Sky Harbour Group Corp (SKYH) Business
This page reproduces the company's own Item 1 Business text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.
Informational only - not investment advice. See Disclaimer.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are an aviation infrastructure development company building the first nationwide network of Home Base Operator (“HBO”) campuses designed exclusively for business aircraft. We develop, lease and manage general aviation hangars across the United States, targeting airfields in markets with significant based aircraft populations and high hangar demand. Our HBO campuses feature private and semi-private hangars and a full suite of dedicated services specifically optimized for home based, versus transient, aircraft.
The physical footprint of the U.S. business aviation fleet grew by almost 46 million square feet in the past sixteen years, with hangar supply lagging dramatically, especially in key growth markets. As the fleet of private jets in the United States continues to grow, with recent new aircraft deliveries exceeding retirements, demand for hangar space is at a premium in part because new jets require taller tail clearances and more square footage of hangar space and the pace of new hangar construction has lagged behind the demand. The cumulative square footage of the business aircraft fleet in the United States increased 73% between 2010 and 2025. Moreover, over that same period, there was an 120% increase in the square footage of larger private jets – those with greater than a 24-foot tail height. A recent study conducted by a business aircraft manufacturer forecasted that business aircraft will only continue to grow in the next ten years, with up to 8,500 new business jet deliveries worth over $283 billion expected to be delivered between 2025 and 2034, with over two-thirds of the deliveries expected to be comprised of larger private jets. This forecast is further supported by data from the major business aviation manufacturers that suggest the current order backlog for new business aviation aircraft as of December 31, 2025 is over $57 billion, an increase of approximately 10% over the prior year.
These larger footprint aircraft do not fit in much of the existing hangar infrastructure and impose stacking challenges and constraints in the traditional shared or community hangars operated by fixed-base operators (“FBO”). The addition of winglets (the vertical extensions on aircraft wingtips) on most modern business jets inhibits wing-over-wing storage. Aircraft hangars are in high demand and short supply, with some airports compiling waiting lists that can exceed several years.
We believe our scalable, real estate-centric business model is uniquely positioned to capture this market opportunity and address the increased imbalance between the supply and demand for private jet storage. We intend to capitalize on the existing hangar supply constraints at major U.S. airports by targeting high-end tenants in markets where there is a shortage of private and FBO hangar space, or where such hangars are or are becoming obsolete.
We expect to realize economies of scale in construction through prototype hangar designs replicated at our HBO campuses across the United States through our in-house construction management and general contracting. This allows for centralized procurement, straightforward permitting processes, efficient development processes, and the best hangar in business aviation. Unlike a service company, our revenues are mostly derived from long-term rental agreements, offering stability and forward visibility of revenues and cash flows. This allows us to fund our development through the public bond market and bank debt, providing capital efficiency and mitigating refinance risk.
7
Table of Contents
In contrast with community hangars and other facilities provided by FBOs, the HBO campuses we develop provide the following features and services:
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | private hangar space for exclusive or semi-exclusive use of the tenant; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | adjoining configurable lounge and office suites; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | low-traffic campus environments free of transient aircraft and associated activities; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | line crews and services dedicated exclusively to tenants; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | climate control to mitigate condensation and associated corrosion; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | features to support in-hangar aircraft maintenance; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | no-foam fire suppression; and |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | customized software to provide security, control access and monitor hangar space. |
We use a standard set of proprietary prototype hangar designs, which are intended to deliver high-quality business aviation facilities, lower construction costs, minimize development risk, expedite permit issuance, and facilitate the implementation of refinements across its portfolio. Hangar features include:
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | the ability to accommodate heavy business jets in multi-configuration; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | compliance with National Fire Protection Association (“NFPA”) 409 Group III fire code, eliminating foam fire protection systems, resulting in lower construction costs and operating expenses, as well as eliminating accidental foam discharges and the resultant negative effects on aircraft maintenance and resale value; |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | high-voltage capability, industrial drainage and impervious floors that support in-hangar maintenance and inspections; and |
| Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 |
|---|---|---|
| • | control through smartphone application. |
Our product strategy aims to attract tenants with exclusive or semi-exclusive access to their aircraft, minimize the risk of damage to aircraft, provide increased access, security and control, facilitate maintenance, and improve pre-flight and post-flight convenience for owners, operators, and their support crews. We believe that with no transient traffic, our HBO hangar campuses offer a shorter time to wheels-up, especially during periods of peak traffic. Our research has indicated our current and typical future tenants operate late model business jets that emit less noise than other based aircraft, leading to a decreased average noise footprint at our HBO hangar campuses.
