ONITY GROUP INC. (ONIT) FY 2021 MD&A
This page reproduces the company's own Item 7 MD&A text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts and unless otherwise indicated)
The Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2021 and 2020 items and provides year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020. Discussions of year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019 are not included in this Form 10-K and can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 filed with the SEC on February 19, 2021.
OVERVIEW
We are a financial services company that services and originates mortgage loans. We are a leading mortgage special servicer, servicing 1.4 million loans with a total UPB of $268.0 billion on behalf of more than 3,900 investors and 125 subservicing clients as of December 31, 2021. We service all mortgage loan classes, including conventional, government-insured and non-Agency loans. Our Originations business is part of our balanced business model to generate gains on loan sales and profitable returns, and to support the replenishment and the growth of our servicing portfolio. Through our retail, correspondent and wholesale channels, we originate and purchase conventional and government-insured forward and reverse mortgage loans that we sell or securitize on a servicing retained basis. In addition, we grow our mortgage servicing volume through MSR flow purchase agreements, Agency Cash Window programs, bulk MSR purchase transactions, and subservicing agreements.
The table below summarizes the volume of Originations by channel during 2021, compared with the volume of the prior years. The volume of Originations is a key driver of the profitability of our Originations segment, together with margins, and a key driver of the replenishment and growth of our Servicing segment. In 2021, we added $152.0 billion of new volume, with $55.1 billion MSR bulk acquisitions, $55.9 billion of new subservicing and $41.0 billion of non-bulk Originations volume, as further detailed in the below table.
| $ In billions | UPB | $ Change | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year Ended December 31st | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage servicing originations | ||||||||||||||
| Retail - Consumer Direct MSR (1) | $ | 2.4 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 0.7 | ||||
| Correspondent MSR (1) | 16.6 | 5.7 | 0.5 | 10.9 | 5.2 | |||||||||
| Flow and Agency Cash Window MSR purchases (2) | 20.4 | 15.1 | 0.9 | 5.3 | 14.2 | |||||||||
| Reverse mortgage servicing (3) | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.2 | |||||||||
| Total servicing | 41.0 | 23.0 | 2.8 | 17.9 | 20.3 | |||||||||
| Bulk MSR purchases (2) | 55.1 | 16.6 | 14.6 | 38.6 | 1.9 | |||||||||
| Total servicing additions | 96.1 | 39.6 | 17.4 | 56.5 | 22.2 | |||||||||
| Subservicing additions (4) | 55.9 | 17.8 | 12.7 | 38.2 | 5.1 | |||||||||
| Total servicing and subservicing UPB additions | $ | 152.0 | $ | 57.4 | $ | 30.1 | $ | 94.7 | $ | 27.3 |
(1)Represents the UPB of loans that have been originated or purchased during the respective periods and for which we recognize a new MSR on our consolidated balance sheets upon sale or securitization.
(2)Represents the UPB of loans for which the MSR is purchased.
(3)Represents the UPB of reverse mortgage loans that have been securitized on a servicing retained basis. The loans are recognized on our consolidated balance sheets under GAAP without separate recognition of MSRs.
(4)Includes interim subservicing, including the volume of UPB associated with short-term interim subservicing for certain clients as a support to their originate-to-sell business, with $14.7 billion, $17.8 billion and $12.2 billion in the years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
44
In addition to interim subservicing, subservicing additions for 2021 in the table above include $14.3 billion in UPB of reverse mortgage loan subservicing and $9.4 billion of new subservicing on behalf of MAV. On October 1, 2021, in connection with the transaction with MAM (RMS) and its then parent, PMC became the subservicer for approximately 57,000 reverse mortgages, or approximately $14.3 billion in UPB pursuant to subservicing agreements with various clients, including MAM (RMS). Under the five-year subservicing agreement with MAM (RMS), we expect to add subservicing of approximately 60,000 reverse mortgage loans or approximately $13.1 billion in UPB upon boarding to our servicing platform in the first half of 2022, subject to investor approval. Furthermore, in the second quarter 2021, we launched our joint venture MSR investment with Oaktree with MAV purchasing approximately $9.4 billion GSE MSRs from unrelated third parties that PMC began subservicing in the third quarter of 2021.
The following table summarizes the average volume of our Servicing segment in 2021, compared with prior years. The average volume of Servicing is a key driver of the profitability of our Servicing segment. The relative weight of performing and delinquent loans drives the gross revenue and expenses, and their timing. In 2021, we have increased our total average servicing portfolio by $47.2 billion, net of runoff, with large GSE MSR bulk acquisitions driving the growth of our owned MSR portfolio, and the new subservicing volume generated from our MSR investment joint venture with Oaktree through MAV and our reverse subservicing acquisition from MAM (RMS). In addition to runoff, the NRZ portfolio declined as a result of the termination by NRZ of the PMC servicing agreement resulting in the deboarding of loans with $34.2 billion of UPB in September and October 2020. The year 2021 established the foundation of a transformed servicing portfolio, with the significant addition of a high credit quality GSE MSR portfolio and the continued reduction of our non-Agency servicing through runoff, also reducing our concentration with NRZ servicing agreements.
| $ in billions | Average UPB | $ Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year ended December 31, | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||
| Owned MSR | $ | 117.5 | $ | 71.3 | $ | 70.0 | $ | 46.3 | $ | 1.3 | ||||||||
| NRZ | 61.4 | 74.8 | 125.1 | (13.4) | (50.2) | |||||||||||||
| MAV | 9.1 | — | — | 9.1 | — | |||||||||||||
| Subservicing | 24.7 | 45.5 | 31.2 | (20.7) | 14.2 | |||||||||||||
| Reverse mortgage loans (owned) | 6.8 | 6.5 | 5.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||
| Commercial and other servicing | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
| Total serviced and subserviced UPB (average) | $ | 220.7 | $ | 198.6 | $ | 232.4 | $ | 22.1 | $ | (33.8) |
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the total serviced and subserviced UPB amounted to $268.0 billion and $188.8 billion, respectively, a net increase of $79.2 billion or 42%.
Business Initiatives
We had established five key operating objectives to drive improved value for shareholders in 2021. As our near-term priority remains to return to sustainable profitability, we continue to execute our strategy around these objectives:
•Accelerating growth, by expanding our client base and our product offerings, and by leveraging our MSR asset vehicle with Oaktree;
•Strengthening recapture performance, by expanding our operating capacity;
•Improving our cost leadership position, by driving productivity and efficiencies, with our technology and continuous improvement initiatives;
•Maintaining high quality operational execution, through our technology and continuous improvement initiatives, and our commitment to employee engagement and customer satisfaction; and
•Expanding servicing and other revenue opportunities.
MAV and Oaktree Relationship
On May 3, 2021, we formally launched MAV, our MSR asset vehicle and entered into a number of definitive agreements with Oaktree. Oaktree and Ocwen committed 85% and 15%, respectively, to fund GSE MSR investments on a pro rata basis up to a total aggregate commitment of $250.0 million over a term of three years following closing (subject to extension). This joint venture is structured to provide Oaktree with MSR investment opportunities and returns, while providing PMC scale and incremental income through subservicing and recapture services. Additionally, PMC earns direct MSR investment income through its 15% ownership stake and carry interest on investment returns exceeding certain thresholds. Under the arrangement, MAV has a non-compete to purchase certain GSE MSRs through specific channels in cooperation with PMC. In addition, PMC must offer MAV the first opportunity to purchase GSE MSRs sold by PMC or its affiliates that meet certain criteria, which we refer to as the right of first offer. Both the non-compete and the right of first offer are subject to various restrictions and in effect
45
until MAV has been fully funded, or, if earlier, in the case of the right of first offer, until May 3, 2024 (subject to extension by mutual consent). In exchange, PMC receives exclusive subservicing and recapture rights, subject generally to ongoing performance and financial standards.
During 2021, PMC recognized $17.1 million of total servicing and subservicing fees, including ancillary income, and remitted $12.2 million servicing fees (as Pledged MSR liability expense) under its agreements with MAV (refer to Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further description of the accounting for the MAV agreements). In addition, PMC recognized $3.6 million earnings in 2021 from its equity method investment in MAV Canopy.
COVID-19 Pandemic Update
Our financial performance in 2020 was affected by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the associated historical decline in interest rates, mostly due to large losses on MSRs and lower revenue in our Servicing business, partially offset by the growth and profitability of our Originations business. Furthermore, the CARES Act allowed us to recognize income tax benefits in 2020 mostly due to the carryback of a portion of our prior net operating losses.
In 2021, our Servicing business continued to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a large number of loans placed under forbearance and the moratorium on foreclosures and evictions. The collection and recognition of servicing fees and ancillary income related to forbearance loans continued to be delayed or reduced. In addition, our outreach activities with impacted borrowers have intensified to address extensions and exits of plans or to offer loan modifications. The foreclosure moratorium ended on July 31, 2021, and the eviction moratorium was extended through January 1, 2022 for foreclosed borrowers.
As of December 31, 2021, we managed 28,500 loans under forbearance (or 2.1% of our total portfolio), 6,800 of which related to our owned MSRs, or 1.1% of our owned MSR servicing portfolio (excluding NRZ and MAV), a reduction of 65% and 71%, respectively, compared to the prior year end. As of December 31, 2020, we managed 81,900 loans under forbearance, 23,100 of which related to our owned MSRs (excluding NRZ). During 2021, the number of loans under forbearance continued to trend down, as illustrated by the below chart of forbearance plans by investor for our owned MSR portfolio (excluding NRZ).
46
The decline in open plans of our owned MSR portfolio during 2021 is mostly driven by performing loans and pay-offs (excluding servicing transfers), as further illustrated below:
We outperformed the industry average as reported by the MBA relating to the percentage of borrowers with an Agency loan who exited forbearance with a reinstatement or loss mitigation solution in place. In addition, we consistently exceeded the industry benchmark for borrowers with a GSE loan who remained current while on forbearance. We undertook significant efforts to contact and educate borrowers in understanding their forbearance plans and resolution options, and believe our high-touch communication strategy resulted in these favorable outcomes. We continue to reach out to all borrowers who have not resumed making payments after exiting their plans with the goal of coming to an appropriate resolution.
We continue to operate through a secure remote workforce model for approximately 95% of our global workforce and continue to adhere to COVID-19 health and safety-related requirements and best practices across all of our locations. We monitor the impact of the pandemic on our workforce and have established business resiliency plans for all our locations. At December 31, 2021, we had approximately 5,700 employees, of which approximately 3,200 were located in India and approximately 500 were based in the Philippines. While we have contingency and continuity plans in place, we cannot guarantee that our operations will not be negatively impacted. To date, our operations have not been significantly affected.
Uncertainties related to the duration and severity of the pandemic and related economic impact remain and make it difficult for us to determine the continued ongoing effect the pandemic may have on us and our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
47
Operations Summary
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing and subservicing fees | $ | 781.9 | $ | 737.3 | $ | 975.5 | 6 | % | (24) | % | |||||||||||
| Reverse mortgage revenue, net | 79.7 | 60.7 | 86.3 | 31 | (30) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain on loans held for sale, net | 145.8 | 137.2 | 38.3 | 6 | 258 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other revenue, net | 42.7 | 25.6 | 23.3 | 67 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 1,050.1 | 960.9 | 1,123.4 | 9 | (14) | ||||||||||||||||
| MSR valuation adjustments, net | (109.9) | (251.9) | (120.9) | (56) | 108 | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | 297.9 | 265.3 | 313.5 | 12 | (15) | ||||||||||||||||
| Professional services | 81.9 | 106.9 | 102.6 | (23) | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Servicing and origination | 113.6 | 77.3 | 109.0 | 47 | (29) | ||||||||||||||||
| Technology and communications | 56.0 | 59.6 | 79.2 | (6) | (25) | ||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 36.5 | 47.5 | 68.1 | (23) | (30) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 23.3 | 19.2 | 1.5 | 22 | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 609.3 | 575.7 | 673.9 | 6 | (15) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 26.4 | 16.0 | 17.1 | 65 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (144.0) | (109.4) | (114.1) | 32 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Pledged MSR liability expense | (209.9) | (152.3) | (372.1) | 38 | (59) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | (15.5) | — | 5.1 | n/m | (100) | ||||||||||||||||
| Earnings of equity method investee | 3.6 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||||||
| Other, net | 4.1 | 6.7 | 9.0 | (39) | (25) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | (335.2) | (239.0) | (455.1) | 40 | (47) | ||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | (4.4) | (105.7) | (126.5) | (96) | (16) | ||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (22.4) | (65.5) | 15.6 | (66) | (519) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 18.1 | (40.2) | (142.1) | (145) | (72) | ||||||||||||||||
| Segment income (loss) before taxes: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing | $ | 19.9 | $ | (75.8) | $ | (72.7) | (126) | % | 4 | % | |||||||||||
| Originations | 93.9 | 104.2 | (12.2) | (10) | (952) | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Items and Other | (118.1) | (134.1) | (41.6) | (12) | 222 | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | (4.4) | $ | (105.7) | $ | (126.5) | (96) | % | (16) | % | ||||||||||||
| n/m: not meaningful |
48
Total Revenue
The below table presents total revenue by segment and at the consolidated level:
| Revenue | Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||
| Servicing | $ | 819.4 | $ | 757.7 | $ | 1,048.5 | 8% | (28)% | ||||
| Originations | 249.9 | 179.3 | 61.7 | 39 | 191 | |||||||
| Corporate | 6.2 | 6.6 | 13.2 | (6) | (50) | |||||||
| Total segment revenue | 1,075.4 | 943.5 | 1,123.4 | 14 | (16) | |||||||
| Inter-segment elimination (1) | (25.3) | 17.4 | — | (245) | n/m | |||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,050.1 | $ | 960.9 | $ | 1,123.4 | 9% | (14)% |
(1)The fair value change of inter-segment economic hedge derivatives reported within Total revenue (Gain on loans held for sale, net) is eliminated at the consolidated level with an offset in MSR valuation adjustments, net.
As compared to 2020, total segment revenue for 2021 was $131.9 million or 14% higher, due to a $70.6 million increase in Originations revenue and a $61.7 million increase in Servicing revenue. The 39% increase in Originations revenue is primarily due to a 159% increase in total forward and reverse production volume combined, partially offset by lower margins. The increase in Servicing revenue is primarily due to a $42.2 million increase in servicing fees and $27.1 million gain on sale of loans acquired through the exercise of call rights in 2021. The $42.2 million increase in servicing fees is mostly driven by a $123.1 million or 57% increase in servicing fee income on our owned MSRs and $15.7 million new servicing fees collected on behalf of MAV in 2021, partially offset by $79.4 million reduction in fees collected on behalf of NRZ and a $9.3 million reduction in ancillary income. The growth in our owned MSR portfolio is mostly due to bulk MSR acquisitions, MSR acquisitions through the Agency Cash Window programs and the growth in our correspondent lending volumes. The decline in the collection of NRZ servicing fees is mostly due to portfolio runoff and the termination of the PMC servicing agreement in February 2020. The decline in ancillary fees is mostly due to the COVID-19 environment and related decrease in late fees, collection and convenience fees as well as a decrease in float earnings due to lower interest rates, partially offset by the growth in our owned MSR portfolio.
Total revenue (after elimination of inter-segment derivative fair value changes) was $1.05 billion for 2021, $89.2 million or 9% higher than 2020, driven by the segment revenue factors described above and the presentation of macro-hedging derivative gains and losses reported within MSR valuation adjustments, net at the consolidated level, as disclosed in Note 4 — Loans Held for Sale, Note 17 — Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities and Note 23 — Business Segment Reporting. Effective May 2021, we replaced our macro-hedging strategies with two distinct strategies to separately hedge the pipeline and our MSR exposure with third party derivatives. However, we have and may continue to use inter-segment derivatives between the two strategies. Refer to the MSR Hedging Strategy section of Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further detail.
See the respective Segment Results of Operations for additional information.
MSR Valuation Adjustments, Net
The table below presents the key components of MSR valuation adjustments, net:
| Segment Results | Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||
| MSR realization of expected cash flows (1) | $ | (250.2) | $ | (171.4) | $ | (197.3) | ||
| MSR fair value changes due to interest rate and assumption updates | 124.7 | (149.8) | 75.9 | |||||
| Derivative fair value gain (loss) | (34.9) | 44.9 | 0.5 | |||||
| Total Servicing | (160.4) | (276.3) | (120.9) | |||||
| Originations - MSR fair value changes | 25.2 | 41.7 | — | |||||
| Inter-segment elimination - derivative fair value gain (loss) (2) | 25.3 | (17.4) | — | |||||
| MSR valuation adjustments, net | $ | (109.9) | $ | (252.0) | $ | (120.9) |
(1)The terms “realization of expected cash flows” and “runoff” may be used interchangeably within this discussion.
(2)The fair value change of inter-segment economic hedge derivatives reported within MSR valuation adjustments, net is eliminated at the consolidated level with an offset in Gain on loans held for sale, net (Total Revenue). Also refer to the description of the inter-segment derivative elimination in Note 23 — Business Segment Reporting.
49
We reported a $109.9 million loss in MSR valuation adjustments, net in 2021. As detailed in the above table and further discussed below, the loss is due to $250.2 million portfolio runoff and a $124.7 million fair value gain due to interest rate and assumption updates, $34.9 million loss on MSR hedging derivative instruments, $25.2 million revaluation gain on MSR purchases reported in Originations and a $25.3 million gain on derivatives hedging the pipeline within the Originations segment.
•MSR portfolio runoff represents the realization of expected cash flows and yield based on projected borrower behavior, including scheduled and unscheduled amortization of the loan UPB. MSR portfolio runoff increased by $78.8 million mostly due to a higher MSR portfolio driven by MSR acquisitions and continued elevated levels of prepayments in a relatively low interest rate environment.
•The $124.7 million fair value gain due to interest rate and assumption updates is comprised of a $88.5 million gain on the MSRs transferred to NRZ and MAV (that did not achieve sale accounting) and a $36.2 million gain on our owned MSRs. This NRZ and MAV MSR gain is mostly driven by assumption updates implemented in the third quarter of 2021 relating to a PLS model calibration by our third-party valuation expert, and is largely offset by a corresponding loss separately reported with Pledged MSR liability expense.
•Our MSR hedging policy is designed to reduce the volatility of the MSR portfolio fair value due to market interest rates. In 2021, we reported a $36.2 million fair value gain on our owned MSR portfolio attributable to interest rate and assumption updates and a $34.9 million hedging derivative loss. The year-over-year fair value changes are mostly explained by interest rate changes, with a 66 basis point increase in the 10-year swap rate during 2021. The changes in fair value of the MSR and economically hedging derivatives were not offset to the same extent as per their expected hedging sensitivity measures, mainly due to non-parallel changes in the interest rate curve and the basis risk inherent in the MSR profile and the available hedging instruments. Refer to the MSR Hedging Strategy section of Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for additional information regarding our hedging programs.
•The $16.5 million decline in 2021 in MSR fair value changes reported in Originations, from $41.7 million to $25.2 million, is due to a decrease in our cash window MSR originations volume and declining margins.
•In connection with our macro-hedge strategy through the second quarter of 2021, we have used our derivative instruments to economically hedge both the fair value changes of the MSR and Originations pipeline exposures. While allocated to the pipeline for risk management purposes and segment reporting, inter-segment derivatives are eliminated in our consolidated financial statements and we reported a $25.3 million gain on inter-segment derivatives in 2021 economically hedging the Originations pipeline. The change from $17.4 million loss in 2020 to $25.3 million gain on Originations inter-segment derivatives in 2021 is mostly due to the change in interest rates and related changes in our Originations pipeline.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense increased $32.7 million, or 12%, as compared to 2020. Salaries and benefits, commissions, and incentive compensation increased $13.6 million, $9.9 million, and $9.7 million, respectively. Originations segment compensation and benefits increased by $39.4 million, mostly due to additional commissions and salaries driven by additional headcount to support higher loan production levels in 2021. Servicing segment compensation and benefits expense decreased by $5.4 million, mostly driven by a decline in average headcount that was largely due to the scaling down of our platform to the number of loans serviced and the efficiencies resulting from our cost re-engineering initiatives, partially offset by the hiring of employees to support the acquisition of reverse mortgage subservicing from MAM (RMS) on October 1, 2021. Corporate segment compensation and benefits expense decreased $1.3 million primarily as a result of a decrease in average corporate headcount and a decrease in annual incentive compensation, significantly offset by a $7.9 million increase in share-based compensation. Our total average headcount declined by 2%, and overall our offshore-to-total average headcount ratio decreased from 72% to 68%.
