Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) Business

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Certain acronyms and terms used throughout this Annual Report are specific to our company, commonly used in our industry, or are otherwise frequently used throughout our document. Definitions for these acronyms and terms are provided in the "Glossary of Terms," available in the front of this document.

Company Overview

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. is one of North America's largest and most diversified freight transportation companies, providing multiple full truckload, LTL, intermodal, and other complementary services. Our objective is to operate our business with industry-leading margins, continued organic growth and growth through acquisitions while providing safe, high-quality, cost-effective solutions for our customers. Knight-Swift uses a nationwide network of business units and terminals in the US and Mexico to serve customers throughout North America. In addition to operating one of the country's largest truckload fleets, Knight-Swift also contracts with third-party carriers to provide a broad range of transportation services to our customers while creating quality driving jobs for our driving associates and successful business opportunities for independent contractors.

During 2025, we covered 1.8 billion loaded miles for shippers throughout North America, contributing to consolidated total revenue of $7.5 billion and consolidated operating income of $216.1 million. During 2025, the Truckload segment operated an average of 21,428 tractors (comprised of 19,395 company tractors and 2,033 independent contractor tractors) and 84,851 trailers. Our LTL segment operated an average of 4,164 tractors and 11,057 trailers. Additionally, the Intermodal segment operated an average of 595 tractors and 12,539 intermodal containers. Our four reportable segments are Truckload, LTL, Logistics, and Intermodal.

We have historically grown through a combination of organic growth and through mergers and acquisitions (discussed below). Mergers and acquisitions have enhanced our business and service offerings with additional terminals, driving associates, revenue equipment, and customer relationships. Our multiple service offerings, capabilities, and transportation modes enable us to transport, or arrange transportation for, general commodities for our diversified customer base throughout the US and Mexico using our equipment, information technology, and qualified driving associates and non-driver employees. We are committed to providing our customers with a wide range of full truckload, LTL, logistics, and intermodal services and continuing to invest in developing a range of solutions for our customers across multiple service offerings and transportation modes. Our overall objective is to provide full truckload, LTL, logistics, and intermodal services that, when combined, lead the industry in margin and growth, while providing efficient and cost-effective solutions for our customers.

Business Combinations and Investments

We became Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. on September 8, 2017 through the 2017 Merger transaction. Since 1966, we have continuously expanded the reach of our network, the depth of our capacity, and our service offerings through organic growth, as well as through the acquisition of twenty-five companies.

See Note 1 and Note 4 in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report, for more information regarding the 2017 Merger and our recent acquisitions. See Note 5 in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report, regarding our partnership agreements with Transportation Resource Partners and our other equity investments in transportation-related companies.

6

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Industry and Competition

The trucking industry has two primary types of motor carriers: full truckload and LTL. Full truckload carriers represent the largest part of the transportation supply chain for most retail and manufactured goods in North America and typically transport a full trailer (or container) of freight for a single customer from origin to destination without intermediate sorting and handling. By contrast, LTL carriers typically transport multiple shipments from multiple customers in the same trailer (or container). LTL shipments are then sent through a network of service centers where they may be conveyed to other trailers with nearby destinations. Generally, the full truckload industry is compensated based on miles, or length of haul, whereas the LTL industry is compensated based on freight density, weight, and length of haul. Overall, the US transportation and logistics industry is large, fragmented, and highly competitive. We compete with thousands of full truckload carriers, most of whom operate significantly smaller fleets than we do, as well as a number of national, regional, and inter-regional LTL carriers. Our trucking segments compete with other motor carriers for the services of driving associates, independent contractors, and management and other employees. To a lesser extent, our intermodal and logistics businesses compete with railroads, LTL carriers, logistics providers, and other transportation companies. Our logistics businesses compete with other logistics companies for the services of third-party capacity providers and management employees.

Our industry has recently encountered the following major economic cycles:

The principal means of competition in our industry are customer service and relationships, capacity, and price. In times of strong freight demand, customer service and capacity become increasingly important, and in times of weak freight demand, pricing becomes increasingly important. Most trucking contracts (other than dedicated contracts) do not guarantee truck availability or shipment volumes. Pricing is influenced by supply and demand.

The trucking industry faces the following primary dynamics, which we believe we are well-positioned to address, as discussed under "Our Competitive Strengths" and "Our Mission and Company Strategy," below:

•tightening industry capacity;

•cumulative impacts of regulatory initiatives, such as ELDs, hours-of-service enforcement for drivers, non-domiciled CDLs, English proficiency, and others;

•uncertainty in the economic environment, including inflation, interest rates, tariffs, and changing supply chain and consumer spending patterns;

•driver shortages;

7

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

•increased insurance costs as significant verdicts and settlement amounts for accident claims impact the industry;

•significant and rapid fluctuations in fuel prices and availability, including in connection with international conflicts; and

•increased prices for new revenue equipment, design changes of new engines, advancements in technology of revenue equipment, and volatility in the used equipment sales market.

Our Competitive Strengths

As a provider of multiple transportation solutions, including one of North America's largest truckload fleets, we believe that our principal competitive strengths are our regional presence, service quality, operating efficiency, cost control, technological enhancements in our revenue equipment and supporting back-office functions, and our diverse offerings that allow us to provide multiple transportation services and configuration of equipment that satisfies customers' needs.

8

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

9

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Our Mission and Company Strategy

Our mission is to operate full truckload, LTL, logistics, intermodal and related businesses that are industry-leading in both margin and growth, while providing cost-effective solutions for our customers. Our success depends on our ability to efficiently and effectively manage our resources in providing transportation and logistics solutions to our customers, as well as our ability to leverage efficiencies and best practices across our brands. We evaluate growth opportunities based on customer demand and supply chain trends, availability of drivers and third-party capacity providers, expected returns on invested capital, expected net cash flows, and our company-specific capabilities.

10

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Customers and Marketing

Marketing

Our marketing mission is to be a strategic, efficient transportation capacity partner for our customers by providing transportation and logistics solutions that are responsive to the unique needs of our customers. We deliver these capacity solutions through our network of owned assets, independent contractors, third-party capacity providers, and rail providers. The diverse and premium services we offer provide a comprehensive approach to supply chain solutions for our customers. At December 31, 2025, we had a sales staff of approximately 200 individuals across the US and Mexico, who work closely with management to establish and expand accounts. Our sales and marketing leaders are members of our senior management team, who are assisted by other sales professionals in each segment. Our sales team emphasizes our industry-leading service, environmental leadership, and ability to accommodate a variety of customer needs, while providing consistent capacity and financial strength and stability.