We believe demand for HBO hangar campuses will be driven broadly by the growing size of the business aviation fleet in the United States and the delivery of larger aircraft with taller tail heights, as well as the privacy and security inherent at our hangar campuses in comparison to operations focused on transient and commercial aircraft. The discovery by first-time flyers in the convenience, control and comfort of general aviation has caused a shift in consumer behavior which we believe will also support increasing demand for HBO hangar campuses.
8
Table of Contents
Our Properties
We develop our HBO campuses on long-term ground leases (or sub-leases thereof) at airports with suitable infrastructure serving metropolitan centers across the United States. Our portfolio of ground leases as of December 31, 2025 was as follows:
| Airport | IATA Code | Location (City, State) | Location (Metropolitan Center) | Ground Lessor | Ground Lease Acres | Ground Lease Exp. Year (1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addison Airport | ADS | Addison, TX | Dallas, TX | Town of Addison | 12.5 | 2065 | |||||||||
| Bradley International Airport | BDL | Windsor Locks, CT | Hartford, CT | Connecticut Airport Authority | 8.0 | 2075 | |||||||||
| Camarillo Airport | CMA | Camarillo, CA | Los Angeles, CA | County of Ventura | 17.1 (2) | 2073 (2) | |||||||||
| Centennial Airport | APA | Englewood, CO | Denver, CO | Arapahoe County Public Airport Authority | 19.7 | 2097 | |||||||||
| Chicago Executive Airport | PWK | Wheeling, IL | Chicago, IL | Village of Wheeling and City of Prospect Heights | 15.0 | 2075 | |||||||||
| Fort Worth Meacham International Airport | FTW | Fort Worth, TX | Fort Worth, TX | City of Fort Worth | 4.5 | 2056 | |||||||||
| Hillsboro Airport | HIO | Hillsboro, OR | Portland, OR | Port of Portland | 13.2 | 2072 | |||||||||
| Hudson Valley Regional Airport | POU | Wappingers Falls, NY | New York, NY | County of Duchess | 7.1 | 2066 | |||||||||
| King County International Airport (Boeing Field) | BFI | Seattle, WA | Seattle, WA | King County | 5.0 | 2026 | |||||||||
| Long Beach Airport | LGB | Long Beach, CA | Los Angeles, CA | City of Long Beach | 17.1 | 2075 | |||||||||
| Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport | OPF | Opa Locka, FL | Miami, FL | Miami-Dade County | 22.6 | 2079 | |||||||||
| Nashville International Airport | BNA | Nashville, TN | Nashville, TN | Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority | 15.2 | 2070 | |||||||||
| New York Stewart International Airport | SWF | New Windsor, NY | New York, NY | The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey | 16.0 | 2070 | |||||||||
| Orlando Executive Airport | ORL | Orlando, FL | Orlando, FL | Greater Orlando Aviation Authority | 20.0 | 2074 | |||||||||
| Phoenix Deer Valley Airport | DVT | Phoenix, AZ | Phoenix, AZ | City of Phoenix | 15.4 | 2061 | |||||||||
| Salt Lake City International Airport | SLC | Salt Lake City, UT | Salt Lake City, UT | Salt Lake City Corporation | 8.4 | 2077 | |||||||||
| San José Mineta International Airport | SJC | San José, CA | San José, CA | City of San José | 6.5 | 2044 | |||||||||
| Sugar Land Regional Airport | SGR | Sugar Land, TX | Houston, TX | City of Sugar Land | 4.1 | 2049 | |||||||||
| Trenton-Mercer Airport | TTN | Ewing, NJ | New York, NY - Philadelphia, PA | County of Mercer | 11.8 | 2078 | |||||||||
