to shifts in portfolio mix over time. These changes in business mix may affect paid and reported development patterns. Our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, but our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Other impacts that create additional loss and loss expense reserve uncertainty
Claims Initiative Impacts
Our Claims Department continually identifies areas for improvement and efficiency to increase our policyholder value proposition. These improvements may lead to changes in claims practice that affect average case reserve levels and claims settlement rates, which directly impact the data we use to project ultimate loss and loss expense. While these changes may increase uncertainty in our estimates in the short term, we expect refined claims process management to create longer-term benefits.
Our internal reserve analyses incorporate actuarial projection methods that make adjustments for changes in case reserve adequacy and claims settlement rates. These methods adjust our historical loss experience to the current case adequacy or settlement rate level, providing a more consistent basis for projecting future development patterns. Because these projection methods have their own assumptions and judgments, no single method can be considered definitive.
Unanticipated Changes in Economic Inflation
United States ("U.S.") fiscal and monetary policy and global economic conditions bring additional inflationary trend uncertainty. Changes in inflation affect the ultimate settlement costs for many of our lines of business, with the most significant reserve impact on the longer-tailed lines, such as general liability and workers compensation. Uncertainty about future inflation or deflation creates the potential for additional reserve variability in these lines of business.
Sensitivity analysis: Potential impact on reserve estimates due to changes in key assumptions
Our process to establish reserves includes a variety of key assumptions, such as:
•The selection of loss and loss expense development factors;
•The weight applied to each individual actuarial projection method;
•Projected future loss trends; and
•Expected claim frequencies, severities, and ultimate loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year.
The importance of any single assumption depends on several considerations, such as line of business and accident year. If the actual experience emerges differently than the assumptions underlying the reserve process, possible changes in our reserve estimates could be material to the results of operations in future periods. We conduct sensitivity tests that highlight potential impacts to loss and loss expense reserves for the major casualty lines of business under different scenarios. These tests consider each assumption and line of business individually, without considering the correlation between lines of business and accident years. The results (i) do not constitute an actuarial range, (ii) show possible impacts from variations in certain key assumptions,
42
Table of Contents
and (iii) offer no assurance that future loss and loss expense emergence will be consistent with our current or alternative assumptions.
Changes in internal and external trends and operational changes may manifest as changes in loss and loss expense development patterns. These patterns are a key assumption in the reserving process, as are the current accident year expected loss and loss expense ratios. These ratios are developed through a rigorous process of projecting recent accident years' experience to an ultimate settlement basis. They are then adjusted to the current accident year's pricing and loss cost levels. The impact of changes to underwriting portfolio and claims handling practices is estimated and reflected where appropriate. Nonetheless, the ultimate loss and loss expense ratios may differ from current estimates.
The two tables below illustrate the sensitivities of loss and loss expense reserves to these key assumptions for the major casualty lines. The first table displays estimated impacts from changes in expected reported loss and loss expense development patterns for our major casualty lines of business. It shows line of business reserve impacts if the actual calendar year incurred amounts are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages. While judgmental, the selected percentages by line are based on the reserve range analysis and the actual historical reserve development for the line of business. The second table displays the estimated impacts of changes to the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year. It shows reserve impacts by line of business if the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages.
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Expected Loss and Loss Expense Reporting Patterns | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Future Calendar Year Reported | Increase to Future Calendar Year Reported | ||||||||
| General liability | 15 | % | $ | (500) | $ | 500 | |||||
| Workers compensation | 20 | (100) | 100 | ||||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (135) | 135 | ||||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (20) | 20 | ||||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (85) | 85 |
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Current Accident Year Expected Ultimate Loss and Loss Expense Ratios | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | Increase to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | |||||||
| General liability | 10 | pts | $ | (125) | $ | 125 | ||||
| Workers compensation | 10 | (30) | 30 | |||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 15 | (120) | 120 | |||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (20) | 20 | |||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 15 | (55) | 55 |
There is some overlap between the impacts shown in the tables. For example, increases in the calendar year development would ultimately impact our view of the current accident year's loss and loss expense ratios. However, these tables provide perspective on the sensitivity of each key assumption. While the changes represent outcomes based on reasonably likely changes to our underlying reserving assumptions, they do not represent a range of possible outcomes and our reserves could increase or decrease significantly differently.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
Our general liability, businessowners' policies, and homeowners reserves include exposure to asbestos and environmental claims. The emergence of these claims occurs over an extended period and can be unpredictable. The total recorded net loss and loss expense reserves for these claims were $27.6 million as of December 31, 2025, and $27.4 million as of December 31, 2024, with asbestos claims constituting approximately 41% of these reserves in 2025 and 44% in 2024.
Environmental claims have arisen from Standard Commercial Lines policies issued to municipal governments and small non-manufacturing commercial customers for landfill exposures, and Standard Personal Lines homeowners policies related to leaking underground storage tanks. Asbestos claims have generally arisen from Standard Commercial Lines policies issued to (i) various distributors of asbestos-containing products, such as electrical and plumbing materials and (ii) contractors exposed to or handling asbestos-containing products, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractors. These claims are handled by a centralized and specialized asbestos and environmental claim unit that establishes case reserves based on each claim's then-known facts and circumstances, which IBNR reserves supplement.
Estimating IBNR reserves for asbestos and environmental claims is difficult because these claims have delayed and inconsistent reporting patterns. Significant uncertainties are associated with estimating critical reserve assumptions, such as average clean-
43
Table of Contents
up costs, third-party costs, potentially responsible party shares, allocation of damages, litigation and coverage costs, and potential state and federal legislative changes.
Other Latent Exposures
We have other latent and continuous trigger exposures in our ongoing portfolio. Examples include claims for construction defect and abuse or molestation, including in states that have increased and expanded the statute of limitations. We manage our exposure to these liabilities through our underwriting and claims practices, which include dedicated claim units, like we do for asbestos and environmental claims. The impact of social, political, and legal trends on these claims remains highly uncertain, so the development and adequacy of our related loss and loss expense reserves remain highly uncertain. Some of these exposures remain in our ongoing portfolio and are reserved in aggregate, with other exposures within the line of business reserves. We remove other unusual and highly uncertain exposures, like toxic product claims involving diacetyl, lead paint, and silica, from our traditional reserve analysis and undertake a separate review for them.
Investment Valuation and the Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
Investment Valuation
Accounting guidance defines the fair value of our investment portfolio as the exit price or amount that would be (i) received to sell an asset or (ii) paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When determining an exit price, we must rely on observable market data, if available. Most securities in our equity portfolio have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized gains or losses recognized through income. Our AFS fixed income securities portfolio is recorded at fair value, and the related unrealized gains or losses are reflected in stockholders' equity, net of tax. For our AFS fixed income securities portfolios, fair value is a key factor in the measurement of (i) losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell and (ii) changes in the allowance for credit losses.
Approximately 88% of our investments measured at fair value are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and are priced using observable inputs for identical or similar assets. About 12% are classified as either (i) Level 3 and are based on unobservable market inputs because the related securities are not traded on a public market or (ii) not leveled because the related securities are measured at fair value using net asset value per share (or its practical expedient). For additional information, refer to the following sections within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K: (i) item (d) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for descriptions of the levels within the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques used for our Level 3 securities and (ii) Note 7. "Fair Value Measurements" for quantitative information on the unobservable inputs in our securities measured using Level 3 inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
When we do not intend to sell fixed income securities in an unrealized loss position, we record an allowance for credit losses for the portion of the unrealized loss related to an expected credit loss. We estimate expected credit losses on these securities by performing a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow ("DCF"). The allowance for credit losses is the excess of amortized cost over the greater of (i) our estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows or (ii) fair value. The allowance for credit losses cannot exceed the unrealized loss, and therefore it may fluctuate with changes in the security's fair value. We also consider the need to record losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for which we have the intent to sell. If we determine that we have the intent or likely requirement to sell the security, we write down its amortized cost to its fair value.
We analyze unrealized losses for credit loss in accordance with our existing accounting policy, which includes performing DCF analyses at the lot level and analyzing the resulting DCFs using various economic scenarios. In performing these DCF analyses, we calculate the present value of future cash flows using various models specific to the major security types in our portfolio. These models use security-specific information and forecasted macroeconomic data to determine possible expected credit loss scenarios based on projected economic changes. The forecasted economic data incorporated into the models is based on the Federal Reserve Board’s annual supervisory stress test review of certain large banks and financial institutions.
We also can incorporate internally-developed forecast information into the models as we deem appropriate. In developing our best estimate of the allowance for credit losses, we consider our outlook for the probability of the various scenarios.
Based on these analyses, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio of $31.3 million at December 31, 2025, and $31.9 million at December 31, 2024. If the security-specific and macroeconomic assumptions in our DCF analyses or our outlook on the occurrence probability of our DCF model scenarios were to change, our allowance for credit losses and the resulting credit loss expense or benefit would negatively or positively impact our results of operations. Factors considered in determining the allowance for credit losses require significant judgment, including our evaluation of the security's projected cash flow stream.
44
Table of Contents
For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses on AFS fixed income securities, see item (c) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and item (i) of Note 5. "Investments" within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, respectively.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss expense represent our estimates of the amounts we will recover from reinsurers. Each reinsurance contract is analyzed to ensure sufficient risk is transferred to record the transactions appropriately as reinsurance in the Financial Statements. Amounts recovered from reinsurers are recognized as assets contemporaneously and in a manner consistent with the paid and unpaid losses associated with the underlying policies. An allowance for credit losses on our reinsurance recoverable balance is recorded based on an evaluation of balances due from reinsurers and other available information, including collateral we hold under the terms and conditions of the underlying agreements. Reinsurers often purchase and rely on their retrocessional reinsurance programs to manage their capital positions and improve their financial strength ratings. Details about retrocessional reinsurance programs are not always transparent, making it difficult to assess our reinsurers' exposure to counterparty credit risk. Other factors impact our reinsurer's credit quality, such as their reserve adequacy, investment portfolio, regulatory capital position, catastrophe aggregations, and risk management practices. In addition, contractual language interpretations and willingness to pay valid claims can impact our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance. Our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance was $2.0 million at both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. We continually monitor developments that may impact recoverability from our reinsurers, for which we have contractual remedies, if necessary. For further information regarding reinsurance, see the "Reinsurance" section below in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" and Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
45
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 20231
| 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2025 | 2024 | vs. 2024 | 2023 | vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 5,336,928 | 4,861,664 | 10 | % | $ | 4,232,106 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 421,164 | 362,616 | 16 | 309,535 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income (loss) | 107,352 | (104,745) | (202) | 104,911 | (200) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before income tax | 589,597 | 258,034 | 128 | 458,412 | (44) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 466,411 | 207,012 | 125 | 365,238 | (43) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | 457,211 | 197,812 | 131 | 356,038 | (44) | ||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 97.2 | % | 103.0 | (5.8) | pts | 96.5 | % | 6.5 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 3.32 | 3.31 | — | % | $ | 3.16 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Annualized after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | — | pts | 3.7 | % | 0.3 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Return on common equity ("ROE") | 14.4 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 14.3 | (7.3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio | $ | 1.36 | 1.60 | (15) | % | $ | 1.51 | 6 | % | ||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 7.49 | 3.23 | 132 | % | $ | 5.84 | (45) | % | ||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 56.74 | 47.99 | 18 | 45.42 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 1.57 | 1.43 | 10 | 1.25 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information2: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) | $ | 450,631 | 200,141 | 125 | % | $ | 358,844 | (44) | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | 7.38 | 3.27 | 126 | 5.89 | (44) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.2 | % | 7.1 | 7.1 | pts | 14.4 | % | (7.3) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 57.91 | 52.10 | 11 | % | $ | 50.03 | 4 | % |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this financial review.
2Non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are comparable to net income (loss) available to common stockholders, net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments included in net income (loss). Adjusted book value per common share is comparable to book value per common share, but excludes total after-tax unrealized gains and losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These non-GAAP measures are important financial measures used by us, analysts, and investors because the timing of realized investment gains and losses on securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments could distort the analysis of trends.
Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures are provided in the tables below:
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income (loss) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | $ | 457,211 | 197,812 | 356,038 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income, before tax | (8,330) | 2,949 | 3,552 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 1,750 | (620) | (746) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) | $ | 450,631 | 200,141 | 358,844 |
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 7.49 | 3.23 | 5.84 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | (0.14) | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.03 | (0.01) | (0.01) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | $ | 7.38 | 3.27 | 5.89 |
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.4 | % | 7.0 | 14.3 | ||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | (0.3) | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.1 | — | — | |||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.2 | % | 7.1 | 14.4 |
46
Table of Contents
| Reconciliation of book value per common share to adjusted book value per common share | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value per common share | $ | 56.74 | 47.99 | 45.42 | |||||
| Total unrealized investment (gains) losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax | 1.47 | 5.21 | 5.83 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (0.30) | (1.10) | (1.22) | ||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 57.91 | 52.10 | 50.03 |
The components of our ROE and non-GAAP operating ROE are as follows:
| ROE Components | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | vs. 2024 | 2023 | vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||
| Standard Commercial Lines segment | 1.7 | % | (4.0) | 5.7 | pts | 5.0 | (9.0) | pts | ||||||||||
| Standard Personal Lines segment | (0.1) | (1.1) | 1.0 | (2.5) | 1.4 | |||||||||||||
| E&S Lines segment | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.7 | (0.3) | |||||||||||||
| Total insurance operations | 3.4 | (3.7) | 7.1 | 4.2 | (7.9) | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned | 13.3 | 12.8 | 0.5 | 12.4 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.3 | (0.1) | — | |||||||||||||
| Total investments segment | 13.5 | 12.7 | 0.8 | 12.3 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
| Other | (2.5) | (2.0) | (0.5) | (2.2) | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
| ROE | 14.4 | 7.0 | 7.4 | 14.3 | (7.3) | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses, after tax | (0.2) | 0.1 | (0.3) | 0.1 | — | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.2 | % | 7.1 | 7.1 | 14.4 | (7.3) |
In 2025, we generated an ROE of 14.4% and a non-GAAP operating ROE of 14.2%, driven by strong investment income and improved underwriting performance. This year's results exceeded our target non-GAAP operating ROE of 12%. The improvement in net investment income earned in 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily driven by active portfolio management, operating cash flow deployment, and the proceeds from our 5.9% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2025. All three insurance segments also contributed to the higher ROE this year compared to last. After-tax underwriting income of $107.4 million this year compared to an underwriting loss of $104.7 million last year was driven by lower catastrophe losses and lower prior year casualty reserve development, partially offset by higher current year loss costs. Underwriting results for 2025 included $90 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development, down from $311 million in 2024.
For additional qualitative discussion on prior year casualty reserve development, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Outlook
In 2025, we delivered a double-digit operating ROE of 14.2%, exceeding our ten-year average operating ROE of 12.1%. Our performance drove an 18% increase in book value per share in 2025, and we returned $182 million to common stockholders through regular dividends and opportunistic share repurchases. Selective celebrates its 100th anniversary in 2026, and we are proud of our history, the work our employees do, and the value we deliver our policyholders, distribution partners, and shareholders. To ensure our continued success, we remain focused on a set of key priorities across the company to drive future success, including:
•Relentlessly improving on the fundamentals across risk selection, individual policy pricing, and claims outcomes. Risk selection, granular and accurate risk pricing, and prompt, fair claims adjudication are foundational capabilities we have built over many decades and remain focused on today.
•Diversifying revenue and income within and across our three insurance segments. Growth levers include achieving greater market share and segment diversification in Standard Commercial Lines, potential geographic expansion in Standard Personal Lines, and increasing our product and distribution capabilities in E&S Lines and other specialty lines.
•Further leveraging the use of data analytics and technology, including general-purpose, industry-trained, and agentic artificial intelligence solutions, to drive operational efficiency and improved underwriting and claim outcomes. Technology investments are critical to ensure efficiency and scale. To enhance underwriting scalability, risk management, and claims handling, we are actively developing and executing artificial intelligence use cases. We have also made considerable progress in modernizing our policy acquisition and claims systems. For example, system
47
Table of Contents
enhancements in our E&S Lines segment have created significant operational efficiency, with the segment’s premium production increasing significantly despite limited headcount growth.
We remain committed to making strategic investments that fuel continued growth, innovation, and performance excellence. As we position ourselves for the future, we have several strategies to grow market share profitably:
•In our existing footprint, we are focused on growing with existing partners and strategically appointing new agency locations. During 2025, we had a net increase of approximately 100 agency locations, and we had a net increase of 200 agency locations in 2024.
•Careful and deliberate geographic expansion. Since 2017, we have added fourteen states to our Standard Commercial Lines footprint, including Kansas in 2025. In 2025, these expansion states produced $430 million in premium, representing approximately 9% of total NPW and approximately 1% marginal total premium growth. We expect to write new business in Montana and Wyoming by the end of 2026.
For 2026, our full-year expectations are as follows:
•A GAAP combined ratio of 96.5% to 97.5%, including net catastrophe losses of 6 points. Our combined ratio estimate assumes no prior year casualty reserve development, as we record our best estimate each quarter. We do not make assumptions about future reserve development;
•After-tax net investment income of $465 million;
•An overall effective tax rate of 21.5%; and
•Weighted average shares of 61 million on a fully diluted basis. We do not make assumptions about future share repurchases under our existing authorization.
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing the combined ratio:
| All Lines | 2025 vs. 2024 | 2024 vs. 2023 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Operations Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 4,866,495 | 4,630,001 | 5 | % | $ | 4,134,532 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 4,768,196 | 4,376,447 | 9 | 3,827,606 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 3,157,726 | 3,164,484 | — | 2,484,285 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,470,940 | 1,338,047 | 10 | 1,203,767 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 3,642 | 6,504 | (44) | 6,755 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 135,888 | (132,588) | (202) | % | $ | 132,799 | (200) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 66.3 | % | 72.3 | (6.0) | pts | 64.9 | % | 7.4 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 30.8 | 30.6 | 0.2 | 31.4 | (0.8) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | 0.2 | (0.1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 97.2 | 103.0 | (5.8) | 96.5 | 6.5 |
The NPW growth of 5% in 2025 compared to 2024 included:
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 956.0 | 994.3 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 9.5 | % | 9.5 |
Our NPW growth in 2025 also benefited from exposure growth on renewal policies. The impacts of exposure growth and renewal pure price increases were partially offset by a modest decrease in policy count and lower new business.
The increase in NPE in 2025 compared to 2024 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
48
Table of Contents
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| 2025 vs. 2024 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||||||
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | |||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 90,000 | 311,000 | (71) | % | ||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 2,217,339 | 1,887,374 | 17 | ||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 169,196 | 284,503 | (41) | ||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 681,191 | 681,607 | — | ||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | $ | 3,157,726 | 3,164,484 | — | |||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | |||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 1.9 | % | 7.1 | (5.2) | pts | ||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 46.6 | 43.1 | 3.5 | ||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 3.5 | 6.5 | (3.0) | ||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 14.3 | 15.6 | (1.3) | ||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 66.3 | 72.3 | (6.0) |
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by reportable segment and line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| General liability | $ | 40.0 | 316.0 | |||
| Commercial automobile | 125.0 | 20.0 | ||||
| Workers compensation | (90.0) | (45.0) | ||||
| Businessowners' policies | (2.5) | — | ||||
| Bonds | (7.5) | (5.0) | ||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 65.0 | 286.0 | ||||
| Homeowners | — | (5.0) | ||||
| Personal automobile | 15.0 | 10.0 | ||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 15.0 | 5.0 | ||||
| E&S | 10.0 | 20.0 | ||||
| Total (favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 90.0 | 311.0 |
The loss and loss expense ratio improved 6.0 points in 2025 compared to 2024, including a 5.2-point improvement in net unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development, driven by improved severities in our workers compensation line of business in accident year 2022 and prior, combined with a stabilization of loss trends in our general liability and E&S casualty lines of business. Even with the year-over-year improvement in the development, these two lines reflected increased severity in recent prior accident years due to the impact of ongoing, broad-based social inflation. However, this improvement was partially offset by a higher amount of prior year development in commercial and personal automobile, as we experienced a re-acceleration of severity growth. For commercial automobile, the unfavorable prior year development was related to accident years 2022 through 2024, with 2024 being the primary driver. For personal automobile, accident year 2024 was the primary driver of the unfavorable prior year development.
In 2024, unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development was $311 million, or 7.1 combined ratio points. This included $316 million in the general liability line of business in our Standard Commercial Lines segment for accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023. Social inflation drove this development.
Current year loss costs were 3.5-points higher in 2025 compared to 2024, driven by elevated severity trend assumptions attributable to social inflation on our general liability and E&S casualty lines of business, and responding to prior year development in our commercial and personal automobile line of business.
For additional qualitative discussion on prior-year casualty reserve development and current-year casualty loss costs, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
49
Table of Contents
Property Losses
Net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses were 4.3 points lower in the aggregate in 2025 compared to 2024. Lower net catastrophe losses were due to a lower frequency and severity of storms that impacted our footprint. Lower non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses reflected (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2025, (ii) lower claim frequencies, and (iii) variability from period to period of non-catastrophe losses.
For additional qualitative discussion on non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Standard Commercial Lines Segment
| 2025 vs. 2024 | 2024 vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 3,837,656 | 3,632,113 | 6 | % | $ | 3,281,319 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 3,753,908 | 3,447,556 | 9 | 3,071,784 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 2,493,321 | 2,501,615 | — | 1,919,204 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,192,359 | 1,084,420 | 10 | 988,519 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 3,642 | 6,504 | (44) | 6,755 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 64,586 | (144,983) | (145) | % | $ | 157,306 | (192) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 66.4 | % | 72.5 | (6.1) | pts | 62.5 | % | 10.0 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 31.8 | 31.5 | 0.3 | 32.2 | (0.7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 98.3 | 104.2 | (5.9) | 94.9 | 9.3 |
NPW and NPE growth in 2025 compared to 2024 included renewal pure price increases and exposure growth on renewal policies, partially offset by lower retention as a result of underwriting actions.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 614.0 | $ | 619.1 | ||||
| Retention | 82 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 8.6 | 8.3 |
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 65,000 | 286,000 | (77) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 1,839,988 | 1,574,532 | 17 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 98,522 | 181,546 | (46) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 489,811 | 459,537 | 7 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | $ | 2,493,321 | 2,501,615 | — | ||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 1.7 | % | 8.3 | (6.6) | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 49.1 | 45.6 | 3.5 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 2.6 | 5.3 | (2.7) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 13.0 | 13.3 | (0.3) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 66.4 | 72.5 | (6.1) |
50
Table of Contents
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| General liability | $ | 40.0 | 316.0 | |||
| Commercial automobile | 125.0 | 20.0 | ||||
| Workers compensation | (90.0) | (45.0) | ||||
| Businessowners' policies | (2.5) | — | ||||
| Bonds | (7.5) | (5.0) | ||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | $ | 65.0 | 286.0 |
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 6.1 points in 2025 compared to 2024, including a 6.6-point improvement in net unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development. The increase in current year loss costs compared to 2024 was primarily driven by elevated severity trend assumptions attributable to social inflation on our general liability line of business, and responding to prior year development in our commercial automobile line of business.
Refer to the line of business sections below for qualitative discussion of the significant drivers of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development and current-year casualty loss costs.
Property Losses
Net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses were 3.0 points lower in the aggregate in 2025 compared to 2024. This was primarily driven by net catastrophe losses, which were 2.7 points lower than last year, driven by a lower frequency of wind, winter storm, and hurricane events.
Refer to the line of business sections below for qualitative discussion of the significant drivers of non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses.
The following is a discussion of our most significant Standard Commercial Lines of business:
| General Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs. 20241 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 20231 | ||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 1,269,846 | 1,183,194 | 7 | % | $ | 1,087,079 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 179,383 | 179,921 | n/a | 179,047 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 82 | % | 86 | n/a | 85 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 11.3 | 8.6 | n/a | 5.4 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 1,231,380 | 1,125,491 | 9 | % | $ | 1,020,362 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | (104,490) | (295,876) | (65) | 70,806 | (518) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 108.5 | % | 126.3 | (17.8) | pts | 93.1 | % | 33.2 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 33 | 33 | 33 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 7% in 2025 compared to 2024, benefiting from renewal pure price increases and renewal exposure growth.
The combined ratio was 17.8 points lower in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 40,000 | 316,000 | (87) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 909,136 | 754,676 | 20 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | $ | 949,136 | $ | 1,070,676 | (11) | |||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 3.2 | % | 28.1 | (24.9) | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 73.9 | 67.0 | 6.9 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 77.1 | 95.1 | (18.0) |
51
Table of Contents
We recorded unfavorable prior-year casualty reserve development of $40 million in 2025, compared to $316 million in 2024. We attribute the unfavorable development in both periods to the ongoing, broad-based social inflationary factors impacting this line of business. Development in 2025 was driven by increased severities in accident years 2022 and 2023. Development in 2024 was driven by increased severities in accident years 2020 through 2023.
The general liability line of business has experienced a long-term trend of meaningful severity increases, partially offset by claim frequency decreases. Prior-year severities developed adversely, impacting our view of more recent accident years in 2024 and 2025. We attribute the increased severities to elevated social inflation, which we view as an industry dynamic characterized by higher claimant propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. Certain jurisdictions with expanded liability theories and higher damage awards pose increased challenges. We are closely monitoring these jurisdictions and the broader trends across our business.
We experienced a 6.9-point increase in current-year casualty loss costs in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by increased loss trend expectations and higher prior-year severity assumptions related to the impacts of social inflation.
We believe that social inflation and elevated loss trends continue to support an elevated near-term pricing environment. In response, we have a heightened focus on prudent underwriting and appropriate pricing. Our renewal pure price increase in this line of business was 11.3% in 2025, up from 8.6% in 2024. In sectors and jurisdictions where market pricing does not align with our view of rate need, we are taking targeted underwriting actions, including (i) revising underwriting guidelines, (ii) tightening coverage offerings, and (iii) reducing writings.
| Commercial Automobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 vs. 20241 | 2024 vs. 20231 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 1,184,848 | 1,121,488 | 6 | % | $ | 976,888 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 158,809 | 164,329 | n/a | 147,242 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 83 | % | 86 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 9.9 | 10.7 | n/a | 9.8 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 1,162,500 | 1,058,228 | 10 | % | $ | 916,140 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | (122,696) | 2,474 | (5,059) | (33,724) | 107 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 110.6 | % | 99.8 | 10.8 | pts | 103.7 | % | (3.9) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 31 | 31 | 30 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 6% in 2025 compared to 2024, benefiting from renewal pure price increases, partially offset by lower retention.
The combined ratio was 10.8 points higher in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 125,000 | 20,000 | 525 | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 637,368 | 544,691 | 17 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 7,712 | 8,646 | (11) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 168,582 | 172,094 | (2) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 938,662 | 745,431 | 26 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 10.8 | % | 1.9 | 8.9 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 54.8 | 51.5 | 3.3 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 0.7 | 0.8 | (0.1) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 14.5 | 16.3 | (1.8) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 80.8 | 70.5 | 10.3 |
52
Table of Contents
We recorded $125 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2025, driven by increased severities in accident years 2022 through 2024, with 2024 being the primary driver. Current year casualty loss costs were higher in 2025 compared to the same prior-year periods, in reaction to the unfavorable prior-year casualty reserve development.
Partially offsetting the unfavorable combined ratio drivers mentioned above, non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses in 2025 were lower compared to 2024, primarily due to (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2025, and (ii) lower claim frequencies.
| Commercial Property1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 vs. 20242 | 2024 vs. 20232 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 793,115 | 739,500 | 7 | % | $ | 648,753 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 167,181 | 152,248 | n/a | 147,358 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 81 | % | 84 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 7.9 | 10.0 | n/a | 9.8 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 767,734 | 685,568 | 12 | % | $ | 586,267 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 151,448 | 53,331 | 184 | 10,765 | 395 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 80.3 | pts | 92.2 | (11.9) | 98.2 | pts | (6.0) | ||||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 21 | 20 | 20 |
1includes Inland Marine.
2n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 7% in 2025 compared to 2024, benefiting from renewal pure price increases and exposure growth on renewal policies.
The combined ratio was 11.9 points lower in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | |||||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | $ | 74,170 | $ | 146,350 | (49) | % | |||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 275,610 | 244,990 | 12 | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | $ | 349,780 | 391,340 | (11) | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | |||||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 9.7 | % | 21.3 | (11.6) | pts | ||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 35.9 | 35.7 | 0.2 | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 45.6 | 57.0 | (11.4) |
Net catastrophe losses were meaningfully lower in 2025 compared to 2024, driven by a lower frequency of wind, winter storm, and hurricane events.
| Workers Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 vs. 20241 | 2024 vs. 20231 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 295,892 | 320,608 | (8) | % | $ | 338,123 | (5) | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 45,809 | 54,520 | n/a | 63,703 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 83 | % | 84 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases (decreases) | (3.6) | (2.8) | n/a | (1.5) | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 310,021 | 327,725 | (5) | % | $ | 333,669 | (2) | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 75,794 | 57,724 | 31 | 95,397 | (39) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 75.6 | % | 82.4 | (6.8) | pts | 71.4 | % | 11.0 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 8 | 9 | 12 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW decreased 8% in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily due to renewal pure price decreases and a reduction in direct new business.
53
Table of Contents
The combined ratio was 6.8 points lower in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily due to the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | |||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | (90,000) | $ | (45,000) | 100 | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 239,792 | 227,535 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 149,792 | 182,535 | (18) | ||||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | |||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | (29.0) | % | (13.7) | (15.3) | pts | ||||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 77.4 | 69.4 | 8.0 | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 48.4 | 55.7 | (7.3) |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2025 and 2024 was primarily due to improved loss severities driven by continued lower medical cost trends. The favorable development in 2025 and 2024 was related to improved loss severities in accident years 2022 and prior.
In addition, the combined ratio was adversely impacted by an increase in current year casualty loss costs of 8.0 points in 2025, primarily driven by negative rate changes and increased loss trends. These rate level reductions are driven by continued decreases in workers compensation rating bureau loss costs, which form the basis for our filed rating plans, and heavily influence marketplace pricing for this line of business.
Standard Personal Lines Segment
| 2025 vs. 2024 | 2024 vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 397,677 | 430,725 | (8) | % | $ | 414,585 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 408,190 | 424,917 | (4) | 365,213 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 315,652 | 364,601 | (13) | 353,185 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 95,167 | 99,801 | (5) | 91,291 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | (2,629) | (39,485) | (93) | % | $ | (79,263) | 50 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 77.3 | % | 85.8 | (8.5) | pts | 96.7 | % | (10.9) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 23.3 | 23.5 | (0.2) | 25.0 | (1.5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 100.6 | 109.3 | (8.7) | 121.7 | (12.4) |
NPW decreased 8% in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily due to lower direct new business. New business decreased 37% in 2025 compared to 2024. The reduction in direct new business premiums was primarily due to a 50% decline in new policy counts in 2025 compared to 2024. The reduction in new policy counts and new business premiums was driven by (i) market conditions, including a challenging rate environment in New Jersey and South Carolina, (ii) competition in other states due to our recent rate activity, and (iii) focusing on our target mass affluent market. We have received regulatory approvals for increased rate levels in most of our footprint states and are focused on growth where we believe our rates are adequate.
The following table depicts our reductions in direct new business and retention for 2025 and 2024:
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums1 | $ | 45.4 | $ | 72.6 | ||||
| Retention | 78 | % | 77 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 18.6 | 20.6 |
1Excludes our flood direct premiums written, which is 100% ceded to the NFIP and therefore, has no impact on our NPW.
The change in NPE in 2025 compared to 2024 was driven by the same impacts on NPW described above.
Underwriting results for this segment improved in 2025 compared to 2024 as we are obtaining positive results from the actions we took to refine our pricing factors and prioritize rate filings to mitigate inflationary impacts. Our more significant rate increases began to take effect early in 2023, increased in number and magnitude throughout 2024, and remained strong in 2025, albeit moderately lower than in 2024. We expect these rates to continue outpacing loss trends in 2026, but at lower levels than those seen in 2024 and 2025. Through our actions, we achieved renewal pure prices increases of 18.6% in 2025. Additionally,
54
Table of Contents
we have continued to focus our efforts on our target mass affluent market. In 2025, target business grew 10%, with nearly all new business being in our target market.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs 2024 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 15,000 | 5,000 | 200 | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 121,510 | 115,591 | 5 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 41,139 | 79,965 | (49) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 138,003 | 164,045 | (16) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 315,652 | 364,601 | (13) | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 3.7 | % | 1.2 | 2.5 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 29.7 | 27.2 | 2.5 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 10.1 | 18.8 | (8.7) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 33.8 | 38.6 | (4.8) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 77.3 | 85.8 | (8.5) |
Property Losses
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 8.5 points in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses, which reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 13.5 points in the aggregate in 2025 compared to 2024. Net catastrophe losses reflected lower frequency and severity of weather-related catastrophe events this year compared to last year. Non-catastrophe property losses were lower in 2025 compared to 2024 due to (i) the earned impact of renewal pure price increases in 2025, (ii) lower claim frequencies, and (iii) variability from period to period of non-catastrophe losses.
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
| Homeowners | $ | — | (5.0) | |||
| Personal automobile | 15.0 | 10.0 | ||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | $ | 15.0 | 5.0 |
Prior year casualty reserve development in 2025 included $15.0 million of unfavorable development in personal automobile, primarily driven by increased loss severities in the 2024 accident year related to the New Jersey portfolio. Prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 included $10.0 million of unfavorable development in personal automobile, primarily driven by increased loss severities in accident years 2022 and 2023. This was partially offset by $5.0 million of favorable development in homeowners, primarily due to lower loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior.
Current year casualty loss costs increased 2.5 points in 2025 compared to 2024. Prior-year severities developed adversely over the course of 2024 and 2025, impacting our view of the current year loss costs for 2025. This resulted in higher current-year casualty loss costs this year compared to last.
55
Table of Contents
E&S Lines Segment
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs. 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 631,162 | 567,163 | 11 | % | $ | 438,628 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 606,098 | 503,974 | 20 | 390,609 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 348,753 | 298,268 | 17 | 211,896 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 183,414 | 153,826 | 19 | 123,957 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 73,931 | 51,880 | 43 | % | $ | 54,756 | (5) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 57.5 | % | 59.2 | (1.7) | pts | 54.3 | % | 4.9 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 30.3 | 30.5 | (0.2) | 31.7 | (1.2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 87.8 | 89.7 | (1.9) | 86.0 | 3.7 |
NPW grew 11% in 2025 compared to 2024 and included:
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 296.6 | 302.6 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 8.5 | % | 7.2 |
NPW and NPE growth in 2025 benefited from (i) both property and casualty exposure growth on renewal policies, (ii) higher rates per exposure, and (iii) an increase in renewal policy count. Increased competition in the marketplace has lowered our NPW growth rate this year compared to last, primarily due to more capacity entering the E&S marketplace and the admitted markets' appetite for insureds previously written by E&S companies.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs. 2024 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | |||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 10,000 | $ | 20,000 | (50) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 255,841 | 197,251 | 30 | ||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 29,535 | 22,992 | 28 | ||||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 53,377 | 58,025 | (8) | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | $ | 348,753 | $ | 298,268 | 17 | ||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | |||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 1.6 | % | 4.0 | (2.4) | pts | ||||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 42.2 | 39.1 | 3.1 | ||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 4.9 | 4.6 | 0.3 | ||||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 8.8 | 11.5 | (2.7) | ||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 57.5 | 59.2 | (1.7) |
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 1.7 points in 2025 compared to 2024. The loss and loss expense ratio was reduced by a $10 million, or 2.4-point decrease in unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development. In 2025, the unfavorable prior-year casualty reserve development was primarily due to loss severities in accident years 2020 through 2023, driven by the broad-reaching impacts of social inflation. Additionally, non-catastrophe property losses decreased 2.7 points in 2025 compared to 2024. This decrease was primarily driven by (i) normal period-to-period variability associated with property losses and (ii) the impact of earned rates per exposure in excess of loss trend.
Partially offsetting the lower prior year casualty reserve development and non-catastrophe property losses was higher current year casualty loss costs of 3.1 points, primarily due to increased severities related to social inflation.
56
Table of Contents
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to protect our capital resources and insure against losses on property and casualty risks we underwrite above the amount of losses we are willing to accept. We use two main reinsurance vehicles: (i) a reinsurance pooling agreement among our Insurance Subsidiaries through which each company agrees to share in premiums and losses based on certain specified percentages; and (ii) reinsurance treaties and arrangements with third parties that cover various policies that we issue to our customers.
Reinsurance Pooling Agreement
The primary purposes of the Insurance Subsidiaries' reinsurance pooling agreement are to:
•Pool or proportionately share the underwriting profit and loss results of property and casualty insurance underwriting operations through reinsurance;
•Reduce administration expenses; and
•Permit all the Insurance Subsidiaries to obtain a uniform rating from AM Best Company ("AM Best").
The following table shows the Insurance Subsidiary pooling percentages as of December 31, 2025:
| Insurance Subsidiary | Pooling Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance Company of America ("SICA") | 32.0% | |
| Selective Way Insurance Company ("SWIC") | 21.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") | 9.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New York ("SICNY") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Casualty Insurance Company ("SCIC") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey ("SAICNJ") | 6.0% | |
| Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC") | 5.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New England ("SICNE") | 3.0% | |
| Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("SFCIC") | 3.0% |
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangements
By entering into reinsurance treaties and arrangements, we can increase our underwriting capacity, accepting larger individual risks and risk aggregations without directly increasing our capital or statutory surplus. Under our reinsurance treaties, we cede our reinsurers a portion of our incurred losses from an individual policy or group of policies in exchange for a portion of the premium on those policies. Amounts not reinsured below a specified dollar threshold are known as retention. Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from liability under the terms and limits of our policies, but it does make our reinsurers liable to us for the amount of liability we cede to them. Our reinsurers often rely on their own reinsurance programs, or retrocessions, to manage their large loss exposures. The global reinsurance community is relatively small. If our reinsurers cannot collect on their retrocessional programs, it may impair their ability to pay us for the amounts we cede to them.
Consequently, our reinsurers present us with direct, indirect, and contingent counterparty credit risk. We attempt to mitigate this credit risk by (i) pursuing relationships with reinsurers rated "A-" or higher by AM Best and/or (ii) obtaining collateral to secure reinsurance obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties permit us to terminate or commute them – or require the reinsurer to post collateral if the reinsurer's financial condition or rating deteriorates. We monitor our reinsurers' financial condition and review the quality of reinsurance recoverables and reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. For additional information regarding our reinsurance counterparty credit risk, see Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Our reinsurance program has contracts that separately cover our property and casualty insurance business and can be categorized as follows:
•Property Reinsurance, which includes our (i) property per risk excess of loss treaties purchased for protection against large individual property losses and (ii) property catastrophe treaties and a property catastrophe bond transaction to provide protection for the overall property portfolio against severe catastrophic events. We also purchase a limited amount of facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual property risks exceeding our property per-risk excess-of-loss treaty capacity.
57
Table of Contents
•Casualty Reinsurance, which provides protection for both individual large casualty losses and catastrophic casualty losses involving multiple claimants or insureds. We also may use (i) facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual casualty risks in excess of our treaty capacity and (ii) quota share capacity for certain new or higher severity casualty lines of business.
•Terrorism Reinsurance, which provides a federal reinsurance backstop behind the protection of our property and casualty reinsurance treaties, for terrorism losses covered under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act ("TRIPRA"). For further information about TRIPRA, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K.
•Flood Reinsurance, for which all of the premiums and losses related to our participation in the WYO (for which we also receive a servicing fee) are 100% ceded to the federal government.
Property Reinsurance
The following table summarizes our property reinsurance program:
| PROPERTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $1.4 billion above $100 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis in four layers: | All nuclear, biological, chemical, and radioactive ("NBCR") losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding TRIPRA. | ||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $100 million up to $200 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $200 million up to $400 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $400 million up to $800 million; and | ||||
| - 46% of losses in excess of $800 million up to $1.5 billion. The treaty provides one reinstatement in each of the first three layers and no reinstatement in the fourth layer. | ||||
| Personal Lines-only treaty with $20 million of limit excess of $20 million retention and coverage of 100% of losses. This has an annual aggregate limit of $20 million. | ||||
| The per occurrence limit is $1.045 billion, which includes $20 million for the Personal Lines-only treaty. The annual aggregate limit is $1.745 billion. | ||||
| Property Catastrophe Bond (covers all insurance operations, excluding Florida, California, Louisiana, and Texas) | 46% of losses in excess of $800 million up to $1.5 billion that responds on a per occurrence basis. The catastrophe bond provides a single $325 million limit with no reinstatements. | None. | ||
| Property Per Risk Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are three layers covering 100% of $95 million in excess of $5 million. Losses other than TRIPRA certified losses are subject to the following reinstatements and annual aggregate limits: | All NBCR losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under the TRIPRA. For non-NBCR losses, the treaty distinguishes between acts committed on behalf of foreign persons or foreign interests ("Foreign Terrorism") and those that are not. The treaty provides annual aggregate limits for Foreign Terrorism (other than NBCR) acts of $15 million for the first layer, $60 million for the second layer, and $70 million for the third layer. Non-Foreign Terrorism losses (other than NBCR) are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. | ||
| - $5 million in excess of $5 million layer provides 15 reinstatements; $80 million in aggregate limits; | ||||
| - $20 million in excess of $10 million layer provides four reinstatements, $100 million in aggregate limits; and | ||||
| - $70 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $140 million in aggregate limits. | ||||
| Flood | 100% reinsurance by the federal government’s WYO. | None. |
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Program
Our property catastrophe reinsurance program includes a primary excess of loss treaty and an indemnity reinsurance agreement with a special purpose insurer that issued a catastrophe bond. This program covers our standard market and E&S business. In addition, we renewed the Personal Lines-only treaty of $20 million in excess of a $20 million retention to mitigate Personal Lines-specific catastrophe losses. Effective January 1, 2026, we renewed our main property catastrophe treaty, with additional limit, stable retention, and improved terms. The property catastrophe treaty excludes coverage for communicable disease but
58
Table of Contents
retains (i) coverage for strike, riot, civil unrest, severe convective storms, and other traditionally-covered property perils, (ii) coverage for conventional terrorism losses, and (iii) limited coverage for cybersecurity risks. Our program now provides coverage of $1.4 billion in excess of a $100 million retention, compared to $1.3 billion in 2025, thereby extending the exhaustion point by $100 million to respond to our growing property portfolio. The highest layer of the treaty provides coverage for 46% of losses in the $700 million in excess of $800 million layer.
To provide additional, fully collateralized coverage at the top end of our property catastrophe reinsurance program, we secured property catastrophe protection through a per-occurrence excess of loss indemnity reinsurance agreement effective December 9, 2023, with High Point Re Ltd. ("High Point Re"), an independent Bermuda special purpose insurer. The reinsurance agreement meets the accounting guidance requirements to be accounted for as reinsurance. In connection with the reinsurance agreement, High Point Re issued Series 2023-1, Class A Principal-at-Risk Variable Rates Notes to unrelated investors totaling $325 million, consistent with the coverage provided under the reinsurance agreement. The proceeds were deposited in a reinsurance trust account. The reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage of up to $325 million for the three-year period from December 9, 2023, through December 31, 2026, for property catastrophe losses from named storms, earthquakes, severe thunderstorms, winter storms, wildfires, meteorite impacts, and volcanic eruptions in all states except California, Florida, Texas, and Louisiana. The reinsurance agreement's attachment point and exhaustion limit may be reset annually to adjust the expected loss of the layer within a predetermined range. For the 2026 treaty year, this reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage for 46% of losses in the $700 million in excess of $800 million layer, bringing our co-participation in this layer to 8%. The reinsurance agreement is collateralized, which is provided by High Point Re using proceeds from the issuance of the Series 2023-1 Notes.
Reinsurance agreements carry credit risk associated with amounts due from reinsurers. With High Point Re, that risk is reduced because the collateralized reinsurance trust account is funded with money market funds domiciled in the U.S. The money market funds invest solely in cash or high-quality direct obligations of the U.S. government, such as U.S. Treasury bills and other short-term securities backed by the U.S. government.
In addition to the fully collateralized catastrophe bond, we seek to minimize reinsurance credit risk by transacting with highly-rated reinsurance partners and purchasing collateralized reinsurance products, particularly for high-severity, low-probability events, if feasible. Our current reinsurance program includes $498 million in collateralized limit of the total $650 million limit in place for the highest layer of the catastrophe program, including the $325 million secured through High Point Re, compared to $450 million in collateralized limit under the 2025 reinsurance program.
Overall, ceded premium for our property catastrophe reinsurance program will decrease in 2026 due to (i) risk-adjusted price decreases driven by favorable reinsurance market conditions and (ii) modest overall growth in underlying property exposures, marked by exposure reductions in higher catastrophe-risk regions. These reductions will be partially offset by the addition of $80.0 million of net limit coverage, which improved our net risk profile.
Catastrophe Models
We model various catastrophic perils, and hurricane risk remains our portfolio's most significant natural catastrophe peril because of the geographic location of the risks we insure. The table below illustrates the impact of the five largest hurricane losses we have experienced in the last 36 years:
| ($ in millions) | Gross Loss1 | Net Loss2 | Accident Year | Gross Loss Ratio | Net Loss Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Name | ||||||||||
| Superstorm Sandy | $125.5 | 45.6 | 2012 | 7.9% | 2.9 | |||||
| Hurricane Helene | 73.9 | 73.9 | 2024 | 1.7 | 1.7 | |||||
| Hurricane Ida | 49.9 | 39.7 | 2021 | 1.7 | 1.3 | |||||
| Hurricane Irene | 44.8 | 40.2 | 2011 | 3.1 | 2.8 | |||||
| Hurricane Hugo | 26.4 | 3.0 | 1989 | 5.9 | 0.7 |
1This amount represents reported and unreported gross losses estimated as of December 31, 2025.
2Net loss does not include reinstatement premiums, taxes, or flood claims handling fees.
We assess our exposure to hurricane risk by examining third-party vendor models and conducting a proprietary analysis. The third-party vendor models provide both long-term and near-term views, with the near-term view conditioned to adjust for elevated sea surface temperatures. We adjust these models to reflect certain non-modeled cost assumptions, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses. We believe that modeled estimates provide a range of potential outcomes, and we review multiple estimates to understand our catastrophic risk.
59
Table of Contents
Our established catastrophic risk tolerance requires that no more than 10% of stockholders’ equity be exposed to a loss from a hurricane event at a 99.6% confidence level (1-in-250-year event or 0.4% probability), on a net-of-reinsurance and after-tax basis. Our property catastrophe reinsurance program limits our net after-tax impact of a 1-in-250-year event to about 5% of our GAAP equity, within our established tolerance for catastrophic risk. In addition to the 1-in-250-year modeled event, we evaluate the impact of several other scenarios on stockholders’ equity.
The table below shows the gross and net losses modeled results for (i) hurricane peril in our underwriting property portfolio and (ii) the gross and net of reinsurance hurricane losses from the following scenarios:
•Recasts of two large hurricanes that impacted our geographic footprint:
◦1938 New England Hurricane, one of the largest hurricanes to impact the Northeast U.S.; and
◦Hurricane Hazel, a Category 4 storm that made landfall near the border between North Carolina and South Carolina in 1954; and
•Realistic disaster scenarios ("RDS") for significant potential storms in the Northeast and the Carolinas based on Lloyds of London ("Lloyds") methodology.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Hurricane | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $344,765 | 86,852 | 2 | % | |||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 574,308 | 94,679 | 3 | ||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 959,215 | 109,035 | 3 | ||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 1,263,479 | 126,629 | 4 | ||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 1,451,583 | 136,576 | 4 | ||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 1,611,249 | 184,208 | 5 | ||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 2,280,688 | 711,136 | 20 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1938 New England Hurricane | 717,122 | 99,390 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS North-East (Category 4 hurricane) | 1,283,361 | 128,269 | 4 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1954 Hurricane Hazel | 438,523 | 90,394 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS Carolinas (Category 5 hurricane) | 672,676 | 104,896 | 3 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance, including reinstatement premiums and applicable property per risk and facultative reinsurance based on our reinsurance structure effective January 1, 2026.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2025.
As the table above reflects, we are within our established tolerance for catastrophic risk. Based on a multi-model view of hurricane risk, our current catastrophe reinsurance program exhausts at a return period of approximately 1-in-211-years, or events with a 0.5% probability. Our modeled losses incorporate expected reinsurance recoveries from our per-risk reinsurance treaty and facultative reinsurance in addition to the recoveries from our property catastrophe treaties. Our actual gross and net losses incurred from hurricanes making U.S. landfall will vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated modeled losses.
In addition to hurricane peril, the table below shows gross and net losses modeled by other wind and earthquake perils in our underwriting property portfolio. Other wind perils include the sub-perils of hail, straight-line wind, and tornadoes.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Other Wind | Earthquake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $149,504 | $79,972 | 2 | % | $14,657 | $10,803 | — | % | ||||||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | $200,924 | $80,866 | 2 | $41,836 | $29,913 | 1 | ||||||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | $271,813 | $80,880 | 2 | $117,179 | $79,589 | 2 | ||||||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | $315,507 | $80,313 | 2 | $208,664 | $90,592 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | $364,358 | $82,818 | 2 | $266,879 | $95,272 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | $400,463 | $84,885 | 2 | $321,703 | $99,252 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | $494,805 | $88,770 | 2 | $509,656 | $100,236 | 3 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance, including reinstatement premiums as well as applicable property per risk and facultative reinsurance based on the reinsurance structure effective January 1, 2026.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2025.
We do not write crop insurance, have minimal exposure to private flood, and have a small geographic footprint in the Western U.S., all limiting our exposures to certain weather-related perils, such as droughts, wildfires, and flooding. However, as our
60
Table of Contents
geographic expansion progresses and we continue to evaluate our business appetite, physical risks from these perils and others will be considered in our strategic decision making.
While we regularly experience property losses from winter storms and use third-party vendor models to help us model and manage our exposure to this peril, we also evaluate our winter storm exposure based on our own historical experience, as winter storm third-party vendor models are currently less mature than models for other perils, such as hurricane wind or severe convective storms.
Property Per Risk Excess of Loss Treaty
Effective July 1, 2025, we renewed the Property Excess of Loss Treaty ("Property Treaty") with the same retention as the expiring treaty, but with a $30 million increase in limit. The treaty now provides coverage for $95 million in excess of a $5 million retention for losses on a per risk basis. The treaty year deposit premium increased modestly, reflecting higher projected subject earned premium due to growth in our book of business and the increased treaty limit.
Casualty Reinsurance
The following table summarizes our casualty reinsurance program:
| CASUALTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Casualty Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are six layers covering $87 million in excess of $3 million on a per occurrence basis. Losses other than terrorism losses are subject to the following: | All NBCR losses are excluded. All other losses stemming from the acts of terrorism are subject to the following: | ||
| - 80% of $3 million in excess of $3 million layer provides 65 reinstatements, $198 million annual aggregate limit; | - 80% of $3 million in excess of $3 million layer with $15 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $6 million in excess of $6 million layer provides 14 reinstatements, $90 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $6 million in excess of $6 million layer with $30 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $9 million in excess of $12 million layer provides three reinstatements, $36 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $9 million in excess of $12 million layer with $27 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $9 million in excess of $21 million layer provides one reinstatement, $18 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $9 million in excess of $21 million layer with $18 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $20 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $40 million annual aggregate limit; and | - 100% of $20 million in excess of $30 million layer with $40 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; and | |||
| - 100% of $40 million in excess of $50 million layer provides one reinstatement, $80 million annual aggregate limit. | - 100% of $40 million in excess of $50 million layer with $80 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit. |
We renewed the casualty excess of loss treaty ("Casualty Treaty"), which covers our Standard Lines and E&S Lines, on July 1, 2025, with coverage of $87 million in excess of a $3 million retention per loss occurrence. The first layer was modified with an increase in net retention to $3 million, from $2 million, and we continue to retain a portion of the first layer through a 20% co-participation. The 2025 treaty year deposit premium decreased, primarily due to increased retention and co-participation, partially offset by higher projected subject-earned premium due to growth of our book of business.
To complement our key reinsurance programs and provide reinsurance protection on specific coverages or programs, we have other reinsurance treaties, such as our (i) Surety and Fidelity Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaty, (ii) National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool Quota Share, which covers business assumed from the involuntary workers compensation pool, (iii) Equipment Breakdown Coverage Reinsurance Treaty, (iv) Multi-line Quota Share, which covers additional personal lines coverages, such as personal cyber and home systems protection, (v) Cyber Liability Quota Share, (vi) Endurance Specialty Quota share and Loss Development Cover, which protects against losses on policies written before the acquisition and any development on reserves established by MUSIC as of the date of acquisition, and (vii) Excess Liability Quota Share, which covers MUSIC's excess liability business.
