HEARTLAND EXPRESS INC (HTLD) Business

ITEM 1.    Business

General

Heartland Express, Inc. is a holding company incorporated in Nevada, which directly or indirectly owns all of the stock of the following legal entities: Heartland Express, Inc. of Iowa, Heartland Express Services, Inc., Heartland Express Maintenance Services, Inc. (collectively, "Heartland Express"), and Midwest Holding Group, LLC and Millis Transfer, LLC (together, "Millis Transfer"), and Smith Transport, LLC ("Smith Transport"), and certain Mexican entities. Effective December 31, 2025, we integrated and rebranded U.S. operations of Contract Freighters, Inc. ("CFI") into Heartland Express. Effective December 31, 2024, Franklin Logistics, LLC was merged into Smith Transport, LLC. Effective December 31, 2023, Smith Trucking, Inc. was merged into Smith Transport, Inc. Further, effective December 31, 2023 Smith Transport, Inc. and Franklin Logistics, Inc.

1

were converted to Smith Transport, LLC and Franklin Logistics, LLC, respectively. We, together with our subsidiaries, are a short, medium, and long-haul truckload carrier and transportation services provider.

We primarily provide nationwide asset-based dry van truckload service for major shippers across the United States, along with cross-border freight and other transportation services offered through third party partnerships in Mexico. Our consolidated average length of haul is under 400 miles. We focus on providing high quality service to targeted customers with a high density of freight in our operating areas. We also offer truckload temperature-controlled transportation services and Mexico logistics services, which are not significant to our consolidated operations. We generally earn revenue based on the number of miles per load delivered and the revenue per mile or per load paid. We operate our consolidated operations under the brand names of Heartland Express, Millis Transfer, Smith Transport, and CFI (for services within Mexico). We manage our business based on overall corporate operating goals and objectives that are the same for all of our brands. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), our CEO and President, evaluates the operational efficiencies of our transportation services, operating performance and asset allocation on a combined basis based on consolidated operating goals and objectives. In addition to consolidated data on a combined basis that has been historically used, our CODM also makes use of available disaggregated operating segment data as well. We believe the keys to success are maintaining high levels of customer service and safety, which are predicated on the availability of experienced drivers and late-model equipment. We believe that our service standards, safety record, and equipment accessibility have made us a core carrier to many of our major customers, as well as allowed us to build solid, long-term relationships with customers and brand ourselves as an industry leader for on-time service.

Our corporate headquarters is located in North Liberty, Iowa, in a lower-cost environment with ready access to a skilled, educated, and industrious workforce. Our other terminals are located near major shipping corridors nationwide, affording proximity to customer locations, driver domiciles, and distribution centers. Approximately 80% of our terminals are located within 200 miles of the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. We believe our geographic reach and terminal locations assist us with driver recruiting and retention, efficient fleet maintenance, and consistent customer engagement.

We were founded by Russell A. Gerdin in 1978 and became publicly traded in November 1986. Over the thirty-nine years from 1986 to 2025, we have grown our revenues to $805.7 million from $21.6 million. For the five year period 2021 through 2025 we had the highest revenue, $4.6 billion, of any previous five year period. Much of our growth has been attributable to expanding service for existing customers, acquiring new customers, and continued expansion of our operating regions through new and existing customers as well as strategic acquisitions. More information regarding our total assets, revenues and profits for the past three years can be found in our “Consolidated Balance Sheets” and “Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income” that are included in this report.

Organic growth has become increasingly difficult for traditional over-the-road truckload carriers given an ongoing shortage of qualified drivers in the industry that meet our hiring standards. We have completed strategic acquisitions to assist with the industry challenges, although we have been further challenged by the weak freight environment and the resulting shortage of profitable freight within the last three years. The profitable freight shortage we anticipate to be a near term challenge whereas we expect the shortage of qualified drivers to be ongoing. In response, we continue to evaluate and explore different driving options and offerings for our existing and potential new drivers across our unique mix of driver and equipment offerings across Heartland Express, Millis Transfer and Smith Transport.

In addition to past organic growth through the development of our operating areas, we have completed ten acquisitions since 1986 with the most recent and our fifth acquisition since 2013, CFI, occurring on August 31, 2022 following the acquisition of Smith Transport on May 31, 2022. These ten acquisitions have enabled us to solidify our position within existing regions, expand into new operating regions, expand service offerings to address longer length of haul needs from customers, and pursue new customer relationships in new markets, as well as expand business relationships with current customers in new markets. We have historically been a debt free organization although with the acquisition of CFI we incurred debt but have significantly lowered our debt balance since the acquisition. We expect to continue to evaluate acquisition candidates presented to us, however, we do not expect to make any significant acquisitions while we are paying down debt. We believe future growth depends upon several factors including the level of economic growth and the related customer demand, the available capacity in the trucking industry, our ability to identify and consummate future acquisitions, our ability to integrate operations of acquired companies to realize efficiencies, and our ability to attract and retain experienced drivers that meet our hiring standards.

Operations

Our operating motto is "Service For Success". Our operations department focuses on the successful execution of customer expectations and providing consistent opportunities for our drivers, in conjunction with maximizing equipment utilization. These objectives require a combined effort of marketing, operations managers, and fleet management.

2

Our customer service department is responsible for maintaining the continuity between the customer’s needs and our ability to meet those needs by communicating the customer’s expectations to the fleet management group. Collectively, the marketing and operations groups (customer service and fleet management) are charged with developing customer relationships, ensuring service standards, coordinating proper freight-to-capacity balancing, trailer asset management, and daily tactical decisions to match customer demand with revenue equipment availability across our entire network. Fleet management assigns orders to drivers based on well-defined criteria, such as United States Department of Transportation (the “DOT”) hours of service ("HOS") compliance, customer requirements, equipment utilization, driver “home time” and other driver needs, limiting non-revenue miles, and equipment maintenance needs.

Fleet management employees are responsible for driver management, development, and retention. Additionally, they maximize the capacity that is available to meet the service needs of our customers. Their responsibilities include meeting the needs of the drivers within the standards that have been set by the organization and communicating the requirements of the customers to the drivers on each order to ensure successful execution.

Primarily serving the short-to-medium haul market permits us to use single rather than team drivers on most loads and dispatch most loads directly from origin to destination without an intermediate equipment change other than for driver scheduling purposes. During 2025, approximately 77% of our loads were less than 500 miles in length of haul. Substantially all of our revenue is, and for the last three fiscal years has been, generated from within the U.S. with immaterial revenue derived from Mexico and Canada.