Customers

Our customers are typically large corporations in the retail (including discount, general merchandise, and online retail), food and beverage, consumer products, paper products, transportation and logistics, housing and building, automotive, and manufacturing industries. Many of our customers have extensive operations, geographically distributed locations, and diverse shipping needs.

11

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Consistent with industry practice, our typical customer contracts (other than dedicated contracts) do not guarantee shipment volumes by our customers or truck availability by us. This affords us and our customers some flexibility to negotiate rates in response to changes in freight demand and industry-wide truck capacity. Our dedicated services within the Truckload and LTL segments assign particular driving associates and revenue equipment to prescribed routes, pursuant to multi-year agreements. This dedicated service provides individual customers with a guaranteed source of capacity and allows our driving associates to have more predictable schedules and routes. Under our dedicated transportation services, we provide driving associates, equipment, maintenance, and, in some instances, transportation management services that supplement the customer's in-house transportation department.

A majority of our terminals are linked to our corporate information technology systems at our brand headquarters. The capabilities of this system and its software enhance our operating efficiency by providing cost-effective access to detailed information concerning equipment location and availability, drivers' hours of service, shipment tracking, on-time delivery status, and other specific customer requirements. The system also enables us to respond promptly and accurately to customer requests and assists us in optimally matching available equipment with customer loads. Additionally, our customers can track shipments and obtain copies of shipping documents via our website. We also provide electronic data interchange services to customers desiring these services.

We believe our fleet capacity, terminal network, customer service and suite of services offer a competitive advantage for major shippers, particularly in times of rising freight volumes when shippers must quickly access capacity across multiple facilities and regions.

We strive to maintain a diversified customer base. Services provided to our largest customer generated 13.1% and 12.6% of total revenue in 2025 and 2024, respectively. Revenue generated by our largest customer is reported in each of our reportable operating segments. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue in 2025 or 2024.

Our top customers drive a substantial portion of our total revenue, as follows:

•In 2025, our top 25, top 10, and top 5 customers accounted for 49.3%, 34.8%, and 25.6% of our total revenue, respectively.

•In 2024, our top 25, top 10, and top 5 customers accounted for 47.2%, 33.6%, and 24.1% of our total revenue, respectively.

Revenue Equipment

We operate a modern fleet of company tractors intended to help attract and retain driving associates, promote safe operations, and reduce maintenance and repair costs.

In 2025, we obtained our revenue equipment through a combination of cash purchases and finance leases. We typically obtain tractors and trailers manufactured to our specifications in order to meet a wide variety of customer needs. Growth of our tractor and trailer fleet is determined by market conditions and our experience and expectations regarding equipment utilization. In acquiring revenue equipment, we consider a number of factors, including economy, price, rate, economic environment, technology, warranty terms, manufacturer support, driving associate comfort, and resale value. We maintain strong relationships with our equipment vendors and have the financial flexibility to react as market conditions dictate.

Our current approach is to replace our tractors between four and nine years after purchase and to replace our trailers every seven or more years. Changes in the current market for used tractors and trailers, regulatory changes, and difficult market and supply chain conditions faced by tractor and trailer manufacturers may result in price increases that may affect the period of time for which we operate our equipment.

Our newer equipment has enhanced features, which we believe tends to lower the overall life cycle costs by reducing safety-related expenses, lowering repair and maintenance expenses, improving fuel economy, and improving driving associate satisfaction. In 2026 and beyond, we will continue to monitor the appropriateness of this relatively short tractor trade-in cycle against the lower capital expenditure and financing costs of a longer tractor trade-in cycle, based on current and future business needs.

12

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Human Capital

Employees

The strength of our company is our people, working together with common goals. As of December 31, 2025, our full-time employee headcount was comprised of:

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately 1,600 Trans-Mex driving associates in Mexico that were represented by a union.

Company Driving Associates

We recognize that the recruitment, training, and retention of a professional driving associate workforce, which is one of our most valuable assets, is essential to our continued growth and meeting the service requirements of our customers. In order to attract and retain safe driving associates who are committed to the highest levels of customer service and safety, we focus our operations for driving associates around a collaborative and supportive team environment. To help retain driving associates we provide late model and comfortable equipment, direct communication with management, competitive wages and benefits, and other incentives designed to encourage driving associate safety, retention, and long-term employment. Some examples of these incentive programs include our Million Miler and military apprenticeship programs. To help recruit drivers, we have established various driving academies across the US. Our academies are strategically located in areas where external driver-training organizations were lacking. In other areas of the US, we have contracted with driver training schools, which are managed by third parties. There are certain minimum qualifications for candidates to be accepted into the academy, including passing the DOT physical examination and drug/alcohol screening, which includes hair follicle testing, a qualification standard more stringent than required by the DOT.

Terminal Staff

Most of our large terminals are staffed with terminal leaders, fleet leaders, driver leaders, planners, safety coordinators, shop leaders, technicians, and customer service representatives. Our terminal leaders work with driver leaders, customer service representatives, and other operations personnel to coordinate the needs of both our customers and our driving associates. Terminal leaders are also responsible for serving existing customers in their areas. Fleet leaders supervise driver leaders, who are responsible for the general operation of our trucks and their driving associates, focusing on driving associate retention, productivity per truck, fuel consumption, fuel efficiency (with respect to driver-controllable idle time), safety, and scheduled maintenance. Customer service representatives are assigned specific customers to ensure specialized, high-quality service, and frequent customer contact.

Succession Planning and Talent Management

We regularly review talent development and succession plans to identify and develop a pipeline of talent to maintain business operations. We understand the potential costs and risks of bringing in an outside executive officer and that businesses are often, but not always, more successful in promoting internal candidates. Accordingly, the Board makes an effort to identify potential successors for those positions long in advance of any potential positional vacancies, perform skills gap analyses for those internal candidates, and provide training and exposure on those gap areas to those candidates in order to develop better potential successors. The Board is primarily responsible for succession planning for the CEO, but also participates in succession planning discussions for other executive officer positions. We believe that our culture, compensation structure, long-term equity program, and robust training and development program provide motivation for talented leaders to remain with the Company.

