California BanCorp \ CA (BCAL) Risk Factors

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors which we have identified as being material to us, in addition to the other information contained in this annual report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes, before deciding to invest in our common stock. Any of the following risks, as well as risks that we do not know or that we currently deem immaterial, could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations and future prospects. As a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risk Factors Summary

This section summarizes some of the risks potentially affecting our business, consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operations and future prospects. These risks and others are discussed in more detail further below in this section. You should consider this summary together with the more detailed information provided below.

23

Table of Contents

Economic, Market and Investment Risks

•We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutions.

•We face risks related to severe weather, natural disasters, acts of terrorism and global conflicts.

•We are particularly vulnerable to an economic downturn in California.

•We have a significant number of loans secured by real estate, and a downturn in the local real estate market could negatively impact our profitability.

•Changes in interest rates may affect net interest income and otherwise negatively impact our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Risks Related to Lending and Credit

•We may not be able to measure and limit our credit risk adequately, which could lead to unexpected losses. Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

•Regulatory policies regarding commercial real estate loans could limit our ability to leverage our capital and limit our growth.

•The appraisals value of the real estate that secures a significant portion of our loan portfolio may not be realizable if we foreclose on such loans.

•The small- to medium-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business developments, which may impair our borrowers’ ability to repay loans.

•Our loan portfolio may be subject to increased concentration and volatility risks due to variability, driven by large relationship-based lending commitments.

•Our construction and land development loans involve additional risks that could results in higher losses.

Liquidity and Capital Risks

•A lack of liquidity, or an increase in the cost of liquidity could materially impair our ability to fund our operations and jeopardize our consolidated financial condition.

•We may need to raise additional capital, but additional capital may not be available.

•We rely on the dividends and return of capital from our Bank subsidiary.

Strategic and Competitive Risks

•We face risks related to our growth, expansion and any acquisitions we may pursue.

•We may experience goodwill impairment.

•Our reputation is critical to the success of our business and our failure to maintain our reputation may materially adversely affect our performance.

•New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject us to additional risk.

•Competition may limit our growth and profitability.

•We rely heavily on our executive management team and other key personnel.

Regulatory and Compliance Risks

•We operate in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations regarding capital requirements, anti-money laundering, information security and many other aspects of our business. Our failure to comply could adversely affect us and our future growth.

24

Table of Contents

•We are subject to laws regarding the privacy, information security and protection of personal information and any violation of these laws could damage our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.

•Our failure to comply with stringent capital requirements could result in regulatory criticism, requirements and restrictions.

•We face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.

Technology Risks

•Our failure to keep up with the rapid technological changes in the financial services industry could have an adverse effect on our competitive position and profitability.

•We face risks related to network failures, cyberattacks and data security breaches, which could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

•The development and use of artificial intelligence may result in reputational harm or liability, or could adversely affect our business.

Operational Risks

•Our enterprise risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk, including those related to fraud or data processing errors.

•We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, internal or external fraud and data processing system failures and errors.

•We depend on the use of data, modeling and estimates, yet the data, models and estimates we use may be inaccurate or incorrect.

•We may be subject to environmental liabilities in connection with the real properties we own and the foreclosure on real estate assets securing our loan portfolio.

•We may fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting.

•We rely on third-party service providers for key aspects of our operations.

•Climate change could have a material negative impact on us and our clients.

•Our consolidated financial statements are based in part on assumptions and estimates which, if incorrect, could cause unexpected losses in the future.

Risks Related to an Investment in our Common Stock

•We may reduce or discontinue the payment of dividends on our common stock.

•As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of reduced regulatory and reporting requirements under the federal securities laws, which may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

•We may issue additional equity securities which may adversely affect existing holders of our common stock.

•Our common stock is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC.

25

Table of Contents

Risk Factors

ECONOMIC, MARKET AND INVESTMENT RISKS

We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutions

The failures of some depository institutions have raised concerns among depositors that their deposits may be at risk. While we believe the Bank is operated in a safe and sound manner, a market-wide loss of depositor confidence caused by the failures or the perceived unsoundness of other depository institutions could lead to deposit outflows at the Bank, potentially at levels that could require that we borrow funds or sell securities or other assets to address liquidity concerns, any of which could adversely affect our consolidated operating results, business prospects and capital.

Our ability to engage in routine funding transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services companies may be interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, and other relationships. We have exposure to different industries and counterparties, and through transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including broker-dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, and other financial intermediaries. As a result, defaults by, declines in the financial condition of, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial services companies, or the financial services industry generally, could lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses or defaults by us or other institutions. These losses could have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We face risks related to severe weather, natural disasters, acts of terrorism and global conflicts.

Severe weather, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, global conflicts, or other similar events have in the past, and may in the future have, a negative impact on our business and operations. Our business and most of the collateral securing our loans are concentrated in California, which is prone to earthquakes, fires, mudslides, drought, flooding and other natural disasters, including the January 2025 Los Angeles county wildfires. These events impact us negatively to the extent that they result in reduced capital markets activity, lower asset price levels, destruction of residential and commercial properties, or disruptions in general economic activity in the United States or abroad, or in financial market settlement functions. Disruptions to our clients could result in increased risk of delinquencies, defaults, foreclosures and losses on our loans.