We operate twenty-five terminal facilities throughout the contiguous U.S. and one in Mexico, in addition to our terminal and corporate headquarters in North Liberty, Iowa. These terminal locations are owned facilities and strategically located to concentrate on freight movements generally within a 500-mile radius of the terminals. This allows us to meet the needs of our customers in those regions while allowing our drivers to primarily stay within an operating region which provides them with more “home time.” This also allows us opportunities to service and maintain revenue equipment across all subsidiaries, at our facilities on a frequent basis.

Personnel at the individual terminal locations manage these operations based on the overall corporate operating and maintenance goals and objectives. Our CODM evaluates the operational efficiencies of the Company's transportation services and operating performance of terminals on a combined basis based on consolidated operating ratio and reports detailing all of the Company’s load movements, rate per mile, and non-revenue miles. In addition to consolidated data on a combined basis that has been historically used, our CODM also makes use of available disaggregated operating segment data as well. Our reporting units operate on a centralized computer network which assists with regular communication to achieve enterprise-wide load coordination and other operating efficiencies.

We emphasize customer satisfaction through on-time performance, dependable late-model equipment, and consistent equipment availability to meet the volume requirements of our customers. We also maintain a trailer to tractor ratio that allows us to position trailers at customer locations for convenient loading and unloading. The freight we transport is predominately non-perishable and does not require driver handling. These factors help minimize waiting time, which increases tractor utilization and promotes driver retention.

Customers, Marketing, and Safety

We seek to transport freight that will complement traffic in our existing service areas and remain consistent with our focus on short-to-medium haul and cross-border freight to and from Mexico. Management believes that building lane density in our primary traffic lanes will minimize empty miles and enhance driver “home time.”

We target customers with multiple, time-sensitive shipments, including those utilizing “just-in-time” manufacturing and inventory management. In seeking these customers, we have positioned our business as a provider of premium service at compensatory rates, rather than competing solely on the basis of price. We believe our reputation for quality service, reliable equipment, and equipment availability makes us a core carrier for many of our customers. This past year our operating companies once again were recognized for customer service by several of our customers as a testament to our service standards. These awards include:

•Pepsico Transportation – Carrier of the Year – WHD West Division

•Georgia Pacific – OTR Van National Carrier of the Year

•WK Kellogg Co – WKKCC CD&L Supplier Founders Award

•Molson Coors – Transportation Supplier of the Year

•Shaw Industries – Outbound Class B Carrier of the Year

3

•FedEx Express - Yearly Superior Performance Award FY 25

•Mars Pet Nutrition – Carrier of the Year East

•Tractor Supply – Value Award – Accountability

During 2025, we were also recognized with the following environmental, operational, safety, and community service awards:

•Newsweek's 2025 Most Trustworthy Companies in America

•Logistics Management – Quest for Quality Award – Expedited Motor Carriers

•Wreaths Across America - Honor Fleet

These awards are hard-earned and are a direct reflection upon our outstanding group of employees and our focus on excellence in all areas of our business.

Our primary customers include retailers, manufacturers and parcel carriers. Our 25, 10, and 5 largest customers accounted for approximately 63%, 47%, and 32% of our operating revenues, respectively, in 2025. During 2024, our 25, 10, and 5 largest customers were approximately 60%, 40%, and 26%, of our operating revenues respectively. Our broad capacity network and customer base has allowed us to remain appropriately diversified as only one customer accounted for more than 10% of our operating revenues in 2025, while no customers accounted for more than 10% in 2024 or 2023.

Environmental and Sustainability

We have adopted an "Environmental and Sustainability Mission". This document portrays our commitment to the environment and sustainability through our long track record of successful business practices. Through equipment designs, equipment replacement strategies, idle reduction techniques, and battery usage, and practices at each of our terminals, we are focused on reducing waste and conserving energy. Heartland's sustainability efforts are endorsed and overseen by senior management throughout the Company. Our efforts have been recognized by the U.S. EPA SmartWay Excellence Award seven times. We have also been recognized as a SmartWay High Performer seven times.

Human Rights

We have adopted a "Human Rights Mission". This document portrays our commitment to human rights through anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies, reinforcing advancement through qualifications, performance, skills, and experience, workplace safety and health, and prohibitions on forced labor and human trafficking. Heartland's human rights efforts are endorsed and overseen by senior management throughout the Company. The Company has historically partnered with "Truckers Against Trafficking" (TAT). TAT exists to educate, equip, empower, and mobilize members of the trucking, bus and energy industries to combat human trafficking.

Seasonality

We operate in a cyclical industry, within any given year there is also seasonality to typical freight patterns. Our tractor productivity decreases during the winter season because inclement weather impedes operations, and some shippers reduce their shipments after the winter holiday season. Revenue can also be affected by bad weather, holidays, and the number of business days that occur during a given period, since revenue is directly related to available working days of shippers. At the same time, operating expenses increase and fuel efficiency declines because of engine idling in extreme weather conditions, while harsh weather creates higher accident frequency, increased claims, and more equipment repairs. In addition, many of our customers, particularly those in the retail industry where we have a large presence, demand additional capacity during the fourth quarter, which limits our ability to take advantage of more attractive market rates that generally exist during such periods. Demand for our services may be muted during soft freight environments, like we experienced in the last three years. Demand for our freight services has been soft for the last three years as there has been a general imbalance of freight movements that have lagged available truck capacity. We may also suffer from natural disasters and weather-related events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, blizzards, ice storms, floods, and fires, which may increase in frequency and severity due to climate change, as well as other man-made disasters. These events may disrupt fuel supplies, increase fuel costs, disrupt freight shipments or routes, affect regional economies, destroy our assets, or adversely affect the business or financial condition of our customers.