Servicing and Origination Expense
Servicing and origination expense increased $36.4 million, or 47%, as compared to 2020, with $29.8 million from Servicing (see below) and $7.8 million from Originations, due to the increase in loan production volume. Servicing expenses increased $29.8 million, or 44%, largely driven by the following:
•$19.0 million provision release recorded in 2020, comprised of $9.9 million recoveries from a settlement in 2020 with a mortgage insurer, and $9.1 million improved advance recoveries in 2020, which decreased loss severity rates used in the computation of advance reserves;
•Additional subservicing expenses primarily due to a $4.5 million increase in interim subservicing expense on MSR bulk acquisitions and a $5.2 million increase largely attributable to the termination and deboarding fees associated with moving our owned reverse portfolio from a subservicer onto our platform;
50
•$8.4 million additional satisfaction and other loan expenses attributed to a larger portfolio; and
•$6.6 million reduction in government-insured claim loss provisions in 2021 on reinstated or modified loans that was primarily due to a decline in the volume of government-insured claim receivables due to the foreclosure moratorium in effect for much of 2021.
Other Operating Expenses
Professional services expense decreased $25.0 million, or 23%, as compared to 2020 primarily due to a $17.2 million decline in legal expenses and an $8.5 million decline in other professional services. The decline in legal fees is primarily due to expenses recorded in 2020 related to the CFPB and Florida matters. Cost reduction initiatives and higher utilization of professional services in 2020, including strategic vendor sourcing, cloud migration and consulting, resulted in lower other professional fees in 2021. In addition, professional services for 2021 include $3.2 million of advisory fees related to the launch of our MSR investment joint venture with Oaktree, MAV Canopy. Legal expenses and professional services for 2020 included an $8.0 million recovery of prior expenses from a mortgage insurer and $5.1 million of COVID-19 related expenses, respectively.
Technology and communication expense decreased $3.6 million, or 6%, as compared to 2020. Telephone and telecommunication expense declined $4.4 million as compared to 2020, largely driven by facility closures, our transition to a more cost-effective alternative telephone system, consolidation of telecommunication vendors and other cost savings initiatives. Depreciation expense decreased $2.6 million as compared to 2020. These decreases were partially offset by a $4.0 million increase in software usage and maintenance expenses, mostly in our Originations segment to support its growth.
Occupancy and equipment expense decreased $11.0 million, or 23%, as compared to 2020. Depreciation expense, facility maintenance and utility expenses, and interest on lease liabilities decreased $6.3 million, $2.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively, compared to 2020 largely due to our cost reduction efforts in 2020, which included closing and consolidating certain facilities.
Other expenses increased $4.1 million as compared to 2020 primarily due to a $3.8 million increase in advertising expenses, mostly in our Originations segment as part of our initiative to expand our origination platform and increase volumes.
In February 2020, we announced our intention to implement certain cost re-engineering initiatives in 2020 to generate further cost savings. Our continuous cost improvement efforts were focused on reducing operating and overhead costs through facility rationalization, strategic sourcing and actions, off-shore utilization, lean process design, simplification, automation and other technology-enabled productivity enhancement. We incurred a total of $27.6 million re-engineering costs in 2020, including $6.2 million facility-related expenses reported as Occupancy and equipment, $9.7 million Compensation and benefits costs and $6.7 million Professional services costs.
Other Income (Expense)
The $10.4 million increase in interest income during as compared to 2020 is primarily attributable to the Originations segment and as a result of the increase in loan production volumes.
Interest expense increased $34.6 million, or 32%, as compared to 2020, due to an increased average debt balance to finance our increased loan production volumes and MSR portfolio, partially offset by a lower cost of funds. The $1.2 billion or 59% higher debt balance is driven by a higher MSR portfolio - largely due to bulk acquisitions - and additional warehouse loans, partially offset by lower advance match funded liabilities. The lower cost of funds on asset backed financing facilities (102 basis point lower effective interest rate) is partially offset by the issuance of higher-rate senior secured notes as part of our corporate debt refinancing on March 4, 2021.
Pledged MSR liability expense increased $57.6 million as compared to 2020, primarily due to a $71.1 million unfavorable fair value change, mostly driven by a fair value increase in NRZ PLS MSRs due to model recalibrations performed by our third-party valuation expert to more accurately reflect the favorable delinquency and default performance of PLS collateral across its client base. Fair value adjustments to our NRZ MSR pledged liability are offset by fair value adjustments to the related MSR asset, which are recorded in MSR valuation adjustments, net. In addition, the lump-sum cash payments received from NRZ in 2017 and 2018 were fully amortized as of the end of the second quarter of 2020 ($34.2 million income in 2020). These increases in expense were partially offset by a $50.8 million decline in servicing fee remittance driven by lower volume serviced, with the runoff of the portfolio and the termination of the PMC agreement by NRZ in February 2020.
Loss on debt extinguishment of $15.5 million for 2021 was recognized in the first quarter of 2021 and resulted from our early repayment of the Senior Secured Term Loan (SSTL) due May 2022 and our early redemption of the PHH 6.375% senior unsecured notes due August 2021 and the PMC 8.375% senior secured notes due November 2022.
Earnings of equity method investee represent our 15% share of MAV Canopy from May 3, 2021. See Note 11 — Investment in Equity Method Investee for further detail.
51
Income Tax Benefit (Expense)
For 2021 and 2020, we recognized an income tax benefit of $22.4 million and $65.5 million on pre-tax losses of $4.4 million and $105.7 million, respectively. For 2021, the income tax benefit was driven primarily by $12.6 million of additional income tax benefit recognized under the CARES Act and $9.0 million of income tax benefit recognized related to the favorable resolution of various uncertain tax positions during the year. For 2020, the income tax benefit was driven by the $79.0 million of estimated income tax benefit recognized under the CARES Act offset by $15.0 million of income tax expense for related uncertain tax positions. Income tax benefits recognized during 2021 and 2020 related primarily to resolution of prior period uncertain tax positions and utilization of prior period losses that bear no relationship to current operating results. This in turn resulted in the high effective tax rates of 513.6% and 62.0% for 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The $43.1 million reduction in income tax benefit for 2021, compared with 2020, is primarily due to a $45.0 million reduction in estimated income tax benefit recognized under the CARES Act, net of related uncertain tax positions, during 2021 versus 2020 based on modification of the tax rules to allow the carryback of NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 tax years to the five prior tax years, and the increase to the business interest expense limitation under IRC Section 163(j). In 2021 and 2020, we collected $24.6 million and $51.4 million, respectively, which represents the tax refund associated with the NOLs generated in 2019 and 2018, respectively, carried back to prior tax years.
Under our transfer pricing agreements, our operations in India and Philippines are compensated on a cost-plus basis for the services they provide, such that even when we have a consolidated pre-tax loss from operations these foreign operations have taxable income, which is subject to statutory tax rates in these jurisdictions that are higher than the U.S. statutory rate of 21%.
52
Financial Condition Summary
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 192.8 | $ | 284.8 | $ | (92.0) | (32) | % | ||||||
| Restricted cash | 70.7 | 72.5 | (1.8) | (2) | ||||||||||
| MSRs, at fair value | 2,250.1 | 1,294.8 | 955.3 | 74 | ||||||||||
| Advances, net | 772.4 | 828.2 | (55.8) | (7) | ||||||||||
| Loans held for sale | 928.5 | 387.8 | 540.7 | 139 | ||||||||||
| Loans held for investment, at fair value | 7,207.6 | 7,006.9 | 200.7 | 3 | ||||||||||
| Receivables | 180.7 | 187.7 | (7.0) | (4) | ||||||||||
| Investment in equity method investee | 23.3 | — | 23.3 | n/m | ||||||||||
| Other assets | 520.9 | 588.4 | (67.5) | (11) | ||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 12,147.1 | $ | 10,651.1 | $ | 1,496.0 | 14 | % | ||||||
| Total Assets by Segment | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing | $ | 10,999.2 | $ | 9,847.6 | $ | 1,151.6 | 12 | % | ||||||
| Originations | 823.5 | 379.2 | 444.3 | 117 | ||||||||||
| Corporate Items and Other | 324.4 | 424.3 | (99.9) | (24) | ||||||||||
| $ | 12,147.1 | $ | 10,651.1 | $ | 1,496.0 | 14 | % | |||||||
| HMBS-related borrowings, at fair value | $ | 6,885.0 | $ | 6,772.7 | $ | 112.3 | 2 | |||||||
| Other financing liabilities, at fair value | 805.0 | 576.7 | 228.2 | 40 | ||||||||||
| Advance match funded liabilities | 512.3 | 581.3 | (69.0) | (12) | ||||||||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | 1,085.1 | 451.7 | 633.4 | 140 | ||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities, net | 900.8 | 437.7 | 463.1 | 106 | ||||||||||
| Senior secured term loan | — | 179.8 | (179.8) | (100) | ||||||||||
| Senior notes, net | 614.8 | 311.9 | 302.9 | 97 | ||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 867.5 | 924.0 | (56.5) | (6) | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 11,670.4 | 10,235.8 | 1,434.7 | 14 | ||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 476.7 | 415.4 | 61.3 | 15 | ||||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 12,147.1 | $ | 10,651.1 | $ | 1,496.0 | 14 | % | ||||||
| Total Liabilities by Segment | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing | $ | 10,101.5 | $ | 9,163.5 | $ | 937.9 | 10 | % | ||||||
| Originations | 813.3 | 428.5 | 384.8 | 90 | ||||||||||
| Corporate Items and Other | 755.7 | 643.7 | 112.0 | 17 | ||||||||||
| $ | 11,670.4 | $ | 10,235.8 | $ | 1,434.7 | 14 | % | |||||||
| Book value per share | $ | 51.77 | $ | 47.81 | $ | 3.96 | 8 | % |
Total assets increased by $1.5 billion, or 14%, between December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021 mostly due to a $955.3 million, or 74%, increase in our MSR portfolio - mostly driven by MSR bulk acquisitions and new capitalized MSRs - and a $540.7 million, or 139%, increase in our loans held for sale portfolio - driven by higher production volumes. In addition, loans held for investment increased $200.7 million mostly due to the continued growth of our reverse mortgage business. Servicing advances declined $55.8 million mostly due to heightened payoff activity and lower delinquencies, partially offset by increased escrow advances on acquired MSRs. The $67.5 million decrease in other assets is mostly attributable to the decrease in contingent repurchase rights related to loans that have been repurchased from Ginnie Mae.
53
Total liabilities increased $1.4 billion, or 14%, as compared to December 31, 2020 with similar effects as described above. Borrowings under our mortgage warehouse lines and MSR financing facilities increased $633.4 million and $463.1 million, respectively, due to higher loan production volumes and MSR bulk acquisitions, respectively. Our HMBS-related borrowings increased by $112.3 million due to the continued growth of our reverse mortgage business and its securitization. Our senior notes increased $302.9 million due to the refinancing transactions completed on March 4, 2021 and May 3, 2021. We issued $627.1 million of new senior notes, net of discount, redeemed in full $313.1 million of existing senior notes and repaid the $185.0 million SSTL. The $228.2 million increase in Other financing liabilities is due to the transfers of MSRs to MAV in 2021 which did not qualify for sale accounting. Advance match funded liabilities decreased $69.0 million consistent with the decline in servicing advances. Other liabilities declined $56.5 million mostly due to a decrease in the Ginnie Mae contingent repurchase rights of loans under forbearance.
Total equity increased $61.3 million during 2021 mostly due to $32.1 million issuance of common stock and warrants to Oaktree in March and May 2021, $18.1 million net income, a $6.5 million reduction in the unfunded pension plan obligation recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income and $4.4 million of equity-classified awards.
Key Trends
The following discussion provides information regarding certain key drivers of our financial performance. Also refer to the Segment results of operations section for further detail, the description of our business environment, initiatives and risks.
Servicing fee revenue - Our servicing fee revenue is a function of the volume being serviced - UPB for servicing fees and loan count for subservicing fees. We expect we will continue to replenish and grow our servicing portfolio through our multi-channel Originations platform in 2022. In addition, we continuously evaluate the relative mix between servicing and subservicing volume. The expected volume increase is also intended to exceed the portfolio serviced on behalf of NRZ that may end in July 2022. Servicing revenue and ancillary income have been adversely impacted by COVID-19, which may persist throughout 2022, until forbearance plan exits and the end of foreclosure and eviction moratoria or related restrictions.
Gain on sale of loans held for sale - Our gain on sale is driven by both volume and margin and is channel-sensitive, with consumer direct generating relatively higher margins than correspondent. The volume mix is expected to shift to purchase as the volume of refinance activity by borrowers is expected to continue to decline, consistent with expected industry trends. While we continue to increase our recapture rate by expanding our channel operating capacity, we focus on cash-out, debt consolidation and other borrower solutions, in addition to new customer acquisitions. Based on industry origination volume projections for 2022, we expect competition to intensify and origination margins will be under pressure until industry excess capacity can be eliminated. This will impose trade-offs between volumes and margins, and potential shifts among channels.
Reverse mortgage revenue, net - The reverse mortgage origination gain is driven by the same factors as gain on sale of loans held for sale, with smaller volumes in the reverse mortgage market and generally larger margins. With our experience and brand in the marketplace, we expect to continue to grow our volumes and maintain similar margins in each channel, however the channel mix may vary. With the assignment of MAM (RMS) subservicing agreements to PMC on October 1, 2021 and the expected additional loans to transfer on our subservicing platform in the first half of 2022, reverse mortgage servicing revenue is expected to grow.
MSR valuation adjustments, net - Our net MSR fair value changes include multiple components. First, amortization of our investment is function of both UPB, capitalized value of the MSR relative to the UPB, and the level of scheduled payments and prepayments. We expect the MSR realization of cash flows to increase in 2022 as we have recently grown our MSR portfolio. Second, MSR fair value changes are driven by changes in interest rates and assumptions, such as forecasted prepayments, Third, the MSR fair value changes are partially offset by derivative fair value changes that economically hedge the MSR portfolio. We are exposed to increased interest rate volatility due to our now larger MSR portfolio. Refer to the sensitivity analysis in the Market Risk sections of Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further detail.
Operating expenses - Compensation and benefits is a significant component of our cost-to-service and cost-per-loan and is directly correlated to headcount levels. Headcount in Servicing is primarily driven by the number of loans or UPB being serviced and subserviced, and by the relative mix of performing, delinquent and defaulted loans. As servicing volume is expected to increase (see above), we expect an increase in our workforce with partial offset from an increased relative share of performing loans through our MSR acquisitions. We expect to swiftly scale our headcount and operating expenses to servicing volume in 2022, including due to the potential non-renewal or termination of the NRZ agreement. We expect our Originations workforce to remain largely stable or moderately increase in the near term to accompany the growth of the channels. Other operating expenses are expected to favorably correlate with volumes, as productivity and efficiencies are expected with our technology and continuous improvement initiatives.
Stockholders’ equity - With the above considerations, we expect our businesses to generate net income and increase our equity in 2022, absent any significant adverse change in interest rates.
54
SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We report our activities in three segments, Servicing, Originations (previously Lending) and Corporate Items and Other that reflect other business activities that are currently individually insignificant. Our business segments reflect the internal reporting that we use to evaluate operating performance and to assess the allocation of our resources.
Servicing
We earn contractual monthly servicing fees pursuant to servicing agreements, which are typically payable as a percentage of UPB, as well as ancillary fees, including late fees, modification incentive fees, REO referral commissions, float earnings and Speedpay/collection fees. We also earn fees under both subservicing and special servicing arrangements with banks and other institutions that own the MSRs. Subservicing and special servicing fees are earned either as a percentage of UPB or on a per-loan basis. Per-loan fees typically vary based on type of investor and on loan delinquency status.
As of December 31, 2021, we serviced 1.4 million mortgage loans with an aggregate UPB of $268.0 billion, an increase of 22% and 42%, respectively, from December 31, 2020. The average UPB of loans serviced during 2021 increased by 11% or $22.1 billion compared to 2020. The increase in our servicing volume is mostly due to MSR acquisitions, subservicing additions and increased MSR originations. We manage the size of our servicing portfolio with our Originations business and by selectively purchasing MSRs based on our capital availability and financial return targets.
In May 2021, PMC entered into a subservicing agreement with MAV for exclusive rights to service the mortgage loans underlying MSRs owned by MAV. In addition, in October 2021, PMC acquired reverse mortgage subservicing contracts from MAM (RMS) and became its exclusive subservicer under a five-year subservicing agreement.
NRZ remains our largest subservicing client, accounting for 21% and 31% of the UPB and loan count, respectively, in our servicing portfolio as of December 31, 2021. NRZ servicing fees retained by Ocwen represented approximately 19% and 30% of the total servicing and subservicing fees earned by Ocwen, net of servicing fees remitted to NRZ and excluding ancillary income, for 2021 and 2020, respectively. NRZ’s portfolio represents approximately 66% of all delinquent loans that Ocwen serviced, for which the cost to service and the associated risks are higher. Consistent with a subservicing relationship, NRZ is responsible for funding the advances we service for NRZ.
In 2017 and early 2018, we renegotiated the Ocwen agreements with NRZ to more closely align with a typical subservicing arrangement whereby we receive a base servicing fee and certain ancillary fees, primarily late fees, loan modification fees and Speedpay fees. We may also receive certain incentive fees or pay penalties tied to various contractual performance metrics. We received upfront cash payments in 2018 and 2017 of $279.6 million and $54.6 million, respectively, from NRZ in connection with the resulting 2017 and New RMSR Agreements. These upfront payments generally represented the net present value of the difference between the future revenue stream Ocwen would have received under the original agreements and the future revenue Ocwen would receive under the renegotiated agreements. These upfront payments received from NRZ were deferred and recorded within Other income (expense) as they amortized through the remaining term of the original agreements (April 30, 2020).
The financial performance of our servicing segment is impacted by the changes in fair value of the MSR portfolio due to changes in market interest rates. Our MSR portfolio is carried at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in earnings, within MSR valuation adjustments, net. The value of our MSRs is typically correlated to changes in market interest rates; as interest rates decrease, the value of the servicing portfolio typically decreases as a result of higher anticipated prepayment speeds, and the reverse is true. The sensitivity of MSR fair value to interest rates is typically higher for higher credit quality loans, such as our Agency loans. Our Non-Agency portfolio is significantly seasoned, with an average loan age of approximately 16 years, exhibiting little response to movements in market interest rates. Our hedging strategy is designed to reduce the volatility of the MSR portfolio.
For those MSR sale transactions with NRZ and MAV that do not achieve sale accounting treatment, we present on a gross basis the transferred MSR as an asset at fair value and the corresponding liability amount as a pledged MSR liability at fair value on our balance sheet. The changes in fair value of the MSR are reflected as MSR valuation adjustments, net and the corresponding changes in fair value of the pledged MSR liability are reported within Pledged MSR liability expense. Similarly, we present on a gross basis the total servicing fees collected on behalf of NRZ within Servicing and subservicing fees, net and the total servicing fee remittance to NRZ within Pledged MSR liability expense.
Our Servicing business continues to be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with the loans placed under forbearance, the moratorium on foreclosures and elevated prepayments of our MSR portfolio due to interest rates. See further discussion within Overview, COVID-19 Pandemic Update.
