NORTHRIM BANCORP INC (NRIM) Business
This page reproduces the company's own Item 1 Business text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.
Informational only - not investment advice. See Disclaimer.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
In this document, please note that references to "we", "our", "us", or the "Company" mean Northrim BanCorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context suggests otherwise.
General
We are a publicly traded bank holding company headquartered in Anchorage, Alaska. The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol, “NRIM.” The Company is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (the “FRB”). We began banking operations in Anchorage in December 1990, and formed the Company as an Alaska corporation in connection with our reorganization into a holding company structure; that reorganization was completed effective December 31, 2001. The Company has grown to be the third largest commercial bank in Alaska in terms of deposits, with $2.8 billion in total deposits and $3.3 billion in total assets at December 31, 2025.
Effective October 31, 2024, the Company completed its acquisition of Sallyport Commercial Finance, LLC (“SCF”), and its subsidiaries. SCF provides factoring, asset based lending, and alternative working capital lending to businesses throughout the United States and, through its subsidiaries and affiliates, to businesses in Canada and the United Kingdom.
2
The Company has three direct wholly-owned subsidiaries:
•Northrim Bank (the “Bank”), a state chartered, full-service commercial bank headquartered in Anchorage, Alaska. The Bank is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and the State of Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, Division of Banking and Securities (the “Division”). The Bank has 20 branch locations throughout the State of Alaska. We operate in Washington State through Northrim Funding Services (“NFS”), a division of the Bank started in 2004 engaged in the factoring business. We offer a wide array of commercial and consumer loan and deposit products, investment products, and electronic banking services over the Internet;
•Northrim Investment Services Company (“NISC”) was formed in November 2002. Through NISC, we own 21% of the total outstanding equity interest in Pacific Wealth Advisors, LLC (“PWA”), an investment advisory, trust, and wealth management business located in Seattle, Washington. PWA is a holding company that owns Pacific Portfolio Consulting, LLC and Pacific Portfolio Trust Company. PWA sold all of its operating assets in 2025, including all of the assets of Pacific Portfolio Consulting, LLC and all of its interest in Pacific Portfolio Trust Company;
•Northrim Statutory Trust 2 (“NST2”), an entity that we formed in December 2005 to facilitate a trust preferred securities offering by the Company.
The Bank has four direct wholly-owned subsidiaries:
•Residential Mortgage, LLC (“RML”) originates 1-4 family residential mortgages, most of which are sold to the secondary market. In connection with internal restructuring of the Bank's subsidiaries, the legacy intermediate holding companies Northrim Capital Investments Co. and Residential Mortgage Holding Company, LLC were voluntarily dissolved in 2025.
•SCF provides factoring, asset based lending and alternative working capital solutions to small and medium sized enterprises in the United States and, through its affiliates in Canada and the United Kingdom. SCF holds a 100% interest in Sallyport Commercial Finance CAN, LLC, a holding company, and a 40% interest in Sallyport Commercial Finance LTD, located in the United Kingdom. Sallyport Commercial Finance CAN, LLC, holds a 100% interest in Sallyport Commercial Finance ULC, located in Canada.
•Northrim Building, LLC (“NBL”) owns and operates the Company’s main office facility at 3111 C Street in Anchorage.
•Northrim Building LO, LLC owns and operates the Company’s community branch facilities at 2270 E. 37th Avenue in Anchorage and 2491 Tongass Avenue in Ketchikan.
Segments
The Company operates in three reportable segments: Community Banking, Home Mortgage Lending, and Specialty Finance. Measures of the revenues, profit or loss, and total assets for each of the Company's segments are included in Part II. Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Business Strategy
The Company’s primary objective is to be Alaska's most trusted financial institution by adding value for our customers, communities, and shareholders. We aspire to be Alaska's premier bank and employer of choice as a leader in financial expertise, products, and services. We value our state, and we are proud to be Alaskan. We embody Alaska's frontier spirit and values, and we support our communities. We have a sincere appreciation for our customers, and we strive to deliver superior customer first service that is reliable, ethical, and secure. We look for growth opportunities for our customers, our institution, and our employees.
Our strategy is one of value-added growth. Management believes that calculated, sustainable organic and inorganic market share growth coupled with good asset quality, an appropriate core deposit and capital base, operational efficiency, diversified sources of other operating income, and consistent profitability are the most appropriate means of increasing shareholder value.
3
Our business strategy emphasizes commercial lending products and services through relationship banking with businesses and professional individuals in our Community Banking segment, mortgage origination and sale, mortgages held for investment, and mortgage servicing activities through our Mortgage Banking segment, and factoring, asset based lending, and alternative working capital lending through our Specialty Finance segment. Our experienced senior management team is intimately involved with serving customers and making credit decisions, all of which are made in Alaska for our Community Banking segment, allowing us to compete more favorably with larger competitors for business lending relationships. Our business strategy also emphasizes the origination of a variety of home mortgage loan products, most of which we sell to the secondary market. We retain servicing for home mortgages that we originate and sell to the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation (“AHFC”). We believe that there is opportunity to increase the Company’s loan portfolio, particularly in the commercial portion of the portfolio, in the Company’s current market areas through existing and new customers. In addition to lending products, in many cases commercial customers also require multiple deposit and affiliated services that add franchise value to the Company. We believe that these strategies will continue to benefit the Company in 2026, and we intend to continue to grow our balance sheet through increasing our market share.
The Company’s business strategy also stresses the importance of customer deposit relationships to support its lending activities. Our guiding principle is to serve our market areas by operating with a “Superior Customer First Service” philosophy, affording our customers the highest priority in all aspects of our operations. We believe that our adherence to this philosophy has created a strong core deposit franchise that provides a stable, low cost funding source for expanded growth in all of our lending areas. We have devoted significant resources to our treasury management products, including a corporate purchasing card and integrated payables, as well as expansion of electronic services for both personal and business customers, and enhancement of the Company's information security related to providing these services.