Our business is concentrated in California and we are particularly vulnerable to an economic downturn in our primary market area.

We primarily serve businesses, organizations and individuals located in California. As a result, we are exposed to risks associated with lack of geographic diversification. An economic downturn or decrease in property values in California, adverse changes in laws or regulations in California could impact the credit quality of our assets, the businesses of our customers and the ability to expand our business. Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, commerce, deposits and housing in our market area. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally are unfavorable, our business may be negatively affected.

Additionally, our business and our customers may be affected by shifts in federal trade policy and judicial interpretations of trade authorities. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the President does not have authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose broad tariffs without explicit congressional authorization, striking down major tariffs previously in place. This decision may reduce certain costs for import-dependent businesses and ease inflationary pressures in

26

Table of Contents

affected sectors, but it also introduces uncertainty regarding future trade policy, potential tariff refund claims and shifting trade relationships. The ruling, and any subsequent legislative or executive actions in response, could influence costs for manufacturers and resellers, alter demand for U.S. exports, and affect broader economic conditions. Prolonged uncertainty or volatility in trade policy and economic conditions - whether arising from the Supreme Court’s decision, legislative responses, or other shifts in federal trade authority - could negatively affect consumer spending, business investment and economic growth, which in turn could adversely impact credit quality, loan growth, and demand for banking products and services. Any such effects could materially and adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We have a significant number of loans secured by real estate, and a downturn in the local real estate market could negatively impact our profitability.

The market value of the real estate securing loans as collateral could be adversely affected by unfavorable changes in market and economic conditions. Adverse developments affecting commerce or real estate values in the local economies in our primary market areas could increase the credit risk associated with our loan portfolio and have an adverse impact on our revenues and consolidated financial condition. Declines in the real estate market could hurt our business because if real estate values were to decline, the collateral for our loans would provide less security. As a result, our ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate would be diminished, and we would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans.

Interest rate shifts may affect net interest income and otherwise negatively impact our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

The majority of our banking assets are monetary in nature and subject to risk from changes in interest rates. Like most banks, our earnings and cash flows depend to a great extent upon the level of our net interest income, or the difference between the interest income we earn on loans, investments and other interest-earning assets, and the interest we pay on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Changes in interest rates can increase or decrease our net interest income, because different types of assets and liabilities may react differently, and at different times, to market interest rate changes.

When interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater degree than interest-earning assets in a period, an increase in interest rates could reduce net interest income. Similarly, when interest-earning assets mature or reprice more quickly, or to a greater degree than interest-bearing liabilities, falling interest rates could reduce net interest income. An increase in interest rates may, among other things, reduce the demand for loans and our ability to originate loans and decrease loan repayment rates. Conversely, a decrease in the general level of interest rates may affect us through, among other things, increased prepayments on our loan portfolio and increased competition for deposits. Accordingly, changes in the level of market interest rates affect our net yield on interest-earning assets, loan origination volume and our overall results of operations. Although our asset-liability management strategy is designed to control and mitigate exposure to the risks related to changes in market interest rates, those rates are affected by many factors outside of our control, including governmental monetary policies, inflation, deflation, recession, changes in unemployment, the money supply, international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets.

We expect that we will periodically experience “gaps” in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities, meaning that either our interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest earning assets, or vice versa. In either case, if market interest

rates should move contrary to our position, this gap will negatively impact our earnings. The impact on earnings is more adverse when the slope of the yield curve flattens; that is, when short-term interest rates

27

Table of Contents

increase more than long-term interest rates or when long-term interest rates decrease more than short-term interest rates.

Changes to prevailing interest rates could, among other things, (1) affect our ability to originate loans at competitive rates or reduce the demand for loans, which could limit our loan growth, (2) increase loans costs for existing borrowers with variable rate loans, potentially impacting credit quality, (3) make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain and retain deposits, which could reduce our net interest margin or our liquidity, (4) reduce the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities, which could result in losses or (5) change the average duration of our loan portfolios and other interest-earning assets. A prolonged period of extremely volatile and unstable market conditions could increase our funding costs and negatively affect market risk mitigation strategies. Any steps we may take to mitigate these risks could impact our growth, credit quality and overall profitability.

RISKS RELATED TO LENDING AND CREDIT

Our loan portfolio exposes us to credit risk, but we may not be able to measure and limit our credit risk adequately, which could lead to unexpected losses.