13

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Independent Contractors

In addition to our employed driving associates, we enter into contractor agreements with third parties who own and operate tractors (or hire their own driving associates to operate the tractors) that service our customers. We pay these independent contractors for their services, based on a contracted rate per mile. By operating safely and productively, independent contractors can improve their own profitability and ours. Independent contractors are responsible for most costs incurred for owning and operating their tractors. In 2025, independent contractors comprised 7.9% of our total fleet, as measured by average tractor count.

Safety and Insurance

Safety

We are committed to safe and secure operations. We conduct an intensive driver qualification process, including defensive driving training. We require prospective drivers to meet higher qualification standards than those required by the DOT, including extensive background checks and hair follicle drug testing. We regularly communicate with drivers to promote safety and instill safe work habits through effective use of various media and safety review sessions. We dedicate personnel and resources to ensure safe operation and regulatory compliance. We employ technology to assist us in managing risks associated with our business. We have event recorders in substantially all of our tractors, which are used daily by drivers and operations leaders to provide feedback and coaching in regard to driving behaviors. In addition, we have an innovative recognition program for driver safety performance and emphasize safety through our equipment specifications and maintenance programs. Our Corporate Directors of Safety review all accidents and report weekly to leadership.

Insurance

The primary claims arising in our business consist of auto liability, including personal injury, property damage, physical damage, and cargo loss. We self-insure for a significant portion of our claims exposure and related expenses. We also maintain insurance that covers our directors and officers for losses and expenses arising out of claims, based on acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers. While under dispatch and our operating authority, the independent contractors we contract with are covered by our liability coverage and self-insurance retention limits. However, each is responsible for physical damage to his or her own equipment, occupational accident coverage, and liability exposure while the truck is used for non-company purposes. Additionally, fleet operators are responsible for any applicable workers' compensation requirements for their employees.

We insure certain casualty risks through our wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries. Our capitve insurance subsidiaries provide reinsurance associated with a share of our automobile liability risk. In addition to insuring a proportionate share of our corporate casualty risk, Mohave provides reinsurance to third-party insurance companies who provide insurance coverage for independent contractors, as well as affiliated carriers through the first quarter of 2024.

Based on results of operations of this business, including the continued unfavorable development of insurance reserves, the Company ceased all third-party insurance operations and canceled any remaining policies as of March 31, 2024.

Please refer to Note 10 in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report for more information about our insurance policies, self-insurance retention limits, and the third-party insurance carrier business.

Fuel

We actively manage our fuel purchasing network in an effort to maintain adequate fuel supplies and reduce our Truckload and LTL fuel costs. Additionally, we utilize a fuel surcharge program to pass a majority of increases in fuel costs to our customers. In 2025, we purchased 10.9% of our fuel in bulk at our locations across the US and Mexico. We purchased substantially all of the remainder through a network of retail truck stops with which we have negotiated volume purchasing discounts. The volumes we purchase at terminals and through the fuel network vary based on procurement costs and other factors. We seek to reduce our fuel costs by routing our driving associates to truck stops when fuel prices at such stops are more affordable than the bulk rate paid for fuel at our terminals. We primarily store fuel in above-ground storage tanks at most of our other bulk fueling terminals. We believe that we are

14

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

sufficiently in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations relating to the storage and dispensing of fuel.

Seasonality

See Note 1 in Part II, Item 8 in this Annual Report, regarding the impact of seasonality on our operations.

Environmental Regulation

General

We have bulk fuel storage and fuel islands at many of our terminals, as well as vehicle maintenance, repair, and washing operations at some of our facilities, which exposes us to certain environmental risks. Soil and groundwater contamination have occurred at some of our facilities in prior years, for which we have been responsible for remediating the environmental contamination. Also, a small percentage of our total shipments contain hazardous materials, which are generally rated as low to medium-risk, and subject us to a wide array of regulation. In the past, we have been responsible for the costs of clean-up of cargo and diesel fuel spills caused by traffic accidents or other events.

We have instituted programs to monitor and mitigate environmental risks and maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws governing the hauling, handling, and disposal of hazardous materials, fuel spillage or seepage, emissions from our vehicles and facilities, engine-idling, discharge and retention of storm water, and other environmental matters. As part of our safety and risk management program, we periodically perform internal environmental reviews. We are a Charter Partner in the EPA's SmartWay Transport Partnership, a voluntary program promoting energy efficiency and air quality. We believe that our operations are in material compliance with current laws and regulations and do not know of any existing environmental condition that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business or operating results.

If we are held responsible for the cleanup of any environmental incidents or conditions caused by our operations or business, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to clean-up costs and other liabilities, including substantial fines, penalties and/or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We have paid penalties for spills and violations in the past; however, they have not been material to our financial results or position.

Greenhouse Gas ("GHG") Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards

California ARB — In 2019, the California Phase 2 Standards, which generally align with the federal Phase 2 Standards (the "Phase 2 Standards," discussed in further detail below), with some minor additional requirements, became final.

The Advanced Clean Trucks ("ACT") regulation became effective in 2021, requiring original equipment manufacturers to begin shifting towards greater production and sales of zero-emission heavy-duty tractors starting with model year 2024. Under ACT, by 2045, every new tractor sold in California will need to be zero-emission. The most aggressive ACT standards apply to Class 4-8 trucks, which range from 14,000-33,000 pounds, by requiring that 9% of such trucks be zero emission beginning in 2024 and increasing to 75% by 2035. Similar (albeit lower) increasing zero emission requirements apply to Class 2b-3 trucks, and Class 7-8 trucks between 2024 and 2035. Among other impacts, ACT could affect the cost and/or supply of traditional diesel tractors. It has also led to similar legislation in other states, with several already adopting ACT, and a number of other states either considering adoption of ACT or affirmatively conducting a preliminary rule making process to that effect. In 2024, the Advanced Clean Fleets ("ACF") regulation became effective, also aimed at transitioning to zero emission vehicles. ACF is a purchase requirement for medium and heavy-duty fleets to adopt an increasing percentage of zero emission trucks, designed to complement the sell-side obligations of ACT. However, given legal challenges to the ACF and a lack of public support for environmental regulation from the current administration, the State of California's Air Resources Board ("ARB") withdrew its request for the EPA to provide a waiver of certain federal regulations necessary for ARB to impose the environmental restrictions and mandates in the ACF that are more stringent than federal law, which effectively tabled the ACF. Further, ARB has proposed amendments to repeal portions of the ACF to exempt certain industries previously impacted in addition to pushing back some target dates. If ARB seeks to adopt and implement

15

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

the ACF in the future, it could materially and negatively impact our business by increasing our compliance obligations, operating costs, and related expenses.