We continually evaluate our overall reinsurance program to effectively manage the transfer of risk. We base our analysis on a comprehensive process that includes periodic analysis of modeling results, our own loss experience, aggregation of exposures, exposure growth, diversification of risks, limits written, projected reinsurance costs, reinsurer financial strength, and projected impact on earnings, equity, and statutory surplus. We strive to balance reinsurer credit quality, price, terms, and our appetite to retain a certain level of risk.
61
Table of Contents
Investments Segment
Our Investments Segment's objectives are to maximize the economic value of our investment portfolio by achieving stable, risk-adjusted after-tax net investment income and generating long-term growth in book value per share. Our strategies consider prevailing market conditions, our enterprise risk tolerances, and other risk implications by:
•Maximizing the portfolio's overall total return by investing (i) the premiums from our insurance operations, (ii) amounts generated through our capital management strategies, including debt and equity security issuances, and (iii) profits of our business, and
•Maintaining (i) a well-diversified portfolio across issuers, sectors, and asset classes and (ii) a fixed income securities portfolio with high credit quality and acceptable duration and maturity profiles to provide ample liquidity.
The effective duration of our fixed income and short-term investments was 4.1 years as of December 31, 2025. We monitor and manage the effective duration to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. We buy and sell investments with the intent of maximizing investment returns in the current market environment, while balancing capital preservation and ensuring adequate liquidity to support our insurance business.
At both December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, our fixed income and short-term investments (i) represented 92% of our invested assets, (ii) had a weighted average credit rating of "A+," and (iii) had investment grade holdings representing 97% of the total fixed income and short-term investment portfolio.
For further details on the composition, credit quality, and various risks to which our portfolio is subject, see Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." of this Form 10-K.
Total Invested Assets
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total invested assets | $ | 11,302,440 | 9,651,297 | 17 | % | |||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | 3.32 | 3.31 | — | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – before tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (88,415) | (316,796) | (72) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 14,311 | 2,116 | 576 | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) – before tax | (74,104) | (314,680) | (76) | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – after tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (69,848) | (250,269) | (72) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 11,306 | 1,671 | 577 | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) – after tax | $ | (58,542) | (248,598) | (76) |
Invested assets increased by $1.7 billion at December 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024, primarily reflecting (i) net proceeds from the issuance of our 5.9% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2025, (ii) our active investment of operating cash flows, which were 25% of NPW in 2025, and (iii) a $240.6 million reduction in pre-tax net unrealized losses in our fixed income and equity securities portfolios, primarily due to lower interest rates and strong performance of U.S. equities during 2025. For additional information about our 5.9% Senior Notes, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this form 10-K.
62
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs. 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 459,330 | 389,198 | 18 | % | 345,886 | 13 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") | 15,491 | 12,448 | 24 | 9,336 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 23,794 | 18,295 | 30 | 9,395 | 95 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 22,309 | 20,274 | 10 | 14,818 | 37 | ||||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 32,388 | 37,053 | (13) | 26,777 | 38 | ||||||||||||||
| Other investments | 750 | 864 | (13) | 650 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
| Investment expenses | (22,912) | (21,081) | 9 | (18,212) | (16) | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – before tax | 531,150 | 457,051 | 16 | 388,650 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income tax expense | 109,986 | 94,435 | 16 | 79,115 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – after tax | $ | 421,164 | 362,616 | 16 | 309,535 | 17 | |||||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 20.7 | % | 20.7 | — | pts | 20.4 | 0.3 | pts | |||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on fixed income investments | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 3.9 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 4.0 | 4.0 | — | 3.7 | 0.3 |
After-tax net investment income earned increased 16% in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily driven by active portfolio management, operating cash flow deployment, and net proceeds from the issuance of our 5.9% Senior Notes in the first quarter of 2025. For additional information about our 5.9% Senior Notes, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this form 10-K.
Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
When evaluating securities for sale, our general philosophy is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations of whether (i) the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated or (ii) the timing is appropriate to trade opportunistically for other securities with better economic-return characteristics. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses for the indicated periods were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2025 | 2024 | 2025 vs. 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net realized gains (losses) on disposals | $ | (1,217) | 6,276 | (119) | % | (24,864) | (125) | % | ||||||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities | 12,196 | (1,964) | (721) | 9,510 | (121) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, AFS | (1,044) | (5,628) | (81) | 12,898 | (144) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on CMLs | (160) | 217 | (174) | (175) | (224) | |||||||||||||
| Losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell | (1,445) | (1,248) | 16 | (921) | 36 | |||||||||||||
| Other realized gains (losses) | — | (602) | (100) | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Total net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | $ | 8,330 | (2,949) | (382) | (3,552) | (17) |
For additional information regarding our methodologies for recognizing losses on securities we intend to sell and estimating the allowance for credit losses, see Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding income taxes.
| ($ in millions) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax expense | $ | 123.2 | 51.0 | 93.2 | |||||
| Effective tax rate1 | 21.2 | % | 20.5 | 20.7 |
1The effective tax rate is calculated by taking "Total income tax expense" divided by "Income before income tax" less "Preferred stock dividends" on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Income tax expense increased $72.2 million in 2025 compared to 2024, primarily due to (i) an underwriting profit from our Insurance Operations this year compared to an underwriting loss last year and (ii) higher net investment income. Refer to "Insurance Operations" and "Investments Segment" above for more information.
On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the "Act") became law. The legislation extends and modifies multiple tax provisions, some affecting current and future years. The tax law changes are reflected in the enactment period, which is the year ending December 31, 2025. Accordingly, we have analyzed the Act's major impacts, which include provisions that allow
63
Table of Contents
100% bonus depreciation for certain qualified assets and full deduction of domestic research and development expenditures. Both are temporary differences and do not have an impact on the total tax expense, but provide a cash tax benefit that is estimated at $7.1 million for the year.
See Note 14. " Income Taxes" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K for (i) reconciliations of our effective tax rate to the statutory rate of 21% and (ii) details regarding our net deferred tax asset and liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity by generating sufficient cash flows to meet our business operations' short-term and long-term cash requirements. As discussed further below, we adjust our liquidity requirements based on economic conditions, market conditions, and future cash flow commitments.
Sources of Liquidity
The Parent's sources of cash historically have consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, the Parent's investment portfolio, borrowings under third-party lines of credit, intercompany revolving demand loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of equity (common or preferred) and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, considering our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital management strategies.
The Parent's cash and investment portfolio components were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | December 31, 2025 | December 31, 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 254,851 | 268,486 | |||
| Equity securities | 49,978 | 53,248 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 78,973 | 62,223 | ||||
| Alternative investments | 21,603 | 18,443 | ||||
| Cash | 248 | 91 | ||||
| Total investments and cash | $ | 405,653 | 402,491 |
Short-term investments have historically been maintained in "AAA" rated money market funds, and fixed income securities are comprised of high-quality, liquid government and corporate securities.
The amount and composition of the Parent's investment portfolio may change over time based on various factors, including the amount and availability of dividends from our Insurance Subsidiaries, investment income, expenses, other Parent cash needs, such as dividends payable to stockholders, asset allocation investment decisions, inorganic growth opportunities, debt retirement, and share repurchases. We have an established target for the Parent to maintain liquid investments of at least twice its expected annual net cash outflow needs.
Insurance Subsidiary Dividends
The Insurance Subsidiaries generate liquidity through insurance float, created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before paying claims. The float period can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of securities with maturity dates that continually provide a source of cash flow for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. To protect our Insurance Subsidiaries' capital, we purchase reinsurance coverage for significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur.
The Insurance Subsidiaries did not pay cash dividends to the Parent in 2025. As of December 31, 2025, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend is $466 million for 2026. All Insurance Subsidiary dividends to the Parent are (i) subject to the approval and/or review of its domiciliary state insurance regulator and (ii) generally payable only from earned statutory surplus reported in its annual statements as of the preceding December 31. Although domiciliary state insurance regulators have historically approved Insurance Subsidiary dividends, there is no assurance they will approve future dividends.
New Jersey corporate law also limits the maximum amount of dividends the Parent can pay its stockholders if either (i) the Parent would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or (ii) the Parent’s total assets would be less than its total liabilities. The Parent’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is also impacted by (i) covenants in
64
Table of Contents
its credit agreement that obligate it, among other things, to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, and (ii) the terms of our preferred stock that prohibit dividends from being declared or paid on our common stock if dividends are not declared and paid, or made payable, on all outstanding preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions and financial covenants, where applicable, see Note 11. "Indebtedness," Note 17. "Equity," and Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Line of Credit
On June 30, 2025, the Parent entered into a Credit Agreement (the "Line of Credit") with the lenders named therein (the "Lenders") and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent. Under the Line of Credit, the Lenders have agreed to provide the Parent with a $100 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to $200 million with the Lenders' consent. The Line of Credit will mature on June 30, 2028, and has a variable interest rate based on the Parent’s debt ratings. This agreement replaced a prior credit agreement that the Parent terminated in conjunction with entering into the Line of Credit. No borrowings were made under either credit facility in 2025.
For additional information regarding the Line of Credit and corresponding representations, warranties, and covenants, refer to Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Four Insurance Subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") branches, as shown in the following table. Membership requires the ownership of branch stock and includes the right to access liquidity. All Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") borrowings are required to be secured by investments pledged as collateral. For additional information regarding collateral outstanding, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
| Branch | Insurance Subsidiary Member |
|---|---|
| FHLBI | SICSC1SICSE1 |
| FHLBNY | SICA SICNY |
1These subsidiaries are jointly referred to as the "Indiana Subsidiaries" because they are domiciled in Indiana.
The Line of Credit permits aggregate borrowings from the FHLBI and the FHLBNY up to 10% of the respective member company’s admitted assets for the previous year. SICNY is domiciled in New York, which limits its FHLBNY borrowings to the lesser of 5% of admitted assets for the most recently completed fiscal quarter or 10% of the previous year-end's admitted assets.
The following table provides information on the remaining capacity for FHLB borrowings based on these restrictions, as well as the additional FHLB stock purchase requirement to allow these member companies to borrow their remaining capacity amounts:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | Additional FHLB Stock Requirements | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,284.5 | $ | 128.4 | 32.0 | 96.4 | 2.9 | |||||||||
| SICSE | 1,045.8 | 104.6 | 28.0 | 76.6 | 2.4 | |||||||||||
| SICA | 4,709.7 | 471.0 | — | 471.0 | 21.2 | |||||||||||
| SICNY | 892.5 | 44.6 | — | 44.6 | 2.0 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 748.6 | 60.0 | 688.6 | 28.5 |
Short-term Borrowings
We made no material short-term borrowings from FHLB branches during 2025.
65
Table of Contents
Intercompany Loan Agreements
The Parent has lending agreements with the Indiana Subsidiaries, approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance, that provide the Parent with additional intercompany liquidity. Like the Line of Credit, these lending agreements limit the Parent's borrowings from the Indiana Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. The following table provides information on the Parent’s borrowings and remaining borrowing capacity from the two Indiana Subsidiaries:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets as of December 31, 2025 | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | ||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,284.5 | $ | 128.4 | 21.0 | 107.4 | ||||||
| SICSE | 1,045.8 | 104.6 | 14.0 | 90.6 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 233.0 | 35.0 | 198.0 |
Additionally, we have other insurance regulator-approved intercompany agreements that facilitate liquidity management between the Parent and the Insurance Subsidiaries, thereby enhancing flexibility.
Capital Market Activities
In 2025, the Parent issued $400 million of 5.90% Senior Notes due 2035, resulting in net proceeds of $395.9 million after a $0.1 million discount and debt issuance costs of approximately $4.1 million. The proceeds from this debt issuance were used for general corporate purposes, including supporting organic growth with a $200 million capital contribution to the Insurance Subsidiaries in March 2025. The Parent had no private or public stock issuances during 2025.
On October 22, 2025, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase issued and outstanding shares of common stock up to $200 million, exclusive of any excise tax impact. The program became effective on October 27, 2025, and has no expiration date. The previously existing $100 million share repurchase program remained effective through October 24, 2025. Repurchases under both programs in 2025 were as follows:
| 2025 | Total Number of Shares Purchased | Average Price Paid Per Share | Remaining Authorizationas of 12/31/25(in millions) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prior Share Repurchase Program | 698,312 | $ | 79.60 | $ | — | |||||
| Current Share Repurchase Program | 395,073 | 75.94 | 170.0 | |||||||
| Total | 1,093,385 | $ | 78.28 | $ | 170.0 |
For additional information on the share repurchase program, refer to Note 17. "Equity" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Uses of Liquidity
The Parent uses the liquidity generated from the sources discussed above to pay dividends to our stockholders, among other things. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common and preferred stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors. In October 2025, our Board approved a 13% increase in the quarterly cash dividend on common stock, to $0.43, from $0.38 per share. On January 29, 2026, our Board declared:
•A quarterly cash dividend on common stock of $0.43 per common share, that is payable on March 2, 2026, to holders of record as of February 13, 2026; and
•A quarterly cash dividend of $287.50 per share on our 4.60% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B (equivalent to $0.28750 per depositary share) payable on March 16, 2026, to holders of record as of February 27, 2026.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt and continue to pay dividends to our stockholders depends on (i) liquidity at the Parent, (ii) the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or (iii) the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Our next borrowing principal repayment is $60 million to FHLBI due on December 16, 2026.
Restrictions on the Insurance Subsidiaries' ability to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common and preferred stock.
66
Table of Contents
Capital Resources
Capital resources ensure we can pay policyholder claims, furnish the financial strength to support underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At December 31, 2025, we had GAAP stockholders’ equity of $3.6 billion and statutory surplus of $3.6 billion. With total debt of $902 million at December 31, 2025, our debt-to-capital ratio was 20.0%. For additional information on our statutory surplus, see Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2025, which we expect to fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 910.0 | 60.0 | — | — | 850.0 | |||||||||
| Interest on debt obligation | 704.5 | 51.8 | 100.1 | 100.1 | 452.5 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,614.5 | 111.8 | 100.1 | 100.1 | 1,302.5 | ||||||||||
| Gross loss and loss expense payments | 7,225.4 | 1,915.9 | 2,406.9 | 1,286.0 | 1,616.6 | ||||||||||
| Ceded loss and loss expense payments | 877.8 | 219.9 | 236.6 | 136.6 | 284.7 | ||||||||||
| Net loss and loss expense payments | 6,347.6 | 1,696.0 | 2,170.3 | 1,149.4 | 1,331.9 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 7,962.1 | 1,807.8 | 2,270.4 | 1,249.5 | 2,634.4 |
The loss and loss expense payments in the table above represent estimated paid amounts by period on our loss and loss expense reserves. These estimates are based on past experience, adjusted for current developments and anticipated trends, and involve considerable judgment. There is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the projected timing of loss and loss expense reserve payments, so the timing and amounts of the actual payments will be affected by many factors. Therefore, the projected settlement of the reserves for net loss and loss expense may differ, perhaps significantly, from actual future payments. The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was 3.0 years at December 31, 2025.
For more information on our case reserves and estimates of reserve for loss and loss expense IBNR, refer to the "Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense" section in the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section of this MD&A and Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding cross-default provisions associated with our notes payable in the table above or our Line of Credit, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in this Form 10-K.
In addition to the above, the following table summarizes certain contractual obligations we had at December 31, 2025, that may require us to invest additional amounts in our investment portfolio, which we would fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| ($ in millions) | Amount of Obligation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 508.8 | |
| Alternative investments | 376.3 | ||
| CMLs | 19.4 | ||
| Equity securities | 18.8 | ||
| Total | $ | 923.3 |
There is no certainty (i) that any such additional investments will be required and (ii) about the timing of funding. We expect to have the capacity to fund these commitments through our normal operating and investing activities as they come due.
Our other cash requirements include, without limitation, dividends to stockholders, capital expenditures, and other operating expenses, including commissions to our distribution partners, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had no (i) material guarantees on behalf of others and trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value, (ii) material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in Note 18. "Related Party Transactions" included in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, and (iii) material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special
67
Table of Contents
purpose entities, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Consequently, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk related to off-balance sheet arrangements.
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the capital resources we maintain at the holding company and Insurance Subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics that support our targeted financial strength relative to the macroeconomic environment. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, without limitation, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt and/or equity securities, repurchasing existing debt, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and adjusting common stockholders’ dividends.
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the Insurance Subsidiaries' policyholders and our stockholders, and to enhance our financial strength and underwriting capacity. We have a strong capital base and a high-quality underwriting portfolio, positioning us well to capitalize on potential market opportunities.
Book value per common share increased 18% to $56.74 as of December 31, 2025, from $47.99 as of December 31, 2024, driven by $7.49 in net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share and a $3.01 reduction in after-tax net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities portfolio, partially offset by $1.57 in dividends to our common stockholders. The decrease in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities was primarily driven by a decline in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates. Our adjusted book value per share, which is book value per share excluding total after-tax unrealized gains or losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), increased to $57.91 as of December 31, 2025, from $52.10 as of December 31, 2024.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $1.2 billion in 2025, compared to $1.1 billion in 2024, primarily driven by higher cash premium receipts in 2025 compared to 2024. Operating cash flows were 25% of NPW in 2025 compared to 24% in 2024. For more information on our underwriting results, refer to "Insurance Operations" above in this MD&A.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $1.5 billion in 2025, compared to $947 million in 2024, primarily due to the investment of proceeds from our 5.9% Senior Note issuance in 2025. These proceeds also drove the $207 million net cash provided by financing activities in 2025 compared to $103 million in net cash used in financing activities in 2024. Partially offsetting cash proceeds from the 5.9% Senior Note issuance was cash used for share repurchases and common stock dividends.
MD&A history
Prior-year 10-K MD&A spans are extracted from SEC filings with the same bounded parser used for the latest filing. The latest 10-K appears above; prior years are below.
FY 2024 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000230557-25-000006.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The terms "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Parent") and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires. Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"). The PSLRA provides a forward-looking statement safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements discuss our intentions, beliefs, projections, estimations, or forecasts of future events and financial performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, activity levels, or performance to materially differ from those in or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements include the words "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "attribute," "confident," "strong," "target," "project," "intend," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential," "pro forma," "seek," "likely," "continue," or comparable terms. Our forward-looking statements are only predictions; we cannot guarantee or assure that such expectations will prove correct. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason except as required by law.
We discuss the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our projections, forecasts, or estimates in forward-looking statements in Item 1A. "Risk Factors." of this form 10-K. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a constantly changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge anytime. We cannot predict these new risk factors, their impact on our businesses, or the extent to which one or any combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events we discuss might not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For more details about these segments, refer to Note 1. "Organization" and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program ("WYO"). We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC"), a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
37
Table of Contents
The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of our financial condition and consolidated results of operations, including an evaluation of the amounts and certainty of cash flows from operations and outside sources, trends, and uncertainties that may have a material impact in future periods. The MD&A discusses and analyzes our 2024 results compared to 2023. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K. For discussion and analysis of our 2023 results compared to 2022, refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
In the MD&A, we will discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022;
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes; and
•Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates critical to our business operations and understanding of our results of operations. We consider the policies and estimates most critical to the preparation of the Financial Statements to be (i) reserve for loss and loss expense, (ii) investment valuation and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities, and (iii) reinsurance.
Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense
Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of a claim to us, and the final claim settlement and payment. Insurers establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities to recognize liabilities for unpaid loss and loss expenses. The following tables provide case and incurred but not reported ("IBNR") reserves for loss and loss expenses and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss expense as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:
| December 31, 2024 | Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 515,057 | 2,391,162 | 2,906,219 | 396,702 | 2,509,517 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 347,555 | 688,323 | 1,035,878 | 238,995 | 796,883 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 343,969 | 764,709 | 1,108,678 | 14,774 | 1,093,904 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 46,076 | 78,048 | 124,124 | 2,604 | 121,520 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 119,858 | 71,223 | 191,081 | 36,313 | 154,768 | ||||||||||
| Other | 6,497 | 15,729 | 22,226 | 2,612 | 19,614 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,379,012 | 4,009,194 | 5,388,206 | 692,000 | 4,696,206 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 75,461 | 118,355 | 193,816 | 35,386 | 158,430 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 19,593 | 37,851 | 57,444 | 1,962 | 55,482 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 240,704 | 49,484 | 290,188 | 273,013 | 17,175 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 335,758 | 205,690 | 541,448 | 310,361 | 231,087 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 106,178 | 530,099 | 636,277 | 18,903 | 617,374 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 12,030 | 11,840 | 23,870 | 981 | 22,889 | ||||||||||
| Total E&S Lines | 118,208 | 541,939 | 660,147 | 19,884 | 640,263 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,832,978 | 4,756,823 | 6,589,801 | 1,022,245 | 5,567,556 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure related to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our WYO flood losses.
2Includes general liability (97% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (3% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (93% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (7% of net reserves).
38
Table of Contents
| December 31, 2023 | Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 453,520 | 1,743,885 | 2,197,405 | 255,493 | 1,941,912 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 353,448 | 654,267 | 1,007,715 | 203,982 | 803,733 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 315,116 | 659,234 | 974,350 | 15,683 | 958,667 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 39,034 | 71,159 | 110,193 | 5,252 | 104,941 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 108,644 | 66,579 | 175,223 | 39,152 | 136,071 | ||||||||||
| Other | 17,260 | 12,819 | 30,079 | 10,241 | 19,838 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,287,022 | 3,207,943 | 4,494,965 | 529,803 | 3,965,162 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 68,329 | 100,036 | 168,365 | 38,273 | 130,092 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 18,335 | 44,261 | 62,596 | 1,647 | 60,949 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 12,909 | 34,282 | 47,191 | 32,736 | 14,455 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 99,573 | 178,579 | 278,152 | 72,656 | 205,496 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 99,690 | 447,770 | 547,460 | 15,686 | 531,774 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 5,667 | 10,667 | 16,334 | 456 | 15,878 | ||||||||||
| E&S Lines | 105,357 | 458,437 | 563,794 | 16,142 | 547,652 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,491,952 | 3,844,959 | 5,336,911 | 618,601 | 4,718,310 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure relates to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (97% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (3% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (90% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (10% of net reserves).
The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was approximately 3.0 years at December 31, 2024 and 3.1 years at December 31, 2023.
How the reserve is established
Reserve for loss and loss expense include case reserves on reported claims and IBNR reserves. Case reserves are estimated for each individual claim based on facts and circumstances known at the time. Case reserves may be adjusted up or down as the claim's specific facts and circumstances change. IBNR reserves are established at more aggregated levels and include provisions for (i) claims not yet reported, (ii) future development on reported claims, (iii) closed claims that could reopen in the future, and (iv) anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries.
We perform quarterly internal reserve reviews using our own loss experience, considering various internal and external factors. Changes in claim dynamics may inherently alter paid and reported development patterns. While the selections in our reserve analyses aim to account for these impacts, estimated reserves involve greater risk of variability. In addition to our internal reserve reviews, an external consulting actuary performs an independent semiannual reserve review. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's report to determine our recorded reserves but we review and discuss our observations on trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies with our consulting actuary. While not required, our independent consulting actuary issues the annual statutory Statements of Actuarial Opinion for our Insurance Subsidiaries. For additional information on our accounting policy for reserve for loss and loss expense, refer to Note. 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Range of Reasonable Reserve Estimates
We have estimated a range of reasonable reserve estimates for net loss and loss expense of $5,003 million to $6,114 million at December 31, 2024. This range reflects low and high reasonable reserve estimates determined after using judgment to adjust the methods, factors, and assumptions selected within the internal reserve review. This approach produces a range of reasonable reserve estimates but does not represent a distribution of all possible outcomes. Consequently, final outcomes may be greater or less than the estimates.
The range of reasonable reserve estimates increased as of December 31, 2024, relative to December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily related to reserve growth commensurate with (i) our net premiums earned ("NPE") growth and (ii) increased uncertainty in severity due to the impact of social inflation.
Changes in Reserve Estimates (Loss Development)
Our quarterly reserving process may lead to changes in the recorded reserves for prior accident years, referred to as favorable or unfavorable prior year loss and loss expense development. In 2024, we experienced net unfavorable prior year loss
39
Table of Contents
development of $285.3 million, compared to net unfavorable development of $10.0 million in 2023 and net favorable development of $78.9 million in 2022. The following table summarizes prior year development by line of business:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Loss and Loss Expense Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | 316.0 | 55.0 | (5.0) | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 19.5 | 8.0 | 22.5 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (45.0) | (74.5) | (70.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | (1.7) | 7.6 | (7.3) | ||||||
| Commercial property | (23.4) | 0.7 | (1.6) | ||||||
| Bonds | (5.0) | — | (10.0) | ||||||
| Homeowners | (1.4) | 4.6 | (0.6) | ||||||
| Personal automobile | 11.1 | 15.3 | 0.5 | ||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 20.0 | (5.0) | (5.0) | ||||||
| E&S property lines | (4.9) | (1.6) | (2.5) | ||||||
| Other | 0.1 | (0.1) | 0.1 | ||||||
| Total | $ | 285.3 | 10.0 | (78.9) |
A detailed discussion of recent reserve development by line of business follows.
Standard Market General Liability Line of Business
At December 31, 2024, our general liability line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $2.5 billion, representing 45% of our total net reserves. In 2024, this line experienced unfavorable reserve development of $316.0 million, primarily due to the impact of social inflation that increased loss severities in accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023. We attribute the increased severities to elevated social inflation, which we view as an industry dynamic characterized by higher claimant propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. Similarly, this line experienced unfavorable development in 2023 of $55.0 million, attributable to the impact of social inflation driving increased loss severities in accident years 2015 through 2020.
This general liability line of business has experienced a long-term historical trend of meaningful claim severity increases that have been partially offset by claim frequency decreases. In recent years, we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates to address social inflation's increasing impacts. Although we planned for higher expected loss trends, 2024's claim emergence exceeded our expectations. If the favorable frequency trend moderates or severities continue to emerge higher than expected, this line's ultimate loss estimates could be adversely impacted.
The general liability line of business presents a diverse set of exposures. Various factors influence losses and loss trends, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, and economic and social inflation. Economic inflation directly impacts our claims severities by increasing the costs of raw materials, medical procedures, and labor. Social inflation may impact both claim frequency and severity by affecting (i) claimant propensity to file a claim, (ii) the percentage of claimants who engage lawyers, and (iii) broader liability interpretations and the nature and amounts of judicial verdicts and associated awards, all influencing future settlement values. We monitor claim litigation rates regularly. We have observed the percentage of general liability claims with plaintiff attorney involvement increasing in recent periods. Other social inflationary factors, including the increased prevalence of third-party litigation funding, claimant willingness to undergo surgery, evolving plaintiff attorney strategies and tactics, and broadening liability definitions and interpretations are also impacting claims severities. These trends and post-pandemic court case scheduling continue to affect claim settlement times.
We have exposure to abuse or molestation claims, mainly through policies that we (i) underwrite through our Community and Public Services ("CAPS") strategic business unit and (ii) issue to schools, religious institutions, day-care facilities, and other social services. These CAPS business unit customers represented approximately 10% of our total Standard Commercial Lines NPW in 2024 and 2023. We continue to actively manage policy limits and monitor each jurisdiction's statute of limitations to ensure our rate level reflects increased exposure to the extent regulatorily possible. These underwriting and pricing actions have positioned the portfolio for future profitability but limited our CAPS growth in recent years.
Certain states have enacted state laws that extend the statute of limitations or permit windows for abuse or molestation claims and lawsuits that statutes of limitations previously barred. Consequently, we may receive claims decades after the alleged acts involving complex claims coverage determinations, potential litigation, higher defense costs, and the need to collect from reinsurers under older reinsurance agreements. Our claims and actuarial departments actively monitor these claims to identify changes in frequency or severity and any emerging or shifting trends.
40
Table of Contents
Our active monitoring of claim patterns and emerging or shifting trends should help us better understand this rapidly evolving exposure. However, the ultimate impact of social, political, and legal trends remains highly uncertain and could substantially impact the ultimate settlement values for these claims.
In addition, over the last several years, we have implemented underwriting changes within this line of business that we believe will lead to improved profitability. These changes may impact portfolio composition and may affect paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Standard Market Workers Compensation Line of Business
At December 31, 2024, our workers compensation line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $797 million, representing 14% of our total net reserves. During 2024, this line experienced favorable reserve development of $45.0 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2022 and prior. Similarly, this line experienced favorable reserve development during 2023 of $74.5 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior. During both 2024 and 2023, the lower-than-expected loss emergence was partly due to (i) lower than initially anticipated medical inflation and (ii) our various implemented claims initiatives. Because of the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development over an extended number of accident years.
A variety of issues can impact the workers compensation line of business, including:
Unexpected changes in medical cost inflation – The industry has experienced an extended period of lower medical claim cost inflation. Changes to our historical workers compensation medical costs and potential changes in future medical inflation could increase reserve variability;
Changes in statutory workers compensation benefits – Statutory benefit changes may affect all outstanding claims, including past and not-yet-settled claims. Depending on the social and political climate, these changes may either increase or decrease associated claim costs; and
Changes in utilization of the workers compensation system – These changes may be driven by economic, legislative, or other changes, like increased use of prescriptions for pharmaceuticals, more complex medical procedures, changes in permanently injured workers' life expectancy, and health insurance availability.
Standard Market Commercial Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2024, our commercial automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $1.1 billion, representing 20% of our total net reserves. In 2024, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $19.5 million, primarily due to increased severities in accident year 2023. In 2023, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $8.0 million, driven by increased loss expenses in accident years 2022 and prior.
The commercial automobile line has experienced unfavorable trends in recent years that have negatively affected the industry's results and ours. During the pandemic, reduced frequencies were accompanied by significant severity increases, resulting from increased risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence. Risky driving behaviors and the impacts of social inflation continue to pressure this line's claim severities. As of year-end 2024, frequencies remained somewhat below pre-pandemic levels due to changes in commuting patterns.
Increased property damage and physical damage severities relate to (i) elevated repair costs for increasingly complex vehicles that incorporate more technology, (ii) extended periods of rental reimbursement costs for claims, and (iii) inflationary impacts and disruptions to the supply chain, although these have moderated since their peak in 2022.
Over the last several years, we have implemented underwriting changes within this line of business that we believe will lead to improved profitability. These changes may impact portfolio composition and may affect paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Standard Market Personal Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2024, our personal automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $158 million, representing 3% of our total net reserves. This line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $11.1 million in 2024, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2022 through 2023. This line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $15.3 million in 2023, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident year 2022.
41
Table of Contents
Some of the same issues affecting the commercial automobile line also impact this line. The COVID-19-related frequency reduction was even more pronounced for the personal automobile line. Frequencies rebounded after the pandemic and now are at pre-pandemic levels. In addition to the COVID-19-related temporary impacts, the underlying trends of increased vehicle repair costs are likely causes of rising severities, exacerbated by riskier driving behaviors, including distracted driving. We continue recalibrating our predictive models and refining our underwriting and pricing approaches, including prioritizing additional rate filings by state and further refining our pricing factors. These filed rate increases began to take effect early in 2023 and increased in volume and magnitude throughout 2023 and 2024. We expect them to remain above loss trends in 2025 but lower than the rate increases in 2023 and 2024. While we believe these underwriting and pricing changes will ultimately lead to improved profitability and greater stability, the resulting changes to our exposure profile may impact paid and reported development patterns, increasing reserve uncertainty in the near term.
E&S Casualty Lines of Business
At December 31, 2024, our E&S casualty lines of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $617 million, representing 11% of our total net reserves. In 2024, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $20.0 million, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2023 and prior. In 2023, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $5.0 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior.
Some of the risk factors for the general liability line also affect the E&S casualty lines. These include (i) economic inflation, such as materials and labor costs and (ii) social inflationary trends, such as increased attorney involvement, broader liability findings, and more generous settlement awards. In response to these social inflationary trends, we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates, which materialized in 2024.
Over the past several years, we have made operational changes to improve E&S casualty claims processes:
•We created a dedicated E&S claims team, bringing greater expertise and consistency to E&S claims handling.
•We created separate specialized claims teams for "litigated," "non-litigated," and "high exposure" claims.
•We implemented legal operational and expense improvement initiatives, including (i) increasing the use of employed staff counsel lawyers to defend covered claims litigation and (ii) consistent with our duty to defend and manage litigation against our policyholders per the terms and conditions of our policies, we enhanced processes for legal budgeting, expense management, and selection and evaluation of outside policyholder defense counsel.
While we believe these claims operational changes are improving our results and customer experience, they have inherent risks. Changes in claims processes may affect paid and reported development patterns. Our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, but our estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
Other impacts that create additional loss and loss expense reserve uncertainty
Claims Initiative Impacts
Our Claims Department continually identifies areas for improvement and efficiency to increase our policyholder value proposition. These improvements may lead to changes in claims practice that affect average case reserve levels and claims settlement rates, which directly impact the data we use to project ultimate loss and loss expense. While these changes may increase uncertainty in our estimates in the short term, we expect refined claims process management to create longer-term benefits.
Our internal reserve analyses incorporate actuarial projection methods that make adjustments for changes in case reserve adequacy and claims settlement rates. These methods adjust our historical loss experience to the current case adequacy or settlement rate level, providing a more consistent basis for projecting future development patterns. Because these projection methods have their own assumptions and judgments, no single method can be considered definitive.
Unanticipated Changes in Economic Inflation
United States ("U.S.") fiscal and monetary policy and global economic conditions bring additional inflationary trend uncertainty. Changes in inflation affect the ultimate settlement costs for many of our lines of business, with the greatest reserve impact on the longer-tailed lines, such as general liability and workers compensation. Uncertainty about future inflation or deflation creates the potential for additional reserve variability in these lines of business.
42
Table of Contents
Sensitivity analysis: Potential impact on reserve estimates due to changes in key assumptions
Our process to establish reserves includes a variety of key assumptions, such as:
•The selection of loss and loss expense development factors;
•The weight applied to each individual actuarial projection method;
•Projected future loss trends; and
•Expected claim frequencies, severities, and ultimate loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year.
The importance of any single assumption depends on several considerations, such as line of business and accident year. If the actual experience emerges differently than the assumptions underlying the reserve process, possible changes in our reserve estimates could be material to the results of operations in future periods. We conduct sensitivity tests highlighting potential impacts to loss and loss expense reserves for the major casualty lines of business under different scenarios. These tests consider each assumption and line of business individually without considering correlation between lines of business and accident years. The results (i) do not constitute an actuarial range, (ii) show possible impacts from variations in certain key assumptions, and (iii) offer no assurance that future loss and loss expense emergence will be consistent with our current or alternative assumptions.
Changes in internal and external trends and operational changes may manifest as changes in loss and loss expense development patterns. These patterns are a key assumption in the reserving process, as are the current accident year expected loss and loss expense ratios. These ratios are developed through a rigorous process of projecting recent accident years' experience to an ultimate settlement basis. They then are adjusted to the current accident year's pricing and loss cost levels. The impact of underwriting portfolio and claims handling practice changes is also quantified and reflected where appropriate. Nonetheless, the ultimate loss and loss expense ratios may differ from current estimates.
The two tables below illustrate the sensitivities of loss and loss expense reserves to these key assumptions for the major casualty lines. The first table displays estimated impacts from changes in expected reported loss and loss expense development patterns for our major casualty lines of business. It shows line of business reserve impacts if the actual calendar year incurred amounts are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages. While judgmental, the selected percentages by line are based on the reserve range analysis and the actual historical reserve development for the line of business. The second table displays the estimated impacts of changes to the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year. It shows reserve impacts by line of business if the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages.
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Expected Loss and Loss Expense Reporting Patterns | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Future Calendar Year Reported | Increase to Future Calendar Year Reported | ||||||||
| General liability | 15 | % | $ | (425) | $ | 425 | |||||
| Workers compensation | 15 | (85) | 85 | ||||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (110) | 110 | ||||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (20) | 20 | ||||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (70) | 70 |
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Current Year Expected Ultimate Loss and Loss Expense Ratios | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | Increase to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | ||||||||
| General liability | 15 | pts | $ | (170) | $ | 170 | |||||
| Workers compensation | 10 | (35) | 35 | ||||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (75) | 75 | ||||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (20) | 20 | ||||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 15 | (45) | 45 |
There is some overlap between the impacts shown in the tables. For example, increases in the calendar year development would ultimately impact our view of the current accident year's loss and loss expense ratios. However, these tables provide perspective on the sensitivity of each key assumption. While the changes represent outcomes based on reasonably likely changes to our underlying reserving assumptions, they do not represent a range of possible outcomes and our reserves could increase or decrease significantly differently.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
Our general liability, businessowners' policies, and homeowners reserves include exposure to asbestos and environmental claims. The emergence of these claims occurs over an extended period and can be unpredictable. The total recorded net loss
43
Table of Contents
and loss expense reserves for these claims were $27.4 million as of December 31, 2024, and $19.1 million as of December 31, 2023, with asbestos claims constituting approximately 44% of these reserves in 2024 and 18% in 2023.
Environmental claims have arisen primarily from Standard Commercial Lines policies issued to municipal governments and small non-manufacturing commercial customers for landfill exposures, and Standard Personal Lines homeowners policies related to leaking underground storage tanks. Asbestos claims have arisen primarily from Standard Commercial Lines policies issued to (i) various distributors of asbestos-containing products, such as electrical and plumbing materials and (ii) contractors exposed to or handling asbestos-containing products, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractors. These claims are handled in a centralized and specialized asbestos and environmental claim unit that establishes case reserves based on each claim's then-known facts and circumstances, which IBNR reserves supplement.
Estimating IBNR reserves for asbestos and environmental claims is difficult because these claims have delayed and inconsistent reporting patterns. Significant uncertainties are associated with estimating critical reserve assumptions, such as average clean-up costs, third-party costs, potentially responsible party shares, allocation of damages, litigation and coverage costs, and potential state and federal legislative changes.
Other Latent Exposures
We have other latent and continuous trigger exposures in our ongoing portfolio. Examples include claims for construction defect and abuse or molestation, including in states that have increased and expanded the statute of limitations. We manage our exposure to these liabilities through our underwriting and claims practices, which includes a dedicated claims unit, like we do for asbestos and environmental claims. The impact of social, political, and legal trends on these claims remains highly uncertain, so the development and adequacy of our related loss and loss expense reserves remain highly uncertain. Some of these exposures remain in our ongoing portfolio and are reserved in aggregate, with other exposures within the line of business reserves. We remove other unusual and highly uncertain exposures, like toxic product claims involving diacetyl, lead paint, and silica, from our traditional reserve analysis and undertake a separate review for them.
Investment Valuation and the Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
Investment Valuation
Accounting guidance defines the fair value of our investment portfolio as the exit price or amount that would be (i) received to sell an asset or (ii) paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When determining an exit price, we must rely on observable market data, if available. Most securities in our equity portfolio have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized gains or losses recognized through income. Our AFS fixed income securities portfolio is recorded at fair value, and the related unrealized gains or losses are reflected in stockholders' equity, net of tax. For our AFS fixed income securities portfolios, fair value is a key factor in the measurement of (i) losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell and (ii) changes in the allowance for credit losses.
The fair value of approximately 91% of our investments measured at fair value are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and are priced using observable inputs for identical or similar assets. About 9% are classified as either (i) Level 3 and are based on unobservable market inputs because the related securities are not traded on a public market, or (ii) not leveled because the related securities are measured at fair value using net asset value per share (or its practical expedient). For additional information, refer to the following sections within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K: (i) item (d) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for descriptions of the levels within the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques used for our Level 3 securities, and (ii) Note 7. "Fair Value Measurements" for quantitative information on the unobservable inputs in our securities measured using Level 3 inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
When fixed income securities are in an unrealized loss position and we do not intend to sell them, we record an allowance for credit losses for the portion of the unrealized loss related to an expected credit loss. We estimate expected credit losses on these securities by performing a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow ("DCF"). The allowance for credit losses is the excess of amortized cost over the greater of (i) our estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows or (ii) fair value. The allowance for credit losses cannot exceed the unrealized loss, and therefore it may fluctuate with changes in the security's fair value. We also consider the need to record losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for which we have the intent to sell. If we determine that we have the intent or likely requirement to sell the security, we write down its amortized cost to its fair value.
We analyze unrealized losses for credit loss in accordance with our existing accounting policy, which includes performing DCF analyses on securities at the lot level and analyzing these DCFs using various economic scenarios. In performing these DCF analyses, we calculate the present value of future cash flows using various models specific to the major security types in our
44
Table of Contents
portfolio. These models use security-specific information and forecasted macroeconomic data to determine possible expected credit loss scenarios based on projected economic changes. The forecasted economic data incorporated into the models is based on the Federal Reserve Board’s annual supervisory stress test review on certain large banks and financial institutions.
We also can incorporate internally-developed forecast information into the models as we deem appropriate. In developing our best estimate of the allowance for credit losses, we consider our outlook on the probability of the various scenarios occurring.
Based on these analyses, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio of $31.9 million at December 31, 2024, and $28.2 million at December 31, 2023. If the security-specific and macroeconomic assumptions in our DCF analyses or our outlook on the occurrence probability of our DCF model scenarios were to change, our allowance for credit losses and the resulting credit loss expense or benefit will negatively or positively impact our results of operations. Factors considered in determining the allowance for credit losses require significant judgment, including our evaluation of the security's projected cash flow stream.
For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses on AFS fixed income securities, see item (c) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and item (i) of Note 5. "Investments" within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, respectively.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss expense represent our estimates of the amounts we will recover from reinsurers. Each reinsurance contract is analyzed to ensure sufficient risk is transferred to record the transactions appropriately as reinsurance in the Financial Statements. Amounts recovered from reinsurers are recognized as assets contemporaneously and in a manner consistent with the paid and unpaid losses associated with the underlying policies. An allowance for credit losses on our reinsurance recoverable balance is recorded based on an evaluation of balances due from reinsurers and other available information, including collateral we hold under the terms and conditions of the underlying agreements. Reinsurers often purchase and rely on their retrocessional reinsurance programs to manage their capital position and improve their financial strength ratings. Details about retrocessional reinsurance programs are not always transparent, making it difficult to assess our reinsurers' exposure to counterparty credit risk. Other factors impact our reinsurer's credit quality, such as their reserve adequacy, investment portfolio, regulatory capital position, catastrophe aggregations, and risk management practices. In addition, contractual language interpretations and willingness to pay valid claims can impact our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance. Our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance was $2.0 million at December 31, 2024, and $1.7 million at December 31, 2023. We continually monitor developments that may impact recoverability from our reinsurers, for which we have contractual remedies, if necessary. For further information regarding reinsurance, see the "Reinsurance" section below in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" and Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
45
Table of Contents
Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 20221
| 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2024 | 2023 | vs. 2023 | 2022 | vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,861,664 | 4,232,106 | 15 | % | $ | 3,558,062 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 362,616 | 309,535 | 17 | 232,199 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income (loss) | (104,745) | 104,911 | (200) | 131,774 | (20) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) before federal income tax | 258,034 | 458,412 | (44) | 280,186 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 207,012 | 365,238 | (43) | 224,886 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | 197,812 | 356,038 | (44) | 215,686 | 65 | ||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 103.0 | % | 96.5 | 6.5 | pts | 95.1 | % | 1.4 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 3.31 | 3.16 | 5 | % | $ | 3.37 | (6) | % | ||||||||||||
| Annualized after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 4.0 | % | 3.7 | 0.3 | pts | 2.9 | % | 0.8 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Return on common equity ("ROE") | 7.0 | 14.3 | (7.3) | 8.8 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio | $ | 1.60 | 1.51 | 6 | % | $ | 1.44 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share | $ | 3.23 | 5.84 | (45) | % | $ | 3.54 | 65 | % | ||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 47.99 | 45.42 | 6 | 38.57 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 1.43 | 1.25 | 14 | 1.14 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information2: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) | $ | 200,141 | 358,844 | (44) | % | $ | 306,384 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | 3.27 | 5.89 | (44) | 5.03 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 7.1 | % | 14.4 | (7.3) | pts | 12.4 | % | 2.0 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 52.10 | 50.03 | 4 | % | $ | 45.49 | 10 | % |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this financial review.
2Non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are comparable to net income (loss) available to common stockholders, net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments included in net income (loss). Adjusted book value per common share is comparable to book value per common share, but excludes total after-tax unrealized gains and losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These non-GAAP measures are important financial measures used by us, analysts, and investors because the timing of realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments could distort the analysis of trends.
Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures are provided in the tables below:
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income (loss) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders | $ | 197,812 | 356,038 | 215,686 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income, before tax | 2,949 | 3,552 | 114,808 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (620) | (746) | (24,110) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) | $ | 200,141 | 358,844 | 306,384 |
| Reconciliation of net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 3.23 | 5.84 | 3.54 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | 0.05 | 0.06 | 1.89 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (0.01) | (0.01) | (0.40) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income (loss) per diluted common share | $ | 3.27 | 5.89 | 5.03 |
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.0 | % | 14.3 | 8.8 | ||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income (loss), before tax | 0.1 | 0.1 | 4.7 | |||||
| Tax on reconciling items | — | — | (1.1) | |||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 7.1 | % | 14.4 | 12.4 |
46
Table of Contents
| Reconciliation of book value per common share to adjusted book value per common share | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value per common share | $ | 47.99 | 45.42 | 38.57 | |||||
| Total unrealized investment (gains) losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax | 5.21 | 5.83 | 8.75 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (1.10) | (1.22) | (1.83) | ||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 52.10 | 50.03 | 45.49 |
The components of our ROE and non-GAAP operating ROE are as follows:
| ROE Components | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2023 | vs. 2023 | 2022 | vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||
| Standard Commercial Lines segment | (4.0) | % | 5.0 | (9.0) | pts | 4.6 | 0.4 | pts | ||||||||||
| Standard Personal Lines segment | (1.1) | (2.5) | 1.4 | (0.2) | (2.3) | |||||||||||||
| E&S Lines segment | 1.4 | 1.7 | (0.3) | 1.0 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||
| Total insurance operations | (3.7) | 4.2 | (7.9) | 5.4 | (1.2) | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned | 12.8 | 12.4 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | (0.1) | (0.1) | — | (3.6) | 3.5 | |||||||||||||
| Total investments segment | 12.7 | 12.3 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 6.5 | |||||||||||||
| Other | (2.0) | (2.2) | 0.2 | (2.4) | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
| ROE | 7.0 | 14.3 | (7.3) | 8.8 | 5.5 | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses, after tax | 0.1 | 0.1 | — | 3.6 | (3.5) | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 7.1 | % | 14.4 | (7.3) | 12.4 | 2.0 |
In 2024, we generated an ROE of 7.0% compared to 14.3% in 2023. Our non-GAAP operating ROE of 7.1% in 2024 was below our target non-GAAP operating ROE of 12% and below our 2023 non-GAAP operating ROE of 14.4%. Investment performance was strong in 2024 and contributed 12.8 points to ROE; however, an after-tax underwriting loss reduced our ROE by 3.7 points in 2024, a reduction of 7.9 points when compared to 2023.
The after-tax underwriting loss in 2024 compared to income in 2023 was primarily attributable to unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024. We recorded $311.0 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024, compared to $6.5 million of favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023. Development in 2024 included $316.0 million in the general liability line of business in our Standard Commercial Lines segment for accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023. We believe that current market conditions and environmental factors, most notably social inflation, are impacting us more than historically. As a commercial lines-focused underwriter with a higher mix of casualty business, we recognize this social inflationary environment has increased loss severities. Reflecting these trends, current year casualty loss costs were 1.4 combined ratio points higher in 2024 compared to 2023.
For additional qualitative discussion on prior year casualty reserve development, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Outlook
Although our 2024 ROE was below our target, we ended the year with a strong capital position and the financial flexibility to execute our strategy of disciplined, profitable growth. In recent years, we made strategic investments to expand our runway for profitable growth. These included adding eight states to our Standard Commercial Lines footprint, organically growing within our existing footprint, and investing in technology. These investments better position us to scale our business effectively with a focus on operational efficiency. Our reserving actions, pricing response, and progress on our strategic priorities in 2024 have us well-positioned to quickly return to delivering operating ROEs at or better than our 12% target.
Our granular approach to managing renewal pure price and retention coupled with our unique field model, the strength of our distribution partner relationships, and focus on customer experience continue to differentiate us in the market. In this uncertain environment, we are focused on rate and non-rate actions to drive underwriting profitability while prudently growing the business, including:
•Standard Commercial Lines
◦Achieving overall Standard Commercial Lines renewal pure price increases that reflect forward loss trend expectations;
47
Table of Contents
◦Implementing underwriting refinements in our general liability line of business, including managing limits and coverage grants in challenging jurisdictions, driving improved terms and conditions, and focusing production on better-performing classes of business;
◦Continuing to expand our Standard Commercial Lines market share by (i) increasing our share towards a 12% target of our agents' premiums and (ii) strategically appointing new agents; and
◦Expanding our geographic footprint. In 2024, we entered Maine, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and West Virginia, now covering 35 states and the District of Columbia. We expect to write new business in Kansas, Montana, and Wyoming over the next two years. After that, our pace of geographic expansion should moderate as we move closer to our goal of operating our Standard Commercial Lines business with a near national footprint.
•Standard Personal Lines
◦Continuing to refine our underwriting approach and pricing factors and achieving overall Standard Personal Lines renewal pure price increases that exceed loss trends;
◦Continuing to grow our mass affluent customer base in states where we have filed and obtained approvals of adequate rates; and
◦Continuing to seek improved homeowners line of business profitability by expanding the use of new policy terms and conditions, including (i) coverage for older roofs based on depreciation schedules rather than replacement cost and (ii) implementing mandatory wind/hail deductibles in states exposed to severe convective storms, where law permits.
•E&S Lines
◦Achieving E&S Lines renewal pure price increases that reflect forward loss trend expectations; and
◦Continuing to invest in product expansion, risk evaluation, and operational efficiency for small and middle market E&S lines accounts.
For 2025, our full-year expectations are as follows:
•A GAAP combined ratio of 96% to 97%, including net catastrophe losses of 6 points. Our combined ratio estimate assumes no prior year casualty reserve development;
•After-tax net investment income of $405 million;
•An overall effective tax rate of 21.5%; and
•Weighted average shares of 61.5 million on a fully diluted basis.
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing the combined ratio:
| All Lines | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Operations Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 4,630,001 | 4,134,532 | 12 | % | $ | 3,573,590 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 4,376,447 | 3,827,606 | 14 | 3,373,380 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 3,164,484 | 2,484,285 | 27 | 2,111,778 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,338,047 | 1,203,767 | 11 | 1,089,942 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 6,504 | 6,755 | (4) | 4,858 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | (132,588) | 132,799 | (200) | % | $ | 166,802 | (20) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 72.3 | % | 64.9 | 7.4 | pts | 62.7 | % | 2.2 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 30.6 | 31.4 | (0.8) | 32.3 | (0.9) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 103.0 | 96.5 | 6.5 | 95.1 | 1.4 |
48
Table of Contents
The NPW growth of 12% in 2024 compared to 2023 included:
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 994.3 | 923.5 | 731.7 | ||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 9.5 | % | 6.8 | 5.1 |
Our NPW growth in 2024 also benefited from (i) exposure growth on renewal policies and (ii) stable retention in our Standard Commercial Lines and E&S Lines.
The increase in NPE in 2024 compared to 2023 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 311,000 | (6,500) | (4,885) | % | (86,000) | (92) | % | ||||||||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 1,887,374 | 1,595,891 | 18 | 1,433,982 | 11 | |||||||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 284,503 | 244,510 | 16 | 145,926 | 68 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 681,607 | 650,384 | 5 | 617,870 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 3,164,484 | 2,484,285 | 27 | 2,111,778 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 7.1 | % | (0.2) | 7.3 | pts | (2.5) | 2.3 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 43.1 | 41.7 | 1.4 | 42.6 | (0.9) | |||||||||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 6.5 | 6.4 | 0.1 | 4.3 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 15.6 | 17.0 | (1.4) | 18.3 | (1.3) | |||||||||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 72.3 | 64.9 | 7.4 | 62.7 | 2.2 |
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 7.4 points in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by:
•An increase of 7.3 points in unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 compared to 2023. In 2024, we recorded $311 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development compared to $6.5 million, or 0.2 points, of favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023. Our 2024 calendar year actions were predominantly in the general liability line for accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023; and
•An increase of 1.4 points in current year casualty loss costs in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to increased loss trend expectations and higher prior-year severity assumptions related to the impacts of social inflation on our general liability and E&S casualty lines of business.