The business of lending is inherently risky, including risks that the principal or interest on any loan will not be repaid in a timely manner or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting the loan will be insufficient to cover losses in the event of a default. Our risk management practices, such as managing the concentration of our loans within specific industries, loan types and geographic areas, and our credit approval practices may not adequately reduce credit risk. Further, our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting clients and the quality of the loan portfolio. A failure to effectively measure and manage the credit risk, including non-performing assets, associated with our loan portfolio could lead to unexpected losses and have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Our allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”), which is established to absorb future expected credit losses. We have a proactive program to monitor credit quality and to identify loans that may become non-performing; however, at any time there could be loans in the portfolio that may result in losses, but that have not been identified as non-performing or potential problem credits. We may be unable to identify all deteriorating credits prior to them becoming non-performing assets, or to limit losses on those loans that are identified. With respect to real estate loans and property taken in satisfaction of such loans (“other real estate owned” or “OREO”), we can be required to recognize significant declines in the value of the underlying real estate collateral quite suddenly as values are updated through appraisals and evaluations (new or updated) performed in the normal course of monitoring the credit quality of the loans. We monitor the adequacy of our ACL and may need to increase it if, for example, economic conditions deteriorate, property values decrease or expected credit losses otherwise increase. The OCC reviews our ACL as an integral part of its examination process and may require that we increase it based on their judgment, which may be different than ours. Additional provision to increase the ACL, should they become necessary, would decrease our net income and reduce our capital.

Regulatory policies regarding loans secured by commercial real estate could limit our ability to leverage our capital and adversely affect our growth and profitability.

The federal banking agencies have issued guidance regarding concentrations in CRE lending for institutions that are deemed to have particularly high concentrations of CRE loans within their lending portfolios. Under this guidance, an institution that has (i) total reported loans for construction, land

28

Table of Contents

development, and other land which represent 100% or more of the institution’s total risk-based capital; or (ii) total CRE representing 300% or more of the institution’s total risk-based capital, where the outstanding balance of the institution’s CRE loan portfolio has increased 50% or more during the prior 36 months, is identified as having potential CRE concentration risk. An institution that is deemed to have concentrations in CRE lending is expected to employ heightened levels of risk management with respect to its CRE portfolios, and may be required to maintain higher levels of capital.

As of December 31, 2025, our CRE loans for purposes of this guidance represented 469.3% of our total risk-based capital. As of December 31, 2025, total loans secured by CRE under construction and land development represented 28.0% of our total risk-based capital. As a result, the OCC could view the Bank as having a high concentration of CRE loans under this guidance.

Although we actively work to manage our CRE concentration and believe that our underwriting policies, management information systems, independent credit administration process, and monitoring of real estate loan concentrations are appropriate to address our CRE concentration, we face heightened regulatory scrutiny as a result of our CRE loan concentrations. The OCC or other federal regulators could become concerned about our CRE loan concentrations and we cannot guarantee that any risk management practices we implement will be effective to prevent losses relating to our CRE portfolio. Further, we could be required to maintain higher levels of capital as a result of our CRE concentration, which could limit our growth, require us to obtain additional capital, and have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We rely upon independent appraisals to determine the value of the real estate that secures a significant portion of our loans, and the values indicated by such appraisals may not be realizable if we are forced to foreclose upon such loans.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate. We rely upon independent appraisers at the time of origination to estimate the value of such real estate. Appraisals are only estimates of value, and the soundness of those estimates may be affected by volatility in the real estate market or other changes in market conditions. In addition, the independent appraisers may make mistakes of fact or judgment, which adversely affect the reliability of their appraisals. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to increase or decrease. For example, since 2020 and in light of the prevalence of hybrid work arrangements and associated lower occupancy rates, the value of commercial real estate secured by office properties has generally declined. As a result of these factors, the real estate securing some of our loans is less valuable than anticipated at the time the loans were made. If a default occurs on a loan secured by real estate that is less valuable than originally estimated, we may not be able to recover the outstanding balance of the loan and will suffer a loss.

The small- to medium-sized businesses that we lend to may have fewer resources to weather adverse business developments, which may impair our borrowers’ ability to repay loans.

We target our business development and marketing strategy to serve the banking and financial services needs of our community, including small- to medium-sized businesses and real estate owners. These small- to medium-sized businesses frequently have smaller market share than their competition, may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, often need substantial additional capital to expand or compete and may experience significant volatility in operating results. Any one or more of these factors may impair the borrower’s ability to repay a loan. In addition, the success of a small- to medium-sized business often depends on the management talents and efforts of one or two persons or a small group of persons, and the death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on the business and its ability to repay a loan. Economic downturns and other events that

29

Table of Contents

negatively impact our market areas could cause us to incur substantial credit losses that could negatively affect our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Our loan portfolio may be subject to increased concentration and volatility risks due to variability, driven by large relationship-based lending commitments.

Our loan portfolio includes a limited number of large, real estate secured relationships and lending commitments that are significant in relation to our overall balance sheet. These large, well secured relationships may cause the loan portfolio to experience limited period‑to‑period variability, as the origination, repayment capacity, or modification of such loans may result in meaningful fluctuations in loan balances, asset quality metrics, earnings, and capital ratios. Due to our portfolio characteristics compared to other larger institutions, adverse developments affecting a single large relationship, such as changes in cash flows, liquidity, collateral values, or local economic condition - could have a disproportionate impact on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, repayments or paydowns of large commercial lending commitments may result in limited opportunities in redeploying capital efficiently, which could constrain growth and negatively affect profitability if suitable lending opportunities are not available on comparable terms.