Loan Resolutions
We have a strong track record of success as a leader in the servicing industry in foreclosure prevention and loss mitigation that helps homeowners stay in their homes and improves financial outcomes for mortgage loan investors. Reducing
55
delinquencies also enables us to recover advances and recognize additional ancillary income, such as late fees, which we do not recognize on delinquent loans until they are brought current. Loan resolution activities address the pipeline of delinquent loans and generally lead to (i) modification of the loan terms, (ii) repayment plan alternatives, (iii) a discounted payoff of the loan (e.g., a “short sale”), or (iv) foreclosure or deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure and sale of the resulting REO. Loan modifications must be made in accordance with the applicable servicing agreement as such agreements may require approvals or impose restrictions upon, or even forbid, loan modifications. To select an appropriate loan modification option for a borrower, we perform a structured analysis, using a proprietary model, of all options using information provided by the borrower as well as external data, including recent broker price opinions to value the mortgaged property. Our proprietary model includes, among other things, an assessment of re-default risk.
Our future financial performance will be less impacted by loan resolutions because, under our NRZ agreements, NRZ receives all deferred servicing fees. Deferred servicing fees related to delinquent borrower payments were $148.4 million at December 31, 2021, of which $117.7 million were attributable to NRZ agreements.
Advance Obligation
As a servicer, we are generally obligated to advance funds in the event borrowers are delinquent on their monthly mortgage related payments. We advance principal and interest (P&I Advances), taxes and insurance (T&I Advances) and legal fees, property valuation fees, property inspection fees, maintenance costs and preservation costs on properties that have been foreclosed (Corporate Advances). For certain loans in non-Agency securitization trusts, we have the ability to cease making P&I advances and immediately recover advances previously made from the general collections of the respective trust if we determine that our P&I advances cannot be recovered from the projected future cash flows. With T&I and Corporate advances, we continue to advance if net future cash flows exceed projected future advances without regard to advances already made.
Most of our advances have the highest reimbursement priority (i.e., they are “top of the waterfall”) so that we are entitled to repayment from respective loan or REO liquidation proceeds before any interest or principal is paid on the bonds that were issued by the trust. In the majority of cases, advances in excess of respective loan or REO liquidation proceeds may be recovered from pool-level proceeds. The costs incurred in meeting these obligations consist principally of the interest expense incurred in financing the servicing advances. Most subservicing agreements, including our agreements with NRZ, provide for prompt reimbursement of any advances from the owner of the servicing rights. Refer to Note 25 — Commitments to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further description of servicer advance obligations.
Significant Variables
Aggregate UPB and Loan Count. Servicing fees are generally expressed as a percentage of UPB and subservicing fees are earned on a per-loan basis or expressed as a percentage of UPB. Aggregate UPB and loan count decline as a result of portfolio run-off and increase to the extent we retain MSRs from new originations or engage in MSR acquisitions, to the extent permitted.
Operating Efficiency. Our operating results are heavily dependent on our ability to scale our operations to cost-effectively and efficiently perform servicing activities in accordance with our servicing agreements.
Delinquencies. Delinquencies impact our results of operations and operating cash flows. Non-performing loans are more expensive to service because the loss mitigation activities that we must undertake to keep borrowers in their homes or to foreclose, if necessary, are costlier than the activities required to service a performing loan. These loss mitigation activities include increased contact with the borrower for collection and the development of forbearance plans or loan modifications by highly skilled associates who command higher compensation as well as the higher compliance costs associated with these, and similar, activities. While the higher cost is somewhat offset by ancillary fees, for severely delinquent loans or loans that enter the foreclosure process the incremental revenue opportunities are generally not sufficient to cover our increased costs.
In addition, when borrowers are delinquent, the amount of funds that we are required to advance to the investors increases. We utilize servicing advance financing facilities, which are asset-backed (i.e., match funded liabilities) securitization facilities, to finance a portion of our advances. As a result, increased delinquencies result in increased interest expense.
Prepayment Speed. The rate at which portfolio UPB declines can have a significant impact on our business. Items reducing UPB include scheduled and unscheduled principal payments (runoff), refinancing, loan modifications involving forgiveness of principal, voluntary property sales and involuntary property sales such as foreclosures. Prepayment speed impacts future servicing fees, amortization and valuation of MSRs, float earnings on float balances and interest expense on advances. Increases in anticipated lifetime prepayment speeds generally cause MSR valuation adjustments to increase because MSRs are valued based on total expected servicing income over the life of a portfolio. The converse is true when expectations for prepayment speeds decrease.
56
Reverse Mortgage Revenue
The activities and financial performance related to reverse mortgage loans that are securitized and classified as held for investment, at fair value, together with the HMBS-related borrowings, at fair value (internally identified as our Reverse Servicing business) are reflected in the Servicing segment, consistent with how the activities are managed and internally reported. Once a reverse mortgage loan is securitized, our activities are generally consistent with other loan servicing as described above, with the following variations.
Under the terms of ARM-based HECM loan agreements, the borrowers have additional borrowing capacity of $1.5 billion at December 31, 2021. These draws or tails are funded by the servicer and can be subsequently securitized. We do not incur any substantive underwriting, marketing or compensation costs in connection with any future draws, although we must maintain sufficient capital resources and available borrowing capacity to ensure that we are able to fund these future draws.
As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. In addition to our obligation to fund tails, the most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once they reach 98% of the maximum claim amount (MCA repurchases or active buyouts). Active repurchased loans are assigned to HUD and payment is received from HUD through a claims process. HUD reimburses us for the outstanding principal balance on the loan up to the maximum claim amount; we bear the risk of exposure if the outstanding balance on a loan exceeds the maximum claim amount. Inactive repurchased loans or buyouts (loans that are in default for one of the following reasons - title conveyances or the borrower is deceased, no longer occupies the property or is delinquent on tax and insurance payments) are generally liquidated through foreclosure and subsequent sale of REO. State specific foreclosure and REO liquidation timelines have a significant impact on the timing and amount of our recovery. If we are unable to sell the property securing the inactive reverse loan for an acceptable price within the timeframe established by HUD (six months), we are required to make an appraisal-based claim to HUD. In such cases, HUD reimburses us for the loan balance, eligible expenses and interest, less the appraised value of the underlying property. Thereafter, all the risks and costs associated with maintaining and liquidating the property remains with us; we may incur additional losses on REO properties as they progress through the liquidation processes related to delayed timelines due to market conditions, sales commissions, property preservation costs or property tax and insurance advances. The significance of future losses associated with appraisal-based claims is dependent upon the volume of inactive loans, condition of foreclosed properties and the general real estate market.
The reverse mortgage revenue reported within the Servicing segment includes the net fair value changes of securitized reverse mortgage loans held for investment and HMBS-related borrowings. We elected the fair value accounting election for both our reverse mortgage loans held for investment and the HMBS-related borrowings. The net fair value changes of the reverse mortgage loans and related borrowings reported within the Servicing segment include the following:
•contractual interest income earned on securitized reverse mortgage loans, net of interest expense on HMBS-related borrowings, that is, the servicing fee we are contractually entitled to and collect on a monthly basis under the Ginnie Mae MBS Guide regarding servicing HMBS;
•cash gains on tail securitization. Tails are participations in previously securitized HECMs and are created by additions to principal for borrower draws on lines-of-credit (scheduled and unscheduled), interest, servicing fees, and mortgage insurance premiums;
•fair value changes due to the realization of expected cash flows of the net asset balance of securitized loans held for investment and HMBS-related borrowings; and
•fair value changes due to the inputs and assumptions of the net balance of securitized loans held for investment and HMBS-related borrowings.
The fair value of our HECM loan portfolio generally decreases as market interest rates rise and increases as market rates fall. As our HECM loan portfolio is predominantly comprised of ARMs, higher interest rates cause the loan balance to accrue and reach a 98% maximum claim amount liquidation event more quickly, with lower interest rates extending the timeline to liquidation. HECM loans have a longer duration than HMBS-related borrowings as a result of the future draw commitments, and our obligations as issuer of HMBS to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM loan is equal to 98% of the maximum claim amount.
The financial performance associated with the subservicing of reverse mortgage loans associated with the MAM (RMS) transaction is primarily reflected within Servicing and subservicing fees, net since Reverse mortgage revenue, net strictly reflects the financial performance of owned loans/servicing. We collect higher subservicing fees for inactive loans relative to the base subservicing fee for performing loans or active repurchased loans, commensurate with the level of servicing efforts, as described above.
57
The following table presents selected results of operations of our Servicing segment. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other segments:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Servicing and subservicing fees | $ | 773.5 | $ | 731.2 | $ | 974.2 | 6 | % | (25) | % | |||||||
| Gain on loans held for sale, net | 46.6 | 14.7 | 5.4 | 217 | 171 | ||||||||||||
| Reverse mortgage revenue, net | (2.3) | 7.6 | 63.5 | (131) | (88) | ||||||||||||
| Other revenue, net | 1.7 | 4.2 | 5.4 | (60) | (24) | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 819.4 | 757.7 | 1,048.5 | 8 | (28) | ||||||||||||
| MSR valuation adjustments, net | (160.4) | (276.3) | (120.9) | (42) | 129 | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | 108.1 | 113.6 | 144.0 | (5) | (21) | ||||||||||||
| Servicing expense | 98.2 | 68.4 | 101.3 | 44 | (32) | ||||||||||||
| Professional services | 31.4 | 28.1 | 42.2 | 11 | (33) | ||||||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 26.5 | 31.0 | 44.3 | (14) | (30) | ||||||||||||
| Technology and communications | 23.8 | 25.2 | 32.6 | (5) | (23) | ||||||||||||
| Corporate overhead allocations | 47.7 | 61.0 | 197.9 | (22) | (69) | ||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 6.6 | 4.5 | (14.3) | 46 | (132) | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 342.4 | 331.9 | 548.0 | 3 | (39) | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 8.2 | 7.1 | 10.1 | 17 | (30) | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (104.6) | (90.7) | (102.5) | 15 | (12) | ||||||||||||
| Pledged MSR liability expense | (209.1) | (152.5) | (372.2) | 37 | (59) | ||||||||||||
| Earnings of equity method investee | 3.6 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Other, net | 5.2 | 10.8 | 12.3 | (52) | (13) | ||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | (296.6) | (225.3) | (452.3) | 32 | (50) | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 19.9 | $ | (75.8) | $ | (72.7) | (126) | % | 4 | % |
58
The following table provides selected operating statistics for our Servicing segment:
| % Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Assets Serviced at December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unpaid principal balance (UPB) in billions: | |||||||||||||||||
| Performing loans (1) | $ | 254.2 | $ | 177.6 | $ | 198.9 | 43 | % | (11) | % | |||||||
| Non-performing loans | 13.1 | 10.3 | 11.2 | 27 | (8) | ||||||||||||
| Non-performing real estate | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.2 | (22) | (59) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 268.0 | $ | 188.8 | $ | 212.4 | 42 | (11) | |||||||||
| Conventional loans (2) | $ | 166.3 | $ | 77.0 | $ | 95.3 | 116 | % | (19) | % | |||||||
| Government-insured loans | 28.8 | 34.8 | 30.1 | (17) | 16 | ||||||||||||
| Non-Agency loans | 72.8 | 77.0 | 87.0 | (5) | (11) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 268.0 | $ | 188.8 | $ | 212.4 | 42 | (11) | |||||||||
| Servicing portfolio (3) | $ | 135.9 | $ | 97.4 | $ | 76.7 | 40 | % | 27 | % | |||||||
| Subservicing portfolio | |||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing - forward | 29.4 | 24.3 | 17.1 | 21 | 42 | ||||||||||||
| Subservicing - reverse | 13.9 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Total subservicing | 43.3 | 24.3 | 17.1 | 78 | 42 | ||||||||||||
| MAV (4) | 33.0 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
| NRZ (5) (6) | 55.8 | 67.1 | 118.6 | (17) | (43) | ||||||||||||
| $ | 268.0 | $ | 188.8 | $ | 212.4 | 42 | (11) | ||||||||||
| Number (in 000’s): | |||||||||||||||||
| Performing loans (1) | 1,287.0 | 1,048.7 | 1,344.9 | 23 | % | (22) | % | ||||||||||
| Non-performing loans | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-performing loans - NRZ | 30.7 | 33.8 | 54.2 | (9) | % | (38) | % | ||||||||||
| Non-performing loans - Other | 30.7 | 18.4 | 6.6 | 67 | 179 | ||||||||||||
| 61.4 | 52.2 | 60.8 | 18 | (14) | |||||||||||||
| Non-performing real estate | 4.9 | 6.7 | 14.3 | (27) | (53) | ||||||||||||
| Total | 1,353.3 | 1,107.6 | 1,420.0 | 22 | (22) | ||||||||||||
| Conventional loans (2) | 686.5 | 349.6 | 607.9 | 96 | % | (42) | % | ||||||||||
| Government-insured loans | 168.1 | 201.9 | 185.1 | (17) | 9 | ||||||||||||
| Non-Agency loans | 498.7 | 556.1 | 627.0 | (10) | (11) | ||||||||||||
| Total | 1,353.3 | 1,107.6 | 1,420.0 | 22 | (22) |
59
| % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Servicing portfolio | 636.1 | 511.6 | 472.8 | 24 | % | 8 | % | |||||||||
| Subservicing portfolio | ||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing - forward | 105.6 | 96.3 | 77.3 | 10 | 25 | |||||||||||
| Subservicing - reverse | 54.7 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||
| Total subservicing | ||||||||||||||||
| MAV | 131.6 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||
| NRZ (5) | 425.4 | 499.6 | 869.9 | (15) | (43) | |||||||||||
| 1,353.3 | 1,107.6 | 1,420.0 | 22 | (22) | ||||||||||||
| Prepayment speed (CPR) (7) | ||||||||||||||||
| 12-month % Voluntary CPR | 18 | % | 15 | % | 11 | % | 20 | % | 36 | % | ||||||
| 12-month % Involuntary CPR | 1 | 2 | 2 | (50) | — | |||||||||||
| Total 12-month % CPR | 21 | 20 | 16 | 5 | 25 | |||||||||||
| Number of completed modifications | 17,294 | 28,322 | 25,754 | (39) | % | 10 | % | |||||||||
| Revenue recognized in connection with loan modifications | $ | 27.8 | $ | 30.2 | $ | 38.5 | (8) | (22) | ||||||||
| n/m: not meaningful |
(1)Performing loans include those loans that are less than 90 days past due and those loans for which borrowers are making scheduled payments under loan modification, forbearance or bankruptcy plans. We consider all other loans to be non-performing.
(2)Conventional loans at December 31, 2021 include 73,340 prime loans with a UPB of $13.7 billion which we service or subservice. This compares to 89,458 prime loans with a UPB of $16.1 billion at December 31, 2020. Prime loans are generally good credit quality loans that meet GSE underwriting standards.
(3)Includes $7.0 billion UPB of reverse mortgage loans that are recognized in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2021.
(4)Includes $8.9 billion UPB subserviced and $24.0 billion UPB of MSRs sold to MAV that does not achieve sale accounting treatment.
(5)Loans serviced or subserviced pursuant to our agreements with NRZ.
(6)Includes $2.1 billion UPB of subserviced loans at December 31, 2021.
(7)Total 12-month % CPR includes voluntary and involuntary prepayments, as shown in the table, plus scheduled principal amortization.
The following table provides selected operating statistics related to our owned reverse mortgage loans held for investment reported within our Servicing segment:
| % Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Reverse Mortgage Loans at December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unpaid principal balance (UPB) in millions: | |||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for investment (1) | $ | 6,546.5 | $ | 6,299.6 | $ | 5,658.3 | 4 | % | 11 | % | |||||||
| Active Buyouts (2) | 36.1 | 28.4 | 10.2 | 27 | 178 | ||||||||||||
| Inactive Buyouts (2) | 95.3 | 60.9 | 26.4 | 56 | 131 | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,677.9 | $ | 6,388.9 | $ | 5,694.9 | 5 | 12 | |||||||||
| Inactive buyouts % to total | 1.43 | % | 0.95 | % | 0.46 | % | 51 | 107 | |||||||||
| Future draw commitments (UPB) in millions: | 1,507.1 | 2,044.4 | 1,937.4 | (26) | 6 |
60
| % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs. 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Fair value in millions: | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for investment (1) | $ | 6,979.1 | $ | 6,872.3 | $ | 6,120.9 | 2 | 12 | ||||||||
| HMBS related borrowings | 6,885.0 | 6,772.7 | 6,063.4 | 2 | 12 | |||||||||||
| Net asset value | $ | 94.1 | $ | 99.6 | $ | 57.5 | (6) | 73 | ||||||||
| Net asset value to UPB | 1.44 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.02 | % |
(1)Securitized loans only; excludes unsecuritized loans as reported within the Originations segment.
(2)Buyouts are reported as Loans held for sale, Accounts Receivable or REO depending on the loan and foreclosure status.
The following table provides selected operating statistics related to advances for our Servicing segment:
| Advances by investor type (Carrying value in millions) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2021 | Principal and Interest | Taxes and Insurance | Foreclosures, bankruptcy, REO and other | Total | |||||||
| Conventional | $ | 2 | $ | 66 | $ | 7 | $ | 75 | |||
| Government-insured | 1 | 55 | 23 | 79 | |||||||
| Non-Agency | 225 | 261 | 133 | 618 | |||||||
| Total, net | $ | 228 | $ | 381 | $ | 164 | $ | 772 | |||
| December 31, 2020 | Principal and Interest | Taxes and Insurance | Foreclosures, bankruptcy, REO and other | Total | |||||||
| Conventional | $ | 4 | $ | 30 | $ | 5 | $ | 38 | |||
| Government-insured | 1 | 55 | 28 | 84 | |||||||
| Non-Agency | 272 | 279 | 155 | 705 | |||||||
| Total, net | $ | 277 | $ | 365 | $ | 187 | $ | 828 |
The following table provides the rollforward of activity of our portfolio of mortgage loans serviced for the years ended December 31, that includes MSR, whole loans and subserviced loans, both forward and reverse:
| Amount of UPB (in billions) | Count (in 000’s) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Portfolio at beginning of year | $ | 188.8 | $ | 212.4 | $ | 256.0 | 1,107.6 | 1,420.0 | 1,562.2 | ||||||||||
| Additions (1) (2) | 152.0 | 57.4 | 30.1 | 567.9 | 194.5 | 100.6 | |||||||||||||
| Sales | — | (0.2) | (1.2) | (0.2) | (1.6) | (8.3) | |||||||||||||
| Servicing transfers (2) (3) | (23.1) | (40.5) | (34.3) | (102.0) | (303.1) | (48.5) | |||||||||||||
| Runoff | (49.7) | (40.3) | (38.3) | (220.0) | (202.2) | (186.0) | |||||||||||||
| Portfolio at end of year | $ | 268.0 | $ | 188.8 | $ | 212.3 | 1,353.3 | 1,107.6 | 1,420.0 |
(1)2021 additions include purchased MSRs on portfolios consisting of 287 loans with a UPB of $0.1 billion that have not yet transferred to the Black Knight MSP servicing system as of December 31, 2021. Because we have legal title to the MSRs, the UPB and count of the loans are included in our reported servicing portfolio. The seller continues to subservice the loans on an interim basis between the transaction closing date and the servicing transfer date.
(2)Includes the volume UPB associated with short-term interim subservicing for some clients as a support to their originate-to-sell business, where loans are boarded and deboarded within the same quarter.
(3)2020 includes 270,218 deboarded loans with a UPB of $34.2 billion related to the termination of the subservicing agreement between NRZ and PMC on February 20, 2020. Refer to Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting.