49
Table of Contents
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by reportable segment and line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | 316.0 | 55.0 | (5.0) | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 20.0 | 4.0 | 15.0 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (45.0) | (74.5) | (70.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | — | — | (11.0) | ||||||
| Bonds | (5.0) | — | (10.0) | ||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 286.0 | (15.5) | (81.0) | ||||||
| Homeowners | (5.0) | — | — | ||||||
| Personal automobile | 10.0 | 14.0 | — | ||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 5.0 | 14.0 | — | ||||||
| E&S | 20.0 | (5.0) | (5.0) | ||||||
| Total (favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 311.0 | (6.5) | (86.0) |
The 2024 unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development by line of business was driven by the following:
•General liability - increased severities in accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023, due to impacts from social inflation;
•Commercial automobile - increased severities in accident year 2023;
•Personal automobile - increased severities in accident years 2022 through 2023; and
•E&S casualty - increased severities in accident years 2023 and prior.
Favorable prior year casualty reserve development on our workers' compensation, bonds, and homeowners lines of business provided a partial offset to the items above. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development on the workers compensation line was primarily driven by improved severities in accident years 2022 and prior.
The 2023 favorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily driven by favorable development on our workers compensation line of business, due to improved loss severities driven by continued favorable medical cost trends in accident years 2021 and prior. Partially offsetting this favorable development was unfavorable development on our general liability and personal automobile lines of business. The unfavorable prior year development on (i) general liability was primarily driven by increased loss severities in accident years 2015 through 2020 attributable to social inflation and (ii) personal automobile was primarily driven by increased loss severities in accident year 2022.
For additional qualitative discussion on prior year casualty reserve development and current year casualty loss costs, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Property Losses
Net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 1.3 points in the aggregate in 2024 compared to 2023. The non-catastrophe property loss and loss expense ratio was 1.4 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, reflecting (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024, (ii) lower claim frequencies, and (iii) variability from period to period of non-catastrophe weather. Net catastrophe losses were in line with last year, with the single largest event being Hurricane Helene for $85.0 million, or 1.9 points. Hurricane Helene occurred in late September 2024 and primarily impacted states in our Southeastern footprint.
For additional qualitative discussion on non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio was 0.8 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to lower expected profit-based employee compensation and growth in premium outpacing growth in underwriting expenses.
50
Table of Contents
Standard Commercial Lines Segment
| 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 3,632,113 | 3,281,319 | 11 | % | $ | 2,901,984 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 3,447,556 | 3,071,784 | 12 | 2,739,819 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 2,501,615 | 1,919,204 | 30 | 1,683,988 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,084,420 | 988,519 | 10 | 907,277 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 6,504 | 6,755 | (4) | 4,858 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | (144,983) | 157,306 | (192) | % | $ | 143,696 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 72.5 | % | 62.5 | 10.0 | pts | 61.5 | % | 1.0 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 31.5 | 32.2 | (0.7) | 33.1 | (0.9) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 104.2 | 94.9 | 9.3 | 94.8 | 0.1 |
NPW growth of 11% in 2024 compared to 2023 included:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 619.1 | $ | 597.5 | ||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 8.3 | 7.0 |
In addition, NPW growth in 2024 benefited from strong exposure growth on renewal policies.
The increase in NPE in 2024 compared to 2023 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 286,000 | (15,500) | (1,945) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 1,574,532 | 1,322,593 | 19 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 181,546 | 150,518 | 21 | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 459,537 | 461,593 | — | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 2,501,615 | 1,919,204 | 30 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 8.3 | % | (0.5) | 8.8 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 45.6 | 43.1 | 2.5 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 5.3 | 4.9 | 0.4 | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 13.3 | 15.0 | (1.7) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 72.5 | 62.5 | 10.0 |
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 10.0 points in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by:
•An increase of 8.8 points in unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 compared to 2023. In 2024, we recorded $286.0 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development compared to $15.5 million, or 0.5 points, of favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023. Our 2024 calendar year actions were predominantly in the general liability line for accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most of the actions for accident years 2022 and 2023; and
•An increase of 2.5 points in current year casualty loss costs in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to increased loss trend expectations and higher prior-year severity assumptions related to the impacts of social inflation on our general liability line.
51
Table of Contents
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | 316.0 | 55.0 | (5.0) | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 20.0 | 4.0 | 15.0 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (45.0) | (74.5) | (70.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | — | — | (11.0) | ||||||
| Bonds | (5.0) | — | (10.0) | ||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 286.0 | (15.5) | (81.0) |
Refer to the line of business sections below for qualitative discussion on the significant drivers of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development and current year casualty loss costs.
Property Losses
Net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 1.3 points in the aggregate in 2024 compared to 2023. The non-catastrophe property loss and loss expense ratio was 1.7 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, reflecting (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024, (ii) lower claim frequencies, and (iii) variability from period to period of non-catastrophe weather. Net catastrophe losses were 0.4 points higher than last year, driven by Hurricane Helene, our single largest event in 2024, resulting in $65.5 million, or 1.9 points.
Refer to the line of business sections below for qualitative discussion on the significant drivers of non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio was 0.7 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to lower expected profit-based employee compensation and growth in premium outpacing growth in underwriting expenses.
The following is a discussion of our most significant Standard Commercial Lines of business:
| General Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 20231 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 20221 | ||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 1,183,194 | 1,087,079 | 9 | % | $ | 958,121 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 179,921 | 179,047 | n/a | 151,005 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 85 | n/a | 85 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 8.6 | 5.4 | n/a | 4.5 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 1,125,491 | 1,020,362 | 10 | % | $ | 902,428 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | (295,876) | 70,806 | (518) | 104,517 | (32) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 126.3 | % | 93.1 | 33.2 | pts | 88.4 | % | 4.7 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 33 | 33 | 33 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 9% in 2024 compared to 2023, benefiting from renewal pure price increases, exposure growth on renewal policies, and strong retention.
The combined ratio was 33.2 points higher in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 316,000 | 55,000 | 475 | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 754,676 | 571,207 | 32 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 1,070,676 | 626,207 | 71 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 28.1 | % | 5.4 | 22.7 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 67.0 | 56.0 | 11.0 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 95.1 | 61.4 | 33.7 |
52
Table of Contents
The general liability line of business has experienced a long-term historical trend of meaningful severity increases that have been partially offset by claim frequency decreases. Prior-year severities have developed adversely. Although we saw these trends primarily impact the pre-pandemic period in 2023, we have seen elevated severity escalation extend into the more recent accident years during 2024. We attribute the increased severities to elevated social inflation, which we view as an industry dynamic characterized by higher claimant propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. We are closely monitoring specific jurisdictions with expanded liability definitions and interpretations and higher damage awards for loss trend impact and broader industry trends.
Although we planned for higher expected loss trends, claim emergence in 2024 exceeded our expectations. In response to these unfavorable trends due to the impact of social inflation, we recorded unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development of $316.0 million in 2024 for accident years 2020 and subsequent, with most actions for accident years 2022 and 2023. Additionally, current year casualty loss costs were 11.0 points higher in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to increased loss trend expectations and higher prior-year severity assumptions. If severities continue to emerge higher than expected, this line's ultimate loss estimates could be adversely impacted.
We believe that social inflation and elevated loss trends are an industry dynamic, which may lead to an acceleration of rate increases in this line of business for the industry and us. Given the consistency in our underwriting appetite and risk profile over time, we have focused our actions primarily on prudent underwriting and achieving additional rate. Our renewal pure price increase in this line of business accelerated to 8.6% in 2024, up from 5.4% in 2023.
Despite the adverse emergence in general liability, we remain comfortable with the composition and quality of our underwriting portfolio. While rate increases will continue to be the primary focus for profitability improvement, we are also making underwriting refinements, including managing limits and coverage grants in challenging jurisdictions, driving improved terms and conditions, and focusing production on better-performing classes of business.
| Commercial Automobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 vs. 20231 | 2023 vs. 20221 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 1,121,488 | 976,888 | 15 | % | $ | 860,116 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 164,329 | 147,242 | n/a | 125,129 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 86 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 10.7 | 9.8 | n/a | 8.1 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 1,058,228 | 916,140 | 16 | % | $ | 812,306 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 2,474 | (33,724) | 107 | (63,112) | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 99.8 | % | 103.7 | (3.9) | pts | 107.8 | % | (4.1) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 31 | 30 | 30 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 15% in 2024 compared to 2023, benefiting from renewal pure price increases, strong retention, and higher direct new business. This strong retention and higher direct new business contributed to a 5% growth of in-force vehicle counts as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023.
The combined ratio was 3.9 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 20,000 | 4,000 | 400 | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 544,691 | 489,463 | 11 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 8,646 | 5,038 | 72 | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 172,094 | 177,803 | (3) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 745,431 | 676,304 | 10 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 1.9 | % | 0.4 | 1.5 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 51.5 | 53.5 | (2.0) | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 16.3 | 19.4 | (3.1) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 70.5 | 73.8 | (3.3) |
53
Table of Contents
Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses in 2024 were lower compared to 2023, primarily due to (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024 and (ii) lower claim frequencies. In addition, the current year casualty loss costs ratio was 2.0 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024.
Partially offsetting the favorable combined ratio drivers mentioned above, was unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024, primarily due to increased severities in accident year 2023. The 2023 unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily due to increased loss expenses in accident years 2022 and prior.
| Commercial Property1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 vs. 20232 | 2023 vs. 20222 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 739,500 | 648,753 | 14 | % | $ | 535,666 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 152,248 | 147,358 | n/a | 118,470 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 84 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 10.0 | 9.8 | n/a | 6.2 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 685,568 | 586,267 | 17 | % | $ | 495,647 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 53,331 | 10,765 | 395 | (7,015) | 253 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 92.2 | pts | 98.2 | (6.0) | 101.4 | pts | (3.2) | ||||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 20 | 20 | 18 |
1includes Inland Marine.
2n/a: not applicable.
NPW grew 14% in 2024 compared to 2023 benefiting from renewal pure price increases, strong retention, and exposure growth on renewal policies.
The combined ratio was 6.0 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 245.0 | 35.7 | pts | $ | 146.4 | 21.3 | pts | 57.0 | (4.6) | |||||||||||
| 2023 | 233.4 | 39.8 | 127.9 | 21.8 | 61.6 | (2.1) |
Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expense ratios were lower in 2024 compared to 2023, reflecting (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024 and (ii) the continued variability from period to period normally associated with the commercial property line of business. We continue to manage our long-term profitability through (i) price increases and (ii) targeted underwriting actions, including an ongoing focus on appropriate policy terms and conditions and achieving accurate insurance-to-value ratios, in part, by using automated aerial imagery solutions.
In addition, the underwriting expense ratio was 1.4 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, as discussed in the "Standard Commercial Lines Segment" section above.
| Workers Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 vs. 20231 | 2023 vs. 20221 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 320,608 | 338,123 | (5) | % | $ | 340,802 | (1) | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 54,520 | 63,703 | n/a | 61,726 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 84 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases (decreases) | (2.8) | (1.5) | n/a | (0.5) | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 327,725 | 333,669 | (2) | % | $ | 335,955 | (1) | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 57,724 | 95,397 | (39) | 91,087 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 82.4 | % | 71.4 | 11.0 | pts | 72.9 | % | (1.5) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 9 | 12 | 12 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW decreased 5% in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to renewal pure price decreases and a reduction in direct new business.
54
Table of Contents
The combined ratio was 11.0 points higher in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to the following:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | Unfavorable/(Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2024 | $ | (45.0) | (13.7) | pts | 8.6 | |||||
| 2023 | (74.5) | (22.3) | (1.5) |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 was primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2022 and prior. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily due to improved loss severities driven by continued favorable medical cost trends in accident years 2021 and prior.
In addition, the combined ratio was adversely impacted by an increase in current year casualty loss costs of 3.2 points in 2024, primarily driven by loss trend outpacing rate level reductions associated with workers compensation rating bureau loss cost reductions.
Standard Personal Lines Segment
| 2024 vs. 2023 | 2023 vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 430,725 | 414,585 | 4 | % | $ | 319,059 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 424,917 | 365,213 | 16 | 299,405 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 364,601 | 353,185 | 3 | 231,113 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 99,801 | 91,291 | 9 | 75,485 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | (39,485) | (79,263) | 50 | % | $ | (7,193) | (1,002) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 85.8 | % | 96.7 | (10.9) | pts | 77.2 | % | 19.5 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 23.5 | 25.0 | (1.5) | 25.2 | (0.2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 109.3 | 121.7 | (12.4) | 102.4 | 19.3 |
NPW increased 4% in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to renewal pure price increases, exposure growth on renewal policies, and higher average policy sizes from our mass affluent market strategy, partially offset by reductions in direct new business and retention. The reduction in direct new business premiums was primarily due to a decrease in new policy counts, which were down 51% in 2024 compared to 2023. These reductions, and the reduction in retention illustrated in the table below, resulted from the rate increases we are implementing as part of our overall profit improvement plan.
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums1 | $ | 72.6 | $ | 116.5 | ||||
| Retention | 77 | % | 87 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 20.6 | 5.2 |
1Excludes our flood direct premiums written, which is 100% ceded to the NFIP and therefore, has no impact on our NPW.
In recent years, we've been taking aggressive actions to improve the profitability of this business by prioritizing additional rate filings to attain premiums in line with current loss costs, and further refining our pricing factors. These filed rate increases began to take effect early in 2023 and increased in number and magnitude throughout 2023 and 2024. In 2025, we expect rate changes to remain above loss trends but will moderate compared to the filed rate increases in 2023 and 2024. Renewal pure prices increased 20.6% in 2024, a direct outcome of these actions. In addition, we are continuing to seek improved profitability within our homeowners line of business by expanding the use of new policy terms and conditions, including (i) coverage for older roofs based on a schedule of factors rather than replacement cost and (ii) implementing mandatory wind/hail deductibles in states exposed to severe convective storms, where allowed by law.
The increase in NPE in 2024 compared to 2023 resulted from the same impacts on NPW discussed above.
55
Table of Contents
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 5,000 | 14,000 | (64) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 115,591 | 112,980 | 2 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 79,965 | 69,315 | 15 | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 164,045 | 156,890 | 5 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 364,601 | 353,185 | 3 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 1.2 | % | 3.8 | (2.6) | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 27.2 | 30.9 | (3.7) | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 18.8 | 19.0 | (0.2) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 38.6 | 43.0 | (4.4) | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 85.8 | 96.7 | (10.9) |
Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development and Current Year Casualty Loss Costs
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 10.9 points in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by (i) a decrease of 2.6 points in unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 compared to 2023 and (ii) a decrease of 3.7 points in current year casualty loss costs in 2024 compared to 2023. The decrease in current year casualty loss costs in 2024 compared to 2023 was primarily due to (i) significant rate increases, and (ii) a 1.0-point increase in flood claims handling fees related to Hurricane Helene from our participation in the NFIP.
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development by line of business were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | ||||
| Homeowners | $ | (5.0) | — | |||
| Personal automobile | 10.0 | 14.0 | ||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 5.0 | 14.0 |
Prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 included $10.0 million of unfavorable development in personal automobile, primarily driven by increased loss severities in accident years 2022 through 2023. This was partially offset by $5.0 million of favorable development in homeowners, primarily due to lower loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior.
The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily attributable to increased loss severities in accident year 2022 on our personal automobile line of business.
Property Losses
Net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 4.6 points in the aggregate in 2024 compared to 2023. Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expense ratios were lower in 2024 compared to 2023 due to (i) the earned impact of higher renewal pure price increases in 2024 and (ii) variability from period to period of non-catastrophe weather. Net catastrophe losses were in line with last year and included $17.4 million, or 4.1 points, related to Hurricane Helene.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio was 1.5 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to lower profit-based employee compensation and growth in premiums earned outpacing growth in underwriting expenses.
56
Table of Contents
E&S Lines Segment
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 567,163 | 438,628 | 29 | % | $ | 352,547 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 503,974 | 390,609 | 29 | 334,156 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 298,268 | 211,896 | 41 | 196,677 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 153,826 | 123,957 | 24 | 107,180 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 51,880 | 54,756 | (5) | % | $ | 30,299 | 81 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 59.2 | % | 54.3 | 4.9 | pts | 58.8 | % | (4.5) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 30.5 | 31.7 | (1.2) | 32.1 | (0.4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 89.7 | 86.0 | 3.7 | 90.9 | (4.9) |
NPW growth of 29% in 2024 compared to 2023 included:
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 302.6 | 209.5 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 7.2 | % | 6.9 |
In addition, NPW growth in 2024 benefited from both property and casualty exposure growth on renewal policies and higher rates per exposure.
The increase in NPE in 2024 compared to 2023 resulted from the same impacts to NPW discussed above.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing loss and loss expense incurred:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Incurred: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | $ | 20,000 | (5,000) | (500) | % | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 197,251 | 160,318 | 23 | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 22,992 | 24,677 | (7) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 58,025 | 31,901 | 82 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 298,268 | 211,896 | 41 | |||||||||
| Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio: | ||||||||||||
| (Favorable) unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development | 4.0 | % | (1.3) | 5.3 | pts | |||||||
| Current year casualty loss costs | 39.1 | 41.1 | (2.0) | |||||||||
| Net catastrophe losses | 4.6 | 6.3 | (1.7) | |||||||||
| Non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses | 11.5 | 8.2 | 3.3 | |||||||||
| Total loss and loss expense incurred | 59.2 | 54.3 | 4.9 |
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 4.9 points in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily driven by an increase of 5.3 points in unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 compared to 2023. The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2024 was primarily due to increased loss severities in accident years 2023 and prior, driven by the broad-reaching impacts of social inflation. While we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates in response to these inflationary trends, emergence exceeded those levels during the year. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior.
The loss and loss expense ratio was also unfavorably impacted by property losses as net catastrophe and non-catastrophe property losses increased the ratio by 1.6 points in the aggregate for 2024 compared to 2023. We experienced higher non-catastrophe property loss and loss expense in 2024 compared to 2023 of 3.3 points, primarily due to the impact of large fire losses, reflecting the continued period to period variability normally associated with our E&S property line of business. Partially offsetting the increase in non-catastrophe property losses was a decrease in net catastrophe losses in 2024 compared to 2023 of 1.7 points. While our footprint was impacted by a greater number of Property Claim Services-named events in 2024, we experienced lower claim severities compared to 2023.
57
Table of Contents
Partially offsetting these items was a decrease of 2.0 points in current year casualty loss cost in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to the mix of business between our property and casualty lines of business. Our E&S property line of business historically has a lower loss ratio compared to our E&S casualty line of business and represented a more significant portion of this segment in 2024 compared to 2023.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio was 1.2 points lower in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to premium growth outpacing underwriting expense.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to protect our capital resources and insure against losses on property and casualty risks that we underwrite above the amount of losses we are willing to accept. We use two main reinsurance vehicles: (i) a reinsurance pooling agreement among our Insurance Subsidiaries through which each company agrees to share in premiums and losses based on certain specified percentages; and (ii) reinsurance treaties and arrangements with third parties that cover various policies that we issue to our customers.
Reinsurance Pooling Agreement
The primary purposes of the Insurance Subsidiaries' reinsurance pooling agreement are to:
•Pool or share proportionately the underwriting profit and loss results of property and casualty insurance underwriting operations through reinsurance;
•Reduce administration expenses; and
•Permit all the Insurance Subsidiaries to obtain a uniform rating from AM Best Company ("AM Best").
The following illustrates the pooling percentages by Insurance Subsidiary as of December 31, 2024:
| Insurance Subsidiary | Pooling Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance Company of America ("SICA") | 32.0% | |
| Selective Way Insurance Company ("SWIC") | 21.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") | 9.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New York ("SICNY") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Casualty Insurance Company ("SCIC") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey ("SAICNJ") | 6.0% | |
| Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC") | 5.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New England ("SICNE") | 3.0% | |
| Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("SFCIC") | 3.0% |
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangements
By entering into reinsurance treaties and arrangements, we can increase our underwriting capacity, accepting larger individual risks and aggregations of risks without directly increasing our capital or statutory surplus. Under our reinsurance treaties, we cede to our reinsurers a portion of our incurred losses from an individual policy or group of policies in exchange for a portion of the premium on those policies. Amounts not reinsured below a specified dollar threshold are known as retention. Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from liability under the terms and limits of our policies, but it does make our reinsurers liable to us for the amount of liability we cede to them. Our reinsurers often rely on their own reinsurance programs, or retrocessions, to manage their large loss exposures. The size of the global reinsurance community is relatively small. If our reinsurers cannot collect on their retrocessional programs, it may impair their ability to pay us for the amounts we cede to them.
Consequently, our reinsurers present us with direct, indirect, and contingent counterparty credit risk. We attempt to mitigate this credit risk by (i) pursuing relationships with reinsurers rated "A-" or higher by AM Best and/or (ii) obtaining collateral to secure reinsurance obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties permit us to terminate or commute them – or require the reinsurer to post collateral if the reinsurer's financial condition or rating deteriorates. We monitor our reinsurers' financial condition and review the quality of reinsurance recoverables and reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. For additional information regarding our reinsurance counterparty credit risk, see Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
58
Table of Contents
Our reinsurance program has contracts that separately cover our property and casualty insurance business and can be categorized as follows:
•Property Reinsurance, which includes our (i) property per risk excess of loss treaties purchased for protection against large individual property losses and (ii) property catastrophe treaties and a property catastrophe bond transaction to provide protection for the overall property portfolio against severe catastrophic events. We also purchase a limited amount of facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual property risks greater than our property per risk excess of loss treaty capacity.
•Casualty Reinsurance, which provides protection for both individual large casualty losses and catastrophic casualty losses involving multiple claimants or insureds. We also may use (i) facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual casualty risks in excess of our treaty capacity and (ii) quota share capacity for certain new or higher severity casualty lines of business.
•Terrorism Reinsurance, which provides a federal reinsurance backstop, behind the protection built into our property and casualty reinsurance treaties, for terrorism losses covered under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act ("TRIPRA"). For further information about TRIPRA, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K.
•Flood Reinsurance, for which all of the premiums and losses related to our participation in the WYO (for which we also receive a servicing fee) are 100% ceded to the federal government.
Property Reinsurance
The following table summarizes our property reinsurance program:
| PROPERTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $1.3 billion above $100 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis in four layers: | All nuclear, biological, chemical, and radioactive ("NBCR") losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding TRIPRA. | ||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $100 million up to $200 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $200 million up to $400 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $400 million up to $800 million; and | ||||
| - 41% of losses in excess of $800 million up to $1.4 billion. The treaty provides one reinstatement in each of the first three layers and no reinstatement in the fourth layer. | ||||
| - Personal Lines-only treaty with $20 million of limit excess of $20 million retention and coverage of 97% of losses. This has an annual aggregate limit of $19.4 million, net of the Insurance Subsidiaries' co-participation. | ||||
| - The per occurrence limit is $965 million, which includes $19.4 million for the new Personal Lines-only treaty. The annual aggregate limit is $1.665 billion. | ||||
| Property Catastrophe Bond (covers all insurance operations, excluding Florida, California, Louisiana, and Texas) | 54% of losses in excess of $800 million up to $1.4 billion that responds on a per occurrence basis. The catastrophe bond provides a single $325 million limit with no reinstatements. | None. | ||
| Property Per Risk Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are three layers covering 100% of $65 million in excess of $5 million. Losses other than TRIPRA certified losses are subject to the following reinstatements and annual aggregate limits: | All NBCR losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under the TRIPRA. For non-NBCR losses, the treaty distinguishes between acts committed on behalf of foreign persons or foreign interests ("Foreign Terrorism") and those that are not. The treaty provides annual aggregate limits for Foreign Terrorism (other than NBCR) acts of $15 million for the first layer, $60 million for the second layer, and $40 million for the third layer. Non-Foreign Terrorism losses (other than NBCR) are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. | ||
| - $5 million in excess of $5 million layer provides 15 reinstatements; $80 million in aggregate limits; | ||||
| - $20 million in excess of $10 million layer provides four reinstatements, $100 million in aggregate limits; and | ||||
| - $40 million in excess of $30 million layer provides two reinstatements, $120 million in aggregate limits. | ||||
| Flood | 100% reinsurance by the federal government’s WYO. | None. |
59
Table of Contents
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Program
Our 2025 property catastrophe reinsurance program includes a main excess of loss treaty and an indemnity reinsurance agreement with a special purpose insurer that issued a catastrophe bond. This program covers our standard market and E&S business. In addition, we purchased a Personal Lines-only treaty of $20 million in excess of $20 million retention to mitigate Personal Lines-specific catastrophe losses. Effective January 1, 2025, we renewed our main property catastrophe treaty, with additional limit, stable retention and improved terms. Our program now provides coverage of $1.3 billion in excess of a $100 million retention, compared to $1.1 billion in 2024, thereby, extending the exhaustion point by $200 million to respond to our growing property portfolio. The highest layer of the treaty provides coverage for 41% of losses in the $600 million in excess of $800 million layer. The property catastrophe treaty excludes coverage for communicable disease but retains (i) coverage for strike, riot, civil unrest, severe convective storms, and other traditionally-covered property perils, (ii) coverage for conventional terrorism losses, and (iii) limited coverage for cybersecurity risks.
To provide additional, fully collateralized coverage at the top end of our property catastrophe reinsurance program, we secured property catastrophe protection through a per occurrence excess of loss indemnity reinsurance agreement effective December 9, 2023, with High Point Re Ltd. ("High Point Re"), an independent Bermuda special purpose insurer. The reinsurance agreement meets the accounting guidance requirements to be accounted for as reinsurance. In connection with the reinsurance agreement, High Point Re issued Series 2023-1, Class A Principal-at-Risk Variable Rates Notes to unrelated investors totaling $325 million, consistent with the coverage provided under the reinsurance agreement. The proceeds were deposited in a reinsurance trust account. The reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage of up to $325 million for the three-year period from December 9, 2023, through December 31, 2026, for property catastrophe losses from named storms, earthquakes, severe thunderstorms, winter storms, wildfires, meteorite impacts, and volcanic eruptions in all states except California, Florida, Texas, and Louisiana. The reinsurance agreement's attachment point and exhaustion limit may be reset annually to adjust the expected loss of the layer within a predetermined range. For the 2025 treaty year, this reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage for 54% of losses in the $600 million in excess of $800 million layer. The reinsurance agreement is collateralized, which is provided by High Point Re using proceeds from the issuance of the Series 2023-1 Notes.
Reinsurance agreements have credit risk associated with collecting amounts due from reinsurers. With High Point Re, that risk is reduced because the collateralized reinsurance trust account is funded with money market funds domiciled in the U.S. The money market funds invest solely in cash or high-quality direct obligations of the U.S. government, such as U.S. Treasury bills and other short-term securities backed by the U.S. government.
In addition to the fully collateralized catastrophe bond, we seek to minimize reinsurance credit risk by transacting with highly-rated reinsurance partners and purchasing collateralized reinsurance products, particularly for high-severity, low-probability events, if feasible. Our current reinsurance program includes $450 million in collateralized limit of the total $570 million limit in place for the highest layer of the catastrophe program, including the $325 million secured through High Point Re, compared to $417.5 million in collateralized limit under the 2024 reinsurance program.
Overall, ceded premium for our property catastrophe reinsurance program will increase in 2025 due to: (i) increases in underlying property exposures in line with our growing property insurance portfolio; and (ii) the addition of $189.8 million of net limit coverage, which improved our net risk profile. These increases will be partially offset by risk-adjusted price decreases from more favorable reinsurance market conditions.
Catastrophe Models
We model various catastrophic perils, and hurricane risk remains our portfolio's most significant natural catastrophe peril because of the geographic location of the risks we insure. The table below illustrates the impact of the five largest hurricane losses we have experienced in the last 35 years:
| ($ in millions) | Gross Loss1 | Net Loss2 | Accident Year | Gross Loss Ratio | Net Loss Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Name | ||||||||||
| Superstorm Sandy | $125.5 | 45.6 | 2012 | 7.9% | 2.9 | |||||
| Hurricane Helene | 85.0 | 85.0 | 2024 | 1.9 | 1.9 | |||||
| Hurricane Ida | 53.4 | 39.7 | 2021 | 1.8 | 1.3 | |||||
| Hurricane Irene | 44.8 | 40.2 | 2011 | 3.1 | 2.8 | |||||
| Hurricane Hugo | 26.4 | 3.0 | 1989 | 5.9 | 0.7 |
1This amount represents reported and unreported gross losses estimated as of December 31, 2024.
2Net loss does not include reinstatement premiums, taxes, or flood claims handling fees.
We review our exposure to hurricane risk by examining third-party vendor models and conducting a proprietary analysis. The third-party vendor models provide both long-term and near-term views with the near-term view conditioned to adjust for
60
Table of Contents
elevated sea surface temperatures. We adjust these models to reflect certain non-modeled cost assumptions, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses. We believe that modeled estimates provide a range of potential outcomes, and we review multiple estimates to understand our catastrophic risk.
Our established catastrophic risk tolerance requires that no more than 10% of stockholders’ equity is exposed to a loss from a hurricane event at a 99.6% confidence level (1-in-250-year event or 0.4% probability) on a net of reinsurance and after-tax basis. Our property catastrophe reinsurance program limits our net after-tax impact of a 1-in-250-year event to about 4% of our GAAP equity. In addition to the 1-in-250-year modeled event, we evaluate the impact of a number of other scenarios on stockholders’ equity.
The table below shows the gross and net losses modeled results for (i) hurricane peril in our underwriting property portfolio and (ii) the gross and net of reinsurance hurricane losses from the following scenarios:
•Recasts of two large hurricanes that impacted our geographic footprint:
◦1938 New England Hurricane, one of the largest hurricanes to impact the Northeast U.S.; and
◦Hurricane Hazel, a Category 4 storm that made landfall near the border between North Carolina and South Carolina in 1954; and
•Realistic disaster scenarios ("RDS") for significant potential storms in the Northeast and the Carolinas based on Lloyds of London ("Lloyds") methodology.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Hurricane | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $313,990 | 95,629 | 3 | % | |||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 518,000 | 102,908 | 3 | ||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 879,169 | 117,049 | 4 | ||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 1,102,857 | 126,603 | 4 | ||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 1,298,909 | 132,753 | 4 | ||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 1,402,203 | 137,311 | 4 | ||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 1,946,311 | 495,592 | 16 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1938 New England Hurricane | 615,564 | 107,547 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS North-East (Category 4 hurricane) | 1,099,850 | 126,893 | 4 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1954 Hurricane Hazel | 402,118 | 96,182 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS Carolinas (Category 5 hurricane) | 596,022 | 116,590 | 4 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums and applicable property per risk and facultative reinsurance based on reinsurance structure effective January 1, 2025.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2024.
As the table above reflects, we are within our established tolerance for catastrophic risk. Based on a multi-model view of hurricane risk, our current catastrophe reinsurance program exhausts at an approximately 1-in-230-year return period, or events with 0.4% probability. Our modeled losses incorporate expected reinsurance recoveries from our per-risk reinsurance treaty and facultative reinsurance in addition to the recoveries from our property catastrophe treaties. Our actual gross and net losses incurred from hurricanes making U.S. landfall will vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated modeled losses.
61
Table of Contents
In addition to hurricane peril, the table below shows gross and net losses modeled by other wind and earthquake perils in our underwriting property portfolio. Other wind perils include the sub-perils of hail, straight-line wind, and tornado.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Other Wind | Earthquake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $140,132 | $79,256 | 3 | % | $11,937 | $8,921 | — | % | ||||||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | $192,796 | $80,416 | 3 | $37,439 | $26,047 | 1 | ||||||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | $256,136 | $82,298 | 3 | $110,397 | $79,907 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | $302,958 | $85,193 | 3 | $202,543 | $91,742 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | $336,516 | $88,109 | 3 | $250,667 | $100,341 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | $359,147 | $90,290 | 3 | $297,048 | $104,306 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | $474,212 | $97,020 | 3 | $467,605 | $112,344 | 4 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums as well as applicable property per risk and facultative reinsurance based on the reinsurance structure effective January 1, 2025.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2024.
We do not write crop insurance, have minimal exposure to private flood, and have a limited percentage of our insured properties in the Western U.S., all limiting our exposures to certain weather-related perils, such as droughts, wildfires, and flooding. However, as our geographic expansion progresses, we continually evaluate how we consider physical risks from these perils and others in our strategic decision making.
While we regularly experience property losses from winter storms and use third-party vendor models to help us model and manage our exposure to this peril, we also evaluate our winter storm exposure based on our own historical experience, as winter storm third-party vendor models are currently less mature than models for other perils such as hurricane wind or severe convective storms.
Property Per Risk Excess of Loss Treaty
We renewed the property per risk excess of loss treaty, which covers our standard market and E&S business, on July 1, 2024, with substantially the same structure as the treaty that expired on June 30, 2024, providing coverage of $65 million in excess of a $5 million retention, with an additional reinstatement on the second layer of the program. The treaty year deposit premium increased, reflecting higher projected subject earned premium due to growth of our book of business.
Casualty Reinsurance
The following table summarizes our casualty reinsurance program:
| CASUALTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Casualty Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are six layers covering $88 million in excess of $2 million on a per occurrence basis. Losses other than terrorism losses are subject to the following: | All NBCR losses are excluded. All other losses stemming from the acts of terrorism are subject to the following: | ||
| - 82.5% of $3 million in excess of $2 million layer provides 71 reinstatements, $216 million annual aggregate limit; | - 82.5% of $3 million in excess of $2 million layer with $15 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $7 million in excess of $5 million layer provides 12 reinstatements, $91 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $7 million in excess of $5 million layer with $28 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $9 million in excess of $12 million layer provides three reinstatements, $36 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $9 million in excess of $12 million layer with $27 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $9 million in excess of $21 million layer provides one reinstatement, $18 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $9 million in excess of $21 million layer with $18 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - 100% of $20 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $40 million annual aggregate limit; and | - 100% of $20 million in excess of $30 million layer with $40 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; and | |||
| - 100% of $40 million in excess of $50 million layer provides one reinstatement, $80 million annual aggregate limit; | - 100% of $40 million in excess of $50 million layer with $80 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit. |
We renewed the casualty excess of loss treaty, which covers our standard market and E&S Lines business, on July 1, 2024, on substantially the same terms as the treaty expiring June 30, 2024 with a co-participation of 17.5% on the first $3 million in excess of $2 million layer, but with the benefit of additional reinstatements on several of the layers. The treaty year 2024 deposit premium increased, reflecting (i) higher projected subject earned premium due to growth of our book of business, including pure renewal rate increases; and (ii) higher anticipated losses in the excess layers, partially offset by (iii) the
62
Table of Contents
introduction of the first layer co-participation.
To complement our key reinsurance programs and provide reinsurance protection on specific coverages or programs, we have other reinsurance treaties, such as our (i) Surety and Fidelity Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaty, (ii) National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool Quota Share, which covers business assumed from the involuntary workers compensation pool, (iii) Endurance Specialty Quota share and Loss Development Cover, which protects against losses on policies written before the acquisition and any development on reserves established by MUSIC as of the date of acquisition, (iv) Equipment Breakdown Coverage Reinsurance Treaty, (v) Multi-line Quota Share, which covers additional personal lines coverages, such as personal cyber and home systems protection, (vi) Cyber Liability Quota Share, and (vii) Excess Liability Quota Share, which covers MUSIC's excess liability business.
We continually evaluate our overall reinsurance program and try to develop effective ways to manage the transfer of risk. We base our analysis on a comprehensive process that includes periodic analysis of modeling results, our own loss experience, aggregation of exposures, exposure growth, diversification of risks, limits written, projected reinsurance costs, reinsurer financial strength, and projected impact on earnings, equity, and statutory surplus. We strive to balance reinsurer credit quality, price, terms, and our appetite to retain a certain level of risk.
Investments Segment
Our Investments Segment's objectives are to maximize the economic value of our investment portfolio by achieving stable, risk-adjusted after-tax net investment income and generate long-term growth in book value per share, considering prevailing market conditions, our enterprise risk tolerances, and other risk implications. We aim to accomplish this by:
•Maximizing the portfolio's overall total return by investing (i) the premiums from our insurance operations and (ii) amounts generated through our capital management strategies, including debt and equity security issuances, and
•Maintaining (i) a well-diversified portfolio across issuers, sectors, and asset classes, and (ii) a high credit quality fixed income securities portfolio with a duration and maturity profile at an acceptable risk level that provides ample liquidity.
The effective duration of our fixed income and short-term investments was 4.0 years as of December 31, 2024. We monitor and manage the effective duration to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. We buy and sell investments with the intent of maximizing investment returns in the current market environment, while balancing capital preservation.
Our fixed income and short-term investments represented 92% of our invested assets at both December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023. These investments had (i) a weighted average credit rating of "A+" as of December 31, 2024 and "AA-" at December 31, 2023, and (ii) investment grade holdings representing 97% of the total fixed income and short-term investment portfolio at December 31, 2024, and 96% at December 31, 2023.
For further details on the composition, credit quality, and various risks to which our portfolio is subject, see Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." of this Form 10-K.
Total Invested Assets
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total invested assets | $ | 9,651,297 | 8,693,729 | 11 | % | |||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | 3.31 | 3.16 | 5 | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – before tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (316,796) | (353,253) | (10) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 2,116 | 4,079 | (48) | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) - before tax | (314,680) | (349,174) | (10) | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – after tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (250,269) | (279,070) | (10) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 1,671 | 3,223 | (48) | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) - after tax | (248,598) | (275,847) | (10) |
Invested assets increased by $957.6 million at December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, reflecting our active investment of operating and investing cash flows. Operating cash flows during 2024 were 24% of NPW.
63
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 389,198 | 345,886 | 13 | % | 259,918 | 33 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") | 12,448 | 9,336 | 33 | 5,555 | 68 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 18,295 | 9,395 | 95 | 13,554 | (31) | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 20,274 | 14,818 | 37 | 3,997 | 271 | ||||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 37,053 | 26,777 | 38 | 23,003 | 16 | ||||||||||||||
| Other investments | 864 | 650 | 33 | 258 | 152 | ||||||||||||||
| Investment expenses | (21,081) | (18,212) | (16) | (18,130) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – before tax | 457,051 | 388,650 | 18 | 288,155 | 35 | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income tax expense | 94,435 | 79,115 | 19 | 55,956 | 41 | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – after tax | $ | 362,616 | 309,535 | 17 | 232,199 | 33 | |||||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 20.7 | % | 20.4 | 0.3 | pts | 19.4 | 1.0 | pts | |||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on fixed income investments | 4.0 | 3.9 | 0.1 | 3.1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 4.0 | 3.7 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 0.8 |
After-tax net investment income earned increased 17% in 2024, compared to 2023, primarily driven by higher interest rates, active portfolio management, and operating cash flow deployment. In addition, income earned on our alternative investments portfolio increased in 2024 compared to 2023 as a result of strong capital market performance in 2024.
Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
When evaluating securities for sale, our general philosophy is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations of whether (i) the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated or (ii) the timing is appropriate to trade opportunistically for other securities with better economic-return characteristics. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses for the indicated periods were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 vs. 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net realized gains (losses) on disposals | $ | 6,276 | (24,864) | (125) | % | (31,636) | (21) | % | ||||||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities | (1,964) | 9,510 | (121) | (32,127) | (130) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, AFS | (5,628) | 12,898 | (144) | (39,169) | (133) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, held-to-maturity | — | — | — | 63 | (100) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on CMLs | 217 | (175) | (224) | (116) | 51 | |||||||||||||
| Losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell | (1,248) | (921) | 36 | (11,823) | (92) | |||||||||||||
| Other realized gains (losses) | (602) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Total net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | $ | (2,949) | (3,552) | (17) | (114,808) | (97) |
For additional information regarding our losses on securities we intend to sell and our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses, see Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Federal Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding federal income taxes.
| ($ in millions) | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal income tax expense | $ | 51.0 | 93.2 | 55.3 | |||||
| Effective tax rate1 | 20.5 | % | 20.7 | 20.4 |
1The effective tax rate is calculated by taking "Total federal income tax expense" divided by "Income before federal income tax" less "Preferred stock dividends" on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Federal income tax expense decreased $42.2 million in 2024 compared to 2023, primarily due to an underwriting loss from our Insurance Operations this year compared to underwriting income last year. Higher net investment income earned provided a partial offset to the impact of the underwriting loss, driven by increased income from our fixed income securities portfolio. Refer to "Insurance Operations" and "Investments Segment" above for more information.
See Note 14. "Federal Income Taxes" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K for (i) a
64
Table of Contents
reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory rate of 21% and (ii) details regarding our net deferred tax asset and liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity by generating sufficient cash flows to meet our business operations' short-term and long-term cash requirements. As discussed further below, we adjust our liquidity requirements based on economic conditions, market conditions, and future cash flow commitments.
Sources of Liquidity
The Parent's sources of cash historically have consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, the Parent's investment portfolio, borrowings under third-party lines of credit, intercompany revolving demand loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of equity (common or preferred) and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, considering our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital preservation strategies.
The Parent's cash and components of its investment portfolio were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | December 31, 2024 | December 31, 2023 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 268,486 | 421,089 | |||
| Equity securities | 53,248 | 50,920 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 62,223 | 17,671 | ||||
| Alternative investments | 18,443 | 18,134 | ||||
| Cash | 91 | 180 | ||||
| Total investments and cash | $ | 402,491 | 507,994 |
Short-term investments have historically been maintained in "AAA" rated money market funds, and fixed income securities are comprised of high-quality, liquid government and corporate securities.
The amount and composition of the Parent's investment portfolio may change over time based on various factors, including the amount and availability of dividends from our Insurance Subsidiaries, investment income, expenses, other Parent cash needs, such as dividends payable to stockholders, asset allocation investment decisions, inorganic growth opportunities, debt retirement, and share repurchases. We have an established target for the Parent to maintain liquid investments of at least twice its expected annual net cash outflow needs, which was met as of December 31, 2024.
Insurance Subsidiary Dividends
The Insurance Subsidiaries generate liquidity through insurance float, created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before paying claims. The period of float can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of securities with maturity dates that continually provide a source of cash flow for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. To protect our Insurance Subsidiaries' capital, we purchase reinsurance coverage for significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur.
The Insurance Subsidiaries paid $44 million in total dividends to the Parent in 2024. As of December 31, 2024, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend is $290 million for 2025. All Insurance Subsidiary dividends to the Parent are (i) subject to the approval and/or review of its domiciliary state insurance regulator, and (ii) generally payable only from earned statutory surplus reported in its annual statements as of the preceding December 31. Although domiciliary state insurance regulators have historically approved dividends, there is no assurance they will approve future Insurance Subsidiary dividends.
New Jersey corporate law also limits the maximum amount of dividends the Parent can pay our stockholders if either (i) the Parent would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or (ii) the Parent’s total assets would be less than its total liabilities. The Parent’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is also impacted by (i) covenants in its credit agreement that obligate it, among other things, to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, and (ii) the terms of our preferred stock that prohibit dividends from being declared or paid on our common stock if dividends are not declared and paid, or made payable, on all outstanding preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
65
Table of Contents
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions and financial covenants, where applicable, see Note 11. "Indebtedness," Note 17. "Equity," and Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Line of Credit
On November 7, 2022, the Parent entered into a Credit Agreement with the lenders named therein (the "Lenders") and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent ("Line of Credit"). Under the Line of Credit, the Lenders have agreed to provide the Parent with a $50 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to $125 million with the Lenders' consent. The Line of Credit will mature on November 7, 2025, and has a variable interest rate based on the Parent’s debt ratings. We expect to continue to maintain a credit facility for liquidity purposes. For additional information regarding the Line of Credit and corresponding representations, warranties, and covenants, refer to Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Four Insurance Subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") branches, as shown in the following table. Membership requires the ownership of branch stock and includes the right to access liquidity. All Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") borrowings are required to be secured by investments pledged as collateral. For additional information regarding collateral outstanding, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
| Branch | Insurance Subsidiary Member |
|---|---|
| FHLBI | SICSC1SICSE1 |
| FHLBNY | SICA SICNY |
1These subsidiaries are jointly referred to as the "Indiana Subsidiaries" because they are domiciled in Indiana.
The Line of Credit permits aggregate borrowings from the FHLBI and the FHLBNY up to 10% of the respective member company’s admitted assets for the previous year. SICNY is domiciled in New York, which limits its FHLBNY borrowings to the lesser of 5% of admitted assets for the most recently completed fiscal quarter or 10% of the previous year-end's admitted assets.
The following table provides information on the remaining capacity for FHLB borrowings based on these restrictions, as well as the additional FHLB stock purchase requirement to allow these member companies to borrow their remaining capacity amounts:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | Additional FHLB Stock Requirements | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,154.9 | $ | 115.5 | 32.0 | 83.5 | 2.3 | |||||||||
| SICSE | 913.1 | 91.3 | 28.0 | 63.3 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
| SICA | 4,211.3 | 421.1 | — | 421.1 | 19.0 | |||||||||||
| SICNY | 778.0 | 38.9 | — | 38.9 | 1.7 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 666.8 | 60.0 | 606.8 | 24.8 |
Short-term Borrowings
We made no short-term borrowings from FHLB branches during 2024.
Intercompany Loan Agreements
The Parent has lending agreements with the Indiana Subsidiaries, approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance, that provide the Parent with additional intercompany liquidity. Like the Line of Credit, these lending agreements limit the Parent's borrowings from the Indiana Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. The following table provides information on the Parent’s borrowings and remaining borrowing capacity from the two Indiana Subsidiaries:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets as of December 31, 2024 | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2024 | ||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,154.9 | $ | 115.5 | 21.0 | 94.5 | ||||||
| SICSE | 913.1 | 91.3 | 14.0 | 77.3 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 206.8 | 35.0 | 171.8 |
66
Table of Contents
Additionally, we have other insurance regulator-approved intercompany agreements that facilitate liquidity management between the Parent and the Insurance Subsidiaries to enhance flexibility.
Capital Market Activities
The Parent had no private or public stock issuances during 2024. During 2024, we repurchased 103,000 shares of our common stock under our existing share repurchase program for $8.7 million, an $84.34 average price per share, excluding commissions paid. We had $75.5 million of remaining capacity under our share repurchase program as of December 31, 2024. For additional information on the share repurchase program, refer to Note 17. "Equity" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Uses of Liquidity
The Parent uses the liquidity generated from the sources discussed above to pay dividends to our stockholders, among other things. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common and preferred stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors. In October 2024, our Board approved a 9% increase in the quarterly cash dividend on common stock, to $0.38 from $0.35 per share. In addition, our Board declared:
•A quarterly cash dividend on common stock of $0.38 per common share, that is payable March 3, 2025, to holders of record on February 14, 2025; and
•A quarterly cash dividend of $287.50 per share on our 4.60% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B (equivalent to $0.28750 per depositary share) payable on March 17, 2025, to holders of record as of February 28, 2025.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt and our ability to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders is dependent on (i) liquidity at the Parent, (ii) the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or (iii) the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Our next borrowing principal repayment is $60 million to FHLBI due on December 16, 2026.
Restrictions on the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common and preferred stock.
Capital Resources
Capital resources ensure we can pay policyholder claims, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At December 31, 2024, we had GAAP stockholders’ equity of $3.1 billion and statutory surplus of $2.9 billion. With total debt of $508 million at December 31, 2024, our debt-to-capital ratio was 14.0%. For additional information on our statutory surplus, see Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2024, which we expect to fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 510.0 | — | 60.0 | — | 450.0 | |||||||||
| Interest on debt obligation | 508.7 | 28.3 | 54.7 | 52.9 | 372.8 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,018.7 | 28.3 | 114.7 | 52.9 | 822.8 | ||||||||||
| Gross loss and loss expense payments | 6,589.8 | 1,957.8 | 2,074.6 | 1,066.0 | 1,491.4 | ||||||||||
| Ceded loss and loss expense payments | 1,022.2 | 417.6 | 239.1 | 122.8 | 242.7 | ||||||||||
| Net loss and loss expense payments | 5,567.6 | 1,540.2 | 1,835.5 | 943.2 | 1,248.7 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,586.3 | 1,568.5 | 1,950.2 | 996.1 | 2,071.5 |
Our loss and loss expense payments in the table above represent estimated paid amounts by period on our loss and loss expense reserves. These estimates are based on past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, and include considerable judgment. There is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the projected timing of loss and loss expense reserve payments, so the timing and amounts of the actual payments will be affected by many
67
Table of Contents
factors. Therefore, the projected settlement of the reserves for net loss and loss expense may differ, perhaps significantly, from actual future payments. The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was 3.0 years at December 31, 2024.
For more information on our case reserves and estimates of reserve for loss and loss expense IBNR, refer to the "Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense" section in the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section of this MD&A and Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding cross-default provisions associated with our notes payable in the table above or our Line of Credit, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in this Form 10-K.
In addition to the above, the following table summarizes certain contractual obligations we had at December 31, 2024 that may require us to invest additional amounts into our investment portfolio, which we would fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| ($ in millions) | Amount of Obligation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative investments | $ | 320.5 | |
| Non-publicly traded collateralized loan obligations in our fixed income securities portfolio | 143.4 | ||
| Non-publicly traded common stock within our equity portfolio | 22.1 | ||
| CMLs | 18.4 | ||
| Privately-placed corporate securities | 57.0 | ||
| Total | $ | 561.4 |
There is no certainty (i) that any such additional investments will be required and (ii) about the timing of funding. We expect to have the capacity to fund these commitments through our normal operating and investing activities as they come due.
Our other cash requirements include, without limitation, dividends to stockholders, capital expenditures, and other operating expenses, including commissions to our distribution partners, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes.
As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had no (i) material guarantees on behalf of others and trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value, (ii) material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in Note 18. "Related Party Transactions" included in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, and (iii) material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Consequently, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk related to off-balance sheet arrangements.
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the capital resources we maintain at the holding company and Insurance Subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics that support our targeted financial strength relative to the macroeconomic environment. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, without limitation, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt and/or equity securities, repurchasing existing debt, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and adjusting common stockholders’ dividends.
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the policyholders of the Insurance Subsidiaries and our stockholders and enhance our financial strength and underwriting capacity. We have a strong capital base and high-quality underwriting portfolio, positioning us well to take advantage of potential market opportunities.
Book value per common share increased 6% to $47.99 as of December 31, 2024, from $45.42 as of December 31, 2023, driven by $3.23 in net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share and a $0.47 reduction in after-tax net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities portfolio, partially offset by $1.43 in dividends to our common stockholders. The decrease in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities was primarily driven by a tightening of credit spreads, partially offset by an increase in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates. Our adjusted book value per share, which is book value per share excluding total after-tax unrealized gains or losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), increased to $52.10 as of December 31, 2024, from $50.03 as of December 31, 2023.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $1.1 billion in 2024, compared to $759 million in 2023, primarily driven by higher levels of cash received for premiums in 2024 compared to 2023, partially offset by higher claim payments made in
68
Table of Contents
2024 compared to 2023. Operating cash flows were 24% of NPW in 2024 compared to 18% of NPW in 2023. For more information on our underwriting results, refer to "Insurance Operations" above in this MD&A.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $947 million in 2024, compared to $686 million in 2023, as a result of investing more cash from operating activities.
Net cash used in financing activities increased to $103 million in 2024, compared to $84 million in 2023, primarily due to (i) an increase in dividends paid to our common shareholders in 2024 and (ii) greater activity in our share repurchase program in 2024.
FY 2023 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000230557-24-000005.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
The terms "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Parent"), and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires. Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). The PSLRA provides a forward-looking statement safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements discuss our intentions, beliefs, projections, estimations, or forecasts of future events and financial performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry's actual results, activity levels, or performance to materially differ from those in or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements include the words “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “pro forma,” “seek,” “likely,” “continue,” or comparable terms. Our forward-looking statements are only predictions; we cannot guarantee or assure that such expectations will prove correct. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason except as required by law.
We discuss factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our project, forecasts, or estimates in forward-looking statements in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this form 10-K. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a constantly changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge at any time. We can neither predict these new risk factors nor assess their impact, if any, on our businesses or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events we discuss in this report might not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For more details about these segments, refer to Note 1. "Organization" and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program ("WYO"). We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
38
Table of Contents
The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. Included in the MD&A is an evaluation of the amounts and certainty of cash flows from operations and outside sources, trends, and uncertainties that may have a material impact in future periods. The MD&A discusses and analyzes our 2023 results compared to 2022. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K. For discussion and analysis of our 2022 results compared to 2021, refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
In the MD&A, we will discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021;
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes; and
•Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The policies and estimates we considered most critical to the preparation of the Financial Statements involved (i) reserves for loss and loss expense, (ii) investment valuation and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities, and (iii) reinsurance.
