grepcent / static financial knowledge base

ARCBEST CORP /DE/ (ARCB) Risk Factors

Verbatim Item 1A Risk Factors from ARCBEST CORP /DE/'s latest 10-K. Filing date: 2026-02-25. Accession: 0001104659-26-019699.

This page reproduces the company's own Item 1A Risk Factors text from the linked SEC filing. It is filer text, not grepcent analysis, scoring, or investment advice.

Informational only - not investment advice. See Disclaimer.

Extracted from Item 1A Risk Factors to the first Item 1B/1C/2 boundary after HTML sanitization. Confidence: high. Source form: 10-K. Character span: 108857-185072.

Back to ARCB company profile

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

Our business is subject to a variety of material risks that we have identified and could also be affected by additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial. This Risk Factors section discusses the material risks relating to our business activities, including those affecting the transportation industry and our Company that are largely out of our control. If any of these risks or circumstances actually occur, it could materially harm our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows; impair our ability to implement business plans or complete development activities as scheduled; and/or result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.

Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, and Information Technology

An interruption, failure, perceived or actual data breach, or cybersecurity incident in the Information Technology (“IT”) systems that we depend on, including software programs and applications provided by third parties, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We depend on the proper functioning, availability, and security of our IT systems, including communications, data processing, financial, and operating systems, as well as proprietary software programs and certain software applications provided by third parties that are integral to our business operations. Such third parties may host, store, transmit data or have access by means of connected IT systems to information about our business, customers, employees, and vendors. Our IT systems and third-party applications that we utilize are vulnerable to interruption by adverse weather conditions; natural disasters; power, internet, or telecommunications outages; computer viruses; and cybersecurity incidents such as denial of service, phishing, malware, artificial intelligence (“AI”)-enabled attacks, or other security or data breaches; as well as other events beyond our control. A failure or disruption in critical IT systems, including the applications provided by third parties, could adversely affect our operations, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customers, cause errors or delays in financial reporting, result in violation of privacy laws, expose us to potential loss or litigation, and/or cause us to incur significant time and expense to remedy such an event. New or enhanced technology that we develop and implement may also be subject to cybersecurity attacks and may be more prone to related incidents.

We have limited control over the operation, quality, maintenance, or continued availability of services provided by our vendors, including third-party software providers whose systems we rely on for critical operations. We depend on the design and operating effectiveness of the internal controls of these providers and obtain assurance reports from independent service auditors engaged by our third-party software providers for systems in scope for our internal controls over financial reporting. However, we cannot ensure that these controls are adequate to prevent, detect, or correct misstatements or to mitigate system or operational vulnerabilities. Additionally, there is no guarantee that we will be able to maintain our software licensing arrangements that support key functions, or that we can renew or replace these arrangements on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Some of our employees work remotely, including under hybrid work arrangements, which has increased demand for IT resources and heightened our exposure to unauthorized access to proprietary information or sensitive or confidential data and other cybersecurity incidents.

17

Table of Contents

As AI capabilities improve and are increasingly adopted, including generative AI, we may see cybersecurity attacks perpetrated through AI, including an increase in the speed, scale, sophistication, and automation of such attacks. While we maintain property and cyber insurance, losses arising from a significant disaster or cyber incident may exceed our insurance coverage and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Although we have implemented measures to mitigate our exposure to the heightened risks of cybersecurity incidents, we cannot be certain that such measures will be effective to prevent a cybersecurity incident from materializing. Additionally, it may be more difficult to defend against such attacks.

We have experienced incidents involving attempted denial of service attacks, malware attacks, and other events intended to disrupt information systems, wrongfully obtain valuable information, or cause other types of malicious events that could have resulted in harm to our business. To our knowledge, the various protections we have employed have been effective to date in identifying such events at points when the impact on our business could be minimized. Despite our efforts to monitor and develop our IT networks and infrastructure, due to the increasing sophistication of cyber criminals and the development of new techniques for attack, we may be unable to anticipate, promptly detect, or timely implement adequate protective or remedial measures against cybersecurity attacks or recover use of our IT networks and infrastructure timely.

If we are unable to timely and effectively develop and implement new or enhanced technology or processes, or if we fail to realize the potential benefits thereof, we may suffer competitive disadvantages, loss of customers, or other consequences that could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The transportation industry is experiencing rapid changes in technology, driven by the development and implementation of new and emerging technologies, including generative AI and machine learning, and enhancements in existing technology. New entrants to the market, including technology-centric or technology-enabled start-ups and emerging business models, have expanded the field of competition and increased pressure for innovation in the industry. Our customers may find alternatives to our services to meet their freight transportation and logistics needs.

We expect our customers will continue to demand more sophisticated technology-driven solutions, including advancements in processes, equipment, and facilities to address concerns over business efficiency, supply chain effectiveness, and sustainability. We have made, and continue to make, significant investments in technology, including enhancements to existing technology and the development of new and innovative solutions, such as software and physical assets that are in various stages of development and implementation. Our investments in technology are further described in “Technology” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A number of factors are involved in determining proof of concept, and there can be no assurance that our technology implementations will be successful.

Our efforts and investments in technology innovation, including generative AI technologies, may continue to require significant ongoing research and development and implementation costs and may involve new or unforeseen risks and challenges, including heightened risks regarding data and information security, privacy, protection, and copyright infringement and, in the case of generative AI, potential compliance gaps in an emerging but fragmented regulatory environment. The success of our approach to innovation depends on market acceptance of our solutions and other factors, including our ability to:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
deploy funds and resources for investment in technology and innovation;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
achieve the right balance of strategic investments in existing or developing technology and innovation;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
timely and effectively develop and implement new or enhanced technology, including integration into current operations and interaction with existing systems;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
train our employees to operate the technology and/or achieve appropriate customer, carrier, or other desired user adoption of the technology;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
adequately anticipate challenges and respond to unforeseen challenges;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
detect and remedy defects in enhanced or new technology; and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
recover costs of investment through increased business levels, higher prices, improved efficiencies, or other means, such as licensing or disposing of the developed technology.