Drivers, Independent Contractors, and Other Employees

We rely on our workforce in achieving our business objectives. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we had an average of approximately 4,560 drivers and non-driving personnel compared to approximately 5,700 during the year ended December 31, 2024. As of the end of January 2026 there were approximately 3,630 drivers and non-driving personnel. The

4

decrease in average of the drivers and non-driving personnel during the year ended December 31, 2025 was predominantly due to weak freight demand and our strategic response to right size. In addition to company drivers, we also contracted with independent contractors to provide and operate tractors which provides us additional revenue equipment capacity, although not material to our operations. Independent contractors own their own tractors and are responsible for all associated expenses, including financing costs, fuel, maintenance, insurance, and highway use taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, independent contractors accounted for approximately 2.0% and 3.8% of our total miles, respectively. We also utilize third party carriers to facilitate our CFI Mexico logistics operations. Independent contractors and third party carrier costs are presented as rent and purchased transportation within the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The issue of a decreasing amount of overall qualified CDL drivers in our industry continues. We continually explore new strategies to attract and retain qualified drivers with changes in market conditions and demands. We hire the majority of our drivers with at least six to twelve months of over-the-road experience and safe driving records. As discussed below, the Company's driver training programs provide an additional source of future potential professional drivers. In order to attract and retain experienced drivers who understand the importance of customer service, we have sought to solidify our position as an industry leader in driver compensation in our operating markets and for the services we provide. We have continued to get more creative in providing better pay, benefits, equipment, and facilities for our drivers. Our comprehensive driver compensation and benefits program rewards drivers for years of service and safe operating mileage benchmarks, which are critical to our operational and financial performance. Certain driver pay packages include future pay increases based on years of continued service with us, increased rates for accident-free miles of operation, detention pay, and other pay programs to assist drivers with unproductive time associated with circumstances outside of their control, such as inclement weather, equipment breakdowns, and customer issues. Driver pay, home time, and other amenities have allowed us to maintain driver turnover rates lower than the industry average. We believe that our driver compensation and benefits package is consistently among the best in the industry. We are committed to investing in our drivers and compensating them for safety as both are key to our operational and financial performance. Currently over 16% of our driver employees, individually, have achieved 1.0 million or more safe miles. We also invest a significant amount of capital in our terminal facilities as we strive to offer our driver employees up to date and convenient amenities and safe and secure parking throughout our terminal network across the country while they are away from home. Over the last three years we have invested $81.8 million in terminal properties, while also divesting of properties for a combined $29.0 million gain.

Millis Training Institute, opened in 1989, and Heartland Training Institute, opened in 2022, are driver training programs dedicated to identifying, training, and developing capable individuals into obtaining their commercial driving license and becoming professional truck drivers. These driver training programs offer additional opportunities to hire professional drivers other than the traditional approach of hiring only experienced over-the-road drivers.

Current government focus on English proficiency requirements, as well as reviews of CDL status for non-domiciled drivers, will potentially eliminate some level of driver capacity in our industry. We believe this could help supply and demand dynamics currently being experienced in our industry. However, due to our comprehensive hiring and safety standards, we continue to experience a challenging driver hiring environment.

We are not a party to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that we have good relationships with our employees.

Revenue Equipment

Our industry is very capital intensive as it relates to tractors and trailers. One of our core operating goals is to maintain a modern fleet of predominantly company owned tractor and trailer equipment. The overall performance and reliability of tractor equipment typically has increased with each new model year of tractors that we have acquired in the last 5 years. By maintaining late model year tractors, a low average age, we experience better operating performance. Our drivers, along with the Company, benefit from the latest safety technologies and features that we choose to equip our tractors with. The modern fleet appeals to new drivers and aids in the retention of current drivers. Deploying this core strategy, along with idle management and driver comfort technology, also allows us to reduce our carbon footprint. This is evidenced by us being awarded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SmartWay Excellence Award seven times. We have also been recognized as a SmartWay High Performer seven times.

We have historically owned our tractors and trailers and do not lease revenue equipment, other than when we have acquired companies that have utilized leases. Historically, we have paid cash for the acquisition of new revenue equipment. These strategies allow us the flexibility to buy and sell tractors (and trailers) opportunistically to capitalize on new and used equipment markets, size our fleet to the volume of attractive freight, and manage cash tax expense. One method we use to accomplish these goals is to depreciate our new tractors (excludes assets acquired through an acquisition) for financial reporting purposes using the declining balance method, in which depreciation is higher in early periods and tapers off in later periods. We believe

5

this method more accurately reflects actual asset values and makes it less likely that we will experience losses on sales at most points during their life cycle. In addition, the decline in depreciation during later periods is typically offset by increased repairs and maintenance expense as the tractors age, which keeps our total operating costs more uniform over the operating life of the equipment. Trailers are depreciated using the straight-line method.

Revenue equipment acquired through acquisitions is generally revalued to current market values as of the acquisition date. Assets obtained more than a year prior to the acquisition by the acquired company are depreciated on a straight-line basis aligned with the remaining period of expected use, whereas those obtained less than a year prior are depreciated consistent with newly purchased assets. As acquired equipment is replaced, our fleet returns to our base methods of declining balance depreciation for tractors and straight-line depreciation for trailers. We believe our revenue equipment strategy is sound over the long term. However, it can contribute to volatility in gain on sale of equipment and quarterly earnings per share.

At December 31, 2025, all of our over-the-road operating tractor fleet was equipped with event recorders and accident avoidance technology. All over-the-road tractors are equipped with mobile communication systems that comply with the latest electronic log device regulations. These units are the base communication with our drivers. This technology allows for efficient real-time communication with our drivers regarding freight and safety (e.g. weather shutdowns), as well as fueling decisions, and provides the ability to manage the needs of our customers based on real-time information on load status as well as vehicle maintenance items. Our mobile communication systems allows us to obtain information regarding equipment for better planning and efficient maintenance time as well as information regarding driver performance and efficiency.

As of December 31, 2025 the average age of our tractor fleet was 2.6 years compared to 2.5 years at December 31, 2024. We have historically operated the majority of our tractors while under warranty to minimize repair and maintenance cost and reduce service interruptions caused by breakdowns. The average age of our trailer fleet was 7.3 years at December 31, 2025 compared to 7.4 years at December 31, 2024.

The "Regulation" section in this Item 1 of Part I of this Annual Report discusses in detail several regulations that have impacted and could continue to affect our cost and use of revenue equipment.

Fuel

We mainly purchase diesel fuel ("fuel") over-the-road through a network of fuel stops throughout the U.S. at which we have negotiated price discounts. In addition, bulk fuel sites are maintained at nineteen of our terminal locations. We strategically manage fuel purchase decisions based on pricing of over-the-road fuel prices, bulk fuel prices, and the routing of equipment. Both above ground and underground storage tanks are utilized at the bulk fuel sites. We believe exposure to environmental cleanup costs is minimized by periodic inspection and monitoring of the tanks. We also have insurance policies in place for the operation of our tanks located at terminal locations. Increases in fuel prices can have a significant adverse effect on the results of operations given the amount of fuel we consume. We have fuel surcharge agreements with most customers that enable us to pass through most long-term price increases. For the years ended December 31, 2025, and 2024, fuel expense was $135.2 million and $177.2 million, or 15.7% and 16.6%, respectively, of our total operating expenses. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, fuel surcharge revenues were $96.6 million and $133.9 million, respectively. Department of Energy (“DOE”) average price of fuel decreased 2.6% in 2025 compared to 2024, which decreased our net fuel cost, before the impacts of fleet efficiency, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024. Fuel consumed by empty and out-of-route miles and by truck engine idling time is not recoverable and therefore any increases or decreases in fuel costs related to empty and out-of-route miles and idling time will directly impact our operating results. Due to the freight environment experienced during the last three years, fuel consumption has been negatively impacted by higher non-revenue miles and truck idle time due to lower truck utilization.