Reserves for Loss and Loss Expense
Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the claim to us, and the final settlement and payment of the claim. Insurers establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities to recognize liabilities for unpaid loss and loss expense. The following tables provide case and incurred but not reported ("IBNR") reserves for loss and loss expenses and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss expense as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 453,520 | 1,743,885 | 2,197,405 | 255,493 | 1,941,912 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 353,448 | 654,267 | 1,007,715 | 203,982 | 803,733 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 315,116 | 659,234 | 974,350 | 15,683 | 958,667 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 39,034 | 71,159 | 110,193 | 5,252 | 104,941 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 108,644 | 66,579 | 175,223 | 39,152 | 136,071 | ||||||||||
| Other | 17,260 | 12,819 | 30,079 | 10,241 | 19,838 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,287,022 | 3,207,943 | 4,494,965 | 529,803 | 3,965,162 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 68,329 | 100,036 | 168,365 | 38,273 | 130,092 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 18,335 | 44,261 | 62,596 | 1,647 | 60,949 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 12,909 | 34,282 | 47,191 | 32,736 | 14,455 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 99,573 | 178,579 | 278,152 | 72,656 | 205,496 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 99,690 | 447,770 | 547,460 | 15,686 | 531,774 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 5,667 | 10,667 | 16,334 | 456 | 15,878 | ||||||||||
| Total E&S Lines | 105,357 | 458,437 | 563,794 | 16,142 | 547,652 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,491,952 | 3,844,959 | 5,336,911 | 618,601 | 4,718,310 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure related to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (97% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (3% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (90% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (10% of net reserves).
39
Table of Contents
| December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 358,967 | 1,624,148 | 1,983,115 | 246,736 | 1,736,379 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 347,992 | 694,777 | 1,042,769 | 199,057 | 843,712 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 299,444 | 578,283 | 877,727 | 14,271 | 863,456 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 43,456 | 89,429 | 132,885 | 19,277 | 113,608 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 81,377 | 133,523 | 214,900 | 81,970 | 132,930 | ||||||||||
| Other | 11,030 | 12,576 | 23,606 | 4,443 | 19,163 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,142,266 | 3,132,736 | 4,275,002 | 565,754 | 3,709,248 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 61,499 | 79,060 | 140,559 | 36,529 | 104,030 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 13,237 | 42,051 | 55,288 | 7,124 | 48,164 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 111,355 | 33,100 | 144,455 | 132,525 | 11,930 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 186,091 | 154,211 | 340,302 | 176,178 | 164,124 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 88,965 | 416,299 | 505,264 | 11,397 | 493,867 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 9,303 | 14,950 | 24,253 | 4,184 | 20,069 | ||||||||||
| E&S Lines | 98,268 | 431,249 | 529,517 | 15,581 | 513,936 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,426,625 | 3,718,196 | 5,144,821 | 757,513 | 4,387,308 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure relates to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (96% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (4% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (90% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (10% of net reserves).
The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was approximately 3.1 years at both December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
How reserves are established
Reserve for loss and loss expense include case reserves on reported claims and IBNR reserves. Case reserves are estimated for each individual claim based on facts and circumstances known at the time. Case reserves may be adjusted up or down as the claim's specific facts and circumstances change. IBNR reserves are established at more aggregated levels and include provisions for (i) claims not yet reported, (ii) future development on reported claims, (iii) closed claims that could reopen in the future, and (iv) anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries.
We perform quarterly internal reserve reviews using our own loss experience, with consideration given to various internal and external factors. Changes in claim dynamics may inherently alter paid and reported development patterns. While the selections in our reserve analyses aim to account for these impacts, estimated reserves involve an increased risk of variability. In addition to our internal reserve reviews, an external consulting actuary performs an independent semiannual review of our reserves. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's report to determine our recorded reserves; however, we review and discuss our observations on trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies with our consulting actuary. While not required, our independent consulting actuary issues the annual statutory Statements of Actuarial Opinion for our Insurance Subsidiaries. For additional information on our accounting policy for reserve for loss and loss expense, refer to Note. 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Range of Reasonable Reserve Estimates
We have estimated a range of reasonable reserve estimates for net loss and loss expense of $4,253 million to $5,004 million at December 31, 2023. This range reflects low and high reasonable reserve estimates determined by judgmentally adjusting the methods, factors, and assumptions selected within the internal reserve review. This approach produces a range of reasonable reserve estimates but does not represent a distribution of all possible outcomes. Therefore, the final outcomes may be greater than or less than these amounts.
The range of reasonable reserve estimates increased as of December 31, 2023, relative to December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily related to reserve growth commensurate with our net premiums earned ("NPE") growth.
Changes in Reserve Estimates (Loss Development)
Our quarterly reserving process may lead to changes in the recorded reserves for prior accident years, referred to as favorable or unfavorable prior year loss and loss expense development. In 2023, we experienced net unfavorable prior year loss
40
Table of Contents
development of $10.0 million, compared to net favorable development of $78.9 million in 2022 and $82.9 million in 2021. The following table summarizes prior year development by line of business:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Loss and Loss Expense Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | 55.0 | (5.0) | (29.0) | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 8.0 | 22.5 | 13.3 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (74.5) | (70.0) | (58.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 7.6 | (7.3) | (0.4) | ||||||
| Commercial property | 0.7 | (1.6) | (2.6) | ||||||
| Bonds | — | (10.0) | — | ||||||
| Homeowners | 4.6 | (0.6) | 1.8 | ||||||
| Personal automobile | 15.3 | 0.5 | (0.2) | ||||||
| E&S casualty lines | (5.0) | (5.0) | (7.0) | ||||||
| E&S property lines | (1.6) | (2.5) | (0.8) | ||||||
| Other | (0.1) | 0.1 | — | ||||||
| Total | $ | 10.0 | (78.9) | (82.9) |
A detailed discussion of recent reserve development by line of business follows.
Standard Market General Liability Line of Business
At December 31, 2023, our general liability line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $1.9 billion, representing 41% of our total net reserves. In 2023, this line experienced unfavorable reserve development of $55.0 million, attributable to social inflationary impacts driving increased loss severities in accident years 2015 through 2020. We see these social inflationary impacts as an industry dynamic with higher propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. In 2022, this line experienced favorable development of $5.0 million, attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident years 2020 and 2021.
This line of business has experienced a long-term historical trend of meaningful severity increases, largely offset by decreases in claim frequencies. In response to potentially increasing social inflationary impacts, we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates in recent years, which are materializing in actual results. The trend of lower frequencies has continued, while prior year severities have developed adversely. Despite this, initial estimates for less mature accident years have remained stable. However, if the favorable frequency trend moderates or severities continue to emerge higher than expected, there could be impacts to ultimate loss estimates for this line.
The general liability line of business presents a diverse set of exposures. Various factors influence losses and loss trends, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, and economic and social inflation. Economic inflation directly impacts our claims severities by increasing the costs of raw materials, medical procedures, and labor. Social inflation may impact both the frequency and severity of claims by affecting (i) the propensity for a claimant to file a claim, (ii) the percentage of claimants who engage lawyers, and (iii) the nature of judicial verdicts, broader liability interpretations, and amounts of associated awards, which influence future settlement values. We monitor claim litigation rates regularly. We have observed modest increases in the percentage of claims with attorney involvement in recent periods, partly due to more litigious coverages, such as management liability coverage. This trend and the impact of previous court closures continue to affect the time to settle claims.
We have exposure to abuse or molestation claims, mainly through insurance policies that we (i) underwrite through our Community and Public Services ("CAPS") strategic business unit and (ii) issue to schools, religious institutions, day-care facilities, and other social services. These customers within our CAPS business unit represented approximately 10% of our total Standard Commercial Lines NPW in 2023 and 2022. We continue to actively manage policy limits and monitor each jurisdiction's statute of limitations to ensure our rate level accounts for the changing exposure, to the extent regulatorily possible. While these underwriting and pricing actions have been necessary to position the portfolio for future profitability, they have limited our CAPS growth in recent years.
We also have exposure to abuse or molestation claims from enacted state laws that extend the statute of limitations or permit windows for abuse or molestation claims and lawsuits that statutes of limitations previously barred. Consequently, we may receive claims decades after the alleged acts involving complex claims coverage determinations, potential litigation, higher defense costs, and the need to collect from reinsurers under older reinsurance agreements. Our claims and actuarial departments actively monitor these claims to identify changes in frequency or severity and any emerging or shifting trends.
41
Table of Contents
While this should help us better understand this rapidly evolving exposure, the ultimate impact of social, political, and legal trends remains highly uncertain, which could significantly impact the ultimate settlement values for these claims.
Standard Market Workers Compensation Line of Business
At December 31, 2023, our workers compensation line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $804 million, representing 17% of our total net reserves. During 2023, this line experienced favorable reserve development of $74.5 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior. Similarly, this line experienced favorable reserve development during 2022 of $70.0 million related to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident year 2020 and improved loss severities in accident years 2020 and prior. During both 2023 and 2022, the lower-than-expected loss emergence was partly due to (i) medical inflation that was lower than initially anticipated and (ii) various claims initiatives we have implemented. Because of the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development over an extended number of accident years.
A variety of issues can impact the workers compensation line of business, such as:
Unexpected changes in medical cost inflation – The industry currently is experiencing an extended period of lower medical claim cost inflation. However, medical costs are beginning to rise, though to a lesser degree than the recent elevated economic inflation measured by the Consumer Price Index. Offering some protection are wage increases, which are used as the rating basis for workers compensation coverage and continue to outpace medical inflation. Changes to our historical workers compensation medical costs and potential changes in future medical inflation can add reserve variability;
Changes in statutory workers compensation benefits – Statutory benefit changes may affect all outstanding claims, including past and not-yet-settled claims. Depending on the social and political climate, these changes may either increase or decrease associated claim costs; and
Changes in utilization of the workers compensation system – These changes may be driven by economic, legislative, or other changes, like increased prescriptions for pharmaceuticals, more complex medical procedures, changes in permanently injured workers' life expectancy, and health insurance availability.
Standard Market Commercial Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2023, our commercial automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $959 million, representing 20% of our total net reserves. In 2023, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $8.0 million, primarily due to increased loss expenses in accident years 2022 and prior. In 2022, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $22.5 million, driven by increased severities in the 2021 accident year.
The commercial automobile line has experienced unfavorable trends in recent years that has negatively affected results for us and the industry. Pre-pandemic, increased frequencies were attributable to increased miles driven, likely related to lower unemployment, poor road quality, and increased distracted driving. The pandemic and the governmental "stay-at-home" orders issued in early 2020 dramatically reduced miles driven and road traffic, significantly reducing claims frequency that year. At the same time, the industry reported dramatic increases in risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, distracted driving, and driving under the influence. In addition, traffic deaths per mile driven increased significantly. With increased miles driven in subsequent years, fatality rates per mile driven have tempered but remain well above pre-pandemic levels. Risky driving behaviors and the impacts of social inflation continue to pressure this line's claim severities. As of year-end 2023, frequencies remained somewhat below pre-pandemic levels due to changes in commuting patterns.
Increased property damage and physical damage severities relate to (i) elevated repair costs for increasingly complex vehicles that incorporate more technology, (ii) extended periods of rental reimbursement costs for claims, and (iii) inflationary impacts and disruptions to the supply chain, although these have moderated in recent quarters.
Over the last several years, we have taken actions to improve the profitability of this line of business, including:
•Taking meaningful rate and underwriting actions on our renewal portfolio. We continue to leverage our predictive modeling and analytical capabilities that provide guidance and automatic retrieval of relevant public information on existing and potential policyholders to provide more granular insights about where we should focus our actions.
•Reducing premium leakage by improving the quality of our rating information, including validating application information with third-party data and obtaining more detailed vehicle usage information.
42
Table of Contents
•Aggressively managing new business pricing and hazard mix. Deploying co-underwriting by our regional underwriters and corporate underwriting teams' subject matter experts for selected higher hazard classes to improve risk-driver recognition and exposure-based pricing.
Standard Market Personal Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2023, our personal automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $130 million, representing 3% of our total net reserves. This line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $15.3 million in 2023, primarily due to increased loss severities in accident year 2022. This line experienced modest unfavorable prior year reserve development of $0.5 million in 2022.
Some of the same issues affecting the commercial automobile line also impact this line. The COVID-19-related frequency reduction was even more pronounced for the personal automobile line than the commercial automobile line. Frequencies rebounded post-pandemic and have nearly returned to pre-pandemic levels. In addition to the COVID-19-related temporary impacts, the underlying trends of increased vehicle repair costs and poor road quality are likely causes of rising severities, exacerbated by riskier driving behaviors, including distracted driving trends. We continue recalibrating our predictive models and refining our underwriting and pricing approaches, including prioritizing rate filings state-by-state, to mitigate these rising severities. These filed rate increases began to take effect on a written basis during the first quarter of 2023 and continued to take effect through the end of 2023. We expect the number of rate filings and their rate impacts to continue to increase throughout 2024. While we believe these underwriting and pricing changes will ultimately lead to improved profitability and greater stability, the resulting changes to our exposure profile may impact paid and reported development patterns, increasing the uncertainty in the reserves in the near-term.
E&S Casualty Lines of Business
At December 31, 2023, our E&S casualty lines of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $532 million, representing 11% of our total net reserves. Our E&S casualty lines results have improved over recent years. In 2023, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $5.0 million, primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior. In 2022, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $5.0 million, primarily attributable to favorable policy inception-to-date claim frequencies and improved loss severities in accident years 2020 and 2021.
Some of the risk factors for the general liability line also affect the E&S casualty lines. These include (i) economic inflation, such as materials and labor costs and (ii) social inflationary trends, such as increased attorney involvement, broader liability findings, and more generous settlement awards.
We made underwriting operational changes that improved E&S casualty lines performance. Before 2023, our underwriting operations had substantially exited several targeted business classes with historically volatile results, including commercial automobile liability, liquor liability, and snow removal. We have shifted more policy acquisitions to middle market business without materially increasing the portfolio's overall risk profile.
The following E&S casualty claims operational changes have created further casualty improvements:
•We created a dedicated E&S claims team in our corporate claims function, bringing greater expertise and consistency to E&S claims handling.
•We created separate specialized claims teams for "litigated," "non-litigated," and "high exposure" claims.
•We implemented the following legal operational and expense improvement initiatives:
◦Increased the use of employed staff counsel lawyers to defend covered claims litigation;
◦Consistent with our policies' terms related to covered claims, the duty to defend, and regulatory standards, enhanced processes for legal budgeting and expense management; and
◦Implemented a process to review the effectiveness of outside counsel defending our insureds.
While we believe these underwriting and claims operational changes have improved our underwriting experience, these changes have inherent risks. Changes in portfolio composition or our claims processes may affect paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, estimated reserves have a greater risk of fluctuation.
43
Table of Contents
Other impacts that create additional loss and loss expense reserve uncertainty
Claims Initiative Impacts
Our Claims Department continually identifies areas for improvement and efficiency to increase our value proposition to policyholders. These improvements may lead to claims practice changes affecting average case reserve levels and claims settlement rates, directly impacting the data used to project ultimate loss and loss expense. While these changes may increase uncertainty in our estimates in the short term, we expect refined claims process management to be the longer-term benefit.
Our internal reserve analyses incorporate actuarial projection methods that make adjustments for changes in case reserve adequacy and claims settlement rates. These methods adjust our historical loss experience to the current case adequacy or settlement rate level, providing a more consistent basis for projecting future development patterns. Like all projection methods, these have their own associated assumptions and judgments. Accordingly, no single method can be considered definitive.
Unanticipated Changes in Economic Inflation
United States ("U.S.") monetary policy and global economic conditions bring additional uncertainty related to inflationary trends. Changes in inflation affect the ultimate settlement costs for many of our lines of business, with the greatest reserve impact on the longer-tailed lines, such as general liability and workers compensation. Uncertainty about future inflation or deflation creates the potential for additional reserve variability in these lines of business.
Sensitivity analysis: Potential impact on reserve estimates due to changes in key assumptions
Our process to establish reserves includes a variety of key assumptions, such as:
•The selection of loss and loss expense development factors;
•The weight applied to each individual actuarial projection method;
•Projected future loss trends; and
•Expected claim frequencies, severities, and ultimate loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year.
The importance of any single assumption depends on several considerations, such as line of business and accident year. If the actual experience emerges differently than the assumptions underlying the reserve process, possible changes in our reserve estimates could be material to the results of operations in future periods. Below are sensitivity tests highlighting potential impacts to loss and loss expense reserves for the major casualty lines of business under different scenarios. These tests consider each assumption and line of business individually without considering the correlation between lines of business and accident years. Therefore, the results do not constitute an actuarial range. While the figures represent possible impacts from variations in certain key assumptions, there is no assurance that future loss and loss expense emergence will be consistent with our current or alternative assumptions.
Changes in internal and external trends and operational changes may manifest as changes in loss and loss expense development patterns. These patterns are a key assumption in the reserving process. In addition, the current accident year expected loss and loss expense ratios are key assumptions. These ratios are developed through a rigorous process of projecting recent accident years' experience to an ultimate settlement basis. They are then adjusted to the current accident year's pricing and loss cost levels. The impact of underwriting portfolio and claims handling practice changes is also quantified and reflected where appropriate. As with all estimates, the ultimate loss and loss expense ratios may differ from those currently estimated.
44
Table of Contents
The sensitivities of loss and loss expense reserves to these key assumptions are illustrated below for the major casualty lines. The first table displays estimated impacts from changes in expected reported loss and loss expense development patterns for our major casualty lines of business. It shows line of business reserve impacts if the actual calendar year incurred amounts are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages. While judgmental, the selected percentages by line are based on the reserve range analysis and the actual historical reserve development for the line of business. The second table displays the estimated impacts of changes to the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year. It shows reserve impacts by line of business if the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages.
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Expected Loss and Loss Expense Reporting Patterns | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Future Calendar Year Reported | Increase to Future Calendar Year Reported | ||||||||
| General liability | 12 | % | $ | (225) | $ | 225 | |||||
| Workers compensation | 15 | (85) | 85 | ||||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 12 | (105) | 105 | ||||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 20 | (20) | 20 | ||||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (55) | 55 |
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Current Year Expected Ultimate Loss and Loss Expense Ratios | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | Increase to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense | ||||||||
| General liability | 10 | pts | $ | (105) | $ | 105 | |||||
| Workers compensation | 10 | (35) | 35 | ||||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (65) | 65 | ||||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 10 | (10) | 10 | ||||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (25) | 25 |
There is some overlap between the impacts shown in the two tables. For example, increases in the calendar year development would ultimately impact our view of the current accident year's loss and loss expense ratios. However, these tables provide perspective on the sensitivity of each key assumption. While the changes represent outcomes based on reasonably likely changes to our underlying reserving assumptions, they do not represent a range of possible outcomes. Our reserves could increase or decrease significantly from what the tables reflect.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
Our general liability, businessowners' policies, and homeowners reserves include exposure to asbestos and environmental claims. The emergence of these claims occurs over an extended period and can be unpredictable. The total recorded net loss and loss expense reserves for these claims were $19.1 million as of December 31, 2023, and $20.3 million as of December 31, 2022, with asbestos claims constituting approximately 18% of these reserves in 2023 and 23% in 2022.
Environmental claims have arisen primarily from insured landfill exposures in municipal government and small non-manufacturing commercial risks, and leaking underground storage tanks under homeowners policies. Asbestos claims have arisen primarily from policies issued to (i) various distributors of asbestos-containing products, such as electrical and plumbing materials and (ii) contractors exposed to or handling asbestos-containing products, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractors. We handle our asbestos and environmental claims in a centralized and specialized asbestos and environmental claim unit. That unit establishes case reserves on individual claims based on the then-known facts and circumstances, which IBNR reserves supplement.
Estimating IBNR reserves for asbestos and environmental claims is difficult because these claims have delayed and inconsistent reporting patterns. In addition, significant uncertainties are associated with estimating critical reserve assumptions, such as average clean-up costs, third-party costs, potentially responsible party shares, allocation of damages, litigation and coverage costs, and potential state and federal legislative changes.
Other Latent Exposures
We also have other latent and continuous trigger exposures in our ongoing portfolio. Examples include claims for construction defect and abuse or molestation, including in states that have increased and expanded the statute of limitations. We manage our exposure to these liabilities through our underwriting and claims practices and a dedicated claims unit, similar to our handling of asbestos and environmental claims. The impact of social, political, and legal trends on these claims remains highly uncertain, so the adequacy of our related loss and loss expense reserves to cover these claims remain highly uncertain. These exposures remain in our ongoing portfolio and are reserved in aggregate, with other exposures within the line of business
45
Table of Contents
reserves.
Investment Valuation and the Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
Investment Valuation
Accounting guidance defines the fair value of our investment portfolio as the exit price or amount that would be (i) received to sell an asset or (ii) paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When determining an exit price, we must rely on observable market data, if available. Most securities in our equity portfolio have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized gains or losses recognized through income. Our AFS fixed income securities portfolio is recorded at fair value, and the related unrealized gains or losses are reflected in stockholders' equity, net of tax. For our AFS fixed income securities portfolios, fair value is a key factor in the measurement of (i) losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell, and (ii) changes in the allowance for credit losses.
The fair value of approximately 91% of our investments measured at fair value are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and are priced using observable inputs for identical or similar assets. About 9% are classified as either (i) Level 3 and are based on unobservable market inputs because the related securities are not traded on a public market, or (ii) not leveled because the related securities are measured at fair value using net asset value per share (or its practical expedient). For additional information, refer to the following sections within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K: (i) item (d) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for descriptions of the levels within the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques used for our Level 3 securities, and (ii) Note 7. "Fair Value Measurements" for quantitative information on the unobservable inputs in our securities measured using Level 3 inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
When fixed income securities are in an unrealized loss position and we do not intend to sell them, we record an allowance for credit losses for the portion of the unrealized loss related to an expected credit loss. We estimate expected credit losses on these securities by performing a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow ("DCF"). The allowance for credit losses is the excess of amortized cost over the greater of (i) our estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows or (ii) fair value. The allowance for credit losses cannot exceed the unrealized loss, and therefore it may fluctuate with changes in the security's fair value. We also consider the need to record losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for which we have the intent to sell.
We analyze unrealized losses for credit loss in accordance with our existing accounting policy, which includes performing DCF analyses on securities at the lot level and analyzing these DCFs using various economic scenarios. In performing these DCF analyses, we calculate the present value of future cash flows using various models specific to the major security types in our portfolio. These models use security-specific information and forecasted macroeconomic data to determine possible expected credit loss scenarios based on projected economic changes. The forecasted economic data incorporated into the models is based on the Federal Reserve Board’s annual supervisory stress test review on certain large banks and financial institutions.
We also can incorporate internally-developed forecast information into the models as we deem appropriate. In developing our best estimate of the allowance for credit losses, we consider our outlook on the probability of the various scenarios occurring.
Based on these analyses, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio of $28.2 million at December 31, 2023, and $45.7 million at December 31, 2022. After considering the allowance for credit losses, the remaining unrealized losses on this portfolio were $403.4 million at December 31, 2023 and $537.2 million at December 31, 2022. The decrease in 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily driven by a decrease in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, a tightening of credit spreads. If the security-specific and macroeconomic assumptions in our DCF analyses or our outlook on the occurrence probability of our DCF model scenarios were to change, our allowance for credit losses and the resulting credit loss expense or benefit will negatively or positively impact our results of operations. Factors considered in determining the allowance for credit losses require significant judgment, including our evaluation of the security's projected cash flow stream.
For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses on AFS fixed income securities, see item (c) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and item (i) of Note 5. "Investments" within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, respectively.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss expense represent our estimates of the amounts we will recover from reinsurers. Each reinsurance contract is analyzed to ensure sufficient risk is transferred to record the transactions appropriately as reinsurance in the Financial Statements. Amounts recovered from reinsurers are recognized as assets contemporaneously and
46
Table of Contents
in a manner consistent with the paid and unpaid losses associated with the reinsured policies. An allowance for credit losses on our reinsurance recoverable balance is recorded based on an evaluation of balances due from reinsurers and other available information, including collateral we hold under the terms and conditions of the underlying agreements. Reinsurers often purchase and rely on their retrocessional reinsurance programs to manage their capital position and improve their financial strength ratings. Details about retrocessional reinsurance programs are not always transparent, making it difficult to assess our reinsurers' exposure to counterparty credit risk. Other factors impact our reinsurer's credit quality, such as their reserve adequacy, investment portfolio, regulatory capital position, catastrophe aggregations, and risk management practices. In addition, contractual language interpretations and willingness to pay valid claims can impact our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance. Our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance was $1.7 million at December 31, 2023, and $1.6 million at December 31, 2022. We continually monitor developments that may impact recoverability from our reinsurers, for which we have contractual remedies if necessary. For further information regarding reinsurance, see the "Reinsurance" section below in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" and Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 20211
| 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2023 | 2022 | vs. 2022 | 2021 | vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 4,232,106 | 3,558,062 | 19 | % | $ | 3,379,164 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 309,535 | 232,199 | 33 | 263,000 | (12) | ||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income | 104,911 | 131,774 | (20) | 172,688 | (24) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income before federal income tax | 458,412 | 280,186 | 64 | 505,310 | (45) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 365,238 | 224,886 | 62 | 403,837 | (44) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | 356,038 | 215,686 | 65 | 394,484 | (45) | ||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 96.5 | % | 95.1 | 1.4 | pts | 92.8 | % | 2.3 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 3.16 | 3.37 | (6) | % | $ | 2.88 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Annualized after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 3.7 | % | 2.9 | 0.8 | pts | 3.4 | % | (0.5) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Return on common equity ("ROE") | 14.3 | 8.8 | 5.5 | 14.8 | (14.7) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio | 1.51 | x | 1.44 | 0.07 | 1.33 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 5.84 | 3.54 | 65 | % | $ | 6.50 | (46) | % | ||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 45.42 | 38.57 | 18 | 46.24 | (17) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 1.25 | 1.14 | 10 | 1.03 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information2: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income | $ | 358,844 | 306,384 | 17 | % | $ | 380,580 | (19) | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | 5.89 | 5.03 | 17 | 6.27 | (20) | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.4 | % | 12.4 | 2.0 | pts | 14.3 | % | (1.9) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 50.03 | 45.49 | 10 | % | $ | 43.23 | 5 | % |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this financial review.
2Non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are measures comparable to net income available to common stockholders, net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments included in net income. Adjusted book value per common share is a measure comparable to book value per common share, but excludes total after-tax unrealized gains and losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). These non-GAAP measures are important financial measures that we, analysts, and investors use because the timing of realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on
investments could distort the analysis of trends.
Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures are provided in the tables below:
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 356,038 | 215,686 | 394,484 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income, before tax | 3,552 | 114,808 | (17,599) | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (746) | (24,110) | 3,695 | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income | $ | 358,844 | 306,384 | 380,580 |
47
Table of Contents
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 5.84 | 3.54 | 6.50 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income, before tax | 0.06 | 1.89 | (0.29) | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (0.01) | (0.40) | 0.06 | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | $ | 5.89 | 5.03 | 6.27 |
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.3 | % | 8.8 | 14.8 | ||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses included in net income, before tax | 0.1 | 4.7 | (0.7) | |||||
| Tax on reconciling items | — | (1.1) | 0.2 | |||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.4 | % | 12.4 | 14.3 |
| Reconciliation of book value per common share to adjusted book value per common share | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value per common share | $ | 45.42 | 38.57 | 46.24 | |||||
| Total unrealized investment gains losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before tax | 5.83 | 8.75 | (3.80) | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (1.22) | (1.83) | 0.79 | ||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 50.03 | 45.49 | 43.23 |
The components of our ROE and non-GAAP operating ROE are as follows:
| ROE Components | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | vs. 2022 | 2021 | vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Standard Commercial Lines segment | 5.0 | % | 4.6 | 0.4 | pts | 5.9 | (1.3) | pts | ||||||||||
| Standard Personal Lines segment | (2.5) | (0.2) | (2.3) | 0.1 | (0.3) | |||||||||||||
| E&S Lines segment | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||
| Total insurance operations | 4.2 | 5.4 | (1.2) | 6.5 | (1.1) | |||||||||||||
| Investment income | 12.4 | 9.4 | 3.0 | 9.9 | (0.5) | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | (0.1) | (3.6) | 3.5 | 0.5 | (4.1) | |||||||||||||
| Total investments segment | 12.3 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 10.4 | (4.6) | |||||||||||||
| Other | (2.2) | (2.4) | 0.2 | (2.1) | (0.3) | |||||||||||||
| ROE | 14.3 | 8.8 | 5.5 | 14.8 | (6.0) | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (gains) losses, after tax | 0.1 | 3.6 | (3.5) | (0.5) | 4.1 | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.4 | % | 12.4 | 2.0 | 14.3 | (1.9) |
In 2023, we generated an ROE of 14.3% compared to 8.8% in 2022. Our non-GAAP operating ROE of 14.4% in 2023 was above our target non-GAAP operating ROE of 12% and above our 2022 non-GAAP operating ROE of 12.4%, which marks a significant milestone for us as this was our tenth consecutive year generating double-digit non-GAAP operating ROE. We also exceeded $4 billion of net premiums written ("NPW") for the first time in our nearly 100-year history, as we achieved 16% NPW growth in 2023 compared to 2022. We view our 2023 results as a significant achievement in a year with elevated uncertainty of loss trends influenced by economic and social inflation, the unusual frequency and severity patterns resulting from the pandemic and its longer-term residual impacts, and a heightened frequency of catastrophe losses. Our results reflect the success of our underwriting discipline, active management of our investment portfolio, and profitable growth strategies.
The 2.0-point increase in our non-GAAP operating ROE in 2023, compared to 2022, included the following:
•An increase in after-tax net investment income of $77.3 million, or 3.0 points, in 2023, compared to 2022. The 2023 increase was attributable to greater after-tax net investment income earned on our fixed income securities portfolio. This portfolio benefited from higher book yields we earned on the investment of operating and investing cash flows in the higher interest rate environment over the past two years.
•An increase in Standard Commercial Lines and E&S Lines after-tax underwriting income of $30.1 million, or 1.1 points, in 2023, compared to 2022. These segments represent 90% of our business and delivered underwriting results at or better than our 95% combined ratio target. The 2023 increase was attributable to lower non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses and improved underwriting expenses, partially offset by higher net catastrophe losses and lower favorable prior year casualty reserve development.
•An increase in Standard Personal Lines after-tax underwriting losses of $56.9 million, or 2.3 points, in 2023, compared
48
Table of Contents
to 2022, which partially offset the improvements in our other segments. Higher net catastrophe losses and unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development negatively impacted this segment in 2023.
Overall pre-tax net catastrophe losses increased $98.6 million in 2023, compared to 2022. We were impacted by 66 Property Claim Services ("PCS") named events in 2023, compared to 56 in 2022. In addition, favorable prior year casualty reserve development decreased $79.5 million in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily driven by $55 million of unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in our general liability line of business in 2023 compared to favorable development of $5 million in 2022. While down year-over-year, we reported our 18th consecutive year of net favorable prior year casualty reserve development.
For additional information on our insurance segment results, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Our ROE was up 3.5 points in 2023 compared to 2022 due to a decrease in net realized and unrealized investment losses. The decrease in net realized and unrealized investment losses was primarily due to (i) a credit loss benefit recorded on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio in 2023, compared to credit loss expense recorded in 2022, and (ii) an increase in valuations reflecting the current public equities market. The 2023 credit loss benefit reflected the decrease in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, a tightening of credit spreads.
Outlook
2023 marks our tenth consecutive year of double-digit non-GAAP operating ROE. Over those ten years, our operating ROE was 12.2%, exceeding our target of 12%. Our target is set approximately 300 to 400 basis points above our weighted average cost of capital. Throughout the market cycle and under various interest rate environments, we believe a 95% combined ratio should allow us to meet our operating ROE target. Based on current interest rates and the elevated contribution of net investment income to operating ROE, we expect to produce an operating ROE in excess of our target, as was the case in 2023. Our combined ratio target allows us to remain focused on disciplined underwriting and profitable growth while being a stable insurance carrier for our customers and distribution partners.
With our strong capital position and operational results, we are well-positioned to navigate the on-going challenges of elevated economic and social inflation and financial market volatility. In 2024, we will focus on delivering on our strategy for disciplined and profitable growth within our insurance operation segments by:
•Standard Commercial Lines
◦Achieving Standard Commercial Lines renewal pure price increases that reflect our current profitability and forward loss trend expectations;
◦Continuing to expand our Standard Commercial Lines market share by (i) increasing our share towards our 12% target of our agents' premiums, (ii) strategically appointing new agents, and (iii) maximizing new business growth in the small business market through the use of our enhanced small business platform; and
◦Expanding our geographic footprint. In 2022, we began writing Standard Commercial Lines business in Vermont, Alabama, and Idaho. We expect to write new business in West Virginia and Maine in early 2024, and Washington, Oregon, and Nevada in late 2024. Over time, we plan to expand our Standard Commercial Lines footprint into most of the contiguous U.S.
•E&S Lines
◦Achieving E&S Lines renewal pure price increases that reflect our current profitability and forward loss trend expectations; and
◦Continuing to invest in product expansion, risk evaluation, and operational efficiency for middle market E&S accounts.
•Standard Personal Lines
◦Aggressively pursuing profitability on our Standard Personal Lines segment by prioritizing additional rate filings on a state-by-state basis and further refining our pricing factors. These filed rate increases began to take effect early in 2023, increasing in number and magnitude throughout the year, and are expected to continue through 2024. We expect our overall written renewal rate to range from approximately 20% to 25% in 2024, subject to regulatory approvals. In addition, other underwriting actions include the following:
▪Seeking to improve our homeowners line of business profitability through the introduction of new policy terms and conditions, including (i) coverage for older roofs based on depreciation schedules rather than replacement cost, and (ii) implementing mandatory wind/hail deductibles in states exposed to severe convective storms, where allowed by law; and
▪Continuing the migration of our Standard Personal Lines products and services towards customers in
49
Table of Contents
the mass affluent market, where we believe we can be more competitive with our strong coverage and servicing capabilities.
In addition, we will continue developing our culture centered on the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion that foster innovation, idea generation, and the development of a group of specially trained leaders who can guide us successfully into the future.
For 2024, our full-year guidance is as follows:
•A GAAP combined ratio of 95.5%, including net catastrophe losses of 5.0 points. Our combined ratio estimate assumes no prior year casualty reserve development;
•After-tax net investment income of $360 million that includes $32 million of after-tax net investment income from our alternative investments;
•An overall effective tax rate of approximately 21.0%, which assumes an effective tax rate of 20.5% for net investment income and 21% for all other items; and
•Weighted average shares of 61.5 million on a fully diluted basis, which assumes no share repurchases we may make under our authorization.
Our guidance implies a healthy ROE outlook for 2024 that exceeds our 12% target, with ample runway to continue our trajectory of profitable growth. We have the team, sophisticated tools, and disciplined execution to effectively manage through market dynamics, and believe we are operating from a position of strength.
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing the combined ratio:
| All Lines | 2023 vs. 2022 | 2022 vs. 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Operations Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 4,134,532 | 3,573,590 | 16 | % | $ | 3,189,713 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 3,827,606 | 3,373,380 | 13 | 3,017,253 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 2,484,285 | 2,111,778 | 18 | 1,813,984 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,203,767 | 1,089,942 | 10 | 979,537 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 6,755 | 4,858 | 39 | 5,140 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 132,799 | 166,802 | (20) | % | $ | 218,592 | (24) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 64.9 | % | 62.7 | 2.2 | pts | 60.1 | % | 2.6 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 31.4 | 32.3 | (0.9) | 32.5 | (0.2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 96.5 | 95.1 | 1.4 | 92.8 | 2.3 |
The NPW growth of 16% in 2023 compared to 2022 reflected (i) overall renewal pure price increases, and (ii) higher direct new business, as shown in the following table:
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 923.5 | 731.7 | 648.5 | ||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 6.8 | % | 5.1 | 4.9 |
Our NPW growth in 2023 also benefited from strong retention and exposure growth on renewal policies.
The increase in NPE in 2023 compared to 2022 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
50
Table of Contents
Loss and Loss Expenses
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 2.2 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 650.4 | 17.0 | pts | $ | 244.5 | 6.4 | pts | 23.4 | 0.8 | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 617.9 | 18.3 | 145.9 | 4.3 | 22.6 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 471.7 | 15.6 | 164.2 | 5.4 | 21.0 | (2.3) |
We had higher net catastrophe losses in 2023 compared to 2022. In 2023, 66 PCS named events impacted our footprint, compared to 56 in 2022. In 2023 and 2022, net catastrophe losses primarily impacted our commercial property and homeowners line of business, with 2023 events also impacting our E&S property lines.
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development were as follows:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2023 | $ | (6.5) | (0.2) | pts | 2.3 | |||||
| 2022 | (86.0) | (2.5) | 0.2 | |||||||
| 2021 | (81.0) | (2.7) | 0.5 |
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| General liability | $ | 55.0 | (5.0) | (29.0) | ||||||
| Commercial automobile | 4.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | |||||||
| Workers compensation | (74.5) | (70.0) | (58.0) | |||||||
| Businessowners' policies | — | (11.0) | (2.0) | |||||||
| Bonds | — | (10.0) | — | |||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | (15.5) | (81.0) | (74.0) | |||||||
| Homeowners | — | — | — | |||||||
| Personal automobile | 14.0 | — | — | |||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 14.0 | — | — | |||||||
| E&S | (5.0) | (5.0) | (7.0) | |||||||
| Total (favorable) prior year casualty reserve development | $ | (6.5) | (86.0) | (81.0) | ||||||
| (Favorable) impact on loss ratio | (0.2) | pts | (2.5) | (2.7) |
In addition, the loss and loss expense ratio was impacted by a decrease in current year casualty loss costs of 0.8 points in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to the mix of business from the impact of premium growth in 2023 compared to 2022.
For additional qualitative discussion on prior year reserve development, current year casualty loss costs, and non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio decreased 0.9 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to premium growth outpacing the growth in underwriting expenses.
51
Table of Contents
Standard Commercial Lines Segment
| 2023 vs. 2022 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 3,281,319 | 2,901,984 | 13 | % | $ | 2,593,018 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 3,071,784 | 2,739,819 | 12 | 2,443,885 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 1,919,204 | 1,683,988 | 14 | 1,426,768 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 988,519 | 907,277 | 9 | 813,381 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 6,755 | 4,858 | 39 | 5,140 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 157,306 | 143,696 | 9 | % | $ | 198,596 | (28) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 62.5 | % | 61.5 | 1.0 | pts | 58.4 | % | 3.1 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 32.2 | 33.1 | (0.9) | 33.3 | (0.2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 94.9 | 94.8 | 0.1 | 91.9 | 2.9 |
NPW growth of 13% in 2023 compared to 2022 reflected (i) renewal pure price increases, (ii) higher direct new business, and (iii) strong retention as shown in the table below. In addition, NPW growth in 2023 benefited from exposure growth on renewal policies.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 597.5 | $ | 512.5 | ||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 7.0 | 5.4 |
The increase in NPE in 2023 compared to 2022 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
The 1.0-point increase in the loss and loss expense ratio in 2023 compared to 2022 was primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 461.6 | 15.0 | pts | $ | 150.5 | 4.9 | pts | 19.9 | (0.4) | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 461.1 | 16.8 | 95.6 | 3.5 | 20.3 | 2.1 |
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||
| 2023 | $ | (15.5) | (0.5) | pts | 2.5 | ||||||
| 2022 | (81.0) | (3.0) | — |
Our loss and loss expenses in 2023 experienced elevated net catastrophe losses compared to 2022, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above. Refer to the line of business sections below for qualitative discussion on the significant drivers of favorable prior year casualty reserve development and non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses.
In addition, the loss and loss expense ratio was impacted by a decrease in current year casualty loss costs of 1.0 point in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to (i) the mix of business from the impact of premium growth in 2023, partially offset by (ii) an increase in current year casualty loss costs in our commercial automobile line of business. Refer to the "Commercial Automobile" section below for a qualitative discussion on these current year loss costs.
The underwriting expense ratio decreased 0.9 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to premium growth outpacing the growth in underwriting expenses.
52
Table of Contents
The following is a discussion of our most significant Standard Commercial Lines of business:
| General Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 1,087,079 | 958,121 | 13 | % | $ | 859,284 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 179,047 | 151,005 | n/a | 139,255 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | n/a | 85 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 5.4 | 4.5 | n/a | 4.4 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 1,020,362 | 902,428 | 13 | % | $ | 807,158 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | 70,806 | 104,517 | (32) | 123,450 | (15) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 93.1 | % | 88.4 | 4.7 | pts | 84.7 | % | 3.7 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 33 | 33 | 33 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 13% in 2023 compared to 2022 benefited from exposure growth on renewal policies, strong retention, renewal pure price increases, and higher direct new business.
The combined ratio increased 4.7 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily driven by unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023, as follows:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||
| 2023 | $ | 55.0 | 5.4 | pts | 6.0 | |||||
| 2022 | (5.0) | (0.6) | 3.0 |
The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily driven by increased loss severities in accident years 2015 through 2020 attributable to social inflationary impacts. We see this as an industry dynamic with higher propensity for attorney representation and litigation, longer settlement times, and higher settlement values. The 2022 favorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident years 2021 and 2020.
This line of business has experienced a long-term historical trend of meaningful severity increases, which have been largely offset by decreases in claim frequencies. In response to potential social inflationary impacts, we have been embedding higher severity assumptions in our initial loss ratio estimates in recent years, which are materializing in actual results. The trend of lower frequencies has continued, while prior year severities have developed adversely. Despite this, initial estimates for less mature accident years have remained stable. However, if the favorable frequency trend moderates and severities continue to emerge higher than expected, there could be impacts on ultimate loss estimates for this line.
The combined ratio was also impacted by a decrease in the underwriting expense ratio of 1.2 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to premium growth outpacing the growth in underwriting expenses.
| Commercial Automobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 vs. 20221 | 2022 vs. 20211 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 976,888 | 860,116 | 14 | % | $ | 767,723 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 147,242 | 125,129 | n/a | 115,088 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 86 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 9.8 | 8.1 | n/a | 8.3 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 916,140 | 812,306 | 13 | % | $ | 724,398 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting loss | (33,724) | (63,112) | 47 | (23,335) | (170) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 103.7 | % | 107.8 | (4.1) | pts | 103.2 | % | 4.6 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 30 | 30 | 30 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 14% in 2023 compared to 2022 benefited from renewal pure price increases, higher direct new business, and strong retention. The higher new business and strong retention contributed to a 5% growth of in-force vehicle counts as of December 31, 2023, compared to December 31, 2022.
53
Table of Contents
The combined ratio decreased 4.1 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/ Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 177.8 | 19.4 | pts | $ | 5.0 | 0.5 | pts | 19.9 | (1.7) | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 172.2 | 21.2 | 3.1 | 0.4 | 21.6 | 2.9 |
Loss and loss expenses in 2023 compared to 2022 experienced (i) lower non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, as inflationary and supply chain impacts have moderated, partially offset by (ii) elevated net catastrophe losses, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
| ($ in millions) | Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/ Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 4.0 | 0.4 | pts | (1.4) | ||||||
| 2022 | 15.0 | 1.8 | (0.3) |
The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily due to increased loss expenses in accident years 2022 and prior. The 2022 unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily due to increased severities in the 2021 accident year.
The combined ratio was also impacted by a decrease in the underwriting expense ratio of 1.0 point in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to premium growth outpacing the growth in underwriting expenses.
| Commercial Property | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 vs. 20221 | 2022 vs. 20211 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 648,753 | 535,666 | 21 | % | $ | 470,043 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 147,358 | 118,470 | n/a | 108,418 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 84 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 9.8 | 6.2 | n/a | 6.0 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 586,267 | 495,647 | 18 | % | $ | 436,412 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 10,765 | (7,015) | 253 | 10,515 | (167) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 98.2 | pts | 101.4 | (3.2) | 97.6 | pts | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 20 | 18 | 18 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 21% in 2023 compared to 2022 benefited from renewal pure price increases, exposure growth on renewal policies, strong retention, and higher direct new business.
The combined ratio decreased 3.2 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 233.4 | 39.8 | pts | $ | 127.9 | 21.8 | pts | 61.6 | (2.1) | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 240.5 | 48.5 | 75.3 | 15.2 | 63.7 | 3.7 |
The lower non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses were primarily due to lower frequencies compared to 2022. We continue to manage our long-term profitability through (i) price increases and (ii) targeted underwriting actions, including an ongoing focus on appropriate policy terms and conditions and achieving accurate insurance-to-value ratios. The elevated net catastrophe losses are further discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
The combined ratio was also impacted by a decrease in the underwriting expense ratio of 1.2 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to premium growth outpacing the growth in underwriting expenses.
54
Table of Contents
| Workers Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 vs. 20221 | 2022 vs. 20211 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 338,123 | 340,802 | (1) | % | $ | 317,035 | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 63,703 | 61,726 | n/a | 59,938 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 86 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases (decreases) | (1.5) | (0.5) | n/a | 0.1 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 333,669 | 335,955 | (1) | % | $ | 306,428 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | 95,397 | 91,087 | 5 | 78,537 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 71.4 | % | 72.9 | (1.5) | pts | 74.4 | % | (1.5) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 12 | 12 | 12 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW decreased 1% in 2023 compared to 2022 due to renewal pure price decreases and a slight decrease in retention.
The combined ratio decreased 1.5 points in 2023 compared to 2022, driven by higher favorable prior year casualty reserve development, as follows:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | Unfavorable/(Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2023 | $ | (74.5) | (22.3) | pts | (1.5) | |||||
| 2022 | (70.0) | (20.8) | (1.9) |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily due to improved loss severities driven by continued favorable medical cost trends in accident years 2021 and prior. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily due to continued favorable medical trends in accident years 2020 and prior, and favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident year 2020.
Standard Personal Lines Segment
| 2023 vs. 2022 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 414,585 | 319,059 | 30 | % | $ | 292,265 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 365,213 | 299,405 | 22 | 293,559 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 353,185 | 231,113 | 53 | 212,116 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 91,291 | 75,485 | 21 | 77,477 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | (79,263) | (7,193) | (1,002) | % | $ | 3,966 | (281) | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 96.7 | % | 77.2 | 19.5 | pts | 72.2 | % | 5.0 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 25.0 | 25.2 | (0.2) | 26.4 | (1.2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 121.7 | 102.4 | 19.3 | 98.6 | 3.8 |
NPW increased 30% in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily due to (i) higher direct new business, (ii) stronger retention, (iii) renewal pure price increases, (iv) higher homeowners coverage amounts due to inflation adjustments, and (v) higher average policy sizes from our mass affluent market strategy. In the third quarter of 2021, we transitioned our personal lines strategy to targeting customers in the mass affluent market, where we believe our strong coverage and servicing capabilities will be more competitive. Over 65% of new business in our homeowners line of business in 2023 had dwelling coverage values over $500,000.
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums1 | $ | 116.5 | $ | 62.9 | ||||
| Retention | 87 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 5.2 | 0.7 |
1Excludes our flood direct premiums written, which is 100% ceded to the NFIP and therefore, has no impact on our NPW.
The increase in NPE in 2023 compared to 2022 resulted from the same impacts on NPW discussed above.
55
Table of Contents
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 19.5 points in 2023 compared to 2022, driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 156.9 | 43.0 | pts | $ | 69.3 | 19.0 | pts | 62.0 | 9.3 | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 117.1 | 39.1 | 40.8 | 13.6 | 52.7 | 5.0 |
Net catastrophe losses in both 2023 and 2022 exceeded our 10-year historical average, with 2023 being elevated over 2022, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
We experienced elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses in 2023 compared to 2022, driven by higher personal automobile physical damage losses and homeowners property losses. The higher automobile damage losses resulted from increased claim frequencies, driven in part by increased miles driven. Higher homeowners property losses were attributable to elevated severities due to (i) higher construction costs impacted by economic inflation and (ii) increasing home values due to higher average policy sizes from our mass affluent market strategy.
| ($ in millions) | Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | Unfavorable/(Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 14.0 | 3.8 | pts | 3.8 | |||||
| 2022 | — | — | — |
The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily attributable to increased loss severities in accident year 2022. There was no prior year casualty reserve development in 2022.
In addition, the loss and loss expense ratio was impacted by a 6.4-point increase in current year casualty loss costs in 2023 compared to 2022 from (i) elevated prior year severities, which influenced our current year severity estimates, and (ii) increased claim frequencies in the current year.
We are aggressively managing this business by continuing to prioritize additional rate filings on a state-by-state basis to mitigate these inflationary impacts, and refining our pricing factors. These filed rate increases began to take effect early in 2023, increasing in number and magnitude throughout the year, and are expected to continue through 2024. We expect our overall written renewal rate to range from approximately 20% to 25%, subject to regulatory approvals. In addition, we are seeking to improve profitability within our homeowners' line of business by introducing new policy terms and conditions, including (i) coverage for older roofs based on a schedule of factors rather than replacement cost and (ii) implementing mandatory wind/hail deductibles in states exposed to severe convective storms, where allowed by law.
E&S Lines Segment
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 438,628 | 352,547 | 24 | % | $ | 304,430 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 390,609 | 334,156 | 17 | 279,809 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 211,896 | 196,677 | 8 | 175,100 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 123,957 | 107,180 | 16 | 88,679 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 54,756 | 30,299 | 81 | % | $ | 16,030 | 89 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 54.3 | % | 58.8 | (4.5) | pts | 62.6 | % | (3.8) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 31.7 | 32.1 | (0.4) | 31.7 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 86.0 | 90.9 | (4.9) | 94.3 | (3.4) |
56
Table of Contents
NPW growth of 24% in 2023 compared to 2022, reflected renewal pure price increases and higher direct new business as shown in the table below. NPW growth in 2023 also benefited from property and casualty exposure growth on renewal policies driven by higher rates associated with increased construction costs resulting from economic inflation.
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 209.5 | 156.3 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 6.9 | % | 7.3 |
The increase in NPE in 2023 compared to 2022 resulted from the same impacts to NPW discussed above.
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 4.5 points in 2023 compared to 2022, primarily driven by a 4.6-point decrease in current year casualty loss costs in 2023 compared to 2022. Our E&S casualty lines results have improved over recent years, benefiting from several underwriting and claims initiatives and strong rate increases. The decrease in current year casualty loss costs reflects the impacts of these actions.
In addition, the loss and loss expense ratio was impacted by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 31.9 | 8.2 | pts | $ | 24.7 | 6.3 | pts | 14.5 | (0.3) | |||||||||||
| 2022 | 39.6 | 11.9 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 14.8 | (3.4) |
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2023 | $ | (5.0) | (1.3) | pts | 0.2 | |||||
| 2022 | (5.0) | (1.5) | 1.0 |
We experienced elevated net catastrophe losses in 2023 compared to 2022, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2023 was primarily due to improved loss severities in accident years 2021 and prior. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies and lower loss severities in accident years 2021 and 2020.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to protect our capital resources and insure against losses on property and casualty risks that we underwrite above the amount of losses we are willing to accept. We use two main reinsurance vehicles: (i) a reinsurance pooling agreement among our Insurance Subsidiaries through which each company agrees to share in premiums and losses based on certain specified percentages; and (ii) reinsurance treaties and arrangements with third parties that cover various policies that we issue to our customers.
Reinsurance Pooling Agreement
The primary purposes of the Insurance Subsidiaries' reinsurance pooling agreement are to:
•Pool or share proportionately the underwriting profit and loss results of property and casualty insurance underwriting operations through reinsurance;
•Reduce administration expenses; and
•Permit all the Insurance Subsidiaries to obtain a uniform rating from AM Best Company ("AM Best").