We are still in the early stages of developing and deploying generative AI, a process that is particularly complex due to the use of sensitive, proprietary, and confidential data that could be leaked, as well as the potential flaws in algorithms and models, which may include biases, errors, and limitations in handling certain data types or scenarios, ultimately affecting the reliability of outputs. If we do not pursue technological advances or engage in innovation; if we fail to successfully or timely develop and deploy enhanced or new technology; if any enhanced or new technology does not yield the results we expect, or is developed by others; or if the decisions are made by us or our customers based on flawed AI or model outputs,

18

Table of Contents

we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage; lose customers; be led to make decisions that could bias certain individuals or classes of individuals and adversely impact their rights; incur higher than anticipated costs, including the possible impact of asset impairment or the write-off of software development costs; or fail to meet the goals of our internal growth strategy, any one of which could materially adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

The loss of or reduction in business from multiple large customers or an overall reduction in our customer base could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

We do not have a significant customer concentration. However, our customer relationships are generally not subject to long-term contractual obligations or minimum volume commitments, and we cannot ensure that our current customer relationships will continue at the same business levels or at all. If we were to lose all or a portion of the business of some of our large customers or if our customers were to demand pricing concessions for our services, require us to provide enhanced services at lower prices, or develop their own shipping and distribution capabilities, our business, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely impacted. A reduction in our customer base or difficulty in collecting, or the inability to collect, payments from our customers due to pricing changes, economic hardship, or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Our initiatives to grow our business operations or to manage our cost structure to business levels may take longer than anticipated, may not generate adequate returns, or may not be successful.

Growing our service offerings requires ongoing investment in personnel and infrastructure, including operating and management information systems. Depending upon the timing and level of revenues generated from our growth initiatives, the related results of operations and cash flows we anticipate from these initiatives and additional service offerings may not be achieved.

Our growth plans place significant demand on our management and operating personnel, and we may not be able to hire, train, upskill, and retain the appropriate personnel to manage and grow our services. We have incurred increased costs associated with long-term investment in the development of our owner-operator fleet and contract carrier capacity for our Asset-Light segment. As we focus on market opportunities for our asset-light solutions, we may also encounter difficulties in adapting our corporate structure or in developing and maintaining effective partnerships among our operating segments, which could hinder our operational, financial, and strategic objectives. Furthermore, we may invest significant resources to enter or expand our services in markets with established competitors and new competitive challenges, and we may not be able to successfully gain market share.

We also face challenges and risks in implementing initiatives to manage our cost structure to business levels or changing market demands, as portions of salaries, wages, and benefits are fixed in nature, and adjustments otherwise needed to align the labor cost structure to corresponding business levels are limited as we strive to maintain service quality. It is more difficult to match our staffing levels and purchased transportation resources to our business needs in periods of rapid or unexpected change. We may, in the future, incur additional costs related to purchased transportation and/or experience labor inefficiencies in training new employees who are hired in response to growth. Such additional costs could be disproportionate to our business levels and may adversely impact our operating results. A prolonged labor shortage or significant labor inefficiencies could result in lower levels of service, including timeliness, productivity and/or quality of service. While we regularly evaluate and modify the network of our Asset-Based operations to reflect changes in customer demands and to reconcile the segment’s infrastructure with tonnage and shipment levels and the proximity of customer freight, there can be no assurance that any given network change will result in improvement in our Asset-Based segment’s results of operations.

We may be unsuccessful in realizing all or any part of the anticipated benefits of future acquisitions. The cost, integration, and performance of any such acquisition may disrupt or adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

We evaluate acquisition candidates and may pursue opportunities to acquire assets and businesses that we believe will complement our existing assets and business or enhance our service offerings. However, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenue or earnings from any future acquired business to offset acquisition or investment costs, and the acquired business may fail to meet operational or strategic expectations. We may encounter difficulties integrating the assets,

19

Table of Contents

workforce, systems, and operations of acquired companies, including underestimating the resources needed to support an acquisition, which could prevent us from realizing the full anticipated benefits of the acquisition, including within the anticipated timeframe, or inhibit our ability to provide consistent, high-quality service to customers. If acquired operations fail to generate sufficient cash flows, we may incur impairments of goodwill, intangibles, and other assets in the future.

The possible risks involved in acquisitions include, among others:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
potential loss of customers, key employees, and third-party service providers;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
potentially unacceptable qualification requirements for contract carriers or other third-party vendors;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
potentially unfavorable, or adverse changes to, pre-existing contractual relationships;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
difficulties and costs of synchronizing our policies, procedures, business culture, and benefits and compensation programs;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
inability to integrate and maintain our internal controls over financial reporting;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
difficulties related to additional or unanticipated regulatory and compliance issues;
Column 1Column 2Column 3
adverse tax consequences; and
Column 1Column 2Column 3
other unanticipated issues, expenses, and liabilities, including previously unknown liabilities, or legal proceedings which may arise, associated with the acquired business for which we have no, or are unable to secure, recourse under applicable indemnification or insurance provisions.

Due diligence procedures performed in evaluating acquisitions may not identify all risks that adversely impact the success of our transactions. Future acquisitions may require substantial capital or the incurrence of substantial indebtedness or may involve the dilutive issuance of equity securities, which could negatively impact our capitalization and financial position. Further, we may not be able to acquire businesses or assets in the future even though we may have incurred expenses in evaluating and pursuing strategic transactions.

Unsolicited takeover proposals, proxy contests, and other proposals or actions by activist investors may adversely affect our business and our stock price.

We could become subject to unfavorable advances by investor activists or receive unsolicited takeover proposals at an undervalued stock price. In the event that a third party makes an unsolicited takeover proposal or otherwise attempts to gain control of our Company, our review and consideration of such proposals may require our management to expend significant time and resources away from our primary operations. Such proposals may disrupt our business, including causing uncertainty among current and potential employees, customers, and other stakeholders, which could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction also may adversely affect the market price and lead to pronounced volatility in the price of our common stock.

Damage to our corporate reputation may cause our business to suffer.