Our construction and land development loans involve additional risks that could result in higher losses.

At December 31, 2025, our construction and land development loans totaled $134.3 million, or 4.4% of our loans held for investment portfolio, excluding SBA loans. Typical for the construction loan segment, these loans involve additional risks because funds are advanced upon the progress of the project, which often exhibits volatile completion value, as among other things, costs may exceed realizable values in declining real estate markets. A downturn in the commercial real estate market could increase delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, and significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. During the term of construction loans, often no payment from the borrower is required since the accumulated interest is included in the loan commitment through an interest reserve. As a result, construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell, operate, or lease the property, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest.

Properties under construction are often difficult to sell, either by the borrower of the bank upon foreclosure, and typically must be completed in order to be successfully sold, which may increase our loss exposure. Further, in the case of speculative construction loans, there is the added risk associated with the borrower obtaining a take-out commitment for a permanent loan. Loans on secured by land under development or held for future construction also pose additional risk because of the lack of income production by the property, the volatility of the future value, and the potential illiquid nature of the collateral. For these reasons and uncertainties, and typical for this product type, construction and land development loans may represent greater risks than other types of loans.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RISKS

Liquidity, primarily through deposits, is essential to our business. A lack of liquidity, or an increase in the cost of liquidity could materially impair our ability to fund our operations and jeopardize our consolidated financial condition, consolidated results of operation and cash flows.

Liquidity represents an institution’s ability to provide funds to satisfy demands from depositors, borrowers and other creditors by either converting assets into cash or accessing new or existing sources of

30

Table of Contents

incremental funds. Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that we may be unable to satisfy current or future funding requirements and needs.

Liquidity is essential for the operation of our business. Market conditions, unforeseen outflows of funds or other events could have a negative effect on our level or cost of funding, affecting our ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals, meet contractual obligations, and fund new business transactions at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner. If our access to stable and low-cost sources of funding, such as client deposits, is reduced, we may need to use alternative funding, which could be more expensive or of limited availability. Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged changes in the level or cost of liquidity could affect our business adversely.

Deposit levels may be affected by several factors, including rates paid by competitors, general interest rate levels, returns available to customers on alternative investments, customers seeking to maximize deposit insurance by limiting their deposits at a single financial institution to $250,000, general economic and market conditions and other factors. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds but are subject to the borrowers’ ability to repay loans, which can be adversely affected by a number of factors including changes in general economic conditions, adverse trends or events affecting business industry groups or specific businesses, declines in real estate values or markets, business closings or lay-offs, inclement weather, natural disasters and other factors.

Furthermore, loans generally are not readily convertible to cash. From time to time, if our ability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of investment securities and other sources are not sufficient to meet our liquidity needs, we may be required to rely on alternative funding sources of liquidity to meet growth in loans, deposit withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations. Such alternative funding sources include FHLB advances, Federal Reserve borrowings, brokered deposits, unsecured federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks and/or accessing the equity or debt capital markets. The availability of these alternative funding sources is subject to broad economic conditions, to regulation and to investor assessment of our financial strength and, as such, the cost of funds may fluctuate significantly and/or the availability of such funds may be restricted, thus impacting our net interest income, our immediate liquidity and/or our access to additional liquidity. Additionally, if we fail to remain “ well-capitalized” our ability to utilize brokered deposits may be restricted. We have somewhat similar risks to the extent high balance core deposits (defined as noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing NOW, money market and savings account customer relationships, excluding brokered deposits) exceed the amount of deposit insurance coverage available.

We anticipate we will continue to rely primarily on deposits, loan repayments, and cash flows from our investment securities to provide liquidity. Additionally, when necessary, the alternative funding sources of borrowed funds described above will be used to augment our primary funding sources. An inability to maintain or raise funds (including the inability to access alternative funding sources) in amounts necessary to meet our liquidity needs would have a substantial negative effect, individually or collectively, on our liquidity. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities, or on terms attractive to us, could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. For example, factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include our consolidated financial results, a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a market downturn or adverse regulatory action against us, a reduction in our credit rating, any damage to our reputation, counterparty availability, changes in the activities of our business partners, changes affecting our loan portfolio or other assets, or any other event that could cause a decrease in depositor or investor confidence in our creditworthiness and business. Those factors may lead to depositors withdrawing their deposits or creditors limiting our borrowings. A portion of our deposits may exceed FDIC insurance limits, and uninsured depositors may be more likely to withdraw their funds during periods of actual or perceived financial stress affecting us or the banking industry generally. Rapid and unexpected deposit outflows, including those driven by negative publicity, social media, or a loss of

31

Table of Contents

depositor confidence, could require us to seek more expensive or less readily available alternative funding sources, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, net interest margin, and overall financial condition.

Our access to liquidity could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as general business conditions, interest rate fluctuations, severe volatility or disruption of the financial markets, bank closures or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole, or legal, regulatory, accounting, and tax environments governing our funding transactions. In addition, our ability to raise funds is strongly affected by the general state of the U.S. and world economies and financial markets as well as the policies and capabilities of the U.S. government and its agencies, and may remain or become increasingly difficult due to economic and other factors beyond our control. Any such event or failure to manage our liquidity effectively could affect our competitive position, increase our borrowing costs and the interest rates we pay on deposits, limit our access to the capital markets and have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We may need to raise additional capital, but additional capital may not be available.