| Washington Dulles International Airport | IAD | Dulles, VA | Washington, DC | Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority | 18.0 | 2084 |
| (1) | Ground lease expiration years presented assume the exercise of all lease term extension options exercisable at our sole discretion. |
|---|---|
| (2) | Our portfolio at Camarillo Airport consists of two ground leases which cover 6.2 and 10.9 acres, respectively. Such leases expire in 2071 and 2073, respectively. |
9
Table of Contents
The following tables provide supplemental information regarding each of our HBO campus properties in operation and in development:
PROPERTIES IN OPERATION
| Facility | Completion Date | Hangars | Rentable Square Footage | % of Total Rentable Square Footage | Occupancy at December 31, 2025 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGR | December 2020 | 7 | 66,080 | 6.5 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| BNA | November 2022 | 10 | 149,069 | 14.6 | % | 88.9 | % | |||||||||||
| OPF Phase I | February 2023 | 12 | 160,092 | 15.6 | % | 97.6 | % | |||||||||||
| DVT Phase I | April 2025 | 8 | 134,270 | 13.1 | % | 73.1 | % | |||||||||||
| ADS Phase I | June 2025 | 6 | 118,602 | 11.6 | % | 86.7 | % | |||||||||||
| APA Phase I | September 2025 | 9 | 130,664 | 12.8 | % | 26.9 | % | |||||||||||
| SJC Renovation | Existing facility | 1 | 50,431 | 4.9 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| CMA | Existing facility | 4 | 121,931 | 11.9 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| BFI | Existing facility | 4 | 92,495 | 9.0 | % | 39.5 | % | |||||||||||
| Total/Weighted Average | 61 | 1,023,634 | 100.0 | % | 78.1 | % |
PROPERTIES IN DEVELOPMENT
| Facility | Status | Projected Construction Start (1) | Projected Completion Date (1) | Estimated Total Construction Cost ($mm) (1) | Hangars (1) | Rentable Square Footage (1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS Phase II | In Construction | Q2 2025 | Q1 2027 | $24.6 - $27.6 | 4 | 110,990 | |||||||||||
| APA Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 30.4 - 33.6 | 3 | 57,570 | |||||||||||
| BDL Phase I | In Construction | Q3 2025 | Q4 2026 | 40.0 - 42.1 | 3 | 107,360 | |||||||||||
| CMA Phase I | In Development | Q2 2027 | Q2 2028 | 26.0 - 35.0 | 3 | 92,680 | |||||||||||
| DVT Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 34.6 - 38.6 | 4 | 132,732 | |||||||||||
| FTW Phase I | In Development | Q1 2027 | Q1 2028 | 17.5 - 19.5 | 2 | 74,560 | |||||||||||
| HIO Phase I | In Development | Q4 2026 | Q4 2027 | 32.0 - 34.0 | 4 | 107,680 | |||||||||||
| HIO Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 29.5 - 32.0 | 2 | 85,760 | |||||||||||
| IAD Phase I | In Development | Q4 2026 | Q4 2027 | 55.0 - 60.8 | 4 | 171,520 | |||||||||||
| IAD Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 44.7 - 49.4 | 4 | 171,520 | |||||||||||
| LGB Phase I | In Development | Q3 2027 | Q1 2029 | 55.0 - 67.0 | 5 | 196,920 | |||||||||||
| OPF Phase II | In Construction | Q1 2025 | Q2 2026 | 39.3 - 39.6 | 3 | 111,201 | |||||||||||
| ORL Phase I | In Development | Q1 2026 | Q2 2027 | 39.5 - 43.6 | 4 | 133,640 | |||||||||||
| ORL Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 35.2 - 39.0 | 3 | 128,640 | |||||||||||
| POU Phase I | In Development | Q2 2026 | Q3 2027 | 31.0 - 32.5 | 2 | 85,760 | |||||||||||
| POU Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | 18.3 - 20.3 | 1 | 42,880 | |||||||||||
| PWK Phase I | In Development | Q4 2026 | Q4 2027 | 33.0 - 35.6 | 3 | 128,640 | |||||||||||