The periodic testing portion of California’s Clean Truck Check (as a part of ARB's Clean Truck program), known as Phase 3 of the Clean Truck Check, began in 2024. Under Phase 3, heavy duty vehicles are subject to periodic emissions testing and annual compliance fees, which, if applicable, could increase our operating costs and related expenses. In August 2025, the EPA proposed a rule that would partially approve California’s Clean Truck Check, allowing California to require periodic emissions testing for heavy duty vehicles registered in California, but prohibit California from testing heavy duty vehicles that are registered outside of the state. Currently, we and our subsidiaries have no equipment that is registered with the State of California, meaning we would be exempt from the Clean Truck Check testing requirements if the rule currently proposed by the EPA were finalized.

Additionally, in October 2023, California enacted two bills into law, Senate Bill 253 ("SB 253") and Senate Bill 261 ("SB 261"), which could require certain companies doing business in California to disclose greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions and climate-related financial risks. SB 253 requires companies that exceed $1 billion in annual revenue and that do business in California to publicly disclose their GHG emissions, with initial reporting due on or before August 10, 2026, while SB 261 requires companies doing business in California and earning annual revenue exceeding $500 million to report on their climate-related financial risks and measures taken to mitigate such risks. The reporting deadline under SB 261 was originally targeted for January 2026, but legal challenges and ongoing court proceedings have prevented California from enforcing SB 261 as originally intended, and it remains unclear whether SB 261 will ultimately go into effect, and if so, when reporting will commence. Implementation of SB 253 and SB 261 or additional reporting requirements would result in increased compliance costs and resource utilization.

EPA and NHTSA — The EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ("NHTSA") have previously taken coordinated steps in support of a new generation of clean vehicles and engines through reduced GHG emissions and improved fuel efficiency at a national level.

Originally, the rule was written so that tractors and certain trailer types would be subject to the Phase 2 Standards beginning with model-years 2018 and 2021 respectively, increasing in and phasing in completely by model-year 2027. This rule would have marked the first time federal mandates would have been applied to trailers, with respect to aerodynamics and low-rolling resistance tires. The final rule was effective in December 2016. However, implementation of the Phase 2 Standards as they relate to trailers was successfully challenged in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As a result, the Phase 2 Standards only require reductions in emissions and fuel consumption for tractors. The Company’s new tractor purchases in 2025 complied with the emission and fuel consumption reductions required by the Phase 2 Standards.

Even though the trailer provisions of the Phase 2 Standards have been removed, we will still need to ensure the majority of our fleet is compliant with the California Phase 2 Standards.

In 2022, the EPA adopted a final rule regarding emissions standards of nitrogen oxides for heavy-duty motor vehicles beginning with model year 2027 being more than 80% stronger than current emission standards, with the intent to reduce heavy duty emissions by almost 50% from 2022 levels by 2045 (the “2022 NOx Rule”). The EPA had indicated that the 2022 NOx Rule is the first part of a three-part plan focusing on greenhouse gas emissions, which is commonly referred to as the “Cleaner Trucks Initiative,” or the “Clean Trucks Plan.” In 2023, the EPA released the second and third parts to the Clean Trucks Plan, including a proposed rule relating to GHG standards for heavy-duty vehicles known as “Phase 3” to the EPA’s GHG program. A final rule with respect to these regulations was issued in 2024 and established new GHG emission standards for heavy-duty motor vehicles which are phased-in starting with model year 2027 and increasing in stringency annually through model year 2032 (the “Phase 3 Rule”). However, in February 2026, the EPA rescinded the 2009 Endangerment Finding (which determined that GHG emissions from motor vehicles threatens public health and welfare under Clean Air Act Section 202(a)) and concurrently repealed all subsequent federal GHG emission standards for light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines from model years 2012 onward. The 2022 NOx Rule is expected to remain in effect to the extent based on separate criteria pollutant authority. The rescission removes federal GHG emission requirements previously applicable to heavy-duty vehicles, including the Phase 3 Rule. This development may reduce capital expenditures for fleet replacement or upgrades that would have been necessary to meet prior GHG-related standards. The absence of uniform GHG regulations potentially creates a patchwork of regulations, which when combined with the uncertainty as to the operating results that will be produced if manufacturers are required to re-design diesel engines or make other changes affecting the residual values of vehicles, may increase our costs or

16

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. Additionally, the EPA's action may be subject to legal challenges from states, environmental groups, or other stakeholders, which could lead to judicial stays, partial reinstatements, or modifications of the rescission, creating further uncertainty regarding the long-term regulatory landscape. This uncertainty may affect vehicle manufacturer production timelines, the availability and pricing of compliant equipment, expectations for fuel efficiency improvements and equipment productivity, compliance costs, operating expenses, and residual values of vehicles which may increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations.

These effects, combined with the uncertainty of any future GHG regulations enacted by California’s ARB, the EPA, the NHTSA and/or any other state or federal governing body may increase the cost of our new tractors, may increase the cost of new trailers, may require us to retrofit certain of our trailers, may increase our maintenance costs, and could impair equipment productivity and increase our operating costs, particularly if such costs are not offset by potential fuel savings. These adverse effects, combined with the uncertainty as to whether manufacturers will be required to re-design diesel engines or make other changes affecting the residual values of our equipment, could materially increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. We cannot predict, however, the extent to which our operations and productivity will be impacted. We will continue monitoring our compliance with federal and state GHG regulations.

Climate-change Proposals

Federal and state lawmakers are considering a variety of other climate-change proposals related to carbon emissions and GHG emissions. The proposals could potentially limit carbon emissions within certain states and municipalities, which continue to restrict the location and amount of time that diesel-powered tractors (like ours) may idle.

These restrictions could force us to purchase on-board power units that do not require the engine to idle or to alter our driving associates' behavior, which could result in a decrease in productivity, or increase in driving associate turnover.