We may need to raise additional capital, in the future, to support our growth, strategic objectives or to meet regulatory or other internal requirements. Our ability to access the capital markets, if needed, will depend on a number of factors, including our consolidated financial condition, our business prospectus and the state of the financial markets. If capital is not available on favorable terms when we need it, we may have to either issue common stock or other securities on less than desirable terms or curtail our growth until market conditions become more favorable. Any diminished ability to raise additional capital, if needed, could restrict our ability to grow, require us to take actions that would affect our earnings negatively or otherwise affect our business and our ability to implement our business plan, capital plan and strategic goals adversely. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We rely on the dividends and return of capital we receive from our bank subsidiary.

The Company is a separate and distinct legal entity from the Bank. As a holding company with no significant assets other than the Bank, the Company depends on dividends from the Bank to fund operating expenses, service debt, pay dividends, repurchase shares, and pay taxes. The Bank paid $60.0 million in dividends to the Company during 2025. The ability of the Bank to pay dividends or make other capital distributions is subject to the restrictions of the National Bank Act and the requirement that the Bank maintains a certain minimum amount of capital to be considered a “well capitalized” institution as well as a separate capital conservation buffer. See “Supervision and Regulation - Capital Adequacy.” Details regarding the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and the amount of required capital are included in Note 17 — Regulatory Matters of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this annual report. In addition, it is possible, depending upon the financial condition of the Bank and other factors, that the OCC could assert that payment of dividends or other payments is an unsafe or unsound practice.

In the event the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company could have difficulty meeting its other financial obligations and may need to seek other forms of liquidity, such as the sale of stock or indebtedness. The inability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company could have a material adverse effect on our business, including the market price of our common stock.

32

Table of Contents

STRATEGIC AND COMPETITIVE RISKS

Our growth, expansion and any acquisitions we may pursue may strain our ability to manage our operations and financial resources.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue prudent and commercially attractive acquisitions that will position us to capitalize on market opportunities.

Acquiring other banks or branches involves risks commonly associated with acquisitions including, among other things, the risk of incurring substantial expenses in pursuing potential acquisitions without completing such acquisitions, the risk that acquisition activity may divert our management’s attention from other aspects of our business, the difficulty in estimating the value of a target company, and the risk that an acquired business may not perform in accordance with our expectations. Our failure to manage acquisitions and other significant transactions successfully may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations, and cash flows.

We may experience goodwill impairment.

Goodwill is initially recorded at fair value and is not amortized but is reviewed at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. If our estimates of goodwill fair value change, we may determine that impairment charges are necessary. The determination of whether impairment has occurred, takes into consideration a number of factors including, but not limited to, operating results, business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows, and current market data. Our goodwill was not considered impaired as of December 31, 2025 and 2024; however, no assurance can be given that we will not record an impairment loss on goodwill in the future and any such impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, and our consolidated results of operations. Furthermore, even though goodwill is a non-cash item, significant impairment of goodwill could subject us to regulatory limitations, including the ability to pay dividends on our common stock.

Our reputation is critical to the success of our business and our failure to maintain our reputation may materially adversely affect our performance.

Our reputation is one of the most valuable assets of our business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market area and contiguous areas. As such, if our reputation is negatively affected, by the actions of our employees or otherwise, our business and, therefore, our consolidated results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

New lines of business, products, product enhancements or services may subject us to additional risk.

From time to time, we may implement new lines of business, or offer new products and product enhancements as well as new services within our existing lines of business. In developing, implementing or marketing new lines of business, products, product enhancements or services, we may invest significant time and resources, yet our new products or product enhancements may not be successful or may require more resources or expertise than we anticipated. We may also face factors, such as regulatory compliance, competitive alternatives and shifting market preferences, any of which may impact the success of a new line of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or offerings of new products, product enhancements or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

33

Table of Contents

Competition may limit our growth and profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, finance companies, non-bank lenders including “fintech” lending and payment companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other mutual funds, as well as regional and national financial institutions that operate offices in our market areas and elsewhere. Many of these competitors have substantially greater name recognition, resources and lending limits than we do and may offer certain services or prices for services that we do not or cannot provide. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our markets.

We rely heavily on our executive management team and other key personnel for our successful operation, and we could be adversely affected by the unexpected loss of their services.

Our success depends in large part on the performance of our key personnel that have substantial experience and tenure with us and in the markets that we serve. Our continued success and growth depend in large part on the efforts of these key personnel and ability to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified senior and middle management and other skilled employees to complement and succeed to our core senior management team.

REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE RISKS

We operate in a highly regulated environment and the laws and regulations that govern our operations, corporate governance, executive compensation and accounting principles, or changes in them, or our failure to comply with them, could adversely affect us and our future growth.