Competition and Industry

The truckload industry is highly competitive and fragmented with thousands of carriers of varying sizes. We compete with other truckload carriers; primarily those serving the short-to-medium haul market. Logistics providers, railroads, less-than-truckload carriers, and private fleets provide additional competition but to a lesser extent. The industry is highly competitive based primarily upon freight rates, qualified drivers, service, and equipment availability. We specialize in time-sensitive shipments, including "just-in-time" and similar types of freight. We provide premium service at compensatory rates, rather than competing solely on the basis of price.

We operate in a cyclical industry. Freight demand was degraded throughout all of 2023 and continued to be weak during 2024 and 2025. While we believe we are seeing positive signs across the transportation industry to reduce excess capacity, which could lead to a positive shift in customer rate and volume negotiations during 2026, the weak freight environment has extended

6

longer than we previously expected and it remains uncertain when we will see meaningful improvement. We believe that cost improvements and transportation system changes implemented during 2025 will provide a better cost structure and operating visibility to deliver a path toward operating profitability for our consolidated operations over the next twelve months. However, general consumer product output and inventory volatility, consumer demand, the political landscape, potential tariffs, foreign wars, and disruption in oil and diesel markets all could create additional volatility regarding future freight demand.

The trucking industry also faces a shortage of qualified drivers, as discussed above under the heading “Drivers, Independent Contractors, and Other Employees.”

Safety and Risk Management

Our safety program is designed to minimize accidents and to conduct our business within governmental safety regulations. We communicate safety issues with drivers on a regular basis and also emphasize safety through equipment specifications and regularly scheduled maintenance intervals. Our drivers are compensated and recognized for achieving and maintaining a safe driving record.

The primary risks associated with our business include cargo loss and physical damage, personal injury, property damage, and workers’ compensation claims. We self-insure a portion of the exposure related to all of the aforementioned risks. Insurance coverage, including self-insurance retention levels, is evaluated on an annual basis. We actively participate in the settlement of each claim incurred.

We act as a self-insurer for auto liability, defined as including property damage, personal injury, or cargo based on defined insurance retention. In April 2023, we renewed our primary auto liability insurance with a three year program. Under the April 2023 renewal, our auto liability retention limit across all operating entities was increased to $3.0 million for any individual claim based on the insured party, accident date, and circumstances of the loss event subject to a $3.5 million corridor for any one accident or combination of accidents that exceed $3.0 million. In April 2025, the $5.0 million in excess of $10.0 million layer and the $5.0 million in excess of $15.0 million layer became part of a three year structured program, each with a $5.0 million per occurrence and a $10.0 million aggregate limit per policy year. For the duration of the three year structured program, the $5.0 million in excess of $10.0 million layer has a $15.0 million aggregate limit and the $5.0 million in excess of $15.0 million layer has a $10.0 million aggregate limit. Also, in April 2025, an additional corridor was added, where we retain liability of $5.0 million for the first accident or series of accidents that exceed $20.0 million. We maintain limited excess liability coverage, subject to the foregoing limits and corridors, and retain any liability in excess of the coverage. Our premiums for certain layers are subject to upward or downward adjustments based on claims experience. The elevated retention limit and the premium adjustment feature could lead to increased volatility in our insurance and claims expense, depending on the frequency and magnitude of claims, which is exacerbated given significantly increased judgments and settlements of over-the-road accident claims.

We act as a self-insurer for workers’ compensation based on defined insurance retention of $1.0 million. We act as a self-insurer for property damage to our tractors and trailers. We maintain a general insurance coverage policy for our terminal facilities with a $1.0 million deductible.

Regulation

Transportation Regulations

We are a common and contract motor carrier regulated by the DOT and various state and local agencies. We operate under DOT authorities respective to our individual operating brands. The DOT generally governs matters such as safety requirements, registration to engage in motor carrier operations, insurance requirements, and periodic financial reporting. Our Company drivers and independent contractor drivers also must comply with the safety and fitness regulations of the DOT, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing and HOS. Such matters as weight and equipment dimensions are also subject to U.S. regulations. We also may become subject to new or more restrictive regulations relating to fuel emissions, drivers' HOS, ergonomics, or other matters affecting safety or operating methods. Other agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") also regulate our equipment, operations, and drivers.

The DOT, through the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”), imposes safety and fitness regulations on us and our drivers, including rules that restrict driver HOS. Changes to such HOS rules can negatively impact our productivity and affect our operations and profitability by reducing the number of hours per day or week our drivers may operate and/or disrupting our network. The FMCSA has made changes to the HOS rules in recent years that include greater flexibility to truck drivers regarding their 30-minute rest breaks, an extension of the shorthaul exemption by an additional two hours, and an

7

extension of duty time for drivers encountering adverse weather by up to two hours. Certain industry groups have challenged these rules in court, and while the FMCSA's final rule has been upheld, it remains unclear if industry or other groups will bring additional challenges against the FMCSA's final rule. Further, in September 2025, the FMCSA adopted two pilot programs to study the effect of increasing the flexibility of the hours-of-service rules to improve driver working conditions and quality of life. The hours-of-service pilot programs provide participating drivers increased control and flexibility in their schedules by allowing the participating drivers to pause their 14-hour driving window for up to three hours and split their 10-hour off-duty period into more flexible combinations. Any future changes to HOS rules could materially and adversely affect our operations and profitability. Future rulemaking relating to electronic logging devices (“ELD”) may occur and any final rules could affect our ELD technology, compliance, usage, and compliance efforts.

The DOT evaluates the safety and fitness of carriers based on onsite investigations or a remote compliance reviews. All of our motor carriers currently have a satisfactory DOT safety rating, which is the highest available rating under the current safety rating scale. If any of our motor carriers received a conditional or unsatisfactory DOT safety rating, it could disrupt operations and adversely affect our business, as some of our existing customer contracts require a satisfactory DOT safety rating.