| PWK Phase II | In Development | TBD | TBD | TBD | 4 | 171,520 | |||||||||||
| SJC Phase II | In Development | Q1 2027 | Q1 2028 | 17.1 - 17.9 | 1 | 28,000 | |||||||||||
| SLC Phase I | In Construction | Q1 2026 | Q1 2027 | 47.2 - 49.0 | 4 | 171,520 | |||||||||||
| SWF Phase I | In Development | TBD | TBD | TBD | 8 | 256,240 | |||||||||||
| TTN Phase I | In Development | Q2 2026 | Q3 2027 | 40.1 - 44.3 | 3 | 128,640 | |||||||||||
| Total | $690.0 - $761.4 | 74 | 2,695,973 |
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
|---|---|
| (1) | Our projections associated with the commencement and completion of construction, estimated total construction cost as of December 31, 2025, hangars, and rentable square footage of our properties in development are inherently subjective and require judgement to estimate. We believe that our estimates of construction costs and timelines are subject to variability based on various factors including, but not limited to, changes in anticipated site plans, hangar mix, hangar specifications, executed guaranteed maximum price construction contracts, and general market conditions. |
10
Table of Contents
The following table identifies the latest available information on the number of aircraft based at each of the airports within our portfolio of ground leases:
| Single Engine | Multi Engine | Jet | Helicopters | Military | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addison Airport (ADS) | 223 | 43 | 131 | 6 | - | 403 | |||||||||||||||||
| Bradley International Airport (BDL) | 3 | 2 | 27 | 5 | 25 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||
| Camarillo Airport (CMA) | 425 | 41 | 36 | 34 | - | 536 | |||||||||||||||||
| Centennial Airport (APA) | 521 | 79 | 172 | 27 | - | 799 | |||||||||||||||||
| Chicago Executive Airport (PWK) | 114 | 16 | 81 | 5 | - | 216 | |||||||||||||||||
| Fort Worth Meacham International Airport (FTW) | 101 | 48 | 85 | 34 | - | 268 | |||||||||||||||||
| Hillsboro Airport (HIO) | 210 | 25 | 32 | 16 | - | 283 | |||||||||||||||||
| Hudson Valley Regional Airport (POU) | 117 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 133 | |||||||||||||||||
| King County International Airport (BFI) | 229 | 40 | 88 | 26 | - | 383 | |||||||||||||||||
| Long Beach International Airport (LBG) | 255 | 72 | 37 | 34 | - | 398 | |||||||||||||||||
| Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF) | 42 | 13 | 103 | 7 | 5 | 170 | |||||||||||||||||
| Nashville International Airport (BNA) | 18 | 9 | 79 | 2 | 15 | 123 | |||||||||||||||||
| New York Stewart International Airport (SWF) | 10 | 3 | 36 | 7 | 11 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||
| Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) | 158 | 40 | 59 | 27 | - | 284 | |||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) | 834 | 83 | 29 | 20 | 2 | 968 | |||||||||||||||||
| Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC) | 126 | 29 | 55 | 13 | 12 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||
| San José Mineta International Airport (SJC) | 66 | 17 | 53 | 6 | - | 142 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sugar Land Regional Airport (SGR) | 101 | 22 | 32 | 4 | - | 159 | |||||||||||||||||
| Trenton-Mercer Airport (TTN) | 40 | 15 | 22 | 14 | - | 91 | |||||||||||||||||
| Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) | 6 | - | 46 | - | - | 52 |
Sources: FAA Airport Master Records as of February 2026.