In addition to market share growth, a significant aspect of the Company’s business strategy is focused on managing the credit quality of our loan portfolio. As the Company continues to grow, management is committed to allocating more resources to the credit management function of the Bank to provide enhanced financial analysis of our largest, most complex loan relationships to further develop our processes for analyzing and managing various concentrations of credit within the overall loan portfolio. Continued success in maintaining the credit quality of our loan portfolio and managing our level of other real estate owned is a significant aspect of the Company’s strategy for attaining sustainable, long-term market growth to produce increased shareholder value.
Human Capital Resources
We believe that we provide a high level of customer service. To achieve our objective of providing “Superior Customer First Service”, in managing its human capital resources, management emphasizes the hiring and retention of competent and highly motivated employees at all levels of the organization. Management believes that a well-trained and highly motivated core of employees allows maximum personal contact with customers in order to understand and fulfill customer needs and preferences. This “Superior Customer First Service” philosophy is combined with our emphasis on personalized, local decision making. The Company continues to enhance our company-wide employee training program which focuses on Northrim culture, "Superior Customer First Service", general sales and management skills, and various technical areas. All applicants and employees are treated with the same high level of respect regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, age, marital status, political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or protected veteran status. The Company complies with all applicable state and local laws governing nondiscrimination in employment in every location in which the Company operates.
The Company strives to continuously evaluate our human capital polices for improvement and alignment with current best practices. In the last several years, the Company added the Juneteenth National Independence Day and Indigenous People's Day to our lineup of paid holidays for employees. The Company also enhanced its paid parental leave program for employees following the birth of a child or the placement of a child in connection with an adoption, and increased base wages for all Bank employees below the level of Senior Vice President. In 2024, the Company overhauled employee healthcare options for employees that included new benefit plans that provided additional coverage options. This included a new essential care option at no cost for employee only coverage. Beginning in 2025, the Company increased its 401(k) match for Bank employees to 100% of employee deferrals up to 6% annually. Effective July 1, 2025, the Company increased its sick leave benefit to an accrual of 1 hour for every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 56 hours per year.
Approximately 40% of the Company's employees are working remotely as of December 31, 2025 either on a full- or part-time basis, including employees that work remotely part-time and work in the office part-time, which we refer to as a "hybrid" work from home arrangement. We also offer our employees other flexible work options, such as variable work hours, condensed workweeks and part-time hours. There have been no material impacts to our operations due to the increase in these
4
alternative working arrangements, and we are pleased to provide our employees with more flexibility to accommodate their needs. In addition, Northrim provides for a strong work/life balance, including generous paid time off and paid parental leave.
Employee Profile
We consider our relations with our employees to be highly satisfactory. We had 516 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2025. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Of the 516 full-time equivalent employees, 332 were Community Banking employees, 154 were Home Mortgage Lending employees, and 30 were Specialty Finance employees.
Among the Company's full-time equivalent employees as of December 31, 2025, 63% identify as women and 37% as men. Approximately 35% of the workforce identify as a member of a racial minority, 6% identify as individuals with a disability, and 2% identify as veterans. In executive and senior management positions, 33% identify as women and 67% as men as of December 31, 2025. Approximately 7% of those in executive and senior management positions identify as a member of a racial minority, 13% identify as individuals with a disability, and 3% identify as veterans.
Workplace Practices
We support and cultivate an open and respectful environment where everyone can actively contribute, have equal access to opportunities and resources, be themselves, and realize their potential. This is reflected in our policies, which encourage individual values, strengths and protections to provide equality for all in the workplace and are reinforced through our annual anti-harassment training. As an Equal Opportunity Employer, we emphasize inclusion through hiring and compensation practices and consider a pool of diverse candidates for open positions and internal advancement opportunities and treat all our applicants with the same high level of respect regardless of their gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, age, marital status, political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability or protected veteran status. To address issues related to pay discrimination, we do not ask potential candidates about their current or previous compensation during the hiring process, and we incorporate equal and fair pay reviews into every employment compensation decision.
Products and Services
Community Banking
Lending Services: We have an emphasis on commercial and real estate lending. Our loan products include short and medium-term commercial loans, commercial credit lines, construction and real estate loans, and consumer loans. We emphasize providing financial services to small and medium-sized businesses and to individuals. These types of lending products have provided us with market opportunities and generally provide higher net interest margins compared to other types of lending such as consumer lending. However, they also involve greater risks, including greater exposure to changes in local economic conditions.
Our lending operations are guided by loan policies, approval procedures, and amount limitations. Our loan policies outline the basic policies and procedures by which lending operations are conducted. Generally, the policies address our desired loan types, target markets, underwriting and collateral requirements, terms, interest rate and yield considerations, and compliance with laws and regulations. The policies are reviewed and approved annually by the board of directors of the Bank. Management has processes in place to analyze and manage various concentrations of credit within the overall loan portfolio. The Credit Administration Department monitors the procedures and processes for both the analysis and reporting of problem loans, and also develops strategies to resolve problem loans based on the facts and circumstances for each loan. Additionally, the Credit Administration Department performs a review of the loan portfolio for compliance with loan policy, as well as a review of credit quality. Loan review follows the FDIC sampling guidelines on an annual basis. Finally, our Internal Audit independently reviews loans for regulatory compliance and conformance to the Bank's policies and procedures.
Deposit Services: Our deposit services include business and personal noninterest-bearing checking accounts and interest-bearing time deposits, checking accounts, savings accounts, and individual retirement accounts. Our interest-bearing accounts generally earn interest at rates established by management in accordance with management’s deposit growth strategy.
Several of our deposit services and products are:
•A specialized business checking account customized to account activity;
•A money market deposit account;
5
•A “Jump-Up” certificate of deposit (“CD”) that allows additional deposits with the opportunity to increase the rate to the current market rate for a similar term CD;
• An 'Alaska Savings' account meant for higher balances with added flexibility;
•A Bank-On certified consumer checking account;
•IntraFi® Network Deposits℠ and business sweep;
•Consumer online banking, mobile app, and mobile deposit;
•Business online banking, business mobile app, and business mobile deposit; and
•Instantly issued debit cards for business and consumer accounts at account opening.