Industry Regulation

Our operations are regulated and licensed by various federal, state, and local government agencies in North America, including the DOT, the FMCSA, and the US Department of Homeland Security, among others. Our company, as well as our driving associates and independent contractors, must comply with enacted governmental regulations regarding safety, equipment, and operating methods. Examples include regulation of equipment weight, equipment dimensions, driver hours-of-service, driver eligibility requirements, including drug and alcohol testing, on-board reporting of operations, and ergonomics. The following discussion presents recently enacted federal, state, and local regulations that could have an impact on our operations.

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Bill

Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse — There is a national Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, a database containing information about violations of the FMCSA's drug and alcohol testing program for holders of commercial driver's licenses. Currently, the Company is required to (1) report drug and alcohol violations to the Clearinghouse; (2) query the Clearinghouse regarding drug and alcohol violations for current and prospective employees prior to permitting such employees to operate a commercial motor vehicle ("CMV"); and (3) query the Clearinghouse for each currently employed driver annually. In 2024, a new rule referred to by the FMCSA as "Clearinghouse II," a program which relates to drivers with drug and alcohol violations, took effect. Under Clearinghouse II, a driver with a drug or alcohol violation resulting in a "Prohibited" status in the Clearinghouse may not operate a CMV and must complete the FMCSA's return-to-duty education, treatment, and testing prior to regaining CMV driving privileges. With Clearinghouse II now in effect, states are required to query the Clearinghouse when issuing, renewing, transferring, or upgrading a commercial driver’s license and must revoke a driver’s commercial driving privileges if such driver is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle for one or more drug or alcohol violations. It is anticipated that the FMCSA will propose further changes regarding the Clearinghouse to increase the availability of driver violation information and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Clearinghouse. It is expected that any additional changes to the rule may reduce the pool of available drivers.

17

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

In 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services ("DHHS") announced proposed mandatory guidelines to allow employers to drug test truck drivers and other federal workers for pre-employment and random testing using hair specimens. However, the proposal also requires a second sample using either urine or an oral fluid test if a hair test is positive or a donor is unable to provide a sufficient amount of hair. DHHS indicated the two-test approach is intended to protect federal workers from issues that have been identified as limitations of hair testing, and related legal deficiencies identified in prior court cases. In 2022, an industry group known as the Trucking Alliance, of which the Company is a member, sought an exemption from the FMCSA that would allow positive hair specimen tests to be uploaded into the Clearinghouse. This request was denied by the FMCSA, however, noting they cannot act until DHHS finalizes these guidelines, which have suffered ongoing delays with the DHHS. Additionally, in 2022 the DOT issued a notice of proposed rule making that would include oral fluid testing as an alternative to urine testing for purposes of the DOT’s drug testing program, with a goal of improving the integrity and effectiveness of the drug testing program, along with potential cost savings to regulated parties. In 2023, a final rule became effective amending the DOT’s drug testing program to include oral fluid testing; however, implementation cannot take effect until DHHS approves at least two laboratories to conduct oral fluid testing. Currently, DHHS has not approved any laboratories. Any changes to drug testing programs may reduce the number of available drivers. We currently perform hair follicle testing and will continue to monitor any developments in this area. Finally, federal drug regulators have announced a proposal to add fentanyl and norfentanyl to a drug testing panel that would detect the use of such drugs among safety-sensitive federal employees, which would include truck drivers if adopted by the DOT. Currently, fentanyl and norfentanyl testing are expected to be added to the urine panel at some point in the near future.

Other Regulations Impacting Availability of Drivers — Effective in 2022, the FMCSA established minimum training standards (the "ELDT Regulations") which unified curriculum to be followed and completed by certain individuals applying for (or upgrading) a Class A or Class B commercial driver's license, or obtaining a hazardous materials, passenger, or school bus endorsement on their commercial driver's license. Such individuals are subject to the entry-level driver training requirements and must complete a prescribed curriculum of theory and behind-the-wheel instruction prior to taking the skills test. Training schools and other programs (including ours) are required to implement the prescribed curriculum and register with the FMCSA's Training Provider Registry to certify that their program meets the classroom and driving standards. We are also required to comply with this rule in the course of operating our driving schools. In December 2025, the FMCSA announced that it could revoke the accreditation of more than 7,000 training schools nationwide for violations regarding the (i) falsification or manipulation of training data, (ii) failure to meet required curriculum standards, facility conditions, or instructor qualifications, or (iii) failure to maintain accurate and complete documentation or refusal to provide records during federal audits or investigations.

In May 2025 the FMCSA announced it was strengthening enforcement of its longstanding English language proficiency requirements for commercial drivers, which require drivers to be able to (i) read and speak English sufficiently to converse with the general public, (ii) understand highway signs and signals in English, (iii) respond to official inquiries, and (iv) make entries on reports and records. Under the strengthened enforcement guidelines, FMCSA inspectors will now place drivers failing to meet the English proficiency requirements out-of-service instead of simply citing non-compliant drivers for violations. Further, the FMCSA issued an interim rule in September 2025 revising the requirements for the issuance or renewal of CDLs to non-domiciled persons and restricting the issuance or renewal of a CDL for non-domiciled persons without a lawful immigration status or legitimate employment-based reason to hold a CDL. While the interim rule has been challenged and enforcement has been temporarily stayed by a federal appeals court while it reviews the legality of the interim rule, it remains uncertain whether there will be further changes to the interim rule in response to such challenges or whether it will go into effect as originally issued.

While we have not been notified by the FMCSA that our training school is at the risk of losing accreditation, the effects of these rules could result in a decrease in driver availability, greater competition for drivers, and/or an increase in recruitment and training costs, and training school costs, any of which could adversely affect our business, operations or profitability.

18

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

Brokerage Operations — The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (“IIJA”) required that the FMCSA clarify the differences between brokers, bona fide agents, and dispatch services, and to further specify its interpretation of the definitions of "broker" and "bona fide agents." In 2023, FMCSA issued final guidance on the definitions of “broker” and “bona fide agents,” in which the distinction between the two largely hinges upon control and whether the person or company is engaged in the allocation of traffic between motor carriers. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries currently hold FMCSA brokerage authority, so while the impact of this guidance remains to be seen, the Company does not currently anticipate an adverse impact on its operations.