Our business depends, in part, on our ability to maintain the image of our brands. Service, performance, and safety issues, whether actual or perceived, and whether as a result of our actions or those of our third-party service providers, could adversely impact the image of our brands, including ArcBest, ABF Freight, Panther, MoLo, U-Pack, and Vaux. Adverse publicity regarding labor relations, legal matters, cybersecurity and data privacy concerns, social and sustainability issues, and similar matters, whether or not justified, could also have a negative impact on our reputation. Despite our efforts to adapt to and address these concerns, our efforts may be insufficient and could result in the loss of business, including loss of customers, affect our ability to secure new customer relationships, and otherwise impede our growth initiatives. It is difficult to predict how our sustainability efforts, which may increase costs, will be evaluated by current and prospective investors or by our customers or business partners. Our industry may be generally disfavored by the investing community at large despite our sustainability efforts.

Our business is increasingly dependent on the internet for attracting and securing customers. The possibility that fraudulent behavior may confuse or deceive customers, including through the misuse of generative AI, which can produce inaccurate, biased, or misleading content, heightens the risk of reputational harm and could increase the time and expense required to protect and maintain the integrity of our brands. With the increased use of social media outlets, adverse publicity, even when based upon incorrect information or false statements, can be disseminated quickly and broadly, making it increasingly difficult for us to effectively respond. Damage to our reputation and loss of brand equity could reduce demand for our services and, thus, have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and the market price of our stock, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation and restore the value of our brands.

20

Table of Contents

Our corporate reputation and business depend on a variety of intellectual property rights, and the costs and resources expended to enforce or protect our rights or to defend against infringement claims could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We have registered or are pursuing registration of various marks and designs as trademarks in the United States. We have also registered or are pursuing registration in certain other countries for some trademarks. At times, competitors may adopt service or trade names, logos, or designs similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. We have obtained or are pursuing patent protection on internally developed and certain purchased technology, including equipment and process patents in connection with Vaux. Competitors or other third parties could attempt to reproduce or reverse-engineer our patented technologies, or we could be subject to third-party claims of infringement. Any of our intellectual property rights related to trademarks, trade secrets, domain names, copyrights, patents, or other intellectual property, whether owned or licensed, could be challenged, invalidated, misappropriated, or infringed upon by third parties. Our efforts to obtain, enforce, or protect our proprietary rights, or to defend against third-party infringement claims, may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could adversely impact our corporate reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.

VauxTM technologies may not achieve market acceptance or generate adequate returns.

We have invested and expect to continue to invest significant resources in our suite of VauxTM technology offerings. These investments, including the following, may not be recovered if the technologies do not perform as intended, fail to gain traction in the logistics industry, or require ongoing investment at levels exceeding our expectations.

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Vaux Freight Movement SystemTM, which transforms the way that freight is loaded, unloaded and transferred through the use of proprietary hardware, depends on successfully delivering operational reliability and compatibility with customer facilities.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Vaux Smart AutonomyTM, which includes combining autonomous mobile robot forklifts and reach trucks with fleet-management software and remote-teleoperation capabilities, must operate safely and consistently in complex, high-throughput logistics environments.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Vaux VisionTM, a 3D perception technology that transforms forklifts and reach trucks into mobile freight dimensioners, depends on accurate perception and data processing across varied warehouse conditions.

Even if these technologies are successfully developed, we may face challenges scaling production, integrating with customer operations, meeting regulatory requirements, and demonstrating sufficient operational or economic benefits to drive demand. Customer adoption may be slower than expected due to operational disruption concerns, competing priorities, or alternative technologies. Each of these Vaux initiatives involves substantial development and commercialization risks, and there is no assurance that they will achieve technical success, customer adoption, or financial returns. As a result, we may not recover the significant investments we have made and expect to continue making in these technologies, which could adversely affect our financial condition and long-term strategy.

Ineffective internal controls could negatively impact our business, results of operations, and reputation.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal controls over financial reporting, even if effective, only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements and may not prevent or detect misstatements because of their inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, failure or interruption of information technology systems, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. If we are unable to establish adequate internal controls or if our internal controls do not consistently operate as designed, our business, operating results, and reputation could be harmed, and we could fail to meet our financial reporting and other obligations.

21

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Industry

Disruptions in domestic or global manufacturing activity, supply chains, and related changes in producer and consumer spending could materially reduce our freight volumes and adversely affect our business.

Our operations depend on the steady production, movement, and consumption of goods. Widespread or prolonged disruptions—such as factory shutdowns, production slowdowns, shortages of raw materials or components, transportation bottlenecks, labor constraints, or changes in trade policy—can significantly reduce the volume of freight available to transport and alter producer and consumer spending patterns. These conditions may depress demand for transportation services, create volatility in shipping activity, and limit our ability to efficiently serve customers.

As a result of these types of events, we have experienced in the past and may experience in the future an inability to timely or cost-effectively obtain tractors, trailers, and other equipment necessary for our business. The extent, duration, and severity of such disruptions are unpredictable and largely outside our control. Any sustained reduction in freight volumes, delays in equipment availability, or shifts in shipping patterns resulting from these factors could negatively impact our revenue, operating performance, and overall ability to meet customer needs.

We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented industry, and our business could suffer if we are unable to adequately address factors that could affect our profitability, growth prospects, and ability to compete in the transportation and logistics market.

We face significant competition in local, regional, national, and, to a lesser extent, international markets. We compete with union and nonunion LTL carriers of varying sizes and, to a lesser extent, with truckload carriers and railroads. We also compete with domestic and global logistics service providers, including asset-light logistics companies, integrated logistics companies, and third-party freight brokers that compete in one or more segments of the transportation industry.