Other Services: In addition to our traditional deposit and lending services, we offer our customers several convenience services: Mobile Web and Mobile APP Banking, consumer online account opening, Personal Finance, Online Documents, Consumer Debit Cards, Business Debit Cards, retail lockbox services, card controls, Consumer Credit Cards, Business Credit Cards, Corporate Purchase Cards, Integrated Payables, home equity advantage access cards, telebanking, and automated teller services. Other services include personalized checks at account opening, overdraft protection from a savings account, commercial drive-up banking at many locations, automatic transfers and payments, Zelle (a peer-to-peer payment functionality), external transfers, Bill Pay, wire transfers, direct payroll deposit, electronic tax payments, Automated Clearing House origination and receipt, remote deposit capture, account reconciliation and positive pay, merchant services, cash management programs and sweep options to meet the needs of business customers, annuity products, and long term investment portfolios.
Significant Business Concentrations: No individual or single group of related accounts is considered material in relation to our total assets or total revenues, or to the total assets, deposits or revenues of the Bank, or in relation to our overall business. Based on classification by North American Industry Classification System ("NAICS"), there are no segments or loan classifications that exceed 10% of portfolio loans, except for real estate (see Note 6, Loans and Credit Quality, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II. Item 8 of this report for a breakout of real estate loans). The Company has $767.6 million non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans as of December 31, 2025 of which 21% are apartments, 13% are retail centers, 13% are office class A or B, 12% are hotels, 10% are office / warehouse, 6% are mini warehouse and self-storage, 6% are warehouse, and 19% are other.
In addition to its review of NAICS codes, the Company has also identified concentrations in various industries that may be adversely impacted by a potential future health pandemic and a decline in oil prices. We estimate that as of December 31, 2025 the Company had $145.5 million, or 6% of total portfolio loans, in the Healthcare sector; $137.2 million, or 6% in the Accommodations sector; $117.6 million, or 5% of portfolio loans, in the Tourism sector; $97.9 million, or 4% in Retail loans; $89.2 million, or 4% of portfolio loans, in the Aviation (non-tourism) sector; $64.6 million, or 3% in the Restaurants and Breweries sector; and $57.6 million, or 2% in the Fishing sector. Additionally, approximately 20% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2025 is attributable to 28 large borrowing relationships. Large borrowing relationships are defined as loan relationships with an aggregate commitment amount greater than or equal to 50% of the Bank's Legal Lending Limit to one borrower. Moreover, our business activities are currently focused primarily in the state of Alaska. Consequently, our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends in the Alaska economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, and to a lesser extent, Ketchikan, Sitka, Kodiak and Nome.
Alaskans continue to account for substantially all of Northrim’s deposit base. Total deposits were $2.81 billion at December 31, 2025, up 5% from $2.68 billion a year ago. At December 31, 2025, 74% of total deposits were held in business accounts and 26% of deposit balances were held in consumer accounts. Northrim had approximately 34,000 deposit customers with an average balance of $62,000 as of December 31, 2025. Northrim had 32 customers with balances over $10 million as of December 31, 2025, which accounted for $707.8 million, or 25%, of total deposits.
6
Home Mortgage Lending
Lending Services: The Company originates 1-4 family residential mortgages through RML, most of which we sell to the secondary market. Of the 1-4 family residential mortgages originated by the Company in 2025, 74% were located in Alaska. Residential mortgage choices include several products from AHFC including first-time homebuyer, veteran's and rural community programs; Federal Housing Authority, or "FHA" loans; Veterans Affairs, or "VA" loans; and various conventional mortgages. The Company retains servicing rights on loans sold to AHFC since implementing a loan servicing program in July 2015. The Company also originates loans funded for investment, including adjustable rate mortgages, a second home product, jumbo loans, and extended locks which are retained as consumer loans in the Company's loan portfolio.
Specialty Finance
Purchase of accounts receivable, asset based lending, and alternative working capital solutions: We provide short and medium-term working capital to customers in Alaska, multiple states in the continental United States, and to a lessor extent in Canada and the United Kingdom through affiliates of SCF by purchasing their accounts receivable and by providing asset based lending and other alternative working capital products through our Specialty Finance segment, which includes activities at NFS and SCF. Our mission is to provide access to capital through tailored funding solutions to fuel growth and provide entrepreneurs opportunities to create value. We believe that business activities in this segment will generate profitability, including through periods of macroeconomic disruption, by cultivating relationships with an approach based on a thorough understanding of each of our customers' business operations, opportunities, and challenges. These activities are guided by policies that outline risk management, documentation, and approval limits.
Alaska Economy
Our growth and operations are impacted by the economic conditions of Alaska and the specific markets we serve. Significant changes in the Alaska economy and the markets we serve eventually could have a positive or negative impact on the Company. Alaska is strategically located on the Pacific Rim, within nine hours by air from 95% of the northern hemisphere, and Anchorage is a worldwide air cargo and transportation link between the United States and international business in Asia and Europe. The economy of Alaska is no longer entirely dependent upon natural resource industries. Key sectors of the Alaska economy are the oil industry, government and military spending, and the fishing, mining, tourism, air cargo, transportation, and construction industries, as well as health services.
Recent Economic Developments
While the Alaska Department of Labor has not updated statistics since mid 2025 due to the federal government shutdown, they did publish their monthly magazine Alaska Economic Trends in January of 2026. State Labor Economist Karinne Wiebold said, “we forecast the state will add 3,000 jobs this year – just under 1 percent growth – with oil and gas, health care, construction and transportation contributing to that increase.” The main drivers outlined in the forecast were the Pikka and Willow oil fields; high gold prices with the new Manh Choh mine producing its first bar in 2024; increased military spending; and stabilized fisheries and tourism markets.
Alaska’s seasonally adjusted personal income was $59.4 billion in the second quarter of 2025 according to the Federal Bureau of Economic Analysis (“BEA”). Alaska had an annualized improvement of 9.7% in the first quarter and 5% in the second quarter of 2025. This is compared to the national average of 6.4% in the first quarter and 5.5% in the second quarter of 2025. Alaska enjoyed an annual personal income improvement of 5.8% in 2024 compared to the U.S. increase of 5.6%. Per capita personal income in Alaska is now estimated at $80,208 according to the BEA, ranking it 12th highest of the 50 U.S. states.