In 2024, the FMCSA modified regulations in five areas: (1) assets readily available, (2) immediate suspension of broker/freight forwarder operating authority, (3) surety or trust responsibilities, (4) enforcement authority, and (5) entities eligible to serve as BMC-85 trustees. Among other changes, the modified regulations allows brokers or freight forwarders to meet regulatory requirements to have “assets readily available” by maintaining trusts that meet certain criteria, including that they can be liquidated within seven calendar days of an event that triggers a payment from the trust. The modified regulations also stipulate that "available financial security" falls below $75,000 when there is a drawdown on the broker or freight forwarder’s surety bond or trust fund. Compliance with these changes was required starting in January 2026 and may negatively impact our business by increasing our compliance obligations, operating costs, and related expenses. Additionally, in 2024, the FMCSA published a notice of proposed rulemaking relating to brokerage operations which, among other things, proposes to increase transparency and the maintenance of recordkeeping procedures. Further, the FMCSA is expected to update its 2024 proposed rule by issuing a second notice of proposed rulemaking in May 2026. It is uncertain what changes, if any, will ultimately result from the proposed rulemaking.

Hours-of-service

From time to time, the FMCSA proposes and implements changes to regulations impacting hours-of-service. Such changes can negatively impact our productivity and affect our operations and profitability by reducing the number of hours per day or week our driving associates and independent contractors may operate and/or disrupting our network. In recent years, the FMCSA has made changes to the hours-of-service rules that provide greater flexibility to drivers regarding their 30-minute rest breaks, an extension of the shorthaul exemption by an additional two hours, and an extension of duty time for drivers encountering adverse weather by up to two hours. Certain industry groups have challenged these hours-of-service rules in court, and while the FMCSA's final rule has been upheld, it remains unclear if industry or other groups will bring additional challenges against the FMCSA's final rule. Further, in September 2025, the FMCSA adopted two pilot programs to study the effect of increasing the flexibility of the hours-of-service rules to improve driver working conditions and quality of life. The hours-of-service pilot programs provide participating drivers increased control and flexibility in their schedules by allowing the participating drivers to pause their 14-hour driving window for up to three hours and split their 10-hour off-duty period into more flexible combinations. Any future changes to hours-of-service regulations could materially and adversely affect our operations and profitability. Future rulemaking relating to ELDs may occur in the future, which may affect our ELD technology, compliance, and compliance efforts.

Safety and Fitness Ratings

There are currently two methods of evaluating the safety and fitness of carriers: CSA, which evaluates and ranks fleets on certain safety-related standards by analyzing data from recent safety events and investigation results, and the DOT safety rating, which is based on an on-site investigation or remote compliance review and affects a carrier's ability to operate in interstate commerce. Additionally, the FMCSA has proposed rules in the past that would change the methodologies used to determine carrier safety and fitness.

DOT Safety Rating — The DOT safety rating is currently the only safety measurement system that has a direct impact on a carrier's ability to operate in interstate commerce. Our motor carriers currently have a satisfactory DOT safety rating, which is the best available rating under the current safety rating scale. If we were to receive a conditional or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could adversely affect our business, as some of our existing customer contracts require a satisfactory DOT safety rating.

19

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

CSA — In December 2010, the FMCSA introduced CSA, an enforcement and compliance model that ranks carriers on seven categories of safety-related data. The seven categories of safety-related data, currently include Unsafe Driving, Hours-of-Service Compliance, Driver Fitness, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Vehicle Maintenance, Hazardous Materials Compliance, and Crash Indicator (such categories known as "BASICs"). Carriers are grouped by category with other carriers that have a similar number of safety events (i.e., crashes, inspections, or violations) and carriers are ranked and assigned a rating percentile or score to prioritize them for interventions if they are above a certain threshold.

Certain CSA scores were initially published and made available to the general public. However, in 2015, as part of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation ("FAST") Act, Congress mandated that the FMCSA remove all CSA scores from public view until a more comprehensive study regarding the effectiveness of CSA improving truck safety could be completed. For more information about proposed changes to the CSA program, please refer to the "Safety Fitness Determination" section, below. The FMCSA has been conducting a study on the causation of crashes, expanding on its previous Large Truck Crash Causation Study, known as the Crash Causal Factors Program ("CCFP"). Phase 1 of the CCFP is designed to study crashes of heavy-duty trucks, and the Phase 1 final report is expected in 2029. However, any changes that increase the likelihood of us receiving unfavorable scores could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

In 2020 the FMCSA announced permanent effectiveness of a pilot program that does not count a crash in which a motor carrier was not at fault when calculating the carrier’s safety measurement profile, called the Crash Preventability Demonstration Program ("CPDP"). The CPDP expands the types of eligible crashes, modified the Safety Measurement System ("SMS") to exclude crashes with not preventable determinations from the prioritization algorithm and noted the not preventable determinations in the Pre-Employment Screening Program.

Currently, CSA scores generally do not have a direct impact on a carrier's safety rating. However, the occurrence of unfavorable scores in one or more categories may affect driving associate recruiting and retention by causing qualified driving associates to seek employment with other carriers, cause our customers to direct their business away from us and to carriers with more favorable scores, subjecting us to an increase in compliance reviews and roadside inspections, or cause us to incur greater than expected expenses in our attempts to improve unfavorable scores, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

Safety Fitness Determination — In 2023, the FMCSA announced that it was interested in developing a new methodology to determine whether a carrier is fit to operate CMVs. In 2024, the FMCSA published a notice announcing a revised SMS methodology, including, among other changes, (i) rebranding BASICs as "Compliance Categories" and revising certain categories, (ii) consolidating existing road violations into simplified and distinct violation groups and simplifying the scale used to measure the severity of violations, (iii) adjusting intervention thresholds, and (iv) revising the SMS methodology to focus more heavily on recent violations. Whether this revised SMS methodology will take effect is uncertain, however, any change which results in the Company or its subsidiaries receiving less favorable scores, or an increased visibility of less favorable scores or of complaints against the Company may have an adverse effect on our operations and financial position. Moreover, in 2023, the FMCSA announced a proposal that would allow carriers to undergo an appeal process for requests of data review.

Further, in 2025, the FMCSA announced proposed revisions to their 2023 proposal to improve the impartiality, timeliness, transparency, and fairness of the data review and appeal process. The revised proposal, if adopted, may provide an opportunity for the Company to appeal in certain scenarios which could result in more favorable outcomes.