Numerous factors could adversely impact our ability to compete effectively in the transportation and logistics industry, retain our existing customers, or attract new customers. The competitive factors material to our business are the following:

Column 1Column 2Column 3
Our Asset-Based segment competes primarily with nonunion motor carriers who generally have a lower fringe benefit cost structure than union carriers for freight-handling and driving personnel and have greater operating flexibility as they are subject to less-stringent labor work rules.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Some of our competitors periodically reduce their prices to gain business, especially during times of reduced growth rates in the economy, which limits our ability to maintain or increase prices. If customers select transportation service providers based on price alone rather than the total value offered, we may be unable to maintain our operating margins or to maintain or grow tonnage levels.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Enhanced visibility of capacity options in the marketplace is increasing, and customers may seek bids from multiple carriers for their shipping needs, which may generally depress prices or result in the loss of some business to our competitors.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
In an excess capacity market, we may be unable to maintain the higher market-driven prices we obtained for our services in the tighter capacity environment, especially if there is a prolonged recessionary period in the freight environment as we have experienced in recent years. Alternatively, as market capacity tightens, customer demand may exceed available carrier capacity in the industry.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Customers may reduce the number of carriers they use by selecting “core carriers” as approved transportation service providers, and in some instances, we may not be selected.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Customers are increasingly focused on environmental concerns, including emissions, and may select transportation providers that are able to reduce emissions more readily or effectively through improvements to existing and emerging technologies, the adoption of alternative fuels, or carbon offsetting mechanisms.
Column 1Column 2Column 3
Shippers may choose to build their own logistics capabilities, reducing or eliminating need for such services from our Asset-Based segment.

Additionally, as the retail industry continues its trend toward increases in e-commerce at an unprecedented rate, the manner in which our customers source or utilize our services will continue to evolve. If we are unable to successfully adapt and implement appropriate measures in response to these changes, our operating results could be adversely affected.

22

Table of Contents

Increased prices for, or decreases in the availability of, equipment, including new revenue equipment, as well as higher costs of related operating expenses, could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

In recent years, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) have significantly raised the prices of equipment, including new revenue equipment, due to supply chain disruptions and other challenges beyond our control, including, but not limited to geopolitical conflicts; increased costs of materials and labor, above normal inflation levels; and high interest rates, which impact equipment financing. Manufacturers have also raised prices, in part, to offset their costs of compliance with new tractor engine and emissions system design requirements intended to reduce emissions, which have been mandated by the EPA, the NHTSA, and various state agencies as described in “Environmental and Other Government Regulations” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. State-mandated emission-control requirements are likely to continue to impact the design of and cost of equipment and increase fuel costs for entire fleets that operate in interstate commerce. Increased prices of new equipment could lead to higher depreciation and rental expenses than anticipated. Our third-party capacity providers, including owner-operators for portions of our Asset-Light segment operations, are also subject to increased regulations and higher equipment and fuel prices, which will, in turn, increase our costs for utilizing their services or may cause certain providers to exit the industry, which could lead to or exacerbate a capacity shortage and further increase our costs of securing third-party services. If we are unable to fully offset any such increases in expenses with freight rate increases and/or improved fuel economy, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

We depend on suppliers for equipment, parts, and services that are critical to our operations, which may be difficult to procure in the event of decreased supply or other supply chain disruptions. From time to time, some OEMs of tractors and trailers may reduce their manufacturing output due to, for example, lower demand for their products in economic downturns or a shortage of component parts. Component suppliers may either reduce production or be unable to increase production to meet OEM demand, creating periodic difficulty for OEMs to react in a timely manner to increased demand for new equipment and/or increased demand for replacement components as economic conditions change, leading to lower supply of tractors and trailers, higher prices and lengthened trade cycles. We have in the past and may again face reduced supply levels and/or increased acquisition costs for new tractors or trailers, as well as related parts and services, for our Asset-Based operations.

Fuel shortages, changes in fuel prices, or the inability to collect fuel surcharges, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

The transportation industry is dependent upon the availability of adequate fuel supplies. Fuel represents a significant operating expense for us, and we do not have any long-term fuel purchase contracts or hedging arrangements to protect against fuel price increases. The supply and price of fuel fluctuates greatly due to factors beyond our control, such as global supply and demand for crude oil and diesel, political events, legislation and regulation, military conflicts, price and supply decisions by oil producing countries and cartels, terrorist activities, and natural or man-made disasters. A disruption in our fuel supply or significant increases in fuel prices that are not offset by base freight rate increases or fuel surcharges could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We also pay independent contractor drivers a fuel surcharge that increases with the increase in fuel prices in our Asset‑Light segment. A significant increase or rapid fluctuation in fuel prices could cause the fuel surcharge we pay to independent contractors to be higher than the revenue we receive under our customer fuel surcharge programs, which could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our Asset-Based segment and certain operations of our Asset-Light segment assess a fuel surcharge based on an index of national diesel fuel prices. When fuel surcharges constitute a higher proportion of the total freight rate paid, our customers are less receptive to increases in base freight rates. Prolonged periods of inadequate base rate improvements could adversely impact operating results as elements of costs, including contractual wage rates, continue to increase. In periods of declining fuel prices, fuel surcharge percentages also decrease, which negatively impacts the total billed revenue per hundredweight or revenue per shipment and, consequently, our revenues, and the revenue decline may be disproportionate to the corresponding decline in our fuel costs.

23

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Employees and Benefits

Difficulty attracting, retaining, and upskilling employees, or ABF Freight’s inability to reach agreement on future collective bargaining agreements, could result in labor inefficiencies, disruptions, stoppages, or delayed growth.

In certain markets, we continue to experience challenges with hiring an adequate number of qualified drivers and freight-handlers. The available pool of drivers is expected to continue to decline as retirements accelerate in the current driver workforce and recruitment and retention may be further impacted by government regulations or legislative actions, such as the recent English proficiency and domicile mandates. The expansion of flexible work options in recent years has provided more employment opportunities for those in professional roles, including our IT roles, making attraction and retention more complex. If wage inflation continues for noncontractual professional roles, our labor costs will increase. If we encounter difficulty in attracting and retaining employees, including qualified drivers, freight-handlers, and professional personnel, we could incur higher recruiting expenses or a loss of business, and our profitability and ability to grow could be adversely affected. If AI and other technological innovations accelerate the need for upskilling of employees or increase the resources necessary to carry out such training, we could incur higher training-related costs, and our profitability and ability to grow could be negatively impacted.

A significant portion of the employees in our Asset-Based segment are covered under the collective bargaining agreement between ABF Freight and the IBT. If we are unable to effectively manage our relationship with the IBT, we could be less effective in ongoing relations and future negotiations, which could lead to operational inefficiencies and increased operating costs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to agree on acceptable terms for the next contract period or, if agreed upon, that those terms will be favorable to us in future collective bargaining agreements, which may result in higher labor costs, insufficient operational flexibility, a work stoppage, the loss of customers, or other events that could have a material adverse effect on our business. We could also experience a loss of customers or a reduction in our potential share of business in the markets we serve if shippers limit their use of unionized freight transportation service providers because of the risk of work stoppages.