57
Table of Contents
The following illustrates the pooling percentages by Insurance Subsidiary as of December 31, 2023:
| Insurance Subsidiary | Pooling Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance Company of America ("SICA") | 32.0% | |
| Selective Way Insurance Company ("SWIC") | 21.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") | 9.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New York ("SICNY") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Casualty Insurance Company ("SCIC") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey ("SAICNJ") | 6.0% | |
| Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC") | 5.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New England ("SICNE") | 3.0% | |
| Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("SFCIC") | 3.0% |
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangements
By entering into reinsurance treaties and arrangements, we can increase our underwriting capacity, accepting larger individual risks and aggregations of risks without directly increasing our capital or statutory surplus. Under our reinsurance treaties, we cede to our reinsurers a portion of our incurred losses from an individual policy or group of policies in exchange for a portion of the premium on those policies. Amounts not reinsured below a specified dollar threshold are known as retention. Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from liability under the terms and limits of our policies, but it does make our reinsurers liable to us for the amount of liability we cede to them. Our reinsurers often rely on their own reinsurance programs, or retrocessions, to manage their large loss exposures. The size of the global reinsurance community is relatively small. If our reinsurers cannot collect on their retrocessional programs, it may impair their ability to pay us for the amounts we cede to them.
Consequently, our reinsurers present us with direct, indirect, and contingent counterparty credit risk. We attempt to mitigate this credit risk by (i) pursuing relationships with reinsurers rated “A-” or higher by AM Best and/or (ii) obtaining collateral to secure reinsurance obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties permit us to terminate or commute them – or require the reinsurer to post collateral if the reinsurer's financial condition or rating deteriorates. We monitor our reinsurers' financial condition and review the quality of reinsurance recoverables and reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. For additional information regarding our reinsurance counterparty credit risk, see Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We have reinsurance contracts that separately cover our property and casualty insurance business that can be categorized as follows:
•Property Reinsurance, which includes our (i) property excess of loss treaties purchased for protection against large individual property losses and (ii) property catastrophe treaties and a property catastrophe bond transaction to provide protection for the overall property portfolio against severe catastrophic events. We also purchase a limited amount of facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual property risks greater than our property excess of loss treaty capacity.
•Casualty Reinsurance, which provides protection for both individual large casualty losses and catastrophic casualty losses involving multiple claimants or insureds. We also may use (i) facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual casualty risks in excess of our treaty capacity and (ii) quota share capacity for certain new or higher severity casualty lines of business.
•Terrorism Reinsurance, which provides a federal reinsurance backstop, behind the protection built into our property and casualty reinsurance treaties, for terrorism losses covered under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”). For further information about TRIPRA, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K.
•Flood Reinsurance, for which all of the premiums and losses related to our participation in the WYO (for which we also receive a servicing fee) are 100% ceded to the federal government.
Property Reinsurance
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance Program
Our 2024 property catastrophe reinsurance program includes an excess of loss treaty and an indemnity reinsurance agreement with a special purpose insurer that issued a catastrophe bond (discussed more fully below). This program provides coverage of
58
Table of Contents
$1.1 billion in excess of a $100 million retention. Compared to our expiring program, we extended the exhaustion limit by $290 million and increased our retention by $40 million to respond to our growing property portfolio. In addition, we eliminated co-participations throughout the program. The overall net purchased limits increased to $1.1 billion, from $810 million in the expiring treaty.
We renewed our property catastrophe treaty, which covers our standard market and E&S business, effective January 1, 2024. The highest layer of the treaty provides 35% coverage of the $500 million in excess of $700 million layer. The property catastrophe treaty excludes coverage for communicable disease but retains (i) coverage for strike, riot, civil unrest, severe convective storms, and other traditionally-covered property perils, (ii) coverage for conventional terrorism losses in most geographic areas, and (iii) limited coverage for cybersecurity risks.
To provide additional, fully collateralized coverage at the top end of our property catastrophe reinsurance program, we secured property catastrophe protection through a per occurrence excess of loss indemnity reinsurance agreement effective December 9, 2023, with High Point Re Ltd. ("High Point Re"), an independent Bermuda special purpose insurer. The reinsurance agreement meets the accounting guidance requirements to be accounted for as reinsurance. In connection with the reinsurance agreement, High Point Re issued Series 2023-1, Class A Principal-at-Risk Variable Rates Notes to unrelated investors totaling $325 million, consistent with the coverage provided under the reinsurance agreement. The proceeds were deposited in a reinsurance trust account. The reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage of up to $325 million for the three-year period from December 9, 2023, through December 31, 2026, for property catastrophe losses from named storms, earthquakes, severe thunderstorms, winter storms, wildfires, meteorite impacts, and volcanic eruptions in all states except California, Florida, Texas, and Louisiana. The reinsurance agreement's attachment point and exhaustion limit may be reset annually to adjust the expected loss of the layer within a predetermined range. For the 2024 treaty year, this reinsurance agreement provides us with coverage for 65% of losses in the $500 million in excess of $700 million layer. The reinsurance agreement is collateralized, which is provided by High Point Re using proceeds from the issuance of the Series 2023-1 Notes.
Reinsurance agreements have credit risk associated with collecting amounts due from reinsurers. With High Point Re, that risk is reduced because the collateralized reinsurance trust account is funded with money market funds domiciled in the U.S. The money market funds invest solely in cash or high-quality direct obligations of the U.S. government, such as U.S. treasury bills and other short-term securities backed by the U.S. government.
In addition to the fully collateralized catastrophe bond, we seek to minimize reinsurance credit risk by transacting with highly-rated reinsurance partners and purchasing collateralized reinsurance products, particularly for high-severity, low-probability events, if feasible. Our current reinsurance program includes $417.5 million in collateralized limit of the total $500 million for that layer of the catastrophe program, including the $325 million secured through High Point Re, compared to $216 million in collateralized limit under the prior year's reinsurance program.
Overall, ceded premium for our property catastrophe reinsurance program will increase considerably in 2024 due to three factors: (i) increases in underlying property exposures in line with our growing property insurance portfolio; (ii) the addition of $290 million of net limit coverage, which improved our net risk profile; and (iii) moderate-risk adjusted price increases from our reinsurers.
We model various catastrophic perils, and hurricane risk remains our portfolio's most significant natural catastrophe peril because of the geographic location of the risks we insure. The table below illustrates the impact of the five largest hurricane losses we have experienced in the last 35 years:
| ($ in millions) | Gross Loss1 | Net Loss2 | Accident Year | Gross Loss Ratio | Net Loss Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Name | ||||||||||
| Superstorm Sandy | $125.5 | 45.6 | 2012 | 7.9% | 2.9 | |||||
| Hurricane Ida | 51.7 | 40.8 | 2021 | 1.7 | 1.4 | |||||
| Hurricane Irene | 44.8 | 40.2 | 2011 | 3.1 | 2.8 | |||||
| Hurricane Hugo | 26.4 | 3.0 | 1989 | 5.9 | 0.7 | |||||
| Hurricane Isabel | 25.1 | 15.7 | 2003 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
1This amount represents reported and unreported gross losses estimated as of December 31, 2023.
2Net loss does not include reinstatement premiums, taxes, or flood claims handling fees.
We review our exposure to hurricane risk by examining third-party vendor models and conducting our proprietary analysis. The third-party vendor models provide a long-term view that closely relates modeled event frequency to historical hurricane activity, adjusting to reflect certain non-modeled cost assumptions, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market
59
Table of Contents
assessments, and automobile-related losses. We believe that modeled estimates provide a range of potential outcomes, and we review multiple estimates to understand our catastrophic risk.
Our established catastrophic risk tolerance requires that no more than 10% of stockholders’ equity is exposed to a loss from a hurricane event at a 99.6% confidence level (1-in-250-year event or 0.4% probability) on a net of reinsurance and after-tax basis. Our property catastrophe reinsurance program limits our net after-tax impact of a 1-in-250-year event to about 4% of our GAAP equity. In addition to the 1-in-250-year modeled event, we evaluate the impact of a number of other scenarios on stockholders’ equity.
The table below shows the gross and net losses modeled results for (i) hurricane peril in our underwriting property portfolio and (ii) the gross and net of reinsurance hurricane losses from the following scenarios:
•Recasts of two large hurricanes that impacted our geographic footprint:
◦1938 New England Hurricane, one of the largest hurricanes to impact the Northeast U.S.; and
◦Hurricane Hazel, a Category 4 storm that made landfall near the border between North Carolina and South Carolina in 1954; and
•Realistic disaster scenarios (“RDS”) for significant potential storms in the Northeast and the Carolinas based on Lloyds of London methodology.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Hurricane | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $238,175 | 97,571 | 3 | % | |||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 401,866 | 110,902 | 4 | ||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 650,920 | 122,731 | 4 | ||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 913,554 | 127,388 | 4 | ||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 1,034,491 | 127,388 | 4 | ||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 1,184,048 | 127,388 | 4 | ||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 1,692,236 | 443,173 | 15 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1938 New England Hurricane | 452,577 | 114,497 | 4 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS North-East (Category 4 hurricane) | 825,960 | 127,388 | 4 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1954 Hurricane Hazel | 318,950 | 103,099 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS Carolinas (Category 5 hurricane) | 483,327 | 115,817 | 4 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums based on the program structure effective January 1, 2024.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2023.
As the table above reflects, we are well within our established tolerance for catastrophic risk. Based on a multi-model view of hurricane risk, our current catastrophe reinsurance program exhausts at an approximately 1-in-260-year return period, or events with 0.4% probability. Our actual gross and net losses incurred from hurricanes making U.S. landfall will vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated modeled losses.
In addition to hurricane peril, the table below shows gross and net losses modeled by other wind and earthquake perils in our underwriting property portfolio. Other wind perils include the sub-perils of hail, straight-line wind, and tornado.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Other Wind | Earthquake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $125,735 | 73,594 | 2 | % | $9,616 | $7,597 | — | % | ||||||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 169,457 | 82,865 | 3 | $31,302 | $24,727 | 1 | ||||||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 226,152 | 90,600 | 3 | $100,097 | $79,017 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 266,520 | 97,066 | 3 | $154,986 | $85,087 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 295,215 | 98,440 | 3 | $216,452 | $97,808 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 308,914 | 100,176 | 3 | $245,577 | $100,337 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 398,673 | 104,837 | 4 | $398,039 | $113,074 | 4 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums based on the program structure effective January 1, 2024.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2023.
60
Table of Contents
We currently do not write crop insurance, have minimal exposure to private flood, and have a small geographic footprint in the Western U.S., so our exposures to perils such as droughts, wildfires, and flooding, tend to be relatively modest. However, as our geographic expansion progresses, we continually evaluate how we consider physical risks from these perils and others in our strategic decision making.
While we regularly experience property losses from winter storms and use third-party vendor models to help us model and manage our exposure to this peril, we also evaluate our winter storm exposure based on our own historical experience, as winter storm third-party vendor models are currently less mature.
Property Excess of Loss Treaty
We renewed the property excess of loss treaty, which covers our standard market and E&S business, on July 1, 2023, with a $2 million increase on our retention for total coverage of $65 million in excess of a $5 million retention. The remaining terms are substantially the same as the treaty that expired on June 30, 2023.
The following table summarizes of our property reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| PROPERTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $1.1 billion above $100 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis in four layers: | All nuclear, biological, chemical, and radioactive ("NBCR") losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. Coverage for non-NBCR losses are provided in most geographies. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding TRIPRA. | ||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $100 million up to $200 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $200 million up to $400 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $400 million up to $700 million; and | ||||
| - 35% of losses in excess of $700 million up to $1.2 billion. | ||||
| The treaty provides one reinstatement in each of the first three layers and no reinstatement in the fourth layer. The per occurrence limit is $775 million and the annual aggregate limit is $1.375 billion. | ||||
| Property Catastrophe Bond (covers all insurance operations, excluding Florida, California, Louisiana, and Texas) | 65% of losses in excess of $700 million up to $1.2 billion. The catastrophe bond provides a single $325 million limit with no reinstatements. | None. | ||
| Property Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $65 million above $5 million retention covering 100% in three layers. Losses other than TRIPRA certified losses are subject to the following reinstatements and annual aggregate limits: | All NBCR losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. For non-NBCR losses, the treaty distinguishes between acts committed on behalf of foreign persons or foreign interests ("Foreign Terrorism") and those that are not. The treaty provides annual aggregate limits for Foreign Terrorism (other than NBCR) acts of $15 million for the first layer; $60 million for the second layer; and $40 million for the third layer. Non-foreign terrorism losses (other than NBCR) are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. | ||
| - $5 million in excess of $5 million layer provides 15 reinstatements; $80 million in aggregate limits; | ||||
| - $20 million in excess of $10 million layer provides three reinstatements, $80 million in aggregate limits; and | ||||
| - $40 million in excess of $30 million layer provides two reinstatements, $120 million in aggregate limits. | ||||
| Flood | 100% reinsurance by the federal government’s WYO. | None. |
61
Table of Contents
Casualty Reinsurance
We renewed the casualty excess of loss treaty, which covers our standard market and E&S Lines business, on July 1, 2023, on substantially the same terms as the treaty expiring June 30, 2023.
The following table summarizes our casualty reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| CASUALTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Casualty Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are six layers covering 100% of $88 million in excess of $2 million. Losses other than terrorism losses are subject to the following: | All NBCR losses are excluded. All other losses stemming from the acts of terrorism are subject to the following: | ||
| - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer provides 48 reinstatements, $147 million annual aggregate limit; | - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer with $15 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer provides eight reinstatements, $63 million annual aggregate limit; | - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer with $28 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer provides three reinstatements, $36 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer with $27 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer provides one reinstatement, $18 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer with $18 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $40 million annual aggregate limit; and | - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer with $40 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; and | |||
| - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer provides one reinstatement, $80 million annual aggregate limit. | - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer with $80 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit. |
To complement our key reinsurance programs and provide reinsurance protection on specific coverages or programs, we have other reinsurance treaties, such as our (i) Surety and Fidelity Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaty, (ii) National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool Quota Share, which covers business assumed from the involuntary workers compensation pool, (iii) Endurance Specialty Quota share and Loss Development Cover, which protects against losses on policies written before the acquisition and any development on reserves established by MUSIC as of the date of acquisition, (iv) Equipment Breakdown Coverage Reinsurance Treaty, (v) Multi-line Quota Share, which covers additional personal lines coverages, such as personal cyber and home systems protection, (vi) Cyber Liability Quota Share, and (vii) Excess Liability Quota Share, which covers MUSIC's excess liability business.
We regularly evaluate our overall reinsurance program and try to develop effective ways to manage the transfer of risk. We base our analysis on a comprehensive process that includes periodic analysis of modeling results, our own loss experience, aggregation of exposures, exposure growth, diversification of risks, limits written, projected reinsurance costs, reinsurer financial strength, and projected impact on earnings, equity, and statutory surplus. We strive to balance reinsurer credit quality, price, terms, and our appetite to retain a certain level of risk.
Investments Segment
Our investment portfolio's objectives are to maximize after-tax net investment income and generate long-term growth in book value per share by maximizing the overall total return of the portfolio by investing the premiums we receive from our insurance operations and the amounts generated through our capital management strategies, which may include debt and equity security issuances. We balance those objectives against prevailing market conditions, capital preservation considerations, and our enterprise risk-taking appetite. We maintain (i) a well-diversified portfolio across issuers, sectors, and asset classes and (ii) a high credit quality fixed income securities portfolio with a duration and maturity profile at an acceptable risk level that provides ample liquidity.
The effective duration of the fixed income securities portfolio, including short-term investments, was 4.0 years as of December 31, 2023. The effective duration is monitored and managed to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. Purchases and sales are made with the intent to maximize investment returns in the current market environment while balancing capital preservation.
Our fixed income and short-term investments (i) represented 92% of our invested assets, (ii) had a weighted average credit rating of "AA-", and (iii) had investment grade holdings representing 96% of the total portfolio at both December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
For further details on the composition, credit quality, and the various risks to which our portfolio is subject, see Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk." of this Form 10-K.
62
Table of Contents
Total Invested Assets
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total invested assets | $ | 8,693,729 | 7,837,469 | 11 | % | |||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | 3.16 | 3.37 | (6) | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – before tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (353,253) | (527,892) | (33) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 4,079 | (5,431) | (175) | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) - before tax | (349,174) | (533,323) | (35) | |||||||
| Components of unrealized gains (losses) – after tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (279,070) | (417,035) | (33) | |||||||
| Equity securities | 3,223 | (4,290) | (175) | |||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) - after tax | (275,847) | (421,325) | (35) |
Invested assets increased by $856.3 million as of December 31, 2023, compared to December 31, 2022, reflecting (i) our active investment of operating and investing cash flows in 2023 and (ii) a $184.1 million decrease in pre-tax unrealized losses during 2023. Operating cash flows during 2023 were 18% of NPW. The decrease in pre-tax unrealized losses was primarily driven by a decrease in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, a tightening of credit spreads.
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 345,886 | 259,918 | 33 | % | 209,709 | 24 | % | |||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") | 9,336 | 5,555 | 68 | 2,743 | 103 | ||||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 9,395 | 13,554 | (31) | 15,920 | (15) | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 14,818 | 3,997 | 271 | 260 | 1,437 | ||||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 26,777 | 23,003 | 16 | 117,701 | (80) | ||||||||||||||
| Other investments | 650 | 258 | 152 | 359 | (28) | ||||||||||||||
| Investment expenses | (18,212) | (18,130) | — | (20,103) | 10 | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – before tax | 388,650 | 288,155 | 35 | 326,589 | (12) | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income tax expense | 79,115 | 55,956 | 41 | 63,589 | (12) | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – after tax | $ | 309,535 | 232,199 | 33 | 263,000 | (12) | |||||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 20.4 | % | 19.4 | 1.0 | pts | 19.5 | (0.1) | pts | |||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on fixed income investments | 3.9 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 3.7 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 3.4 | (0.5) |
After-tax net investment income earned increased 33% in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily driven by higher interest rates, active portfolio management, and operating and investing cash flow deployment.
Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
When evaluating securities for sale, our general philosophy is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations of whether (i) the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated or (ii) the timing is appropriate to opportunistically trade for other securities with better economic-return characteristics. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses for the indicated periods were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2023 | 2022 | 2023 vs. 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net realized gains (losses) on disposals | $ | (24,864) | (31,636) | (21) | % | 7,144 | (543) | % | ||||||||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities | 9,510 | (32,127) | (130) | 17,881 | (280) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, AFS | 12,898 | (39,169) | (133) | (6,858) | 471 | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, HTM | — | 63 | (100) | (49) | (229) | |||||||||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on CMLs | (175) | (116) | 51 | — | NM | |||||||||||||
| Losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell | (921) | (11,823) | (92) | (519) | 2178 | |||||||||||||
| Total net realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) | $ | (3,552) | (114,808) | (97) | 17,599 | (752) |
The credit loss benefit in 2023 shown in the table above reflected the decrease in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and a tightening of credit spreads, with the decrease in interest rates having the most significant impact.
63
Table of Contents
For additional information regarding our losses on securities we intend to sell and our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses, see Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Federal Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding federal income taxes.
| ($ in millions) | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal income tax expense | $ | 93.2 | 55.3 | 101.5 | |||||
| Effective tax rate1 | 20.7 | % | 20.4 | 20.5 |
1The effective tax rate is calculated by taking "Total federal income tax expense" divided by "Income before federal income tax" less "Preferred stock dividends" on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Federal income tax expense increased $37.9 million in 2023, compared to 2022, primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income that is taxed at the statutory rate. The increase in pre-tax income was primarily driven by (i) higher net investment income earned in 2023, compared to 2022, resulting from an increase in income earned on our fixed income securities portfolio, and (ii) a decrease in net realized and unrealized investment losses in 2023, compared to 2022, partially offset by (iii) a decrease in underwriting income.
See Note 14. "Federal Income Taxes" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K for (i) a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory rate of 21% and (ii) details regarding our net deferred tax asset and liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity by generating sufficient cash flows to meet our business operations' short-term and long-term cash requirements. As discussed further below, we adjust our liquidity requirements based on economic conditions, market conditions, and future cash flow commitments.
Sources of Liquidity
Sources of cash for the Parent historically have consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, the investment portfolio held at the Parent, borrowings under third-party lines of credit, intercompany revolving demand loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of equity (common or preferred) and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, considering our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital preservation strategies.
The Parent's cash and components of its investment portfolio were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | December 31, 2023 | December 31, 2022 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 421,089 | 387,535 | |||
| Equity securities | 50,920 | 48,095 | ||||
| Short-term investments | 17,671 | 33,008 | ||||
| Alternative investments | 18,134 | 15,631 | ||||
| Cash | 180 | 26 | ||||
| Total investments and cash | $ | 507,994 | 484,295 |
Short-term investments have historically been maintained in “AAA” rated money market funds, and fixed income securities are comprised of high-quality, liquid government and corporate securities.
The amount and composition of the Parent's investment portfolio may change over time based on various factors, including the amount and availability of dividends from our Insurance Subsidiaries, investment income, expenses, other Parent cash needs, such as dividends payable to stockholders, asset allocation investment decisions, inorganic growth opportunities, debt retirement, and share repurchases. Our target is for the Parent to maintain liquid investments of at least twice its expected annual net cash outflow needs, or $210 million.
64
Table of Contents
Insurance Subsidiary Dividends
The Insurance Subsidiaries generate liquidity through insurance float, created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before paying claims. The period of float can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of securities with maturity dates that continually provide a source of cash flow for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. To protect our Insurance Subsidiaries' capital, we purchase reinsurance coverage for significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur.
The Insurance Subsidiaries paid $80 million in total dividends to the Parent in 2023. As of December 31, 2023, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend is $316 million for 2024. All Insurance Subsidiary dividends to the Parent are (i) subject to the approval and/or review of its domiciliary state insurance regulator, and (ii) generally payable only from earned statutory surplus reported in its annual statements as of the preceding December 31. Although domiciliary state insurance regulators have historically approved dividends, there is no assurance they will approve future Insurance Subsidiary dividends.
New Jersey corporate law also limits the maximum amount of dividends the Parent can pay our stockholders if either (i) the Parent would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or (ii) the Parent’s total assets would be less than its total liabilities. The Parent’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is also impacted by (i) covenants in its credit agreement that obligate it, among other things, to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, and (ii) the terms of our preferred stock that prohibit dividends from being declared or paid on our common stock if dividends are not declared and paid, or made payable, on all outstanding preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions and financial covenants, where applicable, see Note 11. "Indebtedness," Note 17. "Equity," and Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Line of Credit
On November 7, 2022, the Parent entered into a Credit Agreement with the lenders named therein (the "Lenders") and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent ("Line of Credit"). Under the Line of Credit, the Lenders have agreed to provide the Parent with a $50 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to $125 million with the Lenders' consent. The Line of Credit will mature on November 7, 2025, and has a variable interest rate based on the Parent’s debt ratings. We expect to continue to maintain a credit facility for liquidity purposes. For additional information regarding the Line of Credit and corresponding representations, warranties, and covenants, refer to Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Four Insurance Subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") branches, as shown in the following table. Membership requires the ownership of branch stock and includes the right to access liquidity. All Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") borrowings are required to be secured by investments pledged as collateral. For additional information regarding collateral outstanding, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
| Branch | Insurance Subsidiary Member |
|---|---|
| FHLBI | SICSC1SICSE1 |
| FHLBNY | SICA SICNY |
1These subsidiaries are jointly referred to as the "Indiana Subsidiaries" because they are domiciled in Indiana.
The Line of Credit permits aggregate borrowings from the FHLBI and the FHLBNY up to 10% of the respective member company’s admitted assets for the previous year. SICNY is domiciled in New York, which limits its FHLBNY borrowings to the lesser of 5% of admitted assets for the most recently completed fiscal quarter or 10% of the previous year-end's admitted assets.
65
Table of Contents
The following table provides information on the remaining capacity for FHLB borrowings based on these restrictions, as well as the additional FHLB stock purchase requirement to allow these member companies to borrow their remaining capacity amounts:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | Additional FHLB Stock Requirements | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,012.5 | $ | 101.2 | 32.0 | 69.2 | 1.7 | |||||||||
| SICSE | 802.9 | 80.3 | 28.0 | 52.3 | 1.3 | |||||||||||
| SICA | 3,715.3 | 371.5 | — | 371.5 | 16.7 | |||||||||||
| SICNY | 689.4 | 34.5 | — | 34.5 | 1.5 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 587.5 | 60.0 | 527.5 | 21.2 |
Short-term Borrowings
On April 6, 2023, SICA borrowed $20 million from the FHLBNY at an interest rate of 5.00% that was repaid on May 8, 2023. These funds were used for general corporate purposes.
Intercompany Loan Agreements
The Parent has lending agreements with the Indiana Subsidiaries, approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance, that provide the Parent with additional intercompany liquidity. Like the Line of Credit, these lending agreements limit the Parent's borrowings from the Indiana Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. The following table provides information on the Parent’s borrowings and remaining borrowing capacity from the two Indiana Subsidiaries:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets as of December 31, 2023 | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2023 | ||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 1,012.5 | $ | 101.2 | 51.0 | 50.2 | ||||||
| SICSE | 802.9 | 80.3 | 16.0 | 64.3 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 181.5 | 67.0 | 114.5 |
In November 2023, the Parent borrowed $27 million from SICSC per an intercompany revolving demand loan agreement at an interest rate equal to the federal funds effective rate computed on a daily basis. These funds were used for general corporate purposes.
Capital Market Activities
The Parent had no private or public stock issuances during 2023. In addition, we had no common stock share repurchases in 2023 under our existing share repurchase program. We had $84.2 million of remaining capacity under our share repurchase program as of December 31, 2023. For additional information on the share repurchase program, refer to Note 17. "Equity" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
Uses of Liquidity
The Parent uses the liquidity generated from the sources discussed above to pay dividends to our stockholders, among other things. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common and preferred stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors. In November 2023, our Board approved a 17% increase in the quarterly cash dividend on common stock, to $0.35 from $0.30 per share. On January 31, 2024, our Board declared:
•A quarterly cash dividend on common stock of $0.35 per common share, that is payable March 1, 2024, to holders of record on February 15, 2024; and
•A cash dividend of $287.50 per share on our 4.60% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B (equivalent to $0.28750 per depository share) payable on March 15, 2024, to holders of record as of February 29, 2024.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt and our ability to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders is dependent on (i) liquidity at the Parent, (ii) the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or (iii) the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Our next borrowing principal repayment is $60 million to FHLBI due on December 16, 2026.
Restrictions on the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common and preferred stock.
66
Table of Contents
Capital Resources
Capital resources ensure we can pay policyholder claims, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At December 31, 2023, we had GAAP stockholders’ equity of $3.0 billion and statutory surplus of $2.7 billion. With total debt of $504 million at December 31, 2023, our debt-to-capital ratio was 14.6%. For additional information on our statutory surplus, see Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2023, which we expect to fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 510.0 | — | 60.0 | — | 450.0 | |||||||||
| Interest on debt obligation | 536.9 | 28.3 | 56.5 | 52.9 | 399.2 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,046.9 | 28.3 | 116.5 | 52.9 | 849.2 | ||||||||||
| Gross loss and loss expense payments | 5,336.9 | 1,500.2 | 1,738.3 | 863.7 | 1,234.7 | ||||||||||
| Ceded loss and loss expense payments | 618.6 | 172.7 | 154.8 | 83.2 | 207.9 | ||||||||||
| Net loss and loss expense payments | 4,718.3 | 1,327.5 | 1,583.5 | 780.5 | 1,026.8 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 5,765.2 | 1,355.8 | 1,700.0 | 833.4 | 1,876.0 |
Our loss and loss expense payments in the table above represent estimated paid amounts by year on our loss and loss expense reserves. These estimates are based on past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, and include considerable judgment. There is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the projected timing of loss and loss expense reserve payments, so the timing and amounts of the actual payments will be affected by many factors. Therefore, the projected settlement of the reserves for net loss and loss expense may differ, perhaps significantly, from actual future payments. The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was 3.1 years at December 31, 2023.
For more information on our case reserves and estimates of reserves for loss and loss expense IBNR, refer to the "Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense" section in the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section of this MD&A and Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding cross-default provisions associated with our notes payable in the table above or our Line of Credit, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in this Form 10-K.
In addition to the above, the following table summarizes certain contractual obligations we had at December 31, 2023 that may require us to invest additional amounts into our investment portfolio, which we would fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| ($ in millions) | Amount of Obligation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative investments | $ | 254.3 | |
| Non-publicly traded collateralized loan obligations in our fixed income securities portfolio | 86.7 | ||
| Non-publicly traded common stock within our equity portfolio | 40.0 | ||
| CMLs | 0.8 | ||
| Privately-placed corporate securities | 32.0 | ||
| Total | $ | 413.8 |
There is no certainty (i) that any such additional investments will be required and (ii) about the timing of funding. We expect to have the capacity to fund these commitments through our normal operating and investing activities as they come due.
Our other cash requirements include, without limitation, dividends to stockholders, capital expenditures, and other operating expenses, including commissions to our distribution partners, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had no (i) material guarantees on behalf of others and trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value, (ii) material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in
67
Table of Contents
Note 18. "Related Party Transactions" included in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, and (iii) material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Consequently, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk related to off-balance sheet arrangements.
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the capital resources we maintain at the holding company and Insurance Subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics that support our targeted financial strength relative to the macroeconomic environment. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, without limitation, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt and/or equity securities, repurchasing existing debt, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and adjusting common stockholders’ dividends.
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the policyholders of the Insurance Subsidiaries and our stockholders and enhance our financial strength and underwriting capacity. We have a profitable underwriting portfolio and solid capital base, positioning us well to take advantage of potential market opportunities.
Book value per common share increased 18% to $45.42 as of December 31, 2023, from $38.57 as of December 31, 2022, driven by $5.84 in net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share and a $2.27 reduction in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities portfolio, partially offset by $1.25 in dividends to our common stockholders'. The decrease in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities was driven by a decrease in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, a tightening of credit spreads. Our adjusted book value per share, which is book value per share excluding total after-tax unrealized gains or losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), increased to $50.03 as of December 31, 2023, from $45.49 as of December 31, 2022.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $759 million in 2023 compared to $802 million in 2022, primarily driven by higher losses paid in 2023 compared to 2022, largely offset by an increase in net cash received from premiums in 2023 compared to 2022.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $686 million in 2023, compared to $734 million in 2022, primarily due to reduced cash received from operating activities.
Net cash used in financing activities remained relatively flat at $84 million in 2023, compared to $88 million in 2022.
FY 2022 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000230557-23-000006.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-looking Statements
The terms "Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (the "Parent"), and its subsidiaries, except as expressly indicated or the context otherwise requires. Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). The PSLRA provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our intentions, beliefs, projections, estimations, or forecasts
36
Table of Contents
of future events and financial performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or industry actual results, activity levels, or performance to materially differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements include the words “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “pro forma,” “seek,” “likely,” “continue,” or comparable terms. Our forward-looking statements are only predictions, and we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove correct. We undertake no obligation, other than as federal securities laws may require, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what we project, forecast, or estimate in forward-looking statements are discussed in further detail in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this form 10-K. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a constantly changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge anytime. We can neither predict these new risk factors nor assess their impact, if any, on our businesses or the extent any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events we discuss in this report might not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For more details about these segments, refer to Note 1. "Organization" and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program ("WYO"). We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition, as well as known trends and uncertainties, that may have a material impact in future periods. The MD&A discusses and analyzes our 2022 results compared to 2021. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K. For discussion and analysis of our 2021 results compared to 2020, refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.
In the MD&A, we discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020;
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes; and
•Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The policies and estimates we considered most critical to the preparation of the Financial Statements involved (i) reserves for loss and loss expense, (ii) investment valuation and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities, and (iii) reinsurance.
37
Table of Contents
Reserves for Loss and Loss Expense
Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the claim to us, and the final settlement and payment of the claim. To recognize liabilities for unpaid loss and loss expense, insurers establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities. The following tables provide case and incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for loss and loss expenses, and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss expense as of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
| As of December 31, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 358,967 | 1,624,148 | 1,983,115 | 246,736 | 1,736,379 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 347,992 | 694,777 | 1,042,769 | 199,057 | 843,712 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 299,444 | 578,283 | 877,727 | 14,271 | 863,456 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 43,456 | 89,429 | 132,885 | 19,277 | 113,608 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 81,377 | 133,523 | 214,900 | 81,970 | 132,930 | ||||||||||
| Other | 11,030 | 12,576 | 23,606 | 4,443 | 19,163 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,142,266 | 3,132,736 | 4,275,002 | 565,754 | 3,709,248 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 61,499 | 79,060 | 140,559 | 36,529 | 104,030 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 13,237 | 42,051 | 55,288 | 7,124 | 48,164 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 111,355 | 33,100 | 144,455 | 132,525 | 11,930 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 186,091 | 154,211 | 340,302 | 176,178 | 164,124 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 88,965 | 416,299 | 505,264 | 11,397 | 493,867 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 9,303 | 14,950 | 24,253 | 4,184 | 20,069 | ||||||||||
| Total E&S Lines | 98,268 | 431,249 | 529,517 | 15,581 | 513,936 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,426,625 | 3,718,196 | 5,144,821 | 757,513 | 4,387,308 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure related to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (96% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (4% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (90% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (10% of net reserves).
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 345,996 | 1,427,326 | 1,773,322 | 213,253 | 1,560,069 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 351,705 | 700,304 | 1,052,009 | 196,670 | 855,339 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 271,729 | 476,176 | 747,905 | 15,480 | 732,425 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 41,603 | 67,786 | 109,389 | 6,828 | 102,561 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 76,406 | 46,975 | 123,381 | 22,277 | 101,104 | ||||||||||
| Other | 3,671 | 22,474 | 26,145 | 2,136 | 24,009 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,091,110 | 2,741,041 | 3,832,151 | 456,644 | 3,375,507 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 60,871 | 82,468 | 143,339 | 40,941 | 102,398 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 13,709 | 35,602 | 49,311 | 2,392 | 46,919 | ||||||||||
| Other1 | 44,301 | 33,115 | 77,416 | 64,975 | 12,441 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 118,881 | 151,185 | 270,066 | 108,308 | 161,758 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines2 | 94,839 | 361,875 | 456,714 | 11,672 | 445,042 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines3 | 9,080 | 12,892 | 21,972 | 2,017 | 19,955 | ||||||||||
| E&S Lines | 103,919 | 374,767 | 478,686 | 13,689 | 464,997 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,313,910 | 3,266,993 | 4,580,903 | 578,641 | 4,002,262 |
1Includes our flood loss exposure relates to our participation in the NFIP's WYO program, to which we cede 100% of our flood losses.
2Includes general liability (95% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (5% of net reserves).
3Includes commercial property (91% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (9% of net reserves).
38
Table of Contents
The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was approximately 3.1 years at December 31, 2022, down from 3.5 years at December 31, 2021.
How reserves are established
Reserves for loss and loss expense include case reserves on reported claims and IBNR reserves. Case reserves are estimated on each individual claim based on claim-specific facts and circumstances known at the time. Case reserves may be adjusted up or down as the claim's specific facts and circumstances change. IBNR reserves are established at more aggregated levels, and they include provisions for (i) claims not yet reported, (ii) future development on reported claims, (iii) closed claims that could reopen in the future, and (iv) anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries.
Our thorough reserving process relies on quarterly internal reserve reviews, based on our own loss experience, with consideration given to various internal and external factors. Changes in claim dynamics may inherently change paid and reported development patterns. While the selections in our reserve analyses aim to account for these impacts, there remains an increased risk of variability in the estimated reserves. In addition to our internal reserve reviews, we have an external consulting actuary perform an independent review of our reserves semi-annually. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's report to determine our recorded reserves; however, we review and discuss with the consulting actuary our respective observations regarding trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies. While not required, our independent consulting actuary issues the annual statutory Statements of Actuarial Opinion for our Insurance Subsidiaries. For additional information on our accounting policy for reserves for loss and loss expense, refer to Note. 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Range of Reasonable Reserve Estimates
We have estimated a range of reasonable reserve estimates for net loss and loss expense of $3,920 million to $4,662 million at December 31, 2022. This range reflects low and high reasonable reserve estimates determined by judgmentally adjusting the methods, factors, and assumptions selected within the internal reserve review. This approach produces a range of reasonable reserve estimates, and does not represent a distribution of all possible outcomes. Therefore, the final outcomes may be greater than or less than these amounts.
The range of reasonable reserve estimates increased as of December 31, 2022, relative to December 31, 2021. This increase primarily relates to the growth in reserves commensurate with our growth in net premiums earned ("NPE").
Changes in Reserve Estimates (Loss Development)
Our quarterly reserving process may lead to changes in the recorded reserves for prior accident years, referred to as favorable or unfavorable prior year loss and loss expense development. In 2022, we experienced net favorable prior year loss development of $78.9 million, compared to $82.9 million in 2021 and $72.9 million in 2020. The following table summarizes prior year development by line of business:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Loss and Loss Expense Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | (5.0) | (29.0) | (35.0) | |||||
| Commercial automobile | 22.5 | 13.3 | 7.1 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (70.0) | (58.0) | (60.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | (7.3) | (0.4) | 3.9 | ||||||
| Commercial property | (1.6) | (2.6) | 9.2 | ||||||
| Bonds | (10.0) | — | — | ||||||
| Homeowners | (0.6) | 1.8 | 7.7 | ||||||
| Personal automobile | 0.5 | (0.2) | (1.8) | ||||||
| E&S casualty lines | (5.0) | (7.0) | — | ||||||
| E&S property lines | (2.5) | (0.8) | (4.0) | ||||||
| Other | 0.1 | — | — | ||||||
| Total | $ | (78.9) | (82.9) | (72.9) |
A detailed discussion of recent reserve development by line of business follows.
Standard Market General Liability Line of Business
At December 31, 2022, our general liability line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $1.7 billion, representing 40% of our total net reserves. In 2022, this line experienced favorable development of $5.0 million, attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident years 2020 and 2021. In 2021, this line experienced favorable development of $29.0 million, attributable to improved loss severities in accident years 2018 and prior.
39
Table of Contents
By its nature, general liability presents a diverse set of exposures. Losses and loss trends are influenced by various factors, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, and economic and social inflation. Economic inflation directly impacts our claims severities by increasing the costs of raw materials, medical procedures, and labor. Social inflation may impact both the frequency and severity of claims by affecting (i) the propensity for a claimant to file a claim, (ii) the percentage of claimants who engage lawyers, and (iii) the nature of judicial verdicts and amount of the associated awards, which influence settlement values going forward. We monitor claim litigation rates regularly and have observed modest increases in the percentage of claims with attorney involvement in recent periods. This trend and the impact of previous court closures are affecting the time to settle claims.
We have exposure to abuse or molestation claims, mainly through insurance policies that we (i) underwrite through our Community and Public Services ("CAPS") strategic business unit, and (ii) issue to schools, religious institutions, day-care facilities, and other social services. These customers within our CAPS business unit represented approximately 10% of our total Standard Commercial Lines NPW in both 2022 and 2021. Through 2017, our exposure to abuse or molestation risk increased, reflective of our CAPS book's growth. In 2018, we implemented more stringent underwriting eligibility guidelines and partnered with a third party to better assess exposure and enhance loss control measures. In 2019, we filed and approved significant rate increases for this exposure. We continue to monitor each jurisdiction's statute of limitations to ensure our rate level accounts for the changing exposure as best we reasonably can. While these underwriting and pricing actions have been necessary to ensure the profitability of the portfolio going forward, they have limited our CAPS growth in recent years.
We also have exposure to abuse or molestation claims from recently enacted state laws that extend the statute of limitations or permit windows for abuse or molestation claims and lawsuits to be filed that statutes of limitations previously barred. Consequently, we may receive claims decades after the alleged acts occurred that will involve complex claims coverage determinations, potential litigation, higher defense costs, and potentially the need to collect from reinsurers under older reinsurance agreements. Our claims and actuarial departments actively monitor these claims to identify changes in frequency or severity and any emerging or shifting trends. While this should help us better understand this rapidly evolving exposure, the ultimate impact of social, political, and legal trends remains highly uncertain, and may significantly impact the ultimate settlement values for these claims.
Standard Market Workers Compensation Line of Business
At December 31, 2022, our workers compensation line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $844 million, representing 19% of our total net reserves. During 2022, this line experienced favorable reserve development of $70.0 million, due to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident year 2020, and improved loss severities in accident years 2020 and prior. Similarly, this line experienced favorable reserve development during 2021 of $58.0 million, driven by accident years 2019 and prior. During both 2022 and 2021, the lower loss emergence than expected was partly due to: (i) medical inflation that was lower than originally anticipated; and (ii) various claims initiatives we have implemented. Because of the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development over an extended number of accident years.
A variety of issues can impact the workers compensation line of business, such as:
Unexpected changes in medical cost inflation – The industry is currently experiencing a period of lower medical claim cost inflation. However, alongside elevated inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index, medical costs are also beginning to rise, though to a lesser degree. Changes in our historical workers compensation medical costs, along with potential changes in future medical inflation, can create additional variability in our reserves;
Changes in statutory workers compensation benefits – Benefit changes may be enacted that affect all outstanding claims, including claims that have occurred in the past, but have not yet been settled. Depending on the social and political climate, these changes may either increase or decrease associated claim costs;
Changes in utilization of the workers compensation system – These changes may be driven by economic, legislative, or other changes, such as increased pharmaceutical prescriptions, more complex medical procedures, changes in permanently injured workers' life expectancy, and health insurance availability.
Standard Market Commercial Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2022, our commercial automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $863 million, which represented 20% of our total net reserves. In 2022, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $22.5 million, driven by increased severities in the 2021 accident year. In 2021, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $13.3 million, driven by higher loss severities in accident years 2016 through 2019.
40
Table of Contents
For both us and the industry, the commercial automobile line has experienced unfavorable trends in recent years. Pre-pandemic, increased frequencies were likely due to increased miles driven related to lower unemployment, poor road quality, and an increase in distracted driving. The pandemic and the governmental "stay-at-home" orders issued in early 2020 dramatically reduced miles driven and road traffic, significantly reducing claims frequency in 2020. At the same time, along with industry reporting of dramatic increases in risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, distracted driving, and driving while under the influence, traffic deaths per mile driven increased significantly. As miles driven increased in 2021 and 2022, fatality rates per mile driven have somewhat tempered, but remain well above pre-pandemic levels. This, along with the impacts of social inflation, continue to put pressure on claim severities in this line. As of the end of 2022, frequencies remained somewhat below pre-pandemic levels due to shifts in commuting patterns and fewer low-speed crashes.
Increasing property damage and physical damage severities relate to (i) elevated repair costs for increasingly complex vehicles that incorporate more technology, (ii) longer periods of rental reimbursement costs for claims, and (iii) recent inflationary impacts and disruptions to the supply chain. Continued complications in the supply chain, including labor shortages, increase the risk of longer-term elevated economic inflation.
Over the last several years, we have taken actions to improve the profitability of this line of business, including:
•Taking meaningful rate and underwriting actions on our renewal portfolio. We continue to leverage our predictive modeling and analytical capabilities that provide guidance and automatic retrieval of relevant public information on existing and potential policyholders to provide more granular insights about where we should focus our actions.
•Reducing premium leakage by improving the quality of our rating information, including validating application information with third-party data and obtaining more detailed vehicle usage information.
•Aggressively managing new business pricing and hazard mix while deploying co-underwriting by our regional underwriters and corporate underwriting teams' subject matter experts for selected higher hazard classes to improve risk-driver recognition and exposure-based pricing.
Standard Market Personal Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2022, our personal automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $104 million, which represented 2% of our total net reserves. In 2022, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $0.5 million. In 2021, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $0.2 million.
Some of the same issues affecting the commercial automobile line are affecting this line. The COVID-19-related reduction in frequencies was even more pronounced than in the commercial automobile line. As with the commercial automobile line, these frequencies significantly rebounded in 2021 and 2022, yet remain less than pre-pandemic levels. This line has a similar potential for increasing average severities like the commercial automobile line. In addition to the COVID-19-related temporary impacts, the underlying trends of increased vehicle repair costs and poor road quality are likely causes of rising severities, exacerbated by riskier driving behaviors, including distracted driving trends. We continue to recalibrate our predictive models and refine our underwriting and pricing approaches. While we believe these underwriting and pricing changes will ultimately lead to improved profitability and greater stability, the resulting changes to our exposure profile may impact paid and reported development patterns, thereby increasing the uncertainty in the reserves in the near term.
E&S Casualty Lines of Business
At December 31, 2022, our E&S casualty lines of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $494 million, representing 11% of our total net reserves. Our E&S casualty lines results have improved over recent years. In 2022, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $5.0 million, primarily attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies and lower loss severities in accident years 2020 and 2021. In 2021, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $7.0 million, primarily attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2016 and prior.
Some of the risk factors for the general liability line also affect the E&S casualty lines. These include (i) economic inflation, such as materials and labor costs; and (ii) social trends, such as increased attorney involvement.
The E&S casualty lines also are impacted by operational changes we have made to improve the portfolio's performance. Prior to 2022, our underwriting operations have substantially exited several targeted business classes that have historically produced volatile results, including commercial automobile liability, liquor liability, and snow removal. In addition, we have shifted more of our sales towards middle market business without materially increasing the overall risk profile of the portfolio.
41
Table of Contents
Recent E&S casualty claims actions have created further casualty improvements:
•We created a dedicated E&S claims team in our corporate claims function, bringing greater expertise and consistency to E&S claims handling.
•We segregated “litigated,” “non-litigated,” and "high exposure" claims, with separate specialized teams for each.
•We implemented the following operational and expense improvement initiatives for legal counsel:
◦Increased the use of staff counsel, increasing legal staff in their assigned territories to support claims volume;
◦Heightened focus on legal budgeting and expense management; and
◦Implemented a panel counsel review process.
While we believe these underwriting and claims operational changes improved our underwriting experience, there is risk associated with these changes. Most notably, changes in portfolio composition or our claims processes may inherently change paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, there remains a greater risk of fluctuation in the estimated reserves.
Other impacts creating additional loss and loss expense reserve uncertainty
Claims Initiative Impacts
Consistent with our strategic imperative to optimize operational effectiveness and efficiency, our Claims Department continually identifies areas for improvement and efficiency to increase our value proposition to policyholders. These improvements may lead to claims practice changes that affect average case reserve levels and claims settlement rates, which directly impact the data used to project ultimate loss and loss expense. While these changes may increase uncertainty in our estimates in the short term, we expect refined management of the claims process to be the longer-term benefit.
Our internal reserve analyses incorporate certain actuarial projection methods that make adjustments for changes in case reserve adequacy and claims settlement rates. These methods adjust our historical loss experience to the current case adequacy or settlement rate level, providing a more consistent basis for projecting future development patterns. These methods, like all projection methods, have their own associated assumptions and judgments. Therefore, no single method can be interpreted as definitive.
Unanticipated Changes in Inflation
United States ("U.S.") monetary policy and global economic conditions bring additional uncertainty related to inflationary trends. Changes in inflation affect the ultimate settlement costs for many of our lines of business, with the greatest reserve impact on the longer-tailed lines, such as general liability and workers compensation. Therefore, uncertainty about future inflation or deflation creates the potential for additional reserve variability in these lines of business.
Sensitivity analysis: Potential impact on reserve estimates due to changes in key assumptions
Our process to establish reserves includes a variety of key assumptions, such as:
•The selection of loss and loss expense development factors;
•The weight to be applied to each individual actuarial projection method;
•Projected future loss trends; and
•Expected claim frequencies, severities, and ultimate loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year.
The importance of any single assumption depends on several considerations, such as line of business and accident year. If the actual experience emerges differently than the assumptions underlying the reserve process, changes in our reserve estimates are possible that may be material to the results of operations in future periods. Below are sensitivity tests highlighting potential impacts to loss and loss expense reserves for the major casualty lines of business under different scenarios. These tests consider each assumption and line of business individually, without any consideration of correlation between lines of business and accident years. Therefore, the results do not constitute an actuarial range. While the figures represent possible impacts from variations in certain key assumptions, there is no assurance that future loss and loss expense emergence will be consistent with either our current or alternative sets of assumptions.
While the sources of reserve variability are generated by different internal and external trends and operational changes, they ultimately manifest themselves as changes in the expected loss and loss expense development patterns. These patterns are a key assumption in the reserving process. In addition, the current accident year expected loss and loss expense ratios are a key assumption. These ratios are developed through a rigorous process of projecting recent accident years' experience to an ultimate settlement basis. Then they are adjusted to the current accident year's pricing and loss cost levels. The impact from underwriting portfolio and claims handling practice changes are also quantified and reflected where appropriate. As with all estimates, the ultimate loss and loss expense ratios may differ from those currently estimated.
42
Table of Contents
The sensitivities of loss and loss expense reserves to these key assumptions are illustrated below for the major casualty lines. The first table displays estimated impacts from changes in expected reported loss and loss expense development patterns for our major casualty lines of business. It shows line of business reserve impacts if the actual calendar year incurred amounts are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages. While judgmental, the selected percentages by line are based on the reserve range analysis and the actual historical reserve development for the line of business. The second table displays the estimated impacts from changes to the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year. It shows reserve impacts by line of business if the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages.
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Expected Loss and Loss Expense Reporting Patterns | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Future Calendar Year Reported | Increase to Future Calendar Year Reported | |||||||
| General liability | 10 | % | $ | (180) | $ | 180 | ||||
| Workers compensation | 18 | (105) | 105 | |||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 15 | (115) | 115 | |||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (10) | 10 | |||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (50) | 50 |
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Current Year Expected Ultimate Loss and Loss Expense Ratios | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Increase to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||
| General liability | 10 | pts | $ | (90) | $ | 90 | ||||
| Workers compensation | 10 | (35) | 35 | |||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (60) | 60 | |||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 10 | (10) | 10 | |||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (25) | 25 |
Note that there is some overlap between the impacts in the two tables. For example, increases in the calendar year development would ultimately impact our view of the current accident year's loss and loss expense ratios. However, these tables provide perspective on the sensitivity of each key assumption. While the changes represent outcomes based on reasonably likely changes to our underlying reserving assumptions, they do not represent a range of possible outcomes. Our reserves could increase or decrease significantly from what the tables above reflect.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
Our general liability, excess liability, businessowners' policies, and homeowners reserves include exposure to asbestos and environmental claims. The emergence of these claims occurs over an extended period and can be unpredictable. The total recorded net loss and loss expense reserves for these claims were $20.3 million as of December 31, 2022 and $21.1 million as of December 31, 2021, with asbestos claims constituting approximately 23% of these reserves in both years.
Environmental claims have arisen primarily from insured landfill exposures in municipal government and small non-manufacturing commercial risk, as well as leaking underground storage tanks within our homeowners policies. Asbestos claims have arisen primarily from policies issued to various distributors of asbestos-containing products, such as electrical and plumbing materials. We handle our asbestos and environmental claims in a centralized and specialized asbestos and environmental claim unit. That unit establishes case reserves on individual claims based on the facts and circumstances known at a given point in time, which are supplemented by IBNR reserves.
Estimating IBNR reserves for asbestos and environmental claims is difficult because these claims have delayed and inconsistent reporting patterns. In addition, there are significant uncertainties associated with estimating critical reserve assumptions, such as average clean-up costs, third-party costs, potentially responsible party shares, allocation of damages, litigation and coverage costs, and potential state and federal legislative changes. Limiting our exposure to asbestos and environmental claims are (i) the fuel oil system exclusion on our New Jersey homeowners policies that we introduced in 2007, and (ii) the Insurance Services Office, Inc.'s Total Pollution Exclusion that was introduced in the mid-1980s. Prior to the mid-1980s, we primarily wrote Standard Personal Lines, which has also limited our exposure to asbestos and environmental claims.
43
Table of Contents
Other Latent Exposures
We also have other latent and continuous trigger exposures in our ongoing portfolio. Examples include claims for construction defect and abuse or molestation, for which states have increased and expanded the statute of limitations. We manage our exposure to these liabilities through our underwriting and claims practices, and a dedicated claims unit, similar to our handling of asbestos and environmental claims. The impact of social, political, and legal trends on these claims remains highly uncertain, so our related loss and loss expense reserves remain highly uncertain. These exposures remain in our ongoing portfolio, and as such, are reserved in aggregate, with other exposures within the line of business reserves.
Investment Valuation and the Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
Investment Valuation
Accounting guidance defines the fair value of our investment portfolio as the exit price, or the amount that would be (i) received to sell an asset, or (ii) paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When determining an exit price, we must rely on observable market data, if available. Most securities in our equity portfolio have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized gains or losses recognized through income. Our AFS fixed income securities portfolio is recorded at fair value, and the related unrealized gains or losses are reflected in stockholders' equity, net of tax. For our AFS fixed income securities portfolios, fair value is a key factor in the measurement of (i) losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell, and (ii) changes in the allowance for credit losses.