Alaska’s Gross State Product (“GSP”) in the second quarter of 2025 reached $74.2 billion according to the BEA. Alaska’s inflation adjusted “real” GSP increased 1.5% in 2024, 1.8% annualized in the first quarter of 2025, and 2% in the second quarter of 2025. The average U.S. GDP growth rate was 2.8% for 2024, annualized -0.6% in the first quarter of 2025 and 3.8% in the second quarter of 2025. Alaska’s real GSP improvement in the second quarter of 2025 was led by the Mining, Oil & Gas sector; Transportation & Warehousing; Professional, Scientific & Technical Services; and Manufacturing, but was somewhat offset by decreases in Retail Trade and Government.
Alaska exported $5.9 billion in goods to foreign countries in 2024 according to the U.S. International Trade Administration. China is the largest importer of Alaska’s products at $1.5 billion, followed by Australia at $804 million, Japan at $674 million and South Korea at $634 million in 2024. Fish and related maritime products accounted for the largest volume
7
at $2.1 billion, followed by minerals and ores at $2 billion, and primary metals at $992 million in 2024. Oil & Gas international exports were $380 million because the majority of Alaska’s production is refined and consumed within the United States.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the U.S. increased 2.7% between December of 2024 and December of 2025. In Alaska, the rate of increase was lower at 1.9% for the same time period. The largest increases in Alaska since August of 2025 came from Motor Fuel (+6.5%), Apparel (+6.5%), Housing (+3.4%), and Food and beverage (+2.9%). Slower increases or declining costs in Recreation (+2%), Education (+0.7%), and Transportation (-5.3%), helped moderate inflationary pressures in Alaska relative to the U.S in 2025.
The monthly average price of Alaska North Slope (“ANS”) crude oil has ranged between $76.39 a barrel in January of 2025 and $62.70 in December. The Alaska Department of Revenue (“DOR”) calculated ANS crude oil production was 468 thousand barrels per day (“bpd”) in Alaska’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. In the Fall 2025 Revenue Forecast published December 19, 2025, the DOR expects production to average 457 thousand bpd in fiscal year 2026 and 518 thousand bpd in fiscal year 2027. Over the next decade it is expected to continue to grow to 621 thousand bpd, or 33% by fiscal year 2036. This is primarily a result of new production coming on-line in and around the NPR-A region west of Prudhoe Bay. A partnership between Santos and Repsol is constructing the new Pikka field and ConocoPhillips is developing the large new Willow field. There are also several smaller new fields in Alaska’s North Slope that are contributing to the State of Alaska’s production growth estimate.
The Alaska Permanent Fund is seeded annually by the oil wealth the State continues to save each year and has grown significantly over 40 years of successful investment. As of November 30, 2025 the fund’s value was $85.75 billion. According to the DOR it is scheduled to contribute $3.8 billion to Alaska’s General Fund in fiscal year 2026 and $4 billion in fiscal year 2027 for general government spending and to pay the annual dividend.
According to the Alaska Multiple Listing Services, the average sales price of a single-family home in Anchorage rose 4.4% in 2025 to $532,301, following an increase of 6.2% in 2024 and 5.2% in 2023. This was the eighth consecutive year of price increases in the Anchorage market.
The average sales price for single family homes in the Matanuska Susitna Borough rose 6.6% in 2025 to $440,237, after climbing 3.8% in 2024 and 4% in 2023. This continues a trend of average price increases for more than a decade in the region. These two markets represent where the vast majority of the Bank’s residential lending activity occurs.
The Alaska Multiple Listing Services reported a 0.6% decrease in the number of units sold in Anchorage when comparing 2025 to 2024. There were 2,222 homes sold in 2025 and 2,235 sold in 2024. Last year there were 1,764 homes sold in the Matanuska Susitna Borough, compared to 1,632 in 2024, an increase of 8.1%.
A material portion of our loans at December 31, 2025, were secured by real estate located in greater Anchorage, Matanuska-Susitna Valley, Fairbanks, and Southeast Alaska. In 2025, 26% of our revenue was derived from the residential housing market in the form of loan fees and interest on mortgage loans, interest and fees on residential construction and land development loans, gains on the sale or mortgage loans, and mortgage servicing income as compared to 31% and 24% in 2024 and 2023, respectively. Real estate values generally are affected by economic and other conditions in the area where the real estate is located, fluctuations in interest rates, changes in tax and other laws, and other matters outside of our control. A decline in real estate values in the greater Anchorage, Matanuska-Susitna Valley, Fairbanks, and Southeast Alaska areas could significantly reduce the value of the real estate collateral securing our real estate loans and could increase the likelihood of defaults under these loans.
8
Long Term Economic Factors
We believe the long-term growth of the Alaska economy will most likely be impacted by large scale natural resource development projects. Several multi-billion dollar projects can potentially advance in the moderate-term. Some of these projects include copper, gold and molybdenum production at the proposed Donlin Gold mine and continued exploration in the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska. Two significant oil production projects, Willow and Pikka, have been sanctioned and are under development, with first oil expected from Pikka in 2026 and from Willow in 2029. We believe the companies developing these projects will continue to provide significant capital investment, as long as oil prices remain sufficient to justify the economics of the projects and the tax environment remains stable. If these projects stall or fail to move forward, we believe state revenues will continue to decline with falling oil production from older fields on the ANS. We anticipate the decline in state revenues would likely have a negative effect on Alaska’s economy.
The oil industry plays a significant role in the economy of Alaska, but revenues for the State of Alaska are less dependent on the oil industry than they have been historically due to the implementation of a percent of market value (“POMV”) concept that has balanced and created more certainty in state revenue streams. Part of the POMV concept creates an allocation of a portion of investment earnings to unrestricted revenue instead of restricted revenue. According to the DOR, in 2025 and 2024, investment earnings allocated from the Alaska Permanent Fund under the POMV represented $3.8 billion, or 60%, and $3.7 billion, or 55%, respectively, of unrestricted State revenues. As of December 31, 2025, Alaska's Constitutional Budget Reserve was $2.9 billion and the Alaska Permanent Fund had a balance of $86.3 billion. Investment revenue generated by the Alaska Permanent Fund is also used to pay an annual dividend to every eligible Alaskan citizen.