The following table summarizes the total aircraft operations and forecasted total aircraft operations from 2021 through 2030 at at each of the airports within our portfolio of ground leases:
| Total Operations | Forecasted Total Operations | Average Annual | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | Growth | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Addison Airport (ADS) | 114,295 | 120,256 | 119,149 | 119,100 | 121,136 | 131,533 | 137,116 | 143,352 | 145,348 | 147,398 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Bradley International Airport (BDL) | 72,807 | 79,385 | 79,626 | 83,238 | 85,169 | 91,870 | 93,261 | 94,696 | 95,974 | 97,133 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Camarillo Airport (CMA) | 173,970 | 187,076 | 170,566 | 180,162 | 186,679 | 184,005 | 184,797 | 185,592 | 186,391 | 187,194 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Centennial Airport (APA) | 310,861 | 300,558 | 360,725 | 340,411 | 305,102 | 360,640 | 367,636 | 374,108 | 379,174 | 384,242 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Chicago Executive Airport (PWK) | 99,795 | 97,456 | 98,111 | 98,551 | 100,958 | 98,569 | 99,217 | 99,864 | 100,512 | 101,160 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fort Worth Meacham International Airport (FTW) | 154,015 | 179,415 | 181,712 | 210,278 | 216,544 | 220,110 | 222,163 | 224,229 | 226,309 | 228,403 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Hillsboro Airport (HIO) | 131,527 | 159,261 | 183,771 | 172,718 | 165,317 | 180,778 | 185,054 | 185,385 | 185,717 | 186,050 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Hudson Valley Regional Airport (POU) | 58,306 | 60,403 | 58,935 | 79,227 | 74,437 | 81,092 | 82,363 | 83,638 | 84,915 | 86,197 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| King County International Airport (BFI) | 169,569 | 156,522 | 157,064 | 149,559 | 99,681 | 169,289 | 172,324 | 175,332 | 176,614 | 177,921 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Long Beach International Airport (LGB) | 334,767 | 316,842 | 356,266 | 389,532 | 376,994 | 391,027 | 393,049 | 395,070 | 397,029 | 398,961 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Miami-Opa Locka Executive Airport (OPF) | 163,215 | 157,286 | 173,897 | 140,955 | 155,392 | 167,305 | 174,221 | 180,645 | 183,024 | 185,409 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Nashville International Airport (BNA) | 219,427 | 251,446 | 271,842 | 275,116 | 289,055 | 285,345 | 291,760 | 298,633 | 305,381 | 312,054 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| New York Stewart International Airport (SWF) | 32,175 | 37,262 | 33,368 | 32,352 | 33,766 | 32,267 | 33,819 | 35,080 | 35,537 | 35,887 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Orlando Executive Airport (ORL) | 143,840 | 152,282 | 174,314 | 180,221 | 176,185 | 182,632 | 184,190 | 185,750 | 187,313 | 188,878 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) | 271,979 | 275,153 | 344,393 | 432,874 | 490,702 | 447,756 | 452,885 | 457,296 | 459,527 | 461,779 | 6.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC) | 342,505 | 321,941 | 318,998 | 326,687 | 333,038 | 343,133 | 351,791 | 360,551 | 367,654 | 374,659 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| San José Mineta International Airport (SJC) | 135,032 | 166,038 | 164,546 | 164,630 | 156,655 | 186,163 | 197,496 | 203,543 | 207,385 | 211,206 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sugar Land Regional Airport (SGR) | 72,409 | 79,662 | 87,048 | 79,122 | 89,556 | 81,546 | 81,927 | 82,308 | 82,690 | 83,071 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Trenton-Mercer Airport (TTN) | 85,160 | 105,217 | 99,905 | 93,779 | 79,762 | 98,149 | 101,702 | 102,532 | 103,287 | 104,011 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD) | 245,805 | 272,889 | 284,866 | 306,582 | 340,369 | 320,961 | 326,323 | 333,439 | 338,469 | 343,447 | 3.9 | % |
Sources: Historic data derived from FAA OPSNET and forecast data from FAA TAF.