The fair value of approximately 93% of our investments measured at fair value are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and are priced using observable inputs for identical or similar assets. About 7% are classified as either (i) Level 3 and are based on unobservable market inputs because the related securities are not traded on a public market, or (ii) not leveled because the related securities are measured at fair value using net asset value per share (or its practical expedient). For additional information, refer to the following within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K: (i) item (d) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" regarding descriptions of the levels within the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques used for our Level 3 securities, and (ii) Note 7. "Fair Value Measurements" for additional information on the unobservable inputs in our securities measured using Level 3 inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
When fixed income securities are in an unrealized loss position and we do not intend to sell them, we record an allowance for credit losses for the portion of the unrealized loss related to an expected credit loss. We estimate expected credit losses on these securities by performing a risk-adjusted discounted cash flow (“DCF”). The allowance for credit losses is the excess of amortized cost over the greater of (i) our estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows, or (ii) fair value. The allowance for credit losses cannot exceed the unrealized loss, and therefore it may fluctuate with changes in the security's fair value. We also consider the need to record losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for which we have the intent to sell.
We analyze unrealized losses for credit loss in accordance with our existing accounting policy, which includes performing DCF analyses on securities at the lot level and analyzing these DCFs using various economic scenarios. In performing these DCF analyses, we calculate the present value of future cash flows using various models specific to the major security types in our portfolio. These models use security-specific information and forecasted macroeconomic data to determine possible expected credit loss scenarios based on projected changes in the economy. The models contain forecasted economic data from the Federal Reserve Board’s annual supervisory stress test review on certain large banks and financial institutions. We also have the ability to incorporate internally-developed forecast information into the models as we deem appropriate. In developing our best estimate of the allowance for credit losses, we consider our outlook as to the probability of the various scenarios occurring.
Based on these analyses, we recorded an allowance for credit losses of $45.7 million in 2022, and $9.7 million in 2021, on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio. After considering the allowance for credit losses, the remaining unrealized losses on this portfolio were $537.2 million in 2022 and $17.4 million in 2021. The increase in 2022 compared to 2021 was driven by an increase in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and a widening of credit spreads, with the increase in interest rates having the most significant impact. If the security-specific and macroeconomic assumptions in our DCF analyses or our outlook as to the occurrence probability of our DCF model scenarios were to change, our allowance for credit losses and the resulting credit loss expense or benefit will negatively or positively impact our results of operations. Factors considered in determining the allowance for credit losses require significant judgment, including our evaluation of the security's projected cash flow stream.
For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses on AFS fixed income securities, see item (c) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and item (i) of Note 5. "Investments" within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, respectively.
44
Table of Contents
Reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss expense represent our estimates of the amounts we will recover from reinsurers. Each reinsurance contract is analyzed to ensure that sufficient risk is transferred to record the transactions appropriately as reinsurance in the Financial Statements. Amounts recovered from reinsurers are recognized as assets contemporaneously and in a manner consistent with the paid and unpaid losses associated with the reinsured policies. An allowance for credit losses on our reinsurance recoverable balance is recorded based on an evaluation of balances due from reinsurers and other available information, including collateral we hold under the terms and conditions of the underlying agreements. Reinsurers often purchase and rely on their own retrocessional reinsurance programs to manage their capital position and improve their financial strength ratings. Details about retrocessional reinsurance programs are not always transparent, making it difficult to assess our reinsurers' exposure to counterparty credit risk. Our reinsurer's credit quality is also impacted by other factors, such as their reserve adequacy, investment portfolio, regulatory capital position, catastrophe aggregations, and risk management expertise. In addition, contractual language interpretations and willingness to pay valid claims can impact our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance. Our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance was $1.6 million at both December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021. We continually monitor developments that may impact recoverability from our reinsurers, for which we have contractual remedies if necessary. For further information regarding reinsurance, see the “Reinsurance” section below in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" and Note 9. “Reinsurance” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
| Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 20201 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2022 | 2021 | vs. 2021 | 2020 | vs. 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 3,558,062 | 3,379,164 | 5 | % | $ | 2,922,274 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 232,199 | 263,000 | (12) | 184,612 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income | 131,774 | 172,688 | (24) | 107,716 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income before federal income tax | 280,186 | 505,310 | (45) | 302,988 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 224,886 | 403,837 | (44) | 246,355 | 64 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | 215,686 | 394,484 | (45) | 246,355 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 95.1 | % | 92.8 | 2.3 | pts | 94.9 | % | (2.1) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 3.37 | 2.88 | 17 | % | $ | 2.96 | (3) | % | ||||||||||||
| Total return on investments | 2.9 | % | 3.4 | (0.5) | pts | 2.6 | % | 0.8 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Return on average common equity ("ROE") | 8.8 | 14.8 | (6.0) | 10.4 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio | 1.44 | x | 1.33 | 0.11 | 1.30 | 0.03 | |||||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 3.54 | 6.50 | (46) | % | $ | 4.09 | 59 | % | ||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 38.57 | 46.24 | (17) | 42.38 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 1.14 | 1.03 | 11 | 0.94 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income2 | $ | 306,384 | 380,580 | (19) | % | $ | 249,686 | 52 | % | ||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share2 | 5.03 | 6.27 | (20) | 4.15 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE2 | 12.4 | % | 14.3 | (1.9) | pts | 10.5 | % | 3.8 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share2 | $ | 45.49 | 43.23 | 5 | % | $ | 37.29 | 16 | % |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this financial review.
2Non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are measures comparable to net income available to common stockholders, net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after-tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments included in net income. Adjusted book value per common share is a measure comparable to book value per common share, but excludes total after-tax unrealized gains and losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. These non-GAAP measures are important financial measures used by us, analysts, and investors because the timing of realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments could distort the analysis of trends.
45
Table of Contents
Reconciliations of our GAAP to non-GAAP measures are provided in the tables below:
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 215,686 | 394,484 | 246,355 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment losses (gains) included in net income, before tax | 114,808 | (17,599) | 4,217 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (24,110) | 3,695 | (886) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income | $ | 306,384 | 380,580 | 249,686 |
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 3.54 | 6.50 | 4.09 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment losses (gains) included in net income, before tax | 1.89 | (0.29) | 0.07 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (0.40) | 0.06 | (0.01) | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | $ | 5.03 | 6.27 | 4.15 |
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.8 | % | 14.8 | 10.4 | ||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment losses (gains) included in net income, before tax | 4.7 | (0.7) | 0.2 | |||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (1.1) | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 12.4 | % | 14.3 | 10.5 |
| Reconciliation of book value per common share to adjusted book value per common share | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book value per common share | 38.57 | 46.24 | 42.38 | ||||||
| Total unrealized investment losses (gains) included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax | 8.75 | (3.80) | (6.45) | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | (1.83) | 0.79 | 1.36 | ||||||
| Adjusted book value per common share | $ | 45.49 | 43.23 | 37.29 |
The components of our ROE and non-GAAP operating ROE are as follows:
| ROE Components | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2021 | vs. 2021 | 2020 | vs. 2020 | ||||||||||||||
| Standard Commercial Lines segment | 4.6 | % | 5.9 | (1.3) | pts | 5.1 | 0.8 | pts | ||||||||||
| Standard Personal Lines segment | (0.2) | 0.1 | (0.3) | (0.5) | 0.6 | |||||||||||||
| E&S Lines segment | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | |||||||||||||
| Total insurance operations | 5.4 | 6.5 | (1.1) | 4.6 | 1.9 | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income | 9.4 | 9.9 | (0.5) | 7.8 | 2.1 | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment (losses) gains | (3.6) | 0.5 | (4.1) | (0.1) | 0.6 | |||||||||||||
| Total investments segment | 5.8 | 10.4 | (4.6) | 7.7 | 2.7 | |||||||||||||
| Other | (2.4) | (2.1) | (0.3) | (1.9) | (0.2) | |||||||||||||
| ROE | 8.8 | 14.8 | (6.0) | 10.4 | 4.4 | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized investment losses (gains), after tax | 3.6 | (0.5) | 4.1 | 0.1 | (0.6) | |||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 12.4 | % | 14.3 | (1.9) | 10.5 | 3.8 |
In 2022, we generated our ninth consecutive year of double-digit non-GAAP operating ROEs, with a 12.4% non-GAAP operating ROE, which was above our full-year 2022 target of 11%, but below our 2021 non-GAAP operating ROE of 14.3%. This was a significant achievement in a year with elevated net catastrophe losses, capital market volatility, and higher loss cost trends driven by elevated inflation, among other factors. Our results reflect the success of our underwriting discipline and profitable growth strategies.
The 1.9-point decrease in non-GAAP operating ROE in 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily driven by a reduction in after-tax underwriting and investment income. After-tax underwriting income decreased $40.9 million, or 1.1 ROE points, in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily from increased non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses. The higher non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses were mainly due to the higher inflationary environment that resulted in an increase in the cost
46
Table of Contents
of materials and labor associated with repairs.
While net catastrophe losses were down slightly in 2022 compared to 2021, these losses included a significant impact from Winter Storm Elliott. This storm, which occurred in late-December 2022, impacted 37 states, 26 of which are in our Standard Commercial Lines footprint. We recorded $135.0 million of gross losses, or $46.1 million net of reinsurance. In addition, we incurred $11.7 million in reinstatement premium, resulting in a total impact of $57.8 million, pre-tax, or 1.9 ROE points and $0.75 per diluted common share.
After-tax net investment income decreased $30.8 million, or 0.5 ROE points, in 2022 compared to 2021, from lower after-tax alternative investment income in 2022. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in income earned on fixed income securities, which benefited from higher new purchase yields in 2022 as a result of the rapid rise in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and slightly wider credit spreads.
In addition, our ROE was reduced by the impact of net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses, which was 3.6 ROE points in 2022. Net realized and unrealized investment losses in 2022 compared to net realized and unrealized investment gains in 2021 drove the reduction in our ROE. The increase in net realized and unrealized losses resulted from (i) a decrease in valuations reflecting the current public equities market, (ii) active trading of our fixed income securities to increase the book yield of our fixed income portfolio due to increasing new purchase yields, resulting in realized losses, and (iii) higher credit loss expense on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio.
Outlook
For 2023, we established a non-GAAP operating ROE target of 12%. Our 2023 target is based on (i) our current estimated weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"), (ii) an approximate 400 basis point spread over our estimated WACC, (iii) the current interest rate environment, and (iv) property and casualty insurance market conditions. Our 2023 12% non-GAAP operating ROE target sets a high bar for our financial performance, challenges us to perform at our best, and aligns our incentive compensation structure with shareholder interests.
In 2022, the elevated level of economic inflation, the significant increase in interest rates, and predictions of a recession in the near term, which led to a widening of credit spreads, have all contributed to lower investment valuations and significant financial market volatility. The higher interest rates, and to a lesser extent the widening of credit spreads, have reduced the fair value of our fixed income securities, which in turn has negatively impacted our stockholders' equity, which was down 15% in 2022. The higher economic inflation has also negatively impacted our property loss and loss expenses through increased severities in our short-tail property lines, which has reduced our underwriting income. Should these trends continue, and in the absence of taking enough rate and other underwriting actions, our underwriting profitability could be negatively impacted in the near term. We will continue to focus on underwriting improvements, proper insurance-to-value on our property exposures, and achieving written renewal pure price increases that meet or exceed expected loss trend. In 2022, we achieved Standard Commercial Lines renewal pure price increases of 5.4% and exposure growth of 4.0%. These rates were up from 2021, which experienced renewal pure price increases of 5.3% and exposure growth of 2.6%.
While higher interest rates, wider credit spreads, and financial market volatility have negatively impacted our investment valuations and certain key financial metrics, such as stockholders' equity and book value per common share, they have also provided us with the opportunity to invest our cash flows at significantly higher new purchase yields. Our pre-tax new purchase yields for fixed income securities averaged 4.5% in 2022, compared to 2.3% in 2021. The portfolio's net investment income also benefited from our 11% allocation to floating rate fixed income securities, which are primarily tied to 90-day U.S. dollar-denominated London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). The 90-day LIBOR increased to 4.77% at December 31, 2022 from 0.21% at December 31, 2021. These floating securities have reset quarterly at higher rates, which combined with our higher new purchase yields for fixed income securities, contributed to higher net investment income from our fixed income securities. Partially offsetting the increase in net investment income from fixed income securities were lower returns from our allocation to alternative investments. We expect these dynamics to continue in 2023, and as such, are factored into our full-year 2023 after-tax net investment income expectations, as discussed below.
Our focus in 2023 will continue to be on several other foundational areas to position us for ongoing success:
•Delivering on our strategy for continued disciplined and profitable growth by:
◦Continuing to expand our Standard Commercial Lines market share by (i) increasing our share towards our 12% target of our agents' premiums, (ii) strategically appointing new agents, and (iii) maximizing new business growth in the small business market through the utilization of our enhanced small business platform;
◦Expanding our geographic footprint. In June 2022, we began writing Standard Commercial Lines business in Vermont. In October 2022, we began writing Standard Commercial Lines business in Alabama and Idaho.
47
Table of Contents
We plan to expand our Standard Commercial Lines footprint into other states over time;
◦Increasing customer retention by delivering a superior omnichannel experience and offering value-added technologies and services;
◦Shifting our Standard Personal Lines products and services towards customers in the mass affluent market, where we believe we can be more competitive with the strong coverage and servicing capabilities that we offer; and
◦Deploying our new underwriting platform in our E&S segment and improving agents' ease of interactions with us.
•Continuing to build on a culture centered on the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion that fosters innovation, idea generation, and developing a group of specially trained leaders who can guide us successfully into the future.
As we look ahead to 2023, we believe the elevated level of economic inflation will persist and continue to negatively impact our short-tail property lines of business and may impact our general and administrative expenses. In addition, we expect reduced reinsurance capacity and higher demand for new and expanded reinsurance purchases by U.S. primary insurance companies will result in higher reinsurance prices in 2023 and less favorable terms and conditions for the industry, including us. We experienced reinsurance price increases at our January 1, 2023 renewals, as discussed in the "Reinsurance" section below. While these factors could negatively impact our 2023 combined ratio and underwriting profits, we believe we are well-positioned to navigate these challenges and expect to continue generating strong overall returns.
For 2023, our full-year guidance is as follows:
•A GAAP combined ratio of 96.5%, including net catastrophe losses of 4.5 points. Our combined ratio estimate assumes no prior year casualty reserve development;
•After-tax net investment income of $300 million that includes after-tax net investment income from our alternative investments of $30 million;
•An overall effective tax rate of approximately 21.0%, which assumes an effective tax rate of 20.0% for net investment income and 21.0% for all other items; and
•Weighted average shares of 61 million on a fully diluted basis, which assumes no share repurchases we may make under our authorization.
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing the combined ratio:
| All Lines | 2022 vs. 2021 | 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Operations Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written ("NPW") | $ | 3,573,590 | 3,189,713 | 12 | % | $ | 2,773,092 | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 3,373,380 | 3,017,253 | 12 | 2,681,814 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 2,111,778 | 1,813,984 | 16 | 1,635,823 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 1,089,942 | 979,537 | 11 | 905,830 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 4,858 | 5,140 | (5) | 3,812 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 166,802 | 218,592 | (24) | % | $ | 136,349 | 60 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 62.7 | % | 60.1 | 2.6 | pts | 61.0 | % | (0.9) | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 32.3 | 32.5 | (0.2) | 33.8 | (1.3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 95.1 | 92.8 | 2.3 | 94.9 | (2.1) |
The 12% NPW growth in 2022 compared to 2021 reflected (i) overall renewal pure price increases, and (ii) higher direct new business, as shown in the following table:
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 731.7 | 648.5 | 579.7 | |||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 5.1 | % | 4.9 | 4.3 |
48
Table of Contents
Our NPW growth in 2022 also benefited from strong retention. In addition, increased economic activity and inflation in the U.S. resulted in our customers increasing their sales, payrolls, and exposure units, all of which favorably impacted our NPW.
The increase in NPE in 2022 compared to 2021 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 2.6 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 617.9 | 18.3 | pts | $ | 145.9 | 4.3 | pts | 22.6 | 1.6 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 471.7 | 15.6 | 164.2 | 5.4 | 21.0 | (2.3) | |||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 410.0 | 15.3 | 215.4 | 8.0 | 23.3 | 4.4 |
Net catastrophe losses in 2022 were lower than losses in 2021 and 2020; however, 2022 did include gross losses from Winter Storm Elliott of $135.0 million, or net losses of approximately $46.1 million, or 1.6 points. This storm impacted 37 states, 26 of which are in our Standard Commercial Lines footprint, and primarily included property losses from damage to commercial businesses and personal homes. Including the impact of reinstatement premium of $11.7 million for this event, the total impact to the overall combined ratio was 1.7 points.
Net catastrophe losses of 5.4 points in 2021 were higher than our longer-term net catastrophe loss averages. Catastrophe losses in 2021 included gross losses of $53 million from Hurricane Ida, or net losses of approximately $41 million, or 1.4 points. The majority of the Hurricane Ida losses, which included meaningful property losses from damage to personal and commercial automobiles, occurred in New Jersey and the surrounding states.
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development were as follows:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||
| 2022 | (86.0) | (2.5) | pts | 0.2 | |||||
| 2021 | (81.0) | (2.7) | 0.5 | ||||||
| 2020 | (85.0) | (3.2) | (0.9) |
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||
| General liability | $ | (5.0) | (29.0) | (35.0) | ||||||
| Commercial automobile | 15.0 | 15.0 | 10.0 | |||||||
| Workers compensation | (70.0) | (58.0) | (60.0) | |||||||
| Businessowners' policies | (11.0) | (2.0) | — | |||||||
| Bonds | (10.0) | — | — | |||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | (81.0) | (74.0) | (85.0) | |||||||
| Homeowners | — | — | — | |||||||
| Personal automobile | — | — | — | |||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | — | — | — | |||||||
| E&S | (5.0) | (7.0) | — | |||||||
| Total (favorable) prior year casualty reserve development | $ | (86.0) | (81.0) | (85.0) | ||||||
| (Favorable) impact on loss ratio | (2.5) | pts | (2.7) | (3.2) |
In addition to the prior year casualty reserve development, current year casualty loss costs increased 0.7 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by a higher estimated loss trend.
49
Table of Contents
For additional qualitative discussion on prior year reserve development, current year casualty loss costs, and non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Standard Commercial Lines Segment
| 2022 vs. 2021 | 2021 vs. 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 2,901,984 | 2,593,018 | 12 | % | $ | 2,230,636 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| NPE | 2,739,819 | 2,443,885 | 12 | 2,143,184 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
| Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 1,683,988 | 1,426,768 | 18 | 1,245,627 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 907,277 | 813,381 | 12 | 742,014 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 4,858 | 5,140 | (5) | 3,812 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 143,696 | 198,596 | (28) | % | $ | 151,731 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 61.5 | % | 58.4 | 3.1 | pts | 58.1 | % | 0.3 | pts | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 33.1 | 33.3 | (0.2) | 34.6 | (1.3) | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 94.8 | 91.9 | 2.9 | 92.9 | (1.0) |
NPW growth of 12% in 2022 compared to 2021 reflected (i) renewal pure price increases, (ii) higher direct new business, and (iii) strong retention as shown in the table below. In addition, NPW growth in 2022 benefited from exposure growth.
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 512.5 | $ | 469.9 | ||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 5.4 | 5.3 |
The increase in NPE in 2022 compared to 2021 resulted from the same impacts to NPW described above.
The 3.1-point increase in the loss and loss expense ratio in 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 461.1 | 16.8 | pts | $ | 95.6 | 3.5 | pts | 20.3 | 2.1 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 340.7 | 13.9 | 104.1 | 4.3 | 18.2 | (1.1) |
Our loss and loss expenses in 2022 compared to 2021 included (i) elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, primarily due to increased severities resulting from inflationary pressures on labor and material costs, and (ii) lower net catastrophe losses, as discussed below and in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
Our 2022 catastrophe losses were impacted by 48 events designated as catastrophes by Property Claims Services ("PCS"), an internationally recognized authority on insured catastrophe property losses, including (i) several wind and thunderstorm events that occurred throughout the second quarter of 2022, and (ii) Winter Storm Elliott, a cross-country storm that impacted 26 of our footprint states in December 2022. Catastrophe losses in 2021 were impacted by 46 events that PCS designed as catastrophes, including two severe thunderstorms accompanied by wind and hail, Hurricane Ida, and a series of severe tornadoes.
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||
| 2022 | $ | (81.0) | (3.0) | pts | — | ||||||
| 2021 | (74.0) | (3.0) | 1.0 |
50
Table of Contents
For quantitative information on favorable prior year casualty reserve development by line of business, see the "Insurance Operations" section above. For qualitative information about the significant drivers of this development, see the line of business discussions below.
The loss and loss expense ratio increase in 2022 also included an increase in current year casualty loss costs of 0.9 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by a higher estimated loss trend.
The following is a discussion of our most significant Standard Commercial Lines of business:
| General Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 20211 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 20201 | ||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 958,121 | 859,284 | 12 | % | $ | 716,119 | 20 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 151,005 | 139,255 | n/a | 122,159 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | n/a | 85 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 4.5 | 4.4 | n/a | 3.9 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 902,428 | 807,158 | 12 | % | $ | 694,019 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | 104,517 | 123,450 | (15) | 103,262 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 88.4 | % | 84.7 | 3.7 | pts | 85.1 | % | (0.4) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 33 | 33 | 32 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 12% in 2022 compared to 2021 benefited from exposure growth, strong retention, renewal pure price increases, and direct new business.
The combined ratio increased 3.7 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by less favorable prior year casualty reserve development, as follows:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||
| 2022 | $ | (5.0) | (0.6) | pts | 3.0 | |||||
| 2021 | (29.0) | (3.6) | 1.4 |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident years 2021 and 2020. The 2021 favorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily attributable to improved loss severities in accident years 2018 and prior.
The combined ratio increase in 2022 also included an increase in current year casualty loss costs of 1.1 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by (i) higher estimated loss trend for this line, and (ii) an increase in ceded casualty reinstatement premium principally due to development on one large loss from the 2018 treaty year and two large losses from the 2020 treaty year. This line is exposed to changes in economic and social trends, including litigation propensity and outcomes, and changes in state laws, such as those that extend the statute of limitations or open windows for previously time-barred actions.
| Commercial Automobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 vs. 20211 | 2021 vs. 20201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 860,116 | 767,723 | 12 | % | $ | 658,930 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 125,129 | 115,088 | n/a | 112,893 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 86 | n/a | 86 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 8.1 | 8.3 | n/a | 8.1 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 812,306 | 724,398 | 12 | % | $ | 615,181 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting loss | (63,112) | (23,335) | (170) | (3,126) | (646) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 107.8 | % | 103.2 | 4.6 | pts | 100.5 | % | 2.7 | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 30 | 30 | 30 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 12% in 2022 compared to 2021 benefited from renewal pure price increases, higher direct new business, and strong retention. NPW also benefited from 5% growth of in-force vehicle counts as of December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021.
51
Table of Contents
The combined ratio increased 4.6 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/ Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 172.2 | 21.2 | pts | $ | 3.1 | 0.4 | pts | 21.6 | 2.9 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 125.2 | 17.3 | 9.8 | 1.4 | 18.7 | 3.1 |
Loss and loss expenses in 2022 compared to 2021 experienced (i) lower net catastrophe losses, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above, and (ii) elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, primarily due to higher severities from inflationary and supply chain impacts that have increased labor, material, and replacement vehicle costs, as well as the duration of claims, which impacts vehicle rental days.
| ($ in millions) | Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/ Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 15.0 | 1.8 | pts | (0.3) | ||||||
| 2021 | 15.0 | 2.1 | 0.5 |
The unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily due to increased severities in the 2021 accident year. The 2021 unfavorable prior year casualty reserve development was primarily attributable to unfavorable reserve development on loss severities in accident years 2016 through 2019.
In addition, the combined ratio was impacted by a 1.9-point increase in current year casualty loss costs in 2022 compared to 2021, due to (i) an expected increase in claim frequencies from a more normalized amount of miles driven as COVID-19-related impacts continue to lessen, and (ii) increased loss severity expectations following the unfavorable development for the 2021 accident year.
This line of business remains an area of focus for us and most of the industry, as profitability challenges continue to generate combined ratios higher than targets. We will continue to actively seek price increases on this line and execute on targeted underwriting and claims actions to improve the mix of business and claim outcomes.
| Commercial Property | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 vs. 20211 | 2021 vs. 20201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 535,666 | 470,043 | 14 | % | $ | 413,194 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 118,470 | 108,418 | n/a | 94,697 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 84 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 6.2 | 6.0 | n/a | 4.6 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 495,647 | 436,412 | 14 | % | $ | 388,120 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | (7,015) | 10,515 | (167) | (21,296) | (149) | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 101.4 | pts | 97.6 | 3.8 | 105.5 | pts | (7.9) | ||||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 18 | 18 | 19 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW growth of 14% in 2022 compared to 2021 benefited from renewal pure price increases, exposure growth, strong retention, and higher direct new business.
The combined ratio increased 3.8 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 240.5 | 48.5 | pts | $ | 75.3 | 15.2 | pts | 63.7 | 3.7 | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 182.5 | 41.8 | 79.3 | 18.2 | 60.0 | (6.7) |
52
Table of Contents
Loss and loss expenses in 2022 compared to 2021 experienced (i) lower net catastrophe losses, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above, and (ii) elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses. The elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses was primarily due to increased severity compared to 2021 reflecting inflationary pressures on building material and labor costs.
As profitability challenges continue to generate combined ratios higher than targets, we will continue to actively seek price increases on this line and execute on targeted underwriting and claims actions to improve the mix of business and claim outcomes.
| Workers Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 vs. 20211 | 2021 vs. 20201 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 340,802 | 317,035 | 7 | % | $ | 270,168 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Direct new business | 61,726 | 59,938 | n/a | 51,078 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 86 | n/a | 84 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases (decreases) | (0.5) | 0.1 | n/a | (2.0) | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 335,955 | 306,428 | 10 | % | $ | 278,062 | 10 | % | ||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | 91,087 | 78,537 | 16 | 70,897 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 72.9 | % | 74.4 | (1.5) | pts | 74.5 | % | (0.1) | pts | ||||||||||||
| % of total Standard Commercial Lines NPW | 12 | 12 | 12 |
1n/a: not applicable.
NPW increased 7% in 2022 compared to 2021 due to exposure growth, strong retention, and higher direct new business.
The combined ratio decreased 1.5 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by favorable prior year casualty reserve development:
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | Unfavorable/(Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2022 | $ | (70.0) | (20.8) | pts | (1.9) | |||||
| 2021 | (58.0) | (18.9) | 2.7 |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily due to continued favorable medical trends in accident years 2020 and prior, and favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies in accident year 2020. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2021 was primarily due to continued favorable medical trends in accident years 2019 and prior. Due to the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development across an extended number of accident years.
Standard Personal Lines Segment
| 2022 vs. 2021 | 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 319,059 | 292,265 | 9 | % | $ | 295,166 | (1) | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 299,405 | 293,559 | 2 | 299,140 | (2) | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 231,113 | 212,116 | 9 | 233,260 | (9) | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 75,485 | 77,477 | (3) | 81,388 | (5) | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | (7,193) | 3,966 | (281) | % | $ | (15,508) | (126) | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 77.2 | % | 72.2 | 5.0 | pts | 78.0 | % | (5.8) | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 25.2 | 26.4 | (1.2) | 27.2 | (0.8) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 102.4 | 98.6 | 3.8 | 105.2 | (6.6) |
NPW increased 9% in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to (i) higher direct new business, (ii) stronger retention, (iii) higher homeowner coverage amounts due to inflation adjustments, and (iv) higher average policy sizes from our mass affluent market strategy. In the third quarter of 2021, we transitioned our personal lines strategy to targeting customers in the mass affluent market where we believe our strong coverage and servicing capabilities will be more competitive.
53
Table of Contents
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums1 | $ | 62.9 | $ | 40.9 | ||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 82 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 0.7 | 1.0 |
1Excludes our flood direct premiums written, which is 100% ceded to the NFIP and therefore, has no impact on our NPW.
The increase in NPE in 2022 compared to 2021 resulted from the same impacts to NPW discussed above.
The loss and loss expense ratio increased 5.0 points in 2022 compared to 2021, driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 117.1 | 39.1 | pts | $ | 40.8 | 13.6 | pts | 52.7 | 5.0 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 102.8 | 35.0 | 37.4 | 12.7 | 47.7 | (6.9) |
Our 2022 catastrophe losses were impacted by 43 events designated as catastrophes by PCS, including (i) several wind and thunderstorm events that occurred throughout the second quarter of 2022, and (ii) Winter Storm Elliott in December 2022. Our 2021 catastrophe losses were impacted by 44 events designated as catastrophes by PCS, including two severe thunderstorms accompanied by wind and hail, Hurricane Ida, and a series of severe tornadoes.
In addition, we experienced elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses in 2022 compared to 2021, driven by higher personal automobile physical damage losses. These higher losses resulted from (i) higher frequencies from increased miles driven, and (ii) greater severities from inflationary and supply chain impacts that have increased labor, material, and replacement vehicle costs, and the duration of claims, which impacts vehicle rental days. The likely continuation of elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, coupled with renewal pure price increases below loss trend, will put pressure on this segment's profitability in the near-term. To alleviate pressure on profitability in our homeowners line of business, we have and continue to apply valuation inflationary adjustments at renewal, and file rate increases to mitigate these inflationary impacts. Additionally, the personal automobile line of business remains an area of focus for us and most of the industry, as profitability challenges continue to generate combined ratios higher than targets. We will continue to actively seek price increases on this line and execute on targeted underwriting and claims actions to improve the mix of business and claim outcomes.
The underwriting expense ratio decreased 1.2 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a decrease in labor expenses.
E&S Lines Segment
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Segments Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 352,547 | 304,430 | 16 | % | $ | 247,290 | 23 | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 334,156 | 279,809 | 19 | 239,490 | 17 | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 196,677 | 175,100 | 12 | 156,936 | 12 | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 107,180 | 88,679 | 21 | 82,428 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 30,299 | 16,030 | 89 | % | $ | 126 | 12,622 | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 58.8 | % | 62.6 | (3.8) | pts | 65.5 | % | (2.9) | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 32.1 | 31.7 | 0.4 | 34.4 | (2.7) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 90.9 | 94.3 | (3.4) | 99.9 | (5.6) |
54
Table of Contents
NPW growth of 16% in 2022 compared to 2021 reflected renewal pure price increases and higher direct new business as shown in the table below. In addition, NPW growth in 2022 benefited from exposure growth driven by favorable E&S Lines marketplace conditions.
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 156.3 | 137.7 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 7.3 | % | 6.5 |
The increase in NPE in 2022 compared to 2021 resulted from the same impacts to NPW discussed above.
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 3.8 points in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 39.6 | 11.9 | pts | $ | 9.6 | 2.9 | pts | 14.8 | (3.4) | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 28.2 | 10.1 | 22.7 | 8.1 | 18.2 | (1.8) |
We experienced lower net catastrophe losses in 2022 compared 2021. Our 2022 catastrophe losses were impacted by 44 events that PCS designated as catastrophes, including severe weather affecting Midwestern states. Winter Storm Elliott did not have a meaningful impact on our E&S Lines segment. Our 2021 losses were impacted by 50 events that PCS designated as catastrophes, including Winter Storm Uri affecting Texas, a series of large storms affecting Southern and Midwestern states, and Hurricane Ida.
We experienced elevated non-catastrophe property loss and loss expenses in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to increased severity reflecting inflationary pressures on labor and material costs, and the normal period-to-period volatility of our property lines of business in this segment.
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2022 | $ | (5.0) | (1.5) | pts | 1.0 | |||||
| 2021 | (7.0) | (2.5) | (2.5) |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2022 was primarily attributable to favorable inception-to-date claim frequencies and lower loss severities in accident years 2021 and 2020. The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2021 was primarily attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2016 and prior.
In addition, the loss and loss expense ratio was favorably impacted by a 1.3-point decrease in current year casualty loss costs in 2022 compared to 2021. Our E&S casualty lines results have improved over recent years after benefiting from several underwriting and claims initiatives and strong rate increases. The decrease in current year casualty loss costs reflects the impacts of these actions.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to protect our capital resources and insure against losses on property and casualty risks that we underwrite in excess of the amount that we are prepared to accept. We use two main reinsurance vehicles: (i) a reinsurance pooling agreement among our Insurance Subsidiaries through which each company agrees to share in premiums and losses based on certain specified percentages; and (ii) reinsurance contracts and arrangements with third parties that cover various policies that we issue to our customers.
Reinsurance Pooling Agreement
The primary purposes of the Insurance Subsidiaries' reinsurance pooling agreement are to:
•Pool or share proportionately the underwriting profit and loss results of property and casualty insurance underwriting operations through reinsurance;
•Reduce administration expenses; and
55
Table of Contents
•Permit all the Insurance Subsidiaries to obtain a uniform rating from AM Best Company ("AM Best").
The following illustrates the pooling percentages by Insurance Subsidiary as of December 31, 2022:
| Insurance Subsidiary | Pooling Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance Company of America ("SICA") | 32.0% | |
| Selective Way Insurance Company ("SWIC") | 21.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") | 9.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New York ("SICNY") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Casualty Insurance Company ("SCIC") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey ("SAICNJ") | 6.0% | |
| Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC") | 5.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New England ("SICNE") | 3.0% | |
| Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("SFCIC") | 3.0% |
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangements
By entering into reinsurance treaties and arrangements, we can increase our underwriting capacity, accepting larger individual risks and aggregations of risks without directly increasing our capital or statutory surplus. Under our reinsurance treaties, we cede to our reinsurers a portion of our incurred losses from an individual policy or group of policies in exchange for a portion of the premium on those policies. Amounts not reinsured below a specified dollar threshold are known as retention. Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from liability under the terms and limits of our policies, but it does make our reinsurers liable to us for the amount of liability we cede to them. Our reinsurers often rely on their own reinsurance programs, or retrocessions, to manage their large loss exposures. The size of the global reinsurance community is relatively small. If our reinsurers are unable to collect on their retrocessional programs, it may impair their ability to pay us for the amounts we cede to them.
Consequently, our reinsurers present us with direct, indirect, and contingent counterparty credit risk. We attempt to mitigate this credit risk by (i) pursuing relationships with reinsurers rated “A-” or higher by AM Best and/or (ii) obtaining collateral to secure reinsurance obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties permit us to terminate or commute them – or require the reinsurer to post collateral if the reinsurer's financial condition or rating deteriorates. We monitor our reinsurers' financial condition, and we review the quality of reinsurance recoverables and reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. For additional information regarding our reinsurance counterparty credit risk, see Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We have reinsurance contracts that separately cover our property and casualty insurance business that can be segregated into the following key categories:
•Property Reinsurance, which includes our (i) property excess of loss treaties purchased for protection against large individual property losses and (ii) property catastrophe treaties purchased to provide protection for the overall property portfolio against severe catastrophic events. We also purchase a limited amount of facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual property risks greater than our property excess of loss treaty capacity.
•Casualty Reinsurance, which provides protection for both individual large casualty losses and catastrophic casualty losses involving multiple claimants or insureds. We also may use facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual casualty risks in excess of our treaty capacity. We may also purchase quota share capacity for certain new or higher severity casualty lines of business.
•Terrorism Reinsurance, which provides a federal reinsurance backstop, behind the protection built into our property and casualty reinsurance treaties, for terrorism losses covered under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”). For further information about TRIPRA, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K.
•Flood Reinsurance, for which all of the premiums and losses related to our participation in the WYO (for which we also receive a servicing fee) are 100% ceded to the federal government.
Property Reinsurance
We renewed our main property catastrophe treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S business, effective January 1, 2023. For this treaty, we increased our treaty limit by $100 million and increased our treaty retention by $20 million to
56
Table of Contents
respond to our growing property portfolio. As a result, the coverage was extended to $915 million in excess of the $60 million retention with higher co-participations in certain layers as our overall net purchased limits increased to $810 million from $776 million. A hardening reinsurance pricing environment was also characterized by significant efforts on the part of reinsurers to impose restrictions on cedents' terms and conditions, particularly with respect to coverage for non-modeled/under-modeled perils, such as terrorism, strike, riot, civil unrest, severe convective storms, and the systemic perils of communicable disease and cyber. Consequently, the property catastrophe program excludes coverage for communicable disease, but retains limited reinsurance coverage for terrorism, strike, riot, civil unrest, severe convective storms, and cybersecurity risks. Despite these limitations, coverage for other traditionally covered property perils was largely maintained. Additionally, we made the decision to not purchase our expiring E&S Lines $30 million in excess of $10 million treaty, which covered all 50 states and the District of Columbia, due to challenging market conditions and our assessment of the projected reinsurance spend relative to expected covered losses.
We seek to minimize reinsurance credit risk by transacting with highly-rated reinsurance partners and purchasing collateralized reinsurance products, particularly for high-severity, low-probability events, if feasible. Our current reinsurance program includes $216 million in collateralized limit in the top layer of the catastrophe program, compared to $259 million in collateralized limit under the prior year's reinsurance program.
Overall, ceded premium for our property catastrophe reinsurance treaty will increase considerably in 2023 due to three factors: (i) increases in underlying property exposures in line with our growing property insurance portfolio; (ii) the addition of $100 million of coverage purchased to maintain stability in our net risk profile; and (iii) significant risk-adjusted price increases due to a severely hardening reinsurance market driven by such dynamics as elevated inflation-driven demand for reinsurance capacity, reinsurer investment losses, exchange rate impacts, poor reinsurance profitability over the past six years, limited supply of retrocessional capacity, and reinsurer and investor concerns over climate change and un-modeled/under-modeled perils.
We model various catastrophic perils, and hurricane risk continues to be our portfolio's most significant natural catastrophe peril because of the geographic location of the risks we insure. The table below illustrates the impact of the five largest hurricane losses we have experienced in the last 35 years:
| ($ in millions) | Gross Loss1 | Net Loss2 | Accident Year | Gross Loss Ratio | Net Loss Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Name | ||||||||||
| Superstorm Sandy | $125.5 | 45.6 | 2012 | 7.9% | 2.9 | |||||
| Hurricane Ida | 50.8 | 41.5 | 2021 | 1.7 | 1.4 | |||||
| Hurricane Irene | 44.8 | 40.2 | 2011 | 3.1 | 2.8 | |||||
| Hurricane Hugo | 26.4 | 3.0 | 1989 | 5.9 | 0.7 | |||||
| Hurricane Isabel | 25.1 | 15.7 | 2003 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
1This amount represents reported and unreported gross losses estimated as of December 31, 2022.
2Net loss does not include reinstatement premiums, taxes, or flood claims handling fees.
We review our exposure to hurricane risk by examining third-party vendor models and conducting our own proprietary analysis. The third-party vendor models provide a long-term view that closely relates modeled event frequency to historical hurricane activity, adjusting to reflect certain non-modeled cost assumptions, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses. We believe that modeled estimates provide a range of potential outcomes, and we review multiple estimates to understand our catastrophic risk.
Our established catastrophic risk tolerance requires that no more than 10% of stockholders’ equity is exposed to a loss from a hurricane event at a 99.6% confidence level (1-in-250 year event or 0.4% probability) on a net of reinsurance and after-tax basis. In addition to the 1-in-250 year modeled event, we evaluate the impact of a number of other scenarios on stockholders’ equity.
57
Table of Contents
The table below shows the gross and net losses modeled results for (i) hurricane peril in our underwriting property portfolio, and (ii) the gross and net of reinsurance hurricane losses from the following scenarios:
•Recasts of two large hurricanes that impacted our geographic footprint:
◦1938 New England Hurricane, one of the largest hurricanes to impact the Northeast United States; and
◦Hurricane Hazel, a Category 4 storm that made landfall near the border between North Carolina and South Carolina in 1954; and
•Realistic disaster scenarios (“RDS”) for significant potential storms in the Northeast and the Carolinas based on Lloyds of London methodology.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Hurricane | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $212,267 | 66,724 | 3 | % | |||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 354,977 | 73,001 | 3 | ||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 575,734 | 83,045 | 3 | ||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 818,907 | 118,032 | 5 | ||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 906,745 | 130,419 | 5 | ||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 1,041,355 | 171,671 | 7 | ||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 1,504,757 | 526,564 | 21 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1938 New England Hurricane | 452,577 | 78,011 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS North-East (Category 4 hurricane) | 825,960 | 122,269 | 5 | ||||
| Historical recast - 1954 Hurricane Hazel | 282,257 | 66,903 | 3 | ||||
| Lloyd's RDS Carolinas (Category 5 hurricane) | 483,327 | 78,915 | 3 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums based on the treaty structure effective January 1, 2023.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2022.
As reflected in the table above, we are well within our established tolerance for catastrophic risk. Our current catastrophe reinsurance program exhausts at an approximately 1-in-220 year return period, or events with 0.5% probability, based on a multi-model view of hurricane risk. Our actual gross and net losses incurred from hurricanes making U.S.-landfall will vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated modeled losses.
In addition to hurricane peril, the table below shows gross and net losses modeled by other wind and earthquake perils in our underwriting property portfolio.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Other Wind | Earthquake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses % of Equity3 | ||||||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $114,149 | 47,782 | 2 | % | $7,681 | $5,502 | — | % | ||||||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 153,494 | 50,526 | 2 | $24,349 | $16,566 | 1 | ||||||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 206,864 | 52,843 | 2 | $72,657 | $43,376 | 2 | ||||||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 236,293 | 57,050 | 2 | $116,502 | $54,125 | 2 | ||||||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 265,758 | 57,548 | 2 | $147,880 | $63,394 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 295,893 | 58,486 | 2 | $187,630 | $63,238 | 3 | ||||||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 351,876 | 61,968 | 2 | $273,747 | $65,493 | 3 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums based on the treaty structure effective January 1, 2023.
3GAAP stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2022.
As we currently do not write crop insurance, have minimal exposure to private flood, and have a small geographic footprint in the Western U.S., our exposures to perils, such as droughts, wildfires, and flooding, tend to be relatively modest. However, as our geographic expansion progresses, we continually evaluate how physical risks from these perils and others are considered in our strategic decision making.
In addition, we regularly experience property losses from winter storms, and while we utilize third-party vendor models to help us model and manage our exposure to this peril, we also evaluate our winter storm exposure based on our own historical experience, as winter storm third-party vendor models are currently less mature. As an example of the impact from a large and recent winter storm, we incurred $135.0 million in gross losses from Winter Storm Elliott which took place in late-December 2022, or $46.1 million net of reinsurance. In addition, we incurred $11.7 million in reinstatement premium from Winter Storm
58
Table of Contents
Elliott, resulting in a total impact of $57.8 million, pre-tax or $45.7 million after-tax. Despite the size of this event, our reinsurance strategy limited the impact on our full-year 2022 results to 1.8% of equity or a 1.7-point impact on our combined ratio. Based on our 2023 property catastrophe reinsurance program discussed above, if Winter Storm Elliott were to recur, the net impact to us would be more significant.
We renewed the property excess of loss treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S business, on July 1, 2022, with a $10 million increase in coverage in the highest layer. The treaty is comprised of three layers, with the $20 million in excess of $40 million layer effective January 1, 2022, being cancelled effective July 1, 2022.
The following table summarizes of our property reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| PROPERTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $915 million above $60 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis in four layers: | All nuclear, biological, chemical, and radioactive ("NBCR") losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. Coverage for non-NBCR losses is limited due to current market conditions. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding TRIPRA. | ||
| - 47% of losses in excess of $60 million up to $100 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $100 million up to $225 million; | ||||
| - 100% of losses in excess of $225 million up to $525 million; and | ||||
| - 81% of losses in excess of $525 million up to $975 million. | ||||
| The treaty provides one reinstatement in each of the first three layers and no reinstatement in the fourth layer. The per occurrence limit is $810.1 million and the annual aggregate limit is $1.3 billion, net of the Insurance Subsidiaries' co-participation. | ||||
| Property Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $67 million above $3 million retention covering 100% in three layers. Losses other than TRIPRA certified losses are subject to the following reinstatements and annual aggregate limits: | All NBCR losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. For non-NBCR losses, the treaty distinguishes between acts committed on behalf of foreign persons or foreign interests ("Foreign Terrorism") and those that are not. The treaty provides annual aggregate limits for Foreign Terrorism (other than NBCR) acts of $21 million for the first layer; $60 million for the second layer; and $40 million for the third layer. Non-foreign terrorism losses (other than NBCR) are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. | ||
| - $7 million in excess of $3 million layer provides unlimited reinstatements; | ||||
| - $20 million in excess of $10 million layer provides three reinstatements, $80 million in aggregate limits; and | ||||
| - $40 million in excess of $30 million layer provides two reinstatements, $120 million in aggregate limits. | ||||
| Flood | 100% reinsurance by the federal government’s WYO. | None |
Casualty Reinsurance
We renewed the casualty excess of loss treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S Lines business, on July 1, 2022, substantially on the same terms as the treaty expiring June 30, 2022.
The following table summarizes our casualty reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| CASUALTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Casualty Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are six layers covering 100% of $88 million in excess of $2 million. Losses other than terrorism losses are subject to the following: | All NBCR losses are excluded. All other losses stemming from the acts of terrorism are subject to the following: | ||
| - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer provides 41 reinstatements, $126 million annual aggregate limit; | - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer with $15 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer provides six reinstatements, $49 million annual aggregate limit; | - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer with $28 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer provides three reinstatements, $36 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer with $27 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer provides one reinstatement, $18 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer with $18 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $40 million annual aggregate limit; and | - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer with $40 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; and | |||
| - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer provides one reinstatement, $80 million annual aggregate limit. | - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer with $80 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit. |
59
Table of Contents
We have other reinsurance treaties, such as our (i) Surety and Fidelity Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaty, (ii) National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool Quota Share, which covers business assumed from the involuntary workers compensation pool, (iii) Endurance Specialty Quota share and Loss Development Cover, which protects against losses on policies written before the acquisition and any development on reserves established by MUSIC as of the date of acquisition, (iv) Equipment Breakdown Coverage Reinsurance Treaty, (v) Multi-line Quota Share, which covers additional personal lines coverages, such as personal cyber and home systems protection, (vi) Cyber Liability Quota Share, and (vii) Excess Liability Quota Share, which covers MUSIC's excess liability business.
We regularly evaluate our overall reinsurance program and try to develop effective ways to manage the transfer of risk. We base our analysis on a comprehensive process that includes periodic analysis of modeling results, our own loss experience, aggregation of exposures, exposure growth, diversification of risks, limits written, projected reinsurance costs, reinsurer financial strength, and projected impact on earnings, equity, and statutory surplus. We strive to balance reinsurer credit quality, price, terms, and our appetite to retain a certain level of risk.
Investments Segment
Our investment portfolio's objectives are to maximize after-tax net investment income and generate long-term growth in book value per share by maximizing the overall total return of the portfolio by investing the premiums we receive from our insurance operations and the amounts generated through our capital management strategies, which may include debt and equity security issuances. We balance those objectives against prevailing market conditions, capital preservation considerations, and our enterprise risk-taking appetite. We maintain (i) a well-diversified portfolio across issuers, sectors, and asset classes; and (ii) a high credit quality fixed income securities portfolio with a duration and maturity profile at an acceptable risk level that provides ample liquidity.
The effective duration of the fixed income securities portfolio, including short-term investments, was 4.1 years as of December 31, 2022, compared to the Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration of 3.1 years. The effective duration is monitored and managed to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. Purchases and sales are made with the intent of maximizing investment returns in the current market environment while balancing capital preservation.
Our fixed income and short-term investments represented 92% of our invested assets at December 31, 2022, and 91% at December 31, 2021. These investments had a weighted average credit rating of “AA-” as of December 31, 2022 and "A+" as of December 31, 2021, with a 96% allocation to investment grade holdings at both December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021. The improvement in our weighted average credit rating reflects active management of our investment portfolio in 2022 to optimize our risk-adjusted investment yields in the rising interest rate environment, which resulted in higher credit quality fixed income security purchases.
For further details on the composition, credit quality, and the various risks to which our portfolio is subject, see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” of this Form 10-K.
Total Invested Assets
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total invested assets | $ | 7,837,469 | 8,026,988 | (2) | % | |||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | 3.37 | 2.88 | 17 | |||||||
| Components of unrealized (losses) gains – before tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (527,892) | 228,962 | (331) | |||||||
| Equity securities | (5,431) | 26,696 | (120) | |||||||
| Net unrealized (losses) gains - before tax | (533,323) | 255,658 | (309) | |||||||
| Components of unrealized (losses) gains – after tax: | ||||||||||
| Fixed income securities | (417,035) | 180,880 | (331) | |||||||
| Equity securities | (4,290) | 21,090 | (120) | |||||||
| Net unrealized (losses) gains - after tax | (421,325) | 201,970 | (309) |
Invested assets decreased $189.5 million at December 31, 2022, compared to December 31, 2021, reflecting a $789.0 million increase in pre-tax unrealized losses during 2022. The increase in pre-tax unrealized losses was primarily due to an increase in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates, and to a lesser extent the widening of credit spreads. This decrease in invested assets was partially offset by operating cash flows during 2022 that were 22% of NPW.
60
Table of Contents
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 vs. 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 259,918 | 209,709 | 24 | % | 203,926 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") | 5,555 | 2,743 | 103 | 844 | 225 | |||||||||||||
| Equity securities | 13,554 | 15,920 | (15) | 9,286 | 71 | |||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 3,997 | 260 | 1,437 | 1,821 | (86) | |||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 23,003 | 117,701 | (80) | 26,504 | 344 | |||||||||||||
| Other investments | 258 | 359 | (28) | 418 | (14) | |||||||||||||
| Investment expenses | (18,130) | (20,103) | 10 | (15,692) | (28) | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – before tax | 288,155 | 326,589 | (12) | 227,107 | 44 | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income tax expense | 55,956 | 63,589 | (12) | 42,495 | 50 | |||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – after tax | $ | 232,199 | 263,000 | (12) | 184,612 | 42 | ||||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 19.4 | % | 19.5 | (0.1) | pts | 18.7 | 0.8 | pts | ||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on fixed income investments | 3.1 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 2.6 | — | |||||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 2.9 | 3.4 | (0.5) | 2.6 | 0.8 |
Net investment income earned decreased 12% in 2022 compared to 2021, driven by lower returns on our alternative investments, reflecting lower valuations. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in income earned on fixed income securities.
During 2022, we managed our fixed income securities portfolio to opportunistically increase the book yield in a rapidly rising interest rate environment. The pre-tax earned yield for fixed income investments was 3.90% in 2022, compared to 3.18% in 2021. The increase in investment income associated with fixed income securities was driven by (i) investing approximately $2.7 billion of new money, taking advantage of higher investment yields, and simultaneously improving credit quality and liquidity, and (ii) higher resets on our floating rate securities. The average pre-tax new purchase yield on fixed income securities in 2022 was 4.5%, up from 2.3% in 2021. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, 11% of our fixed income securities portfolio was invested in floating rate securities that reset principally to 90-day LIBOR. LIBOR increased 456 basis points in 2022 to 4.77% at December 31, 2022 from 0.21% at December 31, 2021, which increased the book yield on our floating rate securities and increased net investment income.
Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
When evaluating securities for sale, our general philosophy is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations of whether the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated or the timing is appropriate to opportunistically trade for other securities with better economic-return characteristics. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses for the indicated periods were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net realized (losses) gains on disposals | $ | (31,636) | 7,144 | 9,148 | |||||
| Net unrealized (losses) gains on equity securities | (32,127) | 17,881 | 7,939 | ||||||
| Net credit loss (expense) on fixed income securities, AFS | (39,169) | (6,858) | (5,042) | ||||||
| Net credit loss benefit (expense) on fixed income securities, HTM | 63 | (49) | 4 | ||||||
| Net credit loss (expense) on CMLs | (116) | — | — | ||||||
| Losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell | (11,823) | (519) | (16,266) | ||||||
| Total net realized and unrealized investment (losses) gains | $ | (114,808) | 17,599 | (4,217) |
Net realized and unrealized investment losses in 2022 were primarily driven by (i) a decrease in valuations reflecting the current public equities market, (ii) active trading of our fixed income securities to opportunistically increase yield in the rising interest rate environment, and (iii) higher credit loss expense on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio.