Even though we believe that the implementation of the POMV concept is a positive for the state of Alaska's financial well-being, we anticipate that if oil prices drop to lower levels in the longer term it will be a concern for Alaska's long-term economic growth. However, we believe Alaska's economy is less sensitive to oil price volatility within a six- to twelve-month time frame than Alaska's state government budget. While state government revenue from oil royalties is immediately and directly impacted by a drop in oil prices, we believe that the large scale and nature of oil wells in Alaska are such that project commitments that currently exist will most likely not be disrupted by short-term price volatility.
We believe our exposure to the tourism industry diversifies the Company's customer base in the long-term. We believe this helps mitigate the effect that a decline in natural resource industries, specifically the oil industry, in Alaska would have on the Company's operations. Southeast Alaska is the primary destination for cruise ships that visit Alaska. Based on information from Rain Coast Data, over one million cruise ship tourists have visited Southeast Alaska annually in recent years, including 1.7 million in 2023 and 1.2 million in 2022. Additionally, the Cruise Lines International Association has reported that 1.7 million cruise ship visitors visited Southeast Alaska in 2024 and 2025.
Alaska’s residents are not subject to any state income or state sales taxes. For over 40 years, Alaska residents have received annual distributions payable in October of each year from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, which is supported by royalties from oil production and earnings from its investments. The distribution was $1,000 per eligible resident in 2025 for an aggregate distribution of approximately $619.6 million. The Anchorage Economic Development Corporation estimates that, for most Anchorage households, distributions from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation exceed other Alaska taxes to which those households are subject.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive and concentrated banking environment. We compete not only with other commercial banks, but also with many other financial competitors, including credit unions (including Global Credit Union, one of the nation’s largest credit unions), finance companies, mortgage banks and brokers, securities firms, insurance companies, private lenders, and other financial intermediaries, many of which have a state-wide or regional presence, and in some cases, a national presence. Our non-bank competitors also generally operate under fewer regulatory constraints, and in the case of credit unions, are not subject to income taxes. Changes in credit union operating practices have effectively eliminated the “common bond” of membership requirement and liberalized their lending authority to include business and real estate loans on par with commercial banks. The differences in resources and regulation may make it harder for us to compete profitably, to reduce the rates that we can earn on loans and investments, to increase the rates we must offer on deposits and other funds, and adversely affect our financial condition and earnings.
As our industry becomes increasingly dependent on and oriented toward technology-driven delivery systems, permitting transactions to be conducted electronically, non-bank institutions are able to attract funds and provide lending and other financial services even without offices located in our primary service area. Some insurance companies and brokerage firms compete for deposits by offering rates that are higher than may be appropriate for the Company in relation to its asset and
9
liability management objectives. However, we offer a wide array of deposit products and services and believe we can compete effectively through relationship based pricing and effective delivery of “Superior Customer First Service”. We also compete with full service investment firms for non-bank financial products and services through retail investment advisory services and annuity investment products that we offer through a third-party vendor.
Currently, there are seven commercial banks operating in Alaska. At June 30, 2025, the date of the most recently available information from the FDIC, the Bank had approximately a 18% share of the Alaska bank deposits, 20% in the Anchorage area, 23% in Juneau, 22% in Matanuska-Susitna, 22% in Sitka, 14% in Fairbanks, 14% in the Kenai Peninsula, 64% in Nome, 9% in Ketchikan, and 8% in Kodiak.
The following table sets forth market share data for the banks having a presence in Alaska as of June 30, 2025, the most recent date for which comparative deposit information is available.
| Financial institution | Number of branches | Total deposits (in thousands) | Market share of total bank deposits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northrim Bank(1) | 20 | $2,812,725 | 17.5 | % | |
| Wells Fargo Bank Alaska(1) | 37 | 6,771,111 | 42.2 | % | |
| First National Bank Alaska(1) | 27 | 3,586,204 | 22.4 | % | |
| Key Bank(1) | 10 | 1,092,955 | 6.8 | % | |
| First Bank(1) | 9 | 798,785 | 5.0 | % | |
| Mt. McKinley Bank(1) | 5 | 519,136 | 3.2 | % | |
| Denali State Bank(1) | 5 | 463,259 | 2.9 | % | |
| Total bank branches | 113 | $16,044,175 | 100 | % |
(1) FDIC Summary of Deposits as of June 30, 2025.
Supervision and Regulation
General
Federal and state banking laws impose a comprehensive system of supervision, examination, regulation, and enforcement on the operations of insured banks and their holding companies. Supervision and regulation of banks, their holding companies, and affiliates is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and customers, the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”) of the FDIC, and the U.S. banking and financial system, rather than holders of our capital stock. As a result, our growth, earnings performance, and operations may be affected by the requirements of federal and state statutes and by the regulations and policies of various bank regulatory agencies, including the Division, the FDIC, the FRB, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the "CFPB"). Furthermore, tax laws administered by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state taxing authorities, accounting rules developed by the FASB, securities laws administered by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and state securities authorities, anti-money laundering laws enforced by the Treasury Department, and U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) regulations with respect to small business loans, have an impact on our business. These statutes, regulations, and policies are continually under the review of the United States Congress and state legislatures, as well as federal and state regulatory agencies, and the nature and extent of future legislative, regulatory, or other developments affecting financial institutions are impossible to predict with any certainty. Any change in the statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to us, including changes in their interpretation, expectations or implementation, could have a material effect on our business and operations.
The following is a summary of material elements of the regulatory and supervisory framework applicable to the Company, the Bank and their subsidiaries. It does not describe all of the statutes, regulations, and regulatory policies that apply, nor does it provide complete summaries of the statutes, regulations, and policies referenced therein.
Supervision and Regulation of the Company
The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHC Act”) registered with and subject to examination by the FRB. Federal law subjects bank holding companies, such as the Company, to restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations. Violations of laws and regulations, or
10
other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in regulatory agencies imposing fines, penalties, or cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees, and other parties participating in the affairs of a bank or bank holding company. The Company is also subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Securities Exchange Act of 1934”), including certain requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Source of Strength
Under longstanding FRB policy and under the Dodd-Frank Act, a bank holding company is required to act as a source of financial strength for its subsidiary bank. The Company could be required to commit resources to its subsidiary bank in circumstances where it might not do so, absent such requirement.