Bank holding companies and banks are highly regulated under federal and state law. As such, we are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and legal requirements from government agencies such as the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC, which govern almost all aspects of our operations. Compliance with laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations often impose additional operating costs. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations, could subject us to restrictions on our business activities, enforcement actions and fines and other penalties, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations, regulatory capital levels and the price of our common stock.

As part of the bank regulatory process, the OCC and the Federal Reserve periodically conduct examinations of our businesses, including compliance with laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, either of these banking agencies were to determine that our financial condition, capital adequacy, asset quality, earnings prospects, management capability, liquidity, asset sensitivity to market risks, asset management, risk management or other aspects of any of our operations have become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management were in violation of any law or regulation, our regulators may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital levels, to pay additional deposit insurance premiums, to restrict our growth, to assess civil monetary penalties against us, our officers or directors, to remove our officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, terminate our deposit insurance and our charter to operate. If we become subject to such regulatory actions, our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations, and reputation could be adversely affected.

34

Table of Contents

We are subject to laws regarding the privacy, information security and protection of personal information and any violation of these laws could damage our reputation or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Our business requires the collection and retention of volumes of customer data in various information systems that we maintain and in those maintained by third party service providers. We are subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations regarding privacy and data protection including the GLBA and the California Consumer Privacy Act. If personal, confidential or proprietary information of customers or others were to be mishandled or misused (in situations where, for example, such information was erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information or where such information was intercepted or otherwise compromised by third parties), we could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and data protection laws. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of our measures to safeguard data could cause us to lose customers or potential customers and reduce our revenue. Accordingly, any failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws may subject us to inquiries, examinations and investigations that could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or result in significant liabilities, fines or penalties, and could damage our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our operations, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Our failure to comply with stringent capital requirements could result in regulatory criticism, requirements and restrictions.

We are subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital which we must maintain. If we fail to meet the minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements as applicable to us, then we may be restricted in the types of activities that we may conduct, and we may be prohibited from taking certain capital actions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The application of more stringent capital requirements could, among other things, adversely affect our results of operations and growth, require the raising of additional capital, restrict our ability to pay dividends or repurchase shares and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements. See “Supervision and Regulation - Capital Requirements.” Details regarding the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios and the amount of required capital are included in Note 17 — Regulatory Matters of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 in this annual report.

We face a risk of noncompliance and enforcement action with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations.

The Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”), and other laws and regulations require financial institutions to institute and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program and file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports. There is also increased scrutiny of compliance with the sanctions programs and rules administered and enforced by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

To comply with laws and guidelines in this area, we have dedicated significant resources to our anti-money laundering program. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient, we could be required to dedicate additional resources to our anti-money laundering program and could be subject to liabilities, including fines, and regulatory enforcement actions restricting our growth and restrictions on future acquisitions and de novo branching.

35

Table of Contents

TECHNOLOGY RISKS

Failure to keep up with the rapid technological changes in the financial services industry could have an adverse effect on our competitive position and profitability.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, including the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to interact with customers and review and analyze data. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements than we have. As a result, competitors may be able to offer additional or superior products compared to those that we will be able to provide, which would put us at a competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to implement new technology-driven products and services effectively or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to keep pace successfully with technological change affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to compete effectively and could have an adverse effect on our business, growth and consolidated results of operations.

System failure or breaches of our network security, including as a result of cyber-attacks or data security breaches, could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

The computer systems and network infrastructure we use may be vulnerable to physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems caused by hackers. Further, our remediation efforts in response to these events may not be successful. Any damage or failure that causes breakdowns or disruptions in our customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems could damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny for failure to comply with required information security standards, or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. The continued evolution and increased usage of artificial intelligence technologies may further increase these risks.

Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure. Information security risks have generally increased in recent years in part because of the proliferation of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies to conduct financial transactions, and the increased sophistication and activities of organized crime, hackers, terrorists, activists, and other external parties. Our operations rely on the secure processing, transmission and storage of confidential information in our computer systems and networks. In addition, to access our products and services, our customers may use devices that are beyond our control systems. Although we believe we have robust information security procedures and controls, our technologies, systems, networks, and our customers’ devices may become the target of cyber-attacks or information security breaches that could result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of our or our customers’ confidential, proprietary and other information, or otherwise disrupt our or our customers’ or other third parties’ business operations. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

36

Table of Contents

We are under continuous threat of loss due to hacking and cyber-attacks especially as we continue to expand customer capabilities to utilize internet and other remote channels to transact business. Two of the most significant cyber-attack risks that we face are e-fraud and loss of sensitive customer data. Loss from e-fraud occurs when cybercriminals breach and extract funds directly from customer or our accounts. Attempts to breach sensitive customer data, such as account numbers and social security numbers, present significant reputational, legal and/or regulatory costs to us, if successful. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of the evolving nature and complexity of these threats from cybercriminals and hackers, our plans to continue to provide internet banking and mobile banking channels, and our plans to develop additional remote connectivity solutions to serve our customers. We cannot assure that we will not be the victim of successful hacking or cyberattacks in the future that could cause us to suffer material losses or that our efforts to remediate any such attack will be successful. The occurrence of any cyber-attack or information security breach could result in potential liability to customers, reputational damage and the disruption of our operations, and regulatory concerns, all of which could adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

The development and use of artificial intelligence presents risk and challenges that may adversely impact our business.