In addition to the safety rating system, the FMCSA has adopted the Compliance Safety Accountability (“CSA”) program as an additional safety enforcement and compliance model that evaluates and ranks fleets on certain safety-related standards. The CSA program analyzes data from roadside inspections, moving violations, crash reports from the last two years, and investigation results. The data is organized into seven categories (such categories are known as the “BASICs”). Carriers are grouped by category with other carriers that have a similar number of safety events (e.g., crashes, inspections, or violations) and carriers are ranked and assigned a rating percentile to prioritize them for interventions if they are above a certain threshold. Generally, these scores do not have a direct impact on a carrier’s safety rating. However, the occurrence of unfavorable scores in one or more categories may (i) affect driver recruiting and retention by causing high-quality drivers to seek employment with other carriers, (ii) cause our customers to direct their business away from us and to carriers with higher fleet rankings, (iii) subject us to an increase in compliance reviews and roadside inspections, (iv) cause us to incur greater than expected expenses in our attempts to improve unfavorable scores or (v) increase our insurance costs, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

Under the CSA, these scores were initially made available to the public in five of the seven categories. However, pursuant to the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (the "FAST Act"), the FMCSA was required to remove from public view the previously available CSA scores while it reviews the reliability of the scoring system. During this period of review by the FMCSA, we will continue to have access to our own scores and will still be subject to intervention by the FMCSA when such scores are above the intervention thresholds. We will continue to monitor our CSA scores and compliance through results from roadside inspections and other data available to detect positive or negative trends in compliance issues on an ongoing basis. A study was conducted and delivered to the FMCSA with several recommendations to make the CSA program more fair, accurate, and reliable. The FMCSA provided a report to Congress outlining the changes it may make to the CSA program in response to the study. Such changes include the testing and possible adoption of a revised risk modeling theory, potential collection and dissemination of additional carrier data and revised measures for intervention thresholds. The adoption of such changes is contingent on the results of the new modeling theory and additional public feedback. Therefore, it is unclear if, when and to what extent such changes to the CSA program will occur.

In 2023, the FMCSA announced that it was interested in developing a new methodology to determine whether a carrier is fit to operate commercial motor vehicles (“CMV” or “CMVs”). In 2024, the FMCSA published a notice announcing a revised Safety Management System (“SMS”) methodology, including, among other changes, (i) rebranding BASICs as “Compliance Categories” and revising certain categories, (ii) consolidating existing road violations into simplified and distinct violation groups and simplifying the scale used to measure the severity of violations, (iii) adjusting intervention thresholds, and (iv) revising the SMS methodology to focus more heavily on recent violations. Whether this revised SMS methodology will take effect is uncertain; however, any change which results in the Company or its subsidiaries receiving less favorable scores, or an increased visibility of less favorable scores or of complaints against the Company may have an adverse effect on our operations and financial position. Moreover, in 2023, the FMCSA announced a proposal that would allow carriers to undergo an appeal process for requests of data review. Further, in 2025, the FMCSA announced proposed revisions to their 2023 proposal to improve the impartiality, timeliness, transparency, and fairness of the data review and appeal process. The revised proposal, if adopted, may provide an opportunity for the Company to appeal in certain scenarios which could result in more favorable outcomes. Another source of potential changes may be from the FMCSA’s study on the causation of crashes, known as the Crash Causal Factors Program (“CCFP”) which builds upon the FMCSA’s previous Large Truck Crash Causation Study. Phase 1 of the CCFP is designed to study crashes of heavy-duty trucks and a report from Phase 1 of the CCFP is expected in 2029. Any changes that increase the likelihood of us receiving unfavorable scores could adversely affect our results of operations and profitability.

8

In 2020 the FMCSA announced that it would permanently implement the Crash Preventability Demonstration Program (“CPDP”), which does not count crashes when motor carriers are not at fault while calculating a carrier’s safety measurement profile. The CPDP expands the types of eligible crashes, modifies the SMS to exclude crashes with not preventable determinations from the prioritization algorithm, and notes the not preventable determinations in the Pre-Employment Screening Program. Under the program, carriers may submit a Request for Data Review with the required police accident report and other supporting documents, photos or videos through the FMCSA’s DataQs website. If the FMCSA determines the crash was not preventable, it will be listed on the SMS but not included when calculating a carrier’s BASICs measure for the crash indicator category in SMS.

There is a national clearinghouse for drug and alcohol testing results that requires motor carriers and medical review officers to provide records of violations by commercial drivers of FMCSA drug and alcohol testing requirements. Motor carriers are required to query the clearinghouse to ensure drivers and driver applicants do not have violations of federal drug and alcohol testing regulations that prohibit them from operating CMVs. Currently, the Company is required to (i) report drug and alcohol violations to the clearinghouse based upon DOT requirements; (ii) query the clearinghouse regarding drug and alcohol violations for current and prospective employees prior to permitting such employees to operate a CMV; and (iii) query the clearinghouse for each currently employed driver annually. In 2024, a new rule referred to by the FMCSA as “Clearinghouse II,” a program that relates to drivers with drug and alcohol violations, took effect. Under Clearinghouse II, a driver with a drug or alcohol violation resulting in a “Prohibited” status in the Clearinghouse may not operate a CMV and must complete the FMCSA’s return-to-duty education, treatment, and testing prior to regaining CMV driving privileges. With Clearinghouse II now in effect, states are required to query the Clearinghouse when issuing, renewing, transferring, or upgrading a commercial driver's license and must revoke a driver's commercial driving privileges if such driver is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle for one or more drug or alcohol violations. It is anticipated that the FMCSA will propose further changes regarding the Clearinghouse to increase the availability of driver violation information and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the Clearinghouse. It is expected that any additional changes to the rule may further impair the availability of an already weak driver pool.