Notice and Approval Requirements Related to Control, Investments, and Activities
Bank holding companies, such as the Company, are subject to a variety of restrictions on the activities in which they can engage and the acquisitions they can make. The activities or acquisitions of bank holding companies, such as the Company, that are not financial holding companies, are limited to those which constitute banking, managing or controlling banks or which are closely related activities. A bank holding company is required to obtain the prior approval of the FRB for the acquisition of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities or substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Nonbank acquisitions and activities of a bank holding company are also generally limited to the acquisition of up to 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting securities of a company unless the FRB has previously determined that the nonbank activities are closely related to banking, or prior approval is obtained from the FRB. Before approving any such transaction, the FRB is required by the BHC Act to consider a number of factors, including the transaction’s competitive impact, the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding companies and banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the community to be served, and the effectiveness of the parties in combating money laundering activities.
Provisions of the Bank Merger Act impose similar approval standards for an insured depository institution to merge with another insured depository institution or a non-insured institution. On September 17, 2024, the FDIC finalized changes to its Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions (the “Policy Statement”), which outlines factors that the FDIC will consider when evaluating a proposed bank merger transaction. Also on September 17, 2024, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) withdrew its 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines and announced that it will instead evaluate the competitive impact of bank mergers using its 2023 Merger Guidelines that the DOJ applies to mergers in all industries. Compared to the 1995 Bank Merger Guidelines, the 2023 Merger Guidelines set forth more stringent concentration limits and add several largely qualitative bases on which the DOJ may challenge a merger. While the effect of these changes for particular transactions remains unclear, both the Policy Statement and the change in the DOJ’s bank merger antitrust policy may make it more difficult and/or costly for us to obtain regulatory approval for an acquisition or otherwise result in more onerous conditions to obtain approval for an acquisition.
The BHC Act, as amended by the interstate banking provisions of the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Riegle-Neal Act”), permits us to acquire a bank located in any other state, regardless of state law to the contrary, subject to certain deposit percentage, aging requirements, and other restrictions. The Riegle-Neal Act also generally permits national- and state-chartered banks to branch interstate through acquisitions of banks in other states. Bank holding companies must be “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” to obtain federal bank regulatory approval of an interstate acquisition without regard to state law prohibiting the transaction.
The BHC Act also generally requires FRB approval for a bank holding company’s acquisition of a company that is not an insured depository institution. Bank holding companies generally may engage, directly or indirectly, only in managing or controlling banks, and such other activities as are determined by the FRB to be closely related to banking, and certain other permissible nonbanking activities. Bank holding companies generally must notify the FRB before acquiring a company that is not an insured depository institution or engaging in a permissible nonbanking activity, and the FRB considers several factors in reviewing such a notice. The FRB may order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any of these activities or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when it has reasonable cause to believe that the bank holding company’s continued ownership, activity, or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of it or any of its bank subsidiaries.
Certain acquisitions of our voting stock may be subject to regulatory approval or notice under federal law. Investors are responsible for ensuring that they do not, directly or indirectly, acquire shares of our stock in excess of the amount that can
11
be acquired without regulatory approval under the Change in Bank Control Act and the BHC Act, which prohibit any person or company from acquiring control of the Company without, in most cases, the prior written approval of the FRB.
Capital Adequacy
Both the Company and the Bank are required to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital, under capital requirement rules (the “Rules”) of federal banking regulators (including the FDIC and the FRB). The Rules apply to both depository institutions (such as the Bank) and their holding companies (such as the Company). The Rules reflect, in part, certain standards initially adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2010 (which standards are commonly referred to as “Basel III”) as well as requirements contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Rules recognize three types, or tiers, of capital: common equity Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. Common equity Tier 1 capital generally consists of retained earnings and common stock instruments (subject to certain adjustments), as well as accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), except to the extent that the Company and the Bank exercise a one-time irrevocable option to exclude certain components of AOCI. Additional Tier 1 capital generally includes noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus subject to certain adjustments and limitations. Tier 2 capital generally includes certain capital instruments (such as subordinated debt) and portions of the amounts of the allowance for loan and lease losses, subject to certain requirements and deductions. The term "Tier 1 capital" means common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital, and the term "total capital" means Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital.
The Rules generally measure an institution's capital using four capital measures or ratios. The common equity Tier 1 capital ratio is the ratio of the institution's common equity Tier 1 capital to its total risk-weighted assets. The Tier 1 capital ratio is the ratio of the institution's total Tier 1 capital to its total risk-weighted assets. The total capital ratio is the ratio of the institution's total capital to its total risk-weighted assets. The leverage ratio is the ratio of the institution's Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets. To determine risk-weighted assets, assets of an institution are generally placed into a risk category and given a percentage weight based on the relative risk of that category. The percentage weights range from 0% to 1,250%. An asset's risk-weighted value will generally be its percentage weight multiplied by the asset's value as determined under generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, certain off-balance-sheet items are converted to balance-sheet credit equivalent amounts, and each amount is then assigned to one of the risk categories. An institution's federal regulator may require the institution to hold more capital than would otherwise be required under the Rules if the regulator determines that the institution's capital requirements under the Rules are not commensurate with the institution's credit, market, operational or other risks.
Both the Company and the Bank are required to have a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% as well as a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 6.0% and a total risk-based ratio of 8.0%. In addition to the preceding requirements, both the Company and the Bank are required to have a “conservation buffer,” consisting of common equity Tier 1 capital, which is at least 2.5% above each of the preceding common equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 risk-based ratio and the total risk-based ratio. An institution that does not meet the conservation buffer will be subject to restrictions on certain activities including payment of dividends, stock repurchases and discretionary bonuses to executive officers. In addition, insured depository institutions such as the Bank, unlike bank holding companies, are subject to further capital requirements to be deemed “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action provisions of the Rules and implementing regulations of the federal banking agencies, as described in the section entitled “—Supervision and Regulation of the Bank—Prompt Corrective Action” below
The Rules set forth the manner in which certain capital elements are determined, including but not limited to, requiring certain deductions related to mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets. The Rules permit certain holding companies, including the Company, to continue to include trust preferred securities issued prior to May 19, 2010 in Tier 1 capital, generally up to 25% of other Tier 1 capital.