For additional information regarding our losses on securities we intend to sell and our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses, see Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
61
Table of Contents
Federal Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding federal income taxes.
| ($ in millions) | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal income tax expense | $ | 55.3 | 101.5 | 56.6 | |||||
| Effective tax rate1 | 20.4 | % | 20.5 | 18.7 |
1The effective tax rate is calculated by taking "Total federal income tax expense" divided by "Income before federal income tax" less "Preferred stock dividends" on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Federal income tax expense decreased $46.2 million in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a decrease in pre-tax income that is taxed at the statutory rate. The decrease in pre-tax income was primarily driven by (i) a decrease in underwriting income, (ii) lower net investment income earned, primarily due to lower returns on our alternative investments, and (iii) net realized and unrealized investment losses in 2022 compared to net realized and unrealized investment gains in 2021.
See Note 14. “Federal Income Taxes” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K for: (i) a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory rate of 21%; and (ii) details regarding our net deferred tax asset and liability.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity by focusing on generating sufficient cash flows to meet the short-term and long-term cash requirements of our business operations. We adjust our liquidity requirements based on economic conditions, market conditions, and future cash flow commitments, as discussed further below.
Sources of Liquidity
Sources of cash for the Parent historically have consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, the investment portfolio held at the Parent, borrowings under third-party lines of credit, loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of equity (common or preferred) and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, considering our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital preservation strategies.
The Parent’s investment portfolio includes (i) short-term investments generally maintained in “AAA” rated money market funds approved by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, (ii) high-quality, highly-liquid government and corporate fixed income securities, (iii) equity securities, (iv) alternative investments, and (v) a cash balance. In the aggregate, Parent cash and total investments amounted to $484 million at December 31, 2022, and $527 million at December 31, 2021.
The amount and composition of the Parent's investment portfolio may change over time based on various factors, including the amount and availability of dividends from our Insurance Subsidiaries, investment income, expenses, other Parent cash needs, such as dividends payable to stockholders, asset allocation investment decisions, inorganic growth opportunities, debt retirement, and share repurchases. Our target is for the Parent to maintain highly liquid investments of at least twice its expected annual net cash outflow needs, or $180 million.
Insurance Subsidiary Dividends
The Insurance Subsidiaries generate liquidity through insurance float, which is created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before paying claims. The period of float can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of securities with maturity dates that continually provide a source of cash flow for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. To protect our Insurance Subsidiaries' capital, we purchase reinsurance coverage for significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur.
The Insurance Subsidiaries paid $120 million in total dividends to the Parent in 2022. As of December 31, 2022, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend is $283 million for 2023. All Insurance Subsidiary dividends to the Parent are (i) subject to the approval and/or review of its domiciliary state insurance regulator and (ii) generally payable only from earned statutory surplus reported in its annual statements as of the preceding December 31. Although domiciliary state insurance regulators historically have approved dividends, there is no assurance they will approve future Insurance Subsidiary dividends.
New Jersey corporate law also limits the maximum amount of dividends the Parent can pay our stockholders if either (i) the Parent would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or (ii) the Parent’s total assets
62
Table of Contents
would be less than its total liabilities. The Parent’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is also impacted by (i) covenants in its credit agreement that obligate it, among other things, to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, and (ii) the terms of our preferred stock that prohibit dividends to be declared or paid on our common stock if dividends are not declared and paid, or made payable, on all outstanding preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions and financial covenants, where applicable, see Note 11. “Indebtedness,” Note 17. “Equity,” and Note 22. “Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Line of Credit
On November 7, 2022, the Parent entered into a Credit Agreement with the lenders named therein (the “Lenders”) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent ("Line of Credit"). Under the Line of Credit, the Lenders have agreed to provide the Parent with a $50 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to $125 million with the Lenders' consent. The Line of Credit will mature on November 7, 2025, and has a variable interest rate based on the Parent’s debt ratings. This agreement replaced a prior credit agreement that the Parent terminated in conjunction with entering into the Line of Credit. No borrowings were made under either credit facility in 2022. For additional information regarding the Line of Credit and corresponding representations, warranties, and covenants, refer to Note 11. “Indebtedness” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Four of the Insurance Subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") branches, as shown in the following table. Membership requires the ownership of branch stock and includes the right to access liquidity. All Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") borrowings are required to be secured by investments pledged as collateral. For additional information regarding collateral outstanding, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
| Branch | Insurance Subsidiary Member |
|---|---|
| FHLBI | SICSC1SICSE1 |
| FHLBNY | SICA SICNY |
1These subsidiaries are jointly referred to as the "Indiana Subsidiaries" because they are domiciled in Indiana.
The Line of Credit permits aggregate borrowings from the FHLBI and the FHLBNY up to 10% of the respective member company’s admitted assets for the previous year. As SICNY is domiciled in New York, its FHLBNY borrowings are limited by New York insurance regulations to the lower of 5% of admitted assets for the most recently completed fiscal quarter, or 10% of admitted assets for the previous year-end.
The following table provides information on the remaining capacity for FHLB borrowings based on these restrictions, as well as the additional FHLB stock purchase requirement to allow these member companies to borrow their remaining capacity amounts:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | Additional FHLB Stock Requirements | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 899.0 | $ | 89.9 | 32.0 | 57.9 | 1.2 | |||||||||
| SICSE | 715.8 | 71.6 | 28.0 | 43.6 | 0.9 | |||||||||||
| SICA | 3,356.4 | 335.6 | — | 335.6 | 15.1 | |||||||||||
| SICNY | 625.6 | 31.3 | — | 31.3 | 1.4 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 528.4 | 60.0 | 468.4 | 18.6 |
Short-term Borrowings
During 2022, SICA borrowed the following funds from the FHLBNY for general corporate purposes:
•$35 million on April 1, 2022 at an interest rate of 0.70% with repayment due on May 2, 2022. This borrowing was refinanced upon its maturity on May 2, 2022, at an interest rate of 1.10% and was subsequently repaid on June 27, 2022.
•$25 million on October 3, 2022 at an interest rate of 3.21%, which was repaid on November 3, 2022.
63
Table of Contents
Intercompany Loan Agreements
The Parent has lending agreements with the Indiana Subsidiaries approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance that provide additional liquidity. Similar to the Line of Credit, these lending agreements limit the Parent's borrowings from the Indiana Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. The following table provides information on the Parent’s borrowings and remaining borrowing capacity from the two Indiana Subsidiaries:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets as of December 31, 2022 | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 899.0 | $ | 89.9 | 24.0 | 65.9 | ||||||
| SICSE | 715.8 | 71.6 | 16.0 | 55.6 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 161.5 | 40.0 | 121.5 |
Capital Market Activities
The Parent had no private or public stock issuances during 2022. During 2022, we repurchased 165,159 shares of our common stock under our existing share repurchase program for $12.4 million, or a $75.20 average price per share, excluding commission costs paid. We had $84.2 million of remaining capacity under our share repurchase program as of December 31, 2022. For additional information on the preferred stock transaction, refer to Note 17. “Equity” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Uses of Liquidity
The Parent's liquidity generated from the sources discussed above is used, among other things, to pay dividends to our stockholders. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common and preferred stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors. In November 2022, our Board approved a 7% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, to $0.30 from $0.28 per share. On February 2, 2023, our Board declared:
•A quarterly cash dividend on common stock of $0.30 per common share, that is payable March 1, 2023, to holders of record on February 15, 2023; and
•A cash dividend of $287.50 per share on our 4.60% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B (equivalent to $0.28750 per depository share) payable on March 15, 2023, to holders of record as of February 28, 2023.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt and our ability to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders is dependent on (i) liquidity at the Parent, (ii) the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or (iii) the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Our next FHLB borrowing principal repayment is $60 million to FHLBI due on December 16, 2026.
Restrictions on the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common and preferred stock.
Capital Resources
Capital resources ensure we can pay policyholder claims, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At December 31, 2022, we had GAAP stockholders’ equity of $2.5 billion and statutory surplus of $2.5 billion. With total debt of $505 million at December 31, 2022, our debt-to-capital ratio was 16.6%. For additional information on our statutory surplus, see Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
64
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2022, which we expect to fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 510.0 | — | — | 60.0 | 450.0 | |||||||||
| Interest on debt obligation | 565.3 | 28.3 | 56.6 | 54.8 | 425.6 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,075.3 | 28.3 | 56.6 | 114.8 | 875.6 | ||||||||||
| Gross loss and loss expense payments | 5,144.8 | 1,571.9 | 1,633.8 | 778.9 | 1,160.2 | ||||||||||
| Ceded loss and loss expense payments | 757.5 | 305.8 | 170.7 | 79.3 | 201.7 | ||||||||||
| Net loss and loss expense payments | 4,387.3 | 1,266.1 | 1,463.1 | 699.6 | 958.5 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 5,462.6 | 1,294.4 | 1,519.7 | 814.4 | 1,834.1 |
Our loss and loss expense payments in the table above represent estimated paid amounts by year on our loss and loss expense reserves. These estimates are based on past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, and include considerable judgment. There is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the projected timing of loss and loss expense reserve payments, so the timing and amounts of the actual payments will be affected by many factors. Therefore, the projected settlement of the reserves for net loss and loss expense may differ, perhaps significantly, from actual future payments. For more information on our case reserves and estimates of reserves for loss and loss expense IBNR, refer to the “Reserves for Loss and Loss Expense” section in the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section of this MD&A and Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding cross-default provisions associated with our notes payable in the table above or our Line of Credit, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in this Form 10-K.
In addition to the above, the following table summarizes certain contractual obligations we had at December 31, 2022 that may require us to invest additional amounts into our investment portfolio, which we would fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| ($ in millions) | Amount of Obligation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative investments | $ | 246.1 | |
| Non-publicly traded collateralized loan obligations in our fixed income securities portfolio | 106.6 | ||
| Non-publicly traded common stock within our equity portfolio | 35.0 | ||
| CMLs | 4.9 | ||
| Privately-placed corporate securities | 20.1 | ||
| Total | $ | 412.7 |
There is no certainty (i) that any such additional investments will be required, and (ii) of the actual timing of funding. We expect to have the capacity to fund these commitments through our normal operating and investing activities as they come due.
Our other cash requirements include, without limitation, dividends to stockholders, capital expenditures, and other operating expenses, including commissions to our distribution partners, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, we had no (i) material guarantees on behalf of others and trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value, (ii) material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in Note 18. “Related Party Transactions” included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K, and (iii) material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Consequently, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk related to off-balance sheet arrangements.
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the amount of capital resources we maintain at the holding company and operating subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics that support our targeted financial strength relative to the macroeconomic environment. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, without limitation, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt
65
Table of Contents
and/or equity securities, repurchasing existing debt, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and increasing common stockholders’ dividends.
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the policyholders of the Insurance Subsidiaries and our stockholders, while enhancing our financial strength and underwriting capacity. We have a profitable book of business and solid capital base, positioning us well to take advantage of potential market opportunities.
Book value per common share decreased 17% to $38.57 as of December 31, 2022, from $46.24 as of December 31, 2021, driven by a $9.91 change in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities portfolio and $1.14 in dividends to our common stockholders, partially offset by $3.54 in net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share. The increase in net unrealized losses on our fixed income securities was primarily driven by an increase in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates, and to a lesser extent the widening of credit spreads. Our adjusted book value per share, which is book value per share excluding total after-tax unrealized gains or losses on investments included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, increased to $45.49 as of December 31, 2022, from $43.23 as of December 31, 2021.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities of $802 million in 2022 reflected a modest 4% increase compared to $771 million in 2021, primarily driven by a 5% increase in total revenues. Operating cash flows during 2022 were 22% of NPW.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to $734 million in 2022, compared to $619 million in 2021, primarily due to investing cash received from operating activities. A greater percentage of operating cash flows was used in our investing activities because of the reduced cash required in our financing activities.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased to $88 million in 2022, compared to $123 million in 2021, primarily due to a decrease in borrowing repayments made in 2022, partially offset by increased dividends to common stockholders and increased activity in our share repurchase program in 2022.
FY 2021 10-K MD&A
SEC filing source: 0000230557-22-000006.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-looking Statements
Certain statements in this report, including information incorporated by reference, are “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). The PSLRA provides a safe harbor under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for forward-looking statements. These statements relate to our intentions, beliefs, projections, estimations, or forecasts of future events and financial performance. They involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or industry actual results, activity levels, or performance to materially differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “target,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “pro forma,” “seek,” “likely,” “continue,” or comparable terms. Our forward-looking statements are only predictions, and we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove correct. We undertake no obligation, other than as federal securities laws may require, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what we project, forecast, or estimate in forward-looking statements are discussed in further detail in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K. These risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a constantly changing business environment, and new risk factors may emerge at any time. We can neither predict these new risk factors nor assess their impact, if any, on our businesses or the extent any new factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Given these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking events we discuss in this report might not occur.
Introduction
We classify our business into four reportable segments:
•Standard Commercial Lines;
•Standard Personal Lines;
•Excess and Surplus Lines ("E&S Lines"); and
•Investments.
For more details about these segments, refer to Note 1. "Organization" and Note 12. "Segment Information" in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
We write our Standard Commercial and Standard Personal Lines products and services through nine of our insurance subsidiaries, some of which participate in the federal government's National Flood Insurance Program's ("NFIP") Write Your Own Program ("WYO"). We write our E&S products through another subsidiary, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company, a nationally-authorized non-admitted platform for customers who generally cannot obtain coverage in the standard marketplace. Collectively, we refer to our ten insurance subsidiaries as the "Insurance Subsidiaries."
The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis ("MD&A") of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition, as well as known trends and uncertainties, that may have a material impact in future periods. The MD&A discusses and analyzes our 2021 results compared to 2020. Investors should read the MD&A in conjunction with Item 8. "Financial Statements." of this Form 10-K. For discussion and analysis of our 2020 results compared to 2019, refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
In the MD&A, we will discuss and analyze the following:
•Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates;
•Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019;
•Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment;
•Federal Income Taxes; and
•Liquidity and Capital Resources.
34
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have identified the policies and estimates critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The policies and estimates we consider most critical to the preparation of the Financial Statements involved (i) reserves for loss and loss expense, (ii) investment valuations and the allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale ("AFS") fixed income securities, and (iii) reinsurance.
Reserves for Loss and Loss Expense
Significant time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the claim to us, and the final settlement and payment of the claim. To recognize liabilities for unpaid loss and loss expense, insurers establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities representing an estimate of amounts needed to pay reported and unreported loss and loss expense. The following tables provide case and incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for loss and loss expenses, and reinsurance recoverable on unpaid loss and loss expense as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:
| As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 345,996 | 1,427,326 | 1,773,322 | 213,253 | 1,560,069 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 351,705 | 700,304 | 1,052,009 | 196,670 | 855,339 | ||||||||||
| Commercial automobile | 271,729 | 476,176 | 747,905 | 15,480 | 732,425 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 41,603 | 67,786 | 109,389 | 6,828 | 102,561 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 76,406 | 46,975 | 123,381 | 22,277 | 101,104 | ||||||||||
| Other | 3,671 | 22,474 | 26,145 | 2,136 | 24,009 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 1,091,110 | 2,741,041 | 3,832,151 | 456,644 | 3,375,507 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 60,871 | 82,468 | 143,339 | 40,941 | 102,398 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 13,709 | 35,602 | 49,311 | 2,392 | 46,919 | ||||||||||
| Other | 44,301 | 33,115 | 77,416 | 64,975 | 12,441 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 118,881 | 151,185 | 270,066 | 108,308 | 161,758 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines1 | 94,839 | 361,875 | 456,714 | 11,672 | 445,042 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines2 | 9,080 | 12,892 | 21,972 | 2,017 | 19,955 | ||||||||||
| Total E&S Lines | 103,919 | 374,767 | 478,686 | 13,689 | 464,997 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,313,910 | 3,266,993 | 4,580,903 | 578,641 | 4,002,262 |
1Includes general liability (95% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (5% of net reserves).
2Includes commercial property (91% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (9% of net reserves).
35
| December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loss and Loss Expense Reserves | |||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | Case Reserves | IBNR Reserves | Total | Reinsurance Recoverable on Unpaid Loss and Loss Expense | Net Reserves | ||||||||||
| General liability | $ | 275,133 | 1,363,508 | 1,638,641 | 215,136 | 1,423,505 | |||||||||
| Workers compensation | 359,344 | 721,437 | 1,080,781 | 210,450 | 870,331 | ||||||||||
| Commercial auto | 246,428 | 410,123 | 656,551 | 11,611 | 644,940 | ||||||||||
| Businessowners' policies | 39,047 | 62,517 | 101,564 | 6,849 | 94,715 | ||||||||||
| Commercial property | 60,254 | 38,228 | 98,482 | 21,760 | 76,722 | ||||||||||
| Other | 5,247 | 15,073 | 20,320 | 2,853 | 17,467 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | 985,453 | 2,610,886 | 3,596,339 | 468,659 | 3,127,680 | ||||||||||
| Personal automobile | 60,860 | 79,596 | 140,456 | 42,403 | 98,053 | ||||||||||
| Homeowners | 15,456 | 31,926 | 47,382 | 847 | 46,535 | ||||||||||
| Other | 10,498 | 30,013 | 40,511 | 29,589 | 10,922 | ||||||||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | 86,814 | 141,535 | 228,349 | 72,839 | 155,510 | ||||||||||
| E&S casualty lines1 | 80,506 | 336,596 | 417,102 | 12,195 | 404,907 | ||||||||||
| E&S property lines2 | 9,401 | 9,164 | 18,565 | 576 | 17,989 | ||||||||||
| E&S Lines | 89,907 | 345,760 | 435,667 | 12,771 | 422,896 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,162,174 | 3,098,181 | 4,260,355 | 554,269 | 3,706,086 |
1Includes general liability (95% of net reserves) and commercial auto liability coverages (5% of net reserves).
2Includes commercial property (92% of net reserves) and commercial auto property coverages (8% of net reserves).
The Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration was approximately 3.5 years at December 31, 2021, down from 3.7 years at December 31, 2020.
How reserves are established
Reserves for loss and loss expense include case reserves on reported claims and IBNR reserves. Case reserves are estimated on each individual claim based on claim-specific facts and circumstances known at the time. Case reserves may be adjusted up or down as the claim's specific facts and circumstances change. IBNR reserves are established at more aggregated levels, and they include provisions for (i) claims not yet reported, (ii) future development on reported claims, (iii) closed claims that will reopen in the future, and (iv) anticipated salvage and subrogation recoveries.
Our robust reserve process relies on quarterly internal reserve reviews, based on our own loss experience, with consideration given to various internal and external factors. In addition to our internal reserve reviews, we have an external consulting actuary perform an independent review of our reserves semi-annually. We do not rely on the external consulting actuary's report to determine our recorded reserves; however, we review and discuss with the consulting actuary our respective observations regarding trends, key assumptions, and actuarial methodologies. While not required, our independent consulting actuary issues the annual statutory Statements of Actuarial Opinion for our Insurance Subsidiaries. For additional information on our accounting policy for reserves for loss and loss expense, refer to Note. 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Range of reasonable reserve estimates
We have estimated a range of reasonable reserve estimates for net loss and loss expense of $3,564 million to $4,236 million at December 31, 2021. This range reflects low and high reasonable reserve estimates determined by judgmentally adjusting the methods, factors, and assumptions selected within the internal reserve review. This approach produces a range of reasonable reserve estimates, and does not represent a distribution of all possible outcomes. Therefore, the final outcomes may fall above or below these amounts. The range does not include a provision for potential increases or decreases associated with asbestos, environmental, and certain other continuous exposure claims, which by their nature are more variable and, therefore, traditional actuarial techniques cannot be effectively applied.
The range of reasonable reserve estimates increased as of December 31, 2021 relative to December 31, 2020. This increase primarily relates to the growth in reserves commensurate with our growth in net premiums earned ("NPE") and additional risk created by the current inflationary environment.
36
Changes in Reserve Estimates (Loss Development)
Our quarterly reserve process may lead to changes in the recorded reserves for prior accident years, referred to as favorable or unfavorable prior year loss and loss expense development. In 2021, we experienced net favorable prior year loss development of $82.9 million, compared to $72.9 million in 2020 and $50.3 million in 2019. The following table summarizes prior year development by line of business:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Loss and Loss Expense Development | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| General liability | $ | (29.0) | (35.0) | (5.0) | |||||
| Commercial Automobile | 13.3 | 7.1 | 0.7 | ||||||
| Workers compensation | (58.0) | (60.0) | (68.0) | ||||||
| Businessowners' policies | (0.4) | 3.9 | 1.9 | ||||||
| Commercial property | (2.6) | 9.2 | 5.1 | ||||||
| Homeowners | 1.8 | 7.7 | 7.5 | ||||||
| Personal automobile | (0.2) | (1.8) | 4.4 | ||||||
| E&S casualty lines | (7.0) | — | 2.0 | ||||||
| E&S property lines | (0.8) | (4.0) | 1.0 | ||||||
| Other | — | — | 0.1 | ||||||
| Total | $ | (82.9) | (72.9) | (50.3) |
A detailed discussion of recent reserve development by line of business follows.
Standard Market General Liability Line of Business
At December 31, 2021, our general liability line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $1.6 billion, representing 39% of our total net reserves. In 2021, this line experienced favorable development of $29.0 million, attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2018 and prior. During 2020, this line experienced favorable development of $35.0 million, attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2017 and prior.
By its nature, general liability presents a diverse set of exposures. Losses and loss trends are influenced by various factors, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, and economic and social inflation. Economic inflation directly impacts our claims severities by increasing the costs of raw materials, medical procedures and labor. Social inflation may impact both the frequency and severity of claims by affecting (i) the propensity for a claimant to file a claim, (ii) the percentage of claimants who engage lawyers, and (iii) the nature of judicial verdicts and amount of the associated awards, which influence settlement values going forward. We monitor claim litigation rates regularly and have observed modest increases in the percentage of claims with attorney involvement in recent periods. This trend and the impact of court closures are affecting the time to settle claims.
We have exposure to abuse or molestation claims, mainly through insurance policies that we (i) underwrite through our Community and Public Services ("CAPS") strategic business unit and (ii) issue to schools, religious institutions, day-care facilities, and other social services. These customers within our CAPS business unit represented approximately 10% of our total Standard Commercial Lines NPW in 2021 and 11% in 2020. Through 2017, our exposure to abuse or molestation risk increased, reflective of our CAPS book's growth. In 2018, we implemented more stringent underwriting eligibility guidelines and partnered with a third party to better assess exposure and enhance loss control measures. In 2019, we filed and approved significant rate increases for this exposure. We continue to monitor each jurisdiction's statute of limitations to ensure our rate level accounts for the changing exposure as best we reasonably can. While these underwriting and pricing actions have been necessary to ensure the profitability of the portfolio going forward, they have limited our CAPS growth in recent years.
We also have exposure to abuse or molestation claims from recently enacted state laws that extend the statute of limitations or permit windows for abuse or molestation claims and lawsuits to be filed that statutes of limitations previously barred. Consequently, we may receive claims decades after the alleged acts occurred that will involve complex claims coverage determinations, potential litigation, higher defense costs, and the need to collect from reinsurers under older reinsurance agreements. Our claims and actuarial departments actively monitor these claims to identify changes in frequency or severity and any emerging or shifting trends. While this should help us better understand this rapidly evolving exposure, the ultimate impact of social, political, and legal trends remains highly uncertain, and may significantly impact the ultimate settlement values for these claims.
The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic slowdown have presented additional risks to this line of business. The impact of the pandemic, including related governmental orders, court closures, and other behavioral and procedural changes, such as slower than usual timing in which an individual might bring a claim, may have or could impact claims reporting or
37
settlement patterns. Settlement patterns may be further impacted by a general trend towards increased attorney involvement in the claims process, as previously discussed.
Standard Market Workers Compensation Line of Business
At December 31, 2021, our workers compensation line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $855 million, representing 21% of our total net reserves. During 2021, this line experienced favorable reserve development of $58.0 million, driven by accident years 2019 and prior. Similarly, this line experienced favorable reserve development during 2020 of $60.0 million, driven by accident years 2018 and prior. During both 2021 and 2020, the lower loss emergence than expected was partly due to: (i) medical inflation that was lower than originally anticipated; and (ii) various significant claims initiatives we have implemented. Because of the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development over an extended number of accident years.
While we believe our underwriting and claims operational changes improved our underwriting experience, there is risk associated with these changes. Most notably, changes in operations may inherently change paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, a greater risk of fluctuation remains in the estimated reserves.
In addition to the operational changes, a variety of other issues can impact the workers compensation line of business, such as the following:
Unexpected changes in medical cost inflation –The industry is currently experiencing a period of lower medical claim cost inflation. However, some signs indicate inflationary pressure on these costs. Changes in our historical workers compensation medical costs, along with potential changes in future medical inflation, can create additional variability in our reserves;
Changes in statutory workers compensation benefits – Benefit changes may be enacted that affect all outstanding claims, including claims that have occurred in the past, but have not yet been settled. Depending on the social and political climate, these changes may either increase or decrease associated claim costs;
Changes in utilization of the workers compensation system – These changes may be driven by economic, legislative, or other changes, such as increased pharmaceutical prescriptions, more complex medical procedures, changes in permanently injured workers' life expectancy, and health insurance availability.
COVID-19-related impacts – While not a major insurer of front-line workers (e.g. medical facilities and hospitals), we have potential exposure to employees contracting COVID-19 in the course of their employment. These claims may be asserted under certain state "presumption statutes" that shift the burden of proof from the claimant to the insurer. Medical system service and supply constraints, coupled with injured workers delaying non-essential procedures, may extend the duration of non-COVID-19 claims. To date, we have not seen significant COVID-19-related workers compensation losses
Standard Market Commercial Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2021, our commercial automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $732 million, which represented 18% of our total net reserves. In 2021, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $13.3 million, driven by higher loss severities in accident years 2016 through 2019. In 2020, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $7.1 million, driven by higher loss severities in accident years 2016 through 2019 and higher than expected frequencies in accident year 2019.
For both us and the industry, the commercial automobile line has experienced unfavorable trends in recent years. Pre-pandemic, increased frequencies were likely due to increased miles driven related to lower unemployment, poor road quality, and an increase in distracted driving. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, along with governmental "stay-at-home" orders, dramatically reduced miles driven and road traffic, significantly reducing claims frequency in 2020. While miles driven increased in 2021, driving patterns have also shifted, including changes in the days of the week and times of day people are driving. As of the end of 2021, frequencies remained somewhat below pre-pandemic levels.
Since the pandemic's start, we have seen increasing severities in both the liability and physical damage coverages. The average value of our bodily injury paid loss settlements has increased, possibly relating to higher average driving speeds, higher jury awards, and an increase in distracted driving. Increasing property damage severities may relate to elevated repair costs for increasingly complex vehicles that incorporate more technology, as well as recent disruptions to the supply chain. Continued complications in the supply chain, including labor shortages, increase the risk of longer-term elevated economic inflation.
38
Over the last several years, we have taken actions to improve the profitability of this line of business, including:
•Taking meaningful rate and underwriting actions on our renewal portfolio. We will continue to leverage our predictive modeling and analytical capabilities to provide more granular insights about where we should focus our actions.
•Reducing premium leakage by improving the quality of our rating information, including validating application information with third-party data and obtaining more detailed driver information.
•Implementing new tools to score drivers to underwrite more effectively and align rate with exposure.
•Aggressively managing new business pricing and hazard mix while deploying co-underwriting by our regional underwriters and corporate underwriting teams' subject matter experts for selected higher hazard classes to improve risk driver recognition and exposure-based pricing.
Standard Market Personal Automobile Line of Business
At December 31, 2021, our personal automobile line of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $102 million, which represented 3% of our total net reserves. In 2021, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $0.2 million. In 2020, this line experienced unfavorable prior year reserve development of $1.8 million.
Some of the same issues affecting the commercial automobile line are affecting this line. The COVID-19-related reduction in frequencies was even more pronounced than in commercial automobile line. As with the commercial automobile line, these frequencies significantly rebounded in 2021, yet remain less than pre-pandemic levels. This line also has a similar potential for higher average severities like the commercial automobile line. In addition to the COVID-19-related temporary impacts, the underlying trends of increased vehicle repair costs and poor road quality are likely causes of rising severities, possibly exacerbated by distracted driving trends. We continue to recalibrate our predictive models and refine our underwriting and pricing approaches. While we believe these underwriting and pricing changes will ultimately lead to improved profitability and greater stability, the resulting changes to our exposure profile may impact paid and reported development patterns, thereby increasing the uncertainty in the reserves in the near term.
E&S Casualty Lines of Business
At December 31, 2021, our E&S casualty lines of business had recorded reserves, net of reinsurance, of $445 million, representing 11% of our total net reserves. Our E&S casualty lines results have improved over recent years. In 2021, this line experienced favorable prior year reserve development of $7.0 million, primarily attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2016 and prior. In 2020, this line did not experience prior year reserve development.
Some of the risk factors for the general liability line also affect the E&S casualty lines. These include (i) economic inflation, such as materials and labor costs; (ii) social trends, such as increased attorney involvement; and (iii) COVID-19-related impacts, such as court closures.
The E&S casualty lines also are impacted by operational changes we have made to improve the portfolio's performance. Our underwriting operations have substantially exited several targeted business classes that have historically produced volatile results, including commercial automobile liability, liquor liability, and snow removal.
Recent E&S casualty claims actions have created further casualty improvements:
•In 2020, we created a dedicated E&S claims team in our corporate claims function, bringing greater expertise and consistency to E&S claims handling.
•We have segregated “litigated,” “non-litigated,” and "high exposure" claims, with separate specialized teams for each.
•We implemented the following operational and expense improvement initiatives for legal counsel:
◦Increased the use of staff counsel, increasing legal staff in their assigned territories to support claims volume;
◦Heightened focus on legal budgeting and expense management; and
◦Implemented a panel counsel review process.
While we believe these underwriting and claims operational changes improved our underwriting experience, there is risk associated with these changes. Most notably, changes in portfolio composition or our claims processes may inherently change paid and reported development patterns. While our reserve analyses incorporate methods that adjust for these changes, there remains a greater risk of fluctuation in the estimated reserves.
39
Other impacts creating additional loss and loss expense reserve uncertainty
Claims Initiative Impacts
Consistent with our strategic imperative to optimize operational efficiency, our Claims Department continually identifies areas for improvement and efficiency to increase our value proposition to policyholders. These improvements may lead to claims practice changes that affect average case reserve levels and claims settlement rates, which directly impact the data used to project ultimate loss and loss expense. While these changes may increase uncertainty in our estimates in the short term, we expect refined management of the claims process to be the longer-term benefit.
Our internal reserve analyses incorporate certain actuarial projection methods that make adjustments for changes in case reserve adequacy and claims settlement rates. These methods adjust our historical loss experience to the current case adequacy or settlement rate level, providing a more consistent basis for projecting future development patterns. These methods, like all projection methods, have their own associated assumptions and judgments. Therefore, no single method can be interpreted as definitive.
Unanticipated Changes in Inflation
United States ("U.S.") monetary policy and global economic conditions will bring additional uncertainty related to inflationary trends. Changes in inflation affect the ultimate settlement costs for many of our lines of business, with the greatest reserve impact on the longer-tailed lines such as general liability and workers compensation. Therefore, uncertainty about future inflation or deflation creates the potential for additional reserve variability in these lines of business.
Sensitivity analysis: Potential impact on reserve estimates due to changes in key assumptions
Our process to establish reserves includes a variety of key assumptions, including without limitation:
•The selection of loss and loss expense development factors;
•The weight to be applied to each individual actuarial projection method;
•Projected future loss trends; and
•Expected claim frequencies, severities, and ultimate loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year.
The importance of any single assumption depends on several considerations, such as the line of business and the accident year. If the actual experience emerges differently than the assumptions underlying the reserve process, changes in our reserve estimates are possible that may be material to the results of operations in future periods. Below are sensitivity tests highlighting potential impacts to loss and loss expense reserves for the major casualty lines of business under different scenarios. These tests consider each assumption and line of business individually, without any consideration of correlation between lines of business and accident years. Therefore, the results do not constitute an actuarial range. While the figures represent possible impacts from variations in certain key assumptions, there is no assurance that future loss and loss expense emergence will be consistent with either our current or alternative sets of assumptions.
While the sources of reserve variability are generated by different internal and external trends and operational changes, they ultimately manifest themselves as changes in the expected loss and loss expense development patterns. These patterns are a key assumption in the reserving process. In addition, the current accident year expected loss and loss expense ratios are also a key assumption. These ratios are developed through a rigorous process of projecting recent accident years' experience to an ultimate settlement basis. Then they are adjusted to the current accident year's pricing and loss cost levels. The impact from underwriting portfolio and claims handling practice changes are also quantified and reflected where appropriate. As with all estimates, the ultimate loss and loss expense ratios may differ from those currently estimated.
The sensitivities of loss and loss expense reserves to these key assumptions are illustrated below for the major casualty lines. The first table displays estimated impacts from changes in expected reported loss and loss expense development patterns for our major casualty lines of business. It shows line of business reserve impacts if the actual calendar year incurred amounts are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages. While judgmental, the selected percentages by line are based on the reserve range analysis and the actual historical reserve development for the line of business. The second table displays the estimated impacts from changes to the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year. It shows reserve impacts by line of business if the expected loss and loss expense ratios for the current accident year are greater or less than current expectations by the selected percentages.
40
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Expected Loss and Loss Expense Reporting Patterns | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Future Calendar Year Reported | Increase to Future Calendar Year Reported | |||||||
| General liability | 10 | % | $ | (155) | $ | 155 | ||||
| Workers compensation | 18 | (105) | 105 | |||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 15 | (90) | 90 | |||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 15 | (10) | 10 | |||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (45) | 45 |
| Reserve Impacts of Changes to Current Year Expected Ultimate Loss and Loss Expense Ratios | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | Percentage Decrease/Increase | (Decrease) to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Increase to Current Accident Year Expected Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||
| General liability | 10 | pts | $ | (80) | $ | 80 | ||||
| Workers compensation | 10 | (30) | 30 | |||||||
| Commercial automobile liability | 10 | (50) | 50 | |||||||
| Personal automobile liability | 10 | (10) | 10 | |||||||
| E&S casualty lines | 10 | (20) | 20 |
Note that there is some overlap between the impacts in the two tables. For example, increases in the calendar year development would ultimately impact our view of the current accident year's loss and loss expense ratios. However, these tables provide perspective on the sensitivity of each key assumption. While the changes represent outcomes based on reasonably likely changes to our underlying reserving assumptions, they do not represent a range of possible outcomes. Our reserves could increase or decrease significantly from what the tables above reflect.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
Our general liability, excess liability, and homeowners reserves include exposure to asbestos and environmental claims. The emergence of these claims occurs over an extended period and can be unpredictable. The total recorded net loss and loss expense reserves for these claims were $21.1 million as of December 31, 2021 and $21.4 million as of December 31, 2020, with asbestos claims constituting approximately 23% of these reserves in both years.
Environmental claims have arisen primarily from insured landfill exposures in municipal government and small non-manufacturing commercial risk, as well as leaking underground storage tanks within our homeowners policies. Asbestos claims have arisen primarily from policies issued to various distributors of asbestos-containing products, such as electrical and plumbing materials. We handle our asbestos and environmental claims in a centralized and specialized asbestos and environmental claim unit. That unit establishes case reserves on individual claims based on the facts and circumstances known at a given point in time, supplemented by bulk IBNR reserves.
Estimating IBNR reserves for asbestos and environmental claims is difficult because these claims have delayed and inconsistent reporting patterns. In addition, there are significant uncertainties associated with estimating critical reserve assumptions, such as average clean-up costs, third-party costs, potentially responsible party shares, allocation of damages, litigation and coverage costs, and potential state and federal legislative changes. Limiting our exposure to asbestos and environmental claims are (i) the fuel oil system exclusion on our New Jersey homeowners policies that we introduced in 2007, and (ii) the Insurance Services Office, Inc.'s Total Pollution Exclusion that was introduced in the mid-1980's, Prior to the mid-1980's, we primarily wrote Standard Personal Lines, which has also limited our exposure to asbestos and environmental claims.
Other Latent Exposures
We also have other latent and continuous trigger exposures in our ongoing portfolio. Examples include claims for construction defect and abuse or molestation, for which states have increased and expanded the statute of limitations. We manage our exposure to these liabilities through our underwriting and claims practices, and, a dedicated claims unit, similar to our handling of asbestos and environmental claims. The impact of social, political, and legal trends on these claims remains highly uncertain, so our related loss and loss expense reserves remain highly uncertain. These exposures remain in our ongoing portfolio, and as such, are reserved in aggregate, with other exposures within the line of business reserves.
41
Investment Valuation and the Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
Investment Valuation
Accounting guidance defines the fair value of our investment portfolio as the exit price, or the amount that would be (i) received to sell an asset or (ii) paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. When determining an exit price we must rely on observable market data, if available. Most securities in our equity portfolio have readily determinable fair values and are recorded at fair value with changes in unrealized gains or losses recognized through income. Our AFS fixed income securities portfolio is recorded at fair value, and the related unrealized gains or losses are reflected in stockholders' equity, net of tax. For our AFS fixed income securities portfolios, fair value is a key factor in the measurement of (i) losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell, and (ii) changes in the allowance for credit losses.
The fair value of approximately 96% of our investments measured at fair value are classified as either Level 1 or Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy and are priced using observable inputs for identical or similar assets. About 3% are classified as Level 3 and are based on unobservable market inputs because the related securities are not traded on a public market. For additional information, refer to the following within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K: (i) item (d) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" regarding descriptions of the levels within the fair value hierarchy and the valuation techniques used for our Level 3 securities, and (ii) Note 7. "Fair Value Measurements" for additional information on the unobservable inputs in our securities measured using Level 3 inputs.
Allowance for Credit Losses on AFS Fixed Income Securities
When fixed income securities are in an unrealized loss position and we do not intend to sell them, we record an allowance for credit losses for the portion of the unrealized loss related to an expected credit loss. We estimate expected credit losses on these securities by performing a discounted cash flow (“DCF”). The allowance for credit losses is the excess of amortized cost over the greater of (i) our estimate of the present value of expected future cash flows, or (ii) fair value. The allowance for credit losses cannot exceed the unrealized loss, and therefore it may fluctuate with changes in the security's fair value. We also consider the need to record losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for which we have the intent to sell.
We analyze unrealized losses for credit loss in accordance with our existing accounting policy, which includes performing DCF analyses on each security at the lot level and analyzing these DCFs using various economic scenarios. In performing these DCF analyses, we calculate the present value of future cash flows using various models specific to the major security types in our portfolio. These models use security-specific information and forecasted macroeconomic data to determine possible expected credit loss scenarios based on projected changes in the economy. The models contain forecasted economic data from the Federal Reserve Board’s annual supervisory stress test review on certain large banks and financial institutions. We also have the ability to incorporate internally-developed forecast information into the models as we deem appropriate. In developing our best estimate of the allowance for credit losses, we consider our outlook as to the probability of the various scenarios occurring.
Based on these analyses, we recorded an allowance for credit losses of $9.7 million in 2021 and $4.0 million in 2020 on our AFS fixed income securities portfolio. After considering the allowance for credit losses, the remaining unrealized losses on this portfolio were $17.4 million in 2021 and $11.5 million in 2020. If the security-specific and macroeconomic assumptions in our DCF analyses or our outlook as to the occurrence probability of our DCF model scenarios were to change, our allowance for credit losses and the resulting credit loss expense will negatively impact our results of operations. Factors considered in determining the allowance for credit losses require significant judgment, including our evaluation of the security's projected cash flow stream.
For additional information regarding our allowance for credit losses on AFS fixed income securities, see item (c) of Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" and item (i) of Note 5. "Investments" within Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K, respectively.
Reinsurance
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid loss and loss expense represent our estimates of the amounts we will recover from reinsurers. Each reinsurance contract is analyzed to ensure that sufficient risk is transferred to record the transactions appropriately as reinsurance in the Financial Statements. Amounts recovered from reinsurers are recognized as assets contemporaneously and in a manner consistent with the paid and unpaid losses associated with the reinsured policies. An allowance for credit losses on our reinsurance recoverable balance is recorded based on an evaluation of balances due from reinsurers and other available information, including collateral we hold under the terms and conditions of the underlying agreements. Reinsurers often purchase and rely on their own retrocessional reinsurance programs to manage their capital position and improve their financial strength ratings. Details about retrocessional reinsurance programs are not always transparent, making it difficult to assess our reinsurers' exposure to counterparty credit risk. Our reinsurer's credit quality is
42
also impacted by other factors, such as their reserve adequacy, investment portfolio, regulatory capital position, catastrophe aggregations, and risk management expertise. In addition, contractual language interpretations and willingness to pay valid claims can impact our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance. Our allowance for estimated uncollectible reinsurance totaled $1.6 million at December 31, 2021, and $1.8 million at December 31, 2020. We continually monitor developments that may impact recoverability from our reinsurers, for which we have contractual remedies if necessary. For further information regarding reinsurance, see the “Reinsurance” section below in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" and Note 9. “Reinsurance” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
| Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 20191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2021 | 2020 | vs. 2020 | 2019 | vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Financial Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues | $ | 3,379,164 | 2,922,274 | 16 | % | $ | 2,846,491 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
| After-tax net investment income | 263,000 | 184,612 | 42 | 181,161 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||
| After-tax underwriting income | 172,688 | 107,716 | 60 | 129,554 | (17) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income before federal income tax | 505,310 | 302,988 | 67 | 336,390 | (10) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 403,837 | 246,355 | 64 | 271,623 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | 394,484 | 246,355 | 60 | 271,623 | (9) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Key Metrics: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 92.8 | % | 94.9 | (2.1) | pts | 93.7 | % | 1.2 | pts | |||||||||||||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | $ | 2.88 | 2.96 | (3) | % | $ | 3.05 | (3) | % | |||||||||||||||
| Return on average common equity ("ROE") | 14.8 | % | 10.4 | 4.4 | pts | 13.6 | (3.2) | pts | ||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written to statutory surplus ratio | 1.33 | x | 1.30 | 0.03 | pts | 1.39 | (0.09) | pts | ||||||||||||||||
| Per Common Share Amounts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diluted net income per share | $ | 6.50 | 4.09 | 59 | % | $ | 4.53 | (10) | % | |||||||||||||||
| Book value per share | 46.24 | 42.38 | 9 | 36.91 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared per share to common stockholders | 1.03 | 0.94 | 10 | 0.83 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP Information: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income2 | $ | 380,580 | 249,686 | 52 | % | $ | 264,418 | (6) | % | |||||||||||||||
| Diluted non-GAAP operating income per common share2 | 6.27 | 4.15 | 51 | 4.40 | (6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE2 | 14.3 | % | 10.5 | 3.8 | pts | 13.3 | % | (2.8) | pts |
1Refer to the Glossary of Terms attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 99.1 for definitions of terms used in this financial review.
2Non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE are measures comparable to net income available to common stockholders, net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE, respectively, but exclude after-tax net realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments, and after-tax debt retirement costs. They are used as important financial measures by us, analysts, and investors because the timing of realized investment gains and losses on sales of securities in any given period is largely discretionary. In addition, net realized and unrealized investment gains and losses on investments that are charged to earnings and the debt retirement costs could distort the analysis of trends.
Reconciliations of net income available to common stockholders, net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share, and ROE to non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share, and non-GAAP operating ROE, respectively, are provided in the tables below:
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to non-GAAP operating income | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| Net income available to common stockholders | $ | 394,484 | 246,355 | 271,623 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses, before tax | (17,599) | 4,217 | (14,422) | ||||||
| Debt retirement costs, before tax | — | — | 4,175 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 3,695 | (886) | 3,042 | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income | $ | 380,580 | 249,686 | 264,418 |
| Reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share to non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share | $ | 6.50 | 4.09 | 4.53 | |||||
| Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses, before tax | (0.29) | 0.07 | (0.24) | ||||||
| Debt retirement costs, before tax | — | — | 0.07 | ||||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.06 | (0.01) | 0.04 | ||||||
| Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share | $ | 6.27 | 4.15 | 4.40 |
43
| Reconciliation of ROE to non-GAAP operating ROE | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.8 | % | 10.4 | 13.6 | ||||
| Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses, before tax | (0.7) | 0.2 | (0.7) | |||||
| Debt retirement costs, before tax | — | — | 0.2 | |||||
| Tax on reconciling items | 0.2 | (0.1) | 0.2 | |||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.3 | % | 10.5 | 13.3 |
The components of our ROE and non-GAAP operating ROE are as follows:
| ROE Components | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | vs. 2020 | 2019 | vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Standard Commercial Lines segment | 5.9 | % | 5.1 | 0.8 | pts | 5.8 | (0.7) | pts | |||||||||||
| Standard Personal Lines segment | 0.1 | (0.5) | 0.6 | 0.3 | (0.8) | ||||||||||||||
| E&S Lines segment | 0.5 | — | 0.5 | 0.4 | (0.4) | ||||||||||||||
| Total insurance operations | 6.5 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 6.5 | (1.9) | ||||||||||||||
| Investment income | 9.9 | 7.8 | 2.1 | 9.1 | (1.3) | ||||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | 0.5 | (0.1) | 0.6 | 0.5 | (0.6) | ||||||||||||||
| Total investments segment | 10.4 | 7.7 | 2.7 | 9.6 | (1.9) | ||||||||||||||
| Debt retirement costs | — | — | — | (0.2) | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | (2.1) | (1.9) | (0.2) | (2.3) | 0.4 | ||||||||||||||
| ROE | 14.8 | % | 10.4 | 4.4 | 13.6 | (3.2) | |||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized (gains) losses, after tax | (0.5) | 0.1 | (0.6) | (0.5) | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||
| Debt retirement costs, after tax | — | — | — | 0.2 | (0.2) | ||||||||||||||
| Non-GAAP operating ROE | 14.3 | % | 10.5 | 3.8 | 13.3 | (2.8) |
In 2021, we met the challenges associated with (i) the economic and societal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, (ii) higher inflation, (iii) severe natural catastrophes, and (iv) a competitive labor market and delivered another exceptional year of results. We generated our eighth consecutive year of double-digit non-GAAP operating ROEs, with a 14.3% non-GAAP operating ROE, above our full-year 2021 target of 11% and our 2020 non-GAAP operating ROE of 10.5%. Our 2021 results included exceptional growth in revenues and a record level of net income available to common stockholders per diluted common share as discussed below. Our ongoing financial success led to an AM Best Company ("AM Best") rating upgrade to “A+” (Superior) from "A" (Excellent) in November 2021, reflecting our financial strength, accomplishments, and future prospects.
In 2021, we grew book value per common share by 9%. This increase reflected $6.50 per diluted common share of net income available to common stockholders, partially offset by $2.07 of lower unrealized gains on our fixed income securities portfolio and $1.03 in dividends paid to our common stockholders. Non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share of $6.27 in 2021, increased $2.12, or 51%, compared to 2020, with the increase driven by strong contributions from both underwriting and net investment income.
The increase in non-GAAP operating income per diluted common share in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily driven by (i) a 60% increase in after-tax underwriting income to $172.7 million, or $2.85 per share, resulting from a decrease in net catastrophe losses of $1.02 due to industry-wide U.S. catastrophe loss activity in 2020 that significantly exceeded the 10-year historical median, and (ii) a 42% increase in after-tax net investment income to $263 million, or $4.34 per share. The $1.28 per share increase in after-tax net investment income in 2021 was driven by a $1.19 per share increase in after-tax net investment income from our alternative investments within our other investments portfolio. These strong alternative investment returns principally reflect our private equity holdings and the results were driven by strong corporate earnings and robust valuations.
Outlook
For 2022, we have established a non-GAAP operating ROE target of 11%. We have based our 2022 target on (i) our current estimated weighted average cost of capital ("WACC"), (ii) an approximate 350 basis point spread over our estimated WACC, (iii) the current interest rate environment, and (iv) property and casualty insurance market conditions. Our 2022 11% ROE target sets a high bar for our financial performance, challenges us to perform at our best, and aligns our incentive compensation structure with shareholder interests. We entered 2022 in the strongest financial position in our 95-year history, with having a record level of GAAP equity, statutory capital and surplus, and holding company cash and investments. We are well positioned to continue executing on our strategic objectives and delivering growth and profitability.
44
Our focus in 2022 will be on several areas to position us for ongoing success:
•Delivering on our strategy for continued disciplined and profitable growth by:
◦Continuing to expand our Standard Commercial Lines market share by (i) increasing our share towards our 12% target of our agents' premiums, (ii) strategically appointing new agents, and (iii) maximizing new business growth in the small business market through utilization of our enhanced small business platform;
◦Expanding our geographic footprint, with a plan to commence writing Standard Commercial Lines business in the states of Vermont, Alabama, and Idaho, subject to regulatory approvals, in the near-term, and other states over time;
◦Increasing customer retention by delivering a superior omnichannel experience and offering value-added technologies and services;
◦Shifting our focus towards targeting new and renewal customers in the mass affluent market within our Standard Personal Lines segment, where we believe we can be more competitive with the strong coverage and servicing capabilities that we offer; and
◦Deploying our new underwriting platform in our E&S segment that will improve agents' ease of interactions with us.
•Continuing to achieve written renewal pure price increases, along with underwriting improvements, that are in line with expected loss trend, while delivering on our strategy for continued disciplined growth.
•Continuing to build on a culture centered on the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion that fosters innovation, idea
generation, and developing a group of specially trained leaders who can guide us successfully into the future.
For 2022, our full-year guidance is as follows:
•A GAAP combined ratio, excluding catastrophe losses, of 91.0%. Our combined ratio estimate assumes no prior-year casualty reserve development;
•Net catastrophe losses of 4.0 points on the combined ratio;
•After-tax net investment income of $200 million that includes $20 million in after-tax net investment income from our alternative investments;
•An overall effective tax rate of approximately 20.5% that assumes an effective tax rate of 19.5% for net investment income and 21.0% for all other items; and
•Weighted average shares of 61 million on a fully diluted basis.
45
Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment
Insurance Operations
The following table provides quantitative information for analyzing the combined ratio:
| All Lines | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance Operations Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net premiums written ("NPW") | $ | 3,189,713 | 2,773,092 | 15 | % | $ | 2,679,424 | 3 | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 3,017,253 | 2,681,814 | 13 | 2,597,171 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 1,813,984 | 1,635,823 | 11 | 1,551,491 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 979,537 | 905,830 | 8 | 876,567 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 5,140 | 3,812 | 35 | 5,120 | (26) | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 218,592 | 136,349 | 60 | % | $ | 163,993 | (17) | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 60.1 | % | 61.0 | (0.9) | pts | 59.7 | % | 1.3 | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 32.5 | 33.8 | (1.3) | 33.8 | — | |||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 92.8 | 94.9 | (2.1) | 93.7 | 1.2 |
The 15% NPW growth in 2021 compared to the prior-year period reflects our strong relationships with best-in-class distribution partners, sophisticated underwriting and pricing tools, and excellent customer servicing capabilities. This solid growth included (i) renewal pure price increases, and (ii) new business growth, as follows
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Direct new business | $ | 648.5 | 579.7 | 12 | % | $ | 548.7 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 4.9 | % | 4.3 | 0.6 | pts | 3.7 | % | 0.6 | pts |
In addition, our strong NPW growth in 2021 benefited from exposure growth driven by robust economic activity in the U.S., which resulted in our customers increasing their sales, payrolls, and exposure units, all of which favorably impacted our NPW.
The growth in 2021 was further impacted by the 2020 COVID-19-related $75 million estimate of return audit and mid-term endorsement premium and $19.7 million of premium credits to our personal and commercial automobile customers, which reduced NPW by $94.7 million in 2020. The reduction in NPW in 2020 from COVID-19-related adjustments had the impact of increasing our 2021 NPW growth rate by 4 percentage points.
Consistent with the impacts to NPW, the increase in NPE in 2021 compared to 2020 reflected the items discussed above.