The use of artificial intelligence in our marketplace may result in reputational harm or liability, or could otherwise adversely affect our business. Artificial intelligence, including generative artificial intelligence, is or may be enabled by or integrated into our products and services or those developed by our third-party partners. As with many developing technologies, artificial intelligence presents risks and challenges that could affect its further development, adoption, and use, and therefore our business. Artificial intelligence algorithms may be flawed. Datasets may contain biased information or otherwise be insufficient; and inappropriate or controversial data practices could impair the acceptance of artificial intelligence solutions and result in burdensome new regulations. If the analyses that products incorporating artificial intelligence assist in producing for us or our third-party partners are deficient, biased or inaccurate, we could be subject to competitive harm, potential legal liability and brand or reputational harm. The use of artificial intelligence may also present ethical issues. If we or our third-party partners offer artificial intelligence enabled products that are controversial because of their purported or real impact on human rights, privacy, or other issues, we may experience competitive harm, potential legal liability and brand or reputational harm. In addition, we expect that governments will continue to assess and implement new laws and regulations concerning the use of artificial intelligence, which may affect or impair the usability or efficiency of our products and services and those developed by our third-party partners.

OPERATIONAL RISKS

Our enterprise risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for losses.

Our enterprise risk management framework seeks to mitigate risk and loss to us. We have established comprehensive policies and procedures and an internal control framework designed to provide a sound operational environment for the types of risk to which we are subject, including credit risk, market risk (interest rate and price risks), liquidity risk, operational risk, compliance risk, legal risk, strategic risk, and reputational risk. However, as with any risk management framework, there are inherent limitations to our current and future risk management strategies, including risks that we have not appropriately anticipated or identified. In addition, our businesses and the markets in which we operate are continuously evolving. We may fail to adequately or timely enhance our enterprise risk framework to

37

Table of Contents

address those changes. If our enterprise risk framework is ineffective, either because it fails to keep pace with changes in the financial markets, regulatory requirements, our businesses, our counterparties, clients or service providers or for other reasons, we could incur losses, suffer reputational damage or find ourselves out of compliance with applicable regulatory or contractual mandates.

We are subject to certain operational risks, including, but not limited to, internal or external fraud and data processing system failures and errors.

Employee errors and employee and customer misconduct could subject us to financial losses or regulatory sanctions and seriously harm our reputation. Misconduct by our employees could include hiding unauthorized activities from us, improper or unauthorized activities on behalf of our customers or improper use of confidential information. It is not always possible to prevent employee errors and misconduct, and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. Employee errors could also subject us to financial claims for negligence.

We maintain a system of internal controls and insurance coverage to mitigate against operational risks, including data processing system failures and errors and customer or employee fraud. If our internal controls fail to prevent or detect an occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured or exceeds applicable insurance limits, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of operational deficiencies or as a result of non-compliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, or customer attrition due to potential negative publicity.

We depend on the use of data and modeling in our management’s decision-making, and faulty data or modeling approaches could negatively impact our decision-making ability or possibly subject us to regulatory scrutiny in the future.

The use of statistical and quantitative models and other quantitatively-based analyses is prevalent in bank decision making and regulatory compliance processes, and the use of such analyses is becoming increasingly widespread in our operations. Liquidity stress testing, interest rate sensitivity analysis, allowance for credit losses measurement, portfolio stress testing and the identification of possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations are examples of areas in which we are dependent on models and the data that underlie them. We anticipate that model-derived insights will be used more widely in our decision making in the future. While these quantitative techniques and approaches improve our decision making, they also create the possibility that faulty data or flawed quantitative approaches could yield adverse outcomes or regulatory scrutiny. Secondarily, because of the complexity inherent in these approaches, misunderstanding or misuse of their outputs could similarly result in suboptimal decision making, which could have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities in connection with the real properties we own and the foreclosure on real estate assets securing our loan portfolio.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate. In the course of our business, we may foreclose and take title to real estate and could be subject to environmental liabilities with respect to these properties. We may be held liable to a government entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation and clean-up costs incurred by these parties in connection with environmental contamination, or may be required to clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or chemical releases at a property. The costs associated with investigation and remediation activities could be substantial. In addition, if we are the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, we may be subject to

38

Table of Contents

common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. These costs and claims could adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations and prospects.

We may fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of internal controls over financial reporting that provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and for evaluating and reporting on that system of internal control. We are continuing to refine our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers. We are also continuing to refine our internal controls over financial reporting. Maintaining and improving the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting will require that we continue to expend significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.

Nevertheless, these efforts may not be sufficient to result in an effective internal control environment. In addition, there are risks that individuals, either employees or contractors, consciously circumvent established control mechanisms by, for example, exceeding trading or investment management limitations, or committing fraud. If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, we may not be able to report our consolidated financial results accurately and in a timely manner, in which case our business may be harmed, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our consolidated financial reports, we could be subject to regulatory penalties and the price of our common stock may decline.