In 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (“DHHS”) announced proposed mandatory guidelines to allow employers to drug test truck drivers and other federal workers for pre-employment and random testing using hair specimens. However, the proposal also requires a second sample using either urine or an oral fluid test if a hair test is positive or if a donor is unable to provide a sufficient amount of hair. The proposal specifically requires that the second test be done simultaneously at the collection event or when directed by the medical review officer after review and verification of laboratory-reported results for the hair specimen. DHHS indicated the two-test approach is intended to protect federal workers from issues that have been identified as limitations of hair testing, and related legal deficiencies identified in two prior court cases. In 2022, an industry group known as the Trucking Alliance sought an exemption from the FMCSA that would allow positive hair specimen tests to be uploaded to the Clearinghouse. This request was denied by the FMCSA, however, noting they cannot act until the DHHS finalizes these guidelines, which have suffered ongoing delays with the DHHS. Additionally, in 2022 the DOT issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would include oral fluid testing as an alternative to urine testing for purposes of the DOT’s drug testing program, with a goal of improving the integrity and effectiveness of the drug testing program, along with potential cost savings to regulated parties. In 2023, a final rule that amended DOT’s drug testing program to include oral fluid testing became effective; however, implementation cannot take effect until DHHS approves at least two laboratories to conduct oral fluid testing. Currently, DHHS has not approved any laboratories. Any changes to drug testing programs may reduce the number of available drivers. We currently perform urine testing and will continue to monitor any developments in this area to ensure compliance. Finally, federal drug regulators have announced a proposal to add fentanyl and norfentanyl to a drug testing panel that would detect the use of such drugs among safety-sensitive federal employees, which would include truck drivers if adopted by the DOT. Currently, fentanyl and norfentanyl testing are expected to be added to the urine panel at some point in the near future.

Other rules have been proposed or made final by the FMCSA, including a rule setting forth minimum driver training standards for new drivers applying for commercial driver’s licenses for the first time and to experienced drivers upgrading their licenses or seeking certain endorsements, including a hazardous materials endorsement, known as the Entry-Level Driver Training regulations. Training schools and other programs (including ours) are required to implement the prescribed curriculum and register with the FMCSA's Training Provider Registry to certify that their program meets the classroom and driving standards. We are also required to comply with this rule in the course of operating our driving schools. In December 2025, the FMCSA announced that it could revoke the accreditation of more than 7,000 training schools nationwide for violations regarding the (i) falsification or manipulation of training data, (ii) failure to meet required curriculum standards, facility conditions, or instructor qualifications, or (iii) failure to maintain accurate and complete documentation or refusal to provide records during federal audits or investigations. Additionally, in May 2025 the FMCSA announced it was strengthening enforcement of its longstanding English proficiency requirements for commercial drivers, which require drivers to be able to (i) read and speak English sufficiently to converse with the general public, (ii) understand highway signs and signals in English, (iii) respond to

9

official inquiries, and (iv) make entries on reports and records. Under the strengthened enforcement guidelines, FMCSA inspectors will now place drivers failing to meet the English proficiency requirements out-of-service instead of simply citing non-compliant drivers for violations. Further, the FMCSA issued an interim rule in September 2025 revising the requirements for the issuance or renewal of CDLs for non-domiciled persons and restricting the issuance or renewal of a CDL for non-domiciled persons without a lawful immigration status or legitimate employment-based reason to hold a CDL. While the interim rule has been challenged and enforcement has been temporarily stayed by a federal appeals court while it reviews the legality of the interim rule, it remains uncertain whether there will be further changes to the interim rule in response to such challenges or whether it will go into effect as originally issued. While we have not been notified by the FMCSA that our training schools are at the risk of losing accreditation, the effects of these rules could result in a decrease in driver availability, greater competition for drivers, and/or an increase in recruitment costs, training costs, and training school costs, any of which could adversely affect our business, operations or profitability.

In 2023, the FMCSA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking requesting additional information on automated driving systems (“ADS”) and seeking comment on regulatory approaches that would enable it to obtain relevant safety information and the current and anticipated size of the population of carriers operating ADS-equipped CMVs. In 2023, the FMCSA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ("NHTSA") issued a joint proposed rule that would require automated emergency braking on all new heavy-duty trucks. Additionally, in 2023, NHTSA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that would require side underride guards to be installed on all new trailers and semi-trailers. It remains to be seen what, if any, final rules will stem from such proposals.

Our industry has faced proposed rules aiming to mandate the use of speed-limiting devices in certain CMVs, including a rule proposed in 2023 that would have required certain commercial vehicles to be equipped with speed limiters; however, the proposal was ultimately withdrawn in 2025. A rule mandating speed-limiting devices could result in a decrease in driver availability or otherwise adversely affect our business, operations, or profitability.

In 2022, the FMCSA issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking that would require fleets and independent contractors to equip their trucks with unique electronic identification systems designed to streamline roadside inspections and provide transparency and accountability in day-to-day trucking operations. The petition was generally disfavored by transportation industry participants, citing, among other things, the petition’s failure to address privacy and data security risks. It remains to be seen what rules, if any, may stem from this notice. However, in 2023, the FMCSA announced a new operational test for monitoring and enforcing driver and motor carrier safety compliance standards. In 2024, the FMCSA began proof-of-concept testing to determine whether the technology required for electronic identification systems is sufficient and information and data being provided is secure, reliable, and useful for the FMCSA.

In 2022, Senate lawmakers introduced legislation that would set aside grant funds over four years to expand truck parking across the U.S. Such legislation would allow for the creation of new parking areas, the expansion of existing facilities, and the approval of commercial parking at existing weigh stations, rest areas, and park-and-ride facilities. It would also allow for truck parking expansion at commercial truck stops and travel plazas. Further, the DOT has provided funding to increase parking in certain heavily congested areas of Nevada, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Florida, while certain Congressional leaders have introduced legislation to allocate an additional $200 million for truck parking projects. Industry groups are generally in favor of additional funding to improve parking infrastructure, as a lack of available parking has negatively impacted the industry as a whole, including the Company and its subsidiaries.

In 2018, the FMCSA granted a petition filed by the American Trucking Associations and in doing so determined that federal law preempts California’s wage and hour laws, and interstate truck drivers are not subject to such laws. The FMCSA’s decision has been appealed by labor groups and multiple lawsuits have been filed in federal courts seeking to overturn the decision. In 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the FMCSA's determination that federal law preempts California's meal and rest break laws, as applied to drivers of property-carrying CMVs. Other current and future state and local laws, including laws related to employee meal breaks and rest periods, may also vary significantly from federal law. Further, driver piece rate compensation, which is an industry standard, has been attacked as non-compliant with state minimum wage laws and lawsuits have recently been filed and/or adjudicated against carriers demanding compensation for sleeper berth time, layovers, rest breaks and pre-trip and post-trip inspections, the outcome of which could have major implications for the treatment of time that drivers spend off-duty (whether in a truck’s sleeper berth or otherwise) under applicable wage laws. Both of these issues are adversely impacting the Company and the industry as a whole, with respect to the practical application of the laws, thereby resulting in additional cost. As a result, we, along with other companies in the industry, could become subject to an uneven patchwork of laws throughout the U.S. In the past, certain legislators have proposed federal legislation to preempt certain state and local laws; however, passage of such legislation is uncertain. In the absence of such federal legislation preempting state and local wage and hour laws, we will either need to comply with the most restrictive state and local laws across our entire network

10

or overhaul our management systems to comply with varying state and local laws. Either solution could result in increased compliance and labor costs, driver turnover, decreased efficiency, and amplified legal exposure.