The Rules made changes in the methods of calculating certain risk-based assets, which in turn affects the calculation of risk- based ratios. Higher or more sensitive risk weights are assigned to various categories of assets, among which are commercial real estate, credit facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property, certain exposures or credits that are 90 days past due or are nonaccrual, foreign exposures, certain corporate exposures, securitization exposures, equity exposures and in certain cases mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets. We believe that the current capital levels of the Company and the Bank are in compliance with the standards under the Rules including the conservation buffer.
12
Payment of Dividends and Stock Repurchases
There also are certain limitations on the ability of the Company to pay dividends to its shareholders. It is the policy of the FRB that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of net income available over the past year and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s current and expected future capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines a bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. Additionally, the Alaska Corporations Code generally prohibits the Company from making any distributions to the Company's shareholders unless the amount of the retained earnings of the Company immediately before the distribution equals or exceeds the amount of the proposed distribution. The Alaska Corporations Code also prohibits the Company from making any distribution to the Company's shareholders if the Company or a subsidiary of the Company making the distribution is, or as a result of the distribution would be, likely to be unable to meet its liabilities as they mature.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 was enacted, which among other things, imposed a one percent excise tax on publicly traded U.S. corporations for the fair market value of stock repurchased after December 31, 2022. With certain exceptions, the value of stock repurchased is net of stock issued in the year, including those issued pursuant to share-based compensation programs.
Supervision and Regulation of the Bank
The Bank is an Alaska-state chartered commercial bank and is subject to examination, supervision, and regulation by the Division. The FDIC insures the Bank’s deposits and also examines, supervises, and regulates the Bank. The Bank is required to file periodic reports with the FDIC and the Division and is subject to periodic examinations and evaluations by those regulatory authorities. Almost every area of the operations and financial condition of the Bank is subject to extensive regulation and supervision and to various requirements and restrictions under federal and state law, including loans, reserves, investments, issuance of securities, establishment of branches, capital adequacy, liquidity, earnings, dividends, management practices, and the provision of services. These regulations include limitations on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company, numerous federal and state consumer protection laws imposing requirements on the making, enforcement, and collection of consumer loans, and restrictions on and regulation of the sale of mutual funds and other uninsured investment products to customers.
Safety and Soundness
The federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines that establish operational and managerial standards to promote the safety and soundness of federally insured depository institutions such as the Bank. Among other things, applicable federal and state statutes and regulations which govern a bank’s activities relate to minimum capital requirements, required reserves against deposits, investments, loans, legal lending limits, mergers and consolidations, borrowings, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches and other aspects of its operations. The Division and the FDIC also have authority to prohibit banks under their supervision from engaging in what they consider to be unsafe or unsound practices.
Dividends
Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends that subsidiary banks can pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval. Under Alaska law, the Bank is not permitted to pay or declare a dividend in an amount greater than its undivided profits. The FDIC or the Division could also take the position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. In addition, recent capital rules may affect the Bank's ability to pay dividends to the Company.
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The FDIC provides insurance coverage for certain deposits held by the Bank through the DIF, which the FDIC maintains by assessing depository institutions an insurance premium. The Bank is assessed deposit insurance premiums by the FDIC using a risk-based assessment rate and an adjusted average total assets. A depository institution’s deposit insurance may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound, or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, or has violated any applicable rule, regulation, or order or condition enacted or imposed by a regulatory agency. In the liquidation or other resolution of a failed insured depository institution, claims for administrative expenses (including certain employee compensation claims) and deposits are afforded a priority over other general unsecured claims, including non-deposit claims, and claims of a parent company such as the Company. Such priority
13
creditors would include the FDIC, which succeeds to the position of insured depositors to the extent it has made payments to such depositors.
FDIC insurance coverage is funded by the FDIC's assessment on insured depository institutions like the Bank and FDIC's annual base assessment rates are currently between 2.5 and 42 basis points on the depository institution's quarterly average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. Base assessment rates for banks vary depending on whether a depository institution is small or large and highly complex per FDIC's definition. In deriving the base assessment rate, the FDIC applies financial ratios, scorecards, and other financial measures to determine a bank's ability to withstand financial stress.
In October 2022, the FDIC adopted a final rule to increase the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points beginning with the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The increased assessment is expected to improve the likelihood that the DIF reserve ratio would reach the statutory minimum of 1.35% by the statutory deadline prescribed under the FDIC's amended restoration plan. The FDIC has indicated that the new assessment rate schedules will remain in effect until the DIF reserve ratio meets or exceeds 2 percent.
Dodd-Frank Act
The Dodd-Frank Act significantly modified and expanded the legal and regulatory requirements imposed on banks and other financial institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance coverage to $250,000 per depositor and deposit insurance assessments paid by the Bank are now based on the Bank’s total assets. Other Dodd-Frank Act changes include: (i) tightened capital requirements for the Bank and the Company; (ii) new requirements on parties engaged in residential mortgage origination, brokerage, lending and securitization; (iii) expanded restrictions on affiliate and insider transactions; (iv) enhanced restrictions on management compensation and related governance procedures; (v) creation of a federal CFPB with broad authority to regulate consumer financial products and services; and (vi) restrictions and prohibitions on the ability of banking entities to engage in proprietary trading and to invest in or have certain relationships with hedge funds and private equity funds.
Restrictions on Lending, Insider Transactions, and Affiliate Transactions
There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its nonbank subsidiaries can borrow or otherwise obtain credit from their banking subsidiaries or engage in certain other transactions with or involving those banking subsidiaries. With certain exceptions, federal law imposes limitations on, and requires collateral for, extensions of credit by insured depository institutions, such as the Bank, to their non-bank affiliates, such as the Company.
Transactions between the Company and the Bank are quantitatively and qualitatively restricted under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Regulation W. Section 23A places restrictions on the Bank's “covered transactions” with the Company, including loans and other extensions of credit, investments in the securities of, and purchases of assets from the Company. Section 23B requires that certain transactions, including all covered transactions, be on market terms and conditions. Federal Reserve Regulation W combines statutory restrictions on transactions between the Bank and the Company with FRB interpretations in an effort to simplify compliance with Sections 23A and 23B.