We rely on third-party service providers for key aspects of our operations.

We rely on third parties for certain services, including, but not limited to, our critical core banking, web hosting and other processing services. The failure of these systems, a cybersecurity breach involving any of our third-party service providers or the termination or change in terms of these services could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. Replacing vendors or addressing issues with our third-party service providers could entail significant delay, expense and disruption of service. Even if we are able to replace third-party service providers, it may be at a higher cost to us. In addition, our failure to adequately oversee the actions of our third-party service providers could result in regulatory actions against us. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Climate change could have a material negative impact on us and our clients.

Concerns over the long-term impact of climate change could significantly affect our geographic markets and disrupt our operations, those of our customers, third parties on which we rely, or supply chains more broadly. These disruptions, including increased regulatory costs and changes in consumer behavior, could weaken economic conditions in affected markets or industries, impair customers’ ability to repay loans or maintain deposits, and reduce the value of collateral securing our loans.

Our business, as well as the operations and activities of our clients, could be negatively impacted by climate change. Climate change presents both immediate and long-term risks to us and our clients, and

39

Table of Contents

these risks are expected to increase over time. Climate change presents multi-faceted risks, including: operational risk from the physical effects of climate events on us and our clients’ facilities and other assets; credit risk from borrowers with significant exposure to climate risk; transition risks associated with the transition to a less carbon-dependent economy; and reputational risk from stakeholder concerns about our practices related to climate change, our carbon footprint, and our business relationships with clients who operate in carbon-intensive industries.

The risks associated with climate change are rapidly changing and evolving in an escalating fashion, making them difficult to assess. Any of the risks associated with climate change could have a material negative impact on our business, consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations.

Our consolidated financial statements are based in part on assumptions and estimates which, if incorrect, could cause unexpected losses in the future.

We have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period, to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Material estimates subject to change in the near term include, among other items, the ACL; the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and related purchase price allocation, the valuation of acquired loans, the valuation of goodwill and separately identifiable intangible assets associated with mergers and acquisitions, loan sales and servicing of financial assets and deferred tax assets and liabilities. These estimates may be adjusted as more current information becomes available, and any adjustment may be significant.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK

We may reduce or discontinue the payment of dividends on our common stock.

Holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors declares out of funds legally available for such payments. Although we initiated the payment of a quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2025, there may be circumstances under which we would reduce, suspend, or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future. This could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

As a bank holding company, our ability to pay dividends is affected by the policies and enforcement powers of the Federal Reserve and any future payment of dividends will depend on the Bank’s ability to make distributions and payments to the Company as our principal source of funds to pay such dividends. The Bank is also subject to various legal, regulatory and other restrictions on its ability to make distributions and payments to the Company. There are numerous laws and banking regulations that restrict the Bank’s ability to pay dividends or make capital distributions to the Company. These statutes and regulations require, among other things, that the Bank maintain certain levels of capital in order to pay a dividend. Further, our banking authorities have the ability to restrict the Bank’s payment of dividends through supervisory action. In addition, in the future, we may enter into borrowing or other contractual arrangements that restrict our ability to pay dividends. As a consequence of these various limitations and restrictions, we may not be able to make the payment of dividends on our common stock in the future.

40

Table of Contents

We are an emerging growth company, and the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. These include, without limitation, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced financial reporting requirements, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding non-binding shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute payments. The JOBS Act also permits an emerging growth company such as us to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. We have irrevocably opted to decline this extended transition period, which means that any consolidated financial statements that we file will be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies. We may take advantage of some or all of these provisions for up to five years or such earlier time as we cease to qualify as an emerging growth company, which will occur if we have more than $1.235 billion in total annual gross revenue, if we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in a three-year period, or if we become a “large accelerated filer,” in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 in the Exchange Act, which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to provide an auditor attestation of our internal control over financial reporting and reduced disclosure regarding our executive compensation arrangements in our periodic reports and proxy statements. Investors may find our common stock less attractive because we intend to rely on certain of these exemptions, which may result in a less active trading market and increased volatility in our stock price.

We may issue additional equity securities, or engage in other transactions, which could affect the priority of our common stock, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors may determine from time to time that we need to raise additional capital by issuing additional shares of our common stock or other securities. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares issued in connection with an acquisition), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. We are not restricted from issuing additional shares of common stock, including securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock. We may also issue shares of preferred stock that will provide new investors with rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to, and that adversely affect, our then current common shareholders. We cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of any future offerings, or the prices at which such offerings may be completed. Any additional equity issuances may dilute the holdings of our existing shareholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both.

An investment in our common stock is not an insured deposit and is not guaranteed by the FDIC, so you could lose some or all of your investment.

An investment in our common stock is not a deposit account or other obligation of the Bank and, therefore, is not insured against loss or guaranteed by the FDIC, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other governmental, public or private entity. An investment in our common stock is subject to many risks, such as those described in this document and others. As a result, if you acquire our common stock, you could lose some or all of your investment.

41

Table of Contents