61
Year Ended December 31, 2021 versus 2020
Servicing and Subservicing Fees
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Loan servicing and subservicing fees | |||||||||||||||||
| Servicing | $ | 339.3 | $ | 216.2 | $ | 227.5 | 57 | % | (5) | % | |||||||
| Subservicing | 21.1 | 28.9 | 15.4 | (27) | 87 | ||||||||||||
| MAV | 15.7 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
| NRZ | 304.2 | 383.7 | 577.0 | (21) | (34) | ||||||||||||
| Servicing and subservicing fees | 680.3 | 628.8 | 820.0 | 8 | (23) | ||||||||||||
| Ancillary income | 93.2 | 102.5 | 154.2 | (9) | (34) | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 773.5 | $ | 731.2 | $ | 974.2 | 6 | % | (25) | % |
The $42.2 million, or 6% increase in total servicing and subservicing fees in 2021 as compared to 2020 is primarily driven by servicing volume, with a $123.1 million or 57% increase in servicing fee income on our owned MSR, partially offset by $79.4 million reduction in fees collected on behalf of NRZ. The increase in servicing fee income on our owned MSR as compared to 2020 is due to a 60% increase in our average volume serviced, primarily driven by bulk acquisitions, MSR acquisitions through the Agency Cash Window programs and the growth in our correspondent lending volumes. The decline in the collection of NRZ servicing fees is mostly due to portfolio runoff and the PMC servicing termination in February 2020.
Additional changes between 2020 and 2021 include $15.7 million of servicing fees collected on behalf of MAV, launched in 2021 and $9.2 million subservicing fees related to the MAM (RMS) reverse subservicing portfolio acquired in the fourth quarter of 2021. The average subservicing fee per loan increased, driven by the inclusion of reverse mortgage loans, with relatively higher compensation for inactive loans. These fee increases were offset by a $9.3 million decline in ancillary income and a $15.8 million decrease in NRZ subservicing fees. The $7.8 million decrease in subservicing fees is mostly due to NRZ fees being reported as subservicing fees during 2020 from PMC servicing termination through loan deboarding, partially offset by MAM (RMS) reverse subservicing fees.
62
The following table presents the respective drivers of loan servicing and subservicing fees.
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing and subservicing fee | ||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing fee | $ | 339.3 | $ | 216.2 | $ | 227.5 | 57 | % | (5) | % | ||||||||
| Average servicing fee (% of UPB) | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.30 | (4) | % | (7) | % | |||||||||||
| Subservicing fee (1) (2) | $ | 21.1 | $ | 28.9 | $ | 15.4 | (27) | 88 | % | |||||||||
| Average monthly fee per loan (in dollars) (2) | $ | 18 | $ | 9 | $ | 12 | 100 | (25) | % | |||||||||
| Assets serviced | ||||||||||||||||||
| Average UPB ($ in billions): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing portfolio | $ | 125.48 | $ | 78.30 | $ | 76.14 | 60 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
| Subservicing portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing - forward | 21.46 | 45.46 | 31.23 | (53) | 46 | % | ||||||||||||
| Subservicing - reverse | 3.26 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||
| MAV | 9.08 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||
| NRZ | 61.43 | 74.84 | 125.07 | (18) | (40) | % | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 220.71 | $ | 198.60 | $ | 232.44 | 11 | % | (15) | % | ||||||||
| Average number (in 000’s): | ||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing portfolio | 609.1 | 466.1 | 471.8 | 31 | % | (1) | % | |||||||||||
| Subservicing portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing - forward | 83.6 | 268.5 | 106.2 | (69) | 153 | % | ||||||||||||
| Subservicing - reverse | 12.9 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||
| MAV | 37.4 | — | — | n/m | n/m | |||||||||||||
| NRZ | 463.1 | 561.6 | 913.2 | (18) | (39) | % | ||||||||||||
| 1,206.1 | 1,296.2 | 1,491.2 | (7) | % | (13) | % |
(1)Subservicing fees for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes $15.9 million of fees earned on the NRZ PMC MSR Agreements upon receiving the notice of cancellation in February 2020.
(2)Excludes MAV portfolio and includes reverse subservicing in the fourth quarter of 2021.
The following table presents both servicing fees collected and subservicing fees retained by Ocwen under the NRZ agreements, together with the previously recognized amortization gain of the lump-sum payments received in connection with the 2017 Agreements and New RMSR Agreements (through the second quarter of 2020 only). See Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting for further information.
| NRZ Servicing and Subservicing Fees | Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
| Servicing fees collected on behalf of NRZ | $ | 304.2 | $ | 383.7 | $ | 577.0 | ||||
| Servicing fees remitted to NRZ (1) | (215.8) | (278.8) | (437.7) | |||||||
| Retained subservicing fees on NRZ agreements (2) | $ | 88.4 | $ | 104.8 | $ | 139.3 | ||||
| Amortization gain of the lump-sum cash payments received (including fair value change) (1) (3) | — | 34.2 | 95.1 | |||||||
| Total retained subservicing fees and amortization gain of lump-sum payments (including fair value change) | $ | 88.4 | $ | 139.0 | $ | 234.4 | ||||
| Average NRZ UPB (in billions) (4) | $ | 61.4 | $ | 74.8 | $ | 125.1 | ||||
| Average retained subservicing fees as a % of NRZ UPB (excluding amortization gain of lump-sum cash payments) | 0.14 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.11 | % |
63
(1)Reported within Pledged MSR liability expense. The NRZ servicing fee includes the total servicing fees collected on behalf of NRZ relating to the MSR sold but not derecognized from our balance sheet. Under GAAP, we separately present servicing fees collected and remitted on a gross basis, with the servicing fees remitted to NRZ reported as Pledged MSR liability expense.
(2)Excludes the servicing fees of loans under the PMC Servicing Agreement after February 20, 2020 due to the notice of termination by NRZ, and subservicing fees earned under subservicing agreements. Excludes ancillary income.
(3)In 2017 and early 2018, we renegotiated the Ocwen agreements with NRZ to more closely align with a typical subservicing arrangement whereby we receive a base servicing fee and certain ancillary fees, primarily late fees, loan modification fees and Speedpay fees. We may also receive certain incentive fees or pay penalties tied to various contractual performance metrics. We received upfront cash payments in 2018 and 2017 of $279.6 million and $54.6 million, respectively, from NRZ in connection with the resulting 2017 and New RMSR Agreements. These upfront payments generally represented the net present value of the difference between the future revenue stream Ocwen would have received under the original agreements and the future revenue Ocwen received under the renegotiated agreements. These upfront payments received from NRZ were deferred and recorded within Other income (expense), Pledged MSR liability expense, as they amortized through the term of the original agreements (April 2020). See Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting for further information.
(4)Excludes the UPB of loans subserviced under the PMC Servicing Agreement after February 20, 2020 due to the notice of termination by NRZ, and excludes the UPB of loans under subservicing agreements.
The net retained fee on our NRZ portfolio declined by $16.4 million, or 16% as compared to 2020. The decline in the NRZ fee collection and remittance is primarily driven by the decline in the average UPB of 18%, partially offset by an increased fee margin due to the nature of remaining collateral, which was non-Agency with higher delinquencies, as compared to the performing Agency portfolio that deboarded in connection with the termination of the PMC agreement by NRZ on February 20, 2020. The decline in serviced volume is explained by the NRZ portfolio runoff and the derecognition of the MSRs in connection with the termination of the PMC agreement. As the NRZ relationship is effectively a subservicing agreement, the COVID-19 environment, loans under forbearance and the fee collection do not impact our financial results to the same extent as for serviced loans with our owned MSRs.
The following table presents the detail of our ancillary income:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Income | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Late charges | $ | 40.9 | $ | 47.7 | $ | 57.2 | (14) | % | (17) | % | |||||||
| Custodial accounts (float earnings) | 4.7 | 9.9 | 47.5 | (52) | (79) | ||||||||||||
| Loan collection fees | 11.7 | 13.0 | 15.5 | (10) | (16) | ||||||||||||
| Recording fees | 16.0 | 14.3 | 13.0 | 12 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Boarding and deboarding fees | 4.3 | 5.0 | 3.3 | (15) | 52 | ||||||||||||
| GSE forbearance fees | 1.5 | 1.2 | — | 28 | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Reverse subservicing | 1.4 | — | — | n/m | n/m | ||||||||||||
| HAMP fees | 0.6 | 0.6 | 5.5 | 13 | (89) | ||||||||||||
| Other | 12.0 | 10.8 | 12.2 | 11 | (11) | ||||||||||||
| Ancillary income | $ | 93.2 | $ | 102.5 | $ | 154.2 | (9) | % | (34) | % |
Ancillary income declined by $9.3 million as compared to 2020 primarily due to $6.8 million lower late fees, driven by the combined effect of lower servicing volume of delinquent loans, through acquisitions of primarily performing portfolios and sales of delinquent portfolios in 2021, and the COVID-19 environment restricting late fees. Float earnings were $5.2 million lower driven by the decline in interest rates, with average one-month LIBOR declining by approximately 40 basis points in 2021 as compared to 2020, partially offset by larger account balances due to the MSR portfolio growth.
Gain on Loans Held for Sale, Net
Gain on loans held for sale, net of $46.6 million increased $31.9 million as compared to 2020 primarily due to a $27.1 million gain recognized in 2021 on the sale of loans acquired in connection with the exercise of call rights relating to certain Non-Agency trusts, and additional gains on repurchased loans in connection with Ginnie Mae loan modifications and early buyout (EBO) activities.
Reverse Mortgage Revenue, Net
Reverse mortgage revenue, net is the net change in fair value of securitized loans held for investment and HMBS-related borrowings. The following table presents the components of the net fair value change and is comprised of net interest income and other fair value gains or losses. Net interest income is primarily driven by the volume of securitized UPB as it is the interest
64
income earned on the securitized loans offset against interest expense incurred on the HMBS-related borrowings, and represents our compensation for servicing the portfolio, that is typically a percentage of the outstanding UPB. Other fair value changes are primarily driven by changes in market-based inputs or assumptions. Lower interest rates generally result in favorable net fair value impacts on our HECM reverse mortgage loans and the related HMBS financing liability and higher interest rates generally result in unfavorable net fair value impacts.
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Net interest income (servicing fee) | $ | 19.9 | $ | 19.2 | $ | 16.9 | 4 | % | 13 | % | |||||||
| Other fair value changes (1) | (22.3) | (11.6) | 46.6 | 91 | (125) | % | |||||||||||
| Reverse mortgage revenue, net (Servicing) | $ | (2.3) | $ | 7.6 | $ | 63.5 | (131) | % | (88) | % |
(1) Includes $21.6 million and $24.4 million of realized gains on tail securitization in 2021 and 2020, respectively. On January 1, 2020, we made an irrevocable election to account for tails at fair value.
The decline in Reverse mortgage revenue, net of $9.9 million, or 131%, as compared to 2020 is primarily due to unrealized losses on the HECM loan portfolio attributable to market rate conditions. Specifically, fair value losses are driven by increasing interest rates and widening yield spread directly impacting the tail value of the HECM reverse mortgage loans. Tails represent the future draws of borrowers, scheduled and unscheduled, as well as capitalized interest and are included in the fair value of the underlying loans. As our HECM loan portfolio is predominantly comprised of ARMs, higher interest rates cause the loan balance to accrue and reach the 98% maximum claim amount liquidation event more quickly. Tails are securitized on a monthly basis and a widening yield spread results in lower cash gain on securitization. Net interest income, that effectively represents our servicing fee increased in 2021 as compared with 2020 mostly due to the growth of the loan portfolio.
MSR Valuation Adjustments, Net
The following table summarizes the MSR valuation adjustments, net reported in our Servicing segment, with the breakdown of the total MSRs recorded on our balance sheet between our owned MSR and the MSRs transferred to NRZ and MAV that did not achieve sale accounting treatment:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total (1) | Owned MSR (1) | Pledged MSR (NRZ and MAV) (2) | Total (1) | Owned MSR (1) | Pledged MSR (NRZ) (2) | Total | Owned MSR (1) | Pledged MSR (NRZ) (2) | |||||||||||||
| Runoff (3) (4) | $ | (250.2) | (159.9) | (90.3) | (171.4) | (93.5) | (77.9) | (197.3) | (90.4) | $ | (106.9) | ||||||||||
| Rate and assumption change (1) | 124.7 | 36.2 | 88.5 | (149.8) | (145.1) | (4.7) | 75.9 | (64.7) | 140.6 | ||||||||||||
| Hedging gain (loss) | (34.9) | (34.9) | — | 44.9 | 44.9 | — | 0.5 | 0.5 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total | $ | (160.4) | (158.6) | (1.8) | (276.3) | (193.7) | (82.6) | (120.9) | (154.6) | $ | 33.8 |
(1)Excludes gains of $25.2 million and $41.7 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively (nil in 2019), on the revaluation of MSRs purchased at a discount, that is reported in the Originations segment as MSR valuation adjustments, net.
(2)MSR sale transactions with NRZ and MAV that do not achieve sale accounting treatment. See Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting for further information.
(3)Effective January 1, 2021, changes in fair value due to actual versus model variances are presented as Changes in valuation inputs or assumptions. Activity for 2020 and 2019 in the table above has been recast to conform to current year disclosure, resulting in a $1.8 million and $18.1 million gain, respectively, reclassified from Runoff to Rate and assumption change.
(4)The terms runoff and realization of expected future cash flows may be used interchangeably within this discussion.
We reported a $160.4 million loss in MSR valuation adjustments, net in 2021, comprised of $158.6 million loss on our owned MSRs and $1.8 million loss on the MSRs transferred to NRZ and MAV. The $158.6 million loss on our owned MSRs is comprised of $159.9 million MSR portfolio runoff, $36.2 million gain on the MSR portfolio attributed to rate and assumption change and a $34.9 million hedging loss. MSR portfolio runoff represents the realization of expected cash flows and yield based on projected borrower behavior, including scheduled amortization of the loan UPB together with projected voluntary prepayments. The gain on rate and assumption change is primarily due to an increase in market interest rates (the 10 year swap rate increased by 66 basis points in 2021), partially offset by a loss on assumption updates driven by unfavorable prepayment model variance and related calibrations.
Our MSR hedging policy is designed to reduce the volatility of the MSR portfolio fair value due to market interest rates. The changes in fair value of the MSR and hedging derivatives were not offset to the same extent as per their expected hedging
65
sensitivity measures, mainly due to non-parallel changes in the interest rate curve and the basis risk inherent in the MSR profile and the available hedging instruments. Refer to the Market Risk sections for further detail on our hedging strategy and its effectiveness.
The following table provides information regarding the changes in the fair value and the UPB of our portfolio of Owned MSRs (excluding NRZ and MAV related MSRs) during 2021, with the breakdown by investor type.
| Owned MSR Fair Value (4) | Owned MSR UPB ($ in billions) (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSEs | Ginnie Mae | Non- Agency | Total | GSEs | Ginnie Mae | Non- Agency | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | 507.9 | $ | 75.4 | $ | 144.5 | $ | 727.8 | $ | 55.1 | $ | 13.1 | $ | 22.1 | $ | 90.3 | ||||||||||||||
| Additions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New cap. | 199.2 | 23.5 | 1.9 | 224.6 | 16.9 | 1.7 | — | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases (1) | 833.2 | 11.3 | — | 844.5 | 74.6 | 0.9 | — | 75.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales/servicing transfers | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales/calls (3) | (271.0) | — | (4.5) | (275.5) | (25.1) | — | — | (25.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inputs and assumptions (1) | 47.7 | 9.9 | 3.5 | 61.0 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Realization of cash flows | (118.5) | (10.7) | (30.8) | (159.9) | (23.1) | (3.7) | (4.6) | (31.5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 1,198.5 | $ | 109.4 | $ | 114.6 | $ | 1,422.5 | $ | 98.4 | $ | 12.0 | $ | 17.5 | $ | 127.9 | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value (% of UPB) | 1.22 | % | 0.91 | % | 0.65 | % | 1.11 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value multiple (2) | 4.8 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
(1)Mostly changes in interest rates, except for gains of $25.2 million on the revaluation of purchased MSRs, that are reported in the Originations segment.
(2)Multiple of average servicing fee and UPB.
(3)Includes $274.8 million fair value and $24.9 billion UPB of MSR sales to MAV in 2021 that did not achieve sale accounting treatment.
(4)See Note 7 — Mortgage Servicing and Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting for further information on the NRZ and MAV portfolios.
The $1.8 million loss on the transferred MSRs not qualifying for sale accounting (transferred to NRZ and MAV) includes $90.3 million runoff and $88.5 million fair value gain attributable to rates and assumptions. The runoff is explained by the same factors underlying our owned MSR, discussed above, and the transfers of MSRs to MAV in 2021 and the decline in the NRZ MSR portfolio, due to runoff and the termination of the PMC servicing agreement by NRZ in February 2020. The $88.5 million fair value gain attributable to rates and assumptions in 2021 is mostly driven by PLS model calibrations by our third-party valuation expert. The model calibrations more accurately reflect the favorable delinquency and default performance of the PLS collateral across the valuation expert’s client base and was supported by our fair value benchmarking and back-testing analysis. This MSR fair value gain is offset by a fair value loss recorded on the associated NRZ MSR pledged liability.
Compensation and Benefits
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | $ | 108.1 | $ | 113.6 | $ | 144.0 | (5) | % | (21) | % | |||||||
| Average Employment - Servicing | |||||||||||||||||
| India and other | 2,432 | 2,880 | 3,360 | (16) | % | (14) | |||||||||||
| U.S. | 740 | 730 | 1,158 | 1 | (37) | ||||||||||||
| Total | 3,172 | 3,610 | 4,518 | (12) | (20) |
Compensation and benefits expense declined $5.4 million, or 5%, as compared to 2020 primarily due to a $5.3 million decrease in salaries and benefit expense as a result of the 12% decline in our average servicing headcount, mostly offshore. A $0.8 million decline in commissions also contributed to the decline in Compensation and benefits expense. During 2021, we serviced 7% fewer loans, on average, as compared to 2020. The decline in servicing headcount reflects the scaling down of our
66
platform to the number of loans being serviced and the efficiencies resulting from our cost re-engineering initiatives, partially offset by the hiring of employees to support the acquisition of reverse mortgage subservicing from MAM (RMS) on October 1, 2021.
Servicing Expense
Servicing expense primarily includes claim losses and interest curtailments on government-insured loans, provision expense for advances and servicing representation and warranties, and certain loan volume related expenses.
Servicing expense increased $29.8 million, or 44%, as compared to 2020 largely driven by a $4.5 million increase in interim subservicing expense on MSR bulk acquisitions, a $5.2 million increase in our subservicer expenses largely attributable to the termination and deboarding fees associated with moving our owned reverse portfolio from a subservicer onto our platform, and an $8.4 million increase in satisfaction and other loan expenses attributed to a larger portfolio. In addition, Servicing expense for 2020 included a $19.0 million provision release comprised of $9.9 million recoveries from a settlement in 2020 with a mortgage insurer, and $9.1 million improved advance recoveries in 2020, which decreased loss severity rates used in the computation of advance reserves.
The effects of the above factors were partially offset by a $6.6 million reduction in government-insured claim loss provisions in 2021 on reinstated or modified loans and receivables primarily due to a decline in the volume of government-insured claim receivables and claim losses due to the foreclosure moratorium in effect for much of 2021.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses (total operating expenses less compensation and benefit expense and servicer expense) decreased by $13.8 million in 2021 as compared to 2020, in large part due to a $13.3 million decline in Corporate overhead allocations and other cost savings attributed to our re-engineering initiatives.
Professional services increased by $3.2 million primarily due to $1.6 million increase in other professional services fee expense driven by additional expense related to reverse sub-servicing business. Professional services expenses in 2020 included $1.1 million reimbursement credits for the NRM consent deal-related shared expenses.
Occupancy and equipment expense decreased $4.5 million primarily due to a $3.8 million decrease in office space occupancy allocations resulting from a reduction in Servicing headcount and the cost savings of prior year office space rationalization initiatives.
Technology and communications expense declined $1.4 million primarily due to cost savings associated with the implementation of data solutions as well as consolidation of telecommunication vendors in the second quarter of 2020.
The $13.3 million decline in Corporate overhead allocations is attributable to the decline in support group operating expenses, including technology savings, and the lower relative weight of Servicing headcount to the consolidated organization.
67
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) primarily includes net interest expense and the Pledged MSR liability expense.