We could be obligated to make additional significant contributions to multiemployer pension plans.

ABF Freight contributes to multiemployer pension and health and welfare plans to provide benefits for its contractual employees. These multiemployer plans, established pursuant to the Taft-Hartley Act, are jointly trusteed and cover collectively bargained employees of multiple unrelated employers. Due to the inherent nature of multiemployer pension plans, there are risks associated with participation in these plans that differ from single-employer plans. Assets received by the plans are not segregated by employer, and contributions made by one employer can be and are used to provide benefits to current and former employees of other employers. If a participating employer in a multiemployer pension plan no longer contributes to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. If a participating employer in a multiemployer pension plan completely withdraws from the plan, it owes to the plan its proportionate share of the plan’s unfunded vested benefits, referred to as withdrawal liability. A complete withdrawal generally occurs when the employer permanently ceases to have an obligation to contribute to the plan. Withdrawal liability is also owed in the event the employer withdraws from a plan in connection with a mass withdrawal, which generally occurs when all or substantially all employers withdraw from the plan in a relatively short period of time pursuant to an agreement. Were ABF Freight to completely withdraw from certain multiemployer pension plans, whether in connection with a mass withdrawal or otherwise, under current law, we would have material liabilities for our share of the unfunded vested liabilities of each such plan.

The multiemployer pension plans to which ABF Freight contributes vary greatly in size and in funded status. ABF Freight’s obligations to these plans are generally specified in the 2023 ABF NMFA and other related supplemental agreements, as further discussed in Note I to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These pension plans provide the best retirement benefits in the industry. However, when compared to competitors, ABF Freight pays some of the highest benefit contribution rates in the industry and continues to address the effect of the Asset-Based segment’s wage and benefit cost structure on its operating results in discussions with the IBT. Through the term of its current collective bargaining agreement, ABF Freight’s multiemployer pension obligations generally will be satisfied by making the specified contributions when due. Future contribution rates will be determined through the negotiation process for contract periods following the term of the current collective bargaining agreement.

Certain legislative actions that became effective in recent years include provisions to improve funding for multiemployer pension plans, as further discussed in Note I to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this

24

Table of Contents

Annual Report on Form 10-K. However, despite such legislative actions, we may still trigger withdrawal liability through, among other things, mergers and other fundamental corporate transactions and as a result of operational changes, site closures and job losses. We continue to monitor the impact of legislative actions on the funding status of the multiemployer pension plans to which ABF Freight contributes; however, we cannot determine with any certainty the minimum contributions that will be required under future collective bargaining agreements or the impact they will have on our results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Third Parties

We depend on services provided by third parties and could be adversely impacted by increased costs or disruption of these services, and claims arising from these services.

A reduction in the availability of rail services or services provided by third-party capacity providers to meet customer requirements; higher prices, including fuel surcharges; as well as higher utilization of third-party agents to maintain service levels in periods of tonnage growth or higher shipment levels, could increase purchased transportation costs which we may be unable to pass along to our customers. If a disruption or reduction in transportation services from our rail or other third-party service providers were to occur, we could be faced with business interruptions that could cause us to fail to meet the needs of our customers and result in loss of business or customer loyalty. In addition, third-party providers can be expected to increase their prices based on market conditions or to cover increases in their operating expenses. If we are unable to increase the prices we charge to our customers in response, or if we are unable to secure sufficient third-party services to expand our capacity, add additional routes, or meet our commitments to our customers, there could be a material adverse impact on our operations, revenues, profitability and customer relationships.

Our ability to secure the services of third-party service providers is affected by many risks beyond our control, including unfavorable pricing conditions; the shortage of quality third-party providers, including owner-operators and drivers of contracted carriers for our Asset-Light segment; shortages in available cargo capacity of third parties; equipment shortages in the transportation industry, particularly among contracted truckload carriers; changes in government regulations affecting the transportation industry and their related impact on operations, such as hours-of-service rules, the electronic logging device (“ELD”) mandate, and recent federal executive orders relating to English language proficiency, commercial driver licenses, and domicile requirements; labor disputes; or a significant interruption in service or stoppage in third-party transportation services. Each of these risks could have a material adverse effect on the operating results of our Asset-Light segment.

In addition, we may be subject to claims arising from services provided by third parties, particularly in connection with the operations of our Asset-Light segment, which are dependent on third-party contract carriers. From time to time, the drivers who are owner-operators, independent contractors, or employees working for third-party carriers that we contract with are involved in accidents or incidents that may result in cargo loss or damage, other property damage, or serious personal injuries including death, which may result in claims asserted against us. We or our subsidiaries could be held directly responsible for these third-party claims and, regardless of ultimate liability, may incur significant costs and expenses in defending these claims or through settlements, even in cases where we believe we have meritorious claims or defenses. Our third-party contract carriers and other vendors may not agree to bear responsibility for such claims, or we may become responsible if they are unable to pay the claims, for example, due to bankruptcy proceedings, and such claims may exceed the amount of our insurance coverage or may not be covered by insurance at all.

Our engagement of independent contractor drivers to provide a portion of the capacity for our Asset-Light segment exposes us to different risks than we face with our employee drivers, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

The driver fleet for portions of our Asset-Light segment is made up of independent owner-operators and individuals. We face intense competition in attracting and retaining qualified owner-operators from the available pool of drivers and fleets, and we may be required to increase owner-operator compensation or take other measures to remain an attractive option for owner-operators. If we are not able to maintain our delivery schedules due to a shortage of drivers or if we are required to increase our rates to offset increases in owner-operator compensation, our services may be less competitive. Furthermore, as independent owner-operators and individuals are third-party service providers, rather than our employees, they may decline loads of freight from time to time, which may impede our ability to deliver freight in a timely manner or result in increased expenses to do so.

25

Table of Contents

If the independent contractors with which we contract are deemed by regulators or judicial process to be employees, or if we experience operational or regulatory issues related to our use of these contract drivers, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected.