11
Table of Contents
Customers, Sales and Marketing
We seek to maximize hangar rental charges consistent with capacity utilization at our existing and future facilities. We have, and believe we can continue to, achieve economic occupancy greater than 100% at most of our hangar campuses as certain space within semi-exclusive hangars is rented to multiple tenants, and we also seek to maximize our ability to rent available ramp space outside of our hangars, where permitted. Rental hangar space is open to the public and prospective tenants are reviewed for credit quality and the nature of their intended use of the facilities. As of December 31, 2025, we have 85 tenant leases. A majority of our tenant mix is composed of individuals (directly or through personally or family-owned companies), and is diversified by a mix of charter operations, corporate fleets, government entities, and other aviation services providers. No single tenant accounts for more than 10% of our revenue or rentable square footage.
The weighted-average lease term of our tenant leases is approximately 5.6 years and 2.8 years, in terms of contractual lease payments and rentable square footage, respectively. The maturity dates of our tenant leases are staggered for the purpose of risk management. The original lease terms within our portfolio range from 6 months to 15 years. Base lease rents vary by location, but substantially all leases feature annual rent escalation. Leases are structured as either gross or triple-net, with tenants covering insurance, taxes, common area maintenance, and utilities. The tenant leases generally do not have early termination options, and we expect renewals to be reset to prevailing fair market value.
Competition
The hangar space rental segment of the aviation services industry in which we operate is very competitive. We compete with national, regional and local FBOs and other hangar real estate companies. Our competitors include FBOs currently operating at certain airports that may have greater financial or other resources and/or lower cost structure than us. Other competitors have been in business longer than us and may have greater financial resources available.
We compete with other operators at all of our current locations, and our hangar campuses may also face indirect competition from operators located at nearby airports. In addition, we may be adversely affected by competition from other facilities within or outside the airports where the facilities are located, including construction of new facilities at the airports at which we operate or the expansion of hangar facilities by competitors at nearby airports. We must compete with other operators based on the location of the facility relative to runways and street access, quality of customer service, safety, reliability, value-added features, and price. See “— Investment Criteria” for additional information regarding our competitors with respect to each particular facility.
Seasonality
Adverse weather conditions, particularly during the winter months, can cause delays in the development, construction, and leasing of our HBO campus projects. The geographic diversity of our development portfolio helps mitigate this risk through exposure to various geographies and climates. With respect to our ongoing hangar leasing operations, we do not experience substantial seasonal fluctuations in our revenues and the results of operations.
Government Regulation
FAA Regulation
The industry is overseen primarily by the Federal Aviation Administration (the “FAA”). In addition, the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency, state and local environmental agencies, and local airport authorities contribute to the regulation of our HBO campuses. We must comply with federal, state, and local environmental statutes, and regulations, including those associated in part with the operation of fuel storage tank systems and fuel trucks. These requirements include, among others, tank and pipe testing for tightness, soil sampling for evidence of leaking, and remediation of detected leaks and spills.
Environmental and Related Matters
Our HBO campuses are subject to regular inspection by local environmental agencies, as well as local fire marshals and other agencies. We do not expect that compliance and related remediation work, if any, will have a material negative impact on our business. We have not received notice requiring us to cease operations at any location or of any abatement proceeding by any government agency for failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations.
Americans with Disabilities Act
Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and rules promulgated thereunder, in order to protect individuals with disabilities, public accommodations must remove architectural and communication barriers that are structural in nature from existing places of public accommodation to the extent “readily achievable.” In addition, under the ADA, alterations to a place of public accommodation or a commercial facility are to be made so that, to the maximum extent feasible, such altered portions are readily accessible to and usable by disabled individuals. The “readily achievable” standard takes into account, among other factors, the financial resources of the affected site and the owner, lessor or other applicable person.