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Interest Expense | |||||||||||||||||
| Advance match funded liabilities | $ | 14.2 | $ | 24.1 | $ | 26.9 | (41) | % | (10) | % | |||||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | 8.9 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 65 | 53 | ||||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities | 26.0 | 15.9 | 8.1 | 64 | 96 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate debt interest expense allocation | 48.8 | 38.2 | 54.9 | 28 | (30) | ||||||||||||
| Escrow and other | 6.5 | 7.0 | 9.1 | (7) | (23) | ||||||||||||
| Total interest expense | $ | 104.6 | $ | 90.7 | $ | 102.5 | 15 | % | (12) | % | |||||||
| Average balances | |||||||||||||||||
| Average balance of advances | $ | 754.1 | $ | 891.3 | $ | 1,006.3 | (15) | % | (11) | % | |||||||
| Advance match funded liabilities | 505.4 | 603.7 | 671.8 | (16) | (10) | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | 265.4 | 116.0 | 49.4 | 129 | 135 | ||||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities | 701.2 | 308.4 | 148.5 | 127 | 108 | ||||||||||||
| Effective average interest rate | |||||||||||||||||
| Advance match funded liabilities | 2.82 | % | 4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | (29) | % | — | % | |||||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | 3.36 | 4.66 | 7.14 | (28) | (35) | ||||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities | 3.71 | 5.15 | 5.46 | (28) | (6) | ||||||||||||
| Facility costs included in interest expense | $ | 9.8 | $ | 13.1 | $ | 6.2 | (25) | 112 | |||||||||
| Average one-month LIBOR | 0.10 | % | 0.52 | % | 1.75 | % | (81) | % | (70) | % |
Interest expense increased by $13.9 million, or 15%, compared to 2020, due to an overall increase in the average debt balances to finance the growth of the business, partially offset by a lower funding cost. The $10.2 million increase in interest expense on MSR financing facilities, $10.6 million increase in the corporate debt interest expense allocation and $3.5 million increase in interest expense on mortgage loan warehouse facilities, are mostly the result of larger MSR and Loans held for sale portfolios, partially offset by lower funding costs. The $9.9 million decline in interest expense on advance match funded facilities is due to lower average balances of advances and borrowings and a lower cost of funds.
Pledged MSR liability expense relates to the MSR transfers that do not qualify for sale accounting and are presented on a gross basis in our financial statements. See Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Pledged MSR liability expense includes the servicing fee remittance for these transfers and the fair value changes of the pledged MSR liability.
The following table provides information regarding the Pledged MSR liability expense:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||
| Net servicing fee remittance (1) | $ | 228.0 | $ | 278.8 | $ | 437.7 | ||||
| Pledged MSR liability fair value (gain) loss (1) | (11.4) | (82.6) | 33.8 | |||||||
| NRZ 2017/18 lump sum amortization gain | — | (34.2) | (95.1) | |||||||
| Other | (7.6) | (9.6) | (4.2) | |||||||
| Pledged MSR liability expense | $ | 209.1 | $ | 152.4 | $ | 372.2 |
(1)See Note 8 — MSR Transfers Not Qualifying for Sale Accounting
68
Pledged MSR liability expense increased $56.7 million as compared to 2020, primarily due to a $71.1 million unfavorable fair value change on the Pledged MSR liability, mostly driven by a fair value increase in NRZ PLS MSRs due to model recalibrations performed by our third-party valuation expert to more accurately reflect the favorable delinquency and default performance of PLS collateral across its client base. Fair value adjustments to our NRZ MSR pledged liability are offset by fair value adjustments to the related MSR asset, which are recorded in MSR valuation adjustments, net. In addition, we recognized a $34.2 million amortization gain recorded in 2020 (through the end of the second quarter of 2020, nil in 2021), related to the lump-sum cash payments received from NRZ in 2017 and 2018. These increases in the expense were partially offset by a $50.8 million decline in servicing fee remittance, driven by lower volume serviced, with the runoff of the portfolio and the termination of the PMC agreement by NRZ in February 2020. Refer to the above discussions of MSR valuation adjustments, net (Pledged MSR to NRZ and MAV) and Servicing and subservicing fees (NRZ).
Originations
We originate and purchase loans and MSRs through multiple channels, including retail, wholesale, correspondent, flow MSR purchase agreements, the Agency Cash Window and Co-issue programs and bulk MSR purchases.
We originate and purchase conventional loans (conforming to the underwriting standards of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; collectively referred to as Agency loans) and government-insured (FHA or VA) forward mortgage loans. The GSEs and Ginnie Mae guarantee these mortgage securitizations. We originate HECM loans, or reverse mortgages, that are mostly insured by the FHA and we are an approved issuer of HECM mortgage-backed securities (HMBS) that are guaranteed by Ginnie Mae.
Within retail, our Consumer Direct channel for forward mortgage loans (previously called Recapture) focuses on targeting existing servicing customers by offering them competitive mortgage refinance opportunities, where permitted by the governing servicing and pooling agreement. In doing so, we generate revenues for our forward lending business and protect the servicing portfolio by retaining these customers. A portion of our servicing portfolio is susceptible to refinance activity during periods of declining interest rates. Origination recapture volume and related gains are a natural economic hedge, to a certain degree, to the impact of declining MSR values as interest rates decline. To the extent we refinance a loan underlying the MSRs subject to the MAV subservicing agreement, we are obligated to transfer such recaptured MSR to MAV under the terms of the joint-marketing agreement. In addition to refinance activities, our Consumer Direct channel targets cash-out, debt consolidation, mortgage insurance premium reduction, and new customer acquisition.
Our forward lending correspondent channel drives higher servicing portfolio replenishment. We purchase closed loans that have been underwritten to investor guidelines from our network of correspondent sellers and sell and securitize them. As of December 31, 2021, we have relationships with 438 approved correspondent sellers, or 307 new sellers since December 31, 2020. On June 1, 2021, we expanded our network through the assignment by Texas Capital Bank (TCB) to us, of all its correspondent loan purchase agreements with its correspondent sellers (approximately 220 sellers).
We originate and purchase reverse mortgage loans through our retail, wholesale and correspondent lending channels, under the guidelines of the HECM reverse mortgage insurance program of the FHA. Loans originated under this program are generally insured by the FHA, which provides protection against risk of borrower default.
After origination, we package and sell the loans in the secondary mortgage market, through GSE and Ginnie Mae securitizations on a servicing retained basis. Origination revenues mostly include interest income earned for the period the loans are held by us, gain on sale revenue, which represents the difference between the origination or purchase value and the sale value of the loan including its MSR value, and fee income earned at origination. As the securitizations of reverse mortgage loans do not achieve sale accounting treatment and the loans are classified as loans held for investment, at fair value, reverse mortgage revenues include the fair value changes of the loan from lock date to securitization date.
We provide customary origination representations and warranties to investors in connection with our GSE loan sales and securitization activities. We receive customary origination representations and warranties from our network of approved correspondent lenders. We recognize the fair value of the liability for our representations and warranties at the time of sale. In the event we cannot remedy a breach of a representation or warranty, we may be required to repurchase the loan or provide an indemnification payment to the mortgage loan investor. To the extent that we have recourse against a third-party originator, we may recover part or all of any loss we incur. We actively monitor our counterparty risk associated with our network of correspondent lenders-sellers.
We purchase MSRs through flow purchase agreements, the Agency Cash Window programs and bulk MSR purchases. The Agency Cash Window programs we participate in, and purchase MSR from, allow mortgage companies and financial institutions to sell whole loans to the respective agency and sell the MSR to the winning bidder servicing released. In addition, we partner with other originators to replenish our MSRs through flow purchase agreements. We do not provide any origination representations and warranties in connection with our MSR purchases through MSR flow purchase agreements or Agency Cash Window programs. As of December 31, 2021, we have relationships with 154 approved sellers through the Agency Cash Window co-issue programs, or 121 new sellers since December 31, 2020.
69
We recognize our MSR origination with the associated economics in our Originations business, and transfer the MSR to our Servicing segment at fair value once the MSR is recognized on our balance sheet. Our Servicing segment reflects all subsequent performance associated with the MSR, including funding cost, run-off and other fair value changes.
We source additional servicing volume through our subservicing and interim servicing agreements, through our existing relationships and our enterprise sales initiatives. We do not report any revenue or gain associated with subservicing within the Originations segment as the impact is captured in the Servicing segment. However, sales efforts and certain costs - marginal compensation and benefits - are managed and reported within the Originations segment.
For 2021, our Originations business originated or purchased forward and reverse mortgage loans with a UPB of $19.0 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively. In addition, we purchased $20.4 billion UPB MSR through the Agency Cash Window / Flow MSR during 2021.
Significant Variables
Economic Conditions. General economic conditions impact the capacity for consumer credit and the supply of capital. More specifically, employment and home prices are variables that can each have a material impact on mortgage volume. Employment levels, the level of wages and the stability of employment are underlying factors that impact credit qualification. The effect of home prices on lending volumes is significant and complex. As home prices go up, home equity increases and this improves the position of existing homeowners either to refinance or to sell their home, which often leads to a new home purchase and a new forward mortgage loan, or in the case of a reverse mortgage, increase the size of the mortgage loan available and the number of potential borrowers. However, if home prices increase rapidly, the effect on affordability for first-time and move-up buyers can dampen the demand for mortgage loans. The more restrictive standards for loan to value (LTV) ratios, debt to income (DTI) ratios and employment that characterize the current market amplify the significance and sensitivity of the housing market and related mortgage lending volumes to employment levels and home prices.
Market Size and Composition. Changes in mortgage rates directly impact the demand for both purchase and refinance forward mortgages. Small changes in mortgage rates directly impact housing affordability for both first-time and move-up home buyers and affect their ability to purchase a home. For refinance loans, current market mortgage rates must be considered relative to the rates on the current mortgage debt outstanding. As the time and cost to refinance has decreased, relatively small reductions in mortgage rates can trigger higher refinancing activity. Given the large size of U.S. residential forward mortgage debt outstanding, the impact of mortgage rate changes can drive significant swings in mortgage refinance volume.
Market size is likewise impacted by changes to existing, or development of new, GSE or other government sponsored programs. Changes in GSE or HUD guidelines and costs and the availability of alternative financing sources, such as non-Agency proprietary loans and traditional home equity loans, impact borrower demand for forward and reverse mortgages.
Investor Demand. The liquidity of the secondary market impacts the size of the market by defining loan attributes and credit guidelines for loans that investors are willing to buy and at what price. In recent years, the GSEs have been the dominant providers of secondary market liquidity for forward mortgages, keeping the product and credit spectrum relatively homogeneous and risk averse (higher credit standards).
Margins. Changes in pricing margin are closely correlated with changes in market size. As loan demand and market capacity move out of alignment, pricing adjusts. In a growing market, margins expand and in a contracting market, margins tighten as lenders seek to keep their production at or close to full capacity. Managing capacity and cost is critical as volumes change. Among our channels, our margins per loan are highest in the retail channel and lowest in the correspondent channel. We work directly with the borrower to process, underwrite and close loans in our retail and reverse wholesale channels. In our retail channel, we also identify the customer and take loan applications. As a result, our retail channel is the most people- and cost-intensive and experiences the greatest volume volatility.
70
The following table presents the results of operations of our Originations segment. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other segments:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Gain on loans held for sale, net | $ | 124.5 | $ | 105.2 | $ | 32.9 | 18 | % | 220 | % | |||||||
| Reverse mortgage revenue, net | 82.0 | 53.1 | 22.9 | 54 | 133 | ||||||||||||
| Other revenue, net (1) | 43.4 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 107 | 251 | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 249.9 | 179.3 | 61.7 | 39 | 191 | ||||||||||||
| MSR valuation adjustments, net | 25.2 | 41.7 | — | (40) | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | 101.6 | 62.2 | 43.8 | 63 | 42 | ||||||||||||
| Origination expense | 15.0 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 109 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 6.9 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 27 | (15) | ||||||||||||
| Technology and communications | 9.8 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 76 | 76 | ||||||||||||
| Professional services | 10.2 | 9.3 | 1.3 | 10 | 620 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate overhead allocations | 20.0 | 18.2 | 6.0 | 10 | 202 | ||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 9.4 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 43 | 36 | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 172.8 | 114.4 | 72.5 | 51 | 58 | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense) | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 17.7 | 7.0 | 5.2 | 152 | 34 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (23.0) | (9.8) | (7.6) | 134 | 30 | ||||||||||||
| Other, net | (3.1) | 0.4 | 0.9 | (988) | (61) | ||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | (8.4) | (2.5) | (1.5) | 239 | 70 | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 93.9 | $ | 104.2 | $ | (12.2) | (10) | (952) |
(1)Includes $8.5 million, $6.0 million, and $1.3 million ancillary fee income related to MSR acquisitions reported as Servicing and subservicing fees at the consolidated level for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
71
The following table provides selected operating statistics for our Origination segment:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPB in millions | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | ||||||||||||
| Loan Production by Channel | |||||||||||||||||
| Forward loans | |||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | $ | 16,577.8 | $ | 5,685.5 | $ | 494.0 | 192 | % | n/m | ||||||||
| Consumer Direct | 2,411.7 | 1,309.8 | 656.6 | 84 | 99 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 18,989.5 | $ | 6,995.3 | $ | 1,150.5 | 171 | 508 | ||||||||||
| % Purchase production | 32 | 20 | 18 | 63 | 10 | ||||||||||||
| % Refinance production | 68 | 80 | 82 | (15) | (2) | ||||||||||||
| Reverse loans (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | $ | 807.1 | $ | 470.3 | $ | 411.6 | 72 | % | 14 | % | |||||||
| Wholesale | 275.4 | 300.5 | 238.2 | (8) | 26 | ||||||||||||
| Retail | 445.5 | 170.8 | 79.6 | 161 | 115 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 1,527.9 | $ | 941.6 | $ | 729.4 | 62 | 29 | ||||||||||
| MSR Purchases by Channel (Forward only) | |||||||||||||||||
| Agency Cash Window / Flow MSR | 20,443.4 | 15,111.6 | 908.3 | 35 | n/m | ||||||||||||
| Bulk MSR purchases | 55,133.5 | 16,566.2 | 14,616.7 | 233 | 13 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 75,576.9 | $ | 31,677.7 | $ | 15,525.0 | 139 | 104 | ||||||||||
| Total | $ | 96,094.3 | $ | 39,614.7 | $ | 17,405.0 | 143 | 128 | |||||||||
| Short-term loan commitment (at year end) | |||||||||||||||||
| Forward loans | $ | 1,022.0 | $ | 619.7 | 204.0 | 65 | % | 204 | % | ||||||||
| Reverse loans | 63.3 | 11.7 | 28.5 | 442 | (59) | ||||||||||||
| Average Employment | |||||||||||||||||
| U.S. | 653 | 461 | 387 | 42 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||
| India and other | 400 | 177 | 97 | 126 | 82 | ||||||||||||
| Total | 1,053 | 638 | 484 | 65 | 32 |
(1)Loan production excludes reverse mortgage loan draws by borrowers disbursed subsequent to origination that are reported within the Servicing segment.
72
Gain on Loans Held for Sale
The following table provides information regarding Gain on loans held for sale by channel and the related forward loan origination volume and margins (excluding fees that are presented in Other revenue, net):
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Gain on Loans Held for Sale (1) | |||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | $ | 18.5 | $ | 20.8 | $ | 0.1 | (11) | % | n/m | ||||||||
| Consumer Direct | 106.0 | 84.4 | 32.8 | 26 | 158 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 124.5 | $ | 105.2 | $ | 32.9 | 18 | % | 220 | % | ||||||||
| % Gain on Sale Margin (2) | |||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | 0.11 | % | 0.35 | % | 0.02 | % | (69) | % | n/m | ||||||||
| Consumer Direct | 4.36 | 5.41 | 5.00 | % | (19) | 8 | |||||||||||
| 0.64 | % | 1.42 | % | 2.65 | % | (55) | % | (46) | % | ||||||||
| Origination UPB (3) | |||||||||||||||||
| Correspondent | $ | 16,957.0 | $ | 5,851.1 | $ | 584.6 | 190 | % | 901 | % | |||||||
| Consumer Direct | 2,432.0 | 1,560.4 | 655.5 | 56 | 138 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 19,389.0 | $ | 7,411.5 | $ | 1,240.1 | 162 | % | 498 | % |
(1)Includes realized gains on loan sales and related new MSR capitalization, changes in fair value of IRLCs, changes in fair value of loans held for sale and economic hedging gains and losses.
(2)Ratio of gain on Loans held for sale to Origination UPB - see (3) below. Note that the ratio differs from the day-one gain on sale margin upon lock.
(3)Defined as the UPB of loans funded in the period plus the change in the period in the pull-through adjusted UPB of IRLCs.
Gain on loans held for sale, net, increased $19.3 million, or 18%, as compared to 2020, all attributed to our consumer direct channel, with a 56% increase in our loan production volume, partially offset by a lower margin. The effect of nearly three times higher production volume in our correspondent channel was more than offset by lower margin and resulted in a 11% lower gain on sale as compared to 2020. The combined $12.0 billion, or 162% new production volume increase in our correspondent and consumer direct channels is due to favorable market conditions for borrower refinancing, the successful integration of the TCB correspondent lending resources and network of correspondent sellers, and the demonstrated capability of our Originations platform. We have expanded our correspondent seller network from 131 to 438, a 234% increase in twelve months. In addition, the increase in the new production volume of our consumer direct channel is the result of investments in staffing we made to develop the production capabilities of our platform. Overall, the average gain on sale margin for forward loans declined from 142 basis points in 2020 to 64 basis points in 2021, mostly due to the continued shift in the channel mix, with higher volume in correspondent, a lower-margin channel.
Reverse Mortgage Revenue, Net
The following table provides information regarding Reverse mortgage revenue, net of the Originations segment that comprises fair value changes of the pipeline and unsecuritized reverse mortgage loans held for investment, at fair value, together with volume and margin:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Origination UPB (1) | $ | 1,547.0 | $ | 915.4 | $ | 731.4 | 69 | % | 25 | % | |||||||
| Origination margin (2) | 5.30 | % | 5.81 | % | 3.12 | % | (9) | 86 | % | ||||||||
| Reverse mortgage revenue, net (Originations) (3) | $ | 82.0 | $ | 53.1 | $ | 22.9 | 54 | % | 133 | % |
(1)Defined as the UPB of loans funded in the period plus the change in the period in the pull-through adjusted UPB of IRLCs.
(2)Ratio of origination gain and fees - see (3) below - to origination UPB - see (1) above.
(3)Includes gain on new origination, and loan fees and other. Includes $34.1 million, $26.9 million and $16.6 million non-cash gain on securitization of newly originated loans in 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
We reported $82.0 million Reverse mortgage revenue, net in 2021, a $28.9 million or 54% increase as compared to 2020. The increase is primarily driven by an increase in volume of our higher-margin retail channel that generated an additional $26.8
73
million revenue. The historical record increase in the volume of our reverse correspondent and retail channels were partially offset by a lower average margin in those channels mostly due to unfavorable yield spread widening observed in the market.
Other revenue, net
Other revenue, net increased $22.4 million as compared to 2020 primarily due to higher fees earned on increased loan origination volume and setup fees earned for loans boarded on our servicing platform, mostly driven by our forward correspondent and consumer direct channels.
MSR Valuation Adjustments, Net
MSR valuation adjustments, net includes gains of $25.2 million and $41.7 million in 2021 and 2020, respectively, due to the revaluation gains on certain MSRs purchased through the Agency Cash Window programs, and flow purchases. As an aggregator of MSRs, we may purchase MSRs from smaller originators with a purchase price at a discount to fair value and we recognize valuation adjustments for differences in exit markets in accordance with the accounting fair value guidance. We record such valuation adjustments as MSR valuation adjustments, net, within the Originations segment because the segment’s business objective is the sourcing of new MSRs at targeted returns. We transfer the MSR from the Originations segment to the Servicing segment at fair value.