In a 2023 case involving the Fair Labor Standards Act, the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a decision that would require additional payment to team drivers to be paid while in their sleeper berth. It is unclear if other jurisdictions will adopt this view, or if any legislation will result from this holding. If so, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In 2023, a bill was introduced to Congress that would eliminate an exclusion of truck drivers from receiving overtime pay. If enacted, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Environmental Regulations

We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations including those dealing with the hauling and handling of hazardous materials, fuel storage tanks, air emissions from our vehicles and facilities, engine idling, and discharge and retention of storm water. Our truck terminals often are located in industrial areas where groundwater or other forms of environmental contamination could occur. Our operations involve the risks of fuel spillage or seepage, environmental damage, and hazardous waste disposal, among others. Certain facilities have waste oil, new oil, diesel exhaust fluid ("DEF"), or fuel storage tanks and fueling islands. We do not know of any environmental regulations that would have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Additionally, efforts to control emissions of greenhouse gases may have an adverse effect on us. We aim to maintain a young fleet age of tractors to ensure we are utilizing technological advancements deployed by manufacturers to reduce emissions. Although we have instituted programs to monitor and control environmental risks and promote compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, if we are involved in a spill or other accident involving hazardous substances, if there are releases of hazardous substances we transport, if soil or groundwater contamination is found at our facilities or results from our operations, or if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations, we could be subject to cleanup costs and liabilities, including substantial fines or penalties or civil and criminal liability, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

The NHTSA and the EPA currently have fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for medium-and heavy-duty vehicles, including the tractors we use. In 2016, the NHTSA and the EPA published the final rule mandating that fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards apply to trailers beginning with model year 2018 and tractors beginning with model year 2021; however, in 2021, a panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of an association challenging the standards and vacated all portions of the standards that applied to trailers. Consequently, the standards require 25 percent reductions in emissions and fuel consumption for tractors. The Company’s (or its subsidiaries', as applicable) new tractor purchases in 2025 complied with the emission and fuel consumption reductions required by the standards. Even though the trailer provisions of the current standards have been removed, we will still need to ensure the majority of our fleet is compliant with the California standards (described in further detail below).

In 2022, the EPA adopted a final rule regarding emissions standards of nitrogen oxides for heavy-duty motor vehicles beginning with model year 2027 being more than 80% stronger than current emission standards, with the intent to reduce heavy duty emissions by almost 50% from 2022 levels by 2045 (the “2022 NOx Rule”). The EPA had indicated that the 2022 NOx Rule is the first part of a three-part plan focusing on greenhouse gas emissions, which is commonly referred to as the “Cleaner Trucks Initiative,” or the “Clean Trucks Plan.” In 2023, the EPA released the second and third parts to the Clean Trucks Plan, including a proposed rule relating to GHG standards for heavy-duty vehicles known as “Phase 3” to the EPA’s GHG program. A final rule with respect to these regulations was issued in 2024 and established new GHG emission standards for heavy-duty motor vehicles which are phased-in starting with model year 2027 and increasing in stringency annually through model year 2032 (the “Phase 3 Rule”). However, in February 2026, the EPA rescinded the 2009 Endangerment Finding (which determined that GHG emissions from motor vehicles threatens public health and welfare under Clean Air Act Section 202(a)) and concurrently repealed all subsequent federal GHG emission standards for light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines from model years 2012 onward. The 2022 NOx Rule is expected to remain in effect to the extent based on separate criteria pollutant authority. The rescission removes federal GHG emission requirements previously applicable to heavy-duty vehicles, including the Phase 3 Rule. This development may reduce capital expenditures for fleet replacement or upgrades that would have been necessary to meet prior GHG-related standards. The absence of uniform GHG regulations potentially creates a patchwork of regulations, which when combined with the uncertainty as to the operating results that will be produced if manufacturers are required to re-design diesel engines or make other changes affecting the residual values of vehicles, may increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. Additionally, the EPA's action may be subject to legal challenges from states, environmental groups, or other stakeholders, which could lead to judicial stays, partial reinstatements, or modifications of the rescission, creating further uncertainty regarding the long-term regulatory landscape. This uncertainty may affect vehicle manufacturer production timelines, the availability and pricing of compliant equipment,

11

expectations for fuel efficiency improvements and equipment productivity, compliance costs, operating expenses, and residual values of vehicles which may increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations.

The California Air Resources Board ("CARB") also adopted emission control regulations that is applicable to all heavy-duty tractors that pull 53-foot or longer box-type trailers within the State of California. The tractors and trailers subject to these CARB regulations must be either EPA SmartWay certified or equipped with low-rolling, resistance tires and retrofitted with SmartWay-approved aerodynamic technologies. While the greenhouse gas standards affecting trailers were removed from the federal regulations, we must still ensure the majority of our fleet is compliant with the California standards, which may adversely affect our operating results and profitability. CARB has also announced its intentions to adopt regulations ensuring that 100% of tractors operating in California are operating with battery or fuel cell-electric engines in the future. Whether these regulations will ultimately be adopted remains unclear. Federal and state lawmakers also have proposed a variety of other regulatory limits on carbon emissions and fuel consumption. Compliance with such regulations could increase the cost of new tractors and trailers, impair equipment productivity, and increase operating expenses. These effects, combined with the uncertainty as to the operating results that will be produced by the newly designed diesel engines and the residual values of these vehicles, could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. In 2020 CARB passed the Advanced Clean Trucks (“ACT”) regulation, which became effective in 2021 and generally requires original equipment manufacturers to begin shifting towards greater production and sales of zero-emission heavy duty tractors starting with model year 2024. Under ACT, by 2045, every new tractor sold in California will need to be zero-emission. The most aggressive ACT standards apply to Class 4-8 trucks, which range from 14,000-33,000 pounds, by requiring that 9% of such trucks be zero emission beginning in 2024 and increasing to 75% by 2035. Similar (albeit lower) increasing zero emission requirements apply to Class 2b-3 trucks, and Class 7-8 trucks between 2024 and 2035. Among other impacts, ACT could affect the cost and/or supply of traditional diesel tractors. It has also led to similar legislation in several states and a number of other states either considering adoption of ACT or affirmatively conducting a preliminary rulemaking process to that effect. In 2023, CARB finalized what is known as the Advanced Clean Fleets (“ACF”) regulation, also aimed at transitioning to zero emission vehicles, which became effective in January 2024. ACF is a purchase requirement for medium and heavy-duty fleets to adopt an increasing percentage of zero emission trucks, designed to complement the sell-side obligations of ACT. However, in January 2025, given legal challenges to the ACF and a lack of public support for environmental regulation, CARB withdrew its request for the EPA to provide a waiver of certain federal regulations necessary for CARB to impose the environmental restrictions and mandates in the ACF that are more stringent than federal law, which effectively tabled the ACF. Further, CARB has proposed amendments to repeal portions of the ACF to exempt certain industries previously impacted in addition to pushing back some target dates. If CARB seeks to adopt and implement the ACF in the future, it could materially and negatively impact our business by increasing our compliance obligations, operating costs, and related expenses.