Class actions and other lawsuits have arisen in the transportation and logistics industry seeking to reclassify independent contractor drivers as employees for a variety of purposes, including workers’ compensation, wage-and-hour, and health care coverage. Many states have enacted restrictive laws that make it difficult to successfully prove independent-contractor status, and all states have enforcement programs to evaluate the classification of independent contractors. In the event of such reclassification of our owner-operators, we could be exposed to various liabilities and additional costs, for both future and prior periods, under federal, state, and local tax laws, and workers’ compensation, unemployment benefits, labor, and employment laws, as well as potential liability for penalties and interest and under vicarious liability principles.

Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Matters

We are subject to litigation risks, and at times may need to initiate litigation, which could result in significant costs and have other material adverse effects on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The nature of our business, including both our Asset-Based and Asset-Light segments, exposes us to the potential for various claims and litigation, including class-action litigation and other legal proceedings brought by customers, suppliers, employees, or other parties, related to labor and employment, including wage and hour claims; competitive matters; personal injury; property damage; cargo claims; safety and contract compliance; environmental liability; and other matters, such as the matters, if any, described in Item 3 (Legal Proceedings) included in Part I of, or otherwise disclosed in, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are subject to risk and uncertainties related to liabilities, including damages, fines, penalties, and substantial legal and related costs, that may result from claims and litigation arising from either segment of our business.

We could be held liable for personal injury, property damage, and cargo claims arising not only in connection with the trucks we operate, but also from trucks that are operated by contracted owner-operators and brokered third-party carriers. Courts across the United States have reached differing conclusions regarding whether federal law preempts state-law negligent selection of motor carrier claims asserted against freight brokers. The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing this issue in Montgomery v Caribe Transport II, LLC with a hearing date set for March 2026. The outcome of this case, as well as future judicial or regulatory developments, could expand the circumstances under which freight brokers may be subject to state-law negligent selection or similar claims. The elimination or limitation of federal preemption could increase our litigation exposure, lead to higher insurance premiums or make obtaining adequate insurance coverage more difficult, and result in additional compliance and operational burdens related to carrier selection and monitoring.

Some or all of our expenditures to defend or settle claims and litigation may not be covered by insurance or could impact our cost of, and ability to obtain, insurance in the future. Litigation can be disruptive to normal business operations and could require a substantial amount of time and effort from our management team. Further, because of the potential risks, expenses, and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from time to time, settle disputes, even where we believe that we have meritorious claims or defenses. Any litigation or a catastrophic accident or series of accidents could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Our business reputation and our relationship with our customers, suppliers, and employees may also be adversely impacted by our involvement in legal proceedings.

We establish reserves based on our assessment of known legal matters and contingencies. New legal claims or subsequent developments related to known legal claims asserted against us may affect our assessment and estimates of our recorded legal reserves and may require us to make payments in excess of our reserves, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Our business operations are subject to numerous governmental regulations in the transportation industry, and costs of compliance with, or liability for violations of, existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Various international, federal, state, and local agencies exercise broad regulatory powers over the transportation industry, such as those described in “Environmental and Other Government Regulations” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We could become subject to new or more restrictive regulations, and the costs to comply with such regulations could increase our operating expenses. Such regulations could also influence the demand for

26

Table of Contents

transportation services. Failure to comply with laws and regulations can result in penalties, revocation of our permits or licenses, or both civil and criminal actions against us, in addition to potentially harming our reputation and brands.

Failures by us, or our contracted owner-operators and third-party carriers, to comply with the various applicable federal safety laws and regulations, or downgrades in our safety rating, among other things, could cause us to lose customers and our ability to self-insure. The loss of our ability to self-insure for any significant period of time could materially increase insurance costs, or we could experience difficulty in obtaining adequate levels of insurance coverage.

Our Asset-Light segment utilizes third-party service providers who are subject to similar regulatory requirements. We could be materially adversely affected if the operations of these providers are impacted by regulatory actions to the extent that a shortage of quality third-party service providers occurs. Also, activities by these providers that violate applicable laws or regulations could result in governmental or third-party actions against us. Although third-party service providers with whom we contract agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may not be aware of, and may therefore be unable to address or remedy, violations by them.

We are also subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations and standards as well as policies, contracts, and other obligations related to data privacy, including customer and employee data. As a provider of worldwide transportation and logistics services, we collect and process significant amounts of customer data daily. In recent years, governments and consumer groups have called for increased transparency in how customer data is utilized and how customers and employees can control the use and storage of their data. Complying with existing or new data protection laws and regulations may increase our compliance costs or require us to modify our data handling practices. Non-compliance could result in governmental or consumer actions against us, and even perceived non-compliance may adversely impact our reputation, operating results and financial condition. The uncertainty of the interpretation and enforcement of these laws, and their increasing scope and complexity, create regulatory risks that will likely increase over time. Additionally, if third parties or others violate obligations and restrictions with respect to data privacy and security, such violations may also put our customers’ or employees’ information at risk and could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, the violation of which could result in substantial fines or penalties. The costs of compliance with current and future environmental laws and regulations may be significant and could adversely impact our results of operations.

Our Asset-Based facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations relating to, among other areas: underground and aboveground storage tanks for fuel and oil storage, stormwater pollution prevention, contingency planning for spills of petroleum products, and disposal of waste oil. We may be subject to substantial fines, civil penalties, or litigation if we fail to obtain proper certifications or permits or if we do not comply with required environmental inspections, testing provisions, and consent decrees. Under certain environmental laws, we could be subject to strict liability for any clean-up costs relating to contamination at our past or present facilities, including those occurring prior to ownership or use of such facilities, and at third-party waste disposal sites.

We routinely transport or arrange for the transportation of hazardous materials and explosives, which involves risks such as leakage, environmental damage, a spill or accident involving hazardous substances, and hazardous waste disposal, as well as costs associated with the environmental clean-up of fuel spillage from our vehicles. We may also be subject to claims from third parties and bear liability for any damage or injury that occurs as a result of these operations.