MSR valuation adjustments, net decreased $16.5 million as compared to 2020. Opportunities for fair value discount or margins were larger in the early period of the pandemic and have reduced as markets normalized.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased $58.4 million, or 51%, as compared to 2020, due to our increased production volumes. Compensation and benefits increased by $39.4 million, or 63%, with a $23.1 million increase in salary and benefits and $10.9 million higher commissions. Originations average headcount increased 65% as compared to 2020, reflecting an increase in loan production levels, and reflecting the integration of the TCB correspondent lending resources in the second half of 2021. The offshore-to-total average headcount ratio for Originations increased from 28% for 2020 to 38% for 2021.
Other operating expenses increased primarily due to a $7.8 million increase in Origination expense driven by increased origination volumes, a $4.2 million increase in Technology and communications mostly due to higher software usage and maintenance expenses to support the growth in originations volumes, a $3.5 million increase in advertising expense as part of Origination business expansion, and a $2.0 million increase in postage and mailing expenses in support of increased volumes. Certain other operating expenses are variable, and as a result, as origination volume increased so did the related expenses. Examples include credit reports, appraisals, settlement fees, and tax service fees recorded in origination expenses or certain outsourced services including surge resources recorded in Professional services.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on newly-originated and purchased loans prior to sale to investors. Interest expense is incurred to finance the mortgage loans. We finance originated and purchased forward and reverse mortgage loans with repurchase and participation agreements, commonly referred to as warehouse lines. The increases in interest income and interest expense as compared to 2020 is primarily the result of the increase in the average held-for-sale loan and warehouse debt balances, due to increased loan production volumes.
Corporate Items and Other
Corporate Items and Other includes revenues and expenses of corporate support services, our reinsurance business CRL, inactive entities, and our other business activities that are currently individually insignificant, revenues and expenses that are not directly related to other reportable segments, interest income on short-term investments of cash, gain or loss on repurchases of debt, interest expense on unallocated corporate debt and foreign currency exchange gains or losses. Interest expense on direct asset-backed financings are recorded in the respective Servicing and Originations segments. Interest expense on corporate debt is allocated to the Servicing segment and the Originations segment (starting in the fourth quarter of 2021) based on relative financing requirements.
Corporate support services include finance, facilities, human resources, internal audit, legal, risk and compliance and technology functions. Certain expenses incurred by corporate support services are allocated to the Servicing and Originations segments using various methodologies intended to approximate the utilization of such services. Various measurements of utilization of corporate support services are maintained, primarily time studies, personnel volumes and service consumption levels. In 2019, corporate support services costs were primarily allocated based on relative segment size. Support service costs not allocated to the Servicing and Originations segments are retained in the Corporate Items and Other segment along with certain other costs including certain litigation and settlement related expenses or recoveries, and other costs related to operating as a public company. Corporate Items and Other also includes severance, retention, facility-related and other expenses incurred in 2020 and 2019 related to our re-engineering initiatives and have not been allocated to other segments.
74
CRL, our wholly-owned captive reinsurance subsidiary, provides re-insurance related to coverage on REO properties owned or serviced by us. CRL assumes a quota share of REO insurance coverage written by a third-party insurer under a blanket policy issued to PMC. The underlying REO policy provides coverage for direct physical loss on commercial and residential properties, subject to certain limitations. Under the terms of the reinsurance agreement, CRL assumes a 60% quota share of premiums and all related losses incurred by the third-party insurer, effective March 2021, with a 50% and 40% quota share through February 2021 and May 2020, respectively. The reinsurance agreement expires December 31, 2023, but may be terminated by either party at any time with six months advance written notice. The agreement will automatically renew for additional one-year terms unless either party provides 60 days advance written notice prior to renewal.
The following table presents selected results of operations of Corporate Items and Other. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other segments:
| Years Ended December 31, | % Change | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | 2020 vs. 2019 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | |||||||||||||||||
| Premiums (CRL) | $ | 5.9 | $ | 6.2 | $ | 12.9 | (5) | % | (52) | % | |||||||
| Other revenue | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | (28) | 55 | ||||||||||||
| Total revenue | 6.2 | 6.6 | 13.2 | (6) | (50) | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses | |||||||||||||||||
| Compensation and benefits | 88.2 | 89.6 | 125.7 | (1) | (29) | ||||||||||||
| Professional services | 40.3 | 69.4 | 59.2 | (42) | 17 | ||||||||||||
| Technology and communications | 22.5 | 28.9 | 43.4 | (22) | (34) | ||||||||||||
| Occupancy and equipment | 3.1 | 11.1 | 17.4 | (72) | (36) | ||||||||||||
| Servicing and origination | 0.4 | 1.7 | 0.7 | (74) | (94) | ||||||||||||
| Other expenses | 7.3 | 8.1 | 11.0 | (10) | (26) | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses before corporate overhead allocations | 161.8 | 208.7 | 257.4 | (22) | (19) | ||||||||||||
| Corporate overhead allocations | |||||||||||||||||
| Servicing segment | (47.7) | (61.0) | (197.9) | (22) | (69) | ||||||||||||
| Originations segment | (20.0) | (18.2) | (6.0) | 10 | 202 | ||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 94.1 | 129.5 | 53.5 | (27) | 142 | ||||||||||||
| Other income (expense), net | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8 | (77) | 9 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (16.4) | (8.9) | (4.0) | 85 | 121 | ||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt | (15.5) | — | 5.1 | n/m | (100) | ||||||||||||
| Other, net | 1.2 | (4.3) | (4.1) | (129) | 3 | ||||||||||||
| Total other (expense) income, net | (30.2) | (11.2) | (1.3) | 170 | 775 | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (118.1) | $ | (134.1) | $ | (41.6) | (12) | 222 | |||||||||
| n/m: not meaningful |
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense decreased $1.3 million, or 1%, as compared to 2020 primarily as a result of a $4.2 million decline in salaries and benefit expense driven by a 7% decrease in average corporate headcount, including a 13% decrease in average onshore headcount from 308 to 267. In addition, the decline in compensation and benefits expense is driven by a $2.2 million decrease in annual incentive compensation and a $1.8 million decline in severance expense. These lower expenses were largely offset by a $7.9 million increase in share-based compensation mostly due to an increase in the fair value of cash-settled share-based awards associated with the increase in our common stock price during the year.
Professional Services
Professional services expense declined $29.1 million, or 42%, as compared to 2020, primarily due to a $16.9 million decrease in legal expenses and an $11.1 million decline in other professional services expenses. The net decline in legal expenses is largely due to expenses and provision for litigation settlement recorded in 2020 related to the CFPB and Florida
75
matters. Legal expenses and professional services for 2020 included an $8.0 million recovery of prior expenses from a mortgage insurer and $3.5 million of COVID-19 related expenses, respectively. Cost reduction initiatives and higher utilization of professional services in 2020, including strategic vendor sourcing, cloud migration and consulting, resulted in lower other professional fees in 2021. Other professional services for 2021 includes $3.2 million of advisory fees related to the setup of our MSR investment joint venture with Oaktree, MAV Canopy.
Other Operating Expenses
Technology and communications expense decreased $6.4 million, or 22%, as compared to 2020, primarily due to a $3.5 million decline in telephone and telecommunication expense, and a $2.5 million decline in hardware and software depreciation expense. Cost re-engineering initiatives in 2020 resulted in lower expenses in 2021 through facility closure and the transition to a more cost-effective alternative telephone system. In addition, during 2020, we recognized accelerated depreciation for certain of our hardware and software assets and incurred additional expenses related to COVID-19.
Occupancy and equipment expense decreased $8.0 million or 72%, as compared to 2020, primarily due to the rationalization of our facilities. In 2020, we partially abandoned certain leased properties and recognized accelerated depreciation and exit costs. Depreciation and lease interest expense for 2021 declined $7.9 million as compared to 2020. Occupancy allocations to Servicing and Originations segments were lower by $4.3 million due to the above mentioned facility rationalization, partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in repair, maintenance and utilities related expenses and a $1.1 million decline in postage and mailing expenses attributed to COVID-19.
Corporate overhead allocations decreased $11.5 million for 2021 as compared to 2020 largely due to the benefits of cost savings achieved at the corporate level, most significantly technology expenses, achieved through our cost re-engineering initiatives in 2020.
Other Income (Expense)
Interest expense of the Corporate segment relates to the remaining corporate debt unallocated to other segments. Interest expense increased $7.6 million, or 85%, as compared to 2020. The increase is primarily driven by a higher cost of corporate debt that is mostly due to the senior secured notes issued at a discount on March 4, 2021 and May 3, 2021.
On March 4, 2021, we recognized a loss on debt extinguishment of $15.5 million resulting from our early repayment of the SSTL due May 2022 and our early redemption of our 6.375% PHH senior unsecured notes due August 2021 and our 8.375% PMC senior secured notes due November 2022.
We reported $1.2 million Other income in 2021, as compared to $4.3 million Other expense in 2020. Loss adjustment expense, related to our CRL business decreased by $1.8 million due to a decline in the number of covered REO properties and claims filed during 2021 compared to 2020. In 2020, we recognized a $2.2 million net loss on the sale of a vacant office facility. In addition, we recorded foreign currency remeasurement gains of $0.3 million in 2021, as compared to losses of $1.0 million in 2020, related to our operations in India and the Philippines.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
On March 4, 2021, we successfully completed a comprehensive refinancing of our corporate debt and a capital contribution to our licensed entity PMC, through the following transactions:
•We redeemed all of PHH’s outstanding 6.375% Senior Notes due August 2021 at a price of 100% of the $21.5 million principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and all of PMC’s 8.375% Senior Secured Notes due November 2022 at a price of 102.094% of the $291.5 million principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
•We repaid in full the $185.0 million outstanding principal balance of the SSTL due May 2022, with a 2% prepayment premium of the outstanding principal balance, or $3.7 million.
•PMC completed the issuance and sale of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior secured notes due March 15, 2026 (the PMC Senior Secured Notes).
•Ocwen Financial Corporation, completed the private placement of $199.5 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due March 4, 2027 (the OFC Senior Secured Notes) together with the issuance of warrants to certain entities owned by funds and accounts managed by Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (the Oaktree Investors).
•Ocwen Financial Corporation contributed the $175.0 million net proceeds from the issuance of the OFC Senior Secured Notes to its wholly owned subsidiary, PHH, and PHH contributed $153.4 million to its wholly owned subsidiary PMC, as permanent equity, after redeeming PHH’s 6.375% Senior Notes disclosed above.
With the completion of the corporate debt refinancing, we have reduced corporate indebtedness at the PHH and PMC level by approximately $100 million and extended overall corporate debt maturities by over three years resulting in a better
76
alignment of the debt profile with our investments. We now have greater financial flexibility than with the prior capital structure, and we believe, an opportunity to negotiate better terms for our future financing needs.
On May 3, 2021, concurrent with the closing of the MAV transaction, we issued to Oaktree the second tranche of the OFC Senior Secured Notes due March 4, 2027 in an aggregate principal amount of $85.5 million, together with the issuance of common shares and additional warrants.
In addition, we have successfully completed at market terms the following during 2021 with respect to our current and anticipated financing needs:
•We increased the total borrowing capacity on our mortgage loan warehouse facilities by $1.1 billion to support growth in our Originations business. We reduced our weighted average interest rate on these facilities by 0.72% during the year.
•We increased the borrowing capacity of our MSR financing facilities by $410.0 million to fund our MSR bulk acquisitions and portfolio growth, and extended the duration of our debt. We reduced our weighted average interest rate on these facilities by 1.11% during the year.
•We voluntarily reduced total borrowing capacity on our advance facilities by $200.0 million as we continue to experience better than expected forbearance performance. We reduced our weighted average interest rate on these facilities by 0.42% during the year.
In the normal course of business, we are actively engaged with our lenders and as a result, have renewed, replaced or extended our debt agreements to the extent necessary to finance our operations. See Note 14 — Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
A summary of borrowing capacity under our advance facilities, mortgage warehouse facilities and MSR financing facilities is as follows at the dates indicated:
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Borrowing Capacity (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity - Committed (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity - Uncommitted (1) | Total Borrowing Capacity (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity - Committed (1) | Available Borrowing Capacity - Uncommitted (1) | ||||||||||||
| Advance facilities | $ | 595.0 | $ | 82.7 | $ | — | $ | 795.0 | $ | 213.7 | $ | — | |||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | 2,119.3 | 240.3 | 794.0 | 1,037.0 | 186.9 | 398.4 | |||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities | 785.0 | 40.4 | 18.3 | 375.0 | 39.2 | 13.0 | |||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,499.3 | $ | 363.4 | $ | 812.3 | $ | 2,207.0 | $ | 439.9 | $ | 411.3 | |||||
| Total Capacity increase (decrease) | $ | 1,292.3 | $ | (76.5) | 59% | (17)% | |||||||||||
| Advance facilities | $ | (200.0) | $ | (131.0) | (25)% | (61)% | |||||||||||
| Mortgage loan warehouse facilities | $ | 1,082.3 | $ | 53.4 | 104% | 29% | |||||||||||
| MSR financing facilities | $ | 410.0 | $ | 1.2 | 109% | 3% |
(1)Total Borrowing Capacity represents the maximum amount which can be borrowed, subject to eligible collateral. Available Borrowing Capacity represents Total Borrowing Capacity less outstanding borrowings.
Our total borrowing capacity increased by approximately $1.3 billion (or 59%) in 2021, mostly driven by a $1.1 billion (104%) increase in our mortgage loan warehouse capacity to fund the growth in our Originations business. In addition, we increased the capacity of our MSR financing facilities by $410.0 million to fund our MSR bulk acquisitions and portfolio growth. The available borrowing capacity under our advance financing facilities decreased by $131.0 million as compared to December 31, 2020 due to a $170.0 million voluntary reduction in total borrowing capacity of the OMART variable funding notes and a $30.0 million reduction in total borrowing capacity of the OFAF facility, offset in part by a $69.0 million decrease in outstanding borrowings, consistent with a decrease in our servicer advances. At December 31, 2021, none of the available borrowing capacity under our advance financing facilities could be funded based on the amount of eligible collateral that had been pledged to such facilities. Also, none of our uncommitted borrowing capacity was available to fund advances at December 31, 2021 under our Ginnie Mae MSR financing facility based on the amount of eligible collateral.
We may utilize committed borrowing capacity under our mortgage warehouse facilities and MSR financing facilities to the extent we have sufficient eligible collateral to borrow against and otherwise satisfy the applicable conditions to funding. At December 31, 2021, we had no committed borrowing capacity under our mortgage loan warehouse facilities, based on the
77
amount of eligible collateral. Uncommitted amounts can be advanced at the discretion of the lender, and there can be no assurance that any uncommitted amounts will be available to us at any particular time.
At December 31, 2021, our unrestricted cash position was $192.8 million compared to $284.8 million at December 31, 2020. We typically invest cash in excess of our immediate operating needs in deposit accounts and other liquid assets.
We strive to optimize our daily cash position to reduce financing costs while closely monitoring our liquidity needs and ongoing funding requirements. We regularly monitor and project cash flows over various time horizons as a way to anticipate and mitigate liquidity risk.
In assessing our liquidity outlook, our primary focus is on available cash on hand, unused available funding and the following forecast measures:
•Financial projections for ongoing net income, excluding the impact of non-cash items, and working capital needs including loan repurchases;
•Requirements for amortizing and maturing liabilities;
•The projected change in advances compared to the projected borrowing capacity to fund such advances under our facilities, including capacity for monthly peak needs;
•Projected funding requirements for acquisitions of MSRs and other investment opportunities;
•Funding capacity for whole loans and tail draws under our reverse mortgage commitments subject to warehouse eligibility requirements;
•Potential payments or recoveries related to legal and regulatory matters, insurance, taxes and others; and
•Margining requirements associated with our borrowing facilities and hedging program.
Use of Funds
Our primary near-term uses of funds in the normal course include:
•Payment of operating costs and corporate expenses;
•Payments for advances in excess of collections;
•Investing in our servicing and originations businesses, including MSR, other asset acquisitions and MAV Canopy equity contribution;
•Originated and repurchased loans, including scheduled and unscheduled equity draws on reverse mortgage loans;
•Payment of margin calls under our MSR financing facilities and derivative instruments;
•Repayments of borrowings, including under our MSR financing, advance financing and warehouse facilities, and payment of interest expense; and
•Net negative working capital and other general corporate cash outflows.
We have originated floating-rate reverse mortgage loans under which the borrowers have additional borrowing capacity of $1.5 billion at December 31, 2021. This additional borrowing capacity is available on a scheduled or unscheduled payment basis. During 2021, we funded $226.6 million out of the $2.0 billion borrowing capacity available as of December 31, 2020. We also had short-term commitments to lend $1.0 billion and $63.3 million in connection with our forward and reverse mortgage loan IRLCs, respectively, outstanding at December 31, 2021. As an HMBS issuer, we assume certain obligations related to each security issued. The most significant obligation is the requirement to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once the outstanding principal balance of the related HECM is equal to or greater than 98% of the maximum claim amount (MCA repurchases). See Note 25 — Commitments to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. We finance originated and purchased forward and reverse mortgage loans with repurchase and participation agreements, referred to as warehouse lines.
Regarding the current maturities of our borrowings, as of December 31, 2021, we have approximately $2.09 billion of debt outstanding that would either come due, begin amortizing or require partial repayment in the next 12 months. This amount is comprised of $1.09 billion of borrowings under forward and reverse mortgage warehouse facilities, $512.3 million of notes under advance financing facilities that will enter their respective amortization periods, $449.2 million outstanding under Agency and Ginnie Mae MSR financing facilities maturing in 2022, and $41.7 million of scheduled principal amortization on the PLS Notes secured by PLS MSRs.
78
In our liquidity management, we consider two factors more specifically as a result of the COVID-19 environment and the volatile interest rate environment: our increased advancing requirements as servicer during each investor remittance period, and the uncertainties of daily margin calls on our collateralized debt facilities and derivative instruments due to interest rate fluctuations. First, as servicer, we are required to advance to investors the loan P&I installments not collected from borrowers for those delinquent loans, including those on forbearance plans. Loan payoffs and prepayments are a source of additional liquidity and are dependent on the interest rate environment. We also advance T&I and Corporate advances primarily on properties that are in default or have been foreclosed. Our obligations to make these advances are governed by servicing agreements or guides, depending on investors or guarantor. Refer to Note 25 — Commitments to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further description of our servicer advance obligations. As subservicer, we are also required to make P&I, T&I and Corporate advances on behalf of servicers following the servicing agreements or guides. However, servicers are generally required to reimburse us within 30 days of our advancing under the terms of the subservicing agreements, and we are generally reimbursed by NRZ the same day we fund P&I advances, or within no more than three days for servicing advances and certain P&I advances under the Ocwen agreements.
Second, we are generally subject to daily margining requirements under the terms of our MSR financing facilities and daily cash calls for our TBAs, interest rate swap futures or other derivatives. Declines in fair value of our MSRs due to declines in market interest rates, assumption updates or other factors require that we provide additional collateral to our lenders under MSR financing facilities. Similarly, declines in fair value of our derivative instruments require that we provide additional collateral to the clearing counterparties. Our exposure to changes in fair value of our MSRs and the associated liquidity risk have increased as a result of the GSE MSR bulk acquisitions in June 2021. Refer to the sensitivity analysis in the Market Risk section of Risk Management for our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.
Our medium- and long-term requirements for cash include:
•Payment of interest and principal repayment of our corporate debt that matures in 2026 and 2027;
•Any payments associated with the confirmation of loss contingencies; and
•Any other payments required under contractual obligations discussed above that extend beyond one year, e.g., lease payments.
We are focused on ensuring that we have sufficient liquidity sources to continue to operate through the pandemic as well as after. We continuously evaluate alternative financings to diversify our sources of funds, optimize maturities and reduce our funding cost. See “Sources of Funds” below.