Loss and Loss Expenses
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 0.9 points in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to (i) non-catastrophe and catastrophe property loss and loss expenses, (ii) prior year casualty reserve development, and (iii) the current year loss and loss expense ratio, which is detailed as follows:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Loss and Loss Expenses | Net Catastrophe Losses | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Change in Ratio | |||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 471.7 | 15.6 | pts | $ | 164.2 | 5.4 | pts | 21.0 | (2.3) | |||||||||
| 2020 | 410.0 | 15.3 | 215.4 | 8.0 | 23.3 | 4.4 | |||||||||||||
| 2019 | 410.5 | 15.8 | 81.0 | 3.1 | 18.9 | (1.3) |
Net catastrophe losses of 5.4 points in 2021 and 8.0 points in 2020 were higher than our longer-term net catastrophe loss averages. Catastrophe losses in 2021 included gross losses of $53 million from Hurricane Ida, or net losses of approximately $41 million, or 1.4 points, after factoring in the benefit from our Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Treaty, which attaches at $40 million. The structure of our Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss Treaty is detailed in the "Reinsurance" section in "Results of Operations and Related Information by Segment" of this MD&A. The majority of the Hurricane Ida losses, which included meaningful property losses from damage to personal and commercial automobiles, occurred in New Jersey and the
46
surrounding states. Losses in 2020 were mainly driven by a tornado and subsequent hail event that impacted Tennessee in March, two large storms in April, civil unrest claims, the Midwestern derecho, and Hurricane Isaias.
| ($ in millions) | Favorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Change in Ratio | |||||
| 2021 | (81.0) | (2.7) | pts | 0.5 | ||||
| 2020 | (85.0) | (3.2) | (0.9) | |||||
| 2019 | (61.0) | (2.3) | (0.6) |
Details of the prior year casualty reserve development were as follows:
| (Favorable)/Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||
| General liability | $ | (29.0) | (35.0) | (5.0) | ||||
| Commercial automobile | 15.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | |||||
| Workers compensation | (58.0) | (60.0) | (68.0) | |||||
| Businessowners' policies | (2.0) | — | — | |||||
| Total Standard Commercial Lines | (74.0) | (85.0) | (69.0) | |||||
| Personal automobile | — | — | 6.0 | |||||
| Total Standard Personal Lines | — | — | 6.0 | |||||
| E&S | (7.0) | — | 2.0 | |||||
| Total (favorable) prior year casualty reserve development | $ | (81.0) | (85.0) | (61.0) | ||||
| (Favorable) impact on loss ratio | (2.7) | pts | (3.2) | (2.3) |
In addition to the prior year casualty reserve development, the current year loss and loss expense ratio was 0.9 points higher in 2021 compared to 2020. In 2020, we experienced lower claims frequencies in our commercial and personal automobile lines of business reflecting reductions in miles driven due to the pandemic environment, which benefited our loss ratio in 2020. Although some benefit continued in 2021, it was not as significant as in 2020.
For additional qualitative reserve development discussion, refer to the insurance segment sections below.
Underwriting Expenses
The underwriting expense ratio decreased 1.3 points in 2021 compared to 2020. The underwriting expense ratio in 2020 was elevated by 1.1 points for COVID-19-related items. The decrease in the underwriting expense ratio in 2021 reflects the absence of these COVID-19-related impacts, as well as a continued below-normal travel and entertainment expense levels due to most of 2021's pandemic-related limited business travel. The COVID-19-related items included in 2020 results were as follows: (i) lower NPE from the estimate of return audit and mid-term endorsement premium and premium credits given to our personal and commercial automobile customer; and (ii) a $13.5 million increase to our allowance for credit losses on premiums receivable.
47
Standard Commercial Lines Segment
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 2,593,018 | 2,230,636 | 16 | % | $ | 2,137,071 | 4 | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 2,443,885 | 2,143,184 | 14 | 2,049,614 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 1,426,768 | 1,245,627 | 15 | 1,187,856 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 813,381 | 742,014 | 10 | 710,648 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders | 5,140 | 3,812 | 35 | 5,120 | (26) | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 198,596 | 151,731 | 31 | % | $ | 145,990 | 4 | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 58.4 | % | 58.1 | 0.3 | pts | 58.0 | % | 0.1 | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 33.3 | 34.6 | (1.3) | 34.7 | (0.1) | |||||||||||||
| Dividends to policyholders ratio | 0.2 | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | — | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 91.9 | 92.9 | (1.0) | 92.9 | — |
NPW growth of 16% in this segment in 2021 compared to 2020 reflected (i) renewal pure price increases, (ii) new business growth, and (iii) stable retention as follows:
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||
| Direct new business | $ | 469.9 | $ | 421.1 | ||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | |||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 5.3 | 4.4 |
Consistent with our overall insurance operations, NPW growth in 2021 (i) benefited from exposure growth, and (ii) was positively impacted by approximately four points due to the following 2020 COVID-19 related items that did not reoccur in 2021:
•A $75 million estimate of return audit and mid-term endorsement premium that reduced 2020 NPW.
•A $15.4 million premium credit to our commercial automobile customers that reduced 2020 NPW.
Consistent with the impacts to NPW, the increase in NPE in 2021 compared to 2020 reflected the items discussed above.
The 0.3-point increase in the loss and loss expense ratio in 2021 compared to 2020 was driven by the following:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Losses | Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 340.7 | 13.9 | pts | $ | 104.1 | 4.3 | pts | 18.2 | (1.1) | ||||||||
| 2020 | 296.2 | 13.8 | 117.8 | 5.5 | 19.3 | 2.9 |
Our losses in 2021 and 2020 included elevated levels of catastrophe losses, with 4.3 points this year and 5.5 points last year. Both years compared unfavorably to our longer-term catastrophe loss average for this segment. Catastrophe losses for this segment are consistent with the discussion in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2021 | $ | (74.0) | (3.0) | pts | 1.0 | |||||
| 2020 | (85.0) | (4.0) | (0.6) |
In addition to the prior year casualty reserve development above, current year casualty loss costs were 0.4 points higher in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by our commercial automobile line of business, which experienced an increase in claim frequencies as driving patterns continued to evolve in the COVID-19 environment, despite still being below our 2019 pre-pandemic levels. In 2020, we experienced lower claim frequencies in our commercial automobile line of business due to the pandemic environment. Lower claims frequencies and lower non-catastrophe property losses provided an offset to the $15.4 million premium credit to customers in 2020.
48
For quantitative information on the prior year development by line of business, see "Financial Highlights of Results for Years Ended December 2021, 2020, and 2019" above and for qualitative information about the significant drivers of this development, see the line of business discussions below.
The Standard Commercial Lines underwriting expense ratio decreased 1.3-points in 2021 compared to 2020. The ratio was elevated in 2020 by 1.2 points for COVID-19-related items, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above. The decrease in the 2021 underwriting expense ratio reflects the absence of these COVID-19-related impacts.
The following is a discussion of our most significant Standard Commercial Lines of business:
| General Liability | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2019 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 859,284 | 716,119 | 20 | % | $ | 699,262 | 2 | % | |||||||||
| Direct new business | 139,255 | 122,159 | 14 | 119,055 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Retention | 85 | % | 85 | — | pts | 83 | % | 2 | pts | |||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 4.4 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 1.1 | |||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 807,158 | 694,019 | 16 | % | $ | 669,895 | 4 | % | |||||||||
| Underwriting income | 123,450 | 103,262 | 20 | 69,932 | 48 | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 84.7 | 85.1 | (0.4) | 89.6 | (4.5) | |||||||||||||
| % of total standard commercial NPW | 33 | 32 | 33 |
NPW grew 20% in 2021 due to renewal pure price increases, exposure growth, and higher direct new business. NPW growth in 2021 also included a 7-point benefit from the 2020 COVID-19-related $46 million estimate of return audit and mid-term endorsement premium recorded on this line in the first quarter of 2020, which did not reoccur in 2021.
The combined ratio decreased 0.4 points in 2021, driven principally by a decrease in the underwriting expense ratio of 1.5 points, the drivers of which are consistent with the items discussed in the Standard Commercial Lines Segment above.
Partially offsetting this decrease in the combined ratio was less favorable prior year casualty reserve development compared to 2020, as outlined in the table below.
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2021 | $ | (29.0) | (3.6) | pts | 1.4 | |||||
| 2020 | (35.0) | (5.0) | 4.3 |
In 2021, the prior year reserve development was primarily attributable to favorable reserve development on loss severities in accident years 2018 and prior. In 2020, the prior year reserve development was primarily attributable to favorable reserve development on loss severities in accident years 2017 and prior. While this line experienced favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2021 and 2020, it is also exposed to changes in economic and social trends, including litigation propensity and outcomes, and changes in state laws such as those that extend the statute of limitations or open windows for previously time-barred actions.
| Commercial Automobile | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 767,723 | 658,930 | 17 | % | $ | 590,011 | 12 | % | |||||||||
| Direct new business | 115,088 | 112,893 | 2 | 102,956 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 86 | — | pts | 83 | % | 3 | pts | |||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 8.3 | 8.1 | 0.2 | 7.5 | 0.6 | |||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 724,398 | 615,181 | 18 | % | $ | 554,256 | 11 | % | |||||||||
| Underwriting loss | (23,335) | (3,126) | (646) | (43,797) | 93 | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 103.2 | 100.5 | 2.7 | 107.9 | (7.4) | |||||||||||||
| % of total standard commercial NPW | 30 | 30 | 28 |
NPW growth of 17% benefited from renewal pure price increases and higher direct new business, as shown in the table above. Additionally, NPW growth in 2021 included (i) exposure growth, and (ii) a 3-point benefit from the 2020 COVID-19-related
49
$15.4 million premium credit to our commercial automobile customers in the second quarter of 2020, which did not reoccur in 2021.
The 2.7-point increase in the combined ratio in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily driven by the items in the tables shown below.
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Losses | Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 125.2 | 17.3 | pts | $ | 9.8 | 1.4 | pts | 18.7 | 3.1 | ||||||||
| 2020 | 92.2 | 15.0 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 15.6 | (3.0) |
| ($ in millions) | Unfavorable Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/ Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 15.0 | 2.1 | pts | 0.5 | |||||
| 2020 | 10.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 |
The 2021 and 2020 prior year casualty reserve development was primarily attributable to unfavorable reserve development on loss severities in accident years 2016 through 2019. The 2020 prior year casualty reserve development also experienced higher than expected frequencies in accident year 2019.
In addition to the items in the table above, the combined ratio variances included the following:
•A 1.4-point increase in the current year casualty loss costs in 2021 compared to 2020, driven primarily by increased claim frequencies in 2021 due to driving patterns that continue to evolve in the COVID-19 environment compared to 2020. Last year experienced lower claim frequencies reflecting reductions in miles driven due to the COVID-19-related driving pattern shifts impacting this line of business. Lower claims frequencies and lower non-catastrophe property losses provided an offset to the $15.4 million of premium credits to customers in 2020.
•A 2.2-point decrease in the underwriting expense ratio in 2021 compared to 2020, the drivers of which are consistent with the items discussed in the Standard Commercial Lines Segment above.
This line of business remains an area of focus for us and most of the industry, as profitability challenges continue to generate
combined ratios higher than risk-adjusted targets. We will continue to (i) actively implement price increases consistent with levels experienced in 2021 and 2020, (ii) enhance our underwriting tools to further improve the accuracy of our rating information to prevent premium leakage, and (iii) actively manage our new and renewal business.
| Workers Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 317,035 | 270,168 | 17 | % | $ | 309,322 | (13) | % | |||||||||
| Direct new business | 59,938 | 51,078 | 17 | 60,139 | (15) | |||||||||||||
| Retention | 86 | % | 84 | 2 | pts | 84 | % | — | pts | |||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases (decreases) | 0.1 | (2.0) | 2.1 | (2.8) | 0.8 | |||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 306,428 | 278,062 | 10 | % | $ | 311,370 | (11) | % | |||||||||
| Underwriting income | 78,537 | 70,897 | 11 | 80,630 | (12) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 74.4 | 74.5 | (0.1) | 74.1 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||
| % of total standard commercial NPW | 12 | 12 | 14 |
NPW increased 17% in 2021 compared to 2020 due to higher retention, exposure growth, and increased direct new business. Additionally, NPW growth in 2021 included an 11-point benefit due to the 2020 COVID-19-related $29 million estimate of return audit and mid-term endorsement premium recorded on this line in the first quarter of 2020 that did not reoccur in 2021.
The decrease in the combined ratio in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to: (i) a decrease in the underwriting expense ratio of 1.7 points, the drivers of which are consistent with the items discussed in the Standard Commercial Lines Segment above; and (ii) a 1.4-point reduction in the current year casualty loss costs. This reduction was in recognition of the favorable frequency trends and sustained lower medical severity trends impacting this line.
50
Partially offsetting the decreases in the combined ratio was less favorable prior year casualty reserve development compared to 2020, as follows:
| ($ in millions) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | Unfavorable/(Favorable) Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2021 | $ | (58.0) | (18.9) | pts | 2.7 | |||||
| 2020 | (60.0) | (21.6) | 0.2 |
For both periods, the favorable reserve development was due to continued favorable medical severity trends impacting accident years 2019 and prior. Due to the length of time injured workers can receive related medical treatment, decreases in medical inflation can cause favorable loss development across an extended number of accident years.
| Commercial Property | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 470,043 | 413,194 | 14 | % | $ | 373,809 | 11 | % | |||||||||
| Direct new business | 108,418 | 94,697 | 14 | 88,527 | 7 | |||||||||||||
| Retention | 84 | % | 84 | — | pts | 82 | % | 2 | pts | |||||||||
| Renewal pure price increases | 6.0 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 1.3 | |||||||||||||
| NPE | $ | 436,412 | 388,120 | 12 | % | $ | 353,834 | 10 | % | |||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | 10,515 | (21,296) | (149) | 21,639 | (198) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 97.6 | 105.5 | (7.9) | 93.9 | 11.6 | |||||||||||||
| % of total standard commercial NPW | 18 | 19 | 17 |
NPW growth of 14% in this line in 2021 compared to 2020 was driven by renewal pure price increases, exposure growth, and higher new business.
Quantitative information regarding property losses is as follows:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Losses | Catastrophe Losses | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | |||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 182.5 | 41.8 | pts | $ | 79.3 | 18.2 | pts | 60.0 | (6.7) | ||||||||
| 2020 | 168.6 | 43.4 | 90.2 | 23.3 | 66.7 | 11.7 |
Our losses in 2021 and 2020 included elevated levels of catastrophe losses, with 18.2 points this year and 23.3 points last year. Both years compare unfavorably to our longer-term catastrophe loss average for this line of business. Catastrophe losses for this segment are consistent with the discussion in the "Insurance Operations" section above.
Standard Personal Lines Segment
| 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Insurance Segments Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 292,265 | 295,166 | (1) | % | $ | 304,592 | (3) | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 293,559 | 299,140 | (2) | 307,739 | (3) | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 212,116 | 233,260 | (9) | 211,300 | 10 | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 77,477 | 81,388 | (5) | 88,179 | (8) | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income | $ | 3,966 | (15,508) | (126) | % | $ | 8,260 | (288) | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 72.2 | % | 78.0 | (5.8) | pts | 68.6 | % | 9.4 | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 26.4 | 27.2 | (0.8) | 28.7 | (1.5) | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 98.6 | 105.2 | (6.6) | 97.3 | 7.9 |
NPW declined 1% in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily driven by a reduction in direct new business and slightly lower retention, both of which were impacted by the challenging personal automobile competitive environment. This decrease was
51
partially offset by the impact of the COVID-19 related premium credits to our personal automobile customers, which reduced NPW by $4.3 million in 2020 and added one point of growth in 2021 compared to 2020, as these premium credits did not reoccur in 2021. In the third quarter of 2021, we transitioned our personal lines strategy to targeting new and renewal customers in the mass affluent market where we believe our strong coverage and servicing capabilities can be more competitive.
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct new business premiums1 | $ | 40.9 | $ | 44.7 | |||
| Retention | 82 | % | 83 | ||||
| Renewal pure price increases on NPW | 1.0 | 2.5 |
1Excludes our flood direct premiums written, which is 100% ceded to the NFIP and therefore has no impact on our NPW.
The reduction in NPE in 2021 compared to 2020 reflects the decreases in NPW discussed above.
The loss and loss expense ratio decreased 5.8 points in 2021 compared to 2020, the primary drivers of which were as follows:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Losses | Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 102.8 | 35.0 | pts | $ | 37.4 | 12.7 | pts | 47.7 | (6.9) | ||||||||
| 2020 | 86.0 | 28.7 | 77.5 | 25.9 | 54.6 | 13.8 |
Our 2021 losses were impacted by 44 events that were designated as catastrophes by Property Claims Services ("PCS"), an internationally recognized authority on insured catastrophe property losses, including two severe thunderstorms accompanied by wind and hail occurring in March and June, Hurricane Ida in late August and early September, and a series of severe tornadoes that swept the Midwest in December. Our 2020 losses were impacted by 38 events that PCS designated as catastrophes, including a tornado affecting Tennessee in March, two severe April storms with damaging winds and tornadoes affecting the Midwestern states, Hurricane Isaias in late July and early August, and the August derecho in the Midwest.
There was no prior year casualty reserve development in either 2021 and 2020. However, current year casualty loss costs were 1.2 points higher in 2021 compared to 2020, driven by our personal automobile line of business, reflecting increases in claim frequencies as driving patterns continued to evolve in the COVID-19 environment.
The underwriting expense ratio decreased 0.8-points in 2021 compared to 2020. The ratio was elevated in 2020 by 1.0 points for COVID-19-related items, as discussed in the "Insurance Operations" section above. The decrease in the underwriting expense ratio in 2021 reflects the absence of these COVID-19-related impacts.
E&S Lines Segment
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2019 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insurance Segments Results: | ||||||||||||||||||
| NPW | $ | 304,430 | 247,290 | 23 | % | $ | 237,761 | 4 | % | |||||||||
| NPE | 279,809 | 239,490 | 17 | 239,818 | — | |||||||||||||
| Less: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense incurred | 175,100 | 156,936 | 12 | 152,335 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Net underwriting expenses incurred | 88,679 | 82,428 | 8 | 77,740 | 6 | |||||||||||||
| Underwriting income (loss) | $ | 16,030 | 126 | 12,622 | % | $ | 9,743 | (99) | % | |||||||||
| Combined Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loss and loss expense ratio | 62.6 | % | 65.5 | (2.9) | pts | 63.5 | % | 2.0 | pts | |||||||||
| Underwriting expense ratio | 31.7 | 34.4 | (2.7) | 32.4 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||
| Combined ratio | 94.3 | 99.9 | (5.6) | 95.9 | 4.0 |
The strong NPW growth of 23% in 2021 was due to increases in direct new business, renewal pure price, and exposure growth driven by favorable market conditions in E&S lines in the U.S.
52
Quantitative information is as follows:
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall renewal price increases | 6.5 | % | 6.2 | |||
| Direct new business premiums | $ | 137.7 | 113.9 |
The increase in NPE in 2021 compared to 2020 reflects the increases in NPW discussed above.
The 2.9-point decrease in the loss and loss expense ratio in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily attributable to favorable prior year casualty reserve development and a decrease in property losses. This was partially offset by an increase in current year casualty loss costs of 1.4 points, driven primarily by increased claim frequencies in 2021 compared to the decreased levels experienced in 2020.
Quantitative information regarding our property losses and prior year casualty reserve development are as follows:
| ($ in millions) | Non-Catastrophe Property Losses | Catastrophe Losses | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | Total Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | $ | 28.2 | 10.1 | pts | $ | 22.7 | 8.1 | pts | 18.2 | (1.8) | ||||||||
| 2020 | 27.9 | 11.6 | 20.0 | 8.4 | 20.0 | 8.3 |
Our 2021 losses were impacted by 50 events that PCS designated as catastrophes, including Winter Storm Uri affecting Texas in February, a series of large storms affecting the Southern and Midwestern states in May, and Hurricane Ida in late August and early September. Our 2020 losses were impacted by 49 events that PCS designated as catastrophes, including the civil unrest throughout the country in June and Hurricane Laura in August.
| ($ in millions) | (Favorable) Prior Year Casualty Reserve Development | (Favorable)/Unfavorable Year-Over-Year Change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For the year ended December 31, | Loss and Loss Expense Incurred | Impact on Loss and Loss Expense Ratio | ||||||||
| 2021 | $ | (7.0) | (2.5) | pts | (2.5) | |||||
| 2020 | — | — | (0.8) |
The favorable prior year casualty reserve development in 2021 was primarily attributable to lower loss severities in accident years 2016 and prior. There was no prior year casualty reserve development in 2020.
The 2.7-point decrease in the underwriting expense ratio in 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily driven by: (i) a decrease in labor expenses of 1.5 points and (ii) a decrease in compensation to our distribution partners of 0.6 points from changes in premium mix and corresponding commission rates. In addition, the underwriting expense ratio in 2020 was elevated by 0.9 points for the COVID-19-related increase in our allowance for credit losses on premiums receivable, as discussed in "Insurance Operations" above. The decrease in the underwriting expense ratio in 2021 reflects the absence of this COVID-19-related impact.
Reinsurance
We use reinsurance to protect our capital resources and insure against losses on property and casualty risks that we underwrite in excess of the amount that we are prepared to accept. We use two main reinsurance vehicles: (i) a reinsurance pooling agreement among our Insurance Subsidiaries through which each company agrees to share in premiums and losses based on certain specified percentages; and (ii) reinsurance contracts and arrangements with third parties that cover various policies that we issue to our customers.
Reinsurance Pooling Agreement
The primary purposes of the Insurance Subsidiaries' reinsurance pooling agreement are to:
•Pool or share proportionately the underwriting profit and loss results of property and casualty insurance underwriting operations through reinsurance;
•Reduce administration expenses; and
53
•Permit all the Insurance Subsidiaries to obtain a uniform rating from AM Best.
The following illustrates the pooling percentages by Insurance Subsidiary as of December 31, 2021:
| Insurance Subsidiary | Pooling Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Selective Insurance Company of America ("SICA") | 32.0% | |
| Selective Way Insurance Company ("SWIC") | 21.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina ("SICSC") | 9.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of the Southeast ("SICSE") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New York ("SICNY") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Casualty Insurance Company ("SCIC") | 7.0% | |
| Selective Auto Insurance Company of New Jersey ("SAICNJ") | 6.0% | |
| Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company ("MUSIC") | 5.0% | |
| Selective Insurance Company of New England ("SICNE") | 3.0% | |
| Selective Fire and Casualty Insurance Company ("SFCIC") | 3.0% |
Reinsurance Treaties and Arrangements
By entering into reinsurance treaties and arrangements, we can increase our underwriting capacity, accepting larger individual risks and aggregations of risks without directly increasing our capital or statutory surplus. Our reinsurance program principally consists of traditional reinsurance. Under our reinsurance treaties, we cede to our reinsurers a portion of our incurred losses from an individual policy or group of policies in exchange for a portion of the premium on those policies. Amounts not reinsured below a specified dollar threshold are known as retention. Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from liability under the terms and limits of our policies, but it does make our reinsurers liable to us for the amount of liability we cede to them. Our reinsurers often rely on their own reinsurance programs, or retrocessions, to manage their large loss exposures. The size of the global reinsurance community is relatively small. If our reinsurers are unable to collect on their retrocessional programs, it may impair their ability to pay us for the amounts we cede to them.
Consequently, our reinsurers present us with direct, indirect, and contingent counterparty credit risk. We attempt to mitigate this credit risk by (i) pursuing relationships with reinsurers rated “A-” or higher by AM Best and/or (ii) obtaining collateral to secure reinsurance obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties permit us to terminate or commute them – or require the reinsurer to post collateral if the reinsurer's financial condition or rating deteriorates. We monitor our reinsurers' financial condition, and we review the quality of reinsurance recoverables and reserves for uncollectible reinsurance. For additional information regarding our reinsurance counterparty credit risk, see Note 9. "Reinsurance" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
We have reinsurance contracts that separately cover our property and casualty insurance business that can be segregated into the following key categories:
•Property Reinsurance, which includes our (i) property excess of loss treaties purchased for protection against large individual property losses and (ii) property catastrophe treaties purchased to provide protection for the overall property portfolio against severe catastrophic events. We also purchase a limited amount of facultative reinsurance, primarily for large individual property risks greater than our property excess of loss treaty capacity.
•Casualty Reinsurance, which provides protection for both individual large casualty losses and catastrophic casualty losses involving multiple claimants or insureds. We also may use facultative reinsurance for large individual casualty risks in excess of our treaty capacity. We may also purchase quota share capacity for certain new or higher severity casualty lines of business.
•Terrorism Reinsurance, which provides a federal reinsurance backstop, behind the protection built into our property and casualty reinsurance treaties, for terrorism losses covered under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (“TRIPRA”). For further information about TRIPRA, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K.
•Flood Reinsurance, for which all of the premiums and losses related to our participation in the WYO (for which we also receive a servicing fee) are 100% ceded to the federal government.
Property Reinsurance
We renewed our main property catastrophe treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S business, effective January 1, 2022. For this treaty, we purchased an additional $50 million in limit to respond to our growing property portfolio, thereby
54
extending the coverage to $835 million in excess of the $40 million retention. Due to growth in our E&S property book of business, more challenging market conditions, and our recent and planned Standard Commercial Lines geographic expansion, we restructured our non-footprint catastrophe treaty from a $35 million in excess of $5 million structure covering a limited number of states to a $30 million in excess of $10 million treaty, covering all 50 states and the District of Columbia, for our E&S business only. This removed our five newest Standard Commercial Lines states from coverage under this treaty, as they are covered under the main property catastrophe treaty. We also increased our co-participation from 15% to 34% to balance the cost versus volatility protection provided by this treaty. Consistent with the prior year, both treaties were renewed with restrictions in coverage related to the systemic perils of communicable disease and first-party cybersecurity coverage, in line with current market conditions. Consequently, the property catastrophe program excludes coverage for communicable disease, but retains limited reinsurance coverage for cybersecurity risks. Despite these limitations, coverage for traditionally covered property perils was maintained.
We seek to minimize reinsurance credit risk by transacting with highly-rated reinsurance partners and purchasing collateralized reinsurance products, particularly for high-severity, low-probability events, if feasible. Our current reinsurance program includes $259 million in collateralized limit, primarily in the top layer of the catastrophe program, compared to $281 million in collateralized limit under the prior year's reinsurance program.
Overall, we expect ceded premium for our property catastrophe reinsurance treaties to increase modestly in 2022 due to three factors: (i) increases in underlying property exposures in line with our growing property insurance portfolio; (ii) the addition of $50 million of coverage purchased to maintain stability in our net risk profile; and (iii) modest risk-adjusted price increases.
We model various catastrophic perils, and hurricane risk continues to be our portfolio's most significant natural catastrophe peril because of the geographic location of the risks we insure. The table below illustrates the impact of the five largest hurricane losses we have experienced in the last 35 years:
| ($ in millions) | Actual Gross Loss1 | Net Loss2 | Accident Year | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane Name | ||||||
| Superstorm Sandy | $125.5 | 45.6 | 2012 | |||
| Hurricane Ida | 53.4 | 41.5 | 2021 | |||
| Hurricane Irene | 44.8 | 40.2 | 2011 | |||
| Hurricane Hugo | 26.4 | 3.0 | 1989 | |||
| Hurricane Isabel | 25.1 | 15.7 | 2003 |
1This amount represents reported and unreported gross losses estimated as of December 31, 2021.
2Net loss does not include reinstatement premiums, taxes, or flood claims handling fees.
We review our exposure to hurricane risk by examining third-party vendor models and conducting our own proprietary analysis. The third-party vendor models provide a long-term view that closely relates modeled event frequency to historical hurricane activity, adjusting to reflect certain non-modeled cost assumptions, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses. We believe that modeled estimates provide a range of potential outcomes, and we review multiple estimates to understand our catastrophic risk.
| Occurrence Exceedance Probability | Modeled Losses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ($ in thousands) | GrossLosses1 | Net Losses2 | Net Losses as a Percent of GAAP Equity3 | ||||
| 4.0% (1 in 25 year event) | $196,905 | 35,304 | 1 | % | |||
| 2.0% (1 in 50 year event) | 325,920 | 38,613 | 1 | ||||
| 1.0% (1 in 100 year event) | 529,858 | 43,956 | 1 | ||||
| 0.67% (1 in 150 year event) | 757,577 | 61,871 | 2 | ||||
| 0.5% (1 in 200 year event) | 831,257 | 67,544 | 2 | ||||
| 0.4% (1 in 250 year event) | 965,971 | 125,306 | 4 | ||||
| 0.2% (1 in 500 year event) | 1,384,970 | 454,888 | 15 |
1Gross losses include uncertainty associated with damage/loss estimation, demand and storm surge, and assumptions for certain un-modeled costs, such as the impact of loss expenses, residual market assessments, and automobile-related losses, which collectively increase our gross losses by approximately 13%.
2Net losses are after-tax losses net of catastrophe reinsurance including reinstatement premiums.
3GAAP Equity as of December 31, 2021.
Our current catastrophe reinsurance program exhausts at an approximately 1 in 216 year return period, or events with 0.5% probability, based on a multi-model view of hurricane risk. Our actual gross and net losses incurred from hurricanes making U.S.-landfall will vary, perhaps materially, from our estimated modeled losses.
55
We renewed the property excess of loss treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S business, on July 1, 2021, and the top layer renewed on January 1, 2022. This treaty was renewed with an increase in the retention on the first layer to $3.0 million from $2.0 million to manage the overall reinsurance cost on our growing portfolio and maintain projected earnings volatility protection in line with our historical levels.
The following table summarizes of our property reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| PROPERTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Property Catastrophe Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $835 million above $40 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis in four layers: | All nuclear, biological, chemical, and radioactive ("NBCR") losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. Non-NBCR losses are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. Please see Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding TRIPRA. | ||
| - 82% of losses in excess of $40 million up to $100 million; | ||||
| - 97% of losses in excess of $100 million up to $225 million; | ||||
| - 97% of losses in excess of $225 million up to $525 million; and | ||||
| - 90% of losses in excess of $525 million up to $875 million. | ||||
| The treaty provides one reinstatement in each of the first three layers and no reinstatement in the fourth layer. The per occurrence limit is $776.5 million and the annual aggregate limit is $1.2 billion, net of the Insurance Subsidiaries' co-participation. | ||||
| In addition, our $30 million above $10 million retention treaty that responds on per occurrence basis covers 66% of E&S losses only, in all states, and has an annual aggregate limit of $34 million, net of the Insurance Subsidiaries' co-participation. | ||||
| Property Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | $57 million above $3 million retention covering 100% in three layers. Losses other than TRIPRA certified losses are subject to the following reinstatements and annual aggregate limits: | All NBCR losses are excluded regardless of whether or not they are certified under TRIPRA. For non-NBCR losses, the treaty distinguishes between acts committed on behalf of foreign persons or foreign interests ("Foreign Terrorism") and those that are not. The treaty provides annual aggregate limits for Foreign Terrorism (other than NBCR) acts of $21 million for the first layer; $60 million for the second layer; and $40 million for the third layer. Non-foreign terrorism losses (other than NBCR) are covered to the same extent as non-terrorism losses. | ||
| - $7 million in excess of $3 million layer provides unlimited reinstatements; | ||||
| - $30 million in excess of $10 million layer provides three reinstatements, $120 million in aggregate limits; and | ||||
| - $20 million in excess of $40 million layer provides three reinstatements, $80 million in aggregate limits. | ||||
| Flood | 100% reinsurance by the federal government’s WYO. | None |
56
Casualty Reinsurance
We renewed the casualty excess of loss treaty, which covers both our standard market and E&S Lines business, on July 1, 2021, substantially on the same terms as the treaty expiring June 30, 2021.
The following table summarizes our casualty reinsurance treaties and arrangements covering our Insurance Subsidiaries:
| CASUALTY REINSURANCE ON INSURANCE PRODUCTS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treaty Name | Reinsurance Coverage | Terrorism Coverage | ||
| Casualty Excess of Loss (covers all insurance operations) | There are six layers covering 100% of $88 million in excess of $2 million. Losses other than terrorism losses are subject to the following: | All NBCR losses are excluded. All other losses stemming from the acts of terrorism are subject to the following: | ||
| - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer provides 33 reinstatements, $102 million annual aggregate limit; | - $3 million in excess of $2 million layer with $15 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer provides six reinstatements, $49 million annual aggregate limit; | - $7 million in excess of $5 million layer with $28 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer provides three reinstatements; $36 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $12 million layer with $27 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer provides one reinstatement, $18 million annual aggregate limit; | - $9 million in excess of $21 million layer with $18 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; | |||
| - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer provides one reinstatement, $40 million annual aggregate limit; and | - $20 million in excess of $30 million layer with $40 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit; and | |||
| - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer provides one reinstatement, $80 million annual aggregate limit. | - $40 million in excess of $50 million layer with $80 million net annual terrorism aggregate limit. |
We have other reinsurance treaties, such as our (i) Surety and Fidelity Excess of Loss Reinsurance Treaty, (ii) National Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool Quota Share, which covers business assumed from the involuntary workers compensation pool, (iii) Endurance Specialty Quota share and Loss Development Cover, which protects against losses on policies written before the acquisition and any development on reserves established by MUSIC as of the date of acquisition, (iv) Equipment Breakdown Coverage Reinsurance Treaty, (v) Multi-line Quota Share, which covers additional personal lines coverages, (vi) Cyber Liability Quota Share, and (vii) Excess Liability Quota Share, which covers MUSIC's excess liability business.
We regularly evaluate our overall reinsurance program, and we try to develop effective ways to manage the transfer of risk. We base our analysis on a comprehensive process that includes periodic analysis of modeling results, our own loss experience, aggregation of exposures, exposure growth, diversification of risks, limits written, projected reinsurance costs, reinsurer financial strength, and projected impact on earnings, equity, and statutory surplus. We strive to balance reinsurer credit quality, price, terms, and our appetite to retain a certain level of risk.
Investments Segment
The primary objective of the investment portfolio is to maximize after-tax net investment income and the overall total return of the portfolio, while maintaining a high credit quality core fixed income securities portfolio and managing our duration risk profile. The effective duration of the fixed income securities portfolio, including short-term investments, was 3.9 years as of December 31, 2021, compared to the Insurance Subsidiaries' net loss and loss expense reserves duration of 3.5 years. The effective duration is monitored and managed to maximize yield while managing interest rate risk at an acceptable level. We maintain a well-diversified portfolio across sectors, with credit quality and maturities that provide ample liquidity. Purchases and sales are made with the intent of maximizing investment returns in the current market environment while balancing capital preservation.
Our fixed income and short-term investments represented 91% of our invested assets at December 31, 2021, and 92% at December 31, 2020. These investments had a weighted average credit rating of “A+” as of December 31, 2021 and "AA-" as of December 31, 2020, with a 96% allocation to investment grade holdings at both December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. The weighted average credit rating decline reflects a planned reduction in our sector allocation to agency residential mortgage-backed securities over the past year as lower interest rates accelerated prepayments, as expected. Given the very low reinvestment rates for this asset class, we reallocated these non-sale disposal cash flows into other high-quality fixed income sectors, including corporate securities and other asset-backed security classes without a "AAA" rating but in our view currently offer a better risk and reward trade-off.
For further details on the composition, credit quality, and the various risks to which our portfolio is subject, see Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” of this Form 10-K.
57
Total Invested Assets
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | Change | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total invested assets | $ | 8,026,988 | 7,505,599 | 7 | % | |||||
| Invested assets per dollar of common stockholders' equity | 2.88 | 2.96 | (3) | |||||||
| Unrealized gain – before tax1 | 255,658 | 395,207 | (35) | |||||||
| Unrealized gain – after tax1 | 201,970 | 312,214 | (35) |
1Includes unrealized gain on fixed income securities of $229 million and equity securities of $27 million at December 31, 2021.
Invested assets increased $521 million at December 31, 2021, compared to December 31, 2020, reflecting strong 2021 operating cash flows of $771 million, partially offset by a decrease in pre-tax unrealized gains of $140 million. The majority of this $140 million decrease was related to our fixed income securities portfolio, which was impacted by an increase in benchmark U. S. Treasury rates, partially offset by a tightening of credit spreads.
Net Investment Income
The components of net investment income earned were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2019 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed income securities | $ | 209,709 | 203,926 | 3 | % | 203,255 | — | % | |||||||||
| Equity securities | 15,920 | 9,286 | 71 | 6,996 | 33 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") | 2,743 | 844 | 225 | — | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Short-term investments | 260 | 1,821 | (86) | 6,653 | (73) | ||||||||||||
| Other investments | 118,060 | 26,922 | 339 | 18,778 | 43 | ||||||||||||
| Investment expenses | (20,103) | (15,692) | (28) | (13,139) | (19) | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – before tax | 326,589 | 227,107 | 44 | 222,543 | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income tax expense | 63,589 | 42,495 | 50 | 41,382 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income earned – after tax | $ | 263,000 | 184,612 | 42 | 181,161 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Effective tax rate | 19.5 | % | 18.7 | 0.8 | pts | 18.6 | 0.1 | pts | |||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on fixed income investments | 2.6 | 2.6 | — | 2.9 | (0.3) | ||||||||||||
| Annual after-tax yield on investment portfolio | 3.4 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 2.9 | (0.3) |
The $78.4 million increase in after-tax net investment income in 2021 compared to 2020 was driven by higher alternative investments gains in our other investment portfolio of $93.0 million, after-tax, in 2021 compared to $20.9 million, after-tax, in 2020, resulting in a $72.0 million increase in after-tax net investment income in 2021. Our alternative investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and are recorded on a one-quarter lag. The results on alternative investments in 2021 principally reflected unrealized gains on our holdings that benefited from the strong equity and credit capital market performance in the 12-month period ended September 2021.
Realized and Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses
When evaluating securities for sale, our general philosophy is to reduce our exposure to securities and sectors based on economic evaluations of whether the fundamentals for that security or sector have deteriorated or the timing is appropriate to opportunistically trade for other securities with better economic-return characteristics. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses for the indicated periods were as follows:
| ($ in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net realized gains on disposals | $ | 7,144 | 9,148 | 26,715 | |||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities | 17,881 | 7,939 | (8,649) | ||||||
| Net credit loss (expense) on fixed income securities, AFS | (6,858) | (5,042) | |||||||
| Net credit loss (expense) benefit on fixed income securities, HTM | (49) | 4 | |||||||
| Losses on securities for which we have the intent to sell | (519) | (16,266) | |||||||
| Net other-than-temporary-impairment losses recognized earnings | (3,644) | ||||||||
| Total net realized and unrealized investment (losses) gains | $ | 17,599 | (4,217) | 14,422 |
Realized and unrealized investment gains (losses) in 2020 were significantly impacted by COVID-19-related market volatility in the first quarter of 2020, and substantially all of the $16.3 million of losses on securities we intended to sell were recorded in that quarter to provide our investment managers flexibility to trade and optimize our investment portfolio. The increase in unrealized gains on equity securities in 2021 was driven by strong public equities performance in the year.
58
For additional information regarding our losses on securities we intend to sell and our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses, see Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Federal Income Taxes
The following table provides information regarding federal income taxes.
| ($ in millions) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal income tax expense | $ | 101.5 | 56.6 | 64.8 | |||||
| Effective tax rate1 | 20.5 | % | 18.7 | 19.3 |
1The effective tax rate is calculated by taking "Total federal income tax expense" divided by "Income before federal income tax" less "Preferred stock dividends" on our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Federal income tax expense increased by $44.9 million in 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to an increase in pre-tax income that is taxed at the statutory rate. The increase in pre-tax income was primarily driven by increases in underwriting income and net investment income earned primarily due to higher gains on alternative investments in our other investment portfolio. See Note 14. “Federal Income Taxes” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K for further information about the following: (i) a reconciliation of our effective tax rate to the statutory rate of 21%; and (ii) details regarding our net deferred tax liability and asset.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital resources and liquidity reflect our ability to generate cash flows from business operations, borrow funds at competitive rates, and raise new capital to meet our operating and growth needs.
Liquidity
We manage liquidity by focusing on generating sufficient cash flows to meet the short-term and long-term cash requirements of our business operations. We also adjust our liquidity in light of economic or market conditions, as discussed further below.
Sources of Liquidity
Sources of cash for Selective Insurance Group, Inc. ("Parent") historically have consisted of dividends from the Insurance Subsidiaries, the investment portfolio held at the Parent, borrowings under third-party lines of credit, loan agreements with certain Insurance Subsidiaries, and the issuance of equity (common or preferred) and debt securities. We continue to monitor these sources, considering both our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital preservation strategies.
The Parent’s investment portfolio includes (i) short-term investments that are generally maintained in “AAA” rated money market funds approved by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, (ii) high-quality, highly-liquid government and corporate fixed income securities, (iii) equity securities, (iv) other investments, and (v) a cash balance. In the aggregate, Parent cash and total investments amounted to $527 million at December 31, 2021, and $490 million at December 31, 2020.
The composition of the Parent's investment portfolio may change over time based upon various factors, including the amount and availability of dividends from our Insurance Subsidiaries, investment income, expenses, other Parent cash needs, such as dividends payable to shareholders, asset allocation investment decisions, inorganic growth opportunities, debt retirement, and share repurchases. Our target is for the Parent to maintain highly liquid investments of at least twice its expected annual net cash outflow needs, with the target currently estimated at approximately $180 million.
Insurance Subsidiary Dividends
The Insurance Subsidiaries generate liquidity through insurance float, which is created by collecting premiums and earning investment income before paying claims. The period of float can extend over many years. Our investment portfolio consists of maturity dates that continually provide a source of cash flow for claims payments in the ordinary course of business. To protect our Insurance Subsidiaries' capital, we purchase reinsurance coverage for significantly large claims or catastrophes that may occur.
The Insurance Subsidiaries paid $140 million in dividends to the Parent in 2021. As of December 31, 2021, our allowable ordinary maximum dividend is $322 million for 2022. All Insurance Subsidiary dividends to the Parent are (i) subject to the approval and/or review of its domiciliary state insurance regulator and (ii) generally payable only from earned statutory surplus reported in its annual statements as of the preceding December 31. Although domiciliary state insurance regulators historically have approved dividends, there is no assurance they will approve future Insurance Subsidiary dividends.
New Jersey corporate law also limits the maximum amount of dividends the Parent can pay our shareholders if either (i) the Parent would be unable to pay its debts as they became due in the usual course of business, or (ii) the Parent’s total assets
59
would be less than its total liabilities. The Parent’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders is also impacted by (i) covenants in its credit agreement that obligate it, among other things, to maintain a minimum consolidated net worth and a maximum ratio of consolidated debt to total capitalization, and (ii) the terms of our preferred stock that prohibit dividends to be declared or paid on our common stock if dividends are not declared and paid, or made payable, on all outstanding preferred stock for the latest completed dividend period.
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions and financial covenants, where applicable, see Note 11. “Indebtedness,” Note 17. “Equity,” and Note 22. “Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form
10-K.
Line of Credit
On December 20, 2019, the Parent entered into a Credit Agreement with the lenders named therein (the “Lenders”) and the Bank of Montreal, Chicago Branch, as Administrative Agent ("Line of Credit"). Under the Line of Credit, the Lenders have agreed to provide the Parent with a $50 million revolving credit facility that can be increased to $125 million with the Lenders' consent. No borrowings were made under the Line of Credit in 2021. The Line of Credit will mature on December 20, 2022, and has a variable interest rate based on, among other factors, the Parent’s debt ratings. For additional information regarding the Line of Credit and corresponding representations, warranties, and covenants, refer to Note 11. “Indebtedness” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Four of the Insurance Subsidiaries are members of Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") branches, as shown in the following table. Membership requires the ownership of branch stock and includes the right to access to liquidity. All Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") borrowings are required to be secured by investments pledged as collateral. For additional information regarding collateral outstanding, refer to Note 5. "Investments" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
| Branch | Insurance Subsidiary Member |
|---|---|
| FHLBI | SICSC1 |
| SICSE1 | |
| FHLBNY | SICA |
| SICNY |
1These subsidiaries are jointly referred to as the "Indiana Subsidiaries" as they are domiciled in Indiana.
The Line of Credit permits aggregate borrowings from the FHLBI and the FHLBNY up to 10% of the respective member company’s admitted assets for the previous year. As SICNY is domiciled in New York, its FHLBNY borrowings are limited by New York insurance regulations to the lower of 5% of admitted assets for the most recently completed fiscal quarter, or 10% of admitted assets for the previous year-end.
The following table provides information on the remaining capacity for FHLB borrowings based on these restrictions, as well as the amount of additional FHLB stock that would need to be purchased to allow these member companies to borrow their remaining capacity:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | Additional FHLB Stock Requirements | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 833.2 | $ | 83.3 | 32.0 | 51.3 | 0.6 | ||||||||
| SICSE | 665.6 | 66.6 | 28.0 | 38.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||
| SICA | 3,160.6 | 316.1 | — | 316.1 | 14.2 | ||||||||||
| SICNY | 580.2 | 29.0 | — | 29.0 | 1.3 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 495.0 | 60.0 | 435.0 | 16.6 |
Short-term Borrowings
We did not make any short-term borrowings from FHLB branches during 2021.
Intercompany Loan Agreements
The Parent has lending agreements with the Indiana Subsidiaries approved by the Indiana Department of Insurance that provide additional liquidity. Similar to the Line of Credit, these lending agreements limit the Parent's borrowings from the Indiana
60
Subsidiaries to 10% of the admitted assets of the respective Indiana Subsidiary. The following table provides information on the Parent’s borrowings and remaining borrowing capacity from the two Indiana Subsidiaries:
| ($ in millions) | Admitted Assets as of December 31, 2021 | Borrowing Limitation | Amount Borrowed | Remaining Capacity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As of December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||
| SICSC | $ | 833.2 | $ | 83.3 | 24.0 | 59.3 | ||||||
| SICSE | 665.6 | 66.6 | 16.0 | 50.6 | ||||||||
| Total | $ | 149.9 | 40.0 | 109.9 |
Capital Market Activities
The Parent had no private or public issuances of stock during 2021. In the fourth quarter of 2020, we enhanced our capital structure flexibility at the Parent by issuing $200 million of 4.60% non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock. Net proceeds after issuance costs were $195 million. The Parent is using these proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include the repurchase of common stock under a $100 million share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors (the "Board") in conjunction with the preferred stock offering. During 2021, we repurchased 52,781 shares of our common stock under this authorization at a cost of $3.4 million, with a $64.49 average price per share. We have $96.6 million of remaining capacity under our share repurchase program. For additional information on the preferred stock transaction, refer to Note 17. “Preferred Stock” in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K.
Uses of Liquidity
The Parent's liquidity generated from the sources discussed above is used, among other things, to pay dividends to our shareholders. Dividends on shares of the Parent's common and preferred stock are declared and paid at the discretion of the Board based on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other relevant factors. In October 2021, our Board approved a 12% increase in the quarterly cash dividend, to $0.28 from $0.25 per share. On February 3, 2022, our Board declared:
•A quarterly cash dividend on common stock of $0.28 per common share, that is payable March 1, 2022, to holders of record on February 15, 2022; and
•A cash dividend of $287.50 per share on our 4.60% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B (equivalent to $0.28750 per depository share) payable on March 15, 2022, to holders of record as of February 28, 2022.
Our ability to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations on our debt, as well as our ability to continue to pay dividends to our stockholders, is dependent on (i) liquidity at the Parent, (ii) the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to pay dividends, if necessary, and/or (iii) the availability of other sources of liquidity to the Parent. Our next FHLB borrowing principal repayment is $60 million to FHLBI due on December 16, 2026.
Restrictions on the ability of the Insurance Subsidiaries to declare and pay dividends, without alternative liquidity options, could materially affect our ability to service debt and pay dividends on common and preferred stock.
Capital Resources
Capital resources ensure we can pay policyholder claims, furnish the financial strength to support the business of underwriting insurance risks, and facilitate continued business growth. At December 31, 2021, we had GAAP stockholders’ equity of $3.0 billion and statutory surplus of $2.4 billion. With total debt of $506.1 million at December 31, 2021, our debt-to-capital ratio was 14.5%. For additional information on our statutory surplus, see Note 22. "Statutory Financial Information, Capital Requirements, and Restrictions on Dividends and Transfers of Funds" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
61
The following table summarizes current and long-term material cash requirements as of December 31, 2021, which we expect to fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| Payment Due by Period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
| ($ in millions) | Total | ||||||||||||||
| Notes payable | $ | 510.0 | — | — | 60.0 | 450.0 | |||||||||
| Interest on debt obligation | 593.6 | 28.3 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 452.1 | ||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1,103.6 | 28.3 | 56.6 | 116.6 | 902.1 | ||||||||||
| Gross loss and loss expense payments | 4,580.9 | 1,303.5 | 1,473.8 | 701.5 | 1,102.1 | ||||||||||
| Ceded loss and loss expense payments | 578.6 | 174.5 | 137.3 | 71.1 | 195.7 | ||||||||||
| Net loss and loss expense payments | 4,002.3 | 1,129.0 | 1,336.5 | 630.4 | 906.4 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 5,105.9 | 1,157.3 | 1,393.1 | 747.0 | 1,808.5 |
Our loss and loss expense payments in the table above represent estimated paid amounts by year on our loss and loss expense reserves that are estimates based on past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, and include considerable judgment. There is no precise method for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the projected timing of loss and loss expense reserve payments, so the timing and amounts of the actual payments will be affected by many factors. Therefore, the projected settlement of the reserves for net loss and loss expense may differ, perhaps significantly, from actual future payments. For more information on our case reserves and estimates of reserves for loss and loss expense IBNR, refer to the “Reserve for Loss and Loss Expense” section in the "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" section of this MD&A and Note 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." of this Form 10-K.
For additional information regarding cross-default provisions associated with our notes payable in the table above or our Line of Credit, see Note 11. "Indebtedness" in Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." in this Form 10-K.
In addition to the above, the following table summarizes certain contractual obligations we had at December 31, 2021 that may require us to invest additional amounts into our investment portfolio, which we would fund primarily with operating cash flows.
| ($ in millions) | Amount of Obligation | Year of Expiration of Obligation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternative and other investments | $ | 215.0 | 2036 | |||
| Non-publicly traded collateralized loan obligations in our fixed income securities portfolio | 59.8 | 2030 | ||||
| Non-publicly traded common stock within our equity portfolio | 4.2 | 2027 | ||||
| CMLs | 5.5 | 2023 | ||||
| Privately-placed corporate securities | 4.3 | Less than 1 year | ||||
| Total | $ | 288.8 |
There is no certainty that any such additional investment will be required, and we expect to have the capacity to repay or refinance these obligations as they come due.
Our other cash requirements include, without limitation, dividends to stockholders, capital expenditures, and other operating expenses, including commissions to our distribution partners, labor costs, premium taxes, general and administrative expenses, and income taxes.
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had no (i) material guarantees on behalf of others and trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value, (ii) material transactions with related parties other than those disclosed in Note 18. “Related Party Transactions” included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” of this Form 10-K, and (iii) material relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships at December 31, 2021 and 2020, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, established to facilitate off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Consequently, we are not exposed to any material financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk related to off-balance sheet arrangements.
We continually monitor our cash requirements and the amount of capital resources we maintain at the holding company and operating subsidiary levels. As part of our long-term capital strategy, we strive to maintain capital metrics that support our targeted financial strength relative to the macroeconomic environment. Based on our analysis and market conditions, we may take a variety of actions, including, without limitation, contributing capital to the Insurance Subsidiaries, issuing additional debt
62
and/or equity securities, repurchasing existing debt, repurchasing shares of the Parent’s common stock, and increasing stockholders’ dividends.
Our capital management strategy is intended to protect the interests of the policyholders of the Insurance Subsidiaries and our stockholders, while enhancing our financial strength and underwriting capacity. We have a profitable book of business and
solid capital base, positioning us well to take advantage of market opportunities that may arise.
Book value per common share increased 9% to $46.24 as of December 31, 2021, from $42.38 as of December 31, 2020, driven by $6.50 in net income per diluted common share, partially offset by $2.07 of lower unrealized gains on our fixed income securities portfolio and $1.03 in dividends to our common stockholders. The book value per common share at December 31, 2021 included $3.01 of unrealized gains on our fixed income securities portfolio, which have an inverse relationship to changes in interest rates. The yields on benchmark U.S. Treasury securities have increased subsequent to December 31, 2021, which has resulted in a decrease in the net unrealized gains on our fixed income securities. If interest rates continue to increase and/or credit spreads widen in 2022, our net unrealized gains on our fixed income securities portfolio will come under pressure and could move into a net unrealized loss position.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities was $771 million in 2021 compared to $554 million in 2020. Cash flows from operations increased in 2021 primarily driven by growth in our insurance operations. For more information on our underwriting results, refer to "Insurance Operations" above in this MD&A.
Net cash used in investing activities was $619 million in 2021 compared to $688 million in 2020. Investing activity was greater in 2020, as we benefited from $195 million of net proceeds from our perpetual preferred stock issuance last year.
Net cash used in financing activities was $123 million in 2021 compared to net cash provided of $141 million in 2020. The cash flows from financing activities decreased due to (i) a long-term debt repayment to the FHLBNY of $50 million in 2021, and (ii) our 2020 perpetual preferred stock issuance that resulted in $195 million of net proceeds last year.