Although we have instituted programs to monitor and control environmental risks and promote and maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, violations of applicable laws or regulations may subject us to clean-up costs and liabilities not covered by insurance or in excess of our applicable insurance coverage, including substantial fines, civil penalties, or civil and criminal liability, as well as bans on making future shipments in particular geographic areas, any of which could adversely affect our business.

Concern over climate change has led to increased legislative and regulatory efforts to limit carbon and other GHG emissions in certain states and additional legislation is possible in the future. Emission-related regulatory actions have historically resulted in increased costs of revenue equipment, diesel fuel, and equipment maintenance, and future legislation, if enacted, could impose substantial costs on us and may require changes in our operating practices, impair equipment productivity, or require additional reporting disclosures. Compliance with such laws and regulations may also increase our exposure to litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings. We may also encounter difficulties in collecting and managing data that impact timely compliance or incur significant costs to comply with increased regulation

27

Table of Contents

regarding environmental monitoring and reporting disclosure requirements, including those described in “Environmental and Other Government Regulations” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are subject to increasing investor and customer sensitivity to sustainability issues, and we may be subject to additional requirements, which could result in increased costs, related to shareholder proposals, customer-led initiatives, or our customers’ efforts to comply with environmental programs. Although we cannot predict the effect of future regulation or customer requirements, our compliance with such requirements could have an adverse impact on our cost structure, business, or results of operations.

Risks Related to Financial Considerations

We are subject to interest rate risk and certain covenants under our financing arrangements. A default under these financing arrangements or changes in regulations could impact the availability of funds or our borrowing costs.

We are affected by the instability in the financial and credit markets, which from time to time has created volatility in various interest rates and returns on invested assets. We are subject to market risk due to variable interest rates on borrowings on our accounts receivable securitization program (“A/R Securitization”) and the revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) under our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”). Changes in interest rates may increase our financing costs related to future borrowings under our Credit Facility, future borrowings against our A/R Securitization, new notes payable or finance lease arrangements, or additional sources of financing. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including inflation, governmental monetary policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. Furthermore, future financial market disruptions may adversely affect our ability to refinance, maintain our letter of credit arrangements or, if needed, secure alternative sources of financing. If any of the financial institutions that have extended credit commitments to us are adversely affected by economic conditions, disruption to the capital and credit markets, or increased regulation, they may become unable to fund borrowings under their credit commitments or otherwise fulfill their obligations to us, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to borrow additional funds, and thus have an adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. See Note G to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our financing arrangements.

Our Credit Agreement and A/R Securitization contain customary financial and other restrictive covenants. Failing to achieve certain required financial ratios could adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, make strategic acquisitions or investments, or plan for or react to market conditions or otherwise execute our business strategies. If we default under the terms of the Credit Agreement or our A/R Securitization and fail to obtain appropriate amendments to or waivers under the applicable financing arrangement, any borrowings under such facilities could be immediately declared due and payable. An event of default under either of these facilities could constitute automatic default on the other facility and could trigger cross-default provisions in our outstanding notes payable and other financing agreements unless the lenders to these facilities choose not to exercise remedies or to otherwise allow us to cure the default. If we fail to pay the amount due under our Credit Facility or A/R Securitization, the lender of the A/R Securitization could proceed against the collateral by which that facility is secured, our borrowing capacity may be limited, or one or both of the facilities could be terminated. If acceleration of outstanding borrowings occurs or if one or both of the facilities is terminated, we may have difficulty borrowing additional funds sufficient to refinance the accelerated debt or entering into new credit or debt arrangements, and, if available, the terms of the financing may not be favorable or acceptable. A default under the Credit Agreement or A/R Securitization, changes in regulations that impact the availability of funds or our borrowing costs, or our inability to renew our financing arrangements with terms that are acceptable to us, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.

Our business is capital intensive. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations, our growth and profitability could be limited due to significant ongoing capital expenditure requirements.

Our business requires significant capital expenditures, which we finance through various sources, including cash flows from operations, borrowings under our Credit Facility and A/R Securitization, and notes payable. We continue to invest significantly in our revenue equipment fleet. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash over an extended period of time from operations to fund our capital requirements, we may have to limit our growth, including our ability to invest in technological initiatives that drive business efficiencies; utilize our existing liquidity or enter into additional financing arrangements, including leasing arrangements; or be forced to operate our revenue equipment for longer periods resulting in increased maintenance costs, any of which could negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

28

Table of Contents

Claims expenses, the cost of maintaining our insurance, or the loss of our ability to self-insure could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Claims may be asserted against us for cargo loss or damage, property damage, personal injury, and workers’ compensation related to accidents or events occurring in our operations. Claims may also be asserted against us for accidents involving the operations of third-party service providers that we utilize, for our actions in retaining their services, or for loss or damage to our customers’ goods or other damages for which we are alleged or may be determined to be responsible. Such claims against us and associated costs and legal expenses may not be covered by insurance policies or, when covered by insurance policies, which are subject to self-insured retentions and coverage limits, may exceed the amount of insurance coverage or our established reserves. Trends of higher third-party casualty claims exposure in recent years have increased, and may continue to increase, our claims costs. If the frequency and/or severity of claims increase, as experienced in recent years, our operating results could be adversely affected. The timing of the incurrence of these costs could significantly and adversely impact our operating results.