Sources of Funds
Our primary sources of funds for near-term liquidity in normal course include:
•Collections of servicing and subservicing fees and ancillary revenues;
•Collections of advances in excess of new advances;
•Proceeds from match funded advance financing facilities;
•Proceeds from other borrowings, including warehouse facilities and MSR financing facilities;
•Proceeds from sales and securitizations of originated loans and repurchased loans; and
•Net positive working capital from changes in other assets and liabilities.
Servicing advances are an important component of our business and represent amounts that we, as servicer, are required to advance to, or on behalf of, our servicing clients if we do not receive such amounts from borrowers. Our use of advance financing facilities is integral to our cash and liquidity management strategy. Revolving variable funding notes issued by our advance financing facilities to financial institutions typically have a revolving period of 12 months. Term notes are generally issued to institutional investors with one-, two- or three-year revolving periods. Additionally, certain of our financing and subservicing agreements permit us to retain advance collections for a period ranging from one to two business days before remittance, thus providing a source of short-term liquidity.
We use mortgage loan repurchase and participation facilities (commonly called warehouse lines) to fund newly-originated loans on a short-term basis until they are sold to secondary market investors, including GSEs or other third-party investors, and to fund repurchases of certain Ginnie Mae forward loans, HECM loans, second-lien loans and other types of loans. Warehouse facilities are structured as repurchase or participation agreements under which ownership of the loans is temporarily transferred to the lender. These facilities contain eligibility criteria that include aging and concentration limits by loan type among other provisions. Currently, our master repurchase and participation agreements generally have maximum terms of 364-days. The funds are typically repaid using the proceeds from the sale of the loans to the secondary market investors, usually within 30 days.
We also rely on the secondary mortgage market as a source of consistent liquidity to support our lending operations. Substantially all of the mortgage loans that we originate or purchase are sold or securitized in the secondary mortgage market in the form of residential mortgage backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac and, in the case of mortgage
79
backed securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, are mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by the FHA, VA or United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
We regularly evaluate financing structure options that we believe will most effectively provide the necessary capacity to support our investment plans, address upcoming debt maturities and accommodate our business needs. We continuously evaluate the allocation of our capital to MSR investments, the related returns, funding and liquidity requirements. While our investment in MAV Canopy exposes us to additional capital contributions, the relationship provides PMC an additional means to finance MSRs and maintain liquidity while maintaining servicing volume - See Item 1. Business, Oaktree Relationship for further details. With the launch of MAV and our relationships with other clients, additional opportunities to rebalance our servicing and subservicing portfolio mix are available to us and may result in additional sales of MSRs while we would perform subservicing for the sold portfolio.
Covenants
Our debt agreements contain various qualitative and quantitative covenants including financial covenants, covenants to operate in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations, monitoring and reporting obligations and restrictions on our ability to engage in various activities, including but not limited to incurring or guarantying additional debt, paying dividends or making distributions on or purchasing equity interests of Ocwen and its subsidiaries, repurchasing or redeeming capital stock or junior capital, repurchasing or redeeming subordinated debt prior to maturity, issuing preferred stock, selling or transferring assets or making loans or investments or other restricted payments, entering into mergers or consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of the assets of Ocwen and its subsidiaries, creating liens on assets to secure debt, and entering into transactions with affiliates. These covenants may limit the manner in which we conduct our business and may limit our ability to engage in favorable business activities or raise additional capital to finance future operations or satisfy future liquidity needs. In addition, breaches or events that may result in a default under our debt agreements include, among other things, nonpayment of principal or interest, noncompliance with our covenants, breach of representations, the occurrence of a material adverse change, insolvency, bankruptcy, certain material judgments and litigation and changes of control. See Note 14 — Borrowings to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our covenants. The most restrictive liquidity requirement under our debt agreements is for a minimum of $125.0 million in consolidated liquidity, as defined, under certain of our advance match funded debt and MSR financing facilities agreements. At December 31, 2021, we held unrestricted cash in excess of this minimum amount.
In addition, our debt agreements generally include cross default provisions such that a default under one agreement could trigger defaults under other agreements. If we fail to comply with our debt agreements and are unable to avoid, remedy or secure a waiver of any resulting default, we may be subject to adverse action by our lenders, including termination of further funding, acceleration of outstanding obligations, enforcement of liens against the assets securing or otherwise supporting our obligations, and other legal remedies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. We believe that we are in compliance with the covenants in our debt agreements as of December 31, 2021.
Credit Ratings
Credit ratings are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a company’s debt obligations. Lower ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs and reduced access to capital markets. The following table summarizes our current ratings and outlook by the respective nationally recognized rating agencies. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time.
| Rating Agency | Long-term Corporate Rating | Review Status / Outlook | Date of last action | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moody’s | Caa1 | Stable | February 24, 2021 | |||||||
| S&P | B- | Stable | February 24, 2021 |
On February 24, 2021, concurrent with the launch of the $400.0 million PMC Senior Secured Notes offering, both Moody’s and S&P reaffirmed the corporate ratings at Caa1 and B-, respectively. In addition, both agencies revised the outlook of the corporate ratings to Stable from Negative. This change in outlook was driven by the elimination of the short debt maturity runway and refinancing risk, which was listed as an area of concern by both Moody’s and S&P. On January 24, 2022, S&P affirmed the corporate rating at B-.
On January 24, 2022, S&P raised the assigned rating to the PMC Senior Secured Notes from ‘B-’ to ‘B’ and maintained a stable outlook citing improved profitability and increase in assets. It is possible that additional actions by credit rating agencies could have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and funding position, including materially changing the terms on which we may be able to borrow money.
80
Cash Flows
Our operating cash flow is primarily impacted by operating results, including Originations gains on loan sales, changes in our servicing advance balances, the level of mortgage loan production, the timing of sales and securitizations of mortgage loans, and the margin calls required under our MSR financing facilities or derivative instruments. We classify purchases of MSRs through flow purchase agreements, Agency Cash Window and bulk acquisitions as investing activity. MSR investments represent a key indicator of our ability to generate future income in our Servicing business, together with originated MSRs. We classify changes in HECM loans held for investment as investing activity and changes in the related HMBS borrowings as financing activity.
Our NRZ agreements represent an important component of our liquidity and our liquidity management, and have a significant impact on our consolidated statements of cash flows. Because the lump-sum payments we received in connection with our 2017 Agreements and New RMSR Agreements were recorded as secured financings, additions to, and reductions in, the balance of those secured financings were recognized as financing activity in our consolidated statements of cash flows through April 2020. Excluding the impact of changes to the secured financings attributed to changes in fair value, changes in the balance of these secured financings are reflected in cash flows from operating activities despite having no impact on our consolidated cash balance. Net cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 includes $— million and $35.1 million, respectively, of such cash flows and they were offset by corresponding amounts in net cash used in financing activities in the same periods.
Our cash flows are summarized as follows:
| $ in millions | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | (472) | $ | 261 | ||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (1,001) | (528) | ||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 1,380 | 132 | ||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | $ | (93) | $ | (135) | ||
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 263 | $ | 357 |
Cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2021
Our operating activities used $472.2 million of cash largely due to the growth of our new Originations production with net cash paid on loans held for sale of $623.0 million, partially offset by the $28.9 million of net collections of servicing advances, mostly P&I advances.
Our investing activities used $1.0 billion of cash. The primary uses of cash in our investing activities include $831.2 million to purchase MSRs, mostly through bulk acquisitions, net cash outflows in connection with our HECM reverse mortgages of $135.1 million, and $27.9 million of capital contributions to our equity method investee MAV Canopy.
Our financing activities provided $1.4 billion of cash. Cash inflows include $647.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of the PMC Senior Secured Notes and the OFC Senior Secured Notes, warrants and common stock to Oaktree and $1.7 billion received in connection with our reverse mortgage securitizations, which are accounted for as secured financings, largely offset by repayments on the related financing liability of $1.6 billion, $247.0 million of proceeds from sale of MSRs accounted for as a financing in connection with sales of MSRs to MAV, and a $1.1 billion net increase in borrowings under our mortgage warehouse and MSR financing facilities. Cash outflows include $319.2 million to repay our 6.375% senior unsecured notes and 8.375% senior secured notes, $188.7 million repayment of the SSTL, $69.0 million of net repayments on advance match funded liabilities, and $91.2 million of net payments on the financing liabilities related to MSRs transferred.
Cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2020
Our operating activities provided $261.0 million of cash largely due to $213.3 million of net collections of servicing advances, mostly P&I advances, partially offset by net cash paid on loans held for sale during the year of $121.5 million.
Our investing activities used $527.9 million of cash. The primary uses of cash in our investing activities include net cash outflows in connection with our HECM reverse mortgages of $258.9 million and $273.2 million to purchase MSRs.
Our financing activities provided $131.8 million of cash. Cash inflows include $1.2 billion received in connection with our reverse mortgage securitizations, which are accounted for as secured financings, less repayments on the related financing liability of $935.8 million. In addition, we increased borrowings under our mortgage loan warehouse facilities and MSR financing facilities by $119.5 million and $66.9 million, respectively. Cash outflows include repayments of $141.1 million on the SSTL, $97.8 million of net repayments on advance match funded liabilities, and $101.8 million of net payments on the
81
financing liabilities related to MSRs transferred. In addition, we also paid $7.7 million of debt issuance costs related to our SSTL facility amendment and repurchased shares of our common stock for $4.6 million.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Our risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and appropriately balance risk and return. We have established policies and procedures intended to identify, assess, monitor and manage the types of risk to which we are subject, including strategic, market, credit, liquidity and operational risks.
Our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer is responsible for the design, implementation and oversight of our global risk management and compliance programs. Risks unique to our businesses are governed through various management processes and governance committees to oversee risk and related control activities across our company and provide a framework for potential issues to be identified, assessed and remediated under the direction of senior executives from our business, finance, risk, compliance, internal audit and law departments, as applicable. Information is aggregated and reports on risk matters are made to the Board of Directors, its Risk and Compliance Committee or its other committees, as applicable, to enable the Board of Directors and its committees to fulfill their governance and oversight responsibilities.
Strategic Risk
We are exposed to risk with respect to the strategic initiatives we need to undertake in order to return to sustainable growth and profitability. Strategic risk represents the risk to shareholder or enterprise value, current or future earnings, capital and liquidity from adverse business decisions and/or improper implementation of business strategies. Management is responsible for developing and implementing business strategies that leverage our core competencies and are appropriately structured, resourced and executed. Oversight for our strategic actions is provided by the Board of Directors. Our performance, relative to our business plans and our longer-term strategic plans, is reviewed by management and the Board of Directors.
To achieve our near-term financial objectives, we believe we need to execute on the key business initiatives discussed above under “Overview”. Our ability to achieve our objectives is highly dependent on the success of our business relationships with our critical counterparties like the GSEs, FHFA, Ginnie Mae, our lenders, regulators, significant customers and our ability to attract new customers, all of which are impacted by our capability to adequately address the competitive challenges we face. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in executing on these initiatives. Further, there can be no assurance that even if we execute on these initiatives we will be able to return to profitability. In addition to successful operational execution of our key initiatives, our success will also depend on market conditions and other factors outside of our control. If we continue to experience losses, our share price, business, reputation, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Market Risk
See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Liquidity Risk
We are exposed to liquidity risk through our ongoing needs to: originate, purchase, repurchase and finance mortgage loans; sell mortgage loans into secondary markets; retain, acquire and finance MSRs, make and finance advances; fund and sell additional future draws by borrowers under variable rate HECM loans; meet our HMBS issuer obligations with respect to MCA repurchases; repay maturing debt; meet our contractual obligations; and otherwise fund our operations. Liquidity is an essential component of our ability to operate and grow our business; therefore, it is crucial that we maintain adequate levels of excess liquidity to fund our businesses during normal economic cycles and events of market stress.
We estimate how our liquidity needs may be impacted by a number of factors, including fluctuations in asset and liability levels due to our business strategy, asset valuations, changes in cash flows from operations, levels of interest rates, debt service requirements including contractual amortization and maturities, and unanticipated events, including legal and regulatory expenses. We also assess market conditions and capacity for debt issuance in the various markets that we access to fund our business needs. We have established internal processes to anticipate future cash needs and continuously monitor the availability of funds pursuant to our existing debt arrangements. We monitor MSR asset valuations and communicate closely with our lenders for this asset class to ensure adequate liquidity is maintained for mark-to-market valuation changes within MSR financing facilities. We manage this risk in multiple ways, including but not limited to engaging in MSR hedging activities, and maintaining liquidity earmarks at levels to support potential changes in MSR fair values.
We regularly evaluate capital structure options that we believe will most effectively provide the necessary capacity to support our investment objectives, address upcoming debt maturities and contractual amortization, and accommodate our business needs. Our objective is to maximize the total investment capacity through diversification of our funding sources while optimizing cost, advance rates and terms. Historical losses have significantly eroded our stockholders’ equity and weakened our
82
financial condition. To the extent we are not successful in achieving our near-term objective of returning to sustainable profitability, funding continuing losses will limit opportunities to grow our business.
In general, we finance our business operations through a variety of activities - cash on hand, operating cash flow, term borrowings and both committed and non-committed asset-based lending facilities for our significant MSR, mortgage warehouse and servicing advance activities. We address liquidity risk by actively managing our sources and uses of funds and maintaining contingency funding capacities, including but not limited to undrawn excess borrowing capacity on credit lines beyond our expected needs and by extending the tenor of our financing arrangements from time to time. Management closely monitors growth, and can adjust originations pricing quickly to manage its liquidity profile as needed. We have typically “upsized” existing warehouse or advance facilities or entered into new secured facilities in anticipation of our liquidity needs.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is inherent in each of our business lines and related support activities. This risk can manifest itself in various ways, including process execution errors, clerical or technological failures or errors, business interruptions and frauds, all of which could cause us to incur losses. Operational risk includes the following key risks:
•legal risk, as we can have legal disputes with borrowers or counterparties;
•compliance risk, as we are subject to many federal and state rules and regulations;
•third-party risk, as we have many processes that have been outsourced to third parties;
•information technology risk, as we operate many information systems that depend on proper functioning of hardware and software;
•information security risk, as our information systems and associates handle personal financial data of borrowers.
The Board of Directors provides direction to senior executives by setting our organization’s risk appetite, and delegates to our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives the primary ownership and responsibility for operational risk management and control. Senior executives in our risk department oversee the establishment of policies and control frameworks that are designed, executed and administered to provide a sound and well-controlled operational environment in accordance with our risk appetite framework. We mandate training for our employees in respect to these policies, require business line change management control oversight, and we conduct targeted control assessment/reviews on a regular basis. Risk issues identified are tracked in our Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) system, Process Unity. Remediation and assurance testing are also tracked in our GRC system. We also have several channels for employees to report operational and/or technological issues affecting their operations to management, the operational risk or compliance teams or the Board.
We seek to embed a culture of compliance and business line responsibility for managing operational and compliance risks in our enterprise-wide approach toward risk management. Ocwen has adopted a “Three Lines of Defense” model to enable risks and controls to be properly managed on an on-going basis. The model delineates business line management's accountabilities and responsibilities over risk management and the control environment and includes mechanisms to assess the effectiveness of executing these responsibilities.
The first line of defense consists of business line management, dedicated control directors and quality assurance personnel who are accountable and responsible for their day-to-day activities, processes and controls. The first line of defense is responsible for ensuring that key risks within their activities and operations are identified, assessed, mitigated and monitored by an appropriate control environment that is commensurate with the operations risk profile.
The second line of defense is independent from the business and comprises a Risk Management function (including Third-Party Risk and Information Security) and a Compliance function, which are responsible for:
•providing assurance, oversight, and credible challenge over the effectiveness of the risk and control activities conducted by the first line;
•establishing frameworks to identify and measure the risks being taken by different parts of the business;
•monitoring risk levels, through key indicators and oversight/assurance and testing programs; and
•provide periodic reporting to Senior Management and the Board of Directors for transparency.
The third line of defense, Internal Audit, provides independent assurance as to the effectiveness of the design, implementation and embedding of the risk management frameworks, as well as the management of the risks and controls by the first line and control oversight by the second line. The Internal Audit function provides periodic reporting on its activities to Senior Management and the Board of Directors for transparency.
All business units and overhead functions are subject to unrestricted audits by our internal audit department. Internal audit is granted unrestricted access to our records, physical properties, systems, management and employees in order to perform these audits. The internal audit department reports to the Audit Committee of the Board and assists the Audit Committee in fulfilling its governance and oversight responsibility.
83
Compliance risk is managed through an enterprise-wide compliance risk management program designed to monitor, detect and deter compliance issues. Our compliance and risk management policies assign primary responsibility and accountability for the management of compliance risk in the lines of business to business line management.
Information Security Risk oversight is performed by our Chief Information Security Officer. Ocwen’s information security plans are developed to meet or exceed Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council standards.
Credit Risk
Consumer Credit Risk
The typical obligor credit-related risks inherent in maintaining a mortgage loan portfolio as an investment tend to impact us less than a typical long-term investor because we generally sell the mortgage loans that we originate in the secondary market shortly after origination through GSE and Ginnie Mae guaranteed securitizations and whole loan transactions. We are exposed to early payment defaults from the time that we originate a loan to the time that the loan is sold in the secondary market or shortly thereafter. Early payment defaults are monitored and loans are audited by our quality assurance teams for origination defects. Our exposure to early payment defaults remains very limited and we do not anticipate material losses from this exposure.
Servicing costs are generally higher on higher credit risk loans. In addition, higher credit risk loans are generally affected to a greater extent by an economic downturn or a deterioration of the housing market. An increase in delinquencies and foreclosure rates generally results in increased advances for delinquent principal and interest, taxes and insurance, foreclosure costs and the upkeep of vacant property in foreclosure. Interest expense on advances and higher operating expenses decrease the value of our servicing portfolio. We track the credit risk profile of our servicing portfolio, including the recoverability of advances, with a view to ensuring that changes in portfolio credit risk are identified on a timely basis.
We have loan repurchase and indemnification obligations arising from potential breaches of the representation and warranty provisions in connection with loans we sell in the secondary market. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and we may bear any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan.
We endeavor to minimize our losses from loan repurchases and indemnifications by focusing on originating fully compliant mortgage loans and closely monitoring investor and agency eligibility requirements for loan sales. Our quality assurance teams perform independent testing related to the processing and underwriting of mortgage loans to investor guidelines prior to closing, as well as after the closing but before the sale of loans, to identify potential repurchase exposures due to breach of representations and warranties. In addition, we perform a comprehensive review of the loan files where we receive investor requests for repurchase and indemnification to establish the validity of the claims and determine our obligation. In limited circumstances, we may retain the full risk of loss on loans sold to the extent that the liquidation value of the asset collateralizing the loan is insufficient to cover the loan itself and associated servicing expenses. In instances where we have purchased loans from third parties, we usually have the ability to recover the loss from the third-party originator.
Counterparty Credit Risk
Counterparty credit risk represents the potential loss that may occur because a party to a transaction fails to perform according to the terms of the contract. We regularly evaluate the financial position and creditworthiness of our counterparties and disperse risk among multiple counterparties to the extent possible. We manage derivative counterparty credit risk by entering into financial instrument transactions through national exchanges, primary dealers or approved counterparties and using mutual margining agreements whenever possible to limit potential exposure.
NRZ is contractually obligated, pursuant to our agreements with them related to the Rights to MSRs, to make all advances required in connection with the loans underlying such MSRs. If NRZ’s advance financing facilities do not perform as envisaged or should NRZ otherwise be unable to meets its advance financing obligations, we would be required to meet our advance financing obligations with respect to the loans underlying these Rights to MSRs, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and servicing operations. Due to its concentration in our portfolio, we monitor NRZ’s payment performance, liquidity and capital on a regular basis.
Counterparty credit risk exists with our third-party originators, including our correspondent lenders, from whom we purchase originated mortgage loans. The third-party originators make certain representations and warranties to us when we acquire the mortgage loan from them, and they agree to reimburse us for losses incurred due to an origination defect. We become exposed to losses for origination defects if the third-party originator is not able to reimburse us for losses incurred for indemnification or repurchase. We mitigate this risk by monitoring purchase levels from our third-party originators (to reduce concentration risk), by performing regular quality control reviews of the third-party originators’ underwriting standards and by regular reviews of the creditworthiness of third-party originators.