Equipment Developments

In 2021, legislation was reintroduced into the US House of Representatives and would require commercial motor vehicles with a gross weight of more than 26,000 pounds to be equipped with a speed limiter that would limit the vehicle's speed to no more than 65 miles per hour. Whether this legislation will ultimately become law is uncertain. The FMCSA announced its intention to propose a rule during 2023 which will require certain commercial vehicles to be equipped with speed limiters; however, the proposal was ultimately withdrawn in 2025. While we electronically govern the speed of substantially all of our company tractors and require our independent contractors to comply with the Company's speed policy, such legislation or future rules could result in a decrease in fleet production and driver availability, either of which could adversely affect our business, operations, or profitability.

In 2022, the FMCSA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that would require fleets and independent contractors to equip their trucks with unique electronic identification systems designed to streamline roadside

20

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

inspections and provide transparency and accountability in day-to-day trucking operations. The petition was generally disfavored by transportation industry participants, citing, among other things, the petition’s failure to address privacy and data security risks. It remains to be seen what rules, if any, may stem from this notice. However, in 2023 the FMCSA announced a new operational test for monitoring and enforcing driver and motor carrier safety compliance standards. In 2024, the FMCSA began proof-of-concept testing to determine whether the technology required for electronic identification systems is sufficient and the information and data being provided is secure, reliable, and useful for the FMCSA.

In 2023, the FMCSA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking requesting additional information on automated driving systems ("ADS") and seeking comment on regulatory approaches that would enable it to obtain relevant safety information and the current and anticipated size of the population of carriers operating ADS-equipped commercial motor vehicles. In 2023, the FMCSA and NHTSA issued a joint proposed rule that would require automated emergency braking on all new heavy-duty trucks. Additionally, in 2023, NHTSA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that would require side underride guards to be installed on all new trailers and semi-trailers. It remains to be seen, what, if any, final rules will stem from such proposals.

Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 ("FSMA")

In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") published a final rule establishing requirements for shippers, loaders, carriers by motor vehicle and rail vehicle, and receivers engaged in the transportation of food, to use sanitary transportation practices to ensure the safety of the food they transport as part of the FSMA. This rule sets forth requirements related to among other things, equipment used to transport food, measures taken during such transportation, personnel training, and record retention. We believe we have been in compliance with these requirements since they have applied to us. However, if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations related to the FSMA, or if we transport food or goods that are contaminated or are found to cause illness and/or death, we could be subject to substantial fines, lawsuits, penalties and/or criminal and civil liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As the FDA continues its efforts to modernize food safety, it is likely additional food safety regulations will take effect in the future. In 2020, the FDA released its "New Era of Smarter Food Safety" blueprint, which creates a ten year roadmap to create a more digital, traceable and safer food system. This blueprint builds on the work done under the FSMA, generally requiring persons who manufacture, process, pack, or hold foods on the FDA's "Food Traceability List" to maintain detailed records of key data elements for critical tracking events in a manner that can be provided to the FDA within 24 hours of request. It is still unclear what impact of the Food Traceability Rule, which has a compliance date of July 2028, will have on the Company and others in the industry, but further regulation in this area could negatively affect our business by increasing our compliance obligations and related expenses going forward.

Legislation Regarding Independent Contractors

Tax and other regulatory authorities, as well as independent contractors themselves, have sought in the past to assert that independent contractors in the trucking industry are employees rather than independent contractors. Federal legislators continue to introduce legislation concerning the classification of independent contractors as employees, including legislation that proposes to increase the tax and labor penalties against employers who intentionally or unintentionally misclassify employees as independent contractors and are also found to have violated employees' overtime or wage requirements. The Protecting the Rights to Organize ("PRO") Act was passed by the US House of Representatives and received by the US Senate in 2021, which was further sent to the Senate's Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. In 2023, a substantially similar bill was introduced to the US House of Representatives and referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce. These bills propose to apply the "ABC Test" for classifying workers under Federal Fair Labor Standards Act claims. In 2024, a Department of Labor rule regarding independent contractor classification took effect. The 2024 rule rescinded the Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Under the 2024 rule, workers’ relationship with a principal are classified under six factors, including: (1) opportunity for profit and loss depending on managerial skill; (2) investments by the worker and the principal; (3) degree of permanence of the relationship; (4) nature and degree of control; (5) extent to which worker is integral to the principal’s business; and (6) skill and initiative, together with a provision for unspecified other factors, to determine if such worker should be classified as an independent contractor. At this time, the Department of Labor has issued a notice that it is not currently enforcing the 2024 rule while it reviews the 2024 rule, which is also being challenged in federal court and instead will revert back to classifying a worker’s relationship under the “Economic Realities Test,” which primarily focuses on the

21

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

following factors: (i) the nature and degree of the potential employer’s control, (ii) the permanency of the worker’s relationship with the potential employer, (iii) the worker’s investment in facilities, equipment, or helpers, (iv) the amount of skill, initiative, judgement, or foresight required for the worker’s services, (v) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss, and (vi) the extent of integration of the worker’s services into the potential employer’s business. Additionally, federal legislators have sought to:

•abolish the current safe harbor allowing taxpayers meeting certain criteria to treat individuals as independent contractors if they are following a long-standing, recognized practice,

•extend the FLSA to independent contractors, and

•impose notice requirements based upon employment or independent contractor status and fines for failure to comply.

Some states have adopted initiatives to increase their revenues from items such as unemployment, workers' compensation, and income taxes, and we believe a reclassification of independent contractors as employees would help states with this initiative. Federal and state taxing and other regulatory authorities and courts apply a variety of standards in their determination of independent contractor status.

Recently, courts in certain states have issued decisions that could result in a greater likelihood that independent contractors would be judicially classified as employees in such states. Further, class actions and other lawsuits have been filed against us and other members of our industry seeking to reclassify independent contractors as employees for a variety of purposes, including workers' compensation and health care coverage. Our defense of such class actions and other lawsuits has not always been successful, and we have been subject to adverse judgments with respect to such matters. In addition, carriers such as us that operate or have operated lease-purchase programs have been more susceptible to lawsuits seeking to reclassify independent contractors that have engaged in such programs. If our independent contractors were determined to be our employees, we would incur additional exposure under federal and state tax, workers' compensation, unemployment benefits, labor, employment, and tort laws, which could potentially include prior periods, as well as potential liability for employee benefits and tax withholdings. We currently observe and monitor our compliance with current related and applicable laws and regulations, but we cannot predict whether future laws and regulations, judicial decisions, or settlements regarding the classification of independent contractors will adversely affect our business or operations.