The periodic testing portion of California’s Clean Truck Check (as a part of CARB’s Clean Truck program), known as Phase 3 of the Clean Truck Check, began in 2024. Under Phase 3, heavy duty vehicles are subject to periodic emissions testing and annual compliance fees, which, if applicable, could increase our operating costs and related expenses. In August 2025, the EPA proposed a rule that would partially approve California’s Clean Truck Check, allowing California to require periodic emissions testing for heavy duty vehicles registered in California, but prohibit California from testing heavy duty vehicles that are registered outside of the state. Currently, we and our subsidiaries have no equipment that is registered with the State of California, meaning we would be exempt from the Clean Truck Check testing requirements if the rule currently proposed by the EPA were finalized.

Additionally, in October 2023, California enacted two bills into law, Senate Bill 253 (“SB 253”) and Senate Bill 261 (“SB 261”), which require certain companies doing business in California to disclose greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related financial risks. SB 253 requires companies that exceed $1 billion in annual revenue and that do business in California to publicly disclose their GHG emissions with initial reporting due on or before August 10, 2026, while SB 261 requires companies doing business in California and earning annual revenue exceeding $500 million to report on their climate-related financial risks and measures taken to mitigate such risks. The reporting deadline under SB 261 was originally targeted for January 2026, but legal challenges and ongoing court proceedings have prevented California from enforcing SB 261 as originally intended, and it remains unclear whether SB 261 will ultimately go into effect, and if so, when reporting will commence. Implementation of SB 253 and SB 261 or additional reporting requirements would result in increased compliance costs and resource utilization.

In order to reduce exhaust emissions, lawmakers, including federal and some states and municipalities continue to restrict the locations and amount of time where diesel-powered tractors may idle. These restrictions could force us to purchase on-board power units that do not require the engine to idle or to alter our drivers' behavior, which could result in a decrease in productivity or increase in driver turnover.

12

These effects, combined with the uncertainty of any future GHG regulations enacted by CARB, the EPA, the NHTSA and/or any other state or federal governing body has increased and will likely continue to increase the cost of our new tractors, may increase the cost of new trailers, may require us to retrofit certain of our trailers, may increase our maintenance costs, and could impair equipment productivity and increase our operating costs, particularly if such costs are not offset by potential fuel savings. These adverse effects, combined with the uncertainty as to whether manufacturers will be required to re-design diesel engines or make other changes affecting the residual values of our equipment, could materially increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. We cannot predict, however, the extent to which our operations and productivity will be impacted. We will continue monitoring our compliance with federal and state GHG and other material environmental regulations.

The Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (the "FSMA") requires us to use sanitary transportation practices to ensure the safety of the food we transport. This rule sets forth requirements related to (i) the design and maintenance of equipment used to transport food, (ii) the measures taken during food transportation to ensure food safety, (iii) the training of carrier personnel in sanitary food transportation practices, and (iv) maintenance and retention of records of written procedures, agreements, and training related to the foregoing items. We believe we are in compliance with these requirements. However, if we are found to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations related to the FSMA or if we transport food or goods that are contaminated or are found to cause illness and/or death, we could be subject to substantial fines, lawsuits, penalties and/or criminal and civil liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As the FDA continues its efforts to modernize food safety, it is likely additional food safety regulations will take effect in the future. In 2020, the FDA released its “New Era of Smarter Food Safety” blueprint, which creates a ten year roadmap to create a more digital, traceable and safer food system. The Food Traceability Rule is one aspect of the blueprint and, for all parties subject to its recordkeeping requirements, had an original compliance date of January 20, 2026 that has since been extended to July 20, 2028. In the event the Company becomes subject to any such recordkeeping requirements, compliance costs may increase. This blueprint builds on the work done under the FSMA, generally requiring persons who manufacture, process, pack, or hold foods on the FDA’s “Food Traceability List” to maintain detailed records of key data elements for critical tracking events in a manner that can be provided to the FDA within 24 hours of request. It is still unclear what impact of the Food Traceability Rule will have on the Company and others in the industry, but further regulation in this area could negatively affect our business by increasing our compliance obligations and related expenses going forward.

Executive and Legislative Climate

In July 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was signed into law. The OBBBA makes permanent key elements of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including 100% bonus depreciation for certain property and the business interest expense limitation. Although we do not expect the OBBBA to have a negative effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows, until certain regulations are promulgated, we may not know the full extent of the OBBBA’s effects on our financial results and financial position. It is unclear what other legislative initiatives will be signed into law and what changes they may undergo. However, adoption and implementation could negatively impact our business by increasing our compliance obligations and related expenses.

In 2023, the Safer Highways and Increased Performance for Interstate Trucking Act (the “SHIP IT Act”) was introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives. As proposed, the SHIP IT Act would allow states to issue special permits for overweight vehicles and loads during emergencies, allow drivers to apply for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act grants, attempt to recruit truck drivers to the industry through targeted and temporary tax credits, streamline the CDL process in certain respects, and expand access to truck parking and rest areas for commercial drivers. A similar bill, the Truck Parking Safety Improvement Act, was introduced into the Senate in 2023 and reintroduced in February 2025. If enacted, the bill would dedicate $755 million in funding over the following three years to expand access to truck parking and rest areas for commercial drivers. It remains unclear whether such acts will ultimately become law, however, and what changes they may undergo prior to finalization.

For further discussion regarding laws and regulations, refer to the "Risk Factors" section under Item 1A of Part I of this Annual Report.

Available Information

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available to the public, free of charge, through our Internet website, at http://www.heartlandexpress.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Information on our

13

website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. You may also access and read our filings with the SEC without charge through the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.