Compliance with the ADA, as well as other federal, state and local laws, may require modifications to properties we currently own or may purchase, or may restrict renovations of those properties. Failure to comply with these laws or regulations could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants, as well as the incurrence of the costs of making modifications to attain compliance, and future legislation could impose additional obligations or restrictions on our properties. Although our tenants are generally responsible for all maintenance and repairs of the property pursuant to our leases, including compliance with the ADA and other similar laws or regulations, we could be held liable as the owner of the property for a failure of one of our tenants to comply with these laws or regulations.
12
Table of Contents
Environmental Matters
Our properties are subject to numerous statutes, rules and regulations relating to environmental protection and our business is exposed to various environmental risks, hazards, and environmental protection requirements, including those related to the storage and handling of jet fuel and compliance with firefighting regulations. See “Risk Factors — Our properties are subject to environmental risks that may impact our future profitability” of this Report.
We endeavor to be a leader of the industry’s initiatives to address environmental issues, and we are increasingly focused on how we can reduce our carbon footprint in a sustainable way. As part of this, our HBO campuses are designed to reduce the need to reposition private jets, which reduces the use of fuel as well as air emissions and noise pollution. We operate a fleet of electric ground support equipment which have a low cost to operate and maintain. In addition, our HBO campuses are designed to be electric vehicle charger-equipped and electric aircraft charger-ready. In addition, our hangar design contains environmentally friendly aspects such as no-foam fire suppression. Moreover, our hangars are designed to be both solar and wind energy capable for future installation.
Insurance
We maintain insurance of the types and in amounts that we believe to be adequate and consistent with industry standards. During construction, our principal coverage includes builder's risk, general and hangarkeepers liability, excess liability, and contractor's pollution liability insurance. Once operational, each campus maintains commercial property, flood, earthquake, boiler and machinery, business income/loss of rent, automobile liability, general liability, environmental liability, and worker's compensation insurance. We maintain general liability and product liability insurance in connection with our hangar manufacturing activities. We maintain general liability and professional liability insurance in connection with our hangar design and general contracting activities. We also maintain insurance coverage related to our directors and officers, employment-related liabilities, automobile liabilities, and cyber-related incidents. We require the tenants at our campuses to maintain aircraft physical damage, general liability, worker's compensation, and automobile liability insurance coverage.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2025, we had 112 employees, none of whom were subject to collective bargaining agreements. We also engage contractors and consultants to supplement our permanent workforce. Our operations are overseen by senior personnel with experience in business aviation and real estate, and include top-level design, construction, operations, and finance expertise. We consider our employee relations to be in good standing. We are committed to keeping our employees informed and supported through regular communication and events, including our monthly town hall meetings.
We strive to recruit from amongst the best talent in the industry and reward them appropriately. Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract, retain and develop high-quality management, operations, and other personnel who are in high demand, are often subject to competing employment offers, and are attractive recruiting targets for our competitors in fields such as aviation and real estate.
We believe we offer competitive compensation (including base salary, incentive bonuses, and long-term equity awards) and benefits packages designed to attract and reward talented individuals who possess the skills necessary to support our business objectives and assist in the achievement of our strategic goals and development plans. All employees are eligible for health insurance, a retirement plan, and life/disability coverage.
Certain of our HBO campuses feature the Sky Harbour Academy training program, which includes paid training for a career in the aviation industry. The Sky Harbour Academy recruits members with an interest in aviation, ultimately providing such members full training and certification as line service technicians and customer service representatives. The Sky Harbour Academy aims to provide assistance with placement in aviation jobs, including full-time roles and career development tracks at Sky Harbour.
Human capital strategies are developed and managed by our Chief Financial Officer, who reports to the Chief Executive Officer, and are overseen by the compensation committee and the Board. Our executive management team regularly reviews and updates our talent strategy, monitoring a variety of data, including turnover, diversity, and tenure, to design and implement effective recognition, training, development, succession, and benefit programs to meet the needs of our business and our employees.