84
Concentration Risk
Our Servicing segment has exposure to concentration risk and client retention risk. As of December 31, 2021, our servicing portfolio included significant client relationships with NRZ which represented 21% and 31% of our servicing portfolio UPB and loan count, respectively. The NRZ servicing portfolio accounts for approximately 66% of all delinquent loans that Ocwen services. During 2021, NRZ-related servicing fees retained by Ocwen represented approximately 19% of the total servicing and subservicing fees earned by Ocwen, net of servicing fees remitted to NRZ (excluding ancillary income). The current terms of our agreements with NRZ extend through July 2022 (legacy Ocwen agreements).
On February 20, 2020, we received a notice of termination from NRZ with respect to the PMC servicing agreement. This termination was for convenience and not for cause, and provided for loan deboarding fees to be paid by NRZ. As the sale accounting criteria were met upon the notice of termination, the MSRs and the Rights to MSRs were derecognized from our balance sheet on February 20, 2020 without any gain or loss on derecognition. We serviced these loans until deboarding in October 2020 representing $34.2 billion of UPB, and accounted for them as a subservicing relationship. Accordingly, we recognized subservicing fees associated with the subservicing agreement subsequent to February 20, 2020 and have not reported any servicing fees collected on behalf of, and remitted to NRZ, any change in fair value, runoff and settlement in financing liability thereafter. On September 1, 2020, 133,718 loans representing $18.2 billion of UPB were deboarded and the remaining 136,500 loans representing $16.0 billion of UPB were deboarded on October 1, 2020.
Currently, subject to proper notice (generally180 days) and the payment of termination fees, NRZ has rights to terminate the legacy Ocwen agreements for convenience. Following the initial term ending July 2022, NRZ may extend the term of the Subservicing Agreements and Servicing Addendum for additional three-month periods by providing proper notice.
In the ordinary course, we regularly share information with NRZ and discuss various aspects of our relationship. At times, we discuss modifications to our relationship that we believe could be to our mutual benefit as our respective businesses evolve over time. We also discuss alternatives to the outcomes contemplated under our agreements when they were originally executed as facts and circumstances change over time. Examples of these discussions include our discussions with respect to the Rights to MSRs. As part of these discussions, we discussed several potential changes to existing contracts. It is possible that NRZ could exercise its rights to terminate for convenience or not renew some or all of the legacy Ocwen servicing agreements.
Given the NRZ concentration in our servicing segment, senior management has been monitoring two main risks associated with our NRZ relationship, in addition to its strategic component. First, management has been monitoring the profitability of the NRZ servicing agreements. As performing loans in the NRZ servicing portfolio have run-off, delinquencies have remained high, resulting in a relatively elevated average cost per loan. Because the NRZ portfolio contains a high percentage of delinquent accounts, it has an inherently high level of potential operational and compliance risk and requires a disproportionately high level of operating staff, oversight support infrastructure and overhead which drives the elevated average cost per loan. We actively pursue cost re-engineering initiatives to continue to reduce our cost-to-service and our corporate overhead, as well as pursue actions to grow our non-NRZ servicing portfolio.
Second, because NRZ has rights to terminate for convenience subject to certain conditions, senior management has been monitoring our risks associated with a potential early termination or non-renewal of some or all of the Ocwen legacy agreements with NRZ. Management developed stress scenarios to assess the operational and financial impact of such termination scenarios, and the necessary mitigating actions. Management’s responses to the different scenarios are all based on the appropriate right-sizing or restructuring of our operations and include, but are not limited to the adequate reduction of direct servicing resources, the closure of certain facilities in different locations to rationalize property utilization, the appropriate planning of loan deboarding, and the potential reduction in corporate support functions without impairing our ability to effectively operate in a controlled environment.
It is possible that the unwinding of all or a significant portion of our relationship with NRZ may not occur in an orderly or timely manner, which could be disruptive and could result in us incurring additional costs or even in disagreements with NRZ relating to our respective rights and obligations. Furthermore, if NRZ were to take actions to limit or terminate our relationship, that could impact perceptions of other servicing clients, lenders, GSEs or others, which could cause them to take actions that materially and adversely impact our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.
Market conditions, including interest rates and future economic projections, could impact investor demand to hold MSRs, which may result in our loss of additional subservicing relationships, or significantly decrease the number of loans under such relationships.
The mortgaged properties securing the residential loans that we service are geographically dispersed throughout all 50 states, the District of Columbia and two U.S. territories. The five largest concentrations of properties are located in California, Texas, Florida, New York and New Jersey, comprising 42% of the number of loans serviced at December 31, 2021. California has the largest concentration with 16% of the total loans serviced.
85
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our ability to measure and report our financial position and operating results is influenced by the need to estimate the impact or outcome of future events based on information available at the date of the financial statements. An accounting estimate is considered critical if it requires that management make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made. If actual results differ from our judgments and assumptions, then it may have an adverse impact on the results of operations and cash flows. We have processes in place to monitor these judgments and assumptions, and management is required to review critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The following is a summary of certain accounting policies and estimates involving significant judgments. Our significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates are described in Note 1 — Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fair Value Measurements
We use fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain instruments in our statement of operations and to determine fair value disclosures. Refer to Note 3 — Fair Value to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the fair value hierarchy, descriptions of valuation methodologies used to measure significant assets and liabilities at fair value and details of the valuation models, key inputs to those models, significant assumptions utilized, and sensitivity analyses. We follow the fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs utilized to measure fair value and classify instruments as Level 3 when the valuation technique requires significant unobservable inputs or assumptions. We review and modify, as necessary, our fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. The determination of the fair value of these Level 3 financial assets and liabilities and MSRs requires significant management judgment and estimation. See the Market Risk sections of Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for a sensitivity analysis reflecting the estimated change in the fair value of our MSRs, HECM loans held for investment and loans held for sale carried at fair value as well as any related derivatives at December 31, 2021, given hypothetical instantaneous parallel shifts in the yield curve. The following table summarizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis and the amounts measured using Level 3 inputs:
| December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||
| Loans held for sale | $ | 928.5 | $ | 387.8 | ||
| Loans held for investment - Reverse mortgages | 7,199.8 | 6,997.1 | ||||
| MSRs | 2,250.1 | 1,294.8 | ||||
| Other | 29.8 | 35.2 | ||||
| Assets at fair value | $ | 10,408.2 | $ | 8,715.0 | ||
| As a percentage of total assets | 86 | % | 82 | % | ||
| Assets at fair value using Level 3 inputs | $ | 9,707.8 | $ | 8,376.8 | ||
| As a percentage of assets at fair value | 93 | % | 96 | % | ||
| HMBS-related borrowings | 6,885.0 | 6,772.7 | ||||
| Pledged MSR liabilities | 797.1 | 567.0 | ||||
| Other | 11.0 | 14.4 | ||||
| Liabilities at fair value | $ | 7,693.1 | $ | 7,354.1 | ||
| As a percentage of total liabilities | 66 | % | 72 | % | ||
| Liabilities at fair value using Level 3 inputs | $ | 7,688.9 | $ | 7,349.4 | ||
| As a percentage of liabilities at fair value | 100 | % | 100 | % |
We have various internal controls in place to ensure the appropriateness of fair value measurements. Significant fair value measures are subject to analysis and management review and approval. Additionally, we utilize a number of operational controls to ensure the results are reasonable, including comparison, or “back testing,” of model results against actual performance and monitoring the market for recent trades, including our own price discovery in connection with potential and completed sales, and other market information that can be used to benchmark inputs or outputs. Considerable judgment is used in forming conclusions about Level 3 inputs such as prepayment speeds and discount rates. Changes to these inputs could have a significant effect on fair value measurements.
86
Valuation of Reverse Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
Reverse mortgage loans are insured by the FHA and transferred into Ginnie Mae guaranteed securities (or HMBS) that we sell into the secondary market. Loan transfers in these Ginnie Mae securitizations do not qualify for sale accounting and are recorded as secured borrowings. We record both loans held for investment and the corresponding HMBS borrowings at fair value. Our net exposure to reverse mortgages and the HMBS-related borrowings is limited to the residual value we retain, including future draw commitments. Changes in the fair value of the loans held for investment are largely offset by changes in the value of the related secured financing. As of December 31, 2021, we reported $6.98 billion securitized loans held for investment at fair value and $6.89 billion HMBS-related borrowings at fair value, with a residual, net asset value of $94.1 million. In 2021, we recorded a net $2.3 million loss on change in fair value of securitized loans held for investment and HMBS-related borrowings reported in Reverse mortgage revenue, net in our Servicing segment.
The fair value of both reverse mortgage loans held for investment and corresponding HMBS-related borrowings is based primarily on discounted cash flow methodologies. Inputs to the discounted cash flows of these assets include future draws and tail spread gains, conditional prepayment rate (including voluntary and involuntary prepayments) and discount rate. The determination of fair value requires management judgment due to the significant unobservable assumptions, including conditional prepayment rate and discount rate.
We engage third-party valuation experts to support our valuation and provide observations and assumptions related to market activities. We evaluate the reasonableness of our fair value estimate and assumptions using historical experience, or cash flow backtesting, adjusted for prevailing market conditions and benchmarks with third-party expert valuations. We believe that our back-testing and benchmarking procedures provide reasonable assurance that the fair value used in our consolidated financial statements comply with the accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures and reflect the assumptions that a market participant would use.
The following table provides the range and weighted average of significant unobservable assumptions used (expressed as a percentage of UPB) by class projected for the five-year period beginning December 31, 2021:
| December 31, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significant unobservable assumptions | 2021 | 2020 | |||
| Life in years | |||||
| Range | 1.0 to 8.2 | 0.9 to 8.0 | |||
| Weighted average | 5.7 | 5.9 | |||
| Conditional prepayment rate (1) | |||||
| Range | 11.2 % to 36.6% | 10.6% to 28.8% | |||
| Weighted average | 16.0 | % | 15.4 | % | |
| Discount rate | 2.6 | % | 1.9 | % |
(1)Includes voluntary and involuntary prepayments.
Valuation of MSRs and Pledged MSR Liabilities
We originate MSRs from our lending activities and acquire MSRs through flow purchase agreements, Agency Cash Window programs, bulk purchases, asset acquisitions or business combinations. We account for MSRs and pledged MSR liabilities at fair value. As of December 31, 2021, we reported a $2.3 billion fair value of MSRs. In 2021, we recognized a $149.5 million fair value gain on the revaluation of our MSRs.
We determine the fair value of MSRs and pledged MSR liabilities primarily using discounted cash flow methodologies. The significant estimated future cash inflows for MSRs include servicing fees, late fees, float earnings and other ancillary fees and cash outflows include the cost of servicing, the cost of financing servicing advances and compensating interest payments. The determination of the fair value of MSRs and pledged MSR liabilities requires management judgment relating to the significant unobservable assumptions that underlie the valuation, including prepayment speed, delinquency rates, cost to service and discount rate. Our judgement is informed by the transactions we observe in the market, by our actual portfolio performance and by the advice and information we obtain from our valuation experts, amongst other factors.
To assist in the determination of fair value, we engage third-party valuation experts who generally utilize: (a) transactions involving instruments with similar collateral and risk profiles, adjusted as necessary based on specific characteristics of the asset or liability being valued; and/or (b) industry-standard modeling, such as a discounted cash flow model and a prepayment model, in arriving at their estimate of fair value. The prices provided by the valuation experts reflect their observations and assumptions related to market activity, incorporating available industry survey results, and including risk premiums and liquidity adjustments. While the models and related assumptions used by the valuation experts are proprietary to them, we
87
understand the methodologies and assumptions used to develop the prices based on our ongoing due diligence, which includes regular discussions with the valuation experts, and we perform additional verification and analytical procedures. We evaluate the reasonableness of our third-party experts’ assumptions using historical experience adjusted for prevailing market conditions and benchmarks with third-party expert valuation and market participant surveys. We believe that our procedures provide reasonable assurance that the fair value used in our consolidated financial statements comply with the accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures and reflect the assumptions that a market participant would use.
The following table provides the range and weighted average of significant unobservable assumptions used (expressed as a percentage of UPB) by class projected for the five-year period beginning December 31, 2021:
| Conventional | Government-Insured | Non-Agency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prepayment speed | |||||
| Range | 6.0% to 12.5% | 7.2% to 16.5% | 11.7% to 14.5% | ||
| Weighted average | 9.0% | 11.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Delinquency | |||||
| Range | 0.6% to 1.3% | 6.0% to 13.7% | 9.9% to 20.0% | ||
| Weighted average | 0.8% | 7.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Cost to service (in dollars) | |||||
| Range | $68 to $69 | $96 to $125 | $193 to $235 | ||
| Weighted average | $68 | $106 | $214 | ||
| Discount rate | 8.3% | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Changes in these assumptions are generally expected to affect our results of operations as follows:
•Increases in prepayment speeds generally reduce the value of our MSRs as the underlying loans prepay faster which causes accelerated MSR portfolio runoff, higher compensating interest payments and lower overall servicing fees, partially offset by a lower overall cost of servicing, increased float earnings on higher float balances and lower interest expense on lower servicing advance balances.
•Increases in delinquencies generally reduce the value of our MSRs as the cost of servicing increases during the delinquency period, and the amounts of servicing advances and related interest expense also increase.
•Increases in the discount rate reduce the value of our MSRs due to the lower overall net present value of the net cash flows.
•Increases in interest rate assumptions will increase interest expense for financing servicing advances although this effect is partially offset because rate increases will also increase the amount of float earnings that we recognize.
Allowance for Losses on Servicing Advances and Receivables
Advances are generally fully reimbursed under the terms of servicing agreements. However, servicing advances may include claimable (with investors) but non-recoverable expenses, for example due to servicer error, such as lack of reasonable documentation as to the type and amount of advances. We record an allowance for losses on servicing advances to the extent we believe that a portion of advances are uncollectible under the provisions of each servicing contract taking into consideration, among other factors, our historical collection rates, probability of default, cure or modification, length of delinquency and the amount of the advance. We continually assess collectability using proprietary cash flow projection models that incorporate a number of different factors, depending on the characteristics of the mortgage loan or pool, including, for example, the probable loan liquidation path, estimated time to a foreclosure sale, estimated costs of foreclosure action, estimated future property tax payments and the estimated value of the underlying property net of estimated carrying costs, commissions and closing costs. At December 31, 2021, the allowance for losses on servicing advances was $7.0 million, which represented 1% of total servicing advances. In 2021, we recorded an $8.1 million provision expense for losses on servicing advances.
We record an allowance for losses on receivables in our Servicing business, including related to defaulted FHA or VA insured loans repurchased from Ginnie Mae guaranteed securitizations. This allowance is based upon continuing assessments of collectability, historical loss experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. At December 31, 2021, the allowance for losses on receivables related to government-insured claims was $41.5 million, which represented 32% of total government-insured claims receivables. In 2021, we recorded a $14.4 million provision expense on receivables related to government-insured claims.
Determining an allowance for losses involves management judgment and assumptions that, given similar information at any given point, may result in a different but reasonable estimate.
88
Income Taxes
We record a tax provision for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations. We compute the provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the currently enacted tax rates in each jurisdiction that applies to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.
We conduct periodic evaluations of positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset can be realized in future periods. In these evaluations, we gave more significant weight to objective evidence, such as our actual financial condition and historical results of operations, as compared to subjective evidence, such as projections of future taxable income or losses.
For the three-year periods ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the U.S. and USVI filing jurisdictions were in material cumulative loss positions. We recognize that cumulative losses in recent years is an objective form of negative evidence in assessing the need for a valuation allowance and that such negative evidence is difficult to overcome. Other factors considered in these evaluations are estimates of future taxable income, future reversals of temporary differences, tax character and the impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented, if warranted.
As a result of these evaluations, we recognized a full valuation allowance of $175.4 million and $182.7 million on our U.S. deferred tax assets at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and a full valuation allowance of $0.4 million on our USVI deferred tax assets at both December 31, 2021 and 2020. The U.S. and USVI jurisdictional deferred tax assets are not considered to be more likely than not realizable based on all available positive and negative evidence. We intend to continue maintaining a full valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets in both the U.S. and USVI until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. Release of the valuation allowance would result in the recognition of certain deferred tax assets and a decrease to income tax expense for the period in which the release is recorded. However, the exact timing and amount of the valuation allowance release are subject to change based on the profitability that we achieve.
We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such positions are then measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
NOL carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (Section 382) (or comparable provisions of foreign or state law) in the event that certain changes in ownership were to occur. In addition, tax credit carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 383 (Section 383). We periodically evaluate our NOL and tax credit carryforwards and whether certain changes in ownership have occurred as measured under Section 382 that would limit our ability to utilize a portion of our NOL and tax credit carryforwards. If it is determined that an ownership change(s) has occurred, there may be annual limitations on the use of these NOL and tax credit carryforwards under Sections 382 and 383 (or comparable provisions of foreign or state law).
Ocwen and PHH have both experienced historical ownership changes that have caused the use of certain tax attributes to be limited and have resulted in the write-off of certain of these attributes based on our inability to use them in the carryforward periods defined under the tax laws. Ocwen continues to monitor the ownership in its stock to evaluate whether any additional ownership changes have occurred that would further limit its ability to utilize certain tax attributes. As such, our analysis regarding the amount of tax attributes that may be available to offset taxable income in the future without restrictions imposed by Section 382 may continue to evolve.
Indemnification Obligations
We have exposure to representation, warranty and indemnification obligations because of our lending, sales and securitization activities, our acquisitions to the extent we assume one or more of these obligations, and in connection with our servicing practices. We initially recognize these obligations at fair value. Thereafter, the estimation of the liability considers probable future obligations based on industry data of loans of similar type segregated by year of origination, to the extent applicable, and estimated loss severity based on current loss rates for similar loans, our historical rescission rates and the current pipeline of unresolved demands. Our historical loss severity considers the historical loss experience that we incur upon sale or liquidation of a repurchased loan as well as current market conditions. We monitor the adequacy of the overall liability and make adjustments, as necessary, after consideration of other qualitative factors including ongoing dialogue and experience with our counterparties. As of December 31, 2021, we have recorded a liability for representation and warranty obligations and
89
similar indemnification obligations of $49.4 million. In 2021, we recorded a $3.2 million provision expense for indemnification. See Note 26 — Contingencies for additional information.
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, we are a defendant in, or a party or potential party to, many threatened and pending litigation matters. We monitor our litigation matters, including advice from external legal counsel, and regularly perform assessments of these matters for potential loss accrual and disclosure. We establish liabilities for settlements, judgments on appeal and filed and/or threatened claims for which we believe it is probable that a loss has been or will be incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated based on current information regarding these matters. Where we determine that a loss is not probable but is reasonably possible or where a loss in excess of the amount accrued is reasonably possible, we disclose an estimate of the amount of the loss or range of possible losses for the claim if a reasonable estimate can be made, unless the amount of such reasonably possible loss is not material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Management’s assessment involves the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgments, including progress of the matter, prior experience, available defenses, and the advice of legal counsel and other experts. Accruals are adjusted as more information becomes available or when an event occurs requiring a change. In 2021, we recorded a $9.4 million provision expense for loss contingencies. Our total accrual for probable and estimable legal and regulatory matters, including accrued legal fees, was $44.0 million at December 31, 2021. It is possible that we will incur losses relating to threatened and pending litigation that materially exceed the amount accrued. We cannot currently estimate the amount, if any, of reasonably possible losses above amounts that have been recorded at December 31, 2021.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For additional information, see Note 1 — Organization, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Our adoption of the standards listed below on January 1, 2021 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements:
•Investments—Equity Securities (ASC Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (ASC Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (ASC Topic 815) (ASU 2020-01)
•Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity's Own Equity—Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity (ASU 2020-06)
•Income Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12)