We are primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, third-party casualty loss, and cargo loss and damage claims for the operations of our Asset-Based segment and certain of our other subsidiaries. We also self-insure for medical benefits for our eligible nonunion personnel. Because we self-insure for a significant portion of our claims exposure and related expenses, our insurance and claims expense may be volatile. If we lose our ability to self-insure for any significant period of time, insurance costs could materially increase, and obtaining adequate levels of insurance coverage could be difficult. Our self-insurance program for third-party automobile casualty claims is conducted under a federal program administered by a government agency. If the government were to terminate the program or if we were to be excluded from the program, our insurance costs could increase. Additionally, if our third-party insurance carriers or underwriters leave the trucking/logistics sector, our insurance costs or collateral requirements could materially increase, or we could experience difficulties in finding insurance in excess of our self-insured retention limits. In recent years, many insurance companies have completely stopped offering coverage to trucking and logistics companies or have significantly reduced the amount of coverage they offer or have significantly raised premiums or retention levels as a result of increases in the severity of automobile liability claims and sharply higher costs of settlements and verdicts. Our insurance premiums, deductibles, and self-insurance retention levels, which are discussed in “Insurance” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, have increased and could further increase in the future due to market conditions or if our claims experience worsens. The impact of climate change, including its effect on weather-related events which may disrupt our operations or damage our property and equipment, may increase our claims liabilities and the cost to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our business. If our insurance or claims expense increases, or if we decide to increase our insurance coverage in the future, and we are unable to offset any increase in expense with higher revenues, our earnings could be adversely affected. In some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We have programs in place with multiple surety companies for the issuance of unsecured surety bonds in support of our self-insurance program for workers’ compensation and third-party casualty liability. Estimates made by the states and the surety companies of our future exposure for our self-insurance liabilities could influence the amount and cost of additional letters of credit and surety bonds required to support our self-insurance program, and we may be required to maintain secured surety bonds in the future, which could increase the amount of our cash equivalents and short-term investments restricted for use and unavailable for operational or capital requirements.

Impairment of our long-lived assets and our goodwill and intangible assets could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Long-lived assets, including operating right-of-use assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Determination that certain long-lived assets are no longer needed for the strategic growth of our business may result in impairment charges. See Note C to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our impairment charges.

Our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset, which are subject to annual impairment evaluations, are associated with acquisitions in the Asset-Light segment. Our annual impairment evaluations for goodwill produced no indication of impairment of the recorded balances in recent years. Our annual impairment evaluation of our indefinite-lived intangible asset resulted in an impairment charge to write down the carrying value of our Panther trade name to the indicated fair

29

Table of Contents

value (see Notes C and D to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K). There can be no assurance that an impairment of our goodwill or further impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible asset will not occur in the future.

Given the uncertainties regarding the economic environment, there can be no assurance that our estimates and assumptions made for purposes of impairment evaluations and accounting estimates will prove to be accurate. Significant declines in business levels or other changes in cash flow assumptions, or other factors that negatively impact the fair value of the operations of our reporting units, could result in impairment and noncash write-off of a significant portion of our long‑lived assets, goodwill, and intangible assets.

Risks Related to Other External Conditions

We, or the third parties who provide services for us, may be adversely affected by external events for which our business continuity plans may not adequately prepare us.

External events, including, but not limited to, the occurrence of natural disasters, public health crises, geopolitical conflicts, acts of terrorism or war, cybersecurity incidents, and trade restrictions could significantly impact our ability to conduct business. Although we have business continuity plans in place, there is no guarantee that our plans have adequately addressed every possible risk and can be successfully or timely implemented. We may incur substantial expenses with the implementation of our business continuity plans, and there is no guarantee that our business, financial condition, and results of operations will not be materially impacted. Many of the other risks discussed in this Risk Factors section may be heightened by such events, including those impacted by U.S. and global economic outlook.

We are subject to general economic factors and instability in financial and credit markets that are largely beyond our control.

Our business is cyclical in nature and tends to reflect general economic conditions, which can be impacted by government actions, including changes in tax laws, suspension of government operations, imposition of trade tariffs, or volatility in U.S. trade policy. The imposition of baseline tariffs on product imports from almost all countries and individualized higher tariffs on certain countries and products, along with frequent changes in tariff policy, have caused uncertainty and volatility in financial markets. Our performance is affected by recessionary economic cycles, inflation, labor and supply shortages, and downturns in customers’ business cycles and changes in their business practices. Our tonnage and shipment levels are directly affected by industrial production and manufacturing, distribution, residential and commercial construction, and consumer spending, in each case primarily in the North American economy, and capacity in the trucking industry as well as our customers’ inventory levels and freight profile characteristics. We are also subject to risks related to disruption of world markets that could affect shipments between countries and could adversely affect the volume of freight and related pricing in the markets we serve. Changes to U.S. or international trade policy or other global trade impacts could result in increased cost for goods transported globally, which may lead to reduced consumer demand, or trading partners could limit trades with countries that impose anti-trade measures, which may lead to a lower volume of trading activity. International security concerns, geopolitical tensions, and potential actions or retaliatory measures taken in respect thereof, could continue to have a material adverse effect on trade activity.

Recessionary economic conditions may result in a general decline in demand for freight transportation and logistics services. The pricing environment generally becomes more competitive during periods of slow economic growth and economic recessions, which may adversely affect the profit margin for our services. If we are unable to respond timely and effectively to changes in the pricing environment or if our strategies for customer retention and margin optimization are unsuccessful, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely impacted. Our operations and the rates we obtain for our services may also be negatively impacted when economic conditions lead to a decrease in shipping demand, which, in turn, results in excess equipment capacity in the industry. In certain market conditions, we may have to accept more freight from freight brokers, where freight rates are typically lower, or we may be forced to incur more non-revenue miles to obtain loads. Conversely, during times of higher shipping demand, tight market capacity may negatively impact the service levels we are able to provide to our customers.

Economic conditions could adversely affect our customers’ business levels, the amount of transportation services they require, and their ability to pay for our services, which could negatively impact our working capital and our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and covenants of our financing arrangements. Customers encountering adverse economic conditions or facing credit issues could experience cash flow difficulties, increasing the potential for payment delays or

30

Table of Contents

uncollectible accounts receivable. As a result, we may be required to increase our allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable. Our obligation to pay third-party service providers is not contingent upon payment from our customers, and we extend unsecured credit to these customers, which increases our exposure to uncollectible receivables.

Our business and results of operations could be impacted by seasonal fluctuations, adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, and climate change.

Our operations are, and may in the future be, impacted by seasonal fluctuations and, at times, inclement weather conditions that affect employee working conditions, tonnage and shipment levels, demand for our services, and operating costs, which in turn may impact our revenues and operating results, as further described in “Seasonality” within Part I, Item 1 (Business) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Severe weather events, including those influenced by climate change, and natural disasters could disrupt our operations or the operations of our customers or third-party service providers, damage existing infrastructure, destroy our assets, affect regional economies, or disrupt fuel supplies or increase fuel costs, any of which could adversely affect our business levels and operating results.