Regulation O, governs and restricts extensions of credit by a member bank to an executive officer, director, or principal shareholder of the bank and its affiliates. By making these provisions applicable to state non-member banks, the regulations impose these restrictions on the Bank’s purchases or sales of assets from or to insiders of the Bank and the Company. In general, extensions of credit to insiders: (i) may not exceed certain dollar limitations; (ii) must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties; and (iii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
Prompt Corrective Action
In addition to the minimum capital standards, the federal banking agencies have issued regulations to implement a system of "prompt corrective action." These regulations apply to the Bank but not the Company. The regulations establish five capital categories; under the Rules, a bank generally is:
“well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or more, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or more, a common equity Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 6.5% or more, and a leverage capital ratio of 5.0% or more, and is not subject to any written agreement, order or capital directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure;
14
“adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or more, a common equity Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 4.5% or more, and a leverage capital ratio of 4.0% or more;
“undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio less than 6.0%, a common equity risk-based ratio less than 4.5% or a leverage capital ratio less than 4.0%;
“significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio less than 4.0%, a common equity risk-based ratio less than 3.0% or a leverage capital ratio less than 3.0%; and
“critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
A bank that, based upon its capital levels, is classified as “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized” or “undercapitalized” may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition, or an unsafe or unsound practice, warrants such treatment.
At each successive lower capital category, a bank is subject to increasing supervisory restrictions. For example, being “adequately capitalized” rather than “well-capitalized” affects a bank’s ability to accept brokered deposits without the prior approval of the FDIC, and may cause greater difficulty obtaining retail deposits. Banks in the “adequately capitalized” classification may have to pay higher interest rates to continue to attract those deposits, and higher deposit insurance rates for those deposits. This status also affects a bank’s eligibility for a streamlined review process for acquisition proposals.
Management intends to maintain capital ratios for the Bank in 2026 that exceed the FDIC’s requirements for the “well-capitalized” capital requirement classification. The dividends that the Bank pays to the Company will be limited to the extent necessary for the Bank to meet the regulatory requirements of a “well-capitalized” bank.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Bank is subject to the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”). The CRA requires that the Bank help meet the credit needs of the communities it serves, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound operation of the institution. The FDIC assigns one of four possible ratings to the Bank’s CRA performance and makes the rating and the examination reports publicly available. The four possible ratings are outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve and substantial noncompliance. A financial institution’s CRA rating can affect an institution’s future business. In its most recent CRA examination, the Bank received a “Satisfactory” rating from the FDIC.
Anti-Money-Laundering Regulations
The Bank is also subject to the Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”) and other anti-money laundering laws and regulations including the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) and the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (the “AMLA”). In addition, FinCEN has promulgated customer due diligence and customer identification rules that require banks to identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners. The USA PATRIOT Act mandates that financial service companies implement additional policies and procedures and take heightened measures designed to address any or all of the following matters: customer identification programs, money laundering, terrorist financing, identifying and reporting suspicious activities and currency transactions, currency crimes, and cooperation between financial institutions and law enforcement authorities.
Consumer Protection Regulations
A number of other federal and state consumer protection laws extensively govern the Bank’s relationship with its customers. These laws include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Service Members Civil Relief Act and these laws’ respective state-law counterparts, as well as state and territorial usury laws and laws regarding unfair and deceptive acts and practices. These and other laws subject the Bank to substantial regulatory oversight and, among other things, require disclosures of the cost of credit and terms of deposit accounts, provide substantive consumer rights, prohibit discrimination in credit transactions, regulate the use of credit report information, provide financial privacy protections, prohibit unfair, deceptive and abusive practices, and restrict the Bank’s ability to raise interest rates.
15
Privacy, Data Protection, and Cybersecurity
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLB Act”) also included extensive consumer privacy provisions. These provisions, among other things, limit the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic consumer information to non-affiliated third parties. The regulations require disclosure of privacy policies and allow consumers to prevent certain personal information from being shared with non-affiliated third parties. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (“FACT Act”) requires financial institutions to develop and implement an identity theft prevention program to detect, prevent and mitigate identity theft “red flags” to reduce the risk that customer information will be misused to conduct fraudulent financial transactions. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, the rule-making authority for the privacy provisions of the GLB Act has been transferred to the CFPB. In addition, the states are permitted to adopt more extensive privacy protections through legislation or regulation.
In July 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) published adopted final rules relating to risk management, strategy, governance and incident disclosure which are applicable to public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. These SEC rules, and any other regulatory guidance, are in addition to notification and disclosure requirements under state and federal banking law and regulations.
The federal banking regulators regularly issue new guidance and standards, and update existing guidance and standards, regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk management among financial institutions. Financial institutions are expected to comply with such guidance and standards and to accordingly develop appropriate security controls and risk management processes. If we fail to observe such regulatory guidance or standards, we could be subject to various regulatory sanctions, including financial penalties.
Effective in 2022, the federal banking agencies adopted a final rule, that requires banking organizations to notify their primary banking regulator within 36 hours of determining that a “computer-security incident” has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, the banking organization’s ability to carry out banking operations or deliver banking products and services to a material portion of its customer base, its businesses and operations that would result in material loss, or that would impact the stability of the United States. State regulators have also been increasingly active in implementing privacy and cybersecurity standards and regulations.
Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks, including litigation and enforcement risks, are expected to be elevated for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by us and our customers.
Supervision and Regulation of SCF
The Bank's subsidiary, SCF, is subject to supervision and regulation by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (the “DFPI”). If the DFPI should determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, or other aspects of SCF’s operations are unsatisfactory, or that SCF has violated any law or regulation, various remedies are available to the DFPI.
Available Information
The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as well as its current reports on Form 8-K and proxy statement filings (and all amendments thereto), which are filed with the SEC, are accessible free of charge at our website at http://www.northrim.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. By making this reference to our website, the Company does not intend to incorporate into this report any information contained in the website. The website should not be considered part of this report.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, including the Company, that file electronically with the SEC.