In 2019, California enacted A.B. 5 ("AB5"), a new law that changed the landscape of the state’s treatment of employees and independent contractors. AB5 provides that the three-pronged "ABC Test" must be used to determine worker classification in wage-order claims. Under the ABC Test, a worker is presumed to be an employee and the burden to demonstrate their independent contractor status is on the hiring company through satisfying all three of the following criteria:

•the worker is free from control and direction in the performance of services, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact;

•the worker is performing work outside the usual course of business of the hiring company; and

•the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

How AB5 will be enforced is still to be determined. While it was set to go into effect in January 2020, it was subject to various court proceedings, and ultimately AB5 was retroactively placed into law as of January 2020, with the ABC Test being applied in certain circumstances retroactively to April 2018. Litigation surrounding the matter continues, and it remains unclear whether such challenges will be successful in invalidating the law. AB5 has spurred the introduction of similar legislation in states other than California, which if enacted, could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

Wage and Hour Legislation

In 2018, the FMCSA granted a petition filed by the American Trucking Associations and in doing so determined that federal law preempts California’s wage and hour laws, and interstate truck drivers are not subject to such laws. The FMCSA’s decision has been appealed by labor groups and multiple lawsuits have been filed in federal courts seeking to overturn the decision. In 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FMCSA’s determination that federal law preempts California's meal and rest break laws, as applied to drivers of property-carrying commercial motor vehicles. Other current and future state and local wage and hour laws, including laws related to employee meal breaks and rest periods, may also vary significantly from federal law. Further, driver piece rate compensation, which is an industry standard, has been attacked as non-compliant with state minimum wage laws. Both of these

22

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

issues are adversely impacting the Company and the industry as a whole, with respect to the practical application of the laws, thereby resulting in additional cost. As a result, we are subject to an uneven patchwork of wage and hour laws throughout the US. In the absence of such federal legislation preempting state and local wage and hour laws, we will either need to comply with the most restrictive state and local laws across our entire fleet, or revise our management systems to comply with varying state and local laws. Either solution could result in increased compliance costs, increased driver turnover, decreased efficiency, and amplified legal exposure.

In a 2023 case involving the Fair Labor Standards Act, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision that would require additional payment to team drivers to be paid while in their sleeper berth. It is unclear if other jurisdictions will adopt this view, or if any legislation will result from this holding. If so, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In 2023, a bill was introduced to Congress that would eliminate an exclusion of truck drivers from receiving overtime pay. If enacted, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Other Regulation

One Big Beautiful Bill Act

In July 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act ("OBBBA") was signed into law. The OBBBA makes permanent key elements of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including 100% bonus depreciation for certain property and the business interest expense limitation. Although we do not expect the OBBBA to have a negative effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, until certain regulations are promulgated, we may not know the full extent of the OBBBA’s effects on our financial results and financial position. It is unclear what other legislative initiatives will be signed into law and what changes they may undergo. However, adoption and implementation could negatively impact our business by increasing our compliance obligations and related expenses.

Infrastructure Spending

In 2022, Senate lawmakers introduced legislation that would set aside grant funds over four years to expand truck parking across the United States. Such legislation would allow for the creation of new parking areas, the expansion of existing facilities, and the approval of commercial parking at existing weigh stations, rest areas, and park-and-ride facilities. It would also allow for truck parking expansion at commercial truck stops and travel plazas. Further, the DOT has provided funding to increase parking in certain heavily congested areas of Nevada, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Florida, while certain Congressional leaders have introduced legislation to allocate an additional $200 million for truck parking projects. Industry groups are generally in favor of additional funding to improve parking infrastructure as a lack of available parking has negatively impacted the industry as a whole, including the Company and its subsidiaries.

Brokerage Liability

Federal courts have reached different decisions on the issue of whether preemption applies to broker liability. In 2022, the US Supreme Court declined to review a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that broker liability is not preempted by federal regulation, in certain circumstances, which would expose freight brokers to a patchwork of state laws across the United States. In 2023, the Eleventh Circuit Court held that the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act ("FAAAA") expressly preempted such personal liability claims against a broker. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provided a supporting decision holding that the plaintiff’s claim was preempted by the FAAAA. The US Supreme Court agreed to review the issue, and while the U.S. Supreme Court’s review and decision is pending, it remains uncertain how long the current circuit split will continue and whether the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately agree that the FAAAA preempts personal liability claims against a broker. If the U.S. Supreme Court adopts the Ninth Circuit view that freight broker liability is not preempted by federal regulation, it could lead to a patchwork of state laws across the United States and also result in primary (as opposed to contingent) liability being imposed upon freight brokers, and increased insurance premiums for brokerage operations generally. Although we are committed to selecting safe and secure motor carriers in carrying out our brokerage activities, if we are found to be negligent in the motor carrier selection process it could lead to significant liabilities in the event of an accident, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

23

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.

SHIP IT Act

In 2023, the Safer Highways and Increased Performance for Interstate Trucking Act (the "SHIP IT Act") was introduced into the US House of Representatives. As proposed, the SHIP IT Act would allow states to issue special permits for overweight vehicles and loads during emergencies, allow drivers to apply for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act grants, attempt to recruit truck drivers to the industry through targeted and temporary tax credits, streamline the CDL process in certain respects, and expand access to truck parking and rest areas for commercial drivers. A similar bill, the Truck Parking Safety Improvement Act, was introduced into the Senate in 2023 and reintroduced in February 2025. If enacted the bill would dedicate $755 million in funding over the following three years to expand access to truck parking and rest areas for commercial drivers. It remains unclear whether such acts will ultimately become law, however, and what changes they may undergo prior to finalization.

Available Information

Our investor site, http://investor.knight-swift.com, includes our annual reports on Form 10-K with accompanying XBRL documents, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with accompanying XBRL documents, current reports on Form 8-K with accompanying XBRL documents, and amendments to those reports that are filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable once the material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov.

24

Table of Contents Glossary of Terms

KNIGHT-SWIFT TRANSPORTATION HOLDINGS INC.